the DON JONES INDEX…
|
|||
|
|
GAINS POSTED in GREEN LOSSES POSTED in RED 1/23/26…
16,034.90 1/8/26… 16,030.37 6/27/13... 15,000.00 |
||
|
|||
|
(THE DOW JONES INDEX: 1/23/26... 48,442.44; 1/8/26... 48,996.08; 6/27/13… 15,000.00)
|
|||
LESSON for JANUARY 16th, 2026 – “PIRATES of the POTOMAC!”
Our last issue’s breaking news was headline
nobody else was paying attention to… the White House has declared that piracy
is no longer a crime.
Yo ho! Ho!...
America’s War on Piracy came to a shuddering
stop a week ago pursuant to White House Executive Order 14199 in which
President Trump pulled the United States out of sixty six
international organizations. Many were
involved in issues like fighting climate change or promoting humanitarian
issues, but pullout number thirty was from the Regional Cooperation Agreement on Combatting Piracy and
Armed Robbery (RECAPP) against Ships in Asia.
(ATTACHMENT ONE “A”)
...and
a bottle of, uh, diet Coke.
Wikipedia
(ATTACHMENT ONE “B”) defines RECAPP as “a multilateral
agreement between 16 countries in Asia,
concluded in November 2004 and includes the RECAAP Information Sharing Centre
(ISC), an initiative for facilitating the dissemination of piracy-related
information.”
First
proposed in 1999 and ratified in 2006 ReCAAP was
established as a decentralized security network, which included the formation
of an Information Security Center (ISC) as part of the UN Trade & Development,
which produces an annual report on the state of the maritime industry and
advocates for developing nations in global trade talks.
The
maritime journal Trade Winds (ATTACHMENT ONE “C”) cited an “Asian security
group” which said that Americans “paid only a nominal sum every year”, but
Germany’s Hansa Shipping and Markets journal claimed that... while withdrawal
from the squandrous sixty six
was
about saving costs, “it was primarily about “which organizations, agreements
and treaties run counter to the interests of the United States.” (ATTACHMENT ONE “D”)
“Recaap
cooperation is primarily about sharing information on piracy cases, threats,
strategic plans. In contrast to East Africa, where some of the states are very
weak in terms of naval and coastal protection and Somalia was considered a
“failed state”, better developed, sovereign states are involved here.
Strictly
speaking, many cases in the region are “armed robbery” and not “piracy” because
the vast majority of attacks take place in the territorial waters of the
states. This circumstance has important consequences because it is the coastal
states that have the right to pursue and intervene there first, and not the
naval units of other countries that are on patrol duty and could intervene more
quickly if necessary.
Even though pirates
off East and West Africa have received much more attention in recent years
and the military has recently sounded the alarm again, shipping in Southeast Asia is
still struggling with attacks, thefts and boardings. Despite – or perhaps
because of – its “low profile” cooperation, Recaap is
considered a model for success, even if two important countries in the region,
Malaysia and Indonesia, cannot bring themselves to join for fear of losing
sovereignty.”
SecState Rubio
described the organizations in question as “redundant, mismanaged, unnecessary,
wasteful and poorly run”. They would be “captured by the interests of actors
pursuing their own agendas contrary to our interests, or pose a threat to our
nation’s sovereignty, freedoms and overall prosperity”.
The
withdrawal from the global climate treaty is "a new low" from the
administration, said Rachel Cleetus, policy director
and lead economist for the Union of Concerned Scientists climate and energy
program. It's another "sign that this authoritarian, anti-science
administration is determined to sacrifice people’s well-being and destabilize
global cooperation."
But
oh... the treasure to be gained from pirates’ plunder!
This development went almost unnoticed in the
press, owing to the press of other events and White House Executive Orders with
what little coverage noted primarily concerned with climate change and
manifestations of the detestable “green hoax” promulgated by President Trump
and his cabinet of curiosities; howsoever it gave credence to not only the
active brigands of the Pacific but to contentions by Venezuela’s deposed
dictator Nicolas Maduro, (currently locked up for dastardly dictatorial deeds
in the doing of Venezuelan gumment bizness) that Djonald UnJollied’s seagoing attacks on and confiscations of oil
tankers flying various or no flags but all full of black gold, or goop, which
had begun during Christmas Week, had joined the ostensibly original drugrunners, gunrunners and pirates of the Caribbean,
impacting customers like Cuba, Iran, Russia, China and more than a few
ostensible American allies.
Oil, its extraction from the Venezuelan
deposits in primarily located in the vast Orinoco
Belt (Faja Petrolífera del Orinoco) in central
Venezuela, holding the world's
largest proven reserves, mostly as extra-heavy crude. Significant conventional
oil resources are also found in the Maracaibo Basin (around Lake
Maracaibo) and the Eastern Venezuelan Basin - processing and transport, appearing to have
stolen the thunder from the brief and increasingly limited war on that country
– replacing regime change (achieved, as to Maduro and his wife) although his
own Veep, Delcy Rodriguez has been sworn in as
dictator (or President, to supporters) shadow dictator Diosdado Cabello,
the interior minister/cum/thuglord in his “Doubt is
Treason” continues to rule his
armies of colectivo thugs that continue to oppress
and arrest and, when orders or whims dictate, kill persons even suspected of
being pro-Yanqui. Trump, SecState Marco Rubio, DefSec Hegseth and the usual MAGA diplomatic foibles like Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner are now focused on cutting deals
with the Maduro cronies and, perhaps, commandeering at least a portion of the
nation’s wealth... tho’ not the foreign bank accounts
of Chavistas (followers of Chavez, the country’s predecessor dictator). (USA Today, Dec. 2, 2025/Updated Jan. 3, 2026,
6:47 AM ET – ATTACHMENT TWO)
Two
days before Christmas, 2025, Venezuela's
ruling-party controlled National Assembly unanimously approved a law that
allows prison sentences of up to 20 years “for anyone who promotes or finances
what it describes as piracy or blockades.”
National
Assembly President Jorge Rodriguez,
a former psychiatrist and brother of now-President Delcy,
accused the supporters of opposition party leader and Nobel prizewinner Machado
of promoting sanctions and said they "stole, plundered, bowed down to U.S.
imperialism," adding that "they are happy with the aggressive actions
currently taking place in the Caribbean Sea." (Reuters, December
23, 2025 1:30 PM EST –Updated December 23, 2025 – ATTACHMENT THREE)
NASTY NIKKI
Asking and answering (sort of) the
question of Maduro’s identity and accomplishments... including the awful
ones... USA Today reported that, during the 1980s, Maduro worked as a
bodyguard and a bus driver, and belonged to the Caracas Metro system transit
union. Jailed for anti-government
activities including a reported coup to oust then-President Carlos Andres
Perez, he was released with the aid of Hugo Chavez and returned the favor by
supporting his predecessor in the 1998 presidential campaign "that
promised to give poor Venezuelans a larger share of the economic pie dominated
by the country's wealthy ruling elite,"
Earning
a place in Chávez’s inner circle, Maduro
went on to serve as the country's foreign minister and vice president before
being elected President for three terms – the last in July 2024, the country's
government-controlled electoral commission declared he’d won the election,
keeping his seat in office despite disputed results showing Machado had won
from 70 to 80 percent of the vote.
Maduro
and his top generals were indicted in 2020 for their
alleged involvement in a drug trafficking conspiracy as the alleged head
of the Cartel de los Soles, a group
the U.S. State Department has labeled a foreign terrorist organization.
The Venezuelan
president denied having any links to the illegal drug trade. (ATTACHMENT FOUR – Jan.
3, 2026, 6:47 a.m. ET)
But, in fact, regime
change, in its turn, had largely... if briefly... replaced the demonic drugs
(largely cocaine and marijuana with fentanyl being a specialty of the Chinese)
and invading aliens fleeing Venezuela for economic or political reasons (or, in
many cases, to go on living after having offended the regime, one way or
another.
Therefore, the prelude to invasion, arrest and
extraction of Mr. and Mrs. Maduro which had been presaged by those “piratical”
attacks, seizures and sinkings... first upon small boats believed to be
transporting the wicked weed and various powders (later, authorities would
state that Europe, not America, had been their likely destination) and then
seizures of oil-bearing tankers... first a couple under Venezuelan flags, then
a “shadow ship” flying the banner of Russia – which protested but, notably, did
not declare what fearful Fannies warned might be World War Three.
Rumblings
of revolution began under a Wolf supermoon in appropriate Hour of the Wolf -
the dead of night Saturday morning, when the New York Times (ATTACHMENT FIVE, Jan. 3, 2026, 2:24
a.m. ET) reported “explosions” in Caracas.
“It
was not immediately clear what caused the blasts,” said the Times, but the
United States “has been building pressure on Nicolás Maduro, Venezuela’s
authoritarian president, for months.”
President Trump, having said he would wait
until time and the weather co-operated, pulled the plug under that glowering
Wolf Supermoon and, amidst the barrage upon what even skeptics agreed were
largely military targets (several dozen Cuban mercenaries were reportedly
killed in their sleep).
The troops
reportedly arrived at Maduro’s compound at 1:01 a.m. ET. Inside his home on a military base, the
Maduros bolted for a safe room as U.S. troops swooped into the compound and
explosions lit up the nighttime sky over Caracas.
“Maduro
made it as far as the door but couldn’t get it to shut,” reported USA Today’s
Michael Collins (ATTACHMENT SIX Jan. 3,
2026/Updated Jan. 4, 2026, 11:12 a.m. ET)
“Members
of the Army’s secretive Delta Force grabbed the Venezuelan leader and his wife,
Cilia Flores, whisked them out of the compound and took them to the USS Iwo
Jima, an amphibious assault ship waiting off the South
American coast.”
No
U.S. forces were killed, and no American aircraft were lost during the strike,
said President Donald Trump, who announced the military operation had been
“one of the most stunning, effective and powerful displays of American military
might and competence in American history,” while USA Today concurred that it
was “one of the most significant incursions into a foreign country since the
wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.”
“This
mission was meticulously planned, drawing lessons from decades of missions over
the last many years,” said Gen. Dan Caine, an Air Force general who serves as
Trump’s chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, during a news conference at
Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida.
Intelligence
teams monitored Maduro to understand how he moved, where he lived, where he
traveled, what he ate, what he wore – and even what kind of pets he had, Caine
said.
Republicans still
clung to the “War on Drugs” explanation for the raid and apprehemsion. Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Tom Cotton, R-Arkansas, said
in a post on X that Maduro “wasn’t just an illegitimate dictator; he also ran a
vast drug-trafficking operation. That’s why he was indicted in U.S. court
nearly six years ago for drug trafficking and narco-terrorism.”
House
Speaker Mike Johnson,
R-Louisiana, described the military action as “a decisive and justified operation
that will protect American lives.”
“Nicolas
Maduro is responsible for the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Americans
after years of trafficking illegal drugs and violent cartel members into our
country – crimes for which he’s been properly indicted in U.S. courts and an
arrest warrant duly issued – and today he learned what accountability looks
like,” Johnson said in a statement.
Democrats
expressed a range of reactions from concern to outright disapproval as the
dictator was being hauled back to America. “It’s
embarrassing that we went from the world cop to the world bully in less than
one year,” said Sen. Ruben Gallego, D-Arizona, an Iraq war veteran.
And
Sen. Tim Kaine, D-Virginia, objected to the exclusion of Congressional
concurrence, or even input, before military action.
“Where
will this go next?” Kaine asked. “Will the
president deploy our troops to protect Iranian protesters? To enforce the
fragile ceasefire in Gaza? To battle terrorists in Nigeria? To seize Greenland
or the Panama Canal? To suppress Americans peacefully assembling to protest his
policies? Trump has threatened to do all this and more and sees no need to seek
legal authorization from people’s elected legislature before putting
servicemembers at risk.”
The
Trump administration insisted it did not need congressional authorization for
its military operations in and around Venezuela.
Time
had said that the half-hour incursion had drawn on “weeks
of rehearsals and a vast armada of aircraft and intelligence assets that
tracked Maduro’s behavioral habits.”
WHY TRUMP AUTHORIZED THE OPERATION
Trump framed the raid as both a law enforcement
action and an act of war against drug trafficking networks he says are
protected by the Venezuelan state.
“We had to do it because it’s a war,” he said, citing
what he described as an armed conflict with cartels moving drugs toward the
United States.
Other Administration officials agreed - saying that
the strikes were intended to take down transnational drug cartels, arguing that
Venezuelan territory had become central to trafficking routes into the United
States. But the first replacement of the
campaign... a pivot from drug war to regime change... was also voiced with
Time’s Nik Popli contending (Jan. 3, 2:17 PM,
ATTACHMENT SEVEN) that it served a broader strategic purpose: “degrading
Venezuela’s ability to detect or respond to American military movements, while
signaling to Maduro that Trump was prepared to act directly on Venezuelan
soil.”
The second pivot... from regime change to oil... was
now beginning to manifest and would gain supremacy within a few days (below).
The operation, Time reported, “was carried out by an
elite U.S. Army special operations unit known as Delta Force, which specializes
in covert and dangerous missions at the direction of the president.”
Trump said the U.S. intended to carry out the
operation four days earlier to usher in 2026, but weather nearly delayed the
mission.
“Over
the weeks through Christmas and New Year’s, the men and women of the United
States military sat ready,” said General Caine.
According to “Raisin’” Caine, the final order to
strike Venezuela came late Friday night. “At 10:46 p.m. ET, the President
ordered the United States military to move forward with this mission,” he said.
“He said to us, ‘Good luck and Godspeed.’”
Over
the next several hours, more than 150 aircraft—including bombers, fighter jets,
surveillance planes, helicopters and drones—launched from 20 bases on land and
at sea across the Western Hemisphere while U.S. Cyber Command, Space Command
and other agencies “layered effects overhead” to protect the aircraft and
preserve surprise, General Caine said.
A FIREFIGHT DURING THE RAID
He also said that as the apprehension force descended
and moved to isolate the area, helicopters came under fire, prompting American
forces to respond “with overwhelming force and self defense.”
One U.S. aircraft was hit but remained flyable, and
all aircraft returned safely, he added.
Time reported that Trump had
said that the United States planned to oversee Venezuela until a transition of
power could be arranged. “We’re going to run the country until such time as we
can do a safe, proper and judicious transition,” he said.
The
British liberals at Guardian U.K., however, cited Alan McPherson, a history professor at Temple
University and author of “A Short History of US Interventions in Latin America
and the Caribbean” who opined that while “One”... even when kicking the
colonials, the English are always polite... “might have thought that this era
of naked imperialism – of the US getting the political outcomes it wants in
Latin America through sheer military force – would be over in the 21st century,
but clearly it is not,” he added.
Looking
backwards to the capture
of Panama’s dictator Manuel Noriega in 1989, covert actions which helped topple
democratically elected governments and usher in military dictatorships in
countries such as Brazil, Chile and Argentina and... as Maurício Santoro, a professor of international relations at
the State University of Rio de Janeiro, described the new national security strategy
published by the Trump administration a few weeks ago... a “Trump corollary” to the Monroe doctrine – the
“America for Americans” foreign policy “set out in 1823 by President James
Monroe and later used to justify US-backed military coups in South and Central
America.” (G.U.K. – Jan. 3, 2300 EST,
ATTACHMENT EIGHT)
Said corollary has, since the dawn
of 2026 and the dusk of the dictator, been dubbed the “Donroe
Doctrine” by the Man Himself (Jan. 4. 11:42 AM: ATTACHMENT NINE)...
one of what Margaret Hartmann in New York Magazine called “...(t)he wildest things Trump said about
the Venezuela attack.”
Other whoppers included the
statement, during his Saturday press conference, that: “We’re
going to run the country until such time as we can do a safe proper and
judicious transition... (w)e don’t want to be
involved with having somebody else get in and we have the same situation that
we had for the last long period of years,” or the contention that, responding
to an inquiry from Fox about China’s reaction to the attack: “There’s not going
to be a problem... (t)hey’re going to get oil. We’re
going to allow people to have oil.”
How civilized!
The New Yorker’s compilation also
quoted the Djonald UnCivilized
uncivilized threats against Mexico – including the warning: “We can do it
again, too. Nobody can stop us,” and
adding that, while Mexican president Claudia Sheinbaum is a “good woman”, (the
cartels) are running Mexico, “she’s not running Mexico,” so “something is going
to have to be done with Mexico.”
Looking back
even further than the Mexican War of 1846 (when the United States nearly
doubled its territory by removing Hollywood, Salt Lake and... after a brief
interstice of independence, Texas... from Mexico) to a time a quarter of a
century earlier, Trump laughed off Democrats’ nagging that the Veninvasion wasn’t constitutional by boasting: “The Monroe
Doctrine … They now call it the Donroe Document.”
Trump reversed his timeline back
to the future (or, rather, near past... Cuba, Brazil, Panama – where the
deposition and apprehension of Manuael Noriega in
1989 was called comparable to the Maduro overthrow) concluded his remarks on
Air Force One by claiming that attacking Venezuela, then threatening various
other countries, isn’t about oil but peace.
“It’s about
peace on earth.”
A noble (if not Nobel) sentiment... but Gothanite troller Margaret Hartmann plucked a few Trumptastic chestnuts from the fires of the (brief) war...
(New York Magazine, Jan. 4, ATTACHMENT NINE) and, amidst his Air Force One
discourse, related nuggets like...
“Nobody can
stop us...”
“We’re going to run the country
until such time as we can do a safe proper and judicious transition,” he said.
“We don’t want to be involved with having somebody else get in and we have the
same situation that we had for the last long period of years.”
China’s reaction to
the attacks...
“There’s not going to be a
problem. “They’re going to get oil.
We’re going to allow people to have oil.”
“Something is
going to have to be done with Mexico.”
“(W)e’re
very friendly with” Mexican president Claudia Sheinbaum, who’s a “good
woman.” But … maybe
yes? “The cartels are running Mexico, she’s not running Mexico,” so “something
is going to have to be done with Mexico.”
“We’re going
to be very strongly involved” in Venezuela’s oil industry.
“At least we don’t have to waste a
lot of time wondering what this is really about,” Hartmann divulged, citing
Trump’s “openly describing how U.S. companies are going to take over
Venezuela’s oil business.”
As everyone knows, said the
President, “the oil business in Venezuela has been a bust, a total bust. For a
long period of time they were pumping almost nothing
in comparison to what they could have been pumping and what could have taken
place. We’re going to have our very large United States oil companies, the
biggest anywhere in the world go in, spend billions of dollars, fix the badly
broken infrastructure. The oil infrastructure. And start making money for the
country.”
Anticipating questions about
constitutionality, Hartman asked: “So how are we supposed to respond to all this?
Definitely not by questioning Trump’s power!”
Unfortunately for future history
students, she added, “Trump has already coined an incredibly stupid term for
this era of American foreign policy.”
“The Monroe
Doctrine … They now call it the Donroe Document.”
Venezuela
“took our oil away from us.”
Trump then complained that
Venezuela took America’s oil … by which he meant Venezuelan oil that he thinks
the U.S. is entitled to. “Remember, they
stole our property,” he said. “It was the greatest theft in the history of
America. Nobody has ever stolen our property like they have. They took our oil
away from us. They took the infrastructure away. And all that infrastructure is
rotten and decayed. And the oil companies are going to go in and rebuild it.
We’re not going to spend very much money at all. They oil companies are going
to go in, we’re going to take our oil back.”
Kidnapping is
“not a bad term.”
Trump suggested that he had talked
to Delcy Rodríguez, and shrugged off her calling
Maduro’s capture a “kidnapping.”
“It’s about
peace on earth.”
Or, perhaps, piracy?
While some AI jokers issued
deepfakes of Trump as President of Venezuela (prompting the latenite
comedians to snark that he’d become the first American in history to lead two
failing states) it was Delcy, not Donnie actually “sworn in
as Venezuela’s president after Maduro abduction,” according to those boppers at
Al Jazeera (Jan. 5, ATTACHMENT TEN).
While the President of only America, so far, actually
allowed Rodriguez to take her oath of office... with cautious intimations that
it was contingent on deals uncounted (deals on debt, deals on oil, deals on
deals with bad actors) - but, apparantly, no deals on
democracy’s continuing decline with Trump himself warning that her
tenure as president could be cut short, “should she fail to abide by US
demands.
“If she
doesn’t do what’s right, she is going to pay a very big price, probably bigger
than Maduro,”
Parsing the career of Rodriguez – a former labour lawyer and stalwart
“chavista” (adhering to the left-wing political
movement founded by Maduro’s mentor, the late Chavez) who has held “various
ministerial roles under Maduro, including leading the Ministry of Foreign
Affairs.”
The
jazzies also noted that even Republicans were having
doubts about Rodriguez.
“We
don’t recognise Delcy
Rodriguez as the legitimate ruler of Venezuela. We didn’t recognise
Nicolas Maduro as a legitimate ruler,” Republican Senator Tom Cotton told CNN
on Sunday.
“It
is a fact that she and other indicted and sanctioned officials are in
Venezuela. They have control over the military and security services. We have
to deal with that fact. That does not make them a legitimate leader.”
Then the US military seized two
more Venezuela-linked oil tankers, this time including a
Russian-flagged ship called the Bella 1 that it had pursued for more than two
weeks. “On Dec. 24, the ship received approval from the Kremlin to reflag
under Russia and has since changed its name to the Marinera. It was accompanied
by Russian naval vessels and a submarine but was seized between the British
Isles and Iceland with support from the UK military.” (1440 –
ATTACHMENT ELEVEN)
Department
of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Kristi Noem
shared a video of the operations to the social platform X Wednesday morning at
9:22 a.m. EST.
“In
two predawn operations today, the Coast Guard conducted back-to-back
meticulously coordinated boarding of two ‘ghost fleet’ tanker ships— one in the
North Atlantic Sea and one in international waters near the Caribbean,” she
wrote. (The Hill:
Jan. 7, 9:14 AM, ATTACHMENT TWELVE)
Hillsiders Max Rego
and Ellen Mitchell said that evidence set forth by officeholders and
influencers within the United States accused Delcy
Rodriguez and her replacement regime of ordering police to "immediately begin the
national search and capture of everyone involved in the promotion or support
for the armed attack by the United States," according to the text of the
decree, as reported by Reuters and set forth by Fox (Jan. 5, ATTACHMENT
THIRTEEN)
Despite denouncing the
U.S. military operation, Rodriguez said in a Sunday social media post that the
country aspires towards balanced and respectful international relations between
Caracas and Washington although, as post-Maduro
colectivo thugs hunt down, arrest, torture and kill
those who speak out against the continuation of the regime (now, apparently,
with the support of the White House), ordinary Venezuelans are dodging police
as they journey to retailers to stockpile necessities (like food, medicines
and... shades of the plague... toilet paper).
GUK, Jan. 4 (ATTACHMENT
FOURTEEN) interviewed residents of Caracas standing in long lines “to stock up on
supplies in case the coming days brought yet more drama.”
There
was scant sign of citizens celebrating Maduro’s downfall, something locals
attributed to fear that his regime – which
remains in power despite his arrest – might crack
down and a deep-rooted sense that little had actually changed as a result of
the US intervention.
“We all get what we deserve. Maduro is a man who
never put his hand on his heart to see the hardships of his country, to see his
people going hungry,” said Griselda Guzmán, recalling the satisfying moment she
had seen images of the dethroned dictator languishing in US custody. “When I
saw him like that – handcuffed – I saw him for what he was: the biggest fool on
Earth.”
Guzmán
said she believed Maduro had had “the opportunity of a lifetime” to leave power
voluntarily after the 2024 vote, which independently
verified voting data showed he had lost to the
political movement led by the Nobel laureate María Corina Machado. “He could
have handed over the presidency because he knew he hadn’t won,” she said.
“But instead Maduro chose to
cling to power – and now,” he was behind bars in New York facing decades in a
US jail.
US
News (Jan. 5, 4:00 PM, ATTACHMENT FIFTEEN) – having socked the Maduros away in
a decrepit Brooklyn jail asked the Administration whether there would be
elections in Venezuela... but when?... and would opposition leader and Nobel
Peace Prize winner María Corina Machado be allowed to run (or even to return)
after Trump said she lacked the “support” and “respect” internally to lead the
country.
So what’s
next for Venezuela and America’s role there? Olivier Knox asked and, sometimes,
offered answers to “some of the big questions,” like...
WHO’S IN CHARGE IN CARACAS?
On
Saturday, President Donald Trump sketched out a concept of a plan that, he
said, would put the U.S. in charge of Venezuela for an indefinite period of
time.
"We're
going to run the country until such time as we can do a safe, proper and
judicious transition," he said. Who will do the running? "It's
largely going to be, for a period of time, the people that are standing right
behind me," said Trump, referring to his secretaries of state, Marco Rubio,
and defense, Pete Hegseth.
But the deal artist also said he could “work
with” a compliant Rodriguez so U.S.N.W.R.’s Olivier Knox termed the American
actions “...more
a leadership change than a regime change. Coerce and co-opt Caracas, not “run”
(it).”
WILL THERE BE ELECTIONS?
“Short answer: Not
soon.” Trump has doubled down on his
opinion of Machado’s “lack of support” (only 70%) rejecting her dedication of
the Nobel to him and, after the U.S.N. article, her statement that she would
hand over the prize itself if Djonald UnBribed would allow control of Venezuela to return to
Venezuelans (with the unspoken caveat that Trump, Rubio, Hegseth
and such would at least rein in the colectivos if not returning to round up
their leaders and install them in prisons next to Maduro). This, also, was rejected.
Say what you will about Donnie’s
love of gold, it tarnishes when compared to his need for control.
So, WILL THERE BE MORE U.S. MILITARY ACTION IN
VENEZUELA?
That, according to USN and others, depends on whether
Rodriguez can kiss Trump’s backside on issues of import (like oil) while
spewing anti-American and patriotic rhetoric that will prevent colectivo commanders like DefSec
Bad Vlad Padrino López and interior minister Cabello
(above), and also profiled in the Romero/Kurmanev
takeaway in the New York Times’ Jan. 3rd anthology – (below,
Attachment “A”) from slicing her up like a pineapple.
More
American forces in Venezuela if she either fails him or falls victim to a coup?
“We’re not afraid of boots on the ground,” Trump said, telling The Atlantic
that if Delcy didn’t do “what’s right”, she would
“pay a very big price, probably bigger than Maduro” who, at least, is alive –
for the time being.
CAN VENEZUELA’S NEW LEADER KEEP THINGS TOGETHER?
This
depends on whether Rodríguez “can somehow steer a middle course of satisfying
American demands while preventing a rebellion from loyal Chavistas” like López,
Cabello and the colectivos in the country’s politics,
military and street gangs.
DOES THE U.S. HAVE A PLAN IF SHE DOESN’T?
It’ll take some pretty pivoting for Rodriguez to
survive but, if Venezuela collapses, USN’s Knox predicted “large emigrant flows
to neighboring countries, with potentially destabilizing effects for the
region. And what replaces the regime – chaos or a Maduro diehard – could be
worse for American interests.”
WILL AMERICAN OIL COMPANIES RUSH TO VENEZUELA?
On
Saturday, Trump repeatedly cited a desire to get American oil companies back in
the business of exploiting Venezuelan reserves but the oilies,
most already burned, some twice, are going to take their sweet crude time...
and at least wait until the country stabilizes (or, at least prices at the pump
“rise to the point where it’s profitable to drill for Venezuelan oil) despite
the risks.”
WORLD REACTION
Time (Jan 3, 10:54 AM, ATTACHMENT
@X55) took note of world leaders’ reaction to the removal of Maduro “with a mixture of
outrage, concern, and caution” two weeks ago Saturday.
Many countries expressed outrage over the capture of
Maduro on Saturday, while even some U.S. allies issued statements calling for
the rule of law to be respected. South American leaders in particular
expressed anger at the attack.
THE RESPONSES (Time, unless initialed)
Below is a round-up of global reactions to the
operation from Time and from others with fingers in foreign pies as follows...
Excerpts from these last four, plus takeaways from
the New York Times anthology have been folded into some of the Time flies from
foreign nations with identifying initials inserted... G, U, R, I and N as
listed as well as DJI for our own input – based on sources near or far or even
wholly imaginary.
UNITED KINGDOM
British Prime Minister Keir Starmer
said he wanted to speak to President Trump before making any firm statements
either way about Maduro’s capture.
"I always say and believe we should uphold
international law, but I think at this stage [in a] fast moving situation,
let's establish the facts and take it from there,” he said in a statement to
British broadcasters.
As news
emerged of the U.S. intervention, Starmer said: “I
will want to talk to the president” and to allies to “establish the facts.”
After Mr. Trump’s announcement, he wrote on X that the U.K. shed “no
tears” about the end of Mr. Maduro’s regime and would “discuss the evolving
situation with US counterparts” in hopes of a peaceful transition. (NYT in Attachment “A” – Erlanger)
RUSSIA
Russia's Foreign Ministry said it is "extremely
alarmed" and called for "immediate clarification", according to
a statement posted on Saturday on the ministry's Telegram channel.
It added later in a post on X: “The US committed an
act of armed aggression against Venezuela, which gives rise to deep concern
& warrants condemnation.”
The
UKRAINIAN Review (Jan. 4th, ATTACHMENT @X69) took a cautiously
optimistic stance on the Operation because Moscow
has for years supplied weapons and political backing to Nicolás Maduro’s regime
and because, following the dictator’s deposition and capture, “the divide
between Russia and the United States has become even more pronounced.”
RUSSIA
itself denounced the “US aggression” with Deputy Chairman of the Russian Security Council
Dmitry Medvedev declaring that “Washington no longer has the formal right to
criticize Moscow for any actions” in the Jan. 4th edition of the
state news agency TASS. (ATTACHMENT @70)
Allies of Mr. Maduro, including Cuba and Russia,
predictably condemned the American intervention, despite Russia’s own invasion
of sovereign Ukraine nearly four years ago.
(NYT – Erlanger 1:00 PM)
The reaction of Russia, another
ally of Mr. Maduro, was strongly worded and apparently without irony. Russia,
which launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine four years ago and is still at
war there, condemned the U.S. military action as “an act of armed aggression
against Venezuela.” The Russian foreign ministry, in a statement, called the
American attack “deeply concerning and condemnable,” adding: “Ideological
hostility has triumphed over businesslike pragmatism.” (NYT – Erlanger 1:00 PM)
Representative Don Bacon,
Republican of Nebraska, said the mission to capture Maduro was “great for the
future of Venezuelans and the region,” but he warned that it could hand
authoritarian powers a justification for aggression elsewhere. “My main concern
is now Russia will use this to justify their illegal and barbaric military
actions against Ukraine, or China to justify an invasion of Taiwan,” he wrote
in a social media post. (NYT – Jimison 10:07 AM)
Russian
Minister of Foreign Affairs Sergei Lavrov said he had spoken to Venezuelan Vice
President Delcy Rodriguez by telephone. Lavrov
“expressed firm solidarity with the people of Venezuela in the face of armed
aggression” and said Moscow would “continue to support” the government,
according to a summary of the conversation published by the ministry. (NYT – Hopkins 9:57 AM)
“The tanker (Bella 1) recently
claimed Russian protection. On Wednesday, the Russian government formally asked the United States to stop
chasing the ship, which the Coast Guard tried to intercept last month as it
traversed the Caribbean Sea on its way to pick up oil in Venezuela. The Bella 1
recently appeared in Russia’s official
register of ships under a new name, the Marinera, with a
home port of Sochi, on the Black Sea.
“Ships like the Bella 1, part of a
so-called shadow fleet that transports oil for Russia, Iran and Venezuela in
violation of sanctions imposed by the United States and other countries...” (NYT – Triebert and
Nehamas, Jan. 2 1:05 PM
EUROPEAN UNION
EU foreign policy chief Kaja
Kallas wrote on X that she had spoken to US Secretary
of State Marco Rubio and the EU ambassador in Caracas.
"The EU has repeatedly stated that Mr Maduro lacks legitimacy and has defended a peaceful
transition," she wrote. "Under all circumstances, the principles of
international law and the UN Charter must be respected. We call for
restraint."
The president of the European
Council, António Costa, said on Saturday that the European Union wants
de-escalation in Venezuela. Mr. Costa wrote on X that the E.U. “would
continue to support a peaceful, democratic, and inclusive
solution in Venezuela.” (NYT – Erlanger
1:00 PM)
EU and NATO MEMBERS
GERMANY hesitated to
condemn the US attack, seeming to have three things on its mind
in regard to US capture of of Venezuelan President
Nicolás Maduro in a DW timeline beginning Jan. 3rd (ATTACHMENT @): be cautious,
wait-and-see and don't upset Donald Trump.
Chancellor Friedrich Merz of Germany wrote on social media that
“Maduro has led his country into ruin” and that the U.S. intervention was
“complex” and required “careful consideration,” without going
into further detail. “The objective” now, he added, “is an orderly transition
to an elected government.” (NYT –
Erlanger 1:00 PM)
FRANCE
NYT
President Emmanuel Macron of
France wrote on X that
the Venezuelan people could “only rejoice” at the end of Mr.
Maduro’s dictatorship, and did not address the U.S. approach - however, French
foreign minister, Jean-Noël Barrot, wrote on social
media that the military operation “violates the principle of non-resort to
force that underpins international law.”
Perhaps the most interesting
criticism of Mr. Trump came from Jordan Bardella, the
likely presidential candidate of France’s far right National Rally party... “No
one will miss” the Maduro regime, Mr. Bardella said on social media. “That said, respect for international law and the
sovereignty of states cannot be applied selectively,” he added.
DENMARK
Denmark issued a muted response to the operation,
saying America needed to get “back on track toward de-escalation and dialogue.
International law must be respected," Foreign Minister Lars Løkke Rasmussen wrote on X.
Although unrelated to the Venezuelan operation,
Denmark faces invasion of its colony, Greenland, by Americans, should Djonald UnChained decide the huge
island (with its military applications and mineral worth) justify the
destruction of NATO and a potential war with former allies like France,
Germany, Slovenia etc. - DJI
SPAIN
Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez called for
"de-escalation and responsibility” posting that “International Law and
the principles of the United Nations Charter must be respected."
THE AMERICAS
CANADA
Canada stopped short of condemning
the U.S. actions in Venezuela.
“Canada has long supported a
peaceful, negotiated, and Venezuelan-led transition process that respects the
democratic will of the Venezuelan people,” Prime Minister Mark Carney of Canada
said in a statement, adding, “In keeping with our longstanding commitment to
upholding the rule of law, sovereignty, and human rights, Canada calls on all
parties to respect international law.”
(NYT – Erlanger 1:00 PM)
MEXICO
Mexico's President, Claudia Sheinbaum, cited a United
Nations Charter dictate to Members to “refrain from the threat or use of force
against the territorial integrity or political independence of any State, or in
any other manner inconsistent with the Purposes of the United Nations.”
The Mexican government “condemned energetically”
Washington’s unilateral military action in Venezuela, warned of regional
instability and urged dialogue, according to a statement from
the country’s foreign ministry. (NYT –
Erlanger 1:00 PM)
President Trump has included Mexico among Cuba, Iran,
Colombia... maybe Nicaragua... as potential targets for invasion. DJI
COLOMBIA
“The
Government of Colombia rejects the aggression against the sovereignty of
Venezuela and of Latin America,” wrote
Colombia’s President Gustavo Petro
“Internal conflicts between peoples are resolved by
those same peoples in peace. That is the principle of the self-determination of
peoples, which forms the foundation of the United Nations system.”
President Gustavo Petro of
Colombia wrote on X that he rejected “the aggression against the sovereignty of
Venezuela and of Latin America.” He added that he was deploying forces to
Colombia’s border with Venezuela, with additional support “in the event of a
massive influx of refugees.” (NYT – Erlanger 1:00 PM)
Colombia, like Mexico, has been singled out as a
potential target for invasion and Americanization. DJI
ARGENTINA
Mr. Trump had supporters in the
region, too. President Javier Milei of Argentina
celebrated the capture of Mr. Maduro. “Liberty advances,” he wrote on X. (NYT – Erlanger 1:00 PM
BRAZIL
“Attacking
countries, in flagrant violation of international law, is the first step toward
a world of violence, chaos, and instability, where the law of the strongest
prevails over multilateralism,” Brazilian President Luiz Inacio
Lula da Silva wrote on X.
Lula da Silva of Brazil was
particularly scathing. He condemned the U.S. action and said it recalled “the
worst moments of interference in the politics” of the region.
“The bombings
on Venezuelan territory and the capture of its president cross an unacceptable
line,” Mr. Lula wrote on social media.
(NYT – Erlanger 1:00 PM)
Brazil has not been recommended as a target for
invasion, as yet... perhaps because it is big, and its jungles are full of
snakes. But President Trump has
protested the trial of his best buddy Bolsonaro by imposing punitive tariffs on
coffee (thereby punishing Americans who have to get up and go to work in the
mornings). DJI
CHILE
President Gabriel Boric of Chile, a leftist whose
term is coming to an end, also condemned the intervention. “We express our
concern and condemnation of the military actions by the United States taking
place in Venezuela, and we call for seeking a peaceful solution to the serious
crisis affecting the country,” he said on social media. (NYT – Erlanger 1:00 PM)
CUBA
President Miguel Díaz-Canel
of Cuba, a Maduro ally, denounced “a criminal attack” by the United States and
called for “urgent reaction” from the world.
(NYT – Erlanger 1:00 PM)
PANAMA
The Venezuela intervention in the
name of countering drug smuggling recalled to many the invasion of Panama in
1989. Back then, American forces captured Manuel Antonio Noriega, the ruler of
Panama, and brought him to the United States to face charges of drug
trafficking. He was convicted and sentenced to 40 years in prison, ultimately
serving 17 years after a reduction in his sentence for good behavior. He died
in Panamanian custody in 2017. (NYT –
Erlanger 1:00 PM)
THE MIDEAST
IRAN And from another
American enemy, the Jan. 4th Tehran Times (ATTACHMENT @ X71)
accepted the gratitude of Venezuelan Foreign Minister Yvan Gil
Pinto for Iranian voicing of solidarity with his country.
AFRICA
Gen. Dan Caine, the chairman of
the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said the mission drew on decades of experience
fighting terrorists in the Middle East, Southwest Asia and Africa. (NYT – Eric Schmitt, Jan. 3 12:07 PM)
CHINA
China's Foreign Ministry said in a statement that it
was "deeply shocked" by what it described as a "blatant use of
force against a sovereign state and action against its president."
"Such hegemonic acts of the U.S. seriously
violate international law and Venezuela's sovereignty and threaten peace and
security in Latin America and the Caribbean region," it said. We call on the U.S. to abide by international
law and the purposes and principles of the UN Charter, and stop violating other
countries’ sovereignty and security," the statement continued.
THE UNITED NATIONS
The U.N. itself said it was "deeply
alarmed" by the U.S. strikes and capture of Maduro, suggesting it could
have violated international law.
"These developments constitute a dangerous
precedent," Stéphane Dujarric, spokesman for the U.N. secretary-general,
said in a statement.
PARKED in PRISON
A@ FROM THE NEW YORK POST X67 Maduros in court
Venezuelan
dictator Nicolas Maduro and first lady Cilia Flores made their first appearance
before 92 year old Judge Alvin Hellerstein in a US
federal court Monday, Jan. 5th.
Charges
included “narco-terrorism conspiracy, cocaine importation conspiracy,
possession of machine guns and destructive devices, and conspiracy to possess
machine guns and destructive devices against the United States.” They pleaded not guilty to the charges.
The
New York Post timeline (ATTACHMENT @X67) tracked proceedings in the New York
Southern District Court, and also in Venezuela where “pro-Maduro thugs were
called to the streets to hunt down Venezuelans who supported the US attack.”
Gov.
Kathy Hochul said she ripped President Trump for
acting without Congressional approval in Venezuela after he called her on
Monday.
“The
Democratic governor also bizarrely claimed credit for sparking the nationwide
"No Kings" protest movement against the Trump administration.”
This
Post, not that one, also reported “a bizarre courtroom moment” when, after the
dictator claimed innocence, a Venezuelan detractor yelled from the gallery, “Jamas!’’
The
Spanish word translates to “never’’ — but it is pronounced like “Hamas’’ in English,
also the name of the Palestinian terror organization.
Authorities
claimed the prosecution would be bolstered by testimony from old Nick’s
crony-turned-rat Gen. Hugo Carvajal (aka "El Pollo" or "The
Chicken") who agreed to testify so as to obtain a reduced sentence on her
own drug-trafficking charges.
The
Trumpy Post called Maduro “twisted”, while protestors
chanted outside and the Communist dictator proclaimed his innocence to
courtroom during first appearance - saying: 'I am a decent man'.
The
unjailed Commies at Jacobin reported that
capitalists... specifically oily capitalists... were
seeking money from lawsuits, not petrolrum (ATTACHMENT X64).
“Companies with pending claims
could be among the first in line to receive a windfall from a new Trump-installed
Venezuelan government that is willing to funnel the South American country’s
cash to corporate plaintiffs.”
Alleging many of the recipients were Trump
cronies, these would
be among the first in line to receive “a massive windfall from a new Trump-installed
Venezuelan government that is willing to funnel the South American country’s
cash to corporate plaintiffs” that include the likes of Halliburton, Koch and
ConocoPhillips.
Non-oily beneficiaries may
“include the food giant Kellogg’s, the cement and construction
firm Holcim Group, packaging conglomerate Smurfit, and Gold Reserve, a mining conglomerate whose
largest investors include a trio of US investment firms.”
Time’s Philip Elliott, not a
Communist but... now and again... he opens the can of whoop-ass on the
occupants of 1600 Pennsylvania. On Jan.
3, he warned the President that he was “risking his MAGA base” on the invasion,
in that many of his most fervent supporters are isolationist who had potshotted Joe Biden and previous enemy agents for
involving the United States in fruitless foreign wars. (ATTACHMENT @)
“Trump
adopted a colonial posture to replace that stagnation—and take the spoils of
war, as the United States did not do in Iraq, much to Trump’s
dismay. It was, in a way, the first steps at unfurling a new American
empire...” Elliott wrote, and, said Trump, “we are ready to stage a second and
much larger attack if we need to do so.”
“This is what many in MAGA thought
they voted to end,” said Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, a one-time Trump loyalist
who is set to resign this week from her seat representing Georgia. “Boy were we wrong.”
Trump still has his
defenders. Cal Thomas in the Washington Times cited the many liberals who
had to grit their teeth and admit that Operation Absolute Resolve was an
absolute success. “Even the Washington
Post, which is no fan of Trump or most of his policies, spoke well of the
operation that captured Mr. Maduro”, calling the action “a major victory for
American interests.”
Thomas also hailed Nobel
Peace Prize winner and opposition leader Maria Corina Machado, who posted on X:
“The time for freedom has come! [Maduro] will face international justice for atrocious
crimes against Venezuelans and against citizens of many other nations.”
Additional justification
for military action came from an article by Elliott Abrams, published in
National Review days before the raid and republished by the Council on Foreign
Relations: with Abrams reporting that “Last year the democratic forces there
won a landslide victory in the presidential election — despite the fact that
the regime tried desperately to fix the outcome.
“Go ahead,
Democrats, and try to make the case that Mr. Maduro should have remained in
power,” Thomas taunted (Jan. 5th, ATTACHMENT x) and continued to
kill Americans and his own people. That won’t benefit your electoral prospects
in the next election.”
The liberal Huffington Post, not
surprisingly, differed – accusing President
Donald Trump of “dialing up the saber-rattling in the wake of the United
States’ attack on Venezuela last weekend,” (Jan. 5th, ATTACHMENT
@X66).
Among
what Huffer Li Zhou called “incendiary” threats on
the flight aboard Air Force One on Sunday, Trump targeted Colombia, arguing
that it was “very sick, too,” and “run by a sick man, who likes making cocaine
and selling it to the United States.” He
said that Mexicans had to “get their act together” but denied looking for
another Bay of Pigs in Cuba... which would be “going down” without U.S.
military intervention.
But
his insisance that “we need Greenland” disturbed NATO
and the EU allies and Time (also on Monday last) as Greeny Prime Minister Jens-Frederik
Nielsen urged: “No more pressure. No more
hints. No more fantasies about annexation.”
Annexation
by whom? That is the question asked and
answered by POTUS, who continued to insist that “...(we) need Greenland from a national
security situation. It’s so strategic,” the President told reporters aboard Air
Force One. “Right now Greenland is covered with
Russian and Chinese ships all over the place. We need Greenland from the
standpoint of national security. And Denmark is not going to be able to do it.”
“PIRATES” of “WHEN? VANCE...”
Before dancing back to Venezuela,
let’s view Veep Vance one last time, lobbying the troops at America’s over seventy year old Pituffik Space
Base to prepare them for war. “Our
message to Denmark is very simple: You have not done a good job by the people
of Greenland,” said Vance as he addressed the U.S. personnel.
And
Katie Miller,
the wife of Trump’s deputy chief of staff for policy Stephen Miller, alluded to
the U.S. one day controlling Greenland in a social media post over the
weekend. Miller wrote “soon” alongside an image of
a map of Greenland with the U.S. flag across the island.
As our own seven (or eight) day countdown
began... another “damned if you do, damned if you don’t” guest editor Robert Guest opined upon
economic issues in, of course, “The Economist” which, having scrutinized the
Venezuelan economy before Maduro’s removal, determined that it was not very
good.
Not only was Nicolás
Maduro’s dictatorship one of the most thuggish in the world, “... *(it) was
also one of the most economically incompetent.”
The economy shrank by 69% under Mr Maduro—a
swifter decline than would normally occur during an all-out civil war.
“Small wonder
Venezuelans in Miami danced in the streets” when Donald Trump deposed the dictator
and “whisked him to a courtroom in New York. But they
were not dancing in Caracas, for fear of being arrested and tortured. For
though the despot is gone, the rest of the regime is still in
place.”
So the regime change that is looking more and
more like a simple name change was, Guest exclaimed, simply the most dramatic
expression yet of the “Donroe doctrine”—Mr Trump’s belief that he can do whatever he likes in the
western hemisphere, “from commandeering
Venezuela’s oil to grabbing Greenland concluding that
“this is a formula for making America weaker in the long run.”
Olivier Knox of U.S.
News disagreed with the premise that Venezuela was not Iraq 2.0, inasmuch as “there
has been no talk of bringing democracy to Venezuela, a stated goal of President
George W. Bush’s Iraq invasion.”
Rodriguez? OK. Bad Vlad (Lopez) and creepy Cabello? Well, uppity people need a strong,
authoritarian hand to do right by the regime.
Knox said the regime change that left all the regime below Maduro’s neck
in place was “a case of history “rhyming more than repeating.” (ATTACHMENT @X05)
Nor did most of the talkers on Talkshow Sunday find any particular resonance... US News
and World Report pointing out that most of the fentanyl MAGA was so afraid of
comes from China, not the Americas – where the drug boats and seized tankers were
primarily transporting marijuana and cocaine.
Drawing... or perhaps scrawling... parallels
between George W. Bush and his contention that that toppling
Saddam Hussein would promote democracy across the Middle
East (ATTACHMENT @X07), “Morning”Joe Scarborough related a recent conversation with
Trump in which the president declared: “The difference between Iraq and
this is that (Bush) didn’t keep the oil. We’re going to keep the oil.”
Crowdsurfing advisers to
“the younger Bush”, on the other foot, were so sensitive to allegations of
corruption that they hurriedly changed the name of that war from Operation
Iraqi Liberation to Operation Iraqi Freedom due to concerns that the sheeple
might draw wrongful conclusions about the acronym.
To give the President his due, he may have
considered the scenario as unfolded after W’s “disbanding of the Iraqi army and the
purge of Saddam Hussein loyalists from every level of government and the
military, a process known as de-Baathification after Saddam’s “Ba’ath” Party.”
Those policies “left thousands
upon thousands of angry Iraqi men – many of them with guns – unemployed and
under military occupation. It’s widely blamed
for fueling the
deadly insurgency against American forces and
for former Iraqi military officials aiding the rise of ISIS.
“What we see in Venezuela today
is the Maduro regime chugging along,
without Maduro but run by his allies, albeit under threat from the United
States.”
Time’s Philip Elliott admitted to
the national confusion over what to call Venezuela after Operation Absolute Resolve... “a colony? an
occupation?”... around Washington, “even those who
have gotten briefed by the Trump Administration’s most-senior hands overseeing
the operation cannot convincingly describe it. The D.C. set lacks a vocabulary
to detail what has happened, what is happening, and what they expect to happen next.”
One of the victims of verbosity
was Speaker Mike – declaiming: “The way this is being described, this is not a
regime change,” Johnson said. “This is a demand for change of behavior by a
regime.”
“Got that?” Elliott
asked. “Yeah, neither does most of Washington.”
Time also added that
scholars of U.S. ambitions are also searching for the right language. “It does
not seem that Trump is imagining regime change. He would be doing different
things if that were the goal,” says Daniel Immerwahr,
a historian at Northwestern University whose 2019 book, How to Hide an Empire: A History of the
Greater United States, seems prescient these days. “You could call it an
informal empire if you wanted to, like, We will turn you into a protectorate. But that is different
from We're going to micromanage
your internal politics. That is different from We're going to try to make you part of us,
or like us in some way, or make you over in our image.” (Jan. 8th - ATTACHMENT @X08)
In the most simple terms: there is not really a word that fits what
just happened. “It’s not like, to borrow
an Immerwahr analogy, the munchkins are ready to
greet Dorothy as a liberator for dropping a house on the Wicked Witch of the
East.”
Two days later, Elliott could not help but pile on
the paradoxii in dissenting from most of his comrade scriveners
in that the President’s objective was ideological, not just oilygarchial. (Time, Jan. 10th, ATTACHMENT @X01)
Trump, Elliott conjectured, “is fairly
uninterested in democracy” after interviewing military historian Dominic
Tierney, whose expertise on losing wars has been detailed in several books and
told him that: “The use of force, whether it reaches the threshold of war or not,
is very difficult to control and very difficult to predict,” leading to the
U.S. “despite being incredibly powerful, has a poor military record since World
War II.”
To Elliott’s question harkening back to
nomenclature – was “regime change the right term to be using
here?” – Tierney opted to call the President’s preference for “a law
enforcement operation” a false flag, due to the reality that... except for Old
Nick and his wife... the “regime” and its policies remain in place.
“The
leader, a dictator, has been taken by force,” Tierney said. “Dozens of people were killed. Certainly if another country tried to do that to the United
States, we would consider that a pretty aggressive move and an attempt to
regime change,” if not an actual act of war.
And, qualifying the dominant view that the
capture and coup was due to oil, Tierney advanced the premise that Trump “is
personally quite attracted to this idea of controlling stuff. Maybe it's his
real estate background...” and, harking back to the Monroe (and, now, Donroe) Docrine, Tierney
expressed the alternative that, since America already has so much oil that
prices are falling, there were other motives – “like hemispheric dominance and
Venezuela being seen as a kind of leftist state,” a comparison which American
leftists refute.
What
determines Trump’s willingness to invade, conquer, kill and replace regimes,
Tierney believes, is less about democracy than “whether foreign governments are
left wing or right wing. Are they seen as liberal or are they seen as more
traditional conservative governments? You've seen a big effort by the Trump
administration to just explicitly favor European countries or political parties
that are right wing or conservative. It's not so much an interest in democracy
versus non-democracy but an interest in populist conservative right-wing
governments versus liberal left-wing governments. Under Biden, the focus was on
Are you a democracy or non-democracy? And under Trump it is Do you like MAGA?”
The
problem with Venezuela, as it might be tomorrow in Colombia, Cuba, Nicaragua...
even Greenland... anywhere today (or in Iraq, Afghanistan or Syria a quarter of
a century ago)... has been the the
Americans’ “very moralistic, very crusading view of war, a very black-and-white
view that there were good guys and bad guys, and America would wield the swift
sword of justice,” which is Tierney calls extremely dangerous “because it
exaggerates American power and is too morally self-righteous. You need to be
more pragmatic.”
After
the December capture of the Russian flagged Bella One (subsequently
“Marinera”), the US
seized two other tankers—the Centuries and the Skipper
(1440, ATTACHMENT @X10)... believed to be part of the “ghost fleet” pursuant to
a warrant issued by a U.S. federal court resulting in its tracking by the U.S.
Coast Guard Munro, a sixth Legend-class cutter homeported in Alameda, Ca.” (The Hill, ATTACHMENT @X11)
The
U.S. was joined by the U.K. whose DefSec John Healey
said that British armed forces supported the operation as part of “global
efforts to crack down on sanctions busting.”
“This
ship, with a nefarious history, is part of a Russian-Iranian axis of sanctions
evasion which is fueling terrorism, conflict, and misery from the Middle East
to Ukraine,” Healey said.
Defense
Secretary Pete Hegseth said on X that the “blockade
of sanctioned and illicit Venezuelan oil remains in full effect — anywhere in the world.”
THE
OILIES
Despite
the seizures and spookiness, President Trump continued lobbying major American
oil companies to invest “at
least 100 billion dollars” into Venezuela towards “rebuilding, in a
much bigger, better and more modern form, their oil and gas infrastructure.”
He also claimed
Washington and Caracas have been “working well together” on rebuilding the
Venezuelan oil industry in the days since Venezuelan president Darcy Rodriguez
was installed following the snatching-up of Maduro.
(Independent U. K. ATTACHMENT @X03)
“They don't need government money,
but they need government protection and need government security that when they
spend all this money, it's going to be there,” Trump said. “So
they get their money back and make a very nice return.”
According to the
White House, executives from 17 companies were in attendance, including
Chevron, the only company that has some current involvement in Venezuela, plus
ExxonMobil and ConocoPhillips. The two latter companies lost control of prior
projects in the country when then-president Hugo Chavez nationalized them
nearly two decades ago.
American companies
have been loath to invest in Venezuela since a wave of nationalization laws
that were enacted in the country starting in 1976, dispossessing American
companies including ExxonMobile and ConocoPhillips.
Although the
companies were compensated for some of their losses by the Venezuelan
government, Trump characterized the nationalization process that occurred
decades ago as theft of American-owned assets.
He also suggested
his administration’s purported takeover of the Venezuelan oil industry was
justified by those long-ago developments.
The
President promised the oil giants “total safety, total security” in Venezuela
in an effort to persuade them to invest $100bn in the country’s infrastructure
after US forces toppled Nicolás Maduro from power. (GUK, Jan. 9, ATTACHMENT @04)
“We’re
not going to look at what people lost in the past, because that was their
fault. That was a different president. We’re going to make a lot of money, but
we’re not going to go back,” he said.
Though
Maduro is being tried in US federal court on “narco-terrorism” charges, Trump
has been very enthusiastic about Venezuela opening back up to the American oil
industry. On Wednesday, the White House said that it planned to control
Venezuela’s oil “indefinitely” and that it would sell billions of dollars’
worth of recently seized crude oil.
“History
from the last two decades has shown that foreign intervention can have an
impact on a country’s oil output, but with mixed and unstable results.
At
present the results would be negative – at least for producers. “Oil is experiencing a global surplus,” GUK
reported; average US gas prices “are now about 25 cents lower than last year.”
LOCAL
and INTERNATIONAL POLITICS and LAW
The
Senate fired a warning shot at President Donald Trump, voting Thursday to
advance a bipartisan resolution to block him from using military force “within
or against Venezuela” unless he gets prior approval from Congress.
“The
vote of 52-47 on the war powers measure came after an unsuccessful plea by Republican
leaders to sink it and preserve Trump’s authority, as he threatens a “second
wave” of attacks on Venezuela. (NBC,
Jan. 8, ATTACHMENT 33)
Trump had declared that the U.S. would “run” the country
temporarily after he ordered a military operation last week to capture and
extradite leader Nicolás Maduro.
Five
Republicans joined all 47 Democrats in voting yes on the motion to advance the
resolution to the Senate floor.
“The
procedural motion Thursday sets up a full Senate vote on the measure next week;
that will also require a simple majority and is expected to pass. It is subject
to House approval and a presidential signature, making it unlikely to become
law. But it sends a significant message to Trump that could impact his foreign
policy moves going forward — in Venezuela and other countries.”
“Instead
of responding to Americans’ concerns about the affordability crisis, President
Trump started a war with Venezuela that is profoundly disrespectful to U.S.
troops, deeply unpopular, suspiciously secretive and likely corrupt.” How is that
‘America First?’ said Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Va).
“Republicans
should be ashamed of the Senators that just voted with Democrats in attempting
to take away our Powers to fight and defend the United States of America,”
Trump replied... presumably threatening primary challenges, if not worse.
One of the
dissidents, Josh Hawley (R-Mo.), denied that his vote was not a rebuke of the
president: “This is all about going forward. If the president should determine,
you know what, I need to put troops on the ground in Venezuela, I think that
wouldn't require Congress.” (Independent U.K. Jan, 8th, ATTACHMENT
@02)
Not mollified, Trump
retorted his revenge and retaliation threats, writing on Truth Social that:
“Republicans should be ashamed of the Senators that just voted with
Democrats...Susan Collins, Lisa Murkowski, Rand Paul, Josh Hawley, and Todd
Young should never be elected to office again.”
Young (R-In)
reminded voters and potential primarians that
President Trump campaigned against forever wars, “and I strongly support(ed)
him in that position. A drawn-out campaign in Venezuela involving the American
military, even if unintended, would be the opposite of President Trump’s goal
of ending foreign entanglements.”
WALKING the PLANK
Pirates walk among us!
The United
States Pirate Party[3] (USPP)
is an American political party founded in 2006 by Brent Allison and Alex
English.[4] The
party's platform is aligned with the global Pirate movement, and supports reform of copyright laws
to reflect open source and free culture values, government transparency, protection of privacy and civil liberties. The
United States Pirate Party also advocates for evidence-based policy, egalitarianism, meritocracy and
the hacker ethic as well as the rolling back of corporate personhood and corporate welfare.
The USPP has also made a priority to advocate for changes in the copyright laws
and removal of patents. It is the
belief of the party that these restrictions greatly hinder the sharing and
expansion of knowledge and resources. (WIKI,
ATTACHMENT THIRTY FOUR)
The
party's national organization has existed in multiple incarnations since its
2006 founding. Its most recent is the Pirate National Committee (PNC), formed
in 2012 as a coalition of state parties. The PNC officially recognizes Pirate
parties from 10 states,[3] and tracks
and assists in the growth of more state parties throughout the United States.
The board of the USPP is the board of the PNC. The chair of the Pirate National
Committee is known as the "Captain". The current Captain is Jolly
Mitch.[6]
A decade ago, former Speaker of
the House Newt Gingrich
made an unusual move and decided to publicly describe both himself and Donald Trump as
“pirates,” perhaps as a reference to their at-times rogue decisions in the
political sphere. (ABC 7/14/16 ATTACHMENT THIRTY FIVE)
“I
told him quite directly that I thought that he had a choice between having two
pirates on the ticket, or having a pirate and a relatively stable, more normal
person,” Gingrich said today during a Facebook live session while talking about
Trump’s decision to choose a running mate -- with sources saying the choice was
likely between Gingrich and Indiana Gov. Mike Pence who was chosen and summarily
dragged to the gallows.
Piratin’ ain’t easy
And Trump’s invasion of Venezuela was the easy part,
Rachel Marsden concluded in the Herald-Standard of Uniontown, Pa (1/14/2026,
ATTACHMENT THIRTY SIX)
asking that if Maduro wins his
show trial in New York and Trump has to put him back on the shelf, will he get
a private ride home or have to fly economy back to Caracas? Earlier accusations
that he led the Cartel de Los Solos were quietly dropped. The Justice
Department now admits it doesn’t even exist.
“No
fentanyl charges either. But he did have weapons. Maybe even an entire army,
since he was president. Now they’ll hope that a judge buys the gymnastics of
kidnapping a leader and dragging him to trial abroad without an extradition
treaty, all while ignoring Trump’s 90-minute televised diatribe insisting that
it’s really about the oil. “Not a single
Trump voter asked for any of this, but one of the early beneficiaries appears
to be pro-Israel philanthropist and billionaire hedge-funder Paul Singer, who
donated $5 million to Trump and now stands to turn his recent bargain-basement
purchase of Venezuela’s U.S.-based refineries, designed for the country’s heavy
crude, into a potential billionaire payday.
“America
First, indeed. If you’re in the donor class.”
As
disasters of the paster... Vietnam, Korea, Iran, Iraq, Guatemala, Chile,
Afghanistan, Somalia, the Philippines, Libya... reconfigure and recur
—Venezuela, Greenland for “national security” — will America have to go to war
since Greenland is part of the EU: a Danish territory ever since the U.S. got
the Danish West Indies in the 1919 deal (renamed the U.S. Virgin Islands) and infamed by the infamous Jeffrey E.
“But
who cares about boring history when you can re-enact the age of swashbuckling
high seas hijinks? Does Amazon sell black eye patches?”
|
IN the NEWS: JANUARY 8th,
2026 to JANUARY 15th, 2026 |
|
|
|
Thursday, January 8, 2026 Dow:
49,266.11 |
Retired ICE Agent says that just escaping does not
justify shooting, saying: “You have to tune out the noise.” DHS Kristi Noem
says that driver Renee Nicole Good tried to run over and kill agent Jonathan
Ross (on Wednesday the 14th, he reported suffering internal
bleeding) – it was “an act of domestic terrorism” and Veep
Vance says her death was her own fault.
Protesters in Minneapolis throw snowballs saying “they’re coming after
Americans now” and ICE responds with tear gas and pepper spray. Schools are closed “out of an abundance of
caution”. Trump tells
reporters that America will run Venezuela and take its oil “for years.” He calls for a 50% increase in the defense
budget and the conquest of Greenland.
Rep. Don Bacon (R-Nb) warns that this will destroy NATO
while even Speaker Mike (R-La) admits America already has a base on Greenland. RFK Junior
says the food pyramid is all wrong... to be healthy, we have to eat more meat
and butter, while eating bread will KILL us. And it’s
the beginning of Awards Season with the Golden Globes, Critics; Choice,
various particulate contests leading up to the Oscars on Feb. 1st and Grammys
on March 15th. |
|
|
Friday, January 9, 2026 Dow:
49.504.07 |
ICE shoots two more in Portland, OR... these mostly
confirmed as illegal aliens, perhaps affiliated with the feared Venezuelan Tren de Aragua narcogangsters. Doubling down on bad Good
shooting, Veep Vance says she was a “deranged leftist”, It’s a
split decision day for President Trump.
