the DON JONES INDEX… |
|||
|
GAINS POSTED in GREEN LOSSES POSTED in RED 4/3/23…
14,977.69 3/27/23…
14,973.21 |
||
6/27/13… 15,000.00 |
|||
(THE DOW JONES
INDEX: 4/3/23...
33,274.15; 3/27/23... 32,237.53; 6/27/13…
15,000.00) |
|||
LESSON for April 10, 2023 – “STORMY of the
CENTURY (“Sizzle”)
We’ve
been following the tribulations and, perhaps, trial of Donald Trump in our last
few Lessons... including last week’s DJI,
covering events up to announcement of the indictment, as re-reported...
Last week’s lesson beginning (3/22)...
Midnight
having tolled and Wednesday the 22nd rolled round –
finding Donald UnEncumbered still at liberty in
Mar-a-Lago
despite all predictions (especially his own) and, after the Grand Jury was sent
home shortly before noon, muttering and puttering around with nothing to do but
go back to his campaign for the Presidency
What a frackin’
drag! Well, there was at least the rally
on Saturday to prepare for... his latest coming-home-party in Waco, home to the
iconic David Koresh and, as the exile now determines, his dozens of patriotic
martyrs, fighting for the cause of America, God and the Flag.
That cheers him up....
And ending (3/30 afternoon)...
“Trump himself concluded,
without offering evidence, that there was only one reasonable explanation for
the delays—they simply don't have a case.
"I have gained
such respect for this grand jury, & perhaps even the grand jury system as a
whole," Trump wrote on Truth Social. "The evidence is so overwhelming
in my favor, & so ridiculously bad for the highly partisan & hateful
district attorney, that the grand jury is saying, hold on, we are not a rubber
stamp, which most grand juries are branded as being, we are not going to vote
against a preponderance of evidence or against large numbers of legal scholars
all saying there is no case here."
"Drop this sick
witch hunt, now!" he added. (Newsweek,
and Business Insider, above)
Unfortunately, he spoke... or
tweeted... a smidgen too soon...”
And then, Manhattan District
Attorney and Trump’s newest nemesis Alvin Bragg and his 23
member Grand Jury confounded the media, the country and the defendant by
issuing their thirty four count indictement
(Attachment Zero) which, according to some reports, could lock the 45th
President (and would-be 47th) up for 136 years.
According to the law, however, he
can campaign for President from within prison.
And, if elected, who knows?
For
the weeks leading up to Donald Trump’s indictment, the former President was
constantly throwing misdirection into the ether. He predicted an indictment and arrest in
the coming hours, even as his advisers and lawyers conceded they had no
evidence that was in the offing. He raised cash on the threat of the
prospect of criminal prosecution and plotted with his team about a
potential perp walk. Amid it all, the ex-President seemed to miss the severity
of history’s judgment should he become the first of his cohort to face a
criminal indictment.
Well, late Thursday, that
anticipated outcome finally came into relief. The Manhattan District Attorney’s
office confirmed that a grand jury had made history, and that the process
of negotiating a surrender and booking for
the former White House resident had already begun.
For
those who have watched Trump’s political career, none of this will seem new
according to Time columnist Philip Elliott who has been on the trail and on the
tail of Trump for a long, long time.
(See Attachment Seventy One) “If anything, it may sound like
rhyming rejoinder to the last couple of years, where a clang of chaos was the
best harmony available in the political hymnal of D.C.”
To
prove his point, Elliott walked round a circle backwards three times, threw a
fistful of magickal ingredients onto a bonfire (the
usual stuff... Eye of Newt, Hair of Rick Scott, Musk of Santos) and intoned
“Tax Cuts for Billionaires” three times – whereupon was summoned up none other
than Steve Bannon (and not just his ghost but the 2016-CEO of Trump’s
presidential campaign, who was headed toward baggage claim at the Las Vegas
airport, “when he boiled Trump’s strategy down to its essence while chatting with reporters who just
happened to catch him. Trump was trailing in the polls and Hillary
Clinton seemed destined to return to the
White House—this time with the good office,” —and the nation seemed ready to
send The Apprentice star back to the firing table. But Bannon,
arriving in Nevada to watch the third and final debate , seemed upbeat, even
excited. Trump, Bannon said, was "the master of the head fake,"
optimistic that such misdirection could help power him to the White House
despite polling, structural, and political headwinds.
“Bannon,
it turned out, was correct,” Elliott admitted, howsoever ruefully. And not just
about how Trump would deploy such tactics to win the White House a few weeks
later, “Trump used them to great effect once there. Few possess his inherent
ability to turn narratives on a dime with little more than a seemingly
accidental aside, an errant tweet, or a snarky insult laced with a threat.
“Put
simply: the Head Fake Presidency seemed limitless. At least until it wasn’t.
As
President, Elliott remembers, “Trump stuck with that instinct, employing
misdirection at every turn. He launched and suddenly called off a strike on Iranian
facilities as retaliation for a downed U.S. drone. On immigration, Puerto Rico , the Trans-Pacific Partnership, guns, immigration, and climate change, he balked at other moves as he
took delight in shattering norms. It’s continued in his post-presidency...
“Trump’s notorious indifference to honest-dealing will be a subtext of the
trial; the jury’s identity will be concealed to protect them from threats
and intimidation—an extraordinary step.”
Two Americans who have seen of the
“head fake” to last seventy lifetimes... wife Melania and daughter Ivanka...
weren’t joining the chorus of sycophants surroundin
the Forty Fifth President of the United States as he frittered away the
interval between leak and meek surrender on Tuesday. Without joining the chorus of indictment
critics... and they were legion, and not only MAGAmob
Republicans but a lot of skeptical liberals and professional head fakers of the
opinion that,,, while Trump may have been a lousy President... complaining that
he did not deserve the sort of frame-up that New York district attorney and
Inquisitor-in-Chief, the former First Daughter posted a message to social
media, saying she was "pained" by the news but thanked those who have
contacted her in support.
The fairest and probably most
accurate minute by minute, hour to hour timeline of the proceedings was offered
up by none other than the alt-right Washington Tmes (with input from the AP) which reported that Donald
Trump’s indictment, the first of a former U.S. president, was quietly brought
to the clerk’s office at the Manhattan criminal courthouse just before closing
time Thursday.
“A
woman and two men in suits walked in past reporters who’ve been staking out the
office for weeks, turned a corner and disappeared through a door to a
non-public area known as the indictment room,” wrote WashTimes
reporter Michael Sisak. (Attachment Seventy Two)
Moments
later, just before 5 p.m., when a reporter asked if there were any filings
involving “People v. Donald Trump” - her customary end-of-day question in
recent days - a usually cheerful clerk sternly replied: “We have no information
on that case. The office is closing. You have to leave.”
The
reporters, from outlets including The Associated Press, The New York Times, New
York Post and legal publication Law360, left the office and stood outside in
the hallway, watching through glass doors as workers turned out the lights and
the people who’d walked in a few minutes earlier worked in darkness inside
filing the indictment.
“After
visiting the clerk’s office for weeks, this was all very strange,” said Frank
G. Runyeon, a reporter for Law360. “Very unusual and
we knew something was up.”
As
the people continued to work, and reporters peered in at what was going on, court
officers came to the hallway and shooed the press away. That floor of the
courthouse was now closed, they said.
Reporters...
the WashTimes interviewed a journalist from Denmark
and what remained of the mini-mob of MAGAmen and
Never-Trumpers outside converged, police surrounded the courthouse into the
evening, with flood lights illuminating the sidewalk and streets. But Trump escaped through a back exit and was
shortly on his way back to Florida.
He may be returning to unhappy
family relations... not quite so bad as at Buckingham Castle, but bad
enough. Melania has been frosty. And daughter Ivanka has even hinted that she
would not support another campaign.
"I love my father, and I love
my country. Today, I am pained for both," she wrote. (Fox News, Attachment Seventy
Three)
She
does not, contended author Timothy
H.J. Nerozzi,
intend to play a role in her father's 2024 presidential campaign nor a possible
second administration.
That administration... or, at
least, the Republican nomination thereto... are looking nearer and nearer and
nearer.
From
supposed family allies of hearth and home to backstabbing traitors lurking in
the woodpile, “Trump's Indictment Drama Showcased His Rivals' Weakness” was the
title of Molly Ball’s Indictment afternoon TimePiece, updating an earlier article upon the effects of Stormy’s tempest on the 2024 election. (4:12 PM, Attachment Seventy
Four)
“When
the time came to actually stand up to him,” -. Nikki Haley, Trump’s major
declared opponent and former U.N. Ambassador, dismissed the potential
indictment on Fox News as “more about revenge than it is about justice.”
Another active candidate, businessman Vivek Ramaswamy, went further, blasting
the “disastrously politicized prosecution” and calling on other Republicans to
condemn it. Former Vice President Mike Pence, who is openly considering a run,
told an interviewer the probe “reeks of the kind of political prosecution we
endured in the days of the Russia hoax.”
And
the gravest threat to Djonald’s exhumation and
resurrection, Florida Guv’nor and gay basher Ron (I’m where woke goes to die) DeSantis,
who has yet to declare his candidacy, “came closest to a swipe, taking care to
excoriate the “Soros-funded prosecutor” overseeing the Manhattan case while
also impishly referencing the underlying conduct. “I don’t know what goes into
paying hush money to a porn star to secure silence over some type of alleged
affair,” DeSantis said, at a March 20 news conference. “I just, I can’t speak
to that.”
But
Trump gleefully seized on this political straddle, “exultant at finally having
baited his would-be rival into the ring after months of attacks. Trump issued a
327-word statement lambasting DeSantis as, among other things, “an average
Governor” whose appeal to GOP voters was “HARDLY GREATNESS.”
For emphasis, Ball summoned up
Denver Riggleman, a former Republican congressman
from Virginia, who declared: “It
is amazing to me that the party that talks about masculinity continues to
belly-crawl for this man, a bully who hides behind the walls of a Florida
mansion,” not specifying whether he was referring to the former President, the
current Governor, or both until clarifying, sort of, the object of his
disaffection...
“This
seemingly inexhaustible grift, raising money based on fear, is really all Trump
has. But the formula works.”
It would be the first indictment issued upon a former (or
sitting) President according to Barbara Perry, a presidential
historian at the Miller Center at the University of Virginia, who parsed
President Ulysses S. Grant arrest
(as opposed to indictment) —for speeding on a
horse and buggy in 1872 and Richard Nixon’s resignation in the face of
indictment one hundred and two years later, or the probable indictment of
Warren Harding for his cabinet of curiosities and grafters had he not died in
office before the investigation was completed. But the Trump case, Perry told
Time (6:37 PM, Attachment Seventy Five) will go down
in history as one of the biggest political scandals in American history—even if
the charges relate to the seemingly mundane offense of bookkeeping fraud.
“Like
all things with Trump, it’s unprecedented,” Perry exclaimed.
Timepiecer
Anisha Kohli provided yet another latenight update – this on Indictment Leakin’
Eve, at 11PM... just in time for the late news and the comedians to draw their
arrows (Attachment Seventy Six) attempted to explain
what might, or will, happen next.
Yes, he might flee to Belarus.
He also might decide to eat a bullet.
But, Ol’ 45 will most likely just keep doing
what he’s been doing... trolling enemies and raising cold, hard cash... and on
Tuesday, as it turned out, he will do what all the busted criminals in New York
do.
“He
will be booked, finger-printed, and have a “mug shot” taken,” predicted
reporter Anisha Kohli (incorrectly as it transpired). With Trump’s substantial
ties to the community, especially his ongoing 2024 presidential campaign, “the
judge likely wouldn’t deem him a flight risk,” former federal prosecutor Renato
Mariotti told TIME. Given the white-collar charges
Trump would likely be confronting, he may not even face bond, just be released
on his own recognizance per New York law.
“This
is not just high profile. This was the President of the United States. There’s
been nobody like him to walk those halls,” Jeremy Saland,
defense attorney and former Manhattan Assistant District Attorney, told Time.
One
of Trump’s lawyers, Susan R. Necheles, told TIME that former President Trump
is expected to turn himself in on Tuesday, April fourth, to be arraigned in
State Supreme Court in Manhattan (despite Gov. DeSantis’ offer of sanctualy in Florida).
Shanlon
Wu, a white-collar defense attorney and former federal prosecutor, told TIME that it would be
highly unlikely if a showdown standoff occurred. Defense counsels typically receive notice
when their white-collar clients are being indicted, she said. “You would make
an appointment basically, to bring your client in to be booked and
fingerprinted,” Wu declared.
Another
of Trump’s attorneys had previously said that if indicted, Trump would not
resist arrest and that they would follow normal procedures. “There won’t be a
standoff at Mar-a-Lago with Secret Service and the Manhattan DA’s office,” Joe Tacopina told the
New York Daily News.no
matter Trump’s status as the 45th president of the United States. He will be
booked, finger-printed, and have a “mug shot” taken. With Trump’s substantial
ties to the community, especially his ongoing 2024 presidential campaign, the
judge likely wouldn’t deem him a flight risk, former federal prosecutor Renato Mariotti tells TIME. Given the white-collar charges Trump
would likely be confronting, he may not even face bond, just released on his
own recognizance per New York law.
If
Trump is arraigned and officially charged, the case would eventually move on to
jury selection, which could be a lengthy and exhausting process.
“The
majority of people in the jury pool would have some opinions about Donald
Trump,” former federal prosecutor Mariotti says.
“Most defendants, even if they’re famous, are often not known by prospective
jurors or they don’t have a certain opinion about that person. I think it’s
safe to say that Donald Trump is different.”
During
jury selection the prosecution and the defense use voir
dire questioning, meaning they can ask each prospective juror
questions about their qualifications and knowledge of the case, in an attempt
to ensure fair and impartial jurors.
Wu
thinks a judge could opt to issue a so-called “gag order,” restricting all
parties from talking to the press. “This is gonna get
so much publicity anyway if he’s charged,” Wu says. “It’d be very hard to find
jurors who haven’t been exposed to the news.” Although rarely used, one method
to combat this is for a judge to sequester jurors, limiting their exposure to
outside influence or information.
In
a Q&A explication originally published Indictment Night at 7:30 pm , then updated on Friday at
3:43 pm, Time... answering its own inquiry about whether the former President
was treating Judge Juan Merchan in the same cavalier
and conspiratorial manner as he derided Bragg|... stated that Trump had posted,
without evidence, that Merchan “hates me,” in a post
on his social media site TruthSocial. Trump, who
misspelled the judge’s name, wrote that Merchan “was hand picked by Bragg & the Prosecutors, & is the
same person who ‘railroaded’ my 75 year old former
CFO, Allen Weisselberg, to take a ‘plea’ deal.” Along
with handling the case against the Trump organization executive, Merchan also presided over a case in which he ordered the
Trump Foundation to pay $1.6 million after a jury found the organization guilty
of criminal tax fraud. Alvin Bragg, the current Manhattan District Attorney,
was a prosecutor involved in that case according to Brian Bennett and unnamed
Time Fillers (Attachment Seventy Seven).
Time
also took note of President Joe and his SecPress
Psaki declining to comment, while former Vice President Mike Pence defended his
former running mate on Thursday night, describing the indictment against Trump
as “an outrage” that will “only further serve to divide our country.”
Time also noted the right-wing
response so far: ‘Now it’s GAME ON’
Some
members of pro-Trump social media groups and forums that served as the staging
grounds of the “Stop the Steal” rallies and the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S.
Capitol celebrated the indictment.
“I
almost wanted this. Now it’s GAME ON,” one person wrote on a popular pro-Trump
forum. “I know all of you are smart enough to know and see all this, but we
need to rally behind him and show the left just how much this reinforces his
popularity and electability,” another person wrote. “Get active at your local
level and get vocal. Teflon Don.”
But
many of Trump’s most loyal supporters exhibited a swelling sense of apathy about largely agreed
that it made no sense organize any mass rallies or events, in that so many are
expressing anger at what they described as Trump’s “betrayal” of those who
heeded his call on Jan. 6.
“Has
he called for protests about these poor guys? No. But he’s calling for us to
protest about his arrest,” a MAGA
dropout wrote on a popular por-Trump forum. “It doesn’t sit right with me.”
Another user agreed: “He’s right. Trump betrayed the J6 patriots.”
The
particulars of the upcoming indictment would remain secret until Tursday, but another
Q&A article, this by Politico and posted shortly after 8 PM on Thursday,
delineated the most likely charges as follows...
While
the precise charges are secret for now, prosecutors have concluded they can
prove a criminal case against Trump because of the apparent subterfuge
surrounding a $130,000 payment to adult-film actress Stormy Daniels to keep her
from publicizing her claim about a sexual encounter with Trump. Trump’s lawyer
Michael Cohen funded that payment through a home equity line of credit.
Trump
insisted in April 2018 he did not know about the hush money, but Cohen provided
Congress a series of check images, signed by Trump, reflecting
payments to Cohen that he said were reimbursements for the money he laid out,
including at least two that came while Trump was in the White House. Cohen said
that Trump and his company concealed the purpose of the payments by falsely
labeling them as legal expenses.
Under
New York law, disguising such payments in corporate records is a crime, but
typically only a misdemeanor. It becomes a felony if the false business records
were intended to obscure a second crime. In this case, that second crime appears
to be the use of the funds to advance Trump’s presidential campaign allegedly
in violation of campaign finance laws.
(Attachment Seventy Eight)
Among other potential inquiries that Pollitico
correspondents Josh
Gerstein and Kyle Cheney attempted to answer were:
Risks to the prosecution: “Cohen
is not the strongest possible witness for prosecutors. He’s provided a lot of
the evidence and testimony needed to bring the case... (but) his credibility is
open to challenge since he pleaded guilty in 2018 to nine felonies and was
sentenced to three years in federal prison. He’s also repeatedly expressed
extreme bitterness towards Trump, even running a podcast he titled “Mea Culpa,” an allusion to his regrets over his time as
Trump’s ally.”
Will Trump remain free? Can he
campaign while under indictment?
“(I)t
seems unlikely that prosecutors would seek to detain the former president or
restrict his travel in the U.S. while the case is pending. There is no legal
impediment to him continuing his presidential campaign while facing criminal
charges — or even if he were jailed.”
How long will it take Trump to be
brought to trial?
“It
will, by necessity, take many months to commence a trial of a former president
of the United States. Even if both sides were eager to proceed to trial
quickly, ironing out legal and constitutional questions would likely stretch
out over the next year and into the 2024 primary season.”
Add
to all the above “Trump’s penchant — in nearly every legal matter he’s
embroiled in — to seek to delay and prolong proceedings whenever possible.”
Trump’s
lawyers “could try to move the case to federal court, arguing that at least
some of the payments to Cohen took place while Trump was president and
therefore a state court should have no authority to resolve the matter. Trump
also could seek to move the trial to a different courthouse elsewhere in New
York state. And he could try to have the indictment dismissed or reduced.” All
of these pre-trial motions, Politico noted, “will take time to resolve.”
Deep
into the night, as the wonderers wondered, and the wonders of a New World... or,
at least, Washington... Order began manifesting as dreams or nightmares, Trump
tweeted a rambling cliché rucksack of old grievances after news of Tuesday’s
indictment surfaced and also “went on a social media frenzy” overnight on
Thursday on Truth Social. “WHERE’S HUNTER?” he posted at around 3am dredging up
one of his longstanding obsessions and calling the indictment “Fake, Corrupt,
and Disgraceful” as well as “an attack on our country” and “free and fair
elections.”
“These
Thugs and Radical Left Monsters have just INDICATED [sic] the 45th President of
the United States of America, and the leading Republican Candidate, by far, for
the 2024 Nomination for President,” Trump wrote.
FRIDAY
While
Midnight Don continued fulminating and Joneses... great and small... tried to
catch up on sleep, it was morning in the Old World, and the Brits were
feverishly finishing up their morning terrors for consumers to consume
alongside their morning tea and Weetos.
Fox News has famously dumped Trump
but, once the indictment date was announced, the polls polled and newly minted
Trump-hater Rupert Murdoch started pivoting back into the embrace of a man who
now appeared to be ready to capture the 2024 nomination, if not the general
election. So, the Guardian U.K.’s correspondent Jonathan Yerushalmy posted at one
minute past midnight (EST... a still-early five AM in London) that
“...if the network’s initial reaction was one of shock, even uncertainty, what
quickly followed was more akin to the bellicose confidence that its viewership
has come to expect,” with Podhost Jesse Watters
telling his prime-time audience (EST) that America was now in a “a revenge
political climate”. (Attachment Seventy Nine)
“When Trump wins back the White
House, he needs to start looking into Democrats,” chimed in Watters’ guest, Mike Davis of Article III.
“Potentially you could have a
former president behind bars. The only way you can get a free Trump is to elect
a free Trump,” Davis added.
“He’s acting like an insane person,” Sean
Hannity, one of the network’s best-known personalities, allegedly said of Trump. Fox News’ owner, Rupert Murdoch,
said several of the network’s top stars “endorsed” Trump’s false claims, and
later added: “I would have liked us to be stronger in denouncing it in
hindsight,” according to a deposition in the case.
“He is a bad-ass if he’s got a mug-shot … his
poll numbers have gone up with this and I just think this is gonna make sure he’s going to be on the ticket,” one
commentator said in the moments after the news broke.
By the time Tucker Carlson, one of
the networks most popular personalities, came on air, the question had shifted:
how to respond?
Carlson – who, in a previous GUK
gobbet only a month ago, told an associate that he passionately hates Trump,
according to evidence in the Dominion case – described the indictment as a
turning point for America. “He offered up a potted history of Trump’s
presidency, a history that he adorned throughout with conspiracy theories,
calls for the FBI to be defunded and parallel narratives of the former
president’s two impeachments. From the start, he said, “Washington elites” had
been working to stop Trump becoming president again.
“The rule of law is suspended
tonight,” Carlson announced gravely. “What you’re seeing now is lawlessness –
the question is who can stop it?
At the ungodly hour of one AM
(EST)... and a still early London morning, GUKster
David Smith proclaimed that 30 March 2023 is now and forevermore “a day for the
history books,” citing presidential historian Michael Beschloss,
who said on the MSNBC network: “Tomorrow, in terms of American history, we will
be waking up in a different country. Before tonight, presidents in this country
were kings.”
And a sad, weeping melanchology sovereign is, or was, King Trump. Jesus had an easy time compared to the
martyred and behectored Exile; the bigger the alleged
crime, the louder he airs grievances and the more he plays the victim – and so far the Republican party has been mostly willing to indulge
him.
That is the role he will play with
an indictment hanging over him. At a campaign rally in Waco, Texas, last
weekend, he claimed: “The Biden regime’s weaponization of law enforcement
against their political opponents is something straight out of the Stalinist
Russia horror show.” He suggested that it is the most serious problem facing
America today.
Trump will now doubtless set about
putting the Manhattan district attorney, Alvin Bragg, on trial in the court of
public opinion. He has already used dehumanising and
racist language. A social media post, later removed, showed a photo of Trump
holding a baseball bat and apparently looming over Bragg, raising fears of
violence against him.
America’s tragedy, penned Mr.
Smith, “is that the tactic will work with many Republicans. That Bragg is a
Democrat from New York will trigger a Pavlovian response in Trump’s favor. That
the case is seven years old, based on an untested legal theory and has Michael
Cohen, a convicted criminal, as a key witness will provide further ammunition.”
Perhaps, even objective Independants and a few de-Bidened
liberals may begin to think that Djonald UnLoved was right!
The
horror!
Mister Smith, noting the tributes
to the victim pouring in from Kevin Mac, Sen. J. D. Vance (R-Oh) and even Saint
Ron; Vance, a Republican senator for Ohio, describing the indictment as
“political persecution masquerading as law”, “blatant election interference”
and “a direct assault on the tens of millions of Americans who support him”.
“But the most telling reaction
came from DeSantis himself,” decided Smith (Attachment Eighty). “This could
have been the moment for him to break from Trump and prove statesmanlike,
calling for dignity and unity in a solemn moment for the nation. Instead he went full Maga.”
With his new best bud, DeSantis,
who said: “The weaponization of the legal system to advance a political agenda
turns the rule of law on its head. It is un-American.” Blowing an antisemitic dog
whistle, DeSantis twice linked Bragg to philanthropist George Soros, adding
that Florida would not assist in “an extradition request” to send Trump to New
York – sending America into the political unknown, a twilight zone where
precedents do not apply and everyone has to respond on the fly. Can the
Manhattan court assemble an impartial jury, and will the timing of the trial
collide with the Republican primary?
