the DON JONES
INDEX…
|
||
|
|
GAINS
POSTED in GREEN LOSSES
POSTED in RED 11/27/25… 15,579.00 11/20/25…
15,403.98 6/27/13... 15,000.00 |
|
|
(THE
DOW JONES INDEX: 12/4/25... 47,@; 11/27/25... 47,427.12; 6/27/13… 15,000.00) |
||
LESSON for DECEMBER 4th, 2025 – “AMERICA by the NUMBERS…!”
Halloween and Thanksgiving over, Christmas still to come, the mass
media consumed by sly selling stories and news of major impact to Don Jones... gumment shutdown, off year elections, wars in Ukraine, the MidEast and Haiti – now largely supplanted by events only
important to some (the ICE migrant battles, Venezuelan drug cartels, dancing
with the stars) or old wars and old chaos leftover from Trump 1.0 and Old White
Joe still slogging on... we’re going to take a closer look at how the
pollsters, statisticians and think tankers view America’s status in the world
as 2025 enters its last month.
The first such encountered, and probably most indicative, would
the annual Happiness Index, first prepared and released back in 2002 by the
World Population Review. The most recent
findings (2024) placed Finland atop the list, with Afghanistan at the
bottom. (ATTACHMENT ONE)
“The citizens of Finland
have strong feelings of communal support and mutual trust that not only helped
secure the #1 ranking but also helped the country as a whole navigate the
COVID-19 pandemic,” the World Poppers found... the next three finishers also
being small, cold republics. At the
bottom was Afghanistan – ranked least happy due to “a low life expectancy rate,
low gross domestic product rates per capita, and perhaps most importantly, the
recent Taliban takeover of Afghanistan.”
Since 2002, the World
Happiness Report has used statistical analysis to
determine the world’s happiest countries - analyzing “comprehensive Gallup
polling data from 143 countries for the past three years, specifically
monitoring performance in six particular categories: gross domestic product per
capita, social support, healthy life expectancy, freedom to make your own life
choices, generosity of the general population, and perceptions of internal and
external corruption levels.”
In order to properly
compare each country’s data, the researchers created a fictional
country—christened Dystopia—filled with “the world’s least-happy people.” They
then set Dystopia as the rock bottom value in each of the six categories and
measured the scores of the real-world countries against this value. All six
variables were then blended to create a single combined score for each country.
THE
HAPPIEST COUNTRIES IN THE WORLD FOR 2024
Finland took top honors—for
the tenth year in a row—with an overall score of 7.741, followed (in order) by
Denmark (7.583), Iceland (7.525), Sweden (7.344), Israel (7.341), the
Netherlands (7.319), and Norway (7.302).
The
citizens of Finland have strong feelings of communal support and mutual trust
that not only helped secure the #1 ranking but also helped the country as a
whole navigate the COVID-19 pandemic. During that trying time, Finlanders felt strongly that they were free to make their
own choices and showed minimal suspicion of government corruption. Both of
these factors are strong contributors to overall happiness.
“This is where I always want to come
back to and where I want to, you know, grow my kids and grow old myself,” said
Aino Virolainen, a digital commerce director who has
lived abroad but always wants to return home to Finland. “I think it’s because,
you know, the peace and the quietness and the trustworthiness. You know, how we
speak directly and the nature, of course. It’s clean and the air is fresh and
what’s there not to love?”
Alexandra Peth, a managing
director, said Finnish culture prioritizes trust and connection.
“People trust each other in
Finland and I think on many levels in the society, we try to support each
other,” Peth said. “So I think the system makes it
kind of that you can trust it somehow.”
(PBS, ATTACHMENT TWO)
The least happy
country in the world for 2024 was Afghanistan, whose 143rd-place ranking of
1.721 can be attributed in part to a low life expectancy rate, low gross
domestic product rates per capita, and perhaps most importantly, the recent
Taliban takeover of Afghanistan. Rounding out the bottom five were Lebanon
(2.707), Lesotho (3.186), Sierra Leone (3.245), and DR Congo (3.295).
For specifics, let’s follow in the footsteps of Ramallah Lakanwa, who shot two National Guardspeople
in DC last week, killing one. Mr. Lakanwa was an Afghan who chose to support President Joe’s
war effort there, serving on the lethal and controversial Zero Force,
associated with the Central Intelligence Agency. Once the war was lost, he and many, many
others emigrating to America... to Washington (state) in this case... where,
according to Home SecSec Kristi Noem,
the red tape snarled his VISA so he was unable to find work and, consequently,
lost his mind. (Others brought up other
reasons, but they’re not on the table this week.)
Note: Life expectancies in Afghanistan are the worst in the world,
according to the CIA. The liberal
Guardian U.K. allowed some credit to the Taliban for attempting to ameliorate
this in a 2011 article, a decade before the Biden withdrawal debacle (ATTACHMENT
THREE), after which their reaction to sin or crime or simple dissent became
execution.
The
United States' happiness index was ranked 24th globally in the
2025 World Happiness Report, marking a new all-time low, according to
the New York Times and Newsweek. The score has declined, particularly among
those under 30, and is attributed to factors like increased solo dining and
rising "deaths of despair". One factor highlighted in the
report was the increasing number of people who eat alone. (CBS News, ATTACHMENT FOUR)
"In
2023, roughly 1 in 4 Americans reported eating all of their meals alone the
previous day — an increase of 53% since 2003," the report said.
"Dining alone has become more prevalent for every age group, but especially
for young people."
Another factor contributing to
America's drop in the rankings, as well as the rankings of some European
countries, was "the rise in political polarization and votes against 'the
system,'" the report said.
A French analytics survey, “MIEUX DONNER”
(ATTACHMENT FIVE) contended that the happiest
countries were also among the most generous; a positive correlation existing
between international aid and happiness, suggesting that countries spreading
happiness beyond their borders are not only happier but also more benevolent.
Trust and kindness were also noted: People’s
perceptions of others’ generosity tending to be pessimistic. “In reality, acts
of kindness, like returning a lost wallet, happen more often than expected,
which significantly boosts happiness. Trust in others is strongly associated
with wellbeing, even more so than factors like income or employment,” while the cost-effectiveness
of charities can be measured and compared with a standardised
metric of value: Wellbeing-Years (WELLBYs).
Mieux Donn also
noted that specific events and longer-range trends could affect either an
individual or a nation’s happiness. Some
of these cited were...
·
Being
unemployed reduces life satisfaction by 0.5 points (on a 0-10 scale).
·
Marriage increases
life satisfaction by 0.3 points (on a
0-10 scale).
·
Doubling income raises
life satisfaction by 0.2 points (on a
0-10 scale).
Charitible giving procedures also raised or
lowered national rankings; the Happier Lives Institute reported that the most
cost-effective charities found so far “focus on mental health, malnutrition,
and lead exposure reduction in low-income countries” – the Happier Lives
Institute wanting to add some estimates of well-known charities, but finding
this surprisingly hard.
Why? “Lots of big charities are
what they call ‘MANGOs’, standing for ‘Multi-Armed NGOs’. For instance, Oxfam
runs hundreds of different programmes. In the
chapter, they explain the ‘MANGO problem’ is that it is effectively impossible
for us to assess these sorts of organisations. So,
donors are really guessing about how much good their money does.”
HLI’s ranking of charities found
that “the most cost-effective charity in the analysis (Pure Earth) (was) around
~1,000 times better (942 times
to be precise) at increasing happiness than the least effective evaluated
charity (Football Beyond Borders).”
The
virtue rankers also asked and answered: “How much should I give? The largest amount that you can
sustain.”
At
Mieux Donner, “we promote the 10% pledge, where
individuals commit to giving 10% of their income to high-impact charities. We
invite people in a variety of situations to consider taking this commitment.
While we understand it may not be for everyone, 1% could be a good starting
point. If you’re still unsure about pledging, you can try a trial pledge of 1%
for a limited period of time.”
The picture in the United States
isn’t so rosy - but “in brighter news, global research shows that people are
much kinder than we expect.” (CNN,
ATTACHMENT SIX)
“People’s fellow citizens are
better than they think they are, and to realize that will make you happier, of
course, but it’ll also change the way you think about your neighbors,” said
John Helliwell, a founding editor of the World Happiness Report.
“And so
you’re more inclined to think of a stranger in the street as simply a friend
you haven’t met and not somebody who poses a threat to you,” said Helliwell,
who is an economics professor emeritus at the University of British Columbia.
THE HAPPIEST
COUNTRIES
When it comes to happiness, the
Nordic countries (i.e. white, rich and cold) are
clearly doing a lot of things right. For the eighth year in a row, Finland is
the world’s happiest country, with its neighbors clustered close behind. (Gallup, ATTACHMENT SEVEN)
“Nordic countries like Finland
continue to benefit from universally available and high-quality health,
education and social support systems. Inequality of wellbeing is also low,”
said Ilana Ron-Levey, managing director at Gallup.
Finland, Denmark, Iceland and
Sweden – the top four – remain in the same order as 2024. And Norway is again
No. 7.
While social support systems that
look out for residents’ welfare are important to Finland’s No. 1 ranking, the
people play a role too, according to Helliwell.
“Having a welfare state doesn’t
find lost wallets and return them to the owners,” said Helliwell, a longtime
lost-wallet researcher, referring to data showing that Nordic nations rank
among the top places for the expected and actual return of lost wallets. “Those
are individuals caring about the people with whom they live.”
Other factors likely contribute to
Finland’s strong performance as well. Helliwell said some Finnish experts point
to the unity and trust that came out of the Winter War in 1939-40, also known
as the Russo-Finnish War.
“They didn’t win that war, but
what they did is they came together and realized even against overwhelming
power they could do remarkably well … Sometimes the challenge posed externally
can bring you together.”
LOWEST
RANKING YET FOR THE UNITED STATES
After dropping out of the top 20
for the first time last year, the US ranks No. 24 in
the latest World Happiness Report.
“The decline in the U.S. in 2024
was at least partly attributable to Americans younger than age 30 feeling worse
about their lives,” said Ron-Levey. “Today’s young people report feeling less
supported by friends and family, less free to make life choices and less
optimistic about their living standards.”
Wikipedia’s
history of happiness began in July 2011,
when “the United Nations General Assembly adopted resolution 65/309, also named as Happiness: Towards a
Holistic Definition of Development,[6] inviting member countries to measure the happiness of their people
and to use the data to help guide public policy.
“The first World Happiness Report was released on 1 April
2012, as a foundational text for the UN High Level Meeting: Well-being
and Happiness: Defining a New Economic Paradigm,[7] drawing international attention.[8] On 2 April 2012, this was followed by the first UN
High Level Meeting called Wellbeing and Happiness: Defining a New
Economic Paradigm,[9] which was chaired by UN Secretary General Ban
Ki-moon, in addition to that prime minister Jigme
Thinley of Bhutan, a nation that adopted gross national happiness instead
of gross domestic product as their main development indicator.[10] (See ATTACHMENT EIGHT... see website for
notes)
“The first report outlined the state of world happiness,
causes of happiness and misery, and policy implications highlighted by case
studies. In 2013, the second World Happiness Report was issued, and in 2015 the
third. Since 2016, it has been issued on an annual basis on 20 March, to
coincide with the UN's International Day of Happiness.[11]”
WELLBYs
From 2021, the World Happiness Report has supported using
WELLBYs (Well-Being-Adjusted Life-Years). It says that QALYs (Quality-Adjusted Life Years) only count a
patient's health quality. Instead, WELLBYs should be used. The report says
policy-makers should aim to increase the WELLBYs of people alive today and
future generations.[15][16][17]
METHODOLOGY
The World Happiness Report's use of a single-item
indicator of subjective well-being is fundamentally different from more
traditional Index approaches which use a range of indicators such as the United
Nations' Human Development Index, the OECD Better
Life Index of 2011, or the Social Progress Index of 2013. There has also been an ongoing debate regarding
single-item and multi-item scales as measures of life satisfaction.[68]
The idea that subjective well-being can be captured by a
survey has also been contested by economists, who have identified that people’s
assessments of their happiness can be affected by how, for example, their
country’s education system grades exams, and that survey questions on
subjective well-being are affected by response styles.[69]
Critics have pointed out the difference between evaluations and experiences
of well-being.[63][64] For instance Colombia came 37th in the 2018 World Happiness Report rankings but first by
daily emotional experience in Gallup's Positive Experience Index.[65] The inconsistencies in the results of different happiness measurement
surveys have also been noted, for instance, a Pew
survey of 43
countries in 2014 (which excluded most of Europe) had Mexico, Israel, and
Venezuela finishing first, second and third.[66] Others point out that the variables of interest used by the World
Happiness Report are more appropriate for measuring national-level rather than
individual-level happiness.[67]
LEGITIMACY
In 2014, British journalist Michael Booth questioned the legitimacy of the Nordic
countries' freedom
and happiness rankings in his book The Almost
Nearly Perfect People. In it, he criticizes Denmark's environmental
footprint and
notes that the taxes and personal debt levels among its citizens are the
highest in the world.[70] He also writes that in Finland, the most common type of prescription medications in the country are antipsychotic. He also points out the country's high alcohol consumption, murder, and
suicide rates.[71] Further, he argues that he doesn't think the Danes were the world's
happiest people, but instead described them as the "most satisfied".[72]
Perhaps in confirmation, Reuters’ Anne Kauranen balancedwrote (November
25th, ATTACHMENT NINE) that Finland is now “grappling
with economic stagnation, rising
joblessness and strained public finances,” but had still managed to secure the
title of world's happiest country for the eighth year in a row in this year's
annual World Happiness Report
six months previous.
Its success, experts say, is
due in no small part to a generous welfare state - but that is now being trimmed back as ministers confront
the surging social costs of an aging population.
"I've been grateful
that in Finland there has been a safety net and social security that have
supported me financially ... So maybe I'm not more unhappy than I was
before," unemployed video producer Juho-Pekka Palomaa told Kauranen.
Finland's export-dependent
economy has struggled since the phone business of Nokia, once Europe's most
valuable company, collapsed in 2014 after it fumbled the switch to touch-screen
smartphones. Sanctions on neighbouring Russia over
its war in Ukraine have also hit exports and tourism, while uncertainty over
tariffs and global trade present a further challenge.
Poor public finances have
already prompted the government to start pruning some parts of the welfare state,
including unemployment and housing benefits and some medical facilities.
"I'm honestly terrified
for younger people," said Hanna Taimio, 54,
another unemployed Finn who joined Palomaa's
commemoration and fears she may never work again. "All these cutbacks and
downgrades... it's genuinely frightening."
The right-wing coalition
government, in office since 2023, aims to "to strengthen public finances
and to bring the growing debt under control", Minister of Employment
Matias Marttinen told Reuters.
Marttinen called the high jobless
rate "an awful situation", but defended the government's decision to
make dismissals easier to lower the risks of hiring for companies, to
ultimately boost employment.
But there is more to
happiness than economics, Reuters added.
The life evaluations that
people report in the happiness survey are determined more by factors like
resilience and the ability to "deal collaboratively and constructively in
bad times" than by national economic conditions, said the World Happiness
report's founding editor, emeritus professor John Helliwell.
"Of course, Finland is
very high in resilience," he said.
Recent data by analytics
company Gallup (above) shows no significant fluctuations in Finns'
reported emotional wellbeing since last year. Data from the same survey on life
evaluations will be published with the next World Happiness Report next year
and the world shall see if there is now a New Number One.
Despite the cut in gumment handouts to the unemployed (and with Finland, so
far, lacking the “get tough or get out” American mandatory work requirements
for food stamps), Palomaa still looks forward to enjoying a free
community sauna run and funded by volunteers by the Baltic Sea shore in
Helsinki.
"The sauna is a place
where everyone's so equal ... You cannot say based on someone's appearance what
they do for a living, who they are," he said.
Aside from spying on and sometimes meddling in foreign affairs,
the CIA publishes some of its middle “I” (intelligence) findings in a Factbook
that, among other things, ranks the nations of the world by population, income
and other ambiances (or their absence) to compile lists from best to
worst. (ATTACHMENT TEN – including A, B,
C etc.) Here in this most comprehensive listing of categories (multiple, only
some included) and countries (usually well over 200) we find professional
judgments by professional judges and, if there is a bias towards America, it
might actually be a negative bias in that the image does not always live up to
the reality.
Given the tendency of the CIA to embrace and protect secrecy, it’s
rather surprising that the spooks would publish and post on the Internet
innumerable secret stats regarding America, Americans and the American Way.
This spooky Index noted some of the more pertinent national
profiles... these being 10A) Area; 10B) Population; 19C) Population growth
rate; 10D) Life Expectancy – the United States ranked 49th with a
rate of 80.9 years*; 10E) Migration rate – the United States ranked 39th
at Plus 3.0; 10F) GDP rate (total); 10G) GDP rate (per capita) – the United
States ranked thirteenth; and 10H) Unemployment – the United States ranked 67th.
* There is an AI Overview
and some pertinent URLs following as relate to life expectancy.
Equality, as measured by the GINI coefficient, found the United
States ranking 34th (worst).
Unlike the CIA and most other indices, the higher the rank the worse off
the country... Americans were slightly less equal among themselves than in Djijouti, slightly more so than in Bolivia. The world’s most equal countries were
Slovakia and Slovenia – the most unequal was Namibia. (ATTACHMENT ELEVEN)
Freedom House (ATTACHMENT TWELVE) rates
people’s access to political rights and civil liberties in 208 countries and
territories through its annual Freedom in the World report. “Individual
freedoms—ranging from the right to vote to freedom of expression and equality
before the law—can be affected by state or nonstate actors...” and nations have
been ranked FREE (scoring 70 points or higher on a scale of one hundred),
PARTLY FREE (32 to 69 points) or NOT FREE (31 or fewer points). Within their rankings were subcategories of
“political rights” (ranked from zero to 40) and civil liberties (zero to 60).
One might think the division between partly
and not free would cut off at 30 points, not 31, but their Indix
is what it is and, for what it is worth, Algeria, Iraq and Kuwait fall into the
most repressive category.
Those happy Finns also earned a perfect
100/100 freedom score, perhaps one of the reason why
they are so happy... or maybe it’s because of the drugs and alcohol noted
above.
Sweden, Norway and New Zealand scored 99/100 rankings
while, at the bottom, Turkmenistan and South Sudan (scoring 1/100) and Sudan
proper (2/100) were adjudicated least free nations (North Korea registered a
comparatively libertarian 3), but FH also included the “Russian occupied
territories of Ukraine” and gave it a quite incomprehensible ranking of minus
one. How the freedom score can fall
below zero was not explained – the premise being that, at zero, the government
kills everybody, including themselves but, again, they did what they did.
The United States, at 84/100 remains within
the FREE category but, notably, trailed the likes of Argentina in the last
survey (both have since shifted sharply rightward). But we beat out those rich snobs in Monaco.
An alternate ranking agency, CEO World, derived different
results... perhaps because of its orientation towards defining freedom as the
freedom to make money. (ATTACHMENT THIRTEEN) These businesspeople configured
the national value slightly differently... while their title indicated a rating
for “human freedom”, the subcategories were a nebulous “Situation” and a
measured “Travel Risk” (against, perhaps, the possibility of organized or lone
wolf terror, revolutions or perhaps even uppity labor unions.
The business orientation was reinforced by their favored nation
(out of 197) which was the banking gnome and capital accumulation capitol of
Switzerland. Finland also earned a
“good” situation report with “insignificant” travel risk, but finished only in
sixth place behind New Zealand, Denmark, Luxembourg and Ireland (despite its
bumped up “low” travel risk – perhaps anticipating a possible return of “the
troubles.
The United States scored better here than at Freedom House,
finishing 20th and with a good situation and insignificant travel
risk. The worst-case countries were all
Asian or MidEastern as opposed to the African states
on FH naughty list... Syria deemed worst of all. (Again, there may have been changes since the
last reckoning in that Syria ousted a brutal dictator in favor of an Islamist
mystery man but... again... there seems to be a distinct dislike of Islamic
states (rich or poor, Sunni or Shiite) at CEO World.
While both Saudi Arabia and Egypt were ranked NOT FREE by FH, they
were further towards the end at CEO World which, in a notable anomaly, called
Cuba the 51st best of its 197 as opposed to its NOT FREE
designation. Perhaps the businesspeople
see financial opportunity there, as opposed to China
And, because inquiring minds will want to know the interior
ranking of American metropolitan areas, and because conservatives frequently
allege that liberty leads to license, we have found... and so present to you
and the Joneses of America... a ranking of the most sinful cities in America, as compiled by Mental Floss
(ATTACHMENT FOURTEEN) and Wallet Hub (ATTACHMENT FIFTEEN)... both of which
agree with each other and with popular prejudices that the most sinful
municipality is... surprise?... Las Vegas.
Contrary to popular prejudice, however, the big Number Two is not
shoddy but sinful Atlantic City, New Jersey... (in fact, the stomping grounds
of Trump’s seedier casino alleys and the byways of the Boss is not even ranked
at all!) Whether this is because its
resident population is a relatively low 38K m/l (although the sinseekers include Juneau, Alaska with six thousand wicked
souls less) or its grimy Jersey nature fails to elicit even offense is a
mystery known only to the flossers and walleteers.
Instead, the second most vicious city in America is... Houston
(whose own grime is a more oily sheen). The least sinful is Columbia, Maryland – a
planned community that serves wealthy suburbanites who work in Baltimore or
D.C. (Washington being named the “angriest city in America”).
So, one may well conclude that America is in the toilet and at
risk of being flushed down the drain.
There are so many bad omens these days (today, for example, President
Trump said that Somali migrants in Minnesota came from Hell, not Africa, and
were... thus... DEMONS. Partisans
contend that you cannot demonize actual demons so it is best to blow them up,
be they hostile or not. Not
surprisingly, the rest of the world is pivoting towards China... which may rank
lower on some indices like freedom and equality, but they still make stuff.
Against this sense of American decline and doom, and an impending
death of democracy, the occasional optimist still fights on and, re this: we
have an opinium in the New Atlantis (ATTACHMENT
SIXTEEN) from
@fill in
See graphs, charts and maps from...
OurWorldinData.com/child-mortality and OurWorldinData.com/maternal-mortality
|
IN the NEWS: NOVEMBER 20TH to NOVEMBER 26TH,
2025 |
|
|
|
Thursday, November 27, 2025 Dow: Closed for Thanksgiving |
It’s
Thanksgiving. President Trump pardons
turkeys Gobble and Waddle; and Macy’s holds its 99th parade. Washington Natl. Guard shooter identified
as Ramallah Lakanwa, a former operative with the
American CIA’s elite Zero Unit in Afghanistan who came to America with other
Afghan collaborators after the Taliban routed our troops in Kabul. Trump, of course, blames Biden for 1) the Afghan
disaster, and 2) bringing in all of their helpers without “proper” vetting. The possible presence of more terrorists –
Afghan, other or domestic, leads to high security on the Macy’s parade route,
but there are only balloons and a cheering crowd. So the only real
danger for Thanksgiving is the weather... blizzards in the upper Midwest
snarl highways and cause airline delays and cancellations. An Atlanta flight is halted by a crazy
passenger opening the slide on takeoff, but he’s not a terrorist... just
crazy. While Americans stuff themselves and watch
football on TV, Bad Vlad shouts “Nyet!!” to Trump’s TACO on the “peace deal”
with Ukraine – now both sides hate
the USA. Jakarta overtakes Tokyo as
the world’s most populous city (see above) while Pope Leo’s Thanksgiving
message is to “say thank you to somebody” in... Turkey! |
|
|
Friday, November 28, 2025 Dow: 47,716.42 |
It’s Black
Friday. Most Americans pivot from shopping
for stuffing their bellies to shopping for the next round of holidays
upcoming. Also enjoying the holiday...
porch pirates. Natl. Guardswoman Sarah Beckstrom, 20, dies;
24-year-old Andrew Wolfe remains in critical condition.
Charges against Lakanwa are upgraded to
murder. President Trump
ramps up war against immigrants, saying that no more Afghans will be accepted
into the America and those already here will be re-vetted and, if failing,
sent back to Afghanistan (where, Democrats say, they face certain
execution). Migrants from some other
“unstable” countries are also to be sent back... Yemen, Somalia and Venezuela
noted. Ukraine under fire as Putin bombs cities
and power plants, auguring a long and freezing winter. The peace process takes another hit as
President Zelenskyy’s Number One Advisor is being investigated for
corruption. Those Uke authorities not
fighting in the East raid Andriy Smyrnov’s
home. Also being investigated – the
Hong Kong hirise fire (deaths up to 128 with
hundreds more missing). |
|
|
Saturday, November 29, 2025 Dow: Closed |
And now...
Small Business Saturday! Black Friday sales continue through to
Cyber Monday and sales are up 5% over 2024 despite Trump’s tariffs. AI shopping up 725% over the past year,
despite the prevalence of scams; retailers are hoping for a total tally of a
trillion dollars. Worst Midwest blizzard in four years
closes roads from Chicago to Minnesota and all the way down to St.
Louis. Airline closings mean that
Thanksgiving visitors will have to stay over with relatives for perhaps
several days. Trouble predicted. Despite its problems on the battlefield
and in the courts, Ukraine strikes back and uses its Sea Baby@ drones to sink
Putin’s “shadow fleet” of tankers transporting prohibited fossil fuels to be
sold to raise more money for the war. While Russian robots continue falling down
and breaking down a Chinese “humanois” sets a sort
of record by walking for 66 miles. |
|
|
Sunday, November 30, 2025 Dow: Closed |
It’s
National Mousse Day. Also, Woody
Allen’s 90th birthday. Police warn that burglars, scammers and
porch pirates are targeting travelers, as is the weather. They say not to leave guns in plain sight
or announce plans over social media.
New scams target online payments and retailers gouge shoppers with
“dynamic pricing”. For talkshow
Saturday, HomeSecSec Kristi Noem
calls the Washington Post “traitorous” and Biden bears sole responsibility
for Lakanwa’s rampage. She also says wonderful President Trump is
being persecuted by “activist” judges. In reply, Sen Chris van Hollen
(D-Md) says the Trump administration was the last to have vetted Lakanwa who was radicalized either in Afghanistan or
America and “collective punishment” of all Afghan migrants (most of whom
worked with America) and adds that Hegseth’s
bombing of Venezuelan boat people survivors is a war crime, as would be
intervention without Congressional declaration of war. Tormented Rep. Don Bacon (R-Nb) expresses
skepticism on Trump’s plans, including his Ukraine proposal that he calls a
“surrender document”. On the ABC roundtable, Donna Brazile says Speaker Mike is “underwater”...
a firefighter, always putting out fires.
Chris Christie says that Djonald UnPopular is “on the wrong side of issues.” Voters want him to just shut up. Faiz Shakir says@ the public wants a check on Donald Trump.
That's obviously at play here. You have MAGA folks and independents checking
out to the extent that they're moving, they're towards the Democratic side.
There is a lot of anger towards Donald Trump. This is a guy you don't trust
with power, and engage in many illegal actions. We don't have to document
them all right now. Also, he's not on the main highway. He's not thinking
about me; he's thinking about Saudi King and rich people. and Frank
Lutz says it’s all about affordability – don’t worry about the news, most
people have stopped watching. And, on “Face the Nation” CBS analyst
Samantha Vinograd says Afghan refugees went through
extensive vetting but the Afghan regime let those inevitable “bad actors”
into the USA. Kisti
Noem says Lakanwa was
radicalized because he’d lost his job due to visa red tape. |
|
|
Monday, December 1, 2025 Dow:
47,289.33 |
@ |
|
|
Tuesday, December 2, 2025 Dow: 47,474.46 |
|
|
|
Wednesday, December 3, 2025 Dow: 47,427.12 |
|
|
|
|
||
|
THE DON JONES INDEX CHART
of CATEGORIES w/VALUE ADDED to EQUAL BASELINE of 15,000 (REFLECTING…
approximately… DOW JONES INDEX of June 27, 2013) Gains in indices as improved are noted in GREEN. Negative/harmful
indices in RED as are their designation. (Note – some of the indices where the total
went up created a realm where their value went down... and vice versa.) See a
further explanation of categories HERE |
|
ECONOMIC INDICES
|
(60%) |
|
||||||||||||
|
CATEGORY |
VALUE |
BASE |
RESULTS by PERCENTAGE |
SCORE |
OUR SOURCES and COMMENTS |
|
||||||||
|
INCOME |
(24%) |
6/17/13 revised 1/1/22 |
LAST |
CHANGE |
NEXT |
LAST WEEK |
THIS WEEK |
THE WEEK’S CLOSING STATS... |
|
|||||
|
Wages (hrly. Per cap) |
9% |
1350 points |
11/20/25 |
+0.38% |
12/25 |
1,846.20 |
1,853.22 |
https://tradingeconomics.com/united-states/average-hourly-earnings
36.67* * Average
hourly earnings for all employees on US private nonfarm payrolls rose by 9
cents, or 0.2% over a month, to $36.67 in September 2025, slowing from an
upwardly revised 0.4% gain in August and just below market forecasts of a
0.3% increase. In September, average hourly earnings of private-sector
production and nonsupervisory employees rose by 8 cents, or 0.3%, to $31.53.
Over the past 12 months, average hourly earnings have increased by 3.8% in
September, matching August's revised pace and slightly above analysts'
estimates of 3.7%. source: U.S. Bureau of Labor
Statistics |
|
|||||
|
Median Inc. (yearly) |
4% |
600 |
11/20/25 |
+16.72% |
12/4/25 |
986.80 |
1,151.83 |
http://www.usdebtclock.org/ 52,347* 363 |
|
|||||
|
Unempl. (BLS – in mi) |
4% |
600 |
11/20/25 |
+0.28% |
10/25* |
530.25 |
530.25 |
http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS14000000/
4.3* 4.4%
(SEPT.) |
|
|||||
|
Official (DC – in mi) |
2% |
300 |
11/20/25 |
+5.58% |
12/4/25 |
215.11 |
203.10 |
http://www.usdebtclock.org/ 7,722 730 |
|
|||||
|
Unofficl. (DC – in mi) |
2% |
300 |
11/20/25 |
-6.12% |
12/4/25 |
229.26 |
243.27 |
http://www.usdebtclock.org/ 14,135 141 |
|
|||||
|
Workforce Participation Number Percent |
2% |
300 |
11/20/25 |
+0.16%
-0.00015% |
12/4/25 |
297.14 |
297.14 |
http://www.usdebtclock.org/ In
163,956 977 Out 104,418 447 Total:
268,174 61.138 |
|
|||||
|
WP % (ycharts)* |
1% |
150 |
11/20/25 |
-0.16% |
10/25* |
150.71 |
150.71 |
https://ycharts.com/indicators/labor_force_participation_rate 62.30 * |
|
|||||
|
OUTGO |
(15%) |
* An official website of the United States government census.gov
Notification |
|
|||||||||||
|
Total Inflation |
7% |
1050 |
11/20/25 |
+0.4% |
10/25* |
927.45 |
927.45 |
http://www.bls.gov/news.release/cpi.nr0.htm +0.3 |
|
|||||
|
Food |
2% |
300 |
11/20/25 |
+0.5% |
10/25* |
262.59 |
262.59 |
http://www.bls.gov/news.release/cpi.nr0.htm +0.2 |
|
|||||
|
Gasoline |
2% |
300 |
11/20/25 |
+1.9% |
10/25* |
255.11 |
255.11 |
http://www.bls.gov/news.release/cpi.nr0.htm +4.1 |
|
|||||
|
Medical Costs |
2% |
300 |
11/20/25 |
-0.1% |
10/25* |
274.20 |
274.20 |
http://www.bls.gov/news.release/cpi.nr0.htm
+0.3 |
|
|||||
|
Shelter |
2% |
300 |
11/20/25 |
+0.4% |
10/25* |
250.63 |
250.63 |
http://www.bls.gov/news.release/cpi.nr0.htm
+0.2 |
|
|||||
|
WEALTH |
An official website of the United States government census.gov
Notification |
|
||||||||||||
|
Dow Jones Index |
2% |
300 |
11/20/25 |
+0.245% |
12/4/25 |
360.20 |
361.08 |
https://www.wsj.com/market-data/quotes/index/ 47,427.12 |
|
|||||
|
Home (Sales) (Valuation) |
1% 1% |
150 150 |
11/20/25 |
+1.015% -1.75% |
10/25* |
125.77 272.70 |
125.77 272.70 |
https://www.nar.realtor/research-and-statistics Sales
(M): 4.10 Valuations (K): 415.2* |
|
|||||
|
Millionaires (New Category) |
1% |
150 |
11/20/25 |
+0.07% |
12/4/25 |
134.30 |
134.40 |
http://www.usdebtclock.org/ 23,873 879 |
|
|||||
|
Paupers (New Category) |
1% |
150 |
11/20/25 |
+0.027% |
12/4/25 |
133.42 |
133.46 |
http://www.usdebtclock.org/ 37,234 230 |
|
|||||
|
*Due to the
lapse of federal funding, portions of this website are not being updated. Any
inquiries submitted via www.census.gov will not be answered until
appropriations are enacted. |
|
|||||||||||||
|
GOVERNMENT |
(10%) |
|
||||||||||||
|
Revenue (trilns.) |
2% |
300 |
11/20/25 |
+0.08% |
12/4/25 |
458.71 |
459.06 |
http://www.usdebtclock.org/ 5,265 267 |
|
|||||
|
Expenditures (tr.) |
2% |
300 |
11/20/25 |
+0.04% |
12/4/25 |
295.38 |
295.25 |
http://www.usdebtclock.org/
7,033 035 |
|
|||||
|
National Debt tr.) |
3% |
450 |
11/20/25 |
+0.33% |
12/4/25 |
354.24 |
353.07 |
http://www.usdebtclock.org/ 38,347 434 |
|
|||||
|
Aggregate Debt (tr.) |
3% |
450 |
11/20/25 |
+0.19% |
12/4/25 |
377.76 |
377.05 |
http://www.usdebtclock.org/ 105,567 624 |
|
|||||
|
||||||||||||||
|
TRADE |
(5%) |
|
||||||||||||
|
Foreign Debt (tr.) |
2% |
300 |
11/20/25 |
+0.27% |
12/4/25 |
258.57 |
257.88 |
http://www.usdebtclock.org/
9,411 417 |
|
|||||
|
Exports (in billions) |
1% |
150 |
11/20/25 |
+1.15% |
10/25* |
174.76 |
174.76 |
* |
|
|||||
|
Imports (in billions)) |
1% |
150 |
11/20/25 |
-5.94% |
10/25* |
151.56 |
151.56 |
* |
|
|||||
|
Trade Surplus/Deficit (blns.) |
1% |
150 |
11/20/25 |
-23.12% |
10/25* |
253.88 |
253.88 |
* |
|
|||||
|
|
census.gov Notification: Due to the lapse of federal funding,
portions of this website are not being updated. Any inquiries submitted via
www.census.gov will not be answered until appropriations are enacted. |
|
||||||||||||
|
SOCIAL INDICES
|
(40%) |
|
Sarah
Beckstrom, 20, died of wounds Thursday. Her counterpart, 24-year-old Andrew
Wolfe, |
|
||||||||||
|
ACTS of MAN |
(12%) |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
World Affairs |
3% |
450 |
11/20/25 |
-0.2% |
12/4/25 |
470.08 |
469.14 |
American
critics, even some Republicans, point out hypocrisy in Trump pardoning
former Honduran President Jose Orlando
Hernandez for drug dealing and corruption. Pope Leo travels Thanksgiving
weekend to... Turkey! |
|
|||||
|
War and terrorism |
2% |
300 |
11/20/25 |
-0.2% |
12/4/25 |
288.34 |
287.76 |
DC
shooting upgraded to murder after guardswoman Beckstrom dies, colleague Wolf
still critical. Politicians play blame
game. Putin says no deal on Ukraine
because corruption proves Zelenskyy is “illegitimate”. War crimes investigators probe Israeli
killing of surrendering Palestinians
and Hegseth orders to kill Venezuelan boat survivors. |
|
|||||
|
Politics |
3% |
450 |
11/20/25 |
nc |
12/4/25 |
460.68 |
460.68 |
Dealmaker
Witkoff and tagalong Jared off to Moscow to present Trump’s revised peace
plan to Mad Vlad. |
|
|||||
|
Economics |
3% |
450 |
11/20/25 |
+0.2 |
12/4/25 |
429.64 |
430.50 |
Shutdown
stock stats find biggest drop in value of the dollar since summer. Black Friday, Small Business Saturday and
Cyber Monday sales up over 2024 despite tariffs. TVconmystics say best deals are on
appliances, tech, gift cards and clothing..
