the DON JONES INDEX…

 

 

GAINS POSTED in GREEN

LOSSES POSTED in RED

 

    4/3/23…    14,977.69

  3/27/23…    14,973.21

   6/27/13…    15,000.00

 

(THE DOW JONES INDEX:  4/3/23... 33,274.15; 3/27/23... 32,237.53; 6/27/13… 15,000.00)

 

LESSON for April 10, 2023 – “STORMY of the CENTURY (“Sizzle”)

 

We’ve been following the tribulations and, perhaps, trial of Donald Trump in our last few Lessons... including last week’s DJI, covering events up to announcement of the indictment, as re-reported...

Last week’s lesson beginning (3/22)...

Midnight having tolled and Wednesday the 22nd rolled round – finding Donald UnEncumbered still at liberty in Mar-a-Lago despite all predictions (especially his own) and, after the Grand Jury was sent home shortly before noon, muttering and puttering around with nothing to do but go back to his campaign for the Presidency

What a frackin’ drag!  Well, there was at least the rally on Saturday to prepare for... his latest coming-home-party in Waco, home to the iconic David Koresh and, as the exile now determines, his dozens of patriotic martyrs, fighting for the cause of America, God and the Flag.

That cheers him up....

And ending (3/30 afternoon)...

“Trump himself concluded, without offering evidence, that there was only one reasonable explanation for the delays—they simply don't have a case.

"I have gained such respect for this grand jury, & perhaps even the grand jury system as a whole," Trump wrote on Truth Social. "The evidence is so overwhelming in my favor, & so ridiculously bad for the highly partisan & hateful district attorney, that the grand jury is saying, hold on, we are not a rubber stamp, which most grand juries are branded as being, we are not going to vote against a preponderance of evidence or against large numbers of legal scholars all saying there is no case here."

"Drop this sick witch hunt, now!" he added.  (Newsweek, and Business Insider, above)

Unfortunately, he spoke... or tweeted... a smidgen too soon...”

 

And then, Manhattan District Attorney and Trump’s newest nemesis Alvin Bragg and his 23 member Grand Jury confounded the media, the country and the defendant by issuing their thirty four count indictement (Attachment Zero) which, according to some reports, could lock the 45th President (and would-be 47th) up for 136 years.

According to the law, however, he can campaign for President from within prison.

And, if elected, who knows?

 

For the weeks leading up to Donald Trump’s indictment, the former President was constantly throwing misdirection into the ether. He predicted an indictment and arrest in the coming hours, even as his advisers and lawyers conceded they had no evidence that was in the offing. He raised cash on the threat of the prospect of criminal prosecution and plotted with his team about a potential perp walk. Amid it all, the ex-President seemed to miss the severity of history’s judgment should he become the first of his cohort to face a criminal indictment.

Well, late Thursday, that anticipated outcome finally came into relief. The Manhattan District Attorney’s office confirmed that a grand jury had made history, and that the process of negotiating a surrender and booking for the former White House resident had already begun. 

For those who have watched Trump’s political career, none of this will seem new according to Time columnist Philip Elliott who has been on the trail and on the tail of Trump for a long, long time.  (See Attachment Seventy One)   “If anything, it may sound like rhyming rejoinder to the last couple of years, where a clang of chaos was the best harmony available in the political hymnal of D.C.”

To prove his point, Elliott walked round a circle backwards three times, threw a fistful of magickal ingredients onto a bonfire (the usual stuff... Eye of Newt, Hair of Rick Scott, Musk of Santos) and intoned “Tax Cuts for Billionaires” three times – whereupon was summoned up none other than Steve Bannon (and not just his ghost but the 2016-CEO of Trump’s presidential campaign, who was headed toward baggage claim at the Las Vegas airport, “when he boiled Trump’s strategy down to its essence while chatting with reporters who just happened to catch him. Trump was trailing in the polls and Hillary Clinton seemed destined to return to the White House—this time with the good office,” —and the nation seemed ready to send The Apprentice star back to the firing table. But Bannon, arriving in Nevada to watch the third and final debate , seemed upbeat, even excited. Trump, Bannon said, was "the master of the head fake," optimistic that such misdirection could help power him to the White House despite polling, structural, and political headwinds.

“Bannon, it turned out, was correct,” Elliott admitted, howsoever ruefully. And not just about how Trump would deploy such tactics to win the White House a few weeks later, “Trump used them to great effect once there. Few possess his inherent ability to turn narratives on a dime with little more than a seemingly accidental aside, an errant tweet, or a snarky insult laced with a threat.

“Put simply: the Head Fake Presidency seemed limitless. At least until it wasn’t.

As President, Elliott remembers, “Trump stuck with that instinct, employing misdirection at every turn. He launched and suddenly called off a strike on Iranian facilities as retaliation for a downed U.S. drone. On immigrationPuerto Rico , the Trans-Pacific Partnership, guns, immigration, and climate change, he balked at other moves as he took delight in shattering norms. It’s continued in his post-presidency... “Trump’s notorious indifference to honest-dealing will be a subtext of the trial; the jury’s identity will be concealed to protect them from threats and intimidation—an extraordinary step.”

 

Two Americans who have seen of the “head fake” to last seventy lifetimes... wife Melania and daughter Ivanka... weren’t joining the chorus of sycophants surroundin the Forty Fifth President of the United States as he frittered away the interval between leak and meek surrender on Tuesday.  Without joining the chorus of indictment critics... and they were legion, and not only MAGAmob Republicans but a lot of skeptical liberals and professional head fakers of the opinion that,,, while Trump may have been a lousy President... complaining that he did not deserve the sort of frame-up that New York district attorney and Inquisitor-in-Chief, the former First Daughter posted a message to social media, saying she was "pained" by the news but thanked those who have contacted her in support.

The fairest and probably most accurate minute by minute, hour to hour timeline of the proceedings was offered up by none other than the alt-right Washington Tmes (with input from the AP) which reported that Donald Trump’s indictment, the first of a former U.S. president, was quietly brought to the clerk’s office at the Manhattan criminal courthouse just before closing time Thursday.

“A woman and two men in suits walked in past reporters who’ve been staking out the office for weeks, turned a corner and disappeared through a door to a non-public area known as the indictment room,” wrote WashTimes reporter Michael Sisak.  (Attachment Seventy Two)

Moments later, just before 5 p.m., when a reporter asked if there were any filings involving “People v. Donald Trump” - her customary end-of-day question in recent days - a usually cheerful clerk sternly replied: “We have no information on that case. The office is closing. You have to leave.”

The reporters, from outlets including The Associated Press, The New York Times, New York Post and legal publication Law360, left the office and stood outside in the hallway, watching through glass doors as workers turned out the lights and the people who’d walked in a few minutes earlier worked in darkness inside filing the indictment.

“After visiting the clerk’s office for weeks, this was all very strange,” said Frank G. Runyeon, a reporter for Law360. “Very unusual and we knew something was up.”

As the people continued to work, and reporters peered in at what was going on, court officers came to the hallway and shooed the press away. That floor of the courthouse was now closed, they said.

Reporters... the WashTimes interviewed a journalist from Denmark and what remained of the mini-mob of MAGAmen and Never-Trumpers outside converged, police surrounded the courthouse into the evening, with flood lights illuminating the sidewalk and streets.  But Trump escaped through a back exit and was shortly on his way back to Florida.

 

He may be returning to unhappy family relations... not quite so bad as at Buckingham Castle, but bad enough.  Melania has been frosty.  And daughter Ivanka has even hinted that she would not support another campaign.

"I love my father, and I love my country. Today, I am pained for both," she wrote.  (Fox News, Attachment Seventy Three)

placeholderShe does not, contended author Timothy H.J. Nerozzi, intend to play a role in her father's 2024 presidential campaign nor a possible second administration.

That administration... or, at least, the Republican nomination thereto... are looking nearer and nearer and nearer.

From supposed family allies of hearth and home to backstabbing traitors lurking in the woodpile, “Trump's Indictment Drama Showcased His Rivals' Weakness” was the title of Molly Ball’s Indictment afternoon TimePiece, updating an earlier article upon the effects of Stormy’s tempest on the 2024 election.  (4:12 PM, Attachment Seventy Four)

“When the time came to actually stand up to him,” -. Nikki Haley, Trump’s major declared opponent and former U.N. Ambassador, dismissed the potential indictment on Fox News as “more about revenge than it is about justice.” Another active candidate, businessman Vivek Ramaswamy, went further, blasting the “disastrously politicized prosecution” and calling on other Republicans to condemn it. Former Vice President Mike Pence, who is openly considering a run, told an interviewer the probe “reeks of the kind of political prosecution we endured in the days of the Russia hoax.”

And the gravest threat to Djonald’s exhumation and resurrection, Florida Guv’nor and gay basher Ron (I’m where woke goes to die) DeSantis, who has yet to declare his candidacy, “came closest to a swipe, taking care to excoriate the “Soros-funded prosecutor” overseeing the Manhattan case while also impishly referencing the underlying conduct. “I don’t know what goes into paying hush money to a porn star to secure silence over some type of alleged affair,” DeSantis said, at a March 20 news conference. “I just, I can’t speak to that.”

But Trump gleefully seized on this political straddle, “exultant at finally having baited his would-be rival into the ring after months of attacks. Trump issued a 327-word statement lambasting DeSantis as, among other things, “an average Governor” whose appeal to GOP voters was “HARDLY GREATNESS.”

For emphasis, Ball summoned up Denver Riggleman, a former Republican congressman from Virginia, who declared: “It is amazing to me that the party that talks about masculinity continues to belly-crawl for this man, a bully who hides behind the walls of a Florida mansion,” not specifying whether he was referring to the former President, the current Governor, or both until clarifying, sort of, the object of his disaffection...

“This seemingly inexhaustible grift, raising money based on fear, is really all Trump has. But the formula works.”

It would be the first indictment issued upon a former (or sitting) President according to Barbara Perry, a presidential historian at the Miller Center at the University of Virginia, who parsed President Ulysses S. Grant arrest  (as opposed to indictment) —for speeding on a horse and buggy in 1872 and Richard Nixon’s resignation in the face of indictment one hundred and two years later, or the probable indictment of Warren Harding for his cabinet of curiosities and grafters had he not died in office before the investigation was completed. But the Trump case, Perry told Time (6:37 PM, Attachment Seventy Five) will go down in history as one of the biggest political scandals in American history—even if the charges relate to the seemingly mundane offense of bookkeeping fraud.

“Like all things with Trump, it’s unprecedented,” Perry exclaimed.

Timepiecer Anisha Kohli provided yet another latenight update – this on Indictment Leakin’ Eve, at 11PM... just in time for the late news and the comedians to draw their arrows (Attachment Seventy Six) attempted to explain what might, or will, happen next.

Yes, he might flee to Belarus.  He also might decide to eat a bullet.  But, Ol’ 45 will most likely just keep doing what he’s been doing... trolling enemies and raising cold, hard cash... and on Tuesday, as it turned out, he will do what all the busted criminals in New York do.

“He will be booked, finger-printed, and have a “mug shot” taken,” predicted reporter Anisha Kohli (incorrectly as it transpired). With Trump’s substantial ties to the community, especially his ongoing 2024 presidential campaign, “the judge likely wouldn’t deem him a flight risk,” former federal prosecutor Renato Mariotti told TIME. Given the white-collar charges Trump would likely be confronting, he may not even face bond, just be released on his own recognizance per New York law.

“This is not just high profile. This was the President of the United States. There’s been nobody like him to walk those halls,” Jeremy Saland, defense attorney and former Manhattan Assistant District Attorney, told Time.

One of Trump’s lawyers, Susan R. Nechelestold TIME that former President Trump is expected to turn himself in on Tuesday, April fourth, to be arraigned in State Supreme Court in Manhattan (despite Gov. DeSantis’ offer of sanctualy in Florida).

Shanlon Wu, a white-collar defense attorney and former federal prosecutor, told TIME that  it would be highly unlikely if a showdown standoff occurred.  Defense counsels typically receive notice when their white-collar clients are being indicted, she said. “You would make an appointment basically, to bring your client in to be booked and fingerprinted,” Wu declared.

Another of Trump’s attorneys had previously said that if indicted, Trump would not resist arrest and that they would follow normal procedures. “There won’t be a standoff at Mar-a-Lago with Secret Service and the Manhattan DA’s office,” Joe Tacopina told the New York Daily News.no matter Trump’s status as the 45th president of the United States. He will be booked, finger-printed, and have a “mug shot” taken. With Trump’s substantial ties to the community, especially his ongoing 2024 presidential campaign, the judge likely wouldn’t deem him a flight risk, former federal prosecutor Renato Mariotti tells TIME. Given the white-collar charges Trump would likely be confronting, he may not even face bond, just released on his own recognizance per New York law.

If Trump is arraigned and officially charged, the case would eventually move on to jury selection, which could be a lengthy and exhausting process.

“The majority of people in the jury pool would have some opinions about Donald Trump,” former federal prosecutor Mariotti says. “Most defendants, even if they’re famous, are often not known by prospective jurors or they don’t have a certain opinion about that person. I think it’s safe to say that Donald Trump is different.”

During jury selection the prosecution and the defense use voir dire questioning, meaning they can ask each prospective juror questions about their qualifications and knowledge of the case, in an attempt to ensure fair and impartial jurors.

Wu thinks a judge could opt to issue a so-called “gag order,” restricting all parties from talking to the press. “This is gonna get so much publicity anyway if he’s charged,” Wu says. “It’d be very hard to find jurors who haven’t been exposed to the news.” Although rarely used, one method to combat this is for a judge to sequester jurors, limiting their exposure to outside influence or information.

 

In a Q&A explication originally published Indictment Night at  7:30 pm , then updated on Friday at 3:43 pm, Time... answering its own inquiry about whether the former President was treating Judge Juan Merchan in the same cavalier and conspiratorial manner as he derided Bragg|... stated that Trump had posted, without evidence, that Merchan “hates me,” in a post on his social media site TruthSocial. Trump, who misspelled the judge’s name, wrote that Merchan “was hand picked by Bragg & the Prosecutors, & is the same person who ‘railroaded’ my 75 year old former CFO, Allen Weisselberg, to take a ‘plea’ deal.” Along with handling the case against the Trump organization executive, Merchan also presided over a case in which he ordered the Trump Foundation to pay $1.6 million after a jury found the organization guilty of criminal tax fraud. Alvin Bragg, the current Manhattan District Attorney, was a prosecutor involved in that case according to Brian Bennett and unnamed Time Fillers (Attachment Seventy Seven). 

Time also took note of President Joe and his SecPress Psaki declining to comment, while former Vice President Mike Pence defended his former running mate on Thursday night, describing the indictment against Trump as “an outrage” that will “only further serve to divide our country.”

Time also noted the right-wing response so far: ‘Now it’s GAME ON’

Some members of pro-Trump social media groups and forums that served as the staging grounds of the “Stop the Steal” rallies and the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol celebrated the indictment.

“I almost wanted this. Now it’s GAME ON,” one person wrote on a popular pro-Trump forum. “I know all of you are smart enough to know and see all this, but we need to rally behind him and show the left just how much this reinforces his popularity and electability,” another person wrote. “Get active at your local level and get vocal. Teflon Don.”

But many of Trump’s most loyal supporters exhibited a swelling sense of apathy about  largely agreed that it made no sense organize any mass rallies or events, in that so many are expressing anger at what they described as Trump’s “betrayal” of those who heeded his call on Jan. 6.

“Has he called for protests about these poor guys? No. But he’s calling for us to protest about his arrest,” a MAGA dropout wrote on a popular por-Trump forum. “It doesn’t sit right with me.” Another user agreed: “He’s right. Trump betrayed the J6 patriots.”

The particulars of the upcoming indictment would remain secret until Tursday, but another Q&A article, this by Politico and posted shortly after 8 PM on Thursday, delineated the most likely charges as follows...

While the precise charges are secret for now, prosecutors have concluded they can prove a criminal case against Trump because of the apparent subterfuge surrounding a $130,000 payment to adult-film actress Stormy Daniels to keep her from publicizing her claim about a sexual encounter with Trump. Trump’s lawyer Michael Cohen funded that payment through a home equity line of credit.

Trump insisted in April 2018 he did not know about the hush money, but Cohen provided Congress a series of check images, signed by Trump, reflecting payments to Cohen that he said were reimbursements for the money he laid out, including at least two that came while Trump was in the White House. Cohen said that Trump and his company concealed the purpose of the payments by falsely labeling them as legal expenses.

Under New York law, disguising such payments in corporate records is a crime, but typically only a misdemeanor. It becomes a felony if the false business records were intended to obscure a second crime. In this case, that second crime appears to be the use of the funds to advance Trump’s presidential campaign allegedly in violation of campaign finance laws.  (Attachment Seventy Eight)

Among other potential inquiries that Pollitico correspondents Josh Gerstein and Kyle Cheney  attempted to answer were:

Risks to the prosecution:  Cohen is not the strongest possible witness for prosecutors. He’s provided a lot of the evidence and testimony needed to bring the case... (but) his credibility is open to challenge since he pleaded guilty in 2018 to nine felonies and was sentenced to three years in federal prison. He’s also repeatedly expressed extreme bitterness towards Trump, even running a podcast he titled “Mea Culpa,” an allusion to his regrets over his time as Trump’s ally.”

Will Trump remain free? Can he campaign while under indictment?

“(I)t seems unlikely that prosecutors would seek to detain the former president or restrict his travel in the U.S. while the case is pending. There is no legal impediment to him continuing his presidential campaign while facing criminal charges — or even if he were jailed.”

How long will it take Trump to be brought to trial?

“It will, by necessity, take many months to commence a trial of a former president of the United States. Even if both sides were eager to proceed to trial quickly, ironing out legal and constitutional questions would likely stretch out over the next year and into the 2024 primary season.”

Add to all the above “Trump’s penchant — in nearly every legal matter he’s embroiled in — to seek to delay and prolong proceedings whenever possible.”

Trump’s lawyers “could try to move the case to federal court, arguing that at least some of the payments to Cohen took place while Trump was president and therefore a state court should have no authority to resolve the matter. Trump also could seek to move the trial to a different courthouse elsewhere in New York state. And he could try to have the indictment dismissed or reduced.” All of these pre-trial motions, Politico noted, “will take time to resolve.”

Deep into the night, as the wonderers wondered, and the wonders of a New World... or, at least, Washington... Order began manifesting as dreams or nightmares, Trump tweeted a rambling cliché rucksack of old grievances after news of Tuesday’s indictment surfaced and also “went on a social media frenzy” overnight on Thursday on Truth Social. “WHERE’S HUNTER?” he posted at around 3am dredging up one of his longstanding obsessions and calling the indictment “Fake, Corrupt, and Disgraceful” as well as “an attack on our country” and “free and fair elections.”

“These Thugs and Radical Left Monsters have just INDICATED [sic] the 45th President of the United States of America, and the leading Republican Candidate, by far, for the 2024 Nomination for President,” Trump wrote.

FRIDAY

While Midnight Don continued fulminating and Joneses... great and small... tried to catch up on sleep, it was morning in the Old World, and the Brits were feverishly finishing up their morning terrors for consumers to consume alongside their morning tea and Weetos.

Fox News has famously dumped Trump but, once the indictment date was announced, the polls polled and newly minted Trump-hater Rupert Murdoch started pivoting back into the embrace of a man who now appeared to be ready to capture the 2024 nomination, if not the general election.  So, the Guardian U.K.’s correspondent  Jonathan Yerushalmy posted at one minute past midnight (EST... a still-early five AM in London) that “...if the network’s initial reaction was one of shock, even uncertainty, what quickly followed was more akin to the bellicose confidence that its viewership has come to expect,” with Podhost Jesse Watters telling his prime-time audience (EST) that America was now in a “a revenge political climate”.  (Attachment Seventy Nine)

“When Trump wins back the White House, he needs to start looking into Democrats,” chimed in Watters’ guest, Mike Davis of Article III.

“Potentially you could have a former president behind bars. The only way you can get a free Trump is to elect a free Trump,” Davis added.

 “He’s acting like an insane person,” Sean Hannity, one of the network’s best-known personalities, allegedly said of Trump. Fox News’ owner, Rupert Murdoch, said several of the network’s top stars “endorsed” Trump’s false claims, and later added: “I would have liked us to be stronger in denouncing it in hindsight,” according to a deposition in the case.

 “He is a bad-ass if he’s got a mug-shot … his poll numbers have gone up with this and I just think this is gonna make sure he’s going to be on the ticket,” one commentator said in the moments after the news broke.

By the time Tucker Carlson, one of the networks most popular personalities, came on air, the question had shifted: how to respond?

Carlson – who, in a previous GUK gobbet only a month ago, told an associate that he passionately hates Trump, according to evidence in the Dominion case – described the indictment as a turning point for America. “He offered up a potted history of Trump’s presidency, a history that he adorned throughout with conspiracy theories, calls for the FBI to be defunded and parallel narratives of the former president’s two impeachments. From the start, he said, “Washington elites” had been working to stop Trump becoming president again.

“The rule of law is suspended tonight,” Carlson announced gravely. “What you’re seeing now is lawlessness – the question is who can stop it?

At the ungodly hour of one AM (EST)... and a still early London morning, GUKster David Smith proclaimed that 30 March 2023 is now and forevermore “a day for the history books,” citing presidential historian Michael Beschloss, who said on the MSNBC network: “Tomorrow, in terms of American history, we will be waking up in a different country. Before tonight, presidents in this country were kings.”

And a sad, weeping melanchology sovereign is, or was, King Trump.  Jesus had an easy time compared to the martyred and behectored Exile; the bigger the alleged crime, the louder he airs grievances and the more he plays the victim – and so far the Republican party has been mostly willing to indulge him.

That is the role he will play with an indictment hanging over him. At a campaign rally in Waco, Texas, last weekend, he claimed: “The Biden regime’s weaponization of law enforcement against their political opponents is something straight out of the Stalinist Russia horror show.” He suggested that it is the most serious problem facing America today.

Trump will now doubtless set about putting the Manhattan district attorney, Alvin Bragg, on trial in the court of public opinion. He has already used dehumanising and racist language. A social media post, later removed, showed a photo of Trump holding a baseball bat and apparently looming over Bragg, raising fears of violence against him.

America’s tragedy, penned Mr. Smith, “is that the tactic will work with many Republicans. That Bragg is a Democrat from New York will trigger a Pavlovian response in Trump’s favor. That the case is seven years old, based on an untested legal theory and has Michael Cohen, a convicted criminal, as a key witness will provide further ammunition.”

Perhaps, even objective Independants and a few de-Bidened liberals may begin to think that Djonald UnLoved was right!

The horror!

Mister Smith, noting the tributes to the victim pouring in from Kevin Mac, Sen. J. D. Vance (R-Oh) and even Saint Ron; Vance, a Republican senator for Ohio, describing the indictment as “political persecution masquerading as law”, “blatant election interference” and “a direct assault on the tens of millions of Americans who support him”.

“But the most telling reaction came from DeSantis himself,” decided Smith (Attachment Eighty). “This could have been the moment for him to break from Trump and prove statesmanlike, calling for dignity and unity in a solemn moment for the nation. Instead he went full Maga.”

With his new best bud, DeSantis, who said: “The weaponization of the legal system to advance a political agenda turns the rule of law on its head. It is un-American.” Blowing an antisemitic dog whistle, DeSantis twice linked Bragg to philanthropist George Soros, adding that Florida would not assist in “an extradition request” to send Trump to New York – sending America into the political unknown, a twilight zone where precedents do not apply and everyone has to respond on the fly. Can the Manhattan court assemble an impartial jury, and will the timing of the trial collide with the Republican primary?