“Then, what about the other major
legal perils threatening Trump: over the January 6 insurrection, over election
interference in Georgia and over the mishandling of classified documents? These cases are arguably more clear-cut and
consequential – but not necessarily in the eyes of Republicans. Will he
recklessly incite unrest among his supporters?” Smith asked.
Another hour and another dispatch
from abroad... Hugo Lowell reporting on the revels of the mob, and @. “But in private,” wrote @Lowell (Attachment Eighty One), “Trump was more subdued as he took in the
significance of becoming the first sitting or former president to be charged
and the changed reality of operating under the threat of an eventual criminal
trial, several sources close to him said.”
The private response showed that
for all his outward bravado – including claims that he wanted to be arrested and handcuffed for a “perp walk” because he wanted to project
defiance if he was ever indicted – deep down, Trump has always feared the
prospect of being criminally charged and its consequences.
The charges remain sealed, but are
expected to touch on $130,000 that Trump made to
Daniels through his then lawyer Michael Cohen in the final days of the 2016
elections campaign. Trump later reimbursed Cohen with $35,000 checks, and Cohen
pleaded guilty in 2018 to federal charges over the money.
“Trump’s mood towards the hush
money investigation has fluctuated in recent weeks – from criticising
the prospect of criminal charges, to growing impatient and insisting they
should charge him already, and then going back to attacking the investigation
with vehemence.”
And Moira Daniels, waiting for the
dawn (EST) when it was already Morning in the United Kingdom, contributed this Infotorial to Team GUK – alleging “This isn’t the Trump
indictment we wanted, but it might be the one we deserve.”
Stormy Daniels and the illegal,
fraudulent machinations that the Trump campaign allegedly undertook to pay her
off during the height of the presidential campaign in 2016, Donegan vented
spleen and confetti, “have always struck me as the most quintessential of
Trump’s many scandals.” (Attachment Eighty Two)
Daniels, for years a successful
porn performer, had met Trump at a celebrity golf tournament in 2006. According
to her, he invited her to his hotel room, offered her work on his TV show and
then had sex with her. The two remained friendly afterwards; Trump invited
Daniels to the launch of his Trump Vodka brand the following year. “It’s the
kind of thing you suspect that these two people would have written off as a
funny story,” Donegan wrote, were it not for the consequences. “Trump denies
Daniels’ allegations, but in retrospect, with the hindsight of what we’ve come
to learn of him, the scene she recounts is almost unbearably true to his
character: the gathering of low-rent celebrities, the paltry quid pro quo, the
golf, and the sad, adolescent fantasy of sex with a porn star. The whole story
drips with Trump’s defining attribute: the desperate and insatiable need to
have his ego gratified. Which is why to me, at least,” Donegan contends, “it
seems obvious that Daniels is telling the truth.”
When Stormy approached the
National Enquirer, which tipped off the Trump campaign. Michael Cohen, Trump’s
“sweaty and exhausted lawyer and fixer, offered to pay her $130,000 to shut up
and go away, which Daniels was happy to accept. Cohen fronted the money
himself; initially, he seems to have taken out a line of credit on his own
house. Why go through this labyrinthine route? Why have the lawyer pay
personally – an unusual and inappropriate arrangement – especially in an amount
that was large for Michael Cohen but should have been small for his alleged
billionaire of a boss?”
Upgrading the indictment into a
conviction... a felony conviction...
will be more difficult to prove, but more than a few Fourth Estaters
– not to mention bloggers and publications like the National Enquirer.have noted, for better or worse, the defense
contention that Cohen, and not Trump, initially paid Daniels off “because if
Trump had paid her, that payment would have been subject to scrutiny – from
campaign finance regulators and from the public. And in the waning days of what
was a chaotic and flailing election, this was scrutiny that the Trump campaign
could not afford.”
Also,
under the eyes of Prince... soon King Charles... another Brit tabloid, Reuters
remarked that senior House of Representatives Republicans have vowed to
investigate Bragg and demanded he hand over documents and other confidential
material from the investigation. Bragg said Congress does not have authority to
interfere with a New York legal proceeding and accused the lawmakers of
escalating political tensions. Bragg's office has been the target of bomb
threats in recent weeks.
"You
and many of your colleagues have chosen to collaborate with Mr. Trump's efforts
to vilify and denigrate the integrity of elected state prosecutors and trial
judges," Bragg wrote in a letter to Republican lawmakers.
Meanwhile, back in the U.S.A., a
lawyer for the former president said that he would not take a plea deal and was
prepared to go to trial.
Here’s what else to know:
·
Mr. Bragg has
brought the case over Mr. Trump’s role, when he was running for president, in a
hush-money payment to a porn star, Stormy Daniels, who then agreed to keep
quiet about her story of an affair with him. Prosecutors are expected to argue
that the payoff, which came in the final days of the 2016 presidential
campaign, functioned as an illegal donation to Mr. Trump’s candidacy.
·
In a
statement on Thursday evening, Mr. Trump called Mr. Bragg, a Democrat, “a
disgrace” and denounced the case as “political persecution and election
interference at the highest level in history.” Mr. Trump described himself as
“a completely innocent person.”
·
Mr. Trump is
expected to turn himself in on Tuesday for arraignment on the indictment in
State Supreme Court in Manhattan, one of his lawyers said. The New York Police
Department issued
an order to all officers to
be “prepared for deployment,” part of enhanced security measures being put in
place all over the city.
·
After months
of cooler coverage of Mr. Trump, Fox
News hosts rallied around him on
Thursday, denouncing his indictment as an attempt to hinder his re-election
chances — he remains a
front-runner for
the 2024 Republican presidential nomination — and suggesting it might lead to
unrest.
Another
UK tabloid, Reuters... a news service that would probably resent the tabloidal appellation (See Attachment Eighty
Four) determined that “Senior House of Representatives Republicans have
vowed to investigate Bragg and demanded he hand over documents and other
confidential material from the investigation. Bragg said Congress does not have
authority to interfere with a New York legal proceeding and accused the lawmakers
of escalating political tensions. Bragg's office has been the target of bomb
threats in recent weeks.
Hypocrisy? Conspiracy?
"You
and many of your colleagues have chosen to collaborate with Mr. Trump's efforts
to vilify and denigrate the integrity of elected state prosecutors and trial
judges," Bragg wrote in a letter to Republican lawmakers.
The
prosecutor... and, by the following week, the judge... have refrained, so far,
from calling the actions of the defendant and his followers a “witch hunt”, but
the black cats are out of their bags, the broomsticks a-flying and the
partisans asking “which witch is which?”
Congressdamsel
Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Georgia) told the Washington Times that she would go
to New York to distress the prosecution and protest former President Donald
Trump’s indictment on charges tied to Stormy.
(Attachment Eighty Five)
“I’m
going to New York on Tuesday,” she wrote. “We MUST protest the unconstitutional
WITCH HUNT!”
“I don’t think people should protest this,
no,” House Speaker Kevin McCarthy had retorted last month at a GOP retreat in
Orlando, Florida. “We want calmness out there.”
Well,
there are magic potions that can gentle a body down, too.
That other Times, supposedly the
real one, the one in New York City, that is, also prepared a sort of Weekend
Update of its own, only without comedy. Also without names... reporting that “a lawyer” for the
former president said that he would not take a plea deal and was prepared to go
to trial.
Taco Joe? That other guy – one of those other, other
guys from the other cases? Rudy?
No matter. Recapitulating the minutae
of the charges as Djonald’s Lost Weekend began, the
old gray lady of Gotham opined that: “while Mr. Trump has sought to capitalize
on the criminal charges to energize his base, the ignominy of becoming a
defendant — especially after decades of evading prosecution despite numerous
repeated investigations — marks a profound change for a global celebrity who
has a history of deriding others accused of wrongdoing.” (Attachment Eighty Six)
“Ignominy?” How... how ignominious!
But there was a
bluebird in the blueberry pie of despair and despondency beclouding
Mar-a-Lago... assuming that Trump’s advisers and pollwatchers
weren’t playing an April Fool’s prank on the defeated President.
According to a Yahoo news poll,
Trump was now “beating DeSantis 57% to 31% in the one-to-one contest, and was
attracting majority support at 52% when pitted against a wider, 10-candidate
field including DeSantis at 21% and the UN ambassador in the Trump
administration, Nikki Haley.
“Trump
also improved his lead over DeSantis in polling done for his campaign by
McLaughlin and Associates, which surveyed 1,000 likely 2024 general election
voters and found Trump beating DeSantis 63% to 30%, improving his lead from
January when Trump was at 52% and DeSantis at 40. (GUK, Sat
1 Apr 2023 23.26 EDT, Attachment Eighty Seven)
The sharp uptick in polling
numbers – and a corresponding reversal by potential 2024 rivals trying to come
to Trump’s defense over the indictment after previously trying to distance
themselves – was so sudden and marked that it took some of Trump’s own advisers
by surprise. Admittedly, McLaughlin
skews Republican, but Yahoo is relatively honest and the conclusions... that
the base is holding... mean that while a majority of the voters aren’t yet
ready to send him back to the White House, nomination is looking more and more
like a low-hanging plum on the tree of destiny.
But for now, a perp walk through the rotting orchard of wormy pipkins in the Big
Apple loomed... full of pitfalls should things go North on Tuesday. Trump was protected from his potential cellies should Judge Merchan really take offense and lock him up
without bail; indictments and criminal trials scheduled for Tuesday at the same
courthouse included: “burglary for taking paintings from a West Village
townhouse; a thwarted terrorist attack on a Jewish community; the illegal
selling of firearms; murder for an East Harlem hammer attack; murder and attempted
murder for attacking multiple homeless men; murder and criminal possession of a
weapon for shooting into a car in East Harlem; and a grand larceny case
involving sim-card swapping.”
GUK reported that discussions were
still being held about whether his booking photo will be publicly circulated.
Trump reportedly “wants the mugshot out” because it could harness (?) donations
to his presidential campaign.
It also published an aliased
Editorial by Observer just after midnight Sunday morning... Attachment Eighty Seven (A)... that, more in the progressive spirit of
the progressive rag, called appealed to some spirit in the sky that, if there’s
any justice, “Trump’s time in court will ultimately be followed by time served.”
The full Trump charge sheet “reads
like a horror novel in which democracy is murdered,” Observer observed... “(t)he
continuing mystery is why justice is so long in coming,” he, she or it
declared. “It is hard to avoid the
conclusion that reluctance to energetically pursue these and other crimes, such
as Trump’s apparent theft of secret documents found at his Florida home, stems
from political timidity at the top. The entire Trump saga, akin to tawdry,
never-ending reality TV show, is a distraction from pressing issues such as
post-pandemic economic revival, the climate emergency and war in Europe. The US
should focus on these challenges rather than endlessly indulge the antic
ravings of a narcissistic, foul-mouthed, misogynistic crook.
Later on
Sunday, GUK took another swipe at the Colonials, with Hugo Lowell reporting
that the former president “has vowed to people close to him that he wants to go
on the offensive and – in a private moment over the weekend at his Mar-a-Lago
resort in Florida,” (that was evidently not so private) remarked using more
colorful language that it was time to politically “rough ’em
up”. (Attachment Eighty Eight)
Since
he had not yet faced the Indictment Indictors and Judge Merchan,
“’em” presumably referred to DA Bragg and his
minions, not Dorothy’s auntie.
Guk published another reverse timeline, dating back to a few
minutes before the indictment. While the
former President was being processed, they also noted that the clown show outside included MTG and the Lyin’
DKing (Attachment Ninety)
And NPR caught up
with Stormy, sizzling at Trump’s moment of truth. Earlier she had called the case a sad day for
America, but after a judge socked her for a portion of Djonald’s
legal bills, she re-pivoted.
"I don't think that his
crimes against me are worthy of incarceration," Daniels said, but later
added: "The other things that he has done — if he is found guilty, then
absolutely." (Attachment Ninety One)
April 3 – April 6 , 2023 (and
Easter Holiday) |
|
|
Monday, April 3, 2023 Dow:
33,601.15 |
After an April
Foolish weekend of wiseguys and fools telling Don
Jones what they know to be true, Former President Donald Trump, himself,
flies north with the geese and the goblins; spending the night in a
now-forbidding Trump Tower, dialing up another lawyer and denouncing
tomorrow’s judge Juan Merchan “a Trump-hater.” Protesters cavort outside, but far fewer
than expected. Stormy Daniels is in seclusion,
calculating ways to make money off her notoriety. Stormy storms continue their Spring
Breaking, 59 tornadoes ravage eleven states and kill 32. Bad foreigners continue doing bad
things. After arresting a Wall Street
Journalist on trumped-up (pun noted) espionage charges, they announce capture
of a suspect in the bombing of a St. Petersburg pro-Putin blogger and blame
America and the Ukraine; maybe she did it, maybe not. OPEC cuts production, likely to lead to a
summer of higher gas prices. Riots
continue in France (pensions) and the Middle East (religion). Fifteen million Americans lose their
Medicaid plague coverage, forcing the poorest to choose between pills and
food. Politicians (with assured govt.
bennies) shrug. |
|
Tuesday, April 4, 2023 Dow:
33,562.38 |
Gov. DeSantis (R-Fl.) doubles down
on his anti-gay, anti-Disney campaign by signing a bill to greenlight
concealed carry guns without precautions.
Time to shoot Mickey! Ford develops and tests its AI app for
self-repossessing cars that drive back to the dealer on their own if the deadbeat
can’t pay. If the cars are too old,
they drive themselves to the junkyard. A weekend in sports finds Uconn (men) and LSU (women) capturing NCAA hoops titles,
with the Masters beginning on Thursday.
In song, the Country Music Awards honor “Jellyroll” (named after the
delicacy that creates his jellyroll physique) with three trophies. And then 2:15 arrives with NYC mayor Eric
Adams warning the rabble outside not to be roused by the rabble rousers,
further warning the outsiders to “control yourself.” Beyond a few weird costumes, the tiny
gatherings do. Trump himself is
further outraged... first he was not allowed to be handcuffed for his perp
walk, now the authorities decide that, since everybody would know him if he
ran away, there is no need for a mugshot.
Merchandisers are crushed... then recover... fake mugshot t-shirts are
on sale by the end of the day. |
|
Wednesday, April 5, 2023 Dow:
33,482.72 |
It’s National Walking Day. Djonald
UnConvicted (yet) flies back to Florida, leaving
lawyer Joe Taco to walk back history – which he does by saying that, although
Trump paid off Cohen to pay off Stormy, the money and the matter was
personal, not campaign finance related (the master key to uplifting misdemeanors
to felonies). He also asks why a State prosecuting is bringing Federal charges. Even the usually-liberal Dan Abrams calls
the case “a souped-up misdemeanor”... will The
Donald end up picking up trash by the roadside... (which is what got him into
trouble in the first place)? Stormy weather continues to
plague not only America but Stormy Daniels herself, as one of the many
defamation lawsuits against Trump fails, and she is ordered to pay his
lawyers $122,000. The leaves her with
an $8,000 profit – still not bad for fifteen minutes’ work. In the other three cases, VP
Pence agrees to testify as to the One Six itself (Trump is predictably
outraged and calls for defunding the FBI but, after all, he did urge the mob
to hang him) while Atlanta voting and Mar-a-Lago documents await their light
of day. Be it through Trumpish reaction or local issues, liberals enjoy
electoral success as another “progressive” wins the Mayoralty of Chicago, and
the Wisconsin Supreme Court is flipped, auguring loosening of harsh
anti-abortion laws. |
|
Thursday, April 6, 2023 Dow:
33,485.29 |
It’s Holy Thursday. Unholy pedophile priests are outed in
Baltimore and a New Jersey cheerleading coach is accused of sexual assault on
his girls. Pope Francis, on the other
hand, staggers from his sickbed to wash the feet of prisoners locked up in
Italy, where a new Plague Variant is rising up and reaping souls. Unholy violence also flares up in the
Mideast as three religious holidays... Easter,
Passover and Ramadan... turn out the faithful to murder the infidels. Whisperers whisper that some Ukrainians
will support Russia’s annexation of Crimea as the price for peace. Crime takes an ee-yah
turn before the holiday as Yue Yu (aka Doctor Drano) is accused of trying to
poison her lying husband with lye (which, she defends herself) was only
intended to kill ants. A dirty Daddy
is charged with murder after an alligator eats his two year
old, and there are the usual incidents of gun violence nationwide, |
|
Friday, April 7, 2023 Dow:
33,274.15 |
Closed for Easter Weekend. The Index will be updated this week. |
|
Saturday, April 3, 2023 Dow: (Closed) |
|
|
Sunday, April 3, 2023 Dow: (Closed) |
|
|
The Dow experienced a Trump (indictment) Bump and rose
by a thousands points,
pushing the Don back into the black. |
|
CHART
of CATEGORIES w/VALUE ADDED to EQUAL BASELINE of 15,000 (REFLECTING…
approximately… DOW JONES INDEX of June 27, 2013) See a further explanation
of categories here… ECONOMIC INDICES (60%) |
CATEGORY |
VALUE |
BASE |
RESULTS |
SCORE |
OUR SOURCES
and COMMENTS |
|
|||||||||||||||
INCOME |
(24%) |
6/17/13
& 1/1/22 |
LAST |
CHANGE |
NEXT |
SOURCE |
|
||||||||||||||
Wages (hrly.
Per cap) |
9% |
1350
points |
3/6/23 |
+1.24% |
4/23 |
1,434.03 |
1,434.03 |
|
|||||||||||||
Median
Inc. (yearly) |
4% |
600 |
4/3/23 |
+0.28% |
4/24/23 |
603.05 |
603.05 |
http://www.usdebtclock.org/ 35,761 771 789 |
|
||||||||||||
Unempl.
(BLS – in mi) |
4% |
600 |
3/6/23 |
+5.56% |
4/23 |
633.65 |
633.65 |
|
|||||||||||||
Official
(DC – in mi) |
2% |
300 |
4/3/23 |
+1.27% |
4/24/23 |
275.12 |
275.12 |
http://www.usdebtclock.org/
5,522 511 820 817 |
|
||||||||||||
Unofficl.
(DC – in mi) |
2% |
300 |
4/3/23 |
-0.91% |
4/24/23 |
265.93 |
265.93 |
http://www.usdebtclock.org/ 11,930
908 12,027 024 |
|
||||||||||||
Workforce
Particip. Number Percent |
2% |
300 |
4/3/23 |
+0.23% +0.23% |
4/24/23 |
302.00 |
302.00 |
In 161,036 094 462 485 Out 100,297 308 029 032 Total: 261,333 402 |
|
||||||||||||
WP
% (ycharts)* |
1% |
150 |
2/27/23 |
+0.16% |
4/23 |
150.95 |
150.95 |
https://ycharts.com/indicators/labor_force_participation_rate 62.50 .60 |
|
||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
15% |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total
Inflation |
7% |
1050 |
4/3/23 |
+0.4% |
4/23 |
996.88 |
996.88 |
http://www.bls.gov/news.release/cpi.nr0.htm +0.4 |
|
||||||||||||
Food |
2% |
300 |
4/3/23 |
+0.4% |
4/23 |
278.78 |
278.78 |
http://www.bls.gov/news.release/cpi.nr0.htm +0.4 |
|
||||||||||||
Gasoline |
2% |
300 |
4/3/23 |
+1.0% |
4/23 |
243.21 |
243.21 |
http://www.bls.gov/news.release/cpi.nr0.htm +1.0 |
|
||||||||||||
Medical
Costs |
2% |
300 |
4/3/23 |
-0.7% |
4/23 |
294.90 |
294.90 |
http://www.bls.gov/news.release/cpi.nr0.htm -0.7 |
|
||||||||||||
Shelter |
2% |
300 |
4/3/23 |
+0.7% |
4/23 |
281.06 |
281.06 |
http://www.bls.gov/news.release/cpi.nr0.htm +0.8 |
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
WEALTH |
6% |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Dow Jones
Index |
2% |
300 |
4/3/23 |
+3.22% |
4/24/23 |
269.51 |
269.51 |
https://www.wsj.com/market-data/quotes/index/ 33,274.15 |
|
||||||||||||
Home
(Sales) (Valuation) |
1% 1% |
150 150 |
3/6/23 |
-0.50% -2.15% |
4/23 |
125.77 267.55 |
125.77 267.55 |
https://www.nar.realtor/research-and-statistics Sales (M): 4.00 4.58 Valuations
(K): 359.0 363 |
|
||||||||||||
Debt
(Personal) |
2% |
300 |
4/3/23 |
+0.085% |
4/24/23 |
277.88 |
277.88 |
http://www.usdebtclock.org/ 72,972
73,034 246 3,273 |
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
NATIONAL |
(10%) |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Revenue
(trilns.) |
2% |
300 |
4/3/23 |
+0.011% |
4/24/23 |
384.49 |
384.49 |
debtclock.org/
4,610.6 0.918 611.3
611.68 612.2 612.4 |
|
||||||||||||
Expenditures
(tr.) |
2% |
300 |
4/3/23 |
+0.033% |
4/24/23 |
340.95 |
340.95 |
debtclock.org/ 6,019
021 023 025 027 029 |
|
||||||||||||
National
Debt tr.) |
3% |
450 |
4/3/23 |
+0.065% |
4/24/23 |
426.57 |
426.57 |
http://www.usdebtclock.org/ 31,596
609 624 639 661 667 (The debt ceiling was 31.4) |
|
||||||||||||
Aggregate
Debt (tr.) |
3% |
450 |
4/3/23 |
+0.11% |
4/24/23 |
421.79 |
421.79 |
http://www.usdebtclock.org/ 94,466
556 660 764 913 958 |
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
GLOBAL |
(5%) |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Foreign
Debt (tr.) |
2% |
300 |
4/3/23 |
+1.35% |
4/24/23 |
342.73 |
342.73 |
http://www.usdebtclock.org/ 7,224
216 315 313 |
|
||||||||||||
Exports
(in billions) |
1% |
150 |
4/3/23 |
+2.92% |
4/23 |
163.94 |
163.94 |
https://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/current/index.html 257.5 251.2 |
|
||||||||||||
Imports
(bl.) |
1% |
150 |
4/3/23 |
+2.52% |
4/23 |
165.54 |
165.54 |
https://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/current/index.html 325.8 321.7 |
|
||||||||||||
Trade
Deficit (bl.) |
1% |
150 |
4/3/23 |
+1.32% |
4/23 |
269.51 |
300.76 |
https://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/current/index.html 68.3 70.5 |
|
||||||||||||
SOCIAL INDICES (40%) |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
ACTS
of MAN |
12% |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
World
Affairs |
3% |
450 |
4/3/23 |
-0.1% |
4/24/23 |
447.23 |
447.23 |
Arab-Israeli conflict extends to Lebanon as battles
rage at AlAqba Mosquei in
Jerusalem. U.K. sanctions Tik Tok for spying on kids: Us next? Jacinda Arden gives an inspiration
retirement speech in New Zealand. |
|
||||||||||||
Terrorism |
2% |
300 |
4/3/23 |
-0.1% |
4/24/23 |
288.15 |
288.15 |
Russia arrests suspect in assassination of Putinista. Report
on Afghan evacuation has President Joe and Trump blaming each other. Riots in France (labor) and Israel
(religion) continue on into adjoining Passover, Easter, Ramadan. |
|
||||||||||||
Politics |
3% |
450 |
4/3/23 |
nc |
4/24/23 |
471.14 |
471.14 |
Trump indictment sets off posturing and
scrambling. Speaker Kevin Mac and
Taiwan PM discuss more arms sales, angering China. Robert F. Kenney Jr. challenges Biden as an
anti-vaxxer. Tennessee legislature
expels two for overenthusiastic advocacy of gun control after Nashville
school murders. |
|
||||||||||||
Economics |
3% |
450 |
4/3/23 |
-0.4% |
4/24/23 |
429.19 |
429.19 |
Post-bankrupt banks cut 56K jobs, McD cuts more, WalMart cuts
2,000. But there are still jobs out
there. Shortage of air traffic
controllers expected to cause delays. |
|
||||||||||||
Crime |
1% |
150 |
4/3/23 |
-0.4% |
4/24/23 |
265.71 |
265.71 |
Nashville cops say school shooter bought 7 guns
legally, but State legislators expel two who call for gun control. Weird alligator and Drano crimes (above); 4
Americans killed in Cancun. Tech mogul
Bob Lee stabbed to death in S.F. |
|
||||||||||||
ACTS
of GOD |
(6%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Environment/Weather |
3% |
450 |
4/3/23 |
-0.2% |
4/24/23 |
421.09 |
421.09 |
Another week of West Coast cold, East Coast heat and
in between come Tornadoes; Missouri hardest hit with 5 killed. |
|
||||||||||||
Disasters |
3% |
450 |
4/3/23 |
+0.6% |
4/24/23 |
441.35 |
441.35 |
|
|||||||||||||
LIFESTYLE/JUSTICE
INDEX |
(15%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Science,
Tech, Educ. |
4% |
600 |
4/3/23 |
+0.3% |
4/24/23 |
626.61 |
626.61 |
Virgin Orbit goes broke after failures to
launch. NASA names four moon
astronauts... and |
|
||||||||||||
Equality
(econ/social) |
4% |
600 |
4/3/23 |
+0.3% |
4/24/23 |
611.18 |
611.18 |
Cites diversity: a black, a woman, a...