The House votes to reinstate Obamacare (it’s still unlikely to pass
the Senate, yet alone a POTUS veto) but refuses to limit future raids on Venezuela,
so Trump says the only thing that can limit his further adventuring “is my
own mind.” The Mind fails, however, to
convince American oilies to move back to Venezuela
because they are still gun shy after two nationalizing confiscations. He also
justifies invasion of Greenland, saying Denmark has no claim to it; they just
landed a boat (a century after the Mayflower!) But hee also praises the insurrectionists in Iran and warns
the mullahs that continuing to shoot civilians (42 dead so far) may result in
American military interventions including sanctions, bombings and droning
(but not boots on the ground, not yet).
Iran cuts off internet service to isolate protesters. whom Supreme
Leader Khameini says are Americcan
and/or Israeli spies – a clandestine journalist interviews Iranians who say
“we have nothing left to lose” as the economy crumbles; some even want to
bring back the son of murderous Shah Pahlevi,
deposed in 1979.. |
|
|
Saturday, January 10, 2026 Dow:
Closed |
While protesters dance and shout in the streets,
partisan politicians and attorneys debate legality of Good shooting, Influencers say that, since there is
no chance of Federal prosecution of ICEman Jonathan
Ross, any Minnesota state prosecution would spark a Constitutional crisis. Ross’ defenders say he was previously
dragged by a protester’s car and had only two seconds to decide whether it
might happen again. On the other hand,
Good’s “wife” defends her character and a judge
blocks Trump’s blocking of childcare funding in five blue states. Rejected by
the oilies, Trump rejects a second land invasion of
Venezuela, leaving Maduro’s thugs and cronies in place... where they begin
searching for and killing pro-American traitors. Instead, he plots invasions of Colombia,
Mexico, Cuba and Greenland and initiates Operation Hawkeye to punish ISIS in
Syria. Advisers float the possibility
that he might consider a deal to let elected leader Maria Machado back into
Venezuela... if she gives him her Nobel. Unionists
in Telluride settle their ski patrol strike but, the deadline for a WNBA deal passes and, in
New York City, thousands of nurses prepare to walk off the job. Sick people facing elective surgeries
advised to do without.as flu season rages. Aging
hippies mourn and remember Bob Weir of the Grateful Dead who joins Jerry
Garcia – truckin’down the road a ways, |
|
|
Sunday, January 11, 2026 Dow:
Closed |
It’s National Milk Day and, also Talkshow
Sunday... Sen. Tina Smith (D-Mn) says that ICE agents are grabbing Americans
and, now, shooting them while the Administration lies and covers up their
depravities, shaping the narrative to their ends. Police chief Jason Armstrong says the
shooting of Good was good because her turning of the wheel to escape meant
Ross faced an immediate threat wherein “the totality of the circumstances” overrode
his belief in “the sanctity of life.”
But former Obama ICE Chief John Sandweg
decries a shift in ICE tactics from border pursuits to “at large” street
apprehensions that officers have not been trained for. Abroad,
Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky) breaks with MAGA and calls bombing of Iran a
Constitutional issue whieh will also drive the
people back to support of the regime.
He also says Venezuela is an example of the Executive v. Legislative
struggle comparable to the European monarchial wars of past centuries and, as
to the Old World, ”rattling the saber” on Greenland
negates any chance of buying it. What
unites all is the War Powers Act. The Round
Table, former RNC Chair Reince Priebus says Minneapolis Mayor Frey is a
“clown” who used the F-bomb in calling Ross a murderer. DNC’s Donna Brazile
says that the murder of a mother of three children is part of Trump’s
rewriting the One Six Insurrection.
Sara Isgur cites past atrocities like Ruby
Ridge and says everybody saw the same video.
The New Yorker’s Sara Glasser says there is political opportunism in
calling Good a terrorist and the temperature of America is being inflamed for
personal gain. Rep. Ilhan
Omar (D-Mn) tells
Margaret Brennan of “Face the Nation” that ICE agents should know not to get
in front of moving venicles. Energy Sec. Chris Wright says returning
control of Veenezuela to Venezuelans “might take
years” but denies allegations of corruption between Trump cronies and the
oily men. Sen. Chris Martin (D-Ct) says Venezuela-vasion about oil, and says an invasion of Greenland would
mean the end of NATO. Mayor Frey said
“I dropped an F-Bomb, they killed somebody.” |
|
|
Monday, January 12, 2026 Dow:
49,590.20 |
Street riots in Iran and Minnesota draw differing
responses from the partisans. As
Tehran burns, Supreme Leader Khameini vows death to
America and Israel and brings death to Iranians. At home, Democrats and liberals condemn
killing of Renee Good while ICE and DHS Sec. Kristi Noem
bolster the 2,000 agents already in place with another thousand. As the
investigation of Fed Chairman Powell moves on towards prosecution for lavish
reconstruction of the headquarters, critics draw a comparison to Trump’s
construction of his Golden Ballroom in what he now says is his White
House. Powell says it’s intimidation
to force him to lower interest rates.
Even Republicans like Sen. Thom Tillis are leery, others say the
President should “grow up.” Stocks
fall as investigators fear a politicized Fed.
The normally Red Wall Street Journal calls the prosecution “dumb”. In a wild
weekend of awards and NFL thrillers, “One Battle After Another” takes home
the most Golden Globes while Avatar Three trails. Underdog “Hamnet” wins best picture. (See all awards here) |
|
|
Tuesday, January 13, 2026 Dow:
49,191.99 |
In the wake of Maduro capture, Trump imposes extra
tariffs on countries trading with Iran and China believes it is being
targeted. Pessimists
fear this may lead to a new trade war.
Death count in Iranian riots tops 600.
“There are people being killed who should be killed,” says Trump
before posting: “Have no fear, people of Minneapolis,” before turning dark
and warning that the day of retribution is coming. Rotten
Tomatoes reviews awards, calling best picture “Hamnet” upset over “Sinners”
and proving that link with Polymarket gambling site
confirms the merger of awards sites with sports. “Sinners” does capture top honors at the NAACP Image awards,
beating out Spike Lee’s “Highest 2 Lowest”. In legal
news, a father in Mississipi turns in his son who
burns down a synagogue, calling it the synagogue of Satan. The building had survived an attack by the
Ku Klux Klan back in the fifties.
States are suing DHS over deployments and Sen. Mark Kelly (D-Az) sues Hegseth for reducing his rank and pension for signing on
to a video telling military not to break the law. SCOTUS smacks down transgender
athletes. The Rotten Mango website
reports Karen Read is fighting civil suit from her husband’s family after the
criminal case ends in acquittal. |
|
|
Wednesday, January 14, 2026 Dow: 49,149.63 |
President Trump tells Iranian protesters “help is on the way” and warns Supreme Leader Khameini not to begin his proposed publis
hangings. American protesters in, for
example, Minnesota – not so lucky.
(But the gumment is not saying t hey will execute anybody for expressing their political
views – except former astronaut and Arizona Senator Kelly. Apropos
Minnesota: several DoJ officials resigning in
protest over the Bondi/Noem inestigations
of victim Renee Good and her family, not the shooter, Joseph Ross. People are being dragged from cars, houses
and businesses, cuffed and beaten and hauled off without even knowing if they
are legal. Mayor Fray tells the press
that over fifty ICE agents swarm a house to apprehend one alien. And where
is Congress? The House is rushing to idict Bill and Hillary Clinton over their association
with dead ped Epstein after Rep. James Comer (R-Ky) says they are in
contempt. The Clintons reply that the Adminsitration has still not released all of the Epstein
files. In the Senate, Senators Graham
(SC) and Cassidy (La) are busy working on legislation to ban abortion
medications like mifeprestone from being sold over
the Internet. Actors in
court: Timothy Busfield (“The West Wing”) for child
sexploitation, Kiefer Sutherland for assaulting a
Uber driver and Matthew McConaghy declares war on
AI by trademarking himself so that deep fakes of his “Awright,
awright” voice and image can’t be used by
advertisers. |
|
|
Thursday, January 15, 2026 Dow: 49,442.44 |
It’s Dolly Day.
She’s 80 and some friends joining for a remake of her old hits. President Trup puts on his MAGA cowboy hat (no such thing, but
should be) and goes war crazy. He
threatens ICE protesters with the Insurrection Act and, until he decides, the
military is also being pivoted from Venezuela to Iran (and, maybe, Greenland), Dolly Pam Bondi
opens proves of Minneapolis Mayor Frey and Gov. Walz... ICE agents shoot more
protesters, gas 6 children (nearly killing three) and poke out the eye of a
presumed liberal. To appease
the beast, Venezuela’s Machado hands over her Nobel medallion to Djonald UnRewarded but after he
takes it he says he’ll still support Delia Rodriguez
(a Communist) over Machado (whom CNN calls a capitalist and gumment cutter – Attachment “C”). Cancelled lateniter
Colbert calls her the “Joker’s Mom” and his guest, Johnathan Meachem says “we are the generation at risk of losing our
ethos” while Trump reportedly posts the sad news that he is sitting alone in
the dark with a dying laptop. The only
thing to cheer him up is to hold a Great Gatsby party at Mar-a-Lago with
champagne and crabs – presumably not the crustacians
spilled onto an Irish road in a truck crash... many excaping
into the void. |
|
|
We add the extra day of
the year. Dow bounces around a bit but
keeps closing higher while the Don still breathing the nitrous oxide of last
week’s Venezuela, maybe Iran and... as in next week’s lesson, Greenland...
cools down to normal. |
|
|
|
THE DON JONES INDEX CHART of CATEGORIES w/VALUE ADDED to EQUAL
BASELINE of 15,000 (REFLECTING… approximately… DOW JONES INDEX of
June 27, 2013) Gains in indices as
improved are noted in GREEN. Negative/harmful indices in RED as are their designation. (Note – some of the indices where the total
went up created a realm where their value went down... and vice versa.) See a
further explanation of categories |
|
ECONOMIC INDICES |
(60%) |
|
|||||||||
|
CATEGORY |
VALUE |
BASE |
RESULTS by PERCENTAGE |
SCORE |
OUR
SOURCES and COMMENTS |
|
|||||
|
INCOME |
(24%) |
6/17/13 revised 1/1/22 |
LAST |
CHANGE |
NEXT |
LAST
WEEK |
THIS WEEK |
THE WEEK’S CLOSING
STATS... |
|
||
|
Wages (hrly. Per cap) |
9% |
1350 points |
12/11/25 |
+5.97% |
1/26 |
1,963.90 |
1,963.90 |
https://tradingeconomics.com/united-states/average-hourly-earnings
38.86 nc Average hourly earnings for all employees on US private
nonfarm payrolls edged up by 5 cents, or 0.1%, over a month to $36.86 in
November 2025, following a 0.4% rise in October and below market forecasts of
0.3%. This was the smalleth increase in wages since
August 2023. This category will be
reformatted next week |
|
||
|
Median Inc. (yearly) |
4% |
600 |
1/8/26 |
+0.07% |
1/23/26 |
1,134.83 |
1,135.65 |
http://www. |
|
||
|
Unempl. (BLS – in mi) |
4% |
600 |
1/8/26 |
+4.55% |
1/26* |
530.25 |
530.25 |
|
|
||
|
Official (DC –
in mi) |
2% |
300 |
1/8/26 |
+0.23% |
1/23/26 |
198.19 |
197.74 |
http://www. |
|
||
|
Unofficl. (DC – in mi) |
2% |
300 |
1/8/26 |
+0.33% |
1/23/26 |
234.89 |
234.12 |
http://www.usdebtclock.org/ 14,152
170 592 640 |
|
||
|
Workforce Participation Number Percent |
2% |
300 |
1/8/26 |
-0.100% +0.097% |
1/23/26 |
298.22 |
298.51 |
http://www.usdebtclock.org/ In 164,048 077
3,876 4.040 Out 103,547 587 257 303 Total: 267,595 664 334
343 61.3046 61.2996 61.3001 .359 |
|
||
|
WP % (ycharts)* |
1% |
150 |
1/8/26 |
+0.16% |
1/26* |
150.95 |
150.95 |
https://ycharts.com/indicators/labor_force_participation_rate 62.50
.40 |
|
||
|
OUTGO |
(15%) |
|
|||||||||
|
Total
Inflation |
7% |
1050 |
1/8/26 |
+0.4% |
10/25* |
927.45 |
927.45 |
http://www.bls.gov/news.release/cpi.nr0.htm +0.3
NC NC * |
|
||
|
Food |
2% |
300 |
1/8/26 |
+0.5% |
10/25* |
262.59 |
262.59 |
http://www.bls.gov/news.release/cpi.nr0.htm +0.2 |
|
||
|
Gasoline |
2% |
300 |
1/8/26 |
+1.9% |
10/25* |
255.11 |
255.11 |
http://www.bls.gov/news.release/cpi.nr0.htm +4.1 |
|
||
|
Medical Costs |
2% |
300 |
1/8/26 |
-0.1% |
10/25* |
274.20 |
274.20 |
http://www.bls.gov/news.release/cpi.nr0.htm
+0.3 |
|
||
|
Shelter |
2% |
300 |
1/8/26 |
+0.4% |
10/25* |
250.63 |
250.63 |
http://www.bls.gov/news.release/cpi.nr0.htm
+0.2 |
|
||
|
WEALTH |
census.gov * Partial
results were recorded forDec. 2025, including gas
at the pump, but most remained uncompiled |
|
|||||||||
|
Dow Jones
Index |
2% |
300 |
1/8/26 |
+0.91% |
1/23/26 |
377.97 |
381.41 |
https://www.wsj.com/market-data/quotes/index/ 47,885.97
48,442.41 48,063.29 48,996.08 49442.44 |
|
||
|
Home (Sales) (Valuation) |
1% 1% |
150 150 |
1/8/26 |
+1.073% -1.445% |
1/23/26 |
126.69 268.76 |
127.62 264.86 |
https://www.nar.realtor/research-and-statistics Sales (M): 4.10 4.13 Valuations
(K): 415.2
409.2 |
|
||
|
Millionaires (New Category) |
1% |
150 |
1/8/26 |
+0.067% |
1/23/26 |
134.96 |
135.05 |
http://www.usdebtclock.org/ 23,905 914 958* 974 |
|
||
|
Paupers (New
Category) |
1% |
150 |
1/8/26 |
+0.036% |
1/23/26 |
135.49 |
135.44 |
http://www.usdebtclock.org/ 37,214 208 6,657* 670 |
|
||
|
*Due to the lapse of federal funding, portions of this website were
not being updated for two months. New
levels represented, consequently, show the effects of several months’
holdovers. Data will return to Debt
Clock weekly findings – unless the government shuts down again. |
|
||||||||||
|
GOVERNMENT |
(10%) |
|
|||||||||
|
Revenue (trilns.) |
2% |
300 |
1/8/26 |
+0.15% |
1/23/26 |
465.33 |
466.03 |
http://www.usdebtclock.org/ 5,274 277 329 337 |
|
||
|
Expenditures
(tr.) |
2% |
300 |
1/8/26 |
+0.06% |
1/23/26 |
294.04 |
293.86 |
http://www.usdebtclock.org/
7,040 042 058 062 |
|
||
|
National Debt
tr.) |
3% |
450 |
1/8/26 |
+0.09% |
1/23/26 |
350.86 |
350.54 |
http://www.usdebtclock.org/ 38,492
516 554 558 591 |
|
||
|
Aggregate Debt
(tr.) |
3% |
450 |
1/8/26 |
+0.07% |
1/23/26 |
375.03 |
374.77 |
http://www.usdebtclock.org/ 105,818 898 6,019 057 136 |
|
||
|
|||||||||||
|
TRADE |
(5%) |
|
|||||||||
|
Foreign Debt
(tr.) |
2% |
300 |
1/8/26 |
+0.13% |
1/23/26 |
259.53 |
259.20 |
http://www.usdebtclock.org/
9,435 442 339 351 |
|
||
|
Exports (in billions) |
1% |
150 |
1/8/26 |
+4.39% |
1/26* |
187.95 |
187.95 |
*https://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/current/index.html 289.3 302.0 |
|
||
|
Imports (in
billions)) |
1% |
150 |
1/8/26 |
+3.23% |
1/26* |
155.68 |
155.68 |
*https://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/current/index.html 342.1 331.4 |
|
||
|
Trade Surplus/Deficit
(blns.) |
1% |
150 |
1/8/26 |
-79.59% |
1/26* |
482.34 |
482.34 |
*https://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/current/index.html 52.8 29.4 |
|
||
|
|||||||||||
|
SOCIAL INDICES |
(40%) |
|
|
||||||||
|
ACTS
of MAN |
(12%) |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
World
Affairs |
3% |
450 |
1/8/26 |
+0.1% |
1/23/26 |
470.08 |
470.55 |
Malaysia and Indonesia block Elon’s GROK pedo porn sites.
Wildfires in Australia kill one, destroy 300 homes. |
|
||
|
War and terrorism |
2% |
300 |
1/8/26 |
-0.2% |
1/23/26 |
286.02 |
285.44 |
Iranian riot death toll is this way or that way of
12,000 as hangings are prepared. Three
killed and 13 injured in Georgia prison riot.
|
|
||
|
Politics |
3% |
450 |
1/8/26 |
nc |
1/23/26 |
459.30 |
459.30 |
Having “fixed” the East Wing, Trump now wants a
symmetrical ballroom over the West.
It’ll help in hosting oily men still leery of going back to
Venezuela. States starting to require
American birth for all political
candidates, not just the President. |
|
||
|
Economics |
3% |
450 |
1/8/26 |
+0.3% |
1/23/26 |
430.50 |
431.79 |
Trump and Dems agree on better laws to stop
corporate speculators from buying homes.
Report says US new jobs down (bad) but
layoffs down (good) and unemployment rate down. Worse: Trump orders student loan debtors wages should be garnished. Good Trump proposes cap on credit card
interest rates. |
|
||
|
Crime |
1% |
150 |
1/8/26 |
-0.2% |
1/23/26 |
207.88 |
207.46 |
Over a hundred skeletons found at Pennsylvania man’s
home.. Actor
Tim Barfield accused of child sex abuse.
Gunman shoots eight, kills two at Salt Lake funeral. 15 year old shoots
12 year old brother in Ohio. Police
shoot apolitical front loader thief ramming them. Instagram hacker steals up to 17M accounts.Synagogue arsonist
arrested and killer shoots 5 including a seven year old girl in
Mississippi.... |
|
||
|
ACTS
of GOD |
(6%) |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
Environment/Weather |
3% |
450 |
1/8/26 |
+0.1% |
1/23/26 |
281.67 |
281.95 |
More bad news for Mississippi – three tornadoes in
Laurel. Otherwise, weather is easing
but it’s cold in the East while gusts and dust blanket the West |
|
||
|
Disasters |
3% |
450 |
1/8/26 |
+0.1% |
1/23/26 |
462.18 |
462.64 |
A year after the LA fires, Mayor Karin Bass says
that “Palisadians” are rebuilding. American tourist killed by shark in Virgin
Is. Stories of snow survival spike
with the season |
|
||
|
LIFESTYLE/JUSTICE
INDEX |
(15%) |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
Science,
Tech, Education |
4% |
600 |
1/8/26 |
+0.2% |
1/23/26 |
613.68 |
614.91 |
NASA brings home ISS astronauts for “medical
emergency”. Next up, a trip around
(but not to) the moon. WalMart expands drone deliveries but a robot deliverything is crushed after being stuck on train tracks.. |
|
||
|
Equality
(econ/social) |
4% |
600 |
1/8/26 |
-0.1% |
1/23/26 |
675.08 |
674.39 |
Red and blue feminists consider Delcy
and Machado. National Opera departs
Kennedy Center after it’s renamed after Trump. SCOTUS rules against transgender
athletes. |
|
||
|
Health |
4% |
600 |
1/8/26 |
+0.3% |
1/23/26 |
416.72 |
417.97 |
TV docs say that 70% now survive cancer for five
years, citing earlier detections, less smoking. Trump joins RFK in promoting whole milk, so
long as there’s a”w”
before the “h” while Rep. Carlos Gimenez tells bad foreign actors “we can
touch you any time we want to.” .
Incompetent plastic surgeon has his license revoked. FDA recalls BMW vehicles with faulty
airbags. Australian shrinks promote
“Goldilocks” strategy on kids’ social media exposure – too much is bad but
banning is also bad. 2 hours OK. |
|
||
|
Freedom
and Justice |
3% |
450 |
1/8/26 |
-0.1% |
1/23/26 |
482.57 |
482.08 |
Gumment sues Roblox for abetting pedophiles after a man ways the Bible told him to rape children. Killer of
dentist and wife arrested; the wife’s former husband. In court: Mangione trial proceeding, Uvalde
jurors see videos in trial of police scapegoat Adrian Gonzales. Protests over Ohio prison serving
disgusting “Wardenburgers” to inmates. |
|
||
|
CULTURAL
and MISCELLANEOUS INCIDENTS |
(6%) |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
Cultural
incidents |
3% |
450 |
1/8/26 |
+0.2% |
1/23/26 |
576.87 |
578.02 |
After Chiefs fail to make playoffs, Travis Kelce
ponders retirement. Weekend NFL
divisions pit Bills/Broncs, Seahawks/49ers, Rams/Bears, Texans/Patriots. NCAA
finale will pit unbeaten Indiana against underdog Miami. Inspirational skater Maxim Naumov makes Olympic team a year after parents killed in
DC air crash Golden Globes winners are “One Battle After Another”
and Avatar with “Hamnet” winning best picture. Bruno Mars releases first album in ten
years. RIP: Grateful Dead Bob Weir, Scott Adams
(“Dilbert”), |
|
||
|
Miscellaneous
incidents |
4% |
450 |
1/8/26 |
+0.1% |
1/23/26 |
546.16 |
546.71 |
Disney marathoners, many costumed, won by
American. Superman comic sells for
record $15M. Monkeys on the oloose reported by Colbert show as “intelligent” but
“aggressive”. |
|
||
|
|||||||||||
The Don Jones Index for the
week of January 9th through January 16th, 2025
was UP 4.53 points
The Don Jones Index is sponsored
by the Coalition for a New Consensus: retired Congressman and Independent
Presidential candidate Jack “Catfish” Parnell, Chairman; Brian Doohan, Administrator.
The CNC denies, emphatically, allegations that the organization, as well
as any of its officers (including former Congressman Parnell,
environmentalist/America-Firster Austin Tillerman and cosmetics CEO Rayna
Finch) and references to Parnell’s works, “Entropy and Renaissance” and “The
Coming Kill-Off” are fictitious or, at best, mere pawns in the web-serial
“Black Helicopters” – and promise swift, effective legal action againth parties promulgating this and/or other such
slanders.
Comments, complaints,
donations (especially SUPERPAC donations) always welcome at feedme@generisis.com or: speak@donjonesindex.com.
ATTACHMENT ZERO from splash 247
Trump quits anti-piracy and trade bodies in broad UN retreat
By Sam
Chambers January 8, 2026
The Trump administration yesterday
announced it is withdrawing from 66 organisations, a
mixture of NGOs and United Nations’ bodies.
Of note for the shipping industry
is the US decision to pull out of the Regional Cooperation Agreement on
Combatting Piracy and Armed Robbery against Ships in Asia (RECAAP), as well as
the UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), and UN Oceans, an
inter-agency coordination mechanism on ocean and coastal issues within the
United Nations system..
Secretary of state Marco Rubio,
who led the review, commented on the 66 organisations:
“The Trump administration has found these institutions to be redundant in their
scope, mismanaged, unnecessary, wasteful, poorly run, captured by the interests
of actors advancing their own agendas contrary to our own, or a threat to our
nation’s sovereignty, freedoms, and general prosperity.”
Trump warned that his review of
further findings of the secretary of state remains ongoing, suggesting other
bodies could face similar treatment.
The Trump administration has had a
strained relationship with another UN body, the International Maritime
Organization (IMO), over the past 12 months, walking out of climate talks last
April and then helping down the IMO’s Net-zero Framework agreement in October. Nevertheless,
the US sought and won for reelection in late November to Category (a) at the
IMO Council, the UN body’s executive organ responsible, under the assembly, for
supervising the work of the organisation.
2 Comments:
FROM Martyn Benson
The incoming Democratic
administration is going to have a lot of remedial work to do in 2029 – the
draft Executive Orders are already piling up.
In the meantime, the US will have to defend its own ships around the world and
may find all sorts of obstacles for non-compliance if they are not willing or
able to participate in international frameworks.
FROM Capt. Ed Enoss
“The US will have to defend its
own ships … “
At the very least we can actually
do that, yes? The vast majority of international players that want to impose
their agenda upon the rest of the world are incapable of enforcing anything
they want without the help of the UN, their Big Brother. We can all see how
well that has worked nearly everywhere, throughout history, eh?
But I know … “orange man bad” is
all part of your TDS. We all get that.
ATTACHMENT ONE “A”to “D”– FROM USA TODAY
TRUMP WITHDRAWS US FROM 66
INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS AND TREATIES
By Dinah Voyles Pulver Jan. 7, 2026
Updated Jan. 8, 2026, 11:40 a.m. ET
The
United States will withdraw from more than five dozen international collaborations,
including treaties and organizations with the United Nations on climate change
and the oceans, President Donald Trump announced
in a memo.
Among
the organizations the United States will withdraw from are the United Nations
Framework Convention on Climate Change and
the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. The list also includes
agreements and groups on renewable energy, oceans, piracy, counterterrorism and
empowerment of women.
The
66 groups, treaties and conventions, including 31 associated with the United
Nations, are "contrary to the interests of the United States,"
the memo's title stated
Jan. 7. The withdrawals follow up on a review by Secretary of State Marco Rubio
at Trump's request of all international organizations, conventions and treaties
to which the United States belongs or is a party to.
The
White House stated the withdrawals "will end American taxpayer funding and
involvement in entities that advance globalist agendas over U.S. priorities, or
that address important issues inefficiently or ineffectively such that U.S.
taxpayer dollars are best allocated in other ways to support the relevant
missions," Reuters reported.
The
Framework Convention on Climate Change was ratified by the U.S. Senate and
signed by President George H. W. Bush in October 1992. The United States was
the first industrialized nation to sign the convention.
At
the time, Bush called it the "first step in crucial long-term
international efforts to address climate change." The convention committed
countries to inventories of all sources and sinks of greenhouse gases, such as
carbon dioxide, and to establish national climate change programs.
Now
the United States will be the only nation in the world that is no longer a
party to the framework, according to the Union of Concerned Scientists. Though
the country had already submitted a letter of intent to leave the Paris climate
agreement for the second time, the United States has never withdrawn from the
convention before, according to the scientists.
The action to
withdraw from the framework and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change,
or IPCC, follows actions taken by the Trump administration in
2025 to downplay climate change, such as an edict that federal
employees were not to be involved with the IPCC's next report. The IPCC is
considered the leading global group studying climate change.
'STRATEGIC BLUNDER THAT GIVES AWAY AMERICAN
ADVANTAGE'
As
reports on 2025's global temperatures are released in the days ahead, major
organizations and climate scientists expect it to be either the second- or third-warmest year on
record globally. Several organizations quickly
criticized the withdrawals from the international collaborations on climate
change and the oceans, saying it will harm U.S. residents and American
companies.
Pulling
out of the framework convention on climate is "a strategic blunder that
gives away American advantage for nothing in return," said David Widawsky, director of WRI US, the World Resources Institute
in the United States. "Walking away doesn’t just put America on the
sidelines − it takes the U.S. out of the arena entirely."
Widawsky said the
action will cost American communities and businesses economic ground as other
countries take advantage of the "booming clean-energy economy."
The
withdrawal from the global climate treaty is "a new low" from the
administration, said Rachel Cleetus, policy director
and lead economist for the Union of Concerned Scientists climate and energy
program. It's another "sign that this authoritarian, anti-science
administration is determined to sacrifice people’s well-being and destabilize
global cooperation."
According
to Cleetus, the withdrawal will serve to further
"isolate the United States and diminish its standing in the world
following a spate of deplorable actions that have already sent our nation’s
credibility plummeting," jeopardize ties with historical allies, and make
the world more unsafe.
Since
Trump's inauguration nearly a year ago, he has worked to slash funding for the
United Nations and cease collaborations with its Human Rights Council and its
cultural agency, UNESCO. The administration has also announced plans to leave
the World Health Organization.
A1A FROM THE WHITE
HOUSE
EXECUTIVE
ORDER 14199
(Partial
only, read the complete list of defunded organizations on White House website here.)
(c) Consistent with
Executive Order 14199 and pursuant to the authority vested in me as President by
the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, I hereby direct
all executive departments and agencies (agencies) to take immediate steps to
effectuate the withdrawal of the United States from the organizations listed in
section 2 of this memorandum as soon as possible. For United Nations
entities, withdrawal means ceasing participation in or funding to those
entities to the extent permitted by law.
(d) My review of further findings
of the Secretary of State remains ongoing.
Sec. 2. Organizations from
Which the United States Shall Withdraw. (a) Non-United Nations
Organizations:
A total
of sixty six are listed. The relevant removal is...
(xxx)
Regional Cooperation Agreement on Combatting Piracy and Armed Robbery (REagainst Ships in Asia;
A1B FROM WIKIPEDIA
RECAAP
DEFINED
Regional Cooperation Agreement on Combating Piracy and Armed Robbery
against Ships in Asia
|
Regional Cooperation Agreement on
Combating Piracy and Armed Robbery against Ships in Asia - Information
Sharing Centre |
|
|
RECAAP (see
logo HERE) |
|
|
Abbreviation |
ReCAAP ISC |
|
Formation |
29 November 2006 (19 years ago) |
|
Type |
|
|
Purpose |
|
|
Headquarters |
|
|
Coordinates |
|
|
Area served |
|
|
Membership |
21 Contracting Parties |
|
Executive Director |
Krishnaswamy Natarajan |
|
Website |
|
List of Countries In ReCAAP (See map here)
The Regional
Cooperation Agreement on Combating Piracy and Armed Robbery against Ships in
Asia, abbreviated as ReCAAP or RECAAP,
is a multilateral agreement between 16 countries in Asia, concluded in November 2004 and includes the RECAAP
Information Sharing Centre (ISC), an initiative for facilitating the
dissemination of piracy-related information.[1]
To date, twenty one countries in various parts of the world
have ratified the ReCAAP agreement.[2]
RECAAP HISTORY
The Regional Cooperation Agreement on Combating Piracy
and Armed Robbery against Ships in Asia (ReCAAP) is
the first regional government-to-government agreement to promote and enhance
cooperation against piracy and armed robbery against ships in Asia. ReCAAP ISC was proposed in 1999 as a result of shared
concern specifically related to cases of piracy and armed robbery, and it came
into force in November 2006 after further ratification by member states.[3] To date, 21 States (14 Asian countries, 5 European
countries, Australia, the USA) have become Contracting Parties to ReCAAP.
On January 2026, the USA withdrew from the Agreement.[4]
The 20 Contracting Parties of ReCAAP:[5] (As of January 2025)
Australia
Bangladesh
Brunei
Cambodia
China
Denmark
India
Japan
South Korea
Laos
Myanmar
Netherlands
Norway
Philippines
Singapore
Sri Lanka
Thailand
United Kingdom
Vietnam
Germany (new)
United States (withdrawn)
The Structure of ReCAAP
ReCAAP was established as a decentralized security network,
which included the formation of an Information Security Center (ISC) and a
Governing Council. The ISC also serves as a platform for information exchange
with the ReCAAP Focal Points via the Information
Network System (IFN). The Governing Council consists of one representative from
each contracting member and is tasked with overseeing a focal point and
managing the ISC's procedures.[6]
A1C FROM FROM TRADE WINDS
TRUMP
DUMPS ANTI-PIRACY BODY ON EVE OF MAJOR REPORT
Administration
is withdrawing from 66 organisations that are
‘contrary to US interests’
Published
8 January 2026, 10:17
The
Trump administration is pulling out of an anti-piracy organisation
on the eve of it reporting the highest level of incidents at a notorious hotspot
for nearly two decades.
The
US said it will withdraw from 66 organisations,
including the Regional Cooperation Agreement on Combating Piracy and Armed
Robbery against Ships in Asia (ReCAAP).
The
list includes 31 United Nations bodies, among them UN Trade & Development,
which produces an annual report on the state of the maritime industry and
advocates for developing nations in global trade talks.
PAYWALL: You need a subscription to read the rest of
this story
Article
includes...
Anti-piracy
experts shrug off Trump team pullout
Asia
security group says the US paid only a nominal sum every year
A1D FROM HANSA SHIPPING and MARKETS (German: see HERE
for Description and Logo)
TRUMP WITHDRAWS USA FROM
COOPERATION AGAINST PIRACY
January 9, 2026
The
US government’s drastic withdrawal from international cooperation now also has
consequences for the fight against piracy: Donald Trump has ordered the US to
quit from a total of 66 organizations, including the “Recaap”.
Around
a year ago, Trump instructed
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio to review all memberships in international
organizations. Although this was also about saving costs, it was primarily
about “which organizations, agreements and treaties run counter to the
interests of the United States”.
Rubio
has now submitted his report. And Trump is making good on his threat. “I have
reviewed the Secretary of State’s report and, after consultation with my
Cabinet, have determined that it is contrary to the interests of the United
States to remain, participate in, or otherwise support some organizations,”
reads a statement from the White House.
In
it, Trump instructs his followers to withdraw from a total of 66 organizations
and cooperations “as soon as possible”.
After
the US government exerted massive pressure on the deliberations at the
International Maritime Organization (IMO) last autumn, ultimately torpedoing
efforts to achieve the widely anticipated “Net Zero Framework”, the shipping
industry is now also feeling the consequences of the latest initiative. The IMO
is not on the list to be deleted. However, the fight against piracy in Asia is
affected.
GERMANY IS ALSO A MEMBER
Among
other things, Trump is calling to withdraw from the “Regional Cooperation
Agreement to Combat Piracy and Armed Robbery against Ships in Asia”, or Recaap for short. This is an intergovernmental cooperation
between 21 countries that was founded in 2004. The members are not only Asian
states. The USA, some European countries and, since 2021, Germany have
also joined.
Recaap
cooperation is primarily about sharing information on piracy cases, threats,
strategic plans. In contrast to East Africa, where some of the states are very
weak in terms of naval and coastal protection and Somalia was considered a
“failed state”, better developed, sovereign states are involved here.
Strictly
speaking, many cases in the region are “armed robbery” and not “piracy” because
the vast majority of attacks take place in the territorial waters of the
states. This circumstance has important consequences because it is the coastal
states that have the right to pursue and intervene there first, and not the
naval units of other countries that are on patrol duty and could intervene more
quickly if necessary.
Even though pirates
off East and West Africa have received much more attention in recent years
and the military has recently sounded the alarm again, shipping in Southeast Asia is
still struggling with attacks, thefts and boardings. Despite – or perhaps
because of – its “low profile” cooperation, Recaap is
considered a model for success, even if two important countries in the region,
Malaysia and Indonesia, cannot bring themselves to join for fear of losing
sovereignty.
“BLOOD, SWEAT AND MONEY”
Incidentally,
the latest instructions do not necessarily mark the end of the list of
deletions. “My review of further findings by the Secretary of State is not yet
complete,” Trump continued.
Rubio
himself also commented on the deletion list, describing the organizations in
question as “redundant, mismanaged, unnecessary, wasteful and poorly run”. They
would be “captured by the interests of actors pursuing their own agendas
contrary to our interests, or pose a threat to our nation’s sovereignty,
freedoms and overall prosperity”. Trump himself is quoted in the statement as
saying that it is no longer acceptable to devote “the blood, sweat and money of
the American people to these institutions without getting any meaningful
results in return. The days of billions of taxpayer dollars flowing to foreign
interests at the expense of our people are over.” These organizations are
actively trying to limit American sovereignty, he said. “We reject inertia and
ideology and instead embrace prudence and purpose. We seek cooperation where it
serves our people and remain steadfast where it does not,” it says.
ATTACHMENT TWO – FROM USA TODAY
Who
is Nicolás Maduro? Trump says Venezuelan
president 'captured'
Maduro was seized by U.S.
forces early on Jan 3. in what Presdient Trump called
"a large scale strike against Venezuela."
By Natalie Neysa Alund Dec. 2, 2025 Updated Jan. 3, 2026, 6:47 a.m. ET
Venezuelan
leader Nicolás Maduro was in U.S. custody overnight on Jan. 3,
President Donald Trump said, after U.S. airstrikes a Delta Force
raid on the South American country.
The
U.S. "successfully carried out a large scale strike against Venezuela and its leader,
President Nicolás Maduro, who has been, along
with his wife, captured and flown out of the Country," Trump said in a
post on Truth Social. "This operation was done in conjunction with U.S.
Law Enforcement."
Since
September, the U.S. military has carried out fatal strikes on nearly two dozen alleged
drug boats in international waters, and has seized oil tankers departing
Venezuela.
WHO IS
NICOLÁS MADURO?
Nicolás Maduro,
63, is the president of Venezuela and has served as the oil-rich country's
leader since 2013. He was born in the country's capital of Caracas.
In
2013, he married Cilia Flores, who is often captured in photos with him during
political events.
Maduro
represents the United Socialist Party of Venezuela.
Despite
Maduro remaining in power, people from across the globe as well as Venezuelan
opposition leaders have claimed Maduro
lost the country's 2024 election.
NICOLÁS MADURO'S RISE TO POWER
During
the 1980s, Maduro worked as a bodyguard and a bus driver, according to previous
USA TODAY reporting. He also belonged to the Caracas Metro system transit
union.
He
is the hand-picked successor to socialist leader, Hugo Chávez, who died from
cancer in 2013.
Maduro's
relationship with Chávez began in the 1990s
when the now president became involved in winning the release of Chávez, who had been jailed for anti-government
activities including a reported coup to oust then-President Carlos Andres
Perez.
Maduro
later supported Chávez's 1998 presidential
campaign "that promised to give poor Venezuelans a larger
share of the economic pie dominated by the country's wealthy ruling
elite," earning him a place in Chávez’s
inner circle.
Before
becoming the country's top leader, he went on to serve as the country's foreign
minister and vice president.
WHEN WAS
NICOLÁS MADARO RE-ELECTED?
Maduro
has been president for three terms.
In
July 2024, the country's government-controlled electoral commission declared
Maduro won the election, keeping his seat in office.
The
government's opposition claimed their candidate, Edmundo Gonzalez, won the
race, but Venezuela’s Supreme Court backed Maduro on Aug. 22.
WHAT IS
MADURO ACCUSED OF?
Trump himself has said Maduro is
allegedly behind supplying illegal drugs trafficked into the U.S. as the
alleged head of the Cartel de los Soles, a group the U.S. State
Department has labeled a foreign terrorist organization.
Trump
has signaled forthcoming land attacks in the country,
after telling U.S. troops on Thanksgiving to expect strikes on
Venezuelan territory.
Maduro
and his top generals were indicted in 2020 for their alleged involvement in a
drug trafficking conspiracy. The Venezuelan president has denied having any
links to the illegal drug trade.
Delcy
Rodriguez, Venezuela's vice president, said on Jan. 3 the Venezuelan government
did not know the whereabouts of Maduro or his wife, Cilia Flores, after
President Trump announced that the U.S. had captured Maduro and flown them out
of the country.
"We
demand immediate proof of life of President Nicolás
Maduro and the first lady Cilia Flores," Rodriguez said on Venezuelan
state TV.
Nicolás Maduro, wife in New York to face charges after US strikes on Venezuela
Who is Nicolás Maduro? Trump says Venezuelan president
'captured'
Explosions
rock Caracas as US seizes Maduro in overnight raid
US
conducted strike on Venezuela, captured Maduro, Trump says
US
bombs targets in Venezuela and captures Nicolás
Maduro
The
U.S. had positioned an aircraft carrier, guided missile destroyers and a
special operations ship near Venezuela. Around 12,000 troops are stationed in
the area.
Contributing:
Eduardo Cueva and Phillip M. Bailey, USA TODAY
Natalie
Neysa Alund is a senior
reporter for USA TODAY. Reach her at nalund@usatoday.com and follow her on X
@nataliealund
ATTACHMENT THREE - FROM REUTERS
VENEZUELA PASSES LAW AGAINST PIRACY,
BLOCKADES AMID US OIL SHIP SEIZURES
December
23, 2025 1:30 PM EST Updated December 23, 2025
Dec 23
(Reuters) - Venezuela's ruling-party controlled National Assembly unanimously
approved a law on Tuesday that allows prison sentences of up to 20 years for
anyone who promotes or finances what it describes as piracy or blockades.
The
law, which includes "other international crimes", comes after recent
U.S. actions against Venezuelan oil shipments.
The U.S. Coast Guard
seized a sanctioned supertanker carrying Venezuelan crude earlier
this month and attempted
to intercept two
other vessels linked to Venezuela over the weekend, U.S. officials said.
The
interceptions mark Washington's toughest blow to state oil company PDVSA since
its Treasury Department sanctioned the oil company's former trading partners,
two subsidiaries of Russia's Rosneft, in 2020, forcing it to cut production and
exports. PDVSA was already under sanctions since 2019.
The
draft "Law to Guarantee Freedom of Navigation and Commerce Against Piracy,
Blockades, and Other International Illicit Acts" was introduced on Monday
by pro-government lawmaker Giuseppe Alessandrello.
National
Assembly President Jorge Rodriguez said at the end of the session the bill will
be sent to the executive for approval and will take effect once published in
the Official Gazette.
Washington
has increased pressure on the government of President Nicolas Maduro in recent
months, including stepping up a military build-up in the Caribbean and killing
dozens of people in strikes on boats it says, without providing evidence, are
trafficking drugs off its coasts.
U.S.
authorities say the operations are part of efforts to combat sanctions evasion
and drug trafficking.
Maduro
says the United States is seeking to undermine Venezuela's economy and remove
him from power.
Rodriguez also
blasted Venezuela's political opposition, whose leader has been in
hiding for months but traveled to Oslo earlier December to collect her Nobel
Peace Prize.
He
accused the opposition of promoting sanctions and said they "stole,
plundered, bowed down to U.S. imperialism," adding that "they are
happy with the aggressive actions currently taking place in the Caribbean
Sea."
A4 X58 FROM NY TIMES
|
Jan. 3,
2026, 2:24 a.m. ET |
|
Explosions Are Reported in
Venezuela’s Capital It was not immediately
clear what caused the blasts. The United States has been building pressure on
Nicolás Maduro, Venezuela’s authoritarian president, for months. |
5X53 FROM USA TODAY
Maduro
bolted for the door as US forces raided. Trump's attack stuns the world.
By Michael Collins Jan. 3,
2026/Updated Jan. 4, 2026, 11:12 a.m. ET
Inside his home on a military base, Venezuelan
President Nicolás Maduro bolted for a safe room as U.S. troops swooped into
the compound and explosions lit up the nighttime sky over Caracas.
Maduro made it as far as the door but
couldn’t get it to shut.
Members of the Army’s secretive Delta
Force grabbed the Venezuelan leader and his wife, Cilia Flores, whisked them
out of the compound and took them to the USS Iwo Jima, an amphibious assault
ship waiting off the South American coast.
Officials said both would travel to the United States, where they are under
indictment on drug-trafficking charges. Maduro and Flores landed in New York on
Saturday evening.
The
attack in Venezuela’s capital during the early morning hours of Jan. 3 was a
swift and stunning show of military force. Images and video showed explosions,
burning vehicles, plumes of smoke rising over the capital city of Caracas, and
a swarm of low-flying helicopters.
President Donald
Trump, who announced the military operation, called it “one of the most
stunning, effective and powerful displays of American military might and
competence in American history.”
The military
operation on Jan. 3 was one of the most significant incursions into a foreign
country since the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, raising questions
about the U.S. role in the Caribbean nation of more than 28 million people.
With
Maduro no longer in charge, Trump said the United States would run Venezuela
until there can be “a safe, proper and judicious transition.” He signaled Secretary of State Marco
Rubio and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth would
be in charge alongside Venezuelan Vice President Delcy
Rodriguez.
Maduro,
63, a former bus driver and union leader, has ruled the county for more than a
decade. The hand-picked successor of the country's former leader, he was
narrowly elected president following Hugo Chávez’s death
in 2013. Maduro was sworn in for a third term last January following an
election that was widely condemned by international observers, the Biden
administration and the opposition as fraudulent.
Maduro’s
reign has severely strained relations with several U.S. presidents, who have
accused him of allowing the flow of illegal drugs into the United States. Trump
has had his sights set on toppling Maduro since his first term in the White
House. He has described Maduro as running Venezuela like a
"narco-terrorist" drug cartel that is directly responsible for
American deaths.
The
federal grand jury in New York that indicted Maduro on charges of
narco-terrorism conspiracy, cocaine importation conspiracy and two illegal
weapons counts said he “sits atop a corrupt, illegitimate government that, for
decades, has leveraged government power to protect and promote illegal
activity, including drug trafficking.”
The
U.S. attack and capture of Maduro had been in the works for months.
“This
mission was meticulously planned, drawing lessons from decades of missions over
the last many years,” Gen.
Dan Caine, an Air Force general who serves as Trump’s chairman of the Joint
Chiefs of Staff, said during a news conference at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort in
Florida.
Intelligence teams monitored Maduro to
understand how he moved, where he lived, where he traveled, what he ate, what
he wore – and even what kind of pets he had, Caine said.
Meanwhile,
starting in early September, U.S. troops mounted a series of attacks on
drug-trafficking vessels in the Caribbean and Pacific. The campaign escalated
to include the seizure of oil tankers coming and going from Venezuelan ports in
late December.
By
December, U.S. forces were ready for the attack but waited until the right day
to minimize the potential for civilian harm and to maximize the element of
surprise, Caine said. Through Christmas and New Year's, troops waited for Trump
to issue the order.
Trump
gave that order on Jan. 2 at 10:46 p.m. ET, Caine said.
US will 'run' Venezuela after capturing Maduro, Trump says: Live
updates
Within
hours, aircraft began launching from 20 different bases on land and sea. More
than 150 teams –including aircraft, bombers, fighters, intelligence,
reconnaissance and law-enforcement – were involved. Helicopters began their
flight into Venezuela at 100 feet above the water. As they approached Caracas,
Caine said, troops began to disable Venezuela’s air defense systems to make
sure the helicopters could safely reach their target.
Helicopters
came under fire as they approached the target. One was hit but was still able
to fly.
The
troops arrived at Maduro’s compound at 1:01 a.m. ET. Maduro and his wife, both inside,
gave up and were taken into custody by the U.S. Department of Justice, with
assistance from the military.
No
U.S. forces were killed, and no American aircraft were lost during the strike,
Trump said.
Trump
later posted a photo on social media showing Maduro aboard the USS Iwo Jima,
dressed in a gray sweatsuit and holding a water bottle. On his head were what
appeared to be noise-suppressing earmuffs. A dark blindfold covered his eyes.
What we know about the US strike on Venezuela, Maduro's capture
Republicans, Democrats
divided over attack
In
Washington, reaction to the military operation divided predictably along party
lines, with Republicans supporting it and Democrats accusing the Trump
administration of conducting an illegal war.
Senate Intelligence
Committee Chairman Tom Cotton, R-Arkansas, said
in a post on X that Maduro “wasn’t just an illegitimate dictator; he also ran a
vast drug-trafficking operation. That’s why he was indicted in U.S. court
nearly six years ago for drug trafficking and narco-terrorism.”
House
Speaker Mike Johnson,
R-Louisiana, described the military action as “a decisive and justified
operation that will protect American lives.”
“Nicolas
Maduro is responsible for the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Americans
after years of trafficking illegal drugs and violent cartel members into our
country – crimes for which he’s been properly indicted in U.S. courts and an
arrest warrant duly issued – and today he learned what accountability looks
like,” Johnson said in a statement.
But
Sen. Ruben Gallego, D-Arizona, an Iraq war veteran, called the strike the
“second unjustified war in my lifetime” in a social media post.
“This
war is illegal,” Gallego said. “It’s embarrassing that we went from the world
cop to the world bully in less than one year.”
America First? What Trump's startling arrest of Maduro tells us.
Sen. Tim Kaine,
D-Virginia, who has pushed for consultation between the White House and
Congress before military action, raised concerns about the administration’s
actions.
“Where
will this go next?” Kaine asked. “Will the president deploy our troops to
protect Iranian protesters? To enforce the fragile ceasefire in Gaza? To battle
terrorists in Nigeria? To seize Greenland or the Panama Canal? To suppress
Americans peacefully assembling to protest his policies? Trump has threatened
to do all this and more and sees no need to seek legal authorization from
people’s elected legislature before putting servicemembers at risk.”
The
Trump administration has insisted it does not need congressional authorization
for its military operations in and around Venezuela.
Other
countries were also critical of the operation.
Russia's
foreign ministry said the strikes were "deeply concerning and
condemnable."
"The
pretexts used to justify such actions are unfounded," the ministry said in
a statement. "Ideological animosity has prevailed over business pragmatism
and the willingness to build relationships based on trust and
predictability."
In
one of many condemnations from Latin leaders, Brazil's President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva said the "bombings on
Venezuelan territory and the capture of its president cross an unacceptable
line.”
Trump releases first picture of Nicolás
Maduro in US custody
For
many, Maduro’s capture evoked memories of a similar raid against Panamanian
Gen. Manuel Noriega that took place on the same date more than three decades
earlier.
On
Jan. 3, 1990, U.S. forces captured Noriega and took him to the United States,
where he was convicted of drug-trafficking, racketeering and money-laundering
charges and sentenced to 40 years in prison.
Back
in Venezuela, the streets of Caracas were mostly silent hours after the attack.
Security forces patrolled the city and, later in the day, supporters of
Maduro’s government gathered to protest his capture.
Most
residents, however, stayed inside their homes as the country – and the world –
wondered what came next.
6X54 FROM TIME
A President Captured: How the Elite Delta Force Raid in Caracas
Unfolded
By Nik Popli Jan 3, 2026 2:17 PM ET
By early Saturday morning, the United States had
taken a step not seen in more than three decades:
capturing a sitting foreign leader and flying him out of the country to face
criminal charges in New York.
President Nicolás Maduro of Venezuela and his wife,
Cilia Flores, were seized in a pre-dawn raid in
Caracas by American special operations forces, the culmination of months of
covert intelligence work and steadily escalating military pressure ordered by
President Donald Trump to oust the authoritarian leader. The operation,
officials said, unfolded in less than half an hour overnight but drew on weeks
of rehearsals and a vast armada of aircraft and intelligence assets that
tracked Maduro’s behavioral habits.
Speaking from Mar-a-Lago on Saturday, Trump praised
what he called a “spectacular assault” on several military facilities in the
oil-rich nation, adding that no American service members were killed and no
U.S. military equipment was lost. “No nation in the world could achieve what
America achieved yesterday,” he said.
Below is how the operation unfolded—and what comes
next.
Months of pressure
The raid on Maduro’s compound was the endpoint of a
strategy Trump began accelerating last fall, after authorizing the C.I.A. to
take a more aggressive posture toward Venezuela. The New York Times reported that
C.I.A. officers working clandestinely inside the country since August built a
detailed picture of Maduro’s “pattern of life”—where he lived, how he moved,
and when he was most vulnerable.
The covert campaign ran in parallel with an
increasingly overt show of force. Since September, the Trump Administration has
ordered dozens of strikes on boats accused of carrying drugs in the Caribbean
and eastern Pacific, killing at least 115 people. In late December, the C.I.A.
carried out a drone strike on a Venezuelan dock believed to be used by drug
traffickers.
Administration officials said the strikes were
intended to take down transnational drug cartels, arguing that Venezuelan
territory had become central to trafficking routes into the United States But
the campaign also served a broader strategic purpose: degrading Venezuela’s
ability to detect or respond to American military movements, while signaling to
Maduro that Trump was prepared to act directly on Venezuelan soil.
The raid on Maduro’s compound
Trump described Maduro as heavily protected inside a
presidential compound in Caracas he likened to a fortress. “It had steel doors,
it had what they call a safety space where it’s solid steel all around,” Trump
said to reporters on Saturday.
He added that U.S. forces were prepared to cut
through those steel walls with blow torches if Maduro locked himself in the
safe room, but the Venezuelan leader was unable to close the door in time.
“He was trying to get into it, but he got bum-rushed
right so fast that he didn’t get into that. We were prepared,” Trump continued.
The military had rehearsed the operation using a
replica of Maduro’s safe house, Trump added, allowing the special forces to
break through steel doors in a matter of seconds. “They actually built a house
which was identical to the one they went into, with all the same steel all over
the place,” Trump said.
“I watched it literally like you are watching a
television show,” he added. “It was an amazing thing.”
The operation was carried out by an elite U.S. Army
special operations unit known as Delta Force, which specializes in covert and
dangerous missions at the direction of the president.
‘Good luck and Godspeed’
Trump said the U.S. intended to carry out the
operation “four days ago,” but that the weather nearly delayed the
mission.
“Over the weeks through Christmas and New Year’s, the
men and women of the United States military sat ready,” said General Caine, the
chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, waiting for conditions that would
minimize civilian harm and maximize surprise.
According to General Caine, the final order to strike
Venezuela came late Friday night. “At 10:46 p.m. ET, the President ordered the
United States military to move forward with this mission,” he said. “He said to
us, ‘Good luck and Godspeed.’”
Over the next several hours, more than 150 aircraft—including
bombers, fighter jets, surveillance planes, helicopters and drones—launched
from 20 bases on land and at sea across the Western Hemisphere. Thousands of
flight hours were airborne at once, General Caine said, in an operation he
called “audacious” and “unprecedented” in its complexity.
The helicopters carrying the apprehension force,
which included U.S. law enforcement officers, skimmed toward Venezuela at
roughly 100 feet above the water to avoid detection. As they approached the
coast, U.S. Cyber Command, Space Command and other agencies layered effects
overhead to protect the aircraft and preserve surprise, General Caine said.
Trump said American forces shut down much of
Caracas’s power during the operation. “It was dark,” he said. “The lights of
Caracas were largely turned off due to a certain expertise that we have.”
As helicopters neared the city, U.S. aircraft
disabled Venezuelan air defense systems to clear a path. By 1:01 a.m. Eastern
time—2:01 a.m. in Caracas—the helicopters arrived at Maduro’s compound.
A firefight during the raid
General Caine said that as the apprehension force
descended and moved to isolate the area, helicopters came under fire, prompting
American forces to respond “with overwhelming force and self
defense.”
One U.S. aircraft was hit but remained flyable, and
all aircraft returned safely, he added.
On the ground, intelligence teams provided real-time
updates, allowing the force to navigate the compound and avoid unnecessary
risk. Maduro and Flores, both indicted in the United States on narco-terrorism
conspiracy charges, surrendered and were taken into custody without any
American loss of life.
“A couple of guys were hit,” Trump said, referring to
U.S. service members who were injured. “But they came back and they’re supposed
to be in pretty good shape.”
The entire assault lasted less than 30 minutes,
though explosions and low-flying aircraft sent shock waves through Caracas. It
is currently unclear how many members of the Venezuelan military were killed.
After securing the couple, U.S. forces called in
helicopters to extract the team while fighter jets and drones provided overhead
cover. By 3:29 a.m. Eastern time, General Caine said, the helicopters were back
over open water with Maduro and Flores on board. They were later transferred to
the U.S.S. Iwo Jima, where Trump said they were held en-route
to New York.
On Saturday morning, Trump posted on his Truth Social
account a photo of Maduro blindfolded and in a sweatsuit aboard the ship.
Why Trump authorized the operation
Trump framed the raid as both a law enforcement
action and an act of war against drug trafficking networks he says are
protected by the Venezuelan state.
“We had to do it because it’s a war,” he said, citing
what he described as an armed conflict with cartels moving drugs toward the
United States.
The Justice Department unsealed a new indictment on
Saturday accusing Maduro and Flores of participating in a narco-terrorism
conspiracy. Attorney General Pam Bondi said the couple would soon face justice
“on American soil in American courts.”
Still, the legal authority for the strike remains
contested. Congressional leaders said the administration had not notified the
Armed Services Committees in advance, and some lawmakers questioned whether the
President could authorize such an operation without explicit approval from
Congress.
Trump said the United States planned to oversee
Venezuela until a transition of power could be arranged. “We’re going to run
the country until such time as we can do a safe, proper and judicious
transition,” he said.
7X59
FROM GUK
‘Naked imperialism’: how Trump intervention in Venezuela is a return to
form for the US
Most of the Americas have suffered
from interference from their powerful northern neighbour
– and are usually the worse off for it
Maduro detained
in New York – live updates
By Tiago Rogero South
America correspondent
Sat 3 Jan 2026 23.00 EST
Share
The US bombardment of Venezuela and
the capture of its president, Nicolás Maduro, follow a long history of
interventions in South and Central America and the Caribbean over the past two
centuries. But they also mark an unprecedented moment as the first direct US
military attack on a South American country.
At a press conference after
Maduro’s capture, Donald Trump said that “American
dominance in the western hemisphere will never be questioned again”.
But since the mid-19th century,
the US has intervened in its continental neighbours
not only through economic pressure but also militarily, with a long list of
invasions, occupations and, in the case most closely resembling the current
situation, the capture of Panama’s dictator Manuel Noriega in 1989.
US agents place chains around the
waist of Panama’s then president Manuel Noriega onboard a C-130 transport plane
on 4 January 1990. Photograph: AP
Covert actions helped topple
democratically elected governments and usher in military dictatorships in
countries such as Brazil, Chile and Argentina, but overt
US military operations have historically been confined to closer neighbours in Central America and the Caribbean.
The first direct US military
attack on a South American country “signals a major shift in foreign and defence policy – one that is made explicit in the new national
security strategy published by the Trump administration a few weeks ago”, said Maurício
Santoro, a professor of international relations at the State University of Rio
de Janeiro.
That strategy called
for an “expansion” of the US military presence in the region in what it
describes as a “Trump
corollary” to
the Monroe doctrine – the “America for Americans” foreign policy set out in
1823 by President James Monroe and later used to justify US-backed military
coups in South and Central America.
While Saturday’s action was “in
line” with many past operations, it is “shocking because nothing like this has
happened since 1989”, said Alan McPherson, a history professor at Temple
University and author of A Short History of US Interventions in Latin America
and the Caribbean.
“One might have thought that this
era of naked imperialism – of the US getting the political outcomes it wants in
Latin America through sheer military force – would be over in the 21st century,
but clearly it is not,” he added.
Almost every country in the region
has experienced some form of US intervention, overt or covert, in the past
decades. Below are a few examples.
Mexico
A hand-coloured
woodcut depicts Gen Winfield Scott leading US forces into Mexico City to end
the Mexican-US war in 1847. Illustration: North Wind Picture Archives/Alamy
The
annexation of Texas, a
former Mexican territory, sparked border disputes that led to a US invasion
of Mexico, with American troops occupying
the capital, Mexico City, in 1847. The war ended only with the signing of a
treaty in 1848 that forced Mexico to cede 55% of its territory – an area
encompassing what are now the states of California, Nevada and Utah, as well as
parts of Arizona, New Mexico, Colorado and Wyoming.
Cuba
In 1898, the US helped Cuba in its war of independence against
Spain. After the victory, the US received control of Puerto Rico and occupied
Cuba until 1902, when an agreement granted the US navy perpetual control of
Guantánamo Bay. US troops later occupied the island in from 1906 to 1909 and
again from 1917 to 1922. After Fidel Castro’s 1959 revolution, the CIA backed
the failed Bay of Pigs invasion in 1961 in an attempt to trigger an uprising.
Haiti
US marines board
the USS Connecticut at Philadelphia’s League Island navy yard en route for Port-au-Prince, Haiti in
1915. Photograph: Bettmann Archive
Under the pretext of “stabilising” the country and protecting US business
interests after domestic unrest that led to the repeated overthrow of Haitian
leaders, the US invaded Haiti in 1915, taking control of customs, the
treasury and the national bank until 1934. When an attempted rebellion
threatened the dictator François “Papa Doc” Duvalier in 1959, the CIA worked
behind the scenes to secure his survival, viewing him as an ally in containing
the influence of Fidel Castro’s Cuban revolution.
Brazil
Although it ultimately never
intervened, a US naval taskforce was positioned off Brazil’s coast to intervene
in case there was resistance to the military coup that overthrew the
democratically elected leftwing president João Goulart in 1964. In the 1970s,
the CIA and the FBI directly advised the repressive apparatus of dictatorships
in countries such as Brazil, Chile and Argentina in the persecution and
assassination of dissidents under what became known as Operation Condor.
Panama
The US militarily backed the
separatist movement that led to Panama’s break from Colombia in 1903 and, after
independence, Washington retained significant influence over the Central
American country. In 1989, President George HW Bush ordered Panama’s invasion
by about 27,000 US troops to capture the dictator Noriega – a former CIA ally
who had been indicted on drug-trafficking charges in US courts.
Hours after the strikes, in which
an estimated 200-500 civilians were killed, along with about 300 Panamanian
soldiers, the US installed the declared winner of the election, Guillermo Endara, as president.
It remains unclear whether a
similar outcome will follow in Venezuela, which Trump has said would be “run”
by the US until a
“proper transition can take place”.
McPherson said it is “very rare”
for US interventions in the region to be followed by “peace, tranquillity, stability and democracy”.
“US interventions almost always
create long-term problems of succession,” he added.
A8X62 X62 from New York Magazine
The Wildest Things Trump Said
About the Venezuela Attack
By Margaret Hartmann, Updated Jan.
4 11:42 A.M.
President George W. Bush did not even
utter the words “mission
accomplished,”
and more than 20 years later, we’re still talking about it. So
imagine the reaction if hours into the invasion of Iraq, Bush had said U.S.
companies were taking over that nation’s natural resources, adding, “Nobody can
stop us.”
Donald Trump said just that about
Venezuela on Saturday, shortly after the U.S. conducted air strikes in Caracas
and captured its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores. Between
a call to Fox & Friends and
a late-morning press conference on Saturday, then remarks to
reporters on Air Force One on Sunday, Trump made so many absolutely
mind-boggling remarks that’s it’s hard to keep track. Here’s a roundup of the
wildest remarks Trump made after attacking
Venezuela.
“Thank you for your attention to this matter!”
Trump announced the attack on
Venezuela in a 4:21 a.m. Truth Social post:
Just a tad less poetic than “a
date which will live in infamy.”
“I watched it literally like I was watching a television show.”
Just another reality show.
“We can’t take a chance on letting somebody else run” Venezuela.
So who’s going to be in charge of
Venezuela now? On Fox, Trump casually suggested that the U.S. is going to
engage in some good old-fashioned imperialism … though it doesn’t sound like he
gave it a lot of thought before attacking.