“Then, what about the other major legal perils threatening Trump: over the January 6 insurrection, over election interference in Georgia and over the mishandling of classified documents?  These cases are arguably more clear-cut and consequential – but not necessarily in the eyes of Republicans. Will he recklessly incite unrest among his supporters?” Smith asked.

Another hour and another dispatch from abroad... Hugo Lowell reporting on the revels of the mob, and @.  “But in private,” wrote @Lowell (Attachment Eighty One), “Trump was more subdued as he took in the significance of becoming the first sitting or former president to be charged and the changed reality of operating under the threat of an eventual criminal trial, several sources close to him said.”

The private response showed that for all his outward bravado – including claims that he wanted to be arrested and handcuffed for a “perp walk” because he wanted to project defiance if he was ever indicted – deep down, Trump has always feared the prospect of being criminally charged and its consequences.

The charges remain sealed, but are expected to touch on $130,000 that Trump made to Daniels through his then lawyer Michael Cohen in the final days of the 2016 elections campaign. Trump later reimbursed Cohen with $35,000 checks, and Cohen pleaded guilty in 2018 to federal charges over the money.

“Trump’s mood towards the hush money investigation has fluctuated in recent weeks – from criticising the prospect of criminal charges, to growing impatient and insisting they should charge him already, and then going back to attacking the investigation with vehemence.”

And Moira Daniels, waiting for the dawn (EST) when it was already Morning in the United Kingdom, contributed this Infotorial to Team GUK – alleging “This isn’t the Trump indictment we wanted, but it might be the one we deserve.”

Stormy Daniels and the illegal, fraudulent machinations that the Trump campaign allegedly undertook to pay her off during the height of the presidential campaign in 2016, Donegan vented spleen and confetti, “have always struck me as the most quintessential of Trump’s many scandals.”  (Attachment Eighty Two)

Daniels, for years a successful porn performer, had met Trump at a celebrity golf tournament in 2006. According to her, he invited her to his hotel room, offered her work on his TV show and then had sex with her. The two remained friendly afterwards; Trump invited Daniels to the launch of his Trump Vodka brand the following year. “It’s the kind of thing you suspect that these two people would have written off as a funny story,” Donegan wrote, were it not for the consequences. “Trump denies Daniels’ allegations, but in retrospect, with the hindsight of what we’ve come to learn of him, the scene she recounts is almost unbearably true to his character: the gathering of low-rent celebrities, the paltry quid pro quo, the golf, and the sad, adolescent fantasy of sex with a porn star. The whole story drips with Trump’s defining attribute: the desperate and insatiable need to have his ego gratified. Which is why to me, at least,” Donegan contends, “it seems obvious that Daniels is telling the truth.”

When Stormy approached the National Enquirer, which tipped off the Trump campaign. Michael Cohen, Trump’s “sweaty and exhausted lawyer and fixer, offered to pay her $130,000 to shut up and go away, which Daniels was happy to accept. Cohen fronted the money himself; initially, he seems to have taken out a line of credit on his own house. Why go through this labyrinthine route? Why have the lawyer pay personally – an unusual and inappropriate arrangement – especially in an amount that was large for Michael Cohen but should have been small for his alleged billionaire of a boss?”

Upgrading the indictment into a conviction... a felony conviction... will be more difficult to prove, but more than a few Fourth Estaters – not to mention bloggers and publications like the National Enquirer.have noted, for better or worse, the defense contention that Cohen, and not Trump, initially paid Daniels off “because if Trump had paid her, that payment would have been subject to scrutiny – from campaign finance regulators and from the public. And in the waning days of what was a chaotic and flailing election, this was scrutiny that the Trump campaign could not afford.”

 

Also, under the eyes of Prince... soon King Charles... another Brit tabloid, Reuters remarked that senior House of Representatives Republicans have vowed to investigate Bragg and demanded he hand over documents and other confidential material from the investigation. Bragg said Congress does not have authority to interfere with a New York legal proceeding and accused the lawmakers of escalating political tensions. Bragg's office has been the target of bomb threats in recent weeks.

"You and many of your colleagues have chosen to collaborate with Mr. Trump's efforts to vilify and denigrate the integrity of elected state prosecutors and trial judges," Bragg wrote in a letter to Republican lawmakers.

 

Meanwhile, back in the U.S.A., a lawyer for the former president said that he would not take a plea deal and was prepared to go to trial.

Here’s what else to know:

·         Mr. Bragg has brought the case over Mr. Trump’s role, when he was running for president, in a hush-money payment to a porn star, Stormy Daniels, who then agreed to keep quiet about her story of an affair with him. Prosecutors are expected to argue that the payoff, which came in the final days of the 2016 presidential campaign, functioned as an illegal donation to Mr. Trump’s candidacy.

·         In a statement on Thursday evening, Mr. Trump called Mr. Bragg, a Democrat, “a disgrace” and denounced the case as “political persecution and election interference at the highest level in history.” Mr. Trump described himself as “a completely innocent person.”

·         Mr. Trump is expected to turn himself in on Tuesday for arraignment on the indictment in State Supreme Court in Manhattan, one of his lawyers said. The New York Police Department issued an order to all officers to be “prepared for deployment,” part of enhanced security measures being put in place all over the city.

·         After months of cooler coverage of Mr. Trump, Fox News hosts rallied around him on Thursday, denouncing his indictment as an attempt to hinder his re-election chances — he remains a front-runner for the 2024 Republican presidential nomination — and suggesting it might lead to unrest.

 

Another UK tabloid, Reuters... a news service that would probably resent the tabloidal appellation (See Attachment Eighty Four) determined that “Senior House of Representatives Republicans have vowed to investigate Bragg and demanded he hand over documents and other confidential material from the investigation. Bragg said Congress does not have authority to interfere with a New York legal proceeding and accused the lawmakers of escalating political tensions. Bragg's office has been the target of bomb threats in recent weeks.

Hypocrisy?  Conspiracy?

"You and many of your colleagues have chosen to collaborate with Mr. Trump's efforts to vilify and denigrate the integrity of elected state prosecutors and trial judges," Bragg wrote in a letter to Republican lawmakers.

The prosecutor... and, by the following week, the judge... have refrained, so far, from calling the actions of the defendant and his followers a “witch hunt”, but the black cats are out of their bags, the broomsticks a-flying and the partisans asking “which witch is which?”

Congressdamsel Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Georgia) told the Washington Times that she would go to New York to distress the prosecution and protest former President Donald Trump’s indictment on charges tied to Stormy.  (Attachment Eighty Five)

“I’m going to New York on Tuesday,” she wrote. “We MUST protest the unconstitutional WITCH HUNT!”

 “I don’t think people should protest this, no,” House Speaker Kevin McCarthy had retorted last month at a GOP retreat in Orlando, Florida. “We want calmness out there.”

Well, there are magic potions that can gentle a body down, too.

 

That other Times, supposedly the real one, the one in New York City, that is, also prepared a sort of Weekend Update of its own, only without comedy.  Also without names... reporting that “a lawyer” for the former president said that he would not take a plea deal and was prepared to go to trial.

Taco Joe?  That other guy – one of those other, other guys from the other cases?  Rudy?

No matter.  Recapitulating the minutae of the charges as Djonald’s Lost Weekend began, the old gray lady of Gotham opined that: “while Mr. Trump has sought to capitalize on the criminal charges to energize his base, the ignominy of becoming a defendant — especially after decades of evading prosecution despite numerous repeated investigations — marks a profound change for a global celebrity who has a history of deriding others accused of wrongdoing.”  (Attachment Eighty Six)

“Ignominy?”  How... how ignominious!

But there was a bluebird in the blueberry pie of despair and despondency beclouding Mar-a-Lago... assuming that Trump’s advisers and pollwatchers weren’t playing an April Fool’s prank on the defeated President. 

According to a Yahoo news poll, Trump was now “beating DeSantis 57% to 31% in the one-to-one contest, and was attracting majority support at 52% when pitted against a wider, 10-candidate field including DeSantis at 21% and the UN ambassador in the Trump administration, Nikki Haley.

“Trump also improved his lead over DeSantis in polling done for his campaign by McLaughlin and Associates, which surveyed 1,000 likely 2024 general election voters and found Trump beating DeSantis 63% to 30%, improving his lead from January when Trump was at 52% and DeSantis at 40.  (GUK, Sat 1 Apr 2023 23.26 EDT, Attachment Eighty Seven)

The sharp uptick in polling numbers – and a corresponding reversal by potential 2024 rivals trying to come to Trump’s defense over the indictment after previously trying to distance themselves – was so sudden and marked that it took some of Trump’s own advisers by surprise.  Admittedly, McLaughlin skews Republican, but Yahoo is relatively honest and the conclusions... that the base is holding... mean that while a majority of the voters aren’t yet ready to send him back to the White House, nomination is looking more and more like a low-hanging plum on the tree of destiny.

But for now, a perp walk through the rotting orchard of wormy pipkins in the Big Apple loomed... full of pitfalls should things go North on Tuesday.  Trump was protected from his potential cellies should Judge Merchan really take offense and lock him up without bail; indictments and criminal trials scheduled for Tuesday at the same courthouse included: “burglary for taking paintings from a West Village townhouse; a thwarted terrorist attack on a Jewish community; the illegal selling of firearms; murder for an East Harlem hammer attack; murder and attempted murder for attacking multiple homeless men; murder and criminal possession of a weapon for shooting into a car in East Harlem; and a grand larceny case involving sim-card swapping.”

GUK reported that discussions were still being held about whether his booking photo will be publicly circulated. Trump reportedly “wants the mugshot out” because it could harness (?) donations to his presidential campaign.

It also published an aliased Editorial by Observer just after midnight Sunday morning... Attachment Eighty Seven (A)... that, more in the progressive spirit of the progressive rag, called appealed to some spirit in the sky that, if there’s any justice, “Trump’s time in court will ultimately be followed by time served.”

The full Trump charge sheet “reads like a horror novel in which democracy is murdered,” Observer observed... “(t)he continuing mystery is why justice is so long in coming,” he, she or it declared.  “It is hard to avoid the conclusion that reluctance to energetically pursue these and other crimes, such as Trump’s apparent theft of secret documents found at his Florida home, stems from political timidity at the top. The entire Trump saga, akin to tawdry, never-ending reality TV show, is a distraction from pressing issues such as post-pandemic economic revival, the climate emergency and war in Europe. The US should focus on these challenges rather than endlessly indulge the antic ravings of a narcissistic, foul-mouthed, misogynistic crook.

Later on Sunday, GUK took another swipe at the Colonials, with Hugo Lowell reporting that the former president “has vowed to people close to him that he wants to go on the offensive and – in a private moment over the weekend at his Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida,” (that was evidently not so private) remarked using more colorful language that it was time to politically “rough ’em up”.  (Attachment Eighty Eight)

Since he had not yet faced the Indictment Indictors and Judge Merchan, “’em” presumably referred to DA Bragg and his minions, not Dorothy’s auntie.

Guk published another reverse timeline, dating back to a few minutes before the indictment.  While the former President was being processed, they also noted that the clown show outside included MTG and the LyinDKing (Attachment Ninety)

And NPR caught up with Stormy, sizzling at Trump’s moment of truth.  Earlier she had called the case a sad day for America, but after a judge socked her for a portion of Djonald’s legal bills, she re-pivoted. 

"I don't think that his crimes against me are worthy of incarceration," Daniels said, but later added: "The other things that he has done — if he is found guilty, then absolutely."  (Attachment Ninety One)

 

 

 

April 3 – April 6 , 2023 (and Easter Holiday)

 

 

Monday, April 3, 2023

Dow:  33,601.15

 

 

After an April Foolish weekend of wiseguys and fools telling Don Jones what they know to be true, Former President Donald Trump, himself, flies north with the geese and the goblins; spending the night in a now-forbidding Trump Tower, dialing up another lawyer and denouncing tomorrow’s judge Juan Merchan “a Trump-hater.”  Protesters cavort outside, but far fewer than expected.

   Stormy Daniels is in seclusion, calculating ways to make money off her notoriety.  Stormy storms continue their Spring Breaking, 59 tornadoes ravage eleven states and kill 32.

   Bad foreigners continue doing bad things.  After arresting a Wall Street Journalist on trumped-up (pun noted) espionage charges, they announce capture of a suspect in the bombing of a St. Petersburg pro-Putin blogger and blame America and the Ukraine; maybe she did it, maybe not.  OPEC cuts production, likely to lead to a summer of higher gas prices.  Riots continue in France (pensions) and the Middle East (religion).

   Fifteen million Americans lose their Medicaid plague coverage, forcing the poorest to choose between pills and food.  Politicians (with assured govt. bennies) shrug.

 

 

 

Tuesday, April 4, 2023

Dow:  33,562.38

 

 

 

 

 

Gov. DeSantis (R-Fl.) doubles down on his anti-gay, anti-Disney campaign by signing a bill to greenlight concealed carry guns without precautions.  Time to shoot Mickey!

   Ford develops and tests its AI app for self-repossessing cars that drive back to the dealer on their own if the deadbeat can’t pay.  If the cars are too old, they drive themselves to the junkyard.

   A weekend in sports finds Uconn (men) and LSU (women) capturing NCAA hoops titles, with the Masters beginning on Thursday.  In song, the Country Music Awards honor “Jellyroll” (named after the delicacy that creates his jellyroll physique) with three trophies.

  And then 2:15 arrives with NYC mayor Eric Adams warning the rabble outside not to be roused by the rabble rousers, further warning the outsiders to “control yourself.”  Beyond a few weird costumes, the tiny gatherings do.  Trump himself is further outraged... first he was not allowed to be handcuffed for his perp walk, now the authorities decide that, since everybody would know him if he ran away, there is no need for a mugshot.  Merchandisers are crushed... then recover... fake mugshot t-shirts are on sale by the end of the day.

 

 

 

Wednesday, April 5, 2023

Dow:  33,482.72

 

 

 

 

 

 

It’s National Walking Day.

   Djonald UnConvicted (yet) flies back to Florida, leaving lawyer Joe Taco to walk back history – which he does by saying that, although Trump paid off Cohen to pay off Stormy, the money and the matter was personal, not campaign finance related (the master key to uplifting misdemeanors to felonies).  He also asks why a State prosecuting is bringing Federal charges.  Even the usually-liberal Dan Abrams calls the case “a souped-up misdemeanor”... will The Donald end up picking up trash by the roadside... (which is what got him into trouble in the first place)?

   Stormy weather continues to plague not only America but Stormy Daniels herself, as one of the many defamation lawsuits against Trump fails, and she is ordered to pay his lawyers $122,000.  The leaves her with an $8,000 profit – still not bad for fifteen minutes’ work.

   In the other three cases, VP Pence agrees to testify as to the One Six itself (Trump is predictably outraged and calls for defunding the FBI but, after all, he did urge the mob to hang him) while Atlanta voting and Mar-a-Lago documents await their light of day.

   Be it through Trumpish reaction or local issues, liberals enjoy electoral success as another “progressive” wins the Mayoralty of Chicago, and the Wisconsin Supreme Court is flipped, auguring loosening of harsh anti-abortion laws.

 

 

Thursday, April 6, 2023

Dow:  33,485.29

 

 

 

 

 

 

It’s Holy Thursday.  Unholy pedophile priests are outed in Baltimore and a New Jersey cheerleading coach is accused of sexual assault on his girls.  Pope Francis, on the other hand, staggers from his sickbed to wash the feet of prisoners locked up in Italy, where a new Plague Variant is rising up and reaping souls.

   Unholy violence also flares up in the Mideast as three religious holidays... Easter, Passover and Ramadan... turn out the faithful to murder the infidels.  Whisperers whisper that some Ukrainians will support Russia’s annexation of Crimea as the price for peace.

   Crime takes an ee-yah turn before the holiday as Yue Yu (aka Doctor Drano) is accused of trying to poison her lying husband with lye (which, she defends herself) was only intended to kill ants.  A dirty Daddy is charged with murder after an alligator eats his two year old, and there are the usual incidents of gun violence nationwide,

 

 

Friday, April 7, 2023

Dow:  33,274.15

 

 

 

Closed for Easter Weekend.  The Index will be updated this week.

 

 

Saturday, April 3, 2023

Dow:  (Closed)

 

 

 

Sunday, April 3, 2023

Dow:  (Closed) 

 

 

 

 

The Dow experienced a Trump (indictment) Bump and rose by a thousands points, pushing the Don back into the black.

 

 

 

THE DON JONES INDEX

 

CHART of CATEGORIES w/VALUE ADDED to EQUAL BASELINE of 15,000

(REFLECTING… approximately… DOW JONES INDEX of June 27, 2013)

 

See a further explanation of categories here

 

ECONOMIC INDICES (60%)

CATEGORY

VALUE

BASE

RESULTS

SCORE

OUR SOURCES and COMMENTS

 

INCOME

(24%)

6/17/13 & 1/1/22

LAST

CHANGE

NEXT

SOURCE

 

Wages (hrly. Per cap)

9%

1350 points

3/6/23

+1.24%

4/23

1,434.03

1,434.03

https://tradingeconomics.com/united-states/wages   28.61

 

Median Inc. (yearly)

4%

600

4/3/23

+0.28%

4/24/23

603.05

603.05

http://www.usdebtclock.org/   35,761 771 789

 

Unempl. (BLS – in mi)

4%

600

3/6/23

+5.56%

4/23

633.65

633.65

http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS14000000   3.6 3.5

 

Official (DC – in mi)

2%

300

4/3/23

+1.27%

4/24/23

275.12

275.12

http://www.usdebtclock.org/      5,522 511 820 817

 

Unofficl. (DC – in mi)

2%

300

4/3/23

-0.91%

4/24/23

265.93

265.93

http://www.usdebtclock.org/    11,930 908 12,027 024

 

Workforce Particip.

   Number

   Percent

2%

300

4/3/23

 

+0.23%                  +0.23%

4/24/23

302.00

302.00

In 161,036 094  462 485  Out 100,297 308  029 032 Total: 261,333 402

 

http://www.usdebtclock.org/  61.61

 

WP %  (ycharts)*

1%

150

2/27/23

+0.16%

4/23

150.95

150.95

https://ycharts.com/indicators/labor_force_participation_rate  62.50 .60

 

 

 

OUTGO

15%

 

 

 

 

Total Inflation

7%

1050

4/3/23

+0.4%

4/23

996.88

996.88

http://www.bls.gov/news.release/cpi.nr0.htm     +0.4

 

Food

2%

300

4/3/23

+0.4%

4/23

278.78

278.78

http://www.bls.gov/news.release/cpi.nr0.htm     +0.4

 

Gasoline

2%

300

4/3/23

+1.0%

4/23

243.21

243.21

http://www.bls.gov/news.release/cpi.nr0.htm     +1.0

 

Medical Costs

2%

300

4/3/23

-0.7%

4/23

294.90

294.90

http://www.bls.gov/news.release/cpi.nr0.htm      -0.7

 

Shelter

2%

300

4/3/23

+0.7%

4/23

281.06

281.06

http://www.bls.gov/news.release/cpi.nr0.htm     +0.8

 

 

WEALTH

6%

 

 

 

 

Dow Jones Index

2%

300

4/3/23

+3.22%

4/24/23

269.51

269.51

https://www.wsj.com/market-data/quotes/index/   33,274.15

 

Home (Sales)

(Valuation)

1%

1%

150

150

3/6/23

-0.50%              -2.15%

4/23

125.77

267.55

125.77

267.55

https://www.nar.realtor/research-and-statistics

Sales (M):  4.00 4.58 Valuations (K):  359.0 363

 

Debt (Personal)

2%

300

4/3/23

+0.085%

4/24/23

277.88

277.88

http://www.usdebtclock.org/    72,972 73,034 246 3,273

 

 

 

 

NATIONAL

(10%)

 

 

 

 

Revenue (trilns.)

2%

300

4/3/23

+0.011%

4/24/23

384.49

384.49

debtclock.org/       4,610.6 0.918  611.3 611.68 612.2 612.4

 

Expenditures (tr.)

2%

300

4/3/23

+0.033%

4/24/23

340.95

340.95

debtclock.org/       6,019 021 023 025 027 029

 

National Debt tr.)

3%

450

4/3/23

+0.065%

4/24/23

426.57

426.57

http://www.usdebtclock.org/    31,596 609 624 639 661 667

(The debt ceiling was 31.4)

 

Aggregate Debt (tr.)

3%

450

4/3/23

+0.11%

4/24/23

421.79

421.79

http://www.usdebtclock.org/    94,466 556 660 764 913 958

 

 

 

 

 

GLOBAL

(5%)

 

 

 

 

Foreign Debt (tr.)

2%

300

4/3/23

+1.35%

4/24/23

342.73

342.73

http://www.usdebtclock.org/   7,224 216 315 313

 

Exports (in billions)

1%

150

4/3/23

+2.92%

4/23

163.94

163.94

https://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/current/index.html  257.5 251.2

 

Imports (bl.)

1%

150

4/3/23

+2.52%

4/23

165.54

165.54

https://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/current/index.html  325.8 321.7

 

Trade Deficit (bl.)

1%

150

4/3/23

+1.32%

4/23

269.51

300.76

https://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/current/index.html  68.3 70.5

 

SOCIAL INDICES  (40%)

 

ACTS of MAN

12%

 

 

 

World Affairs

3%

450

4/3/23

-0.1%

4/24/23

447.23

447.23

Arab-Israeli conflict extends to Lebanon as battles rage at AlAqba Mosquei in Jerusalem. U.K. sanctions Tik Tok for spying on kids: Us next?  Jacinda Arden gives an inspiration retirement speech in New Zealand.

 

Terrorism

2%

300

4/3/23

-0.1%

4/24/23

288.15

288.15

Russia arrests suspect in assassination of Putinista.  Report on Afghan evacuation has President Joe and Trump blaming each other.  Riots in France (labor) and Israel (religion) continue on into adjoining Passover, Easter, Ramadan.

 

Politics

3%

450

4/3/23

nc

4/24/23

471.14

471.14

Trump indictment sets off posturing and scrambling.  Speaker Kevin Mac and Taiwan PM discuss more arms sales, angering China.  Robert F. Kenney Jr. challenges Biden as an anti-vaxxer.  Tennessee legislature expels two for overenthusiastic advocacy of gun control after Nashville school murders.

 

Economics

3%

450

4/3/23

-0.4%

4/24/23

429.19

429.19

Post-bankrupt banks cut 56K jobs, McD cuts more, WalMart cuts 2,000.  But there are still jobs out there.  Shortage of air traffic controllers expected to cause delays.

 

Crime

1%

150

4/3/23

-0.4%

4/24/23

265.71

265.71

Nashville cops say school shooter bought 7 guns legally, but State legislators expel two who call for gun control.  Weird alligator and Drano crimes (above); 4 Americans killed in Cancun.  Tech mogul Bob Lee stabbed to death in S.F.

 

ACTS of GOD

(6%)

 

 

 

 

 

Environment/Weather

3%

450

4/3/23

-0.2%

4/24/23

421.09

421.09

Another week of West Coast cold, East Coast heat and in between come Tornadoes; Missouri hardest hit with 5 killed.

 

Disasters

3%

450

4/3/23

+0.6%

4/24/23

441.35

441.35

 

LIFESTYLE/JUSTICE INDEX

(15%)

 

 

 

 

 

Science, Tech, Educ.