Campbell’s exec fired for saying its soups are for “poor people”. |
|
|||||
|
Crime |
1% |
150 |
11/20/25 |
-0.2% |
12/4/25 |
209.35 |
208.93 |
Four
killed (three children) 10 wounded by shootings at family party in Stockton,
CA. Thieves steal rare wine in
Virginia. |
|
|||||
|
ACTS of GOD |
(6%) |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Environment/Weather |
3% |
450 |
11/20/25 |
-0.1% |
12/4/25 |
284.37 |
284.09 |
2025
hurricane season ends with no strikes on the USA (but destruction in
Jamaica), Midwest blizzards snarl
holiday traffic on land and air. Worst
storm in Chicago in four years. |
|
|||||
|
Disasters |
3% |
450 |
11/20/25 |
+0.1% |
12/4/25 |
459.77 |
460.23 |
Hong Kong hirise
fire blamed on cheap bamboo scaffolding; 8 sloppy contractors arrested. Over 1,000 killed in South Asian
flooding. Two California children
survive coyote attack. |
|
|||||
|
LIFESTYLE/JUSTICE INDEX |
(15%) |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Science, Tech, Education |
4% |
600 |
11/20/25 |
+0.1% |
12/4/25 |
615.43
|
616.05 |
Chinese
robot walks 66 miles, Russian android keeps falling down. AI will triple energy consumption by
2030. Lightning detected on Mars. |
|
|||||
|
Equality (econ/social) |
4% |
600 |
11/20/25 |
+0.2% |
12/4/25 |
671.73 |
673.07 |
Lauren
Sanchez (Bezos) donates another “transformative” $100M grant to help the
homeless – especially pregnant women – and she’s trumped (but not by Donald,
by the Dell family which donates six billion
to young children after they’re born). |
|
|||||
|
Health |
4% |
600 |
11/20/25 |
-0.2% |
12/4/25 |
419.24 |
418.40 |
New H3N2
flu strain in Japan and the U.K. migrating to USA. RFK Junior’s MWAAHAA HHS says Covid vaxxing
kills children. TV docs decry
politicalization. Holiday candy bark
recalled for containing wheat and peanuts. |
|
|||||
|
Freedom and Justice |
3% |
450 |
11/20/25 |
-0.1% |
12/4/25 |
481.61 |
481.13 |
Replacement
DA drops Fani Willis case against Trump.
Jury hears Megan Thee Stallion’s deepfake slander. Wrongfully conviced Louisiana man free
after 30 years on Death Row. |
|
|||||
|
CULTURAL and MISCELLANEOUS
INCIDENTS |
(6%) |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
Cultural incidents |
3% |
450 |
11/20/25 |
+0.1% |
12/4/25 |
571.70 |
572.27 |
“Zootopia
Two” has record US and worldwide B.O.
Kennedy Center’s 12/23 gala to honor George Strait, Sylvester Stallone
and K.I.S.S, RIP: golfer Fuzzy Zoeller, @ R(etire)IP: rassler John Cena to be a full
time actor. |
|
|
Miscellaneous incidents |
4% |
450 |
11/20/25 |
+0.2% |
12/4/25 |
542.32 |
543.40 |
@ |
|
|
|
|||||||||
The Don Jones Index for the week of
November 20th through November 26th, 2025 was UP 175.02 points
The Don Jones Index is sponsored by the
Coalition for a New Consensus: retired Congressman and Independent Presidential
candidate Jack “Catfish” Parnell, Chairman; Brian Doohan, Administrator. The CNC denies, emphatically, allegations
that the organization, as well as any of its officers (including former
Congressman Parnell, environmentalist/America-Firster Austin Tillerman and
cosmetics CEO Rayna Finch) and references to Parnell’s works, “Entropy and
Renaissance” and “The Coming Kill-Off” are fictitious or, at best, mere pawns
in the web-serial “Black Helicopters” – and promise swift, effective legal
action against parties promulgating this and/or other such slanders.
Comments, complaints, donations (especially
SUPERPAC donations) always welcome at feedme@generisis.com or: speak@donjonesindex.com.
ATTACHMENT ONE – FROM
WORLD POPULATION REVIEW – HAPPINESS INDEX 2024
|
|
7.74 |
|
|
|
7.58 |
|
|
|
7.53 |
|
|
|
7.34 |
|
|
|
7.34 |
|
|
|
7.32 |
|
|
|
7.3 |
|
|
|
7.12 |
|
|
|
7.06 |
|
|
|
7.06 |
|
|
|
7.03 |
|
|
|
6.96 |
|
|
|
6.95 |
|
|
|
6.91 |
|
|
|
6.9 |
|
|
|
6.89 |
|
|
|
6.84 |
|
|
|
6.82 |
|
|
|
6.82 |
|
|
|
6.75 |
|
|
|
6.74 |
|
|
|
6.73 |
|
|
|
6.73 |
|
|
|
6.72 |
|
|
|
6.68 |
|
|
|
6.61 |
|
|
|
6.61 |
|
|
|
6.59 |
|
|
|
6.52 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
6.49 |
|
|
|
6.47 |
|
|
|
6.45 |
|
|
|
6.44 |
|
|
|
6.42 |
|
|
|
6.41 |
|
|
|
6.36 |
|
|
|
6.36 |
|
|
|
6.35 |
|
|
|
6.32 |
|
|
|
6.29 |
|
|
|
6.28 |
|
|
|
6.27 |
|
|
|
6.26 |
|
|
|
6.23 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
|
|
|
6.19 |
|
|
|
6.19 |
|
|
|
6.07 |
|
|
|
6.06 |
|
|
|
6.06 |
|
|
|
6.05 |
|
|
|
6.04 |
|
|
|
6.03 |
|
|
|
6.02 |
|
|
|
5.98 |
|
|
|
5.98 |
|
|
|
5.98 |
|
|
|
5.97 |
|
|
|
5.97 |
|
|
|
5.96 |
|
|
|
5.94 |
|
|
|
5.93 |
|
|
|
5.88 |
|
|
|
5.87 |
|
|
|
5.84 |
|
|
|
5.84 |
|
|
|
5.82 |
|
|
|
5.82 |
|
|
|
5.82 |
|
|
|
5.79 |
|
|
|
5.78 |
|
|
|
5.73 |
|
|
|
5.71 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
5.61 |
|
|
|
5.57 |
|
|
|
5.46 |
|
|
|
5.46 |
|
|
|
5.42 |
|
|
|
5.37 |
|
|
|
5.36 |
|
|
|
5.32 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
5.28 |
|
|
|
5.22 |
|
|
|
5.22 |
|
|
|
5.19 |
|
|
|
5.17 |
|
|
|
5.16 |
|
|
|
5.14 |
|
|
|
5.11 |
|
|
|
5.08 |
|
|
|
5.02 |
|
|
|
4.98 |
|
|
|
4.97 |
|
|
|
4.92 |
|
|
|
4.89 |
|
|
|
4.88 |
|
|
|
4.88 |
|
|
|
4.87 |
|
|
|
4.87 |
|
|
|
4.83 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
4.66 |
|
|
|
4.56 |
|
|
|
4.55 |
|
|
|
4.51 |
|
|
|
4.49 |
|
|
|
4.47 |
|
|
|
4.47 |
|
|
|
4.42 |
|
|
|
4.38 |
|
|
|
4.37 |
|
|
|
4.35 |
|
|
|
4.34 |
|
|
|
4.29 |
|
|
|
4.27 |
|
|
|
4.23 |
|
|
|
4.23 |
|
|
|
4.21 |
|
|
|
4.19 |
|
|
|
4.05 |
|
|
|
3.98 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
3.89 |
|
|
|
3.86 |
|
|
|
3.78 |
|
|
|
3.57 |
|
|
|
3.56 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
3.42 |
|
|
|
3.38 |
|
|
|
3.34 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
3.25 |
|
|
|
3.19 |
|
|
|
2.71 |
|
|
|
1.72 |
·
Happiness
rankings are three-year averages. For example, 2023 rankings compile data from
2020-2022, while 2022 rankings compile data from 2019-2021.
·
Happiness
rankings are determined by analyzing comprehensive Gallup polling data from 149
countries in six particular categories: gross domestic product per capita,
social support, healthy life expectancy, freedom to make your own life choices,
generosity of the general population, and perceptions of internal and external
corruption levels.
·
The
following countries lack survey information in 2022, so their 2023 averages are
based on the 2020 and 2021 survey: Zambia, Uganda, Turkey, Tajikistan, Sri
Lanka, South Africa, Slovakia, Singapore, Serbia, Philippines, Pakistan,
Nigeria, Myanmar, Montenegro, Malaysia, Laos, Iraq, China, Burkina Faso, Bosnia
and Herzegovina, Bahrain, Algeria
·
The
following countries lack survey information in 2021, so their 2022 averages are
based on the 2019 and 2020 survey: Yemen, Turkmenistan, Rwanda, Palestine,
Niger, Mauritania, Madagascar, Luxembourg, Libya, Liberia, Lesotho, Kuwait, ,
Guatemala, Gambia, Eswatini, Comoros, Chad, Botswana, Belarus, Azerbaijan.
Snapshot
·
Happiness
is measured using six categories including GDP per capita, social support, and
healthy life expectancy, among others.
·
Northern
European countries dominate the top of the happiness rankings, reflecting
strong social support systems and high standards of living.
·
Finland
is ranked as the happiest country in the world in 2024, with Denmark and
Iceland following closely behind.
Since 2002, the World
Happiness Report has used statistical analysis to
determine the world’s happiest countries. In its 2024 update, the report
concluded that Finland is the happiest country in the world. To determine the
world’s happiest country, researchers analyzed comprehensive Gallup polling
data from 143 countries for the past three years, specifically monitoring
performance in six particular categories: gross domestic product per capita,
social support, healthy life expectancy, freedom to make your own life choices,
generosity of the general population, and perceptions of internal and external
corruption levels.
In order to properly
compare each country’s data, the researchers created a fictional
country—christened Dystopia—filled with “the world’s least-happy people.” They
then set Dystopia as the rock bottom value in each of the six categories and
measured the scores of the real-world countries against this value. All six
variables were then blended to create a single combined score for each country.
Six out of the top seven happiest countries in the world for 2024 were Northern
European countries. Finland took top honors—for the tenth year in a row—with an
overall score of 7.741, followed (in order) by Denmark (7.583), Iceland
(7.525), Sweden (7.344), Israel (7.341), the Netherlands (7.319), and Norway
(7.302).
The
Top 10 Happiest Countries in the World (World Happiness Score 2024)
The least happy
country in the world for 2024 was Afghanistan, whose 143rd-place ranking of
1.721 can be attributed in part to a low life expectancy rate, low gross
domestic product rates per capita, and perhaps most importantly, the recent
Taliban takeover of Afghanistan. Rounding out the bottom five are Lebanon
(2.707), Lesotho (3.186), Sierra Leone (3.245), and DR Congo (3.295).
The
Top 7 Happiest Countries in the World for 2024
1.
Finland
Finland ranks as the world’s
happiest country based on the 2024 report, with a score of 7.741 out of a total
possible score of 10. The citizens of Finland have strong feelings of communal
support and mutual trust that not only helped secure the #1 ranking but also
helped the country as a whole navigate the COVID-19 pandemic. During that
trying time, Finlanders felt strongly that they were free to make their own
choices and showed minimal suspicion of government corruption. Both of these
factors are strong contributors to overall happiness.
2.
Denmark
The second-happiest country
in the world is Denmark, which scores 7.583.
Denmark’s values for each of the six variables are quite comparable to those of
Finland. In fact, Denmark has even outscored the leader in multiple categories,
including GDP per capita and generosity. The country also scored the highest in
happiness among older adults (60+).
3.
Iceland
Iceland ranks as 2024’s
third-happiest country in the entire world, with a total score of 7.525. Of the
top seven happiest countries around the globe, Iceland boasts the highest
feeling of social support. Iceland also had the second-highest generosity score
in the top seven, though it’s worth noting that it ranked only 11th worldwide.
Iceland is also a happier country for the youngsters at #4 than Finland (#7)
and Denmark (#5).
4.
Sweden
Fourth-place Sweden (7.344) ranks only
#18 for happiness among the younger people (aged below 30). Yet, it is also #4
in older adults’ happiness. In fact, according to the report, along with
Norway, Germany, France, the United Kingdom, and Spain, Sweden is a country
where the old are now significantly happier than the young, while in Portugal,
Greece, and Israel the opposite is true.
5.
Israel
Fifth in the ranks of the
happiest countries with a score of 7.341, Israel showed emotional
resilience in the wake of the October 7th attack. Israel occupies the second
spot for the happiness of the young people, just behind Lithuania. However,
conversely to Sweden and Norway, the older Israelis are significantly less
happy than their young fellow citizens, the country ranking #18 for senior
citizens’ happiness.
6.
Netherlands
Edging out Norway for the
honor of sixth-happiest country in the world is the Netherlands (also known as
Holland to many tulip lovers), with a score of 7.319. The Netherlands scored
higher in the generosity category than any other top-seven country and also had
the highest GDP.
7.
Norway
The citizens of
seventh-place Norway (7.302) feel they are
being well cared for by their government thanks to universal healthcare and
free college tuition. Norwegians also enjoy a healthy work-life
balance,
working an average of 27 hours per week vs. 36 hours per week in the United
States. Additionally, Norway has a low crime rate and a strong sense of
community among its citizens—a quality it shares with many in the top seven.
Honorable
Mention: Bhutan
Bhutan was previously excluded
from the 2021 report due to a technicality: each country’s scores were based
upon detailed Gallup polls, but Gallup did not conduct polling in Bhutan during
the required timeframe. In the 1970s, the 4th King of Bhutan stated, “Gross
National Happiness is more important than Gross Domestic Product.” Since then,
the idea of Gross
National Happiness (GNH) has influenced Bhutan’s
development policy. Its GNH Index value increased from 0.743 in 2010 to 0.781
in 2022. With a focus on mindfulness and well-being, Bhutan may soon give some
of its Northern European counterparts a run for their money in terms of
people’s happiness.
A2
FROM PBS
Finland ranked
happiest country in the world. The U.S. falls to its lowest-ever position
World Mar 20, 2025 12:39 PM EST
HELSINKI (AP) — Finland is the happiest country in the world
for the eighth year in a row, according to the World Happiness Report 2025
published Thursday.
Other Nordic countries are also once again at the top of the
happiness rankings in the annual report published by the Wellbeing Research
Centre at the University of Oxford. Besides Finland, Denmark, Iceland and
Sweden remain the top four and in the same order.
Aino Virolainen, a digital commerce director, has lived
abroad but always wants to return home to Finland.
“This is where I always want to come back to and where I
want to, you know, grow my kids and grow old myself,” Virolainen said Thursday.
“And I think it’s because, you know, the peace and the quietness and the
trustworthiness. You know, how we speak directly and the nature, of course.
It’s clean and the air is fresh and what’s there not to love?”
Country rankings were based on answers people give when
asked to rate their own lives. The study was done in partnership with the
analytics firm Gallup and the U.N. Sustainable Development Solutions Network.
“Happiness isn’t just about wealth or growth — it’s about
trust, connection and knowing people have your back,” said Jon Clifton, the CEO
of Gallup. “If we want stronger communities and economies, we must invest in
what truly matters: each other.”
SHARING MEALS AND HAVING SOMEBODY TO
COUNT ON
Researchers say that beyond health and wealth, some factors
that influence happiness sound deceptively simple: sharing meals with others,
having somebody to count on for social support, and household size. In Mexico
and Europe, for example, a household size of four to five people predicts the
highest levels of happiness, the study said.
Believing in the kindness of others is also much more
closely tied to happiness than previously thought, according to the latest
findings.
As an example, the report suggests that people who believe
that others are willing to return their lost wallet is a strong predictor of
the overall happiness of a population.
Nordic nations rank among the top places for expected and
actual return of lost wallets, the study found.
Alexandra Peth, a managing director, said Finnish culture
prioritizes trust and connection.
“People trust each other in Finland and I think on many
levels in the society, we try to support each other,” Peth said. “So I think the
system makes it kind of that you can trust it somehow.”
Overall, researchers said that global evidence on the
perceived and actual return of lost wallets shows that people are much too
pessimistic about the kindness of their communities compared to reality —
actual rates of wallet return are around twice as high as people expect.
THE U.S. FALLS TO ITS LOWEST-EVER
POSITION IN THE HAPPINESS RANKING
While European countries dominate the top 20 in the ranking,
there were some exceptions. Despite the war with Hamas, Israel came in at
eighth. Costa Rica and Mexico entered the top 10 for the first time, ranking at
sixth and 10th respectively.
When it comes to decreasing happiness — or growing
unhappiness — the United States has dropped to its lowest-ever position at 24,
having previously peaked at 11th place in 2012. The report states that the
number of people dining alone in the United States has increased 53% over the
past two decades.
The United Kingdom, at position 23, is reporting its lowest
average life evaluation since the 2017 report.
Afghanistan is again ranked as the unhappiest country in the
world, with Afghan women saying their lives are especially difficult.
Sierra Leone in western Africa is the second unhappiest,
followed by Lebanon, ranking third from the bottom.
Almost one-fifth of young adults
globally have no social support
In a concerning development, the study said that 19% of
young adults across the world reported in 2023 that they have no one they could
count on for social support. That is a 39% increase compared to 2006.
All countries are ranked according to their self-assessed
life evaluations averaged over 2022 to 2024.
Experts in economics, psychology, sociology and beyond then
seek to explain the variations across countries and over time using factors
such as gross domestic product per capita, healthy life expectancy, having
someone to count on, a sense of freedom, generosity and perceptions of
corruption.
Jouni Purhonen, a Helsinki resident, called Finns “really
calm.”
“So we have the time to think about things like live our
life really peacefully and I guess easily, if you will,” Purhonen said.
Kirsten Grieshaber reported from Berlin.
A3 ATTACHMENT – FROM the GUARDIAN U.K.
AFGHANISTAN LIFE EXPECTANCY RISING
AS HEALTHCARE IMPROVES, SURVEY SHOWS
Better access to healthcare in last decade has resulted in Afghans living
longer and the infant mortality rate being cut
Wed 30 Nov 2011 10.15 EST
Afghans are living longer, fewer infants are dying
and more women are surviving childbirth because healthcare has dramatically
improved around the country in the past decade, according to a national survey.
It indicates that increased access to healthcare, more hospitals, clinics
and doctors have significantly contributed to an overall improvement in the
health of most Afghans.
"There have been many
changes in the health sector and that is why we have so many positive
changes," said Bashir Noormal, director general of the Afghan Public Health Institute.
Conducted by the Afghan health
ministry in 2010, the survey was sponsored and funded by international
organisations such as Unicef, the World Health Organisation, the US government
and the British Department for International Development. It was the most
comprehensive to date in Afghanistan,
despite the exclusion of some rural areas in the south where international
forces are fighting insurgents.
It showed that estimated life
expectancy is up to between 62 and 64 years for both men and women. That
compares with previous studies showing life expectancy from 47 to 50 – the
latter figure reported by the WHO in 2009.
The survey also showed infant
mortality had been cut in half in recent years, down to 97 deaths per 1,000
live births. It said one in 10 children in Afghanistan dies before they are
five years old while previous surveys, carried out about five years ago, showed
that one child in five died before reaching that age. The 2009 WHO study
reported 199 deaths per 1,000 live births.
Women are also far more likely
to survive pregnancy today. The survey indicated that the number of women who
die from pregnancy related causes has dropped to one in every 50. Afghan women
on average have just over five children, it said.
Still, one Afghan women dies
about every two hours from pregnancy-related causes and while childhood
mortality is decreasing, it remains the highest in the region. "We still
have a very long way to go," said the Afghan public health minister,
Suraya Dalil.
Recent improvements are visible
at Kabul's Malalai Maternity hospital, the oldest and biggest in the capital,
where Dr Hafeeza Amar Khail, the facility's medical director, said the hospital
was "seeing decreasing mortality every year – last year, the year before
and the year before that" and attributed the improvements to constant
training.
"We now update doctors,
midwives and all the staff of this hospital," she said. "We also have
a midwife clinic and supply midwives to the provinces."
In 2003, there were just 450
health facilities in Afghanistan, including hospitals, according to the health
ministry. Now, there are more than 1,800. The number of midwives has risen from
400 in 2003 to more than 2,000 in 2010, including many trained by organisations
such as Save the Children.
"These encouraging results
show that even in the most challenging and difficult environments, dramatic
improvements in child mortality can be achieved," said David Skinner,
country director for Save the Children.
Since 2003, about 20,000
community health workers have been trained nationwide by various groups and
organisations. "As a result of this, and other community-level activities,
fewer children are dying from preventable causes like diarrhoea or
pneumonia," Skinner said.
The study, however, revealed
significant gaps between rural and urban areas and showed that wealth and
education play a key role in the level of healthcare Afghans receive.
The Afghan government, experts
and sponsors say it also shows that development aid to Afghanistan in the
health sector has worked, despite obstacles, bureaucracy and endemic
corruption.
They argue that aid must not be
reduced as the international community gradually trims the funds it provides
the government as it starts drawing down the 130,000 troops currently in the
country.
"International aid, which
has funded many of the public health programmes in Afghanistan, has made a real
difference, saving many children's lives," Skinner said. "Donor
governments need to build on this success and continue to invest in Afghanistan
in ways that directly benefit ordinary Afghans."
The World Bank said last week
that Afghanistan will need billions of dollars in aid for a decade or more,
especially if it hopes to fund services such as health. The health ministry
receives the majority of its funding from foreign donors, with the biggest
being the US, World Bank and European Union.
The World Bank said Afghanistan
this year received $15.7bn (Ł10bn) in aid, representing more than 90% of its
public spending.
The study surveyed 225,351
households and 47,848 women from ages 12 to 49. Survey organisers acknowledge
that although it covered 87% of the country – 98% of the urban population and
84% of the rural one – the survey had data collection problems.
Because of security reasons, it
did not include rural areas of three major southern provinces, Kandahar,
Helmand and Zabul, which have seen some of the most intense fighting between
insurgents and Afghan and Nato troops
A4 FROM CBS
2025 World Happiness Report shows U.S. in lowest-ever
spot on list
By Nicole Brown
Chau Updated on: March 20, 2025 / 11:30
AM EDT / CBS News
The United States this year fell to its lowest-ever place on
the World Happiness Report, an annual survey published on International
Day of Happiness. The 2025 report highlights the positive effects benevolence
and social connections have on people's life satisfaction.
Finland remained the happiest nation for the eighth year in
a row, while Mexico and Costa Rico ranked among the top 10 for the first time
since the report was first published in 2012.
This year's report ranks 147 countries by their happiness
levels — based on a population's average assessment of their quality of life
from 2022 to 2024. Data from the Gallup World Poll, which asks respondents to
evaluate their current life, is the primary source for the annual happiness
rankings.
Researchers found that the belief in the kindness of others,
as well as actively caring about and sharing with others, has strong effects on
happiness, according to the report.
"Happiness isn't just about wealth or growth — it's
about trust, connection and knowing people have your back," Jon Clifton,
the CEO of Gallup, said in a statement.
U.S. RANKS 24TH, ITS LOWEST RANKING
The U.S. ranked 24th in the world, one place lower than
its 2024
ranking. America previously peaked at 11th place in 2012.
One factor highlighted in the report was the increasing
number of people who eat
alone.
"In 2023, roughly 1 in 4 Americans reported eating all
of their meals alone the previous day — an increase of 53% since 2003,"
the report said. "Dining alone has become more prevalent for every age
group, but especially for young people."
Data reviewed for the report indicates major differences in
the rates of meal-sharing around the world, with sharing meals having a
positive effect on wellbeing.
Another factor contributing to America's drop in the
rankings, as well as the rankings of some European countries, was "the
rise in political polarization and votes against 'the system,'" the report
said.
"The country-wide evolution of happiness and trust is
highly associated with the rise in the likelihood of voting for anti-system
parties in Western Europe and the United States," the authors wrote.
Mexico, Costa Rica enter the top 10
for first time
A key reason for the rise in Mexico and Costa Rica's
rankings appeared to be family household size.
"Latin American societies, characterized by larger
household sizes and strong family bonds, offer valuable lessons for other
societies that seek higher and sustainable wellbeing," the report
said.
The report compared Mexico to European countries, explaining
that even though it is poorer, "larger households imply a potential
advantage to build positive social interactions within the household, which
could partially counterbalance the differences in income with Europe."
In Europe, 23% of households were single-person, while in
Mexico, only 11% were single-person, according to data cited in the
report.
"In both Mexico and Europe, the highest average life
satisfaction is reported by people who live in households with four to five
members," the authors wrote. "We also observe an inverted U-shaped
relationship. Average life satisfaction is lower for people in single-person
households as well as households with six or seven members."
Dropped wallet experiment
The Gallup World Poll asked people in 2019 if they thought
others would return a lost wallet, and found that "people are much too pessimistic
about the benevolence of others."
"When wallets were dropped in the street by
researchers, the proportion of returned wallets was far higher than people
expected," the report said.
The belief that others would return the lost wallets also
contributed to a country's ranking.
The Nordic nations, including Denmark, Finland, Norway and
Sweden, ranked in the top 10 countries and were among the top places for
expected and actual return of lost wallets, the report said.
"The wallet data are so convincing because they confirm
that people are much happier living where they think people care about each
other," John F. Helliwell, an economist at the University of British
Columbia and a founding editor of the World Happiness Report, said in a
statement.
Additionally, the researchers found that globally,
benevolent acts were 10% more frequent in 2024 than in 2017-2019.
AI OVERVIEW
The United States'
happiness index was ranked 24th globally in the 2025 World Happiness Report,
marking a new all-time low, according to the New
York Times and Newsweek.
The score has declined, particularly among those under 30, and is attributed to
factors like increased solo dining and rising "deaths of
despair".
·
Global ranking: The U.S. dropped to 24th in the 2025
World Happiness Report.
·
Historical data: The U.S. ranked 11th
in 2012 but has steadily declined since.
·
Contributing factors:
The decline is linked to factors like a significant increase in Americans
eating meals alone and a rise in "deaths of despair" (suicide, alcohol,
and drug abuse).
·
Age divide: The report noted a
stark difference in happiness levels between age groups, with the U.S. ranking
10th for those over 60 but 62nd for those under 30.
·
Data source: The rankings are
based on the Gallup World Poll, which uses the Cantril Ladder metric to have
people rate their lives on a scale of 0 to 10.
A5 FROM MIEUX
DONNER
The happiest countries and findings from the World
Happiness Report 2025
By
Romain Barbe
.
Table of Contents
2. What are the top
25 happiest countries in 2025?
3. Some of the
world’s happiest countries buy wellbeing for WAY cheaper than others
4. Some of the
world’s happiest countries in 2025 are also the most generous
5. People are kinder
than we think
6. Giving to others:
How to convert your money into greater happiness for others
8. You might also
want to read...
Key insights:
·
Top happiest
countries in 2025: Finland retains its title as the
world’s happiest country, with Nordic countries dominating the top spots. The
UK and the United States barely make the top 25, while France drops to 33rd.
·
Generosity and
happiness: The happiest countries are also among
the most generous. A positive correlation exists between international aid and
happiness, suggesting that countries spreading happiness beyond their borders
are not only happier but also more benevolent.
·
Some countries buy
wellbeing more efficiently: Latin American countries
like Costa Rica and Mexico outperform wealthier nations in terms of life
satisfaction, even though their income levels are lower;
·
Trust and kindness: People’s perceptions of others’ generosity tend to be pessimistic.
In reality, acts of kindness, like returning a lost wallet, happen more often
than expected, which significantly boosts happiness. Trust in others is
strongly associated with wellbeing, even more so than factors like income or
employment.
·
There is a specific chapter of the report
dedicated to giving to others:
o
The cost-effectiveness of charities can be
measured and compared with a standardised metric of value: Wellbeing-Years (WELLBYs).
o
This is the first global review of published evidence about the cost-effectiveness of charities at
increasing happiness.
o
The cost-effectiveness of charities varies
dramatically. The best charities
in our sample are hundreds of times better at increasing happiness per euro
than others. The most effective ones may even surprise
you, as they tend to outperform larger, more well-known organizations.
o
The message for donors is: you can make a far greater difference at no
extra cost by funding more
cost-effective charities; you can also
give with the confidence that researchers have impartially evaluated the
charities for you and compared them by something that really matters: their
impact on people’s happiness.
What
are the top 25 happiest countries in 2025?
The World Happiness
Report, the world’s foremost publication on global wellbeing and how
to improve it, have just shared their 2025 rankings, based on self-reported
happiness. The report is published by the Wellbeing Research Centre at the
University of Oxford, in partnership with Gallup, the UN Sustainable
Development Solutions Network. The Happier Lives Institute, a
research organisation about wellbeing, also wrote a chapter for the report!
Read on to learn more.
Once again, the Nordic
countries claim the top spots, with Finland retaining its title as the world’s
happiest country. These wealthy, homogenous, high trust states with generous
welfare systems continue to dominate the rankings (we assume it doesn’t have to
do with the pickled fish).
The UK and United States may
be countries that pride themselves on their exceptionalism, but they are not
exceptionally satisfied with life – barely making the top 25, France is ranked
33rd, losing 6 ranks compared to the previous edition.
Happier
Lives Institute figure, based on data presented in the 2025 World Happiness
Report. The happiness levels are an average of the years 2022, 2023, and 2024.
The error bars are 95% confidence intervals.