Canadian! Pope Francis washes the feet
of prisoners on Holy Thursday, |
|
||||||||||||
Health |
4% |
600 |
4/3/23 |
nc |
4/24/23 |
472.52 |
472.52 |
CDC warns of deadly Marburg epidemic breaking out in
Africa. Docs say much risk, no benefit
in alcohol: bring back Prohibition?
Bad week for Axis cars: VW recalls 143K for bad airbags, Honda
500K. |
|
||||||||||||
Freedom
and Justice |
3% |
450 |
4/3/23 |
+0.2% |
4/24/23 |
463.15 |
463.15 |
SCOTUS Justice Thomas accused of taking graft from
billionaire Harlan Crow. J&J
settles talcum poweder lawsuit for $9B. Rupert Murdoch called to testify in
Fox/Dominion lawsuit. More corporate legal
warfare between Chipotle and Sweetgreen |
|
||||||||||||
MISCELLANEOUS
and TRANSIENT INDEX |
(7%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
Cultural
incidents |
3% |
450 |
4/3/23 |
+0.3% |
4/24/23 |
487.53 |
487.53 |
Masters tees off Thursday. Uconn and LSU win
NCAA titles. Jelly Roll wins CMA
awards. RIP Madonna producer Seymour Stein, |
|
||||||||||||
Misc.
incidents |
4% |
450 |
4/3/23 |
+0.1% |
4/24/23 |
476.40 |
476.40 |
Osama killer Gen. McRaven writes “Wisdom of the
Bullfrog” and says: “When you’re in command, command!” Heavy California rains enhance spring
flower blooming. |
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
The
Don Jones Index for the week of April 3rd through April 9th,
2023 was UP 4.48 points
The Don Jones
Index is sponsored by the Coalition for a New Consensus: retired Congressman
and Independent Presidential candidate Jack “Catfish” Parnell, Chairman; Brian Doohan, Administrator.
The CNC denies, emphatically, allegations that the organization, as well
as any of its officers (including former Congressman Parnell,
environmentalist/America-Firster Austin Tillerman and cosmetics CEO Rayna
Finch) and references to Parnell’s works, “Entropy and Renaissance” and “The
Coming Kill-Off” are fictitious or, at best, mere pawns in the web-serial
“Black Helicopters” – and promise swift, effective legal action against parties
promulgating this and/or other such slanders.
Comments, complaints, donations (especially SUPERPAC donations) always
welcome at feedme@generisis.com or: speak@donjonesindex.com.
ATTACHMENTS
See Attachments
One through Eighteen appended to our Lesson of March 27th...
“Drizzle”. Our April 3rd lesson, “Sizzle, covered events from the
Indictment Announcement late Thursday, March 30th to the Indictment
on April 2nd (Attachments Nineteen through Seventy)
Below is
Attachment Zero: The Indictment.
Thereafter, we resume with Attachment Seventy One
ATTACHMENT
ZERO – From The Hill
Read the full Trump indictment charging him with 34 felony counts
BY CAITLIN YILEK UPDATED ON: APRIL 4, 2023 / 4:18
PM / CBS NEWS
Former President Donald Trump has
been charged by a New York grand jury with 34 felony counts of
falsifying business records in an indictment that was unsealed Tuesday after Trump
was arraigned in a Manhattan courtroom. Trump pleaded not guilty to all
charges.
The Manhattan District Attorney’s
Office alleges Trump orchestrated a “catch and kill” scheme to suppress
damaging information before the 2016 election. Prosecutors say the scheme
involved falsifying business records to conceal three payments, including
$130,000 that Trump attorney Michael Cohen paid to adult film star Stormy
Daniels.
“The defendant DONALD J. TRUMP
repeatedly and fraudulently falsified New York business records to conceal
criminal conduct that hid damaging information from the voting public during
the 2016 presidential election,” according to a statement of facts released
alongside the indictment.
Read the indictment and the statement of facts below:
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE
OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKTHE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW
YORK-against-DONALD J. TRUMP,Defendant.THE
GRAND JURY OF THE COUNTY OF NEW YORK, by this indictment, accusesthe
defendant of the crime of
FALSIFYING BUSINESS RECORDS IN THE
FIRSTDEGREE
, in violation of Penal Law
§175.10, committed as follows:The defendant, in the
County of New York and elsewhere, on or about February 14, 2017,with intent to
defraud and intent to commit another crime and aid and conceal the commissionthereof, made and caused a false entry in the
business records of an enterprise, to wit, an invoicefrom
Michael Cohen dated February 14, 2017, marked as a record of the Donald J. TrumpRevocable Trust, and kept and maintained by the Trump Organization.SECOND COUNT:AND THE GRAND JURY AFORESAID, by
this indictment, further accuses thedefendant of the
crime of
FALSIFYING BUSINESS RECORDS IN THE
FIRST DEGREE
,in violation of Penal Law §175.10,
committed as follows:The defendant, in the County of
New York and elsewhere, on or about February 14, 2017,with intent to defraud
and intent to commit another crime and aid and conceal the commissionthereof,
made and caused a false entry in the business records of an
enterprise, to wit, an entry inthe Detail General
Ledger for the Donald J. Trump Revocable Trust, bearing voucher number842457,
and kept and maintained by the Trump Organization.
THIRD COUNT:AND THE GRAND JURY
AFORESAID, by this indictment, further accuses thedefendant
of the crime of
FALSIFYING BUSINESS RECORDS IN THE
FIRST DEGREE
,in violation of Penal Law
§175.10, committed as follows:The defendant, in the
County of New York and elsewhere, on or about February 14, 2017,with intent to
defraud and intent to commit another crime and aid and conceal the commissionthereof, made and caused a false entry in
the business records of an enterprise, to wit, an entry inthe Detail General Ledger for the Donald J. Trump
Revocable Trust, bearing voucher number842460, and kept and maintained by the
Trump Organization.FOURTH COUNT:AND THE GRAND JURY
AFORESAID, by this indictment, further accuses thedefendant
of the crime of
FALSIFYING BUSINESS RECORDS IN THE
FIRST DEGREE
,in violation of Penal Law
§175.10, committed as follows:The defendant, in the
County of New York and elsewhere, on or about February 14, 2017,with intent to
defraud and intent to commit another crime and aid and conceal the commissionthereof, made and caused a false entry in
the business records of an enterprise, to wit, a Donald J.Trump Revocable Trust Account check and check stub dated
February 14, 2017, bearing checknumber 000138, and
kept and maintained by the Trump Organization.FIFTH
COUNT:AND THE GRAND JURY AFORESAID, by this indictment, further accuses thedefendant of the crime of
FALSIFYING BUSINESS RECORDS IN THE
FIRST DEGREE
,in violation of Penal Law §175.10,
committed as follows:
The defendant, in the County of New York and elsewhere, on or about March 16, 2017through
March 17, 2017, with intent to defraud and intent to commit another crime and
aid andconceal the commission thereof, made and
caused a false entry in the business records of anenterprise,
to wit, an invoice from Michael Cohen dated February 16, 2017 and transmitted
on orabout March 16, 2017, marked as a record of
the Donald J. Trump Revocable Trust, and kept andmaintained
by the Trump Organization.SIXTH COUNT:AND THE GRAND
JURY AFORESAID, by this indictment, further accuses thedefendant
of the crime of
FALSIFYING BUSINESS RECORDS IN THE
FIRST DEGREE
,in violation of Penal Law
§175.10, committed as follows:The defendant, in the
County of New York and elsewhere, on or about March 17, 2017,with intent to
defraud and intent to commit another crime and aid and conceal the commissionthereof, made and caused a false entry in
the business records of an enterprise, to wit, an entry inthe Detail General Ledger for the Donald J. Trump
Revocable Trust, bearing voucher number846907, and kept and maintained by the
Trump Organization.SEVENTH COUNT:AND THE GRAND JURY
AFORESAID, by this indictment, further accuses thedefendant
of the crime of
FALSIFYING BUSINESS RECORDS IN THE
FIRST DEGREE
,in violation of Penal Law §175.10,
committed as follows:
The defendant, in the County of
New York and elsewhere, on or about March 17, 2017,with intent to defraud and
intent to commit another crime and aid and conceal the commissionthereof,
made and caused a false entry in the business records of an enterprise,
to wit, a Donald J.Trump Revocable Trust Account
check and check stub dated March 17, 2017, bearing checknumber
000147, and kept and maintained by the Trump Organization.EIGHTH
COUNT:AND THE GRAND JURY AFORESAID, by this indictment, further accuses thedefendant of the crime of
FALSIFYING BUSINESS RECORDS IN THE
FIRST DEGREE
,in violation of Penal Law §175.10,
committed as follows:The defendant, in the County of
New York and elsewhere, on or about April 13, 2017through June 19, 2017, with
intent to defraud and intent to commit another crime and aid andconceal the commission thereof, made and caused a false
entry in the business records of anenterprise, to
wit, an invoice from Michael Cohen dated April 13, 2017, marked as a record ofDonald J. Trump, and kept and maintained by the Trump Organization. NINTH
COUNT:AND THE GRAND JURY AFORESAID, by this indictment, further accuses thedefendant of the crime of
FALSIFYING BUSINESS RECORDS IN THE
FIRST DEGREE
,in violation of Penal Law §175.10,
committed as follows:The defendant, in the County of
New York and elsewhere, on or about June 19, 2017, withintent
to defraud and intent to commit another crime and aid and conceal the
commission thereof,made and caused a false entry in
the business records of an enterprise, to wit, an entry in the DetailGeneral Ledger for Donald J. Trump, bearing voucher
number 858770, and kept and maintained by the Trump Organization.
TENTH COUNT:AND THE GRAND
JURY AFORESAID, by this indictment, further accuses thedefendant
of the crime of
FALSIFYING BUSINESS RECORDS IN THE
FIRST DEGREE
,in violation of Penal Law
§175.10, committed as follows:The defendant, in the
County of New York and elsewhere, on or about June 19, 2017, withintent to defraud and intent to commit another crime
and aid and conceal the commission thereof,made and
caused a false entry in the business records of an enterprise, to wit, a Donald
J. Trumpaccount check and check stub dated June 19,
2017, bearing check number 002740, and kept andmaintained
by the Trump Organization.ELEVENTH COUNT:AND THE
GRAND JURY AFORESAID, by this indictment, further accuses thedefendant
of the crime of
FALSIFYING BUSINESS RECORDS IN THE
FIRST DEGREE
,in violation of Penal Law
§175.10, committed as follows:The defendant, in the
County of New York and elsewhere, on or about May 22, 2017, withintent
to defraud and intent to commit another crime and aid and conceal the
commission thereof,made and caused a false entry in
the business records of an enterprise, to wit, an invoice fromMichael
Cohen dated May 22, 2017, marked as a record of Donald J. Trump, and kept andmaintained by the Trump Organization.TWELFTH
COUNT:AND THE GRAND JURY AFORESAID, by this indictment, further accuses thedefendant of the crime of
FALSIFYING BUSINESS RECORDS IN THE
FIRST DEGREE
,in violation of Penal Law §175.10,
committed as follows:
The defendant, in the County of New York and elsewhere, on or about May 22, 2017, withintent
to defraud and intent to commit another crime and aid and conceal the commission
thereof,made and caused a false entry in the business
records of an enterprise, to wit, an entry in the DetailGeneral
Ledger for Donald J. Trump, bearing voucher number 855331, and kept and
maintained by the Trump Organization.THIRTEENTH
COUNT:AND THE GRAND JURY AFORESAID, by this indictment, further accuses thedefendant of the crime of
FALSIFYING BUSINESS RECORDS IN THE
FIRST DEGREE
,in violation of Penal Law
§175.10, committed as follows:The defendant, in the
County of New York and elsewhere, on or about May 23, 2017, withintent
to defraud and intent to commit another crime and aid and conceal the
commission thereof,made and caused a false entry in
the business records of an enterprise, to wit, a Donald J. Trumpaccount
check and check stub dated May 23, 2017, bearing check number 002700, and kept andmaintained by the Trump Organization.FOURTEENTH
COUNT:AND THE GRAND JURY AFORESAID, by this indictment, further accuses thedefendant of the crime of
FALSIFYING BUSINESS RECORDS IN THE
FIRST DEGREE
,in violation of Penal Law §175.10,
committed as follows:The defendant, in the County of
New York and elsewhere, on or about June 16, 2017through June 19, 2017, with
intent to defraud and intent to commit another crime and aid andconceal the commission thereof, made and caused a false
entry in the business records of anenterprise, to
wit, an invoice from Michael Cohen dated June 16, 2017, marked as a record ofDonald J. Trump, and kept and maintained by the Trump
Organization.
FIFTEENTH COUNT:AND THE GRAND JURY
AFORESAID, by this indictment, further accuses thedefendant
of the crime of
FALSIFYING BUSINESS RECORDS IN THE
FIRST DEGREE
,in violation of Penal Law
§175.10, committed as follows:The defendant, in the
County of New York and elsewhere, on or about June 19, 2017, withintent to defraud and intent to commit another crime
and aid and conceal the commission thereof,made and
caused a false entry in the business records of an enterprise, to wit, an entry
in the DetailGeneral Ledger for Donald J. Trump,
bearing voucher number 858772, and kept and maintained by the Trump Organization.SIXTEENTH COUNT:AND THE GRAND JURY AFORESAID,
by this indictment, further accuses thedefendant of
the crime of
FALSIFYING BUSINESS RECORDS IN THE
FIRST DEGREE
,in violation of Penal Law
§175.10, committed as follows:The defendant, in the
County of New York and elsewhere, on or about June 19, 2017, withintent to defraud and intent to commit another crime
and aid and conceal the commission thereof,made and
caused a false entry in the business records of an enterprise, to wit, a Donald
J. Trumpaccount check and check stub dated June 19,
2017, bearing check number 002741, and kept andmaintained
by the Trump Organization.SEVENTEENTH COUNT:AND THE
GRAND JURY AFORESAID, by this indictment, further accuses thedefendant
of the crime of
FALSIFYING BUSINESS RECORDS IN THE
FIRST DEGREE
,in violation of Penal Law §175.10,
committed as follows:
The defendant, in the County of New York and elsewhere, on or about July 11, 2017, withintent
to defraud and intent to commit another crime and aid and conceal the
commission thereof,made and caused a false entry in
the business records of an enterprise, to wit, an invoice fromMichael
Cohen dated July 11, 2017, marked as a record of Donald J. Trump, and kept andmaintained by the Trump Organization.EIGHTEENTH
COUNT:AND THE GRAND JURY AFORESAID, by this indictment, further accuses thedefendant of the crime of
FALSIFYING BUSINESS RECORDS IN THE
FIRST DEGREE
,in violation of Penal Law §175.10,
committed as follows:The defendant, in the County of
New York and elsewhere, on or about July 11, 2017, withintent to defraud and intent to commit another crime
and aid and conceal the commission thereof,made and
caused a false entry in the business records of an enterprise, to wit, an entry
in the DetailGeneral Ledger for Donald J. Trump,
bearing voucher number 861096, and kept and maintained by the Trump
Organization. NINETEENTH COUNT:AND THE GRAND JURY AFORESAID, by this
indictment, further accuses thedefendant of the crime
of
FALSIFYING BUSINESS RECORDS IN THE
FIRST DEGREE
,in violation of Penal Law §175.10,
committed as follows:The defendant, in the County of
New York and elsewhere, on or about July 11, 2017, withintent to defraud and intent to commit another crime
and aid and conceal the commission thereof,made and
caused a false entry in the business records of an enterprise, to wit, a Donald
J. Trumpaccount check and check stub dated July 11,
2017, bearing check number 002781, and kept andmaintained
by the Trump Organization.
TWENTIETH COUNT:AND THE
GRAND JURY AFORESAID, by this indictment, further accuses thedefendant
of the crime of
FALSIFYING BUSINESS RECORDS IN THE
FIRST DEGREE
,in violation of Penal Law
§175.10, committed as follows:The defendant, in the
County of New York and elsewhere, on or about August 1, 2017,with intent to
defraud and intent to commit another crime and aid and conceal the commissionthereof, made and caused a false entry in the
business records of an enterprise, to wit, an invoicefrom
Michael Cohen dated August 1, 2017, marked as a record of Donald J. Trump,
and kept andmaintained by the Trump Organization.TWENTY-FIRST COUNT:AND THE GRAND JURY
AFORESAID, by this indictment, further accuses thedefendant
of the crime of
FALSIFYING BUSINESS RECORDS IN THE
FIRST DEGREE
,in violation of Penal Law
§175.10, committed as follows:The defendant, in the
County of New York and elsewhere, on or about August 1, 2017,with intent to
defraud and intent to commit another crime and aid and conceal the commissionthereof, made and caused a false entry in
the business records of an enterprise, to wit, an entry inthe Detail General Ledger for Donald J. Trump, bearing
voucher number 863641, and kept andmaintained by the
Trump Organization.TWENTY-SECOND COUNT:AND THE GRAND
JURY AFORESAID, by this indictment, further accuses thedefendant
of the crime of
FALSIFYING BUSINESS RECORDS IN THE
FIRST DEGREE
,in violation of Penal Law §175.10,
committed as follows:
The defendant, in the County of New York and elsewhere, on or about August 1, 2017,with
intent to defraud and intent to commit another crime and aid and conceal the commissionthereof, made and caused a false entry in
the business records of an enterprise, to wit, a Donald J.Trump account check and check stub dated August 1, 2017,
bearing check number 002821, andkept and maintained
by the Trump Organization.TWENTY-THIRD COUNT:AND THE
GRAND JURY AFORESAID, by this indictment, further accuses thedefendant
of the crime of
FALSIFYING BUSINESS RECORDS IN THE
FIRST DEGREE
,in violation of Penal Law
§175.10, committed as follows:The defendant, in the
County of New York and elsewhere, on or about September 11,2017, with intent to
defraud and intent to commit another crime and aid and conceal thecommission thereof, made and caused a false entry
in the business records of an enterprise, to wit,an
invoice from Michael Cohen dated September 11, 2017, marked as a record of
Donald J.Trump, and kept and maintained by the Trump Organization.TWENTY-FOURTH COUNT:AND THE GRAND JURY
AFORESAID, by this indictment, further accuses thedefendant
of the crime of
FALSIFYING BUSINESS RECORDS IN THE
FIRST DEGREE
,in violation of Penal Law §175.10,
committed as follows:The defendant, in the County of
New York and elsewhere, on or about September 11,2017, with intent to defraud
and intent to commit another crime and aid and conceal thecommission
thereof, made and caused a false entry in the business records of an
enterprise, to wit,an entry in the Detail General
Ledger for Donald J. Trump, bearing voucher number 868174, andkept
and maintained by the Trump Organization.
TWENTY-FIFTH COUNT:AND THE GRAND
JURY AFORESAID, by this indictment, further accuses thedefendant
of the crime of
FALSIFYING BUSINESS RECORDS IN THE
FIRST DEGREE
,in violation of Penal Law
§175.10, committed as follows:The defendant, in the
County of New York and elsewhere, on or about September 12,2017, with intent to
defraud and intent to commit another crime and aid and conceal thecommission thereof, made and caused a false entry
in the business records of an enterprise, to wit,a
Donald J. Trump account check and check stub dated September 12, 2017, bearing checknumber 002908, and kept and maintained by the Trump Organization.TWENTY-SIXTH COUNT:AND THE GRAND JURY
AFORESAID, by this indictment, further accuses thedefendant
of the crime of
FALSIFYING BUSINESS RECORDS IN THE
FIRST DEGREE
,in violation of Penal Law
§175.10, committed as follows:The defendant, in the
County of New York and elsewhere, on or about October 18, 2017,with intent to
defraud and intent to commit another crime and aid and conceal the commissionthereof, made and caused a false entry in the
business records of an enterprise, to wit, an invoicefrom
Michael Cohen dated October 18, 2017, marked as a record of Donald J. Trump,
and keptand maintained by the Trump Organization.TWENTY-SEVENTH COUNT:AND THE GRAND JURY
AFORESAID, by this indictment, further accuses thedefendant
of the crime of
FALSIFYING BUSINESS RECORDS IN THE
FIRST DEGREE
,in violation of Penal Law §175.10,
committed as follows:
The defendant, in the County of New York and elsewhere, on or about October 18, 2017,with
intent to defraud and intent to commit another crime and aid and conceal the commissionthereof, made and caused a false entry in
the business records of an enterprise, to wit, an entry inthe Detail General Ledger for Donald J. Trump, bearing
voucher number 872654, and kept andmaintained by the
Trump Organization.TWENTY-EIGHTH COUNT:AND THE GRAND
JURY AFORESAID, by this indictment, further accuses thedefendant
of the crime of
FALSIFYING BUSINESS RECORDS IN THE
FIRST DEGREE
,in violation of Penal Law
§175.10, committed as follows:The defendant, in the
County of New York and elsewhere, on or about October 18, 2017,with intent to
defraud and intent to commit another crime and aid and conceal the commissionthereof, made and caused a false entry in
the business records of an enterprise, to wit, a Donald J.Trump account check and check stub dated October 18,
2017, bearing check number 002944, andkept and
maintained by the Trump Organization.TWENTY-NINTH
COUNT:AND THE GRAND JURY AFORESAID, by this indictment, further accuses thedefendant of the crime of
FALSIFYING BUSINESS RECORDS IN THE
FIRST DEGREE
,in violation of Penal Law §175.10,
committed as follows:The defendant, in the County of
New York and elsewhere, on or about November 20,2017, with intent to defraud
and intent to commit another crime and aid and conceal thecommission
thereof, made and caused a false entry in the business records of an
enterprise, to wit,an invoice from Michael Cohen
dated November 20, 2017, marked as a record of Donald J.Trump,
and kept and maintained by the Trump Organization.
THIRTIETH COUNT:AND THE GRAND JURY
AFORESAID, by this indictment, further accuses thedefendant
of the crime of
FALSIFYING BUSINESS RECORDS IN THE
FIRST DEGREE
,in violation of Penal Law
§175.10, committed as follows:The defendant, in the
County of New York and elsewhere, on or about November 20,2017, with intent to
defraud and intent to commit another crime and aid and conceal thecommission thereof, made and caused a false entry
in the business records of an enterprise, to wit,an
entry in the Detail General Ledger for Donald J. Trump, bearing voucher number
876511, andkept and maintained by the Trump Organization.THIRTY-FIRST COUNT:AND THE GRAND JURY
AFORESAID, by this indictment, further accuses thedefendant
of the crime of
FALSIFYING BUSINESS RECORDS IN THE
FIRST DEGREE
,in violation of Penal Law
§175.10, committed as follows:The defendant, in the
County of New York and elsewhere, on or about November 21,2017, with intent to
defraud and intent to commit another crime and aid and conceal thecommission thereof, made and caused a false entry
in the business records of an enterprise, to wit,a
Donald J. Trump account check and check stub dated November 21, 2017, bearing checknumber 002980, and kept and maintained by the Trump Organization.THIRTY-SECOND COUNT:AND THE GRAND JURY
AFORESAID, by this indictment, further accuses thedefendant
of the crime of
FALSIFYING BUSINESS RECORDS IN THE
FIRST DEGREE
,in violation of Penal Law §175.10,
committed as follows:
The defendant, in the County of New York and elsewhere, on or about December 1, 2017,with
intent to defraud and intent to commit another crime and aid and conceal the commissionthereof, made and caused a false entry in the
business records of an enterprise, to wit, an invoicefrom
Michael Cohen dated December 1, 2017, marked as a record of Donald J. Trump,
and keptand maintained by the Trump Organization.THIRTY-THIRD COUNT:AND THE GRAND JURY
AFORESAID, by this indictment, further accuses thedefendant
of the crime of
FALSIFYING BUSINESS RECORDS IN THE
FIRST DEGREE
,in violation of Penal Law
§175.10, committed as follows:The defendant, in the
County of New York and elsewhere, on or about December 1, 2017,with intent to
defraud and intent to commit another crime and aid and conceal the commissionthereof, made and caused a false entry in
the business records of an enterprise, to wit, an entry inthe Detail General Ledger for Donald J. Trump, bearing
voucher number 877785, and kept andmaintained by the
Trump Organization.THIRTY-FOURTH COUNT:AND THE GRAND
JURY AFORESAID, by this indictment, further accuses thedefendant
of the crime of
FALSIFYING BUSINESS RECORDS IN THE
FIRST DEGREE
,in violation of Penal Law §175.10,
committed as follows:The defendant, in the County of
New York and elsewhere, on or about December 5, 2017,with intent to defraud and
intent to commit another crime and aid and conceal the commissionthereof,
made and caused a false entry in the business records of an enterprise,
to wit, a Donald J.