4%

600

4/3/23

+0.3%

4/24/23

626.61

626.61

Virgin Orbit goes broke after failures to launch.  NASA names four moon astronauts... and

 

Equality (econ/social)

4%

600

4/3/23

+0.3%

4/24/23

611.18

611.18

Cites diversity: a black, a woman, a... Canadian!  Pope Francis washes the feet of prisoners on Holy Thursday,

 

Health

4%

600

4/3/23

nc

4/24/23

472.52

472.52

CDC warns of deadly Marburg epidemic breaking out in Africa.  Docs say much risk, no benefit in alcohol: bring back Prohibition?  Bad week for Axis cars: VW recalls 143K for bad airbags, Honda 500K. 

 

Freedom and Justice

3%

450

4/3/23

+0.2%

4/24/23

463.15

463.15

SCOTUS Justice Thomas accused of taking graft from billionaire Harlan Crow.  J&J settles talcum poweder lawsuit for $9B.  Rupert Murdoch called to testify in Fox/Dominion lawsuit.  More corporate legal warfare between Chipotle and Sweetgreen

 

 

MISCELLANEOUS and TRANSIENT INDEX

 

 

(7%)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cultural incidents

3%

450

4/3/23

+0.3%

4/24/23

487.53

487.53

Masters tees off Thursday.  Uconn and LSU win NCAA titles.  Jelly Roll wins CMA awards.

 

RIP Madonna producer Seymour Stein,

 

Misc. incidents

4%

450

4/3/23

+0.1%

4/24/23

476.40

476.40

Osama killer Gen. McRaven writes “Wisdom of the Bullfrog” and says: “When you’re in command, command!”  Heavy California rains enhance spring flower blooming.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Don Jones Index for the week of April 3rd through April 9th, 2023 was UP 4.48 points

 

The Don Jones Index is sponsored by the Coalition for a New Consensus: retired Congressman and Independent Presidential candidate Jack “Catfish” Parnell, Chairman; Brian Doohan, Administrator.  The CNC denies, emphatically, allegations that the organization, as well as any of its officers (including former Congressman Parnell, environmentalist/America-Firster Austin Tillerman and cosmetics CEO Rayna Finch) and references to Parnell’s works, “Entropy and Renaissance” and “The Coming Kill-Off” are fictitious or, at best, mere pawns in the web-serial “Black Helicopters” – and promise swift, effective legal action against parties promulgating this and/or other such slanders.

Comments, complaints, donations (especially SUPERPAC donations) always welcome at feedme@generisis.com or: speak@donjonesindex.com.

 

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

See Attachments One through Eighteen appended to our Lesson of March 27th... “Drizzle”. Our April 3rd lesson, “Sizzle, covered events from the Indictment Announcement late Thursday, March 30th to the Indictment on April 2nd (Attachments Nineteen through Seventy)

Below is Attachment Zero: The Indictment.  Thereafter, we resume with Attachment Seventy One

 

 

ATTACHMENT ZERO – From The Hill

 

Read the full Trump indictment charging him with 34 felony counts

BY CAITLIN YILEK  UPDATED ON: APRIL 4, 2023 / 4:18 PM / CBS NEWS

Former President Donald Trump has been charged by a New York grand jury with 34 felony counts of falsifying business records in an indictment that was unsealed Tuesday after Trump was arraigned in a Manhattan courtroom. Trump pleaded not guilty to all charges.

The Manhattan District Attorney’s Office alleges Trump orchestrated a “catch and kill” scheme to suppress damaging information before the 2016 election. Prosecutors say the scheme involved falsifying business records to conceal three payments, including $130,000 that Trump attorney Michael Cohen paid to adult film star Stormy Daniels.

“The defendant DONALD J. TRUMP repeatedly and fraudulently falsified New York business records to conceal criminal conduct that hid damaging information from the voting public during the 2016 presidential election,” according to a statement of facts released alongside the indictment.

Read the indictment and the statement of facts below: 

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKTHE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK-against-DONALD J. TRUMP,Defendant.THE GRAND JURY OF THE COUNTY OF NEW YORK, by this indictment, accusesthe defendant of the crime of

FALSIFYING BUSINESS RECORDS IN THE FIRSTDEGREE

, in violation of Penal Law §175.10, committed as follows:The defendant, in the County of New York and elsewhere, on or about February 14, 2017,with intent to defraud and intent to commit another crime and aid and conceal the commissionthereof, made and caused a false entry in the business records of an enterprise, to wit, an invoicefrom Michael Cohen dated February 14, 2017, marked as a record of the Donald J. TrumpRevocable Trust, and kept and maintained by the Trump Organization.SECOND COUNT:AND THE GRAND JURY AFORESAID, by this indictment, further accuses thedefendant of the crime of

FALSIFYING BUSINESS RECORDS IN THE FIRST DEGREE

,in violation of Penal Law §175.10, committed as follows:The defendant, in the County of New York and elsewhere, on or about February 14, 2017,with intent to defraud and intent to commit another crime and aid and conceal the commissionthereof, made and caused a false entry in the business records of an enterprise, to wit, an entry inthe Detail General Ledger for the Donald J. Trump Revocable Trust, bearing voucher number842457, and kept and maintained by the Trump Organization.

 

THIRD COUNT:AND THE GRAND JURY AFORESAID, by this indictment, further accuses thedefendant of the crime of

FALSIFYING BUSINESS RECORDS IN THE FIRST DEGREE

,in violation of Penal Law §175.10, committed as follows:The defendant, in the County of New York and elsewhere, on or about February 14, 2017,with intent to defraud and intent to commit another crime and aid and conceal the commissionthereof, made and caused a false entry in the business records of an enterprise, to wit, an entry inthe Detail General Ledger for the Donald J. Trump Revocable Trust, bearing voucher number842460, and kept and maintained by the Trump Organization.FOURTH COUNT:AND THE GRAND JURY AFORESAID, by this indictment, further accuses thedefendant of the crime of

FALSIFYING BUSINESS RECORDS IN THE FIRST DEGREE

,in violation of Penal Law §175.10, committed as follows:The defendant, in the County of New York and elsewhere, on or about February 14, 2017,with intent to defraud and intent to commit another crime and aid and conceal the commissionthereof, made and caused a false entry in the business records of an enterprise, to wit, a Donald J.Trump Revocable Trust Account check and check stub dated February 14, 2017, bearing checknumber 000138, and kept and maintained by the Trump Organization.FIFTH COUNT:AND THE GRAND JURY AFORESAID, by this indictment, further accuses thedefendant of the crime of

FALSIFYING BUSINESS RECORDS IN THE FIRST DEGREE

,in violation of Penal Law §175.10, committed as follows:

 

 The defendant, in the County of New York and elsewhere, on or about March 16, 2017through March 17, 2017, with intent to defraud and intent to commit another crime and aid andconceal the commission thereof, made and caused a false entry in the business records of anenterprise, to wit, an invoice from Michael Cohen dated February 16, 2017 and transmitted on orabout March 16, 2017, marked as a record of the Donald J. Trump Revocable Trust, and kept andmaintained by the Trump Organization.SIXTH COUNT:AND THE GRAND JURY AFORESAID, by this indictment, further accuses thedefendant of the crime of

FALSIFYING BUSINESS RECORDS IN THE FIRST DEGREE

,in violation of Penal Law §175.10, committed as follows:The defendant, in the County of New York and elsewhere, on or about March 17, 2017,with intent to defraud and intent to commit another crime and aid and conceal the commissionthereof, made and caused a false entry in the business records of an enterprise, to wit, an entry inthe Detail General Ledger for the Donald J. Trump Revocable Trust, bearing voucher number846907, and kept and maintained by the Trump Organization.SEVENTH COUNT:AND THE GRAND JURY AFORESAID, by this indictment, further accuses thedefendant of the crime of

FALSIFYING BUSINESS RECORDS IN THE FIRST DEGREE

,in violation of Penal Law §175.10, committed as follows:

 

The defendant, in the County of New York and elsewhere, on or about March 17, 2017,with intent to defraud and intent to commit another crime and aid and conceal the commissionthereof, made and caused a false entry in the business records of an enterprise, to wit, a Donald J.Trump Revocable Trust Account check and check stub dated March 17, 2017, bearing checknumber 000147, and kept and maintained by the Trump Organization.EIGHTH COUNT:AND THE GRAND JURY AFORESAID, by this indictment, further accuses thedefendant of the crime of

FALSIFYING BUSINESS RECORDS IN THE FIRST DEGREE

,in violation of Penal Law §175.10, committed as follows:The defendant, in the County of New York and elsewhere, on or about April 13, 2017through June 19, 2017, with intent to defraud and intent to commit another crime and aid andconceal the commission thereof, made and caused a false entry in the business records of anenterprise, to wit, an invoice from Michael Cohen dated April 13, 2017, marked as a record ofDonald J. Trump, and kept and maintained by the Trump Organization. NINTH COUNT:AND THE GRAND JURY AFORESAID, by this indictment, further accuses thedefendant of the crime of

FALSIFYING BUSINESS RECORDS IN THE FIRST DEGREE

,in violation of Penal Law §175.10, committed as follows:The defendant, in the County of New York and elsewhere, on or about June 19, 2017, withintent to defraud and intent to commit another crime and aid and conceal the commission thereof,made and caused a false entry in the business records of an enterprise, to wit, an entry in the DetailGeneral Ledger for Donald J. Trump, bearing voucher number 858770, and kept and maintained by the Trump Organization.

 

 TENTH COUNT:AND THE GRAND JURY AFORESAID, by this indictment, further accuses thedefendant of the crime of

FALSIFYING BUSINESS RECORDS IN THE FIRST DEGREE

,in violation of Penal Law §175.10, committed as follows:The defendant, in the County of New York and elsewhere, on or about June 19, 2017, withintent to defraud and intent to commit another crime and aid and conceal the commission thereof,made and caused a false entry in the business records of an enterprise, to wit, a Donald J. Trumpaccount check and check stub dated June 19, 2017, bearing check number 002740, and kept andmaintained by the Trump Organization.ELEVENTH COUNT:AND THE GRAND JURY AFORESAID, by this indictment, further accuses thedefendant of the crime of

FALSIFYING BUSINESS RECORDS IN THE FIRST DEGREE

,in violation of Penal Law §175.10, committed as follows:The defendant, in the County of New York and elsewhere, on or about May 22, 2017, withintent to defraud and intent to commit another crime and aid and conceal the commission thereof,made and caused a false entry in the business records of an enterprise, to wit, an invoice fromMichael Cohen dated May 22, 2017, marked as a record of Donald J. Trump, and kept andmaintained by the Trump Organization.TWELFTH COUNT:AND THE GRAND JURY AFORESAID, by this indictment, further accuses thedefendant of the crime of

FALSIFYING BUSINESS RECORDS IN THE FIRST DEGREE

,in violation of Penal Law §175.10, committed as follows:

 

 The defendant, in the County of New York and elsewhere, on or about May 22, 2017, withintent to defraud and intent to commit another crime and aid and conceal the commission thereof,made and caused a false entry in the business records of an enterprise, to wit, an entry in the DetailGeneral Ledger for Donald J. Trump, bearing voucher number 855331, and kept and maintained by the Trump Organization.THIRTEENTH COUNT:AND THE GRAND JURY AFORESAID, by this indictment, further accuses thedefendant of the crime of

FALSIFYING BUSINESS RECORDS IN THE FIRST DEGREE

,in violation of Penal Law §175.10, committed as follows:The defendant, in the County of New York and elsewhere, on or about May 23, 2017, withintent to defraud and intent to commit another crime and aid and conceal the commission thereof,made and caused a false entry in the business records of an enterprise, to wit, a Donald J. Trumpaccount check and check stub dated May 23, 2017, bearing check number 002700, and kept andmaintained by the Trump Organization.FOURTEENTH COUNT:AND THE GRAND JURY AFORESAID, by this indictment, further accuses thedefendant of the crime of

FALSIFYING BUSINESS RECORDS IN THE FIRST DEGREE

,in violation of Penal Law §175.10, committed as follows:The defendant, in the County of New York and elsewhere, on or about June 16, 2017through June 19, 2017, with intent to defraud and intent to commit another crime and aid andconceal the commission thereof, made and caused a false entry in the business records of anenterprise, to wit, an invoice from Michael Cohen dated June 16, 2017, marked as a record ofDonald J. Trump, and kept and maintained by the Trump Organization.

 

FIFTEENTH COUNT:AND THE GRAND JURY AFORESAID, by this indictment, further accuses thedefendant of the crime of

FALSIFYING BUSINESS RECORDS IN THE FIRST DEGREE

,in violation of Penal Law §175.10, committed as follows:The defendant, in the County of New York and elsewhere, on or about June 19, 2017, withintent to defraud and intent to commit another crime and aid and conceal the commission thereof,made and caused a false entry in the business records of an enterprise, to wit, an entry in the DetailGeneral Ledger for Donald J. Trump, bearing voucher number 858772, and kept and maintained by the Trump Organization.SIXTEENTH COUNT:AND THE GRAND JURY AFORESAID, by this indictment, further accuses thedefendant of the crime of

FALSIFYING BUSINESS RECORDS IN THE FIRST DEGREE

,in violation of Penal Law §175.10, committed as follows:The defendant, in the County of New York and elsewhere, on or about June 19, 2017, withintent to defraud and intent to commit another crime and aid and conceal the commission thereof,made and caused a false entry in the business records of an enterprise, to wit, a Donald J. Trumpaccount check and check stub dated June 19, 2017, bearing check number 002741, and kept andmaintained by the Trump Organization.SEVENTEENTH COUNT:AND THE GRAND JURY AFORESAID, by this indictment, further accuses thedefendant of the crime of

FALSIFYING BUSINESS RECORDS IN THE FIRST DEGREE

,in violation of Penal Law §175.10, committed as follows:

 

 The defendant, in the County of New York and elsewhere, on or about July 11, 2017, withintent to defraud and intent to commit another crime and aid and conceal the commission thereof,made and caused a false entry in the business records of an enterprise, to wit, an invoice fromMichael Cohen dated July 11, 2017, marked as a record of Donald J. Trump, and kept andmaintained by the Trump Organization.EIGHTEENTH COUNT:AND THE GRAND JURY AFORESAID, by this indictment, further accuses thedefendant of the crime of

FALSIFYING BUSINESS RECORDS IN THE FIRST DEGREE

,in violation of Penal Law §175.10, committed as follows:The defendant, in the County of New York and elsewhere, on or about July 11, 2017, withintent to defraud and intent to commit another crime and aid and conceal the commission thereof,made and caused a false entry in the business records of an enterprise, to wit, an entry in the DetailGeneral Ledger for Donald J. Trump, bearing voucher number 861096, and kept and maintained by the Trump Organization. NINETEENTH COUNT:AND THE GRAND JURY AFORESAID, by this indictment, further accuses thedefendant of the crime of

FALSIFYING BUSINESS RECORDS IN THE FIRST DEGREE

,in violation of Penal Law §175.10, committed as follows:The defendant, in the County of New York and elsewhere, on or about July 11, 2017, withintent to defraud and intent to commit another crime and aid and conceal the commission thereof,made and caused a false entry in the business records of an enterprise, to wit, a Donald J. Trumpaccount check and check stub dated July 11, 2017, bearing check number 002781, and kept andmaintained by the Trump Organization.

 

 TWENTIETH COUNT:AND THE GRAND JURY AFORESAID, by this indictment, further accuses thedefendant of the crime of

FALSIFYING BUSINESS RECORDS IN THE FIRST DEGREE

,in violation of Penal Law §175.10, committed as follows:The defendant, in the County of New York and elsewhere, on or about August 1, 2017,with intent to defraud and intent to commit another crime and aid and conceal the commissionthereof, made and caused a false entry in the business records of an enterprise, to wit, an invoicefrom Michael Cohen dated August 1, 2017, marked as a record of Donald J. Trump, and kept andmaintained by the Trump Organization.TWENTY-FIRST COUNT:AND THE GRAND JURY AFORESAID, by this indictment, further accuses thedefendant of the crime of

FALSIFYING BUSINESS RECORDS IN THE FIRST DEGREE

,in violation of Penal Law §175.10, committed as follows:The defendant, in the County of New York and elsewhere, on or about August 1, 2017,with intent to defraud and intent to commit another crime and aid and conceal the commissionthereof, made and caused a false entry in the business records of an enterprise, to wit, an entry inthe Detail General Ledger for Donald J. Trump, bearing voucher number 863641, and kept andmaintained by the Trump Organization.TWENTY-SECOND COUNT:AND THE GRAND JURY AFORESAID, by this indictment, further accuses thedefendant of the crime of

FALSIFYING BUSINESS RECORDS IN THE FIRST DEGREE

,in violation of Penal Law §175.10, committed as follows:

 

 The defendant, in the County of New York and elsewhere, on or about August 1, 2017,with intent to defraud and intent to commit another crime and aid and conceal the commissionthereof, made and caused a false entry in the business records of an enterprise, to wit, a Donald J.Trump account check and check stub dated August 1, 2017, bearing check number 002821, andkept and maintained by the Trump Organization.TWENTY-THIRD COUNT:AND THE GRAND JURY AFORESAID, by this indictment, further accuses thedefendant of the crime of

FALSIFYING BUSINESS RECORDS IN THE FIRST DEGREE

,in violation of Penal Law §175.10, committed as follows:The defendant, in the County of New York and elsewhere, on or about September 11,2017, with intent to defraud and intent to commit another crime and aid and conceal thecommission thereof, made and caused a false entry in the business records of an enterprise, to wit,an invoice from Michael Cohen dated September 11, 2017, marked as a record of Donald J.Trump, and kept and maintained by the Trump Organization.TWENTY-FOURTH COUNT:AND THE GRAND JURY AFORESAID, by this indictment, further accuses thedefendant of the crime of

FALSIFYING BUSINESS RECORDS IN THE FIRST DEGREE

,in violation of Penal Law §175.10, committed as follows:The defendant, in the County of New York and elsewhere, on or about September 11,2017, with intent to defraud and intent to commit another crime and aid and conceal thecommission thereof, made and caused a false entry in the business records of an enterprise, to wit,an entry in the Detail General Ledger for Donald J. Trump, bearing voucher number 868174, andkept and maintained by the Trump Organization.

 

TWENTY-FIFTH COUNT:AND THE GRAND JURY AFORESAID, by this indictment, further accuses thedefendant of the crime of

FALSIFYING BUSINESS RECORDS IN THE FIRST DEGREE

,in violation of Penal Law §175.10, committed as follows:The defendant, in the County of New York and elsewhere, on or about September 12,2017, with intent to defraud and intent to commit another crime and aid and conceal thecommission thereof, made and caused a false entry in the business records of an enterprise, to wit,a Donald J. Trump account check and check stub dated September 12, 2017, bearing checknumber 002908, and kept and maintained by the Trump Organization.TWENTY-SIXTH COUNT:AND THE GRAND JURY AFORESAID, by this indictment, further accuses thedefendant of the crime of

FALSIFYING BUSINESS RECORDS IN THE FIRST DEGREE

,in violation of Penal Law §175.10, committed as follows:The defendant, in the County of New York and elsewhere, on or about October 18, 2017,with intent to defraud and intent to commit another crime and aid and conceal the commissionthereof, made and caused a false entry in the business records of an enterprise, to wit, an invoicefrom Michael Cohen dated October 18, 2017, marked as a record of Donald J. Trump, and keptand maintained by the Trump Organization.TWENTY-SEVENTH COUNT:AND THE GRAND JURY AFORESAID, by this indictment, further accuses thedefendant of the crime of

FALSIFYING BUSINESS RECORDS IN THE FIRST DEGREE

,in violation of Penal Law §175.10, committed as follows:

 

 The defendant, in the County of New York and elsewhere, on or about October 18, 2017,with intent to defraud and intent to commit another crime and aid and conceal the commissionthereof, made and caused a false entry in the business records of an enterprise, to wit, an entry inthe Detail General Ledger for Donald J. Trump, bearing voucher number 872654, and kept andmaintained by the Trump Organization.TWENTY-EIGHTH COUNT:AND THE GRAND JURY AFORESAID, by this indictment, further accuses thedefendant of the crime of

FALSIFYING BUSINESS RECORDS IN THE FIRST DEGREE

,in violation of Penal Law §175.10, committed as follows:The defendant, in the County of New York and elsewhere, on or about October 18, 2017,with intent to defraud and intent to commit another crime and aid and conceal the commissionthereof, made and caused a false entry in the business records of an enterprise, to wit, a Donald J.Trump account check and check stub dated October 18, 2017, bearing check number 002944, andkept and maintained by the Trump Organization.TWENTY-NINTH COUNT:AND THE GRAND JURY AFORESAID, by this indictment, further accuses thedefendant of the crime of

FALSIFYING BUSINESS RECORDS IN THE FIRST DEGREE

,in violation of Penal Law §175.10, committed as follows:The defendant, in the County of New York and elsewhere, on or about November 20,2017, with intent to defraud and intent to commit another crime and aid and conceal thecommission thereof, made and caused a false entry in the business records of an enterprise, to wit,an invoice from Michael Cohen dated November 20, 2017, marked as a record of Donald J.Trump, and kept and maintained by the Trump Organization.

 

THIRTIETH COUNT:AND THE GRAND JURY AFORESAID, by this indictment, further accuses thedefendant of the crime of

FALSIFYING BUSINESS RECORDS IN THE FIRST DEGREE

,in violation of Penal Law §175.10, committed as follows:The defendant, in the County of New York and elsewhere, on or about November 20,2017, with intent to defraud and intent to commit another crime and aid and conceal thecommission thereof, made and caused a false entry in the business records of an enterprise, to wit,an entry in the Detail General Ledger for Donald J. Trump, bearing voucher number 876511, andkept and maintained by the Trump Organization.THIRTY-FIRST COUNT:AND THE GRAND JURY AFORESAID, by this indictment, further accuses thedefendant of the crime of

FALSIFYING BUSINESS RECORDS IN THE FIRST DEGREE

,in violation of Penal Law §175.10, committed as follows:The defendant, in the County of New York and elsewhere, on or about November 21,2017, with intent to defraud and intent to commit another crime and aid and conceal thecommission thereof, made and caused a false entry in the business records of an enterprise, to wit,a Donald J. Trump account check and check stub dated November 21, 2017, bearing checknumber 002980, and kept and maintained by the Trump Organization.THIRTY-SECOND COUNT:AND THE GRAND JURY AFORESAID, by this indictment, further accuses thedefendant of the crime of

FALSIFYING BUSINESS RECORDS IN THE FIRST DEGREE

,in violation of Penal Law §175.10, committed as follows:

 

 The defendant, in the County of New York and elsewhere, on or about December 1, 2017,with intent to defraud and intent to commit another crime and aid and conceal the commissionthereof, made and caused a false entry in the business records of an enterprise, to wit, an invoicefrom Michael Cohen dated December 1, 2017, marked as a record of Donald J. Trump, and keptand maintained by the Trump Organization.THIRTY-THIRD COUNT:AND THE GRAND JURY AFORESAID, by this indictment, further accuses thedefendant of the crime of

FALSIFYING BUSINESS RECORDS IN THE FIRST DEGREE

,in violation of Penal Law §175.10, committed as follows:The defendant, in the County of New York and elsewhere, on or about December 1, 2017,with intent to defraud and intent to commit another crime and aid and conceal the commissionthereof, made and caused a false entry in the business records of an enterprise, to wit, an entry inthe Detail General Ledger for Donald J. Trump, bearing voucher number 877785, and kept andmaintained by the Trump Organization.THIRTY-FOURTH COUNT:AND THE GRAND JURY AFORESAID, by this indictment, further accuses thedefendant of the crime of

FALSIFYING BUSINESS RECORDS IN THE FIRST DEGREE

,in violation of Penal Law §175.10, committed as follows:The defendant, in the County of New York and elsewhere, on or about December 5, 2017,with intent to defraud and intent to commit another crime and aid and conceal the commissionthereof, made and caused a false entry in the business records of an enterprise, to wit, a Donald J.