“We can’t take a chance on letting
somebody else run it, just take over where [Maduro] left off. So we’re making that decision now.”
“We’re going to run the country.”
Later in his press conference,
Trump asserted that the United States has taken over Venezuela — for now, at
least.
“We’re going to run the country
until such time as we can do a safe proper and judicious transition,” he said.
“We don’t want to be involved with having somebody else get in and we have the
same situation that we had for the last long period of years.”
He emphasized, “It has to be
judicious, because that’s what we’re all about.” Yes, that is obvious.
“Nobody can stop us.”
During his Fox interview, Trump
was asked if he’s concerned about China’s reaction to the attacks.
“There’s not going to be a
problem,” he said. “They’re going to get oil. We’re going to allow people to
have oil.”
He continued, “We can’t take a
chance on after having done this incredible thing last night of letting
somebody else take over, where we have to do it again. We can do it again, too.
Nobody can stop us. There’s nobody that has the capability that we have. You
know, when I watch that war in Russia going on and on and on and everybody
dying. It’s primitive. It’s horrible. It’s horrible, it’s really horrible.”
“Something is going to have to be done with Mexico.”
So is this attack meant to threaten
Mexico?
Trump answered, “Well, it wasn’t
meant to be, and we’re very friendly with” Mexican president Claudia Sheinbaum,
who’s a “good woman.”
But … maybe
yes? “The cartels are running Mexico, she’s not running Mexico,” so “something
is going to have to be done with Mexico.”
“We’re going to be very strongly involved” in Venezuela’s oil industry.
At least we don’t have to waste a
lot of time wondering what this is really about.
U.S. oil companies will “start making money” for Venezuela.
At the press conference, Trump
openly described how U.S. companies are going to take over Venezuela’s oil
business.
“As everyone knows, the oil
business in Venezuela has been a bust, a total bust. For a long period of time they were pumping almost nothing in comparison to what
they could have been pumping and what could have taken place,” Trump said.
“We’re going to have our very large United States oil companies, the biggest
anywhere in the world go in, spend billions of dollars, fix the badly broken
infrastructure. The oil infrastructure. And start making money for the
country.”
Democrats shouldn’t say, “Oh gee, maybe it’s not constitutional.”
So how are we supposed to respond
to all this? Definitely not by questioning Trump’s power!
“The Monroe Doctrine … They now call it the Donroe
Document.”
Unfortunately for future history
students, Trump has already coined an incredibly stupid term for this era of
American foreign policy.
“We’re in charge.”
While speaking to reporters on Air
Force One on Sunday evening, Trump said he hasn’t even spoken to Delcy Rodríguez, Venezuela’s acting president. He briefly
tried to play coy about who’s running the country, then claimed it’s the U.S.
Kidnapping is “not a bad term.”
Later Trump suggested that he had
talked to Rodríguez, and shrugged off her calling Maduro’s capture a
“kidnapping.”
Venezuela “took our oil away from us.”
Trump then complained that Venezuela
took America’s oil … by which he meant Venezuelan oil that he thinks the U.S.
is entitled to.
“Remember, they stole our
property,” he said. “It was the greatest theft in the history of America.
Nobody has ever stolen our property like they have. They took our oil away from
us. They took the infrastructure away. And all that infrstructure
is rotten and decayed. And the oil companies are goign
to go in and rebuild it. We’re not going to spend very much money at all. They
oil companies are goign to go in, we’re going to take
our oil back.”
“It’s about peace on earth.”
Trump concluded his remarks on Air
Force One by claiming that attacking Venezuela, then threatening various other
countries, isn’t about oil but peace.
This piece has been updated.
More on Venezuela
·
Trump Says ‘We’re Going to Run’ Venezuela and ‘Take’ Its Oil: Now What?
A9 x63 from al Jazeera
Delcy Rodriguez sworn in as Venezuela’s president after Maduro abduction
Trump has signalled
that Rodriguez could face dire consequences should she buck US priorities for
Venezuela.
ByAl
Jazeera Staff and News Agencies
Published
On 5 Jan 2026 5 Jan 2026
Delcy
Rodriguez, formerly Venezuela’s vice president, has been formally sworn in to
lead the South American country following the abduction of
Nicolas Maduro in a United States military operation.
On
Monday, Rodriguez appeared before Venezuela’s National Assembly to take her
oath of office.
Recommended Stories
Trump poses
with ‘Make Iran Great Again’ hat after Maduro abduction
‘
I am still president of my country,’ Nicolas Maduro tells US
court
After the shock
of Maduro’s capture, what’s next for Venezuela?
Speaking
before the legislative body, composed largely of government loyalists,
Rodriguez reaffirmed her opposition to the military attack that led to the
capture and removal of Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores.
“I
come with pain over the kidnapping of two heroes who are being held hostage:
President Nicolás Maduro and First Lady Cilia Flores,” Rodriguez, 56, told the
assembly.
“I
swear to work tirelessly to guarantee the peace, spiritual, economic and social
tranquillity of our people.”
A
former labour lawyer, Rodriguez has been serving as
acting president since the early-morning attack that resulted in the abduction.
Explosions were reported before dawn on Saturday in the capital, Caracas, as
well as at nearby Venezuelan military bases and some civilian areas.
Monday’s
swearing-in ceremony was overseen by Rodriguez’s brother – the president of the
National Assembly, Jorge Rodriguez – and Maduro’s son, Nicolás Maduro Guerra,
who held a copy of the Venezuelan Constitution.
Other
members of Maduro’s inner circle, including Interior Minister Diosdado Cabello
and Defence Minister Vladimir Padrino,
were also in attendance.
The
ceremony took place as Maduro, her predecessor and former boss, faced an
arraignment proceeding in a New York City courthouse.
Federal
prosecutors in the US have charged Maduro with four counts related to
allegations he leveraged government powers to export thousands of tonnes of cocaine to North America.
The
charges include narco-terrorism conspiracy, cocaine importation conspiracy, the
illegal possession of machine guns and other destructive devices, and
conspiracy to possess such guns and devices.
Maduro
and his wife have pleaded not guilty to the charges, and their allies,
including Rodriguez, have denounced the pair’s abduction as a violation of
international law, as well as Venezuelan sovereignty.
In
court on Monday, Maduro maintained he remained the rightful leader of
Venezuela, saying, “I am still president.”
The
administration of US President Donald Trump, however, has signalled
that it plans to work with Rodriguez for the time being, though Trump himself
warned that her tenure as president could be cut short, should she fail to
abide by US demands.
“If
she doesn’t do what’s right, she is going to pay a very big price, probably
bigger than Maduro,” Trump told The Atlantic magazine in a Sunday morning
interview.
A
day earlier, in a televised address announcing the attack, Trump had said his
administration plans “to run the country until such time as we can do a safe,
proper, and judicious transition”.
On
Air Force One on Sunday, as he flew back to Washington, DC, Trump doubled down
on that statement.
“Don’t
ask me who’s in charge, because I’ll give you an answer that will be very
controversial. We’re in charge,” he told reporters.
He
added that Rodriguez is “cooperating” and that, while he personally has not
spoken to her, “we’re dealing with the people who just got sworn in”.
The
Trump administration’s seeming willingness to allow Rodriguez, a former labour lawyer, to remain in charge has raised eyebrows.
Rodriguez,
who served as vice president since 2018, is known to be a stalwart “chavista”: an adherent of the left-wing political movement
founded by Maduro’s mentor, the late Hugo Chavez. She has held various
ministerial roles under Maduro, including leading the Ministry of Foreign
Affairs.
But
Trump’s allies in the Republican Party have argued that keeping Rodriguez in
place is simply a practical reality.
“We
don’t recognise Delcy
Rodriguez as the legitimate ruler of Venezuela. We didn’t recognise
Nicolas Maduro as a legitimate ruler,” Republican Senator Tom Cotton told CNN
on Sunday.
“It
is a fact that she and other indicted and sanctioned officials are in
Venezuela. They have control over the military and security services. We have
to deal with that fact. That does not make them a legitimate leader.”
While
on Air Force One, Trump largely avoided committing to new elections in
Venezuela, indicating he would instead focus on “fixing” the country and
allowing US oil companies access to its vast petroleum reserves.
One
reporter on the aeroplane asked, “How soon can an election
take place?”
“Well,
I think we’re looking more at getting it fixed, getting it ready first, because
it’s a mess. The country is a mess,” Trump replied. “It’s been horribly run.
The oil is just flowing at a very low level.”
He
later added, “We’re going to run everything. We’re going to run it, fix it.
We’ll have elections at the right time. But the main thing you have to fix:
It’s a broken country. There’s no money.”
Recent
presidential elections in Venezuela have been widely denounced as fraudulent,
with Maduro claiming victory in each one.
The
contested 2018 election, for example, led to the US briefly recognising
opposition leader Juan Guaido as president, instead
of Maduro.
Later,
Maduro also claimed victory for a third term in office during the 2024
presidential race, despite election regularities.
The
official vote tally was not released, and the opposition published documents
that appeared to show that Maduro’s rival, Edmundo Gonzalez, had won. Protests
erupted on Venezuela’s streets, and the nonprofit Human Rights Watch reported
that more than 2,000 protesters were unlawfully detained, with at least 25 dead
in apparent extrajudicial killings.
The
opposition has largely boycotted legislative elections in Venezuela, denouncing
them as rigged in favour of “chavistas”.
Monday’s
swearing-in ceremony included the 283 members of the National Assembly elected
last May. Few opposition candidates were among them.
A10X10 from 1440
|
Two Tankers
Taken |
|
The US military
said it had seized two Venezuela-linked oil tankers yesterday,
including a Russian-flagged ship it pursued for more than two weeks. The ship,
formerly called the Bella 1, was working to evade the US Coast Guard in the
northern Atlantic Ocean weeks after allegedly seeking to dock in Venezuela.
On Dec. 24, the ship received approval from the Kremlin to reflag under
Russia and has since changed its name to the Marinera. It was accompanied by
Russian naval vessels and a submarine but was seized between the British
Isles and Iceland with support from the UK military. A second tanker, the
Cameroonian-flagged Sophia, was seized after allegedly leaving a Venezuelan
port. The US seized two other tankers—the Centuries and the Skipper—last
month. The latest
incidents come after President Donald Trump said the US will take possession
of 30 million to 50 million barrels of
sanctioned oil from Venezuela—up to 15% of the country’s annual oil
production. |
A11X11 from the Hill
US seizes 2 Venezuela-linked oil tankers, 1 flying
Russian flag
by Max Rego and Ellen Mitchell - 01/07/26 9:14 AM
ET
The U.S. seized two oil tankers linked to
Venezuela early Wednesday morning, one that was flying a Russian flag, drawing
pushback from Moscow.
Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary
Kristi Noem shared a video of the operations to the
social platform X at 9:22 a.m. EST.
“In two predawn operations today, the Coast Guard
conducted back-to-back meticulously coordinated boarding of two ‘ghost fleet’
tanker ships— one in the North Atlantic Sea and one in international waters
near the Caribbean,” she wrote.
The vessels, the Motor Tanker Bella-1 and the
Motor Tanker Sophia, were located in the North Atlantic and in international
waters near the Caribbean, respectively.
The Bella-1 had reportedly changed its name to the
Marinera and was reflagged from a Guyanese to a Russian vessel. Moscow, a
staunch supporter of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro’s regime, had
reportedly deployed a submarine to help escort it across the ocean.
Russia’s transportation ministry released a
statement saying U.S. Navy forces boarded the ship around 3 p.m. Moscow time,
or 7 a.m. EST, at which point “contact with it was lost.” It also confirmed the
ship received permission to fly Russia’s flag on Dec. 24.
“No state has the right to use force against
vessels duly registered in the jurisdictions of other states,” the ministry
added.
The U.S. European Command said Wednesday on X that
the Defense Department, in conjunction with DHS and the Department of Justice,
seized the Bella-1 “for violations of U.S. sanctions.”
Noem and U.S. European Command added that the Bella-1 tanker was seized
pursuant to a warrant issued by a U.S. federal court and was tracked by the
U.S. Coast Guard Munro, a sixth Legend-class cutter homeported in Alameda, Ca.
U.K. Defense Secretary John Healey said Wednesday
that British armed forces supported the operation as part of “global efforts to
crack down on sanctions busting.”
“This ship, with a nefarious history, is part of a
Russian-Iranian axis of sanctions evasion which is fueling terrorism, conflict,
and misery from the Middle East to Ukraine,” Healey said of the Bella-1.
The Bella-1 was initially chased by the U.S. Coast
Guard off the coast of Venezuela last month. Its capture marks a hot spot
between Washington and Moscow, which has accused the U.S. of a
“disproportionate” focus on the tanker.
U.S. Southern Command, which oversees Washington’s
military campaign in the Caribbean, said on X the Sophia was operating in
international waters and “conducting illicit activities” at the time of its
capture. The U.S. Coast Guard is now escorting the vessel to the U.S. “for
final disposition,” according to the command.
The operations mark the third and fourth such
seizures the U.S. has carried out in the past month. It also comes days after
the capture of Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores.
The U.S. first seized an oil tanker known as
“Skipper” off the coast of Venezuela on Dec. 10, claiming it was being used to
transport “sanctioned oil” from Venezuela and Iran. A week later, President
Trump said his administration would designate Maduro’s regime a foreign terrorist
organization and ordered a blockade of all sanctioned oil tankers going into
and out of the country.
Ten days later, Washington took control of a
second tanker the Coast Guard identified as “Centuries,” suspected of carrying
oil subject to U.S. sanctions.
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth
said on X that the “blockade of sanctioned and illicit Venezuelan oil remains
in FULL EFFECT — anywhere in the world.”
The first two seizures were part of a months-long
pressure campaign against Maduro, which culminated in Saturday’s raid to
capture the Venezuelan leader. Maduro and Flores pleaded not guilty Monday to
U.S. charges of narcoterrorism conspiracy, cocaine importation conspiracy,
possessions of machine guns and destructive devices and conspiracy to possess
machine guns and destructive devices.
The 25-page indictment from the Justice Department
alleges Maduro abused his power to flood the U.S. with cocaine, enriching
himself, his family and regime officials in the process.
With Maduro gone, Trump has said the U.S. is now
going to “run” Venezuela “until such time as we can do a safe, proper and
judicious transition,” and that the country’s petroleum infrastructure would
come under the control of American oil companies.
The president also said Tuesday that the Venezuelan
government, now led by acting President Delcy
Rodríguez, agreed to turn over between 30 million and 50 million barrels of
sanctioned oil to the U.S. The oil, Trump noted, will be “taken by storage
ships, and brought directly to unloading docks in the United States.”
Venezuela has the largest crude oil reserves in
the world, with more than 303 billion barrels as of 2024, according to OPEC.
A12X61
from FOX
Venezuela orders nationwide
manhunt for supporters after Maduro's arrest by US forces
An
emergency decree targets anyone who supported military operation that led to
drug trafficking charges against former president
By Louis Casiano Published January 5, 2026 1:10pm EST
Venezuelan authorities have
been ordered to find and arrest anyone involved in supporting the military
operation that led to the arrest of Nicolás Maduro.
A state of emergency decree issued
Saturday, but published Monday, orders police to "immediately begin the
national search and capture of everyone involved in the promotion or support
for the armed attack by the United States," according to the text of the
decree, Reuters reported.
It was not clear what charges
could be levied against those taken into custody.
Maduro made his first court
appearance Monday in New York, days after he and his wife were arrested by U.S.
forces over the weekend.
Fetterman defends Trump's Venezuela military operation
against criticism from fellow Democrats
Both have been charged by the Justice Department with narco-terrorism and other offenses.
"I am innocent. I am not
guilty of anything that is written here," Maduro said in court as the
charges against him were read.
DEMOCRATS LABEL TRUMP'S VENEZUELA OPERATION AN
'IMPEACHABLE OFFENSE'
Despite denouncing the
U.S. military operation, Rodriguez said in a Sunday social media post that the
country aspires towards balanced and respectful international relations between
Caracas and Washington.
A14X60 stockpiling food X60
FROM GUK
Few in Caracas are celebrating as they face an
uncertain post-Maduro future
Stockpiling not partying is the priority for
Venezuelans who say they fear crackdowns by the regime the US left in place
Patricia Torres in Caracas, Tom Phillips in Bogotá and Camille
Rodríguez Montilla Sun 4 Jan 2026 17.03
EST
there was a whirlwind of emotions on the
streets of Caracas on Sunday, 24 hours after the first-ever
large-scale US attack on South American soil and
the extraordinary snaring of Venezuela’s president, Nicolás Maduro.
“Uncertainty,” said Griselda Guzmán, a 68-year-old
pensioner, fighting back tears as she lined up outside a grocery store with her
husband to stock up on supplies in case the coming days brought yet more drama.
“Anger,” said Sauriany, a
23-year-old administrative worker from Venezuela’s state-owned electricity
company as she queued outside a supermarket on the other side of town with her
24-year-old partner, Leandro.
Leandro voiced shock as the couple waited in a
100-person queue to buy flour, milk and butter alongside a quartet of nuns.
“Who could have imagined that his would happen? That right at the start of the
year they’d bomb our country while everyone was asleep?” he asked.
“If I thought
it would improve the country I’d welcome it,” Leandro added, as shoppers were
allowed into the overcrowded supermarket in small groups. “But I don’t believe
this will happen. If they wanted peace, this isn’t the way to achieve it.”
Similarly confused sentiments could be heard all over
Caracas on Sunday as its 3 million citizens came to terms with the traumatic
nocturnal blitz on their city – a
move the governments of Spain, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Mexico and Uruguay
warned set “an extremely dangerous precedent for peace and regional security”.
“It’s all so distressing,” said Gabriel Vásquez, a
29-year-old video-maker, recalling how he had been woken by the sound of a
“gigantic” explosion at about 2am on Saturday and how his community in central
Caracas was plunged into darkness as aircraft circled overhead.
“I thought that any time my house could get bombed
too,” said Vásquez, whose neighbourhood was still in
the dark on Sunday. “We have no water, no electricity, no phone reception –
nothing,” he complained.
Julio Pimentel, a 33-year-old designer, said his
electricity and water supplies had also been cut but admitted he had been
surprised by the number of people out on the streets “considering the situation
we’re in”. “Supermarkets and pharmacies are very, very crowded,” Pimentel said.
There was scant sign of citizens celebrating Maduro’s
downfall, something locals attributed to fear that his regime – which remains
in power despite his arrest –
might crack down and a deep-rooted sense that little had actually changed as a
result of the US intervention.
Delcy Rodríguez strikes defiant tone but must walk
tightrope as Venezuela’s interim leader
On Sunday, the head of the armed forces, Vladimir Padrino López, announced that military chiefs had recognised the vice-president, Delcy Rodríguez,
as Venezuela’s acting president after the “cowardly kidnapping” of Maduro and
his wife, Cilia Flores. Trump has also indicated he is prepared to deal with
Rodríguez. “She’s essentially willing to do what we think is necessary to make
Venezuela great again,” he said after Saturday’s assault.
“They’ve taken Maduro but the [Bolivarian] revolution
isn’t over,” said Griselda Guzmán’s 71-year-old husband, Antonio, who like his
wife, asked not to be identified with their real names. “We’re still in the
same situation – they’ve just removed a pawn from the game of chess.”
But
many locals were quietly rejoicing at the demise of a politician
who many loathe for leading their oil-rich country into years of ruin and
repression since
he took power in 2013 and is widely believed to have stolen the 2024
presidential election.
“We all get
what we deserve. Maduro is a man who never put his hand on his heart to see the
hardships of his country, to see his people going hungry,” said Griselda
Guzmán, recalling the satisfying moment she had seen images of the dethroned
dictator languishing in US custody. “When I saw him like that – handcuffed – I
saw him for what he was: the biggest fool on Earth.”
Guzmán said
she believed Maduro had had “the opportunity of a lifetime” to leave power
voluntarily after the 2024 vote,
which independently
verified voting data showed he had lost to
the political movement led by the Nobel laureate María Corina Machado. “He
could have handed over the presidency because he knew he hadn’t won,” she said.
But instead Maduro chose to
cling to power – and now he was behind bars in New York facing decades in a US
jail.
Her husband attributed the lack of public commemorations
within Venezuela to a widespread belief that Saturday’s bombardment was merely
the beginning of the latest rollercoaster chapter in Venezuela’s turbulent
recent history. “Nothing has happened yet … this only started yesterday,” he
predicted.
Others were outraged by their president’s abduction
and Trump’s decision to invade, a move many experts believe represents a
flagrant violation of international law.
“OK, there are problems – but they are Venezuelan
problems and Venezuelans need to solve them,” said Sauriany.
“They [the US] aren’t Venezuela’s owners. He [Trump] can’t just come along and
say … he’s going to rule Venezuela because he’s removed Maduro.”
Sauriany
believed Rodríguez should be allowed to “carry on Maduro’s legacy” for the
remainder of his six-year term, a prospect that appalls Venezuela’s opposition
but seemed to become more likely after Trump’s comments on Saturday.
In
the weeks before Trump’s invasion, diplomats and experts warned that such an attack
could plunge Venezuela and the surrounding region into chaos or conflict. But on Sunday
there was no immediate sign of violence erupting in the wake of Maduro’s
toppling, or of a dangerous split in the military, but regional governments are
on edge.
Colombia’s president, Gustavo Petro, ordered 30,000
troops to its border with Venezuela to guard against possible turmoil. Armoured personnel carriers took up position at the border
crossing between the two countries in the city of Cúcuta.
The Colombo-Venezuelan
rebel army, the National Liberation Army, condemned what it
called Trump’s “imperial” onslaught, vowing to “confront” the attack on
Venezuelan sovereignty.
As he waited to stockpile food on Sunday, Antonio
Guzmán said there was little caraqueños could now do but wait: “We still don’t
know what is really going on.”
A13 X55 world by country X55 FROM
TIME
How the World Is Reacting to the U.S. Capture of Nicolas Maduro
By Richard Hall Jan
3, 2026 10:54 AM ET
World leaders reacted to the capture of Venezuelan
President Nicolas Maduro by
the United States with a mixture of outrage, concern, and caution on Saturday.
President Donald Trump announced the capture of Maduro
and his wife, Cilia Flores, and a “large-scale” strike against Venezuela hours
after explosions were reported in the country’s capital, Caracas.
The extraordinary attack follows months of pressure from
the Trump Administration on Maduro to cede power in the South American country
over long-standing accusations of drug trafficking and election rigging.
It represents the largest U.S. military operation in
Latin America since the 1989 invasion of Panama, when, as today, the U.S.
captured the country's leader, Manuel Antonio Noriega.
Many countries expressed outrage over the capture of
Maduro on Saturday, while even some U.S. allies issued statements calling for
the rule of law to be respected.
South American leaders in particular expressed anger
at the attack.
Here is a round-up of global reaction to the
operation.
UNITED
KINGDOM
British Prime Minister Keir Starmer
said he wanted to speak to President Trump before making any firm statements
either way about Maduro’s capture.
"I always say and believe we should uphold
international law, but I think at this stage [in a] fast moving situation,
let's establish the facts and take it from there,” he said in a statement to
British broadcasters.
"I want to establish the facts first. I want to
speak to President Trump,” he said. "I want to speak to allies. As I say I
can be absolutely clear we were not involved in that."
RUSSIA
Russia's Foreign Ministry said it is "extremely
alarmed" and called for "immediate clarification", according to
a statement posted on Saturday on the ministry's Telegram channel.
It added later in a post on X: “The US committed an
act of armed aggression against Venezuela, which gives rise to deep concern
& warrants condemnation.”
“The pretexts used to justify these actions are
untenable. Russia reaffirms its solidarity with the Venezuelan people,’ it
continued in the post.
CHINA
China's Foreign Ministry said in a statement that it
was "deeply shocked" by what it described as a "blatant use of
force against a sovereign state and action against its president."
"Such hegemonic acts of the U.S. seriously
violate international law and Venezuela's sovereignty and threaten peace and
security in Latin America and the Caribbean region," it said.
"China firmly opposes it. We call on the U.S. to
abide by international law and the purposes and principles of the UN Charter,
and stop violating other countries’ sovereignty and security," the
statement continued.
UNITED Nations
The United Nations said it was "deeply
alarmed" by the U.S. strikes and capture of Maduro, suggesting it could
have violated international law.
"These developments constitute a dangerous
precedent," Stéphane Dujarric, spokesman for the U.N. secretary-general,
said in a statement.
"The Secretary-General is deeply alarmed by the
recent escalation in Venezuela, culminating with today’s United States military
action in the country, which has potential worrying implications for the
region," she added.
"The Secretary-General continues to emphasize
the importance of full respect—by all—of international law, including the U.N.
Charter. He’s deeply concerned that the rules of international law have not
been respected," the statement continued
EUROPEAN UNION
EU foreign policy chief Kaja
Kallas wrote on X that she had spoken to US Secretary
of State Marco Rubio and the EU ambassador in Caracas.
"The EU has repeatedly stated that Mr Maduro lacks legitimacy and has defended a peaceful
transition," she wrote. "Under all circumstances, the principles of
international law and the UN Charter must be respected. We call for
restraint."
MEXICO
In a statement on X, Mexico's President, Claudia
Sheinbaum, shared an excerpt from the United Nations Charter.
“The Members of the Organization, in their
international relations, shall refrain from the threat or use of force against
the territorial integrity or political independence of any State, or in any
other manner inconsistent with the Purposes of the United Nations.”
BRAZIL
Brazilian President Luiz Inacio
Lula da Silva condemned the capture of Maduro as crossing “an unacceptable
line”.
“Attacking countries, in flagrant violation of
international law, is the first step toward a world of violence, chaos, and
instability, where the law of the strongest prevails over multilateralism,”
Lula wrote on X.
“The international community, through the United
Nations, needs to respond vigorously to this episode,” he added.
COLOMBIA
Colombia’s President Gustavo Petro condemned the U.S.
operation in several posts on X.
“The Government of Colombia rejects the aggression
against the sovereignty of Venezuela and of Latin America,” he wrote.
“Internal conflicts between peoples are resolved by
those same peoples in peace. That is the principle of the self-determination of
peoples, which forms the foundation of the United Nations system,” Petro
continued.
DENMARK
Denmark, which has been on the receiving end of
threats from the Trump Administration to take control of Greenland, issued a
muted response to the operation.
"Dramatic development in Venezuela, which we are
following closely. We need to get back on track toward de-escalation and
dialogue. International law must be respected," Foreign Minister Lars Løkke Rasmussen wrote on X.
SPAIN
Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez called for
"de-escalation and responsibility.”
“International Law and the principles of the United
Nations Charter must be respected," Mr
Sanchez wrote on X.
A14X51
@FROM GUK
Mexico
A hand-coloured
woodcut depicts Gen Winfield Scott leading US forces into Mexico City to end
the Mexican-US war in 1847. Illustration: North Wind Picture Archives/Alamy
The annexation of Texas, a former
Mexican territory, sparked border disputes that led to a US invasion of Mexico, with American troops occupying
the capital, Mexico City, in 1847. The war ended only with the signing of a
treaty in 1848 that forced Mexico to cede 55% of its territory – an area
encompassing what are now the states of California, Nevada and Utah, as well as
parts of Arizona, New Mexico, Colorado and Wyoming.
Cuba
Col Theodore Roosevelt and the
Rough Riders after capturing Kettle Hill in Cuba in July 1898. Photograph:
Alamy
In 1898, the US helped Cuba in its war of independence against
Spain. After the victory, the US received control of Puerto Rico and occupied
Cuba until 1902, when an agreement granted the US navy perpetual control of
Guantánamo Bay. US troops later occupied the island in from 1906 to 1909 and
again from 1917 to 1922. After Fidel Castro’s 1959 revolution, the CIA backed
the failed Bay of Pigs invasion in 1961 in an attempt to trigger an uprising.
Haiti
US marines board
the USS Connecticut at Philadelphia’s League Island navy yard en route for Port-au-Prince, Haiti in
1915. Photograph: Bettmann Archive
Under the pretext of “stabilising” the country and protecting US business
interests after domestic unrest that led to the repeated overthrow of Haitian
leaders, the US invaded Haiti in 1915, taking control of customs, the
treasury and the national bank until 1934. When an attempted rebellion
threatened the dictator François “Papa Doc” Duvalier in 1959, the CIA worked
behind the scenes to secure his survival, viewing him as an ally in containing
the influence of Fidel Castro’s Cuban revolution.
Brazil
Brazil’s then president João
Goulart (right) receives full military honours as he
arrives for talks with President Kennedy. Lt Col Charles P Murray Jr is in the centre. Photograph: Bettmann/Bettmann Archive
Although it ultimately never
intervened, a US naval taskforce was positioned off Brazil’s coast to intervene
in case there was resistance to the military coup that overthrew the
democratically elected leftwing president João Goulart in 1964. In the 1970s,
the CIA and the FBI directly advised the repressive apparatus of dictatorships
in countries such as Brazil, Chile and Argentina in the persecution and
assassination of dissidents under what became known as Operation Condor.
Panama
Children cheer US marines during
‘Operation Just Cause’, when the US invaded Panama to remove Manuel Noriega in
December 1989. Photograph: New York Daily News/Getty Images
The US militarily backed the
separatist movement that led to Panama’s break from Colombia in 1903 and, after
independence, Washington retained significant influence over the Central
American country. In 1989, President George HW Bush ordered Panama’s invasion
by about 27,000 US troops to capture the dictator Noriega – a former CIA ally
who had been indicted on drug-trafficking charges in US courts.
Hours after the strikes, in which
an estimated 200-500 civilians were killed, along with about 300 Panamanian
soldiers, the US installed the declared winner of the election, Guillermo Endara, as president.
It remains unclear whether a
similar outcome will follow in Venezuela, which Trump has said would be “run”
by the US until a
“proper transition can take place”.
McPherson said it is “very rare”
for US interventions in the region to be followed by “peace, tranquillity, stability and democracy”.
“US interventions almost always
create long-term problems of succession,” he added.
A15 X68 Germany X68 FROM DW
Venezuela: Germany hesitates to condemn US attack
Jens Thurau
8 hours ago
The German government seems to have three things
on its mind in regard to US capture of of Venezuelan
President Nicolás Maduro: be cautious, wait-and-see and don't upset Donald
Trump.
https://p.dw.com/p/56MlE
January 3, 2026, Berlin, Berlin, Germany:
Protesters at Branderburger Tor in a portest sit-in agaist the
imperialistic military USA invasion of Venzuela
A few protesters took to the streets of Berlin
following the US attack on Venezuela, but leading politicians have responded
with cautionImage: Zaira Biagini/ZUMA/picture
alliance
Government spokespeople responded cautiously to
journalists' questions on Monday: For almost 40 minutes, Foreign Office
spokeswoman Kathrin Deschauer and government
spokesman Sebastian Hille took questions on the
subject of Venezuela at the Federal Press Conference in Berlin.
Why did Chancellor Friedrich Merz and Foreign
Minister Johann Wadephul of the conservative
Christian Democratic Union (CDU) not describe last Saturday's action by the US
military as what many experts believe it was, namely a violation of
international law, reporters wanted to know. On Saturday, US soldiers captured
Venezuelan leader Nicolas Maduro in a spectacular operation in the capital
Caracas and flew him to the US.
Hille read out a statement harshly criticizing Maduro: "Maduro has led
his country into dangerous waters in recent years." The statement also
said that his term as president was the result of rigged elections, which is
one of the reasons why Germany has never officially recognized Maduro.
The government spokesperson then stated, "The
Chancellor has emphasized that everyone, including the US, must respect
international law. This applies explicitly to state sovereignty and territorial
integrity." A choice of words that carefully avoided explicitly accusing the
US of violating international law.
How Germany responded to US capture of Nicolas
Maduro
GERMANY'S MERZ SHIES AWAY FROM ACCUSING US OF
VIOLATING INTERNATIONAL LAW
Over the weekend, Germany had also been part of
the effort to come up with a European response and assessment of the US
government's decision to seize Maduro. The result was a statement released on
Sunday and signed by 26 EU countries, but not Hungary. In the statement, EU
Foreign Affairs Representative Kaja Kallas called for compliance with international law.
Respecting the will of the Venezuelan people remains the only way for Venezuela
to restore democracy, she added. The EU has repeatedly stated that Maduro lacks
the legitimacy of a democratically elected president.
German Chancellor Friedrich Merz avoided making a
clear statement over the weekend. On Saturday, he wrote on X: "The legal
situation regarding the US intervention is complex. We are taking our time to
consider it." He added that the principles of international law must apply
to relations between states: "There cannot be political instability in
Venezuela now. It is important to ensure an orderly transition to a government
legitimized by elections."
On Monday morning, Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul felt compelled to once again come to the
chancellor's defense. Speaking on Deutschlandfunk
public radio before a trip to Lithuania, Wadephul
said: "Maduro led an unjust regime; eight million people have left the
country. There are political prisoners."
He added that the United Nations had described the
human rights situation in Venezuela as very critical and that proceedings were
underway against Venezuela at the International Criminal Court. Wadephul said Maduro is not the legitimately elected
president of the country and that the geopolitical interests of the US also
played a role in the attack.
DELCY RODRIGUEZ STEPS IN AS VENEZUELA'S INTERIM
PRESIDENT
GERMANY'S LEFT-LEANING POLITICIANS ARE CRITICAL
This statement was criticized as too weak by
several German opposition politicians, who described the military action that
ultimately brought Maduro to New York as a clear violation of international
law. Katharina Dröge, parliamentary leader of the
Green Party , said over the weekend: "The US
intervention is a violation of international law. What is stopping the
Chancellor from stating this clearly."
She added: "In this situation, keeping a low
profile is a disastrous strategy, Mr. Merz."
Vice Chancellor and Finance Minister Lars Klingbeil, who also co-chairs the center-left Social
Democratic Party (SPD), stated at the weekend: "The events in Venezuela
are very worrying. The Venezuelan ruler Maduro has led an authoritarian regime
that has clung to power through violence and oppression."
"However, this cannot be a justification for
disregarding international law," Klingbeil
added.
The far-right Alternative for Germany party (AfD) has hailed US action in Venezuela as part of a
necessary "realignment of global politics."
EUROPE NEEDS THE US IN THE UKRAINE CONFLICT
Why Merz and Wadephul
are not saying this so clearly is currently the subject of speculation in
political circles in Berlin. On Tuesday, Merz will meet with French President
Emmanuel Macron and other EU leaders in Paris. Representatives from Ukraine and
the US will also be present. As so often in the past, the focus will be on the
prospects for peace in Ukraine, for which American security guarantees would be
very important.
Is that why Germany does not want to clash with
Trump over Venezuela? Armin Laschet (CDU), chairman
of the Bundestag's Foreign Affairs Committee, put it this way: "Foreign
policy is complicated. You have to take the realities of the world into
account."
He added that if Europeans indicted Trump over the
incident, the result would likely be losing leverage in Ukraine policy.
In other words, the German government appears to
believe that it is not the time to fan the flames with the US over Venezuela,
but rather to focus on achieving the best possible outcome in Ukraine.
This article was originally written in German.
A16 X69 Russia X69 FROM
UKRAINIAN REVIEW
Apple of Discord: Russian Reaction to the
U.S. Operation in Venezuela
04.01.2026
It was long evident that
Venezuela had become one of the very illustrative
points of confrontation between Russia and the United States. Moscow has for
years supplied weapons and political backing to Nicolás Maduro’s regime, while
the U.S. President Donald Trump has consistently viewed the Venezuelan dictator
as an adversary. Following the successful U.S. operation to capture Maduro, the
divide between Russia and the United States has become even more pronounced.
On the official level, Russia
condemned the intervention, yet at the same time elements of admiration for the
professionalism of the operation surfaced — in
unofficial and semi-official discourse.
OFFICIAL REACTION
The Russian Ministry of Foreign
Affairs described the U.S. strikes on Venezuela as “an act of armed aggression”
and “unacceptable interference in the sovereignty of an independent state.”
Leaders of the State Duma framed the operation as an attempted foreign coup carried
out under the guise of “legal action.”
Dmitry Medvedev, deputy chairman
of the Russian Security Council, reacted with overt irony, calling the U.S.
operation a “wonderful example of peacemaking” and hinting that a similar
operation could be directed at Ukraine.
Coming from Russian officials who
coordinate and justify a brutal full-scale invasion of Ukraine, such statements
sound particularly absurd.
Bloggers’ opinions and comparisons with Ukraine
In pro-Kremlin Telegram channels
and Z-blogging communities, reactions were mixed, but generally marked by
emotional intensity and rhetoric of fear. Comparisons with Russia’s full-scale
invasion of Ukraine in 2022, originally conceived by the Kremlin as a
blitzkrieg, were inevitable.
Some Z-bloggers displayed near-hysterical
reactions to the unexpectedly effective U.S. operation. This triggered a mix of
envy toward American military success and humiliation over Russia’s own
military shortcomings.
They carried out the operation competently. This is
probably what our Special Operations Forces had in mind—fast, effective, and
efficient. It’s unlikely that Gerasimov planned to wage a war for four years,
one popular propagandist channel admitted.
Ukrainian former MP Oleh Tsariov, currently in hiding, expressed concern that the
United States would now gain control over Venezuela’s oil reserves, potentially
driving global prices down, which would benefit Ukraine.
The Russian reaction to the U.S.
operation once again highlights a fundamental reality: Russia and the United
States have long been ideological rivals. Moscow views its manipulations around
Ukraine largely as a tool to counter the U.S., waiting for revenge while
tacitly acknowledging that, despite all efforts, Washington remains a step
ahead.
What is also evident is jealousy — particularly when Russian
commentators compare a precise U.S. operation targeting a dictator with
Russia’s terror against civilians in Ukraine.
Finally, Venezuela stands as yet
an example of how Russian weapons supplies and political support fail to
guarantee the survival of allied authoritarian regimes.
A17 X70 “ X70 FROM TASS
US strikes on Venezuela4 Jan, 14:47
Medvedev comments on US aggression on Venezuela,
double standards in use by Europe to TASS
According to the senior Russian security official,
Washington no longer has the formal right to criticize Moscow for any actions
Deputy Chairman of Russian Security Council Dmitry
Medvedev Yekaterina Shtukina/POOL/TASS
Deputy Chairman of Russian Security Council Dmitry
Medvedev
© Yekaterina Shtukina/POOL/TASS
MOSCOW, January 4. /TASS/. Deputy Chairman of the
Russian Security Council Dmitry Medvedev described the United States’ actions against
Venezuela, including the seizure of leader Nicolas Maduro, as aggression and a
breach of international law.
According to the senior Russian security official,
Washington no longer has the formal right to criticize Moscow for any actions.
TASS has compiled key takeaways from Medvedev’s
comments on the US operation in Venezuela in response to its questions.
TRUE US PURPOSE
Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro "has
repeatedly said that the current US administration’s true purpose is to grab
their oil and other fossils," Medvedev recalled. "And [US President
Donald] Trump makes no secret of that," he noted.
Medvedev denounced the US actions against
Venezuela as aggression and called them unlawful.
However, he said, the US leader has been somewhat
consistent in his actions. "He and his team have been rigidly defending
his country’s national interests, both political (with Latin America being the
backyard of the United States) and economic (give us your oil and other natural
resources)," the Russian politician noted.
EUROPE’S REACTION
Medvedev described European countries’ reaction to
the events in Venezuela as a classic case of using double standards.
Doubts of Maduro’s legitimacy, voiced by Europe,
"do not hold water," he argued.
He advised Ukraine’s Vladimir Zelensky not to
relax as he argued that Zelensky, whose presidential powers expired long ago,
could be removed from office "very soon."
UN MECHANISMS
As regards the United Nations, the global
organization does not have effective mechanisms to tackle situations as the US
aggression on Venezuela, according to Medvedev.
Meanwhile, he continued, the world needs real and
effective mechanisms as part of international law that could guarantee a calm,
safe and decent life to billions of people on Earth. Fundamental UN documents
"have basically remained good intentions the road to hell is paved
with," Medvedev lamented.
IMPLICATIONS OF US AGGRESSION
The events in Venezuela showed that not a single
country disliked by the United States can feel safe, "especially Denmark
and Danish-owned Greenland," Medvedev opined.
The seizure of Maduro will also add to the hatred
that Latin America harbors toward the United States, Medvedev said.
Besides, Washington might as well repeat the
Venezuela scenario in Ukraine, he concluded.
POLAND 10 Jul 2022, 16:53
Poland’s ex-President Walesa calls on West not to
be limited by liberating Ukraine
According to Lech Walesa, it is necessary to push
for changes in Russia’s political system
2 hours ago
Venezuela achieved victory at UN Security
Council’s meeting — foreign minister
The international community officially recognized
that the attack made on January 3 was the act contradicting the international
law, Yvan Gil Pinto emphasized
3 hours ago
Air defenses down 55 Ukrainian drones over Russian
regions during three hours
31 of them were destroyed over the Bryansk Region
Today, 01:53
Japan’s prime minister avoids criticizing US
actions in Venezuela, Maduro’s capture
Sanae Takaichi emphasized the importance of the
"swift restoration of democracy and stabilization of the situation"
in Venezuela
17 Jul 2017, 06:24
Kremlin stresses Chechen leader’s harsh statements
taken out of context
Kadyrov’s words are taken out of context, the
Kremlin spokesman stressed
30 Dec 2025, 05:00
Press review: Russia may revise Ukraine talks post
attack and China launches Taiwan drills
Top stories from the Russian press on Tuesday,
December 30th
25 Apr 2022, 06:08
Russian defense firm working on improved Kalibr cruise missile — CEO
The Kalibr is a Russian
cruise missile developed and produced by the Yekaterinburg-based Novator design bureau
Two days ago, 10:04
Russian says warning systems failed during US
strikes on Caracas
According to Ivan Pavlov, there is still silence
on television
1 hour ago
Delcy Rodriguez swore in as acting president of Venezuela
She promised to abide by the constitution and laws
of the country, defend its territory and work for prosperity of the nation
Today, 07:46
Colombian president says he could take up arms
after Trump’s threats
Gustavo Petro also expressed confidence the
Colombian people would stand up for him
Learn more
2 Jan, 18:46
The Hague's policy of supporting Kiev leads to its
deep involvement in conflict — diplomat
Vladimir Tarabrin,
Russia’s Ambassador to the Netherlands, added that The Hague prefers to ignore
the obvious consequences of this policy, including the prolongation of
hostilities and the ever-increasing loss of life
1 Jan, 17:23
Dmitriev calls Europeans 'poor' after von der Leyen’s promise
"President of the European Commission
promises to work even harder on Western civilization’s suicide in 2026,"
Russian Direct Investment Fund Kirill Dmitriev said
12 Dec 2025, 08:06
Japan, Turkey, Canada, South Korea keen to join
EU’s scheme to fund defense investment
EC Spokesperson Thomas Regnier
said the commission will "now look into this request"
Today, 09:22
No Russians among 116 people injured in Swiss ski
resort fire
The list of those injured includes 68 Swiss
citizens, 21 Frenchmen, 10 Italians, two Polish citizens, four Serbians, a
Belgian, an Australian, a Bosnian, a resident of the Republic of the Congo, a
Luxembourgian, a Portuguese and a Czech national as well as four dual residents
Today, 05:29
France says US operation
to capture Venezuela’s Maduro violates international law
The government’s spokeswoman, Maud Bregeon, said that Venezuela should now be given the
opportunity to "build a future after Maduro"
Two days ago, 23:15
North Korea launches two ballistic missiles toward
Sea of Japan
Earlier, the South Korea’s Joint Chiefs of Staff
reported the launch of a missile by North Korea
13 Mar 2022, 08:09
Half of Russia’s foreign exchange reserves frozen
due to sanctions — Finance Minister
Anton Siluanov
reiterated that the debts of countries that were unfriendly to Russia would be
paid in rubles
Yesterday, 21:38
Trump says US now
effectively runs Venezuela
Donald Trump explained that he had not personally
been in contact with Venezuelan Vice President Delcy
Rodriguez, who is acting as head of state, but noted that "she is
cooperating" with the US
Today, 09:17
European Commission struggles to assess US actions
in Venezuela
The European Commission also declined to comment
on whether it condemns civilian deaths following US actions
Today, 09:18
Switzerland freezes assets of Venezuela’s Maduro
and his inner circle
The measure is said to ensure that "any
illicitly acquired assets cannot be transferred out of Switzerland in the
current situation", the Swiss government said
29 Dec 2025, 05:15
LazerBuzz laser system hits FPV drone at 1 km range
According to LazerBuzz
representatives, during testing, the system completely damaged the battery and
other components of an FPV drone
1 Aug 2025, 07:32
Exhumation of Soviet soldiers in Lvov 'degradation
bordering on savagery' — Lavrov
The Russian foreign minister emphasized that
despite the OSCE's declared commitment to defending and protecting human rights
as one of the organization's fundamental aims, Western countries maintained a
deathly silence while watching the actions of the Kiev regime
Two days ago, 23:27
Russian forces wipe out Ukrainian infantry near Kupyansk in Kharkov Region
According to the ministry, Russian reconnaissance
drones monitor the enemy movements and then direct fire at them
Today, 09:45
Spartak Moscow FC announces appointment of Spain’s
Carcedo as head coach
Juan Carcedo will assume
the position of head coach on January 8 under a contract valid until the summer
of 2028
Two days ago, 06:02
Russian troops liberate Bondarnoye
community in Donetsk region over past day — top brass
The Ukrainian army lost roughly 1,300 troops in
battles with Russian forces in all the frontline areas over the past 24 hours,
according to the latest data on the special military operation in Ukraine
released by Russia’s Defense Ministry
Yesterday, 22:37
Trump praises Maduro's decision to surrender
US special forces acted "very
violently", Donald Trump said
Yesterday, 22:19
Trump says hardly possible that Kiev attacked
Russian president's residence
According to the US President, "there is
something that happened fairly nearby," but it had nothing to do with the
attack on the Russian leader's official residence
Yesterday, 14:47
Medvedev comments on US aggression on Venezuela,
double standards in use by Europe to TASS
According to the senior Russian security official,
Washington no longer has the formal right to criticize Moscow for any actions
20 Sep 2019, 11:36
Medvedev bashes US general’s idiotic remarks about
Kaliningrad’s air defenses
The Russian PM commented on media reports citing
the commander of the US Air Forces in Europe on Pentagon's plans to ‘crack’ the
air defenses in the Kaliningrad Region in case of Russia's aggression
Yesterday, 16:00
Trump says US needs
Greenland 'for defense'
The US President emphasized that the island is
"surrounded by Russian and Chinese ships"
Yesterday, 23:33
Restoring peak oil production in Venezuela could
take decades — US expert
Tom Kloza opined that it might be relatively easy
with a friendly administration to get back to two million barrels per day but
that would happen later this decade"
Yesterday, 23:01
Venezuela's acting president could face something
'worse than Maduro' — Trump
According to Donald Trump, this is possible if Delcy Rodriguez's actions do not satisfy the US
3 hours ago 0120
UN trying to get information on the ground about
those killed in Venezuela — spokesperson
This was reported by the UN chief’s spokesperson
Stephane Dujarric at a news briefing
4 hours ago 0020
Russian air defenses down 42 Ukrainian drones
during four hours on Monday evening
16 of them were destroyed over the Belgorod Region
Today, 04:20
China backs emergency UN Security Council meeting
on US operation in Venezuela
Lin Jian added that countries have the full right
to choose their own partners for cooperation and external powers should not
interfere in their internal affairs under any pretext.
ATTACHMENT EIGHTEEN –
FROM X71
FROM TEHRAN TIMES
Venezuela thanks Iran for
solidarity as Caracas vows to resist US aggression
January
4, 2026 - 21:17
TEHRAN – Venezuelan Foreign Minister Yvan Gil Pinto
has expressed his gratitude to Iran for voicing solidarity with his country.
In
a phone conversation with his Iranian counterpart Abbas Araghchi, the top
Venezuelan diplomat underlined the government and people of his country are set
to defend their national sovereignty and right to self-determination in the
face of the United States’ “bullying and illegal policies”, according to a
readout published by Iran’s foreign ministry.
The
Iranian foreign minister, in turn, denounced the United States’ military
aggression against Venezuela as “state terrorism and flagrant violation of the
Venezuelan people’s national will and sovereignty.”
On
Saturday, American warplanes attacked Venezuela, striking positions in the
capital, Caracas, and several other regions. U.S. forces also stepped foot in
Venezuela in a blatant violation of international law, and abducted President
Nicolás Maduro and his wife, who were taken to American soil. The escalation
follows nearly four months of U.S. strikes against what it described as drug
boats in waters near Venezuela. The attacks have killed over 100 people, whom
Washington has not yet been able to identify.
The
U.S. aggression has triggered global condemnations. President Donald Trump has
accused President Maduro of being involved in drug trafficking, an allegation
strongly dismissed by Caracas, and mocked by analysts around the world. Hours
after the attacks, Trump declared that Washington will "run"
Venezuela and exploit its vast oil reserves, though he provided few details on
how the U.S. will achieve this. Trump administration officials somehow believe
that the natural resources on Venezuelan territory belong to the United States,
accusing Caracas in recent weeks of having "stolen" American oil.
Analysts and observers have yet to decode the logic behind that assertion.
The
Venezuelan government has promised to stand against Washington’s aggression and
exploitation plans. Vice President Delcy Rodriguez
slammed the kidnapping of Maduro, saying he is “the only president of
Venezuela”. The Latin American country’s Supreme Court
has now ordered Rodriguez to serve as Acting President.
The
United Nations Security Council is due to meet on Monday on the matter, with
Secretary General Antonio Guterres saying the U.S. actions set “a dangerous
precedent”.
During
the Saturday phone conversation, Araghchi condemned President Maduro’s
abduction as a “textbook example of state terrorism”, reaffirming Tehran’s
backing for the people and democratically elected government of Venezuela.
A
second exchange between Tehran and Caracas came on Sunday. Iran’s Ambassador to
Venezuela Ali Chegeni told his colleagues in Iran that
all “Iranian expatriates in Venezuela are in full health,” adding Iran’s
embassy stands ready to offer any kind of assistance to Iranian nationals
residing in the country.
He
made the remarks in a phone talk with Iranian Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Esmail
Baghaei, who, in turn, appreciated efforts by the
ambassador and staff members of the Iranian Embassy in Caracas and was briefed
on the latest developments in Venezuela.
Baghaei said
Iran condemns the United States’ military aggression against Venezuela and the
violation of the South American country’s national sovereignty and territorial
integrity.
He
recalled the legal and moral responsibility of all governments and
international organizations, especially the United Nations and the UN Security
Council, to put an immediate end to Washington’s illegal military aggression,
saying the necessary measures should be adopted to hold accountable the
masterminds and perpetrators behind the crimes committed during the U.S.
attacks.
The
United States' intervention in Venezuela is already triggering international
shockwaves. Following this
weekend's strikes, gold prices—which saw their most significant annual surge
since 1979 with a nearly 70% increase in 2025—are anticipated to return to the
forefront of market attention. Analysts also forecast a sharp rise in silver
prices in the near term.
Also,
jitters have spread across Latin America, with nations fearing that a successful
outcome in Venezuela will embolden Trump to destabilize their countries and
expropriate their resources. Dr. Foad Izadi, a
professor of American Affairs at Tehran University, believes that if Washington
succeeds in imposing its desired order in Venezuela, its focus will likely
shift to Cuba next. "Colombia and Nicaragua could be the third and fourth
targets," he added.
Further
analysis suggests Denmark's Greenland is another objective for the Trump
administration should it prevail in Venezuela. Since re-entering office last
January, Trump has repeatedly stated his belief that Greenland should belong to
the United States. Canada, which Trump has suggested would be better off as an
American state, is also considered a potential target.
A19X51 what next? X51 FROM US NEWS
Maduro’s
Gone. What’s Next for the U.S. in Venezuela?
Conflicting
statements paint a murky picture of what comes next for Venezuela.
By
Olivier Knox Jan. 5, 2026, at 4:00
p.m.
Over
the weekend, American forces penetrated Venezuela and seized President Nicolás
Maduro – a dictator widely seen in the West as an illegitimate tyrant –
and his wife. Both were taken to New York to face criminal charges linked to
drug trafficking.
The legally controversial and
logistically challenging raid, in the works for months, may have been the
easy part. As we have learned over the past quarter-century with wars in
Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya, effecting regime change can be immediately
successful but messy or even disastrous over the long haul.
The
administration has offered shifting rationales for overthrowing Maduro and has
yet to lay out a detailed plan for managing the aftermath of his rule.
So what’s
next for Venezuela and America’s role there? Here are some of the big
questions.
WHO’S IN CHARGE IN
CARACAS?
On
Saturday, President Donald Trump sketched out a concept of a plan that, he
said, would put the U.S. in charge of Venezuela for an indefinite period of
time.
"We're
going to run the country until such time as we can do a safe, proper and
judicious transition," he said. Who will do the running? "It's
largely going to be, for a period of time, the people that are standing right
behind me," said Trump, referring to his secretaries of state, Marco
Rubio, and defense, Pete Hegseth.
But
the president indicated he could work with Maduro’s vice president Delcy Rodríguez, whom he said had spoken by phone with
Rubio. "She's essentially willing to do what we think is necessary,"
Trump said. And Rubio later walked back the “run the country” stance a bit on
Sunday, calling the current situation a “quarantine that allows us to exert
tremendous leverage over what happens next.”
In
short: For now, the Maduro regime will plug along without Maduro, making this
more a leadership change than a regime change. Coerce and co-opt Caracas, not
“run.”
WILL THERE BE ELECTIONS?
Short answer: Not soon.
Trump’s weekend press conference was short on pro-democracy language. On
Sunday, Rubio told NBC’s Meet The Press that talk of elections was “premature at this point.”
On Saturday, the president dismissed
talk of supporting opposition leader and Nobel Peace Prize winner María Corina
Machado – who has wooed Trump for months, even dedicating her award to him –
saying she lacked the “support” and “respect” internally to lead the country.
He
did not mention restoring democracy as a U.S. goal in Venezuela. Nor did he
talk about Edmundo González Urrutia, the opposition figure widely seen in the
West as the winner of Venezuela’s contested 2024 presidential election.
WILL THERE BE MORE U.S.
MILITARY ACTION IN VENEZUELA?
Trump
explicitly threatened remaining regime members on Saturday, saying, "All
political and military figures in Venezuela should understand what happened to
Maduro could happen to them."
What
about American forces in Venezuela? “We’re not afraid of boots on the ground,”
he said.
On Sunday, Trump got
more specific in an interview with The
Atlantic,
saying of Rodríguez, “If she doesn’t do what’s right, she is going to pay a
very big price, probably bigger than Maduro.”
Speaking
on NBC, Rubio said Sunday the United States would continue its restrictions on
Venezuelan oil exports, pursue more deadly strikes on boats the administration
says carry drugs and seize oil tankers sailing to or from Venezuelan ports.
Trump
Bets on Intimidation to Force Venezuelan Leaders Into
Line
WILL AMERICAN OIL
COMPANIES RUSH TO VENEZUELA?
On
Saturday, Trump repeatedly cited a desire to get American oil companies back in
the business of exploiting Venezuelan reserves, thought to be among the world’s largest.
The
administration is reportedly pressuring U.S. oil companies to
return and rebuild the country’s crumbling fossil fuel infrastructure.
But those firms are likely to wait until
the post-Maduro picture clears up. They’ll want to know about arrangements to
keep their staff and equipment safe. And they’ll need oil prices to
rise to the point where it’s profitable to drill for Venezuelan oil, which
is hard to extract and refine.
CAN VENEZUELA’S NEW
LEADER KEEP THINGS TOGETHER?
The
main question here is whether Rodríguez can somehow steer a middle course of
satisfying American demands while preventing a rebellion from loyal Chavistas –
Maduro inherited his movement from late President Hugo Chavez – in the
country’s politics and military.
In
a national address on Saturday, Rodríguez demanded the “immediate liberation”
of Maduro and his wife and called the ousted leader “the only president of
Venezuela.” By Sunday, her tone had changed:
In a post on her Instagram account, she declared, “We invite the US government
to collaborate with us on an agenda of cooperation.” She did not call for the
ousted leader’s release.
Watch
Maduro intimates like Defense Secretary Vladimir Padrino
López – who is also the country’s top-ranking military officer – and Diosdado
Cabello, the interior minister. They control the security forces. Their support
will be crucial to Rodríguez’s survival.
Another
potential stressor, albeit one that has not appeared since Maduro’s ouster, is
public pressure on the regime.
DOES THE U.S. HAVE A PLAN
IF SHE DOESN’T?
If
Venezuela collapses, you could see large emigrant flows to neighboring
countries, with potentially destabilizing effects for the region. And what
replaces the regime – chaos or a Maduro diehard – could be worse for American
interests.
This
is, as one statesman put it last century, merely the end of the beginning.
LEGAL
A20X67 FROM NEW YORK POST - TAKEAWAYS
Nicolas Maduro NYC court appearance live updates:
Lawyer hints at dictator’s possible defense
By Ben Kochman, Kyle
Schnitzer, Desheania Andrews, Kevin Sheehan, Kathleen
Joyce, Joe Marino and Chris Nesi
Updated Jan. 5, 2026, 6:22 p.m. ET 1822
Venezuelan dictator Nicolas Maduro and first lady
Cilia Flores made their first appearance in a US federal court Monday.
The fallen leader, 66, and his 69-year-old wife
were charged with narco-terrorism conspiracy, cocaine importation conspiracy,
possession of machine guns and destructive devices, and conspiracy to possess
machine guns and destructive devices against the United States in the Southern
District of New York on Saturday. They pleaded not guilty to the charges.
The couple was indicted after they were captured
at their heavily fortified compound in Caracas by US forces during a daring
mission dubbed “Operation Absolute Resolve” after President Trump gave the
final directive for the US to attack the South American nation earlier
Saturday.
The Trump administration has repeatedly called
Maduro’s regime “illegitimate” and said he has remained in power due to rigged
elections, including in 2024. Venezuelan Executive Vice President Delcy Rodriguez is next in line for the presidency,
according to its constitution.
Pro-Maduro thugs ordered to hunt down US
collaborators as tension fills Venezuelan streets
Dems against Trump’s Maduro capture: Letters to
the Editor — Jan. 6, 2026
An image collage containing 3 images, Image 1
shows Russia's UN Ambassador Vasily Nebenzya leaving the Security Council meeting, Image 2
shows China's Deputy U.N. Ambassador Sun Lei addressing the Security Council,
Image 3 shows Illustration of Nicolás Maduro and his wife Cilia Flores at their
arraignment in New York, with defense lawyers and court officers
Russia, China ignore own
aggressions to rip US over despot Maduro’s capture during emergency UN Security
Council session
Maduro and Flores are in separate, solitary cells
inside Brooklyn’s notorious Metropolitan Detention Center — where heavily armed
law enforcement members are on patrol outside. The lockup has also housed
disgraced music mogul Sean “Diddy” Combs and accused UnitedHealthcare CEO
killer Luigi Mangione.
5 hours ago (c. 1300)
Maduro lawyer hints at possible defense
By Kyle Schnitzer
Top Nicolas Maduro lawyer Barry Pollack hinted at
a possible defense in court Monday — suggesting the US government violated laws
by nabbing the dictator in Caracas and hauling him off for trial.
“There are issues about the legality of his
military abduction,” Pollack told the judge.
The Trump administration has claimed it was within
its rights to capture Maduro because he is a drug trafficker attacking the US.
Critics have argued that President Trump grossly
overstepped his legal bounds under both US and international law.
40 minutes ago (c. 1740)
Pro-Maduro thugs ordered to hunt down US
collaborators as tension fills Venezuelan streets
By Alex Oliveira
Pro-Maduro thugs were called to the streets to
hunt down Venezuelans who supported the US attack to oust the despotic
president, according to a state of emergency order issued across the South
American Nation over the weekend.
Venezuelan police were ordered to “immediately
begin the national search and capture of everyone involved in the promotion or
support for the armed attack by the United States,” according to the Saturday
decree obtained by Reuters, which was published in full on Monday.
An armed pro-government demonstrator at a protest
against the capture of Maduro in Caracas on Jan. 4, 2026.
It remains unclear whether police had begun
following that order — or if the Maduro regime’s notorious paramilitary
enforcers had been dispatched — but photos began emerging across social media
Monday that appeared to show heavily armed and masked civilians patrolling city
streets and highways.
3 hours ago (c. 1500)
Gov. Hochul says Trump
called her - and that she ripped him over Maduro capture
By Vaughn Golden
Gov. Kathy Hochul said
she ripped President Trump for acting without Congressional approval in
Venezuela after he called her on Monday.
The Democratic governor also bizarrely claimed
credit for sparking the nationwide "No Kings" protest movement against
the Trump administration, as she celebrated the one-year anniversary of
congestion pricing.
Standing with Mayor Zohran
Mamdani, MTA CEO Janno Lieber and transit activists, Hochul said she told Trump the scheme to charge drivers in
Lower Manhattan was working.
But when Trump brought up his raid on Venezuela
that led to the capture of dictator Nicolás Maduro, Hochul
said she told him "I disagree."
“You’ve got to go to Congress. You’ve got to get
authority. It’s kind of important to do things like that,” Hochul
said.
“He’s a bad guy, but you’ve got to get authority,”
Hochul said she told Trump about Maduro.
Hochul, trying to appeal to lefty activists who pushed for the phased-in $15
toll for motorists, also claimed that she triggered the "No Kings"
protests after she held a pro-congestion pricing press conference in February
2024 where she held up a picture of a fake TIME magazine cover put out by the
White House depicting Trump as a king.
“I was pissed. I said, as you heard. I’m still
angry when I think about it," Hochul said
Monday. "We’re not laboring under a king but it was that image, that day
that I believe triggered the ‘No Kings’ rallies all across America."
4 hours ago (c.1400)
Venezuela’s VP Delcy
Rodriguez sworn in as interim president after Maduro arrest
By Reuters
Venezuela’s vice president and oil minister Delcy Rodriguez was formally sworn in on Monday as the
country’s interim president, as US-deposed President Nicolas Maduro appeared in
a New York court on drug charges, after the Trump administration removed him
from power in a dramatic weekend military action.
Venezuelan vice president Delcy
Rodriguez was sworn in as the country's interim president on Jan. 5, 2025.
Rodriguez, a 56-year-old labor lawyer known for
close connections to the private sector and her devotion to the ruling party,
was sworn in by her brother Jorge, who is the head of the national assembly
legislature.