Trump account check and check stub
dated December 5, 2017, bearing check number 003006,and
kept and maintained by the Trump Organization.ALVIN
L. BRAGG, JR.District Attorney
GJ #8-5Filed: NA No.THE
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK-against-DONALD J. TRUMP,Defendant.INDICTMENT
FALSIFYING BUSINESS RECORDS IN THE
FIRST DEGREE, P.L. §175.10, 34 Cts
ALVIN L. BRAGG
JR., District AttorneyA True Bill Foreperson ADJOURNED TO PART _______ ON
See prior lessons for attachments 1 to 70
ATTACHMENT SEVENTY ONE – From Time
TRUMP IS
ABOUT TO STRESS TEST THE CREDIBILITY OF OUR JUDICIAL SYSTEM
By Philip Elliott
For the weeks leading up to Donald
Trump’s indictment, the former President was constantly
throwing misdirection into the ether. He predicted an indictment and arrest in the coming
hours, even as his advisers and lawyers conceded they had no evidence that was
in the offing. He raised cash on the threat of the prospect of
criminal prosecution and plotted with his team about a potential perp walk.
Amid it all, the ex-President seemed to miss the severity of history’s judgment
should he become the first of his cohort to face a criminal indictment.
Well, late Thursday, that
anticipated outcome finally came into relief. The Manhattan District Attorney’s
office confirmed that a grand jury had made history, and that the process
of negotiating a surrender and booking for the former
White House resident had already begun. In the coming days, as the indictment
is unsealed and Trump poses for his mugshot , the misdirection is
unlikely to abate. And in that comes a distinct risk, one not confined to the
American judicial system, the norms of the Presidency itself, or the basics of
civility in a pluralistic political world.
With every single utterance,
filing, and grievance, Trump and those involved in this case—and potentially
others—stand to rewrite the rules of criminal accountability in a high-charged
political environment.
For those who have watched Trump’s
political career, none of this will seem new. If anything, it may sound like
rhyming rejoinder to the last couple of years, where a clang of chaos was the
best harmony available in the political hymnal of D.C.
Few understand this strategy
better than Steve Bannon. In the final weeks of the 2016 campaign, the then-CEO
of Trump’s presidential campaign was headed toward baggage claim at the Las
Vegas airport, when he boiled Trump’s strategy down to its essence while chatting with reporters who just happened to catch
him. Trump was trailing in the polls and Hillary Clinton seemed destined to return to the White House—this
time with the good office—and the nation seemed ready to send The
Apprentice star back to the mock boardroom on the fifth floor of Trump Tower. But Bannon, arriving
in Nevada to watch the third and final debate , seemed upbeat, even excited. Trump,
Bannon said, was “the master of the head fake,” optimistic that such
misdirection could help power him to the White House despite polling,
structural, and political headwinds.
Bannon, it turned out, was
correct. And not just about how Trump would deploy such tactics to win the
White House a few weeks later. Trump used them to great effect once there. Few
possess his inherent ability to turn narratives on a dime with little more than
a seemingly accidental aside, an errant tweet, or a snarky insult laced with a
threat.
Put simply: the Head Fake
Presidency seemed limitless. At least until it wasn’t.
The coming days, weeks, and
probably months are set to test whether Trump’s head fakes can overpower the
institutions of a criminal justice system never before tested in such a way.
Since the start of his career in politics, Trump has seemed to have survived
some of his most dangerous moments using a strategy of drowning bad news with
bigger outrage. Facing his own troubles, he deployed a Soviet-era flex of WhatAboutism.
And, more often than not, it worked.
As President, Trump stuck with
that instinct, employing misdirection at every turn. He launched and suddenly called off a strike on Iranian facilities as
retaliation for a downed U.S. drone. On immigration, Puerto Rico , the Trans-Pacific Partnership, guns, immigration, and climate change, he balked at other moves as he took
delight in shattering norms. His transactional approach was mired in
gamesmanship and posturing, seldom in facts.
It’s continued in his
post-presidency, including through his tangled web of legal troubles. Even when
E. Jean Carroll gets her day in a courtroom in a civil lawsuit alleging Trump raped her in a department store
dressing room and then defamed her for making the allegations, Trump’s
notorious indifference to honest-dealing will be a subtext of the trial; the
jury’s identity will be concealed to protect them from threats and
intimidation—an extraordinary step.
As the first criminal charges
against an ex-President move forward, the combination of head fakes and the
legitimate threat to judicial norms should not be taken lightly.
The stratagem has worked plenty
for Trump to this point, and it still may, to be clear. At the same time, these
proceedings might finally shake the American public of its reflex to follow
Trump’s eyeline when it locks on to something blurry in the distance. After
all, it seems an indictment is about to be in plain view, even if a lot of
Americans aren’t yet ready to believe their eyes. In fact, Trump and his allies
are going to work overtime to ensure that his strongest supporters never get
there, even if it further diminishes the credibility of the nation’s courts.
ATTACHMENT SEVENTY TWO – From the Washington Times
By Michael R. Sisak –
Associated Press – Thursday, March 30, 2023
NEW YORK — If you didn’t know what
you were looking for, you might’ve missed it. Even then, it was hard to know at
the moment that history was unfolding before your eyes.
Donald Trump’s indictment, the
first of a former U.S. president, was quietly brought to the clerk’s office at
the Manhattan criminal courthouse just before closing time Thursday.
A woman and two men in suits walked
in past reporters who’ve been staking out the office for weeks, turned a corner
and disappeared through a door to a non-public area known as the indictment
room.
The vibe in the room shifted, and
then around the courthouse, too.
The clerk’s office, normally a
bustle of lawyers and paralegals seeking case files and submitting papers,
people posting bail and court employees cracking jokes, grew quiet and tense.
TIMES MY VIEW
ALL
·
It’s not
the guns; it’s the phones
·
Jan. 6 ‘Shaman’ released from prison
early as lawyer calls for sanctions on prosecutors over video
·
Potential charges against Trump ‘not
a slam-dunk case,’ legal experts warn
Moments later, just before 5 p.m.,
when a reporter asked if there were any filings involving “People v. Donald
Trump” – her customary end-of-day question in recent days – a usually cheerful
clerk sternly replied: “We have no information on that case. The office is
closing. You have to leave.”
The reporters, from outlets including
The Associated Press, The New York Times, New York Post and legal publication
Law360, left the office and stood outside in the hallway, watching through
glass doors as workers turned out the lights and the people who’d walked in a
few minutes earlier worked in darkness inside filing the indictment.
“After visiting the clerk’s office
for weeks, this was all very strange,” said Frank G. Runyeon,
a reporter for Law360. “Very unusual and we knew something was up.”
As the people continued to work,
and reporters peered in at what was going on, court officers came to the
hallway and shooed the press away. That floor of the courthouse was now closed,
they said.
The indictment remains under seal,
its contents secret, likely until Trump is arraigned. But news of the
indictment, voted on by a grand jury sitting in a court building across the
street from the criminal courthouse, broke shortly after 5 p.m. in The New York
Times. It was confirmed minutes later by Trump’s lawyers and ultimately in a
brief statement from the Manhattan district attorney’s office.
The indictment was broadly
expected for two weeks, with Trump himself even saying he expected to be
arrested. Yet it still came as a surprise. Reports in recent days had indicated
that the grand jury was about to go on a lengthy, scheduled break and wasn’t
expected to be dealing with the Trump matter until late April.
The announcement sent television
crews pouring onto the sidewalks around the courthouse complex and brought a
handful of demonstrators carrying banners and posters – some who opposed Trump
and some that supported him.
As the mini-mob of MAGAmen and Never-Trumpers converged, police surrounded the
courthouse into the evening, with flood lights illuminating the sidewalk and
streets.
Ditte Lynge,
who works for a Danish newspaper that has been staking out the courthouse all
week, was among the reporters who rushed to the scene.
“Everyone’s following what’s going
on over here,” she said of her audience back home. “This is historical. It’s
the first time that a former American president has been indicted. So of
course, it has a lot of interest.”
• Associated Press writer
Bobby Caina Calvan
contributed to this report.
ATTACHMENT SEVENTY THREE – From Fox
IVANKA TRUMP SAYS SHE IS ‘PAINED’ BY FATHER’S INDICTMENT
Ivanka Trump
played a big role in her father’s administration but says she would not be part
of a second Trump White House
By Timothy H.J. Nerozzi | Fox News
Ivanka Trump,
daughter of former President Donald Trump, on Friday addressed her father’s
indictment.
Ivanka posted
the message to social media, saying she was “pained” by the news but thanked
those who have contacted her in support.
“I love my
father, and I love my country. Today, I am pained for both,” she wrote.
“I appreciate
the voices across the political spectrum expressing support and concern.”
After being
indicted by a Manhattan grand jury, the former president is expected to be arraigned in court Tuesday, a law
enforcement source told Fox News.
Judge Juan Merchan will preside over the case brought by Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg over
alleged hush money payments Trump made to porn star Stormy Daniels in
2016.
Trump is
scheduled to be arraigned at 2:15 p.m. Tuesday in Merchan’s
courtroom in New York City.
TRUMP INDICTED AFTER MANHATTAN DA
PROBE FOR HUSH MONEY PAYMENTS
In addition
to Trump’s personal attorney Joe Tacopina,
a second source has confirmed that Trump has made arrangements with the
district attorney’s legal team to surrender without handcuffs. Detectives with
the DA’s office will handle the arrest.
Ivanka and
her husband Jared Kushner moved to Miami after spending four years in Washington, D.C., and serving in
the former Trump administration.
She does not
intend to play a role in her father’s 2024 presidential campaign nor a possible
second administration.
ATTACHMENT SEVENTY FOUR – From X13 Time
Trump’s Indictment Drama Showcased His Rivals’ Weakness
Trump Rallied Supporters in Waco
Ahead of Possible Indictment
BY MOLLY BALL
UPDATED: MARCH 30, 2023 4:12
PM EDT | ORIGINALLY PUBLISHED: MARCH 30, 2023 1:53 PM EDT
It took barely a flick of Donald
Trump’s wrist to set the whole circus back into motion.
“WITH NO CRIME ABLE TO BE PROVEN,
& BASED ON AN OLD & FULLY DEBUNKED (BY NUMEROUS OTHER PROSECUTORS!)
FAIRYTALE, THE FAR & AWAY LEADING REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE & FORMER
PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, WILL BE ARRESTED ON TUESDAY OF NEXT
WEEK,” Trump wrote, or “Truthed,” on his personal
social-media site, Truth Social, on the morning of March 18.
By the time the Manhattan grand
jury finally voted to indict Trump on March
30, all the GOP’s old reflexes had kicked in again. As if by muscle memory,
Republican officeholders and candidates fell all over themselves to air their
indignation at the supposed victimization of a politician being prosecuted
for allegedly paying off a porn star,
using money donated to his campaign, on the eve of a national election, to
conceal an extramarital tryst. House Speaker Kevin McCarthy called for an
investigation, and three House committee chairmen demanded the Manhattan D.A.
testify before Congress about the “politically motivated prosecutorial
decision” that had yet to occur.
Read
More: Why Even Some Trump Critics Think the Stormy Daniels
Case Is Weak.
While the historic indictment of a
former President marked a turning point in the nascent 2024 campaign, it was
the scramble to come to Trump’s defense that might ultimately prove to be a
more pivotal moment. Just a few months ago, Republicans’ disappointing
performance in the midterms marked the third straight national election Trump
tanked for the GOP, and a new consensus began to form: he was weak, a loser,
yesterday’s news. With at least five civil and criminal investigations
percolating and a new generation of candidates in the mix, it was finally time
for Republicans to cut the cord.
But when the time came to actually
stand up to him, Trump’s primary rivals and political enablers were too
cowardly or calculating to throw much of a punch. Nikki Haley, Trump’s major
declared opponent and former U.N. Ambassador, dismissed the potential
indictment on Fox News as “more about revenge than it is about justice.”
Another active candidate, businessman Vivek Ramaswamy, went further, blasting
the “disastrously politicized prosecution” and calling on other Republicans to
condemn it. Former Vice President Mike Pence, who is openly considering a run,
told an interviewer the probe “reeks of the kind of political prosecution we
endured in the days of the Russia hoax.”
Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, who has
yet to declare his candidacy, came closest to a swipe, taking care to excoriate
the “Soros-funded prosecutor” overseeing the Manhattan case while also impishly
referencing the underlying conduct. “I don’t know what goes into paying hush
money to a porn star to secure silence over some type of alleged affair,”
DeSantis said, at a March 20 news conference. “I just, I can’t speak to that.”
But Trump gleefully seized on this
political straddle, exultant at finally having baited his would-be rival into
the ring after months of attacks. Trump issued a 327-word statement lambasting
DeSantis as, among other things, “an average Governor” whose appeal to GOP
voters was “HARDLY GREATNESS.” The statement was Trump’s usual word salad of
innuendo and ad hominem, a nonsensical and largely baseless critique. But in
Trump’s perpetual game of dominance, there can be no question who is the alpha.
One Florida-based GOP strategist
not tied to either man’s camp told me Trump seemed to have “found his stride”
by monopolizing attention around the incident, while DeSantis appeared rattled.
“The moment DeSantis poked his head up, that’s where Trump wants to be,” says
the strategist, speaking on condition of anonymity. DeSantis, he says, is “in
the process of getting bloodied like he’s never gotten bloodied before. We’ll
see if he can handle it.”
If the pattern holds, the 2024
primary could be over before it has even begun, with the GOP once more dominated
by the toxic demands of its chaotic leader. Polls show Trump is getting
stronger: A national survey conducted by Monmouth
University and released March 21 showed Trump beating DeSantis by 14 points
among Republican primary voters—a reversal from December, when the same
pollster found DeSantis leading Trump by 13 points. Suddenly the party appears
imprisoned in a familiar trap: unwilling to stand up to its own base voters’
loyalties, and stymied yet again by Trump’s well-worn divide-and-conquer
strategy.
“It is amazing to me that the
party that talks about masculinity continues to belly-crawl for this man, a
bully who hides behind the walls of a Florida mansion,” says Denver Riggleman, a former Republican congressman from Virginia.
His former colleagues, Riggleman says, remain deathly
afraid of the sway Trump still holds over many of their voters. “They have so
permanently lowered the standard that we’re somehow not even talking about
whether he’s guilty of using an illegal tax pass-through to pay off an
adult-film star—instead, we’re debating whether the indictment is political and
how it will affect his popularity. This should be about the rule of law: did he
do it or not?”
For nearly eight years now,
Republicans have struggled to move on from Trump, despite being afforded
countless opportunities to cut him loose—from the outrages of the 2016
campaign, to the scandal-fest of his Presidential term, to the impeachments and
insurrection that punctuated its end. Evidence from the voting-machine company
Dominion’s lawsuit against Fox News has proved what the political world already
knew: that even Trump’s most ardent propagandists privately despise him and
wish he would go away. Out of office for the past two years, he finally seemed
to fade somewhat, popping back up in the news from time to time with the
occasional weird endorsement or dinner with white supremacists and Holocaust
deniers. The launch of his third campaign, in November, was widely derided as
low-energy, and his campaign seemed to limp along while DeSantis gained ground.
Read
More: Trump Enters the Arena For
Another Fight.
It is, of course, early in the
process, with most potential Trump rivals yet to declare their candidacy. But
in a party whose ideology and leadership appeared up for grabs not long ago, a
familiar dynamic is setting back in. In a January survey GOP pollster
Whit Ayres conducted for the center-right Bulwark publication, Ayres found the
party split into three factions: about 10% who do not support Trump; about a
third who are reflexively, devotedly loyal to the former President; and a
majority, 52%, of fair-weather voters who supported Trump in the past but now
yearn for an alternative who can win in 2024. It’s still possible, Ayres says,
that the latter group will view Trump’s indictment as more evidence that he is
too burdened by political baggage to be the best nominee. “The ultimate impact
of any indictment depends completely on what the charges are, how much evidence
there is, and what the ultimate trial turns out to be like,” Ayres says. “No
one can reliably anticipate the reaction to something that’s never happened
before.”
Even some Trump opponents worry
that the legal uncertainties surrounding the case may be shaky and therefore
serve to boost him. “We’re going to indict a former President for, essentially,
misdemeanor falsification of business records?” says former Michigan GOP
congressman Peter Meijer. “We’re crossing the Rubicon for that? That seems like
f—ing weak sauce.” Trump, Meijer points out,
succeeded in whipping up a media frenzy before any arrest actually occurred.
“He is an absolute savant when it comes to getting reactions,” Meijer says.
“That’s not a shame on him so much as it’s a shame on the rest of us.”
Since seeding rumors of his
imminent arrest, Trump has warned of “potential death & destruction” if
charges are brought and repeatedly called on his supporters to protest, a
vague-for-now summons that nonetheless harks back to the Jan. 6 Capitol riot.
It was a reminder that for a broad swath of Americans, Trump has succeeded in
delegitimizing virtually all the institutions of democracy—from elections to
the courts to the current White House—and he may well retain the ability to
summon a violent army to a time and place of his choosing.
“There are tens of millions of
Americans who believe that government institutions are aligned against the true
and rightful President, ordained from on high, and as far as they’re concerned
the ends justify the means in an apocalyptic battle of good against evil,” says
Riggleman, the former Virginia congressman. “This
seemingly inexhaustible grift, raising money based on fear, is really all Trump
has. But the formula works.”
ATTACHMENT SEVENTY FIVE – From Time
DONALD TRUMP IS THE FIRST PRESIDENT EVER CRIMINALLY CHARGED. OTHERS
HAVE COME CLOSE THOUGH
BY OLIVIA B. WAXMAN UPDATED: MARCH 30, 2023 6:37
PM EDT | ORIGINALLY PUBLISHED: MARCH 21, 2023 5:16 PM EDT
Donald Trump will make history
once again—this time as the first former
U.S. president ever to be criminally indicted.
A Manhattan grand jury voted to
indict the 45th President in a case involving his alleged
hush-money payment to former porn star Stormy Daniels, according to his
lawyers and media reports. Daniels says she and Trump had an affair; Trump
denies this.
“Like all things with Trump, it’s
unprecedented,” says Barbara Perry, a presidential historian at the Miller
Center at the University of Virginia. President Ulysses S. Grant was
technically the first President to be arrested—for speeding on a horse
and buggy in 1872. But the Trump case will go down in history as one of the
biggest political scandals in American history—even if the charges relate to
the seemingly mundane offense of bookkeeping fraud.
Criminal history, as it pertains
to U.S. presidents, is pretty brief.
In terms of the seriousness of the
scandal, Perry argues the Watergate scandal is the closest parallel because it
was the first time a President resigned. President Richard Nixon stepped down
in 1974 after tapes revealed he participated in the cover-up of the 1972 break-in
at a Democratic National Committee office in the Watergate complex. Several
Nixon advisors, from the White House lawyer to the Attorney General, served
prison time. While the Department of Justice initially argued that a sitting
president couldn’t be indicted on a criminal charge, Nixon was not assured that
protection post-presidency, so his successor Gerald Ford pardoned him. As Ford
put it, “My fellow Americans, our long national nightmare is over.” But a Sept. 1974 Gallup poll reported 53% of Americans
thought the pardon was the wrong thing to do, and it’s one of the reasons Ford was
voted out of office in the next election.
Read
more: What Was the Biggest Political Scandal in American
History? 7 Historians Make Their Picks
Arrests of major federal officials have an even longer history.
Secretary of the Interior Albert Fall was convicted of bribery in 1929 for
accepting hundreds of thousands of dollars in Liberty Bonds after allowing a
private company to lease oil reserves in Wyoming known as Teapot Dome. Back
then, TIME called Fall “the first felon in a
President’s cabinet in U.S. history.” As biographer Robert Dallek explained the significance
of the scandal, “People in the government were selling the administration to
the highest bidder, using their government power to exploit bad positions to
make a lot of money.” Fall served under President Warren G. Harding from
1921-1923, and Harding came to be viewed as corrupt. Increased press scrutiny
revealed that he had a mistress. The stress of the scandal is thought to have
led to his fatal heart attack in August 1923.
Bill Clinton was the last
President who was close to facing criminal charges. Paula Jones, a receptionist, claimed she
suffered emotional damage after Clinton exposed himself to her in a hotel room
in May of 1991, back when he was the Governor of Arkansas, and sued for sexual
harassment. In Clinton v. Jones, “the Supreme Court sets a
precedent that a president can be sued for actions allegedly taken before he
becomes president—that in turn led to an impeachment,” says Perry. President
Clinton did have to pay civil damages to Paula Jones, and the suit brought to
light the other womanizing he had engaged in, including a roughly two-year
relationship with former White House intern Monica Lewinsky. However, while he was impeached in
Dec. 1998 and acquitted in Feb. 1999, the scandal didn’t impact his popularity.
His approval ratings kept going up.
There are similar worries that
charging Trump could further boost his popularity with his sympathetic
base. Yet Clinton wasn’t trying to run for re-election; the impeachment
happened in his second term. Trump, however, is trying to stage a comeback
after losing the 2020 election. With GOP rivals already making hay of the
scandal—Florida Governor Ron DeSantis quipped, “I don’t know what goes into
paying hush money to a porn star”—it remains to be seen whether criminal
charges would help or hinder his 2024 bid.
ATTACHMENT SEVENTY SIX – From Time
DONALD TRUMP HAS BEEN INDICTED. HERE’S WHAT HAPPENS NEXT IN THE PROCESS
Americans React to News of Donald
Trump’s Impending Indictment
BY ANISHA KOHLI UPDATED: MARCH 30, 2023 10:00 PM
EDT | ORIGINALLY PUBLISHED: MARCH 18, 2023 3:30 PM EDT
Former President Donald Trump has been
indicted over alleged hush money payments. He now becomes the first former
President to face criminal charges.
Manhattan District Attorney Alvin
Bragg said in a statement Thursday night that, “this evening, we contacted Mr.
Trump’s attorney to coordinate his surrender.”
The charges so far remain under
seal, but the investigation centers around cash paid to pornographic film star
Stormy Daniels in 2016 before Trump’s election win. Daniels says she had an
affair with Trump; Trump denies this.
As part of Bragg’s investigation,
Trump could face charges for falsifying business records when he allegedly
reimbursed his then-personal attorney Michael Cohen for paying off Daniels. The
hush-money deal, allegedly crafted weeks before his presidential win, could also
put Trump in jeopardy of violating campaign finance laws. Democrats worry that
it may be a weak case against Trump, compared to other investigations into the
former President. Political commentators are wondering whether an indictment could help Trump’s
2024 campaign if he can successfully paint the case as a political witch hunt.
Read More: What Trump Has Said About Stormy Daniels
But Trump’s impending legal battle
raises questions about the process Trump would be subject to during his arrest
and trial—including whether any extraordinary measures would be taken given his
unique status. “This is not just high profile. This was the President of the
United States. There’s been nobody like him to walk those halls,” Jeremy Saland, defense attorney and former Manhattan Assistant
District Attorney, says.
Prior to the indictment, TIME
spoke with legal experts about each step of the process, and how the charges
against Trump might proceed differently from run-of-the-mill white-collar crime
cases.