 

Trump account check and check stub dated December 5, 2017, bearing check number 003006,and kept and maintained by the Trump Organization.ALVIN L. BRAGG, JR.District Attorney

 

GJ #8-5Filed: NA No.THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK-against-DONALD J. TRUMP,Defendant.INDICTMENT

FALSIFYING BUSINESS RECORDS IN THE FIRST DEGREE, P.L. §175.10, 34 Cts

 

ALVIN L. BRAGG JR., District AttorneyA True Bill   Foreperson  ADJOURNED TO PART _______ ON

 

See prior lessons for attachments 1 to 70

 

 

ATTACHMENT SEVENTY ONEFrom Time

TRUMP IS ABOUT TO STRESS TEST THE CREDIBILITY OF OUR JUDICIAL SYSTEM

By Philip Elliott

 

For the weeks leading up to Donald Trump’s indictment, the former President was constantly throwing misdirection into the ether. He predicted an indictment and arrest in the coming hours, even as his advisers and lawyers conceded they had no evidence that was in the offing. He raised cash on the threat of the prospect of criminal prosecution and plotted with his team about a potential perp walk. Amid it all, the ex-President seemed to miss the severity of history’s judgment should he become the first of his cohort to face a criminal indictment.

Well, late Thursday, that anticipated outcome finally came into relief. The Manhattan District Attorney’s office confirmed that a grand jury had made history, and that the process of negotiating a surrender and booking for the former White House resident had already begun. In the coming days, as the indictment is unsealed and Trump poses for his mugshot , the misdirection is unlikely to abate. And in that comes a distinct risk, one not confined to the American judicial system, the norms of the Presidency itself, or the basics of civility in a pluralistic political world.

With every single utterance, filing, and grievance, Trump and those involved in this case—and potentially others—stand to rewrite the rules of criminal accountability in a high-charged political environment.

For those who have watched Trump’s political career, none of this will seem new. If anything, it may sound like rhyming rejoinder to the last couple of years, where a clang of chaos was the best harmony available in the political hymnal of D.C.

Few understand this strategy better than Steve Bannon. In the final weeks of the 2016 campaign, the then-CEO of Trump’s presidential campaign was headed toward baggage claim at the Las Vegas airport, when he boiled Trump’s strategy down to its essence while chatting with reporters who just happened to catch him. Trump was trailing in the polls and Hillary Clinton seemed destined to return to the White House—this time with the good office—and the nation seemed ready to send The Apprentice star back to the mock boardroom on the fifth floor of Trump Tower. But Bannon, arriving in Nevada to watch the third and final debate , seemed upbeat, even excited. Trump, Bannon said, was “the master of the head fake,” optimistic that such misdirection could help power him to the White House despite polling, structural, and political headwinds.

Bannon, it turned out, was correct. And not just about how Trump would deploy such tactics to win the White House a few weeks later. Trump used them to great effect once there. Few possess his inherent ability to turn narratives on a dime with little more than a seemingly accidental aside, an errant tweet, or a snarky insult laced with a threat.

Put simply: the Head Fake Presidency seemed limitless. At least until it wasn’t.

The coming days, weeks, and probably months are set to test whether Trump’s head fakes can overpower the institutions of a criminal justice system never before tested in such a way. Since the start of his career in politics, Trump has seemed to have survived some of his most dangerous moments using a strategy of drowning bad news with bigger outrage. Facing his own troubles, he deployed a Soviet-era flex of WhatAboutism. And, more often than not, it worked.

As President, Trump stuck with that instinct, employing misdirection at every turn. He launched and suddenly called off a strike on Iranian facilities as retaliation for a downed U.S. drone. On immigrationPuerto Rico , the Trans-Pacific Partnership, guns, immigration, and climate change, he balked at other moves as he took delight in shattering norms. His transactional approach was mired in gamesmanship and posturing, seldom in facts.

It’s continued in his post-presidency, including through his tangled web of legal troubles. Even when E. Jean Carroll gets her day in a courtroom in a civil lawsuit alleging Trump raped her in a department store dressing room and then defamed her for making the allegations, Trump’s notorious indifference to honest-dealing will be a subtext of the trial; the jury’s identity will be concealed to protect them from threats and intimidation—an extraordinary step.

As the first criminal charges against an ex-President move forward, the combination of head fakes and the legitimate threat to judicial norms should not be taken lightly.

The stratagem has worked plenty for Trump to this point, and it still may, to be clear. At the same time, these proceedings might finally shake the American public of its reflex to follow Trump’s eyeline when it locks on to something blurry in the distance. After all, it seems an indictment is about to be in plain view, even if a lot of Americans aren’t yet ready to believe their eyes. In fact, Trump and his allies are going to work overtime to ensure that his strongest supporters never get there, even if it further diminishes the credibility of the nation’s courts.

 

ATTACHMENT SEVENTY TWOFrom the Washington Times

By Michael R. Sisak – Associated Press – Thursday, March 30, 2023

 

NEW YORK — If you didn’t know what you were looking for, you might’ve missed it. Even then, it was hard to know at the moment that history was unfolding before your eyes.

Donald Trump’s indictment, the first of a former U.S. president, was quietly brought to the clerk’s office at the Manhattan criminal courthouse just before closing time Thursday.

A woman and two men in suits walked in past reporters who’ve been staking out the office for weeks, turned a corner and disappeared through a door to a non-public area known as the indictment room.

 

The vibe in the room shifted, and then around the courthouse, too.

The clerk’s office, normally a bustle of lawyers and paralegals seeking case files and submitting papers, people posting bail and court employees cracking jokes, grew quiet and tense.

TIMES MY VIEW ALL 

·         It’s not the guns; it’s the phones

·         Jan. 6 ‘Shaman’ released from prison early as lawyer calls for sanctions on prosecutors over video

·         Potential charges against Trump ‘not a slam-dunk case,’ legal experts warn

 

Moments later, just before 5 p.m., when a reporter asked if there were any filings involving “People v. Donald Trump” – her customary end-of-day question in recent days – a usually cheerful clerk sternly replied: “We have no information on that case. The office is closing. You have to leave.”

The reporters, from outlets including The Associated Press, The New York Times, New York Post and legal publication Law360, left the office and stood outside in the hallway, watching through glass doors as workers turned out the lights and the people who’d walked in a few minutes earlier worked in darkness inside filing the indictment.

“After visiting the clerk’s office for weeks, this was all very strange,” said Frank G. Runyeon, a reporter for Law360. “Very unusual and we knew something was up.”

As the people continued to work, and reporters peered in at what was going on, court officers came to the hallway and shooed the press away. That floor of the courthouse was now closed, they said.

The indictment remains under seal, its contents secret, likely until Trump is arraigned. But news of the indictment, voted on by a grand jury sitting in a court building across the street from the criminal courthouse, broke shortly after 5 p.m. in The New York Times. It was confirmed minutes later by Trump’s lawyers and ultimately in a brief statement from the Manhattan district attorney’s office.

The indictment was broadly expected for two weeks, with Trump himself even saying he expected to be arrested. Yet it still came as a surprise. Reports in recent days had indicated that the grand jury was about to go on a lengthy, scheduled break and wasn’t expected to be dealing with the Trump matter until late April.

The announcement sent television crews pouring onto the sidewalks around the courthouse complex and brought a handful of demonstrators carrying banners and posters – some who opposed Trump and some that supported him.

As the mini-mob of MAGAmen and Never-Trumpers converged, police surrounded the courthouse into the evening, with flood lights illuminating the sidewalk and streets.

Ditte Lynge, who works for a Danish newspaper that has been staking out the courthouse all week, was among the reporters who rushed to the scene.

“Everyone’s following what’s going on over here,” she said of her audience back home. “This is historical. It’s the first time that a former American president has been indicted. So of course, it has a lot of interest.”

• Associated Press writer Bobby Caina Calvan contributed to this report.

 

 

ATTACHMENT SEVENTY THREEFrom Fox

IVANKA TRUMP SAYS SHE IS ‘PAINED’ BY FATHER’S INDICTMENT

Ivanka Trump played a big role in her father’s administration but says she would not be part of a second Trump White House

By Timothy H.J. Nerozzi | Fox News

 

Ivanka Trump, daughter of former President Donald Trump, on Friday addressed her father’s indictment.

Ivanka posted the message to social media, saying she was “pained” by the news but thanked those who have contacted her in support.

“I love my father, and I love my country. Today, I am pained for both,” she wrote.

“I appreciate the voices across the political spectrum expressing support and concern.”

After being indicted by a Manhattan grand jury, the former president is expected to be arraigned in court Tuesday, a law enforcement source told Fox News.

 

TRUMP SAYS DA BRAGG’S ‘OBSESSION’ WITH TRYING TO ‘GET TRUMP’ WILL ‘BACKFIRE’ AFTER GRAND JURY INDICTMENT

 

Judge Juan Merchan will preside over the case brought by Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg over alleged hush money payments Trump made to porn star Stormy Daniels in 2016. 

Trump is scheduled to be arraigned at 2:15 p.m. Tuesday in Merchan’s courtroom in New York City.

 

TRUMP INDICTED AFTER MANHATTAN DA PROBE FOR HUSH MONEY PAYMENTS

 

In addition to Trump’s personal attorney Joe Tacopina, a second source has confirmed that Trump has made arrangements with the district attorney’s legal team to surrender without handcuffs. Detectives with the DA’s office will handle the arrest.

Ivanka and her husband Jared Kushner moved to Miami after spending four years in Washington, D.C., and serving in the former Trump administration.

She does not intend to play a role in her father’s 2024 presidential campaign nor a possible second administration.

 

ATTACHMENT SEVENTY FOURFrom X13 Time

Trump’s Indictment Drama Showcased His Rivals’ Weakness

Trump Rallied Supporters in Waco Ahead of Possible Indictment 

BY MOLLY BALL 

 

UPDATED: MARCH 30, 2023 4:12 PM EDT | ORIGINALLY PUBLISHED: MARCH 30, 2023 1:53 PM EDT

It took barely a flick of Donald Trump’s wrist to set the whole circus back into motion.

“WITH NO CRIME ABLE TO BE PROVEN, & BASED ON AN OLD & FULLY DEBUNKED (BY NUMEROUS OTHER PROSECUTORS!) FAIRYTALE, THE FAR & AWAY LEADING REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE & FORMER PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, WILL BE ARRESTED ON TUESDAY OF NEXT WEEK,” Trump wrote, or “Truthed,” on his personal social-media site, Truth Social, on the morning of March 18.

By the time the Manhattan grand jury finally voted to indict Trump on March 30, all the GOP’s old reflexes had kicked in again. As if by muscle memory, Republican officeholders and candidates fell all over themselves to air their indignation at the supposed victimization of a politician being prosecuted for allegedly paying off a porn star, using money donated to his campaign, on the eve of a national election, to conceal an extramarital tryst. House Speaker Kevin McCarthy called for an investigation, and three House committee chairmen demanded the Manhattan D.A. testify before Congress about the “politically motivated prosecutorial decision” that had yet to occur.

Read More: Why Even Some Trump Critics Think the Stormy Daniels Case Is Weak.

While the historic indictment of a former President marked a turning point in the nascent 2024 campaign, it was the scramble to come to Trump’s defense that might ultimately prove to be a more pivotal moment. Just a few months ago, Republicans’ disappointing performance in the midterms marked the third straight national election Trump tanked for the GOP, and a new consensus began to form: he was weak, a loser, yesterday’s news. With at least five civil and criminal investigations percolating and a new generation of candidates in the mix, it was finally time for Republicans to cut the cord.

But when the time came to actually stand up to him, Trump’s primary rivals and political enablers were too cowardly or calculating to throw much of a punch. Nikki Haley, Trump’s major declared opponent and former U.N. Ambassador, dismissed the potential indictment on Fox News as “more about revenge than it is about justice.” Another active candidate, businessman Vivek Ramaswamy, went further, blasting the “disastrously politicized prosecution” and calling on other Republicans to condemn it. Former Vice President Mike Pence, who is openly considering a run, told an interviewer the probe “reeks of the kind of political prosecution we endured in the days of the Russia hoax.”

Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, who has yet to declare his candidacy, came closest to a swipe, taking care to excoriate the “Soros-funded prosecutor” overseeing the Manhattan case while also impishly referencing the underlying conduct. “I don’t know what goes into paying hush money to a porn star to secure silence over some type of alleged affair,” DeSantis said, at a March 20 news conference. “I just, I can’t speak to that.”

But Trump gleefully seized on this political straddle, exultant at finally having baited his would-be rival into the ring after months of attacks. Trump issued a 327-word statement lambasting DeSantis as, among other things, “an average Governor” whose appeal to GOP voters was “HARDLY GREATNESS.” The statement was Trump’s usual word salad of innuendo and ad hominem, a nonsensical and largely baseless critique. But in Trump’s perpetual game of dominance, there can be no question who is the alpha.

One Florida-based GOP strategist not tied to either man’s camp told me Trump seemed to have “found his stride” by monopolizing attention around the incident, while DeSantis appeared rattled. “The moment DeSantis poked his head up, that’s where Trump wants to be,” says the strategist, speaking on condition of anonymity. DeSantis, he says, is “in the process of getting bloodied like he’s never gotten bloodied before. We’ll see if he can handle it.”

If the pattern holds, the 2024 primary could be over before it has even begun, with the GOP once more dominated by the toxic demands of its chaotic leader. Polls show Trump is getting stronger: A national survey conducted by Monmouth University and released March 21 showed Trump beating DeSantis by 14 points among Republican primary voters—a reversal from December, when the same pollster found DeSantis leading Trump by 13 points. Suddenly the party appears imprisoned in a familiar trap: unwilling to stand up to its own base voters’ loyalties, and stymied yet again by Trump’s well-worn divide-and-conquer strategy.

“It is amazing to me that the party that talks about masculinity continues to belly-crawl for this man, a bully who hides behind the walls of a Florida mansion,” says Denver Riggleman, a former Republican congressman from Virginia. His former colleagues, Riggleman says, remain deathly afraid of the sway Trump still holds over many of their voters. “They have so permanently lowered the standard that we’re somehow not even talking about whether he’s guilty of using an illegal tax pass-through to pay off an adult-film star—instead, we’re debating whether the indictment is political and how it will affect his popularity. This should be about the rule of law: did he do it or not?”

For nearly eight years now, Republicans have struggled to move on from Trump, despite being afforded countless opportunities to cut him loose—from the outrages of the 2016 campaign, to the scandal-fest of his Presidential term, to the impeachments and insurrection that punctuated its end. Evidence from the voting-machine company Dominion’s lawsuit against Fox News has proved what the political world already knew: that even Trump’s most ardent propagandists privately despise him and wish he would go away. Out of office for the past two years, he finally seemed to fade somewhat, popping back up in the news from time to time with the occasional weird endorsement or dinner with white supremacists and Holocaust deniers. The launch of his third campaign, in November, was widely derided as low-energy, and his campaign seemed to limp along while DeSantis gained ground.

Read More: Trump Enters the Arena For Another Fight.

It is, of course, early in the process, with most potential Trump rivals yet to declare their candidacy. But in a party whose ideology and leadership appeared up for grabs not long ago, a familiar dynamic is setting back in. In a January survey GOP pollster Whit Ayres conducted for the center-right Bulwark publication, Ayres found the party split into three factions: about 10% who do not support Trump; about a third who are reflexively, devotedly loyal to the former President; and a majority, 52%, of fair-weather voters who supported Trump in the past but now yearn for an alternative who can win in 2024. It’s still possible, Ayres says, that the latter group will view Trump’s indictment as more evidence that he is too burdened by political baggage to be the best nominee. “The ultimate impact of any indictment depends completely on what the charges are, how much evidence there is, and what the ultimate trial turns out to be like,” Ayres says. “No one can reliably anticipate the reaction to something that’s never happened before.”

Even some Trump opponents worry that the legal uncertainties surrounding the case may be shaky and therefore serve to boost him. “We’re going to indict a former President for, essentially, misdemeanor falsification of business records?” says former Michigan GOP congressman Peter Meijer. “We’re crossing the Rubicon for that? That seems like f—ing weak sauce.” Trump, Meijer points out, succeeded in whipping up a media frenzy before any arrest actually occurred. “He is an absolute savant when it comes to getting reactions,” Meijer says. “That’s not a shame on him so much as it’s a shame on the rest of us.”

Since seeding rumors of his imminent arrest, Trump has warned of “potential death & destruction” if charges are brought and repeatedly called on his supporters to protest, a vague-for-now summons that nonetheless harks back to the Jan. 6 Capitol riot. It was a reminder that for a broad swath of Americans, Trump has succeeded in delegitimizing virtually all the institutions of democracy—from elections to the courts to the current White House—and he may well retain the ability to summon a violent army to a time and place of his choosing.

“There are tens of millions of Americans who believe that government institutions are aligned against the true and rightful President, ordained from on high, and as far as they’re concerned the ends justify the means in an apocalyptic battle of good against evil,” says Riggleman, the former Virginia congressman. “This seemingly inexhaustible grift, raising money based on fear, is really all Trump has. But the formula works.”

 

ATTACHMENT SEVENTY FIVEFrom Time

DONALD TRUMP IS THE FIRST PRESIDENT EVER CRIMINALLY CHARGED. OTHERS HAVE COME CLOSE THOUGH

BY OLIVIA B. WAXMAN UPDATED: MARCH 30, 2023 6:37 PM EDT | ORIGINALLY PUBLISHED: MARCH 21, 2023 5:16 PM EDT

Donald Trump will make history once again—this time as the first former U.S. president ever to be criminally indicted.

A Manhattan grand jury voted to indict the 45th President in a case involving his alleged hush-money payment to former porn star Stormy Daniels, according to his lawyers and media reports. Daniels says she and Trump had an affair; Trump denies this.

“Like all things with Trump, it’s unprecedented,” says Barbara Perry, a presidential historian at the Miller Center at the University of Virginia. President Ulysses S. Grant was technically the first President to be arrested—for speeding on a horse and buggy in 1872. But the Trump case will go down in history as one of the biggest political scandals in American history—even if the charges relate to the seemingly mundane offense of bookkeeping fraud.

Criminal history, as it pertains to U.S. presidents, is pretty brief.

In terms of the seriousness of the scandal, Perry argues the Watergate scandal is the closest parallel because it was the first time a President resigned. President Richard Nixon stepped down in 1974 after tapes revealed he participated in the cover-up of the 1972 break-in at a Democratic National Committee office in the Watergate complex. Several Nixon advisors, from the White House lawyer to the Attorney General, served prison time. While the Department of Justice initially argued that a sitting president couldn’t be indicted on a criminal charge, Nixon was not assured that protection post-presidency, so his successor Gerald Ford pardoned him. As Ford put it, “My fellow Americans, our long national nightmare is over.” But a Sept. 1974 Gallup poll reported 53% of Americans thought the pardon was the wrong thing to do, and it’s one of the reasons Ford was voted out of office in the next election.

 

Read more: What Was the Biggest Political Scandal in American History? 7 Historians Make Their Picks

 

Arrests of major federal officials have an even longer history. Secretary of the Interior Albert Fall was convicted of bribery in 1929 for accepting hundreds of thousands of dollars in Liberty Bonds after allowing a private company to lease oil reserves in Wyoming known as Teapot Dome. Back then, TIME called Fall “the first felon in a President’s cabinet in U.S. history.” As biographer Robert Dallek explained the significance of the scandal, “People in the government were selling the administration to the highest bidder, using their government power to exploit bad positions to make a lot of money.” Fall served under President Warren G. Harding from 1921-1923, and Harding came to be viewed as corrupt. Increased press scrutiny revealed that he had a mistress. The stress of the scandal is thought to have led to his fatal heart attack in August 1923.

Bill Clinton was the last President who was close to facing criminal charges. Paula Jones, a receptionist, claimed she suffered emotional damage after Clinton exposed himself to her in a hotel room in May of 1991, back when he was the Governor of Arkansas, and sued for sexual harassment. In Clinton v. Jones, “the Supreme Court sets a precedent that a president can be sued for actions allegedly taken before he becomes president—that in turn led to an impeachment,” says Perry. President Clinton did have to pay civil damages to Paula Jones, and the suit brought to light the other womanizing he had engaged in, including a roughly two-year relationship with former White House intern Monica Lewinsky. However, while he was impeached in Dec. 1998 and acquitted in Feb. 1999, the scandal didn’t impact his popularity. His approval ratings kept going up.

There are similar worries that charging Trump could further boost his popularity with his sympathetic base. Yet Clinton wasn’t trying to run for re-election; the impeachment happened in his second term. Trump, however, is trying to stage a comeback after losing the 2020 election. With GOP rivals already making hay of the scandal—Florida Governor Ron DeSantis quipped, “I don’t know what goes into paying hush money to a porn star”—it remains to be seen whether criminal charges would help or hinder his 2024 bid.

 

ATTACHMENT SEVENTY SIXFrom Time

DONALD TRUMP HAS BEEN INDICTED. HERE’S WHAT HAPPENS NEXT IN THE PROCESS

Americans React to News of Donald Trump’s Impending Indictment 

BY ANISHA KOHLI   UPDATED: MARCH 30, 2023 10:00 PM EDT | ORIGINALLY PUBLISHED: MARCH 18, 2023 3:30 PM EDT

 

Former President Donald Trump has been indicted over alleged hush money payments. He now becomes the first former President to face criminal charges.

Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg said in a statement Thursday night that, “this evening, we contacted Mr. Trump’s attorney to coordinate his surrender.”

The charges so far remain under seal, but the investigation centers around cash paid to pornographic film star Stormy Daniels in 2016 before Trump’s election win. Daniels says she had an affair with Trump; Trump denies this.

As part of Bragg’s investigation, Trump could face charges for falsifying business records when he allegedly reimbursed his then-personal attorney Michael Cohen for paying off Daniels. The hush-money deal, allegedly crafted weeks before his presidential win, could also put Trump in jeopardy of violating campaign finance laws. Democrats worry that it may be a weak case against Trump, compared to other investigations into the former President. Political commentators are wondering whether an indictment could help Trump’s 2024 campaign if he can successfully paint the case as a political witch hunt.

Read More: What Trump Has Said About Stormy Daniels

But Trump’s impending legal battle raises questions about the process Trump would be subject to during his arrest and trial—including whether any extraordinary measures would be taken given his unique status. “This is not just high profile. This was the President of the United States. There’s been nobody like him to walk those halls,” Jeremy Saland, defense attorney and former Manhattan Assistant District Attorney, says.

Prior to the indictment, TIME spoke with legal experts about each step of the process, and how the charges against Trump might proceed differently from run-of-the-mill white-collar crime cases.

The arrest

The charges Trump faces are for white-collar crimes regarding financial dealings, and given their non-violent nature, defendants in such cases typically “self-surrender,” skipping public perp walks.

One of Trump’s lawyers, Susan R. Nechelestold TIME that former President Trump is expected to turn himself in on Tuesday to be arraigned in State Supreme Court in Manhattan.