5 hours ago (c.1300)
Maduro and wife seen in courtroom sketch at NYC
arraignment
By Joseph Barberio
Ex-Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and his
wife, Cilia Flores, were pictured in a courtroom sketch from their arraignment
Monday at Manhattan federal court.
The couple wore matching prison jumpsuits and were
flanked by their defense attorneys, Mark Donnelly (second from right, in
bowtie) and Andres Sanchez. Flores also appeared to have several bandages on
her face.
Venezuela's captured President Nicolas Maduro and
his wife Cilia Flores attend their arraignment with defense lawyers Barry
Pollack and Mark Donnelly to face U.S. federal charges including
narco-terrorism, conspiracy, drug trafficking, money laundering and others, at
the Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse in Manhattan, New York
City, U.S., January 5, 2026 in this courtroom sketch.
5 hours ago (c.1300)
Bizarre courtroom moment as onlookers hear what they think is shout of, 'Hamas!'
By Kyle Schnitzer
One of the more bizarre moments in the Manhattan
courtroom Monday occurred when Nicolas Maduro claimed he was “innocent” — and a
Venezuelan detractor yelled from the gallery, “Jamas!’’
The Spanish word translates to “never’’ — but it
is pronounced like “Hamas’’ in English, also the name of the Palestinian terror
organization.
The sound jarred more than one court-goer,
observers said.
6 hours ago (c.1200)
Former Venezuela spy chief could be star witness
at trial against Nicolás Maduro: experts
By Priscilla DeGregory
The former spymaster of Venezuela could end up
being a star prosecution witness at Nicolás Maduro's drug-trafficking trial,
experts told The Post.
Hugo Carvajal -- the country's longtime spy chief,
nicknamed "El Pollo" or "The Chicken" -- pleaded guilty in
June to narco-terrorism, weapons and drug trafficking charges in the same case
that Maduro was charged in.
And Carvajal -- who flipped allegiance and backed
Maduro's opponent in 2019 -- has already expressed interest in cooperating with
the feds as he faces the potential of life in prison at his sentencing, set for
next month.
Former Venezuelan military spy chief, retired Maj.
Gen. Hugo Carvajal, walks out of prison in Estremera
on the outskirts of Madrid, on Sept. 15, 2019.
Hugo Carvajal, Venezuela's longtime spy chief who
flipped allegiance and backed Maduro's opponent in 2019, has already expressed
interest in cooperating with the feds.
In A courtroom sketch (see website), retired Maj.
Gen. Hugo Carvajal, center, a former Venezuelan spymaster close to the
country's late leader Hugo Chavez, is flanked by defense attorney Tess Cohen,
left, and defense attorney Zachary Margulis-Ohnuma in
federal court, Thursday, July 20, 2023, in New York. Carvajal was extradited to
New York from Spain on Wednesday to face decade-old drug trafficking charges
Carvajal, center, flanked by defense attorneys in
federal court in July 2023 in New York, is seen in a court sketch after he was
extradited from Spain to face decade-old drug trafficking charges in the same
case as Maduro.
"This is exactly the type of person that
would be a witness in the case," former federal prosecutor Neama Rahmani told The Post.
If he takes the witness stand and testifies
truthfully, he would get a "significant reduction in his sentence," Rahmani said.
"The sentencing [in drug-trafficking] cases
are so high, so you have to cooperate," the lawyer added.
"This is exactly the type of person that
would be a witness in the case," former federal prosecutor Neama Rahmani told The Post.
Dick Gregorie -- a
prosecutor who handled a US case against another foreign leader, Manuel
Noriega, in 1988 -- agreed there is a "good possibility" that
Carvajal will be a prosecution witness.
"I would assume if he had a deal that he made
six months ago, that they have probably been preparing him for weeks, or
months, maybe," Gregorie added.
Prosecutors will also have "a number of
internal people from Venezuela and drug dealers who were involved in moving the
drugs" as witnesses, he said.
6 hours ago
Maduro declares himself 'prisoner of war' and 'man
of God' during spat with one of his political foes while leaving court
By Ben Kochman
Twisted dictator Nicolas Maduro claimed he is a
“prisoner of war’’ and “man of God’’ when confronted Monday by a Venezuelan
countryman who said he had been an imprisoned victim of the fallen despot’s
regime.
A man who identified himself as Pedro Rojas stood
up in a Manhattan federal courtroom after the accused narco-trafficker’s
arraignment and shouted at Maduro that he had been the South American nation’s
illegitimate president and would now face “real justice.’’
Maduro turned to him and said, “I am a man of God”
-- and called himself a POW — during an exchange in Spanish with Rojas as he
was led out of the courtroom.
Rojas, 33, later told reporters that he was a
political prisoner in Venezuela in 2019 for four months.
6 hours ago
Maduro and his wife depart Manhattan court in an
armored vehicle following not guilty pleas: photos
By Joseph Barberio
Ex-Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro was taken
away from the Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse in Manhattan in
an armored vehicle following his arraignment Monday.
The former strongman and his wife, Cilia Flores,
both pleaded not guilty to federal narco-terrorism charges.
The convoy will likely take the couple back to the
notorious Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn, where they were being held
in separate cells.
A convoy believed to be carrying ousted Venezuelan
president Nicolas Maduro departs the Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States
Courthouse after Maduro attended his arraignment hearing on January 5, 2026 in
New York.
Maduro and his wife both pleaded not guilty to
federal narco-terrorism charges.
6 hours ago
Maine-based company says it's being inundated with
calls after shackled Maduro pictured wearing its blue hoodie
By Emily Crane
A Maine-based apparel company's phones have been
ringing off the hook after a shackled Nicolás Maduro was snapped wearing one of
its hoodies when he was hauled to the Big Apple, the company says.
The ousted Venezuelan dictator could be seen
sporting the bright blue Origin attire in a now-infamous photo of him flashing
two thumbs up while surrounded by scores of DEA agents after touching down in
New York.
A Maine-based apparel company's phones have been
ringing off the hook after a shackled Nicolás Maduro was snapped wearing one of
its hoodies.
"Probably a DEA agent slipped this hoodie on
him and said, 'You're gonna feel the fabric of
freedom on American soil.' That's my assumption. I'm taking the liberty to
assume," Origin founder Peter Roberts said in a video statement.
"He definitely gave two thumbs up, so I think
he liked the fabric."
It wasn't clear exactly how the dictator ended up
in the hoodie.
"What I believe happened is they landed in
New York," Roberts speculated. "It was cold outside and they put a
hoodie on him."
The CEO said his phone immediately "blew
up" when people started noticing the company's logo.
6 hours ago
Maduro's wife, Cilia Flores, suffered possible rib
fracture, bruising during arrest: lawyer
By Emily Crane
Venezuela's ousted first lady Cilia Flores
suffered "significant injuries" -- including a possible rib fracture
and bruising -- when she was captured by US forces, her Texas-based lawyer told
a judge Monday.
The private lawyer, Mark Donnelly, asked for his
client to undergo a full X-ray to ensure her health while in federal custody.
He added that her injuries were visible in court.
DEA agents are seen early Monday morning, January
5, 2026, at the Wall Street Heliport as former Venezuelan President Nicolás
Maduro and his wife are transferred under federal custody en
route to the Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse in Manhattan.
Maduro's wife Cilia Flores claims to have suffered
broken ribs from the arrest.
Luiz C. Ribeiro for New York Post
6 hours ago
Maduro's lawyer says client won't seek immediate
release, may request bail later
By Kyle Schnitzer
One of Nicolás Maduro's lawyers told Judge Alvin
Hellerstein that his client is not seeking to be immediately released from
custody but reserves his right to "put in a bail application at a further
day.''
Maduro, who was scribbling on a white piece of
paper during the proceedings, added at one point, "I would like to ask
that my notes be respected and that I am entitled to keep them."
7 hours ago
Maduro's wife pleads not guilty: 'Completely
innocent'
By Emily Crane
Venezuelan dictator Nicolás Maduro's wife, Cilia
Flores, has pleaded not guilty.
"Not guilty. Completely innocent,"
Flores, 69, told a Manhattan federal judge when asked to enter her plea Monday.
Both Maduro and his alleged co-conspirator wife
have been relying on an interpreter as the proceedings continue.
7 hours ago
Maduro proclaims his innocence to courtroom during
first appearance: 'I am a decent man'
By Kyle Schnitzer
Nicolás Maduro vehemently proclaimed he was
innocent of the charges leveled against him at his arraignment in Manhattan
federal court Monday afternoon.
"I am innocent. I am not guilty. I am a
decent man. I am still president of my country," Maduro insisted after
Judge Alvin Hellerstein asked him if he understood he had the right to legal
counsel.
"I did not know of these rights. Your honor
is informing me of them now," Maduro said.
He then claimed he was seeing the indictment
against him for the first time, and said he was pleading innocent.
"I am innocent. I am not guilty of anything
that is mentioned here," he said.
7 hours ago
Venezuelan dictator Maduro claims he was
'kidnapped' in Manhattan federal court outburst
By Chris Nesi
Ousted Venezuelan dictator Nicolás Maduro
denounced his capture as a kidnapping in an outburst in Manhattan federal court
that was swiftly cut off by District Judge Alvin Hellerstein as proceedings got
under way Monday.
"I'm the president of the republic of
Venezuela. ... I am here kidnapped. ... I was captured at my home in Caracas,
Venezuela," he said before Hellerstein stopped him.
Nicolas Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, are
seen in handcuffs after landing at a Manhattan helipad, escorted by heavily
armed Federal agents as they make their way into an armored car en route to a Federal courthouse in Manhattan on January 5,
2026 in New York City
"I'm the president of the republic of
Venezuela. ... I am here kidnapped. ... I was captured at my home in Caracas,
Venezuela," Maduro said in Manhattan federal court.
"Let me interfere,'' the judge said.
"There will be a time and a place to go into all of this. Your counsel
will be able to make motions. ... At this time, I just want to know one thing:
Are you Nicolás Maduro Moros?"
"I am Nicholas Maduro Moros," the fallen
dictator replied.
7 hours ago
Judge Hellerstein lays out charges against Maduro,
including providing financial support for terrorism, terrorist activity
By Kyle Schnitzer and Chris Nesi
Manhattan federal Judge Alvin Hellerstein
exchanged brief pleasantries with the toppled Venezuelan dictator, saying,
"Good morning, Mr. Maduro'' -- before reading out more than a
quarter-century's worth of charges contained in the indictment against him.
"Mr. Maduro ... is charged in one count of
narco-terrorism conspiracy, specifically from 1999 to 2025, he knowingly
conspired with others ... and intentionally provided something of pecuniary
value to a person or organization engaged in terrorism and terrorist activity,"
the 92-year-old jurist said from the bench.
As Hellerstein spoke, Maduro furiously scribbled
notes on a white piece of paper.
7 hours ago
Maduro arrives in court shackled at the ankles,
greets attorneys
By Kyle Schnitzer
Deposed Venezuelan dictator Nicolás Maduro entered
Manhattan court Monday shackled at the ankles -- but not the wrists -- wearing
prison-issued orange shoes, beige pants and an orange shirt with what appears
to be a black v-neck underneath.
7 hours ago
Ex-US hostage urges Venezuela’s Delcy Rodriguez to free Americans as proof she's willing to
work with Washington
By Caitlin Doornbos
An American once held hostage by Venezuela’s
brutal regime on Monday called on the country’s de facto leader, Delcy Rodriguez, to immediately free the five US citizens
still being held in Caracas — saying it would be the clearest sign yet that
she’s willing to work with Washington.
“I’d like to call on interim President Delcy Rodriguez to release the five Americans immediately
as a show of goodwill,” Marine Corps veteran Matthew Heath told The Post.
Heath, who was jailed during Nicolás Maduro’s rule
on bogus charges and released in 2022, said Americans detained in Venezuela are
routinely used as bargaining chips in political standoffs with the US.
“They don’t
have a real justice system,” he said. “Judges do exactly what they’re told — or
they end up in prison themselves.”
Maduro’s government detained more than 40
Americans during his time in power, according to the former prisoner, who said
he was personally framed on fabricated charges and subjected to electric shocks
and other torture inside Venezuela’s political prison system.
Now free and back in the US since 2022, the former
detainee said seeing Maduro face prosecution in an American courtroom on Monday
is deeply satisfying.
“He’s going to get a fair trial,” he said.
“Something none of us were ever given.”
With Maduro gone, he said, Rodriguez has a rare
opportunity to signal a break from the past — but warned that authoritarian
regimes rarely give up hostages without extracting concessions.
“Hope springs eternal,” he said. “But history
shows these regimes don’t release detainees unless they get something in
return.”
Still, he said, freeing the Americans now could
open the door to improved relations and help stabilize the country after years
of repression and international isolation.
“If she wants to show she’s serious about moving
Venezuela forward,” he said, “this is the moment.”
8 hours ago
Private lawyer who famously negotiated release of
WikiLeaks' Julian Assange joins Maduro team
By Ben Kochman
Dictator Nicolas Maduro also will be repped by a
top lawyer who once famously negotiated the prison release of WikiLeaks founder
Julian Assange.
Barry Pollack is a prominent private lawyer who is
now part of the team defending the ousted Venezuelan president.
He brokered a bombshell June 2024 deal with the US
government that allowed Assange, who was charged with breaching the Espionage
Act by divulging state secrets, to return to his native Australia after
pleading guilty to a single misdemeanor count.
Maduro’s wife, Cilia Flores, will be represented
at Monday’s hearing by Mark Donnelly, a private lawyer from Texas who served as
a federal prosecutor.
It’s unclear whether or how the private lawyers
will be paid for the appearance.
Maduro also is being repped by court-appointed
lawyer David Wikstrom — meaning taxpayers will foot
at least that part of the bill.
8 hours ago
Chevron, energy stocks soar after US capture of Nicolás
Maduro – but oil prices barely move
By Taylor Herzlich
Chevron and other energy stocks soared Monday
morning, though oil prices barely budged, after the US captured Venezuelan
dictator Nicolás Maduro and President Trump said American companies would tap
into the nation’s rich oil reserves.
Shares in Chevron, which is the only major US oil
company currently operating in Venezuela, jumped 4.8%.
Chevron and other energy stocks soared Monday
morning after the US captured Maduro.
ConocoPhillips and Exxon Mobil – both of which
left Venezuela nearly 20 years ago when Maduro’s socialist predecessor, Hugo
Chávez, nationalized their assets – also rose 5.3% and 2.4%, respectively.
9 hours ago
Lefty protesters supporting Maduro ripped as
'a--holes' by Cuban, Venezuelan immigrants
By Emily Crane
Roughly a dozen protesters who showed up outside
the Manhattan courthouse to denounce Nicolas Maduro's arrest were blasted as
"a--holes" by those hailing the capture of the Venezuelan dictator.
Dario Blanzo, who was
born in Cuba, came to the federal court to celebrate Maduro's detainment when
he encountered a handful of protesters holding signs reading “Free President
Maduro” and “No War for Venezuela Oil!”
“You’re an
a--hole! You don’t even know where Venezuela is!” Blanzo
shouted at one protester.
“In Venezuela and Cuba, nobody can do that. Nobody
can do that. You go to jail if you do that."
Maria Su, who immigrated
to the US from Caracas, decried them as "paid protesters."
“They are
not Venezuelans. They are paid protesters. They don’t speak Spanish!” she raged
as she waved a Venezuelan flag. “They don’t know anything because they are not
Venezuelan."
9 hours ago
Maduro assigned court-appointed attorney --
meaning US will foot bill for dictator's Monday appearance
By Emily Crane
Venezuelan dictator Nicolas Maduro is expected to
be repped by a court-appointed attorney for his initial hearing at Manhattan
federal court later today -- meaning the US will at least initially be footing
the bill for his defense.
Maduro will be represented by longtime Big Apple
criminal defense attorney David Wikstrom, The Post
confirmed.
It wasn't immediately clear if the court-appointed
attorney would continue to rep the ousted leader at future court hearings.
10 hours ago
Clinton-nominated Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein to
oversee Maduro’s court appearance
By Emily Crane
Manhattan federal Judge Alvin Hellerstein has been
assigned to oversee ousted Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro's initial court
appearance later Monday.
The 92-year-old veteran judge was nominated and
confirmed by President Bill Clinton in 1998.
The born-and-bred New Yorker has presided over a
slew of cases tied to the 9/11 terror attacks and others related to national
security.
In more recent years, Hellerstein quashed
President Trump’s bid to have Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s “hush
money” case against him heard in federal court.
Kyle Mazza-CNP/Shutterstock
11 hours ago (c.0700)
Nicolas Maduro could face death penalty if fallen
Venezuelan dictator is convicted
By Jorge Fitz-Gibbon
Fallen Venezuelan dictator Nicolas Maduro could
face the death penalty if convicted on federal drug-trafficking and other
charges.
The strongman was nabbed at his Caracas palace in
a daring US raid and is being held at the Metropolitan Detention Center in
Brooklyn pending his arraignment Monday on a four-count indictment.
If found guilty, Maduro is likely to spend the
rest of his life behind bars — or worse.
11 hours ago
Maduro arrives at Manhattan federal courthouse
By Emily Crane
The ousted Venezuelan president and his wife have
arrived at the Manhattan federal court where they'll go before a judge later
today on narco-terrorism charges.
The armored car carrying Nicolas Maduro and Cilia
Flores reversed into a secured area at the courthouse just before 7:45 a.m.
Scores of heavily armed DEA officers and NYPD cops
swarmed the streets as the transfer took place.
11 hours ago
Maduro touches down in Manhattan
By Emily Crane and Desheania
Andrews
The chopper carrying fallen Venezuelan leader
Nicolas Maduro arrived in downtown Manhattan at roughly 7:30 a.m.
He was quickly escorted from the helicopter by
about eight heavily armed guards and put in an armored truck at the helipad.
The motorcade immediately set off for the
courthouse.
12 hours ago (c.0600)
Shackled Maduro, wife escorted to helicopter
By Emily Crane
Venezuelan leader Nicolas Maduro and his wife,
Cilia Flores, have been escorted in cuffs to a waiting helicopter.
The fallen leader, 66, and his 69-year-old wife
were both in prison garb after leaving Metropolitan Detention Center in
Brooklyn.
12 hours ago
First look at Maduro ahead of court appearance
By Samuel Chamberlain
The motorcade has arrived at a helipad where
Maduro will make the short flight across the East River to Manhattan for his
court appearance.
Captured Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro
arrives at the Downtown Manhattan Heliport on January 5, 2026.
DEA agents are seen early Monday morning, January
5, 2026, at the Wall Street Heliport as former Venezuelan President Nicolás
Maduro and his wife are transferred under federal custody en
route to the Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse in Manhattan.
Luiz C. Ribeiro for New York Post
News choppers hovering overhead got a brief
glimpse of the fallen left-wing authoritarian as he was transferred from the
armored Bearcat to a police SUV.
Maduro is clad in what appears to be khakhi prison garb and red footwear, with his hands
shackled in front of him.
12 hours ago
Maduro leaves Brooklyn jail, bound for Manhattan
By Samuel Chamberlain
An armored car believed to be carrying arrested
Venezuelan leader Nicolas Maduro has left the Metropolitan Detention Center in
Brooklyn.
The 63-year-old is being escorted by unmarked
white vans and a fleet of NYPD cop cars.
Maduro's first appearance is set for 12 p.m.,
after which he will be returned behind bars in Brooklyn.
20 hours ago (c. 2200 10/4)
Welcome to ‘hell on Earth,’ Nicolas! Inside the
notorious NYC lock-up where Maduro and his wife are being held
By Jorge Fitz-Gibbon
Venezuelan dictator Nicolas Maduro, who dined on
steak and lived in a palace as his country starved, is now in “hell on Earth’’
in a Brooklyn jail — and machine-gun-toting authorities are making sure he
stays there.
Maduro, 63, and his 69-year-old fellow-inmate wife
Cilia were thrown into separate cells in solitary confinement away from the
general population at the infamous federal Metropolitan Detention Center since
their extraordinary capture by elite US forces in Caracas early Saturday.
“This is the least they deserve,” said Gabriel
Bonilla, a Venezuelan comedian who fled to Argentina in 2017, to The Post on
Sunday. “The worst prison in the United States is a mansion compared to the
prisons and holes where people have been tortured for years in Venezuela.”
20 hours ago
Ousted Venezuelan dictator Nicolás Maduro arrives
in NYC by helicopter hours after capture by US
By Marie Pohl
Ousted Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and his
wife, Cilia Flores, touched down in New York City Saturday night after being
captured by US forces — and were greeted by jeers of “Down with the dictator.”
The pair — who landed at Stewart Air National
Guard Base in Upstate Newburgh around 5 p.m. — arrived via helicopter at a
Manhattan heliport just before 7 p.m. and were hauled away in a heavily armed
tactical vehicle called a “Bearcat” surrounded by a small motorcade.
Maduro, 63, and Flores, 69, will first be
transported to the Drug Enforcement Administration Headquarters in Chelsea,
where he was processed before returning to the West 30th Street Heliport and choppered to Brooklyn, sources told The Post.
He took off after 8 p.m., and was seen on video
being flown down the West Side of Manhattan and past the Statue of Liberty
before heading to Brooklyn.
20 hours ago
Inside Operation Absolute Resolve: How US forces
captured Venezuela’s Maduro — after months of secret planning
By Caitlin Doornbos and
Samantha Olander
The U.S. operation to capture Venezuelan strongman
Nicolás Maduro was a months-in-the-making mission rehearsed using replicas of
Maduro’s fortified compound, showcasing military might, ingenuity — and good
timing.
The Venezuelan dictator was stopped just steps
from the steel doors of his fortified lair as elite Army Delta Force commandos
closed in, President Trump said.
Captured Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro
arrive(d) at the Downtown Manhattan Heliport, as he heads towards the Daniel
Patrick Manhattan United States Courthouse for an initial appearance to face
U.S. federal charges including narco-terrorism, conspiracy, drug trafficking,
money laundering and others in New York City, U.S., January 5, 2026.
The Venezuelan dictator was stopped just steps
from the steel doors of his fortified lair as elite Army Delta Force commandos
closed in, President Trump said.
“He was
trying to get into a safe place … the safe place’s all steel, and he wasn’t
able to make it to the door because our guys were so fast,” Trump said.
The commandos closed in “in a matter of seconds,”
Trump said on Fox News.
20 hours ago
Trump says Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro, wife
‘captured’ after large-scale strikes
By Katherine Donlevy
The U.S. captured Venezuelan dictator Nicolás
Maduro early Saturday in an extraordinary military operation to end the
repressive regime of the “fugitive” leader, and usher in a “new dawn” of
freedom to the embattled nation.
Some 150 aircraft took part in Operation Absolute
Resolve, which came after months of mounting pressure by the Trump
administration and lasted just under two and a half hours.
Captured Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro
arrives at the Downtown Manhattan Heliport, as he heads towards the Daniel
Patrick Manhattan United States Courthouse for an initial appearance to face
U.S. federal charges including narco-terrorism, conspiracy, drug trafficking,
money laundering and others in New York City, U.S., January 5, 2026.
Maduro, 63, and his wife Cilia Flores, 69, were
seized just steps from the steel doors of his high-security Ft Tiuna military compound, which President Trump said US troops were able to blast through “a matter of
seconds.”
A21 X64 Oil money and law X64 from Jacobin
Corporations Are Ready to Cash In on Venezuela
By Luke Goldstein and Lucy Dean
Stockton
Before Donald Trump’s capture of
Nicolás Maduro, corporations filed lawsuits against Venezuela seeking damages
tied to state nationalization, international sanctions, and political
instability. A Trump-installed government could tilt the courts in their favor.
Companies with pending claims
could be among the first in line to receive a windfall from a new
Trump-installed Venezuelan government that is willing to funnel the South
American country’s cash to corporate plaintiffs. (Luke Sharrett / Bloomberg via
Getty Images)
What Zohran Can Learn From the Sewer Socialists
When the Leaning Tower Leaned Left
No War but Artisanal Doughnut War
America Can’t Build Homes Anymore
Just weeks before
the American military operation in Venezuela to capture
President Nicolás Maduro, the US energy giant Halliburton filed an unusual lawsuit in international court
claiming the Venezuelan government owed them damages for US sanctions against
the country.
A separate case against Venezuela is also
being pursued by another fossil fuel giant whose board includes an oil magnate
whose family has delivered large financial contributions to Republicans and
conservative causes. One family member poured tens of thousands of dollars into
a political committee focused on reelecting President Donald Trump in 2024.
Such companies with pending claims
could now be among the first in line to receive a massive windfall from a new
Trump-installed Venezuelan government that is willing to funnel the South
American country’s cash to corporate plaintiffs.
Shortly after the US military
operation on January 3, Trump declared that the United States would
“run” Venezuela, along with making investments in the country’s oil and gas
infrastructure and selling state-run oil assets. Venezuela is home to the
largest oil reserves in the world, representing
about 17 percent of the world’s global supply, though much of the country’s
reserves remain untapped.
In all, Venezuela is facing nine pending cases launched by investors and major corporations alleging financial damages
related to the country’s nationalization of state industries, international
sanctions, and political instability. The country has settled dozens more in
recent decades.
These cases are arbitrated within
the World Bank’s International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes, a
governing body that has been widely criticized for prioritizing investors’
interests over those of sovereign states, and particularly those of developing
nations. In 17 percent of such cases, the host country has been forced to settle.
A US-backed Venezuelan government
could settle those cases or fail to adequately argue their side in court, using
Venezuela’s resources to award companies with hundreds of millions in damages.
Halliburton’s case seeks damages for the
roughly $200 million in losses it allegedly incurred between 2016 and 2020 as
it began to cease operations in the country to
comply with the US sanctions first imposed in 2005 and escalated in 2017 and 2020.
But Halliburton is blaming Venezuela’s domestic instability for those losses
and demanding the country now pay up.
Such a legal argument is
reportedly rare in arbitration courts, and
some financial analysts argued the move indicated that
Halliburton potentially expected a military operation in Venezuela to install a
more friendly government willing to cut a deal to make them whole. GOP allies
have directly cited Halliburton as one of the energy companies that could
invest in Venezuela to “rebuild their country” after regime change, as Trump’s
former US secretary of state Mike Pompeo told Fox News in December.
In a separate case filed in the World Bank’s
arbitration courts, natural gas conglomerate the Williams Companies is seeking
damages over a disputed contract and Venezuela’s nationalization of fossil fuel
infrastructure in the early 2000s.
Williams’s board includes Scott Sheffield, whose family has donated more than $6 million over
the last fifteen years, mostly to conservative causes and Republican candidates.
That includes $165,200 worth of donations in 2024 from Sheffield’s son Bryan to
the Republican National Committee, according to Federal Election Commission data compiled by the watchdog
group Public Citizen. Those donations were earmarked
for the “Trump 47 Committee,” a joint fundraising committee to support Trump’s
2024 campaign.
Other companies with pending cases
against Venezuela for nationalizing their assets and causing other business
disruptions include the food giant Kellogg’s, the cement and construction
firm Holcim Group, packaging conglomerate Smurfit, and Gold Reserve, a mining conglomerate whose
largest investors include a trio of US investment firms.
The Irish company Smurfit, which
is publicly traded on the New York Stock Exchange, won a $469 million arbitration
case against Venezuela last year over the company’s 2018 seizure of its assets
in the country and has since filed for additional damages.
For years, US and other Western
firms have sued the Venezuelan government in international arbitration courts
for expropriated property and unpaid debts.
In 2019, the US oil and gas giant
ConocoPhillips won nearly $9 billion in the
World Bank’s arbitration court after Venezuela’s former president, Hugo Chávez,
nationalized the company’s oil assets nearly eighteen years earlier. And in
2021, Koch Industries won a $444 million case against
the country for the expropriation of its fertilizer business by Chávez in 2010.
Halliburton’s arbitration case,
however, involves a different argument. The company’s exit from the market was
the direct result of US sanctions imposed on
Venezuela in 2017 and 2020, not state nationalization. According to the Global
Arbitration Review’s summary of the filing, Halliburton
blames both US sanctions and Venezuelan policy failures for the financial
losses it incurred but is suing only Venezuela for damages.
“Halliburton also notes that
changes in the Venezuelan government’s exchange rate and U.S. sanctions further
complicated the viability of its operations in the country,” reads the review of the legal
brief. Although Venezuela withdrew from the international treaty that
enforces the World Bank’s arbitration rules in 2012, the country has still
been forced to participate in these
cases and abide by the court’s rulings.
An energy service company,
Halliburton operates oil drilling infrastructure
around the world, including the Deepwater Horizon offshore drilling rig
that led to the fatal and environmentally catastrophic 2010 Gulf of Mexico oil
spill. Since the 1940s, the company has been involved in extracting Venezuela’s massive oil
reserves.
Halliburton has previously
benefited from US regime-change efforts. In 2003, Vice President Dick Cheney,
the company’s former CEO, helped launch the Iraq War. After the country’s
military-backed regime change, Cheney’s onetime employer secured lucrative contracts with the
new US occupying force to administer the country’s energy production.
This article was first published
by the Lever, an award-winning independent
investigative newsroom.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
A23X65 Cal Thomas X65 FROM WASHINGTON TIMES
Dictators everywhere, take note: Trump
means business
Maduro's criminal regime
collapses, and America's resolve sends a global message
By Cal
Thomas - Monday,
January 5, 2026
OPINION:
Venezuelans
are celebrating in the streets of Caracas and around the world after U.S.
forces staged a flawless removal of brutal dictator and narco-trafficker
Nicolas Maduro and his wife. Not celebrating are most congressional Democrats,
a few Republicans and the new mayor of New York City, Zohran
Mamdani, whose foreign policy credentials are akin to dining at International
House of Pancakes.
Even
The Washington Post, which is no fan of President Trump or
most of his policies, spoke well of the operation that captured Mr. Maduro. It
called the action “a major victory for American interests” and noted that “just
hours before, supportive Chinese officials held a chummy meeting with Maduro,
who had also been propped up by Russia, Cuba and Iran.”
So,
according to Democrats, it’s OK for some of America’s adversaries to play
footsie with Mr. Maduro, but it’s not OK to break his legs and topple his evil
regime?
Democrats
are already on the wrong side of deporting undocumented immigrants and many
social issues. Do they also want to go on record defending Mr. Maduro?
It’s
helpful to read the first sentence of the federal indictment of Mr. Maduro:
“For over 25 years, leaders of Venezuela have abused their positions of public
trust and corrupted once-legitimate institutions to import tons of cocaine into
the United States.” Mr. Maduro oversaw an attack on America that was as deadly
as a military attack in a conventional war. Democrats in Congress want to
invoke the War Powers Act to prevent the president from taking additional
military action in Venezuela.
Again,
The Washington Post editorial got it right when it said: “Maduro’s removal
sends an important message to tin-pot dictators in Latin America and the
world: Trump follows
through. President Joe Biden offered sanctions relief to Venezuela, and Maduro
responded to that show of weakness by stealing an election.”
Nobel
Peace Prize winner and opposition leader Maria Corina Machado posted on X: “The
time for freedom has come! [Maduro] will face international justice for
atrocious crimes against Venezuelans and against citizens of many other
nations.”
·
Oil, drugs, sphere of influence: How Venezuela became the epicenter of
Trump’s foreign policy
Additional
justification for military action came from an article by Elliott Abrams,
published in National Review days before the raid and republished by the
Council on Foreign Relations: “Last year the democratic forces there won a
landslide victory in the presidential election — despite the fact that the
regime tried desperately to fix the outcome. Edmundo Gonzalez, the opposition
candidate and a virtual unknown before his candidacy, won 70-30 and would have
won by a greater margin had the election been fair. Had Maria Corina Machado,
whom the opposition had chosen as its candidate, been permitted to run, the
margin would, again, have been greater. The desire of the Venezuelan people to
get rid of the corrupt and brutal Maduro regime is clear.”
Lefties
are already in the streets with their “Free Maduro” signs, but their numbers
are a pittance compared with those celebrating his removal. Mr. Maduro’s trial
in New York will likely be a spectacle, but the big question is, what comes
next?
Mr. Trump says
the U.S. and oil companies will “run” Venezuela for an unspecified amount of
time. That will work only with the support of the military and the Venezuelan
people, who Mr. Trump says
will become “rich” after Mr. Maduro’s removal and the ability of citizens to
acquire what Mr. Maduro has denied them, including, and most important,
freedom.
Dictators
in Cuba, along with the ayatollahs in Iran and the Mexican government, which
has insufficiently battled the dominant drug cartels, take note. Mr. Trump is
serious about the promises he makes. He may often embellish and say things that
aren’t true or repeat himself, but especially in the case of removing a threat
to the United States, he means business.
Go
ahead, Democrats, and try to make the case that Mr. Maduro should have remained
in power and continued to kill Americans and his own people. That won’t benefit
your electoral prospects in the next election.
• Readers may email Cal Thomas at
tcaeditors@tribpub.com. Look for Cal Thomas’ latest book, “A Watchman in the
Night: What I’ve Seen Over 50 Years Reporting on America” (Humanix
Books).
A24X66 FROM HUFFPOST
Trump Ramps Up Incendiary Threats After Venezuela
Strike
The president signaled openness to military action
in Colombia and warned Mexico about getting "their act together."
By Li Zhou Jan 5, 2026, 12:05 AM EST
President Donald Trump is dialing up the
saber-rattling in the wake of the United States’ attack on Venezuela last
weekend.
In comments aboard Air Force One on Sunday, Trump
targeted Colombia, arguing that it was “very sick, too,” and “run by a sick
man, who likes making cocaine and selling it to the United States.”
When asked about a potential military operation in
Colombia, he said: “It sounds good to me.”
Additionally, Trump suggested that Mexico had to
“get their act together.”
“We’re going to have to do something,” Trump said,
then added that he hoped Mexico would take action first.
He noted that Cuba could “fall” without any U.S.
military intervention.
“I don’t think we need any action; it looks like
it’s going down,” Trump said.
Trump reiterated that “we need Greenland,” despite
leaders in the region having vocally pushed back against any American
annexation of the semi-autonomous Danish territory.
Trump also hasn’t discounted further military
action in Venezuela.
“If they don’t behave, we will do a second
strike,” Trump said, adding the decision to deploy troops on the ground
“depends” on how the new administration acts.
In comments aboard Air Force One on Sunday, President
Donald Trump dialed up the saber-rattling in the wake of the United States’
attack on Venezuela this weekend.
Trump made his incendiary remarks even as his
first attack on Venezuela, and the kidnapping of Venezuelan President Nicolás
Maduro and his wife Cilia Flores, faces massive backlash from lawmakers over
questions of legality.
Early Sunday, Secretary of State Marco Rubio made
the rounds on the morning talk shows and tried to downplay comments Trump made
about the U.S. running Venezuela. He said that the U.S. would be focused on
enforcing an oil quarantine in Venezuela and less involved in other day-to-day
governance.
“That’s the sort of control the president is
pointing to when he says that,” Rubio said during an appearance on CBS’s “Face
the Nation.”
However, on Sunday night, Trump again pushed his
claim that the U.S. was running things in Venezuela.
“Don’t ask me who’s in charge because I’ll give
you an answer, and it’ll be very controversial,” Trump said during the Air
Force One gaggle. “It means we’re in charge.”
A25 X09 Economist X09 FROM THE
ECONOMIST (use A)
|
|
|
A26 X05 US News – Iraq 2.0? @USE a
|
|
a27X05 US News – Iraq 2.0?
X05 FROM US NEWS
While there are some
similarities to the U.S. invasion of Iraq in 2003 – oil-rich country, strongman
leader, talk of terrorism and “weapons of mass destruction” (drugs this time) – Olivier (Knox) made
the case for why Venezuela is not Iraq 2.0.
For one thing, there has
been no talk of bringing democracy to Venezuela, a stated goal of President
George W. Bush’s Iraq invasion. Though Olivier remembered that incursion was
initially called Operation Iraqi Liberation (acronym: OIL), Bush never
explicitly cited petroleum in his justifications for action, as Trump did for
Venezuela. Nor are there any indications Trump plans to purge the Venezuelan
government or send in a massive ground force, as the U.S. did in Iraq. All that
could change, but for now, it’s a case of history rhyming more than repeating.
A28 X07 “X07 FROM US NEWS @use A
There Are Similarities,
but Venezuela Is Not Iraq
U.S. Marines prepare to
pull down a statue of Saddam Hussein in Baghdad in 2003.
(Ramzi Haidar/AFP/Getty
Images)
After U.S. soldiers seized
President Nicolás Maduro of Venezuela, The Daily Show turned its gimlet eye on
the arguments for American military intervention there, inviting viewers to
conclude that we’re looking at a new version of the case for the disastrous
2003 invasion of Iraq.
The montage opens with
Donald Rumsfeld, defense secretary at the time, declaring in a March 2003
television interview, “We’re giving them (Iraqi leaders) full opportunity to do
it the easy way. And when it doesn’t work, we’ll do it the hard way.”
The video cuts to
President Donald Trump telling reporters aboard Air Force One, “If we can do
things the easy way, that’s fine. And if we have to do it the hard way, that’s
fine too.”
The piece includes other
parallels. President George W. Bush’s warning in late 2002 that there were
“al-Qaida terrorists inside Iraq” turns into Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth calling Latin American drug cartels “the al-Qaida
of our hemisphere.”
The Bush White House’s
warning of supposed Iraqi chemical weapons programs becomes the Trump
administration calling fentanyl a chemical weapon. (And don’t forget the
president labeled fentanyl, which chiefly comes from Mexico, a “weapon of mass
destruction” in December.)
I could note other
parallels as well, like the idea that oil wealth in Iraq or Venezuela will
effectively pay for the costs of any conflict.
But let’s not rush to
oversimplify.
THE JUSTIFICATION
First, American presidents
have recycled these kinds of arguments for going to war for as long as I’ve
been alive – these are not particular to the conflict that began in 2003. A
threat to Americans? Alleged terrorism? We’ve heard this before, many times.
You can spot some of these
arguments – or something very close to them – when commanders-in-chief have
made the case for military action in Afghanistan, the broader war on terrorism,
Syria and even the invasion of another Latin American country, Panama, in
December 1989.
“Many attempts have been
made to resolve this crisis through diplomacy and negotiations,” President
George H. W. Bush said in an address to the nation the day that operation
began. “All were rejected by the dictator of Panama, General Manuel Noriega, an
indicted drug trafficker.”
In other words: We tried
the easy way, then had to resort to the hard way.
There are also two very
obvious differences in the messaging:
• George W. Bush repeatedly declared that toppling Saddam
Hussein would promote democracy across the Middle East. But Trump never
mentioned democracy in his initial press conference on Saturday. He has
sidelined leaders of the opposition to Maduro and declined to set a timetable
for holding elections.
• The younger Bush did not cite Iraqi oil in his case for war.
In fact, the White House hastily retreated after describing the operation as
“Operation Iraqi Liberation” because of the unfortunate acronym, a distinct
memory from my time covering the start of the war from inside the Bush White
House. (It became “Operation Iraqi Freedom.”) Trump has made taking over
Venezuela oil operations central to his arguments.
Morning Joe host Joe
Scarborough related a recent conversation with Trump in which the president
declared: “The difference between Iraq and this is that (Bush) didn’t keep the
oil. We’re going to keep the oil.”
TWO BIG DIFFERENCES
OK, so the messaging isn’t
unique to Iraq and Venezuela and there are profound rhetorical differences.
Let’s not overlook two very important practical differences between the two
conflicts.
The first is that it does
not look like we’re waging full-scale war with Venezuela (and not just because
only Congress gets to declare war and hasn’t). The United States surely
committed an act of war by carrying out strikes on sovereign Venezuelan soil
and seizing Maduro. But unlike in Iraq, there’s no massive invasion force on
the ground.
What we saw over the
weekend was a military strike, but whether it turns into sustained conflict is
an open question. I will note, however, that Trump and top aides have said more
attacks are coming if Caracas bucks Washington’s demands.
The second difference
looks to me like a Trump administration decision to avoid two of the biggest
mistakes of the 2003 invasion: The disbanding of the Iraqi army and the purge
of Saddam Hussein loyalists from every level of government and the military, a
process known as de-Baathification after Saddam’s “Ba’ath” Party.
Those policies left
thousands upon thousands of angry Iraqi men – many of them with guns –
unemployed and under military occupation. It’s widely blamed for fueling the
deadly insurgency against American forces and for former Iraqi military
officials aiding the rise of ISIS.
What we see in Venezuela
today is the Maduro regime chugging along, without Maduro but run by his
allies, albeit under threat from the United States.
That doesn’t mean
Venezuela won’t topple into the kind of deadly chaos that bedeviled Iraq under
U.S. occupation. But the variance in both moves and messaging make it clear you
can’t neatly overlay Baghdad and Caracas.
A29 X08 Time Elliott 1.8 US confusion X08 FROM TIME
(use A)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
A29X01 “ ideology, not oil? X01 FROM
TIME
‘Trump is
Fairly Uninterested in Democracy’: Why Venezuela Is Unlike Other U.S.
Interventions
BY PHILIP ELLIOTT January 10, 2026
Dominic Tierney is an expert on losers—in the best
possible way.
The professor’s studies of war and its political
price are must-read volumes for those looking to understand how force and
governance are often at odds. As Washington tries to make sense of President
Donald Trump’s unprecedented push into Venezuela, his capture of Venezuelan
President Nicholás Maduro, and his constant chatter
about the oil resources of that South American country, I checked in with
Tierney—whose books include and The Right Way to Lose a War and How We Fight:
Crusades, Quagmires, and the American Way of War—to get a sense of how this
moment fits into the larger context of U.S. history and the global consequences
for what comes after the initial drive.
The conversation has been condensed and edited for
clarity.
TIME: Listening to President Trump the last few
days, it seems like he thinks this is going to be an easy operation. What does
history say about this?
Tierney: The use of force, whether it reaches the
threshold of war or not, is very difficult to control and very difficult to
predict. People talk about the day after, but you've got to talk about the week
after, the month after, and so on. This is especially true with regime change,
missions where you are essentially removing the government of a foreign state
and then unleashing political forces that you may struggle to control. The
U.S., for all of its power, has time and again struggled to control those
forces in recent decades. And this is one reason why the U.S., despite being
incredibly powerful, has a poor military record since World War II.
Is regime change the right term to be using here?
I'm struggling to figure out what word we should be using here.
The Trump Administration is trying to describe it
as a law enforcement operation, which is deliberately designed to seemingly
narrow the scope. It's interesting terminology given a
lot of questions about the legality. If you swoop into a foreign country and
capture their leader and then whisk them away—with various sorts of
behind-the-scenes efforts to negotiate with other potential actors—that is a
change in the regime, at least in terms of the leadership.
It's not at all clear how deep that regime change
is going to go, whether it's literally just Maduro and then others aligned with
him staying in power and sort of reaching some modus vivendi with the United
States, or whether we end up in a situation where there's a more sweeping
change.
The leader, a dictator, has been taken by force.
Dozens of people were killed. Certainly if another
country tried to do that to the United States, we would consider that a pretty
aggressive move and an attempt to regime change.
That would be an act of war by anyone else.
Certainly if any other country made any effort to do that to the United States,
it would be considered an act of war, unquestionably.
The wars since 1945 have not actually been so
explicitly about resources, yet the President can't seem to stop talking about
oil and energy. Iraq was under the auspices of preventing another attack. Has
anything changed about Americans' appetite for this sort of adventurism?
Trump is personally quite attracted to this idea
of controlling stuff. Maybe it's his real estate background. I remember he said
similar things about the mission in Syria in his first term, where you could
see he had doubts about it but he was quite drawn to the idea of We're going to
control the oil—even though that wasn't really true and there wasn't a lot of
oil.
To be honest with you, it is hard for me to
imagine that controlling Venezuelan oil is in fact the key, driving force
behind this operation. The United States is producing a massive amount of
energy, and if it really wanted to access the oil, it probably could make a
deal with Maduro. I think there are other motives that are probably more
important, like hemispheric dominance and Venezuela being seen as a kind of
leftist state.
Within the Western Hemisphere in particular, he's
quite willing to threaten or use force. There's sort of some harking back to a
kind of 19th Century approach to this. People are talking about the Donroe—rather than the Monroe—Doctrine. That does lend
itself to meddling in Central and South America.
Trump has been willing to use force more widely,
in Syria, during the war in Iran, briefly. There's no question that Trump is
absolutely not an isolationist. But he's also being quite cautious about sort
of large-scale military operations, at least thus far.
Now, in terms of wider American society, I don't
see any great appetite to get involved in foreign conflicts. Some of the polling
on the Venezuela operations suggest that people are very skeptical about it.
One of the polls suggested about a third of Americans supported it, about a
third were opposed, a third not sure. Those are very weak numbers for the start
of a military operation, right? So there's a bit of a
disjuncture, to say the least, between what Trump is talking about and where
the American people are.
What do you make of the lack of talk of
democratizing in this conversation?
That is quite striking. Traditionally, spreading
democracy is a thread in American foreign policy. It's always been ambiguous
because the U.S. has always pursued its interest first and foremost. Sometimes
that has led decisionmakers to cut deals with non-democratic actors or during
the Cold War outright destabilize perceived leftist democracies.
Now Trump is fairly uninterested in democracy. He
never really even talks about that or human rights or democracy.
You've got two different forces in American
ideology. One is a preference for democracy over non-democracy. And I think
most Americans do prefer democracy over non-democracy. Their willingness to
sacrifice is limited, but they tend to see democracies as friends.
The other piece that I think has become much more
important in the last couple years is about whether foreign governments are
left wing or right wing. Are they seen as liberal or are they seen as more
traditional conservative governments? You've seen a big effort by the Trump
administration to just explicitly favor European countries or political parties
that are right wing or conservative. It's not so much an interest in democracy
versus non-democracy but an interest in populist conservative right-wing
governments versus liberal left-wing governments. Under Biden, the focus was on
Are you a democracy or non-democracy? And under Trump it is Do you like MAGA?
Do you like populism? Are you right wing?
The United States doesn't have a really good
record at this sort of operation, especially not in our own backyard. Is there
anything about President Trump that might break America's bad trajectory on
this sort of operation?
The Venezuela operation makes me very nervous. I'm
worried about the competence of a lot of the officials involved. I'm worried
about the lack of outreach to Democrats, the complete refusal to build any kind
of consensus or reach across the aisle, which by contrast, the Bush
administration tried to do with Iraq in 2003.
And they got there.
Exactly. I'm also worried about the lack of any
kind of allied buy-in, the reveling in American unilateralism, the lack of
planning seemingly for the day after. The United States went to war in 2001 and
2003 with a very moralistic, very crusading view of war, a very black-and-white
view that there were good guys and bad guys, and America would wield the swift
sword of justice. The way the U.S. saw it was that the war would end like World
War II ended, unconditional surrender, total victory. That model of war is extremely
dangerous because it exaggerates American power and is too morally
self-righteous. You need to be more pragmatic.
This mission is extremely dangerous. Either Trump
basically just is satisfied with Maduro, in which case there may actually not
be a huge change necessarily in Venezuela. Or Trump is serious when he talks
about controlling Venezuela and even saying he wouldn't shy away from boots on
the ground. And then you have a recipe for disaster because Venezuela's an
impoverished and divided society. You could see a lot of resistance to what is
seen by Venezuelans and other people in the region as American occupation, the
worst kind of American imperialism.
If you're sitting in the Danish Embassy right now,
what is the conversation happening there about Greenland?
There's been a lot of shocking developments during
this term. But this is surely among the most shocking: that the United States
would talk about the military option remaining on the table in its effort to
acquire Greenland, which is essentially threatening the use of force against a
treaty ally. It puts the European states in a complete bind because they are
desperate to keep Trump somewhat onboard with Ukraine.
The Brits and so on are playing a very careful
game here. They're hoping that this is just bluster and there's no real chance
of the use of force, but what could happen is that the U.S. could present the
Greenlander population with some sort of too-good-to-turn-down proposal. It's
seen as controversial, but it's not immediately destroying NATO in the way that
an invasion of Greenland would do. That would destroy NATO.
A30X03 FROM IUK
Trump says major oil companies will invest
$100B in Venezuela and promises them government security assistance
The U.S. government is attempting to take control of the Venezuelan oil
industry
By
Andrew Feinberg Friday 09 January 2026 22:43 GMT
President Donald Trump told top
oil industry executives the United States
government would guarantee security for companies that assist the
administration’s effort to revive the Venezuelan petroleum sector after U.S.
forces captured the country’s ex-president.
Speaking in the East Room Friday
at the top of a televised sit-down with the energy executives, Trump said his
administration would be “making the decision” on which companies to “allow”
back into Venezuela and promised his administration would “cut a deal” with
those companies.
“We're dealing with the country,
so we're empowered to make that deal, and you have total safety, total
security. One of the reasons you couldn't go in is you had no guarantees, you
had no security. But now you have total security. It's a whole different
Venezuela, and Venezuela is going to be very successful, and the people of the
United States are going to be big beneficiaries,” he said.
Earlier in the day,
the president wrote on Truth Social that “BIG
OIL” leaders
will invest “at least 100 billion dollars” into Venezuela towards
“rebuilding, in a much bigger, better and more modern form, their oil and gas
infrastructure.”
He also claimed Washington and
Caracas have been “working well together” on rebuilding the Venezuelan oil
industry in the days since Venezuelan president Darcy Rodriguez was installed
following the snatching-up of longtime leader Nicolas Maduro in an audacious nighttime
raid by American commandos last week.
“They don't need government money,
but they need government protection and need government security that when they
spend all this money, it's going to be there,” Trump said. “So
they get their money back and make a very nice return.”
According to the White House,
executives from 17 companies were in attendance, including Chevron, the only
company that has some current involvement in Venezuela, plus ExxonMobil and
ConocoPhillips. The two latter companies lost control of prior projects in the
country when then-president Hugo Chavez nationalized them nearly two decades
ago.
The sit-down with oil industry
bigwigs comes as the president has sought to recast his administration’s
decapitation of the Venezuelan government — a surprise attack that has drawn
condemnation from much of the world and raised concerns in the U.S. about
whether it violated U.S. laws — as part of his efforts to lower
the cost of living for Americans who polling has shown to be weary of his
focus on international wheeling and dealing amid unflagging inflation and a
slowing job market.
In the wake of Maduro’s shock
ouster, Trump claimed the U.S. would be taking over sales of Venezuelan crude
across the globe and said the government in Caracas was providing Washington
with between 30 and 50 million barrels of formerly sanctioned oil to sell.
While critics have cast the move
as a Trumpian do-over of the 2003 American invasion of Iraq — overthrowing the
government of an oil-rich nation to install a more U.S.-friendly regime and
reap financial benefits — Trump has claimed it would benefit Americans by
bringing energy prices down with the aid of cheap oil from the formerly
sanctioned nation.
Despite his promise of cheap oil
to lower prices for Americans, he may have an uphill climb in convincing executives
to throw open their coffers in a country that has been particularly
inhospitable for western petroleum concerns over the past decades.
American companies have been wary
of signaling any interest in getting back into Venezuela without ironclad contracts
and guarantees that would prevent Caracas from interfering, though Trump has
said that the U.S. government would assist with guaranteeing any investments
while touting his relationship with Rodriguez.
U.S.-based shale oil producers
have also cried foul over Trump’s newfound love for foreign oil, which they
warn would crater the market for U.S.-produced crude at a time when the
president has obsessively pursued re-shoring American industrial capabilities.
American companies have been loath
to invest in Venezuela since a wave of nationalization laws that were enacted
in the country starting in 1976, dispossessing American companies including ExxonMobile and ConocoPhillips.
Although the companies were
compensated for some of their losses by the Venezuelan government, Trump
characterized the nationalization process that occurred decades ago as theft of
American-owned assets.
He also suggested his
administration’s purported takeover of the Venezuelan oil industry was
justified by those long-ago developments.
“Decades ago, the United States
built Venezuela's oil industry at tremendous expense with American skill,
technology, know how and dollars, but those assets
were stolen from us, and we had presidents who did nothing about it. This
President is much different than your other presidents,” he said.
One of the CEOs in attendance, ExxonMobile CEO Darren Woods, said the country was “uninvestable” without changes to “the legal and commercial
constructs and frameworks in place today.”
“There has to be durable investment
protections, and there has to be change to the hydrocarbon laws in the
country,” said Woods, who also expressed confidence that the Venezuelan
government would make those changes “hand in hand” with the Trump
administration.
But Woods added his company was
“ready to put a team on the ground” to assess the current state of the
country’s oil infrastructure “with the invitation of the Venezuelan government
and with appropriate security guarantees.”
YET
TO BE EXCERPTED
A31X04 FROM GUK
TRUMP PROMISES OIL COMPANIES ‘TOTAL SAFETY’ IN
VENEZUELA AS HE URGES THEM TO INVEST BILLIONS
Country is ‘uninvestable’
today, president told, but CEOs signal they are ready to spend with support
By Lauren Aratani in New York Fri 9 Jan 2026 17.07 EST
Donald Trump promised oil giants “total safety,
total security” in Venezuela in an effort to persuade them to invest $100bn in
the country’s infrastructure after US forces toppled Nicolás Maduro from power.
At a roundtable press conference at the White
House on Friday afternoon with more than a dozen oil executives, including
leaders from Chevron, ExxonMobil and ConocoPhilips,
the US president doubled down on claims that Maduro’s arrest presents American
oil companies with an unprecedented opportunity for extraction.
Many of the executives expressed support for the
Trump administration’s actions in Venezuela last weekend – and hinted that they
stood ready to invest.
Analysts have expressed skepticism that oil firms
will invest vast sums as rapidly as Trump has suggested they will. Earlier this
week, the president suggested production in Venezuela could be boosted within
18 months.
“We’re going to be extracting numbers in terms of
oil like few people have seen,” he said on Friday, emphasizing that the US
stands to benefit from lower energy prices. “Venezuela is going to be very
successful, and the people of the United States are going to be big beneficiaries.”
Notably, Trump said the investment would be coming
from the oil companies, not the federal government. Earlier in the week, he had
suggested that the US taxpayer might fund their investments.
“The plan is for them to spend, meaning our giant
oil companies will be spending at least $100bn of their money, not the
government’s money,” Trump said. “They don’t need government money, but they
need government protection and government security.”
Trump warned the assembled executives that, if
they aren’t interested in rebuilding efforts: “I got 25 people that aren’t here
today that are willing to take your place.”
While he offered them “total safety”, the
president also suggested some of the oil firms present did not need the US
government’s help. “These are people that drill oil in some pretty rough
places,” he said. “I could say a couple of those places make Venezuela look
like a picnic.”
In brief remarks, oil executives – for many, the
first public statements since Maduro’s capture – expressed willingness to
rebuild Venezuela’s oil infrastructure with the US government’s reassurances.
Chevron “has been a part of Venezuela’s past, we
are certainly committed to its present, and we very much look forward as a
proud American company to help it build a better future”, said Mark Nelson,
vice-chair of Chevron, currently the only US major that regularly exports
Venezuelan oil.
Nelson said the company currently had 3,000
employees across four different joint ventures in Venezuela and that it had the
capacity to “increase our liftings from those joint ventures 100% essentially,
effective immediately”.
Darren Woods, Exxon’s chief executive, said the
company expected “significant changes” to Venezuela’s legal and commercial
landscapes in order for the company to reinvest in the country. “Today it’s uninvestable,” he said.
“We’re confident that with this administration and
President Trump, working hand in hand with the Venezuelan government, that
those changes can be put in place,” Woods said.
The ConocoPhillips CEO, Ryan Lance, echoed the
cautious optimism, saying that “there’s an opportunity to be quick, fast and
restore the quality of what’s been lost in Venezuela over the last 25 years”.
Lance also noted that ConocoPhillips is
Venezuela’s largest non-sovereign credit holder, with the country holding $12bn
in debt to the company. Though Trump assured the company that it will get its
money back, “we’re going to start with an even plate”.
“We’re not going to look at what people lost in
the past, because that was their fault. That was a different president. We’re
going to make a lot of money, but we’re not going to go back,” he said.
Venezuela’s oil reserves are reputedly the world’s largest. While the country’s oil industry
experienced a boom in the late 90s and early 2000s, the then Venezuelan
president, Hugo Chávez, eventually reasserted state control over the industry
in the mid-2000s. In the years since, oil production in the country has fallen
drastically as its infrastructure aged and investment dried up.
Though Maduro is being tried in US federal court
on “narco-terrorism” charges, Trump has been very enthusiastic about Venezuela
opening back up to the American oil industry. On Wednesday, the White House
said that it planned to control Venezuela’s oil “indefinitely” and that it
would sell billions of dollars’ worth of recently seized crude oil.
History from the last two decades has shown that
foreign intervention can have an impact on a country’s oil output, but with
mixed and unstable results.
Oil is experiencing a global surplus. Average US
gas prices are now about 25 cents lower than last year.
Legal
X06
Senate defeats Invasion 2
A32X06 FROM NBC
Senate advances measure to restrict Trump's power
to use military force in Venezuela
Democratic Sen. Tim Kaine, who led the bipartisan
resolution, said that Trump's actions in Venezuela are "clearly
illegal" because he did not seek congressional approval.
By Sahil Kapur and Frank
Thorp V Jan. 8, 2026, 11:42 AM
EST / Updated Jan. 8, 2026, 1:05 PM EST
WASHINGTON — The Senate fired a warning shot at
President Donald Trump, voting Thursday to advance a bipartisan resolution to
block him from using military force “within or against Venezuela” unless he
gets prior approval from Congress.
The vote of 52-47 on the war powers measure came
after an unsuccessful plea by Republican leaders to sink it and preserve
Trump’s authority, as he threatens a “second wave” of attacks on Venezuela.
Trump has declared that the U.S. would “run” the country temporarily after he
ordered a military operation last week to capture and extradite leader Nicolás
Maduro.
Five Republicans joined all 47 Democrats in voting
yes on the motion to advance the resolution to the Senate floor.
White House defends seizure of oil tanker
linked to Venezuela
The legislation, led by Sen. Tim Kaine, D-Va., was
co-sponsored by Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., Sen. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., and Senate
Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y.
“Instead of responding to Americans’ concerns
about the affordability crisis, President Trump started a war with Venezuela
that is profoundly disrespectful to U.S. troops, deeply unpopular, suspiciously
secretive and likely corrupt. How is that ‘America First?’” Kaine said. “Trump’s war is also
clearly illegal because this military action was ordered without the
congressional authorization the Constitution requires.”
The procedural motion Thursday sets up a full
Senate vote on the measure next week; that will also require a simple majority
and is expected to pass. It is subject to House approval and a presidential
signature, making it unlikely to become law. But it sends a significant message
to Trump that could impact his foreign policy moves going forward — in
Venezuela and other countries.
“To my Senate colleagues: Enough is enough,” Kaine
said. “You were sent here to have courage and to stand up for your
constituents. That means no war without a debate and vote in Congress.”
Along with Democrats and Paul, the Republicans who
voted for the measure were Sens. Susan Collins of Maine, Lisa Murkowski of
Alaska, Todd Young of Indiana and Josh Hawley of Missouri.
Trump slammed those five Republicans, calling
their votes an act of “stupidity.”
“Republicans should be ashamed of the Senators
that just voted with Democrats in attempting to take away our Powers to fight
and defend the United States of America. Susan Collins, Lisa Murkowski, Rand
Paul, Josh Hawley, and Todd Young should never be elected to office again,”
Trump wrote on Truth Social. “This Vote greatly hampers
American Self Defense and National Security, impeding the President’s Authority
as Commander in Chief.”
Paul said some members of Congress want to “shift
the burden of initiating war to the president” rather than take responsibility.
“But make no mistake, bombing another nation’s
capital and removing their leader is an act of war, plain and simple,” the
Kentucky Republican said. “No provision in the Constitution provides such power
to the presidency.”
The vote represents an early test of Republicans’
appetite to slap limits on Trump’s power to use military force after his
capture of Maduro. Trump has suggested he is open to U.S. boots on the ground
there and also threatened Iran, Greenland and Colombia on Sunday, adding that Cuba “is
ready to fall.”
“I believe invoking the War Powers Act at this
moment is necessary, given the President’s comments about the possibility of
‘boots on the ground’ and a sustained engagement ‘running’ Venezuela, with
which I do not agree,” Collins said in a statement.
Murkowski said Congress must “affirm our role
under Article 1.”
Ahead of the vote, Senate Majority Whip John Barrasso, R-Wyo., urged senators to reject the war powers
measure, calling the U.S. military capture of Maduro a law enforcement
operation.
“It does not make America stronger. It makes
America weaker and less safe,” Barrasso said in a
written statement. “It would weaken the President’s legitimate, constitutional
authority. This body, the United States Senate, is being asked whether the
President of the United States has the authority to arrest indicted criminals. Of course he does.”
Political
X02
T blames 5 traitors for above
A33X02 FROM IUK
Republicans break ranks to halt future
Trump attacks on Venezuela
Five GOP senators break ranks to pass War Powers resolution as
Democrats fall into line
By John Bowden in Washington,
D.C. Thursday 08 January 2026 19:04 GMT
A group of Republican senators
delivered Donald Trump a message of opposition to begin the new year as they
voted to limit the president’s ability to
launch new attacks on
Venezuela.
Five members of the
president’s party broke ranks to support a War Powers Act resolution sponsored by
Sen. Tim Kaine, a Democrat from Virginia, aimed at preventing the White House
from using resources to support further military action inside
Venezuela following
the capture of the country’s leader Nicolas Maduro. The new resolution blocks
the president from using the military against Venezuela without authorization
from Congress.
One of them, Josh Hawley (R-Mo.),
denied that his vote was not a rebuke of the president: “This is all about
going forward. If the president should determine, you know what, I need to put
troops on the ground in Venezuela, I think that wouldn't require Congress.”
But after Thursday, a vote of
52-47 now stands as one of the largest shows of Republican resistance on
Capitol Hill so far during Trump’s second presidency.
And the president clearly didn’t
feel the same way. He quickly dropped a bomb on the wayward Republicans, naming
them on Truth Social and writing that “Republicans should be ashamed of the
Senators that just voted with Democrats...Susan Collins, Lisa Murkowski, Rand
Paul, Josh Hawley, and Todd Young should never be elected to office again.”
The resolution passed with a
greater showing of Republican support than had manifested for a similar
resolution in the fall, which took place before the raid on Venezuela’s capital
to capture Maduro. Just one Democrat, John Fetterman, expressed support for the
president’s actions in response to the Maduro raid, but even he fell into line
and voted with his party Thursday.
Just two Republicans previously
voted to restrict the president’s warmaking in the
fall, as a campaign of military strikes against small boats the U.S. has accused
of being used for drug smuggling escalated in the Caribbean: Lisa Murkowski of
Alaska, and Rand Paul of Kentucky.