Complete
list:
|
1 |
Finland |
7,736 |
|
2 |
Denmark |
7,521 |
|
3 |
Iceland |
7,515 |
|
4 |
Sweden |
7,345 |
|
5 |
Netherlands |
7,306 |
|
6 |
Costa Rica |
7,274 |
|
7 |
Norway |
7,262 |
|
8 |
Israel |
7,234 |
|
9 |
Luxembourg |
7,122 |
|
10 |
Mexico |
6,979 |
|
11 |
Australia |
6,974 |
|
12 |
New Zealand |
6,952 |
|
13 |
Switzerland |
6,935 |
|
14 |
Belgium |
6,910 |
|
15 |
Ireland |
6,889 |
|
16 |
Lithuania |
6,829 |
|
17 |
Austria |
6,810 |
|
18 |
Canada |
6,803 |
|
19 |
Slovenia |
6,792 |
|
20 |
Czechia |
6,775 |
|
21 |
United Arab
Emirates |
6,759 |
|
22 |
Germany |
6,753 |
|
23 |
United Kingdom |
6,728 |
|
24 |
United States |
6,724 |
|
25 |
Belize |
6,711 |
|
26 |
Poland |
6,673 |
|
27 |
Taiwan Province of
China |
6,669 |
|
28 |
Uruguay |
6,661 |
|
29 |
Kosovo |
6,659 |
|
30 |
Kuwait |
6,629 |
|
31 |
Serbia |
6,606 |
|
32 |
Saudi Arabia |
6,600 |
|
33 |
France |
6,593 |
|
34 |
Singapore |
6,565 |
|
35 |
Romania |
6,563 |
|
36 |
Brazil |
6,494 |
|
37 |
El Salvador |
6,492 |
|
38 |
Spain |
6,466 |
|
39 |
Estonia |
6,417 |
|
40 |
Italy |
6,415 |
|
41 |
Panama |
6,407 |
|
42 |
Argentina |
6,397 |
|
43 |
Kazakhstan |
6,378 |
|
44 |
Guatemala |
6,362 |
|
45 |
Chile |
6,361 |
|
46 |
Viet Nam |
6,352 |
|
47 |
Nicaragua |
6,330 |
|
48 |
Malta |
6,316 |
|
49 |
Thailand |
6,222 |
|
50 |
Slovakia |
6,221 |
|
51 |
Latvia |
6,207 |
|
52 |
Oman |
6,197 |
|
53 |
Uzbekistan |
6,193 |
|
54 |
Paraguay |
6,172 |
|
55 |
Japan |
6,147 |
|
56 |
Bosnia and
Herzegovina |
6,136 |
|
57 |
Philippines |
6,107 |
|
58 |
Republic of Korea |
6,038 |
|
59 |
Bahrain |
6,030 |
|
60 |
Portugal |
6,013 |
|
61 |
Colombia |
6,004 |
|
62 |
Ecuador |
5,965 |
|
63 |
Honduras |
5,964 |
|
64 |
Malaysia |
5,955 |
|
65 |
Peru |
5,947 |
|
66 |
Russian Federation |
5,945 |
|
67 |
Cyprus |
5,942 |
|
68 |
China |
5,921 |
|
69 |
Hungary |
5,915 |
|
70 |
Trinidad and Tobago |
5,905 |
|
71 |
Montenegro |
5,877 |
|
72 |
Croatia |
5,870 |
|
73 |
Jamaica |
5,870 |
|
74 |
Bolivia |
5,868 |
|
75 |
Kyrgyzstan |
5,858 |
|
76 |
Dominican Republic |
5,846 |
|
77 |
Mongolia |
5,833 |
|
78 |
Mauritius |
5,832 |
|
79 |
Libya |
5,820 |
|
80 |
Republic of Moldova |
5,819 |
|
81 |
Greece |
5,776 |
|
82 |
Venezuela |
5,683 |
|
83 |
Indonesia |
5,617 |
|
84 |
Algeria |
5,571 |
|
85 |
Bulgaria |
5,554 |
|
86 |
North Macedonia |
5,503 |
|
87 |
Armenia |
5,494 |
|
88 |
Hong Kong SAR of
China |
5,491 |
|
89 |
Albania |
5,411 |
|
90 |
Tajikistan |
5,411 |
|
91 |
Georgia |
5,400 |
|
92 |
Nepal |
5,311 |
|
93 |
Lao PDR |
5,301 |
|
94 |
Türkiye |
5,262 |
|
95 |
South Africa |
5,213 |
|
96 |
Mozambique |
5,190 |
|
97 |
Gabon |
5,120 |
|
98 |
Côte d’Ivoire |
5,102 |
|
99 |
Iran |
5,093 |
|
100 |
Congo |
5,030 |
|
101 |
Iraq |
4,976 |
|
102 |
Guinea |
4,929 |
|
103 |
Namibia |
4,911 |
|
104 |
Cameroon |
4,887 |
|
105 |
Nigeria |
4,885 |
|
106 |
Azerbaijan |
4,875 |
|
107 |
Senegal |
4,856 |
|
108 |
State of Palestine |
4,780 |
|
109 |
Pakistan |
4,768 |
|
110 |
Niger |
4,725 |
|
111 |
Ukraine |
4,680 |
|
112 |
Morocco |
4,622 |
|
113 |
Tunisia |
4,552 |
|
114 |
Mauritania |
4,542 |
|
115 |
Kenya |
4,510 |
|
116 |
Uganda |
4,461 |
|
117 |
Gambia |
4,423 |
|
118 |
India |
4,389 |
|
119 |
Chad |
4,384 |
|
120 |
Burkina Faso |
4,383 |
|
121 |
Benin |
4,357 |
|
122 |
Somalia |
4,347 |
|
123 |
Mali |
4,345 |
|
124 |
Cambodia |
4,341 |
|
125 |
Ghana |
4,340 |
|
126 |
Myanmar |
4,321 |
|
127 |
Togo |
4,315 |
|
128 |
Jordan |
4,310 |
|
129 |
Liberia |
4,277 |
|
130 |
Madagascar |
4,157 |
|
131 |
Zambia |
3,912 |
|
132 |
Ethiopia |
3,898 |
|
133 |
Sri Lanka |
3,891 |
|
134 |
Bangladesh |
3,851 |
|
135 |
Egypt |
3,817 |
|
136 |
Tanzania |
3,800 |
|
137 |
Eswatini |
3,774 |
|
138 |
Lesotho |
3,757 |
|
139 |
Comoros |
3,754 |
|
140 |
Yemen |
3,561 |
|
141 |
DR Congo |
3,469 |
|
142 |
Botswana |
3,438 |
|
143 |
Zimbabwe |
3,396 |
|
144 |
Malawi |
3,260 |
|
145 |
Lebanon |
3,188 |
|
146 |
Sierra Leone |
2,998 |
|
147 |
Afghanistan |
1,364 |
Some
of the world’s happiest countries buy wellbeing for WAY cheaper than others
Richer countries tend to be happier.
Nevertheless, several Latin American countries continue to outperform
expectations based on income alone. Residents of Costa Rica report higher life
satisfaction than Americans (and Mexican life satisfaction is very close to
that of the US), despite having less than half the income.
Some
of the world’s happiest countries in 2025 are also the most generous
Being a happy country is good.
But spreading that happiness beyond one’s borders is even better. This
year’s World Happiness Report [2] highlights the
often-overlooked role of benevolence in improving the lives of the giver and
receiver.
One clear way to measure a
country’s generosity is through its levels of international aid. In the World
Happiness Report (Chapter 2, p. 46), they found a positive correlation between
international aid and a country’s happiness.
Indeed, when we visually
look at foreign aid as a share of national income, an interesting pattern
emerges: the world’s happiest countries also tend to be among the most
generous.
The connection between
helping others and happiness is mirrored on the individual scale. Being more
generous is correlated with being happier. Among the generous acts surveyed,
donating gives double the happiness boost compared to volunteering or helping
strangers (p. 40). Luckily, acts of benevolence may be more common than we
imagine.
People
are kinder than we think
One of our favorite findings
from this year’s report suggests that people are worthier of our trust than we
realize.
In Chapter 2 (p. 31), the
authors compared survey results about people’s expectations for how often a
dropped wallet would be returned with actual return rates from a 40 country
experiment.
They found that the actual
return rate across the world was about twice as high as people
expected.
These expectations are also
strongly and positively related with wellbeing. Having confidence that a wallet
would be returned had a much higher associated effect on happiness than most
other factors.
Believing a wallet would be
returned was twice as related to happiness as unemployment and it was
correlated with nearly 8 times as much happiness as having one’s income double.
THE AUTHORS DRAW OUT THE
IMPLICATION:
“People may be made
needlessly unhappy by their unwarranted pessimism.” (p. 31)
Giving
to others: How to convert your money into greater happiness for others
The impact charities have on
people’s happiness varies hugely. Your donations to charity can go much further
– at no extra cost to you – if you contribute to the best organisations.
Let’s unpack this.
1)
The first ever review of how much happiness charities can create with a donor’s
money
A new chapter of the report
aimed to find and review all pre-existing estimates of how much happiness
charities produce. The review found 24 charity cost-effectiveness estimates by
four different evaluators (interestingly, these evaluators are all UK-based, so
the UK is a world-leader in happiness research, if not
happiness).
Wellbeing-years (WELLBYs)
[5] are an increasingly accepted method of comparing the value of different
interventions, charities, and policies. 1 WELLBY = A 1-point increase on a 0-10
self-reported wellbeing scale (like the one used in the World Happiness Report
ranking!) for one person for one year.
For context, after a year
[6] :
·
Being
unemployed reduces life satisfaction by 0.5 points (on a 0-10 scale).
·
Marriage increases life satisfaction by 0.3 points (on a 0-10 scale).
·
Doubling income raises life satisfaction by 0.2 points (on a 0-10 scale).
2)
The best charities are hundreds of times better at increasing happiness per
euro.
There’s a huge variation in the
wellbeing you can buy per euro donated across charities.
To put this in perspective,
you’re as tall as the average person, and your height represents the
cost-effectiveness of the least good charity on the list (this still has a
positive impact), the charity on the top of the list would be 5x
times taller than the Eiffel Tower! [7]
What’s
driving the differences in impact across charities?
The short answer is that most cost-effective charities are cheaply providing
effective solutions to serious problems faced by people in low and middle
income countries (LMICs). Whereas the least cost-effective charities operate in
high-income countries (HICs). It costs charities much more to provide the same
service in high income countries, and these may have smaller impacts because
the need is less and better met by existing services. The report discusses
this, and caveats, more in the chapter itself.
Note that the task was to
bring together all the work that had already been done. All the research had the
same output (WELLBYs per dollar) but the inputs were ‘lumpy’: some analyses
were much deeper than others. It was out of scope to renanalyse and to update
all the pre-existing estimates. So take this as the first word on the topic,
not the last!
3)
What are the most cost-effective charities identified so far?
The most cost-effective
charities found so far focus on mental health, malnutrition, and lead exposure
reduction in low-income countries:
Both charities provide
low-cost, scalable mental health support in sub-Saharan Africa where the need is
great but there is very little provision.
We recognise “Dollars per
WELLBY” is not very intuitive. To get a feel for what this means, consider that
$20 will, for many, be the cost of a meal out. If you know of a restaurant that
will raise your happiness by 1-point for a whole year – more than the
difference between being employed and unemployed – then let us know so we can
go there! By supporting the best charities, we can make an incredible
difference to others at a very small cost to ourselves.
Using the Happier Lives
Institute latest research, we published about the charities you
can support to increase wellbeing in the world. While
not mentioned in this report, the Happier Lives Institute has
evaluated the Against Malaria
Foundation (AMF). Its impact on well-being is significant, mainly
due to the deaths avoided and suffering reduced as a result of malaria
prevention. Its effectiveness can vary depending on the philosophical approach
adopted. AMF is one of Mieux Donner’s recommendations in our health and poverty
category. You can donate and benefit from the
associated tax reduction.
4) Why
aren’t there any charities I’ve heard of at the top of the list?
In the chapter, what stood
out as a gap in the current research is that it didn’t include any well-known
charities. The Happier Lives Institute wanted to add some estimates of
well-known charities, but they found it surprisingly hard.
Why? Lots of big charities
are what they call ‘MANGOs’, standing for ‘Multi-Armed NGOs’. For instance,
Oxfam runs hundreds of different programmes. In the chapter, they explain the
‘MANGO problem’ is that it is effectively impossible for us to assess these
sorts of organisations. So, donors are really guessing about how much good
their money does.
Well-known charities don’t
necessarily have a big impact, even if they do more or less one thing. For
instance, Happier Lives Institute did a quick estimation of the
cost-effectiveness of Guide Dogs UK, not because they wanted to pick on them,
but simply because they were one prominent charity that was easier to assess.
They estimate that Guide Dogs UK produces a WELLBY for ~$41,000 (i.e., ~2,200
less cost-effective than the average of the top 5 charities, see below). Even
though Guide dogs do have a huge impact on the lives of their beneficiaries,
training each guide dog costs around $200k [8], making it less cost-effective
than other charities that have the same impact for fewer costs.
The HLI did quick
cost-effectiveness analyses based on studies of housing (~$35,000 per WELLBY)
and cash (~$20,000 per WELLBY) interventions to aid the homeless. These came in
at ~2,000 less cost-effective than the top 5 charities, indicating it’s very,
very hard to help the homeless cost-effectively.
5)
Fund the best charities and centuplicate (or more) your impact at no extra
cost!
When the HLI compares the
top 5 charities in the sample to the average of the UK charities [9], le(not
including Guide Dogs), the top 5 are around 150 times better. The implication is that
donating €1,000 to a top charity can have the same impact as donating ~€150,000
to a more typical one. This means that a donation of €1,000 to a leading
charity can have the same impact as a donation of around €150,000 to a more
traditional charity.
The most cost-effective
charity in the analysis (Pure Earth) is around ~1,000 times
better (942
times to be precise) at increasing happiness than the least effective evaluated
charity (Football Beyond Borders).
But all the charities in
their sample had chosen to be evaluated by researchers, so they are probably
much better than average. When compared to the average of our quick analyses of
Guide Dogs and helping the homeless, the best charity is ~3,500
times better
than these popular destinations for our charitable euros.
Does
this mean I have to give? The philosopher Dr. Michael Plant, Happier Lives
Institute Director and main contributor to this chapter, addresses these
questions and more about charitable giving:
·
Do I have to
give? You may not be obligated to give, but you
should, if you can. However, if you do decide to give, many have the intuition
that we should make a bigger, rather than smaller, difference.
·
Will giving make me
happier? Yes [10]. Indeed, in the opening
chapter of the world happiness report, they estimate that people who donate tend
to get more benefit than performing other benevolent acts such as helping
strangers or volunteering. But if you’re not sure if giving will make you
happier, you can always try it out!
·
I already give to
charity – is it wrong for me to switch to something that would help more? No, not if the point is to help others. But if it makes it easier,
consider giving to both the best charities and the ones
closest to your heart.
·
How much should I
give? The largest amount that you can
sustain.
At Mieux Donner, we promote the 10% pledge, where individuals commit to giving 10% of their income to high-impact charities.
We invite people in a variety of situations to consider taking this commitment.
While we understand it may not be for everyone, 1% could be a good starting
point. If you’re still unsure about pledging, you can try a trial pledge of 1%
for a limited period of time.
See the full chapter [11] for more advice.
6) You can do a lot of good, maybe more than you imagined.
Most people [12] think the
best charity to help the global poor is around 1.5x as good as the typical
charity.
Based on the evidence presented,
the difference between the best and the rest of charities is much, much larger
(coarsely illustrated below). We (Mieux Donner) have published an article showing similar
evidence on other areas.
Before this recent
innovation to evaluate charities in terms of wellbeing – using a standardised,
scientific approach, that really captures what matters – it was very hard to
compare charities, or know how much impact you were having. Before this report,
there wasn’t much hard evidence of how big the differences in charity impact
were, per euro or per dollar.
But these developments, and what we’ve found, gives us heart. The world
feels full of problems that we can do nothing about. But it turns out that we
can do something and feel confident we’re making a difference:
we can (now) capture charity’s impacts on happiness. What’s more, because
impact varies so much between charities, this means we can have a huge, and
vastly greater impact, at no extra cost to ourselves – simply by following the
evidence and supporting the best charities found so far.
As we write this, the world we thought we knew seems to be falling apart
around us. Even if our governments are taking their eye off the ball, we, the
citizens of the world, can still do our bit to help the people of the world.
Donating to excellent charities not only does a lot of good in itself, but it
is also a way of showing that many of us do care, and we are willing to put our
money where our mouths are to make the world a better place.
What You Can Do Today
Your donations have the power to transform lives. You’ve probably heard
this for years, maybe your whole life. We think the evidence supports this – IF
you choose wisely. By donating to the most effective charities, you can
centuplicate (100x – or more!) your impact without spending an additional euro.
What can you do? You can do a lot! Hopefully much more than you
imagined.
·
Donate to highly
impactful charities to
maximize the good you do.
·
Read the full chapter to learn more about the
research behind these comparisons.
·
Share this article with others! Spread the word! Tell a friend who you think might be interested
and share this on social media. When people find out there are large
differences between charities’ impact, they give more effectively! [14] Giving
to higher impact causes is a real way we can reach out and meaningfully improve
the world.
·
Stay informed by following the Happier
Lives Institute’s newsletter and Mieux Donner’s
newsletter.
And reach out, if you have any questions.
For
Media
If you work in the media,
check out the Happier Lives Institute’s press release [15]. Please share these findings
and get in touch. Mieux Donner’s team is also happy to answer your questions
and put you in contact with different experts.
For
researchers
The best may be yet to come.
We need much more research into wellbeing cost-effectiveness. Wellbeing cost-effectiveness
is an unusual area where barely any work has been done and it has huge, direct
practical implications. We hope researchers take up the challenge and use their
skills to make a difference.
For
policy makers
Use WELLBYs to design and
evaluate public programs that maximize societal wellbeing. For more, see this
recent research [16] from the London School of Economics.
For
foundations
Focus on funding
interventions with the greatest potential to transform lives. We offer personalised donation advice,
so get in touch if you’re after tailored research to increase your
impact.
This post is informed
by the work of the Happier Lives Institute, whose original pieces can be
found here and here.
A6 FROM CNN
World's
happiest countries 2025
The world’s happiest country
has managed to keep its No. 1 ranking for eight years running. The picture in
the United States isn’t so rosy.
While Finland once again
tops the World Happiness Report’s rankings, the United States — at No. 24 —
earned its lowest ranking yet in the 2025 report. The 13th edition
of the annual report marks the United Nations International Day of Happiness on
March 20.
In the United States and
parts of Europe, declining happiness and social trust have contributed
significantly to the rise of political polarization and votes against “the
system,” the report finds.
The picture in the United
States isn’t so rosy - but “in brighter news, global research shows that people
are much kinder than we expect.”
“People’s fellow citizens
are better than they think they are, and to realize that will make you happier,
of course, but it’ll also change the way you think about your neighbors,” said
John Helliwell, a founding editor of the World Happiness Report.
“And so you’re more inclined
to think of a stranger in the street as simply a friend you haven’t met and not
somebody who poses a threat to you,” said Helliwell, who is an economics
professor emeritus at the University of British Columbia.
There’s “room for
improvement,” Helliwell said, in believing that we’re all part of a larger
group that looks out for each other. It’s an important source of happiness that
we haven’t properly tapped, he said.
The report draws on Gallup
World Poll data from people in more than 140 countries. Countries are ranked on happiness
based on their average life evaluations over the three preceding years, in this
case 2022 to 2024. The report is a partnership of Gallup, the Oxford Wellbeing
Research Centre, the UN Sustainable Development Solutions Network and an
editorial board.
The survey asks each
participant to score their life as a whole and rankings are based on those life
evaluations. The report then looks at six key variables to help explain life
evaluations: GDP per capita, social support, healthy life expectancy, freedom,
generosity and perceptions of corruption.
ATTACHMENT
SEVEN – FROM GALLUP
THE
HAPPIEST COUNTRIES
When it comes to happiness,
the Nordic countries are clearly doing a lot of things right. For the eighth
year in a row, Finland is the world’s happiest country, with its neighbors
clustered close behind.
“Nordic countries like
Finland continue to benefit from universally available and high-quality health,
education and social support systems. Inequality of wellbeing is also low,”
said Ilana Ron-Levey, managing director at Gallup.
Finland, Denmark, Iceland
and Sweden – the top four – remain in the same order as 2024. And Norway is
again No. 7.
While social support systems
that look out for residents’ welfare are important to Finland’s No. 1 ranking,
the people play a role too, according to Helliwell.
“Having a welfare state
doesn’t find lost wallets and return them to the owners,” said Helliwell, a
longtime lost-wallet researcher, referring to data showing that Nordic nations
rank among the top places for the expected and actual return of lost wallets.
“Those are individuals caring about the people with whom they live.”
Other factors likely
contribute to Finland’s strong performance as well. Helliwell said some Finnish
experts point to the unity and trust that came out of the Winter War in
1939-40, also known as the Russo-Finnish War.
“They didn’t win that war,
but what they did is they came together and realized even against overwhelming
power they could do remarkably well … Sometimes the challenge posed externally
can bring you together.”
A less materialistic mindset
may also work in Finland’s favor, Helliwell said.
“And these days, to focus on
the personal rather than the material is of ever-increasing importance.”
Two Latin American countries
— Costa Rica at No. 6 and Mexico at No. 10 — both enter the top 10 for the
first time in the 2025 report.
Both countries’ residents
have “strong social networks and strong perceptions about the direction of
their economy and confidence in leaders and institutions,” Ron-Levey said.
The Netherlands (No. 5),
Israel (No. 8) and Luxembourg (No. 9) fill out the top 10.
Lowest
ranking yet for the United States
After dropping out of the
top 20 for the first time last year, the US ranks No. 24 in the latest World
Happiness Report.
“The decline in the U.S. in
2024 was at least partly attributable to Americans younger than age 30 feeling
worse about their lives,” said Ron-Levey. “Today’s young people report feeling
less supported by friends and family, less free to make life choices and less
optimistic about their living standards.”
Last year’s report paid special attention
to happiness among different age groups, highlighting declines among the young
in numerous countries.
The US isn’t the only
English-speaking country with happiness challenges. At No. 23, the United
Kingdom reported its lowest average life evaluation since 2017. Canada, which
has seen happiness declines over the last decade, remained in the top 20 at No.
18.
While the variables that
help explain life evaluations are complex, there is one “balm” that’s within
everyone’s reach, Helliwell said.
“Look seriously at the people
with whom you are working, with whom you are living, who are on your streets,
and put on a rosier set of glasses when you’re dealing with them. And that’ll
change your behavior in traffic. It’ll change your behavior in political
discussions. It’ll change everything,” Helliwell said.
Talking less and listening
more helps with attitude shifts that can lead to more cooperation.
“Negativity is poisonous to
happiness,” he said.
World’s
20 happiest countries in 2025:
1. Finland
2. Denmark
3.
Iceland
4. Sweden
5.
Netherlands
6.
Costa Rica
7.
Norway
8.
Israel
9.
Luxembourg
10.
Mexico
11. Australia
12. New Zealand
13. Switzerland
14. Belgium
15. Ireland
16. Lithuania
17. Austria
18. Canada
19. Slovenia
20. Czech Republic
AT
THE BOTTOM OF THE LIST...
Afghanistan (No. 147) is
once again last on the list. Sierra Leone (No. 146), Lebanon (No. 145), Malawi
(No. 144) and Zimbabwe (No. 143) make up the rest of the bottom five for
happiness.
A8 FROM WIKIPEDIA
Worldwide levels of happiness
as measured by the World Happiness Report (2024)
The World Happiness
Report is a
publication that contains articles and rankings of national happiness, based on respondent ratings of their own lives,[1] which the report also correlates with
various (quality of) life factors.[2]
Since 2024, the report has been published
by the Wellbeing Research Centre at the University of Oxford, in
partnership with Gallup, the UN Sustainable Development Solutions
Network, and an independent editorial
board.[3] The editorial board consists of the three founding editors, John F. Helliwell, Richard Layard, and Jeffrey D. Sachs, along with Jan-Emmanuel De Neve, Lara Aknin, and Shun Wang.[4]
The report primarily uses data from
the Gallup World Poll. As of
March 2025, Finland has been ranked the happiest country in the world for eight years in
a row.[5]
History
In July 2011, the United Nations General Assembly adopted resolution 65/309, also named as Happiness: Towards a
Holistic Definition of Development,[6] inviting member countries to measure the happiness of their people
and to use the data to help guide public policy.
The first World
Happiness Report was released on 1 April 2012, as a foundational text for the
UN High Level Meeting: Well-being and Happiness: Defining a New
Economic Paradigm,[7] drawing international attention.[8] On 2 April 2012, this was followed by
the first UN High Level Meeting called Wellbeing and Happiness:
Defining a New Economic Paradigm,[9] which was chaired by UN Secretary General Ban
Ki-moon, in
addition to that prime minister Jigme Thinley of Bhutan, a nation that adopted gross national
happiness instead of gross domestic product as their main development indicator.[10]
The first report
outlined the state of world happiness, causes of happiness and misery, and
policy implications highlighted by case studies. In 2013, the second World
Happiness Report was issued, and in 2015 the third. Since 2016, it has been
issued on an annual basis on 20 March, to coincide with the UN's International
Day of Happiness.[11]
Methods and
philosophy
The rankings of national happiness are
based on a happiness measurement survey undertaken world-wide by the polling company Gallup, Inc. Nationally representative samples of respondents are asked to think of a
ladder, with the best possible life for them being a 10, and the worst possible
life being a 0. They are then asked to rate their own current lives on that 0
to 10 scale.[12] The report correlates the life evaluation results with various life
factors.[2]
Researchers use the
reports' life factor variables to explain national-level differences in life
evaluation. However, some variables, such as unemployment or inequality, are
not considered. That is because comparable data is not yet available across all
countries. The reports' variables only show correlation, not causation
(see Correlation does not imply causation).[12]
The report measures
subjective well-being using the "Cantril ladder" to reflect people’s
own views, rather than external judgments. The goal is to free respondents to
evaluate their own well-being.[13][14]
The report shows how experts use well-being
ratings to assess national progress. The experts are from fields
including economics, psychology, survey analysis, and national statistics. Each
report is organized by chapters that focus on issues relating to happiness. This includes mental illness, the objective benefits of happiness, the
importance of ethics, policy implications, and links with the Organization for Economic
Co-operation and Development's (OECD)
approach to measuring subjective well-being and
other international and national efforts.
WELLBYs
From 2021, the World
Happiness Report has supported using WELLBYs (Well-Being-Adjusted Life-Years).
It says that QALYs (Quality-Adjusted Life Years) only count
a patient's health quality. Instead, WELLBYs should be used. The report says
policy-makers should aim to increase the WELLBYs of people alive today and
future generations.[15][16][17]
Annual report topics
The World Happiness
Report has been published every year since 2012 (except for 2014).
In addition to
ranking countries’ happiness and well-being levels, each report has
contributing authors and most focus on a particular theme. The data used to
rank countries in each report is drawn from the Gallup World Poll,[18] as well as other sources such as
the World Values Survey, in some of the reports. The Gallup World Poll
questionnaire[19] measures 14 areas within its core
questions: (1) business & economic, (2) citizen engagement, (3)
communications & technology, (4) diversity (social issues), (5) education
& families, (6) emotions (well-being), (7) environment & energy, (8)
food & shelter, (9) government and politics, (10) law & order (safety),
(11) health, (12) religion & ethics, (13) transportation, and (14) work.
Data is collected
from people in over 150 countries. Each variable measured reveals a
populated-weighted average score on a scale running from 0 to 10 that is
tracked over time and compared against other countries. These variables
currently include:
·
real GDP per capita
·
social support
·
healthy life expectancy
·
freedom to make life choices
·
perceptions of corruption
Each country is also
compared against a hypothetical nation called Dystopia. Dystopia represents the lowest national
averages for each key variable and is, along with residual error, used as a
regression benchmark. The six metrics are used to explain the estimated extent
to which each of these factors contribute to increasing life satisfaction when
compared to the hypothetical nation of Dystopia, but they themselves do not
have an effect on the total score reported for each country.[52]
2025 report
The 2025 report features the happiness
score averaged over the years 2022–2024.[53]
Critics have pointed out the difference
between evaluations and experiences of well-being.[63][64] For instance Colombia came 37th in the 2018 World Happiness Report rankings but first by
daily emotional experience in Gallup's Positive Experience Index.[65] The inconsistencies in the results of different happiness measurement
surveys have also been noted, for instance, a Pew survey of 43 countries in 2014 (which excluded most of Europe) had Mexico,
Israel, and Venezuela finishing first, second and third.[66] Others point out that the variables of interest used by the World
Happiness Report are more appropriate for measuring national-level rather than
individual-level happiness.[67]
Methodology
The World Happiness
Report's use of a single-item indicator of subjective well-being is
fundamentally different from more traditional Index approaches which use a
range of indicators such as the United Nations' Human Development Index, the OECD Better Life Index of 2011, or the Social Progress Index of 2013. There has also been an ongoing debate
regarding single-item and multi-item scales as measures of life satisfaction.[68]
The idea that
subjective well-being can be captured by a survey has also been contested by
economists, who have identified that people’s assessments of their happiness
can be affected by how, for example, their country’s education system grades
exams, and that survey questions on subjective well-being are affected by
response styles.[69]
Legitimacy
In 2014, British journalist Michael Booth questioned
the legitimacy of the Nordic countries' freedom and
happiness rankings in his book The Almost Nearly Perfect People. In it, he criticizes Denmark's environmental footprint and
notes that the taxes and personal debt levels among its citizens are the
highest in the world.[70] He also writes that in Finland, the most common type of prescription medications in the country are antipsychotic. He also points out the country's high alcohol consumption, murder, and
suicide rates.[71] Further, he argues that he doesn't think the Danes were the world's
happiest people, but instead described them as the "most satisfied".[72]
ATTACHMENT
TEN – from reuters
Finland clings to happiness crown as economic gloom
deepens
By Anne Kauranen
November
25, 2025 11:34 AM EST
SUMMARY
·
Finland is world's happiest country for
eighth year, report says
·
But unemployment among the worst in Europe,
economy stagnating
·
Government is now pruning some parts of the
welfare state
·
Collaborative spirit and resilience help,
says report founder
HELSINKI, Nov 25 (Reuters) -
Harsh economic headwinds are sending a chill through the world's happiest
country. But after 1,000 days of unemployment, 33-year-old Juho-Pekka Palomaa
hasn't let Finland's problems get him down just yet.
Finland is
grappling with economic
stagnation, rising joblessness and strained public finances, but still
managed to secure the title of world's happiest country for the eighth year in
a row in this year's annual World
Happiness Report.
Its success, experts say, is
due in no small part to a generous welfare state - but that is now being trimmed
back as
ministers confront the surging social costs of an aging population.
"I've been grateful
that in Finland there has been a safety net and social security that have
supported me financially ... So maybe I'm not more unhappy than I was
before," said Palomaa, who marked his 1,000 days of unemployment with a
bring-your-own-food protest on the steps of parliament.
"But I don't feel there
is very much I can do to change my situation," said the former video
producer, who has submitted countless job applications and completed 11
unsuccessful interviews.
While unemployment benefits
have been cut, the government has left untouched "almost sacred"
pensions, he complained.
NOKIA
COLLAPSE, RUSSIA SANCTIONS
Finland's export-dependent economy
has struggled since the phone business of Nokia, once Europe's most valuable
company, collapsed in 2014 after it fumbled the switch to touch-screen
smartphones. Sanctions on neighbouring
Russia over its war in Ukraine have also hit exports and
tourism, while uncertainty over tariffs and global trade present a further
challenge.
The Bank of
Finland is forecasting economic growth of 0.3% this year, down from 0.4% in
2024. Unemployment is
among the worst in the European Union, and rose to its highest in at least
15 years at 10.3% in October, data from Statistics Finland showed on Tuesday.
The rate was more than twice as high - at 22.4% - among 15 to 24-year-olds.
The European Commission is
expected to decide on Tuesday whether to propose placing Finland in what it calls
an "Excessive Deficit Procedure", after it forecast Finland will have
a budget deficit above the 3% EU limit for the next three years.
See: Statistics Finland / Reuters –
Anne Kauranen, November 12, 2025 for charts and graphs
Finland's general government
budgets have been deficitary every year since the global financial crisis in
2009. Last year's deficit at 4.4% was the second biggest in 25 years, falling
short of only the 2020 deficit of 5.5% amid the Covid pandemic.
Poor public finances have
already prompted the government to start pruning some parts of the welfare
state, including unemployment and housing benefits and some medical facilities.
"I'm honestly terrified
for younger people," said Hanna Taimio, 54, another unemployed Finn who
joined Palomaa's commemoration and fears she may never work again. "All
these cutbacks and downgrades... it's genuinely frightening."
The right-wing coalition
government, in office since 2023, aims to "to strengthen public finances
and to bring the growing debt under control", Minister of Employment
Matias Marttinen told Reuters.
Marttinen called the high
jobless rate "an awful situation", but defended the government's
decision to make dismissals easier to lower the risks of hiring for companies,
to ultimately boost employment.
Some critics argue, however,
that austerity measures have exacerbated economic challenges and consumer
pessimism.
Lauri Holappa, director of the
Finnish Centre for New Economic Analysis, pointed to simulations suggesting the
fiscal consolidation measures could have even led to an increased public debt
rate.
Finland's
finance ministry forecasts the Finnish public debt ratio to reach 90% of gross
domestic product by 2030, after it has more than doubled in the past 15 years.
FINNS'
HAPPINESS HOLDS FIRM
But there is more to
happiness than economics.
The life evaluations that
people report in the happiness survey are determined more by factors like resilience
and the ability to "deal collaboratively and constructively in bad
times" than by national economic conditions, said the report's founding
editor, emeritus professor John Helliwell.
"Of course, Finland is
very high in resilience," he said.
Recent data by analytics
company Gallup shows no significant fluctuations in Finns' reported emotional
wellbeing since last year. Data from the same survey on life evaluations will
be published with the next World Happiness Report next year.
The Happiness Report also
takes into account key indicators such as GDP per capita, social support and
healthy life expectancy.
Reeling from the financial
hit from his long jobless spell, Palomaa has looked to a free community sauna
run and funded by volunteers by the Baltic Sea shore in Helsinki.
"The sauna is a place
where everyone's so equal ... You cannot say based on someone's appearance what
they do for a living, who they are," he said.
When he asked social media
followers what to do on his 1,000th day of unemployment, he got a million views
and a flood of suggestions - including the bring-your-own-food party he held on
the steps of parliament.
"I'm here obviously to
celebrate something that I never wanted to celebrate," he said as he
shared his home-made pastries in the misty rain.
But "I decided that
this is my moment," he said. "I got to seize the moment and do
something about it."