The arrest
The charges Trump faces are for
white-collar crimes regarding financial dealings, and given their non-violent
nature, defendants in such cases typically “self-surrender,” skipping public
perp walks.
One of Trump’s lawyers, Susan R. Necheles, told TIME that former
President Trump is expected to turn himself in on Tuesday to be arraigned in
State Supreme Court in Manhattan.
Shanlon Wu, a white-collar defense
attorney and former federal prosecutor, tells TIME that defense counsels
typically receive notice when their white-collar clients are being indicted.
“You would make an appointment basically, to bring your client in to be booked
and fingerprinted,” Wu says.
Wu adds that Trump’s lawyers may
even seek some special arrangements, given he’s a former president, to avoid
walking through the front entrance of the courthouse or police station in an
attempt to be more discreet. Another of Trump’s attorneys had previously said
that if indicted, Trump would not resist arrest and that they would follow
normal procedures. “There won’t be a standoff at Mar-a-Lago with Secret Service
and the Manhattan DA’s office,” Joe Tacopina
told the New York Daily News.
But some have speculated that Trump
could take a completely different approach, facing the arrest publicly and
choosing to send a message of political victimization to his supporters. “He
sort of embraces the angst, divisiveness and excitement,” Saland
says.
In a post on Truth Social on March
18, Trump claimed his arrest was imminent and called for his supporters to
protest, citing “illegal leaks” from a “corrupt”
and “highly political Manhattan district attorney’s office.”
Saland says he thinks that when Trump
began talking about his indictment on March 18—predicting it would come the
following Tuesday—he was trying to get ahead of the scandal and send a message
that, “I’m gonna show up in court, and I’m gonna face this head on, because there’s a conspiracy
against me.”
Although Trump’s legal team could
probably arrange for a discreet processing appointment, they have the choice to
go through his arrest, booking, and processing publicly if they think it may
benefit his image.
“I would fully expect that he’s
not going to slink away, he’s not going to hide and be discreet, he’s going to
own it. And he’s going to turn it around and use it as a sword and a shield;
‘Yes, I have been arrested. Yes, I have been indicted by a grand jury. Yes.
Prosecutors are unethical. Yes, this is a witch hunt,’” Saland
says. “Something to that effect.”
However, some of the procedures
will likely remain the same, no matter Trump’s status as the 45th
president of the United States. He will be booked, finger-printed, and have a
“mug shot” taken. With Trump’s substantial ties to the community, especially
his ongoing 2024 presidential campaign, the judge likely wouldn’t deem him a
flight risk, former federal prosecutor Renato Mariotti
tells TIME. Given the white-collar charges Trump would likely be confronting,
he may not even face bond, just released on his own recognizance per New York
law.
Security
measures
Law enforcement agencies at the
local, state, and federal level have been working to prepare the Manhattan
Criminal Court for Trump’s indictment, NBC News reported March 17,
citing anonymous sources. The New York Police Department, New York State Court
Officers, the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office, the Secret Service, and the
FBI are all involved, according to NBC.
Wu doesn’t anticipate many unusual
logistics in the procedures if Trump is indicted but believes that security
would be heightened—similar to measures for other high-profile political
figures or celebrities. “Sometimes we see a huge flood of cameras and reporters
at the front of the courthouse,” he says. “With a former president, the Secret
Service would probably have some screening mechanism for that, because
otherwise, you don’t know who’s in the crowd.”
“Court security may also set up a
sort of a barrier zone, meaning there’s going to be ‘X’ amount of feet, where
people can walk through and there won’t be any reporters sticking microphones
in their faces,” Wu adds that there would probably be limits to how many people
are allowed in the courtroom.
“It’s a public forum, anybody should
be able to come into a courthouse, but there are screening techniques you have
to go through to make sure there’s no metal detected,” Saland
says. “They have to make sure he’s safe. They don’t want him sitting among a
whole bunch of people. That’s not a controllable atmosphere. I would expect
there’s going to be barriers even internally.”
Complications
If Trump is arraigned and officially
charged, the case would eventually move on to jury selection, which could be a
lengthy and exhausting process.
“The majority of people in the
jury pool would have some opinions about Donald Trump,” former federal
prosecutor Mariotti says. “Most defendants, even if
they’re famous, are often not known by prospective jurors or they don’t have a
certain opinion about that person. I think it’s safe to say that Donald Trump
is different.”
During jury selection the
prosecution and the defense use voir dire questioning,
meaning they can ask each prospective juror questions about their
qualifications and knowledge of the case, in an attempt to ensure fair and
impartial jurors.
Wu thinks a judge could opt to
issue a so-called “gag order,” restricting all parties from talking to the
press. “This is gonna get so much publicity anyway if
he’s charged,” Wu says. “It’d be very hard to find jurors who haven’t been
exposed to the news.” Although rarely used, one method to combat this is for a
judge to sequester jurors, limiting their exposure to outside influence or
information.
“If this case is still ongoing,
during his run for president, you could face a very unprecedented and
challenging situation,” Mariotti says. “[Trump] would
be subject to a criminal enforcement action by a state, which would pose a lot
of serious constitutional quandaries.”
Many legal experts have been
hesitant to speculate what an indictment against Trump would mean, wary of
using prior cases as a reflection because of how unique these circumstances
are.
“Anyone who knows what’s likely to
happen if/when Trump is indicted is not credible. He’s not ‘high profile.’ He’s
a former POTUS with a Secret Service detail,” Peter Zeidenberg,
a government enforcement attorney, tells TIME. “It’s not similar to any other
cases/defendants.”
ATTACHMENT SEVENTY SEVEN – From Time
FORMER PRESIDENT EXPECTED TO TURN HIMSELF IN: LATEST UPDATES ON TRUMP’S
INDICTMENT
Trump Rallied Supporters in Waco
Ahead of Possible Indictment
BY BRIAN BENNETT AND TIME STAFF UPDATED: MARCH 31, 2023 3:43 PM
EDT | ORIGINALLY PUBLISHED: MARCH 30, 2023 7:30 PM EDT
Former President Donald
Trump was criminally indicted on
Thursday by a Manhattan grand jury. While the exact charges are
still under seal and will likely remain so until next week, they relate
to the payment of hush money to a former
porn star.
Multiple outlets are reporting,
citing unnamed sources, that the charges involve more than two dozen counts.
Americans React to News of Donald
Trump’s Impending Indictment
The office of Manhattan District
Attorney Alvin Bragg announced Thursday evening that it had reached out to
Trump’s team to discuss an arraignment date. One of Trump’s attorneys told TIME
that the former President is expected to turn himself in on Tuesday.
Trump called the indictment
“political persecution” in a statement, attacking Bragg as a “disgrace” and
predicting the decision would hurt Democrats in the 2024 election.
The indictment marks the first
time in American history that a former President has been criminally charged,
and sets up a stunning legal and political test for the nation as Trump once
again seeks the presidency.
Here are the latest updates on the
indictment.
Trump attacks the judge assigned
to his case
Trump is taking aim at the judge
he said is assigned to preside over his arraignment, Juan Merchan,
who is an acting justice with the State Supreme Court.
The New York-based judge, Trump
wrote without evidence, “hates me,” in a post on his social media site TruthSocial. Trump, who misspelled the judge’s name, wrote
that Merchan “was hand picked
by Bragg & the Prosecutors, & is the same person who ‘railroaded’ my 75 year old former CFO, Allen Weisselberg,
to take a ‘plea’ deal.” Along with handling the case against the Trump
organization executive, Merchan also presided over a
case in which he ordered the Trump Foundation to pay $1.6 million after a jury
found the organization guilty of criminal tax fraud. Alvin Bragg, the current
Manhattan District Attorney, was a prosecutor involved in that case.
Justice Merchan’s
signature is on an official order that allowed Bragg to tell the public on
Thursday that the grand jury had voted to indict Trump. That order was released
by the court on Friday. —Brian Bennett
Biden declines to comment
President Joe Biden emphatically
declined to comment on Friday about his predecessor’s indictment, in the first
chance for the current president to address the ongoing case that has sent
shockwaves across the country.
“I have no comment on Trump,”
Biden said outside the White House after reporters asked multiple times about
what Thursday’s indictment means for the rule of law in the U.S. When asked if
he’s worried about protests or violence in the wake of the indictment, Biden
responded: “No. I’m not going to talk about the Trump indictment.”
Jen Psaki, who was Biden’s former
press secretary, said on MSNBC Thursday night that the White House is going to
be “very quiet” about the Trump indictment for as long as it can “in part
because as a policy they don’t comment on ongoing criminal investigations, but
also because they don’t want to feed into the politics of this.” —Nik Popli
Pence calls
indictment an ‘outrage’
Former Vice President Mike Pence
defended his former running mate on Thursday night, describing the indictment
against Trump as “an outrage” that will “only further serve to divide our
country.”
“It appears to millions of
Americans to be nothing more than a political prosecution,” the former vice
president, whose relationship with Trump has been
strained since the Jan. 6 Capitol attack, said on CNN. He also accused
the Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg of having “literally ran” his
campaign vowing to go after Trump, but noted that there is “no reason for
calling for people to be protesting” the indictment, despite Trump’s previous
statements.
Pence, who is weighing his own
presidential bid, added that the case against Trump will have no bearing on his
own decision about the 2024 race. He declined to say if Trump should be
disqualified or drop out of the race if he is convicted. —NP
Catch up on
the case
Trump Is About to Stress Test the
Credibility of Our Judicial System
Trump’s Indictment Drama Showcased
His Rivals’ Weakness
How Republicans
Are Reacting to Donald Trump’s Indictment
Donald Trump Has Been Indicted.
Here’s What Happens Next in the Process
Donald
Trump Was Just Indicted. Here’s What to Know About the Charges and the Case
Donald
Trump Is the First President Ever Criminally Charged. Others Have Come Close
Though
Why This Indictment Can’t Stop Donald
Trump From Being Elected President
Why Did the Stormy Daniels Case Lead
to Trump’s First Indictment?
Alvin Bragg Did What He Had to Do In Indicting Trump
Here’s what
happens next
Next, Trump will be arraigned in
front of a magistrate judge, which usually happens at the courthouse in lower
Manhattan. The Manhattan district attorney’s office has contacted Trump’s legal
team to negotiate when he will surrender himself.
“This evening we contacted Mr.
Trump’s attorney to coordinate his surrender to the Manhattan D.A.’s Office for
arraignment on a Supreme Court indictment, which remains under seal,” a
spokesperson for Bragg said in a statement. “Guidance will be provided when the
arraignment date is selected.”
One of Trump’s lawyers, Susan R. Necheles, told TIME that former President Trump is expected
to turn himself in on Tuesday to be arraigned in State Supreme Court in
Manhattan.
At the initial hearing and arraignment,
Trump will be told the charges against him, his rights, and have a chance to
name his own lawyer to represent him, or use a court-appointed attorney.
Once he is arraigned, the judge
will decide if he is a flight risk or presents a danger, or if he can be
released until the trial. This sets in motion the legal process. At a later
date, Trump will have a chance to plead guilty or not guilty to the charges. If
Trump pleads not guilty, the court will hear pre-trial motions, and court dates
will be set for discovery and a trial to begin.
If the preliminary proceedings
take as long as other similar cases, the trial may not start until well into
2024, in the heat of the presidential election cycle.
Will Trump
turn himself in?
It is expected. Trump’s lawyer Joe
Tacopina has said previously
that Trump would turn himself in if charged.
Trump’s lawyers are in contact
with the Manhattan DA’s office and the offices are likely discussing terms
under which Trump would appear in court to turn himself in to face the charges,
rather than have to be arrested by law enforcement at his club in Palm Beach,
Fla., or elsewhere.
Florida Governor Ron DeSantis, an
expected Republican challenger to Trump in the 2024 election, said on Twitter
Thursday that Florida “will not assist in an extradition request given the
questionable circumstances.” DeSantis went on to defend Trump, describing the
indictment as “un-American” and a “weaponization of the legal system to advance
a political agenda.” (The Constitution requires if
someone is charged with a crime in one state and flees to another that the
person must be returned to the jurisdiction where they were charged if demanded
by the governor of the state from which they fled.)
When could we
know the charges?
Likely soon.
Trump’s indictment is currently
under seal and not yet public. Usually the charges
against a defendant are made public at the arraignment or slightly
before. CNN,
the New York
Times, and CBS News Miami have
each reported that sources tell them the indictment includes more than two
dozen counts.
Once the indictment is made public,
the country will be able to see exactly what charges Trump faces and a summary
of some of the evidence Bragg says has been gathered to back up the charges.
The
right-wing response so far: ‘Now it’s GAME ON’
On Thursday, many on the pro-Trump
social media groups and forums that served as the staging grounds of the “Stop
the Steal” rallies and the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol celebrated the
indictment.
“I almost wanted this. Now it’s
GAME ON,” one person wrote on a popular pro-Trump forum. “I know all of you are
smart enough to know and see all this, but we need to rally behind him and show
the left just how much this reinforces his popularity and electability,”
another person wrote. “Get active at your local level and get vocal. Teflon
Don.”
It was a shift from the tone from
earlier in the month, after Trump announced on March 18 that his arrest was
imminent. Despite Trump calling on his supporters to “PROTEST, PROTEST,
PROTEST!!” to “save America,” few seemed to respond enthusiastically. The
largest protest, organized in Manhattan, barely drew 50 people.
Online, many of Trump’s most loyal
supporters largely agreed that it made no sense to organize any mass rallies or
events, with many expressing anger at what they
described as Trump’s “betrayal” of those who heeded his call on Jan. 6.
“Has he called for protests about
these poor guys? No. But he’s calling for us to protest about his arrest,”
another person wrote on a popular por-Trump forum. “It doesn’t sit right with
me.” Another user agreed: “He’s right. Trump betrayed the J6 patriots.”
But on Thursday, some in Trump’s
orbit continued to forcefully make the case that his indictment affected all of
them.
“For those people who said, ‘It’s
not real. Trump’s making it up. It’s not a real issue for us’….Just
wait until they come for you,” his son Donald Trump Jr. said on a live
videocast on the alternative streaming site Rumble.” We’re in a battle for our
entire existence.”
Intelligence officials tracked an
uptick in violent rhetoric after news of the possible indictment broke on March
18, with most threats targeting law enforcement, judges and government
officials in New York, according to a CBS report. Multiple agencies have
discussed potential security plans for the vicinity of the Manhattan Criminal
Court.
—Vera Bergengruen
Here’s how
Trump is responding
Trump is claiming that the
prosecution against him is politically motivated in order to hurt his candidacy
for President in 2024.
Trump responded to the grand jury’s
vote to indict him Thursday in a statement: “This is Political Persecution and
Election Interference at the highest level in history. From the time I came
down the golden escalator at Trump Tower, and even before I was sworn in as
your President of the United States, the Radical Left Democrats – the enemy of
the hard-working men and women of this Country – have been engaged in a
Witch-Hunt to destroy the Make America Great Again movement. You remember it
just like I do: Russia, Russia, Russia; the Mueller Hoax; Ukraine, Ukraine,
Ukraine; Impeachment Hoax 1; Impeachment Hoax 2; the illegal and
unconstitutional Mar-a-Lago raid; and now this.”
His statement further claimed
Bragg had indicted “a completely innocent person in an act of blatant Election
Interference.”
He also went on a social media
frenzy overnight on Thursday on Truth Social. “WHERE’S HUNTER?” he posted at
around 3am. The post is a reference to President Joe Biden’s son Hunter who has
long been a target of Trump. Hunter Biden has been under federal investigation
since 2018 for tax payments and the Republicans have directed probes at him
since they took control of the House in January.
Trump also called the indictment
“Fake, Corrupt, and Disgraceful” as well as “an attack on our country” and “free
and fair elections.”
“These Thugs and Radical Left
Monsters have just INDICATED [sic] the 45th President of the United States of
America, and the leading Republican Candidate, by far, for the 2024 Nomination
for President,” Trump wrote.
ATTACHMENT SEVENTY EIGHT – From Politico
YOUR
QUESTIONS ABOUT THE TRUMP INDICTMENT, ANSWERED
How strong is the case? Can Trump
continue campaigning? And when will he be brought to trial?
By JOSH GERSTEIN and KYLE CHENEY 03/30/2023 08:12 PM EDT
The unprecedented indictment of
former President Donald Trump plunges the legal system into murky waters.
The Manhattan grand jury’s
decision to charge Trump for his alleged involvement in a hush money scheme
raises a bevy of questions about the soundness of the case, the logistics
involved in forcing a former president into criminal court and the
ramifications for other ongoing state and federal investigations of Trump.
Here’s POLITICO’s look at some of
the key questions posed by the indictment.
What is Trump
accused of?
While the precise charges are
secret for now, prosecutors have concluded they can prove a criminal case
against Trump because of the apparent subterfuge surrounding a $130,000 payment
to adult-film actress Stormy Daniels to keep her from publicizing her claim
about a sexual encounter with Trump. Trump’s lawyer Michael Cohen funded that
payment through a home equity line of credit.
Trump insisted in April 2018 he
did not know about the hush money, but Cohen provided Congress a series
of check images, signed by Trump, reflecting payments to Cohen
that he said were reimbursements for the money he laid out, including at least
two that came while Trump was in the White House. Cohen said that Trump and his
company concealed the purpose of the payments by falsely labeling them as legal
expenses.
Under New York law, disguising
such payments in corporate records is a crime, but typically only a
misdemeanor. It becomes a felony if the false business records were intended to
obscure a second crime. In this case, that second crime appears to be the use of
the funds to advance Trump’s presidential campaign allegedly in violation of
campaign finance laws.
Key figures in the Trump indictment
Here are some of the people
involved as the case against former President Donald Trump moves forward.
Michael Cohen
Trump’s former attorney testified
in 2018 that he made a hush-money payment on behalf of Trump.
Stormy Daniels
The porn actress is said to have
received $130,000 for her silence about an affair with Trump.
Alvin Bragg
The Manhattan DA took office in
January 2022 and inherited the investigation.
Allen Weisselberg
Prosecutors gave the ex-Trump
Organization CFO immunity in their hush-money probe in 2018.
Joe Tacopina
A vocal member of Trump’s legal
team, he began representing Trump earlier this year.
Susan Necheles
She is one of Trump’s lawyers who
was on the defense team in the Trump Organization trial.
Robert Costello
Cohen’s former legal adviser cast aspersions
on Cohen’s credibility before the grand jury.
Karen McDougal
The model is another woman who
received “hush money” for her involvement with Trump.
David Pecker
The former National Enquirer CEO
has been linked to Cohen’s efforts to pay off Daniels and McDougal.
The strongest evidence of such a
link to politics may be the timing: After months of demands, the money was
wired to Daniels’ lawyer on Oct. 27, 2016, just days before the 2016
presidential election.
What are the
possible holes in the prosecution’s case?
It is difficult to assess the case
against Trump without knowing the exact charges or all of the evidence that
prosecutors have marshaled during an investigation that has lasted more than
four years. But based on publicly available information, legal experts have
identified several features of the case that may present stumbling blocks as
prosecutors seek a guilty verdict.
For starters, Cohen is not the
strongest possible witness for prosecutors. He’s provided a lot of the evidence
and testimony needed to bring the case, which investigators have gone to great
lengths to authenticate. But his credibility is open to challenge since he
pleaded guilty in 2018 to nine felonies and was sentenced to three years in
federal prison. He’s also repeatedly expressed extreme bitterness towards
Trump, even running a podcast he titled “Mea Culpa,”
an allusion to his regrets over his time as Trump’s ally.
The case also dates to 2016 and
2017, so it is more than five years old. Some of the delay can be readily
explained — pressing a criminal case against Trump while he was in office would
have been difficult and perhaps impossible. But it’s been more than two years
now since Trump left the White House.
Trump could argue that prosecutors
waited too long. New York’s statute of limitations for most felonies is five
years, but there are some exceptions to that deadline, including if the person being
charged was living out of state.
Another potential difficulty:
Prosecutors may have to prove that Trump knew the arrangement was illegal.
Trump could argue that he fairly assumed that Cohen, as an attorney, was
executing the payments and related paperwork in a manner that was lawful.
Will Trump
remain free? Can he campaign while under indictment? JOSH GERSTEIN and KYLE CHENEY
That will be up to the state-court
judge assigned to Trump’s case, but it seems unlikely that prosecutors would
seek to detain the former president or restrict his travel in the U.S. while
the case is pending. There is no legal impediment to him continuing his
presidential campaign while facing criminal charges — or even if he were
jailed.
If Trump won the presidency while
facing charges or a conviction, the legalities become considerably more murky. There are serious constitutional questions about
whether a state court could keep someone elected to federal office from
serving.
How will the
indictment affect the other ongoing Trump-focused investigations?
The short answer is: Not much.
There’s no reason to think the indictment in Manhattan will influence the
trajectory of several other probes that present an acute risk of more criminal
charges for Trump. A grand jury in Fulton County, Ga., is examining his bid to
overturn the election results in that state, and at the federal level, special
counsel Jack Smith is leading twin probes into Trump’s role in the Jan. 6,
2021, attack on the Capitol and his retention of government documents after his
presidency.
Formally, a federal criminal case
against Trump — if it were filed — would allow federal prosecutors to take
precedence over any local case or cases.
Concurrent criminal proceedings
against Trump would inevitably cause some logistical problems, but typically
the feds and local prosecutors try to work out any conflicts.
How long will
it take Trump to be brought to trial?
It will, by necessity, take many months
to commence a trial of a former president of the United States. Even if both
sides were eager to proceed to trial quickly, ironing out legal and
constitutional questions would likely stretch out over the next year and into
the 2024 primary season.
DeSantis calls Trump indictment ‘un-American’ and
says he won’t assist in extradition
1. Manhattan’s DA wanted a Friday Trump arrest. Trump’s
team said no.
2. Secret Pence ruling breaks new ground for vice
presidency
3. ‘O.J. Simpson on steroids’: Team Trump preps for a
post-indictment frenzy
4. Trump indicted in porn star hush money payment case
Add to that Trump’s penchant — in
nearly every legal matter he’s embroiled in — to seek to delay and prolong
proceedings whenever possible.
Trump’s lawyers could try to move
the case to federal court, arguing that at least some of the payments to Cohen
took place while Trump was president and therefore a state court should have no
authority to resolve the matter. Trump also could seek to move the trial to a
different courthouse elsewhere in New York state. And he could try to have the
indictment dismissed or reduced. All of these pre-trial motions will take time
to resolve.
A criminal tax case the Manhattan
district attorney’s office filed against the Trump Organization in the same
court in 2021 took about 15 months to get to trial. A jury convicted two Trump
companies on all 17 felony charges last December. The issues in the new case
are narrower, but the focus on Trump personally seems certain to drag things
out.
FRIDAY
ATTACHMENT SEVENTY NINE – From the Guardian U.K.
‘HE IS A BAD-ASS’: FOX
NEWS MAKES AMENDS WITH TRUMP AS HE FACES INDICTMENT
The relationship
between the former president and the network had cooled but Fox offered a
full-throated defence of Trump on Thursday night
By
Jonathan Yerushalmy Fri 31 Mar 2023 00.01 EDT
A breaking
news graphic rushes across the screen, as flashing amber lights illuminate the
words: “Fox News alert”.
“We have just
gotten word that former president Donald Trump has been indicted,” the host begins, while a
stunned gasp is audible from off-camera.
“What?” asks
another incredulous voice, as the presenter explains to Fox News’ afternoon
audience that the former president will be charged in relation to an alleged
“hush money payment to adult film star Stormy Daniels”.
In the
moments after the news broke, the network’s hosts and commentators took some
time to digest the information. After reporting for weeks that Trump’s
indictment was imminent, the news – when it did arrive – seemed to take Fox’s
panel of experts by surprise.
Now we know: in Trump’s fantasy comeback, he’ll be wearing handcuffs
“I feel bad for
the guy … now they’re trying to nickel-and-dime him for a private agreement he
made with a woman eight years ago,” host Jesse Watters says.
But if the
network’s initial reaction was one of shock, even uncertainty, what quickly
followed was more akin to the bellicose confidence that its viewership has come
to expect.
By the time
Watters was back on air with his own show, he was telling his prime-time
audience that America was now in a “a revenge political climate”.
“When Trump
wins back the White House, he needs to start looking into Democrats,” Watters’
guest, Mike Davis, told him.
“Potentially
you could have a former president behind bars. The only way you can get a free
Trump is to elect a free Trump,” Davis added.