Three of their colleagues joined
them this week. Sens. Susan Collins, Josh Hawley and Todd Young voted in the
affirmative, and indicated to reporters that the capture of Maduro changed the
calculation.
The legislation will be sent to
the House, and can still be vetoed if it reaches the president’s desk.
White House officials including
the president have refused to take the use of U.S. forces, including a ground
invasion, off the table to stabilize Venezuela in the wake of Maduro’s capture.
Paul spoke to reporters after the
vote and was equally averse to describing it as a firm break with the
president.
“I think it's part of the healthy
debate that we have in a republic,” he contended.
But the senator admitted that
lawmakers and Americans alike were spooked by the rhetoric coming out of the
White House, both from Trump who indicated that he’ll pursue potential efforts
at regime change or efforts to stop drug trafficking elsewhere, and the likes
of Stephen Miller and Karoline Leavitt who repeatedly refused this week to rule
out a military invasion of Greenland, which is controlled by a fellow Nato member-state.
Trump and his allies
have been cagey about details regarding
his future plans for the Western Hemisphere. He has
reignited calls for the U.S. to acquire Greenland, while pointedly not ruling out
military force and
drawing condemnations from European
leaders, who
say such an act would shatter the NATO alliance. Officials have also revealed
only the hints of a solid plan for Venezuela’s future amid questions of who the
administration views as the country’s rightful leader, when elections will be
held and whether the U.S. has plans to take over or seize parts of Venezuela’s
oil reserves.
“I think it concerns people the
more they hear loose rhetoric like, Columbia, you're next green Greenland,
you're next. Watch out. And so the more it becomes
that, well, that the President can make these decisions without any kind of
authorization from Congress. I think that's starting to worry more people,”
said Paul.
Paul did not answer when asked
by The Independent whether
he would support similar legislation, introduced by Sen. Ruben Gallego, to
restrict military force against Greenland. But he and other lawmakers in both
chambers have warned against such saber-rattling from the White House.
“[A]ny
effort to claim or take the territory by force would degrade both our national
security and our international relationships,” wrote Murkowski, one of
Thursday’s yes votes, on Wednesday evening.
Todd Young, her colleague, added
of his yes vote on Thursday: “Although I remain open to persuasion, any future
commitment of U.S. forces in Venezuela must be subject to debate and
authorization in Congress.
“President Trump campaigned against
forever wars, and I strongly support him in that position. A drawn-out campaign
in Venezuela involving the American military, even if unintended, would be the
opposite of President Trump’s goal of ending foreign entanglements,” the
Indiana Republican wrote in a statement.
The Senate’s vote follows an
all-senators briefing on the subject earlier in the week and complaints from
Democrats that the administration gave no forewarning, including to lawmakers
with intelligence backgrounds, regarding the strike.
Members of the opposition party
who exited the briefing on Wednesday said that the president planned to “steal”
Venezuela’s oil “at gun point,” while the future of the country remained
unclear.
“This is an insane plan. They’re
talking about stealing Venezuelan oil at gunpoint for an undefined period of
time to micromanage an entire country,” claimed Sen. Chris Murphy, a Democrat
from Connecticut, as he spoke with reporters after Wednesday’s briefing. “The
scope and insanity of this is absolutely stunning.”
Even some Republicans who voted
against the War Powers resolution on Thursday expressed the need for the
administration to guarantee stability within
Venezuela in the immediate term, and expressed doubts that American
energy companies would make long-term investments without that guarantee. Those
with concerns included Thom Tillis, who excoriated the White House this week
over rhetoric from Miller and others about Greenland.
“I think [success] depends largely
on whether or not we can help the President by passing legislation that
sustains the effort. Because, frankly, if we don't do that, why on earth would
anybody in the energy sector invest in something that may only be a stable it
may be stable for three years?” Tillis asked.
ATTACHMENTS
TO EXCERPT
@trump piracy
A34 From wiki
The United States Pirate Party[3] (USPP)
is an American political party founded in 2006 by Brent Allison and Alex
English.[4] The
party's platform is aligned with the global Pirate movement, and supports reform of copyright laws
to reflect open source and free culture values, government transparency, protection of privacy and civil liberties.
The United States Pirate Party also advocates for evidence-based policy, egalitarianism, meritocracy and
the hacker ethic as well as the rolling back of corporate personhood and corporate welfare.
The USPP has also made a priority to advocate for changes in the copyright laws
and removal of patents. It is the
belief of the party that these restrictions greatly hinder the sharing and
expansion of knowledge and resources.[5]
The
party's national organization has existed in multiple incarnations since its
2006 founding. Its most recent is the Pirate National Committee (PNC), formed
in 2012 as a coalition of state parties. The PNC officially recognizes Pirate
parties from 10 states,[3] and
tracks and assists in the growth of more state parties throughout the United
States. The board of the USPP is the board of the PNC. The chair of the Pirate
National Committee is known as the "Captain". The current Captain is
Jolly Mitch.[6]
ATTACHMENT 35
From abc 7/14/16
Former
Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich made
an unusual move and decided to publicly describe both himself and Donald Trump as
“pirates,” perhaps as a reference to their at-times rogue decisions in the
political sphere.
“I
told him quite directly that I thought that he had a choice between having two
pirates on the ticket, or having a pirate and a relatively stable, more normal
person,” Gingrich said today during a Facebook live session while talking about
Trump’s decision to choose a running mate -- with sources saying the choice is
likely between Gingrich and Indiana Gov. Mike Pence.
A36
HERALD STANDARD ATTACHMENT @ From
the herald-standard, uniontown, pa 1/14/2026
Trump’s invasion of Venezuela was the easy part
Jan 14, 2026 By RACHEL MARSDEN 5 min read
Here
we go again. Another U.S. President promises to fix things at home but, once in
office, gets distracted by the irresistible thrill of overseas regime change.
Americans are tired of it, including Trump himself, at least until he realized
that playing pirate is way more fun than running a country.
Kidnapping
the internationally recognized head of a sovereign nation by having U.S.
special forces drag him out of bed in the dead of night, stuff him into a plane
and fly him to New York isn’t exactly a “big win.” Just ask anyone who
remembers the initial cheering in Vietnam, Korea, Iran, Iraq, Guatemala, Chile,
Afghanistan, Somalia, the Philippines or Libya — before everything went
sideways.
A
victory for democracy, say European leaders desperate for Trump to commit U.S.
troops to babysit their own while they do air squats and burpees in a
post-ceasefire Ukraine so they won’t have to worry about Russia showing up when
things inevitably go belly-up.
Now
that Trump has proof of concept in Venezuela, he’s talking about seizing
Greenland for “national security” — part of the EU and Danish territory ever
since the U.S. got the Danish West Indies in the 1919 deal (renamed the U.S.
Virgin Islands). But who cares about boring history when you can re-enact the
age of swashbuckling high seas hijinks? Does Amazon sell black eye patches?
Europeans,
not wanting to elicit Trump’s wrath, are reduced to pleading for him to respect
international law while applauding its violation in Venezuela “for democracy.”
Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni
even stroked his ego, praising his “very assertive methods.”
When
actions and words ignore common sense and European leaders start tiptoeing
around phrases like “unilateral overthrow,” you can bet corruption is involved.
For decades, European leaders have sold out their citizens to the same globalist
neocon agenda of U.S.-led regime change that Trump just revived. The only thing
annoying them now is the bull’s eye he’s aiming directly at them.
The
America some cheer as being “so back” isn’t the America that Trump promised his
voters. Nobody wanted him to “run Venezuela” for oil like a cartel jefe.
Speaking
of which, how is that going to work when Maduro’s old team is still running the
country? Team Trump says that the Venezuelan leadership must sell its oil to
the U.S. and cut ties with Russia and China, with the unspoken threat that
they’re next if they resist.
Trump
already ousted one Venezuelan leader only to admit that the opposition puppets
the neocons backed didn’t actually have the respect of the Venezuelan people. So who else is left to run the place? Secretary of State
Marco Rubio in his fifth role in this administration? Might as well slap a
Venezuelan presidential sash on him.
Any
puppet propped up by Trump will serve Trump, not Venezuelans. So what will the people do? Stand by politely while American
multinationals scoop up their natural resource wealth? History screams
otherwise.
Chevron
is already in-country, but Exxon Mobil and ConocoPhillips sound like they’d
rather wrestle an alligator than deal with Trump’s latest nation-building
project. “Uninvestable,” says Exxon’s CEO.
Team
Trump treats Venezuelan oil like it’s American just because Big Oil once had to
suffer through nationalization. How to avoid such a disaster from repeating
itself? Maybe don’t invade, to start.
It’s
a hard-learned lesson, apparently, but it might be starting to catch on.
Chevron has recently endured attacks in the Niger Delta and the blowback from
its resulting security crackdown.
And
how many U.S. oil companies are left in Afghanistan after nearly two decades of
U.S. occupation, now that the Taliban is back in charge? Hint: it’s a whole
integer between – one and one.
France’s
TotalEnergies learned the hard way in Mozambique with
war crimes allegations, and suspended operations after attacks.
NGOs
pursued them for violating the rights of locals in Uganda and Tanzania. Perenco had to abandon infrastructure in Guatemala under
public pressure.
Trump
says that the U.S. government will handle security this time. No doubt the
locals will be thrilled to finally have a flag slapped on the faces that
they’ll be aiming at — whether contractors or uniformed forces.
And
then there’s the issue of Maduro. If he wins this show trial in New York and
Trump has to put him back on the shelf, will he get a private ride home or have
to fly economy back to Caracas? Earlier accusations that he led the Cartel de
Los Solos were quietly dropped. The Justice Department now admits it doesn’t
even exist.
No
fentanyl charges either. But he did have weapons. Maybe even an entire army,
since he was president. Now they’ll hope that a judge buys the gymnastics of
kidnapping a leader and dragging him to trial abroad without an extradition
treaty, all while ignoring Trump’s 90-minute televised diatribe insisting that
it’s really about the oil.
Not
a single Trump voter asked for any of this, but one of the early beneficiaries
appears to be pro-Israel philanthropist and billionaire hedge-funder Paul
Singer, who donated $5 million to Trump and now stands to turn his recent
bargain-basement purchase of Venezuela’s U.S.-based refineries, designed for
the country’s heavy crude, into a potential billionaire payday.
America
First, indeed. If you’re in the donor class.
(Rachel
Marsden is a columnist, political strategist and host of independently produced
talk shows in French and English. Her website can be found at
[http://www.rachelmarsden.com.)]http://www.rachelmarsden.com.)
TIMELINES and TAKEAWAY ATTACHMENTS from the
CAPTURE of NICOLAS MADURO
ATTACHMENT “A” – FROM the NEW YORK TIMES
|
Jan. 3,
2026, 2:24 a.m. ET |
Maduro Arrives in N.Y.; Trump Says U.S. Will ‘Run’ Venezuela
Nicolás Maduro, the ousted
president of Venezuela, arrived in Brooklyn and will be held on drugs and
weapons charges. The country’s interim leader demanded his return.
Published Jan. 3,
2026Updated Jan. 5, 2026, 3:56 p.m. ET
By Anatoly Kurmanaev and Tyler Pager
Venezuela’s president, Nicolás
Maduro, was taken to New York City on Saturday to face federal drug charges,
hours after the U.S. military seized him and his wife in a swift and
overwhelming strike on Caracas, the culmination of a campaign by President
Trump and his aides to oust him from power.
Late Saturday, Mr. Maduro arrived
in Brooklyn and will be held at the Metropolitan Detention Center, according to
a law enforcement official with knowledge of Maduro’s movements but who was not
authorized to speak about the matter.
At least 40 people, including
civilians and soldiers, were killed in the attack in Venezuela, according to a
senior Venezuelan official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe
preliminary reports. More than 150 U.S. aircraft were dispatched to knock out
air defenses, so that military helicopters could deliver the Special Operations
forces who assaulted Mr. Maduro’s compound at 2 a.m. local time, U.S. officials
said. The whole operation took two hours and 20 minutes.
Hours after the raid, Mr. Trump
said at a news conference the United States would “run the country” until a
“safe, proper and judicious transition” of power could be arranged, raising the
prospect of an open-ended military commitment. He did not say whether U.S.
forces would occupy the country, although he added he was not afraid of “boots
on the ground.”
Mr. Maduro’s aides appeared to still be in power after
the attack. There were no obvious signs of a U.S. military presence in Venezuela
on Saturday afternoon, and Venezuela’s top officials and state news media
projected a message of defiance.
Mr. Maduro, a self-described
socialist, had led Venezuela since 2013, when the country’s previous
authoritarian leader, Hugo Chávez, died. The Biden administration accused Mr.
Maduro of stealing the election that kept him in power last year.
Mr. Maduro’s vice president, Delcy Rodríguez, who was sworn in as interim president at a
secret ceremony in Caracas, said in a national address that Washington had
invaded her country under false pretenses and that Mr. Maduro was still
Venezuela’s head of state.
“There is only one president in
this country, and his name is Nicolás Maduro Moros,” said Ms. Rodríguez,
appearing with her defense minister and other officials.
The main opposition leader, María
Corina Machado, posted a statement urging that her political ally, Edmundo
González, be recognized as Venezuela’s president immediately. Though Mr. Maduro
claims he defeated Mr. González in the last election, the United States and
other international observers say the election was marred by fraud. “Today we
are prepared to enforce our mandate and take power,” said Ms. Machado, who was
awarded the Nobel Peace Prize last year.
Mr. Trump avoided fully embracing
either Ms. Rodriguez or Ms. Machado. He said his secretary of state, Marco
Rubio, had spoken to Ms. Rodriguez and “she’s essentially willing to do what we
think is necessary to make Venezuela great again.” He also said Ms. Machado
didn’t have the support or respect to lead the country.
One thing Mr. Trump made clear was
his desire to open up Venezuela’s vast state-controlled oil reserves to
American oil companies. He spoke at length at the news conference about
American oil companies rebuilding the country’s energy infrastructure and,
presumably, regaining rights they once held to Venezuela’s vast oil reserves.
“We are going to run the country right,″ Mr. Trump said. “It’s going to make a lot of
money.” Past Venezuelan governments, he said, “stole our oil” — an apparent
reference to the country’s nationalization of its oil industry.
Here is what else to know:
·
Anti-American
protests: Hours
after Mr. Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, were captured by U.S. forces,
Venezuela’s state-run television was broadcasting rallies and protests taking
place across several cities, including the capital, Caracas. Mr. Maduro’s
supporters vowed to defend their country from what they described as an illegal
attack and the kidnapping of their “legitimate” leader. ›
·
C.I.A.
involvement: American
special operations forces captured Mr. Maduro with the help of a C.I.A. source
within the Venezuelan government who had monitored his location in recent days,
according to people briefed on the operation. Mr. Trump posted an image of
Mr. Maduro in custody aboard the U.S.S. Iwo Jima, one of the American warships
that have been prowling the Caribbean, and said he and his wife would be taken
to New York.
·
Cartel
accusations: A new
indictment was unsealed by a federal judge in New York City, charging Mr.
Maduro, his wife and four others with four counts, including narco-terrorism,
conspiracy to import cocaine and possession of machine guns. The indictment was
similar to the one unveiled in March
2020.
·
Military
buildup: Before
the strikes on Saturday, the Pentagon had amassed troops,
aircraft and warships in the Caribbean. The U.S. military has attacked many small vessels that
U.S. officials maintained were smuggling drugs, killing at least 115 people.
And the C.I.A. conducted a drone strike on a port
facility in Venezuela last month, according to people
briefed on the operation. The United States has also carried out a campaign
against tankers carrying Venezuelan crude, throwing the country’s oil industry
into disarray and jeopardizing the government’s main source of revenue.
Genevieve Glatsky contributed
reporting from Bogotà, Colombia, and Annie Correal from Mexico City.
Jan. 4, 2026, 12:14 a.m. ETJan. 4, 2026
Anatoly KurmanaevTyler PagerSimon Romero and Julie Turkewitz
Anatoly Kurmanaev
reported from Venezuela, and Tyler Pager from Palm Beach, Fla.
How Trump fixed on a Maduro loyalist
as Venezuela’s new leader.
Image
Vice President Delcy Rodríguez of Venezuela, now the country’s interim
leader, speaking at the United Nations General Assembly in New York in
2019.Credit...Brittainy Newman for The New York Times
It was one dance move too many for
Venezuela’s President Nicolás Maduro.
Mr. Maduro in late December
rejected an ultimatum from President Trump to leave office and go into a gilded
exile in Turkey, according to several Americans and Venezuelans involved in
transition talks.
This week he was back onstage,
brushing off the latest U.S. escalation — a strike on a dock that the United
States said was used for drug trafficking — by bouncing to an electronic beat on
state television while his recorded voice repeated in English, “No crazy war.”
Mr. Maduro’s regular public
dancing and other displays of nonchalance in recent weeks helped persuade some
on the Trump team that the Venezuelan president was mocking them and trying to
call what he believed to be a bluff, according to two of the people, who spoke
on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to talk about the
confidential discussions.
So the White House decided to follow
through on its military threats.
On Saturday, an elite U.S.
military team swooped into Caracas, the capital, in a pre-dawn raid and whisked
Mr. Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, to New York to face drug trafficking
charges.
Weeks earlier, U.S. officials had
already settled on an acceptable candidate to replace Mr. Maduro, at least for
the time being: Vice President Delcy Rodríguez, who
had impressed Trump officials with her management of Venezuela’s crucial oil
industry.
The people involved in the
discussions said intermediaries persuaded the administration that she would
protect and champion future American energy investments in the country.
“I’ve been watching her career for
a long time, so I have some sense of who she is and what she’s about,” said one
senior U.S. official, referring to Ms. Rodríguez.
“I’m not claiming that she’s the
permanent solution to the country’s problems, but she’s certainly someone we
think we can work at a much more professional level than we were able to do
with him,” the official added, referring to Mr. Maduro.
It was an easy choice, the people
said. Mr. Trump had never warmed up to the Venezuelan opposition leader María
Corina Machado, who had organized a winning presidential campaign in 2024,
earning her the Nobel Peace Prize this year. Since Mr. Trump’s re-election, Ms.
Machado has gone out of her way to please him, calling him a “champion of
freedom,” mimicking his talking points on election fraud in the United States
and even dedicating her Peace Prize to him.
It was in vain. On Saturday, Mr.
Trump said he would accept Ms. Rodríguez, saying that Ms. Machado lacked the
“respect” needed to govern Venezuela.
U.S. officials say that their
relationship with Ms. Rodríguez’s interim government will be based on her
ability to play by their rules, adding that they reserve the right to take
additional military action if she fails to respect America’s interests. Despite
Ms. Rodríguez’s public condemnation of the attack, a senior U.S. official said
that it was too soon to draw conclusions about what her approach would be and that
the administration remained optimistic that they could work with her.
Mr. Trump declared on Saturday
that the United States intended to “run” Venezuela for an unspecified period
and reclaim U.S. oil interests, an extraordinary assertion of unilateral,
expansionist power after more narrow, and also
contested, arguments about stopping the flow of drugs.
In Ms. Rodríguez, the Trump
administration would be engaging a leader of a government that it had routinely
labeled illegitimate, while abandoning Ms. Machado, whose movement won a
presidential election last year in a victory widely recognized as stolen by Mr.
Maduro.
And it was not immediately clear
if Ms. Rodriguez would even play along. In a televised address, she accused the
United States of making an illegal invasion and asserted that Mr. Maduro
remained Venezuela’s legitimate leader.
To retain leverage, senior U.S.
officials said, restrictions on Venezuelan oil exports would remain in place
for now.
But others involved in the talks
expressed hope that the administration would stop detaining Venezuelan oil
tankers and issue more permits for U.S. companies to work in Venezuela in order
to revive the economy and give Ms. Rodríguez a shot at political success.
Ms. Rodríguez, 56, arrives at the
job of Venezuela’s interim leader with credentials of an economic
troubleshooter who orchestrated the country’s shift from
corrupt socialism to similarly corrupt laissez-faire capitalism.
She is the daughter of a Marxist
guerrilla who won fame for kidnapping an American businessman. She was educated
partly in France, where she specialized in labor law.
She held middling government posts
in the government of Mr. Maduro’s predecessor, Hugo Chávez, before being
promoted to bigger roles with the help of her older brother Jorge Rodríguez,
who eventually became Mr. Maduro’s chief political strategist.
Ms. Rodríguez managed to stabilize
the Venezuelan economy after years of crisis and slowly but steadily grow the
country’s oil production amid tightening U.S. sanctions, a feat that earned her
even the grudging respect of some American officials.
As Ms. Rodríguez consolidated
control over economic policy and eliminated rivals,
she built bridges with Venezuela’s economic elites, foreign investors and
diplomats, to whom she presented herself as a soft-spoken technocrat and a
contrast to the burly security officials forming most of the rest of Mr.
Maduro’s inner circle.
Those alliances have borne fruit
in recent months, earning her powerful champions that helped to cement her rise
to power. On Saturday, her assumption of power was greeted with cautious
optimism by some of Venezuela’s captains of industry, who said in private that
she had the skills to create growth, if she could persuade the United States to
relax its chokehold on the country’s economy.
For all her technocratic leanings,
Ms. Rodríguez has never denounced the brutal repression and corruption
sustaining Mr. Maduro’s rule, once calling her decision to join the government
an act of “personal revenge” for her father’s death in prison in 1976, after
being interrogated by intelligence agents from pro-U.S. governments.
Ms. Rodríguez’s capacity for
negotiating across Venezuela’s ideological chasm could prove useful in easing
tensions. Juan Francisco García, a former ruling party lawmaker who has since broken
with the government, said he had some apprehensions about her ability to govern
but gave her the benefit of the doubt.
“History is full of sectors and
figures linked to dictators who have, at some point, served as a bridge to
stabilize the country and transition to a democratic scenario,” Mr. García
said.
The contradictions enveloping Ms.
Rodríguez were on display on Saturday when she addressed the nation.
While Mr. Trump said that Ms.
Rodríguez had been sworn in as Venezuela’s new president, it was clear that Mr.
Maduro’s supporters — including Ms. Rodríguez herself if her remarks are taken
at face value — still see him as Venezuela’s leader.
Spotlighting the potential
challenges ahead, even the text on Venezuelan state television labeled her as
vice president. People close to the government said those displays of loyalty
were a necessary public relations strategy to pacify the ruling party
loyalists, including in the armed forces and paramilitary groups, who were
reeling from the military humiliation inflicted by the United States on their
country and the destruction and death caused by the attack. At least 40
Venezuelans died, both civilians and soldiers, according to a senior Venezuelan
official.
U.S. forces managed to descend
into the capital largely unopposed, destroy at least three military bases and
grab the country’s president from a heavily guarded compound, without any loss
of American life.
Still, the Trump administration
has chosen to give Mr. Maduro’s vice president a chance and to pass over Ms.
Machado, who won the Nobel Prize and had
Ms. Machado, a conservative former
member of the National Assembly from an affluent Venezuelan family, boasts
decades-long ties to Washington.
She has spent the last year courting
Mr. Trump’s support and trying to enlist his help in ousting Mr. Maduro. She
has openly supported his
military campaign in the Caribbean and mostly refrained from commenting on his
policies toward Venezuelan migrants.
On Saturday, after Mr. Trump
announced that the U.S. military had captured Mr. Maduro, she released a
statement saying that she was ready to lead. “Today we are prepared to assert
our mandate and seize power,” she wrote in a message she
posted on X.
But roughly two hours later, Mr.
Trump said they had not spoken. It would be “very tough” for Ms. Machado to
take control of her country, Mr. Trump said, adding in his televised speech that
she was a “very nice woman” but “doesn’t have the support” in Venezuela to
lead.
A spokeswoman for Ms. Machado
declined to comment.
“For Trump, democracy is not a
concern — it is about money, power, and protecting the homeland from drugs and
criminals,” said Michael Shifter, a senior fellow at the Inter-American
Dialogue, a research institute in Washington.
In his speech to the nation, Mr. Trump
also made no mention of Edmundo González, the retired diplomat who became Ms.
Machado’s political surrogate after she was barred from running. Mr. González,
who is in self-imposed exile in Spain, is considered the legitimate winner, by
a wide margin, of the 2024 election, even though Venezuelan authorities handed
the victory to Mr. Maduro.
Eric Schmitt contributed
reporting from Washington, and María Victoria Fermín, Mariana
Martínez and Isayen Herrera from
Caracas, Venezuela.
Venezuela
Sources: Verified videos and
photos (strike locations); Venezuela’s communications ministry (states where
attacks occurred)
By Agnes Chang, Christiaan Triebert and Pablo Robles/The New York Times
Jan. 3, 2026, 11:13 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Restrictions on U.S.-controlled
airspace over the Caribbean that took effect as the U.S. military intervened in
Venezuela will expire at midnight, Secretary of Transportation Sean Duffy said
on social media. The restrictions forced airlines to adjust schedules and
cancel flights to and from destinations like Puerto Rico, St. Lucia and Barbados.
Jan. 3, 2026, 9:35 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Miles G. Cohen
Reporting from Brooklyn
A police officer who provided
security outside of Metropolitan Detention Center ahead of Maduro’s arrival
told demonstrators over a loudspeaker that the ousted president had been
ushered inside the facility. The crowd cheered and began to sing and wave
Venezuelan flags.
Jan. 3, 2026, 9:23 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Maria Abi-Habib and Frances Robles
Maria Abi-Habib is based in Mexico
City, and Frances Robles reported from Florida.
‘What will happen tomorrow?’
Venezuelans fear chaos after U.S. attack.
How Venezuelans Worldwide
Reacted to Overthrow of Maduro
2:14
For Venezuelans living abroad,
news of the U.S. military intervention and President Nicolás Maduro’s capture
triggered a wide spectrum of emotions, ranging from joy to anger and
uncertainty.
Like many Venezuelans, José, an
entrepreneur based in Mexico City, voted against Nicolás Maduro in Venezuela’s
election in 2024. He was dismayed when Mr. Maduro clung to power, amid
accusations of widespread fraud and
nationwide opposition protests. But when he awoke Saturday to the news that Mr.
Maduro had been ousted in a U.S. military operation, he felt only dread.
“It is bittersweet,” said José,
35, who withheld his last name fearing reprisal against his family in Venezuela
from the government. He was worried the majority of his family, who has always
voted against Mr. Maduro, will experience further political and economic
instability, upending his own plans to return to Venezuela.
“The first thing on my mind isn’t,
‘We are free and I’m so happy,’” he said. “It is, ‘What will happen tomorrow?’
Maduro is just one part of a much bigger machine.”
Mr. Maduro was a deeply unpopular
leader and was accused of stealing the election in 2024. An independent exit
poll and a tally of votes by the opposition appeared to show that he lost decisively,
66 percent to 31 percent.
“Nobody wants an invasion,” said
Beatrice Rangel, who was the chief of staff for Venezuela’s former president
Carlos Andrés Pérez. “No one wants a foreign power in their country. I have
always been against such interventions.”
Ms. Rangel said that in that
posting she had tried to convince Panama’s president, Manuel Noriega, to
resign. Her government was opposed to the U.S. coup that
ultimately overthrew him.
But with Venezuela today, she
said, “There was no other way to remove Maduro without the U.S.”
Still, the Trump administration’s
incursion into Venezuela recalled the many
U.S.-backed coups that have destabilized Latin America
in recent decades.
“This has been my fear from Day 1,
that Trump thought this was going to be easy, that once Maduro goes there will
be pixie dust, rainbows and everyone is happy,” said Brian Naranjo, who served
as the deputy chief of mission at the U.S. Embassy in Caracas from 2014 to
2018.
José and many other Venezuelans
have wanted Mr. Maduro out, but they worry that the United States has no plan
for a peaceful transition of power and that the South American nation could
descend into chaos — with a collection of regional guerrilla groups biting off
territory and rival government factions fighting for power.
Many Venezuelans who oppose Mr.
Maduro are also wary of Delcy Rodríguez, the vice
president who Mr. Trump said had been sworn in as interim president on
Saturday, but who appeared loyal to Mr. Maduro in
her remarks the same day.
And the fact that the U.S.
intervention left Maduro’s inner circle in office fueled concern that his
government would not go without a fight.
One teacher in the city of
Maracaibo, whose brother was killed by pro-government paramilitary forces, said
she had cried with joy when she heard Mr. Maduro had been ousted. But her
delight was short-lived, ending when she learned that Ms. Rodríguez would
remain at the helm.
Indeed, Mr. Trump has barely
spoken about democracy since U.S. forces captured Mr. Maduro in an early
morning raid on Saturday, nor has he laid out a detailed transition plan. He
was, however, adamant that the administration will receive a more lucrative
deal on Venezuelan oil.
That added to the fury among
supporters of Mr. Maduro’s government on Saturday.
“Anyone who celebrates an invasion
of the gringos is a traitor,” said Alberto González, 42, a government worker in
Sucre, a state on the northeast coast of Venezuela.
“They’re going to steal everything
from us and humiliate us,” he said. “The country is independent, and we cannot
accept Donald Trump coming here to tell us what to do and kidnapping the
president.”
To many Venezuelans and analysts,
Mr. Trump’s focus on oil reserves draws similarities to the U.S. invasion of
Iraq in 2003. Then President George W. Bush declared “mission accomplished”
just six weeks after the invasion — only for Iraq to descend into a brutal
civil war that killed thousands of Iraqis and U.S. troops.
On Saturday while addressing
reporters, Mr. Trump said that the United States will “run” Venezuela, but the
country is roughly twice as large as California in square miles and filled with
mountains and dense forests. Analysts say that the United States does not have
sufficient forces in the Caribbean to prop up a Venezuelan government of
Washington’s choosing, despite Mr. Trump’s threats to do so.
And compared to the jubilation
that greeted U.S. troops on the streets of Baghdad after Saddam Hussein’s fall
in 2003, the roads of Caracas were chillingly silent on Saturday, save for a few
small demonstrations organized by the government to protest Mr. Maduro’s
ouster.
José Villalobos, a security guard
who was a strong supporter of Mr. Maduro’s predecessor, Hugo Chávez, who had
led the country’s socialist-inspired “Bolivarian revolution,” said that he had
cried when he heard of Mr. Maduro’s arrest.
“I’m afraid the revolution will
end and that the rich won’t want to help the poor anymore,” he said of the
movement spearheaded by Mr. Chávez.
Mr. Villalobos has been receiving
financial support from the Venezuelan government and from a community council,
he said, and he is worried about rising food prices.
“I know food is expensive and that
we’re struggling,” he said, “but I’m a revolutionary, and as Commander Chávez
said, nobody here surrenders.”
Many Venezuelans inside the
country may be too afraid to publicly cheer Mr. Maduro’s capture given the
uncertainty of what happens next. On Saturday, Ms. Rodríguez gave a speech
defiant of the Trump administration, saying that Mr. Maduro remained the “only
president” of Venezuela.
Regional threats also loom. A
prominent Colombian rebel group is active in the border region of Venezuela and
could destabilize the country if there is a power vacuum in Caracas, according
to former U.S. diplomats and analysts.
“What is the plan? Key regime
people are still in place,” Mr. Naranjo said, adding, “this lack of certainty
favors the regime that has been opposed to democracy, not the opposition that
has embraced democracy.”
Jan. 3, 2026, 9:05 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Miles G. Cohen
Reporting from Brooklyn
As the ousted Venezeulan
leader arrived in Brooklyn, law enforcement officers sprinted to a parking lot
behind the Metropolitan Detention Center where he will be held. Nearby, about 100
demonstrators, many draped in Venezuelan flags, cheered from behind police
barricades. Among them was Jaky Coronado, 45, who
arrived in the United States more than a year ago. She waited for four hours to
catch a glimpse of Maduro. “He must pay for all the crimes against humanity
that he has committed against the Venezuelan people,” she said.
Image
Jan. 3, 2026, 8:46 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
A helicopter carrying Nicolás
Maduro has landed in Brooklyn near the Metropolitan Detention Center, where he
will be held, according to a law enforcement official with knowledge of
Maduro’s movements but who was not authorized to speak about the matter
Jan. 3, 2026, 8:43 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Reporting from Mexico City
Maduro’s final plea: ‘No war. Yes
peace.’
Two nights before his capture,
Nicolás Maduro was driving around Caracas, making a plea to the American
public.
“The American people should know
that here they have a friend — a friendly, peaceful nation — and a friendly
government, too,” he said, looking into the camera during a New Year’s Eve interview with
a Spanish journalist, conducted as Mr. Maduro gave a tour by car of his
nation’s capital.
“Our message is very clear: ‘No
war. Yes peace,’” he added, offering a slogan in English that he had been
repeating for weeks. He then handed the journalist, Ignacio Ramonet,
a red hat in the style of the Make America Great Again cap with those same
words.
The hourlong drive on New Year’s
Eve was Mr. Maduro’s last known interview, broadcast on Venezuelan state
television just hours before American forces swooped
into Caracas and captured him, and it provided a final glimpse into the mind of
the Venezuelan autocrat as the U.S. military was pressing in.
As he steered a silver Toyota
S.U.V. with his wife, Cilia Flores, in the back seat, Mr. Maduro boasted about
his success running Venezuela and accused President Trump of devising pretexts
to invade his nation. Most of all, he made clear that he had no interest in a
fight.
“For Venezuela to be great, we
don’t have to hurt anyone,” he said. “Just like the United States. They want to
be ‘great again.’ Well, let them be great through hard work, effort, and a
commitment to peace — not through threats and war. Enough is enough.”
The line echoed Mr. Maduro’s
effort to cast himself as a peace-and-love president of sorts in recent months.
In rallies across Venezuela, he sang “Imagine”
by John Lennon, danced to a
techno beat paired with his peace slogan, and mimicked Bobby McFerrin in
his famous tune encouraging
listeners to relax.
In other words, if Winston
Churchill had “Keep Calm and Carry On”
in the face of a foreign threat, Mr. Maduro was trying “Don’t Worry, Be Happy.”
Mr. Maduro has also frequently
been defiant, however, saying that Venezuela would defend its homeland against
what he called imperial forces.
But in his New Year’s Eve
interview, even as the U.S. military had him in their sights, Mr. Maduro said
he was eager to make a deal.
“The U.S. government knows this
because we’ve told many of their officials,” he said. “If they want to have a
serious conversation about an antidrug agreement, we’re ready. If they want
Venezuelan oil, Venezuela is ready for U.S. investment — like with Chevron —
whenever, wherever, and however they want. People in the U.S. should know that
if they want comprehensive economic development agreements, Venezuela is right
here.”
Secretary of State Marco Rubio
questioned whether Mr. Maduro had actually been interested in a deal. “Nicolás
Maduro had multiple opportunities to avoid this,” he said in a news conference
on Saturday. “He was provided multiple very, very, very generous offers, and
chose instead to act like a wild man, chose instead to play around.”
Mr. Trump has repeatedly called
Mr. Maduro a cartel leader, and federal prosecutors on Saturday charged the
Venezuelan politician and his wife, Ms. Flores, with narco-terrorism and
conspiracy to import cocaine.
In his interview with Mr. Ramonet, Mr. Maduro rejected those accusations, instead
saying that his government had fought cartels from Colombia — with lethal
force, just like Mr. Trump. He said that Venezuelan forces had downed 431
aircraft trafficking drugs over its territory, though it was not clear over
what period of time he was referring to.
“Our model is effective, exemplary
and highly efficient,” he said. “Everything else you hear is just a narrative
that even people in the United States don’t believe.”
He said that the U.S. government
had invented the accusation that Mr. Maduro was a cartel leader to justify
invading Venezuela. “They can’t accuse me or Venezuela of having weapons of
mass destruction, or nuclear missiles, or chemical weapons, so they invented an
accusation that the U.S. government knows is just as false as the W.M.D. claims
that led them into an eternal war,” he said. “They know it’s a lie. I believe
we need to set all that aside and start talking seriously.”
Mr. Trump on Saturday said that he
had spoken to Mr. Maduro “a couple of times,” including last week. Mr. Maduro
denied reports of a more recent conversation, saying in the Wednesday interview
that he spoke with Mr. Trump once, on Nov. 21, in a 10-minute, “very
respectful” call.
“It was actually quite a pleasant
conversation, though the developments following that call have not been
pleasant,” he said. “We shall see. I leave everything in God’s hands.”
While the U.S. government was
already planning his capture, Mr. Maduro was pointing out attractions in
Caracas to Mr. Ramonet, a Spanish author who wrote
authorized biographies of Fidel Castro and Hugo Chávez, the dual leftist icons
of Cuba and Venezuela. There was the plaza where Mr. Castro had held a large
rally in 1959, the avenue that Mr. Chávez had filled during his campaign in
2012, and the statue holding aloft a Soviet flag.
Mr. Ramonet
said this was the 10th consecutive year that he had interviewed Mr. Maduro, and
that he had shown the successes of Mr. Maduro’s government that the
international media sought to hide.
“For the Western media, direct
democracy doesn’t exist” in Venezuela, Mr. Maduro replied. “I challenge them to
debate in any neighborhood in Caracas they want, with our people, not with me.
Let them debate the people, so they can see how a new democracy is being
built.”
Mr. Maduro’s government has for
years suppressed and censored journalists in Venezuela and helped control
state-media broadcasts.
As Mr. Maduro drove, he also
reminisced about his travels in the United States. “New York, Boston,
Baltimore, Philadelphia, New Jersey, Queens, Manhattan, Washington,” he said.
“I’ve driven there quite a bit. I told the U.S. President that: I know it well.”
On Saturday, Mr. Trump brought Mr.
Maduro back to New York. He was expected to be held at the Metropolitan
Detention Center in Brooklyn.
Mr. Maduro had something very
different in mind for 2026. He said in the final hours of 2025 that this year
would be about an important struggle.
“For 2026 — the year I’ve called
the Year of the Great Challenge — we will overcome the turmoil and
difficulties, and continue strengthening Venezuela as a country at peace,” he
said.
“I surrender it all to God,” he
added. “God knows what he’s doing.”
Jan. 3, 2026, 8:39 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Robert ChiaritoAdam Sella and Raúl Vilchis
Protests and celebrations in U.S.
cities follow Maduro’s capture.
Americans took to the streets of
Chicago and Washington on Saturday to protest the U.S. military intervention in
Venezuela, even as Venezuelan migrants in New York gathered to celebrate the
removal of Nicolás Maduro from power.
Holding signs that read “No Blood
for Oil,” “No U.S. War on Venezuela” and “Hands Off Latin America,” a crowd of
several hundred people gathered in Federal Plaza in Chicago as night fell. They
called the operation to remove Nicolás Maduro, the ousted Venezuelan leader, an
act of imperialism that Americans did not vote for, carried out without
required Congressional approval.
“I’m 37 and grew up with the Iraq
wars,” said Katrina Denny. “This morning, I was like, ‘Oh my God, we’re doing
it again.’”
She said she thought that protests
would grow if the Trump administration continued to use military force in
Venezuela. “They filled half the plaza tonight on short notice, but this is
only the beginning,” she said. “If this continues, I’m sure there will be many
more events and larger ones.”
Many protesters expressed
suspicion of the White House’s motives. “If Maduro wasn’t legally elected,
that’s not for us to say,” said Adela Cruz, 51. “It just seems like a ploy to
get oil.”
Jonny Bishop, 28, said he was worried
for the men and women in the military. “As someone who teaches high school, my
kids are the ones who may have to go to war,” he said, adding that with all of
the other problems facing Americans, “going to war is the last thing we need.”
After the rally in Federal Plaza,
the Chicago police allowed protesters to march up Dearborn Street to Wacker
Drive, near Trump Tower Chicago.
In Washington, people on both
sides of the issue gathered for separate afternoon rallies near the White
House.
At one of them, dozens of
opponents of the intervention chanted anti-Trump slogans. One of the
organizers, Morgan Artyukhina, 38, said their message
was “that this is a war that is being waged by the Trump administration, not
just in contravention of U.S. law and international law, but also, falsely in
the name of the American people.”
A few blocks away, a smaller group
celebrated the capture of Mr. Maduro by U.S. troops.
Draped in a Venezuelan flag,
Leonardo Angulo, 35, danced near a statue of Simón Bolivar, who helped free
Venezuela from Spanish imperial rule. Mr. Angulo, who has lived in the United
States for eight years, said he and his family came out “to celebrate, and
gather with my people, because we share this feeling, this feeling of joy, of
happiness, of hope most of all.”
Still, there was an undercurrent
of anxiety, which one person in the crowd attributed to concerns that federal
agents would appear and detain the Venezuelans present at the rally.
In New York, Venezuelan migrants
described a mix of euphoria, relief and guarded hope after years of exile.
Beatriz Hernández danced in Times
Square as a group of 100 gathered in Midtown, waving flags and calling family
members back home.
Ms. Hernández, 60, said the moment
felt transformative for the Venezuelan diaspora forced to emigrate because of
poverty and lack of freedom during Maduro’s administration.
“It’s a great joy, the news we
received,” said Ms. Hernández, who is originally from Maracaibo, Venezuela. “We
haven’t slept since 3 a.m. It’s almost 6 p.m. and I don’t think we’ll be
sleeping anytime soon because of the adrenaline.”
Ms. Hernández arrived in New York
four years ago after a long journey that she said included crossing the Darién Gap on
foot before reaching the U.S. border, where she requested asylum.
“The news is a hope of being able
to return safely to our country,” she said. “I think that now I will be able to
see my daughters who stayed there, and that in the not-too-distant future I
will be able to return to my country and hug my sister.”
Lucia Coronel, 30, who is
originally from Maracay, left Venezuela nine years ago and first emigrated to
Colombia. She arrived in New York, where she requested asylum, three years ago.
“Now I don’t care about asylum,”
Coronel said. “I feel a relief that opens up the possibility of returning to
our homes voluntarily and safely. We didn’t emigrate by choice, we emigrated
out of necessity.”
Other Venezuelans were more measured.
“We’ve gone through sadness and
joy,” said Kimberly Castillo, 32, who is also from Maracay. “Sadness because
nobody wants to see their country being bombed by another country. We are sad
about the people who were caught in the middle, but are joyous knowing now
there is the possibility for better times for my country.”
Robert Chiarito reported
from Chicago and Adam Sella from Washington, D.C.
Jan. 3, 2026, 8:10 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Venezuelan asylum seekers worry about
what comes next.
Alejandro Marcano
Santelli fled his home country in 2009 after receiving death threats. He had
worked for a news outlet that opposed the Venezuelan government and its
eventual leader, Nicolás Maduro, who was captured by the United States and
brought to New York on Saturday to face drug charges.
Mr. Marcano
Santelli, 57, who now lives in Miami, said a feeling of immense joy washed over
him when he heard the news of Mr. Maduro’s removal from Venezuela.
More than 15 years ago, he and his
family obtained asylum in the U.S. within days and, then, eventually,
citizenship. With Mr. Maduro in power, however, Mr. Marcano
Santelli had not been able to return to Venezuela, as his mother had lost her
memory and died. He has not seen his brother in nearly two decades.
Still, he realized that the
reaction in the community around him had been much more mixed, as the
immigration status of many Venezuelans, a majority of whom have entered the
United States in the past decade, has become increasingly tenuous.
“There is pain and happiness, but
above all, worry,” Mr. Marcano Santelli said.
Nearly eight million Venezuelans
have fled their troubled country, the largest exodus in Latin America’s modern
history and one of the largest crises of forced displacement in the world. As
of June 2025, about 1.1 million had come to live in United States, including
about 600,000 immigrants through a humanitarian program known as Temporary Protected Status.
Many Americans did not begin
paying attention to the plight of Venezuelans until migration levels reached
record heights under the Biden administration. As local and state officials
struggled to shelter and assist migrants in major cities and in overcrowded
shelters along the southern border, President Trump campaigned on the promise
of carrying out mass deportations of migrants.
Soon after taking office, Trump
administration officials moved to end T.P.S. protection for Venezuelans, a
decision the Supreme Court has allowed to stand for
now as litigation continues. After the shooting of two National Guard members
in Washington, D.C., the administration halted all asylum petitions and
immigration applications filed for immigrants from 19 countries. The affected
countries were those whose citizens it had restricted from travel to the United
States earlier in the year, including Venezuela.
Tricia McLaughlin, the Department
of Homeland Security’s assistant secretary, made clear in a statement to The
New York Times on Sunday, that the administration had no intention of restoring
the T.P.S. program, saying it had for decades “been abused, exploited, and
politicized as a de facto amnesty program.”
Ms. McLaughlin added that Kristi Noem, the homeland security secretary, “will use every
legal option at the Department’s disposal to end this chaos and prioritize the
safety of Americans.”
Speaking to Fox News Sunday, Ms. Noem said every Venezuelan T.P.S. holder “has the
opportunity to apply for refugee status” and that an evaluation would follow.
But the Trump administration last year set the refugee admission cap for fiscal year 2026 to
a historic low of no more than 7,500 refugees. The previous ceiling, set by the
Biden administration, was 125,000.
Trump administration officials
have framed the measures as efforts to combat fraud and abuse in the national
immigration system and to enhance national security. Immigration lawyers and
Venezuelan American leaders have countered that the moves have been tainted
with racial animus and sought to falsely cast a broad swath of the Venezuelan
diaspora as criminals and terrorists.
On Saturday, Mr. Trump repeated
familiar talking points, conflating immigration with crime and drug
trafficking, as he denounced gangs and criminal organizations that he said had
inflicted crime and terror in American cities.
“As I’ve said many times, the
Maduro regime emptied out their prisons, sent their worst and most violent
monsters into the United States to steal American lives,” Mr. Trump said. At
the same time, he added, among the most significant beneficiaries of the U.S.
operation would be those who “got thrown out of Venezuela that are now in the
United States.”
“Some want to stay, and some
probably want to go back,” he said.
Adelys Ferro, a founder of the
Venezuelan-American Caucus, a grass-roots group representing Venezuelan
interests in the United States, said that, as some Venezuelans were taking to
the streets to celebrate, some others were staying inside, worried about
immigration raids.
Despite entering the country under
humanitarian programs once considered safe and legal, their lives have been
thrust into uncertainty, Ms. Ferro said.
“We are victims of the Nicolás
Maduro regime, but we are also victims of the Trump administration policies,”
she said.
In a statement on Saturday, Eileen
Higgins, the newly elected mayor of Miami, called on the Trump administration
to reinstate the T.P.S. program, describing the decision to end it as “dangerous, reckless and wrong.”
Homeland Security officials did
not immediately respond to requests for comment about whether the
administration would raise the refugee cap as it
evaluates petitions from Venezuelan T.P.S. holders or whether T.P.S.
holders will be able to apply for the status from within the United States.
Under U.S. law, a person must apply from outside the country to be admitted as
a refugee.
Legal challenges to the Trump
administration’s efforts to rescind the T.P.S. program have been led by the
Center for Immigration Law and Policy at the U.C.L.A. School of Law. Ahilan T. Arulanantham, a lawyer
with the center, said the instability in Venezuela underscored why T.P.S.
holders should be allowed to remain in the United States.
Declarations entered in the case
say that Venezuelan T.P.S. holders pay taxes and contribute to Social Security,
and that they tend to hold jobs and to obtain higher education at greater rates
than the broader American population.
In Manhattan, José, a cook from
Venezuela, said that he had applied for asylum and T.P.S. as soon as he arrived
in the United States in 2022. His T.P.S. has expired, and his asylum case has
been pending in bogged-down immigration courts.
Since his last hearing in
December, he has had to wear an ankle monitor.
On Saturday, he said he was
feeling overjoyed that Mr. Maduro had been toppled, but that he was concerned
about what would come next in Venezuela. Mr. Maduro’s reign, for Venezuelans
inside and outside the country, elicits memories of food shortages, poor public
services and economic decline.
“We still don’t know what is going
to happen,” said José, who asked that only his first name be used for fear of
retaliation from immigration authorities. “I want to wait it out here.”
At a cafe in Queens on Saturday,
Rose Ramírez, 28, of Guárico, Venezuela, said she had been experiencing
indescribable emotions since videos of the bombing in her native country began
circulating overnight.
“If I had to choose one word to
describe this moment, I would say it’s one of great joy and hope that we will
have a more prosperous country,” said Ms. Ramírez, while caring for her
4-month-old son, who was in a stroller.
But Ms. Ramírez, who arrived in
New York a little over a year ago and was still seeking asylum, also said a new
period of uncertainty was now beginning.
“I think we will continue to be in
limbo,” she said. “I would like to think that there will now be better
cooperation and a better understanding of our legal situation here, but the
truth is that it will take time for order to be restored.”
Raúl Vilchis contributed
reporting.
Jan. 3, 2026, 7:44 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Rylee Kirk
Speaking to CBS News, Defense
Secretary Pete Hegseth said Americans will benefit
from the capture of Nicolás Maduro. “We can ensure that we have access to
additional wealth and resources, enabling a country to unleash that, without
having to spend American blood,” he said.
Jan. 3, 2026, 7:37 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Reporting from Doral, Fla.
Three Republican members of
Congress from South Florida, where many Venezuelans live, held a news conference
on Saturday praising the Trump administration’s capture of Nicolás Maduro.
Representative Maria Elvira Salazar said the United States was restoring
democracy in Venezuela and elsewhere. “We’re not an occupying power — we are a
liberating power,” she said. Representative Carlos A. Gimenez said the United
States has been ignoring the region for “far too long.” “Protecting
American lives,” he said. “Protecting American interests.”
Jan. 3, 2026, 7:20 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Nicolás Maduro, the ousted
president of Venezuela, arrived in New York City by helicopter just before 7
p.m. on Saturday, according to a law enforcement official briefed on on Maduro’s movements but not authorized to speak publicly
about the matter. The helicopter touched down at a heliport along the Hudson
River near 31st Street, on the west side of Manhattan.
Jan. 3, 2026, 7:26 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
After the helicopter arrived, a
procession of vehicles flashing emergency lights headed downtown on the West
Side Highway, which had been closed to southbound traffic.
Jan. 3, 2026, 7:17 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
In wake of U.S. strike, Venezuelan
paramilitaries barely hit the street.
Groups of armed civilians known as
colectivos have long been known to support the
leftist Venezuelan government — often with violence — but it was unclear on Saturday
what role the paramilitaries would take to support the ousted president.
In the early hours of Saturday,
groups of armed men in civilian clothes had begun to appear on the streets in
Caracas, but not in large numbers.
Several men in civilian clothes
were seen just after daybreak guarding the Gen. Francisco de Miranda air base
outside of Caracas when the airstrikes hit. The men did not allow photographers
to work in the area.
Later, Venezuelan soldiers, who
allowed photographs, guarded the post.
Two pickup trucks filled with men
wearing vests and civilian clothes, carrying gas cans as well as long weapons
and handguns, were seen unloading outside the Centro Ciudad Comercial
Tamanaco, a shopping mall near the air base that had
been hit hours earlier. And in Cumaná, Sucre, a state
about 250 miles east of Caracas, one resident reported seeing a caravan of colectivo members drive by, which sowed fear in the
community.
Experts said it was notable that
the thousands of armed men dispersed throughout the country seemed to be
keeping a relatively low profile. However, the colectivos
are often used to repress protests, and very few Venezuelans left their homes
in the wake of the airstrikes Saturday.
Government officials who are still
in power are probably eager to show the Trump administration that they can
maintain order, and do not want images of chaos in the streets, said Alejandro
Velasco, a Latin America historian at New York University, who is Venezuelan.
Their only bargaining chip to stay in power is the ability to keep the peace,
he said.
“I have to imagine colectivos have been given the order to lay low,” Mr.
Velasco said.
Venezuela has long used the armed
civilians to fight back against protesters. They have been
known to work alongside police or military forces with no consequences for the
excessive or even fatal force often used.
Their precise numbers are
impossible to ascertain, but there are at least thousands of them throughout
the country, Mr. Velasco said. They are funded by the government and often
maintain public-sector jobs, although their true missions are as enforcers.
When protesters hit the streets in
large numbers last summer after the Maduro administration announced that it had
won the elections — contrary to what poll watchers had tallied — colectivos were unleashed throughout the country to repress
protesters.
They originated as pro-government
community organizations that have long been a part of the landscape of leftist
Venezuelan politics. Experts say the civilians are essentially state-sanctioned
paramilitaries, often used to fight back against protests, whether by students,
labor unions or others.
The groups date back to the early
days of President Hugo Chávez, who conceived them as social organizations to
advance his vision of a socialist revolution to transform Venezuela’s poor
neighborhoods.
About 300 colectivo
members gathered Saturday afternoon at a pro-government rally a few blocks from
Miraflores, the presidential palace. Several speakers went up on a stage to
denounce the attack.
By early afternoon, they had yet
to come out in large numbers throughout the city — particularly since no
Venezuelans were in the streets to support the U.S. attack.
President Nicolás Maduro of
Venezuela has low approval ratings, and it was unlikely that he had enough
support outside the colectivos to show force on the
streets, as Mr. Chávez did when he was briefly ousted in 2002, according to a
leading human rights activist who spoke anonymously to avoid reprisals.
On Saturday, the colectivos appeared to have been deployed only at the
organized rallies that government supporters held in several locations, he
said.
Jan. 3, 2026, 7:13 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Genevieve Glatsky and Annie Correal
Reporting from Bogotá, Colombia,
and Mexico City
The United States unsealed
an indictment on
Saturday against Venezuela’s president, Nicolás Maduro, that charges him with
narco-terrorism and conspiracy to import cocaine.
The four-count indictment also
charges Mr. Maduro’s wife, his son, two high-ranking Venezuelan officials and
an alleged leader of the Tren de Aragua group, a gang
that the Trump administration designated as a terrorist
organization last year. President Trump has said that Tren de Aragua operates in conjunction with Mr. Maduro’s
government, a conclusion that U.S. intelligence agencies have contradicted.
The indictment states that Mr.
Maduro and his allies worked for decades with major drug trafficking groups to
move large quantities of cocaine to the United States.
It follows months of a steadily
escalating pressure campaign against Mr. Maduro, which culminated in his
capture by the U.S. military in Caracas, the Venezuelan capital. He arrived in
New York on Saturday afternoon and will be flown in a helicopter to Manhattan
for prosecution.
The pressure campaign began in
September with lethal attacks by U.S. forces on small vessels that the Trump
administration has said were carrying drugs from Venezuela to the United
States. The administration has justified the attacks by saying the United
States was in an armed conflict with drug cartels and vowed to destroy trafficking
networks. Many experts say these strikes are illegal.
President Trump has asserted that
the campaign is targeting drugs killing Americans, but most U.S. overdoses
involve fentanyl, which doesn’t come from South America, experts say.
Fentanyl, which causes tens of
thousands of overdoses per year, is almost entirely produced in Mexico using
chemicals from China, according to U.S. authorities, and
Venezuela plays no known role in its trade, nor does any other South American
country.
The indictment unsealed Saturday
focuses almost entirely on Venezuela’s decades-long role in the cocaine trade.
It accuses Mr. Maduro and co-conspirators of working closely with some of the
region’s largest drug trafficking groups, in Colombia and in Mexico. They
include groups such as the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia, known by its
Spanish acronym FARC, and the Sinaloa Cartel, which are also designated by the
United States as terrorist organizations.
Experts, however, have said
Venezuela is not a major drug producer and have described it as a minor cocaine
transit country, with most of the cocaine flowing through Venezuela heading to
Europe, not the United States.
The majority of the cocaine bound
for the United States is believed to move not through the Caribbean but through
the Pacific, according to data from Colombia, the United States and the United Nations.
Venezuela does not have a Pacific Coast.
While the indictment states that
Venezuela was shipping 200 to 250 metric tons of cocaine a year by around 2020,
that represents only about 10 percent to 13 percent of the global cocaine
trade. Other countries play a much larger role. In 2018, 1,400 metric tons
passed through Guatemala, according to U.S. data.
There is evidence that Mr. Maduro
has benefited from the drug trade to stay in power. Both the indictment and
experts say he also used profits from drug trafficking to secure the loyalty of
military officials and leaders in his party.
Jan. 3, 2026, 7:02 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
At least 40 people were killed in
the U.S. attack on Venezuela early Saturday, including military personnel and
civilians, according to a senior Venezuelan official who spoke on condition of
anonymity to describe preliminary reports.
President Trump, speaking on Fox
News on Saturday, said that no American troops had been killed. He suggested,
however, that some service members had been injured. Gen. Dan Caine, the
chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said later in the day at a news
conference at Mar-a-Lago with Mr. Trump that U.S. helicopters moving to extract
President Nicolás Maduro and his wife had come under fire. He said that one
helicopter had been hit but “remained flyable,” and that all U.S. aircraft
“came home.”
About half a dozen soldiers were
injured in the overall operation to capture Mr. Maduro, according to two U.S.
officials, who spoke on the condition of anonymity.
In the immediate aftermath of the
U.S. attack, details began to emerge of the death of a Venezuelan civilian in
Catia La Mar, a low-income coastal area just west of the Caracas airport.
There, an airstrike hit a three-story civilian apartment complex and knocked
out an exterior wall early Saturday as U.S. forces assaulted the city.
The strike killed Rosa González,
80, her family said, and seriously wounded a second person.
In the afternoon, a government
investigator was present in the area of the strike, interviewing witnesses and
picking up projectiles.
Wilman González, Ms. Gonzalez’s nephew,
said he ducked when heard the strike at about 2 a.m. but nearly lost an eye. He
had three stitches on the side of his face.
Mr. González, who appeared numb
hours later, showed journalists where the U.S. ordnance had hit. Asked where he
would go now that he lost his home, he said simply, “I don’t know.” He spoke
little as he bent down and searched for whatever valuables he could salvage. He
picked up an old umbrella and carried a set of drawers.
The strike left the interior of an
apartment exposed to the public. Among the wreckage was a portrait of
Venezuelan independence hero Simón Bolívar that looked like it had been riddled
with shrapnel.
One neighbor, a 70-year-old man
named Jorge who declined to give his last name, said he lost everything in the
airstrike.
Several people were gathered
outside on Saturday afternoon while others searched what remained of their
apartments. Most were barely speaking.
Some of the residents outside were
praying. Others were angry.
One man, who gave his name as
Javier, blamed greed for the attack on Venezuela, an apparent reference to the
Trump administration’s stated desire to let American companies take control of Venezuelan
oil fields. The lives of people like him, he said, meant nothing.
The residents said that four men
had tried to rescue Ms. González after the airstrike. They carried her onto a
motorbike and took her to a hospital, but she was declared dead on arrival.
Another woman was also taken to
the hospital; residents were later told that she had survived, but was in
critical condition.
Frances
Robles and Mariana Martínez contributed reporting.
Jan. 3, 2026, 6:39 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Reporting from Stewart Air
National Guard Base in New York
A small group of protesters
gathered at the edge of the Stewart Air National Guard Base. One boy had a
Venezuelan flag draped around his shoulders as the group watched for any sign
of ousted President Nicolás Maduro, who had arrived earlier. Alexander Silva,
36, a warehouse worker from Newburgh, N.Y., who fled Venezuela in 2022, brought
his family to witness history. “I wanted them to see that this really had
happened,” Silva said in Spanish, “that the dictatorship had been demolished.”
Jan. 3, 2026, 6:36 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
A pardon and a prosecution in New
York show Trump’s personal geopolitics.
Two Latin American strongmen were
charged in Manhattan with corrupting their governments, using state power to
import hundreds of tons of cocaine into the United States.
One, the former president of
Honduras, Juan Orlando Hernández, was abruptly pardoned by President
Trump last month.
The other, President Nicolás
Maduro of Venezuela, was captured on Saturday in a military raid that Secretary
of State Marco Rubio characterized as a law enforcement operation. Mr. Maduro
was brought to the United States to face fresh allegations of narco-terrorism.
The divergent fates of the two men
accused of similar crimes by the same prosecutor’s office underscore the way
President Trump and his aides are using the federal justice system to conduct a highly personalized geopolitics.
Mr. Trump, when asked on Saturday
about his December pardon of Mr. Hernández in light of the operation against
Mr. Maduro, made no attempt to disguise his feelings about Mr. Hernández: He
saw himself in the imprisoned president.
“The man that I pardoned was, if
you could equate it to us, he was treated like the Biden administration treated
a man named Trump,” Mr. Trump said, adding, “This was a man who was persecuted
very unfairly. He was the head of the country.”
The contradiction prompted an
outcry from the president’s political opponents. “You cannot credibly argue
that drug trafficking charges demand invasion in one case, while issuing a
pardon in another,” Senator Mark Warner, Democrat of Virginia, said in a
statement on Saturday.
The U.S. attorney’s office for the
Southern District of New York has long been the most prominent federal
prosecutor’s office in the country and for years was known for its independence
from Washington. It took on Wall Street, prosecuted high-ranking political
officials from both parties and, in 2022, charged the ex-president of Honduras
in what authorities would later characterize as “one of the largest and most
violent drug-trafficking conspiracies in the world.”
Two years later, prosecutors asked
a judge to ensure that Mr. Hernández died in prison, saying that he had abused
his power, had connections to violent traffickers and was responsible for the
“unfathomable destruction” cocaine had caused in the United States. Mr. Trump
pardoned him nonetheless.
“Trump thinks he can use federal
criminal prosecutions for any purpose, which is to say to promote his foreign
policy views, to promote his vendettas, to promote his self-interest and to
promote his perceived political interests,” said Bruce Green, a former federal
prosecutor who teaches legal ethics at Fordham Law School in New York.
Mr. Rubio, asked about the contradiction on ABC
News on Sunday, referred questions to the White House, given
that he was not involved in the pardon of Mr. Hernández.
“The president outlined yesterday
that he felt that in that particular case there was unfairness,” Mr. Rubio
said.
Pushed by the anchor, George
Stephanopoulos, who emphasized Mr. Hernández’s conviction by a jury, Mr. Rubio
appeared to grow frustrated. He said again he was not involved. When Mr.
Stephanopoulos asked whether he supported the pardon, Mr. Rubio declined to comment,
again citing his lack of familiarity with the specifics of the case.
Both the Hernández and Maduro
cases began as Drug Enforcement Administration investigations around 2010, were
investigated by the same D.E.A. unit and were handled by the same investigative
unit in the Southern District.
Each prosecution was led at various stages by Emil
Bove III, who eventually rose to lead the office’s
terrorism and international narcotics unit. After leaving the office, Mr. Bove
became a criminal defense lawyer for Mr. Trump and then a top Justice
Department official. He is now a judge on the United States Court of Appeals
for the Third Circuit.
The factual similarities in the
cases are striking. It is not just that the charges resemble one another;
prosecutors also accused both men of overseeing key way stations in the same
hemispheric trade.