Reporting by Anne Kauranen
in Helsinki; Additional reporting by Ilze Filks in Stockholm; Editing by
Catherine Evans and Conor Humphries
A10 FROM CIA FACTBOOK
ATTACHMENT TEN –
FROM the CIA FACTBOOK
ATTACHMENT TEN “A”
– NATIONS RANKED by AREA
|
Rank |
Country |
sq km |
|
|
1 |
17,098,242 |
||
|
2 |
14,200,000 |
||
|
3 |
9,984,670 |
||
|
4 |
9,833,517 |
||
|
5 |
9,596,960 |
||
|
6 |
8,515,770 |
||
|
7 |
7,741,220 |
||
|
8 |
3,287,263 |
||
|
9 |
2,780,400 |
||
|
10 |
2,724,900 |
||
|
11 |
2,381,740 |
||
|
12 |
2,344,858 |
||
|
13 |
2,166,086 |
||
|
14 |
2,149,690 |
||
|
15 |
1,964,375 |
||
|
16 |
1,904,569 |
||
|
17 |
1,861,484 |
||
|
18 |
1,759,540 |
||
|
19 |
1,648,195 |
||
|
20 |
1,564,116 |
||
|
21 |
1,285,216 |
||
|
22 |
1,284,000 |
||
|
23 |
1,267,000 |
||
|
24 |
1,246,700 |
||
|
25 |
1,240,192 |
||
|
26 |
1,219,090 |
||
|
27 |
1,138,910 |
||
|
28 |
1,104,300 |
||
|
29 |
1,098,581 |
||
|
30 |
1,030,700 |
||
|
31 |
1,001,450 |
||
|
32 |
947,300 |
||
|
33 |
923,768 |
||
|
34 |
912,050 |
||
|
35 |
824,292 |
||
|
36 |
799,380 |
||
|
37 |
796,095 |
||
|
38 |
783,562 |
||
|
39 |
756,102 |
||
|
40 |
752,618 |
||
|
41 |
716,550 |
||
|
42 |
676,578 |
||
|
43 |
652,230 |
||
|
44 |
644,329 |
||
|
45 |
643,801 |
||
|
46 |
637,657 |
||
|
47 |
622,984 |
||
|
48 |
603,550 |
||
|
49 |
587,041 |
||
|
50 |
581,730 |
||
|
51 |
580,367 |
||
|
52 |
527,968 |
||
|
53 |
513,120 |
||
|
54 |
505,370 |
||
|
55 |
488,100 |
||
|
56 |
475,440 |
||
|
57 |
462,840 |
||
|
58 |
450,295 |
||
|
59 |
447,400 |
||
|
60 |
438,317 |
||
|
61 |
406,752 |
||
|
62 |
390,757 |
||
|
63 |
377,915 |
||
|
64 |
357,022 |
||
|
65 |
342,000 |
||
|
66 |
338,145 |
||
|
67 |
331,210 |
||
|
68 |
329,847 |
||
|
69 |
323,802 |
||
|
70 |
322,463 |
||
|
71 |
312,685 |
||
|
72 |
309,500 |
||
|
73 |
301,340 |
||
|
74 |
300,000 |
||
|
75 |
283,561 |
||
|
76 |
274,200 |
||
|
77 |
268,838 |
||
|
78 |
267,667 |
||
|
79 |
245,857 |
||
|
80 |
243,610 |
||
|
81 |
241,038 |
||
|
82 |
238,533 |
||
|
83 |
238,391 |
||
|
84 |
236,800 |
||
|
85 |
214,969 |
||
|
86 |
207,600 |
||
|
87 |
199,951 |
||
|
88 |
196,722 |
||
|
89 |
187,437 |
||
|
90 |
181,035 |
||
|
91 |
176,215 |
||
|
92 |
163,820 |
||
|
93 |
163,610 |
||
|
94 |
148,460 |
||
|
95 |
147,181 |
||
|
96 |
144,100 |
||
|
97 |
131,957 |
||
|
98 |
130,370 |
||
|
99 |
120,538 |
||
|
100 |
118,484 |
||
|
101 |
117,600 |
||
|
102 |
112,622 |
||
|
103 |
112,090 |
||
|
104 |
111,369 |
||
|
105 |
110,879 |
||
|
106 |
110,860 |
||
|
107 |
108,889 |
||
|
108 |
103,000 |
||
|
109 |
99,720 |
||
|
110 |
93,028 |
||
|
111 |
92,090 |
||
|
112 |
89,342 |
||
|
113 |
86,600 |
||
|
114 |
83,871 |
||
|
115 |
83,600 |
||
|
116 |
78,867 |
||
|
117 |
77,474 |
||
|
118 |
75,420 |
||
|
119 |
71,740 |
||
|
120 |
70,273 |
||
|
121 |
69,700 |
||
|
122 |
65,610 |
||
|
123 |
65,300 |
||
|
124 |
64,589 |
||
|
125 |
62,045 |
||
|
126 |
56,785 |
||
|
127 |
56,594 |
||
|
128 |
51,197 |
||
|
129 |
51,100 |
||
|
130 |
49,035 |
||
|
131 |
48,670 |
||
|
132 |
45,228 |
||
|
133 |
43,094 |
||
|
134 |
41,543 |
||
|
135 |
41,277 |
||
|
136 |
38,394 |
||
|
137 |
36,125 |
||
|
138 |
35,980 |
||
|
139 |
33,851 |
||
|
140 |
30,528 |
||
|
141 |
30,355 |
||
|
142 |
29,743 |
||
|
143 |
28,896 |
||
|
144 |
28,748 |
||
|
145 |
28,051 |
||
|
146 |
27,830 |
||
|
147 |
27,750 |
||
|
148 |
26,338 |
||
|
149 |
25,713 |
||
|
150 |
23,200 |
||
|
151 |
22,966 |
||
|
152 |
21,937 |
||
|
153 |
21,041 |
||
|
154 |
20,273 |
||
|
155 |
18,575 |
||
|
156 |
18,274 |
||
|
157 |
17,818 |
||
|
158 |
17,364 |
||
|
159 |
14,874 |
||
|
160 |
13,880 |
||
|
161 |
13,812 |
||
|
162 |
12,189 |
||
|
163 |
12,173 |
||
|
164 |
11,586 |
||
|
165 |
11,300 |
||
|
166 |
10,991 |
||
|
167 |
10,887 |
||
|
168 |
10,400 |
||
|
169 |
9,251 |
||
|
170 |
9,104 |
||
|
171 |
5,860 |
||
|
172 |
5,765 |
||
|
173 |
5,128 |
||
|
174 |
4,167 |
||
|
175 |
4,033 |
||
|
176 |
3,903 |
||
|
177 |
2,831 |
||
|
178 |
2,586 |
||
|
179 |
2,235 |
||
|
180 |
2,040 |
||
|
181 |
1,910 |
||
|
182 |
1,393 |
||
|
183 |
1,108 |
||
|
184 |
964 |
||
|
185 |
948 |
||
|
186 |
811 |
||
|
187 |
760 |
||
|
188 |
751 |
||
|
189 |
747 |
||
|
190 |
719 |
||
|
191 |
702 |
||
|
192 |
616 |
||
|
193 |
572 |
||
|
194 |
544 |
||
|
195 |
468 |
||
|
196 |
464 |
||
|
197 |
459 |
||
|
198 |
455 |
||
|
199 |
444 |
||
|
200 |
443 |
||
|
201 |
430 |
||
|
202 |
412 |
||
|
203 |
394 |
||
|
204 |
389 |
||
|
205 |
377 |
||
|
206 |
360 |
||
|
207 |
344 |
||
|
208 |
316 |
||
|
209 |
298 |
||
|
210 |
264 |
||
|
211 |
261 |
||
|
212 |
260 |
||
|
213 |
254 |
||
|
214 |
242 |
||
|
215 |
236 |
||
|
216 |
224 |
||
|
217 |
181 |
||
|
218 |
180 |
||
|
219 |
160 |
||
|
220 |
151 |
||
|
221 |
142 |
||
|
222 |
135 |
||
|
223 |
116 |
||
|
224 |
102 |
||
|
225 |
91 |
||
|
226 |
78 |
||
|
227 |
61 |
||
|
228 |
60 |
||
|
229 |
54 |
||
|
230 |
50 |
||
|
231 |
49 |
||
|
232 |
47 |
||
|
233 |
36 |
||
|
234 |
34 |
||
|
235 |
28 |
||
|
236 |
26 |
||
|
237 |
25 |
||
|
238 |
21 |
||
|
239 |
14 |
||
|
240 |
12 |
||
|
241 |
8 |
||
|
242 |
7 |
||
|
243 |
7 |
||
|
244 |
6 |
||
|
245 |
5 |
||
|
246 |
5 |
||
|
247 |
5 |
||
|
248 |
3 |
||
|
249 |
2 |
||
|
250 |
0 |
ATTACHMENT TEN “B” – by POPULATION
|
Rank |
Country |
Population |
Date
of Information |
|
1 |
1,416,043,270 |
2024 est. |
|
|
2 |
1,409,128,296 |
2024 est. |
|
|
3 |
341,963,408 |
2024 est. |
|
|
4 |
281,562,465 |
2024 est. |
|
|
5 |
252,363,571 |
2024 est. |
|
|
6 |
236,747,130 |
2024 est. |
|
|
7 |
220,051,512 |
2024 est. |
|
|
8 |
168,697,184 |
2024 est. |
|
|
9 |
140,820,810 |
2024 est. |
|
|
10 |
130,739,927 |
2024 est. |
|
|
11 |
123,201,945 |
2024 est. |
|
|
12 |
118,550,298 |
2024 est. |
|
|
13 |
118,277,063 |
2024 est. |
|
|
14 |
115,403,027 |
2024 est. |
|
|
15 |
111,247,248 |
2024 est. |
|
|
16 |
105,758,975 |
2024 est. |
|
|
17 |
88,386,937 |
2024 est. |
|
|
18 |
84,119,531 |
2024 est. |
|
|
19 |
84,119,100 |
2024 est. |
|
|
20 |
69,920,998 |
2024 est. |
|
|
21 |
68,459,055 |
2024 est. |
|
|
22 |
68,374,591 |
2024 est. |
|
|
23 |
67,462,121 |
2024 est. |
|
|
24 |
60,964,931 |
2024 est. |
|
|
25 |
60,442,647 |
2024 est. |
|
|
26 |
58,246,378 |
2024 est. |
|
|
27 |
57,527,139 |
2024 est. |
|
|
28 |
52,081,799 |
2024 est. |
|
|
29 |
50,467,278 |
2024 est. |
|
|
30 |
49,588,357 |
2024 est. |
|
|
31 |
49,283,041 |
2024 est. |
|
|
32 |
47,280,433 |
2024 est. |
|
|
33 |
47,022,473 |
2024 est. |
|
|
34 |
46,994,384 |
2024 est. |
|
|
35 |
42,083,436 |
2024 est. |
|
|
36 |
40,121,552 |
2024 est. |
|
|
37 |
38,794,813 |
2024 est. |
|
|
38 |
38,746,310 |
2024 est. |
|
|
39 |
37,387,585 |
2024 est. |
|
|
40 |
37,202,061 |
2024 est. |
|
|
41 |
36,544,431 |
2024 est. |
|
|
42 |
36,520,593 |
2024 est. |
|
|
43 |
35,661,826 |
2024 est. |
|
|
44 |
34,589,092 |
2024 est. |
|
|
45 |
34,564,810 |
2024 est. |
|
|
46 |
33,350,954 |
2024 est. |
|
|
47 |
32,600,249 |
2024 est. |
|
|
48 |
32,140,443 |
2024 est. |
|
|
49 |
31,250,306 |
2024 est. |
|
|
50 |
31,122,387 |
2024 est. |
|
|
51 |
30,966,105 |
2024 est. |
|
|
52 |
29,981,758 |
2024 est. |
|
|
53 |
29,452,714 |
2024 est. |
|
|
54 |
26,768,598 |
2024 est. |
|
|
55 |
26,342,784 |
2024 est. |
|
|
56 |
26,298,666 |
2024 est. |
|
|
57 |
23,865,423 |
2024 est. |
|
|
58 |
23,595,274 |
2024 est. |
|
|
59 |
23,042,199 |
2024 est. |
|
|
60 |
21,990,607 |
2024 est. |
|
|
61 |
21,982,608 |
2024 est. |
|
|
62 |
21,763,309 |
2024 est. |
|
|
63 |
20,799,116 |
2024 est. |
|
|
64 |
20,260,006 |
2024 est. |
|
|
65 |
19,093,595 |
2024 est. |
|
|
66 |
18,847,519 |
2024 est. |
|
|
67 |
18,664,652 |
2024 est. |
|
|
68 |
18,309,984 |
2024 est. |
|
|
69 |
18,255,216 |
2024 est. |
|
|
70 |
18,148,155 |
2024 est. |
|
|
71 |
17,772,378 |
2024 est. |
|
|
72 |
17,150,352 |
2024 est. |
|
|
73 |
17,063,669 |
2024 est. |
|
|
74 |
14,697,052 |
2024 est. |
|
|
75 |
13,986,179 |
2024 est. |
|
|
76 |
13,623,302 |
2024 est. |
|
|
77 |
13,590,102 |
2024 est. |
|
|
78 |
13,017,273 |
2024 est. |
|
|
79 |
12,703,714 |
2024 est. |
|
|
80 |
12,311,974 |
2024 est. |
|
|
81 |
12,048,847 |
2024 est. |
|
|
82 |
11,977,634 |
2024 est. |
|
|
83 |
11,753,943 |
2024 est. |
|
|
84 |
11,174,024 |
2024 est. |
|
|
85 |
10,966,038 |
2024 est. |
|
|
86 |
10,837,890 |
2024 est. |
|
|
87 |
10,815,857 |
2024 est. |
|
|
88 |
10,650,239 |
2024 est. |
|
|
89 |
10,589,835 |
2024 est. |
|
|
90 |
10,461,091 |
2024 est. |
|
|
91 |
10,394,063 |
2024 est. |
|
|
92 |
10,207,177 |
2024 est. |
|
|
93 |
10,046,233 |
2024 est. |
|
|
94 |
10,032,213 |
2024 est. |
|
|
95 |
9,855,745 |
2024 est. |
|
|
96 |
9,529,188 |
2024 est. |
|
|
97 |
9,501,451 |
2024 est. |
|
|
98 |
9,402,617 |
2024 est. |
|
|
99 |
9,121,049 |
2024 est. |
|
|
100 |
8,967,982 |
2024 est. |
|
|
101 |
8,917,994 |
2024 est. |
|
|
102 |
8,860,574 |
2024 est. |
|
|
103 |
7,953,556 |
2024 est. |
|
|
104 |
7,522,549 |
2024 est. |
|
|
105 |
7,361,263 |
2024 est. |
|
|
106 |
7,297,821 |
2024 est. |
|
|
107 |
6,782,659 |
2024 est. |
|
|
108 |
6,676,948 |
2024 est. |
|
|
109 |
6,652,212 |
2024 est. |
|
|
110 |
6,628,702 |
2024 est. |
|
|
111 |
6,343,956 |
2024 est. |
|
|
112 |
6,172,101 |
2024 est. |
|
|
113 |
6,097,665 |
2024 est. |
|
|
114 |
6,028,459 |
2024 est. |
|
|
115 |
5,973,136 |
2024 est. |
|
|
116 |
5,744,151 |
2024 est. |
|
|
117 |
5,650,957 |
2024 est. |
|
|
118 |
5,626,414 |
2024 est. |
|
|
119 |
5,563,649 |
2024 est. |
|
|
120 |
5,509,733 |
2024 est. |
|
|
121 |
5,437,249 |
2024 est. |
|
|
122 |
5,364,482 |
2024 est. |
|
|
123 |
5,265,575 |
2024 est. |
|
|
124 |
5,233,461 |
2024 est. |
|
|
125 |
5,161,211 |
2024 est. |
|
|
126 |
4,900,961 |
2024 est. |
|
|
127 |
4,470,241 |
2024 est. |
|
|
128 |
4,328,040 |
2024 est. |
|
|
129 |
4,150,116 |
2024 est. |
|
|
130 |
3,901,992 |
2024 est. |
|
|
131 |
3,798,671 |
2024 est. |
|
|
132 |
3,599,528 |
2024 est. |
|
|
133 |
3,425,330 |
2024 est. |
|
|
134 |
3,281,676 |
2024 est. |
|
|
135 |
3,243,369 |
2024 est. |
|
|
136 |
3,138,355 |
2024 est. |
|
|
137 |
3,107,100 |
2024 est. |
|
|
138 |
3,019,450 |
2024 est. |
|
|
139 |
2,976,765 |
2024 est. |
|
|
140 |
2,823,713 |
2024 est. |
|
|
141 |
2,803,660 |
2024 est. |
|
|
142 |
2,628,186 |
2024 est. |
|
|
143 |
2,552,088 |
2024 est. |
|
|
144 |
2,523,327 |
2024 est. |
|
|
145 |
2,455,105 |
2024 est. |
|
|
146 |
2,450,668 |
2024 est. |
|
|
147 |
2,227,548 |
2024 est. |
|
|
148 |
2,141,643 |
2024 est. |
|
|
149 |
2,135,622 |
2024 est. |
|
|
150 |
2,132,325 |
2024 est. |
|
|
151 |
2,097,893 |
2024 est. |
|
|
152 |
1,977,093 |
2024 est. |
|
|
153 |
1,801,246 |
2024 est. |
|
|
154 |
1,795,834 |
2024 est. |
|
|
155 |
1,566,888 |
2024 est. |
|
|
156 |
1,506,909 |
2024 est. |
|
|
157 |
1,408,966 |
2024 est. |
|
|
158 |
1,320,525 |
2024 est. |
|
|
159 |
1,310,504 |
2024 est. |
|
|
160 |
1,193,791 |
2024 est. |
|
|
161 |
1,138,089 |
2024 est. |
|
|
162 |
994,974 |
2024 est. |
|
|
163 |
951,611 |
2024 est. |
|
|
164 |
900,141 |
2024 est. |
|
|
165 |
884,546 |
2024 est. |
|
|
166 |
794,099 |
2024 est. |
|
|
167 |
726,799 |
2024 est. |
|
|
168 |
671,254 |
2024 est. |
|
|
169 |
646,758 |
2024 est. |
|
|
170 |
644,426 |
2024 est. |
|
|
171 |
611,014 |
2024 est. |
|
|
172 |
599,849 |
2024 est. |
|
|
173 |
491,900 |
2024 est. |
|
|
174 |
469,730 |
2024 est. |
|
|
175 |
415,789 |
2024 est. |
|
|
176 |
410,862 |
2024 est. |
|
|
177 |
388,858 |
2024 est. |
|
|
178 |
364,036 |
2024 est. |
|
|
179 |
318,007 |
2024 est. |
|
|
180 |
304,167 |
2024 est. |
|
|
181 |
304,139 |
2024 est. |
|
|
182 |
303,540 |
2024 est. |
|
|
183 |
223,561 |
2024 est. |
|
|
184 |
208,853 |
2024 est. |
|
|
185 |
169,532 |
2024 est. |
|
|
186 |
168,038 |
2024 est. |
|
|
187 |
153,289 |
2024 est. |
|
|
188 |
125,063 |
2024 est. |
|
|
189 |
116,545 |
2024 est. |
|
|
190 |
114,621 |
2024 est. |
|
|
191 |
104,889 |
2024 est. |
|
|
192 |
104,377 |
2024 est. |
|
|
193 |
103,387 |
2024 est. |
|
|
194 |
102,634 |
2024 est. |
|
|
195 |
100,647 |
2024 est. |
|
|
196 |
99,603 |
2024 est. |
|
|
197 |
98,187 |
2024 est. |
|
|
198 |
92,269 |
2024 est. |
|
|
199 |
85,370 |
2024 est. |
|
|
200 |
82,011 |
2024 est. |
|
|
201 |
74,661 |
2024 est. |
|
|
202 |
72,800 |
2024 est. |
|
|
203 |
67,787 |
2024 est. |
|
|
204 |
66,653 |
2024 est. |
|
|
205 |
60,439 |
2024 est. |
|
|
206 |
57,751 |
2024 est. |
|
|
207 |
55,133 |
2024 est. |
|
|
208 |
52,933 |
2024 est. |
|
|
209 |
51,118 |
2024 est. |
|
|
210 |
46,215 |
2024 est. |
|
|
211 |
43,895 |
2024 est. |
|
|
212 |
40,272 |
2024 est. |
|
|
213 |
40,102 |
2024 est. |
|
|
214 |
35,095 |
2024 est. |
|
|
215 |
32,996 |
2024 est. |
|
|
216 |
31,813 |
2024 est. |
|
|
217 |
29,683 |
2024 est. |
|
|
218 |
21,864 |
2024 est. |
|
|
219 |
19,416 |
2024 est. |
|
|
220 |
15,964 |
2024 est. |
|
|
221 |
11,733 |
2024 est. |
|
|
222 |
9,892 |
2024 est. |
|
|
223 |
7,943 |
2024 est. |
|
|
224 |
7,761 |
2024 est. |
|
|
225 |
7,086 |
2024 est. |
|
|
226 |
5,468 |
2024 est. |
|
|
227 |
5,132 |
2024 est. |
|
|
228 |
3,142 |
2021 est. |
|
|
229 |
2,556 |
2025 est. |
|
|
230 |
2,453 |
2024 est. |
|
|
231 |
2,230 |
2024 est. |
|
|
232 |
1,815 |
2024 est. |
|
|
233 |
1,739 |
2021 est. |
|
|
234 |
1,692 |
2021 est. |
|
|
235 |
1,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
236 |
593 |
2021 est. |
|
|
237 |
50 |
2025 est. |
ATTACHMENT TEN “C” - POPULATION GROWTH RATE
|
Rank |
Country |
% |
Date
of Information |
|
1 |
4.65 |
2024 est. |
|
|
2 |
3.66 |
2024 est. |
|
|
3 |
3.33 |
2024 est. |
|
|
4 |
3.29 |
2024 est. |
|
|
5 |
3.23 |
2024 est. |
|
|
6 |
3.18 |
2024 est. |
|
|
7 |
3.11 |
2024 est. |
|
|
8 |
3.01 |
2024 est. |
|
|
9 |
2.9 |
2024 est. |
|
|
10 |
2.83 |
2024 est. |
|
|
11 |
2.81 |
2024 est. |
|
|
12 |
2.74 |
2024 est. |
|
|
13 |
2.72 |
2024 est. |
|
|
14 |
2.71 |
2024 est. |
|
|
15 |
2.55 |
2024 est. |
|
|
16 |
2.55 |
2024 est. |
|
|
17 |
2.54 |
2024 est. |
|
|
18 |
2.54 |
2024 est. |
|
|
19 |
2.52 |
2024 est. |
|
|
20 |
2.46 |
2024 est. |
|
|
21 |
2.41 |
2024 est. |
|
|
22 |
2.4 |
2024 est. |
|
|
23 |
2.38 |
2024 est. |
|
|
24 |
2.38 |
2024 est. |
|
|
25 |
2.37 |
2024 est. |
|
|
26 |
2.37 |
2024 est. |
|
|
27 |
2.34 |
2024 est. |
|
|
28 |
2.32 |
2024 est. |
|
|
29 |
2.32 |
2024 est. |
|
|
30 |
2.26 |
2024 est. |
|
|
31 |
2.22 |
2024 est. |
|
|
32 |
2.22 |
2024 est. |
|
|
33 |
2.18 |
2024 est. |
|
|
34 |
2.16 |
2024 est. |
|
|
35 |
2.15 |
2024 est. |
|
|
36 |
2.13 |
2024 est. |
|
|
37 |
2.07 |
2024 est. |
|
|
38 |
2.06 |
2024 est. |
|
|
39 |
2.04 |
2024 est. |
|
|
40 |
2.02 |
2024 est. |
|
|
41 |
1.99 |
2024 est. |
|
|
42 |
1.92 |
2024 est. |
|
|
43 |
1.92 |
2024 est. |
|
|
44 |
1.91 |
2024 est. |
|
|
45 |
1.89 |
2024 est. |
|
|
46 |
1.86 |
2024 est. |
|
|
47 |
1.82 |
2024 est. |
|
|
48 |
1.78 |
2024 est. |
|
|
49 |
1.77 |
2024 est. |
|
|
50 |
1.76 |
2024 est. |
|
|
51 |
1.75 |
2024 est. |
|
|
52 |
1.75 |
2024 est. |
|
|
53 |
1.74 |
2024 est. |
|
|
54 |
1.72 |
2024 est. |
|
|
55 |
1.68 |
2024 est. |
|
|
56 |
1.67 |
2024 est. |
|
|
57 |
1.65 |
2024 est. |
|
|
58 |
1.62 |
2024 est. |
|
|
59 |
1.58 |
2024 est. |
|
|
60 |
1.56 |
2024 est. |
|
|
61 |
1.55 |
2024 est. |
|
|
62 |
1.54 |
2024 est. |
|
|
63 |
1.52 |
2024 est. |
|
|
64 |
1.49 |
2024 est. |
|
|
65 |
1.49 |
2024 est. |
|
|
66 |
1.48 |
2024 est. |
|
|
67 |
1.47 |
2024 est. |
|
|
68 |
1.44 |
2024 est. |
|
|
69 |
1.43 |
2024 est. |
|
|
70 |
1.42 |
2024 est. |
|
|
71 |
1.4 |
2024 est. |
|
|
72 |
1.34 |
2024 est. |
|
|
73 |
1.3 |
2024 est. |
|
|
74 |
1.29 |
2024 est. |
|
|
75 |
1.26 |
2024 est. |
|
|
76 |
1.26 |
2024 est. |
|
|
77 |
1.23 |
2024 est. |
|
|
78 |
1.16 |
2024 est. |
|
|
79 |
1.15 |
2024 est. |
|
|
80 |
1.14 |
2024 est. |
|
|
81 |
1.13 |
2024 est. |
|
|
82 |
1.12 |
2024 est. |
|
|
83 |
1.11 |
2024 est. |
|
|
84 |
1.11 |
2014 est. |
|
|
85 |
1.1 |
2024 est. |
|
|
86 |
1.09 |
2024 est. |
|
|
87 |
1.08 |
2024 est. |
|
|
88 |
1.07 |
2024 est. |
|
|
89 |
1.07 |
2024 est. |
|
|
90 |
1.07 |
2024 est. |
|
|
91 |
1 |
2024 est. |
|
|
92 |
1 |
2024 est. |
|
|
93 |
0.99 |
2024 est. |
|
|
94 |
0.99 |
2024 est. |
|
|
95 |
0.95 |
2024 est. |
|
|
96 |
0.95 |
2024 est. |
|
|
97 |
0.95 |
2024 est. |
|
|
98 |
0.95 |
2024 est. |
|
|
99 |
0.94 |
2024 est. |
|
|
100 |
0.93 |
2024 est. |
|
|
101 |
0.92 |
2024 est. |
|
|
102 |
0.89 |
2024 est. |
|
|
103 |
0.89 |
2024 est. |
|
|
104 |
0.88 |
2024 est. |
|
|
105 |
0.87 |
2024 est. |
|
|
106 |
0.86 |
2024 est. |
|
|
107 |
0.85 |
2024 est. |
|
|
108 |
0.84 |
2024 est. |
|
|
109 |
0.82 |
2024 est. |
|
|
110 |
0.79 |
2024 est. |
|
|
111 |
0.79 |
2024 est. |
|
|
112 |
0.78 |
2024 est. |
|
|
113 |
0.78 |
2024 est. |
|
|
114 |
0.78 |
2024 est. |
|
|
115 |
0.76 |
2024 est. |
|
|
116 |
0.76 |
2024 est. |
|
|
117 |
0.75 |
2024 est. |
|
|
118 |
0.75 |
2021 est. |
|
|
119 |
0.74 |
2024 est. |
|
|
120 |
0.73 |
2024 est. |
|
|
121 |
0.72 |
2024 est. |
|
|
122 |
0.72 |
2024 est. |
|
|
123 |
0.71 |
2024 est. |
|
|
124 |
0.71 |
2024 est. |
|
|
125 |
0.71 |
2024 est. |
|
|
126 |
0.71 |
2024 est. |
|
|
127 |
0.7 |
2024 est. |
|
|
128 |
0.7 |
2024 est. |
|
|
129 |
0.69 |
2024 est. |
|
|
130 |
0.68 |
2024 est. |
|
|
131 |
0.67 |
2024 est. |
|
|
132 |
0.67 |
2024 est. |
|
|
133 |
0.66 |
2024 est. |
|
|
134 |
0.65 |
2024 est. |
|
|
135 |
0.63 |
2024 est. |
|
|
136 |
0.61 |
2024 est. |
|
|
137 |
0.61 |
2024 est. |
|
|
138 |
0.61 |
2024 est. |
|
|
139 |
0.61 |
2024 est. |
|
|
140 |
0.6 |
2024 est. |
|
|
141 |
0.59 |
2024 est. |
|
|
142 |
0.59 |
2024 est. |
|
|
143 |
0.58 |
2024 est. |
|
|
144 |
0.57 |
2024 est. |
|
|
145 |
0.56 |
2024 est. |
|
|
146 |
0.56 |
2024 est. |
|
|
147 |
0.56 |
2024 est. |
|
|
148 |
0.53 |
2024 est. |
|
|
149 |
0.51 |
2024 est. |
|
|
150 |
0.51 |
2024 est. |
|
|
151 |
0.48 |
2024 est. |
|
|
152 |
0.48 |
2024 est. |
|
|
153 |
0.45 |
2024 est. |
|
|
154 |
0.45 |
2024 est. |
|
|
155 |
0.44 |
2024 est. |
|
|
156 |
0.43 |
2024 est. |
|
|
157 |
0.4 |
2024 est. |
|
|
158 |
0.4 |
2024 est. |
|
|
159 |
0.39 |
2024 est. |
|
|
160 |
0.39 |
2024 est. |
|
|
161 |
0.39 |
2024 est. |
|
|
162 |
0.38 |
2024 est. |
|
|
163 |
0.34 |
2024 est. |
|
|
164 |
0.32 |
2024 est. |
|
|
165 |
0.3 |
2024 est. |
|
|
166 |
0.3 |
2024 est. |
|
|
167 |
0.3 |
2024 est. |
|
|
168 |
0.28 |
2024 est. |
|
|
169 |
0.27 |
2024 est. |
|
|
170 |
0.26 |
2024 est. |
|
|
171 |
0.26 |
2024 est. |
|
|
172 |
0.23 |
2024 est. |
|
|
173 |
0.23 |
2024 est. |
|
|
174 |
0.22 |
2024 est. |
|
|
175 |
0.21 |
2024 est. |
|
|
176 |
0.21 |
2024 est. |
|
|
177 |
0.2 |
2024 est. |
|
|
178 |
0.2 |
2024 est. |
|
|
179 |
0.17 |
2024 est. |
|
|
180 |
0.17 |
2024 est. |
|
|
181 |
0.16 |
2024 est. |
|
|
182 |
0.12 |
2024 est. |
|
|
183 |
0.12 |
2024 est. |
|
|
184 |
0.11 |
2024 est. |
|
|
185 |
0.1 |
2024 est. |
|
|
186 |
0.1 |
2024 est. |
|
|
187 |
0.1 |
2024 est. |
|
|
188 |
0.1 |
2024 est. |
|
|
189 |
0.07 |
2024 est. |
|
|
190 |
0.04 |
2024 est. |
|
|
191 |
0.03 |
2024 est. |
|
|
192 |
0.01 |
2014 est. |
|
|
193 |
0.01 |
2014 est. |
|
|
194 |
0 |
2014 est. |
|
|
195 |
0 |
2014 est. |
|
|
196 |
-0.01 |
2024 est. |
|
|
197 |
-0.01 |
2019 est. |
|
|
198 |
-0.03 |
2021 est. |
|
|
199 |
-0.03 |
2019 est. |
|
|
200 |
-0.05 |
2024 est. |
|
|
201 |
-0.08 |
2024 est. |
|
|
202 |
-0.08 |
2024 est. |
|
|
203 |
-0.1 |
2024 est. |
|
|
204 |
-0.11 |
2024 est. |
|
|
205 |
-0.12 |
2024 est. |
|
|
206 |
-0.12 |
2024 est. |
|
|
207 |
-0.14 |
2024 est. |
|
|
208 |
-0.15 |
2024 est. |
|
|
209 |
-0.17 |
2024 est. |
|
|
210 |
-0.2 |
2024 est. |
|
|
211 |
-0.25 |
2024 est. |
|
|
212 |
-0.28 |
2024 est. |
|
|
213 |
-0.34 |
2024 est. |
|
|
214 |
-0.34 |
2024 est. |
|
|
215 |
-0.35 |
2024 est. |
|
|
216 |
-0.42 |
2024 est. |
|
|
217 |
-0.42 |
2024 est. |
|
|
218 |
-0.43 |
2024 est. |
|
|
219 |
-0.44 |
2024 est. |
|
|
220 |
-0.46 |
2024 est. |
|
|
221 |
-0.49 |
2024 est. |
|
|
222 |
-0.5 |
2024 est. |
|
|
223 |
-0.54 |
2024 est. |
|
|
224 |
-0.58 |
2024 est. |
|
|
225 |
-0.61 |
2024 est. |
|
|
226 |
-0.66 |
2024 est. |
|
|
227 |
-0.73 |
2024 est. |
|
|
228 |
-0.76 |
2024 est. |
|
|
229 |
-0.94 |
2024 est. |
|
|
230 |
-1 |
2024 est. |
|
|
231 |
-1.05 |
2024 est. |
|
|
232 |
-1.14 |
2024 est. |
|
|
233 |
-1.2 |
2024 est. |
|
|
234 |
-1.21 |
2024 est. |
|
|
235 |
-1.54 |
2024 est. |
|
|
236 |
-2.24 |
2024 est. |
ATTACHMENT TEN “D” - LIFE EXPECTANCY
|
Rank |
Country |
years |
Date
of Information |
|
1 |
89.8 |
2024 est. |
|
|
2 |
86.7 |
2024 est. |
|
|
3 |
85.3 |
2024 est. |
|
|
4 |
85.2 |
2024 est. |
|
|
5 |
84.2 |
2024 est. |
|
|
6 |
84.2 |
2024 est. |
|
|
7 |
84 |
2024 est. |
|
|
8 |
84 |
2024 est. |
|
|
9 |
83.9 |
2024 est. |
|
|
10 |
83.8 |
2024 est. |
|
|
11 |
83.6 |
2024 est. |
|
|
12 |
83.6 |
2024 est. |
|
|
13 |
83.5 |
2024 est. |
|
|
14 |
83.4 |
2024 est. |
|
|
15 |
83.4 |
2024 est. |
|
|
16 |
83.1 |
2024 est. |
|
|
17 |
83 |
2024 est. |
|
|
18 |
83 |
2024 est. |
|
|
19 |
83 |
2024 est. |
|
|
20 |
83 |
2024 est. |
|
|
21 |
82.9 |
2024 est. |
|
|
22 |
82.9 |
2024 est. |
|
|
23 |
82.9 |
2024 est. |
|
|
24 |
82.7 |
2024 est. |
|
|
25 |
82.6 |
2024 est. |
|
|
26 |
82.6 |
2024 est. |
|
|
27 |
82.5 |
2024 est. |
|
|
28 |
82.5 |
2024 est. |
|
|
29 |
82.5 |
2024 est. |
|
|
30 |
82.3 |
2024 est. |
|
|
31 |
82.2 |
2024 est. |
|
|
32 |
82.2 |
2024 est. |
|
|
33 |
82.2 |
2024 est. |
|
|
34 |
82.1 |
2024 est. |
|
|
35 |
82.1 |
2024 est. |
|
|
36 |
82 |
2024 est. |
|
|
37 |
81.9 |
2024 est. |
|
|
38 |
81.9 |
2024 est. |
|
|
39 |
81.9 |
2024 est. |
|
|
40 |
81.9 |
2024 est. |
|
|
41 |
81.8 |
2024 est. |
|
|
42 |
81.7 |
2024 est. |
|
|
43 |
81.6 |
2024 est. |
|
|
44 |
81.3 |
2024 est. |
|
|
45 |
81.1 |
2024 est. |
|
|
46 |
81 |
2024 est. |
|
|
47 |
81 |
2024 est. |
|
|
48 |
80.9 |
2024 est. |
|
|
49 |
80.9 |
2024 est. |
|
|
50 |
80.9 |
2024 est. |
|
|
51 |
80.7 |
2024 est. |
|
|
52 |
80.4 |
2024 est. |
|
|
53 |
80.3 |
2024 est. |
|
|
54 |
80.3 |
2024 est. |
|
|
55 |
80.3 |
2024 est. |
|
|
56 |
80.2 |
2024 est. |
|
|
57 |
80.1 |
2024 est. |
|
|
58 |
80.1 |
2024 est. |
|
|
59 |
79.9 |
2024 est. |
|
|
60 |
79.9 |
2024 est. |
|
|
61 |
79.9 |
2024 est. |
|
|
62 |
79.7 |
2024 est. |
|
|
63 |
79.6 |
2024 est. |
|
|
64 |
79.4 |
2024 est. |
|
|
65 |
79.3 |
2024 est. |
|
|
66 |
79.2 |
2024 est. |
|
|
67 |
79.2 |
2024 est. |
|
|
68 |
79 |
2024 est. |
|
|
69 |
78.9 |
2024 est. |
|
|
70 |
78.9 |
2024 est. |
|
|
71 |
78.9 |
2024 est. |
|
|
72 |
78.8 |
2024 est. |
|
|
73 |
78.8 |
2024 est. |
|
|
74 |
78.7 |
2024 est. |
|
|
75 |
78.7 |
2024 est. |
|
|
76 |
78.6 |
2024 est. |
|
|
77 |
78.5 |
2024 est. |
|
|
78 |
78.5 |
2024 est. |
|
|
79 |
78.4 |
2024 est. |
|
|
80 |
78.3 |
2024 est. |
|
|
81 |
78.2 |
2024 est. |
|
|
82 |
78.2 |
2024 est. |
|
|
83 |
78 |
2024 est. |
|
|
84 |
78 |
2024 est. |
|
|
85 |
77.9 |
2024 est. |
|
|
86 |
77.7 |
2024 est. |
|
|
87 |
77.7 |
2024 est. |
|
|
88 |
77.6 |
2024 est. |
|
|
89 |
77.6 |
2024 est. |
|
|
90 |
77.4 |
2024 est. |
|
|
91 |
77.4 |
2024 est. |
|
|
92 |
77.3 |
2024 est. |
|
|
93 |
77.3 |
2024 est. |
|
|
94 |
77.2 |
2024 est. |
|
|
95 |
77.2 |
2024 est. |
|
|
96 |
77.2 |
2024 est. |
|
|
97 |
77.2 |
2024 est. |
|
|
98 |
77.1 |
2024 est. |
|
|
99 |
76.9 |
2024 est. |
|
|
100 |
76.8 |
2024 est. |
|
|
101 |
76.7 |
2024 est. |
|
|
102 |
76.7 |
2024 est. |
|
|
103 |
76.7 |
2024 est. |
|
|
104 |
76.7 |
2024 est. |
|
|
105 |
76.6 |
2024 est. |
|
|
106 |
76.6 |
2024 est. |
|
|
107 |
76.5 |
2024 est. |
|
|
108 |
76.5 |
2024 est. |
|
|
109 |
76.5 |
2024 est. |
|
|
110 |
76.4 |
2024 est. |
|
|
111 |
76.3 |
2024 est. |
|
|
112 |
76.3 |
2024 est. |
|
|
113 |
76.3 |
2024 est. |
|
|
114 |
76.2 |
2024 est. |
|
|
115 |
76.1 |
2024 est. |
|
|
116 |
76.1 |
2024 est. |
|
|
117 |
76.1 |
2024 est. |
|
|
118 |
76.1 |
2024 est. |
|
|
119 |
76 |
2024 est. |
|
|
120 |
75.9 |
2024 est. |
|
|
121 |
75.9 |
2024 est. |
|
|
122 |
75.8 |
2024 est. |
|
|
123 |
75.7 |
2024 est. |
|
|
124 |
75.7 |
2024 est. |
|
|
125 |
75.6 |
2024 est. |
|
|
126 |
75.5 |
2024 est. |
|
|
127 |
75.4 |
2024 est. |
|
|
128 |
75.3 |
2024 est. |
|
|
129 |
75.2 |
2024 est. |
|
|
130 |
75.2 |
2024 est. |
|
|
131 |
75.2 |
2024 est. |
|
|
132 |
75 |
2024 est. |
|
|
133 |
75 |
2024 est. |
|
|
134 |
74.9 |
2024 est. |
|
|
135 |
74.9 |
2024 est. |
|
|
136 |
74.8 |
2024 est. |
|
|
137 |
74.8 |
2024 est. |
|
|
138 |
74.7 |
2024 est. |
|
|
139 |
74.7 |
2024 est. |
|
|
140 |
74.6 |
2024 est. |
|
|
141 |
74.5 |
2024 est. |
|
|
142 |
74.5 |
2024 est. |
|
|
143 |
74.3 |
2024 est. |
|
|
144 |
74.3 |
2024 est. |
|
|
145 |
74.2 |
2024 est. |
|
|
146 |
73.7 |
2024 est. |
|
|
147 |
73.7 |
2024 est. |
|
|
148 |
73.6 |
2024 est. |
|
|
149 |
73.5 |
2024 est. |
|
|
150 |
73.5 |
2024 est. |
|
|
151 |
73.3 |
2024 est. |
|
|
152 |
73.1 |
2024 est. |
|
|
153 |
73.1 |
2024 est. |
|
|
154 |
73 |
2024 est. |
|
|
155 |
73 |
2024 est. |
|
|
156 |
72.9 |
2024 est. |
|
|
157 |
72.9 |
2024 est. |
|
|
158 |
72.8 |
2024 est. |
|
|
159 |
72.7 |
2024 est. |
|
|
160 |
72.6 |
2024 est. |
|
|
161 |
72.5 |
2024 est. |
|
|
162 |
72.4 |
2024 est. |
|
|
163 |
72.4 |
2024 est. |
|
|
164 |
72.3 |
2024 est. |
|
|
165 |
72.1 |
2024 est. |
|
|
166 |
71.9 |
2024 est. |
|
|
167 |
71.9 |
2024 est. |
|
|
168 |
71.9 |
2024 est. |
|
|
169 |
71.4 |
2024 est. |
|
|
170 |
70.8 |
2024 est. |
|
|
171 |
70.8 |
2024 est. |
|
|
172 |
70.6 |
2024 est. |
|
|
173 |
70.5 |
2024 est. |
|
|
174 |
70.5 |
2024 est. |
|
|
175 |
70.4 |
2024 est. |
|
|
176 |
70.4 |
2024 est. |
|
|
177 |
70.3 |
2024 est. |
|
|
178 |
70.3 |
2024 est. |
|
|
179 |
70.1 |
2024 est. |
|
|
180 |
70.1 |
2024 est. |
|
|
181 |
70.1 |
2024 est. |
|
|
182 |
69.7 |
2024 est. |
|
|
183 |
69 |
2024 est. |
|
|
184 |
69 |
2024 est. |
|
|
185 |
68.9 |
2024 est. |
|
|
186 |
68.8 |
2024 est. |
|
|
187 |
68.6 |
2024 est. |
|
|
188 |
68.5 |
2024 est. |
|
|
189 |
68.4 |
2024 est. |
|
|
190 |
68.2 |
2024 est. |
|
|
191 |
68.2 |
2024 est. |
|
|
192 |
68.1 |
2024 est. |
|
|
193 |
67.8 |
2024 est. |
|
|
194 |
67.8 |
2024 est. |
|
|
195 |
67.7 |
2024 est. |
|
|
196 |
67.7 |
2024 est. |
|
|
197 |
67.5 |
2024 est. |
|
|
198 |
67.2 |
2024 est. |
|
|
199 |
66.9 |
2024 est. |
|
|
200 |
66.6 |
2024 est. |
|
|
201 |
66.4 |
2024 est. |
|
|
202 |
65.9 |
2024 est. |
|
|
203 |
65.9 |
2024 est. |
|
|
204 |
65.9 |
2024 est. |
|
|
205 |
65.6 |
2024 est. |
|
|
206 |
64.6 |
2024 est. |
|
|
207 |
64.5 |
2024 est. |
|
|
208 |
64.2 |
2024 est. |
|
|
209 |
64.2 |
2024 est. |
|
|
210 |
63.9 |
2024 est. |
|
|
211 |
63.2 |
2024 est. |
|
|
212 |
63.2 |
2024 est. |
|
|
213 |
63 |
2024 est. |
|
|
214 |
62.9 |
2024 est. |
|
|
215 |
62.6 |
2024 est. |
|
|
216 |
62.2 |
2024 est. |
|
|
217 |
61.6 |
2024 est. |
|
|
218 |
60.9 |
2024 est. |
|
|
219 |
60.7 |
2024 est. |
|
|
220 |
60.3 |
2024 est. |
|
|
221 |
60.2 |
2024 est. |
|
|
222 |
60 |
2024 est. |
|
|
223 |
59.4 |
2024 est. |
|
|
224 |
58.3 |
2024 est. |
|
|
225 |
56.5 |
2024 est. |
|
|
226 |
56.4 |
2024 est. |
|
|
227 |
54.4 |
2024 est. |
AI overview:
The projected U.S. life expectancy for 2025 is about 78.4 years, with male life expectancy estimated at 75.8 years
and female life expectancy at 81.1 years. This figure represents a continued
rebound from the COVID-19 pandemic, with Hawaii projected to have the highest
life expectancy at 80.7 years, while Mississippi is expected to have the lowest
at 71.9 years.