Shanlon Wu, a white-collar defense attorney and former federal prosecutor, tells TIME that defense counsels typically receive notice when their white-collar clients are being indicted. “You would make an appointment basically, to bring your client in to be booked and fingerprinted,” Wu says.

Wu adds that Trump’s lawyers may even seek some special arrangements, given he’s a former president, to avoid walking through the front entrance of the courthouse or police station in an attempt to be more discreet. Another of Trump’s attorneys had previously said that if indicted, Trump would not resist arrest and that they would follow normal procedures. “There won’t be a standoff at Mar-a-Lago with Secret Service and the Manhattan DA’s office,” Joe Tacopina told the New York Daily News.

But some have speculated that Trump could take a completely different approach, facing the arrest publicly and choosing to send a message of political victimization to his supporters. “He sort of embraces the angst, divisiveness and excitement,” Saland says.

In a post on Truth Social on March 18, Trump claimed his arrest was imminent and called for his supporters to protest, citing “illegal leaks” from a “corrupt” and “highly political Manhattan district attorney’s office.”

Saland says he thinks that when Trump began talking about his indictment on March 18—predicting it would come the following Tuesday—he was trying to get ahead of the scandal and send a message that, “I’m gonna show up in court, and I’m gonna face this head on, because there’s a conspiracy against me.”

Although Trump’s legal team could probably arrange for a discreet processing appointment, they have the choice to go through his arrest, booking, and processing publicly if they think it may benefit his image.

“I would fully expect that he’s not going to slink away, he’s not going to hide and be discreet, he’s going to own it. And he’s going to turn it around and use it as a sword and a shield; ‘Yes, I have been arrested. Yes, I have been indicted by a grand jury. Yes. Prosecutors are unethical. Yes, this is a witch hunt,’” Saland says. “Something to that effect.”

However, some of the procedures will likely remain the same, no matter Trump’s status as the 45th president of the United States. He will be booked, finger-printed, and have a “mug shot” taken. With Trump’s substantial ties to the community, especially his ongoing 2024 presidential campaign, the judge likely wouldn’t deem him a flight risk, former federal prosecutor Renato Mariotti tells TIME. Given the white-collar charges Trump would likely be confronting, he may not even face bond, just released on his own recognizance per New York law.

Security measures

Law enforcement agencies at the local, state, and federal level have been working to prepare the Manhattan Criminal Court for Trump’s indictment, NBC News reported March 17, citing anonymous sources. The New York Police Department, New York State Court Officers, the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office, the Secret Service, and the FBI are all involved, according to NBC.

Wu doesn’t anticipate many unusual logistics in the procedures if Trump is indicted but believes that security would be heightened—similar to measures for other high-profile political figures or celebrities. “Sometimes we see a huge flood of cameras and reporters at the front of the courthouse,” he says. “With a former president, the Secret Service would probably have some screening mechanism for that, because otherwise, you don’t know who’s in the crowd.”

“Court security may also set up a sort of a barrier zone, meaning there’s going to be ‘X’ amount of feet, where people can walk through and there won’t be any reporters sticking microphones in their faces,” Wu adds that there would probably be limits to how many people are allowed in the courtroom.

“It’s a public forum, anybody should be able to come into a courthouse, but there are screening techniques you have to go through to make sure there’s no metal detected,” Saland says. “They have to make sure he’s safe. They don’t want him sitting among a whole bunch of people. That’s not a controllable atmosphere. I would expect there’s going to be barriers even internally.”

Complications

If Trump is arraigned and officially charged, the case would eventually move on to jury selection, which could be a lengthy and exhausting process.

“The majority of people in the jury pool would have some opinions about Donald Trump,” former federal prosecutor Mariotti says. “Most defendants, even if they’re famous, are often not known by prospective jurors or they don’t have a certain opinion about that person. I think it’s safe to say that Donald Trump is different.”

During jury selection the prosecution and the defense use voir dire questioning, meaning they can ask each prospective juror questions about their qualifications and knowledge of the case, in an attempt to ensure fair and impartial jurors.

Wu thinks a judge could opt to issue a so-called “gag order,” restricting all parties from talking to the press. “This is gonna get so much publicity anyway if he’s charged,” Wu says. “It’d be very hard to find jurors who haven’t been exposed to the news.” Although rarely used, one method to combat this is for a judge to sequester jurors, limiting their exposure to outside influence or information.

“If this case is still ongoing, during his run for president, you could face a very unprecedented and challenging situation,” Mariotti says. “[Trump] would be subject to a criminal enforcement action by a state, which would pose a lot of serious constitutional quandaries.”

Many legal experts have been hesitant to speculate what an indictment against Trump would mean, wary of using prior cases as a reflection because of how unique these circumstances are.

“Anyone who knows what’s likely to happen if/when Trump is indicted is not credible. He’s not ‘high profile.’ He’s a former POTUS with a Secret Service detail,” Peter Zeidenberg, a government enforcement attorney, tells TIME. “It’s not similar to any other cases/defendants.”

 

ATTACHMENT SEVENTY SEVENFrom Time

FORMER PRESIDENT EXPECTED TO TURN HIMSELF IN: LATEST UPDATES ON TRUMP’S INDICTMENT

Trump Rallied Supporters in Waco Ahead of Possible Indictment

BY BRIAN BENNETT AND TIME STAFF   UPDATED: MARCH 31, 2023 3:43 PM EDT | ORIGINALLY PUBLISHED: MARCH 30, 2023 7:30 PM EDT

Former President Donald Trump was criminally indicted on Thursday by a Manhattan grand jury. While the exact charges are still under seal and will likely remain so until next week, they relate to the payment of hush money to a former porn star.

Multiple outlets are reporting, citing unnamed sources, that the charges involve more than two dozen counts.

Americans React to News of Donald Trump’s Impending Indictment

The office of Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg announced Thursday evening that it had reached out to Trump’s team to discuss an arraignment date. One of Trump’s attorneys told TIME that the former President is expected to turn himself in on Tuesday.

Trump called the indictment “political persecution” in a statement, attacking Bragg as a “disgrace” and predicting the decision would hurt Democrats in the 2024 election.

The indictment marks the first time in American history that a former President has been criminally charged, and sets up a stunning legal and political test for the nation as Trump once again seeks the presidency.

Here are the latest updates on the indictment.

Trump attacks the judge assigned to his case

Trump is taking aim at the judge he said is assigned to preside over his arraignment, Juan Merchan, who is an acting justice with the State Supreme Court.

The New York-based judge, Trump wrote without evidence, “hates me,” in a post on his social media site TruthSocial. Trump, who misspelled the judge’s name, wrote that Merchan “was hand picked by Bragg & the Prosecutors, & is the same person who ‘railroaded’ my 75 year old former CFO, Allen Weisselberg, to take a ‘plea’ deal.” Along with handling the case against the Trump organization executive, Merchan also presided over a case in which he ordered the Trump Foundation to pay $1.6 million after a jury found the organization guilty of criminal tax fraud. Alvin Bragg, the current Manhattan District Attorney, was a prosecutor involved in that case.

Justice Merchan’s signature is on an official order that allowed Bragg to tell the public on Thursday that the grand jury had voted to indict Trump. That order was released by the court on Friday. —Brian Bennett

Biden declines to comment

President Joe Biden emphatically declined to comment on Friday about his predecessor’s indictment, in the first chance for the current president to address the ongoing case that has sent shockwaves across the country.

“I have no comment on Trump,” Biden said outside the White House after reporters asked multiple times about what Thursday’s indictment means for the rule of law in the U.S. When asked if he’s worried about protests or violence in the wake of the indictment, Biden responded: “No. I’m not going to talk about the Trump indictment.”

Jen Psaki, who was Biden’s former press secretary, said on MSNBC Thursday night that the White House is going to be “very quiet” about the Trump indictment for as long as it can “in part because as a policy they don’t comment on ongoing criminal investigations, but also because they don’t want to feed into the politics of this.” —Nik Popli

Pence calls indictment an ‘outrage’

Former Vice President Mike Pence defended his former running mate on Thursday night, describing the indictment against Trump as “an outrage” that will “only further serve to divide our country.”

“It appears to millions of Americans to be nothing more than a political prosecution,” the former vice president, whose relationship with Trump has been strained since the Jan. 6 Capitol attack, said on CNN. He also accused the Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg of having “literally ran” his campaign vowing to go after Trump, but noted that there is “no reason for calling for people to be protesting” the indictment, despite Trump’s previous statements.

Pence, who is weighing his own presidential bid, added that the case against Trump will have no bearing on his own decision about the 2024 race. He declined to say if Trump should be disqualified or drop out of the race if he is convicted. —NP

Catch up on the case

Trump Is About to Stress Test the Credibility of Our Judicial System

Trump’s Indictment Drama Showcased His Rivals’ Weakness

How Republicans Are Reacting to Donald Trump’s Indictment

Donald Trump Has Been Indicted. Here’s What Happens Next in the Process

Donald Trump Was Just Indicted. Here’s What to Know About the Charges and the Case

Donald Trump Is the First President Ever Criminally Charged. Others Have Come Close Though

Why This Indictment Can’t Stop Donald Trump From Being Elected President

Why Did the Stormy Daniels Case Lead to Trump’s First Indictment?

Alvin Bragg Did What He Had to Do In Indicting Trump

 

Here’s what happens next

Next, Trump will be arraigned in front of a magistrate judge, which usually happens at the courthouse in lower Manhattan. The Manhattan district attorney’s office has contacted Trump’s legal team to negotiate when he will surrender himself.

“This evening we contacted Mr. Trump’s attorney to coordinate his surrender to the Manhattan D.A.’s Office for arraignment on a Supreme Court indictment, which remains under seal,” a spokesperson for Bragg said in a statement. “Guidance will be provided when the arraignment date is selected.”

One of Trump’s lawyers, Susan R. Necheles, told TIME that former President Trump is expected to turn himself in on Tuesday to be arraigned in State Supreme Court in Manhattan.

At the initial hearing and arraignment, Trump will be told the charges against him, his rights, and have a chance to name his own lawyer to represent him, or use a court-appointed attorney.

Once he is arraigned, the judge will decide if he is a flight risk or presents a danger, or if he can be released until the trial. This sets in motion the legal process. At a later date, Trump will have a chance to plead guilty or not guilty to the charges. If Trump pleads not guilty, the court will hear pre-trial motions, and court dates will be set for discovery and a trial to begin.

If the preliminary proceedings take as long as other similar cases, the trial may not start until well into 2024, in the heat of the presidential election cycle.

Will Trump turn himself in?

It is expected. Trump’s lawyer Joe Tacopina has said previously that Trump would turn himself in if charged.

Trump’s lawyers are in contact with the Manhattan DA’s office and the offices are likely discussing terms under which Trump would appear in court to turn himself in to face the charges, rather than have to be arrested by law enforcement at his club in Palm Beach, Fla., or elsewhere.

Florida Governor Ron DeSantis, an expected Republican challenger to Trump in the 2024 election, said on Twitter Thursday that Florida “will not assist in an extradition request given the questionable circumstances.” DeSantis went on to defend Trump, describing the indictment as “un-American” and a “weaponization of the legal system to advance a political agenda.” (The Constitution requires if someone is charged with a crime in one state and flees to another that the person must be returned to the jurisdiction where they were charged if demanded by the governor of the state from which they fled.)

When could we know the charges?

Likely soon.

Trump’s indictment is currently under seal and not yet public. Usually the charges against a defendant are made public at the arraignment or slightly before. CNN, the New York Times, and CBS News Miami have each reported that sources tell them the indictment includes more than two dozen counts.

Once the indictment is made public, the country will be able to see exactly what charges Trump faces and a summary of some of the evidence Bragg says has been gathered to back up the charges.

The right-wing response so far: ‘Now it’s GAME ON’

On Thursday, many on the pro-Trump social media groups and forums that served as the staging grounds of the “Stop the Steal” rallies and the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol celebrated the indictment.

“I almost wanted this. Now it’s GAME ON,” one person wrote on a popular pro-Trump forum. “I know all of you are smart enough to know and see all this, but we need to rally behind him and show the left just how much this reinforces his popularity and electability,” another person wrote. “Get active at your local level and get vocal. Teflon Don.”

It was a shift from the tone from earlier in the month, after Trump announced on March 18 that his arrest was imminent. Despite Trump calling on his supporters to “PROTEST, PROTEST, PROTEST!!” to “save America,” few seemed to respond enthusiastically. The largest protest, organized in Manhattan, barely drew 50 people.

Online, many of Trump’s most loyal supporters largely agreed that it made no sense to organize any mass rallies or events, with many expressing anger at what they described as Trump’s “betrayal” of those who heeded his call on Jan. 6.

“Has he called for protests about these poor guys? No. But he’s calling for us to protest about his arrest,” another person wrote on a popular por-Trump forum. “It doesn’t sit right with me.” Another user agreed: “He’s right. Trump betrayed the J6 patriots.”

But on Thursday, some in Trump’s orbit continued to forcefully make the case that his indictment affected all of them.

“For those people who said, ‘It’s not real. Trump’s making it up. It’s not a real issue for us’….Just wait until they come for you,” his son Donald Trump Jr. said on a live videocast on the alternative streaming site Rumble.” We’re in a battle for our entire existence.”

Intelligence officials tracked an uptick in violent rhetoric after news of the possible indictment broke on March 18, with most threats targeting law enforcement, judges and government officials in New York, according to a CBS report. Multiple agencies have discussed potential security plans for the vicinity of the Manhattan Criminal Court.

—Vera Bergengruen

Here’s how Trump is responding

Trump is claiming that the prosecution against him is politically motivated in order to hurt his candidacy for President in 2024.

Trump responded to the grand jury’s vote to indict him Thursday in a statement: “This is Political Persecution and Election Interference at the highest level in history. From the time I came down the golden escalator at Trump Tower, and even before I was sworn in as your President of the United States, the Radical Left Democrats – the enemy of the hard-working men and women of this Country – have been engaged in a Witch-Hunt to destroy the Make America Great Again movement. You remember it just like I do: Russia, Russia, Russia; the Mueller Hoax; Ukraine, Ukraine, Ukraine; Impeachment Hoax 1; Impeachment Hoax 2; the illegal and unconstitutional Mar-a-Lago raid; and now this.”

His statement further claimed Bragg had indicted “a completely innocent person in an act of blatant Election Interference.”

He also went on a social media frenzy overnight on Thursday on Truth Social. “WHERE’S HUNTER?” he posted at around 3am. The post is a reference to President Joe Biden’s son Hunter who has long been a target of Trump. Hunter Biden has been under federal investigation since 2018 for tax payments and the Republicans have directed probes at him since they took control of the House in January.

Trump also called the indictment “Fake, Corrupt, and Disgraceful” as well as “an attack on our country” and “free and fair elections.”

“These Thugs and Radical Left Monsters have just INDICATED [sic] the 45th President of the United States of America, and the leading Republican Candidate, by far, for the 2024 Nomination for President,” Trump wrote.

 

ATTACHMENT SEVENTY EIGHTFrom Politico

YOUR QUESTIONS ABOUT THE TRUMP INDICTMENT, ANSWERED

How strong is the case? Can Trump continue campaigning? And when will he be brought to trial?

By JOSH GERSTEIN and KYLE CHENEY  03/30/2023 08:12 PM EDT

 

The unprecedented indictment of former President Donald Trump plunges the legal system into murky waters.

The Manhattan grand jury’s decision to charge Trump for his alleged involvement in a hush money scheme raises a bevy of questions about the soundness of the case, the logistics involved in forcing a former president into criminal court and the ramifications for other ongoing state and federal investigations of Trump.

Here’s POLITICO’s look at some of the key questions posed by the indictment.

What is Trump accused of?

While the precise charges are secret for now, prosecutors have concluded they can prove a criminal case against Trump because of the apparent subterfuge surrounding a $130,000 payment to adult-film actress Stormy Daniels to keep her from publicizing her claim about a sexual encounter with Trump. Trump’s lawyer Michael Cohen funded that payment through a home equity line of credit.

Trump insisted in April 2018 he did not know about the hush money, but Cohen provided Congress a series of check images, signed by Trump, reflecting payments to Cohen that he said were reimbursements for the money he laid out, including at least two that came while Trump was in the White House. Cohen said that Trump and his company concealed the purpose of the payments by falsely labeling them as legal expenses.

Under New York law, disguising such payments in corporate records is a crime, but typically only a misdemeanor. It becomes a felony if the false business records were intended to obscure a second crime. In this case, that second crime appears to be the use of the funds to advance Trump’s presidential campaign allegedly in violation of campaign finance laws.

Key figures in the Trump indictment

Here are some of the people involved as the case against former President Donald Trump moves forward.

Michael Cohen

Trump’s former attorney testified in 2018 that he made a hush-money payment on behalf of Trump.

Stormy Daniels

The porn actress is said to have received $130,000 for her silence about an affair with Trump.

Alvin Bragg

The Manhattan DA took office in January 2022 and inherited the investigation.

Allen Weisselberg

Prosecutors gave the ex-Trump Organization CFO immunity in their hush-money probe in 2018.

Joe Tacopina

A vocal member of Trump’s legal team, he began representing Trump earlier this year.

Susan Necheles

She is one of Trump’s lawyers who was on the defense team in the Trump Organization trial.

Robert Costello

Cohen’s former legal adviser cast aspersions on Cohen’s credibility before the grand jury.

Karen McDougal

The model is another woman who received “hush money” for her involvement with Trump.

David Pecker

The former National Enquirer CEO has been linked to Cohen’s efforts to pay off Daniels and McDougal.

 

The strongest evidence of such a link to politics may be the timing: After months of demands, the money was wired to Daniels’ lawyer on Oct. 27, 2016, just days before the 2016 presidential election.

What are the possible holes in the prosecution’s case?

It is difficult to assess the case against Trump without knowing the exact charges or all of the evidence that prosecutors have marshaled during an investigation that has lasted more than four years. But based on publicly available information, legal experts have identified several features of the case that may present stumbling blocks as prosecutors seek a guilty verdict.

For starters, Cohen is not the strongest possible witness for prosecutors. He’s provided a lot of the evidence and testimony needed to bring the case, which investigators have gone to great lengths to authenticate. But his credibility is open to challenge since he pleaded guilty in 2018 to nine felonies and was sentenced to three years in federal prison. He’s also repeatedly expressed extreme bitterness towards Trump, even running a podcast he titled “Mea Culpa,” an allusion to his regrets over his time as Trump’s ally.

The case also dates to 2016 and 2017, so it is more than five years old. Some of the delay can be readily explained — pressing a criminal case against Trump while he was in office would have been difficult and perhaps impossible. But it’s been more than two years now since Trump left the White House.

Trump could argue that prosecutors waited too long. New York’s statute of limitations for most felonies is five years, but there are some exceptions to that deadline, including if the person being charged was living out of state.

Another potential difficulty: Prosecutors may have to prove that Trump knew the arrangement was illegal. Trump could argue that he fairly assumed that Cohen, as an attorney, was executing the payments and related paperwork in a manner that was lawful.

Will Trump remain free? Can he campaign while under indictment? JOSH GERSTEIN and KYLE CHENEY 

That will be up to the state-court judge assigned to Trump’s case, but it seems unlikely that prosecutors would seek to detain the former president or restrict his travel in the U.S. while the case is pending. There is no legal impediment to him continuing his presidential campaign while facing criminal charges — or even if he were jailed.

If Trump won the presidency while facing charges or a conviction, the legalities become considerably more murky. There are serious constitutional questions about whether a state court could keep someone elected to federal office from serving.

How will the indictment affect the other ongoing Trump-focused investigations?

The short answer is: Not much. There’s no reason to think the indictment in Manhattan will influence the trajectory of several other probes that present an acute risk of more criminal charges for Trump. A grand jury in Fulton County, Ga., is examining his bid to overturn the election results in that state, and at the federal level, special counsel Jack Smith is leading twin probes into Trump’s role in the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol and his retention of government documents after his presidency.

Formally, a federal criminal case against Trump — if it were filed — would allow federal prosecutors to take precedence over any local case or cases.

Concurrent criminal proceedings against Trump would inevitably cause some logistical problems, but typically the feds and local prosecutors try to work out any conflicts.

How long will it take Trump to be brought to trial?

It will, by necessity, take many months to commence a trial of a former president of the United States. Even if both sides were eager to proceed to trial quickly, ironing out legal and constitutional questions would likely stretch out over the next year and into the 2024 primary season.

 DeSantis calls Trump indictment ‘un-American’ and says he won’t assist in extradition

1.    Manhattan’s DA wanted a Friday Trump arrest. Trump’s team said no.

2.    Secret Pence ruling breaks new ground for vice presidency

3.    ‘O.J. Simpson on steroids’: Team Trump preps for a post-indictment frenzy

4.    Trump indicted in porn star hush money payment case

Add to that Trump’s penchant — in nearly every legal matter he’s embroiled in — to seek to delay and prolong proceedings whenever possible.

Trump’s lawyers could try to move the case to federal court, arguing that at least some of the payments to Cohen took place while Trump was president and therefore a state court should have no authority to resolve the matter. Trump also could seek to move the trial to a different courthouse elsewhere in New York state. And he could try to have the indictment dismissed or reduced. All of these pre-trial motions will take time to resolve.

A criminal tax case the Manhattan district attorney’s office filed against the Trump Organization in the same court in 2021 took about 15 months to get to trial. A jury convicted two Trump companies on all 17 felony charges last December. The issues in the new case are narrower, but the focus on Trump personally seems certain to drag things out.

 

FRIDAY

 

ATTACHMENT SEVENTY NINEFrom the Guardian U.K.

‘HE IS A BAD-ASS’: FOX NEWS MAKES AMENDS WITH TRUMP AS HE FACES INDICTMENT

The relationship between the former president and the network had cooled but Fox offered a full-throated defence of Trump on Thursday night

By Jonathan Yerushalmy Fri 31 Mar 2023 00.01 EDT

 

A breaking news graphic rushes across the screen, as flashing amber lights illuminate the words: “Fox News alert”.

“We have just gotten word that former president Donald Trump has been indicted,” the host begins, while a stunned gasp is audible from off-camera.

“What?” asks another incredulous voice, as the presenter explains to Fox News’ afternoon audience that the former president will be charged in relation to an alleged “hush money payment to adult film star Stormy Daniels”.

In the moments after the news broke, the network’s hosts and commentators took some time to digest the information. After reporting for weeks that Trump’s indictment was imminent, the news – when it did arrive – seemed to take Fox’s panel of experts by surprise.

 

          Now we know: in Trump’s fantasy comeback, he’ll be wearing handcuffs

 

“I feel bad for the guy … now they’re trying to nickel-and-dime him for a private agreement he made with a woman eight years ago,” host Jesse Watters says.

But if the network’s initial reaction was one of shock, even uncertainty, what quickly followed was more akin to the bellicose confidence that its viewership has come to expect.

By the time Watters was back on air with his own show, he was telling his prime-time audience that America was now in a “a revenge political climate”.

“When Trump wins back the White House, he needs to start looking into Democrats,” Watters’ guest, Mike Davis, told him.

“Potentially you could have a former president behind bars. The only way you can get a free Trump is to elect a free Trump,” Davis added.

‘Hunting Trump, destroying America’

Fox news has long been friendly to the former president, but has had a more complicated relationship with him recently. Until this week, Trump had been absent from the network for months, the victim of an apparent shadow-ban by senior management.

A closely watched legal battle between the network and voting machine company Dominion was thought to be behind the apparent schism. Evidence put forward in that case revealed what many at the top of Fox truly think of Trump, driving a wedge between the former president and the network that helped to catapult him into the White House.