Taken together, the indictments
provide a bird’s-eye view of the supply chain that for years has brought
processed cocaine from Colombia and Venezuela to shipment points in Honduras
and, ultimately, to the United States.
Mr. Hernández was charged in 2022
with conspiring to import cocaine into the United States and using machine guns
as part of that conspiracy. The charges unveiled against Mr. Maduro on Saturday
also include a cocaine importation conspiracy and possession of machine guns as
part of it. The combination of the trafficking and gun charges makes the
potential penalties in such prosecutions more severe.
In 2020, Mr. Maduro was one of six
defendants charged with participating in a narco-terrorism conspiracy, with
prosecutors accusing him of leading a drug-trafficking organization known as Cártel de los Soles. Venezuelans have used the phrase for
years, a reference to a sun insignia that high-ranking Venezuelan military
personnel wear on their uniforms.
Mr. Maduro, that indictment said,
“coordinated foreign affairs with Honduras and other countries to facilitate
large-scale drug-trafficking.” The newly unsealed indictment was even more
specific, saying that the shipment points in Honduras — as well as in Guatemala
and Mexico — relied on a “culture of corruption,” in which traffickers paid off
politicians for protection and help.
One of those politicians,
prosecutors persuaded a jury, was Mr. Hernández. Jurors in 2024 convicted him
of having received millions from drug-trafficking organizations throughout the
region.
When Mr. Hernández was extradited,
Tegucigalpa, the Honduran capital, erupted in celebration, and, after his
conviction, expatriates rejoiced outside the Manhattan courthouse. But after
pardoning Mr. Hernández last month, Mr. Trump defended the decision, saying it
was the will of Hondurans.
“The people of Honduras really thought
he was set up, and it was a terrible thing,” he said.
Mr. Hernández’s wife has said he
would not immediately return to Honduras, where authorities have issued a warrant for his arrest.
David Smilde,
a professor at Tulane University in New Orleans who has studied Venezuela for
decades and lived in the country part-time until last year, said that the
prosecution of Mr. Maduro might be perceived differently by the eight million
Venezuelans who live outside the country, compared with the roughly 30 million
who are still there.
The diaspora, he said, might
thrill to the prosecution, viewing Mr. Maduro as a Saddam Hussein-like figure
whose capture could bring an end to the Venezuelan regime.
People who live in the country,
Mr. Smilde said, were likely to be less moved, given
that several Venezuelans were
prosecuted in recent years, only to be returned to their home countries by the Biden
administration. They include two nephews of Mr. Maduro’s wife who were
convicted on drug charges in 2015 but released in exchange for Americans.
“With the U.S. justice system and
its inconsistency in recent years, it’s not as big a deal as it used to be,”
Mr. Smilde said.
Jan. 3, 2026, 6:32 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
National Security reporter
Ousted President Nicolás Maduro
and his wife were transferred to the United States on Saturday via the U.S.
Navy base at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, where the F.B.I. had a government plane
waiting to take them to Stewart Air National Guard Base north of New York City,
according to a U.S. official familiar with the operation who was not authorized
by the White House to speak publicly.
Jan. 3, 2026, 6:23 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Zolan Kanno-Youngs and David E. Sanger
White House reporter
In toppling Maduro, Trump risks
blowback from his ‘America First’ base.
For months, a significant segment
of President Trump’s political base has been complaining that
he has spent far too much time on foreign policy — seeking a Ukraine deal and
addressing a long list of other conflicts he claims to have settled — and too
little on America’s economic anxieties.
His announcement on Saturday that
the United States had captured Venezuela’s leader and would “run” the country
for an indefinite period is adding fuel to that fire. As the scope of the
operation was becoming clear on Saturday, critics said Mr. Trump risked getting
the United States into the kind of open-ended conflict that he had railed
against for years.
“This is what many in MAGA thought
they voted to end,” Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, a former Trump ally
turned critic, posted on social media. “Boy were we
wrong.”
Mr. Trump, who has pledged to
cease “endless wars” and reduce the number of American troops overseas, left
open the prospect of deployment to Venezuela — something that he has spoken of only vaguely in the
past. Speaking to reporters, he said the United States was
“not afraid of boots on the ground,” adding that the administration planned to
have a military presence in the nation “as it pertains to oil.”
“We’re going to rebuild the oil
infrastructure,” Mr. Trump said in comments that stunned some Republicans who
questioned how the vague plans squared with a commitment to refrain from
military intervention and regime change. “We’re going to run it properly and
make sure the people of Venezuela are taken care of.”
Mr. Trump in the past has risked
alienating his base over military action, particularly in the run-up to his
Iran strikes in June. Yet the targets in Iran were three underground nuclear
sites, enabling Mr. Trump to launch a high-risk bombing raid from the other
side of the world, bury the stockpiles of uranium and return home. The uproar
died down.
What happened in Caracas, however,
was different.
Mr. Trump decapitated the
Venezuelan government and made no secret of the fact that the United States
planned to pull the strings.
“We’re going to run the country
right,” Mr. Trump said on Saturday. “It’s going to be run very judiciously,
very fairly. It’s going to make a lot of money.”
With those words, Mr. Trump
adopted a version of what former Secretary of State Colin Powell used to call
the “Pottery Barn rule,” which boils down to you-break-it-you-bought-it. That
did not necessarily mean a standing U.S. military force in Venezuela, similar
to what the United States kept in Iraq and Afghanistan. But it did suggest
continuing political intervention, with at least the threat of a military
backup.
Mr. Trump said on Saturday that his
administration was “prepared to do a second wave” after the first attack in
Venezuela, but for now it was not necessary.
Matthew Bartlett, a Republican
strategist and former State Department official under Mr. Trump, said the plan
to run Venezuela was “just jaw dropping.”
“That is not something that the
president has laid out, certainly during the campaign and even during the last
few months,” Mr. Bartlett said.
Ultimately, the extent of any
backlash may depend on what happens next.
“This is the difficult part,” said
Dave Carney, a Republican strategist who ran Preserve America, a pro-Trump
super PAC. “Nobody wants a quagmire. Nobody wants, you know, body bags coming
back to Dover of American solders who are being
sniped at from, you know, a rebellious minority in Venezuela.”
“If it goes on for three years, it
will be negative,” Mr. Carney said. But if the presence in Venezuela lasts
months, Mr. Trump “will be celebrated.”
In Florida, home to the largest
Venezuelan community in the United States, many did in fact respond to the
capture of Venezuela’s leader, Nicolás Maduro, by celebrating in the streets.
And many Republicans appeared ready to stand by Mr. Trump, including Senator
Mike Lee of Utah, who initially seemed critical of the operation.
Mr. Lee later said in a social
media post that after speaking to Secretary of State Marco Rubio he believed
the military action “we saw tonight was deployed to protect and defend those
executing the arrest warrant” of Mr. Maduro.
The operation in Venezuela was
also met with support from the foreign policy hawks that have long been a
target of the MAGA movement.
“I’m grateful to the U.S.
personnel who carried out orders in harm’s way,” said Senator Mitch McConnell,
Republican of Kentucky. “A free, democratic and stable Venezuela, led by
Venezuelans, is in America’s national security interests.”
Mr. Trump’s aides have said that
military action against Venezuela is aligned with his campaign promises by
arguing that Mr. Maduro fueled domestic crises in the United States, including
gang violence and a surge of drug overdoses caused by fentanyl.
The fentanyl that fueled America’s
overdose crisis is, however, manufactured in Mexican labs using chemicals from
China. The U.S. intelligence community also earlier this year undercut Mr.
Trump’s claim that Mr. Maduro sent members of the Tren
de Aragua gang to the United States, saying that the gang was not controlled by
the Venezuelan leader.
Laura Loomer,
the far-right activist and Trump ally who supported the Iran attack, joined
Tucker Carlson and others in opposing the operation in Venezuela, maintaining
that Americans will ultimately pay the price.
“Maybe soon we will see an invasion
of Venezuela so that” Maria Corina Machado, the Venezuelan opposition leader
who won the Nobel Peace Prize in 2025, “can assume power in a country she will
never be able to run without U.S. assistance.” The result, Ms. Loomer said, would be to pave the way for China, among
others, to gain a deeper foothold.
Such views get to a central
argument: Who owns the definition of America First?
Mr. Trump, who first played with
the term in a New York Times interview in 2016, has said that he invented it —
he didn’t — and therefore he gets to define it. Some of his MAGA faithful
clearly believe otherwise.
But at the core of the dispute is
the fact that Mr. Trump is no isolationist, even if many of his backers are.
The person who could face future
political ramifications of a prolonged military presence in Venezuela is Vice
President JD Vance, who is widely thought to be Mr. Trump’s heir to the MAGA
movement. He was not present at Mr. Trump’s news conference on Saturday.
Mr. Vance, who monitored the
operation in Venezuela by video conference, has in the past pushed for military
restraint.
“No more undefined missions; no
more open-ended conflicts,” Mr. Vance told a graduating class at the U.S. Naval
Academy earlier this year.
On Saturday, Mr. Vance expressed
support for the military intervention.
“The president offered multiple
off-ramps, but was very clear throughout this process: The drug trafficking
must stop, and the stolen oil must be returned to the United States,” Mr. Vance
said on social media. “Maduro is the newest person to find out that President
Trump means what he says.”
Whether all of Mr. Trump’s
supporters agree may be another matter.
Jan. 3, 2026, 6:05 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
William K. Rashbaum and Benjamin Weiser
Maduro is expected to make his first
court appearance in Manhattan.
The cases of Nicolás Maduro, the
Venezuelan president, and his wife will move on Monday from the secretive realm
of military special operations into the mundane world of Federal District Court
in Lower Manhattan, where at noon they are to stand before a judge and face
charges of drug-trafficking conspiracy and other crimes.
Their appearance will be the first
step in what undoubtedly will be a yearslong
prosecution, after a stunning change of scene from Mr. Maduro’s presidential
palace in Caracas to the grim and grimy reality of pretrial detention in a
Brooklyn federal jail.
Because of the extraordinary
nature of the case, what happens next will be predictable in some ways, and
perhaps far less so in others.
The arraignment on Monday will
occur before the presiding judge in the case, Alvin K. Hellerstein, and Mr.
Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, are expected to enter pleas of not guilty.
The judge will almost certainly order them detained. And it could be well over
a year before a jury is seated to weigh the evidence against them.
But the prosecution of a leader of
a sovereign nation snatched from his country in a highly choreographed military
operation will most likely lead to arguments seldom heard in an American
courtroom. Mr. Maduro’s lawyers might challenge, for example, the legality of
his arrest and removal to the United States. They also could argue that as
Venezuela’s leader, he is immune from prosecution.
What to
Expect
Such initial hearings are often
brief. Although the proceedings can vary, the judge will advise Mr. Maduro and
Ms. Flores of their rights and ask how they plead.
The indictment released
on Saturday charges Mr. Maduro with narco-terrorism conspiracy and conspiracy
to import cocaine, among other counts. Ms. Flores is charged in the
cocaine conspiracy. The charges carry stiff sentences if the defendants are
convicted.
At the hearing, a prosecutor
typically summarizes the evidence, such as recordings, documents and other
materials seized in searches. There may be discussion of what kinds of motions
the defense will file to challenge the government’s case.
The judge is likely to address the
issue of pretrial detention, and under the circumstances, almost certainly will
order that the defendants be held without bond pending trial. The defense can
also raise concerns about conditions at the Metropolitan Detention
Center, a troubled lockup that has held other
high-profile detainees.
And the judge will ask the
prosecutors and the defense lawyers how much time they will need to prepare for
trial.
The Setting
The case will play out in the
Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States Court House, an imposing 27-story tower
of granite, marble and oak on the edge of Chinatown. Security is always tight
in and around the building, and Mr. Maduro’s presence there will doubtless
bring a marked increase.
The court is part of the Southern
District of New York, which has been the site of trials of accused terrorists,
Mafia figures and corrupt politicians. A former Honduran president, Juan
Orlando Hernández, was extradited to New York in 2022 and tried and convicted
two years later in the courthouse. (Mr. Hernández was pardoned recently
by President Trump.)
The Players
Prosecutors with the U.S.
attorney’s office for the Southern District, led by Jay Clayton, will handle
the case of Mr. Maduro and Ms. Flores. It is being prosecuted by assistant U.S.
attorneys assigned to the office’s National Security and International
Narcotics Unit. The charges stemmed from a lengthy and
extensive investigation by the U.S. Drug Enforcement
Administration.
Defense lawyers play a pivotal
role in any criminal case. But because the Maduro prosecution is sure to raise
difficult and complex issues — from the legality of his arrest to sovereign
immunity to disputes over the possible role of classified evidence — his choice
of lawyers and the strategy they chart will be crucial.
It is unclear who will represent
Mr. Maduro and Ms. Flores. .
Judge Hellerstein, 92, was
appointed to the federal bench in 1998 by President Bill Clinton and recently
presided over President Trump’s attempts to move
his Manhattan criminal conviction into federal court, a
matter that is still pending.
The Stakes
For the government, the stakes of
the prosecution of Mr. Maduro could hardly be higher. The Trump administration
has made it clear that it went to extraordinary lengths to
capture him in Caracas and bring him to New York to face
trial, unleashing the full might of the U.S. military.
And the case is interwoven with
aspects of President Trump’s domestic and foreign policies —
which, like the attack Saturday morning,
have come under harsh criticism.
His focus on immigration has
leaned heavily into a narrative that frequently cites the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua —
which Mr. Trump has tied to Mr. Maduro — as one of the reasons to pursue mass
deportations. At the same time, the administration has pointed to the gang to
justify its campaign of deadly military strikes on small boats in the Caribbean
Sea and eastern Pacific Ocean that it says are hauling drugs linked to
Venezuela. The administration has designated Tren de
Aragua as a foreign terrorist organization.
While Mr. Trump has said that Tren de Aragua operates in conjunction with Mr. Maduro’s
government, it is a conclusion that U.S. intelligence agencies have
contradicted.
At stake for Mr. Maduro is his
freedom. If convicted, he could face between 30 years and life in prison.
Jan. 3, 2026, 5:48 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Reporting from Bogotá, Colombia
Who is Cilia Flores, the power broker
first lady captured alongside Maduro?
When news broke that the United
States had captured and indicted Venezuela’s longtime authoritarian president,
Nicolás Maduro, another name appeared alongside his that left some observers
puzzled: his wife’s, Cilia Flores.
Far more than a first lady, Ms.
Flores is one of Venezuela’s most powerful political figures. She built
extraordinary influence over decades while largely operating from the shadows.
Ms. Flores shaped a judicial system in which nearly every major decision ran
through her and embedded state institutions with relatives and loyalists,
according to journalists, analysts and former officials. At the same time, they
noted, her family amassed vast, unexplained wealth.
A lawyer from a lower middle class background, Ms. Flores began her political rise
in the 1990s, becoming close to Hugo Chávez — the former president who was Mr.
Maduro’s mentor and predecessor — while he was imprisoned after a failed coup
attempt in 1992. She steadily climbed the ranks of Chávez’s socialist movement,
known as chavismo, becoming a central figure in
Venezuela’s legislature.
Ms. Flores and Mr. Maduro have
been partners since at least the late 1990s, when both were lawmakers. They
married in 2013, the year he became president. After Mr. Chávez’s death, she
was widely seen as critical to consolidating and sustaining Mr. Maduro’s hold
on power, bringing a loyal political base and deep institutional influence.
Within chavismo,
she commands both respect and fear, said Roberto Deniz, a Venezuelan
investigative journalist who has reported extensively on the Flores family.
“She is a fundamental figure in
corruption in Venezuela — absolutely fundamental — and especially in the
structure of power,” said Zair Mundaray,
who worked a senior prosecutor under both Mr. Chávez and Mr. Maduro. “Many
people consider her far more astute and shrewd than
Maduro himself.”
In an interview published
in the Spanish newspaper La Vanguardia in 2013, Ms.
Flores called herself a “combatant” and defended hiring relatives.
“My family got in based on their
own merits,” she said. “I am proud of them, and I will defend their work as
many times as necessary.”
Though she stopped holding formal
government posts after 2013, Ms. Flores retained immense behind-the-scenes
authority. She is often described as a key architect of Mr. Maduro’s political
survival.
“Within chavismo
itself, they know the real power that Cilia Flores has, more so than perhaps
the general public,” Mr. Deniz said.
Ms. Flores is also widely believed
to wield decisive influence over Venezuela’s justice system. Many judges and
senior officials are thought to be loyal to her or have been placed through her
networks. The judiciary is considered thoroughly politicized, having failed to
issue a single ruling against the state in more than two decades.
“It is a completely politicized,
flawed, corrupt judicial system, and Cilia Flores bears a great deal of
responsibility for what the Venezuelan judicial system has become,” Mr. Deniz
said.
Investigative journalists have
documented extensive corruption involving the Maduro-Flores family, including
misuse of public funds and business links with sanctioned foreign businessmen.
One investigation showed the family effectively taking over an entire street of
luxury homes in Caracas, the country’s capital.
A federal indictment unsealed on
Saturday charged Ms. Flores, along with her husband and son, with collaborating
with drug traffickers.
“She has been basically
co-governing the country since he came to power, and in many ways is the
strategy or power behind the throne,” said Risa Grais-Targow,
the Latin America director for Eurasia Group, a political risk consultancy.
“She’s been key to his staying power, but also now his downfall as well.”
Jan. 3, 2026, 5:33 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Mariana Martinez
Reporting from Caracas,
Venezuela
At least 40 people were killed in
Saturday’s attack on Venezuela, including military personnel and civilians,
according to a senior Venezuelan official who spoke on condition of anonymity
to describe preliminary reports.
Jan. 3, 2026, 5:15 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
How Democrats are hitting Trump over
his ouster of Maduro.
Prominent Democrats both in and
outside of Congress were quick to criticize President Trump’s attack on
Venezuela on Saturday.
Out of power and lacking a clear
leader, some of the most influential Democrats are among those considered a
loose group of potential 2028 presidential contenders, a half dozen of whom had
weighed in on Mr. Trump’s actions on social media and in television interviews
within hours of his move to capture Nicolás Maduro, the Venezuelan president.
Most tied Mr. Trump’s overseas
intervention with his domestic woes, suggesting the president was seeking to
distract from crises at home.
“It’s not about drugs,”
Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York wrote on social media,
adding, “It’s about oil and regime change. And they need a trial now to pretend
that it isn’t. Especially to distract from Epstein +
skyrocketing health care costs.”
Pete Buttigieg, a 2020
presidential candidate and the transportation secretary in the Biden
administration, wrote that Mr. Trump was following an “old and obvious pattern.
An unpopular president — failing on the economy and losing his grip on power at
home — decides to launch a war for regime change abroad.”
Gov. JB Pritzker of Illinois and
Senator Chris Murphy of Connecticut centered their criticisms on affordability,
a word that
Democrats have seized upon to hammer Mr. Trump as the cost of living remains a
top issue heading into this year’s midterm elections.
“Donald Trump’s unconstitutional
military action in Venezuela is putting our troops in harm’s way with no
long-term strategy,” Mr. Pritzker wrote. “The American people deserve a
president focused on making their lives more affordable.”
Mr. Murphy wrote that the boost in military spending included
in Mr. Trump’s domestic policy bill last summer was “so he could invade and run
Venezuela.” The president paid for it, Mr. Murphy charged, “by throwing
millions of actual Americans off their health care and taking food assistance
from millions of hungry kids” — a reference to the cuts to Medicaid and food
stamps included in the bill.
Senators Mark Kelly and Ruben
Gallego of Arizona, both military veterans with national profiles, also weighed
in. Mr. Kelly, a combat pilot in the Persian Gulf war of 1991, called Mr.
Maduro a “brutal, illegitimate dictator,” but warned that “if we learned
anything from the Iraq war, it’s that dropping bombs or toppling a leader
doesn’t guarantee democracy, stability or make Americans safer.”
Mr. Gallego referenced his time
fighting in the Iraq War as a Marine, writing that this was the “second
unjustified war in my lifetime.”
“The American people have been
very clear: They do not want to be occupiers again and they do not want to be
the world police,” he said in an interview on Fox News.
Representative Ro Khanna of
California sent a fund-raising message off the news, blasting Mr. Trump in an
email calling for “no more dumb wars” and asking recipients to share their
contact information in a petition rejecting war with Venezuela.
On social media, he wrote that the
“times call for a movement of the American people to stand against bloated
defense budgets and warmongering.”
Hours later, Mr. Khanna threw a
dagger at prominent Democrats who had not spoken out: “The silence from many
media-hyped 2028 contenders today is shocking. If you cannot oppose this regime
change war for oil, you don’t have the moral clarity or guts to lead our party
or nation.”
Jan. 3, 2026, 5:12 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Reporting from Stewart Air
National Guard Base in New York
A plane slowly taxied down the
runway at Stewart Air National Guard Base outside New York City in the fading
light Saturday. News crews filmed the arrival from the side of a snow covered airfield. After it stopped, people wearing
jackets emblazoned with the F.B.I surrounded a staircase leading to one of the
plane’s exits.
Jan. 3, 2026, 5:03 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
The ousted Venezuelan president,
Nicolás Maduro, and his wife will be flown in a helicopter to Manhattan,
according to a law enforcement source briefed on the security plan to bring
Maduro to the United States. From there, Maduro will be driven to the U.S. Drug
Enforcement Administration’s New York City headquarters in Manhattan. Then he
will be taken by helicopter to Brooklyn and driven to the Metropolitan
Detention Center. He is expected to be held there.
Jan. 3, 2026, 5:00 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
William Rashbaum
The plane carrying the ousted
president of Venezuela, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, has landed in the United
States, two law enforcement officials said.
Jan. 3, 2026, 4:50 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Sheyla Urdaneta and Frances Robles
With the president gone, Venezuelans
flock to supermarkets.
Venezuelans began lining up at
supermarkets throughout the country on Saturday to stock up on supplies as they
woke to the news that the United States had launched airstrikes on the capital
and seized the country’s leader, Nicolás Maduro.
While many stores in Caracas, the
capital, were closed, some that opened found dozens of people already waiting
outside.
People filled their carts with
water, toilet paper and other goods.
Few cars were on the streets, and
there were no signs of public transportation. Areas near a military base that
had been attacked lacked electricity.
Users of a private internet
company, Vnet, reported service outages.
In Caracas’s Plaza Venezuela
neighborhood, Alondra, a 32-year-old woman who did not want her last name
published because of fears for her safety, said she had just returned to the
capital after the December holidays and had no food at home.
“I’m not happy,” she said as she
shopped. “I understand how delicate the situation is, and I’m afraid things
will get worse in the country.”
Tensions mounted because some
people were cutting the line, which was not budging.
“We’ve suffered so much,” she
added. “I’m feeling hopeless, thinking that everything could get worse and that
we won’t be able to hold out.”
Videos from La Candelaria, in
downtown Caracas, showed dozens of people standing in line for food.
At a shop in a public housing
complex in the city, about 10 people were lined up to fill water jugs.
In La Guaira,
an area near where the strikes took place, residents sent videos showing damage
to what appeared to be an apartment building. A local journalist said
government supporters had taken control of the block and were prohibiting
access.
In Valencia, a city two hours west
of Caracas, supermarkets opened early.
Panic buying caused some people to
bring two cars to transport all the goods they bought.
“We don’t know what is going on —
nobody knows,” said Cecilia Martínez, 47. “But we are five people in my house
and my parents are older than 80, so I can’t sit and wait until they say
whether there is a curfew or not. That’s why I came here and spent all I had.”
José López, 29, at another store
in Valencia, said he had bought two dozen eggs. “There’s a lot of anxiety and
uncertainty,” he said.
In Zulia and Táchira, the states
on Venezuela’s border with Colombia, 400 miles west of Caracas, people who
lined up at supermarkets said their biggest fear was running out of food.
“Thank God we’re far from Caracas,
but we’re afraid that bombings might come to Maracaibo, too,” said Martha
Rangel, a 63-year-old woman who lives in that city. “I don’t have much money,
but I’ll buy some cheese and flour to make arepas and have some at home.”
The governor of the state of
Sucre, about 325 miles east of Caracas, appeared at a town square on Saturday
morning and called for supporters of the ruling party to gather there later in
the day.
“We demand that the entire world
speak out against the threat and chaos they have tried to sow in our homeland,”
said the governor, Jhoanna Carrillo.
People in Sucre had lined up for
gasoline, although many pumps were closed.
Armed civilians who support the
government had begun to gather in caravans in Cumaná,
the capital city in Sucre, and many people were frightened.
“Everyone knows what that means,”
said Alejandro Barreto, 26. “The only thing that matters now is buying food.”
Jan. 3, 2026, 4:37 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
United Nations bureau chief
The United Nations Security
Council will convene an emergency meeting on Monday morning to discuss U.S.
strikes in Venezuela. Russia, China and Colombia asked for the meeting after
Venezuela’s mission to the U.N. wrote a letter to the Council president
requesting the meeting to condemn and stop American strikes on the country.
Secretary General António Guterres is expected to address the Council on
Monday. He said in a statement earlier that all sides must uphold international
law and the U.N. charter.
Jan. 3, 2026, 4:36 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Nicholas Fandos and Maia Coleman
Mamdani called Trump to criticize the
Venezuela strikes.
Zohran Mamdani, the new mayor of New
York City, called President Trump on Saturday to personally object to strikes
the United States had conducted in Venezuela and to the capture of its leader,
Nicolás Maduro.
“I called the president and spoke
with him directly to register my opposition to this act,” Mr. Mamdani said at
an unrelated news conference on Saturday, adding that he told Mr. Trump that he
was “opposed to a pursuit of regime change, to the violation of federal and
international law.”
The mayor declined to characterize
the president’s response when pressed by reporters. His aides said that Mr.
Mamdani had initiated the call earlier on Saturday afternoon and that it was
“brief.”
“I registered my opposition, I
made it clear and we left it at that,” Mr. Mamdani said.
The White House did not
immediately respond to a request for comment on the call.
The remarks — and an earlier written statement —
were the first time the mayor, a left-leaning Democrat, had clashed with Mr.
Trump since taking office on Thursday. But it raised the possibility of more
conflict in the days ahead after Mr. Maduro arrives in New York to face federal drug and weapons charges in
Manhattan.
Mr. Mamdani has profound
differences with the president, and has called him a “fascist.” But after the
men had an unexpectedly cordial meeting at the White House in November, Mr.
Mamdani had been careful not to directly stoke Mr. Trump’s ire — including in his
inaugural address this week.
Mr. Mamdani sought on Saturday to
play down how the call might affect that relationship.
“The president and I have always
been honest and direct with each other about places of disagreement,” he said.
“New Yorkers have elected me to be honest and direct and always to do so with
the understanding that my job is to deliver for the people who call this city
home.”
Mr. Mamdani will likely have
little influence over what happens to Mr. Maduro in federal custody, even if
the leader and a potential trial are being held within the city limits of New
York. The mayor seemingly acknowledged these limits when speaking with
reporters.
“It is my responsibility that
whatever actions the federal government takes, that they have a minimal impact
on the day-to-day lives of New Yorkers,” he said.
Mr. Mamdani has been an outspoken
critic of American support for Israel’s military campaign in Gaza, but before
his comments on Saturday, he had not had much to say about Venezuela or U.S.
policy in Latin America. Both Mr. Mamdani and Mr. Maduro describe themselves as
socialists, though the policies Mr. Maduro presided over in Venezuela differ
starkly from those Mr. Mamdani has vowed to pursue.
In a podcast interview last
fall, Mr. Mamdani said Mr. Maduro had “done many a horrible thing.”
“Maduro’s government is one of
repression, there is no question about it,” he said.
In labeling the American action
unlawful, Mr. Mamdani echoed numerous other Democrats. But where other leaders
in his party called Mr. Maduro an “illegitimate dictator,” Mr. Mamdani did not
comment on his record or standing in Venezuela.
“This blatant pursuit of regime
change doesn’t just affect those abroad, it directly impacts New Yorkers,
including tens of thousands of Venezuelans who call this city home,” the mayor
said in his written statement.
“My focus is their safety and the
safety of every New Yorker,” he added, “and my administration will continue to
monitor the situation and issue relevant guidance.”
Jan. 3, 2026, 4:07 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Rylee Kirk
Senator Mitch McConnell,
Republican from Kentucky, said in a statement on X that the president “has
broad constitutional authority and long historical precedent for the limited
use of military force.” McConnell called Nicolás Maduro a thug and said he
expected Congress to be briefed soon. “A free, democratic, and stable
Venezuela, led by Venezuelans, is in America’s national security interests,” he
wrote.
Jan. 3, 2026, 3:52 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Reporting from São Paulo, Brazil
Delcy Rodríguez, Venezuela’s new leader,
boasts leftist credentials.
Delcy Rodríguez, Venezuela’s new
interim leader, arrives at the job with impeccable leftist credentials.
She is the daughter of a Marxist
guerrilla who won fame for kidnapping an American businessman, was educated
partly in France, where she specialized in labor law and rose to meteoric
heights in the government of Nicolás Maduro, whom she is succeeding.
But Ms. Rodríguez, 56, is also
known for building bridges with Venezuela’s economic elites, foreign investors
and diplomats, presenting herself as a cosmopolitan technocrat in a
militaristic and male-dominated government.
After Venezuela’s economy endured
a harrowing crash from 2013 to 2021, she spearheaded a market-friendly overhaul
which had provided a semblance of economic stability before the U.S. military
campaign targeting Mr. Maduro.
Her privatization of state assets
and relatively conservative fiscal policy had left Venezuela somewhat better
prepared to resist the Trump administration’s blockade of sanctioned tankers
carrying oil, the country’s economic lifeblood.
The contradictions enveloping Ms.
Rodríguez were on display on Saturday when she addressed the nation on state
television. While President Trump said that Ms. Rodríguez had been sworn in as
Venezuela’s new president, it was clear that Mr. Maduro’s supporters —
including her — still see him as Venezuela’s legitimate leader.
Ms. Rodríguez repeatedly said that
Mr. Maduro was Venezuela’s “only president,” and even the text on Venezuelan
state television labeled her as vice president. When she ended, the state
broadcaster immediately said that Ms. Rodríguez, as the vice president, had
just made clear that Mr. Maduro remained Venezuela’s president.
Ms. Rodríguez rose to prominence
after Mr. Maduro became president in 2013, following the death of Hugo Chávez,
the founder of Venezuela’s Bolivarian political
movement, which blends left-wing and nationalist ideals.
Mr. Maduro appointed her as
communications minister, before naming her foreign affairs minister, the first
woman to hold that post in Venezuela.
Shuttling between Latin American
capitals, she often seemed to revel in feuding with conservative leaders.
In 2018, Ms. Rodríguez was
promoted again, this time to the vice presidency, and the head of SEBIN, a
Venezuelan intelligence agency. She took on additional duties in 2020 as
economy minister and proceeded to extend an olive branch to business elites in
Venezuela.
But she has also been targeted by
sanctions from the United States, Canada and the European Union for her role in
supporting and helping to oversee crackdowns on dissent in Venezuela.
Her entry into Venezuelan politics
seemed natural as the daughter of Jorge Antonio Rodríguez, a Marxist leader who
led the kidnapping in Venezuela of William Niehous,
an American businessman who was held for three years in a jungle hide-out and
rescued in 1979.
Her father was arrested and
charged for his role in the kidnapping and died in 1976, at the age of 34,
after being interrogated by intelligence agents.
Politics and leftist activism run
in the family. Ms. Rodríguez’s older brother, Jorge Rodríguez, is another member
of Mr. Maduro’s inner circle. He is the president of the National Assembly and
was Mr. Maduro’s chief political strategist.
Anatoly Kurmanaev contributed
reporting from Venezuela.
Jan. 3, 2026, 3:50 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Julie Turkewitz and Genevieve Glatsky
Trump administration declines to back
Venezuela’s opposition leader.
President Trump said on Saturday
that it would be “very tough” for Venezuela’s leading opposition figure, María
Corina Machado, to take control of her country, claiming in his televised speech that
she was a “very nice woman” but “doesn’t have the support” in Venezuela to
lead.
It was a dramatic shift from the
Trump administration’s assessment of Ms. Machado’s movement in recent months,
in which Washington officials have asserted that her surrogate, Edmundo
González, is the country’s rightful president, after his election victory in
2024. Secretary of State Marco Rubio had called Ms.
Machado “the personification of resilience, tenacity and patriotism.”
Ms. Machado has spent the last year courting
Mr. Trump’s support and trying to enlist his help in ousting Mr. Maduro. She
has openly supported his
military operation in the Caribbean and refrained from criticizing his policies
toward Venezuelan migrants. In October, she dedicated her Nobel Peace Prize to
him, in honor of what she called his “decisive support.”
On Saturday, after Mr. Trump
announced that the U.S. military had captured Mr. Maduro, she released a
statement celebrating the move and asserting that she was ready to lead.
“Today we are prepared to assert
our mandate and seize power,” she wrote in a message she
posted on X.
But roughly two hours later, when
asked by a reporter about Ms. Machado after addressing the nation, Mr. Trump
said they had not spoken. He never mentioned Mr. González.
Instead, he said that his
government was in conversation with Mr. Maduro’s No. 2, Vice President Delcy Rodríguez.
“Are you going to work with the
vice president of Venezuela?” a reporter asked.
“Marco is working on that
directly,” Mr. Trump responded, referring to Mr. Rubio. “He just had a
conversation with her, and she’s essentially willing to do what we think is
necessary to make Venezuela great again.”
A spokeswoman for Ms. Machado and
Mr. González said in a text message that the pair was not offering immediate
comment on the speech.
Ms. Machado is a conservative
former legislator from an affluent Venezuelan family whose ties to Washington
go back two decades. She galvanized millions of Venezuelans to vote in favor of
Mr. González in 2024.
Mr. Maduro lost the
election, according to an independent monitor,
but ignored the results and stayed in power. Mr. González eventually fled to
Spain, and Ms. Machado went into hiding.
In recent months, speaking via
video, Ms. Machado has backed Mr. Trump’s
claims that Mr. Maduro is the head of two drug cartels
and helped rig U.S. elections.
Ms. Machado resurfaced in public
in early December in Oslo for the Nobel Peace Prize ceremony. One of her top
aides, Pedro Urruchurtu, wrote on X on Dec. 17 that
she was no longer in Oslo and was “attending medical appointments with a
specialist as part of her prompt and full recovery.” Ms. Machado said that she
had suffered a fractured vertebra during
her departure from Venezuela.
Her current whereabouts is
unknown.
Mr. González was also in Oslo to
celebrate her prize. Two weeks ago he made an appearance at
the Geneva Summit for Human Rights and Democracy. Mr. González, who is 76,
was briefly hospitalized in
May for a sudden drop in blood pressure.
Jan. 3, 2026, 3:48 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Before Nicolás Maduro, there was
Manuel Noriega.
The last time the United States
deposed a Latin American leader was in 1989, when U.S. forces captured Gen.
Manuel Noriega in Panama. That episode holds some striking parallels to the
capture of Nicolás Maduro of Venezuela on Saturday, with some major
differences.
In December 1989, President George
H.W. Bush sent U.S. troops into Panama with the goal of capturing Mr. Noriega,
who had been the country’s military dictator for about six years. Mr. Noriega
went into hiding in the Vatican’s Embassy in Panama City, where he was eventually
captured, taken to the United States, tried and imprisoned.
Mr. Noriega, like Mr. Maduro, had
been indicted on federal drug-trafficking charges. He was accused by U.S.
officials at the time of taking millions of dollars in bribes from drug
traffickers and turning Panama into a capital of international cocaine
smuggling.
Months before both leaders were
captured, the United States built up its military presence around their
countries.
In Panama, President Bush sent
nearly 2,000 soldiers and Marines to reinforce the 10,300 service members
already there. The troops also began conducting military exercises, which U.S.
officials said was part of their rights under previous treaties. But many saw
it as an attempt to put pressure on Mr. Noriega.
As part of the pressure campaign
on Venezuela, Mr. Trump has been building up forces in the Caribbean for
months, and authorizing strikes on boats that the administration has said are
run by drug traffickers. Many legal experts say these strikes are illegal and
amount to extrajudicial killings of civilians.
The two Latin American leaders,
however, had very different responses to the U.S. pressure campaigns.
In Panama, the National Assembly,
under the control of Mr. Noriega, declared the country at war with the United
States shortly before U.S. troops invaded. As the assault to capture him began,
he fled with his mistress in an unmarked Hyundai and went into hiding, briefly
emerging at a Dairy Queen before taking refuge at the embassy of the Holy See.
He was captured after a standoff
that went on for days with U.S. troops, who surrounded the building and used
speakers to blast heavy metal from
bands like Black Sabbath and Guns N’ Roses until he surrendered.
Mr. Maduro, however, told a
Spanish journalist as late as this week that he was eager to work with the
United States to avoid conflict, including on drug policy and oil agreements.
Mr. Trump said during an interview
on Fox News that Mr. Maduro wanted to negotiate in the final days before U.S.
forces captured him — an offer that Mr. Trump said he rejected.
“I didn’t want to negotiate,” Mr.
Trump said. “I said, ‘Nope, we got to do it.’”
Mr. Trump said that the military repeatedly rehearsed the operation using
a replica of Mr. Maduro’s safe house. Gen. Dan Caine, the
chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said the operation benefited from
detailed information about his whereabouts collected during months of
intelligence gathering.
Around 27,000 troops participated
in the operation in Panama, and 23 U.S. troops were killed, along with an
estimated 314 Panamanian soldiers and 202 civilians.
U.S. officials said the operation
in Venezuela involved 150 aircraft. Since November, the United States has had
around 15,000 military personnel in
the Caribbean.
It’s unclear how many casualties
were involved in the operation on Saturday, but Mr. Trump, speaking on Fox
News, said no American troops were killed. He suggested, however, that some
service members were injured.
Michael Crowley contributed
reporting.
Jan. 3, 2026, 3:36 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Reporting from Palm Beach, Fla.
In an interview with The New York
Times, Marco Rubio, the secretary of state, said he was reserving judgment on Delcy Rodríguez’s comments, in which she denied she planned
to work with the United States.
“We’re going to make decisions
based on their actions and their deeds in the days and weeks to come,” he said,
referring to officials in the interim Venezuelan government. “We think they’re
going to have some unique and historic opportunities to do a great service for
the country, and we hope that they’ll accept that opportunity.”
Jan. 3, 2026, 3:36 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Airlines are canceling flights after
the U.S. closes Caribbean airspace.
U.S. airlines canceled flights and
air travel was disrupted on Saturday after federal aviation authorities shut
down American-controlled airspace over the Caribbean in response to a U.S.
military operation in Venezuela that resulted in the capture of the country’s
president.
The Federal Aviation
Administration issued a notice to airmen early
on Saturday, known as a NOTAM, banning U.S. civil aircraft from operating, as
the United States took action against the South American country,
capturing President Nicolás Maduro and
his wife.
The F.A.A. cited “safety-of-flight
risks associated with ongoing military activity” as the reason for the closure.
The agency did not specify the nature of the military operations in its notice
but said that the action was taken in response to the developments involving
Venezuela.
Those developments became clearer
later on Saturday, when President Trump announced the U.S. military operation.
Mr. Maduro’s capture followed months of U.S. military pressure, including
deadly strikes on vessels, described by U.S. officials as drug-carrying boats;
the seizure of a tanker transporting
Venezuelan oil; and a growing U.S. military presence in
the Caribbean.
Airlines adjusted schedules and
canceled flights into and out of Caribbean destinations like Puerto Rico, St.
Lucia and Barbados as the order took effect. Passengers were advised to check
with carriers for updated travel information.
In a post on social media on
Saturday afternoon, U.S. Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy said the F.A.A.
had ordered the closures to “ensure the SAFETY of the flying public.”
“When appropriate, these airspace
restrictions will be lifted. Please work with your airlines directly if your
flight has been impacted,” he wrote.
Jessica Ramos, 24, a second grade teacher from Harrisburg, Pa., took a cruise
with her mother this week to celebrate the New Year. Their cruise docked in San
Juan, Puerto Rico, on Saturday morning, and they planned to fly to Philadelphia
early Sunday morning. Around 10:30 a.m., as they disembarked their cruise ship,
Ms. Ramos said she received a notification that their flight had been canceled.
“It was a little bit chaotic,” Ms.
Ramos said in a phone interview on Saturday. “Everybody stormed into basically
one hotel.”
Ms. Ramos and her mother began
frantically searching for a place to stay, refreshing hotel websites all around
the island. They ended up at a Holiday Inn with a one-night stay for $900, she
said.
The next flight Ms. Ramos could
book was on Jan. 10.
The airspace closure is the latest
in a series of aviation restrictions imposed by the F.A.A. in response to
tensions in the region, with officials saying they are intended to reduce the
risk to civilian aircraft near military activity.
Delta, American and Southwest were
among the airlines that had canceled flights on Saturday.
“Delta teams continue to monitor
the situation closely, as the safety and security of our customers and people
comes before all else,” the airline said in a statement.
Delta, United and JetBlue added
that they had issued travel waivers for customers heading to and from the
affected airports.
As of 3:07 p.m., the website
FlightAware was reporting 724 delays and 49 cancellations,
most of which were at the Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport in
Florida.
On Saturday morning, the main
international airport in Puerto Rico said on social media that
most commercial flights operated by U.S. airlines were “suspended or may be
temporarily canceled” because of the F.A.A. notice, but that foreign airlines
were not included in the restrictions. The overwhelming majority of commercial
flights to and from the island were canceled on Saturday, according to the
website Flightradar24, which also showed two U.S. Navy aircraft flying nearby.
Caribbean Airlines, which serves
U.S. cities including New York and Orlando, said on its website that
its operations continued as scheduled on Saturday.
Gabe
Castro-Root and Claire Fahy contributed reporting.
Jan. 3, 2026, 3:24 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Mayor Zohran
Mamdani of New York City said he called President Trump on Saturday and spoke
with him directly to register his opposition to the strikes.
Speaking at an unrelated news
conference in Brooklyn, Mamdani said he made clear during the call that he was
opposed to “the pursuit of regime change” and “the violation of federal and
international law.”
“The president and I have always
been honest and direct with each other about places of disagreement,” he said.
“I was honest and direct in the Oval Office. I will be honest and direct in the
phone conversations we have, and New Yorkers have elected me to be honest and
direct.”
Jan. 3, 2026, 3:21 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Mexico City bureau chief
Venezuela’s interim leader defies
Trump and calls Maduro the ‘only president.’
resident Trump said Delcy Rodríguez was sworn in as Venezuela’s interim
president and would act as a partner in letting the United States run the
country.
“She’s essentially willing to do
what we think is necessary to make Venezuela great again,” he said.
Less than two hours later, Ms.
Rodríguez — who was Nicolás Maduro’s vice president — delivered a televised
address to Venezuela that made clear she viewed the United States as an illegal
invader that must be rejected.
“We are determined to be free,”
she said. “What is being done to Venezuela is a barbarity.”
Her swift defiance of Mr. Trump
made clear that his plans to swoop into the South American nation and run it as
his own faced many more hurdles than he suggested in his Saturday news
conference declaring victory in Venezuela.
“We had already warned that an
aggression was underway under false excuses and false pretenses, and that the
masks had fallen off, revealing only one objective: regime change in
Venezuela,” she said. “This regime change would also allow for the seizure of
our energy, mineral and natural resources. This is the true objective, and the
world and the international community must know it.”
Significantly, Ms. Rodríguez
delivered her address alongside what she called Venezuela’s National Defense
Council, which included the nation’s defense minister, attorney general and the
heads of the country’s legislature and judiciary. That unified front directly
contradicted Mr. Trump’s claim that the United States would run Venezuela,
especially given that White House and Pentagon officials had said that U.S.
aircraft and extraction forces had returned to the U.S.S. Iwo Jima.
Venezuela’s defense minister and
attorney general also both publicly criticized Mr. Trump and the U.S. military
action on Saturday.
In his news conference, Mr. Trump
said that Venezuelan leaders must comply with the United States or else. “All
political and military figures must realize that what happened to Maduro can
happen to them,” he said.
Ms. Rodríguez’s speech also made
clear that Mr. Maduro’s supporters — including her — still see him as the
nation’s legitimate leader.
She repeatedly said that Mr.
Maduro was Venezuela’s “only president” and even the text on Venezuelan state
television labeled her as vice president. When she ended, the state broadcaster
said that Ms. Rodríguez was the vice president who had just stated that Mr.
Maduro was Venezuela’s president.
Jan. 3, 2026, 3:13 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
A video shows three U.S. military
helicopters flying over Caracas and headed westward toward Fuerte
Tiuna, the largest military site in Venezuela. At the
end of the video, at least one of the helicopters turns southward, and descends
toward the military site.
The man filming the video gives a
time of 1:58 a.m. Saturday. According to General Dan Caine in the news
conference held at Mar-a-Lago on Saturday, helicopters touched down to capture
President Maduro in Caracas at 2:01 a.m.
Jan. 3, 2026, 3:12 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Protesters are dispersing after a
nearly two hour protest outside the White House
against the Trump administration’s capture of Venezuela’s leader, Nicolás
Maduro.
The protesters, which numbered a
couple hundred at its peak, held signs saying “U.S. out of the Caribbean” and
“No Blood for oil.”
Jan. 3, 2026, 3:07 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Pentagon reporter
The top Democrat on the House
Armed Services Committee expressed shock and anger at President Trump’s
decision to capture Nicolás Maduro and have the U.S. run Venezuela for the
foreseeable future. “Trump clearly has no idea what comes next,” Representative
Adam Smith, Democrat of Washington, said in a telephone interview. “How are we going to run Venezuela when we have no
presence in the country. Where does this go?”
Jan. 3, 2026, 3:00 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Trump shares an image of Maduro
blindfolded and handcuffed.
President Trump posted a
photograph on social media on Saturday that he said was of the captured
Venezuelan president, Nicolás Maduro, on board a U.S. warship hours after the
United States seized him in Caracas, the Venezuelan capital.
The picture showed a man in a gray sweatshirt and sweatpants, blindfolded and handcuffed
with a bottle of water in his right hand.
“Nicolas Maduro on board the USS
Iwo Jima,” Mr. Trump captioned the photo, minutes before he addressed the
nation from Mar-a-Lago, his Florida resort, and announced that America was
“going to run” Venezuela.
The U.S.S. Iwo Jima is an
amphibious assault ship and one of the American warships that have been
prowling the Caribbean in recent weeks; it brought aboard survivors of an American boat strike in
October.
Mr. Trump made the post on
Truth Social on Saturday before a news conference in which he discussed the
American strikes that led to Mr. Maduro’s capture.
Mr. Maduro and his wife, Cilia
Flores, were taken from Caracas, the capital, by helicopter to the Iwo Jima,
the president said in an interview with “Fox and Friends.”
“A nice flight,” Mr. Trump said.
“I’m sure they loved it. But they’ve killed a lot of people.”
Mr. Maduro and his wife were en route Saturday to New York, where they will face
indictments charging them with narco-terrorism and conspiracy to import
cocaine.
The photo of what appears to be
Mr. Maduro blindfolded and handcuffed was striking as it was the first photo of
the captured leader made public after the attack. It came hours after Delcy Rodríguez, who had been Mr. Maduro’s vice president,
demanded the United States provide proof that Mr. Maduro and his wife were
still alive.
Mr. Trump said he and his team had
watched the raid on video feeds as it occurred, subsequently posting what
appeared to be photos of
himself and other senior cabinet members, including Secretary of State Marco
Rubio and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, watching
the attack in real time.
Iconic photos documenting
key moments in American military operations have often come from the Situation
Room in the White House, where former President Barack Obama and his national
security team observed the mission to kill Osama bin Laden, and Mr. Trump and
his team monitored the operation that eliminated Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, the
former leader of the Islamic State, during his first term. Photos of those
targets, who were both killed, were not released to the public.
Jan. 3, 2026, 2:44 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Aimee OrtizHannah Ziegler and Yan Zhuang
Here’s what we know about the U.S.
operation in Venezuela.
Venezuela’s ousted president,
Nicolás Maduro, appeared before a judge in New York on Monday to face drug and
weapons charges, two days after he was captured in a U.S. military raid on
Caracas.
“I’m innocent. I’m not guilty. I
am a decent man,” Mr. Maduro said in court through an interpreter. He added, “I
am still president of my country.”
The fallout for Venezuela is still
far from clear. The acting president, Delcy
Rodríguez, raised the prospect of dialogue with the United States on Sunday —
an apparent shift from the defiance that top Venezuelan officials had shown in
the face of President Trump’s claim that the United States would “run” the
country for the foreseeable future and reclaim American oil interests there.
The U.S. raid followed a
monthslong campaign by the Trump administration to oust Mr. Maduro, an
authoritarian leader.
Here’s what we know:
What
happened?
The United States carried out “a
large scale strike against Venezuela” in which Mr. Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, were
captured, Mr. Trump said.
Gen. Dan Caine, chairman of the
Joint Chiefs of Staff, said at a news conference that Mr. Trump ordered the
operation late Friday. The mission involved 150 aircraft that worked to
dismantle Venezuelan air defenses so military helicopters could deliver troops
to Caracas, the country’s capital, he said.
The mission took about two hours
20 minutes and continued into early Saturday, when Mr. Maduro and Ms. Flores
“gave up,” General Caine said.
U.S. forces encountered
significant resistance, Mr. Trump said. At least 80 people were killed,
including military personnel and civilians, according to a senior Venezuelan
official who spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe preliminary
reports. Cuban state media reported that 32 Cubans were killed in the U.S.
attack. President Miguel Díaz-Canel of Cuba said they
were from Cuba’s armed forces or its interior
ministry.
No Americans were killed, Mr.
Trump said. Two U.S. officials speaking on the condition of anonymity said that
about half a dozen soldiers were injured in the operation. Nearly 200 Special
Operations forces took part in the raid, according to Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth.
Did Trump
have the authority to capture Maduro?
Secretary of State Marco Rubio
said at a news conference on Saturday that it would not have been possible to
inform U.S. lawmakers in advance of the strike. He and Mr. Trump described the
mission as a law enforcement operation rather than a military action, which
would have required greater congressional oversight.
On Monday, the United Nations
Security Council convened an emergency meeting to
discuss the attack. António Guterres, the secretary general of the United
Nations, said in a statement that he was “deeply concerned” that the United
States had not respected the rule of international law. Trump administration
officials also plan to brief leaders in Congress,
after Democrats called on the administration to explain its legal justification
for the raid and its plan for the region.
Mr. Maduro, a self-described
socialist, had led Venezuela since 2013. The Biden administration accused him
of stealing the 2024 election that kept him in
power.
Who is in
charge of Venezuela now?
The country’s new leader is Ms. Rodríguez. She
was Mr. Maduro’s vice president, known as an economic troubleshooter.
Mr. Trump said on Saturday that
the United States intended to “run the country” until
a transition of power could take place. He said Ms. Rodríguez was “essentially
willing to do what we think is necessary to make Venezuela great again.”
On Sunday, Mr. Rubio said the U.S.
military would maintain a “quarantine” around Venezuela to prevent the entry
and exit of oil tankers under American sanctions and to maintain “leverage”
over the country.
Ms. Rodríguez, who has vacillated
in her criticism of the Trump administration after the raid in Caracas, was
formally sworn in on Monday. During the ceremony, she maintained that Mr.
Maduro was the president and said she was pained by the “illegitimate military
aggression” of Venezuela by the United States. Ms. Rodríguez described Mr.
Maduro and his wife as hostages.
Separately, Venezuela’s main opposition
leader, María Corina Machado, has asked that her political ally, Edmundo González,
be recognized as Venezuela’s president immediately.
In his own video statement on Sunday,
Mr. González referred to himself as the president of Venezuela and called for
political prisoners to be released.
What will happen
to Maduro?
Mr. Maduro and Ms. Flores were
brought to the federal courthouse in Lower Manhattan on Monday. An unsealed indictment charged
him with narco-terrorism, cocaine importation conspiracies and possession of
machine guns — charges that would carry lengthy prison sentences if he were
convicted. Ms. Flores is also charged in the cocaine conspiracy.
Mr. Maduro, speaking in Spanish,
told the court that he had been “kidnapped,” and pleaded not guilty to all four
counts against him. The next hearing is scheduled for March 17, Judge Alvin K.
Hellerstein said.
His court appearance drew dozens
of demonstrators — both critics and supporters of Mr. Maduro’s capture — who
were separated by a metal barrier outside the courthouse.
The indictment appears similar to
a 2020 indictment against Mr. Maduro that accused him of
overseeing a violent drug organization known as Cartel de los Soles.
Analysts have said that Cartel de
los Soles does not exist as a literal
organization, and that the term has been used more broadly to
describe the alleged involvement of high-ranking Venezuelan military officers
in the drug trade. However, no evidence has been publicly disclosed showing Mr.
Maduro directing the effort.
When the 2020 indictment was
issued, the Trump administration set a $15 million reward for information
leading to the arrest of Mr. Maduro. The Biden administration increased the
bounty to $25 million in January 2025. The
Trump administration then increased the reward in August to
$50 million.
Amanda Holpuch, Alexandra
E. Petri and Neil Vigdor contributed
reporting.
Jan. 3,
2026, 2:40 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Reporting from Mexico City
Venezuela broadcasts messages of
resistance from Maduro loyalists after the U.S. attack.
Hours after President Nicolás
Maduro and his wife were captured by U.S. forces, Venezuela’s state-run
television was broadcasting rallies and protests taking place across several
cities, including the capital, Caracas. Mr. Maduro’s supporters vowed to defend
their country from what they described as an illegal attack and the kidnapping
of their “legitimate” leader.
In interviews, residents and
people close to Mr. Maduro’s government demanded the Trump administration to
return him and the country’s first lady, Cilia Flores, safely to Venezuela.
The messages were broadcast
entirely on state-run media programs. A free press does not exist in Venezuela
because of years of government suppression and censorship.
Some people condemned the U.S.
airstrikes that accompanied the capture of Mr. Maduro as a violation of
international law and the United Nations Charter. Others were taking more
direct action. In neighborhoods across Caracas and other cities, Venezuelans
were seen in bulletproof vests activating local defense committees — groups
essentially designed to turn every citizen into a soldier and every city block
into a fortress.
“Everybody knows what they have to
do,” said Pedro Infante, a high-ranking Venezuelan politician, as he was
surrounded by supporters in a district of Miranda, one of the states hit
overnight. “Prepare ourselves to defend our homeland and our sovereignty.”
Mr. Infante, who has been a
central figure in both the legislative and executive branches under the
governments of Mr. Maduro and his predecessor, Hugo Chávez, accused the United
States of wanting to steal Venezuela’s resources — specifically the country’s
oil.
“Their fundamental interest is to
gain control over our energy and resources” and “to have all the puppet
governments on their knees,” he added.
Mr. Trump has said on several
occasions that Venezuela stole oil and land belonging to the
United States — referring to the nationalization of oil
fields during which U.S. giants like ExxonMobil and ConocoPhillips lost assets.
In a rally near the Miraflores presidential
palace in Caracas, Jorge Luis Márquez, a local resident, told a state-run
television program that he was startled in the early morning by the explosions,
which he called a “criminal bombing” orchestrated by President Trump.
“The people here are outraged and
demand that the world speak out against this crime committed by Donald Trump’s
dirty, rotten boot, which trampled on sacred ground,” Mr. Márquez said.
By Saturday morning, Venezuelan
authorities were claiming that some of the bombs had struck civilian buildings.
In a televised address from La Guaira, the capital city of a coastal state hit overnight
by the U.S. airstrikes, Gov. José Alejandro Terán
condemned what he called a “terrorist action by the United States government,”
adding that civilians had been targeted. He did not mention any deaths but said
that several people, including women and children, had been sent to the
region’s hospitals and clinics.
Mr. Terán
also said that the city’s historic center had been attacked and that “more than
10 missiles” had destroyed several warehouses at the port — arguably
Venezuela’s most strategically vital maritime hub — where, he claimed,
important medicines for patients with renal failure were stored.
“There is nothing left to prove to
the entire world,” Mr. Terán said. “There has been a
systematic attack to the civilian population.”
In a live broadcast from Caracas,
Erika Farías, a political organizer and a member of
Mr. Maduro’s party, warned both the United States and the Venezuelan opposition
that she and many others would not give in despite the attack on Saturday.
“To the empire, we say:
Venezuela’s oil is ours, and return Nicolás Maduro to us,” Ms. Farías said. “And to the stateless traitors, we say:
Prepare yourselves, because the people have just moved from unarmed struggle to
armed struggle — and we are going to defend our freedom, our independence and
our sovereignty in the streets.”
Jan. 3, 2026, 2:32 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
The family of James Luckey-Lange, a 28-year-old from Staten Island, N.Y., who
is among the Americans who have been recently imprisoned in Venezuela,
said they had not received any information about his whereabouts or been
contacted by U.S. officials since the strikes on the country this morning.
“I remain hopeful and confident
that the administration will prioritize the safety of the Americans over
there,” Abbie Luckey, his aunt, said in a brief phone
interview. Of the likelihood that the capture of President Maduro would hasten
his return, she said: “I am more hopeful than I was 24 hours ago.”
Jan. 3, 2026, 2:32 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Pentagon reporter
The top Democrat on the Senate
Armed Services Committee lambasted President Trump’s plan to run Venezuela.
“This is ludicrous,” said Senator Jack Reed, Democrat of Rhode Island. “No serious
plan has been presented for how such an extraordinary undertaking would work or
what it will cost the American people. History offers no shortage of warnings
about the costs — human, strategic, and moral — of assuming we can govern
another nation by force.”
Jan. 3, 2026, 2:28 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Reporting from London
Here’s what to know about the
Venezuelan oil industry Trump says he will revive.
Venezuela
303 billion barrels
Saudi Arabia
267 billion barrels
Nearly half of the world’s proven
oil reserves are in 12 countries in the Middle East.
Canada
159 billion barrels
United States
81 billion barrels
Russia
80 billion barrels
Libya
48 billion barrels
Nigeria
38 billion barrels
Note: Data shows estimates of
proven oil reserves for 2025.
Source: Oil & Gas Journal.
Venezuela’s oil industry would
“make a lot of money” with the United States behind it, President Trump said
Saturday in a news conference to confirm the capture of the country’s
president, Nicolás Maduro, who is facing federal drugs and weapons charges.
“We’re going to have our very
large United States oil companies, the biggest anywhere in the world, go in,
spend billions of dollars, fix the badly broken infrastructure, the oil
infrastructure, and start making money for the country,” Mr. Trump said.
He said the Venezuelan oil
industry had been “a total bust,” for a long time, adding, “They were pumping
almost nothing by comparison to what they could have been pumping.”
Mr. Trump appears to be counting
heavily on U.S. intervention in the oil industry to help transform Venezuela, a
proposition that could prove to be complicated and expensive.
How much oil
does Venezuela produce?
Venezuela claims to have more than
300 billion barrels in the ground, the largest reserves of oil of any country.
But it struggles to produce about one million barrels a day, or around 1
percent of global production.
In addition, much of Venezuela’s
oil is extra heavy, making it polluting and expensive to process.
Venezuela’s
yearly oil production
Source: U.S. Energy Information
Administration.
The New York Times
What is the
state of the oil industry in Venezuela?
The industry has seen some
recovery in recent years, but output is well below the more than two million
barrels a day that Venezuela was producing in the early 2010s.
The national oil company, known as
PDVSA, lacks the capital and expertise to increase production. The country’s
oil fields are run down and suffer from “years of insufficient drilling,
dilapidated infrastructure, frequent power cuts and equipment theft,” according
to a recent study by Energy Aspects, a research firm. The United States has
placed sanctions on Venezuelan oil, which is now exported primarily to China.
Are any
Western oil companies involved there?
Chevron is the main Western oil
company still operating in the country and produces about a quarter of
Venezuela’s oil. Early in this century, when other companies were forced out,
Chevron stayed, figuring that conditions might
eventually improve.
Roughly half of Chevron’s
production is exported to the United States.
On Saturday, Chevron said it was
trying to ensure the safety of its employees and its operations in the country
after Mr. Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, were arrested and removed in the
U.S. military action.
The oil giant, based in Houston,
has conducted operations in Venezuela since 1923 and has maintained five
onshore and offshore production projects there.
“With more than a century in
Venezuela, we support a peaceful, lawful transition that promotes stability and
economic recovery,” said Kevin Slagle, a Chevron spokesman. “We’re prepared to
work constructively with the U.S. government during this period, leveraging our
experience and presence to strengthen U.S. energy security.”
Later on
Saturday, Chevron said it had given an incorrect statement and issued a new one
that removed mention of the U.S. government, saying: “We continue to operate in
full compliance with all relevant laws and regulations.”
What would
U.S. control of the country’s oil production mean?
In theory, if U.S. oil companies
were given greater access in Venezuela, they could help gradually turn the
industry around. “But it’s not going to be a straightforward proposition,” said
Richard Bronze, head of geopolitics at Energy Aspects.
Analysts say increasing Venezuelan
production will not be cheap. Energy Aspects estimated that adding another half
a million barrels a day of production would cost $10 billion and take about two
years.
Major increases might require
“tens of billions of dollars over multiple years,” the firm said.
The overthrow of the Venezuelan
government may offer opportunities for American oil companies, but they could
also find themselves dragged into a messy situation, industry analysts say.
Pressure from Mr. Trump could
“force them to play a quasi-governmental role on the capacity building and
development front,” Helima Croft, head of commodities
at the investment bank RBC Capital Markets, wrote on Saturday in an investment
note.
She added that reducing military
influence over the oil industry and the broader economy “could prove
challenging.”
How will this
affect oil prices?
Mr. Trump’s intervention in
Venezuela is bound to send jitters through the oil markets, but analysts say
that a major price jump is unlikely.
Venezuela is a relatively small
producer and many analysts calculate that the oil market is currently
oversupplied. Brent crude, the international benchmark, traded at $60.80 a
barrel on Friday, near its lows for the year.
After Washington conducted its
operation to remove Mr. Maduro, Third Bridge, a research firm, said in a note
that it “did not see these events immediately impacting the price of crude oil
or the cost of gasoline drivers see at the pump.”
Rebecca Elliott, Ivan
Penn and Lazaro Gamio contributed
reporting.
Jan. 3, 2026, 2:28 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Mexico City bureau chief
Delcy Rodríguez was sworn in as
Venezuela’s new president on Saturday, but it was clear that Nicolás Maduro’s
supporters — including her — still see him as the nation’s legitimate leader.