·
National
Average: The national average
life expectancy is projected to be approximately 78.4 years.
·
Gender:
o
Male: Projected to be 75.8 years.
o
Female: Projected to be 81.1 years.
·
State
Variations: There is a significant
difference in life expectancy between states.
o
Highest: Hawaii is projected to have the highest life
expectancy at 80.7 years.
o
Lowest: Mississippi is projected to have the lowest
life expectancy at 71.9 years.
·
Trends: The 2025 projection continues a rebound from a
decline in life expectancy during the COVID-19 pandemic. Factors contributing
to the rebound include decreased mortality from COVID-19, heart disease, and
unintentional injuries.
https://worldpopulationreview.com › state-rankings › lif...
States with the ...
Alarming
Stagnation In U.S. Life Expectancy Continues
https://www.forbes.com › Innovation › Healthcare
Over the next 25
years, U.S. life expectancy is projected to rise by only two years, to 80·4. The U.S. will fall from 49th to 66th globally ...
US Life Expectancy Is Rebounding |
Population Health
https://jamanetwork.com › JAMA
by L Schneider · 2025 — The overall average life expectancy rose by almost a year between 2022 and 2023,
from 77.5 years to 78.4 years. During this period, male life ...
https://ysph.yale.edu ›
news-article › study-reveals-star...
Apr 29, 2025 — A sweeping new study led by researchers at the
Yale School of Public Health (YSPH) reveals striking disparities in life expectancy across US states and the ...
AI Overview
In 2025, Monaco's life expectancy is the highest in the world, with an
average of approximately 86.5 to 86.6 years. This figure varies
slightly by source, with a more detailed breakdown showing 89.7 years for both sexes, 85.8 years for men, and 93.8 years for women. This is attributed to high-quality healthcare and a
healthy Mediterranean lifestyle.
·
Average
life expectancy: Around 86.5 to 86.6
years, though one source provides a figure of 89.7 years.
·
Male
life expectancy: Approximately 85.8
years.
·
Female
life expectancy: Approximately 93.8
years.
·
Factors
contributing to high life expectancy: Excellent state-funded healthcare, high GDP per capita allowing
access to top-tier medical care, and a healthy Mediterranean diet rich in olive
oil, seafood, and vegetables.
A Breathtaking Coastal European
Country Has The Highest ...
https://www.islands.com ›
Destinations › Europe
Jun 21, 2025 — Monaco surpasses all other countries with
an average
life expectancy of 86.6 years, according to
2024 United Nations data. Put simply, having ...
AI Overview
Afghanistan's life expectancy for 2025 is estimated to be
around 66.53 years, which is a slight increase from the previous
year. While some sources provide a single estimate, others show
variations, with one source listing 66.5 years and another around 68.1
years.
·
Estimated
2025 life expectancy: Approximately 66.53
years.
·
Comparison
to 2024: This represents a
0.43% increase from the 2024 estimate.
·
Other
estimates: Other sources
provide slightly different figures for 2025, such as 66.5 or 68.1 years.
@to
att. 1
Afghanistan life expectancy rising as healthcare improves, survey shows
This article is more than 14 years old
Better access to healthcare in last decade has resulted
in Afghans living longer and the infant mortality rate being cut
Supported by
Associated Press
Wed 30 Nov 2011 10.15 EST
Share
Afghans are living longer, fewer infants are dying
and more women are surviving childbirth because healthcare has dramatically
improved around the country in the past decade, according to a national survey.
It indicates that increased access to healthcare,
more hospitals, clinics and doctors have significantly contributed to an
overall improvement in the health of most Afghans.
"There have been many changes in the health
sector and that is why we have so many positive changes," said Bashir
Noormal, director general of the Afghan Public Health Institute.
Conducted by the Afghan health ministry in 2010, the
survey was sponsored and funded by international organisations such as Unicef,
the World Health Organisation, the US government and the British Department for
International Development. It was the most comprehensive to date in Afghanistan, despite the exclusion of some rural
areas in the south where international forces are fighting insurgents.
It showed that estimated life expectancy is up to
between 62 and 64 years for both men and women. That compares with previous
studies showing life expectancy from 47 to 50 – the latter figure reported by
the WHO in 2009.
The survey also showed infant mortality had been cut
in half in recent years, down to 97 deaths per 1,000 live births. It said one
in 10 children in Afghanistan dies before they are five years old while
previous surveys, carried out about five years ago, showed that one child in
five died before reaching that age. The 2009 WHO study reported 199 deaths per
1,000 live births.
Women are also far more likely to survive pregnancy
today. The survey indicated that the number of women who die from pregnancy
related causes has dropped to one in every 50. Afghan women on average have
just over five children, it said.
Still, one Afghan women dies about every two hours
from pregnancy-related causes and while childhood mortality is decreasing, it
remains the highest in the region. "We still have a very long way to
go," said the Afghan public health minister, Suraya Dalil.
Recent improvements are visible at Kabul's Malalai
Maternity hospital, the oldest and biggest in the capital, where Dr Hafeeza
Amar Khail, the facility's medical director, said the hospital was "seeing
decreasing mortality every year – last year, the year before and the year
before that" and attributed the improvements to constant training.
"We now update doctors, midwives and all the
staff of this hospital," she said. "We also have a midwife clinic and
supply midwives to the provinces."
In 2003, there were just 450 health facilities in
Afghanistan, including hospitals, according to the health ministry. Now, there
are more than 1,800. The number of midwives has risen from 400 in 2003 to more
than 2,000 in 2010, including many trained by organisations such as Save
the Children.
"These encouraging results show that even in the
most challenging and difficult environments, dramatic improvements in child
mortality can be achieved," said David Skinner, country director for Save
the Children.
Since 2003, about 20,000 community health workers
have been trained nationwide by various groups and organisations. "As a
result of this, and other community-level activities, fewer children are dying
from preventable causes like diarrhoea or pneumonia," Skinner said.
The study, however, revealed significant gaps between
rural and urban areas and showed that wealth and education play a key role in
the level of healthcare Afghans receive.
The Afghan government, experts and sponsors say it
also shows that development aid to Afghanistan in the health sector has worked,
despite obstacles, bureaucracy and endemic corruption.
They argue that aid must not be reduced as the
international community gradually trims the funds it provides the government as
it starts drawing down the 130,000 troops currently in the country.
"International aid, which has funded many of the
public health programmes in Afghanistan, has made a real difference, saving
many children's lives," Skinner said. "Donor governments need to
build on this success and continue to invest in Afghanistan in ways that
directly benefit ordinary Afghans."
The World Bank said last week that Afghanistan will
need billions of dollars in aid for a decade or more, especially if it hopes to
fund services such as health. The health ministry receives the majority of its
funding from foreign donors, with the biggest being the US, World Bank and
European Union.
The World Bank said Afghanistan this year received
$15.7bn (Ł10bn) in aid, representing more than 90% of its public spending.
The study surveyed 225,351 households and 47,848
women from ages 12 to 49. Survey organisers acknowledge that although it
covered 87% of the country – 98% of the urban population and 84% of the rural
one – the survey had data collection problems.
Because of security reasons, it did not include rural
areas of three major southern provinces, Kandahar, Helmand and Zabul, which
have seen some of the most intense fighting between insurgents and Afghan and
Nato troops
@get data – in or out
ATTACHMENT TEN “E” - NET MIGRATION RATE
|
Rank |
Country |
migrant(s)/1,000
population |
Date
of Information |
|
1 |
36.5 |
2024 est. |
|
|
2 |
19.1 |
2024 est. |
|
|
3 |
13.2 |
2024 est. |
|
|
4 |
12.9 |
2024 est. |
|
|
5 |
12.1 |
2024 est. |
|
|
6 |
12.1 |
2024 est. |
|
|
7 |
11.7 |
2024 est. |
|
|
8 |
10.8 |
2024 est. |
|
|
9 |
10.3 |
2024 est. |
|
|
10 |
8.3 |
2024 est. |
|
|
11 |
8 |
2024 est. |
|
|
12 |
6.7 |
2024 est. |
|
|
13 |
6.3 |
2024 est. |
|
|
14 |
5.9 |
2024 est. |
|
|
15 |
5.9 |
2024 est. |
|
|
16 |
5.7 |
2024 est. |
|
|
17 |
5.6 |
2024 est. |
|
|
18 |
5.6 |
2024 est. |
|
|
19 |
5.3 |
2024 est. |
|
|
20 |
4.7 |
2024 est. |
|
|
21 |
4.4 |
2024 est. |
|
|
22 |
4.3 |
2024 est. |
|
|
23 |
4.2 |
2024 est. |
|
|
24 |
4.2 |
2024 est. |
|
|
25 |
4.1 |
2024 est. |
|
|
26 |
4 |
2024 est. |
|
|
27 |
4 |
2024 est. |
|
|
28 |
3.9 |
2024 est. |
|
|
29 |
3.8 |
2024 est. |
|
|
30 |
3.6 |
2024 est. |
|
|
31 |
3.5 |
2024 est. |
|
|
32 |
3.5 |
2024 est. |
|
|
33 |
3.4 |
2024 est. |
|
|
34 |
3.2 |
2024 est. |
|
|
35 |
3.1 |
2024 est. |
|
|
36 |
3 |
2024 est. |
|
|
37 |
3 |
2024 est. |
|
|
38 |
3 |
2024 est. |
|
|
39 |
2.9 |
2024 est. |
|
|
40 |
2.7 |
2024 est. |
|
|
41 |
2.7 |
2024 est. |
|
|
42 |
2.7 |
2024 est. |
|
|
43 |
2.6 |
2024 est. |
|
|
44 |
2.5 |
2024 est. |
|
|
45 |
2.5 |
2024 est. |
|
|
46 |
2.5 |
2024 est. |
|
|
47 |
2.2 |
2024 est. |
|
|
48 |
2.1 |
2024 est. |
|
|
49 |
2 |
2024 est. |
|
|
50 |
2 |
2024 est. |
|
|
51 |
1.9 |
2024 est. |
|
|
52 |
1.9 |
2024 est. |
|
|
53 |
1.8 |
2024 est. |
|
|
54 |
1.6 |
2024 est. |
|
|
55 |
1.6 |
2024 est. |
|
|
56 |
1.5 |
2024 est. |
|
|
57 |
1.5 |
2024 est. |
|
|
58 |
1.5 |
2024 est. |
|
|
59 |
1.4 |
2024 est. |
|
|
60 |
1.4 |
2024 est. |
|
|
61 |
1.2 |
2024 est. |
|
|
62 |
1.1 |
2024 est. |
|
|
63 |
1.1 |
2024 est. |
|
|
64 |
1.1 |
2024 est. |
|
|
65 |
1.1 |
2024 est. |
|
|
66 |
1.1 |
2024 est. |
|
|
67 |
0.8 |
2024 est. |
|
|
68 |
0.8 |
2024 est. |
|
|
69 |
0.8 |
2024 est. |
|
|
70 |
0.7 |
2024 est. |
|
|
71 |
0.7 |
2024 est. |
|
|
72 |
0.4 |
2024 est. |
|
|
73 |
0.4 |
2024 est. |
|
|
74 |
0.3 |
2024 est. |
|
|
75 |
0.2 |
2024 est. |
|
|
76 |
0.1 |
2024 est. |
|
|
77 |
0.1 |
2024 est. |
|
|
78 |
0 |
2024 est. |
|
|
79 |
0 |
2024 est. |
|
|
80 |
0 |
2024 est. |
|
|
81 |
0 |
2024 est. |
|
|
82 |
0 |
2024 est. |
|
|
83 |
0 |
2024 est. |
|
|
84 |
0 |
2024 est. |
|
|
85 |
0 |
2024 est. |
|
|
86 |
0 |
2024 est. |
|
|
87 |
0 |
2024 est. |
|
|
88 |
0 |
2024 est. |
|
|
89 |
0 |
2024 est. |
|
|
90 |
0 |
2024 est. |
|
|
91 |
0 |
2024 est. |
|
|
92 |
0 |
2024 est. |
|
|
93 |
0 |
2024 est. |
|
|
94 |
0 |
2024 est. |
|
|
95 |
-0.1 |
2024 est. |
|
|
96 |
-0.1 |
2024 est. |
|
|
97 |
-0.1 |
2024 est. |
|
|
98 |
-0.1 |
2024 est. |
|
|
99 |
-0.1 |
2024 est. |
|
|
100 |
-0.1 |
2024 est. |
|
|
101 |
-0.1 |
2024 est. |
|
|
102 |
-0.2 |
2024 est. |
|
|
103 |
-0.2 |
2024 est. |
|
|
104 |
-0.2 |
2024 est. |
|
|
105 |
-0.2 |
2024 est. |
|
|
106 |
-0.2 |
2024 est. |
|
|
107 |
-0.2 |
2024 est. |
|
|
108 |
-0.2 |
2024 est. |
|
|
109 |
-0.2 |
2024 est. |
|
|
110 |
-0.2 |
2024 est. |
|
|
111 |
-0.3 |
2024 est. |
|
|
112 |
-0.3 |
2024 est. |
|
|
113 |
-0.3 |
2024 est. |
|
|
114 |
-0.3 |
2024 est. |
|
|
115 |
-0.3 |
2024 est. |
|
|
116 |
-0.3 |
2024 est. |
|
|
117 |
-0.4 |
2024 est. |
|
|
118 |
-0.4 |
2024 est. |
|
|
119 |
-0.4 |
2024 est. |
|
|
120 |
-0.4 |
2024 est. |
|
|
121 |
-0.5 |
2024 est. |
|
|
122 |
-0.5 |
2024 est. |
|
|
123 |
-0.6 |
2024 est. |
|
|
124 |
-0.6 |
2024 est. |
|
|
125 |
-0.6 |
2024 est. |
|
|
126 |
-0.6 |
2024 est. |
|
|
127 |
-0.6 |
2024 est. |
|
|
128 |
-0.6 |
2024 est. |
|
|
129 |
-0.6 |
2024 est. |
|
|
130 |
-0.66 |
2021 est. |
|
|
131 |
-0.7 |
2024 est. |
|
|
132 |
-0.7 |
2024 est. |
|
|
133 |
-0.7 |
2024 est. |
|
|
134 |
-0.7 |
2024 est. |
|
|
135 |
-0.7 |
2024 est. |
|
|
136 |
-0.7 |
2024 est. |
|
|
137 |
-0.7 |
2024 est. |
|
|
138 |
-0.8 |
2024 est. |
|
|
139 |
-0.8 |
2024 est. |
|
|
140 |
-0.9 |
2024 est. |
|
|
141 |
-0.9 |
2024 est. |
|
|
142 |
-0.9 |
2024 est. |
|
|
143 |
-1 |
2024 est. |
|
|
144 |
-1 |
2024 est. |
|
|
145 |
-1 |
2024 est. |
|
|
146 |
-1 |
2024 est. |
|
|
147 |
-1.1 |
2024 est. |
|
|
148 |
-1.1 |
2024 est. |
|
|
149 |
-1.1 |
2024 est. |
|
|
150 |
-1.1 |
2024 est. |
|
|
151 |
-1.2 |
2024 est. |
|
|
152 |
-1.3 |
2024 est. |
|
|
153 |
-1.3 |
2024 est. |
|
|
154 |
-1.3 |
2024 est. |
|
|
155 |
-1.4 |
2024 est. |
|
|
156 |
-1.5 |
2024 est. |
|
|
157 |
-1.5 |
2024 est. |
|
|
158 |
-1.5 |
2024 est. |
|
|
159 |
-1.6 |
2024 est. |
|
|
160 |
-1.6 |
2024 est. |
|
|
161 |
-1.6 |
2024 est. |
|
|
162 |
-1.7 |
2024 est. |
|
|
163 |
-1.7 |
2024 est. |
|
|
164 |
-1.7 |
2024 est. |
|
|
165 |
-1.7 |
2024 est. |
|
|
166 |
-1.8 |
2024 est. |
|
|
167 |
-2 |
2024 est. |
|
|
168 |
-2.1 |
2024 est. |
|
|
169 |
-2.1 |
2024 est. |
|
|
170 |
-2.2 |
2024 est. |
|
|
171 |
-2.2 |
2024 est. |
|
|
172 |
-2.5 |
2024 est. |
|
|
173 |
-2.6 |
2024 est. |
|
|
174 |
-2.7 |
2024 est. |
|
|
175 |
-2.7 |
2024 est. |
|
|
176 |
-2.8 |
2024 est. |
|
|
177 |
-2.9 |
2024 est. |
|
|
178 |
-2.9 |
2024 est. |
|
|
179 |
-3 |
2024 est. |
|
|
180 |
-3.1 |
2024 est. |
|
|
181 |
-3.1 |
2024 est. |
|
|
182 |
-3.1 |
2024 est. |
|
|
183 |
-3.1 |
2024 est. |
|
|
184 |
-3.2 |
2024 est. |
|
|
185 |
-3.2 |
2024 est. |
|
|
186 |
-3.2 |
2024 est. |
|
|
187 |
-3.3 |
2024 est. |
|
|
188 |
-3.5 |
2024 est. |
|
|
189 |
-3.6 |
2024 est. |
|
|
190 |
-3.7 |
2024 est. |
|
|
191 |
-3.8 |
2024 est. |
|
|
192 |
-3.8 |
2024 est. |
|
|
193 |
-3.8 |
2024 est. |
|
|
194 |
-3.84 |
2021 est. |
|
|
195 |
-4.1 |
2024 est. |
|
|
196 |
-4.2 |
2024 est. |
|
|
197 |
-4.3 |
2024 est. |
|
|
198 |
-4.4 |
2024 est. |
|
|
199 |
-4.5 |
2024 est. |
|
|
200 |
-4.8 |
2024 est. |
|
|
201 |
-4.9 |
2024 est. |
|
|
202 |
-4.9 |
2024 est. |
|
|
203 |
-5 |
2024 est. |
|
|
204 |
-5.2 |
2024 est. |
|
|
205 |
-5.3 |
2024 est. |
|
|
206 |
-5.5 |
2024 est. |
|
|
207 |
-5.57 |
2021 est. |
|
|
208 |
-5.8 |
2024 est. |
|
|
209 |
-6 |
2024 est. |
|
|
210 |
-6.2 |
2024 est. |
|
|
211 |
-6.2 |
2024 est. |
|
|
212 |
-6.3 |
2024 est. |
|
|
213 |
-6.5 |
2024 est. |
|
|
214 |
-6.6 |
2024 est. |
|
|
215 |
-6.8 |
2024 est. |
|
|
216 |
-6.9 |
2024 est. |
|
|
217 |
-7.1 |
2024 est. |
|
|
218 |
-7.3 |
2024 est. |
|
|
219 |
-7.7 |
2024 est. |
|
|
220 |
-8.7 |
2024 est. |
|
|
221 |
-9.6 |
2024 est. |
|
|
222 |
-9.8 |
2024 est. |
|
|
223 |
-10.9 |
2024 est. |
|
|
224 |
-10.9 |
2024 est. |
|
|
225 |
-12.8 |
2024 est. |
|
|
226 |
-13.4 |
2024 est. |
|
|
227 |
-18.1 |
2024 est. |
|
|
228 |
-21 |
2024 est. |
|
|
229 |
-24.8 |
2024 est. |
|
|
230 |
-25.1 |
2024 est. |
ATTACHMENT TEN “F” - REAL (Total) GDP RATE
|
Rank |
Country |
Date
of Information |
|
|
1 |
$33,598,000,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
2 |
$25,676,000,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
3 |
$14,244,000,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
4 |
$6,089,000,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
5 |
$5,715,000,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
6 |
$5,247,000,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
7 |
$4,165,000,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
8 |
$4,102,000,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
9 |
$3,732,000,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
10 |
$3,636,000,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
11 |
$3,133,000,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
12 |
$3,018,000,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
13 |
$2,883,000,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
14 |
$2,607,000,000,000 |
2023 est. |
|
|
15 |
$2,361,000,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
16 |
$2,341,000,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
17 |
$2,213,000,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
18 |
$1,958,000,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
19 |
$1,743,000,000,000 |
2023 est. |
|
|
20 |
$1,649,000,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
21 |
$1,635,000,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
22 |
$1,558,000,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
23 |
$1,486,000,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
24 |
$1,473,000,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
25 |
$1,456,000,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
26 |
$1,390,000,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
27 |
$1,318,000,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
28 |
$1,276,000,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
29 |
$1,213,000,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
30 |
$1,212,000,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
31 |
$1,202,000,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
32 |
$978,592,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
33 |
$870,420,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
34 |
$800,304,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
35 |
$774,376,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
36 |
$749,229,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
37 |
$745,994,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
38 |
$741,035,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
39 |
$739,385,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
40 |
$722,912,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
41 |
$668,628,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
42 |
$620,544,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
43 |
$596,556,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
44 |
$585,887,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
45 |
$581,131,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
46 |
$577,583,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
47 |
$535,911,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
48 |
$521,928,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
49 |
$507,680,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
50 |
$497,880,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
51 |
$472,177,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
52 |
$448,226,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
53 |
$440,558,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
54 |
$392,205,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
55 |
$389,207,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
56 |
$380,895,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
57 |
$379,989,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
58 |
$350,594,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
59 |
$328,632,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
60 |
$317,064,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
61 |
$313,591,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
62 |
$301,407,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
63 |
$287,559,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
64 |
$278,239,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
65 |
$276,884,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
66 |
$265,220,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
67 |
$257,117,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
68 |
$252,728,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
69 |
$246,706,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
70 |
$243,124,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
71 |
$232,673,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
72 |
$225,947,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
73 |
$225,198,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
74 |
$219,645,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
75 |
$218,762,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
76 |
$215,018,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
77 |
$193,591,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
78 |
$177,093,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
79 |
$164,825,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
80 |
$164,484,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
81 |
$164,367,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
82 |
$156,086,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
83 |
$149,643,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
84 |
$144,137,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
85 |
$143,264,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
86 |
$141,344,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
87 |
$138,371,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
88 |
$136,227,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
89 |
$134,555,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
90 |
$123,676,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
91 |
$122,200,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
92 |
$112,919,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
93 |
$110,943,000,000 |
2023 est. |
|
|
94 |
$109,986,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
95 |
$108,502,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
96 |
$103,118,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
97 |
$98,858,000,000 |
2023 est. |
|
|
98 |
$94,420,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
99 |
$93,937,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
100 |
$91,849,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
101 |
$90,609,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
102 |
$86,871,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
103 |
$83,183,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
104 |
$82,238,000,000 |
2023 est. |
|
|
105 |
$81,165,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
106 |
$79,207,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
107 |
$77,524,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
108 |
$73,961,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
109 |
$72,516,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
110 |
$71,297,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
111 |
$71,253,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
112 |
$66,905,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
113 |
$65,415,000,000 |
2023 est. |
|
|
114 |
$64,641,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
115 |
$60,909,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
116 |
$60,001,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
117 |
$59,439,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
118 |
$59,221,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
119 |
$58,423,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
120 |
$57,391,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
121 |
$57,001,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
122 |
$56,424,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
123 |
$52,989,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
124 |
$52,968,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
125 |
$52,895,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
126 |
$51,786,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
127 |
$51,360,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
128 |
$50,907,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
129 |
$50,370,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
130 |
$50,055,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
131 |
$48,045,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
132 |
$47,921,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
133 |
$46,543,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
134 |
$45,553,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
135 |
$45,487,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
136 |
$43,844,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
137 |
$43,362,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
138 |
$39,342,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
139 |
$39,147,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
140 |
$36,640,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
141 |
$35,425,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
142 |
$34,731,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
143 |
$34,406,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
144 |
$33,069,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
145 |
$32,971,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
146 |
$31,154,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
147 |
$29,248,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
148 |
$29,130,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
149 |
$27,115,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
150 |