‘Hunting Trump, destroying America’
Fox news has
long been friendly to the former president, but has had a more complicated relationship with
him recently. Until this week, Trump had been absent from
the network for months, the victim of an apparent shadow-ban by senior
management.
A closely
watched legal battle between the network and voting machine
company Dominion was thought to be behind the apparent
schism. Evidence put forward in that case revealed what many at the top of Fox
truly think of Trump, driving a wedge between the former president and the
network that helped to catapult him into the White House.
Why did a grand jury vote to indict
Trump and what does it mean for him?
Private
messages, presented as evidence in the $1.6bn case, showed that even as they
went on the air to cast doubt over the results of the 2020 election, many Fox
News personalities privately doubted Trump’s claims.
“He’s acting
like an insane person,” Sean Hannity, one of the network’s best-known
personalities, allegedly said of Trump.
Fox News’ owner, Rupert Murdoch, said several of the network’s top stars
“endorsed” Trump’s false claims, and later added: “I would have liked us to be
stronger in denouncing it in hindsight,” according to a deposition in the case.
But any
lasting animosity between two of the most powerful forces of the American right
appeared to have disappeared by Thursday night.
Across the
network’s coverage, Trump’s indictment was variously characterised
as revenge, political overreach and, perhaps most significantly, a boon to his
chances of securing the presidency again in 2024.
“He is a
bad-ass if he’s got a mug-shot … his poll numbers have gone up with this and I
just think this is gonna make sure he’s going to be
on the ticket,” one commentator said in the moments after the news broke.
By the time
Tucker Carlson, one of the networks most popular personalities, came on air,
the question had shifted: how to respond?
Carlson – who
once told an associate that he passionately hates Trump,
according to evidence in the Dominion case – described the indictment as a
turning point for America. He offered up a potted history of Trump’s
presidency, a history that he adorned throughout with conspiracy theories,
calls for the FBI to be defunded and parallel narratives of the former
president’s two impeachments. From the start, he said, “Washington elites” had
been working to stop Trump becoming president again.
Trump’s indictment will probably
hurt him with the electorate. But how much?
Throughout his
interviews with fellow analysts, a potential Republican rival and Trump’s
attorney, Carlson continued to return to the question of how Americans should
react.
“The rule of
law is suspended tonight,” Carlson announced gravely. “What you’re seeing now
is lawlessness – the question is who can stop it?
“It almost
feels like they’re pushing the population,” he mused at one point.
Carlson
seemed to finally get the answer he was searching for from sports commentator
Jason Whitlock: “They are agitating for unrest … I’m ready for whatever’s next.
And I hope that every other man watching this is ready for whatever’s next.”
Throughout
the evening, the charges against Trump were framed as a direct attack on
Americans themselves. Laura Ingraham came to air accompanied by a banner that
declared: “Hunting Trump, destroying America”.
Evidence
presented in Dominion’s defamation lawsuit showed that many Fox
News hosts did not believe Trump’s claims of a stolen election which they
pushed on air. But while these depositions suggest that many at the very top of
Fox News were more than ready to break with Trump for good, his indictment
proves that this will be difficult for the network to accomplish.
“It’s a toxic
relationship,” Michael Steele, former chairman of the Republican National
Committee, said earlier this month.
“They are
good and bad for each other at the same time … Fox can’t do without Trump and
Trump ultimately can’t do without Fox because he knows, at the end of the day,
that’s the media vehicle through which he will be able to reach the widest
audience of his supporters.”
ATTACHMENT EIGHTY – From the Guardian U,K.
AFTER INDICTMENT,
TRUMP WILL PLAY THE VICTIM – AND THE TACTIC WILL WORK FOR MANY REPUBLICANS
Trump has
followed a pattern since 2016 – the bigger the alleged crime, the louder he
airs grievances and claims he’s being persecuted
By David Smith in Washington Fri 31 Mar 2023 01.00 EDT
The comedian Chris
Rock gazed out at the audience at an awards ceremony in Washington earlier this
month. “Are you guys really going to arrest Trump?” he asked bluntly. “This is
only going to make him more popular!”
Donald Trump
has not yet been arrested but is now the first person to occupy the Oval
Office to then be charged with a crime.
It also raises the prospect of the Republican favorite for the 2024 presidential
race to be running for the White House while also being criminally prosecuted –
something likely to bring even more chaos to America’s already deeply fractured
political landscape.
It emerged on
Thursday that a Manhattan grand jury has voted to indict Trump over a hush
money payment to the adult film star Stormy Daniels during the 2016
presidential election campaign.
Florida-based
Trump is now expected to surrender himself on Tuesday to the Manhattan district
attorney (DA) to be fingerprinted and photographed for a mugshot – something
guaranteed to delight his many opponents, appall his fans and divide the United
States even more.
30 March 2023
is therefore a day for the history books. It offered an affirmation of the
Magna Carta principle that no one, not even the onetime commander in chief, is
above the law. The 45th president of the United States is set to stand trial
and, if convicted, could find himself behind bars instead of running for
re-election.
Presidential
historian Michael Beschloss said on the MSNBC
network: “Tomorrow, in terms of American history, we will be waking up in a
different country. Before tonight, presidents in this country were kings.”
But while the
law is clear, the politics are murky. A criminal charge or even conviction does
not prevent someone running for the White House, and Trump is currently leading
in opinion polls for the 2024 Republican presidential primary.
In the
pre-Trump universe, an indictment over a hush money payment to an adult film
star would have been career-ending. Candidates have withdrawn from election
races for much less.
But since
2016, Trump has been a political judo master, turning the weight of opponents
and allegations against them to his own advantage. The bigger the alleged
crime, the louder he airs grievances and the more he plays the victim – and so far the Republican party has been mostly willing to indulge
him.
That is the
role he will play with an indictment hanging over him. At a campaign rally in
Waco, Texas, last weekend, he claimed: “The Biden regime’s weaponization of law
enforcement against their political opponents is something straight out of the
Stalinist Russia horror show.” He suggested that it is the most serious problem
facing America today.
In a
statement on Thursday following his indictment, Trump said: “This is Political
Persecution and Election Interference at the highest level in history… The
Democrats have lied, cheated and stolen in their obsession with trying to ‘Get
Trump,’ but now they’ve done the unthinkable - indicting a completely innocent
person in an act of blatant Election Interference.”
Trump will
now doubtless set about putting the Manhattan district attorney, Alvin Bragg, on
trial in the court of public opinion. He has already used dehumanising
and racist language. A social media post, later removed, showed a photo of
Trump holding a baseball bat and apparently looming over Bragg, raising fears
of violence against him.
The bigger
the alleged crime, the louder he airs grievances and the more he plays the
victim – and so far the Republican party has been
mostly willing to indulge him.
That is the
role he will play with an indictment hanging over him. At a campaign rally in
Waco, Texas, last weekend, he claimed: “The Biden regime’s weaponization of law
enforcement against their political opponents is something straight out of the
Stalinist Russia horror show.” He suggested that it is the most serious problem
facing America today.
America’s
tragedy is that the tactic will work with many Republicans. That Bragg is a
Democrat from New York will trigger a Pavlovian response in Trump’s favor. That
the case is seven years old, based on an untested legal theory and has Michael
Cohen, a convicted criminal, as a key witness will provide further ammunition. Maybe DT is even right!
This pattern
came into a focus earlier this month when Trump falsely predicted his own arrest.
Republicans leaped to his defence and he
reportedly raised $1.5m in three days;
on Thursday night he quickly sent out another fundraising email.
The drama put
Trump back where he wants to be: at the centre of the news cycle.
Not coincidentally, it also gave him a boost in the Republican primary polls,
extending a lead over Ron DeSantis, even as the Florida governor was on a book
tour trying to promote his own brand. Everyone was talking about Trump.
So it was
that, after news of the indictment emerged on Thursday, Republicans again came
to his aid. Trump ally Kevin McCarthy, the speaker of the House of
Representatives, accused Bragg of “irreparably” damaging the country “in an
attempt to interfere” in the election.
JD Vance, a
Republican senator for Ohio, described the indictment as “political persecution
masquerading as law”, “blatant election interference” and “a direct assault on
the tens of millions of Americans who support him”.
But the most
telling reaction came from DeSantis himself. This could have been the moment
for him to break from Trump and prove statesmanlike, calling for dignity and
unity in a solemn moment for the nation. Instead he
went full Maga.
DeSantis
said: “The weaponization of the legal system to advance a political agenda
turns the rule of law on its head. It is un-American.” Blowing an antisemitic
dog whistle, DeSantis twice linked Bragg to philanthropist George Soros, adding
that Florida would not assist in “an extradition request” to send Trump to New
York.
The spineless
responses suggested that, in the short term at least, the indictment will
provide a rallying cry for Trump and help rather than hurt him in the 2024
Republican primary. In the for-us-or-against-us binary of American politics,
the party base will be for him and against the perceived Democratic elites and
the deep state.
Yet again, he
has thrust America into the political unknown, a twilight zone where precedents
do not apply and everyone has to respond on the fly. Can the Manhattan court
assemble an impartial jury, and will the timing of the trial collide with the
Republican primary?
Then, what
about the other major legal perils threatening Trump: over the January 6
insurrection, over election interference in Georgia and over the mishandling of
classified documents? These cases are arguably more clear-cut and consequential
– but not necessarily in the eyes of Republicans. Will he recklessly incite
unrest among his supporters?
The lesson of
the Trump era is that most predictions are wrong. The only certainty is that
Thursday will go down as the day when Trump’s age of impunity, in which he was
never legally held to account, is over. The man who rose to power leading
chants of “Lock her up!” is about to get a taste of his own medicine.
ATTACHMENT EIGHTY
ONE – Also from GUK
NEWS OF INDICTMENT
CATCHES TRUMP AND HIS TEAM OFF GUARD
Sources say ex-president
and aides believed prosecutors were reconsidering action and were taken by
surprise by announcement
By Hugo Lowell Fri
31 Mar 2023 02.30 EDT (7:40 GMT)
Donald Trump
and his top advisers were caught flat-footed by the news of
his indictment by the Manhattan grand jury over hush money payments to the adult
film star Stormy Daniels, having expected no charges until at least the end of
April and potentially never at all.
The former
president reckoned
– along with his aides – that recent reporting about the grand jury taking a
break from next week meant prosecutors in the district attorney’s office were
reconsidering whether to seek an indictment over the matter.
But that
optimism proved to be misplaced when Trump was alerted at Mar-a-Lago to the indictment
by his advisers, some of whom had decided to return to Washington after growing
tired of waiting with him for several weeks for charges to materialize.
The former
president issued a pugilistic statement in response to the news and lashed out
at the prosecution as political and an effort to hurt his 2024 presidential
campaign, before appearing for dinner as usual alongside the other guests at
this Florida resort.
But in
private, Trump was more subdued as he took in the significance of becoming the first
sitting or former president to be charged and the changed reality of operating
under the threat of an eventual criminal trial, several sources close to him
said.
The private
response showed that for all his outward bravado – including claims that he wanted
to be arrested and handcuffed for a “perp walk” because he wanted to project
defiance if he was ever indicted – deep down, Trump has always feared the
prospect of being criminally charged and its consequences.
The charges
remain sealed, but are expected to touch on $130,000 that Trump
made to Daniels through his then lawyer Michael Cohen in the final days of the
2016 elections campaign. Trump later reimbursed Cohen with $35,000 checks, and
Cohen pleaded guilty in 2018 to federal charges over the money.
Trump’s mood
towards the hush money investigation has fluctuated in recent weeks – from criticising the prospect of criminal charges, to growing
impatient and insisting they should charge him already, and then going back to
attacking the investigation with vehemence.
After the
first rally of his 2024 campaign in Texas, Trump told an NBC News reporter he
was not frustrated by the case despite appearing quite
frustrated.
“I’m not
frustrated by it. It’s a fake investigation,” Trump said. “This is fake news,
and NBC is one of the worst. Don’t ask me any more questions.”
Trump became
more optimistic this week, believing – based on no actual evidence – that
reports about the grand jury taking a break for most of April could mean the
district attorney was having doubts about prosecuting the hush money case and
that it was “all over”.
Some of
Trump’s advisers took that as an opportunity to get out of Palm Beach, where
they had been waiting with him for weeks for an indictment to arrive.
Shortly after
5pm on Thursday, his 2024 campaign advisers
learned from a New York Times alert that Trump had been indicted, catching them
off guard in part because they assumed they would hear about it first from the
Trump lawyers, who had themselves assumed they would confidentially hear it
first from prosecutors.
Though Trump
had indicated that he expected to be one of the first people to be told if he
was charged in the hush money case, the sources said, when the news actually
arrived, Trump appears to have been one of the very last people to find out.
ATTACHMENT EIGHTY TWO – And Also, from the Guardian U.K.
HUSH MONEY TO A PORN STAR:
OF COURSE THIS WAS HOW TRUMP WAS INDICTED
This isn’t
the Trump indictment we wanted, but it might be the one we deserve
By Moira Donegan Fri 31 Mar 2023 06.11
EDT
Stormy
Daniels didn’t seem to know what she had. In 2011, when The Apprentice was still
getting decent ratings and Donald Trump had drawn attention to himself for
racist claims about the birthplace of Barack Obama, Daniels – also known as
Stephanie Clifford – started asking around to see who she could sell her story
to. Daniels, for years a successful porn performer, had met Trump at a
celebrity golf tournament in 2006. According to her, he invited her to his
hotel room, offered her work on his TV show and then had sex with her. The two
remained friendly afterwards; Trump invited Daniels to the launch of his Trump
Vodka brand the following year. It’s the kind of thing you suspect that these
two people would have written off as a funny story. Instead, it’s the impetus
for one of the most politically volatile prosecutions in the nation’s history:
the first criminal indictment of a former president, which was issued on
Thursday by a federal grand jury in New York.
Stormy
Daniels and the illegal, fraudulent machinations that the Trump campaign
allegedly undertook to pay her off during the height of the presidential
campaign in 2016 have always struck me as the most quintessential of Trump’s
many scandals. Trump denies Daniels’ allegations, but in retrospect, with the
hindsight of what we’ve come to learn of him, the scene she recounts is almost
unbearably true to his character: the gathering of low-rent celebrities, the
paltry quid pro quo, the golf, and the sad, adolescent fantasy of sex with a
porn star. The whole story drips with Trump’s defining attribute: the desperate
and insatiable need to have his ego gratified. Which is why to me, at least, it
seems obvious that Daniels is telling the truth.
The whole
story drips with Trump’s defining attribute: the desperate and insatiable need
to have his ego gratified
Back then,
she offered the interview about it to Life & Style magazine. The piece
never ran, but they paid her $15,000. It’s not a lot of money, when you put it
in the context of what has happened since, but Daniels seems to have made the
same assumption that the rest of us did: that Trump would remain on the C-list,
making needful and desperate bids for the attention of the tabloids. Back then,
you’d have to have been crazy to think that he could have been president.
When it
became clear that he might be, Daniels did what any savvy businesswoman would
have done: she upped her price. After the Access Hollywood tape broke in
October of 2016, Trump’s treatment of women – his leering use of them as props
for his ego, his boorish demonstrations of virility for the benefit of other
men and, suddenly, a flow of uncannily similar allegations of harassment and
assault – gave Daniels another opening.
She
approached the National Enquirer, which tipped off the Trump campaign. Michael
Cohen, Trump’s sweaty and exhausted lawyer and fixer, offered to pay her
$130,000 to shut up and go away, which Daniels was happy to accept. Cohen
fronted the money himself; initially, he seems to have taken out a line of
credit on his own house. Why go through this labyrinthine route? Why have the
lawyer pay personally – an unusual and inappropriate arrangement – especially
in an amount that was large for Michael Cohen but should have been small for
his alleged billionaire of a boss?
The theory of
the case, and the one that has always been most plausible, is that Cohen, and
not Trump, initially paid Daniels off because if Trump had paid her, that
payment would have been subject to scrutiny – from campaign finance regulators
and from the public. And in the waning days of what was a chaotic and flailing
election, this was scrutiny that the Trump campaign could not afford.
The Stormy Daniels
affair is not the most serious of Trump’s alleged crimes, and so it can seem anticlimactic,
and even a little ridiculous, that this is the only bit of his wrongdoing that
he has been indicted for. A grand jury in Georgia is investigating a phone call
he made to the secretary of state there in the wake of the 2020 election,
seemingly imploring the official, Brad Raffensperger,
to facilitate election fraud in his favor; at the justice department, a series
of investigations into the January 6 riot, which disrupted the transfer of
power and left five people dead, are proceeding at a glacial pace. He was
impeached for it; he was also impeached for holding military aid to Ukraine
hostage so he could try to dig up dirt on Joe Biden’s son.
Trump’s
criminality and corruption are so profligate and unconcealed that previous
failures to charge him seemed manifestly a result of fear
Trump also
seems to have taken dozens or hundreds of classified documents with him to his tacky
resort at Mar-a-Lago, throwing them into boxes like someone stuffing their
pockets with tiny shampoo bottles before they leave a fancy hotel. But none of
that is what he’s being held accountable for: he’s being held to account for
trying to launder his hush money to a porn star.
Trump will no
doubt claim that the indictment against him on these comparatively trivial
grounds is politically motivated, and he’s already got some support from
Democrats in making that claim. David Axelrod, the former Obama strategist,
characterized the Daniels charges, not unreasonably, as the “least meaningful”
of Trump’s offenses. “If he’s going to be indicted in any of these probes, this
[is] the one he probably would want first to try and color all of them as
politically motivated.”
But if
anything, what seems politically motivated is the fact that Trump has not been
indicted on criminal charges already: his criminality and corruption are so
profligate and unconcealed that the failure to charge him – a failure which
until Thursday was unanimous among prosecutors across the country – seemed
manifestly a result of fear. “No one is above the law” is something prosecutors
like to say a lot; but the large-scale impunity for the rich and powerful
indicates that they don’t quite believe it.
Now that’s
changed, at least in a small way. It’s yet to be seen whether any other
prosecutors will discover the courage to charge Trump. For now, he’s only been
charged on the stupidest and lowest matter possible. Maybe that’s appropriate:
Trump the man always seemed a little too small and stupid, his effect on
history dramatically outsized to the banality of his character. This isn’t the
Trump indictment we wanted, but it might be the one we deserve.
·
Moira Donegan
is a Guardian US columnist
ATTACHMENT EIGHTY
THREE – From Reuters
TRUMP TO FACE CRIMINAL CHARGES IN STORMY DANIELS HUSH MONEY PROBE
By Karen Freifeld, Luc Cohen and Tyler
Clifford
NEW YORK, March 31 (Reuters) - Donald
Trump is due to be fingerprinted and photographed in a New York courthouse next
week as he becomes the first former U.S. president to face criminal charges in
a case involving a 2016 hush money payment to porn star Stormy Daniels.
Trump's expected appearance before
a judge in Manhattan on Tuesday, as the Republican mounts a bid to regain the
presidency, could further inflame divisions in the United States. A New York
judge on Friday authorized Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, a Democrat,
to make the charges public, but it was not clear when he would do so.
For nearly two weeks, Trump has
been using the various legal threats he confronts to raise money and rally
supporters as he seeks his party's nomination to challenge Democratic President
Joe Biden next year.
The first U.S. president to try to
overthrow an election defeat, inspiring the deadly 2021 assault on the U.S.
Capitol, has signaled he will continue to campaign even as he faces charges.
"I am not afraid of what's to
come," Trump said in a fundraising email on Friday.
Trump has called himself
"completely innocent."
Biden, who defeated Trump in 2020,
on Friday declined to comment on the indictment as he left the White House for
a trip to storm-ravaged Mississippi.
After word surfaced on Thursday
that Trump had been indicted by a Manhattan grand jury, he called himself the
victim of political persecution.
The specific charges are not yet
known, though CNN reported that Trump faced more than 30 counts related to
business fraud.
Susan Necheles,
a Trump attorney, told Reuters he will plead not guilty.
Another Trump lawyer, Joseph Tacopina, said Trump will not have to wear handcuffs at his
court appearance and will likely be released without having to post bail.
"He's ready to fight. He's
gearing up," Tacopina said in a phone interview.
The charges will likely be
unsealed by a judge in the coming days and Trump will have to travel to
Manhattan for the court appearance expected on Tuesday. Necheles
said she did not expect charges to be unsealed until that day.
Any potential trial is still at
least more than a year away, legal experts said, meaning it could occur during
or after the 2024
presidential campaign.
PARTISAN
BRAWL
Trump, 76, has accused Bragg of
trying to damage his electoral chances. Trump's claims have been echoed by
many of his fellow Republicans and his potential rivals in the race for the
party's presidential nomination.
Mike Pence, Trump's former vice
president and a possible 2024 candidate, said the
charges send a "terrible message" to the world about U.S. justice.
"I'm very troubled by
it," Pence said at a forum in Washington.
Ahead of the indictment, the grand
jury heard months of evidence about a $130,000 payment to Daniels in the waning
days of the 2016 presidential campaign. Daniels has said she was paid to keep
silent about a sexual encounter she had with Trump in 2006.
"It's vindication,"
Daniels told the Times of London. "He's done so much worse that he should
have been taken down (for) before."
Senior House of Representatives
Republicans have vowed to investigate Bragg and demanded he hand over documents
and other confidential material from the investigation. Bragg said Congress
does not have authority to interfere with a New York legal proceeding and
accused the lawmakers of escalating political tensions. Bragg's office has been
the target of bomb threats in recent weeks. Hypocrisy?
"You and many of your
colleagues have chosen to collaborate with Mr. Trump's efforts to vilify and
denigrate the integrity of elected state prosecutors and trial judges,"
Bragg wrote in a letter to Republican lawmakers.
Aside from this case, Trump faces two
federal criminal investigations into his efforts to overturn his 2020 election
defeat and his handling of classified documents after leaving office. Trump
also faces a separate Georgia investigation into his efforts to overturn his
2020 loss in that state.
SECURITY HIGH
Officials have stepped up security
around the courthouse in New York since Trump on March 18 called on his
supporters to protest any arrest. A law enforcement source said police would
close streets around the courthouse ahead of Tuesday's expected appearance.
On Friday, media outlets were set
up outside the courthouse but there was no sign of unrest or protests related
to the case.
Trump appealed earlier this month
for nationwide protests, recalling his charged rhetoric ahead of the Jan. 6,
2021, U.S. Capitol attack, and warned last week of potential "death &
destruction" if he were charged.
Outside Trump's Mar-a-Lago resort
in Florida, a small group of people waved "Trump Nation" flags and
cheered as cars passed by.
"I think he's going to get
more votes now because people will maybe wake up," said Eve Knapp, a Trump
supporter.
Merchandise vendor Ronald Solomon
said sales of Trump-themed hats and t-shirts were up sharply after the charges
were announced.
Some 44% of Republicans said Trump
should drop out of the race if he is indicted, according to a Reuters/Ipsos
poll released last week.
LEGAL PERIL
Trump has escaped legal peril
numerous times since the 1970s, when he joined his family's real estate
business.
In the White House, he weathered
an investigation into his 2016 campaign's contacts with Russia and two attempts
in Congress to remove him from office.
Bragg's office prosecuted Trump's
business on tax-fraud charges last year, leading to a $1.61 million criminal
penalty, but Trump himself was not charged.
The presiding judge in that case,
New York Supreme Court Justice Juan Merchan, is
expected to oversee the Daniels case as well, according to a person familiar
with the matter.
Some legal experts have said Bragg
might have to rely on untested legal theories to argue that Trump falsified
business records to cover up other crimes, such as violating federal
campaign-finance law.
The former president's personal
lawyer Michael Cohen has said he coordinated with Trump on the payments to
Daniels and to a second woman, former Playboy model Karen McDougal. Trump has
denied having had sexual relationships with either woman, but has acknowledged
reimbursing Cohen.
Cohen pleaded guilty to a
campaign-finance violation in 2018 and served more than a year in prison.
Federal prosecutors said he acted at Trump's direction.
Additional reporting by Tim Reid,
Alexandra Ulmer, Doina Chiacu
and Katharine Jackson; Writing by Andy Sullivan; Editing by Scott Malone, Will
Dunham, Chizu Nomiyama and Daniel Wallis
ATTACHMENT EIGHTY FOUR – From Time
Former President Expected to Turn Himself In: Latest Updates on Trump’s
Indictment
Trump Rallied Supporters in Waco
Ahead of Possible Indictment
BY BRIAN BENNETT AND TIME STAFF
UPDATED: MARCH 31, 2023 3:43
PM EDT | ORIGINALLY PUBLISHED: MARCH 30, 2023 7:30 PM EDT
Former President Donald
Trump was criminally indicted on Thursday by
a Manhattan grand jury. While the exact charges are still under seal and will
likely remain so until next week, they relate to the payment of hush money to a former porn star.