She repeatedly said that Maduro was Venezuela’s “only president” and even the
text on Venezuelan state television labeled her as vice president. When she
ended, the state broadcaster immediately said that Rodríguez was the vice president
who had just made clear that Maduro was Venezuela’s president.
Jan. 3,
2026, 2:24 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
“There is only one president in
this country, and his name is Nicolás Maduro Moros,” Rodríguez said to
thundering applause.
She added that Venezuela was open
to having a respectful relationship with the Trump administration, but only
within the framework of international and Venezuelan law. “That is the only
type of relationship I will accept, after they have attacked and militarily
assaulted our beloved nation,” she said.
Jan. 3, 2026, 2:17 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Venezuela’s interim president, Delcy Rodríguez, put on a display of force and unity in a
live address to the nation, sitting with powerful military officials and other
key government leaders as she denounced the United States. As she introduced
each figure on live television, they nodded toward her in a show of deference
as she demanded that Maduro was the rightful president of Venezuela. The
display of force and unity undermined President Trump’s earlier comments that
Washington would work with Rodríguez to run Venezuela.
Jan. 3,
2026, 2:17 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Rodríguez, Venezuela’s interim
president, was defiant as she spoke on live television.“If there is one thing that the Venezuelan
people and this country are clear about,” she said, “it is that we will never
again be slaves, that we will never again be a colony of any empire, whatever
its nature.”
Jan. 3, 2026, 2:16 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Mexico City bureau chief
Venezuela’s interim president, Delcy Rodríguez, speaking in an address to the the nation, said Washington “launched an unprecedented
military aggression” that “constitutes a terrible stain on the development of
bilateral relations.” She said that with the invasion, “the masks had fallen
off, revealing only one objective: regime change in Venezuela. This regime
change would also allow for the seizure of our energy, mineral and natural
resources. This is the true objective, and the world and the international
community must know it.”
Jan. 3, 2026, 2:13 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Mexico City bureau chief
Delcy Rodríguez, Venezuela’s interim
president, is delivering an address to the nation and taking a much more
defiant tone than President Trump suggested. Trump said she had agreed to help
the United States run Venezuela. She said the United States invaded Venezuela
under false pretenses and that President Maduro is Venezuela’s “only president.”
Jan. 3, 2026, 2:10 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Chevron, one of the leading private
oil companies in Venezuela, said it was working to ensure
the safety and security of its people and operation in the country after the
arrest of President Nicolás Maduro and his wife. The oil company, based in
Houston, has conducted operations in Venezuela since 1923 and has maintained
five onshore and offshore production projects in the country. “With more than a
century in Venezuela, we support a peaceful, lawful transition that promotes
stability and economic recovery,” said Kevin Slagle, a Chevron spokesman.
“We’re prepared to work constructively with the U.S. government during this
period, leveraging our experience and presence to strengthen U.S. energy
security.”
Jan. 3, 2026, 2:08 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
In Catia la Mar, a city just west
of the Caracas airport, the air strikes hit a three-story civilian apartment
complex, knocking out an exterior wall and killing at least one older woman,
the victim’s family said.
The woman, Rosa González, died in
the strike and a second person was seriously wounded, the family said. One
woman in the building said she was hit and nearly lost her eye. Another person,
a 70-year-old man named Jorge who declined to give his last name, said he “lost
everything” when the bomb exploded.
Jan. 3, 2026, 1:41 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
White House reporter
Representative Majorie
Taylor Greene, just days before she is expected to resign from Congress,
accused President Trump of walking away from his promise to end overseas wars.
“Americans’ disgust with our own government’s never ending military aggression
and support of foreign wars is justified because we are forced to pay for it,
and both parties, Republicans and Democrats, always keep the Washington
military machine funded and going,” Greene, a one-time Trump ally, posted on
social media. “This is what many in MAGA thought they voted to end. Boy were we wrong.”
Jan. 3, 2026, 1:37 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
In his first public break with
President Trump since taking office two days ago, Mayor Zohran
Mamdani of New York City condemned the capture of President Nicolás Maduro and
his wife, calling it “an act of war” and “violation of federal and
international law.”
“This blatant pursuit of regime
change doesn’t just affect those abroad, it directly impacts New Yorkers,
including tens of thousands of Venezuelans who call this city home,” the mayor
said in a statement posted on social media.
Jan. 3, 2026, 1:29 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
William Rashbaum
With President Nicolás Maduro and
his wife en route to New York, the next step in their
case will come in federal court in Manhattan. They are expected to appear
before a U.S. District Court judge in New York City on the four-count
narco-terrorism and cocaine trafficking indictment unsealed on Saturday
morning. In similar cases, the defendants have been flown to Stewart Air
National Guard Base, about 72 miles north of the city, and brought to the
federal courthouse in Lower Manhattan. While it is unclear when they will
arrive, security will undoubtedly be tight. It is also unclear whether the
Venezuelan leader and his wife are yet represented by defense lawyers.
Jan. 3, 2026, 1:25 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Pentagon reporter
Even though General Caine did not
identify the helicopter unit involved in the operation in Caracas, U.S.
officials said it was the 160th Special Operations Aviation Regiment, which
flies modified MH-60 and MH-47 helicopters. The 160th, nicknamed
the Night Stalkers, specializes in high-risk, low-level, and nighttime missions
like insertions, extractions and raids. The unit has conducted what the
Pentagon calls training missions near the coast of Venezuela in recent months.
Jan. 3, 2026, 1:24 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Several U.S. airlines, including
Delta, American and Southwest, began cancelling flights to the Caribbean on
Saturday morning, in compliance with airspace closures from the Federal
Aviation Administration.
Jan. 3, 2026, 1:22 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Secretary of State Marco Rubio
said the extraction of President Nicolás Maduro and his wife from Venezuela was
a “law enforcement” operation, yet the attorney general, Pam Bondi, who has not
shied away from the spotlight, was a notable no-show at the news conference
announcing what is, arguably, the most significant prosecution of her tenure.
Bondi spent the night and early morning
hours watching live feeds inside a secure facility at U.S. Central Command
headquarters in Tampa, not far from her home, according to a senior U.S.
official with knowledge of her whereabouts who requested anonymity because of a
lack of authorization to discuss the matter publicly. It is not clear if Bondi,
who has access to government aircraft, would have had time to fly to New York,
which takes around three hours.
Jan. 3, 2026, 1:20 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
White House reporter
Vice President JD Vance briefly
met with President Trump at the president’s golf club in West Palm Beach, Fla.,
during the day on Friday to discuss the impending strikes, but did not go to
Mar-a-Lago that night, a spokesman said. The reason was the national security
team worried a late-night motorcade movement by the vice president might tip
off the Venezuelans.” Instead the vice president
joined a secure video conference through the night to monitor the operation. He
traveled to Cincinnati after the operation concluded and was not at Trump’s
news conference.
Jan. 3, 2026, 1:11 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Senator Jeanne Shaheen,
the top Democrat on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, said the capture of
Maduro was “entirely inconsistent” with what top officials told top lawmakers
in closed-door briefings in recent weeks.
“Because the president and his
cabinet repeatedly denied any intention of conducting regime change in
Venezuela when briefing Congress, we are left with no understanding of how the
Administration is preparing to mitigate risks to the U.S. and we have no
information regarding a long-term strategy following today’s extraordinary
escalation,” she said in statement.
Jan. 3, 2026, 1:08 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Adelys Ferro, co-founder of the
Venezuelan-American Caucus, a grassroots group representing Venezuelans in the
United States, said asylum petitions and immigration proceedings for hundreds
of thousands of Venezuelans remain suspended. For them, the situation is
particularly fraught. They have tried to prove that they have been targets of
the Maduro regime in U.S. immigration courts, she said, but at the same time,
the Trump administration has cast them as criminals and lawbreakers who should
be deported.
“We are victims of the Nicolás
Maduro regime, but we are also victims of the Trump administration policies,”
she said.
Jan. 3, 2026, 1:01 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Reporting from Venezuela
Delcy Rodríguez has been sworn in as
Venezuela’s interim president in a secret ceremony in Caracas on Saturday,
according to two people close to the government, who spoke on the condition of
anonymity because of fears for their safety. Rodríguez is President Nicolás
Maduro’s vice president.
Jan. 3, 2026, 1:00 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Steven Erlanger covers diplomacy
in Europe and beyond and wrote from Berlin.
Foreign leaders reacted with shock
and skepticism to the U.S. capture of Maduro.
Despite the long American military buildup around
Venezuela, the American raid on Caracas to capture President Nicolás Maduro and
his wife produced initial reactions of shock, outrage and skepticism from
international leaders, many of them troubled by an exercise of American gunboat
diplomacy.
The reactions were particularly
angry from Latin America and from leaders who are more on the left and who have
struggled with President Trump and his trade, tariff and other policies in the
region. Allies of Mr. Maduro, including Cuba and Russia, predictably condemned
the American intervention, despite Russia’s own invasion of sovereign Ukraine
nearly four years ago. And some, like a senior Mexican official, said that Mr.
Trump was simply after Venezuela’s large oil deposits.
Shortly after President Trump announced
that the United States would “run the country," European leaders appeared
to largely support the end to Mr. Maduro’s rule and were more cautious to
criticize Mr. Trump’s intervention.
Chancellor Friedrich Merz of Germany wrote
on social media that “Maduro has led his country into ruin” and that the U.S.
intervention was “complex” and required “careful consideration,” without going
into further detail. “The objective” now, he added, “is an orderly transition
to an elected government.”
President Emmanuel Macron of France
wrote on X that the Venezuelan people could “only
rejoice” at the end of Mr. Maduro’s dictatorship, and did not address the U.S.
approach. Before Mr. Trump’s announcement, however, the French foreign
minister, Jean-Noël Barrot, wrote on social media
that the military operation “violates the principle of non-resort to force that
underpins international law.”
President Luiz Inácio
Lula da Silva of Brazil was particularly scathing. He condemned the U.S. action
and said it recalled “the worst moments of interference in the politics” of the
region.
“The bombings on Venezuelan
territory and the capture of its president cross an unacceptable line,” Mr.
Lula wrote on social media. “These acts represent a grave affront to
Venezuela’s sovereignty and yet another extremely dangerous precedent for the
entire international community.”
President Gustavo Petro of
Colombia wrote on X that he rejected “the aggression against the sovereignty of
Venezuela and of Latin America.” He added that he was deploying forces to
Colombia’s border with Venezuela, with additional support “in the event of a
massive influx of refugees.”
And President Gabriel Boric of
Chile, a leftist whose term is coming to an end, also condemned the
intervention. “We express our concern and condemnation of the military actions
by the United States taking place in Venezuela, and we call for seeking a
peaceful solution to the serious crisis affecting the country,” he said on
social media. Like many, he called for dialogue to resolve the crisis.
President Miguel Díaz-Canel of Cuba, a Maduro ally, denounced “a criminal attack”
by the United States and called for “urgent reaction” from the world.
The reaction of Russia, another
ally of Mr. Maduro, was strongly worded and apparently without irony. Russia,
which launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine four years ago and is still at
war there, condemned the U.S. military action as “an act of armed aggression
against Venezuela.” The Russian foreign ministry, in a statement, called the
American attack “deeply concerning and condemnable,” adding: “Ideological
hostility has triumphed over businesslike pragmatism.”
Russia said that it supported the
leadership of Venezuela and called for an urgent meeting of the U.N. Security
Council to discuss the American intervention.
Iran, which has also been
threatened in the last few days by Mr. Trump, issued a statement on Saturday
condemning the U.S. attack and accusing the United States of violating
the United Nations Charter.
But Mr. Trump had supporters in
the region, too. President Javier Milei of Argentina
celebrated the capture of Mr. Maduro. “Liberty advances,” he wrote on X.
And Prime Minister Kamla Susheila Persad-Bissessar
of neighboring Trinidad and Tobago, who drew criticism for her support of Mr.
Trump’s military buildup against Mr. Maduro in the name of combating drug
trafficking, emphasized that her country played no role in the American
operation and maintains peaceful relations with Venezuela.
The Venezuela intervention in the
name of countering drug smuggling recalled to many the invasion of Panama in
1989. Back then, American forces captured Manuel Antonio Noriega, the ruler of
Panama, and brought him to the United States to face charges of drug
trafficking. He was convicted and sentenced to 40 years in prison, ultimately
serving 17 years after a reduction in his sentence for good behavior. He died
in Panamanian custody in 2017.
The Mexican government “condemned
energetically” Washington’s unilateral military action in Venezuela, warned of
regional instability and urged dialogue, according to a statement from
the country’s foreign ministry. “Mexico makes an urgent call to respect
international law, as well as the principles and purposes of the U.N. Charter,
and to cease any act of aggression against the Venezuelan government and
people,” read the statement, which was posted on X by President Claudia
Sheinbaum of Mexico.
Gerardo Fernández Noroña, the former president of Mexico’s Senate and an
influential leader of the country’s governing Morena party, said the U.S.
actions were aimed at taking control of Venezuela’s oil. “President Maduro has
not been captured; he was deprived of his liberty through a military
intervention by the United States government,” Mr. Fernández Noroña said on social media. “He is a prisoner of war. They
seek through this to subdue the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela in order to
seize its natural resources.”
Canada, which like Mexico has a
tense relationship with the Trump administration and faces a difficult year of
trade negotiations ahead, stopped short of condemning the U.S. actions in
Venezuela.
“Canada has long supported a
peaceful, negotiated, and Venezuelan-led transition process that respects the
democratic will of the Venezuelan people,” Prime Minister Mark Carney of Canada
said in a statement, adding, “In keeping with our longstanding commitment to
upholding the rule of law, sovereignty, and human rights, Canada calls on all
parties to respect international law.”
The Europeans were similarly
circumspect. Kaja Kallas,
the European Union’s foreign policy chief, said she had spoken to Secretary of
State Marco Rubio about events in Venezuela. “The EU is closely monitoring the
situation in Venezuela,” she wrote in a
social media post. “The EU has repeatedly stated that Mr. Maduro lacks
legitimacy and has defended a peaceful transition. Under all circumstances, the
principles of international law and the UN Charter must be respected. We call
for restraint. The safety of EU citizens in the country is our top priority.”
The president of the European
Council, António Costa, said on Saturday that the European Union wants
de-escalation in Venezuela. Mr. Costa wrote on X that
the E.U. “would continue to support a peaceful,
democratic, and inclusive solution in Venezuela.”
Spain, with its close ties to
Latin America, offered to mediate in the crisis in an attempt to broker a
negotiated and peaceful solution. “Spain calls for de-escalation and
restraint,” the foreign ministry said in a statement, adding that it was
prepared to support a “democratic, negotiated, and peaceful solution.”
As news emerged of the U.S.
intervention, Prime Minister Keir Starmer of Britain
was also cautious to take an outright position, saying “I will want to talk to
the president” and to allies to “establish the facts.” After Mr. Trump’s
announcement, he wrote on X that
the U.K. shed “no tears” about the end of Mr. Maduro’s regime and would
“discuss the evolving situation with US counterparts” in hopes of a peaceful
transition.
The Europeans have been mostly
consumed with Ukraine and helping President Volodymyr Zelensky refine a peace proposal that
would satisfy Mr. Trump and then be presented to Russia, which has already made
it clear that it is unacceptable in current form. On Saturday, the national
security advisers of the main European countries were in Kyiv on that matter,
which is of more strategic importance to the Europeans than the fate of Mr.
Maduro.
Ukraine itself largely supported
the actions of Mr. Trump. Foreign Minister Andrii Sybiha
argued that Ukraine defended “the
right of nations to live freely, free of dictatorship, oppression and human
rights violations.” He accused Mr. Maduro’s government of having “violated all
such principles in every respect.”
Perhaps the most interesting
criticism of Mr. Trump came from Jordan Bardella, the
likely presidential candidate of France’s far right National Rally party, which
has received support from Mr. Trump and Vice President JD Vance.
“No one will miss” the Maduro
regime, Mr. Bardella said on social media.
“That said, respect for international law and the sovereignty of states cannot
be applied selectively,” he added. “The forcible overthrow of a government from
the outside cannot constitute an acceptable response, only exacerbating the
geopolitical instability of our time.”
In the face of such intervention,
he added, France must “rearm our nation, to strengthen our industrial and
military capabilities,” in order to “make its independent voice heard on the
international stage, one that respects sovereignties.”
Reporting was contributed
by Ana Ionova, Annie Correal, Simon
Romero, Genevieve Glatsky, Emma Bubola, Maria Abi-Habib, Jason
Horowitz, Lizzie Dearden, Jeanna Smialek, Leily Nikounazar, Matina Stevis-Gridneffand Pranav Baskar.
Jan. 3, 2026, 12:50 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
White House reporter
Trump’s news conference raises
many questions. Who exactly will be running Venezuela, as he stated the United
States would do for a period of time? Trump indicated there will be a U.S.
military presence in Venezuela “as it pertains to oil.” What will that look
like and how many U.S. troops could be deployed?
Amid all the questions, Trump did
make clear one thing: This military operation was not just about ousting a
leader accused of drug trafficking, but also about expanding U.S. access to
Venezuela’s oil reserves.
Jan. 3, 2026, 12:49 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
White House reporter
That was one of the most
consequential news conferences of Trump’s two presidential terms, but it
remains unclear what will follow.
Jan. 3, 2026, 12:46 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Reporting from Palm Beach, Fla.
Trump’s news conference has
concluded. The biggest takeaway, of course, is Trump’s announcement that the
United States would “run” Venezuela, and the lack of details about how that
will work. But it’s also striking how much the president focused on oil and how
central that will be to how the United States runs the country.
Jan. 3, 2026, 12:38 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Pentagon reporter
Asked about the potential presence
of U.S. forces in Venezuela, Trump said that there would be a “presence in
Venezuela as it pertains to oil.”
Jan. 3, 2026, 12:34 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
White House reporter
Trump has made various comments
during this news conference showing that this military operation was at least
in part about gaining more access to oil in Venezuela.
Jan. 3, 2026, 12:33 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Pentagon reporter
When asked how running Venezuela
follows Trump’s long-stated goal of putting “America First,” the president
said, “We want to surround ourselves with good neighbors.”
Jan. 3, 2026, 12:32 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Pentagon reporter
When asked how much running
Venezuela, potentially for years, will cost, Trump said: “It won’t cost us
anything.”
Jan. 3, 2026, 12:31 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
White House reporter
Trump says that Rubio has spoken
to the newly sworn-in Venezuelan president and she has said she would support
what they are doing.
Jan. 3, 2026, 12:30 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Mexico City bureau chief
Trump’s suggestion that
Venezuela’s vice president, Delcy Rodríguez, would
help the United States run the country was stunning because it came just as Venezuelan
state television was playing a clip of her denouncing the U.S. military
operation.
“Faced with this brutal situation
and this brutal attack, we do not know the whereabouts of President Nicolás
Maduro and first lady Cilia Flores,” Rodríguez said, according to a clip played
by Venezuelan state television on Saturday. “We demand immediate proof of life
for President Maduro and the first lady from the government of President Donald
Trump.”
But Trump just told reporters that
Marco Rubio had spoken with her with a different result. “She’s essentially
willing to do what we think is necessary to make Venezuela great again,” Trump
said.
Jan. 3, 2026, 12:29 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
White House reporter
Asked why running a country
elsewhere in the Americas is “America First,” Trump said, “I think it is,”
citing the need for oil and energy. It’s worth recalling his quote to The
Atlantic in which he said that America First is whatever he says it is.
Jan. 3, 2026, 12:29 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
White House reporter
Trump says Rubio and Hegseth will be a “team” working with the people of
Venezuela to run Venezuela for this uncertain period of time. It’s unclear who
those Venezuelans will be.
Jan. 3, 2026, 12:28 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
White House reporter
Trump has long had an interest in
procuring the oil of other countries, including during his first term.
Jan. 3, 2026, 12:28 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
White House reporter
Asked how long the United States
would occupy Venezuela, Trump said, “I’d like to do it quickly, but it takes a
period of time.” He said that the United States would be selling Venezuelan oil
to China and other nations.
“We’ll be selling large amounts of
oil to other countries,” Trump says.
Jan. 3, 2026, 12:26 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Reporting from Palm Beach, Fla.
Trump is demonstrating how much
this effort is about securing access to oil. When asked about the timeline for
the U.S. involvement in the country, he immediately turned to rebuilding oil
assets.
Jan. 3, 2026, 12:26 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
President Trump indicated that
Vice President Delcy Rodríguez had been sworn in as
president of Venezuela. But earlier on Saturday, Rodríguez denounced
Washington’s military actions and Maduro’s capture.
Jan. 3, 2026, 12:25 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Pentagon reporter
Asked about the mixed results of
U.S. intervention and sponsorship of coups in Latin America, Trump said, “Not
with me.”
“We have a perfect record of
winning,” he added.
Jan. 3, 2026, 12:24 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
White House reporter
Pressed by reporters on who would
be running Venezuela, Trump points to his advisers standing behind him and says
that for a “period of time” the “people that are standing right behind me,
we’re going to be running it.”
Some of the advisers standing
behind him include Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth,
Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Gen. Dan Caine, the chairman of the Joint
Chiefs. Trump said the United States would be a part of an unspecified “group”
running Venezuela without providing details.
Jan. 3, 2026, 12:22 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
White House reporter
Rubio said this was not the kind
of mission for which you could give Congress notice in advance. He said it was
“largely a law-enforcement” operation.
But Trump quickly stepped in.
“Congress has a tendency to leak,” Trump said, before adding that “they knew we
were coming.”
Jan. 3, 2026, 12:19 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
White House reporter
“We’re not afraid of boots on the
ground if we have to have” them, Trump said. This is the opposite of what his
administration has repeatedly said its posture is.
Jan. 3, 2026, 12:19 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
White House reporter
“We are going to run the country right,″ Trump said as he turned to oil. “It’s going to
make a lot of money.” Then he added, about past Venezuelan governments,
“they stole our
oil.”
Jan. 3, 2026, 12:18 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
White House reporter
Asked who’s running Venezuela,
Trump said “a group” and immediately turned to the oil industry. He said oil
companies would be paying to rebuild the infrastructure.
Jan. 3, 2026, 12:17 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Pentagon reporter
Marco Rubio, the secretary of
state, said that Nicolás Maduro could have left Venezuela and been living in
another country, but “he wanted to play big boy.”
Jan. 3, 2026, 12:17 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
White House reporter
Trump’s statement that “we are
going to run the country,” is remarkable for a president who led a political
campaign largely opposed to prolonged overseas conflicts and regime changes.
The statement has prompted many
operational questions over how exactly the United States will assert control
over Venezuela. Who exactly will be running the nation and for how long?
The statement alone also raises
political questions over whether this operation undercuts a campaign promise
central to his political identity and support.
Jan. 3, 2026, 12:14 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Mexico City bureau chief
While Trump said the United States
would run Venezuela, some of Maduro’s top deputies were still on Venezuelan
state television on Saturday slamming the United States.
Venezuela’s defense minister and attorney
general, as well as several governors, all gave defiant statements, calling for
an international rejection of the U.S. military operation and saying they still
ran the country. State TV has also shown numerous small pro-Maduro rallies from
around the country.
Trump said Venezuelan leaders must
comply with the United States or else. “All political and military figures must
realize that what happened to Maduro can happen to them,” he said.
Jan. 3, 2026, 12:12 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
White House reporter
General Caine said another team of
helicopters was called in to extract Maduro and his wife, and took fire along
the way. He said the whole operation happened over about two hours and 20
minutes.
Jan. 3, 2026, 12:11 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Pentagon reporter
General Caine said that U.S.
warplanes dismantled Venezuelan air defenses so that American military
helicopters could go into Caracas. “One of our aircraft was hit but remained
flyable,” Caine said.
Jan. 3, 2026, 12:09 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
White House reporter
General Caine says the youngest
crewmember was 20, the oldest 49, and the military force was followed by an
“extraction force” to get Maduro.
Jan. 3, 2026, 12:07 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Pentagon reporter
Gen. Dan Caine, the chairman of
the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said the mission drew on decades of experience
fighting terrorists in the Middle East, Southwest Asia and Africa.
Jan. 3, 2026, 12:06 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
White House reporter
Caine said this operation involved
150 aircraft launching across the hemisphere, in some of the most detailed
description the U.S. government has given so far.
Jan. 3, 2026, 12:05 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Pentagon reporter
Gen. Dan Caine, chairman of the
Joint Chiefs of Staff, said the military mission in Venezuela was launched as
part of a request from the Justice Department. He said the operation was named
“Absolute Resolve.”
Jan. 3, 2026, 12:03 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
The indictment charging Maduro in
Manhattan does not reflect the accusations that Trump just lobbed at the Veneuzuelan president about his ties to Tren
de Aragua. Though the leader of the gang, Hector Rusthenford
Guerrero Flores, is one of the defendants, the indictment does not appear to
explicitly tie him to Maduro, instead accusing him more generally of working
with members of the Venezuelan government.
Jan. 3, 2026, 12:01 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
White House reporter
In declaring that the U.S. will be
“running” Venezuela, the president has raised a host of questions: Will the
United States have an occupying military force? Will it install a pliant
government for some number of years? Will it run the courts, and determine who
pumps the oil? All of this, of course, could enmesh the United States in the
kind of “forever wars” Trump’s MAGA base has rejected.
Trump did talk at some length
about bringing in American oil companies to remake the energy infrastucture and, presumably, regain rights it once held to
exploit the oil reserves.
Jan. 3, 2026, 11:58 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Reporting from Venezuela
There are no signs of U.S.
military presence in the country and the United States closed the embassy in
Caracas in 2019, so it is unclear how the Trump administration would run
Venezuela, as the president claims.
Jan. 3, 2026, 11:56 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
White House reporter
As he justifies the military
operation in Venezuela, Trump argued that Maduro sent members of Tren de Aragua to the United States to terrorize American
communities. Trump’s own intelligence community earlier this
year undercut that claim, finding that the gang was not
controlled by the Venezuelan government.
Jan. 3, 2026, 11:55 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
White House reporter
Trump has offered no details about
what the United States running Venezuela looks like. Will there be an American
official placed there in a leadership position?
Jan. 3, 2026, 11:53 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
White House reporter
Trump has segued from talking
about the Venezuela operation to talking about crime in Washington, falsely claiming there have been no
murders in Washington, D.C., in the last seven months
(and the National Guard has only been there since mid-August).
Jan. 3, 2026, 11:52 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
White House reporter
For all the rationales the Trump
administration gave about trying to curtail illegal drug trafficking, this
effort to knock Maduro out of power amounted to regime change, a fact that
Trump is not masking in this news conference.
Jan. 3, 2026, 11:48 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
White House reporter
Trump referred to a “partnership”
between Venezuela and the United States, which he said would make Venezuelans
“rich, independent and safe.” Of course, this was a partnership accomplished by
a government overthrow.
Jan. 3, 2026, 11:48 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Reporting from Palm Beach, Fla.
“We were prepared to do a second
wave” after the first attack, Trump said but ultimately it was not necessary
because of the success of the first. He added that the United States was ready
to do so in the future if needed.
Jan. 3, 2026, 11:47 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
White House reporter
Trump put no time limit on the
American occupation. It would be up to the United States to decide when to
return the country to Venezuelan control. And then he turned to oil, saying
that American companies would fix the infrastructure, “and start making money
for the country.”
Jan. 3, 2026, 11:46 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
White House reporter
“We are going to run the country
until such time that we can do a safe, proper and judicious transition,” Trump
said, suggesting an occupation. The United States has done this before, in
Germany, in Japan, and of course Iraq. But the history is checkered.
Jan. 3, 2026, 11:45 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
White House reporter
What comes next in terms of
Venezuelan leadership is unclear, Trump said, the United States would be in
charge until there is a clear safe transition. He emphasized it three times.
Jan. 3, 2026, 11:44 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Reporting from Palm Beach, Fla.
“We are going to run the country,”
Trump said of Venezuela. He said he did not want the Maduro regime to continue
with another leader.
Jan. 3, 2026, 11:43 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
White House reporter
“They knew we were coming,″ Trump said, arguing the Venezuelan military
was quickly overwhelmed. “Not a single American service member was killed,″ he said, though earlier he suggested there
were casualties.
Jan. 3, 2026, 11:42 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
White House reporter
Trump suggested the United States
turned off the power in Caracas, Venezuela’s capital. He didn’t say how, but
either a direct physical attack on the grid, or a cyberattack, would be the
most likely method.
Jan. 3, 2026, 11:42 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
White House reporter
Trump opens by saying
“overwhelming American military power” was used, from “air, land and sea” to
seize Maduro, and he also compared it to other operations he ordered, including
the attack in June on Iran’s nuclear sites. He contends that “no other nation”
could pull off this kind of operation.
Jan. 3, 2026, 11:41 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
White House reporter
Trump began his Mar-a-Lago news
conference saying the Venezuela operation was a force the likes of which hadn’t
been seen since World War II. Trump, who has been awake virtually all night,
looks and sounds fatigued.
Jan. 3, 2026, 11:40 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Reporting from Palm Beach, Fla.
Trump is surrounded by a number of
his national security officials: Pete Hegseth, Marco
Rubio, Dan Caine, John Ratcliffe and Stephen Miller. Steve Witkoff
and Kash Patel are also on the room but standing off
to the side.
Jan. 3, 2026, 11:37 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Pentagon reporter
The chairman of the Senate Armed
Services Committee praised Maduro’s capture. “This arrest was the
culmination of a monthslong effort by the Trump administration to degrade the
narco-terrorist organizations that Maduro oversaw,” said Senator Roger Wicker,
Republican of MIssissippi. He called on the
administration for a briefing as soon as possible to hear from senior military
and law enforcement leaders about the operation.
Jan. 3, 2026, 11:32 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Reporting from Palm Beach, Fla.
Trump just posted a photo on Truth Social that
he said is of Maduro aboard the U.S.S. Iwo Jima. The picture shows Maduro in a gray sweatshirt and sweatpants. He is blindfolded and
handcuffed and has large headphones on.
Jan. 3, 2026, 11:27 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Mexico City bureau chief
As President Trump prepares to
speak about the U.S. military operation in Venezuela, there is quite a split
screen with Venezuelan state television. The main government channel is
broadcasting a pro-Venezuela rally in Cuba, where speakers are denouncing Trump
as a dictator, with an all-caps chyron that says: “The empire kidnapped them.
We want them back.”
Jan. 3, 2026, 11:18 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Julian E. Barnes, Tyler Pager and Eric Schmitt
Julian E. Barnes and Eric Schmitt
reported from Washington. Tyler Pager reported from West Palm Beach, Fla.
President Trump says he watched the
capture of Maduro in real time.
In August, a clandestine team of
C.I.A. officers slipped into Venezuela with a plan to collect information on
Nicolás Maduro, the country’s president, whom the Trump administration had
labeled a narco-terrorist.
The C.I.A. team moved about
Caracas, remaining undetected for months while it was in the country. The
intelligence gathered about the Venezuelan leader’s daily movements — combined
with a human source close to Mr. Maduro and a fleet of stealth drones flying
secretly above — enabled the agency to map out minute details about his
routines.
It was a highly dangerous mission.
With the U.S. embassy closed, the C.I.A. officers could not operate under the
cloak of diplomatic cover. But it was highly successful. Gen. Dan Caine, the
chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said at a news conference that because
of the intelligence gathered by the team, the United States knew where Mr.
Maduro moved, what he ate and even what pets he kept.
That information was critical to
the ensuing military operation, a pre-dawn raid Saturday by elite Army Delta
Force commandos, the riskiest U.S. military operation of its kind since members
of the Navy’s SEAL Team 6 killed Osama bin Laden in a safe house in Pakistan in
2011.
The result was a tactically
precise and swiftly executed operation that extracted Mr. Maduro from his
country with no loss of American life, a result heralded by President Trump
amid larger questions about the legality and rationale for the U.S. actions in
Venezuela.
Mr. Trump has justified what was
named Operation Absolute Resolve as a strike against drug trafficking. But
Venezuela is hardly as big a player in the international drug trade as other
countries. Officials had previously told congressional leaders that
their objective in Venezuela was not regime change. And Mr. Trump has long said
he opposes U.S. foreign occupations.
Yet on Saturday, the president
proclaimed that American officials were in charge of Venezuela, and that the
United States would rebuild the country’s oil infrastructure.
In contrast to messy U.S.
interventions of the past — by the military in Panama or the C.I.A. in Cuba —
the operation to grab Mr. Maduro was virtually flawless, according to multiple
officials familiar with the details, some of whom spoke on the condition of
anonymity to describe the plans.
In the run-up, Delta Force
commandos rehearsed the extraction inside a full-scale model of Mr. Maduro’s
compound that the Joint Special Operations Command had built in Kentucky. They
practiced blowing through steel doors at ever-faster paces.
The military had been readying for
days to execute the mission, waiting for good weather conditions and a time
when the risk of civilian casualties would be minimized.
Amid the heightened tensions, Mr.
Maduro had been rotating between six and eight locations, and the United States
did not always learn where he intended to stay until late in the evenings. To
execute the operation, the U.S. military needed confirmation that Mr. Maduro
was at the compound they had trained to attack.
In the days leading up to the raid,
the United States deployed increasing numbers of Special Operations aircraft,
specialized electronic warfare planes, armed Reaper drones, search-and-rescue
helicopters and fighter jets to the region — last-minute reinforcements that
analysts said indicated the only question was when military action would
happen, not if.
The United States had made other
moves intended to ratchet up the pressure on Mr. Maduro and prepare for the
raid to capture him. A week earlier, the C.I.A. had carried out a drone
strike on a port facility in Venezuela. And for months,
the U.S. military has conducted a legally disputed campaign that has destroyed dozens of boats and
killed at least 115 people in the Caribbean and eastern Pacific.
In recent days, Mr. Maduro tried
to head off an American raid, offering the United States access to Venezuelan
oil, Mr. Trump said Saturday. A U.S. official said the deal, offered on Dec.
23, would have had Mr. Maduro leave the country for Turkey. But Mr. Maduro
angrily rejected that plan, the official said. It was clear, the official
added, that Mr. Maduro was not serious.
The collapse of the talks set the
stage for the capture mission, which culminated with Mr. Maduro flown to the
United States and jailed in Brooklyn to face federal drug trafficking charges.
There was likely little doubt in
the Venezuelan government that the United States was coming. But the military
took pains to maintain so-called tactical surprise, like it did with its
operation over the summer to destroy Iran’s nuclear facilities.
Mr. Trump had authorized the U.S.
military to go ahead as early as Dec. 25, but left the precise timing to
Pentagon officials and Special Operations planners to ensure that the attacking
force was ready, and that conditions on the ground were optimal.
The U.S. military wanted to
conduct the operation during the holiday period because many government
officials were on vacation and because significant numbers of Venezuelan
military personnel were on leave, according to a U.S. official.
Unseasonably bad weather pushed
the operation off by several days. Earlier in the week, however, the weather
cleared, and military commanders looked at a “rolling window” of targeting
opportunities in the days ahead. Mr. Trump gave the final go order at 10:46
p.m. Friday.
Had the weather not cleared, the
mission could have been pushed off until mid-January, one official said.
The operation officially got
underway around 4:30 p.m. on Friday, when U.S. officials gave the first set of
approvals to launch certain assets into the air. But that did not mean the full
mission would be authorized. For the next six hours, officials continued to
monitor the conditions on the ground, including the weather and Mr. Maduro’s
whereabouts.
Mr. Trump spent the evening on the
patio at Mar-a-Lago, his Florida club, where he had dinner with aides and
cabinet secretaries. The president’s aides told him that they would be calling
him later that evening, around 10:30 p.m., for the final approval. Mr. Trump
did so by phone, then joined his senior national security officials in a secure
location on the property.
Inside Venezuela, the effort began
with a cyberoperation that cut power to large swaths of Caracas, shrouding the
city in darkness to allow the planes, drones and helicopters to approach
undetected.
More than 150 military aircraft,
including drones, fighter planes and bombers, took part in the mission, taking
off from 20 different military bases and Navy ships.
As the aircraft advanced on
Caracas, military and intelligence agencies determined that they had maintained
tactical surprise: Mr. Maduro had not been warned that the operation was
coming.
Early Saturday morning, thunderous
explosions boomed across Caracas as U.S. warplanes struck at radar and air
defense batteries. While some of the explosions posted on social media looked
dramatic, a U.S. official said that they were mostly radar installations and
radio transmission towers being taken out.
At least 40 people were killed in
Saturday’s attack on Venezuela, including military personnel and civilians,
according to a senior Venezuelan official who spoke on condition of anonymity
to describe preliminary reports.
Later, General Caine told
reporters that the fighter planes, bombers and drones came into Venezuela to
find and destroy the country’s air defenses, to clear a safe pathway for the
helicopters carrying Special Operations forces.
Even though Venezuelan air
defenses were suppressed, the U.S. helicopters came under fire as they moved in
on Mr. Maduro’s compound at about 2:01 a.m. local time. General Caine said the
helicopters responded with “overwhelming force.”
One of the helicopters was hit.
Two U.S. officials said that about half a dozen soldiers were injured in the
overall operation.
The Delta Force operators assigned
to capture Mr. Maduro were whisked to their target — on Venezuela’s most
fortified military base — by an elite Army Special Operations aviation unit,
the 160th Special Operations Aviation Regiment, which flies modified MH-60 and
MH-47 helicopters.
The 160th, nicknamed the Night
Stalkers, specializes in high-risk, low-level and nighttime missions like
insertions, extractions and raids. The unit conducted what the Pentagon called
training missions near the coast of Venezuela in recent months.
Once on the ground, Delta Force
moved quickly through the building to find Mr. Maduro. About 1,300 miles away,
in a room inside Mar-a-Lago, Mr. Trump and key aides watched the raid play out
in real time, courtesy of a camera positioned on an aircraft overhead.
As General Caine narrated the
events on the screen, the president peppered him with questions about how the
operation was unfolding.
“I watched it literally like I was
watching a television show,” Mr. Trump said on Fox News Saturday morning.
As the president monitored the
raid from Florida, the Delta Force operators used an explosive to enter the
building.
The U.S. official said that the
Special Operations forces took three minutes after blowing open the door to
move through the building to Mr. Maduro’s location.
Mr. Trump said that once the
Special Operations forces made it through the compound to Mr. Maduro’s room,
the Venezuelan leader and his wife tried to escape into a steel-reinforced
room, but were stopped by the U.S. forces.
“He was trying to get to a safe
place,” Mr. Trump said during the news conference with General Caine, adding:
“It was a very thick door, a very heavy door. But he was unable to get to that
door. He made it to the door, he was unable to close it.”
About five minutes after entering
the building, Delta Force reported that they had Mr. Maduro in custody.
The military was accompanied by an
F.B.I. hostage negotiator in case Mr. Maduro had locked himself in a safe room or
refused to surrender.
Those negotiations, however,
proved unnecessary. The Delta operatives swiftly loaded the couple into the
helicopters, which had returned to the compound. By 4:29 a.m. Caracas time, Mr.
Maduro and his wife were transferred to the U.S.S. Iwo Jima, a U.S. warship in
the Caribbean stationed about 100 miles off the coast of Venezuela during the
operation.
The couple was transferred from
the Iwo Jima to the U.S. Navy base at Guantánamo Bay, where the F.B.I. had a 757 government plane waiting to bring him to a
military-controlled airport north of Manhattan.
Mr. Trump watched until the
Special Operations forces were out of Venezuela, flying over the ocean, an
official said.
Mr. Trump said that the United
States was prepared to conduct a second wave of attacks against Venezuela, but
that he did not think it would be necessary. He issued a warning to other
Venezuelan leaders: He would be willing to come after them, as well.
Reporting was contributed
by Anatoly Kurmanaev and Mariana
Martínez from Venezuela, Riley Mellen from
New York and Carol Rosenberg from Miami.
Jan. 3, 2026, 11:18 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Before this operation, Americans largely did not support the idea of
U.S. military activity in Venezuela. Just 25 percent of voters nationally — and
about half of Republicans — supported military action in Venezuela, according
to a December poll from Quinnipiac
University.
Jan. 3, 2026, 11:17 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Isabela Espadas Barros Leal and Genevieve Glatsky
A timeline of the rising tension between
the U.S. and Venezuela.
President Trump on Saturday
announced the capture of the authoritarian leader of Venezuela, Nicolás Maduro,
in a U.S. military operation that
appeared to be the culmination of a campaign against Mr. Maduro by the
president and other top American officials.
Mr. Maduro’s capture came after
months of deadly U.S. strikes on supposed drug-carrying boats, the seizure of
two tankers carrying Venezuelan oil and a U.S. military buildup off the South
American country’s shores.
Here are some of the events that
led to the breakdown in relations between the United States and Venezuela, and
the effort to force Mr. Maduro from power.
March
2020: During
Mr. Trump’s first term, the Justice Department indicted Mr.
Maduro in a narco-terrorism and cocaine-trafficking conspiracy in which,
prosecutors said, he helped lead a violent drug cartel that lasted for decades.
Mr. Maduro condemned the charges, denying any involvement with drug
trafficking.
July
2024: After a
vote riddled with irregularities, Mr. Maduro was declared the
winner of Venezuela’s 2024 presidential election. Independent monitors said the
election was marred by fraud and
that an opposition leader, Edmundo González, was its legitimate winner.
January
2025: The
Biden administration recognized Mr.
González, who had fled Venezuela after the election and was living in exile in
Spain, as the legitimate leader of Venezuela as part of an effort to further
isolate Mr. Maduro.
July: The Trump administration
added Cartel de los Soles, which it described as a “Venezuela-based criminal
group,” to a list of global terrorist groups and declared that Mr. Maduro was
its leader. The Treasury Department said that Cartel de los Soles “provided
material support” to Tren de Aragua, another cartel
linked to Venezuela that the administration had designated as a foreign
terrorist organization.
The administration treats Cartel
de los Soles as an organized group, but some experts on Latin American crime
characterize it as a network of corruption in Venezuela’s military and government.
Also in July, Mr. Trump signed a secret order directing
the American military to use force against Latin American drug cartels that his
administration identified as terrorist organizations.
August: The Pentagon began dispatching warships,
fighter jets and thousands of troops into the Caribbean near Venezuela,
increasing tensions in the region.
Aug.
7: Attorney
General Pam Bondi announced that the United States government had increased its reward for
information leading to the arrest of Mr. Maduro to $50 million.
Sept.
2: Mr.
Trump ordered a deadly strike on
a Venezuelan boat that he claimed was carrying “terrorists” who were members of
Tren de Aragua over international waters. Mr. Maduro later
called the strike, which killed 11 people, a “heinous crime” and said the
United States should have captured those onboard if they were believed to have
been transporting drugs.
The American military struck two
other small vessels in September, killing six more people, including one who
was said to be a Colombian citizen.
The strikes have been widely criticized as illegal.
Sept.
4: Two
Venezuelan F-16 fighter jets flew over
American warships in the Caribbean in a show of force after the first deadly
boat strike, a move the Pentagon described as “highly provocative.”
Sept.
6: Mr.
Maduro sent a letter to
Mr. Trump insisting that his country did not export drugs. The White House
press secretary, Karoline Leavitt, later said that the White House had seen the
letter but that it did not change the
administration’s position on Venezuela.
Oct.
2: Mr.
Trump instructed Richard Grenell, who is a special
presidential envoy and the president of the Kennedy Center, to stop all diplomatic outreach to
Venezuela. Mr. Grenell had been trying to negotiate a
deal with Mr. Maduro that would have secured U.S. companies’ access to
Venezuelan oil.
Oct.
8: Republicans
in the Senate rejected a resolution to
bar Mr. Trump from using military force against boats in the Caribbean Sea.
Oct.
15: Mr. Trump
acknowledged that he had authorized the C.I.A. to conduct covert action in
Venezuela, telling reporters that the administration was “certainly looking at
land now, because we’ve got the sea very well under control.” The Venezuelan
government said it would raise the matter with the United Nations Security
Council.
Oct.
16: The U.S.
military carried out a strike on a semisubmersible vessel in the Caribbean Sea,
killing two men on board. Two other men were rescued by
the U.S. military and repatriated within days to Colombia and Ecuador.
Oct.
17: The U.S. military said it killed
three men and destroyed another boat it suspected of
running drugs in the Caribbean Sea, this one alleged to have been affiliated
with a Colombian insurgency group. It was the seventh boat known to have been
attacked since early September.
Oct.
21: The
United States struck a vessel that American officials suspected of carrying
drugs in the Pacific Ocean off
the coast of Colombia, expanding the Trump administration’s campaign past the
Caribbean Sea. The strike killed two or three people, a U.S. official said.
A second Pacific strike announced
a day later killed three more people.
Oct.
23: Mr.
Trump said at a news conference that he would not seek congressional approval for
military strikes against drug cartels. “I don’t think we’re going to
necessarily ask for a declaration of war,” Mr. Trump said, adding: “I think we
are going to kill people that are bringing drugs into our country, OK?”
Oct.
24: The
Pentagon announced that the aircraft carrier Gerald Ford and its accompanying
warships and attack planes would be deployed to
waters near Latin America. It came one day after two Air Force B-1 bombers flew
near Venezuela.
Oct.
27: Another
round of strikes on vessels in the Pacific killed 15 people.
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth initially said one
person had survived, but he was presumed dead after
Mexican officials failed to find anyone in the water.
Oct.
31: María
Corina Machado, Venezuela’s de facto opposition leader — who was awarded the
Nobel Peace Prize in October — told Bloomberg News that
she had “no doubt that Nicolás Maduro, Jorge Rodríguez and many others are the
masterminds of a system that has rigged elections in many countries, including
the U.S.” The comments, which have been widely debunked, were criticized by
former diplomats as well as critics of Mr. Maduro for seeming to provide
justification for a potential invasion by the United States.
Nov.
2: Mr.
Trump said in an interview on
CBS News’s “60 Minutes” that he doubted the United States would go to war with
Venezuela but would not fully rule out the possibility of land strikes. He
accused Venezuela of treating the United States “very badly” and, when asked if
Mr. Maduro’s days in office were numbered, said, “I would say yeah.”
Nov.
6: The
United States struck a boat in the
Caribbean, killing three people. That strike came after two others on the first
week of November, one in the Caribbean and one in the Pacific, that killed five
people.
Nov.
12: The
United States carried out its 20th strike against
the purported drug cartels. The strike killed four people and brought the total
known death toll to 80.
Nov.
28: The New
York Times reported that Mr. Trump and Mr. Maduro had spoken late
the previous week, in a phone call that also included Mr. Rubio. The leaders
discussed a possible meeting in the United States, though no plans were
announced.
Nov.
29: Mr.
Trump said on social media that
the airspace “above and surrounding Venezuela” should be considered “closed in
its entirety.” The president has no authority over Venezuelan airspace, but his
post was expected to deter airlines from flying to the country.
Dec.
2: Mr. Hegseth addressed mounting concerns about
the legality of the first strike on a Caribbean vessel, citing “the fog of war”
in response to questions about whether the U.S. military committed a war crime
when it killed two survivors of that attack in a second strike. Mr. Hegseth said he did not personally see survivors of the
first strike and that Adm. Frank M. Bradley, the commander of the operation,
ordered the second strike.
Dec.
4: A
strike in the Eastern Pacific killed four people at
a moment of heightened scrutiny over the legality of the U.S. military’s campaign,
and nearly two weeks since the previous boat attack.
Dec.
10: Mr.
Trump announced that the U.S. had seized a sanctioned oil tanker off
the coast of Venezuela. U.S. officials said they expected additional seizures
in the coming weeks, asserting that they were part of the Trump
administration’s efforts to weaken Mr. Maduro’s government by undermining its
oil market. One of the officials said that though the ship was carrying Venezuelan
oil, it was seized because of its past links to smuggling illicit Iranian oil.
Dec.
11: Ms.
Machado appeared in Oslo hours
after missing the ceremony that awarded her the Nobel Peace Prize. Her
emergence after more than a year in hiding thrust the opposition back onto the
global stage at a volatile moment in U.S.-Venezuela relations. That same
day the U.S. imposed new sanctions on
Venezuela’s oil sector and on relatives of Mr. Maduro while moving to block
tens of millions of dollars’ worth of oil aboard the seized oil tanker.
Dec.
15: The U.S.
military struck three boats in the Eastern Pacific, killing eight people,
in one of the deadliest days of the campaign. The military said the boats were
traveling along a known narco-trafficking route.
Dec.
16: Mr. Trump
ordered a “complete blockade” of
sanctioned oil tankers entering or leaving Venezuela. In a social media post,
Mr. Trump said Venezuela was “completely surrounded” by a growing U.S. naval
presence, sharply escalating his efforts to disrupt the country’s oil exports.
The move prompted Mr. Maduro to dispatch naval escorts for
oil shipments sailing toward Asia.
Dec.
17: An attack in
the Eastern Pacific killed four people in a strike the military said was
carried out at the direction of Mr. Hegseth. The
House rejected two
resolutions that would have required Mr. Trump to seek congressional approval
before attacking Venezuela and continuing the strikes.
Dec.
18: The military
carried out two more strikes on
boats in the Eastern Pacific, killing five people.
Dec.
19: Mr.
Trump nominated Lt. Gen. Francis L. Donovan,
a marine with extensive special operations and Middle East experience, to lead
the U.S. Southern Command after the abrupt retirement of Adm. Alvin Holsey, who
reportedly objected to the administration’s lethal boat strikes.
Dec.
20: The U.S.
Coast Guard tried to intercept the Bella 1, a stateless tanker under U.S.
sanctions, for past Iranian oil shipments. Personnel on the ship did not allow
it to be boarded and the vessel fled northeast into the Atlantic while
broadcasting distress signals.
The Coast Guard also stopped and
detained the Centuries, a Panamanian-flagged vessel carrying Venezuelan oil for
a China-based trader. It was unclear how long the United States intended to
detain the Centuries, as American authorities did not have a warrant to take
possession of it.
Dec.
22: The U.S.
military said a strike in the eastern Pacific targeted a boat that had been
transporting drugs along known trafficking routes. One person was killed.
Dec.
23: Over several
days, the U.S. military intensified operations in
the Caribbean, sending multiple C-17 transport flights from bases across the
country and Japan to Puerto Rico.
Late
December: In the first
known U.S. operation inside Venezuela, the C.I.A. carried out a drone strike on
a port facility sometime during the fourth week of December, likely on Dec. 24.
The strike hit a dock purportedly used for shipping narcotics and it did not
kill anyone, people briefed on the operation said. News of the strike first
came to light on Dec. 26, when Mr. Trump said in a radio interview that
the U.S. had destroyed “a big facility” as part of its campaign against
Venezuela.
Dec.
29: A
strike on a boat in the Eastern Pacific killed two people, according to the
U.S. Southern Command. The command said on social media that
the boat was engaged in “narco-trafficking operations.”
Dec.
30: Three people
were killed aboard one boat during strikes on three boats traveling in a chain,
according to the U.S. Southern Command, which announced the operation a day
later.
Dec.
31: The U.S.
military killed five people in a strike on two boats, the Southern Command
said. The command did not provide further information about the boats’
location.
As of Dec. 31, at least 115 people
had been killed in 35 boat strikes since Sept. 2.
Jan.
2: President
Trump announced on social media that the United States had captured Mr. Maduro and
was flying him out of Venezuela. Mr. Trump’s announcement came hours after the
start of coordinated U.S. strikes on Venezuela’s capital, Caracas, and other
parts of the country. The strikes killed at least 80 people, according to a
senior Venezuelan official.
Jan. 3: Mr. Maduro arrived
in New York, where he and his wife were indicted on federal drug trafficking
and weapons charges and held in a Brooklyn jail. Mr. Trump said in a news
conference shortly after the announcement of Mr. Maduro’s capture that the
United States would “run” Venezuela, though Mr. Maduro’s aides appeared to still be in power after
the attack.
Jan.
4: After top
Venezuelan officials fiercely condemned the U.S. attack, the country’s interim
leader, Delcy Rodríguez, struck a more conciliatory
tone, asserting Venezuela’s right to sovereignty but offering to work on a
“cooperative agenda” with the United States. Still, Mr. Trump reiterated his
claim to have direct control over the country, saying the United States was “in charge” of
Venezuela.
Jan.
5: Mr. Maduro
and his wife pleaded not guilty to drug trafficking and other federal charges
during their arraignment at a federal courthouse in Manhattan. Mr. Maduro told
the judge he had been kidnapped. “I’m innocent. I’m not guilty. I am a decent
man,” he said through an interpreter. He added, “I am still president of my
country.”
Anushka Patil contributed
reporting.
Jan. 3, 2026, 11:10 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
William Rashbaum
The new indictment tracks
President Nicolás Maduro’s rise through the ranks of the Venezuelan government,
accusing him of committing the crimes charged in the indictment every step of
the way. “Since his early days in Venezuelan government, Maduro Moros has
tarnished every public office he has held,” the indictment charged, using
Maduro’s full Spanish surname. “As a member of Venezuela’s National Assembly,
Maduro Moros moved loads of cocaine under the protection of Venezuelan law
enforcement.”
The indictment continues: “As
Venezuela’s Minister of Foreign Affairs, Maduro Moros provided Venezuelan
diplomatic passports to drug traffickers and facilitated diplomatic cover for
planes used by money launderers to repatriate drug proceeds from Mexico to
Venezuela. As Venezuela’s President and now-de facto ruler, Maduro Moros allows
cocaine-fueled corruption to flourish for his own benefit, for the benefit of
members of his ruling regime, and for the benefit of his family members.”
Jan. 3, 2026, 11:03 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Reporting from Palm Beach, Fla.
We are inside the Tea Room at
Mar-a-Lago awaiting the president’s news conference.
Jan. 3, 2026, 11:01 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Reporting from Washington
Vice President JD Vance justifies
Maduro’s capture as bringing him to justice.
Vice President JD Vance justified
the U.S. operation that captured Venezuela’s leader, Nicolás Maduro, as legal
and necessary, praising it in a social media post on
Saturday.
“PSA for everyone saying this was
‘illegal’: Maduro has multiple indictments in
the United States for narcoterrorism. You don’t get to avoid justice for drug trafficking
in the United States because you live in a palace in Caracas,” he said,
referring to the Venezuelan capital.
Mr. Maduro, Venezuela’s leader
since 2013, has denied U.S. accusations that he controls drug trafficking
groups.
Mr. Vance added that
“the president offered multiple off ramps, but was very clear throughout this
process: the drug trafficking must stop, and the stolen oil must be returned to
the United States.”
The “stolen oil” referred to a
view within the administration that Venezuela illegally took American oil fields through
nationalization.
The U.S. operation inside
Venezuela to capture the country’s leader is the latest in a series of
escalations. The United States has bombed suspected drug boats in the Caribbean
Sea and eastern Pacific Ocean, has declared a blockade on some oil tankers
coming to and from Venezuelan ports, and has seized or pursued several tankers.
While Mr. Vance has not been as
vocal in the administration’s campaign against Venezuela as Secretary of State
Marco Rubio or Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, who
have played key roles in
it. Still, the vice president has regularly proved to be a stalwart defender of
the administration.
In early September after the U.S.
first struck a boat the administration said was trafficking narcotics, killing
11, Mr. Vance said on social
media that “killing cartel members who poison our fellow citizens is the
highest and best use of our military.”
Jan. 3, 2026, 10:54 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
United Nations bureau chief
Venezuela’s mission to the U.N.
has requested an emergency Security Council meeting and has asked the Council
to condemn the U.S. military strikes against the country.
Venezuela’s ambassador, Samuel
Reinaldo Moncada Acosta, said in a letter to the Council’s president: “The
United States of America always uses lies to fabricate wars. It is an
international tyranny imposed with the propaganda of death: the recent past
confirms this.” Russia and China, allies of Venezuela and permanent members of
the Council, have requested the Council convene an emergency meeting this
weekend.
Jan. 3,
2026, 10:47 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
María Corina Machado, the
Venezuelan opposition leader, posted a
statement on social media, calling for national unity following the capture of
Nicolás Maduro.
“Given his refusal to accept a
negotiated exit, the government of the United States has fulfilled its promise
to enforce the law,” she wrote. “We have struggled for years, we have given it
our all, and it has been worth it. What had to happen is happening.”
Machado added that Edmundo
González, who the U.S. has recognized as Venezuela’s President-elect, must
“immediately” take office and be recognized as the country’s commander of the
armed forces.
“Today we are prepared to enforce
our mandate and take power,” Machado said. “We are going to restore order,
release the political prisoners, build an exceptional country, and bring our
children back home.”
Jan. 3, 2026, 10:47 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
William Rashbaum
A judge in the Southern District
of New York has unsealed the new indictment against President Nicolás Maduro of
Venezuela, which opens by saying that for 25 years the leaders of Venezuela
have “abused their positions of public trust and corrupted once-legitimate
institutions to import tons of cocaine into the United States.” The charges are
the same as in the 2020 indictment, though there is more political rhetoric.
There are four counts in both
indictments, including narco-terrorism, conspiracy to import cocaine and
possession of machine guns, which, when combined with drug trafficking charges,
carries a potentially lengthy prison sentence. Both indictments name six defendants,
but the new one includes Maduro’s wife and son. It also names the minister of
the interior, Diosado Cabello Rondon,
who was charged before. It also adds two new defendants, while
dropping three others who had been charged in 2020.
Jan. 3, 2026, 10:46 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Reporting from Washington
Trump didn’t seek congressional
authorization to capture Maduro, and some lawmakers are concerned.
Republicans in Congress on
Saturday cheered the Trump administration’s dramatic military action to capture
President Nicolás Maduro of Venezuela, but top Democrats sounded alarms about
the legality of the operation and said they would seek a quick vote to halt
hostilities without express authorization.
The surprise nighttime operation —
and President Trump’s declaration on Saturday that he planned to “run”
Venezuela and use the U.S. military to guard its oil resources — all but
guaranteed that lawmakers returning to Washington next week would instantly
confront an intense debate about the situation.
That promised the latest test of
whether the Republican-controlled House and Senate, which have deferred
constantly to the president, would try to reassert any of their power in an
election year.
Senator Chuck Schumer, Democrat of
New York and the minority leader, said he would push for a vote next week on a
war powers resolution to limit Mr. Trump’s ability to take further military
action without explicit authorization by Congress.
Senator Andy Kim, Democrat of New
Jersey, said Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth had “blatantly” lied to Congress in recent
briefings when they said the administration’s objective in Venezuela was not
regime change.
Mr. Kim, a former national
security official in the Obama administration, called the move to oust Mr.
Maduro “disastrous,” arguing that it would further isolate the United States on
the global stage.
“Trump rejected our
Constitutionally required approval process for armed conflict because the
Administration knows the American people overwhelmingly reject risks pulling
our nation into another war,” he wrote on social media.
At a morning news conference in
Palm Beach, Fla., the president indicated that he had purposefully skipped
informing members of Congress before taking action in Venezuela because he did
not trust lawmakers to keep his plans confidential.
“Congress has a tendency to leak,”
Mr. Trump said.
And after Mr. Trump said at the
same news conference that the United States would now “run” Venezuela, Mr.
Schumer warned that such an idea “should strike fear in the hearts of all
Americans.”
He called on the administration to
immediately brief Congress on its plan “to prevent a humanitarian and
geopolitical disaster that plunges us into another endless war or one that
trades one corrupt dictator for another.”
Representative Hakeem Jeffries,
Democrat of New York and the minority leader, also called for a briefing,
demanding that the Trump administration immediately present to Congress
“compelling evidence to explain and justify this unauthorized use of military
force.”
The House and the Senate are set
to return to Washington next week after a long holiday break.
But Mr. Schumer said on Saturday
afternoon that the administration had not responded to any request from
congressional leaders for an immediate briefing.
“They have not given us any
details and have not gotten back to us,” Mr. Schumer said during a conference
call with reporters. “They kept everyone in the total dark.”
Most congressional Republicans
rallied around the president’s action, in keeping with the extraordinary deference they have
shown to Mr. Trump even as he has trampled over
congressional prerogatives and contradicted his promises to extricate the
United States from foreign conflicts.
Senator John Thune, Republican of
South Dakota and the majority leader, said Mr. Maduro’s capture was “an
important first step to bring him to justice for the drug crimes for which he
has been indicted in the United States.” He called the operation a “decisive
action” by Mr. Trump.
Speaker Mike Johnson called the
operation “decisive and justified,” and said in a statement that the Trump
administration was “working to schedule briefings for members as Congress
returns to Washington.”
But even some Republicans gently
pressed for more answers from the Trump administration.
“I look forward to hearing more
about the Administration’s plans for a positive transition in the days ahead,”
Senator Todd Young, Republican of Indiana, said online, while also praising the
military personnel who carried out the capture of Mr. Maduro.
And others said the operation ran
counter to Mr. Trump’s “America First” promises.
“This is what many in MAGA thought
they voted to end,” Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, the right-wing
Republican from Georgia who is set to vacate her position as lawmakers return
to Washington, wrote in a lengthy social media post. “Boy
were we wrong.”
Many Democrats called Mr. Maduro’s
apprehension good news, but said the way in which it was done raised serious
questions.
Representative Debbie Wasserman
Schultz, a Florida Democrat who represents a district in which Venezuelan
immigrants cheered the news, said that Mr. Maduro’s capture was “welcome.” But
she added: “I’ll demand answers as to why Congress and the American people were
bypassed in this effort. The absence of congressional involvement prior to this
action risks the continuation of the illegitimate Venezuelan regime.”
At least one Democratic candidate
running for office in this year’s midterm elections was quick to condemn
Republicans in Congress for having failed to stand up to Mr. Trump when they
could have, helping to set the stage for what they called an unauthorized
large-scale strike on Venezuela.
Graham Platner,
a veteran and a progressive Democrat running for Senate in Maine, noted that
Senator Susan Collins, the Republican he is challenging, voted with most members of her party against
a Senate resolution to block the president from invading Venezuela without
congressional authorization. “From Iraq to Venezuela, you can count on Susan
Collins to enable illegal foreign wars,” he wrote online.
And the top Democrats on the national
security, intelligence and armed services committees all condemned the action
even as they denounced Mr. Maduro.
“Last night, President Trump waged
war on a foreign nation without authorization, without notification, and
without any explanation to the American people,” Senator Jack Reed of Rhode
Island, the senior Democrat on the Armed Services Committee, said in a
statement. “Whatever comes next, President Trump will own the consequences.”
At least one Republican expressed
concern early Saturday about the operation, but later said he was satisfied
with the explanation that Mr. Rubio had given him in a phone call. In an
initial post on Saturday morning, Mr. Lee said he wanted to know “what, if
anything, might constitutionally justify this action” in the absence of
congressional authorization for military force.