$26,770,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
151 |
$26,728,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
152 |
$26,561,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
153 |
$25,019,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
154 |
$20,339,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
155 |
$20,339,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
156 |
$18,719,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
157 |
$17,375,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
158 |
$15,416,000,000 |
2023 est. |
|
|
159 |
$14,544,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
160 |
$13,100,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
161 |
$12,885,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
162 |
$12,325,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
163 |
$12,316,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
164 |
$11,739,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
165 |
$11,517,000,000 |
2023 est. |
|
|
166 |
$9,308,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
167 |
$8,924,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
168 |
$8,469,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
169 |
$8,365,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
170 |
$7,995,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
171 |
$7,172,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
172 |
$6,808,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
173 |
$6,752,000,000 |
2023 est. |
|
|
174 |
$6,166,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
175 |
$6,007,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
176 |
$5,926,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
177 |
$5,912,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
178 |
$5,863,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
179 |
$5,705,000,000 |
2023 est. |
|
|
180 |
$5,634,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
181 |
$5,569,000,000 |
2016 est. |
|
|
182 |
$5,538,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
183 |
$5,402,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
184 |
$5,200,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
185 |
$4,900,000,000 |
2022 est. |
|
|
186 |
$4,359,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
187 |
$4,350,000,000 |
2023 est. |
|
|
188 |
$4,312,000,000 |
2023 est. |
|
|
189 |
$4,040,000,000 |
2023 est. |
|
|
190 |
$3,834,000,000 |
2023 est. |
|
|
191 |
$3,549,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
192 |
$3,092,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
193 |
$2,772,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
194 |
$2,534,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
195 |
$2,393,000,000 |
2022 est. |
|
|
196 |
$2,080,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
197 |
$2,070,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
198 |
$1,986,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
199 |
$1,883,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
200 |
$1,634,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
201 |
$1,554,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
202 |
$1,503,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
203 |
$1,465,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
204 |
$1,291,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
205 |
$1,242,000,000 |
2016 est. |
|
|
206 |
$1,241,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
207 |
$1,039,000,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
208 |
$740,082,000 |
2023 est. |
|
|
209 |
$658,000,000 |
2016 est. |
|
|
210 |
$438,143,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
211 |
$432,679,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
212 |
$401,155,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
213 |
$362,499,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
214 |
$280,025,000 |
2023 est. |
|
|
215 |
$270,809,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
216 |
$261,300,000 |
2015 est. |
|
|
217 |
$150,581,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
218 |
$89,254,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
219 |
$57,055,000 |
2023 est. |
|
|
220 |
$18,700,000 |
2021 est. |
|
|
221 |
$7,711,583 |
2017 est. |
ATTACHMENT TEN “G” – GDP PER CAPITA
|
Rank |
Country |
Date
of Information |
|
|
1 |
$270,100 |
2024 est. |
|
|
2 |
$210,600 |
2024 est. |
|
|
3 |
$132,600 |
2024 est. |
|
|
4 |
$128,200 |
2024 est. |
|
|
5 |
$115,300 |
2024 est. |
|
|
6 |
$112,800 |
2024 est. |
|
|
7 |
$110,900 |
2024 est. |
|
|
8 |
$105,300 |
2024 est. |
|
|
9 |
$91,100 |
2024 est. |
|
|
10 |
$82,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
11 |
$79,200 |
2024 est. |
|
|
12 |
$78,100 |
2023 est. |
|
|
13 |
$75,500 |
2024 est. |
|
|
14 |
$73,700 |
2024 est. |
|
|
15 |
$71,000 |
2023 est. |
|
|
16 |
$70,900 |
2022 est. |
|
|
17 |
$70,900 |
2024 est. |
|
|
18 |
$70,800 |
2015 est. |
|
|
19 |
$70,400 |
2023 est. |
|
|
20 |
$70,300 |
2024 est. |
|
|
21 |
$68,600 |
2024 est. |
|
|
22 |
$66,200 |
2024 est. |
|
|
23 |
$65,900 |
2024 est. |
|
|
24 |
$65,600 |
2024 est. |
|
|
25 |
$63,300 |
2024 est. |
|
|
26 |
$63,300 |
2024 est. |
|
|
27 |
$63,100 |
2024 est. |
|
|
28 |
$62,800 |
2024 est. |
|
|
29 |
$62,700 |
2024 est. |
|
|
30 |
$60,500 |
2024 est. |
|
|
31 |
$60,100 |
2024 est. |
|
|
32 |
$59,100 |
2024 est. |
|
|
33 |
$56,700 |
2024 est. |
|
|
34 |
$55,600 |
2024 est. |
|
|
35 |
$54,500 |
2024 est. |
|
|
36 |
$53,300 |
2024 est. |
|
|
37 |
$53,100 |
2024 est. |
|
|
38 |
$52,500 |
2024 est. |
|
|
39 |
$50,400 |
2023 est. |
|
|
40 |
$48,500 |
2024 est. |
|
|
41 |
$48,400 |
2024 est. |
|
|
42 |
$48,200 |
2024 est. |
|
|
43 |
$48,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
44 |
$47,300 |
2024 est. |
|
|
45 |
$47,200 |
2024 est. |
|
|
46 |
$46,500 |
2022 est. |
|
|
47 |
$46,100 |
2024 est. |
|
|
48 |
$45,800 |
2024 est. |
|
|
49 |
$45,400 |
2024 est. |
|
|
50 |
$45,100 |
2024 est. |
|
|
51 |
$44,100 |
2024 est. |
|
|
52 |
$42,600 |
2024 est. |
|
|
53 |
$41,900 |
2024 est. |
|
|
54 |
$41,700 |
2024 est. |
|
|
55 |
$41,500 |
2024 est. |
|
|
56 |
$40,700 |
2024 est. |
|
|
57 |
$40,600 |
2024 est. |
|
|
58 |
$40,500 |
2024 est. |
|
|
59 |
$40,500 |
2023 est. |
|
|
60 |
$40,300 |
2024 est. |
|
|
61 |
$38,900 |
2024 est. |
|
|
62 |
$37,800 |
2024 est. |
|
|
63 |
$36,700 |
2024 est. |
|
|
64 |
$36,400 |
2024 est. |
|
|
65 |
$36,200 |
2024 est. |
|
|
66 |
$35,900 |
2024 est. |
|
|
67 |
$35,600 |
2016 est. |
|
|
68 |
$35,300 |
2024 est. |
|
|
69 |
$34,600 |
2024 est. |
|
|
70 |
$34,100 |
2024 est. |
|
|
71 |
$34,100 |
2024 est. |
|
|
72 |
$33,400 |
2024 est. |
|
|
73 |
$32,300 |
2023 est. |
|
|
74 |
$32,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
75 |
$31,700 |
2024 est. |
|
|
76 |
$31,300 |
2024 est. |
|
|
77 |
$31,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
78 |
$30,200 |
2024 est. |
|
|
79 |
$29,800 |
2024 est. |
|
|
80 |
$29,600 |
2024 est. |
|
|
81 |
$29,200 |
2024 est. |
|
|
82 |
$29,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
83 |
$27,900 |
2024 est. |
|
|
84 |
$27,700 |
2023 est. |
|
|
85 |
$27,300 |
2024 est. |
|
|
86 |
$27,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
87 |
$26,900 |
2024 est. |
|
|
88 |
$26,500 |
2024 est. |
|
|
89 |
$25,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
90 |
$24,500 |
2024 est. |
|
|
91 |
$24,300 |
2024 est. |
|
|
92 |
$24,200 |
2024 est. |
|
|
93 |
$23,800 |
2024 est. |
|
|
94 |
$23,700 |
2024 est. |
|
|
95 |
$23,400 |
2024 est. |
|
|
96 |
$23,300 |
2024 est. |
|
|
97 |
$22,100 |
2024 est. |
|
|
98 |
$22,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
99 |
$21,700 |
2024 est. |
|
|
100 |
$20,400 |
2024 est. |
|
|
101 |
$20,100 |
2024 est. |
|
|
102 |
$19,900 |
2024 est. |
|
|
103 |
$19,600 |
2024 est. |
|
|
104 |
$19,400 |
2024 est. |
|
|
105 |
$19,300 |
2024 est. |
|
|
106 |
$18,900 |
2024 est. |
|
|
107 |
$18,900 |
2024 est. |
|
|
108 |
$18,700 |
2024 est. |
|
|
109 |
$18,700 |
2024 est. |
|
|
110 |
$18,500 |
2024 est. |
|
|
111 |
$18,100 |
2024 est. |
|
|
112 |
$18,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
113 |
$17,700 |
2024 est. |
|
|
114 |
$16,800 |
2024 est. |
|
|
115 |
$16,800 |
2024 est. |
|
|
116 |
$16,500 |
2024 est. |
|
|
117 |
$16,400 |
2024 est. |
|
|
118 |
$16,300 |
2024 est. |
|
|
119 |
$16,300 |
2024 est. |
|
|
120 |
$16,200 |
2024 est. |
|
|
121 |
$15,800 |
2023 est. |
|
|
122 |
$15,700 |
2024 est. |
|
|
123 |
$15,500 |
2024 est. |
|
|
124 |
$15,400 |
2024 est. |
|
|
125 |
$14,600 |
2023 est. |
|
|
126 |
$14,500 |
2024 est. |
|
|
127 |
$14,400 |
2024 est. |
|
|
128 |
$14,100 |
2024 est. |
|
|
129 |
$13,900 |
2024 est. |
|
|
130 |
$13,800 |
2024 est. |
|
|
131 |
$13,600 |
2024 est. |
|
|
132 |
$13,300 |
2024 est. |
|
|
133 |
$12,700 |
2024 est. |
|
|
134 |
$12,700 |
2024 est. |
|
|
135 |
$12,600 |
2024 est. |
|
|
136 |
$12,600 |
2024 est. |
|
|
137 |
$12,300 |
2024 est. |
|
|
138 |
$11,700 |
2024 est. |
|
|
139 |
$11,300 |
2023 est. |
|
|
140 |
$11,100 |
2021 est. |
|
|
141 |
$10,500 |
2024 est. |
|
|
142 |
$10,400 |
2024 est. |
|
|
143 |
$10,400 |
2024 est. |
|
|
144 |
$10,300 |
2024 est. |
|
|
145 |
$10,300 |
2024 est. |
|
|
146 |
$9,900 |
2024 est. |
|
|
147 |
$9,800 |
2024 est. |
|
|
148 |
$9,800 |
2024 est. |
|
|
149 |
$9,500 |
2024 est. |
|
|
150 |
$9,100 |
2024 est. |
|
|
151 |
$8,600 |
2024 est. |
|
|
152 |
$8,500 |
2024 est. |
|
|
153 |
$7,700 |
2024 est. |
|
|
154 |
$7,300 |
2024 est. |
|
|
155 |
$7,200 |
2024 est. |
|
|
156 |
$7,100 |
2023 est. |
|
|
157 |
$7,100 |
2024 est. |
|
|
158 |
$7,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
159 |
$7,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
160 |
$6,900 |
2024 est. |
|
|
161 |
$6,800 |
2024 est. |
|
|
162 |
$6,700 |
2024 est. |
|
|
163 |
$6,600 |
2024 est. |
|
|
164 |
$6,400 |
2024 est. |
|
|
165 |
$6,200 |
2024 est. |
|
|
166 |
$6,004 |
2017 est. |
|
|
167 |
$5,800 |
2024 est. |
|
|
168 |
$5,800 |
2023 est. |
|
|
169 |
$5,700 |
2024 est. |
|
|
170 |
$5,500 |
2024 est. |
|
|
171 |
$5,500 |
2024 est. |
|
|
172 |
$5,300 |
2024 est. |
|
|
173 |
$5,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
174 |
$4,900 |
2024 est. |
|
|
175 |
$4,900 |
2023 est. |
|
|
176 |
$4,800 |
2024 est. |
|
|
177 |
$4,500 |
2024 est. |
|
|
178 |
$4,300 |
2024 est. |
|
|
179 |
$4,200 |
2023 est. |
|
|
180 |
$4,200 |
2024 est. |
|
|
181 |
$4,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
182 |
$3,900 |
2024 est. |
|
|
183 |
$3,800 |
2024 est. |
|
|
184 |
$3,800 |
2024 est. |
|
|
185 |
$3,800 |
2024 est. |
|
|
186 |
$3,700 |
2024 est. |
|
|
187 |
$3,700 |
2024 est. |
|
|
188 |
$3,600 |
2024 est. |
|
|
189 |
$3,500 |
2024 est. |
|
|
190 |
$3,300 |
2024 est. |
|
|
191 |
$3,300 |
2024 est. |
|
|
192 |
$3,200 |
2024 est. |
|
|
193 |
$3,100 |
2024 est. |
|
|
194 |
$3,000 |
2024 est. |
|
|
195 |
$2,900 |
2024 est. |
|
|
196 |
$2,900 |
2024 est. |
|
|
197 |
$2,900 |
2024 est. |
|
|
198 |
$2,800 |
2024 est. |
|
|
199 |
$2,800 |
2024 est. |
|
|
200 |
$2,700 |
2024 est. |
|
|
201 |
$2,600 |
2024 est. |
|
|
202 |
$2,600 |
2024 est. |
|
|
203 |
$2,500 |
2024 est. |
|
|
204 |
$2,500 |
2024 est. |
|
|
205 |
$2,000 |
2023 est. |
|
|
206 |
$1,900 |
2024 est. |
|
|
207 |
$1,800 |
2024 est. |
|
|
208 |
$1,700 |
2024 est. |
|
|
209 |
$1,700 |
2024 est. |
|
|
210 |
$1,600 |
2024 est. |
|
|
211 |
$1,500 |
2024 est. |
|
|
212 |
$1,500 |
2024 est. |
|
|
213 |
$1,400 |
2024 est. |
|
|
214 |
$1,100 |
2024 est. |
|
|
215 |
$800 |
2024 est. |
|
|
216 |
$700 |
2024 est. |
|
|
217 |
$600 |
2023 est. |
|
|
218 |
$400 |
2023 est. |
|
|
219 |
$200 |
2024 est. |
ATTACHMENT TEN “H” – UNEMPLOYMENT
Official or unofficial?
@Download Data
|
Rank |
Country |
% |
Date
of Information |
|
1 |
0.2 |
2024 est. |
|
|
2 |
0.3 |
2024 est. |
|
|
3 |
0.4 |
2024 est. |
|
|
4 |
0.7 |
2024 est. |
|
|
5 |
1 |
2024 est. |
|
|
6 |
1.1 |
2024 est. |
|
|
7 |
1.2 |
2024 est. |
|
|
8 |
1.3 |
2024 est. |
|
|
9 |
1.5 |
2024 est. |
|
|
10 |
1.5 |
2024 est. |
|
|
11 |
1.5 |
2024 est. |
|
|
12 |
1.6 |
2024 est. |
|
|
13 |
1.7 |
2024 est. |
|
|
14 |
1.8 |
2024 est. |
|
|
15 |
2 |
2024 est. |
|
|
16 |
2.2 |
2024 est. |
|
|
17 |
2.2 |
2024 est. |
|
|
18 |
2.2 |
2024 est. |
|
|
19 |
2.2 |
2024 est. |
|
|
20 |
2.3 |
2024 est. |
|
|
21 |
2.3 |
2024 est. |
|
|
22 |
2.5 |
2024 est. |
|
|
23 |
2.5 |
2024 est. |
|
|
24 |
2.6 |
2024 est. |
|
|
25 |
2.6 |
2024 est. |
|
|
26 |
2.6 |
2024 est. |
|
|
27 |
2.6 |
2024 est. |
|
|
28 |
2.7 |
2024 est. |
|
|
29 |
2.7 |
2024 est. |
|
|
30 |
2.8 |
2024 est. |
|
|
31 |
2.8 |
2024 est. |
|
|
32 |
2.8 |
2024 est. |
|
|
33 |
2.8 |
2024 est. |
|
|
34 |
2.9 |
2024 est. |
|
|
35 |
2.9 |
2024 est. |
|
|
36 |
2.9 |
2024 est. |
|
|
37 |
2.9 |
2024 est. |
|
|
38 |
3 |
2024 est. |
|
|
39 |
3 |
2024 est. |
|
|
40 |
3 |
2024 est. |
|
|
41 |
3.1 |
2024 est. |
|
|
42 |
3.1 |
2024 est. |
|
|
43 |
3.1 |
2024 est. |
|
|
44 |
3.1 |
2024 est. |
|
|
45 |
3.1 |
2024 est. |
|
|
46 |
3.2 |
2024 est. |
|
|
47 |
3.2 |
2024 est. |
|
|
48 |
3.2 |
2024 est. |
|
|
49 |
3.2 |
2024 est. |
|
|
50 |
3.2 |
2024 est. |
|
|
51 |
3.3 |
2024 est. |
|
|
52 |
3.3 |
2024 est. |
|
|
53 |
3.4 |
2024 est. |
|
|
54 |
3.4 |
2024 est. |
|
|
55 |
3.4 |
2024 est. |
|
|
56 |
3.4 |
2024 est. |
|
|
57 |
3.5 |
2024 est. |
|
|
58 |
3.6 |
2024 est. |
|
|
59 |
3.6 |
2024 est. |
|
|
60 |
3.6 |
2024 est. |
|
|
61 |
3.9 |
2024 est. |
|
|
62 |
3.9 |
2024 est. |
|
|
63 |
3.9 |
2024 est. |
|
|
64 |
4 |
2024 est. |
|
|
65 |
4.1 |
2024 est. |
|
|
66 |
4.2 |
2024 est. |
|
|
67 |
4.2 |
2024 est. |
|
|
68 |
4.2 |
2024 est. |
|
|
69 |
4.2 |
2024 est. |
|
|
70 |
4.3 |
2024 est. |
|
|
71 |
4.4 |
2024 est. |
|
|
72 |
4.4 |
2024 est. |
|
|
73 |
4.4 |
2024 est. |
|
|
74 |
4.5 |
2024 est. |
|
|
75 |
4.5 |
2024 est. |
|
|
76 |
4.6 |
2024 est. |
|
|
77 |
4.6 |
2024 est. |
|
|
78 |
4.6 |
2024 est. |
|
|
79 |
4.6 |
2024 est. |
|
|
80 |
4.6 |
2024 est. |
|
|
81 |
4.7 |
2024 est. |
|
|
82 |
4.7 |
2024 est. |
|
|
83 |
4.8 |
2024 est. |
|
|
84 |
4.8 |
2024 est. |
|
|
85 |
4.9 |
2024 est. |
|
|
86 |
4.9 |
2024 est. |
|
|
87 |
4.9 |
2024 est. |
|
|
88 |
5 |
2024 est. |
|
|
89 |
5.1 |
2024 est. |
|
|
90 |
5.1 |
2024 est. |
|
|
91 |
5.2 |
2024 est. |
|
|
92 |
5.2 |
2024 est. |
|
|
93 |
5.3 |
2024 est. |
|
|
94 |
5.3 |
2024 est. |
|
|
95 |
5.3 |
2024 est. |
|
|
96 |
5.4 |
2024 est. |
|
|
97 |
5.5 |
2024 est. |
|
|
98 |
5.5 |
2024 est. |
|
|
99 |
5.5 |
2024 est. |
|
|
100 |
5.5 |
2024 est. |
|
|
101 |
5.5 |
2024 est. |
|
|
102 |
5.5 |
2024 est. |
|
|
103 |
5.5 |
2024 est. |
|
|
104 |
5.5 |
2024 est. |
|
|
105 |
5.5 |
2024 est. |
|
|
106 |
5.6 |
2024 est. |
|
|
107 |
5.6 |
2024 est. |
|
|
108 |
5.6 |
2024 est. |
|
|
109 |
5.6 |
2024 est. |
|
|
110 |
5.7 |
2024 est. |
|
|
111 |
5.9 |
2024 est. |
|
|
112 |
6 |
2024 est. |
|
|
113 |
6 |
2024 est. |
|
|
114 |
6.1 |
2024 est. |
|
|
115 |
6.1 |
2024 est. |
|
|
116 |
6.3 |
2024 est. |
|
|
117 |
6.3 |
2024 est. |
|
|
118 |
6.4 |
2024 est. |
|
|
119 |
6.5 |
2024 est. |
|
|
120 |
6.5 |
2024 est. |
|
|
121 |
6.6 |
2024 est. |
|
|
122 |
6.8 |
2024 est. |
|
|
123 |
6.8 |
2024 est. |
|
|
124 |
7 |
2024 est. |
|
|
125 |
7.2 |
2024 est. |
|
|
126 |
7.4 |
2024 est. |
|
|
127 |
7.4 |
2024 est. |
|
|
128 |
7.4 |
2024 est. |
|
|
129 |
7.6 |
2024 est. |
|
|
130 |
7.6 |
2024 est. |
|
|
131 |
7.7 |
2024 est. |
|
|
132 |
7.9 |
2024 est. |
|
|
133 |
7.9 |
2024 est. |
|
|
134 |
7.9 |
2024 est. |
|
|
135 |
7.9 |
2024 est. |
|
|
136 |
8.3 |
2024 est. |
|
|
137 |
8.5 |
2024 est. |
|
|
138 |
8.5 |
2024 est. |
|
|
139 |
8.5 |
2024 est. |
|
|
140 |
8.6 |
2024 est. |
|
|
141 |
8.6 |
2024 est. |
|
|
142 |
9 |
2024 est. |
|
|
143 |
9.1 |
2024 est. |
|
|
144 |
9.2 |
2024 est. |
|
|
145 |
9.2 |
2024 est. |
|
|
146 |
9.7 |
2024 est. |
|
|
147 |
9.9 |
2021 est. |
|
|
148 |
10.2 |
2024 est. |
|
|
149 |
10.2 |
2024 est. |
|
|
150 |
10.3 |
2024 est. |
|
|
151 |
10.4 |
2024 est. |
|
|
152 |
10.8 |
2024 est. |
|
|
153 |
10.8 |
2024 est. |
|
|
154 |
11 |
2024 est. |
|
|
155 |
11.2 |
2024 est. |
|
|
156 |
11.4 |
2024 est. |
|
|
157 |
11.45 |
2023 est. |
|
|
158 |
11.5 |
2024 est. |
|
|
159 |
11.5 |
2024 est. |
|
|
160 |
11.6 |
2023 est. |
|
|
161 |
11.7 |
2024 est. |
|
|
162 |
11.8 |
2024 est. |
|
|
163 |
11.9 |
2024 est. |
|
|
164 |
12 |
2024 est. |
|
|
165 |
12.1 |
2024 est. |
|
|
166 |
12.5 |
2023 est. |
|
|
167 |
13 |
2024 est. |
|
|
168 |
13.3 |
2024 est. |
|
|
169 |
13.4 |
2024 est. |
|
|
170 |
13.5 |
2024 est. |
|
|
171 |
14.1 |
2024 est. |
|
|
172 |
14.5 |
2024 est. |
|
|
173 |
15.1 |
2024 est. |
|
|
174 |
15.6 |
2024 est. |
|
|
175 |
16.2 |
2024 est. |
|
|
176 |
16.3 |
2024 est. |
|
|
177 |
17.1 |
2024 est. |
|
|
178 |
18 |
2024 est. |
|
|
179 |
18.1 |
2024 est. |
|
|
180 |
18.7 |
2024 est. |
|
|
181 |
18.9 |
2024 est. |
|
|
182 |
19.2 |
2024 est. |
|
|
183 |
19.7 |
2024 est. |
|
|
184 |
20.1 |
2024 est. |
|
|
185 |
23.2 |
2024 est. |
|
|
186 |
24.5 |
2022 est. |
|
|
187 |
24.5 |
2022 est. |
|
|
188 |
25.9 |
2024 est. |
|
|
189 |
33.2 |
2024 est. |
|
|
190 |
34.4 |
2024 est. |
ATTACHMENT ELEVEN
EQUALITY (from GINI COEFFICIENT)
Measures the degree of inequality
in the distribution of family income in a country. The more nearly equal a
country's income distribution, the lower its Gini index. The more unequal a
country's income distribution, the higher its Gini Index.
|
Rank |
Country |
Date
of Information |
|
|
1 |
Namibia (Most unequal) |
59.1 |
2015 est. |
|
2 |
54.9 |
2015 est. |
|
|
3 |
54.6 |
2016 est. |
|
|
4 |
53.9 |
2023 est. |
|
|
5 |
51.6 |
2023 est. |
|
|
6 |
51.5 |
2022 est. |
|
|
7 |
51.3 |
2018 est. |
|
|
8 |
51.2 |
2016 est. |
|
|
9 |
50.3 |
2019 est. |
|
|
10 |
50.3 |
2020 est. |
|
|
11 |
49.4 |
2021 est. |
|
|
12 |
48.9 |
2023 est. |
|
|
13 |
46.8 |
2023 est. |
|
|
14 |
45.8 |
2016 est. |
|
|
15 |
45.8 |
2024 est. |
|
|
16 |
45.2 |
2023 est. |
|
|
17 |
44.9 |
2017 est. |
|
|
18 |
44.7 |
2020 est. |
|
|
19 |
44.6 |
2023 est. |
|
|
20 |
44.5 |
2022 est. |
|
|
21 |
44.4 |
2023 est. |
|
|
22 |
44 |
2016 est. |
|
|
23 |
43.8 |
2018 est. |
|
|
24 |
43.7 |
2016 est. |
|
|
25 |
43.5 |
2022 est. |
|
|
26 |
43.5 |
2016 est. |
|
|
27 |
43 |
2022 est. |
|
|
28 |
43 |
2021 est. |
|
|
29 |
42.7 |
2019 est. |
|
|
30 |
42.4 |
2015 est. |
|
|
31 |
42.4 |
2023 est. |
|
|
32 |
42.2 |
2021 est. |
|
|
33 |
42.1 |
2023 est. |
|
|
34 |
41.8 |
2023 est. |
|
|
35 |
41.6 |
2017 est. |
|
|
36 |
40.9 |
2023 est. |
|
|
37 |
40.7 |
2017 est. |
|
|
38 |
40.7 |
2021 est. |
|
|
39 |
40.7 |
2023 est. |
|
|
40 |
40.5 |
2018 est. |
|
|
41 |
39.9 |
2018 est. |
|
|
42 |
39.9 |
2021 est. |
|
|
43 |
39.8 |
2023 est. |
|
|
44 |
39.3 |
2023 est. |
|
|
45 |
39.2 |
2022 est. |
|
|
46 |
38.8 |
2018 est. |
|
|
47 |
38.8 |
2020 est. |
|
|
48 |
38.7 |
2021 est. |
|
|
49 |
38.5 |
2019 est. |
|
|
50 |
38.5 |
2022 est. |
|
|
51 |
38.4 |
2023 est. |
|
|
52 |
38.2 |
2022 est. |
|
|
53 |
38 |
2017 est. |
|
|
54 |
37.9 |
2021 est. |
|
|
55 |
37.9 |
2021 est. |
|
|
56 |
37.7 |
2019 est. |
|
|
57 |
37.5 |
2020 est. |
|
|
58 |
37.4 |
2022 est. |
|
|
59 |
37.4 |
2021 est. |
|
|
60 |
36.8 |
2017 est. |
|
|
61 |
36.6 |
2022 est. |
|
|
62 |
36.4 |
2023 est. |
|
|
63 |
36.4 |
2023 est. |
|
|
64 |
36.3 |
2022 est. |
|
|
65 |
36.2 |
2021 est. |
|
|
66 |
36.1 |
2022 est. |
|
|
67 |
35.9 |
2023 est. |
|
|
68 |
35.7 |
2018 est. |
|
|
69 |
35.7 |
2021 est. |
|
|
70 |
35.7 |
2021 est. |
|
|
71 |
35.5 |
2019 est. |
|
|
72 |
35.3 |
2021 est. |
|
|
73 |
35.3 |
2016 est. |
|
|
74 |
35.1 |
2017 est. |
|
|
75 |
35.1 |
2021 est. |
|
|
76 |
35.1 |
2018 est. |
|
|
77 |
34.9 |
2024 est. |
|
|
78 |
34.8 |
2023 est. |
|
|
79 |
34.6 |
2022 est. |
|
|
80 |
34.5 |
2023 est. |
|
|
81 |
34.4 |
2021 est. |
|
|
82 |
34.3 |
2021 est. |
|
|
83 |
34.3 |
2018 est. |
|
|
84 |
34.1 |
2016 est. |
|
|
85 |
34.1 |
2022 est. |
|
|
86 |
34 |
2015 est. |
|
|
87 |
33.9 |
2023 est. |
|
|
88 |
33.8 |
2021 est. |
|
|
89 |
33.7 |
2021 est. |
|
|
90 |
33.7 |
2022 est. |
|
|
91 |
33.7 |
2022 est. |
|
|
92 |
33.6 |
2022 est. |
|
|
93 |
33.5 |
2019 est. |
|
|
94 |
33.5 |
2023 est. |
|
|
95 |
33.4 |
2022 est. |
|
|
96 |
33.4 |
2021 est. |
|
|
97 |
33.4 |
2022 est. |
|
|
98 |
32.9 |
2021 est. |
|
|
99 |
32.9 |
2021 est. |
|
|
100 |
32.8 |
2022 est. |
|
|
101 |
32.4 |
2020 est. |
|
|
102 |
32.4 |
2021 est. |
|
|
103 |
32.3 |
2022 est. |
|
|
104 |
32.3 |
2020 est. |
|
|
105 |
32.3 |
2019 est. |
|
|
106 |
32.3 |
2022 est. |
|
|
107 |
32.1 |
2018 est. |
|
|
108 |
32 |
2019 est. |
|
|
109 |
31.6 |
2022 est. |
|
|
110 |
31.5 |
2022 est. |
|
|
111 |
31.4 |
2022 est. |
|
|
112 |
31.2 |
2022 est. |
|
|
113 |
31.1 |
2021 est. |
|
|
114 |
30.9 |
2022 est. |
|
|
115 |
30.7 |
2019 est. |
|
|
116 |
30.7 |
2017 est. |
|
|
117 |
30.2 |
2022 est. |
|
|
118 |
30 |
2022 est. |
|
|
119 |
30 |
2022 est. |
|
|
120 |
29.9 |
2022 est. |
|
|
121 |
29.9 |
2020 est. |
|
|
122 |
29.8 |
2023 est. |
|
|
123 |
29.6 |
2018 est. |
|
|
124 |
29.6 |
2018 est. |
|
|
125 |
29.4 |
2020 est. |
|
|
126 |
29.3 |
2019 est. |
|
|
127 |
29.3 |
2022 est. |
|
|
128 |
29.2 |
2021 est. |
|
|
129 |
28.9 |
2022 est. |
|
|
130 |
28.5 |
2021 est. |
|
|
131 |
28.5 |
2022 est. |
|
|
132 |
27.9 |
2022 est. |
|
|
133 |
27.8 |
2019 est. |
|
|
134 |
27.2 |
2023 est. |
|
|
135 |
27.1 |
2021 est. |
|
|
136 |
26.9 |
2022 est. |
|
|
137 |
26.6 |
2018 est. |
|
|
138 |
26.6 |
2022 est. |
|
|
139 |
26.4 |
2022 est. |
|
|
140 |
26.4 |
2022 est. |
|
|
141 |
26.4 |
2018 est. |
|
|
142 |
25.9 |
2022 est. |
|
|
143 |
25.9 |
2022 est. |
|
|
144 |
25.7 |
2021 est. |
|
|
145 |
25.6 |
2020 est. |
|
|
146 |
25.5 |
2022 est. |
|
|
147 |
24.4 |
2020 est. |
|
|
148 |
24.3 |
2022 est. |
|
|
149 |
24.1 |
2022 est. |
ATTACHMENT TWELVE – FROM FREEDOM HOUSE
See charts and graphs here and here
Freedom House rates people’s access to political rights and civil
liberties in 208 countries and territories through its annual Freedom in the
World report. Individual freedoms—ranging from the right to vote to freedom of
expression and equality before the law—can be affected by state or nonstate
actors. Click on a country name below to access the full country narrative
report.
|
Country
or Territory |
Freedom
in the World Score |
Political
Rights |
Civil
Liberties |
|
17 |
22 |
||
|
1 |
5 |
||
|
28 |
40 |
||
|
10 |
21 |
||
|
38 |
55 |
||
|
10 |
18 |
||
|
32 |
51 |
||
|
35 |
50 |
||
|
23 |
31 |
||
|
39 |
56 |
||
|
37 |
56 |
||
|
0 |
7 |
||
|
2 |
10 |
||
|
16 |
29 |
||
|
37 |
57 |
||
|
1 |
6 |
||
|
39 |
57 |
||
|
35 |
53 |
||
|
18 |
42 |
||
|
32 |
36 |
||
|
26 |
39 |
||
|
17 |
35 |
||
|
31 |
44 |
||
|
30 |
42 |
||
|
7 |
20 |
||
|
32 |
45 |
||
|
3 |
22 |
||
|
4 |
11 |
||
|
38 |
54 |
||
|
4 |
19 |
||
|
6 |
9 |
||
|
39 |
58 |
||
|
1 |
4 |
||
|
1 |
14 |
||
|
38 |
57 |
||
|
-2 |
11 |
||
|
31 |
39 |
||
|
16 |
26 |
||
|
38 |
53 |
||
|
34 |
48 |
||
|
1 |
9 |
||
|
38 |
53 |
||
|
37 |
58 |
||
|
19 |
30 |
||
|
4 |
14 |
||
|
40 |
57 |
||
|
5 |
19 |
||
|
37 |
55 |
||
|
27 |
41 |
||
|
28 |
37 |
||
|
6 |
12 |
||
|
17 |
30 |
||
|
0 |
5 |
||
|
1 |
2 |
||
|
39 |
57 |
||
|
1 |
16 |
||
|
8 |
10 |
||
|
28 |
41 |
||
|
40 |
60 |
||
|
38 |
51 |
||
|
2 |
19 |
||
|
-2 |
4 |
||
|
21 |
34 |
||
|
40 |
55 |
||
|
35 |
45 |
||
|
35 |
50 |
||
|
37 |
52 |
||
|
19 |
29 |
||
|
7 |
23 |
||
|
15 |
26 |
||
|
30 |
44 |
||
|
6 |
18 |
||
|
22 |
26 |
||
|
9 |
31 |
||
|
24 |
41 |
||
|
38 |
57 |
||
|
31 |
32 |
||
|
17 |
21 |
||
|
28 |
28 |
||
|
4 |
7 |
||
|
16 |
15 |
||
|
39 |
58 |
||
|
34 |
39 |
||
|
36 |
53 |
||
|
33 |
47 |
||
|
40 |
56 |
||
|
12 |
22 |
||
|
5 |
18 |
||
|
22 |
29 |
||
|
36 |
53 |
||
|
28 |
32 |
||
|
7 |
24 |
||
|
4 |
22 |
||
|
2 |
11 |
||
|
37 |
52 |
||
|
13 |
26 |
||
|
30 |
36 |
||
|
30 |
34 |
||
|
2 |
8 |
||
|
33 |
57 |
||
|
38 |
51 |
||
|
38 |
59 |
||
|
21 |
34 |
||
|
28 |
37 |
||
|
22 |
31 |
||
|
20 |
23 |
||
|
6 |
18 |
||
|
35 |
52 |
||
|
38 |
55 |
||
|
15 |
24 |
||
|
35 |
51 |
||
|
26 |
33 |
||
|
37 |
55 |
||
|
25 |
35 |
||
|
25 |
57 |
||
|
36 |
48 |
||
|
27 |
42 |
||
|
13 |
24 |
||
|
12 |
29 |
||
|
0 |
7 |
||
|
28 |
45 |
||
|
32 |
43 |
||
|
28 |
34 |
||
|
39 |
58 |
||
|
40 |
59 |
||
|
2 |
12 |
||
|
5 |
25 |
||
|
20 |
24 |
||
|
0 |
3 |
||
|
28 |
39 |
||
|
27 |
49 |
||
|
39 |
60 |
||
|
6 |
18 |
||
|
12 |
20 |
||
|
9 |
21 |
||
|
37 |
55 |
||
|
35 |
48 |
||
|
22 |
39 |
||
|
26 |
37 |
||
|
28 |
39 |
||
|
25 |
33 |
||
|
34 |
48 |
||
|
39 |
57 |
||
|
7 |
18 |
||
|
2 |
15 |
||
|
34 |
48 |
||
|
4 |
8 |
||
|
-2 |
1 |
||
|
7 |
14 |
||
|
32 |
52 |
||
|
39 |
58 |
||
|
1 |
8 |
||
|
30 |
39 |
||
|
18 |
38 |
||
|
34 |
46 |
||
|
23 |
36 |
||
|
19 |
29 |
||
|
36 |
53 |
||
|
39 |
57 |
||
|
28 |
47 |
||
|
2 |
6 |
||
|
21 |
26 |
||
|
34 |
47 |
||
|
32 |
49 |
||
|
3 |
9 |
||
|
-3 |
4 |
||
|
37 |
53 |
||
|
26 |
32 |
||
|
35 |
54 |
||
|
38 |
53 |
||
|
36 |
54 |
||
|
-3 |
5 |
||
|
34 |
46 |
||
|
40 |
59 |
||
|
39 |
57 |
||
|
-3 |
8 |
||
|
35 |
49 |
||
|
38 |
56 |
||
|
0 |
5 |
||
|
11 |
24 |
||
|
11 |
23 |
||
|
38 |
52 |
||
|
22 |
28 |
||
|
33 |
39 |
||
|
14 |
27 |
||
|
30 |
50 |
||
|
5 |
12 |
||
|
33 |
49 |
||
|
11 |
33 |
||
|
17 |
16 |
||
|
0 |
1 |
||
|
37 |
56 |
||
|
10 |
24 |
||
|
23 |
28 |
||
|
5 |
13 |
||
|
39 |
53 |
||
|
34 |
50 |
||
|
40 |
56 |
||
|
2 |
10 |
||
|
32 |
50 |
||
|
0 |
13 |
||
|
4 |
16 |
||
|
4 |
18 |
||
|
-3 |
7 |
||
|
1 |
9 |
||
|
22 |
31 |
||
|
9 |
17 |
Global freedom statuses are calculated on a weighted scale. See
the methodology.