Multiple outlets are reporting, citing
unnamed sources, that the charges involve more than two dozen counts.
Americans React to News of Donald
Trump's Impending Indictment
POSTED 4 HOURS AGO
The office of Manhattan District
Attorney Alvin Bragg announced Thursday evening that it had reached out to
Trump’s team to discuss an arraignment date. One of Trump’s attorneys told TIME
that the former President is expected to turn himself in on Tuesday.
Trump called the indictment
“political persecution” in a statement, attacking Bragg as a “disgrace” and
predicting the decision would hurt Democrats in the 2024 election.
The indictment marks the first
time in American history that a former President has been criminally charged,
and sets up a stunning legal and political test for the nation as Trump once
again seeks the presidency.
Here are the latest updates on the
indictment.
Trump attacks
the judge assigned to his case
Trump is taking aim at the judge
he said is assigned to preside over his arraignment, Juan Merchan,
who is an acting justice with the State Supreme Court.
The New York-based judge, Trump
wrote without evidence, “hates me,” in a post on his social media site TruthSocial. Trump, who misspelled the judge’s name, wrote
that Merchan “was hand picked
by Bragg & the Prosecutors, & is the same person who ‘railroaded’ my 75 year old former CFO, Allen Weisselberg,
to take a ‘plea’ deal.” Along with handling the case against the Trump
organization executive, Merchan also presided over a
case in which he ordered the Trump Foundation to pay $1.6 million after a jury
found the organization guilty of criminal tax fraud. Alvin Bragg, the current
Manhattan District Attorney, was a prosecutor involved in that case.
Justice Merchan’s
signature is on an official order that allowed Bragg to tell the public on
Thursday that the grand jury had voted to indict Trump. That order was released
by the court on Friday. —Brian Bennett
Biden
declines to comment
President Joe Biden emphatically
declined to comment on Friday about his predecessor’s indictment, in the first
chance for the current president to address the ongoing case that has sent
shockwaves across the country.
“I have no comment on Trump,”
Biden said outside the White House after reporters asked multiple times about
what Thursday’s indictment means for the rule of law in the U.S. When asked if
he’s worried about protests or violence in the wake of the indictment, Biden
responded: “No. I’m not going to talk about the Trump indictment.”
Jen Psaki, who was Biden’s former
press secretary, said on MSNBC Thursday night that the White House is going to
be “very quiet” about the Trump indictment for as long as it can “in part
because as a policy they don’t comment on ongoing criminal investigations, but
also because they don’t want to feed into the politics of this.” —Nik Popli
Pence calls
indictment an ‘outrage’
Former Vice President Mike Pence
defended his former running mate on Thursday night, describing the indictment
against Trump as “an outrage” that will “only further serve to divide our
country.”
“It appears to millions of
Americans to be nothing more than a political prosecution,” the former vice
president, whose relationship with Trump has been strained since
the Jan. 6 Capitol attack, said on CNN. He also accused the Manhattan District
Attorney Alvin Bragg of having “literally ran” his campaign vowing to go after
Trump, but noted that there is “no reason for calling for people to be
protesting” the indictment, despite Trump’s previous statements.
Pence, who is weighing his own
presidential bid, added that the case against Trump will have no bearing on his
own decision about the 2024 race. He declined to say if Trump should be
disqualified or drop out of the race if he is convicted. —NP
Catch up on
the case
Trump Is About to Stress Test the Credibility of Our
Judicial System
Trump’s Indictment Drama Showcased His Rivals’
Weakness
How Republicans Are Reacting to Donald Trump’s
Indictment
Donald Trump Has Been Indicted. Here’s What Happens
Next in the Process
Donald Trump Was Just Indicted. Here’s What to Know
About the Charges and the Case
Donald Trump Is the First President Ever Criminally
Charged. Others Have Come Close Though
Why This Indictment Can’t Stop Donald Trump From Being Elected President
Why Did the Stormy Daniels Case Lead to Trump’s First
Indictment?
Alvin Bragg Did What He Had to Do In
Indicting Trump
Here’s what
happens next
Next, Trump will be arraigned in
front of a magistrate judge, which usually happens at the courthouse in lower
Manhattan. The Manhattan district attorney’s office has contacted Trump’s legal
team to negotiate when he will surrender himself.
“This evening we contacted Mr.
Trump’s attorney to coordinate his surrender to the Manhattan D.A.’s Office for
arraignment on a Supreme Court indictment, which remains under seal,” a
spokesperson for Bragg said in a statement. “Guidance will be provided when the
arraignment date is selected.”
One of Trump’s lawyers, Susan R. Necheles, told TIME that former President Trump is expected
to turn himself in on Tuesday to be arraigned in State Supreme Court in
Manhattan.
At the initial hearing and
arraignment, Trump will be told the charges against him, his rights, and have a
chance to name his own lawyer to represent him, or use a court-appointed
attorney.
Once he is arraigned, the judge
will decide if he is a flight risk or presents a danger, or if he can be
released until the trial. This sets in motion the legal process. At a later
date, Trump will have a chance to plead guilty or not guilty to the charges. If
Trump pleads not guilty, the court will hear pre-trial motions, and court dates
will be set for discovery and a trial to begin.
If the preliminary proceedings
take as long as other similar cases, the trial may not start until well into
2024, in the heat of the presidential election cycle.
Will Trump
turn himself in?
It is expected. Trump’s lawyer Joe
Tacopina has said previously that Trump
would turn himself in if charged.
Trump’s lawyers are in contact
with the Manhattan DA’s office and the offices are likely discussing terms
under which Trump would appear in court to turn himself in to face the charges,
rather than have to be arrested by law enforcement at his club in Palm Beach,
Fla., or elsewhere.
Florida Governor Ron DeSantis, an
expected Republican challenger to Trump in the 2024 election, said on Twitter
Thursday that Florida “will not assist in an extradition request given the
questionable circumstances.” DeSantis went on to defend Trump, describing the
indictment as “un-American” and a “weaponization of the legal system to advance
a political agenda.” (The Constitution requires if someone is charged
with a crime in one state and flees to another that the person must be returned
to the jurisdiction where they were charged if demanded by the governor of the
state from which they fled.)
When could we
know the charges?
Likely soon.
Trump’s indictment is currently
under seal and not yet public. Usually the charges
against a defendant are made public at the arraignment or slightly
before. CNN, the New
York Times, and CBS News Miami have each
reported that sources tell them the indictment includes more than two dozen
counts.
Once the indictment is made
public, the country will be able to see exactly what charges Trump faces and a summary
of some of the evidence Bragg says has been gathered to back up the charges.
The
right-wing response so far: ‘Now it’s GAME ON’
On Thursday, many on the pro-Trump
social media groups and forums that served as the staging grounds of the “Stop
the Steal” rallies and the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol celebrated the
indictment.
“I almost wanted this. Now it’s
GAME ON,” one person wrote on a popular pro-Trump forum. “I know all of you are
smart enough to know and see all this, but we need to rally behind him and show
the left just how much this reinforces his popularity and electability,”
another person wrote. “Get active at your local level and get vocal. Teflon
Don.”
It was a shift from the tone from
earlier in the month, after Trump announced on March 18 that his arrest was
imminent. Despite Trump calling on his supporters to “PROTEST, PROTEST,
PROTEST!!” to “save America,” few seemed to respond enthusiastically. The
largest protest, organized in Manhattan, barely drew 50 people.
Online, many of Trump’s most loyal
supporters largely agreed that it made no sense to organize any mass rallies or
events, with many expressing anger at what they
described as Trump’s “betrayal” of those who heeded his call on Jan. 6.
“Has he called for protests about
these poor guys? No. But he’s calling for us to protest about his arrest,”
another person wrote on a popular por-Trump forum. “It doesn’t sit right with
me.” Another user agreed: “He’s right. Trump betrayed the J6 patriots.”
But on Thursday, some in Trump’s
orbit continued to forcefully make the case that his indictment affected all of
them.
“For those people who said, ‘It’s
not real. Trump’s making it up. It’s not a real issue for us’….Just
wait until they come for you,” his son Donald Trump Jr. said on a live videocast
on the alternative streaming site Rumble.” We’re in a battle for our entire
existence.”
Intelligence officials tracked an
uptick in violent rhetoric after news of the possible indictment broke on March
18, with most threats targeting law enforcement, judges and government
officials in New York, according to a CBS report. Multiple agencies have
discussed potential security plans for the vicinity of the Manhattan Criminal
Court.
—Vera Bergengruen
Here’s how
Trump is responding
Trump is claiming that the
prosecution against him is politically motivated in order to hurt his candidacy
for President in 2024.
Trump responded to the grand
jury’s vote to indict him Thursday in a statement: “This is Political
Persecution and Election Interference at the highest level in history. From the
time I came down the golden escalator at Trump Tower, and even before I was
sworn in as your President of the United States, the Radical Left Democrats –
the enemy of the hard-working men and women of this Country – have been engaged
in a Witch-Hunt to destroy the Make America Great Again movement. You remember
it just like I do: Russia, Russia, Russia; the Mueller Hoax; Ukraine, Ukraine,
Ukraine; Impeachment Hoax 1; Impeachment Hoax 2; the illegal and
unconstitutional Mar-a-Lago raid; and now this.”
His statement further claimed
Bragg had indicted “a completely innocent person in an act of blatant Election
Interference.”
He also went on a social media
frenzy overnight on Thursday on Truth Social. “WHERE’S HUNTER?” he posted at around
3am. The post is a reference to President Joe Biden’s son Hunter who has long
been a target of Trump. Hunter Biden has been under federal investigation since
2018 for tax payments and the Republicans have directed probes at him since
they took control of the House in January.
Trump also called the indictment
“Fake, Corrupt, and Disgraceful” as well as “an attack on our country” and
“free and fair elections.”
“These Thugs and Radical Left
Monsters have just INDICATED [sic] the 45th President of the United States of
America, and the leading Republican Candidate, by far, for the 2024 Nomination
for President,” Trump wrote.
ATTACHMENT EIGHTY FIVE – From the Washington Times
Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia
on Friday said she will go to New York to protest former President Donald
Trump’s indictment on charges tied to a probe into hush payments for porn star
Stormy Daniels.
Ms. Greene, a Republican and
staunch ally of the ex-president, announced her plans on Twitter ahead of Mr.
Trump’s arraignment in Manhattan, likely on Tuesday.
“I’m going to New York on
Tuesday,” she wrote. “We MUST protest the unconstitutional WITCH HUNT!”
Ms. Greene is among those who
believe the indictment handed up by the grand jury is the result of a political
hit job by Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg.
Mr. Trump had called on people to
protest his pending indictment, though others have pushed for calm.
“I don’t think people should protest this,
no,” House Speaker Kevin McCarthy said last month at a GOP retreat in Orlando,
Florida. “We want calmness out there.”
Mr. Trump is the first president
to be indicted on criminal charges.
His court appearance will likely
be a tightly controlled affair involving the Secret Service.
Mr. Trump’s lawyer, Joe Tacopina, told Newsmax they are working out the
arrangements with Mr. Bragg’s office.
.
ATTACHMENT EIGHTY SIX – From the New York Times
LIVE UPDATES: TRUMP
LIKELY TO BE ARRAIGNED ON TUESDAY
The charges
against Donald J. Trump will be formally unsealed when he is arraigned. He is
the first former U.S. president to be a criminal defendant, and his indictment
puts the legal and political systems in uncharted territory.
By Jonah E.
Bromwich, Ben Protess, William K. Rashbaum and Maggie Haberman
Here’s
the latest on the Trump indictment.
Donald J. Trump
prepared on Friday to surrender to prosecutors in Manhattan next week, as New
York police and court officers girded for protests and sharply partisan
responses from Democrats and Republicans ushered in a tumultuous time for the
deeply polarized nation.
A day after a
grand jury voted to indict Mr. Trump, Republicans continued to criticize the
Manhattan district attorney, Alvin L. Bragg,
whose office rebuked House Republicans for attempting to interfere in the case.
Mr. Trump is likely to be arraigned on Tuesday, when the charges against him
will be unsealed. A lawyer for the former president said that he would not take
a plea deal and was prepared to go to trial.
The case,
which could drag on for months and whose outcome is far from clear, will test
the country’s institutions and the rule of law. It will also have vast
repercussions for the 2024 campaign for the White House — a race in which Mr. Trump
is still the Republican front-runner.
Mr. Trump has
been charged with more than two dozen counts, according to two people familiar
with the matter, although the exact charges remain unknown. And it is not clear
that the New York case will be the first to go to trial because he still faces
other investigations.
A Georgia
prosecutor is in the final stages of an inquiry into Mr. Trump’s attempts to
reverse the election results in that state. Moreover, a federal special counsel
is leading two separate investigations into Mr. Trump’s broader actions to
cling to power after his 2020 electoral defeat, and into his hoarding of
documents marked as classified after leaving office.
While Mr.
Trump has sought to capitalize on the criminal charges to energize his base,
the ignominy of becoming a defendant — especially after decades of evading
prosecution despite numerous repeated investigations — marks a profound change
for a global celebrity who has a history of deriding others accused of
wrongdoing.
Here’s what
else to know:
·
Mr. Bragg has
brought the case over Mr. Trump’s role, when he was running for president, in a
hush-money payment to a porn star, Stormy Daniels, who then agreed to keep
quiet about her story of an affair with him. Prosecutors are expected to argue
that the payoff, which came in the final days of the 2016 presidential
campaign, functioned as an illegal donation to Mr. Trump’s candidacy.
·
In a
statement on Thursday evening, Mr. Trump called Mr. Bragg, a Democrat, “a
disgrace” and denounced the case as “political persecution and election
interference at the highest level in history.” Mr. Trump described himself as
“a completely innocent person.”
·
Mr. Trump is
expected to turn himself in on Tuesday for arraignment on the indictment in
State Supreme Court in Manhattan, one of his lawyers said. The New York Police
Department issued an order to all officers to
be “prepared for deployment,” part of enhanced security measures being put in
place all over the city.
·
After months
of cooler coverage of Mr. Trump, Fox News hosts rallied around him on
Thursday, denouncing his indictment as an attempt to hinder his re-election
chances — he remains a front-runner for
the 2024 Republican presidential nomination — and suggesting it might lead to
unrest.
ATTACHMENT EIGHTY SEVEN – From the Guardian U.K.
DONALD TRUMP HUDDLES
WITH ADVISERS AFTER INITIAL SURPRISE OF INDICTMENT
Trump said to
be buoyed by favorable polling after charges
Sat 1 Apr 2023 23.26 EDT
Donald Trump
huddled with his closest advisers on Saturday at his Mar-a-Lago resort over
political strategy after being caught by surprise about the news that a
Manhattan grand jury had indicted him on criminal charges connected to hush
money payments to adult film star Stormy Daniels in 2016.
The former
president was
buoyed, according to a source familiar with the matter, over new
post-indictment polls that placed him far ahead of his expected 2024 rival, the
Florida governor, Ron DeSantis, and other Republican primary challengers.
See
also these, by Robert Reich...
Trump will attack his indictment on three basic points. Let me rebut them
The most consequential
politics story in the US isn’t the Trump arraignment
According to
a Yahoo news poll, Trump was beating DeSantis 57% to 31% in the one-to-one
contest, and was attracting majority support at 52% when pitted against a
wider, 10-candidate field including DeSantis at 21% and the UN ambassador in
the Trump administration, Nikki Haley.
Trump also
improved his lead over DeSantis in polling done for his campaign by McLaughlin
and Associates, which surveyed 1,000 likely 2024 general election voters and
found Trump beating DeSantis 63% to 30%, improving his lead from January when
Trump was at 52% and DeSantis at 40%.
The sharp
uptick in polling numbers – and a corresponding reversal by potential 2024
rivals trying to come to Trump’s defense over the indictment after previously
trying to distance themselves – was so sudden and marked that it took some of
Trump’s own advisers by surprise.
Trump took the
reluctance of his nearest rivals to directly confront him over the charges as a
sign that he remains the steadfast frontrunner for the Republican nomination,
the source said, and reinforced their difficulty in getting voters to renounce
him, while trying to be his successor.
The strongest
reflection of Trump’s durability with his core Maga base came in fundraising
numbers. The Trump campaign said on Friday that it had raised more than $4m in
the 24 hours after news of the indictment, and that more than 16,000 people
registered to volunteer for the campaign.
The case
centers on $130,000 that Trump paid to Daniels through
Cohen in the final days of the 2016 campaign. Trump later reimbursed Cohen with
$35,000 checks using his personal funds, which were recorded as legal expenses.
Cohen pleaded guilty in 2018 to federal crimes.
With the
charges under seal, it remains unclear what charges the district attorney Alvin
Bragg might seek against Trump, though some members of his legal team believe
the most likely scenario involves a base charge of falsifying business records
elevated to a felony.
An attorney
for Trump, Joe Tacopina, told NBC’s Today show that
his client would not consider taking a plea deal after becoming the first
former president to be criminally charged. “There’s no crime,” Tacopina argued.
Preparations
for the ex-president’s arraignment at Manhattan’s criminal courthouse at 100
Centre St have been under way for 10 days, with barriers being erected for
crowd control.
Indictments
and criminal trials scheduled for Tuesday at the same courthouse include:
burglary for taking paintings from a West Village townhouse; a thwarted
terrorist attack on a Jewish community; the illegal selling of firearms; murder
for an East Harlem hammer attack; murder and attempted murder for attacking
multiple homeless men; murder and criminal possession of a weapon for shooting
into a car in East Harlem; and a grand larceny case involving sim-card
swapping.
New York
police have issued a memo instructing all officers to wear their uniforms and
prepare for mobilization, according to local news reports. That came after Bragg
acknowledged in a memo to the DA’s 1,600 staff members that the office had been
receiving offensive and threatening phone calls and emails.
Bragg said
the safety of his staff remained a top priority, and he thanked them for
persevering in the face of “additional press attention and security around our
office”.
Trump will
not be handcuffed at his arraignment or subjected to a “perp walk”, and
discussions are still being held about whether his booking photo will be
publicly circulated. Trump reportedly “wants the mugshot out” because it could
harness donations to his presidential campaign.
AND... An Editorial...
ATTACHMENT EIGHTY SEVEN (A) – From GUK/Observer
THE OBSERVER VIEW:
DONALD TRUMP DESERVES TO FACE THE FULL FORCE OF JUSTICE
The United
States was founded on the rule of law. It must not now flinch from upholding it
Sun 2 Apr 2023 01.00 EDT
In the tumultuous,
multifaceted case of Donald J Trump versus the people of the United States, the
biggest question is why this former president, political con artist and serial
offender is not already in jail. Trump will be charged this week in
Manhattan over alleged “hush money” payments to a former porn star. This
action, both welcome and overdue, makes him the first US president to be
criminally indicted. Yet twice-impeached Trump stands accused of a string of
infinitely more serious, well-documented crimes, including a violent attempt to
overthrow the government. The continuing mystery is why justice is so long in
coming.
The
full Trump charge sheet reads
like a horror novel in which democracy is murdered. In the weeks following his clear-cut
defeat by Joe Biden in November 2020, Trump did everything he could to subvert
the result, legally and illegally, by making baseless accusations of fraud.
This is not in dispute. Not disputed, either, is a taped telephone conversation on
2 January 2021 between Trump and Brad Raffensperger,
Georgia’s secretary of state, in which the then president pressed the latter
“to find 11,780 votes” – sufficient to cancel Biden’s victory in the key swing
state.
Why has Trump
not been criminally charged in what appears to be an open-and-shut case of
shameless election interference? A special grand jury in Atlanta has
recommended the prosecution of all involved in the illegal lobbying of Raffensperger. Perhaps the courage shown by Manhattan’s
district attorney, Alvin Bragg, in indicting Trump will inspire his Fulton
County counterpart, Fani Willis – and other state and
federal prosecutors – to follow suit without further delays. If this case had
been conducted in a timely manner, Trump might be behind bars now.
It is more
than two years since Trump incited his supporters to attack the Capitol in
order to halt Congress’s ratification of Biden’s victory. The ensuing riot on 6
January 2021 led to deaths and injuries. Yet Trump did nothing to call off the
mob until it was far too late. He has since hailed the rioters as heroes.
Again, much of this is on the record. Congress has conducted exhaustive investigations.
Why has Merrick Garland, the US attorney general, failed to
act against the chief instigator as well as the perpetrators of the coup
attempt? Only in November did Garland finally appoint a special counsel – which
amounts, in effect, to another delay.
It is hard to
avoid the conclusion that reluctance to energetically pursue these and other
crimes, such as Trump’s apparent theft of secret documents found at his Florida
home, stems from political timidity at the top. As he showed again last week,
Trump is ready and able to use his mafia-like grip on the Republican party and
rightwing media to intimidate the entire US body politic. He plays the victim,
turns the tables and claims Biden and the Democrats are the lawbreakers. Trump
says political enemies have singled him out. Yet the only special treatment he
has received is to have been allowed to avoid prosecution for so long.
Diffidence
over confronting Trump full-on stems in part from an understandable desire to
avoid feeding national divisions. The entire Trump saga, akin to tawdry,
never-ending reality TV show, is a distraction from pressing issues such as
post-pandemic economic revival, the climate emergency and war in Europe. The US
should focus on these challenges rather than endlessly indulge the antic
ravings of a narcissistic, foul-mouthed, misogynistic crook.
The
Republican party as a whole continues to place its interests ahead of the
principles for which America stands
Biden would
surely wish it so. At the start of his term, he plainly hoped that, by ignoring
him, Trump would eventually go away. Yet sadly, here he is again, hogging the
limelight. Trump will have his day in court amid blanket media coverage and
feared street violence. He will repeat his usual inflammatory lies and
slanders, proceedings will be adjourned, probably for months, and meanwhile,
this arch-enemy of democracy, decency and justice will try to exploit his
“victimhood” to secure the 2024 Republican presidential nomination. In a sense,
Trump-ism is eternal. It cares for nothing and no one but itself.
The Trump
case poses potentially historic challenges for an American republic founded on
the rule of law. The idea, peddled by Republicans,
that a current or former president enjoys de facto immunity from prosecution is
at odds with modern-day concepts of justice. The fact that it appears such a
person may stand again for the White House while under criminal investigation,
or even following a criminal conviction, points to dangerous flaws in America’s
constitutional arrangements. No person, however famous, big-headed or
threatening, should be above the law.
The aggressive reaction to
the indictment of many leading Republicans, and especially Ron DeSantis,
Trump’s closest competitor, is dismaying. By parroting Trump’s line about “weaponisation” of the courts, the Florida governor shows
himself to be no better or wiser than his egotistic rival. The party as a whole
continues to place its interests ahead of the principles for which America
stands. Democrats, meanwhile, should avoid talk that exacerbates national polarisation. “Lock him up!” is a tempting slogan, given
how Trump used it against Hillary Clinton. But calm, restraint and patience are
required. If there’s any justice, Trump’s time in court will ultimately be
followed by time served.
The manner in
which this unprecedented legal drama is handled, and its outcome, could decide
America’s immediate political future. It may also have a significant, lasting
impact on US influence and moral authority in the global struggle to uphold a
democratic, law-based international order. The world is watching – and that,
regrettably, is what Trump likes.
ATTACHMENT EIGHTY EIGHT – From GUK
DONALD TRUMP VOWS TO ESCALATE ATTACKS AGAINST ALVIN BRAGG – SOURCES
The former
president was stunned by the indictment at first, but after 24 hours he
indicated he wanted to politically ‘rough ’em up’
Hugo
Lowell in
Washington
Sun 2 Apr 2023 17.18 EDT
Donald
Trump has told advisers and associates in recent days that he is prepared
to escalate attacks against the Manhattan prosecutor who resurrected the
criminal prosecution into his hush money payments to adult film star Stormy Daniels
in 2016 now that a grand jury has indicted him.
The former
president has vowed to people close to him that he wants to go on the offensive
and – in a private moment over the weekend at his Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida
that demonstrates his gathering resolve – remarked using more colorful language
that it was time to politically “rough ’em up”.