Why did a grand jury vote to indict Trump and what does it mean for him?

 

Private messages, presented as evidence in the $1.6bn case, showed that even as they went on the air to cast doubt over the results of the 2020 election, many Fox News personalities privately doubted Trump’s claims.

“He’s acting like an insane person,” Sean Hannity, one of the network’s best-known personalities, allegedly said of Trump. Fox News’ owner, Rupert Murdoch, said several of the network’s top stars “endorsed” Trump’s false claims, and later added: “I would have liked us to be stronger in denouncing it in hindsight,” according to a deposition in the case.

But any lasting animosity between two of the most powerful forces of the American right appeared to have disappeared by Thursday night.

Across the network’s coverage, Trump’s indictment was variously characterised as revenge, political overreach and, perhaps most significantly, a boon to his chances of securing the presidency again in 2024.

“He is a bad-ass if he’s got a mug-shot … his poll numbers have gone up with this and I just think this is gonna make sure he’s going to be on the ticket,” one commentator said in the moments after the news broke.

By the time Tucker Carlson, one of the networks most popular personalities, came on air, the question had shifted: how to respond?

Carlson – who once told an associate that he passionately hates Trump, according to evidence in the Dominion case – described the indictment as a turning point for America. He offered up a potted history of Trump’s presidency, a history that he adorned throughout with conspiracy theories, calls for the FBI to be defunded and parallel narratives of the former president’s two impeachments. From the start, he said, “Washington elites” had been working to stop Trump becoming president again.

Trump’s indictment will probably hurt him with the electorate. But how much?

 

Throughout his interviews with fellow analysts, a potential Republican rival and Trump’s attorney, Carlson continued to return to the question of how Americans should react.

“The rule of law is suspended tonight,” Carlson announced gravely. “What you’re seeing now is lawlessness – the question is who can stop it?

“It almost feels like they’re pushing the population,” he mused at one point.

Carlson seemed to finally get the answer he was searching for from sports commentator Jason Whitlock: “They are agitating for unrest … I’m ready for whatever’s next. And I hope that every other man watching this is ready for whatever’s next.”

Throughout the evening, the charges against Trump were framed as a direct attack on Americans themselves. Laura Ingraham came to air accompanied by a banner that declared: “Hunting Trump, destroying America”.

Evidence presented in Dominion’s defamation lawsuit showed that many Fox News hosts did not believe Trump’s claims of a stolen election which they pushed on air. But while these depositions suggest that many at the very top of Fox News were more than ready to break with Trump for good, his indictment proves that this will be difficult for the network to accomplish.

“It’s a toxic relationship,” Michael Steele, former chairman of the Republican National Committee, said earlier this month.

“They are good and bad for each other at the same time … Fox can’t do without Trump and Trump ultimately can’t do without Fox because he knows, at the end of the day, that’s the media vehicle through which he will be able to reach the widest audience of his supporters.”

 

ATTACHMENT EIGHTY – From the Guardian U,K.

AFTER INDICTMENT, TRUMP WILL PLAY THE VICTIM – AND THE TACTIC WILL WORK FOR MANY REPUBLICANS

Trump has followed a pattern since 2016 – the bigger the alleged crime, the louder he airs grievances and claims he’s being persecuted

By David Smith in Washington  Fri 31 Mar 2023 01.00 EDT

 

The comedian Chris Rock gazed out at the audience at an awards ceremony in Washington earlier this month. “Are you guys really going to arrest Trump?” he asked bluntly. “This is only going to make him more popular!”

Donald Trump has not yet been arrested but is now the first person to occupy the Oval Office to then be charged with a crime. It also raises the prospect of the Republican favorite for the 2024 presidential race to be running for the White House while also being criminally prosecuted – something likely to bring even more chaos to America’s already deeply fractured political landscape.

It emerged on Thursday that a Manhattan grand jury has voted to indict Trump over a hush money payment to the adult film star Stormy Daniels during the 2016 presidential election campaign.

Florida-based Trump is now expected to surrender himself on Tuesday to the Manhattan district attorney (DA) to be fingerprinted and photographed for a mugshot – something guaranteed to delight his many opponents, appall his fans and divide the United States even more.

30 March 2023 is therefore a day for the history books. It offered an affirmation of the Magna Carta principle that no one, not even the onetime commander in chief, is above the law. The 45th president of the United States is set to stand trial and, if convicted, could find himself behind bars instead of running for re-election.

Presidential historian Michael Beschloss said on the MSNBC network: “Tomorrow, in terms of American history, we will be waking up in a different country. Before tonight, presidents in this country were kings.”

But while the law is clear, the politics are murky. A criminal charge or even conviction does not prevent someone running for the White House, and Trump is currently leading in opinion polls for the 2024 Republican presidential primary.

In the pre-Trump universe, an indictment over a hush money payment to an adult film star would have been career-ending. Candidates have withdrawn from election races for much less.

But since 2016, Trump has been a political judo master, turning the weight of opponents and allegations against them to his own advantage. The bigger the alleged crime, the louder he airs grievances and the more he plays the victim – and so far the Republican party has been mostly willing to indulge him.

That is the role he will play with an indictment hanging over him. At a campaign rally in Waco, Texas, last weekend, he claimed: “The Biden regime’s weaponization of law enforcement against their political opponents is something straight out of the Stalinist Russia horror show.” He suggested that it is the most serious problem facing America today.

In a statement on Thursday following his indictment, Trump said: “This is Political Persecution and Election Interference at the highest level in history… The Democrats have lied, cheated and stolen in their obsession with trying to ‘Get Trump,’ but now they’ve done the unthinkable - indicting a completely innocent person in an act of blatant Election Interference.”

Trump will now doubtless set about putting the Manhattan district attorney, Alvin Bragg, on trial in the court of public opinion. He has already used dehumanising and racist language. A social media post, later removed, showed a photo of Trump holding a baseball bat and apparently looming over Bragg, raising fears of violence against him.

The bigger the alleged crime, the louder he airs grievances and the more he plays the victim – and so far the Republican party has been mostly willing to indulge him.

That is the role he will play with an indictment hanging over him. At a campaign rally in Waco, Texas, last weekend, he claimed: “The Biden regime’s weaponization of law enforcement against their political opponents is something straight out of the Stalinist Russia horror show.” He suggested that it is the most serious problem facing America today.

America’s tragedy is that the tactic will work with many Republicans. That Bragg is a Democrat from New York will trigger a Pavlovian response in Trump’s favor. That the case is seven years old, based on an untested legal theory and has Michael Cohen, a convicted criminal, as a key witness will provide further ammunition.  Maybe DT is even right!

This pattern came into a focus earlier this month when Trump falsely predicted his own arrest. Republicans leaped to his defence and he reportedly raised $1.5m in three days; on Thursday night he quickly sent out another fundraising email.

The drama put Trump back where he wants to be: at the centre of the news cycle. Not coincidentally, it also gave him a boost in the Republican primary polls, extending a lead over Ron DeSantis, even as the Florida governor was on a book tour trying to promote his own brand. Everyone was talking about Trump.

 

So it was that, after news of the indictment emerged on Thursday, Republicans again came to his aid. Trump ally Kevin McCarthy, the speaker of the House of Representatives, accused Bragg of “irreparably” damaging the country “in an attempt to interfere” in the election.

JD Vance, a Republican senator for Ohio, described the indictment as “political persecution masquerading as law”, “blatant election interference” and “a direct assault on the tens of millions of Americans who support him”.

But the most telling reaction came from DeSantis himself. This could have been the moment for him to break from Trump and prove statesmanlike, calling for dignity and unity in a solemn moment for the nation. Instead he went full Maga.

DeSantis said: “The weaponization of the legal system to advance a political agenda turns the rule of law on its head. It is un-American.” Blowing an antisemitic dog whistle, DeSantis twice linked Bragg to philanthropist George Soros, adding that Florida would not assist in “an extradition request” to send Trump to New York.

The spineless responses suggested that, in the short term at least, the indictment will provide a rallying cry for Trump and help rather than hurt him in the 2024 Republican primary. In the for-us-or-against-us binary of American politics, the party base will be for him and against the perceived Democratic elites and the deep state.

Yet again, he has thrust America into the political unknown, a twilight zone where precedents do not apply and everyone has to respond on the fly. Can the Manhattan court assemble an impartial jury, and will the timing of the trial collide with the Republican primary?

Then, what about the other major legal perils threatening Trump: over the January 6 insurrection, over election interference in Georgia and over the mishandling of classified documents? These cases are arguably more clear-cut and consequential – but not necessarily in the eyes of Republicans. Will he recklessly incite unrest among his supporters?

The lesson of the Trump era is that most predictions are wrong. The only certainty is that Thursday will go down as the day when Trump’s age of impunity, in which he was never legally held to account, is over. The man who rose to power leading chants of “Lock her up!” is about to get a taste of his own medicine.

 

ATTACHMENT EIGHTY ONEAlso from GUK

NEWS OF INDICTMENT CATCHES TRUMP AND HIS TEAM OFF GUARD

Sources say ex-president and aides believed prosecutors were reconsidering action and were taken by surprise by announcement

By Hugo Lowell  Fri 31 Mar 2023 02.30 EDT (7:40 GMT)

 

Donald Trump and his top advisers were caught flat-footed by the news of his indictment by the Manhattan grand jury over hush money payments to the adult film star Stormy Daniels, having expected no charges until at least the end of April and potentially never at all.

The former president reckoned – along with his aides – that recent reporting about the grand jury taking a break from next week meant prosecutors in the district attorney’s office were reconsidering whether to seek an indictment over the matter.

But that optimism proved to be misplaced when Trump was alerted at Mar-a-Lago to the indictment by his advisers, some of whom had decided to return to Washington after growing tired of waiting with him for several weeks for charges to materialize.

The former president issued a pugilistic statement in response to the news and lashed out at the prosecution as political and an effort to hurt his 2024 presidential campaign, before appearing for dinner as usual alongside the other guests at this Florida resort.

But in private, Trump was more subdued as he took in the significance of becoming the first sitting or former president to be charged and the changed reality of operating under the threat of an eventual criminal trial, several sources close to him said.

The private response showed that for all his outward bravado – including claims that he wanted to be arrested and handcuffed for a “perp walk” because he wanted to project defiance if he was ever indicted – deep down, Trump has always feared the prospect of being criminally charged and its consequences.

The charges remain sealed, but are expected to touch on $130,000 that Trump made to Daniels through his then lawyer Michael Cohen in the final days of the 2016 elections campaign. Trump later reimbursed Cohen with $35,000 checks, and Cohen pleaded guilty in 2018 to federal charges over the money.

Trump’s mood towards the hush money investigation has fluctuated in recent weeks – from criticising the prospect of criminal charges, to growing impatient and insisting they should charge him already, and then going back to attacking the investigation with vehemence.

After the first rally of his 2024 campaign in Texas, Trump told an NBC News reporter he was not frustrated by the case despite appearing quite frustrated.

“I’m not frustrated by it. It’s a fake investigation,” Trump said. “This is fake news, and NBC is one of the worst. Don’t ask me any more questions.”

Trump became more optimistic this week, believing – based on no actual evidence – that reports about the grand jury taking a break for most of April could mean the district attorney was having doubts about prosecuting the hush money case and that it was “all over”.

 

Some of Trump’s advisers took that as an opportunity to get out of Palm Beach, where they had been waiting with him for weeks for an indictment to arrive.

Shortly after 5pm on Thursday, his 2024 campaign advisers learned from a New York Times alert that Trump had been indicted, catching them off guard in part because they assumed they would hear about it first from the Trump lawyers, who had themselves assumed they would confidentially hear it first from prosecutors.

Though Trump had indicated that he expected to be one of the first people to be told if he was charged in the hush money case, the sources said, when the news actually arrived, Trump appears to have been one of the very last people to find out.

 

 

ATTACHMENT EIGHTY TWOAnd Also, from the Guardian U.K.

HUSH MONEY TO A PORN STAR: OF COURSE THIS WAS HOW TRUMP WAS INDICTED

This isn’t the Trump indictment we wanted, but it might be the one we deserve

 

By Moira Donegan  Fri 31 Mar 2023 06.11 EDT

Stormy Daniels didn’t seem to know what she had. In 2011, when The Apprentice was still getting decent ratings and Donald Trump had drawn attention to himself for racist claims about the birthplace of Barack Obama, Daniels – also known as Stephanie Clifford – started asking around to see who she could sell her story to. Daniels, for years a successful porn performer, had met Trump at a celebrity golf tournament in 2006. According to her, he invited her to his hotel room, offered her work on his TV show and then had sex with her. The two remained friendly afterwards; Trump invited Daniels to the launch of his Trump Vodka brand the following year. It’s the kind of thing you suspect that these two people would have written off as a funny story. Instead, it’s the impetus for one of the most politically volatile prosecutions in the nation’s history: the first criminal indictment of a former president, which was issued on Thursday by a federal grand jury in New York.

Stormy Daniels and the illegal, fraudulent machinations that the Trump campaign allegedly undertook to pay her off during the height of the presidential campaign in 2016 have always struck me as the most quintessential of Trump’s many scandals. Trump denies Daniels’ allegations, but in retrospect, with the hindsight of what we’ve come to learn of him, the scene she recounts is almost unbearably true to his character: the gathering of low-rent celebrities, the paltry quid pro quo, the golf, and the sad, adolescent fantasy of sex with a porn star. The whole story drips with Trump’s defining attribute: the desperate and insatiable need to have his ego gratified. Which is why to me, at least, it seems obvious that Daniels is telling the truth.

The whole story drips with Trump’s defining attribute: the desperate and insatiable need to have his ego gratified

Back then, she offered the interview about it to Life & Style magazine. The piece never ran, but they paid her $15,000. It’s not a lot of money, when you put it in the context of what has happened since, but Daniels seems to have made the same assumption that the rest of us did: that Trump would remain on the C-list, making needful and desperate bids for the attention of the tabloids. Back then, you’d have to have been crazy to think that he could have been president.

When it became clear that he might be, Daniels did what any savvy businesswoman would have done: she upped her price. After the Access Hollywood tape broke in October of 2016, Trump’s treatment of women – his leering use of them as props for his ego, his boorish demonstrations of virility for the benefit of other men and, suddenly, a flow of uncannily similar allegations of harassment and assault – gave Daniels another opening.

She approached the National Enquirer, which tipped off the Trump campaign. Michael Cohen, Trump’s sweaty and exhausted lawyer and fixer, offered to pay her $130,000 to shut up and go away, which Daniels was happy to accept. Cohen fronted the money himself; initially, he seems to have taken out a line of credit on his own house. Why go through this labyrinthine route? Why have the lawyer pay personally – an unusual and inappropriate arrangement – especially in an amount that was large for Michael Cohen but should have been small for his alleged billionaire of a boss?

The theory of the case, and the one that has always been most plausible, is that Cohen, and not Trump, initially paid Daniels off because if Trump had paid her, that payment would have been subject to scrutiny – from campaign finance regulators and from the public. And in the waning days of what was a chaotic and flailing election, this was scrutiny that the Trump campaign could not afford.

The Stormy Daniels affair is not the most serious of Trump’s alleged crimes, and so it can seem anticlimactic, and even a little ridiculous, that this is the only bit of his wrongdoing that he has been indicted for. A grand jury in Georgia is investigating a phone call he made to the secretary of state there in the wake of the 2020 election, seemingly imploring the official, Brad Raffensperger, to facilitate election fraud in his favor; at the justice department, a series of investigations into the January 6 riot, which disrupted the transfer of power and left five people dead, are proceeding at a glacial pace. He was impeached for it; he was also impeached for holding military aid to Ukraine hostage so he could try to dig up dirt on Joe Biden’s son.

Trump’s criminality and corruption are so profligate and unconcealed that previous failures to charge him seemed manifestly a result of fear

Trump also seems to have taken dozens or hundreds of classified documents with him to his tacky resort at Mar-a-Lago, throwing them into boxes like someone stuffing their pockets with tiny shampoo bottles before they leave a fancy hotel. But none of that is what he’s being held accountable for: he’s being held to account for trying to launder his hush money to a porn star.

Trump will no doubt claim that the indictment against him on these comparatively trivial grounds is politically motivated, and he’s already got some support from Democrats in making that claim. David Axelrod, the former Obama strategist, characterized the Daniels charges, not unreasonably, as the “least meaningful” of Trump’s offenses. “If he’s going to be indicted in any of these probes, this [is] the one he probably would want first to try and color all of them as politically motivated.”

But if anything, what seems politically motivated is the fact that Trump has not been indicted on criminal charges already: his criminality and corruption are so profligate and unconcealed that the failure to charge him – a failure which until Thursday was unanimous among prosecutors across the country – seemed manifestly a result of fear. “No one is above the law” is something prosecutors like to say a lot; but the large-scale impunity for the rich and powerful indicates that they don’t quite believe it.

Now that’s changed, at least in a small way. It’s yet to be seen whether any other prosecutors will discover the courage to charge Trump. For now, he’s only been charged on the stupidest and lowest matter possible. Maybe that’s appropriate: Trump the man always seemed a little too small and stupid, his effect on history dramatically outsized to the banality of his character. This isn’t the Trump indictment we wanted, but it might be the one we deserve.

·         Moira Donegan is a Guardian US columnist

 

ATTACHMENT EIGHTY THREEFrom Reuters

TRUMP TO FACE CRIMINAL CHARGES IN STORMY DANIELS HUSH MONEY PROBE

By Karen FreifeldLuc Cohen and Tyler Clifford

 

NEW YORK, March 31 (Reuters) - Donald Trump is due to be fingerprinted and photographed in a New York courthouse next week as he becomes the first former U.S. president to face criminal charges in a case involving a 2016 hush money payment to porn star Stormy Daniels.

Trump's expected appearance before a judge in Manhattan on Tuesday, as the Republican mounts a bid to regain the presidency, could further inflame divisions in the United States. A New York judge on Friday authorized Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, a Democrat, to make the charges public, but it was not clear when he would do so.

For nearly two weeks, Trump has been using the various legal threats he confronts to raise money and rally supporters as he seeks his party's nomination to challenge Democratic President Joe Biden next year.

The first U.S. president to try to overthrow an election defeat, inspiring the deadly 2021 assault on the U.S. Capitol, has signaled he will continue to campaign even as he faces charges.

"I am not afraid of what's to come," Trump said in a fundraising email on Friday.

Trump has called himself "completely innocent."

Biden, who defeated Trump in 2020, on Friday declined to comment on the indictment as he left the White House for a trip to storm-ravaged Mississippi.

After word surfaced on Thursday that Trump had been indicted by a Manhattan grand jury, he called himself the victim of political persecution.

The specific charges are not yet known, though CNN reported that Trump faced more than 30 counts related to business fraud.

Susan Necheles, a Trump attorney, told Reuters he will plead not guilty.

Another Trump lawyer, Joseph Tacopina, said Trump will not have to wear handcuffs at his court appearance and will likely be released without having to post bail.

"He's ready to fight. He's gearing up," Tacopina said in a phone interview.

The charges will likely be unsealed by a judge in the coming days and Trump will have to travel to Manhattan for the court appearance expected on Tuesday. Necheles said she did not expect charges to be unsealed until that day.

Any potential trial is still at least more than a year away, legal experts said, meaning it could occur during or after the 2024 presidential campaign.

PARTISAN BRAWL

Trump, 76, has accused Bragg of trying to damage his electoral chances. Trump's claims have been echoed by many of his fellow Republicans and his potential rivals in the race for the party's presidential nomination.

Mike Pence, Trump's former vice president and a possible 2024 candidate, said the charges send a "terrible message" to the world about U.S. justice.

"I'm very troubled by it," Pence said at a forum in Washington.

Ahead of the indictment, the grand jury heard months of evidence about a $130,000 payment to Daniels in the waning days of the 2016 presidential campaign. Daniels has said she was paid to keep silent about a sexual encounter she had with Trump in 2006.

"It's vindication," Daniels told the Times of London. "He's done so much worse that he should have been taken down (for) before."

Senior House of Representatives Republicans have vowed to investigate Bragg and demanded he hand over documents and other confidential material from the investigation. Bragg said Congress does not have authority to interfere with a New York legal proceeding and accused the lawmakers of escalating political tensions. Bragg's office has been the target of bomb threats in recent weeks. Hypocrisy?

"You and many of your colleagues have chosen to collaborate with Mr. Trump's efforts to vilify and denigrate the integrity of elected state prosecutors and trial judges," Bragg wrote in a letter to Republican lawmakers.

Aside from this case, Trump faces two federal criminal investigations into his efforts to overturn his 2020 election defeat and his handling of classified documents after leaving office. Trump also faces a separate Georgia investigation into his efforts to overturn his 2020 loss in that state.

SECURITY HIGH

Officials have stepped up security around the courthouse in New York since Trump on March 18 called on his supporters to protest any arrest. A law enforcement source said police would close streets around the courthouse ahead of Tuesday's expected appearance.

On Friday, media outlets were set up outside the courthouse but there was no sign of unrest or protests related to the case.

Trump appealed earlier this month for nationwide protests, recalling his charged rhetoric ahead of the Jan. 6, 2021, U.S. Capitol attack, and warned last week of potential "death & destruction" if he were charged.

Outside Trump's Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida, a small group of people waved "Trump Nation" flags and cheered as cars passed by.

"I think he's going to get more votes now because people will maybe wake up," said Eve Knapp, a Trump supporter.

Merchandise vendor Ronald Solomon said sales of Trump-themed hats and t-shirts were up sharply after the charges were announced.

Some 44% of Republicans said Trump should drop out of the race if he is indicted, according to a Reuters/Ipsos poll released last week.

LEGAL PERIL

Trump has escaped legal peril numerous times since the 1970s, when he joined his family's real estate business.

In the White House, he weathered an investigation into his 2016 campaign's contacts with Russia and two attempts in Congress to remove him from office.

Bragg's office prosecuted Trump's business on tax-fraud charges last year, leading to a $1.61 million criminal penalty, but Trump himself was not charged.

The presiding judge in that case, New York Supreme Court Justice Juan Merchan, is expected to oversee the Daniels case as well, according to a person familiar with the matter.

Some legal experts have said Bragg might have to rely on untested legal theories to argue that Trump falsified business records to cover up other crimes, such as violating federal campaign-finance law.

The former president's personal lawyer Michael Cohen has said he coordinated with Trump on the payments to Daniels and to a second woman, former Playboy model Karen McDougal. Trump has denied having had sexual relationships with either woman, but has acknowledged reimbursing Cohen.

Cohen pleaded guilty to a campaign-finance violation in 2018 and served more than a year in prison. Federal prosecutors said he acted at Trump's direction.

Additional reporting by Tim Reid, Alexandra Ulmer, Doina Chiacu and Katharine Jackson; Writing by Andy Sullivan; Editing by Scott Malone, Will Dunham, Chizu Nomiyama and Daniel Wallis

 

ATTACHMENT EIGHTY FOURFrom Time

Former President Expected to Turn Himself In: Latest Updates on Trump’s Indictment

Trump Rallied Supporters in Waco Ahead of Possible Indictment

BY BRIAN BENNETT AND TIME STAFF

 

UPDATED: MARCH 31, 2023 3:43 PM EDT | ORIGINALLY PUBLISHED: MARCH 30, 2023 7:30 PM EDT

Former President Donald Trump was criminally indicted on Thursday by a Manhattan grand jury. While the exact charges are still under seal and will likely remain so until next week, they relate to the payment of hush money to a former porn star.