* Indicates a territory as opposed to an independent country.
ATTACHMENT
THIRTEEN – FROM CEO World
Countries with the highest human
freedom, 2025
|
Rank |
Country |
Region |
Sub-region |
Situation |
Score |
Travel Risk |
|
1 |
Switzerland |
Europe |
West
Europe |
good
situation |
91.95 |
INSIGNIFICANT |
|
2 |
New
Zealand |
Oceania |
Oceania |
good
situation |
91.58 |
LOW |
|
3 |
Denmark |
Europe |
North
Europe |
good
situation |
91.4 |
INSIGNIFICANT |
|
4 |
Luxembourg |
Europe |
West
Europe |
good
situation |
91.13 |
INSIGNIFICANT |
|
5 |
Ireland |
Europe |
North
Europe |
good
situation |
90.95 |
LOW |
|
6 |
Finland |
Europe |
North
Europe |
good
situation |
90.82 |
INSIGNIFICANT |
|
7 |
Liechtenstein |
Europe |
West
Europe |
good
situation |
90.79 |
LOW |
|
8 |
Australia |
Oceania |
Oceania |
good
situation |
90.74 |
LOW |
|
9 |
Monaco |
Europe |
West
Europe |
good
situation |
90.58 |
LOW |
|
10 |
Iceland |
Europe |
North
Europe |
good
situation |
90.5 |
LOW |
|
11 |
Sweden |
Europe |
North
Europe |
good
situation |
90.47 |
LOW |
|
12 |
Estonia |
Europe |
North
Europe |
good
situation |
89.91 |
LOW |
|
13 |
Japan |
Asia |
East
Asia |
good
situation |
89.52 |
LOW |
|
14 |
Macao
(China) |
Asia |
East
Asia |
good
situation |
89.4 |
LOW |
|
15 |
Norway |
Europe |
North
Europe |
good situation |
89.39 |
INSIGNIFICANT |
|
16 |
Germany |
Europe |
West
Europe |
good
situation |
89.05 |
LOW |
|
17 |
Czech
Republic (Czechia) |
Europe |
East
Europe |
good
situation |
89.04 |
LOW |
|
18 |
Netherlands |
Europe |
West
Europe |
good
situation |
87.75 |
LOW |
|
19 |
United
Kingdom |
Europe |
North
Europe |
good
situation |
87.39 |
LOW |
|
20 |
United
States |
Americas |
North
America |
good
situation |
87.01 |
LOW |
|
21 |
Taiwan |
Asia |
East
Asia |
good
situation |
86.73 |
LOW |
|
22 |
Portugal |
Europe |
South
Europe |
good
situation |
86.45 |
LOW |
|
23 |
San
Marino |
Europe |
South
Europe |
good situation |
86.19 |
LOW |
|
24 |
Latvia |
Europe |
North
Europe |
good
situation |
86.14 |
LOW |
|
25 |
Austria |
Europe |
West
Europe |
good
situation |
86.07 |
LOW |
|
26 |
Malta |
Europe |
South
Europe |
good
situation |
86.01 |
LOW |
|
27 |
Andorra |
Europe |
South
Europe |
good
situation |
85.65 |
LOW |
|
28 |
Belgium |
Europe |
West
Europe |
good
situation |
85.53 |
LOW |
|
29 |
Lithuania |
Europe |
North
Europe |
good
situation |
85.43 |
LOW |
|
30 |
Spain |
Europe |
South
Europe |
good
situation |
84.87 |
LOW |
|
31 |
Italy |
Europe |
South
Europe |
good
situation |
84.68 |
LOW |
|
32 |
Canada |
Americas |
North
America |
good
situation |
83.93 |
LOW |
|
33 |
Slovenia |
Europe |
South
Europe |
good
situation |
83.68 |
INSIGNIFICANT |
|
34 |
Cyprus |
Europe |
West
Asia |
good
situation |
83.37 |
LOW |
|
35 |
Chile |
Americas |
South
America |
good
situation |
83.17 |
LOW |
|
36 |
Costa
Rica |
Americas |
Central
America |
good
situation |
83.02 |
LOW |
|
37 |
South
Korea |
Asia |
East
Asia |
good
situation |
82.8 |
LOW |
|
38 |
France |
Europe |
West
Europe |
good
situation |
82.68 |
LOW |
|
39 |
Slovakia |
Europe |
East
Europe |
satisfactory
situation |
82.41 |
LOW |
|
40 |
Uruguay |
Americas |
South
America |
satisfactory
situation |
82.23 |
LOW |
|
41 |
Romania |
Europe |
East
Europe |
satisfactory
situation |
81.61 |
LOW |
|
42 |
Seychelles |
Africa |
East
Africa |
satisfactory
situation |
81.47 |
LOW |
|
43 |
Croatia |
Europe |
South
Europe |
satisfactory
situation |
81.37 |
LOW |
|
44 |
Panama |
Americas |
Central
America |
satisfactory
situation |
81.01 |
LOW |
|
45 |
Albania |
Europe |
South
Europe |
satisfactory
situation |
80.97 |
LOW |
|
46 |
Armenia |
Asia |
West
Asia |
satisfactory
situation |
80.24 |
HIGH |
|
47 |
Saint
Vincent and the Grenadines |
Americas |
Caribbean |
satisfactory
situation |
79.9 |
LOW |
|
48 |
Dominican
Republic |
Americas |
Caribbean |
satisfactory
situation |
79.51 |
MEDIUM |
|
49 |
Grenada |
Americas |
Caribbean |
satisfactory
situation |
79.42 |
LOW |
|
50 |
Antigua
and Barbuda |
Americas |
Caribbean |
satisfactory
situation |
79.05 |
LOW |
|
51 |
Cuba |
Americas |
Caribbean |
satisfactory
situation |
79.02 |
LOW |
|
52 |
Dominica |
Americas |
Caribbean |
satisfactory
situation |
78.61 |
LOW |
|
53 |
Saint
Kitts and Nevis |
Americas |
Caribbean |
satisfactory
situation |
78.54 |
LOW |
|
54 |
Singapore |
Asia |
South-East
Asia |
satisfactory
situation |
77.4 |
LOW |
|
55 |
Bahamas |
Americas |
Caribbean |
satisfactory
situation |
77.19 |
LOW |
|
56 |
Saint
Lucia |
Americas |
Caribbean |
satisfactory
situation |
76.97 |
LOW |
|
57 |
Jamaica |
Americas |
Caribbean |
satisfactory
situation |
76.72 |
MEDIUM |
|
58 |
Bulgaria |
Europe |
East
Europe |
satisfactory
situation |
76.54 |
LOW |
|
59 |
Montenegro |
Europe |
South
Europe |
satisfactory
situation |
76.52 |
LOW |
|
60 |
Barbados |
Americas |
Caribbean |
satisfactory
situation |
76.44 |
LOW |
|
61 |
Hong
Kong (China) |
Asia |
East
Asia |
satisfactory
situation |
76.15 |
LOW |
|
62 |
Poland |
Europe |
East
Europe |
satisfactory
situation |
76.13 |
LOW |
|
63 |
Georgia |
Asia |
West
Asia |
satisfactory
situation |
76.12 |
LOW |
|
64 |
Mauritius |
Africa |
East
Africa |
satisfactory
situation |
76.08 |
LOW |
|
65 |
Peru |
Americas |
South
America |
satisfactory
situation |
75.63 |
MEDIUM |
|
66 |
Mongolia |
Asia |
East
Asia |
satisfactory
situation |
75.3 |
MEDIUM |
|
67 |
North
Macedonia |
Europe |
South
Europe |
satisfactory
situation |
74.7 |
LOW |
|
68 |
Greece |
Europe |
South
Europe |
satisfactory
situation |
73.7 |
LOW |
|
69 |
Trinidad
and Tobago |
Americas |
Caribbean |
satisfactory
situation |
73.62 |
MEDIUM |
|
70 |
Israel |
Asia |
West
Asia |
satisfactory
situation |
73.57 |
MEDIUM |
|
71 |
Belize |
Americas |
Central
America |
satisfactory
situation |
73.36 |
MEDIUM |
|
72 |
Namibia |
Africa |
South
Africa |
satisfactory
situation |
73.16 |
LOW |
|
73 |
Botswana |
Africa |
South
Africa |
satisfactory
situation |
73.11 |
LOW |
|
74 |
Hungary |
Europe |
East
Europe |
satisfactory
situation |
72.95 |
LOW |
|
75 |
Moldova |
Europe |
East
Europe |
satisfactory
situation |
72.15 |
LOW |
|
76 |
East
Timor [Timor Leste] |
Asia |
South-East
Asia |
satisfactory
situation |
71.07 |
MEDIUM |
|
77 |
Suriname |
Americas |
South
America |
satisfactory
situation |
70.93 |
LOW |
|
78 |
Paraguay |
Americas |
South
America |
satisfactory
situation |
70.5 |
LOW |
|
79 |
Guatemala |
Americas |
Central
America |
satisfactory
situation |
70.34 |
MEDIUM |
|
80 |
Fiji |
Oceania |
Melanesia |
satisfactory
situation |
70.25 |
LOW |
|
81 |
Kiribati |
Oceania |
Micronesia |
satisfactory
situation |
70.22 |
LOW |
|
82 |
Marshall
Islands |
Oceania |
Micronesia |
satisfactory
situation |
70.04 |
LOW |
|
83 |
Brazil |
Americas |
South
America |
satisfactory
situation |
69.95 |
MEDIUM |
|
84 |
Papua
New Guinea |
Oceania |
Oceania |
satisfactory
situation |
69.93 |
HIGH |
|
85 |
Micronesia
(Federated States of) |
Oceania |
Oceania |
satisfactory
situation |
69.84 |
LOW |
|
86 |
Nauru |
Oceania |
Oceania |
satisfactory
situation |
69.63 |
LOW |
|
87 |
Palau |
Oceania |
Oceania |
satisfactory
situation |
69.13 |
LOW |
|
88 |
Samoa |
Oceania |
Oceania |
satisfactory
situation |
69.02 |
LOW |
|
89 |
Bosnia
and Herzegovina |
Europe |
South
Europe |
satisfactory
situation |
68.96 |
LOW |
|
90 |
Solomon
Islands |
Oceania |
Oceania |
satisfactory
situation |
68.52 |
MEDIUM |
|
91 |
Tonga |
Oceania |
Oceania |
satisfactory
situation |
68.08 |
LOW |
|
92 |
El
Salvador |
Americas |
Central
America |
satisfactory
situation |
68 |
MEDIUM |
|
93 |
Tuvalu |
Oceania |
Oceania |
satisfactory
situation |
67.98 |
LOW |
|
94 |
Vanuatu |
Oceania |
Oceania |
satisfactory
situation |
67.19 |
LOW |
|
95 |
South
Africa |
Africa |
South
Africa |
satisfactory
situation |
66.85 |
MEDIUM |
|
96 |
Serbia |
Europe |
South
Europe |
satisfactory
situation |
66.66 |
LOW |
|
97 |
Ghana |
Africa |
West
Africa |
satisfactory
situation |
65.87 |
LOW |
|
98 |
Ivory
Coast [Côte d'Ivoire] |
Africa |
West
Africa |
satisfactory
situation |
65.78 |
MEDIUM |
|
99 |
Malaysia |
Asia |
South-East
Asia |
satisfactory
situation |
65.72 |
LOW |
|
100 |
Ecuador |
Americas |
South
America |
satisfactory
situation |
65.52 |
MEDIUM |
|
101 |
Colombia |
Americas |
South
America |
satisfactory
situation |
65.42 |
MEDIUM |
|
102 |
Argentina |
Americas |
South
America |
satisfactory
situation |
65.27 |
LOW |
|
103 |
Benin |
Africa |
West
Africa |
satisfactory
situation |
64.91 |
LOW |
|
104 |
Guyana |
Americas |
South
America |
satisfactory
situation |
64.9 |
MEDIUM |
|
105 |
Honduras |
Americas |
Central
America |
satisfactory
situation |
64.4 |
HIGH |
|
106 |
Bolivia
(Plurinational State of) |
Americas |
South
America |
satisfactory
situation |
64.39 |
MEDIUM |
|
107 |
Malawi |
Africa |
East
Africa |
satisfactory
situation |
64.1 |
LOW |
|
108 |
India |
Asia |
South
Asia |
satisfactory
situation |
63.48 |
LOW |
|
109 |
Indonesia |
Asia |
South-East
Asia |
satisfactory
situation |
63.14 |
MEDIUM |
|
110 |
Senegal |
Africa |
West
Africa |
noticeable
problems |
63.08 |
LOW |
|
111 |
Gambia |
Africa |
West
Africa |
noticeable
problems |
63.05 |
LOW |
|
112 |
Cape
Verde [Cabo Verde] |
Africa |
West
Africa |
noticeable
problems |
62.79 |
LOW |
|
113 |
Bhutan |
Asia |
South
Asia |
noticeable
problems |
61.93 |
LOW |
|
114 |
Lesotho |
Africa |
South
Africa |
noticeable
problems |
61.83 |
MEDIUM |
|
115 |
Madagascar |
Africa |
East
Africa |
noticeable
problems |
61.39 |
MEDIUM |
|
116 |
Thailand |
Asia |
South-East
Asia |
noticeable
problems |
61.04 |
LOW |
|
117 |
Mexico |
Americas |
Central
America |
noticeable
problems |
60.97 |
MEDIUM |
|
118 |
Zambia |
Africa |
East
Africa |
noticeable
problems |
60.79 |
LOW |
|
119 |
Kenya |
Africa |
East
Africa |
noticeable
problems |
60.76 |
MEDIUM |
|
120 |
Kyrgyzstan |
Asia |
Central
Asia |
noticeable
problems |
60.37 |
MEDIUM |
|
121 |
Philippines |
Asia |
South-East
Asia |
noticeable
problems |
60.04 |
MEDIUM |
|
122 |
Liberia |
Africa |
West
Africa |
noticeable
problems |
59.88 |
MEDIUM |
|
123 |
Jordan |
Asia |
West
Asia |
noticeable
problems |
59.39 |
LOW |
|
124 |
Guinea-Bissau |
Africa |
West
Africa |
noticeable
problems |
59.25 |
MEDIUM |
|
125 |
Mozambique |
Africa |
East
Africa |
noticeable
problems |
58.27 |
MEDIUM |
|
126 |
Kazakhstan |
Asia |
Central
Asia |
noticeable
problems |
57.64 |
MEDIUM |
|
127 |
Tanzania |
Africa |
East
Africa |
noticeable
problems |
56.81 |
MEDIUM |
|
128 |
Sierra
Leone |
Africa |
West
Africa |
noticeable
problems |
56.74 |
MEDIUM |
|
129 |
Gabon |
Africa |
Middle
Africa |
noticeable
problems |
56.19 |
LOW |
|
130 |
Togo |
Africa |
West
Africa |
noticeable
problems |
56.01 |
MEDIUM |
|
131 |
Burkina
Faso |
Africa |
West
Africa |
noticeable
problems |
55.79 |
HIGH |
|
132 |
Niger |
Africa |
West
Africa |
noticeable
problems |
55.77 |
MEDIUM |
|
133 |
Haiti |
Americas |
Caribbean |
noticeable
problems |
55.65 |
HIGH |
|
134 |
Cambodia |
Asia |
South-East
Asia |
noticeable
problems |
55.6 |
MEDIUM |
|
135 |
Kuwait |
Asia |
West
Asia |
noticeable
problems |
54.98 |
LOW |
|
136 |
Tunisia |
Africa |
North
Africa |
noticeable
problems |
54.92 |
MEDIUM |
|
137 |
Lebanon |
Asia |
West
Asia |
noticeable
problems |
54.67 |
EXTREME |
|
138 |
Uganda |
Africa |
East
Africa |
noticeable
problems |
54.35 |
MEDIUM |
|
139 |
United
Arab Emirates |
Asia |
West
Asia |
noticeable
problems |
54.24 |
LOW |
|
140 |
Brunei
Darussalam |
Asia |
South-East
Asia |
noticeable
problems |
54.09 |
LOW |
|
141 |
Rwanda |
Africa |
East
Africa |
noticeable
problems |
53.69 |
LOW |
|
142 |
Ukraine |
Europe |
East
Europe |
noticeable
problems |
53.01 |
EXTREME |
|
143 |
Mali |
Africa |
West
Africa |
noticeable
problems |
52.89 |
HIGH |
|
144 |
Angola |
Africa |
Middle
Africa |
noticeable
problems |
52.81 |
MEDIUM |
|
145 |
Oman |
Asia |
West
Asia |
noticeable
problems |
52.64 |
LOW |
|
146 |
Nigeria |
Africa |
West
Africa |
noticeable
problems |
52.35 |
HIGH |
|
147 |
Azerbaijan |
Asia |
West
Asia |
noticeable
problems |
51.75 |
HIGH |
|
148 |
Bahrain |
Asia |
West
Asia |
noticeable
problems |
50.85 |
LOW |
|
149 |
Djibouti |
Africa |
East
Africa |
noticeable
problems |
50.76 |
MEDIUM |
|
150 |
Morocco |
Africa |
North
Africa |
noticeable
problems |
50.56 |
LOW |
|
151 |
Comoros |
Africa |
East
Africa |
noticeable
problems |
50.54 |
LOW |
|
152 |
Vietnam |
Asia |
South-East
Asia |
noticeable
problems |
50.2 |
LOW |
|
153 |
Mauritania
(Islamic Republic of) |
Africa |
West
Africa |
noticeable
problems |
49.83 |
MEDIUM |
|
154 |
Sri
Lanka |
Asia |
South
Asia |
difficult
situation |
49.82 |
MEDIUM |
|
155 |
Qatar |
Asia |
West
Asia |
difficult
situation |
49.25 |
LOW |
|
156 |
Republic
of the Congo [Congo-Brazzaville] |
Africa |
Middle
Africa |
difficult
situation |
49.24 |
MEDIUM |
|
157 |
Săo Tomé
and Príncipe |
Africa |
Middle
Africa |
difficult
situation |
49.1 |
LOW |
|
158 |
Tajikistan |
Asia |
Central
Asia |
difficult
situation |
49.02 |
MEDIUM |
|
159 |
Turkmenistan |
Asia |
Central
Asia |
difficult
situation |
48.76 |
MEDIUM |
|
160 |
Uzbekistan |
Asia |
Central
Asia |
difficult
situation |
48.48 |
LOW |
|
161 |
Russia |
Europe |
East
Europe |
difficult
situation |
48.32 |
MEDIUM |
|
162 |
Belarus |
Europe |
East
Europe |
difficult
situation |
48.14 |
EXTREME |
|
163 |
Democratic
Republic of the Congo [DR Congo] |
Africa |
Middle
Africa |
difficult
situation |
47.88 |
HIGH |
|
164 |
Equatorial
Guinea |
Africa |
Middle
Africa |
difficult
situation |
47.79 |
LOW |
|
165 |
Bangladesh |
Asia |
South
Asia |
difficult
situation |
47.26 |
HIGH |
|
166 |
Turkey
(Türkiye) |
Asia |
West
Asia |
difficult
situation |
46.88 |
MEDIUM |
|
167 |
Nepal |
Asia |
South
Asia |
difficult
situation |
46.67 |
MEDIUM |
|
168 |
Nicaragua |
Americas |
Central
America |
difficult
situation |
46.53 |
MEDIUM |
|
169 |
Cameroon |
Africa |
Middle
Africa |
difficult
situation |
46.49 |
MEDIUM |
|
170 |
Central
African Republic |
Africa |
Middle
Africa |
difficult
situation |
45.49 |
HIGH |
|
171 |
Ethiopia |
Africa |
East
Africa |
difficult
situation |
45.3 |
HIGH |
|
172 |
Eritrea |
Africa |
East
Africa |
difficult
situation |
45.21 |
MEDIUM |
|
173 |
Guinea |
Africa |
West
Africa |
difficult
situation |
43.82 |
MEDIUM |
|
174 |
Laos
(Lao PDR) |
Asia |
South-East
Asia |
difficult
situation |
43.46 |
LOW |
|
175 |
Eswatini
[Swaziland] |
Africa |
South
Africa |
difficult
situation |
43.32 |
MEDIUM |
|
176 |
China |
Asia |
East
Asia |
difficult
situation |
43.29 |
LOW |
|
177 |
Libya |
Africa |
North
Africa |
difficult
situation |
42.9 |
EXTREME |
|
178 |
Burundi |
Africa |
East
Africa |
difficult
situation |
42.49 |
MEDIUM |
|
179 |
Zimbabwe |
Africa |
East
Africa |
very
serious |
41.25 |
MEDIUM |
|
180 |
Chad |
Africa |
Middle
Africa |
very
serious |
40.28 |
MEDIUM |
|
181 |
Saudi
Arabia |
Asia |
West
Asia |
very
serious |
40.18 |
MEDIUM |
|
182 |
Iraq |
Asia |
West
Asia |
very
serious |
39.83 |
EXTREME |
|
183 |
Algeria |
Africa |
North
Africa |
very
serious |
39.67 |
MEDIUM |
|
184 |
Somalia |
Africa |
East
Africa |
very
serious |
39.07 |
EXTREME |
|
185 |
South
Sudan |
Africa |
East
Africa |
very
serious |
38.9 |
EXTREME |
|
186 |
Venezuela
(Bolivarian Republic of) |
Americas |
South
America |
very
serious |
38.76 |
HIGH |
|
187 |
Egypt |
Africa |
North
Africa |
very
serious |
38.64 |
MEDIUM |
|
188 |
Sudan |
Africa |
North
Africa |
very
serious |
38.44 |
EXTREME |
|
189 |
Pakistan
(Islamic Republic of) |
Asia |
South
Asia |
very
serious |
38.31 |
EXTREME |
|
190 |
Myanmar
[Burma] |
Asia |
South-East
Asia |
very
serious |
38.24 |
EXTREME |
|
191 |
Iran
(Islamic Republic of) |
Asia |
South
Asia |
very
serious |
38.17 |
HIGH |
|
192 |
Maldives |
Asia |
South
Asia |
very
serious |
37.73 |
MEDIUM |
|
193 |
Yemen |
Asia |
West
Asia |
very
serious |
37.39 |
EXTREME |
|
194 |
North
Korea |
Asia |
East Asia |
very
serious |
37.02 |
EXTREME |
|
195 |
Afghanistan |
Asia |
South
Asia |
very
serious |
36.86 |
EXTREME |
|
196 |
Palestine |
Asia |
West
Asia |
very
serious |
36.76 |
EXTREME |
|
197 |
Syria |
Asia |
West
Asia |
very
serious |
36.16 |
EXTREME |
A14 FROM MENTAL FLOSS
2025’s Most—and
Least—Sinful Cities in America, Ranked by Key Factors
The No. 1 city won’t be a
surprise, but the rest of the top spots might be.
By Rudie Obias Nov 30, 2025
When you think of the
nickname “Sin City,” you probably think of the city of Las Vegas, especially
with its wide range of casinos, legalized gambling, salacious adult
entertainment offerings, easy access to just about every vice, and an
around-the-clock party lifestyle. After all, the party life is a
multi-billion-dollar industry in Las Vegas. But although “what happens in
Vegas, stays in Vegas,” it’s not the only sinful city in the United States.
According to WalletHub,
the country is full of people committing sins. The outlet ranked nearly 200
American cities for sinfulness based on seven key dimensions—including anger
and hatred, jealousy, excesses and vices, greed, lust, vanity, and laziness—to
determine which cities are the most sinful and which are the least.
The study is based on
businesses and establishments within city limits, police reports, and
population size from the U.S. Census, as well as local Google Searches for
terms relating to the key dimensions.
It’s no surprise that Las
Vegas, Nevada, is No. 1 on the list, while sinful cities of note, like New
Orleans, Louisiana, Los Angeles, California, Atlanta, Georgia, Miami, Florida,
and others, are in the top 10. However, smaller metropolises, such as
Chattanooga and Knoxville, Tennessee, Wichita, Kansas, Mobile, Alabama,
Wilmington, Delaware, and others, just cracked the top 50 of the most sinful
cities.
By contrast, the least
sinful city in the nation is Columbia, Maryland—which is ranked at the very
bottom at No. 182. Other cities rounding out the bottom five in the rankings
are Madison, Wisconsin, Pearl City, Hawaii, West Valley City, Utah, and
Fremont, California.
Check out a list of the
top 50 cities that are considered the most sinful in America, below:
Las Vegas, NV
Houston, TX
Los Angeles, CA
Philadelphia, PA
Atlanta, GA
Denver, CO
Miami, FL
Dallas, TX
Phoenix, AZ
New Orleans, LA
Baton Rouge, LA
Chicago, IL
St. Louis, MO
Cleveland, OH
Memphis, TN
Orlando, FL
New York, NY
North Las Vegas, NV
Baltimore, MD
Nashville, TN
Henderson, NV
Birmingham, AL
Detroit, MI
Portland, OR
San Antonio, TX
Shreveport, LA
Tampa, FL
Little Rock, AR
Fort Lauderdale, FL
Jacksonville, FL
Richmond, VA
Indianapolis, IN
San Diego, CA
Charlotte, NC
Washington, DC
Cincinnati, OH
Austin, TX
Mobile, AL
Wichita, KS
Pittsburgh, PA
San Bernardino, CA
San Francisco, CA
Kansas City, MO
Sacramento, CA
Tempe, AZ
Wilmington, DE
Minneapolis, MN
Knoxville, TN
Reno, NV
Chattanooga, TN
A15 FROM Wallet Hub
Most Sinful Cities in
America (2025)
By
Adam McCann, WalletHub Financial WriterNov 17, 2025
See charts and graphs here
Las Vegas isn’t the only “Sin City” in America. In other cities, bad things
happen and stay there, too. From beer-loving Milwaukee to decadent New Orleans,
the U.S. is filled with people behaving illicitly. No place is innocent - we
all have flaws, and at some point, we all have to pay for our vices. Gambling addiction, for instance, leads
to over $100 billion in losses for U.S. consumers every year, while smoking burns an over $600 billion
hole in Uncle Sam’s wallet annually.
Luckily for the saints
among us, all American sins are not created or distributed equally. To identify
the darkest corners of America, WalletHub compared more than 180 U.S. cities
across 37 key indicators of vices and illicit behavior. Our data set ranges
from violent crimes per capita to excessive drinking and adult entertainment
establishments per capita.
“Regardless
of any particular religious tenets, certain activities are considered ‘sinful’
by society as a whole. Sometimes, these activities are always bad, like violent
crimes or identity theft. In other cases, they may be relatively harmless in
moderation but incredibly destructive when not kept under control, such as
alcohol use or gambling. The most sinful cities are those where illicit
activities and vices alike are the most widespread.”