Trump had
already signaled that he would go after the Manhattan district attorney, Alvin
Bragg, weeks before the grand jury handed up an
indictment against him on Thursday, saying in pugilistic
posts on Truth Social that the prosecution was purely political and accusing
Bragg of being a psychopath.
But the
latest charged language reflects Trump’s determination to double down on those
attacks as he returns to his time-tested playbook of brawling with prosecutors,
especially when faced with legal trouble that he knows he cannot avoid, people
close to him said.
The episode
at Mar-a-Lago came on the sidelines of strategy meetings Trump had with
advisers and associates about how to respond to the
indictment from a legal and political standpoint, sessions which were described
by two sources close to the former president.
The case
centers on $130,000 that Trump paid to Daniels through
his former lawyer Michael Cohen in the final days of the 2016 campaign. Trump
later reimbursed Cohen with $35,000 checks, which were recorded as legal
expenses. Cohen pleaded guilty in 2018 to federal tax evasion and campaign-finance
violation charges.
With the
indictment under seal until Trump’s scheduled arraignment on Tuesday, the exact
charges remained unclear on Sunday, though they are expected to include the
falsification of business records and additional charges that elevate what
would otherwise be a misdemeanor to a felony.
Trump
was initially caught off-guard by
the indictment and spent the following 24 hours
absorbing the news that was relayed to him by several of his top advisers.
Later, at one point, Trump repeated to himself almost incredulously that
prosecutors had actually charged him.
The shock had
dissipated by the weekend, when Trump’s tone changed and he told his team that
he wanted to attack the case and fight the prosecutors. He steadfastly contends
he did nothing illegal and won’t accept a plea deal that would force him to
admit culpability.
The
ex-president’s pugnacious tone has only accelerated in recent days with a
series of critical posts about New York state supreme court justice Juan Merchan, to whom the case has apparently been allotted
after he presided over a separate matter involving the Trump Organization last
year.
On his Truth
Social platform, Trump said Merchan had “railroaded”
Allen Weisselberg, the former chief executive of the
Trump Organization, who on Sunday was in the middle of serving a 100-day
sentence in the Rikers Island jail complex after pleading guilty to tax fraud
charges in that case.
Referencing Merchan, Trump said: “The Judge ‘assigned’ to my Witch Hunt
Case, a ‘Case’ that has NEVER BEEN CHARGED BEFORE, HATES ME”.
Trump has
also since pivoted his focus to seeing how he can benefit politically from the
indictment, the sources said, and he was encouraged that it had boosted his
poll numbers over potential rivals for the Republican nomination who found
themselves forced to come to his defense against Bragg, a Democrat.
With a grim
fixation on having a mug shot taken, Trump has asked whether his team could
print it on T-shirts that could serve as a rallying motif for his supporters –
an idea that his advisers have been particularly enthusiastic about.
Trump also
spent the weekend reviewing a Yahoo news poll that showed him leading Florida
governor Ron DeSantis, whom he considers his closest rival for the 2024
Republican presidential nomination, 57% to 31% in a hypothetical one-on-one
contest. The poll also found Trump was attracting the majority of support, at
52%, when pitted against a wider, 10-candidate field.
The polling
illustrated the perilous dance for DeSantis and Trump’s other challengers, who
have so far struggled to find a way to defend the ex-president strongly enough
to ensure the support of his core base in the Republican party without
undercutting their pitch as being worthy successors to him.
Trump’s
advisers observed over the weekend that DeSantis had struggled in that test
when his only response to the indictment was to snap back in line behind the former
president, calling the case “the weaponization of the legal system to advance a
political agenda”.
ATTACHMENT EIGHTY
NINE – From the Guardian
UK
TIMELINE, MONDAY AND TUESDAY
Monday,
April 3rd
Monday’s
television and social media news reports reported that Trump had agreed to
surrender tomorrow, and not to accept Saint Ron’s generous offer of troops to
join the Secret Service in shooting it out with the FBI and DOJ.
Such
a nice offer... but no thanks. Six
Governors and ninety-some Congressional Republicans also sent letters of
support to fight what ABCs Dan Abrams called “an old, souped-up misdemeanor”
but, as with President Zelenskyy, contributed no missiles capable of reaching
New York.
While
Djonald UnHinged seethed in
his suite at Trump Tower... probably counting the protesters outside and
finding them insufficient... President Joe was telling jokes in Minnesota and
exclaiming that he “had faith in the American justice system.” The latenite comics
were all telling “Pecker” jokes too so Trump turned off the tube, went to sleep
and dreamed of his return to power in January, 2025.
Tuesday,
April 4th
By Martin Belam Tue 4 Apr 2023 14.08 EDT
Note:
times are in reverse order, ending with 13.35 below
Trump under arrest in New York – what we know
so far
Donald Trump is now under
arrest at the Manhattan courthouse where he will soon be arraigned for charges
linked to a hush-money scheme during the 2016 election.
Here’s what
we know so far:
·
Trump’s arraignment is scheduled for 2.15pm ET at the Manhattan criminal
court. At the
arraignment, Trump is expected to plead not guilty to all charges linked to
hush-money payments to adult film star Stormy
Daniels, who claims to
have had an affair with the former president. After the arraignment, Trump will
likely be allowed to return home to Florida.
·
New York authorities will process Trump’s arrest,
and they are expected to fingerprint the former president. But it remains
unclear whether Trump’s mug shot will be taken, and it appears he will not be
put in handcuffs.
·
Trump is scheduled to deliver remarks at his
Mar-a-Lago resort at 8.15pm ET. The former president has already
aggressively dismissed any suggestion of wrongdoing on his part, and he will
likely only intensify his attacks on prosecutors after being arraigned.
·
No electronic devices will be allowed in the
courtroom. The
judge overseeing the case, New
York supreme court Justice Juan Merchan, issued a ruling late last night
that only a handful of still photographers would be allowed to take pictures
inside the room.
·
Reporters lined up outside the courthouse overnight
in the hopes of getting a seat in the arraignment room. Several dozen
reporters are expected to be allowed inside the room to witness the
unprecedented event of a former US president formally responding to criminal
charges.
·
A trial may still be months away. Once Trump enters
his initial plea, Merchan will likely set a schedule
for pre-trial hearings, but it may take several months for the actual trial to
begin.
The blog will
have more coming up, so stay tuned.
One of Donald Trump’s former
White House aides also described the experience of watching him surrender to
New York authorities as “surreal”.
Alyssa Farah Griffin, Trump’s
former White House director of strategic communications who has severely
criticized the former president over his role in the deadly January 6
insurrection, said Trump is now “the most alone [he] has been in a long time”.
“He’s not flanked by aides,
lawyers, body men & so on,” Griffin said on Twitter. “He’s face to face
with the American legal system that has caught up with him.”
Moments before starting his trip
to the Manhattan criminal court, Donald Trump shared a rather obvious
message with his followers on the social media platform Truth Social.
“Heading to Lower Manhattan, the
Courthouse. Seems so SURREAL – WOW, they are going to ARREST ME,” Trump said.
“Can’t believe this is happening in America. MAGA!”
Trump has already used his Truth
Social account to repeatedly attack Manhattan district attorney Alvin
Bragg, whose office oversaw the hush-money investigation.
The former president will likely double
down on those attacks tonight, when he delivers remarks at his Mar-a-Lago
resort in Florida at 8.15pm ET.
Donald Trump waved to the
assembled crowd as he arrived at the Manhattan courthouse where he has been
arrested and will soon be arraigned.
Hundreds of journalists, security
personnel and protesters have gathered outside the Manhattan criminal court to
witness the unprecedented spectacle of a former US president surrendering
himself to authorities.
Trump under
arrest in New York – what we know so far
Donald Trump is now under
arrest at the Manhattan courthouse where he will soon be arraigned for charges
linked to a hush-money scheme during the 2016 election.
Here’s what we know so far:
·
Trump’s
arraignment is scheduled for 2.15pm ET at the Manhattan criminal court. At
the arraignment, Trump is expected to plead not guilty to all charges linked to
hush-money payments to adult film star Stormy Daniels, who claims to
have had an affair with the former president. After the arraignment, Trump will
likely be allowed to return home to Florida.
·
New
York authorities will process Trump’s arrest, and they are expected to
fingerprint the former president. But it remains unclear whether Trump’s
mug shot will be taken, and it appears he will not be put in handcuffs.
·
Trump
is scheduled to deliver remarks at his Mar-a-Lago resort at 8.15pm ET. The
former president has already aggressively dismissed any suggestion of
wrongdoing on his part, and he will likely only intensify his attacks on
prosecutors after being arraigned.
·
No
electronic devices will be allowed in the courtroom. The judge overseeing
the case, New York supreme court Justice Juan Merchan, issued a ruling late last night that only a
handful of still photographers would be allowed to take pictures inside the
room.
·
Reporters
lined up outside the courthouse overnight in the hopes of getting a seat in the
arraignment room. Several dozen reporters are expected to be allowed
inside the room to witness the unprecedented event of a former US president
formally responding to criminal charges.
·
A
trial may still be months away. Once Trump enters his initial plea, Merchan will likely set a schedule for pre-trial hearings,
but it may take several months for the actual trial to begin.
The blog will have more coming up,
so stay tuned.
Trump arrives
at Manhattan courthouse for arraignment
Donald Trump has arrived at
the Manhattan courthouse where he will soon be arraigned on charges linked to a
hush-money scheme during the 2016 election.
Before the arraignment begins at
2.15pm ET, Trump will be formally arrested and processed by New
York authorities. He is expected to be fingerprinted, but it is
unclear whether he will have his mug shot taken.
At the arraignment, Trump is
expected to plead not guilty to all charges, and the judge presiding over the
case, New York supreme court Justice Juan Merchan,
will then likely allow the former president to return home to Florida.
The blog will have more details
coming up, so stay tuned.
As he left Trump Tower to make his
way to the Manhattan courthouse where he will be arraigned, Donald
Trump raised a fist to supporters waiting outside.
Trump leaves
Trump Tower for arraignment
Donald Trump has left Trump
Tower to make the short trip to the Manhattan courthouse where he will be
arraigned at 2.15pm ET.
Cameras captured the former
president’s motorcade traveling the four miles between Trump Tower and 100
Centre St, where an entrance has already been cleared for his arrival.
When he arrives, Trump will be
formally arrested, fingerprinted and processed before appearing at his
arraignment, where he is expected to plead not guilty to all charges. Stay
tuned.
We expect Donald
Trump to depart his New York home on Fifth Avenue very soon and
start to make his way to the criminal courthouse in lower Manhattan. He’s due
to appear in court a little later this afternoon.
Here’s where things stand:
·
A federal
appeals court has rejected Donald Trump’s request to block senior aides of
his, while he was president, from testifying to special counsel Jack Smith in
the federal criminal inquiries into the now candidate for the Republican
nomination in 2024.
·
Voters
in Wisconsin are casting ballots today in one of the most important elections of
2023 – a contest that will determine the ideological balance of the state’s
supreme court.
·
Donald
Trump’s lawyer Joe Tacopina has been on
television and said the former president wouldn’t plead guilty to lesser
charges, even if it could resolve the case.
·
Trump
will be arraigned at 2.15pm ET at a courthouse in lower Manhattan. At the
arraignment, Trump is expected to plead not guilty to all charges linked to his
involvement in a hush-money scheme during the 2016 election. After the
arraignment, Trump will likely be allowed to return home to Florida.
·
Trump
is expected to be arrested and processed shortly before his arraignment. As
part of his arrest, Trump will be fingerprinted and likely photographed, but
his lawyer has said he does not expect Trump to be handcuffed.
·
Trump
is scheduled to deliver remarks at his Mar-a-Lago resort at 8.15pm ET. The
former president has already aggressively dismissed any suggestion of
wrongdoing on his part, and he will likely only intensify his attacks on
prosecutors after being arraigned.
Court rejects
Trump bid to stop top aides testifying to special counsel - reports
Media reports coming in that a
federal appeals court has rejected Donald Trump’s request to block senior aides
of his while he was president from testifying to special counsel Jack Smith.
Smith is the special counsel
appointed by the Department of Justice last year who is helming investigations
into Trump’s alleged hiding of classified documents at Mar-a-Lago and role in
fomenting the attack on the US Capitol on January 6, 2021, when extremist
supporters tried to stop Congress certifying Joe Biden’s election victory over
Trump.
And this:
Here’s one opinion:
When Donald
Trump arrived in New York yesterday he entered his Trump Tower
skyscraper alone, with his wife, Melania, noticeably absent.
Now there are some reports that
she just turned up, so we’ll bring you any other news on that as it emerges.
Melania Trump
seen arriving at Trump Towers in New York City 👁️
Insiders recently claim that the Trumps could be heading for divorce.#MelaniaTrump
#TrumpArraignment #TrumpIndictment https://t.co/7ubSsiGGYa
— MirrorUSNews
(@MirrorUSNews) April 4, 2023
Outside the criminal court building
in lower Manhattan, handfuls of protesters and a scrum of media are in a brief
news vacuum as they await the arrival of Donald
Trump.
The former president has not left
Trump Tower uptown on Fifth Avenue yet, despite some reports that he would
surrender to the authorities downtown at 11am. So we
wait.
In true New York City style,
there’s a lot of scaffolding around, a mix of poles and roughly painted wooden
panels that ends up casting shade, trapping garbage, hindering navigation on
the sidewalk and giving the location an even less salubrious environment than usual.
The interior of the building is
not exactly cathedral-like splendor, either. For defendants it’s generally a
sobering and dispiriting experience to be arraigned here – an arraignment being
the first appearance in front of a judge after being arrested or surrendering
to authorities, to hear the criminal charges against you.
The scene is colorful and a little
chaotic.
Here’s “Hillary” and a fan.
Protesters:
Protesters:
The Guardian’s Sam Levine is on
the ground in Wisconsin, where voters are heading to the polls to choose the
newest member of the state supreme court.
The court is expected to soon
weigh in on whether an abortion ban dating back to 1849 should be enforced
after the US supreme court ruled to overturn Roe v Wade last summer.
And abortion access appears to be
weighing heavily on the minds of Wisconsin voters as they cast their ballots
today:
Some of Donald Trump’s
supporters have gathered outside the Manhattan courthouse where he will be
arraigned this afternoon, but a handful of the former president’s critics are
also on the scene.
One anti-Trump protester was
photographed holding a sign that read: “Lock him up!” During the 2016
presidential campaign, Trump rally attendees frequently chanted: “Lock her up!”
in reference to Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton over
her mishandling of sensitive government emails.
Anti-Trump protesters demonstrate
outside Manhattan Criminal Courthouse. Photograph: Amanda Perobelli/Reuters
Another anti-Trump protester held
a sign reading, “Trump 4 Prison”. As of now, Trump is still the frontrunner in
the 2024 Republican presidential primary, and the indictment does not prevent
him from seeking office.
It remains unclear whether Donald
Trump will get his mug shot taken when he is processed by New York
authorities today, but one new report suggests he will not.
Yahoo News’ Michael Isikoff reported yesterday that Trump has been
charged with 34 felony counts for falsification of business records, and noted
that the Manhattan district attorney’s office had decided against getting a mug
shot of the former president:
[One] source said, Trump will not
be put in handcuffs, placed in a jail cell or subjected to a mug shot – typical
procedures even for white-collar defendants until a judge has weighed in on
pretrial conditions. Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s office,
which has been consulting with the Secret Service and New York City court
officials, concluded there was no reason to subject the former president to
handcuffs or a mug shot.
The Guardian’s Hugo Lowell previously reported that Trump hoped to
be handcuffed because he wanted to turn the arrest and arraignment into a
“spectacle”.
Progressive congressman Jamaal
Bowman of New York was spotted outside the courthouse where Donald
Trump will be arraigned this afternoon.
Bowman told Semafor
that he felt compelled to make an appearance because he wanted to push back
against the rhetoric he’s heard from one of his House
colleagues, far-right Cong Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia.
“She should not be here,” Bowman
told Semafor’s Kadia Goba. “She should not be pushing rhetoric that is harmful
and dangerous.”
ATTACHMENT NINETY – From Politico
CIRCUS:
MARJORIE TAYLOR GREENE, GEORGE SANTOS HOME IN ON TRUMP INDICTMENT
Greene led a short rally Tuesday
protesting Trump’s indictment with the New York Young Republicans, a group with
ties to white nationalists.
By KIERRA FRAZIER and WESLEY PARNELL 04/04/2023 11:30 AM EDT
Updated: 04/04/2023 01:19 PM EDT
Georgia Rep. Marjorie Taylor
Greene gave a brief speech at a rally across the street from Manhattan
Criminal Courthouse Tuesday to protest the indictment of former President
Donald Trump.
“We are here to peacefully protest
against the persecution of an innocent man. Not just any innocent man, this is
the former president of the United States of America,” Greene told the crowd.
At the protest, put on with the
New York Young Republicans, a group with ties to white nationalists, there were nearly more media
than there were protestors. About 300 people turned out to protest Trump’s
indictment with Greene, with nearly 150 counterprotesters
also on the scene. Counter-protesters were seen playing drums and banging
kettles toward the Trump supporters, with a metal police barricade separating
the two parties.
“I’m here to protest and use my
voice to take a stand. Every American should take a stand,” Greene said.
While Greene was only present at
the protest for about 10 minutes, conservative members swarmed around Greene,
shoving and elbowing to get a glimpse at the congressmember. NYPD escorted her
out.
Greene has been one of
Trump’s most loyal supporters, defending him since the Capitol attack on Jan.
6, 2021. Greene recently appeared with Trump at his Waco,
Texas rally.
New York Rep. George
Santos quickly walked by the courthouse earlier Tuesday, not stopping to
protest or answer questions.
“I wanted to support the president
because this is unprecedented, and this is a bad day for democracy,” Santos
told reporters. “This starts a precedent of what’s to stop the next prosecutor
in two years to do the same thing to Joe Biden and moving on every four years.”
“This cheapens the judicial system,
not good for America.”
Santos, who is
currently under investigation by the House Ethics
Committee,
did not answer multiple questions about his own legal troubles. Santos has been
tied to multiple controversies since his election, including fabricating major portions of his biography, accusations of stealing money from veterans,
alleged involvement in a credit card scam, and falsely claiming to be Jewish.
Rep. Jamaal
Bowman (D-N.Y.) made an appearance after the rally and told Greene to “go
back to your district.”
“Do your freaking job, Marjorie
Taylor Green. You don’t need to be in New York City talking that nonsense. Go
back to your district,” Bowman said.
Earlier on
Monday, New York City Mayor Eric Adams had a message for Greene and
protesters: “Control yourselves.”
“People like Marjorie Taylor
Greene, who is known to spread misinformation and hate speech, while you’re in
town, be on your best behavior,” Adams said at a City Hall press conference
about security preparations.
At the protest, Greene responded
to Adams’ comments.
“Also, to the Mayor Adams, as you
can see, I am here peacefully protesting. He called me out by name,” Greene
said.
Trump is set to be arraigned
Tuesday following his indictment over alleged hush money payments to porn star
Stormy Daniels.
A Trump supporter, Alann Gotlieb, 62, who showed up
at the protest with his dog Anarchy, said that the counter-protest organized by
New York City Public Advocate Jumaane Williams was an attack on conservatives
hoping to make their voices heard in the blue city.
1. He already rocked MAGA world —
twice. Now he’s Trump’s judge.
2. Trump taps white-collar
attorney to helm indictment defense
3. Tennessee GOP members move to
oust 3 Dems after gun protest
4. Trump arrives in Manhattan
ahead of court appearance
5. House GOP’s Biden investigations
sputter out of the gate
“I don’t know what Jumaane
Williams is standing up for,” Gotlieb said. “No, I
don’t think [he’s here in good faith] because he’s counter-protesting the First
Amendment, he’s counter-protesting freedom of speech, and he supports locking
somebody up who allegedly gave money to Stormy Daniels when Michael Cohen was
dealing with the whole thing.”
Meanwhile, Karen Irwan, 47, of Hell’s Kitchen said they showed up to
celebrate Trump’s indictment.
“Watch out, we have fascism over there,”
Irwan said of the pro-Trump rally, adding, “We are
celebrating the very first moment in my lifetime that it appears our justice
system is attempting to apply equally to people, even people with power. It
means that we can pretend now that we have a democracy and can start to act
like it now.”
ATTACHMENT NINETY ONE – From NPR
By Emily Olson April 7, 202311:43 AM ET
In her first interview since the news of Donald Trump's criminal
indictment, Stormy Daniels said she's still seeking a sense of vindication —
but admits that feeling just may never come.
The former president pleaded not guilty on Tuesday to 34
counts of falsifying business records. The Manhattan district attorney's office
says Trump hid reimbursements for hush money payments as part of a "catch
and kill" scheme to suppress affair allegations.
Daniels, the adult film actress behind one set of those allegations, sat
down with TalkTV's Piers Morgan for a wide-ranging,
90-minute interview, touching on everything from her strained relationship with
her parents to her reaction to the week's news. The conversation aired Thursday on
Morgan's show, Uncensored.
Stormy Daniels appeared on Uncensored with Piers Morgan on Thursday.
Daniels, whose legal name is Stephanie Clifford, said she was riding her
horse, aptly named Redemption, when her phone lit up with notifications telling
her of Trump's indictment. While initially thrilled to see the case taking
steps forward, the next day felt "kind of anti-climactic," she said.
"I thought I would feel excited and vindicated."
Seeing Trump convicted would "definitely be a giant step closer in
that direction but I don't think it'll ever be 100%" because so many
people are "unwilling to admit that they were wrong or that he lies,"
she said.
In a historic first, former President Donald Trump is charged with 34
felony counts
Daniels said she's not sure if that would change should Trump
receive jail time.
Trump is facing separate criminal investigations for allegedly pressuring
Georgia to overturn the 2020 election results, interfering with the transfer of
power and mishandling classified documents.
Daniels said she was prepared to testify in the Manhattan grand jury
probe but was never asked. She said she'd welcome the prospect of
testifying if the case goes to trial, which is likely, but not until late
winter or spring 2024.
"It's daunting, but I look forward to it," she said. "I
have nothing to hide. I'm the only one that has been telling the truth. You
can't shame me anymore."
"You can't really shame somebody who's been seen naked
everywhere," she added. "Like what are you gonna
do? Release nudes of me? Please do."
What Trump's arraignment means for his 2024 election bid
Daniels was thrust into the political spotlight after The Wall Street Journal broke the story of the
hush money payments in 2018.
Trump has consistently denied Daniels' claims they had sex in a Texas
hotel in 2006. But he later admitted he reimbursed Cohen for $130,000 in
hush money payments.
The Manhattan DA's case rests on the way the Trump organization recorded
those payments. Still, Daniels says, the news of Trump's arraignment has only
ramped up the frequency and tone of the hate messages she personally receives.
"They really feel like it's my fault — That, you know, I've made
America the laughingstock or I'm the fall of democracy. I wish I had that much
power," she said, confirming later in the interview that she was still a
registered Republican.
5 things to know about Donald Trump's felony charges
Trump and his allies have dismissed the charges as an act of political
persecution, saying the DA's office had weaponized its power to weaken the
GOP's chances of reclaiming the presidency.
When asked whether she was trying to derail Trump's 2024 presidential
campaign, Daniels laughed. "He doesn't need my help for that. He's going
to do that on his own," she quipped.
One particular threat against Daniels sits at the heart of another
pending legal matter — a failed defamation suit that's left Daniels with a bill for hundreds of thousands in Trump's legal fees.
In Daniels' telling, she hesitantly agreed to sell her story of the
affair in In Touch magazine in 2011
because one of the "hundred or so" people she'd told the story to had
threatened to tell it first.
Months later, a man approached her in a Las Vegas parking lot and told
her to "leave Donald Trump alone."
Judge orders Stormy Daniels to pay Donald Trump another $120,000 in legal
fees
Daniels' then-lawyer Michael Avenatti released
a sketch of the man to the public in 2018, and Trump responded on Twitter,
calling it a "con job, playing the Fake News Media."
Avenatti then filed a defamation suit
against Daniels' wishes, she says. She eventually lost the case, with the judge ruling that
Trump's tweet was political rhetoric protected by the first amendment.
When asked in Thursday's interview if she planned to pay the legal fees
as ordered, Daniels said she'd go to jail first.
"I didn't come this far to back down and give him money," she
said. "I did nothing wrong but stand up to him and prove that I wasn't
lying."