Multiple outlets are reporting, citing unnamed sources, that the charges involve more than two dozen counts.

Americans React to News of Donald Trump's Impending Indictment

POSTED 4 HOURS AGO

The office of Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg announced Thursday evening that it had reached out to Trump’s team to discuss an arraignment date. One of Trump’s attorneys told TIME that the former President is expected to turn himself in on Tuesday.

Trump called the indictment “political persecution” in a statement, attacking Bragg as a “disgrace” and predicting the decision would hurt Democrats in the 2024 election.

The indictment marks the first time in American history that a former President has been criminally charged, and sets up a stunning legal and political test for the nation as Trump once again seeks the presidency.

Here are the latest updates on the indictment.

Trump attacks the judge assigned to his case

Trump is taking aim at the judge he said is assigned to preside over his arraignment, Juan Merchan, who is an acting justice with the State Supreme Court.

The New York-based judge, Trump wrote without evidence, “hates me,” in a post on his social media site TruthSocial. Trump, who misspelled the judge’s name, wrote that Merchan “was hand picked by Bragg & the Prosecutors, & is the same person who ‘railroaded’ my 75 year old former CFO, Allen Weisselberg, to take a ‘plea’ deal.” Along with handling the case against the Trump organization executive, Merchan also presided over a case in which he ordered the Trump Foundation to pay $1.6 million after a jury found the organization guilty of criminal tax fraud. Alvin Bragg, the current Manhattan District Attorney, was a prosecutor involved in that case.

Justice Merchan’s signature is on an official order that allowed Bragg to tell the public on Thursday that the grand jury had voted to indict Trump. That order was released by the court on Friday. —Brian Bennett

Biden declines to comment

President Joe Biden emphatically declined to comment on Friday about his predecessor’s indictment, in the first chance for the current president to address the ongoing case that has sent shockwaves across the country.

“I have no comment on Trump,” Biden said outside the White House after reporters asked multiple times about what Thursday’s indictment means for the rule of law in the U.S. When asked if he’s worried about protests or violence in the wake of the indictment, Biden responded: “No. I’m not going to talk about the Trump indictment.”

Jen Psaki, who was Biden’s former press secretary, said on MSNBC Thursday night that the White House is going to be “very quiet” about the Trump indictment for as long as it can “in part because as a policy they don’t comment on ongoing criminal investigations, but also because they don’t want to feed into the politics of this.” —Nik Popli

Pence calls indictment an ‘outrage’

Former Vice President Mike Pence defended his former running mate on Thursday night, describing the indictment against Trump as “an outrage” that will “only further serve to divide our country.”

“It appears to millions of Americans to be nothing more than a political prosecution,” the former vice president, whose relationship with Trump has been strained since the Jan. 6 Capitol attack, said on CNN. He also accused the Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg of having “literally ran” his campaign vowing to go after Trump, but noted that there is “no reason for calling for people to be protesting” the indictment, despite Trump’s previous statements.

Pence, who is weighing his own presidential bid, added that the case against Trump will have no bearing on his own decision about the 2024 race. He declined to say if Trump should be disqualified or drop out of the race if he is convicted. —NP

Catch up on the case

Trump Is About to Stress Test the Credibility of Our Judicial System

Trump’s Indictment Drama Showcased His Rivals’ Weakness

How Republicans Are Reacting to Donald Trump’s Indictment

Donald Trump Has Been Indicted. Here’s What Happens Next in the Process

Donald Trump Was Just Indicted. Here’s What to Know About the Charges and the Case

Donald Trump Is the First President Ever Criminally Charged. Others Have Come Close Though

Why This Indictment Can’t Stop Donald Trump From Being Elected President

Why Did the Stormy Daniels Case Lead to Trump’s First Indictment?

Alvin Bragg Did What He Had to Do In Indicting Trump

 

Here’s what happens next

Next, Trump will be arraigned in front of a magistrate judge, which usually happens at the courthouse in lower Manhattan. The Manhattan district attorney’s office has contacted Trump’s legal team to negotiate when he will surrender himself.

“This evening we contacted Mr. Trump’s attorney to coordinate his surrender to the Manhattan D.A.’s Office for arraignment on a Supreme Court indictment, which remains under seal,” a spokesperson for Bragg said in a statement. “Guidance will be provided when the arraignment date is selected.”

One of Trump’s lawyers, Susan R. Necheles, told TIME that former President Trump is expected to turn himself in on Tuesday to be arraigned in State Supreme Court in Manhattan.

At the initial hearing and arraignment, Trump will be told the charges against him, his rights, and have a chance to name his own lawyer to represent him, or use a court-appointed attorney.

Once he is arraigned, the judge will decide if he is a flight risk or presents a danger, or if he can be released until the trial. This sets in motion the legal process. At a later date, Trump will have a chance to plead guilty or not guilty to the charges. If Trump pleads not guilty, the court will hear pre-trial motions, and court dates will be set for discovery and a trial to begin.

If the preliminary proceedings take as long as other similar cases, the trial may not start until well into 2024, in the heat of the presidential election cycle.

Will Trump turn himself in?

It is expected. Trump’s lawyer Joe Tacopina has said previously that Trump would turn himself in if charged.

Trump’s lawyers are in contact with the Manhattan DA’s office and the offices are likely discussing terms under which Trump would appear in court to turn himself in to face the charges, rather than have to be arrested by law enforcement at his club in Palm Beach, Fla., or elsewhere.

Florida Governor Ron DeSantis, an expected Republican challenger to Trump in the 2024 election, said on Twitter Thursday that Florida “will not assist in an extradition request given the questionable circumstances.” DeSantis went on to defend Trump, describing the indictment as “un-American” and a “weaponization of the legal system to advance a political agenda.” (The Constitution requires if someone is charged with a crime in one state and flees to another that the person must be returned to the jurisdiction where they were charged if demanded by the governor of the state from which they fled.)

When could we know the charges?

Likely soon.

Trump’s indictment is currently under seal and not yet public. Usually the charges against a defendant are made public at the arraignment or slightly before. CNN, the New York Times, and CBS News Miami have each reported that sources tell them the indictment includes more than two dozen counts.

Once the indictment is made public, the country will be able to see exactly what charges Trump faces and a summary of some of the evidence Bragg says has been gathered to back up the charges.

The right-wing response so far: ‘Now it’s GAME ON’

On Thursday, many on the pro-Trump social media groups and forums that served as the staging grounds of the “Stop the Steal” rallies and the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol celebrated the indictment.

“I almost wanted this. Now it’s GAME ON,” one person wrote on a popular pro-Trump forum. “I know all of you are smart enough to know and see all this, but we need to rally behind him and show the left just how much this reinforces his popularity and electability,” another person wrote. “Get active at your local level and get vocal. Teflon Don.”

It was a shift from the tone from earlier in the month, after Trump announced on March 18 that his arrest was imminent. Despite Trump calling on his supporters to “PROTEST, PROTEST, PROTEST!!” to “save America,” few seemed to respond enthusiastically. The largest protest, organized in Manhattan, barely drew 50 people.

Online, many of Trump’s most loyal supporters largely agreed that it made no sense to organize any mass rallies or events, with many expressing anger at what they described as Trump’s “betrayal” of those who heeded his call on Jan. 6.

“Has he called for protests about these poor guys? No. But he’s calling for us to protest about his arrest,” another person wrote on a popular por-Trump forum. “It doesn’t sit right with me.” Another user agreed: “He’s right. Trump betrayed the J6 patriots.”

But on Thursday, some in Trump’s orbit continued to forcefully make the case that his indictment affected all of them.

“For those people who said, ‘It’s not real. Trump’s making it up. It’s not a real issue for us’….Just wait until they come for you,” his son Donald Trump Jr. said on a live videocast on the alternative streaming site Rumble.” We’re in a battle for our entire existence.”

Intelligence officials tracked an uptick in violent rhetoric after news of the possible indictment broke on March 18, with most threats targeting law enforcement, judges and government officials in New York, according to a CBS report. Multiple agencies have discussed potential security plans for the vicinity of the Manhattan Criminal Court.

—Vera Bergengruen

Here’s how Trump is responding

Trump is claiming that the prosecution against him is politically motivated in order to hurt his candidacy for President in 2024.

Trump responded to the grand jury’s vote to indict him Thursday in a statement: “This is Political Persecution and Election Interference at the highest level in history. From the time I came down the golden escalator at Trump Tower, and even before I was sworn in as your President of the United States, the Radical Left Democrats – the enemy of the hard-working men and women of this Country – have been engaged in a Witch-Hunt to destroy the Make America Great Again movement. You remember it just like I do: Russia, Russia, Russia; the Mueller Hoax; Ukraine, Ukraine, Ukraine; Impeachment Hoax 1; Impeachment Hoax 2; the illegal and unconstitutional Mar-a-Lago raid; and now this.”

His statement further claimed Bragg had indicted “a completely innocent person in an act of blatant Election Interference.”

He also went on a social media frenzy overnight on Thursday on Truth Social. “WHERE’S HUNTER?” he posted at around 3am. The post is a reference to President Joe Biden’s son Hunter who has long been a target of Trump. Hunter Biden has been under federal investigation since 2018 for tax payments and the Republicans have directed probes at him since they took control of the House in January.

Trump also called the indictment “Fake, Corrupt, and Disgraceful” as well as “an attack on our country” and “free and fair elections.”

“These Thugs and Radical Left Monsters have just INDICATED [sic] the 45th President of the United States of America, and the leading Republican Candidate, by far, for the 2024 Nomination for President,” Trump wrote.

 

ATTACHMENT EIGHTY FIVEFrom the Washington Times

 

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia on Friday said she will go to New York to protest former President Donald Trump’s indictment on charges tied to a probe into hush payments for porn star Stormy Daniels.

Ms. Greene, a Republican and staunch ally of the ex-president, announced her plans on Twitter ahead of Mr. Trump’s arraignment in Manhattan, likely on Tuesday.

“I’m going to New York on Tuesday,” she wrote. “We MUST protest the unconstitutional WITCH HUNT!”

Ms. Greene is among those who believe the indictment handed up by the grand jury is the result of a political hit job by Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg.

Mr. Trump had called on people to protest his pending indictment, though others have pushed for calm.

 “I don’t think people should protest this, no,” House Speaker Kevin McCarthy said last month at a GOP retreat in Orlando, Florida. “We want calmness out there.”

Mr. Trump is the first president to be indicted on criminal charges.

His court appearance will likely be a tightly controlled affair involving the Secret Service.

Mr. Trump’s lawyer, Joe Tacopina, told Newsmax they are working out the arrangements with Mr. Bragg’s office.

.

 

ATTACHMENT EIGHTY SIXFrom the New York Times

LIVE UPDATES: TRUMP LIKELY TO BE ARRAIGNED ON TUESDAY

The charges against Donald J. Trump will be formally unsealed when he is arraigned. He is the first former U.S. president to be a criminal defendant, and his indictment puts the legal and political systems in uncharted territory.

By Jonah E. Bromwich, Ben Protess, William K. Rashbaum and Maggie Haberman

 

Here’s the latest on the Trump indictment.

 

Donald J. Trump prepared on Friday to surrender to prosecutors in Manhattan next week, as New York police and court officers girded for protests and sharply partisan responses from Democrats and Republicans ushered in a tumultuous time for the deeply polarized nation.

A day after a grand jury voted to indict Mr. Trump, Republicans continued to criticize the Manhattan district attorney, Alvin L. Bragg, whose office rebuked House Republicans for attempting to interfere in the case. Mr. Trump is likely to be arraigned on Tuesday, when the charges against him will be unsealed. A lawyer for the former president said that he would not take a plea deal and was prepared to go to trial.

The case, which could drag on for months and whose outcome is far from clear, will test the country’s institutions and the rule of law. It will also have vast repercussions for the 2024 campaign for the White House — a race in which Mr. Trump is still the Republican front-runner.

Mr. Trump has been charged with more than two dozen counts, according to two people familiar with the matter, although the exact charges remain unknown. And it is not clear that the New York case will be the first to go to trial because he still faces other investigations.

A Georgia prosecutor is in the final stages of an inquiry into Mr. Trump’s attempts to reverse the election results in that state. Moreover, a federal special counsel is leading two separate investigations into Mr. Trump’s broader actions to cling to power after his 2020 electoral defeat, and into his hoarding of documents marked as classified after leaving office.

While Mr. Trump has sought to capitalize on the criminal charges to energize his base, the ignominy of becoming a defendant — especially after decades of evading prosecution despite numerous repeated investigations — marks a profound change for a global celebrity who has a history of deriding others accused of wrongdoing.

Here’s what else to know:

·         Mr. Bragg has brought the case over Mr. Trump’s role, when he was running for president, in a hush-money payment to a porn star, Stormy Daniels, who then agreed to keep quiet about her story of an affair with him. Prosecutors are expected to argue that the payoff, which came in the final days of the 2016 presidential campaign, functioned as an illegal donation to Mr. Trump’s candidacy.

·         In a statement on Thursday evening, Mr. Trump called Mr. Bragg, a Democrat, “a disgrace” and denounced the case as “political persecution and election interference at the highest level in history.” Mr. Trump described himself as “a completely innocent person.”

·         Mr. Trump is expected to turn himself in on Tuesday for arraignment on the indictment in State Supreme Court in Manhattan, one of his lawyers said. The New York Police Department issued an order to all officers to be “prepared for deployment,” part of enhanced security measures being put in place all over the city.

·         After months of cooler coverage of Mr. Trump, Fox News hosts rallied around him on Thursday, denouncing his indictment as an attempt to hinder his re-election chances — he remains a front-runner for the 2024 Republican presidential nomination — and suggesting it might lead to unrest.

 

ATTACHMENT EIGHTY SEVENFrom the Guardian U.K.

DONALD TRUMP HUDDLES WITH ADVISERS AFTER INITIAL SURPRISE OF INDICTMENT

Trump said to be buoyed by favorable polling after charges

Sat 1 Apr 2023 23.26 EDT

 

Donald Trump huddled with his closest advisers on Saturday at his Mar-a-Lago resort over political strategy after being caught by surprise about the news that a Manhattan grand jury had indicted him on criminal charges connected to hush money payments to adult film star Stormy Daniels in 2016.

The former president was buoyed, according to a source familiar with the matter, over new post-indictment polls that placed him far ahead of his expected 2024 rival, the Florida governor, Ron DeSantis, and other Republican primary challengers.

 

See also these, by Robert Reich...

Trump will attack his indictment on three basic points. Let me rebut them

The most consequential politics story in the US isn’t the Trump arraignment

 

According to a Yahoo news poll, Trump was beating DeSantis 57% to 31% in the one-to-one contest, and was attracting majority support at 52% when pitted against a wider, 10-candidate field including DeSantis at 21% and the UN ambassador in the Trump administration, Nikki Haley.

Trump also improved his lead over DeSantis in polling done for his campaign by McLaughlin and Associates, which surveyed 1,000 likely 2024 general election voters and found Trump beating DeSantis 63% to 30%, improving his lead from January when Trump was at 52% and DeSantis at 40%. 

The sharp uptick in polling numbers – and a corresponding reversal by potential 2024 rivals trying to come to Trump’s defense over the indictment after previously trying to distance themselves – was so sudden and marked that it took some of Trump’s own advisers by surprise.

Trump took the reluctance of his nearest rivals to directly confront him over the charges as a sign that he remains the steadfast frontrunner for the Republican nomination, the source said, and reinforced their difficulty in getting voters to renounce him, while trying to be his successor.

The strongest reflection of Trump’s durability with his core Maga base came in fundraising numbers. The Trump campaign said on Friday that it had raised more than $4m in the 24 hours after news of the indictment, and that more than 16,000 people registered to volunteer for the campaign.

The case centers on $130,000 that Trump paid to Daniels through Cohen in the final days of the 2016 campaign. Trump later reimbursed Cohen with $35,000 checks using his personal funds, which were recorded as legal expenses. Cohen pleaded guilty in 2018 to federal crimes.

With the charges under seal, it remains unclear what charges the district attorney Alvin Bragg might seek against Trump, though some members of his legal team believe the most likely scenario involves a base charge of falsifying business records elevated to a felony.

An attorney for Trump, Joe Tacopina, told NBC’s Today show that his client would not consider taking a plea deal after becoming the first former president to be criminally charged. “There’s no crime,” Tacopina argued.

Preparations for the ex-president’s arraignment at Manhattan’s criminal courthouse at 100 Centre St have been under way for 10 days, with barriers being erected for crowd control.

Indictments and criminal trials scheduled for Tuesday at the same courthouse include: burglary for taking paintings from a West Village townhouse; a thwarted terrorist attack on a Jewish community; the illegal selling of firearms; murder for an East Harlem hammer attack; murder and attempted murder for attacking multiple homeless men; murder and criminal possession of a weapon for shooting into a car in East Harlem; and a grand larceny case involving sim-card swapping.

New York police have issued a memo instructing all officers to wear their uniforms and prepare for mobilization, according to local news reports. That came after Bragg acknowledged in a memo to the DA’s 1,600 staff members that the office had been receiving offensive and threatening phone calls and emails.

Bragg said the safety of his staff remained a top priority, and he thanked them for persevering in the face of “additional press attention and security around our office”.

Trump will not be handcuffed at his arraignment or subjected to a “perp walk”, and discussions are still being held about whether his booking photo will be publicly circulated. Trump reportedly “wants the mugshot out” because it could harness donations to his presidential campaign.

 

AND... An Editorial...

ATTACHMENT EIGHTY SEVEN (A) – From GUK/Observer

THE OBSERVER VIEW: DONALD TRUMP DESERVES TO FACE THE FULL FORCE OF JUSTICE

Observer editorial

The United States was founded on the rule of law. It must not now flinch from upholding it

Sun 2 Apr 2023 01.00 EDT

 

In the tumultuous, multifaceted case of Donald J Trump versus the people of the United States, the biggest question is why this former president, political con artist and serial offender is not already in jail. Trump will be charged this week in Manhattan over alleged “hush money” payments to a former porn star. This action, both welcome and overdue, makes him the first US president to be criminally indicted. Yet twice-impeached Trump stands accused of a string of infinitely more serious, well-documented crimes, including a violent attempt to overthrow the government. The continuing mystery is why justice is so long in coming.

The full Trump charge sheet reads like a horror novel in which democracy is murdered. In the weeks following his clear-cut defeat by Joe Biden in November 2020, Trump did everything he could to subvert the result, legally and illegally, by making baseless accusations of fraud. This is not in dispute. Not disputed, either, is a taped telephone conversation on 2 January 2021 between Trump and Brad Raffensperger, Georgia’s secretary of state, in which the then president pressed the latter “to find 11,780 votes” – sufficient to cancel Biden’s victory in the key swing state.

Why has Trump not been criminally charged in what appears to be an open-and-shut case of shameless election interference? A special grand jury in Atlanta has recommended the prosecution of all involved in the illegal lobbying of Raffensperger. Perhaps the courage shown by Manhattan’s district attorney, Alvin Bragg, in indicting Trump will inspire his Fulton County counterpart, Fani Willis – and other state and federal prosecutors – to follow suit without further delays. If this case had been conducted in a timely manner, Trump might be behind bars now.

It is more than two years since Trump incited his supporters to attack the Capitol in order to halt Congress’s ratification of Biden’s victory. The ensuing riot on 6 January 2021 led to deaths and injuries. Yet Trump did nothing to call off the mob until it was far too late. He has since hailed the rioters as heroes. Again, much of this is on the record. Congress has conducted exhaustive investigations. Why has Merrick Garland, the US attorney general, failed to act against the chief instigator as well as the perpetrators of the coup attempt? Only in November did Garland finally appoint a special counsel – which amounts, in effect, to another delay.

It is hard to avoid the conclusion that reluctance to energetically pursue these and other crimes, such as Trump’s apparent theft of secret documents found at his Florida home, stems from political timidity at the top. As he showed again last week, Trump is ready and able to use his mafia-like grip on the Republican party and rightwing media to intimidate the entire US body politic. He plays the victim, turns the tables and claims Biden and the Democrats are the lawbreakers. Trump says political enemies have singled him out. Yet the only special treatment he has received is to have been allowed to avoid prosecution for so long.

Diffidence over confronting Trump full-on stems in part from an understandable desire to avoid feeding national divisions. The entire Trump saga, akin to tawdry, never-ending reality TV show, is a distraction from pressing issues such as post-pandemic economic revival, the climate emergency and war in Europe. The US should focus on these challenges rather than endlessly indulge the antic ravings of a narcissistic, foul-mouthed, misogynistic crook.

The Republican party as a whole continues to place its interests ahead of the principles for which America stands

Biden would surely wish it so. At the start of his term, he plainly hoped that, by ignoring him, Trump would eventually go away. Yet sadly, here he is again, hogging the limelight. Trump will have his day in court amid blanket media coverage and feared street violence. He will repeat his usual inflammatory lies and slanders, proceedings will be adjourned, probably for months, and meanwhile, this arch-enemy of democracy, decency and justice will try to exploit his “victimhood” to secure the 2024 Republican presidential nomination. In a sense, Trump-ism is eternal. It cares for nothing and no one but itself.

The Trump case poses potentially historic challenges for an American republic founded on the rule of law. The idea, peddled by Republicans, that a current or former president enjoys de facto immunity from prosecution is at odds with modern-day concepts of justice. The fact that it appears such a person may stand again for the White House while under criminal investigation, or even following a criminal conviction, points to dangerous flaws in America’s constitutional arrangements. No person, however famous, big-headed or threatening, should be above the law.

The aggressive reaction to the indictment of many leading Republicans, and especially Ron DeSantis, Trump’s closest competitor, is dismaying. By parroting Trump’s line about “weaponisation” of the courts, the Florida governor shows himself to be no better or wiser than his egotistic rival. The party as a whole continues to place its interests ahead of the principles for which America stands. Democrats, meanwhile, should avoid talk that exacerbates national polarisation. “Lock him up!” is a tempting slogan, given how Trump used it against Hillary Clinton. But calm, restraint and patience are required. If there’s any justice, Trump’s time in court will ultimately be followed by time served.

The manner in which this unprecedented legal drama is handled, and its outcome, could decide America’s immediate political future. It may also have a significant, lasting impact on US influence and moral authority in the global struggle to uphold a democratic, law-based international order. The world is watching – and that, regrettably, is what Trump likes.

 

ATTACHMENT EIGHTY EIGHTFrom GUK
DONALD TRUMP VOWS TO ESCALATE ATTACKS AGAINST ALVIN BRAGG – SOURCES

The former president was stunned by the indictment at first, but after 24 hours he indicated he wanted to politically ‘rough ’em up’

Hugo Lowell in Washington

Sun 2 Apr 2023 17.18 EDT

 

Donald Trump has told advisers and associates in recent days that he is prepared to escalate attacks against the Manhattan prosecutor who resurrected the criminal prosecution into his hush money payments to adult film star Stormy Daniels in 2016 now that a grand jury has indicted him.

The former president has vowed to people close to him that he wants to go on the offensive and – in a private moment over the weekend at his Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida that demonstrates his gathering resolve – remarked using more colorful language that it was time to politically “rough ’em up”.

 

Trump had already signaled that he would go after the Manhattan district attorney, Alvin Bragg, weeks before the grand jury handed up an indictment against him on Thursday, saying in pugilistic posts on Truth Social that the prosecution was purely political and accusing Bragg of being a psychopath.

But the latest charged language reflects Trump’s determination to double down on those attacks as he returns to his time-tested playbook of brawling with prosecutors, especially when faced with legal trouble that he knows he cannot avoid, people close to him said.