By Chip Lupo, WalletHub Analyst
Table of Contents
Main Findings In-Depth Look at Most Sinful Cities Ask the ExpertsMethodology
MAIN FINDINGS
Most
Sinful Cities in America
|
Overall Rank* |
City |
WalletHub Vice Index |
Anger & Hatred Rank |
Jealousy Rank |
Excesses & Vices Rank |
Greed Rank |
Lust Rank |
Vanity Rank |
Laziness Rank |
|
1 |
Las Vegas, NV |
61.94 |
33 |
11 |
67 |
1 |
3 |
7 |
3 |
|
2 |
Houston, TX |
58.30 |
19 |
5 |
133 |
24 |
1 |
6 |
125 |
|
3 |
Los Angeles, CA |
54.93 |
24 |
33 |
164 |
95 |
4 |
1 |
67 |
|
4 |
Philadelphia, PA |
54.11 |
2 |
7 |
61 |
66 |
12 |
18 |
64 |
|
5 |
Atlanta, GA |
52.87 |
27 |
2 |
117 |
168 |
2 |
9 |
92 |
|
6 |
Denver, CO |
52.62 |
9 |
40 |
44 |
40 |
9 |
15 |
117 |
|
7 |
Miami, FL |
52.29 |
134 |
8 |
153 |
74 |
8 |
4 |
25 |
|
8 |
Dallas, TX |
51.48 |
40 |
10 |
108 |
99 |
7 |
10 |
114 |
|
9 |
Phoenix, AZ |
51.27 |
65 |
82 |
63 |
67 |
6 |
5 |
53 |
|
10 |
New Orleans, LA |
50.71 |
5 |
9 |
13 |
49 |
29 |
82 |
28 |
|
11 |
Baton Rouge, LA |
50.61 |
3 |
3 |
9 |
125 |
77 |
45 |
17 |
|
12 |
Chicago, IL |
50.04 |
23 |
35 |
123 |
73 |
16 |
8 |
107 |
|
13 |
St. Louis, MO |
49.89 |
8 |
21 |
2 |
52 |
40 |
44 |
99 |
|
14 |
Cleveland, OH |
49.88 |
6 |
27 |
8 |
138 |
24 |
32 |
10 |
|
15 |
Memphis, TN |
49.79 |
7 |
6 |
7 |
117 |
22 |
124 |
22 |
|
16 |
Orlando, FL |
49.52 |
13 |
4 |
118 |
161 |
15 |
14 |
134 |
|
17 |
New York, NY |
49.42 |
47 |
81 |
174 |
97 |
5 |
3 |
31 |
|
18 |
North Las Vegas, NV |
49.12 |
158 |
15 |
43 |
1 |
98 |
21 |
1 |
|
19 |
Baltimore, MD |
47.43 |
4 |
19 |
21 |
170 |
10 |
65 |
96 |
|
20 |
Nashville, TN |
46.35 |
18 |
76 |
14 |
91 |
27 |
27 |
84 |
|
21 |
Henderson, NV |
45.84 |
78 |
16 |
141 |
1 |
114 |
69 |
19 |
|
22 |
Birmingham, AL |
45.79 |
10 |
20 |
3 |
147 |
73 |
72 |
106 |
|
23 |
Detroit, MI |
45.75 |
12 |
23 |
10 |
153 |
19 |
157 |
4 |
|
24 |
Portland, OR |
45.17 |
37 |
49 |
73 |
26 |
14 |
40 |
177 |
|
25 |
San Antonio, TX |
44.80 |
109 |
29 |
97 |
46 |
20 |
26 |
65 |
|
26 |
Shreveport, LA |
44.66 |
32 |
22 |
12 |
98 |
59 |
92 |
14 |
|
27 |
Tampa, FL |
44.34 |
119 |
52 |
95 |
96 |
11 |
17 |
105 |
|
28 |
Little Rock, AR |
44.05 |
28 |
18 |
17 |
169 |
35 |
94 |
18 |
|
29 |
Fort Lauderdale, FL |
43.80 |
39 |
1 |
152 |
93 |
121 |
58 |
58 |
|
30 |
Jacksonville, FL |
43.67 |
44 |
46 |
48 |
156 |
31 |
29 |
33 |
|
31 |
Richmond, VA |
43.54 |
25 |
66 |
20 |
124 |
48 |
46 |
75 |
|
32 |
Indianapolis, IN |
43.45 |
31 |
56 |
25 |
160 |
17 |
42 |
103 |
|
33 |
San Diego, CA |
43.43 |
145 |
123 |
163 |
72 |
33 |
2 |
130 |
|
34 |
Charlotte, NC |
43.35 |
99 |
32 |
100 |
106 |
28 |
23 |
63 |
|
35 |
Washington, DC |
43.26 |
1 |
26 |
74 |
81 |
36 |
78 |
181 |
|
36 |
Cincinnati, OH |
43.06 |
77 |
96 |
5 |
110 |
51 |
25 |
59 |
|
37 |
Austin, TX |
43.04 |
137 |
68 |
151 |
33 |
18 |
13 |
172 |
|
38 |
Mobile, AL |
42.92 |
63 |
88 |
11 |
80 |
25 |
62 |
49 |
|
39 |
Wichita, KS |
42.86 |
38 |
105 |
28 |
59 |
42 |
36 |
70 |
|
40 |
Pittsburgh, PA |
42.73 |
52 |
122 |
46 |
63 |
79 |
11 |
168 |
|
41 |
San Bernardino, CA |
42.55 |
20 |
69 |
33 |
34 |
101 |
151 |
12 |
|
42 |
San Francisco, CA |
42.52 |
62 |
37 |
142 |
104 |
49 |
20 |
121 |
|
43 |
Kansas City, MO |
42.48 |
14 |
73 |
27 |
107 |
45 |
57 |
160 |
|
44 |
Sacramento, CA |
42.29 |
41 |
98 |
99 |
38 |
84 |
34 |
51 |
|
45 |
Tempe, AZ |
42.07 |
26 |
53 |
82 |
144 |
87 |
33 |
45 |
|
46 |
Wilmington, DE |
42.03 |
69 |
12 |
53 |
54 |
169 |
70 |
112 |
|
47 |
Minneapolis, MN |
42.00 |
81 |
77 |
127 |
23 |
38 |
22 |
175 |
|
48 |
Knoxville, TN |
41.87 |
55 |
152 |
1 |
150 |
109 |
16 |
95 |
|
49 |
Reno, NV |
41.45 |
85 |
142 |
62 |
9 |
56 |
61 |
94 |
|
50 |
Chattanooga, TN |
41.19 |
15 |
75 |
15 |
123 |
95 |
84 |
129 |
|
51 |
Rapid City, SD |
40.83 |
48 |
147 |
104 |
16 |
13 |
129 |
61 |
|
52 |
Billings, MT |
40.62 |
50 |
146 |
59 |
8 |
105 |
87 |
97 |
|
53 |
Gulfport, MS |
40.50 |
94 |
89 |
49 |
15 |
43 |
150 |
85 |
|
54 |
Columbus, OH |
40.46 |
46 |
94 |
45 |
151 |
41 |
41 |
110 |
|
55 |
Jackson, MS |
40.33 |
49 |
44 |
32 |
22 |
116 |
168 |
20 |
|
56 |
Akron, OH |
40.31 |
34 |
109 |
18 |
165 |
39 |
71 |
42 |
|
57 |
Bakersfield, CA |
40.26 |
57 |
106 |
35 |
137 |
67 |
38 |
54 |
|
58 |
Toledo, OH |
40.25 |
53 |
140 |
4 |
152 |
32 |
108 |
5 |
|
59 |
Montgomery, AL |
40.23 |
64 |
17 |
42 |
174 |
26 |
139 |
34 |
|
60 |
Tucson, AZ |
40.19 |
76 |
93 |
30 |
141 |
60 |
47 |
23 |
|
61 |
Tacoma, WA |
40.05 |
11 |
43 |
41 |
134 |
136 |
112 |
123 |
|
62 |
Fort Worth, TX |
40.05 |
126 |
25 |
94 |
143 |
68 |
28 |
111 |
|
63 |
Scottsdale, AZ |
39.97 |
106 |
92 |
166 |
55 |
93 |
12 |
147 |
|
64 |
Dover, DE |
39.95 |
68 |
24 |
83 |
109 |
153 |
107 |
83 |
|
65 |
Colorado Springs, CO |
39.86 |
16 |
91 |
86 |
113 |
91 |
66 |
119 |
|
66 |
Fort Smith, AR |
39.74 |
42 |
148 |
37 |
78 |
21 |
123 |
26 |
|
67 |
Charleston, SC |
39.72 |
60 |
58 |
60 |
84 |
108 |
30 |
170 |
|
68 |
Vancouver, WA |
39.68 |
43 |
87 |
70 |
79 |
118 |
43 |
150 |
|
69 |
Long Beach, CA |
39.65 |
104 |
30 |
135 |
27 |
129 |
79 |
69 |
|
70 |
Louisville, KY |
39.57 |
51 |
118 |
34 |
159 |
50 |
31 |
89 |
|
71 |
Columbia, SC |
39.54 |
82 |
54 |
31 |
88 |
103 |
76 |
56 |
|
72 |
Seattle, WA |
39.54 |
71 |
59 |
167 |
70 |
30 |
24 |
178 |
|
73 |
Albuquerque, NM |
39.38 |
35 |
84 |
50 |
142 |
94 |
80 |
36 |
|
74 |
Charleston, WV |
39.15 |
22 |
137 |
23 |
71 |
74 |
95 |
115 |
|
75 |
Aurora, CO |
38.90 |
75 |
85 |
36 |
10 |
138 |
135 |
68 |
|
76 |
Milwaukee, WI |
38.85 |
29 |
116 |
24 |
101 |
65 |
109 |
141 |
|
77 |
Oklahoma City, OK |
38.38 |
72 |
136 |
69 |
164 |
44 |
37 |
32 |
|
78 |
Glendale, AZ |
38.28 |
110 |
72 |
26 |
102 |
100 |
100 |
35 |
|
79 |
Buffalo, NY |
38.25 |
61 |
104 |
55 |
132 |
102 |
98 |
16 |
|
80 |
Fayetteville, NC |
38.20 |
74 |
60 |
29 |
130 |
61 |
118 |
118 |
|
81 |
Omaha, NE |
38.17 |
100 |
127 |
81 |
82 |
66 |
54 |
27 |
|
82 |
Huntington, WV |
37.93 |
54 |
167 |
6 |
136 |
104 |
86 |
7 |
|
83 |
Corpus Christi, TX |
37.92 |
36 |
144 |
56 |
69 |
46 |
145 |
66 |
|
84 |
Salem, OR |
37.90 |
58 |
154 |
90 |
17 |
122 |
85 |
50 |
|
85 |
Salt Lake City, UT |
37.55 |
30 |
63 |
161 |
163 |
47 |
39 |
173 |
|
86 |
Cheyenne, WY |
37.37 |
45 |
129 |
103 |
103 |
53 |
122 |
44 |
|
87 |
Riverside, CA |
37.23 |
136 |
70 |
54 |
128 |
147 |
60 |
41 |
|
88 |
Missoula, MT |
37.21 |
88 |
134 |
88 |
5 |
151 |
128 |
145 |
|
89 |
St. Petersburg, FL |
37.17 |
122 |
36 |
85 |
157 |
117 |
77 |
76 |
|
90 |
Arlington, TX |
36.99 |
138 |
28 |
93 |
41 |
133 |
131 |
104 |
|
91 |
Rochester, NY |
36.94 |
89 |
57 |
47 |
155 |
125 |
48 |
149 |
|
92 |
Springfield, MO |
36.87 |
56 |
125 |
19 |
177 |
63 |
50 |
77 |
|
93 |
Huntington Beach, CA |
36.72 |
165 |
51 |
175 |
27 |
166 |
19 |
159 |
|
94 |
El Paso, TX |
36.61 |
90 |
161 |
84 |
47 |
23 |
120 |
135 |
|
95 |
Fresno, CA |
36.32 |
84 |
115 |
92 |
90 |
82 |
88 |
91 |
|
96 |
Oakland, CA |
36.26 |
17 |
37 |
171 |
92 |
177 |
147 |
137 |
|
97 |
Spokane, WA |
36.25 |
105 |
67 |
66 |
115 |
113 |
116 |
113 |
|
98 |
Anchorage, AK |
36.25 |
21 |
159 |
111 |
86 |
90 |
102 |
101 |
|
99 |
Boston, MA |
36.21 |
97 |
102 |
137 |
39 |
78 |
52 |
164 |
|
100 |
Santa Clarita, CA |
36.17 |
147 |
71 |
154 |
27 |
139 |
67 |
124 |
|
101 |
Tulsa, OK |
36.01 |
87 |
114 |
52 |
175 |
71 |
56 |
47 |
|
102 |
Grand Prairie, TX |
35.96 |
168 |
48 |
101 |
41 |
64 |
165 |
80 |
|
103 |
Gilbert, AZ |
35.93 |
118 |
131 |
126 |
129 |
81 |
35 |
102 |
|
104 |
Hialeah, FL |
35.84 |
178 |
13 |
162 |
100 |
107 |
143 |
9 |
|
105 |
Santa Ana, CA |
35.81 |
98 |
50 |
107 |
27 |
175 |
146 |
74 |
|
106 |
Garland, TX |
35.79 |
125 |
34 |
138 |
112 |
80 |
166 |
72 |
|
107 |
Augusta, GA |
35.63 |
116 |
42 |
16 |
179 |
57 |
133 |
46 |
|
108 |
Lubbock, TX |
35.50 |
101 |
78 |
22 |
145 |
62 |
117 |
176 |
|
109 |
Newark, NJ |
35.45 |
148 |
90 |
115 |
45 |
135 |
174 |
2 |
|
110 |
Ontario, CA |
35.36 |
115 |
103 |
77 |
34 |
140 |
160 |
24 |
|
111 |
Irving, TX |
35.30 |
170 |
31 |
149 |
114 |
83 |
148 |
52 |
|
112 |
Glendale, CA |
35.25 |
150 |
45 |
168 |
85 |
149 |
89 |
86 |
|
113 |
Mesa, AZ |
35.20 |
121 |
107 |
71 |
148 |
111 |
73 |
60 |
|
114 |
Des Moines, IA |
35.19 |
70 |
153 |
51 |
105 |
92 |
99 |
88 |
|
115 |
Stockton, CA |
35.18 |
66 |
107 |
105 |
83 |
110 |
144 |
55 |
|
116 |
Anaheim, CA |
35.05 |
108 |
41 |
144 |
119 |
111 |
140 |
109 |
|
117 |
Las Cruces, NM |
35.03 |
135 |
74 |
96 |
133 |
55 |
167 |
21 |
|
118 |
Columbus, GA |
34.87 |
86 |
62 |
72 |
181 |
58 |
130 |
39 |
|
119 |
Raleigh, NC |
34.86 |
113 |
99 |
139 |
77 |
128 |
63 |
140 |
|
120 |
Chandler, AZ |
34.81 |
156 |
117 |
122 |
87 |
127 |
49 |
108 |
|
121 |
Providence, RI |
34.79 |
177 |
141 |
88 |
6 |
76 |
169 |
15 |
|
122 |
Norfolk, VA |
34.64 |
114 |
61 |
38 |
60 |
97 |
156 |
174 |
|
123 |
Rancho Cucamonga, CA |
34.50 |
141 |
110 |
157 |
34 |
106 |
115 |
81 |
|
124 |
Oceanside, CA |
34.41 |
112 |
126 |
120 |
89 |
146 |
81 |
120 |
|
125 |
Juneau, AK |
34.31 |
59 |
133 |
125 |
31 |
141 |
119 |
138 |
|
126 |
Newport News, VA |
34.26 |
83 |
100 |
102 |
60 |
86 |
161 |
132 |
|
127 |
St. Paul, MN |
34.20 |
123 |
149 |
119 |
32 |
126 |
90 |
165 |
|
128 |
Greensboro, NC |
34.06 |
95 |
79 |
68 |
158 |
130 |
101 |
142 |
|
129 |
Pembroke Pines, FL |
34.01 |
179 |
14 |
165 |
93 |
142 |
158 |
43 |
|
130 |
Casper, WY |
33.38 |
67 |
182 |
91 |
120 |
37 |
155 |
6 |
|
131 |
Nampa, ID |
33.35 |
103 |
180 |
124 |
53 |
96 |
97 |
13 |
|
132 |
Jersey City, NJ |
33.23 |
128 |
113 |
177 |
4 |
158 |
162 |
38 |
|
133 |
Modesto, CA |
33.18 |
91 |
165 |
79 |
127 |
85 |
110 |
133 |
|
134 |
Sioux Falls, SD |
33.10 |
111 |
173 |
121 |
21 |
115 |
111 |
143 |
|
135 |
Warwick, RI |
33.07 |
182 |
158 |
106 |
6 |
181 |
103 |
48 |
|
136 |
Fontana, CA |
32.99 |
163 |
130 |
87 |
34 |
145 |
153 |
30 |
|
137 |
Lewiston, ME |
32.66 |
144 |
178 |
65 |
14 |
174 |
163 |
8 |
|
138 |
Manchester, NH |
32.58 |
80 |
169 |
146 |
48 |
170 |
113 |
71 |
|
139 |
Grand Rapids, MI |
32.55 |
79 |
156 |
64 |
180 |
88 |
51 |
62 |
|
140 |
Oxnard, CA |
32.40 |
127 |
160 |
76 |
75 |
155 |
127 |
73 |
|
141 |
Plano, TX |
32.40 |
107 |
47 |
176 |
135 |
171 |
106 |
158 |
|
142 |
New Haven, CT |
32.22 |
155 |
83 |
116 |
58 |
150 |
173 |
29 |
|
143 |
Cedar Rapids, IA |
32.19 |
133 |
166 |
58 |
131 |
131 |
74 |
127 |
|
144 |
Winston-Salem, NC |
32.18 |
93 |
138 |
40 |
171 |
120 |
132 |
87 |
|
145 |
Amarillo, TX |
32.18 |
96 |
135 |
78 |
167 |
54 |
136 |
153 |
|
146 |
Tallahassee, FL |
32.04 |
73 |
55 |
80 |
182 |
152 |
105 |
154 |
|
147 |
Durham, NC |
32.02 |
149 |
86 |
109 |
20 |
172 |
152 |
146 |
|
148 |
Moreno Valley, CA |
31.98 |
160 |
112 |
75 |
126 |
134 |
180 |
37 |
|
149 |
Peoria, AZ |
31.81 |
140 |
120 |
113 |
122 |
132 |
137 |
126 |
|
150 |
Bismarck, ND |
31.74 |
92 |
171 |
134 |
146 |
72 |
83 |
144 |
|
151 |
Santa Rosa, CA |
31.73 |
102 |
177 |
160 |
13 |
176 |
59 |
136 |
|
152 |
Fargo, ND |
31.65 |
153 |
139 |
156 |
25 |
137 |
138 |
161 |
|
153 |
Aurora, IL |
31.50 |
167 |
101 |
131 |
65 |
164 |
181 |
82 |
|
154 |
Lincoln, NE |
31.47 |
130 |
170 |
130 |
50 |
124 |
104 |
79 |
|
155 |
Garden Grove, CA |
31.33 |
146 |
65 |
159 |
108 |
163 |
175 |
78 |
|
156 |
Lexington-Fayette, KY |
31.29 |
143 |
145 |
39 |
176 |
75 |
91 |
162 |
|
157 |
Worcester, MA |
31.27 |
161 |
155 |
112 |
12 |
168 |
134 |
122 |
|
158 |
Yonkers, NY |
31.23 |
166 |
119 |
173 |
116 |
178 |
68 |
57 |
|
159 |
Fort Wayne, IN |
30.99 |
131 |
164 |
57 |
178 |
70 |
55 |
98 |
|
160 |
Burlington, VT |
30.97 |
151 |
80 |
143 |
43 |
162 |
177 |
152 |
|
161 |
Chula Vista, CA |
30.95 |
159 |
143 |
145 |
76 |
144 |
154 |
90 |
|
162 |
Irvine, CA |
30.75 |
164 |
64 |
181 |
118 |
159 |
96 |
156 |
|
163 |
Huntsville, AL |
30.59 |
142 |
150 |
110 |
111 |
99 |
121 |
151 |
|
164 |
Nashua, NH |
30.52 |
157 |
176 |
155 |
19 |
180 |
126 |
93 |
|
165 |
Brownsville, TX |
30.37 |
171 |
174 |
132 |
51 |
52 |
179 |
11 |
|
166 |
Overland Park, KS |
30.21 |
132 |
157 |
169 |
18 |
160 |
93 |
179 |
|
167 |
San Jose, CA |
30.09 |
120 |
132 |
179 |
172 |
119 |
53 |
148 |
|
168 |
Chesapeake, VA |
30.06 |
154 |
121 |
98 |
60 |
157 |
141 |
169 |
|
169 |
Cape Coral, FL |
29.77 |
173 |
124 |
129 |
139 |
89 |
149 |
128 |
|
170 |
Virginia Beach, VA |
29.56 |
175 |
128 |
114 |
154 |
143 |
64 |
171 |
|
171 |
South Burlington, VT |
29.46 |
124 |
95 |
172 |
43 |
165 |
182 |
182 |
|
172 |
Honolulu, HI |
29.38 |
180 |
172 |
170 |
56 |
69 |
125 |
116 |
|
173 |
Boise, ID |
29.36 |
129 |
179 |
148 |
149 |
123 |
75 |
139 |
|
174 |
Laredo, TX |
29.30 |
172 |
181 |
128 |
64 |
34 |
172 |
100 |
|
175 |
Bridgeport, CT |
28.46 |
169 |
151 |
150 |
57 |
179 |
176 |
40 |
|
176 |
Port St. Lucie, FL |
28.25 |
174 |
97 |
140 |
162 |
148 |
164 |
131 |
|
177 |
Portland, ME |
27.50 |
152 |
175 |
136 |
68 |
173 |
142 |
163 |
|
178 |
Fremont, CA |
26.76 |
139 |
111 |
182 |
121 |
154 |
171 |
155 |
|
179 |
West Valley City, UT |
26.67 |
117 |
162 |
147 |
173 |
156 |
170 |
166 |
|
180 |
Pearl City, HI |
26.29 |
181 |
168 |
178 |
11 |
161 |
178 |
157 |
|
181 |
Madison, WI |
26.15 |
162 |
163 |
158 |
166 |
167 |
114 |
167 |
|
182 |
Columbia, MD |
23.95 |
176 |
39 |
180 |
140 |
182 |
159 |
180 |
Notes: *No. 1 = Most Sinful
With the exception of “WalletHub Vice Index,” all of the columns in the table
above depict the relative rank of that city, where a rank of 1 represents the
worst conditions for that metric category.
Violent Crimes per Capita
Most
·
T-1.
Oakland, CA
·
T-1.
Memphis, TN
·
T-1.
Detroit, MI
·
T-1.
Little Rock, AR
·
T-1.
Cleveland, OH
Fewest
·
175.
Gilbert, AZ
·
176.
Port St. Lucie, FL
·
177.
Virginia Beach, VA
·
178.
Irvine, CA
·
179.
Warwick, RI
Best City vs. Worst City:
51x Difference
Oakland, CA vs. Warwick, RI
Thefts per Capita
Most
·
T-1.
Oakland, CA
·
T-1.
Memphis, TN
·
T-1.
Tacoma, WA
·
T-1.
St. Louis, MO
·
T-1.
Burlington, VT
Fewest
·
175.
Nashua, NH
·
176.
Gilbert, AZ
·
177.
Nampa, ID
·
178.
Port St. Lucie, FL
·
179.
Huntsville, AL
IN-DEPTH
LOOK AT THE MOST SINFUL CITIES IN 2025
Las Vegas, NV
Las Vegas tops the list of
the most sinful cities this year, unsurprisingly. Sin City has the second-most
casinos per capita, driving many people to lose their money in a failed quest
for quick riches and creating the fourth-highest share of residents with
gambling problems.
In addition, Las Vegas has
the most adult entertainment options per capita, and residents search Google
for terms relating to strip clubs, affairs and pornographic content more than
people in most other cities.
Las Vegas also has the
fifth-most fraud and identity theft complaints per capita, so greedy thieves
are no stranger to the city. Many residents are vain about their appearances,
too, searching Google for terms relating to plastic surgery procedures at a
very high rate.
Houston, TX
Houston is the second-most
sinful place this year, featuring the third-highest number of adult
entertainment establishments per capita and some of the highest Google search
interest for terms relating to pornography, strip clubs and affairs.
On top of that, Houston’s
residents struggle with anger and hatred. The city has the 21st-highest violent
crime rate in the country and the 28th-highest number of aggravated assault
offenses per capita. It also had the fifth-highest number of mass shootings
between January 2023 and June 2025.
Finally, many Houstonians
have trouble with vices. For example, the city has the 29th-most drunk driving
fatalities per capita, the eighth-highest share of residents with gambling
problems, and some of the highest Google search interest for plastic surgery.
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles is the
third-most sinful city in the U.S., in part due to violence committed by its
residents. Los Angeles has the third-highest share of students bullied on
school property and the 14th-most hate crimes per capita. It also had the
eighth-most mass shootings between January 2023 and June 2025.
In addition, residents in
Los Angeles may be a bit less giving than people in other cities. Only 24% of
residents volunteer, the fifth-lowest percentage in the country. Residents also
give less than 4% of their adjusted gross income to charity, the 24th-lowest
percentage among the more than 180 cities in our study.
To top things off, Los
Angeles residents search Google more than people in most other cities for terms
stemming from lust and vanity, such as those related to pornography,
extramarital affairs, and plastic surgery.
ASK THE EXPERTS
What leads many of us to
partake in sinful behavior may seem like a mystery, especially when those
behaviors become common in our daily lives. We asked a panel of experts for
their insight on this topic as well as how to combat these bad habits. Below,
you can read their bios and thoughts on the following key questions:
1. To what extent is sinful
behavior innate versus influenced by your surroundings?
2. Is cheating within marriage
becoming more or less common over time?
3. Should the government play
a role in trying to reduce greed and consumerism?
4. What are some effective
ways to combat addiction and domestic violence?
5. What are some strategies
that might help people steer clear of temptations (e.g., unnecessary spending,
excessive drinking and eating, binge-watching, etc.) and maintain their health?
By
J.B. Watson
Ph.D., Emeritus Faculty (Sociology), Department of Government
& Sociology - Stephen F. Austin State University & Emeritus Member,
Association for the Scientific Study of Religion (ASSR)
Colleen
Wynn
Ph.D., Associate Professor and Chair, Department of Sociology and
Co-Director, Community Research Center - University of Indianapolis
Ryan
T Cragun
Professor of Empirical Sociology - University of Tampa
Marta
Soligo
Ph.D., Assistant Professor, William F. Harrah College of
Hospitality - University of Nevada, Las Vegas and Visiting Professor, Master's
Program in Planning and Management of Tourism Systems Universitŕ degli Studi di
Bergamo, Italy
Dr.
Stan Weeber
Professor of Sociology – McNeese State University
Nicole
Marie Brown
MSEd, Ph.D. – Associate Professor, Sociology; Faculty Advisory
Board Member, Ethnic Studies; Affiliate, Women's and Gender Studies – Saint
Mary's College of California
To determine the most sinful
cities in America, WalletHub compared 182 cities — including the 150 most
populated U.S. cities, plus at least two of the most populated cities in each
state — across seven key dimensions: 1) Anger & Hatred, 2) Jealousy, 3)
Excesses & Vices, 4) Greed, 5) Lust, 6) Vanity and 7) Laziness.
We examined those
dimensions using 37 relevant metrics listed below with their corresponding
weights. Each metric was graded on a 100-point scale, with a score of 100
representing the highest level of sinfulness. Please note that data for metrics
marked with an asterisk (*) were available at the state level only. For metrics
marked with two asterisks (**), the square root of the population was used to
calculate the population size to avoid overcompensating for minor differences
across cities.
Finally, we calculated each
city’s weighted average across all metrics to determine its overall score, or
WalletHub Vice Index, and used the resulting scores to rank-order the cities.
Anger & Hatred – Total Points: 14.3
·
Violent
Crimes per 1,000 Residents: Full Weight (~1.59 Points)
·
Sex
Offenders per Capita: Full Weight (~1.59 Points)
·
Aggravated
Assault Offenses Known to Law Enforcement per 1,000 Residents: Full Weight
(~1.59 Points)
·
Bullying
Rate*: Full Weight (~1.59 Points)
·
Hate-Crime
Incidents per Capita: Full Weight (~1.59 Points)
·
Hate
Groups per Capita: Full Weight (~1.59 Points)
·
Deaths
due to Firearms per Capita: Full Weight (~1.59 Points)
·
Number
of Mass Shootings: Full Weight (~1.59 Points)
·
Presence
of Terrorist Attacks: Full Weight (~1.59 Points)
Note: This is a binary metric:
1 – There was a terrorist attack or related incident in the city.
0 – There wasn’t a terrorist attack or related incident in the city.
Jealousy – Total Points: 14.3
·
Thefts
per 1,000 Residents: Full Weight (~4.77 Points)
·
Identity-Theft
Complaints per Capita: Full Weight (~4.77 Points)
·
Fraud
& Other Complaints per Capita: Full Weight (~4.77 Points)
Excesses & Vices – Total Points: 14.3
·
Share
of Obese Adults: Full Weight (~1.43 Points)
·
Fast-Food
Establishments per Capita**: Full Weight (~1.43 Points)
·
Excessive
Drinking: Full Weight (~1.43 Points)
Note: This metric measures the age-adjusted prevalence of binge
and heavy drinking among the adult population.
·
DUI-Related
Fatalities per Capita: Full Weight (~1.43 Points)
·
Share
of Adult Smokers: Full Weight (~1.43 Points)
·
Share
of Adult Coffee Drinkers: Full Weight (~1.43 Points)
Note: This metric measures the share of adults who drank
ready-to-drink coffee in the past six months.
·
Share
of Population Using Marijuana: Full Weight (~1.43 Points)
Note: This metric measures the share of residents aged 12 and
older who used marijuana in the past month.
·
Retail
Opioid Prescriptions Dispensed per 100 Persons: Full Weight (~1.43 Points)
·
Drug
Overdose Deaths: Full Weight (~1.43 Points)
Note: This metric measures the number of deaths due to drug
poisoning per 100,000 residents.
·
Debt-to-Income
Ratio: Full Weight (~1.43 Points)
Greed – Total Points: 14.3
·
Casinos
per Capita**: Full Weight (~4.77 Points)
·
Charitable
Donations as Share of Income: Full Weight (~4.77 Points)
·
Share
of Adults with Gambling Disorders*: Full Weight (~4.77 Points)
Lust – Total Points: 14.3
·
Adult
Entertainment Establishments per Capita**: Full Weight (~3.58 Points)
·
Google
Search Interest Index for “XXX Entertainment”: Full Weight (~3.58 Points)
Note: This metric measures search interest for online adult
entertainment.
·
Google
Search Traffic for the Term “Tinder”: Full Weight (~3.58 Points)
Note: This metric was used as a proxy for the cities that search
Tinder the most.
·
Teen
Birth Rate: Full Weight (~3.58 Points)
Note: This metric measures the number of births per 1,000 female
residents aged 15 to 19.
Vanity – Total Points: 14.3
·
Tanning
Salons per Capita**: Full Weight (~7.15 Points)
·
Google
Search Interest Index for “Top 5 Plastic Surgeries”: Full Weight (~7.15 Points)
Note: This metric measures search interest for the five most
common plastic surgery procedures (rhinoplasty, blepharoplasty, facelift,
liposuction, and silicone implants) as a share of the national average.
Laziness – Total Points: 14.3
·
Share
of Adults Not Exercising: Full Weight (~2.38 Points)
·
Average
Weekly Hours Worked: Full Weight (~2.38 Points)
·
Volunteer
Rate: Full Weight (~2.38 Points)
·
Average
Daily Time Spent Watching TV*: Full Weight (~2.38 Points)
·
High
School Dropout Rate: Full Weight (~2.38 Points)
Note: This metric was adjusted by the poverty rate.
·
Disconnected
Youth (16-24) Rate: Full Weight (~2.38 Points)
Note: Disconnected youth are teenagers and young adults between
the ages of 16 and 24 who are neither in school nor working.
Sources: Data used to create
this ranking were collected as of October 20, 2025 from the U.S. Census Bureau,
Bureau of Labor Statistics, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Internal Revenue
Service, Advameg, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Federal Trade
Commission, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, County
Health Rankings, TransUnion, Yelp, National Council on Problem Gambling,
Corporation for National and Community Service, Esri's Updated Demographics
(2024 estimates), The Southern Poverty Law Center, National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration, Wm. Robert Johnston, Gun Violence Archive, Google Ads
and Tinder.
ATTACHMENT SIXTEEN
– FROM THE NEW
ATLANTIS
Why We Are
Better Off Than a Century Ago
Our ancestors built grand public systems to conquer hunger,
thirst, darkness, and squalor. That progress can be lost if we forget it.
By Charles C. Mann
I began this series of articles by describing a
destination wedding that made me think of Thomas Jefferson. As I was writing
this afterword, I went to another wedding in a faraway place, which put me in
mind of another president, Calvin Coolidge.
WHY WE ARE BETTER OFF THAN A
CENTURY AGO
The groom was a career military man from a conservative
Catholic family. The bride’s family was liberal and Jewish. As I talked with
the families, it became clear that they had strongly diverging ideas about
issues like crime, immigration, religion, economics, and the environment. It is
commonplace to observe that in the United States, and every other Western
nation, these divisions have become so heated that threats of civil war and
government collapse have become familiar news headlines. But at the reception
there was a shared sense of happiness as the bridesmaids, beautiful young women
in flowing dresses, and the groomsmen, handsome young men in dress uniforms,
danced together under a splendid full moon.
The political fights that beset the nation are real and
important. But at the same time people would have to be pretty far gone not to
join in celebrating two nice young people beginning their lives together.
But the people at the wedding had deeper commonalities, too.
All of them — like all the inhabitants of the United States and every other
Western nation — stand together atop a mountain of successful efforts to
improve human well-being. Conservative and liberal, atheist and believer, every
race, age, and social class — each and every one has benefited from the great
systems built up in the last century and a half that deliver to us good food,
clean water, instant electric power, and advances in health. In every material
sense, the people at the wedding were far better off than their forebears.
I was bluntly reminded of our good fortune the day after the
wedding, when I visited friends who lived nearby. When I took a shower, I
looked down and noticed that one of my calves was flushed and swollen. One of my legs is bigger than the other, I
thought. That can’t be good.
A few hours later, I went to the emergency room, where a
doctor diagnosed the swelling and redness as a skin infection: cellulitis. I
asked if cellulitis is risky. “Oh, yes,” the doctor said. “These things have an
excellent chance of killing you.” He prescribed antibiotics, which I bought
afterward. Within a few hours of taking the first pill, the swelling had
subsided. The episode was over — which put me in mind of Calvin Coolidge.
In the summer of 1924, Coolidge’s sixteen-year-old son,
Calvin, Jr., played tennis on the White House grounds. For some reason, he wore
sneakers without socks. He got a blister on his toe, as one might expect. It
quickly became infected. The White House physician took Calvin, Jr., to Walter
Reed General Hospital, then as now one of the nation’s finest health care
facilities. Unsurprisingly, the son of the president got the best care
available. Multiple specialists visited and the full resources of the hospital
were devoted to his care. But none of this did any good. Within a week, the
president’s son was dead. Coolidge went into a deep depression from which he
never fully recovered.
Staphylococcus aureus,
a common bacterium, was the cause of death. Staph was responsible for my
infection, too. It was striking to realize that a) a century ago I might well
have died; and b) the cost of maybe saving my life was three hours in the ER
and $4.16 worth of antibiotics.
Another way of saying this is that I, like billions of
others, have benefited from the progress humankind has made during the last
century.
Progress today is a loaded
word. The idea and its name both arose during the Enlightenment, when modern
ideas about science first became widespread. Progress’s most important exponent
was probably the French philosopher and mathematician
Marie-Jean-Antoine-Nicolas de Caritat, Marquis de Condorcet, who wrote Outline of a Historical View of the Progress of the Human Mind in
1794. The Outline is a triumph of hope over experience. Its
author initially supported the French Revolution, believing it would lead to
more freedom, including freedom to criticize the government. But the
revolutionary junta branded Condorcet as a traitor after he criticized it. He
wrote about progress while hiding from the police. Soon after finishing the
book, Condorcet was caught and thrown in prison. He died in his cell — possibly
murdered, certainly still dreaming of progress — two days later. The Outline appeared posthumously.
Condorcet saw the increase of scientific knowledge as
leading unavoidably to greater political freedom and well-being. So did most of
the framers of the Constitution. But the awful wars of the twentieth century
called this idea into question. In a celebrated passage written in 1940, the German
writer Walter Benjamin imagined the “angel of history” turning backward to look
at the past. “Where we perceive a chain of events [leading to the present], he
sees one single catastrophe which keeps piling wreckage upon wreckage.” The
angel would like to stop to fix the disaster, Benjamin wrote. But he can’t,
because he is caught in a violent storm that hurls him helplessly forward “into
the future to which his back is turned, while the pile of debris before him
grows skyward. This storm is what we call progress.”
From this perspective, the idea of progress is worse than
meaningless. It is a story that we tell ourselves rather than look directly at
what is happening. On top of that, some critics say, these tales are used as
tools to justify an unfair status quo. If Europe and North America are
materially better off, that is not progress, but the profits from slavery,
colonialism, and genocide. “We can find nothing in reality that might help to
redeem the promise inherent in the word ‘progress,’” wrote the philosopher and
critic Theodor Adorno in History and Freedom.
Adorno escaped the Nazis, who killed many of his friends and
associates. Benjamin, one of his closest collaborators, committed
suicide after the failure of his attempt to flee Europe. And after the war Adorno
was dismayed by what he saw as German intellectuals’ clinging to German culture
— its great music, writing, architecture, and so on — to avoid responsibility
for the Holocaust. Adorno died in 1969, when Western cities were torn by riots,
China was wracked by the Cultural Revolution, the two sides in the Cold War
were racing to build ever more nuclear weapons, and warnings of imminent global
famine were hitting the best-seller charts. Little wonder he doubted the idea
of progress!
But Adorno lived before the Green Revolution drastically
reduced world hunger. He never saw how modern anti-pollution techniques cleaned
up rivers and water supplies all over Europe and North America. He never
traveled to Africa, Asia, Latin America, and so did not see what it meant to
have the gift of electric power. He didn’t see global public health campaigns
eliminate smallpox, almost eliminate polio, drastically reduce malaria, and
beat back a host of other infectious diseases.
Unlike me, Adorno never had the experience of going to an
emergency room that was always open to the public, or of taking a life-saving
antibiotic. Instead, his experience with medicine was that of multiple doctors
being unable to diagnose or treat the incapacitating ailments — migraines,
nausea, fever — that afflicted his wife for decades. On a larger scale, he did
not have access to contemporary data and data-visualization techniques and so
never saw charts like these: see websites OurWorldinData.com/child-mortality and OurWorldinData.com/maternal-mortality.
The charts show the fall in the number of British women who
die during pregnancy or childbirth and the number of British children who die
before the age of five. I chose Britain because it has unusually good records,
but similar (if sometimes smaller) long-term declines have occurred all over
the world. One would have to be extraordinarily cynical not to conclude from
these charts that in fundamental ways life has gotten better.
Everywhere these and other improvements have occurred for
the same reasons: better nutrition, cleaner water, more energy for heating and
cooking, advances in public health. Condorcet, in other words, was partially
right: the advance of science did lead to progress. But the progress was not so
much political as material. And it wasn’t so much from science itself as the
use of scientific advances — the invention of powerful pumps, the introduction
of high-yielding crops, the discovery of electrons, the development of vaccines
and antibiotics — to create systems that increased human well-being.
At the same time, Benjamin and Adorno were also partially
correct. Condorcet believed that progress was inevitable, even guaranteed by
natural forces. Benjamin and Adorno remind us that human failings can always
make things worse. For understandable reasons, the two men thought in terms of
human depravity. And it is true that terrorism, insurrection, and war,
especially nuclear war, could negate much or most of the improvement in human
well-being our forebears achieved.
But Benjamin and Adorno missed another, possibly more
pernicious threat. Each increment of progress generates its own overhead. Even
as brilliant minds pursue space flight, cancer cures, and flying cars, we also
must undertake the largely invisible, sometimes thankless labor of maintaining
and improving the sewage treatment plants our forebears bequeathed to us. The
advances of our past are yokes around the neck of the present. The more
advances, the heavier the weight of the yokes.
Power plants must be upgraded and replaced, along with power
lines and distribution centers. Crops must be continually bred to face new
pests and blights. Water systems must be renovated after use and wear. Medical
treatments must adjust to diseases that are constantly evolving. Buildings must
be renewed for new uses with new materials. And the standards behind all these
efforts must be reviewed to take into account changes in science and society.
The list is long, daunting — and necessary. It is true that
some new advances obviate past methods. A clear example: replacing lead pipes
with plastic pipes can mean the water no longer has to be checked constantly
for lead. But the systems overall will always need care. They will always be
one generation from falling apart.
Sometimes it seems that in all the immediate tumult of a
politically divided society the need to continue these efforts for the common
good can be forgotten. These articles have been written in the hope that they
will play a small part in reminding us of the need to pay attention to them.
Our ancestors gave us the food, water, energy, and public health systems that
undergird our world; keeping them going is how we can pass on those gifts to
our children.
Charles C. Mann is a
science journalist and the author of the bestsellers 1491: New Revelations of the Americas Before Columbus (Alfred A. Knopf, 2005) and 1493: Uncovering the New World Columbus Created (Alfred A. Knopf, 2011), as well as The Wizard and the Prophet: Two Remarkable Scientists and Their
Dueling Visions to Shape Tomorrow’s World (Alfred A. Knopf, 2018).