The episode at Mar-a-Lago came on the sidelines of strategy meetings Trump had with advisers and associates about how to respond to the indictment from a legal and political standpoint, sessions which were described by two sources close to the former president.

The case centers on $130,000 that Trump paid to Daniels through his former lawyer Michael Cohen in the final days of the 2016 campaign. Trump later reimbursed Cohen with $35,000 checks, which were recorded as legal expenses. Cohen pleaded guilty in 2018 to federal tax evasion and campaign-finance violation charges.

With the indictment under seal until Trump’s scheduled arraignment on Tuesday, the exact charges remained unclear on Sunday, though they are expected to include the falsification of business records and additional charges that elevate what would otherwise be a misdemeanor to a felony.

Trump was initially caught off-guard by the indictment and spent the following 24 hours absorbing the news that was relayed to him by several of his top advisers. Later, at one point, Trump repeated to himself almost incredulously that prosecutors had actually charged him.

The shock had dissipated by the weekend, when Trump’s tone changed and he told his team that he wanted to attack the case and fight the prosecutors. He steadfastly contends he did nothing illegal and won’t accept a plea deal that would force him to admit culpability.

The ex-president’s pugnacious tone has only accelerated in recent days with a series of critical posts about New York state supreme court justice Juan Merchan, to whom the case has apparently been allotted after he presided over a separate matter involving the Trump Organization last year.

On his Truth Social platform, Trump said Merchan had “railroaded” Allen Weisselberg, the former chief executive of the Trump Organization, who on Sunday was in the middle of serving a 100-day sentence in the Rikers Island jail complex after pleading guilty to tax fraud charges in that case.

Referencing Merchan, Trump said: “The Judge ‘assigned’ to my Witch Hunt Case, a ‘Case’ that has NEVER BEEN CHARGED BEFORE, HATES ME”.

Trump has also since pivoted his focus to seeing how he can benefit politically from the indictment, the sources said, and he was encouraged that it had boosted his poll numbers over potential rivals for the Republican nomination who found themselves forced to come to his defense against Bragg, a Democrat.

With a grim fixation on having a mug shot taken, Trump has asked whether his team could print it on T-shirts that could serve as a rallying motif for his supporters – an idea that his advisers have been particularly enthusiastic about.

Trump also spent the weekend reviewing a Yahoo news poll that showed him leading Florida governor Ron DeSantis, whom he considers his closest rival for the 2024 Republican presidential nomination, 57% to 31% in a hypothetical one-on-one contest. The poll also found Trump was attracting the majority of support, at 52%, when pitted against a wider, 10-candidate field.

The polling illustrated the perilous dance for DeSantis and Trump’s other challengers, who have so far struggled to find a way to defend the ex-president strongly enough to ensure the support of his core base in the Republican party without undercutting their pitch as being worthy successors to him.

Trump’s advisers observed over the weekend that DeSantis had struggled in that test when his only response to the indictment was to snap back in line behind the former president, calling the case “the weaponization of the legal system to advance a political agenda”.

 

ATTACHMENT EIGHTY NINEFrom the Guardian UK

TIMELINE, MONDAY AND TUESDAY

 

Monday, April 3rd

Monday’s television and social media news reports reported that Trump had agreed to surrender tomorrow, and not to accept Saint Ron’s generous offer of troops to join the Secret Service in shooting it out with the FBI and DOJ.

Such a nice offer... but no thanks.  Six Governors and ninety-some Congressional Republicans also sent letters of support to fight what ABCs Dan Abrams called “an old, souped-up misdemeanor” but, as with President Zelenskyy, contributed no missiles capable of reaching New York.

While Djonald UnHinged seethed in his suite at Trump Tower... probably counting the protesters outside and finding them insufficient... President Joe was telling jokes in Minnesota and exclaiming that he “had faith in the American justice system.”  The latenite comics were all telling “Pecker” jokes too so Trump turned off the tube, went to sleep and dreamed of his return to power in January, 2025.

 

Tuesday, April 4th

By Martin Belam   Tue 4 Apr 2023 14.08 EDT

Note: times are in reverse order, ending with 13.35 below

13.35 EDT

 

Trump under arrest in New York – what we know so far

Donald Trump is now under arrest at the Manhattan courthouse where he will soon be arraigned for charges linked to a hush-money scheme during the 2016 election.

Here’s what we know so far:

·         Trump’s arraignment is scheduled for 2.15pm ET at the Manhattan criminal court. At the arraignment, Trump is expected to plead not guilty to all charges linked to hush-money payments to adult film star Stormy Daniels, who claims to have had an affair with the former president. After the arraignment, Trump will likely be allowed to return home to Florida.

·         New York authorities will process Trump’s arrest, and they are expected to fingerprint the former president. But it remains unclear whether Trump’s mug shot will be taken, and it appears he will not be put in handcuffs.

·         Trump is scheduled to deliver remarks at his Mar-a-Lago resort at 8.15pm ET. The former president has already aggressively dismissed any suggestion of wrongdoing on his part, and he will likely only intensify his attacks on prosecutors after being arraigned.

·         No electronic devices will be allowed in the courtroom. The judge overseeing the case, New York supreme court Justice Juan Merchanissued a ruling late last night that only a handful of still photographers would be allowed to take pictures inside the room.

·         Reporters lined up outside the courthouse overnight in the hopes of getting a seat in the arraignment room. Several dozen reporters are expected to be allowed inside the room to witness the unprecedented event of a former US president formally responding to criminal charges.

·         A trial may still be months away. Once Trump enters his initial plea, Merchan will likely set a schedule for pre-trial hearings, but it may take several months for the actual trial to begin.

The blog will have more coming up, so stay tuned.

9m ago14.05 EDT

One of Donald Trump’s former White House aides also described the experience of watching him surrender to New York authorities as “surreal”.

Alyssa Farah Griffin, Trump’s former White House director of strategic communications who has severely criticized the former president over his role in the deadly January 6 insurrection, said Trump is now “the most alone [he] has been in a long time”.

“He’s not flanked by aides, lawyers, body men & so on,” Griffin said on Twitter. “He’s face to face with the American legal system that has caught up with him.”

23m ago13.51 EDT

Moments before starting his trip to the Manhattan criminal court, Donald Trump shared a rather obvious message with his followers on the social media platform Truth Social.

“Heading to Lower Manhattan, the Courthouse. Seems so SURREAL – WOW, they are going to ARREST ME,” Trump said. “Can’t believe this is happening in America. MAGA!”

Trump has already used his Truth Social account to repeatedly attack Manhattan district attorney Alvin Bragg, whose office oversaw the hush-money investigation.

The former president will likely double down on those attacks tonight, when he delivers remarks at his Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida at 8.15pm ET.

34m ago13.40 EDT

Donald Trump waved to the assembled crowd as he arrived at the Manhattan courthouse where he has been arrested and will soon be arraigned.

Hundreds of journalists, security personnel and protesters have gathered outside the Manhattan criminal court to witness the unprecedented spectacle of a former US president surrendering himself to authorities.

39m ago13.35 EDT

Trump under arrest in New York – what we know so far

Donald Trump is now under arrest at the Manhattan courthouse where he will soon be arraigned for charges linked to a hush-money scheme during the 2016 election.

Here’s what we know so far:

·         Trump’s arraignment is scheduled for 2.15pm ET at the Manhattan criminal court. At the arraignment, Trump is expected to plead not guilty to all charges linked to hush-money payments to adult film star Stormy Daniels, who claims to have had an affair with the former president. After the arraignment, Trump will likely be allowed to return home to Florida.

·         New York authorities will process Trump’s arrest, and they are expected to fingerprint the former president. But it remains unclear whether Trump’s mug shot will be taken, and it appears he will not be put in handcuffs.

·         Trump is scheduled to deliver remarks at his Mar-a-Lago resort at 8.15pm ET. The former president has already aggressively dismissed any suggestion of wrongdoing on his part, and he will likely only intensify his attacks on prosecutors after being arraigned.

·         No electronic devices will be allowed in the courtroom. The judge overseeing the case, New York supreme court Justice Juan Merchan, issued a ruling late last night that only a handful of still photographers would be allowed to take pictures inside the room.

·         Reporters lined up outside the courthouse overnight in the hopes of getting a seat in the arraignment room. Several dozen reporters are expected to be allowed inside the room to witness the unprecedented event of a former US president formally responding to criminal charges.

·         A trial may still be months away. Once Trump enters his initial plea, Merchan will likely set a schedule for pre-trial hearings, but it may take several months for the actual trial to begin.

The blog will have more coming up, so stay tuned.

47m ago13.27 EDT

Trump arrives at Manhattan courthouse for arraignment

Donald Trump has arrived at the Manhattan courthouse where he will soon be arraigned on charges linked to a hush-money scheme during the 2016 election.

Before the arraignment begins at 2.15pm ET, Trump will be formally arrested and processed by New York authorities. He is expected to be fingerprinted, but it is unclear whether he will have his mug shot taken.

At the arraignment, Trump is expected to plead not guilty to all charges, and the judge presiding over the case, New York supreme court Justice Juan Merchan, will then likely allow the former president to return home to Florida.

The blog will have more details coming up, so stay tuned.

As he left Trump Tower to make his way to the Manhattan courthouse where he will be arraigned, Donald Trump raised a fist to supporters waiting outside.

Trump leaves Trump Tower for arraignment

Donald Trump has left Trump Tower to make the short trip to the Manhattan courthouse where he will be arraigned at 2.15pm ET.

Cameras captured the former president’s motorcade traveling the four miles between Trump Tower and 100 Centre St, where an entrance has already been cleared for his arrival.

When he arrives, Trump will be formally arrested, fingerprinted and processed before appearing at his arraignment, where he is expected to plead not guilty to all charges. Stay tuned.

We expect Donald Trump to depart his New York home on Fifth Avenue very soon and start to make his way to the criminal courthouse in lower Manhattan. He’s due to appear in court a little later this afternoon.

Here’s where things stand:

·         A federal appeals court has rejected Donald Trump’s request to block senior aides of his, while he was president, from testifying to special counsel Jack Smith in the federal criminal inquiries into the now candidate for the Republican nomination in 2024.

·         Voters in Wisconsin are casting ballots today in one of the most important elections of 2023 – a contest that will determine the ideological balance of the state’s supreme court.

·         Donald Trump’s lawyer Joe Tacopina has been on television and said the former president wouldn’t plead guilty to lesser charges, even if it could resolve the case.

·         Trump will be arraigned at 2.15pm ET at a courthouse in lower Manhattan. At the arraignment, Trump is expected to plead not guilty to all charges linked to his involvement in a hush-money scheme during the 2016 election. After the arraignment, Trump will likely be allowed to return home to Florida.

·         Trump is expected to be arrested and processed shortly before his arraignment. As part of his arrest, Trump will be fingerprinted and likely photographed, but his lawyer has said he does not expect Trump to be handcuffed.

·         Trump is scheduled to deliver remarks at his Mar-a-Lago resort at 8.15pm ET. The former president has already aggressively dismissed any suggestion of wrongdoing on his part, and he will likely only intensify his attacks on prosecutors after being arraigned.

Court rejects Trump bid to stop top aides testifying to special counsel - reports

Media reports coming in that a federal appeals court has rejected Donald Trump’s request to block senior aides of his while he was president from testifying to special counsel Jack Smith.

Smith is the special counsel appointed by the Department of Justice last year who is helming investigations into Trump’s alleged hiding of classified documents at Mar-a-Lago and role in fomenting the attack on the US Capitol on January 6, 2021, when extremist supporters tried to stop Congress certifying Joe Biden’s election victory over Trump.

And this:

Here’s one opinion:

When Donald Trump arrived in New York yesterday he entered his Trump Tower skyscraper alone, with his wife, Melania, noticeably absent.

Now there are some reports that she just turned up, so we’ll bring you any other news on that as it emerges.

Melania Trump seen arriving at Trump Towers in New York City 👁

Insiders recently claim that the Trumps could be heading for divorce.#MelaniaTrump

 #TrumpArraignment #TrumpIndictment https://t.co/7ubSsiGGYa

MirrorUSNews (@MirrorUSNews) April 4, 2023

Outside the criminal court building in lower Manhattan, handfuls of protesters and a scrum of media are in a brief news vacuum as they await the arrival of Donald Trump.

The former president has not left Trump Tower uptown on Fifth Avenue yet, despite some reports that he would surrender to the authorities downtown at 11am. So we wait.

In true New York City style, there’s a lot of scaffolding around, a mix of poles and roughly painted wooden panels that ends up casting shade, trapping garbage, hindering navigation on the sidewalk and giving the location an even less salubrious environment than usual.

The interior of the building is not exactly cathedral-like splendor, either. For defendants it’s generally a sobering and dispiriting experience to be arraigned here – an arraignment being the first appearance in front of a judge after being arrested or surrendering to authorities, to hear the criminal charges against you.

The scene is colorful and a little chaotic.

Here’s “Hillary” and a fan.

Protesters:

Protesters:

2h ago12.00 EDT

The Guardian’s Sam Levine is on the ground in Wisconsin, where voters are heading to the polls to choose the newest member of the state supreme court.

The court is expected to soon weigh in on whether an abortion ban dating back to 1849 should be enforced after the US supreme court ruled to overturn Roe v Wade last summer.

And abortion access appears to be weighing heavily on the minds of Wisconsin voters as they cast their ballots today:

2h ago11.46 EDT

Some of Donald Trump’s supporters have gathered outside the Manhattan courthouse where he will be arraigned this afternoon, but a handful of the former president’s critics are also on the scene.

One anti-Trump protester was photographed holding a sign that read: “Lock him up!” During the 2016 presidential campaign, Trump rally attendees frequently chanted: “Lock her up!” in reference to Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton over her mishandling of sensitive government emails.

Anti-Trump protesters demonstrate outside Manhattan Criminal Courthouse. Photograph: Amanda Perobelli/Reuters

Another anti-Trump protester held a sign reading, “Trump 4 Prison”. As of now, Trump is still the frontrunner in the 2024 Republican presidential primary, and the indictment does not prevent him from seeking office.

 

3h ago11.35 EDT

It remains unclear whether Donald Trump will get his mug shot taken when he is processed by New York authorities today, but one new report suggests he will not.

Yahoo News’ Michael Isikoff reported yesterday that Trump has been charged with 34 felony counts for falsification of business records, and noted that the Manhattan district attorney’s office had decided against getting a mug shot of the former president:

[One] source said, Trump will not be put in handcuffs, placed in a jail cell or subjected to a mug shot – typical procedures even for white-collar defendants until a judge has weighed in on pretrial conditions. Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s office, which has been consulting with the Secret Service and New York City court officials, concluded there was no reason to subject the former president to handcuffs or a mug shot.

The Guardian’s Hugo Lowell previously reported that Trump hoped to be handcuffed because he wanted to turn the arrest and arraignment into a “spectacle”.

3h ago11.20 EDT

Progressive congressman Jamaal Bowman of New York was spotted outside the courthouse where Donald Trump will be arraigned this afternoon.

Bowman told Semafor that he felt compelled to make an appearance because he wanted to push back against the rhetoric he’s heard from one of his House colleagues, far-right Cong Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia.

“She should not be here,” Bowman told Semafor’s Kadia Goba. “She should not be pushing rhetoric that is harmful and dangerous.”

 

ATTACHMENT NINETY – From Politico

CIRCUS: MARJORIE TAYLOR GREENE, GEORGE SANTOS HOME IN ON TRUMP INDICTMENT

Greene led a short rally Tuesday protesting Trump’s indictment with the New York Young Republicans, a group with ties to white nationalists.

By KIERRA FRAZIER and WESLEY PARNELL 04/04/2023 11:30 AM EDT Updated: 04/04/2023 01:19 PM EDT

 

Georgia Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene gave a brief speech at a rally across the street from Manhattan Criminal Courthouse Tuesday to protest the indictment of former President Donald Trump.

“We are here to peacefully protest against the persecution of an innocent man. Not just any innocent man, this is the former president of the United States of America,” Greene told the crowd.

At the protest, put on with the New York Young Republicans, a group with ties to white nationalists, there were nearly more media than there were protestors. About 300 people turned out to protest Trump’s indictment with Greene, with nearly 150 counterprotesters also on the scene. Counter-protesters were seen playing drums and banging kettles toward the Trump supporters, with a metal police barricade separating the two parties.

“I’m here to protest and use my voice to take a stand. Every American should take a stand,” Greene said.

While Greene was only present at the protest for about 10 minutes, conservative members swarmed around Greene, shoving and elbowing to get a glimpse at the congressmember. NYPD escorted her out.

Greene has been one of Trump’s most loyal supporters, defending him since the Capitol attack on Jan. 6, 2021. Greene recently appeared with Trump at his Waco, Texas rally.

New York Rep. George Santos quickly walked by the courthouse earlier Tuesday, not stopping to protest or answer questions.

“I wanted to support the president because this is unprecedented, and this is a bad day for democracy,” Santos told reporters. “This starts a precedent of what’s to stop the next prosecutor in two years to do the same thing to Joe Biden and moving on every four years.”

“This cheapens the judicial system, not good for America.”

Santos, who is currently under investigation by the House Ethics Committee, did not answer multiple questions about his own legal troubles. Santos has been tied to multiple controversies since his election, including fabricating major portions of his biographyaccusations of stealing money from veterans, alleged involvement in a credit card scam, and falsely claiming to be Jewish.

Rep. Jamaal Bowman (D-N.Y.) made an appearance after the rally and told Greene to “go back to your district.”

“Do your freaking job, Marjorie Taylor Green. You don’t need to be in New York City talking that nonsense. Go back to your district,” Bowman said.

Earlier on Monday, New York City Mayor Eric Adams had a message for Greene and protesters: “Control yourselves.”

“People like Marjorie Taylor Greene, who is known to spread misinformation and hate speech, while you’re in town, be on your best behavior,” Adams said at a City Hall press conference about security preparations.

At the protest, Greene responded to Adams’ comments.

“Also, to the Mayor Adams, as you can see, I am here peacefully protesting. He called me out by name,” Greene said.

Trump is set to be arraigned Tuesday following his indictment over alleged hush money payments to porn star Stormy Daniels.

A Trump supporter, Alann Gotlieb, 62, who showed up at the protest with his dog Anarchy, said that the counter-protest organized by New York City Public Advocate Jumaane Williams was an attack on conservatives hoping to make their voices heard in the blue city.

 

1.    He already rocked MAGA world — twice. Now he’s Trump’s judge.

2.    Trump taps white-collar attorney to helm indictment defense

3.    Tennessee GOP members move to oust 3 Dems after gun protest

4.    Trump arrives in Manhattan ahead of court appearance

5.    House GOP’s Biden investigations sputter out of the gate

 

“I don’t know what Jumaane Williams is standing up for,” Gotlieb said. “No, I don’t think [he’s here in good faith] because he’s counter-protesting the First Amendment, he’s counter-protesting freedom of speech, and he supports locking somebody up who allegedly gave money to Stormy Daniels when Michael Cohen was dealing with the whole thing.”

Meanwhile, Karen Irwan, 47, of Hell’s Kitchen said they showed up to celebrate Trump’s indictment.

“Watch out, we have fascism over there,” Irwan said of the pro-Trump rally, adding, “We are celebrating the very first moment in my lifetime that it appears our justice system is attempting to apply equally to people, even people with power. It means that we can pretend now that we have a democracy and can start to act like it now.”

 

ATTACHMENT NINETY ONEFrom NPR

By Emily Olson  April 7, 202311:43 AM ET

 

In her first interview since the news of Donald Trump's criminal indictment, Stormy Daniels said she's still seeking a sense of vindication — but admits that feeling just may never come.

The former president pleaded not guilty on Tuesday to 34 counts of falsifying business records. The Manhattan district attorney's office says Trump hid reimbursements for hush money payments as part of a "catch and kill" scheme to suppress affair allegations.

Daniels, the adult film actress behind one set of those allegations, sat down with TalkTV's Piers Morgan for a wide-ranging, 90-minute interview, touching on everything from her strained relationship with her parents to her reaction to the week's news. The conversation aired Thursday on Morgan's show, Uncensored.

Stormy Daniels appeared on Uncensored with Piers Morgan on Thursday.

Daniels, whose legal name is Stephanie Clifford, said she was riding her horse, aptly named Redemption, when her phone lit up with notifications telling her of Trump's indictment. While initially thrilled to see the case taking steps forward, the next day felt "kind of anti-climactic," she said. "I thought I would feel excited and vindicated."

Seeing Trump convicted would "definitely be a giant step closer in that direction but I don't think it'll ever be 100%" because so many people are "unwilling to admit that they were wrong or that he lies," she said.

In a historic first, former President Donald Trump is charged with 34 felony counts

Daniels said she's not sure if that would change should Trump receive jail time.

"I don't think that his crimes against me are worthy of incarceration," Daniels said, but later added: "The other things that he has done — if he is found guilty, then absolutely."

Trump is facing separate criminal investigations for allegedly pressuring Georgia to overturn the 2020 election results, interfering with the transfer of power and mishandling classified documents.

Daniels said she was prepared to testify in the Manhattan grand jury probe but was never asked. She said she'd welcome the prospect of testifying if the case goes to trial, which is likely, but not until late winter or spring 2024.

"It's daunting, but I look forward to it," she said. "I have nothing to hide. I'm the only one that has been telling the truth. You can't shame me anymore."

"You can't really shame somebody who's been seen naked everywhere," she added. "Like what are you gonna do? Release nudes of me? Please do."

What Trump's arraignment means for his 2024 election bid

Daniels was thrust into the political spotlight after The Wall Street Journal broke the story of the hush money payments in 2018.

Trump has consistently denied Daniels' claims they had sex in a Texas hotel in 2006. But he later admitted he reimbursed Cohen for $130,000 in hush money payments.

The Manhattan DA's case rests on the way the Trump organization recorded those payments. Still, Daniels says, the news of Trump's arraignment has only ramped up the frequency and tone of the hate messages she personally receives.

"They really feel like it's my fault — That, you know, I've made America the laughingstock or I'm the fall of democracy. I wish I had that much power," she said, confirming later in the interview that she was still a registered Republican.

5 things to know about Donald Trump's felony charges

Trump and his allies have dismissed the charges as an act of political persecution, saying the DA's office had weaponized its power to weaken the GOP's chances of reclaiming the presidency.

When asked whether she was trying to derail Trump's 2024 presidential campaign, Daniels laughed. "He doesn't need my help for that. He's going to do that on his own," she quipped.

One particular threat against Daniels sits at the heart of another pending legal matter — a failed defamation suit that's left Daniels with a bill for hundreds of thousands in Trump's legal fees.

In Daniels' telling, she hesitantly agreed to sell her story of the affair in In Touch magazine in 2011 because one of the "hundred or so" people she'd told the story to had threatened to tell it first.

Months later, a man approached her in a Las Vegas parking lot and told her to "leave Donald Trump alone."

Judge orders Stormy Daniels to pay Donald Trump another $120,000 in legal fees

Daniels' then-lawyer Michael Avenatti released a sketch of the man to the public in 2018, and Trump responded on Twitter, calling it a "con job, playing the Fake News Media."

Avenatti then filed a defamation suit against Daniels' wishes, she says. She eventually lost the case, with the judge ruling that Trump's tweet was political rhetoric protected by the first amendment.

When asked in Thursday's interview if she planned to pay the legal fees as ordered, Daniels said she'd go to jail first.

"I didn't come this far to back down and give him money," she said. "I did nothing wrong but stand up to him and prove that I wasn't lying."