But in a second post hours later,
Mr. Lee wrote that Mr. Rubio had told him that Mr. Maduro had been “arrested by
U.S. personnel to stand trial on criminal charges in the United States.” He
added: “This action likely falls within the president’s inherent authority
under Article II of the Constitution to protect U.S. personnel from an actual
or imminent attack.”
Mr. Lee also said that Mr. Rubio
“anticipates no further action in Venezuela now that Maduro is in U.S.
custody.”
That post came hours before Mr.
Trump told reporters that the United States would effectively be running
Venezuela and that a U.S. military presence would remain there “as it pertains
to oil.”
Jan. 3, 2026, 10:39 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
The C.I.A. had a group of officers
on the ground in Venezuela working clandestinely beginning in August, according
to a person familiar with the agency’s work. The officers gathered information
about Maduro’s “pattern of life” and movements that was important as the U.S.
developed intelligence about his whereabouts and movements.
Jan. 3, 2026, 10:31 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Reporting from Venezuela
Venezuela’s Vice President Delcy Rodríguez is in Caracas, according to three people
close to her. Rodríguez is next in line to assume power, according to
Venezuelan constitution. She remains the ruling party’s choice to succeed
Maduro, said a fourth person, a senior Venezuelan official. The United States
has called Mr. Maduro’s government illegitimate, and it’s unclear if the White
House would accept Rodríguez as president.
Jan. 3,
2026, 10:30 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
When asked on Fox News if the
attack in Venezuela were intended as a warning to President Claudia Sheinbaum
of Mexico, Trump seemed to signal they might. “Well, it wasn’t meant to be,” he
replied. “We’re very friendly with her, she’s a good woman. But the cartels are
running Mexico — she’s not running Mexico.”
Trump said Sheinbaum had
repeatedly declined his offers to intervene against the cartels. “I’ve asked
her numerous times, ‘Would you like us to take out the cartels?’” he said,
adding that “something is going to have to be done with Mexico.”
His comments came even after his
own officials have lauded Mexico for an unprecedented surge in cooperation,
citing a record number of cartel arrests and successful fentanyl seizures.
Jan. 3, 2026, 10:28 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Mexico City bureau chief
In an interview with Venezuelan
state television, Venezuela’s attorney general, Tarek William Saab, called on
Venezuelans to take to the streets against the U.S. military action in the
country. “We are going to show the world what we are made of,” he said. State
television has been broadcasting footage of small pro-Maduro rallies on
Saturday.
Saab also demanded the United
States produce proof that Maduro is alive, and he called on international
organizations to denounce Maduro’s capture. “Before the world, I ask the United
Nations at this moment to speak out. Where are the international human rights
organizations?” he said.
Jan. 3, 2026, 10:26 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
U.S. attorney general Pam Bondi
has posted the unsealed indictment of President Nicolás Maduro and his wife,
Cilia Flores. At first glance, it appears quite similar to the 2020 indictment
of the Venezuelan leader, charging him with narco-terrorism and cocaine
importation conspiracies. The charges also include possession of machine guns.
When combined with drug trafficking charges, those gun charges carry strong
prison sentences upon conviction.
Jan. 3, 2026, 10:10 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
The Chinese foreign ministry said
in response to the U.S. capture of Nicolás Maduro that it is “deeply shocked
and strongly condemns the U.S. for recklessly using force against a sovereign
state and targeting its president.” The ministry also said that the U.S.
actions “seriously violate international law, violate Venezuela’s sovereignty,
and threaten the peace and security of Latin America and the Caribbean.” A
Chinese delegation visited with Maduro hours before his capture, according to
photos posted on social media by the Venezuelan president.
Jan. 3, 2026, 10:09 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Simon Romero and Anatoly Kurmanaev
Simon Romero reported from São
Paulo, Brazil, and Anatoly Kurmanaev reported from
Venezuela.
Maduro’s inner circle appeared to
survive the U.S. strikes on Venezuela.
The United States captured
Venezuela’s president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores. But Mr.
Maduro’s inner circle appeared on Saturday morning to have survived the U.S.
strikes on the country, though it was not immediately clear who was in power.
Venezuela’s vice president, Delcy Rodríguez, who is next in the presidential line of
succession, figured among the Venezuelan officials issuing pronouncements or
making public appearances after U.S. strikes on targets in the country.
While reports circulated that
Ms. Rodríguez was in Russia at the time of the attacks, Ms. Rodríguez is in
Caracas, according to three people close to her. Russian state media also
denied reports that she was in Moscow.
Other top Maduro allies who
appeared to survive the attacks included Vladimir Padrino
López, the defense minister and Venezuela’s top ranking military officer; and
Diosdado Cabello, the interior minister and one of Mr. Maduro’s top enforcers.
The survival of these officials
suggests that Venezuela’s government remains functioning, at least shakily, in
the hours after Mr. Maduro and the first lady were seized and extracted from
the country.
If Mr. Maduro’s inner circle does
remain intact and at the helm of Venezuela’s institutions, that also raises
questions as to what happens next.
A war game run during
President Trump’s first term assessed what may follow if Mr. Maduro were
ousted, forecasting chaotic power struggles as military units, rival political
factions and guerrilla groups vie for control of the country.
It is unclear how the intervention
will influence the Venezuelan opposition’s ambitions to exercise power. Edmundo
González, a retired diplomat, is considered the legitimate winner, by a wide
margin, of a presidential election in 2024.
Unable to take office after the
vote, Mr. González fled to Spain, ceding the spotlight to María Corina Machado,
the opposition leader who had been barred from running and who won the 2025
Nobel Peace Prize.
Mr. Trump appeared hesitant to
throw his support behind Ms. Machado.
“Well, we have to look at it right
now,” he said on Fox News on Saturday morning when asked if he would support
her. “They have a vice president, as you know. I mean, I don’t know about what
kind of an election that was, but, you know, the election of Maduro was a
disgrace.”
Mr. Trump also suggested that his
administration would continue to target Venezuelan government officials if they
side with Mr. Maduro.
“If they stay loyal, the future is
really bad, really bad for them,” he said.
Speaking by telephone on state
television, Ms. Rodríguez, the vice president, invoked what she described as
Mr. Maduro’s “instructions,” and called on the people and the armed forces to
defend Venezuela.
Ms. Rodríguez also asked Mr. Trump
to provide proof that Mr. Maduro is alive and condemned the U.S. intervention
as an act of “military aggression” that violated the country’s sovereignty.
Educated partly in France, Ms.
Rodríguez spearheaded a market-friendly overhaul which had provided, before the
U.S. military campaign targeting Mr. Maduro, a semblance of stability in
Venezuela’s economy after a prolonged collapse.
Her older brother, Jorge
Rodríguez, another member of the inner circle who is the president of the
National Assembly and Mr. Maduro’s chief political strategist, shared a
statement on Telegram from Ms. Rodríguez calling the intervention a plot to
seize Venezuela’s oil reserves.
Separately, Mr. Cabello, the
interior minister, appeared on state television and urged Venezuelans to
support Mr. Maduro’s government. While allied with Mr. Maduro, Mr. Cabello is
also viewed as an internal rival in Venezuela’s power structures.
Mr. Cabello, a retired military
figure, is at the helm of Venezuela’s repression apparatus.
As a hard-liner with a caustic political style, his public profile had been on
the rise as the U.S. intensified its campaign against Venezuela in recent
weeks.
The defense minister, Mr. Padrino López, also appeared on state television after the
U.S. attacks, calling them an act of “criminal military aggression.” He is
known as a survivor of political upheaval in Venezuela, holding his role for
the last 11 years.
Genevieve Glatsky contributed
from Bogotá, Colombia, and Jack Nicas from Mexico City.
Jan. 3, 2026, 10:07 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Reporting from Bogotá, Colombia
Ecuador’s president, Daniel Noboa, appeared to endorse the capture of Nicolás Maduro,
writing on X that “all the narco chavista
criminals, your time is coming,” and voicing support for Venezuelan opposition
leaders María Corina Machado and Edmundo González Urrutia.
Jan. 3, 2026, 10:07 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Reporting on Congress
Representative Don Bacon,
Republican of Nebraska, said the mission to capture Maduro was “great for the
future of Venezuelans and the region,” but he warned that it could hand
authoritarian powers a justification for aggression elsewhere. “My main concern
is now Russia will use this to justify their illegal and barbaric military
actions against Ukraine, or China to justify an invasion of Taiwan,” he wrote
in a social media post.
Jan. 3, 2026, 10:03 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Senator John Thune, the Republican
majority leader, said the U.S. capture of the Venezuelan president, Nicolás
Maduro, was “an important first step to bring him to justice for the drug
crimes for which he has been indicted in the United States.” He called the
operation a “decisive action” by President Trump.
Jan. 3, 2026, 9:57 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Russian Minister of Foreign
Affairs Sergei Lavrov said he had spoken to Venezuelan Vice President Delcy Rodriguez by telephone. Lavrov “expressed firm
solidarity with the people of Venezuela in the face of armed aggression” and
said Moscow would “continue to support” the government, according to a summary
of the conversation published by the ministry.
Jan. 3, 2026, 9:56 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
United Nations bureau chief
United Nations secretary general
António Guterres said in a statement that he was alarmed by the events in
Venezuela on Saturday and warned that the U.S. military action there would have
wider implications for the region. “Independently of the situation in
Venezuela, these developments constitute a dangerous precedent,” he said,
calling for international law to be respected.
Jan. 3, 2026, 9:40 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Mexico City bureau chief
Trump suggested on Fox News that
his administration would continue to target Venezuelan government officials if
they side with Maduro. “If they stay loyal, the future is really bad, really
bad for them,” he said. “I’d say most of them have converted.” Several top
Venezuelan officials criticized the U.S. action on Venezuelan state television
on Saturday.
Jan. 3, 2026, 9:39 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
President Trump said to an
interviewer on Fox News that he and his team had watched the raid on video
feeds as it went down. He said he saw the U.S. military team break through
steel doors in “a matter of seconds.” “I’ve never seen anything like it
actually,” he said. He added no American troops were killed but then suggested
some were injured when their helicopter was hit.
Jan. 3, 2026, 9:34 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Trump said on Fox News that Maduro
and his wife had been taken to the U.S.S. Iwo Jima, one of the American
warships that have been prowling the Caribbean. Survivors of one of the boat
strikes were also taken to the Iwo Jima.
Jan. 3, 2026, 9:32 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Reporting from Palm Beach, Fla.
Speaking to Fox News, President
Trump declined to throw his support behind Maria Corina Machado, the Venezuelan
opposition leader who recently won the Nobel Peace Prize.
“Well, we have to look at it right
now,” he said on Fox News when asked if he will support her. “They have a vice
president, as you know. I mean, I don’t know about what kind of an election
that was, but, you know, the election of Maduro was a disgrace.”
Jan. 3, 2026, 9:30 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Reporting from Palm Beach, Fla.
Trump brushed off concerns about
the legality of the U.S. operation in Venezuela. When asked about criticism
from Representative Jim Himes of Connecticut, the top Democrat on the House
Intelligence Committee, the president said Democrats were “weak, stupid
people.”
“They should say great job,” he
said in an interview on Fox News. “They shouldn’t say ‘Oh, gee, maybe it’s not
constitutional.’ You know the same old stuff that we’ve been hearing for years
and years and years.”
Jan. 3, 2026, 9:29 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Reporting from Doral, Fla.
In South Florida, Venezuelans were
partying to celebrate Maduro’s capture.
The party broke out before sunrise
in the heavily Venezuelan city of Doral, Fla., west of Miami. Venezuelans and
Venezuelan Americans blared music, honked car horns and danced to celebrate the
capture of Nicolás Maduro, the Venezuelan leader.
“Viva Venezuela libre!” one man
waving a Venezuelan flag yelled as he drove by El Arepazo,
a Venezuelan arepa shop in a gas station where Venezuelans often gather for
political or sporting events.
South Florida is home to the
largest Venezuelan community in the United States — about 40 percent of Doral’s residents are
of Venezuelan origin — and a vast majority of them are opposed to Mr. Maduro.
Millions of people have left Venezuela in recent years because of economic
chaos and political repression in the country.
Some of Doral’s Venezuelan residents
immigrated more than two decades ago. Others are more recent arrivals. Many of
them watched anxiously over
the last few months as President Trump escalated his threats and boat strikes against
Venezuela, and they wondered how it would all turn out.
“I can’t believe it,” said Mariannys Milano, 45, as she wiped away tears outside El Arepazo early on Saturday morning. She had hardly slept,
she said, after calling and texting relatives in eastern Venezuela all night.
“I have so many emotions. I feel like throwing up. I feel joy.”
Several people said they were
anxious about what would follow with Mr. Maduro out of power, though they all
said they were optimistic. No one wanted any member of Mr. Maduro’s government
to remain in office, though his vice president, Delcy
Rodríguez, was sworn in as interim president on Saturday.
“The good thing is that they took
out Maduro,” said Abner Márquez, 27, of Lake Worth. “Now we have to see who in
the government is going to take power, and what they are going to do.”
Many in Doral said they preferred
that the U.S. lead a transition that would result in turning the government
over to Edmundo González,
the diplomat who outpolled Mr. Maduro in a presidential election in 2024 by a margin of more than 2 to 1,
according to the Venezuelan opposition’s vote count, but was not allowed to
take power.
“I don’t know what’s going to
happen,” said Tibisay Mejía, 51, who immigrated to
the United States in 2015. “But this is the beginning.”
Jesús Naranjo, 57, said that although
he does not like Mr. Trump generally, he enthusiastically approved of his
administration’s removal of Mr. Maduro.
“I support his actions toward
Venezuela,” said Mr. Naranjo, who left Venezuela in 1998, the same year that
Mr. Maduro’s predecessor, Hugo Chávez, was elected president.
Mr. Trump, he said, “had the courage to do what had to be done.”
“If the United States lends a
hand,” Mr. Naranjo added, “things should work democratically.”
Revelers in Doral said they had
deep faith in María Corina Machado, the opposition leader who was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in
October. They said they expected her to work closely with the Trump
administration to lead a transition.
“She’s not just winging it,” said
Yajaira Molina, 52. “I believe in Maria Corina Machado as much as I do in the
American government’s strategy.”
In nearby Key Biscayne, a wealthy
community with many longtime Venezuelan immigrants, people gathered at the
Golden Hog, an upscale deli and market, to celebrate.
“We’re better off than we were
yesterday,” María Carolina Jaso said at a church
market a few blocks away. “It was either in the hands of criminals or in the
hands of unpredictable Trump.”
Some 1,200 miles north in the New
York City borough of Queens, people gathered at the Budare
Café in Jackson Heights. Among them was Sebastián Sánchez, 26, who had a
Venezuelan flag tied around his neck like a cape as he ate a pabellón arepa and sipped black coffee.
“Today this food is for
celebrating,” he said. “It’s typical Venezuelan food and it’s a very special
day. Living here in the United States, I am very privileged, but my family came
here looking for that freedom that we didn’t have in our country, so seeing
that there is a new future in Venezuela makes me very happy.”
The celebratory mood in Doral
persisted for most of the day. At one point, a couple of hundred people stood
in the middle of the gas station, which was closed for business and guarded by
police officers, to sing traditional Venezuelan songs and the Venezuelan and
American national anthems. Some people ducked into a neighboring convenience
store to pick up coffee or the occasional celebratory beer. So many people
crowded outside later that the arepa shop and the store had to lock their doors
and admit people only one at a time.
“We’ve been waiting for this for
so many years,” said Alejandra Arrieta, 55, of Doral.
People held video calls with
Venezuelan relatives and live-streamed the celebration, wishing one another a
happy new year with a feeling that sounded different from what it might have
been on Jan. 1.
Councilman Rafael Pineyro of Doral, a Venezuelan American who immigrated to
Miami when he was 15, said he was visiting relatives in Orlando when he heard
the Maduro news at about 1:30 a.m. Saturday. He scrambled back to Doral, where
the city had spent several weeks, Mr. Pineyro said,
preparing for the possibility of residents’ spilling into the streets if the
United States took military action in Venezuela.
Mr. Pineyro,
a Republican, said that Venezuela “needs help from the U.S. government, 100
percent,” to move on after Mr. Maduro’s removal.
What a transition in power might
look like, or how it would take place, remains in question, he said, but he
added that the remaining members of Mr. Maduro’s government would be wise to
“come to the right side of history.”
José Anka,
57, said that Ms. Rodríguez, the interim president, “is going to have to do
what the U.S. wants.”
As the day went on, more people
arrived at the gas station, often with their entire families and dogs in tow.
Several brought Trump signs or wore “Make America Great Again” hats.
Florida Republicans began seriously courting Venezuelan
American voters after Mr. Trump’s first presidential
election in 2016. Miami’s influential Cuban American politicians, in
particular, embraced Venezuelan Americans, seeing them as ideologically aligned
because both groups had fled from left-wing regimes. Republicans had already
won over many Venezuelan Americans with hard-line
rhetoric and actions against Mr. Maduro, even before his capture on Saturday.
Some people in Doral waved Cuban
flags and said that they hoped Cuba’s communist regime would be the next to
fall, now that Mr. Maduro was gone and his government could no longer help prop
up Cuba’s flailing economy.
“I feel this as if it were my own
country,” Yasier Hernández, 40, who is from Cuba,
said as he wept at the sight of Venezuelans celebrating. “Tomorrow, it will be
our turn.”
When Mr. Trump began speaking at a
news conference in Mar-a-Lago, his resort in Palm Beach, some 75 miles to the
north, a hush fell over the crowd in Doral. Small groups gathered in twos and
threes and strained to listen on their phones. A few people knelt around a
loudspeaker. Some people listened to a Spanish translation of Mr. Trump’s
remarks.
Some in the crowd tuned him out
before he was done. But the street party kept going, a parade of honking cars
filling Doral well into the afternoon.
David C. Adams contributed
reporting from Key Biscayne, Fla., and Raúl Vilchis from New York.
Jan. 3, 2026, 9:28 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
William Rashbaum
An earlier indictment in 2020 had
charged that President Nicolás Maduro and several Venezuelan officials
“participated in a corrupt and violent narco-terrorism conspiracy between the
Cartel de Los Soles and the Fuerzas Armadas Revolucionarias de Colombia,” the armed Columbian group
known as FARC.
At the time, the U.S. attorney
general, William Barr, said that the Venezuelan regime was “plagued by
criminality and corruption” and that “Maduro and a number of high-ranking
colleagues” had conspired with the FARC to smuggle tons of cocaine into the
United States. Others charged in the 2020 indictment included Venezuela’s
Minister of Defense, its chief Supreme Court justice and two FARC leaders.
Jan. 3, 2026, 9:20 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
At La Carlota Air Base in Caracas,
burned husks of military vehicles could be seen hours after the United States
struck the military installation along with other targets across the country.
Jan. 3, 2026, 9:17 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Reporting from Palm Beach, Fla.
In an interview on Fox News, Trump
said that Maduro wanted to negotiate in the final days before U.S. forces
captured him but the American president said he rejected that offer. “I didn’t
want to negotiate,” he said. “I said, ‘Nope, we got to do it.’”
Jan. 3, 2026, 9:14 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Reporting on Congress
A number of Republican lawmakers
who represent districts in Southern Florida with large Venezuelan-American
constituencies were celebrating the capture of Presdient
Nicolás Maduro of Venezuela. “Today’s decisive action is this hemisphere’s
equivalent to the Fall of the Berlin Wall,” Representative Carlos Gimenez said
in a social media post. Representative Mario Diaz-Balart praised President
Trump’s “decisive leadership,” and Representative Maria Salazar said it was
time for “the rightful leaders of Venezuela to restore freedom and rebuild the
nation.”
Jan. 3, 2026, 9:09 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Julian E. Barnes and Eric Schmitt
The C.I.A. had a source inside
Maduro’s government to help track him.
A C.I.A. source within the
Venezuelan government monitored the location of Nicolás Maduro in both the days
and moments before his capture by American special operation forces, according
to people briefed on the operation.
The American spy agency, the
people said, produced the intelligence that led to the capture of Mr. Maduro,
monitoring his position and movements with a fleet of stealth drones that
provided near constant monitoring over Venezuela, in addition to the
information provided by its Venezuelan sources.
The C.I.A. had a group of officers
on the ground in Venezuela working clandestinely beginning in August, according
to a person familiar with the agency’s work. The officers gathered information
about Mr. Maduro’s “pattern of life” and movements.
It is not clear how the C.I.A.
recruited the Venezuelan source who informed the Americans of Mr. Maduro’s
location. But former officials said the agency was clearly aided by the $50
million reward the U.S. government offered for information leading to Mr.
Maduro’s capture.
In his confirmation hearing last
year, John Ratcliffe, the C.I.A. director, promised he would lead a more
aggressive agency, one willing to conduct covert operations to both collect
information and advance American policy. President Trump authorized the C.I.A.
to take more aggressive action last fall, and then in November approved
planning and preparation for a series of operations in Venezuela.
In late December, the C.I.A. used an armed drone to conduct a
strike on a dock that U.S. officials believed was being
used by a Venezuelan gang to load drugs on to boats.
One of the people briefed on Mr.
Maduro’s capture said it was the product of a deep partnership between the
agency and the military and involved “months of meticulous planning.” A senior
U.S. official said that the C.I.A. and special operations analysts had Mr.
Maduro “wired” — meaning precisely located — from early on in the planning of
the operation.
While the C.I.A. played a critical
role in planning and carrying it out, the mission was a law enforcement
operation by the U.S. military’s special operation forces, rather than
operation carried out under the agency’s authority.
Jan. 3, 2026, 9:03 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
The governor of Sucre, about 325
miles east of Caracas, called for party militants to gather in the town square
later in the day. The governor, Jhoanna Carrillo,
appeared at the rally along with mayor Pedro Figueroa to show their loyalty to
the president. “We demand that the entire world speak out against the threat
and chaos they have tried to sow in our homeland,” Carrillo said.
Jan. 3, 2026, 9:01 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Jonah E. BromwichWilliam K. Rashbaum and Benjamin Weiser
Bondi says Maduro and his wife to
face a fresh indictment in Manhattan.
Nicolás Maduro, the president of
Venezuela captured in a military raid on Caracas, faces charges in the Southern
District of New York, where prosecutors have targeted him for years.
The U.S. attorney general, Pam
Bondi, posted the new indictment on social media on Saturday. It charges Mr.
Maduro with narco-terrorism and conspiracy to import cocaine, among other
charges. His wife, Cilia Flores, is also charged in the cocaine conspiracy.
Mr. Maduro, the indictment said,
“allows cocaine-fueled corruption to flourish for his own benefit, for the
benefit of members of his ruling regime and for the benefit of his family
members.”
“The defendant now sits atop a
corrupt, illegitimate government that, for decades, has leveraged government
power to protect and promote illegal activity, including drug trafficking,” it
continued. “That drug trafficking has enriched and entrenched Venezuela’s
political and military elite.”
In an earlier post, Ms. Bondi said
that Mr. Maduro and his wife would “soon face the full wrath of American
justice on American soil in American courts.” President Trump said that the
couple was being brought to New York.
INDICTMENT
Read the Indictment Against Nicolás
Maduro
The
Venezuelan president was accused of narco-terrorism and conspiracy to import
cocaine, among other charges. His wife, Cilia Flores, was also charged.
Though the charges against Ms.
Flores are new, Mr. Maduro was previously indicted in Manhattan in 2020 on
similar allegations. With those charges pending, Secretary of State Marco Rubio
referred to Mr. Maduro last year as a “fugitive of American justice.”
The 2020 indictment said that Mr.
Maduro had come to lead a drug trafficking organization, the Cartel de los
Soles, or Cartel of the Suns, as he gained power in Venezuela. Cartel de los
Soles has been an ironic nickname for the Maduro administration’s military
officers, who wear suns on their epaulets.
The earlier indictment named six
defendants. The one unsealed on Saturday also names six, but they are almost
entirely different, including only two men from the earlier charges. They are
Mr. Maduro and Diosdado Cabello Rondón, who is the
minister of interior, justice and peace, a member of the armed forces and vice
president of the ruling party.
The others charged include Mr.
Maduro’s son, Nicolas Maduro, known as Nicolasito; a
former minister of the interior and justice, Ramón Rodriguez Chacín; and Héctor Guerrero Flores, who prosecutors said
was the leader of Tren de Aragua, a gang that the
Trump administration designated last year as a foreign terrorist organization.
The inclusion of Mr. Guerrero
Flores, who was indicted in a separate case last
month, would appear to reflect the White House’s repeated
assertion that Mr. Maduro worked with narco-terrorists, including Tren de Aragua. American intelligence agencies have
disputed that conclusion.
The charges against Mr. Guerrero
Flores do not tie him directly to Mr. Maduro, but rather to “members of the
Venezuelan regime” and “an individual he understood to be working with” it.
Southern District prosecutors had
long targeted Mr. Maduro, and the investigation that led to his 2020 indictment
was overseen by Emil Bove III, a prosecutor who years later became one of Mr.
Trump’s criminal defense lawyers and whom the president this year appointed to
the federal bench. One of the other prosecutors was Amanda Houle, who now leads
the office’s criminal division.
The indictment says Mr. Maduro’s
wife, Ms. Flores, along with her husband and other defendants, “partnered with
narcotics traffickers and narco-terrorist groups” that were sending cocaine
from Venezuela to the United States through countries like Honduras, Guatemala
and Mexico.
It also says Ms. Flores attended a
meeting in 2007 where she “accepted hundreds of thousands of dollars in bribes
to broker a meeting between a large-scale drug trafficker and the director of
Venezuela’s national antidrug office, Néstor Reverol Torres.”
The trafficker later arranged to
pay monthly bribes to the antidrug official, in addition to about $100,000 to
ensure safe passage for each flight transporting cocaine — a portion was then
paid to Ms. Flores, the indictment says.
Though the circumstances of Mr.
Maduro’s capture in a military raid were extraordinary, the American legal
system has experience in arresting South American leaders and putting them on
trial. Manhattan prosecutors have a saying — “you can’t suppress the body” —
meaning that once a person is in custody, a case tends to move forward
regardless of the circumstances of the arrest.
In 1989, the United States invaded
Panama and compelled the surrender of Gen. Manuel Antonio Noriega, Panama’s
military leader, who was taken to Florida and arrested by agents with the Drug
Enforcement Administration. Three years after his surrender, Mr. Noriega was
tried, convicted and sentenced to 40 years in prison.
In 2022, the former president of
Honduras, Juan Orlando Hernández, was arrested by law enforcement officials
from his own country in connection with a U.S. extradition request. He, too,
was brought to the United States, where he was tried, convicted and sentenced.
Late last year, Mr. Trump abruptly
pardoned Mr. Hernández, saying that the case against him — which had also been
overseen by Mr. Bove and had been built over several presidential
administrations — “was a Biden administration setup.”
The case against Mr. Hernández and
the 2020 charges against Mr. Maduro bear a significant resemblance. Both
leaders were accused of using their governments as vehicles for the exporting
of cocaine into the United States. And both were charged with conspiring to
possess machine guns, which, combined with drug trafficking charges, carries
potentially lengthy prison sentences.
Mr. Maduro’s 2020 indictment has
been pending in the Manhattan federal court before Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein,
a veteran of nearly three decades on the Southern District bench.
Appointed by President Bill
Clinton in 1998, the judge is best known for overseeing the many lawsuits filed
after the Sept. 11 terror attacks, by families of the dead and workers at
ground zero.
More recently, Judge Hellerstein,
92, has presided over Mr. Trump’s attempts to move his Manhattan criminal
conviction into federal court, a matter that is pending.
Jan. 3, 2026, 8:59 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Reporting from Palm Beach, Fla.
In his first comments since Maduro
was captured, Vice President JD Vance applauded the success of the mission and
defended its legality.
“Maduro has multiple indictments
in the United States for narcoterrorism,” he wrote on social media. “You don’t
get to avoid justice for drug trafficking in the United States because you live
in a palace in Caracas.”
Vance added that Trump had offered
“multiple off ramps” to Maduro. Trump had been adamant that “the drug
trafficking must stop” and that “the stolen oil” had to be returned to the
United States, Vance said.
Jan. 3, 2026, 8:58 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
The top Democrat on the House
Intelligence Committee said Saturday that while Maduro was an “illegitimate
ruler” there was no evidence he posed a threat that justified military
intervention. “Secretary Rubio repeatedly denied to Congress that the
Administration intended to force regime change in Venezuela,” Representative
Jim Himes of Connecticut said. “The Administration must immediately brief
Congress on its plan to ensure stability in the region and its legal
justification for this decision.”
Jan. 3, 2026, 8:56 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Groups of armed apparent civilians
have begun to hit the streets in Caracas, according to a journalist who saw
them.
Several men in civilian clothes
were seen just after daybreak guarding the Gen. Francisco de Miranda airbase
outside of Caracas when the airstrikes hit.
Two pickup trucks filled with men
wearing vests and civilian clothes carrying gas cans as well as both long
weapons and handguns were seen unloading outside the Centro Comercial
Ciudad Tamanaco, a shopping mall near the airbase.
Venezuela’s government has long
used armed civilians, known as colectivos, to fight
back against protesters.
Jan. 3, 2026, 8:55 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Chevron, the largest private oil
producer in Venezuela, declined to comment Saturday morning on the status of
its operations in the country. “Chevron remains focused on the safety and
wellbeing of our employees, as well as the integrity of our assets,” a
spokesman said.
Jan. 3, 2026, 8:54 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
It is not uncommon for federal
prosecutors to return what is known as a superseding indictment to add
additional defendants or charges to an existing indictment. In this case,
Attorney General Pam Bondi’s post on X suggests that a new indictment would add
Maduro’s wife as a new defendant. The original indictment against Maduro made
public in 2020 named him and other current and former Venezuelan officials as
defendants.
Jan. 3, 2026, 8:54 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
How tensions between the U.S. and
Venezuela escalated.
The raid in Venezuela Saturday
morning in which President Trump said the United States had captured Nicolás
Maduro, the country’s leader, capped off months of threats and accusations.
The Trump administration accused
Mr. Maduro of drug smuggling, and the State Department has labeled him the head
of a “narco-terrorist” state.
U.S. officials have said Mr.
Maduro, a self-described socialist who has led Venezuela since 2013, is an
illegitimate leader and have accused him of
controlling criminal groups tied to drug trafficking — charges he denies.
The pressure campaign against Mr.
Maduro has been building for years, through a series of indictments, sanctions
and, recently, military actions.
In 2020, during the first Trump
administration, Mr. Maduro was indicted in the United States on corruption,
drug trafficking and other charges. Last year, the United States raised the
reward for information leading to Mr. Maduro’s capture to $50 million.
In recent months, top aides to Mr.
Trump intensified a push to
remove Mr. Maduro from power, as the Trump administration tried to recast the
domestic war on drugs as an international terrorist threat.
Since late August, the Pentagon
has amassed a dozen ships in the Caribbean Sea. With more than 15,000 military
personnel in the region, the U.S. buildup is the largest in the region since
the Cuban Missile Crisis in 1962.
The commando raid on Saturday, the
riskiest known U.S. military operation of its kind since members of the Navy’s
SEAL Team 6 killed Osama bin Laden in a safe house in Pakistan in 2011, comes
amid a legally dubious military campaign in the waters around Latin America in
an effort to raise pressure on Mr. Maduro.
That campaign has been marked by
35 known U.S. strikes that have killed at least 115 people on
boats in the Caribbean and the eastern Pacific. Many legal experts say the
strikes are illegal and that the military is killing civilians.
While some, possibly most, of the
suspected drug runners are believed to be Venezuelan citizens, the targeted
boats also carried some people from Colombia, Ecuador and Trinidad.
Unlike traditional
counternarcotics operations that have targeted senior cartel leaders, the boat
strikes were aimed at low-level operatives
in illicit drug trafficking. In seizing Mr. Maduro, the administration will
probably contend that it has captured the mastermind behind the alleged drug
trafficking.
In reality, Venezuela is not a
major source of drugs in the United States. The country does not produce fentanyl
,and the cocaine that passes through Venezuela is
grown and produced in Colombia, and then moves on to Europe.
Mr. Trump has also repeatedly
threatened to carry out land strikes in Venezuela. Last week, the C.I.A. conducted a drone strike on
a port facility in Venezuela which the United States believed was housing
narcotics from a Venezuelan gang, according to people briefed on the operation.
The raid to capture Mr. Maduro
also constituted Mr. Trump’s latest unilateral exercise of power. He had no
explicit authorization from Congress, where a bipartisan group in the Senate
has been promoting legislation to try to rein in his authority to engage in
hostilities inside Venezuela.
On Saturday, Senator Mike Lee of
Utah said on social media that Secretary of State Marco Rubio told him in a
phone call that Mr. Maduro was “arrested by U.S. personnel to stand trial on
criminal charges in the United States.”
In a social media post after Mr.
Trump announced the capture, Mr. Rubio reposted a message he wrote last July,
in what appeared to be an attempt to push back against concerns, including from
Republican lawmakers, about the legality of the strikes and capture.
“Maduro is NOT the President of
Venezuela and his regime is NOT the legitimate government,” Mr. Rubio wrote.
Mr. Lee said Mr. Rubio did not
anticipate further action in Venezuela now that Mr. Maduro was in custody.
The Trump administration’s
approach to Venezuela has been driven by three separate policy goals:
crippling Mr. Maduro, using military force against drug cartels and securing
access to the country’s vast oil reserves for U.S. companies.
The goal to oust Mr. Maduro as the
leader of Venezuela was an initiative that Mr. Rubio has championed.
On July 25, Mr. Trump signed a
secret order for military action against the cartels, calling for maritime
strikes. Administration officials referred to the boat attacks as “Phase One,”
with SEAL Team 6 taking the lead.
Policymakers at the time also
discussed a vague “Phase Two,” with Army Delta Force units possibly carrying
out land operations.
In October, Mr. Trump called off efforts to
reach a diplomatic agreement with Mr. Maduro, after the Venezuelan leader
refused to accede to U.S. demands to give up power voluntarily and as officials
continued to insist that they had no part in drug trafficking.
As the strikes against boats
continued throughout the fall, Mr. Trump, Mr. Rubio and Stephen Miller, a top
White House aide overseeing immigration policy, moved on to the next stage of
the campaign against Mr. Maduro: seizing oil tankers to deprive Venezuela of
revenue.
They insisted that Mr. Maduro must
return oil and other assets “stolen” from the United States before they lift
what Mr. Trump has referred to as a blockade.
In its first weeks, the tactic
shook Venezuela’s economy by paralyzing its oil industry. Critics called it
gunboat diplomacy or, as Mr. Maduro put it, “a warmongering and colonialist
pretense.”
Eric Schmitt, Tyler
Pager and Carol Rosenberg contributed reporting.
Jan. 3, 2026, 8:53 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
The 2020 indictment against Maduro
said he had helped to manage and to eventually lead a drug trafficking
organization as he gained power in Venezuela. Under his leadership, the
indictment charged, the organization sought not only to enrich its members and
enhance their power, but also to “flood” the U.S. with cocaine and use it as “a
weapon against America.”
Jan. 3, 2026, 8:51 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Spain, with its close ties to
Latin America, offered to mediate and called for “de-escalation and restraint”
in a statement from the foreign ministry. It said it was “ready to help in the
search for a democratic, negotiated, and peaceful solution for the country.”
Jan. 3, 2026, 8:48 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
With the original 2020 charges
pending in the Southern District against Maduro, the U.S. secretary of state,
Marco Rubio, had referred to Maduro as a “fugitive from American justice,”
which appeared to bolster the U.S. government’s efforts to oust Maduro and
seize him as it would any criminal on the run from the law.
Jan. 3, 2026, 8:47 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Prosecutors in the Southern
District had targeted Nicolás Maduro for years. The investigation into him was
overseen by a former criminal defense lawyer to President Trump, Emil Bove III.
One of the prosecutors on the 2020 case was Amanda Houle, who now leads the
office’s criminal division.
Jan. 3, 2026, 8:45 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Mexico City bureau chief
Two nights before his capture,
Nicolás Maduro made a plea for peace in an interview with a Spanish journalist, Ignacio Ramonet, “The American
people should know they have a friendly, peaceful people here, and a friendly
government as well,” he said, looking at the camera. “They should know that our
message is very clear: ‘Not War. Yes Peace,’” he added, saying his peace slogan
in English. He then handed the journalist a red hat in the style of the Make
America Great Again cap with the words: “No War. Yes Peace.”
In the same interview, Maduro said
he was eager to work with the United States to avoid conflict. “If they want to have a serious conversation about an
anti-drug agreement, we’re ready,” he said “If they want Venezuelan oil,
Venezuela is ready for U.S. investment — like with Chevron — whenever,
wherever, and however they want. People in the U.S. should know that if they
want comprehensive economic development agreements, Venezuela is right here.”
Jan. 3, 2026, 8:37 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Reporting from Venezuela
Attention is now turning to the
Venezuelan military’s response to the U.S. attacks. U.S. forces did not appear
to have encountered significant resistance from Venezuelan air defenses or land
forces, despite claiming to have an arsenal capable of confronting, if not
repelling, such an incursion.
Jan. 3, 2026, 8:26 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
William Rashbaum
It appears, based on Attorney
General Pam Bondi’s social media post, that Nicolás Maduro has been charged in
a new indictment. The existing charges filed in March 2020 do not include his
wife, Cilia Flores. The earlier indictment, filed under seal, contained four
counts, charging Maduro and five others with narco-terrorism, conspiracy to
import cocaine, possession of machine guns and conspiracy to possess machine
guns.
Jan. 3, 2026, 7:57 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Attorney General Pam Bondi said on
social media on Saturday that both Nicolás Maduro and his wife Cilia Flores had
been indicted in the Southern District of New York. There has been no public
indictment of her.
Jan. 3, 2026, 7:55 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Deputy Secretary of State
Christopher Landau confirmed in a social media post that Nicolás Maduro has
been removed from power and will be put on trial or punished.
Jan. 3, 2026, 7:48 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
National Security reporter
Attorney General Pam Bondi said
that the Venezuelan president, Nicolás Maduro, would face “American justice on
American soil in American courts.” She referenced his indictment in the
Southern District of New York.
Jan. 3, 2026, 6:53 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Reporting from Bogotá, Colombia
Venezuela’s attorney general,
Tarek William Saab, made televised remarks condemning the U.S. attacks.
“Innocent victims have been mortally wounded and others killed by this criminal
terrorist attack,” he said and called for people to take to the streets “with
calm and vigilance.” Saab also repeated demands that other officials have made
for proof that Nicolás Maduro and his wife Cilia Flores were alive.
Jan. 3, 2026, 6:34 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Pedro Sánchez, the left-wing prime
minister of Spain who has spoken out against the Trump administration’s
previous military actions in Venezuela, struck a new wary note on Saturday. “We
urge everyone to de-escalate the situation and act responsibly. International
law and the principles of the U.N. Charter must be respected,” he wrote on
social media.
Jan. 3, 2026, 6:26 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Reporting from Palm Beach, Fla.
In one of his first social media
posts since Trump announced Maduro’s capture, Secretary of State Marco Rubio
reposted what he wrote in July of last year. It appears to be an attempt to
push back against concerns, including from Republican lawmakers, about the
legality of the strikes and capture. “Maduro is NOT the President of Venezuela
and his regime is NOT the legitimate government,” Rubio wrote in July 2025.
Jan. 3, 2026, 6:03 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Reporting from Bogotá, Colombia
Interior Minister Diosdado Cabello
of Venezuela, considered one of Nicolás Maduro’s top enforcers, called for calm
in televised remarks and urged Venezuelans to trust the leadership. “Let no one
fall into despair. Let no one make things easier for the invading enemy,” he
said. Cabello also said, without providing evidence, that bombs had struck
civilian buildings.
Jan. 3, 2026, 5:57 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
National Security reporter
Nicolás Maduro was indicted in the
United States on corruption, drug trafficking and other charges in 2020, and
the State Department had announced a $50 million reward for information leading
to his arrest or conviction. In announcing the capture of Maduro, President
Trump said it was done in conjunction with U.S. law enforcement. The indictment
was sworn out in the Southern District of New York.
Jan. 3, 2026, 5:48 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
National Security reporter
Senator Mike Lee of Utah said on
social media that Secretary of State Marco Rubio told him in a phone call that
Nicolás Maduro was “arrested by U.S. personnel to stand trial on criminal
charges in the United States.” Lee said Rubio does not anticipate further
action in Venezuela now that Maduro was in custody.
Jan. 3, 2026, 5:36 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Reporting from Bogotá, Colombia
Prime Minister Kamla
Persad-Bissessar of Trinidad and Tobago, who has expressed strong support for
U.S. strikes on suspected drug-smuggling boats near Venezuela, said on social
media that her country was not involved in the U.S. military operations and
maintains peaceful relations with Venezuela.
Jan. 3, 2026, 5:32 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Reporting from Palm Beach, Fla.
In a phone interview, Trump
celebrated the capture of Maduro.
President Trump sounded tired.
It was just after 4:30 a.m.
Saturday morning and 10 minutes after he announced on social media that the
United States had captured Nicolás Maduro, the leader of Venezuela. I had
called the president to try to better understand what happened and what comes next.
He picked up after three rings and answered a few questions.
Mr. Trump first celebrated the
mission’s success.
“A lot of good planning and lot of
great, great troops and great people,” he told me. “It was a brilliant
operation, actually.”
I then asked if he had sought
congressional authority before the U.S. military, along with law enforcement
personnel, engaged in a “large scale strike,” as he described it on social
media.
“We’ll discuss that,” he said.
“We’re going to have a news conference.”
In his social media announcement,
Mr. Trump said he would speak at 11 a.m. from Mar-a-Lago, his private club and
residence where he has spent the past two weeks.
I tried to ask what he envisions
next for Venezuela and why the high-risk mission was worth it.
“You’re going to hear all about it
11 o’clock,” he said before hanging up.
The call had lasted 50 seconds.
Jan. 3, 2026, 5:20 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Reporting from Venezuela
The U.S. attack has left an
unspecified number of Venezuelans dead and injured, Venezuelan officials said
in statements. The number of casualties is still being assessed, they said.
Jan. 3, 2026, 5:17 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Video obtained by the Reuters news
agency and verified by The Times shows smoke billowing near La Carlota Airport
in Caracas, Venezuela, as explosions ring out.
Video
CreditCredit...Social
media via Reuters
Jan. 3, 2026, 5:14 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
President Javier Milei of Argentina celebrated the capture of Nicolás
Maduro. “Liberty advances,” Milei wrote on social
media.
Jan. 3, 2026, 5:12 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Reporting from Bogotá, Colombia
Colombia’s President Gustavo Petro
said on social media that his country’s forces were being deployed to the
border with Venezuela, and that there would be additional support “in the event
of a massive influx of refugees.”
Jan. 3, 2026, 5:09 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Venezuela’s Vice President Delcy Rodríguez, speaking on a state-run television
station, says the whereabouts of Nicolás Maduro and his wife are unknown, and
asks President Trump for proof of life.
Jan. 3, 2026, 4:54 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Pentagon reporter
A U.S. official said there were no
American casualties in the operation but would not comment on Venezuelan
casualties.
Jan. 3, 2026, 4:42 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Reporting from Venezuela
If President Trump’s claim is
true, the Venezuelan constitution states that power would pass to Nicolás
Maduro’s vice president, Delcy Rodríguez, who runs
economic policy. But we are in uncharted territory and it is unclear who would
end up in charge. The United States has not recognized Maduro as a legitimate
president, and Venezuela’s opposition says the rightful president is the exiled
politician Edmundo Gonzalez.
Jan. 3, 2026, 4:39 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Reporting from Palm Beach, Fla.
In a brief phone interview with
The Times, President Trump celebrated the success of the mission to capture
Maduro. “A lot of good planning and lot of great, great troops and great
people,” Trump said. “It was a brilliant operation, actually.”
When asked if he had sought
congressional authority for the operation or what is next for Venezuela, Trump
said he would address those matters during his news conference at Mar-a-Lago in
the morning.
Jan. 3, 2026, 4:25 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Reporting from Palm Beach, Fla.
President Trump says the United
States carried out “a large scale strike against
Venezuela.” He said in his social media post that he will host a news
conference in Mar-a-Lago at 11 a.m.
Jan. 3, 2026, 4:24 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Reporting from Palm Beach, Fla.
President Trump announces on
social media that the United States has captured Nicolás Maduro, the Venezuelan
leader, and his wife and that they are being flown out of the country.
Jan. 3, 2026, 4:23 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Reporting from Venezuela
Venezuela’s defense minister, Gen.
Vladimir Padrino Lopez, in a national address,
denounces what he called a U.S. attack. “This invasion represents the most
blatant outrage suffered by the country,” he says. This is the first public
appearance by a senior Venezuelan official since the start of the explosions.
General Padrino Lopez is Venezuela’s top ranking officer and is seen as a crucial member of
Maduro’s coalition.
Jan. 3, 2026, 4:17 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
The U.S. has been building up forces
off Venezuela for months.
Before President Trump announced
on Saturday that the United States had captured President Nicolás Maduro of
Venezuela, the U.S. military had launched one of the largest deployments of its forces
to the Caribbean region in decades.
The United States Southern Command
said that about 15,000 troops were in the region by December. President Trump
described them as a “massive armada.” In August, he had secretly signed a directive to the
Pentagon to begin using military force against Latin
American drug cartels that his administration had deemed terrorist
organizations.
Since the signing, the United
States had carried out 35 lethal strikes on boats that
the administration said were carrying narcotics. The attacks have killed more than 100 people.
Legal and military experts questioned the legality of the strikes. Congress has
not authorized them, nor has it declared war on Venezuela.
Some Trump officials have said
that the main goal of the increase in troops was to drive Mr. Maduro,
Venezuela’s authoritarian leader, from power. Hours before Mr. Trump announced
the capture of Mr. Maduro and his wife, the Venezuelan government accused the
U.S. military of carrying out attacks in the capital, Caracas, and other parts
of the country.
In recent months, the U.S.
military buildup has included transport and cargo planes. Flight-tracking data
reviewed by The New York Times showed C-17 heavy-lift cargo planes — largely
used for transporting military troops and equipment — conducted at least 16
flights to Puerto Rico from American military bases in one recent week. The
C-17s flew to Puerto Rico from bases in New Mexico,
Illinois, Vermont,
Florida, Arizona, Utah, Washington State and Japan.
The United States has also recently moved
special-operations aircraft to the Caribbean.
Since October, the U.S. forces
have included a Navy expeditionary strike group consisting of amphibious
warships carrying thousands of Marines, along with warplanes, attack
helicopters and other aircraft.
The buildup also brought the
arrival in November of a full aircraft carrier strike group, with the U.S.S. Gerald R. Ford and several
destroyers loitering roughly 100 nautical miles off the shores of Venezuela.
The Ford and its air wing,
however, have not been used to attack vessels suspected of smuggling drugs.
Those attacks have been launched by drones and AC-130 gunships controlled by the U.S. Joint Special Operations
Command.
The U.S. Coast Guard has also
begun chasing, boarding and even seizing
oil tankers that the White House says are violating
sanctions on Caracas.
Christiaan Triebert, John
Ismay and Helene Cooper contributed
reporting.
Jan. 3, 2026, 4:03 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Reporting from Venezuela
No senior Venezuelan government
official or military officer has made a public appearance since the start of
the explosions. The government broadcast an address on all television and radio
frequencies, in which a state television journalist read out a statement
condemning the attack.
Jan. 3, 2026, 4:00 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
President Miguel Díaz-Canel of Cuba, in a social media post, denounced what he
called a “criminal attack” by the United States against Venezuela, and demanded
“urgent reaction” from the international community.
Jan. 3, 2026, 3:54 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
The U.S. embassy in Bogotá,
Colombia, issued an alert to Americans in Venezuela, telling them to shelter in
place, citing “reports of explosions in and around” the city. It did not give
details. The United States suspended operations at its embassy in Caracas in
2019.
Jan. 3, 2026, 3:37 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Reporting from Venezuela
Eyewitnesses say the explosions in
Caracas have eased up but there is still frequent noise from military planes
over the city.
Jan. 3, 2026, 3:17 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Reporting from Venezuela
We are unsure where Maduro is at
the moment. But at least some people in his inner circle appeared safe,
according to two people who have spoken to them.
Jan. 3, 2026, 3:33 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Reporting from Venezuela
Last month, we reported that
Maduro had tightened his personal security amid escalating threats by the Trump
administration. People close to the Venezuelan government said he was
frequently changing sleeping locations and cellphones, and one said he had
expanded the role of Cuban bodyguards in his personal security detail, to try
to protect himself from a potential U.S. strike. Read the article here.
Jan. 3, 2026, 3:15 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Reporting from Palm Beach, Fla.
President Trump is at Mar-a-Lago
in Florida. Many of his top national security advisers have spent significant
time with him at the club, where the president has hosted foreign leaders in
recent days. On Friday evening, Trump received a national security briefing,
according to the White House.
Jan. 3, 2026, 3:09 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
The Federal Aviation
Administration has barred American commercial planes from flying at any
altitude over Venezuela, citing safety risks “associated with ongoing military
activity.” Its notice, effective for 23 hours starting at 2 a.m. Saturday in
Venezuela, did not say which military was involved.
Jan. 3, 2026, 2:55 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Reporting from Bogotá, Colombia
President Nicolás Maduro accused
the United States of carrying out military attacks against Venezuela, in a
statement released by Venezuela’s communications ministry. Venezuela “rejects,
repudiates, and denounces” U.S. military aggression in the capital of Caracas and
the states of Miranda, Aragua, and La Guaira, it
said.
Jan. 3, 2026, 2:35 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Reporting from Venezuela
Eyewitnesses report particularly
heavy and ongoing sounds of explosions in Fuerte Tiuna, a sprawling military base in the center of Caracas
that is home to Venezuela’s top brass and many senior government officials.
Jan. 3, 2026, 2:31 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Reporting from Palm Beach, Fla.
The White House declined to
comment on the reports of explosions in Caracas.
Jan. 3, 2026, 2:30 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Pentagon reporter
A Pentagon spokesman referred all
questions about the explosions to the White House.
Jan. 3, 2026, 2:15 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Reporting from Bogotá, Colombia
Colombia’s president, Gustavo
Petro, a critic of the Trump administration, wrote on social media: “Right now
they are bombing Caracas. Alert to the whole world, they have attacked
Venezuela. They are bombing with missiles.” There has been no acknowledgement
or evidence so far that these explosions were caused by military action.
JaN. 3, 2026, 2:10 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Pentagon reporter
A spokeswoman for the U.S.
military in Washington acknowledged the reports of explosions in Caracas but
had no comment on any American role.
Jan. 3, 2026, 2:05 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026
Reporting from Venezuela
Witnesses report smoke coming out
of major military installations in Venezuela’s capital, Caracas, including La
Carlota military airbase and the Fuerte Tiuna military base. They also describe the sounds of
planes and helicopters over Caracas.
Jan. 2, 2026, 1:05 p.m. ETJan. 2, 2026
Christiaan Triebert and Nicholas Nehamas
An oil tanker initially bound for
Venezuela is fleeing U.S. forces.
The oil tanker evading U.S. forces
is broadcasting its location after more than two weeks of sailing dark,
revealing that it is heading northeast in the North Atlantic Ocean.
The ship that had been known as
Bella 1, which is still being tracked by the U.S. Coast Guard, is on a course
that could take it between Iceland and Britain, according to data published by Pole Star Global, a
ship-tracking company. From there, it is possible that the vessel could head
around Scandinavia to Murmansk, Russia’s ice-free Arctic port.
The tanker recently claimed
Russian protection. On Wednesday, the Russian government formally asked the
United States to stop chasing the ship, which the Coast Guard tried to
intercept last month as it traversed the Caribbean Sea on its way to pick up
oil in Venezuela. The Bella 1 recently appeared in Russia’s official
register of ships under a new name, the Marinera, with a
home port of Sochi, on the Black Sea.
Ships like the Bella 1, part of a
so-called shadow fleet that transports oil for Russia, Iran and Venezuela in
violation of sanctions imposed by the United States and other countries, often
turn off their transponders to hide their locations.
The pursuit of the tanker comes as
President Trump intensifies his pressure campaign on the government of Nicolás
Maduro of Venezuela. Mr. Trump has instituted a quasi-blockade on
some tankers transporting oil from the country, a longtime ally of Russia, and
the United States has already boarded and taken possession of two other tankers
in the Caribbean. American officials have said they plan to seize more ships.
The Bella 1 last broadcast its
location on Dec. 17, showing it was in the Atlantic heading toward the Caribbean.
The Coast Guard stopped the ship
on Dec. 20, saying it was not flying a valid national flag and that the United
States had a seizure warrant. But the Bella 1 refused to be boarded and sailed
back into the Atlantic.
The next day, the tanker began
sending radio distress signals that showed it traveling northeast, more than
300 miles from Antigua and Barbuda.
As the slow-speed chase continued,
the vessel claimed Russian protection, a diplomatic chess move that could
complicate U.S. efforts to seize it. Boarding a moving vessel with a
potentially hostile crew on the high seas is a dangerous mission that would
require a specialized team of Coast Guard or Navy operators.
Last week, in a call between the
foreign ministers of Russia and Venezuela, Moscow “reaffirmed its all-out
support and solidarity with the leaders and people of Venezuela,” according to
a summary of the call from Russia’s foreign ministry.
Tyler Pager and Edward
Wong contributed reporting.
More on the
U.S. Operation in Venezuela
On
January 3, the U.S. military seized Venezuela’s president, Nicolás Maduro, and his
wife in a strike on Caracas, the culmination of a campaign to oust Maduro from
power.
· The View From Venezuelans’ Cellphones: Videos,
filmed on cellphones by people mainly in Caracas and La Guaira,
showed the exact moments in which the U.S. air
and ground incursion played out in real time.
· Venezuelans in Colombia Rejoice: Even
if the road to returning home remained uncertain after the removal of Nicolás
Maduro, many Venezuelans in exile wept from
both hope and pain, with
a hope for change rising
among some immigrants.
· What Latin America Thinks: President
Trump has launched a new era of U.S. intervention in Latin America. Some
regional leaders are celebrating, while many others are deeply concerned.
· Worries About Political Stability: Maduro
was unpopular. But his abrupt removal has created deep uncertainty for
Venezuelans, alarming even those who opposed him.
People began lining up at supermarkets throughout
the country as they anxiously waited for word on what would happen next.
· Can the U.S. Legally ‘Run’ Venezuela?: The
operation revives disputes over the legality of the 1989 Panama intervention,
enhanced by Trump’s vow to take over the
country and also by Maduro’s formal status as
Venezuela’s president. Secretary of State Marco Rubio appeared to pivot away from Trump’s
assertion that the United States would “run” Venezuela.
· Venezuela’s Oil: The
White House had pointed to drug trafficking and migration as reasons to crack
down on Maduro. But oil emerged as a central these.
It will take years and billions in investment to
revitalize Venezuela’s oil industry, and energy producers will likely be
cautious before stepping in. Here’s what to know about the Venezuelan oil
industry.
ATTACHMENT “B” – FROM
NEW YORK POST
NICOLAS
MADURO NYC COURT APPEARANCE LIVE UPDATES: LAWYER HINTS AT DICTATOR’S POSSIBLE
DEFENSE
By
Ben Kochman, Kyle Schnitzer, Desheania
Andrews, Kevin Sheehan, Kathleen Joyce, Joe Marino and Chris Nesi
Updated
Jan. 5, 2026, 6:22 p.m. ET
Venezuelan
dictator Nicolas Maduro and first lady Cilia Flores made their first appearance
in a US federal court Monday.
The
fallen leader, 66, and his 69-year-old wife were charged with narco-terrorism
conspiracy, cocaine importation conspiracy, possession of machine guns and
destructive devices, and conspiracy to possess machine guns and destructive
devices against the United States in the Southern District of New York on
Saturday. They pleaded not guilty to the charges.
The
couple was indicted after they were captured at their heavily fortified
compound in Caracas by US forces during a daring mission dubbed “Operation
Absolute Resolve” after President Trump gave the final directive for the US to
attack the South American nation earlier Saturday.
The
Trump administration has repeatedly called Maduro’s regime “illegitimate” and
said he has remained in power due to rigged elections, including in 2024.
Venezuelan Executive Vice President Delcy Rodriguez
is next in line for the presidency, according to its constitution.
Pro-Maduro
thugs ordered to hunt down US collaborators as tension fills Venezuelan streets
Dems
against Trump’s Maduro capture: Letters to the Editor — Jan. 6, 2026
An
image collage containing 3 images, Image 1 shows Russia's UN Ambassador Vasily Nebenzya leaving the
Security Council meeting, Image 2 shows China's Deputy U.N. Ambassador Sun Lei
addressing the Security Council, Image 3 shows Illustration of Nicolás Maduro
and his wife Cilia Flores at their arraignment in New York, with defense
lawyers and court officers
Russia,
China ignore own aggressions to rip US over despot
Maduro’s capture during emergency UN Security Council session
Maduro
and Flores are in separate, solitary cells inside Brooklyn’s notorious
Metropolitan Detention Center — where heavily armed law enforcement members are
on patrol outside. The lockup has also housed disgraced music mogul Sean
“Diddy” Combs and accused UnitedHealthcare CEO killer Luigi Mangione.
5
hours ago
Maduro
lawyer hints at possible defense
By
Kyle Schnitzer
Top
Nicolas Maduro lawyer Barry Pollack hinted at a possible defense in court
Monday — suggesting the US government violated laws by nabbing the dictator in
Caracas and hauling him off for trial.
“There
are issues about the legality of his military abduction,” Pollack told the
judge.
The
Trump administration has claimed it was within its rights to capture Maduro
because he is a drug trafficker attacking the US.
Critics
have argued that President Trump grossly overstepped his legal bounds under
both US and international law.
40
minutes ago
Pro-Maduro
thugs ordered to hunt down US collaborators as tension fills Venezuelan streets
By
Alex Oliveira
Pro-Maduro
thugs were called to the streets to hunt down Venezuelans who supported the US
attack to oust the despotic president, according to a state of emergency order
issued across the South American Nation over the weekend.
Venezuelan
police were ordered to “immediately begin the national search and capture of
everyone involved in the promotion or support for the armed attack by the
United States,” according to the Saturday decree obtained by Reuters, which was
published in full on Monday.
An
armed pro-government demonstrator at a protest against the capture of Maduro in
Caracas on Jan. 4, 2026.
It
remains unclear whether police had begun following that order — or if the
Maduro regime’s notorious paramilitary enforcers had been dispatched — but
photos began emerging across social media Monday that appeared to show heavily
armed and masked civilians patrolling city streets and highways.
3
hours ago
Gov.
Hochul says Trump called her - and that she ripped
him over Maduro capture
By
Vaughn Golden
Gov.
Kathy Hochul said she ripped President Trump for
acting without Congressional approval in Venezuela after he called her on
Monday.
The
Democratic governor also bizarrely claimed credit for sparking the nationwide
"No Kings" protest movement against the Trump administration, as she
celebrated the one-year anniversary of congestion pricing.
Standing
with Mayor Zohran Mamdani, MTA CEO Janno Lieber and transit activists, Hochul
said she told Trump the scheme to charge drivers in Lower Manhattan was
working.
But
when Trump brought up his raid on Venezuela that led to the capture of dictator
Nicolás Maduro, Hochul said she told him "I
disagree."
“You’ve
got to go to Congress. You’ve got to get authority. It’s kind of important to
do things like that,” Hochul said.
“He’s
a bad guy, but you’ve got to get authority,” Hochul
said she told Trump about Maduro.
Hochul,
trying to appeal to lefty activists who pushed for the phased-in $15 toll for
motorists, also claimed that she triggered the "No Kings" protests
after she held a pro-congestion pricing press conference in February 2024 where
she held up a picture of a fake TIME magazine cover put out by the White House
depicting Trump as a king.
“I
was pissed. I said, as you heard. I’m still angry when I think about it," Hochul said Monday. "We’re not laboring under a king
but it was that image, that day that I believe triggered the ‘No Kings’ rallies
all across America."
4
hours ago
Venezuela’s
VP Delcy Rodriguez sworn in as interim president
after Maduro arrest
By
Reuters
Venezuela’s
vice president and oil minister Delcy Rodriguez was
formally sworn in on Monday as the country’s interim president, as US-deposed
President Nicolas Maduro appeared in a New York court on drug charges, after
the Trump administration removed him from power in a dramatic weekend military
action.
Venezuelan
vice president Delcy Rodriguez was sworn in as the
country's interim president on Jan. 5, 2025.
Rodriguez,
a 56-year-old labor lawyer known for close connections to the private sector
and her devotion to the ruling party, was sworn in by her brother Jorge, who is
the head of the national assembly legislature.
5
hours ago
Maduro
and wife seen in courtroom sketch at NYC arraignment
By
Joseph Barberio
Ex-Venezuelan
President Nicolás Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, were pictured in a
courtroom sketch from their arraignment Monday at Manhattan federal court.
The
couple wore matching prison jumpsuits and were flanked by their defense
attorneys, Mark Donnelly (second from right, in bowtie) and Andres Sanchez.
Flores also appeared to have several bandages on her face.
Venezuela's
captured President Nicolas Maduro and his wife Cilia Flores attend their
arraignment with defense lawyers Barry Pollack and Mark Donnelly to face U.S.
federal charges including narco-terrorism, conspiracy, drug trafficking, money
laundering and others, at the Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse
in Manhattan, New York City, U.S., January 5, 2026 in this courtroom sketch.
5
hours ago
Bizarre
courtroom moment as onlookers hear what they think is
shout of, 'Hamas!'
By
Kyle Schnitzer
One
of the more bizarre moments in the Manhattan courtroom Monday occurred when
Nicolas Maduro claimed he was “innocent” — and a Venezuelan detractor yelled
from the gallery, “Jamas!’’
The
Spanish word translates to “never’’ — but it is pronounced like “Hamas’’ in
English, also the name of the Palestinian terror organization.
The
sound jarred more than one court-goer, observers said.
6
hours ago
Former
Venezuela spy chief could be star witness at trial against Nicolás Maduro:
experts
By
Priscilla DeGregory
The
former spymaster of Venezuela could end up being a star prosecution witness at
Nicolás Maduro's drug-trafficking trial, experts told The Post.
Hugo
Carvajal -- the country's longtime spy chief, nicknamed "El Pollo" or
"The Chicken" -- pleaded guilty in June to narco-terrorism, weapons
and drug trafficking charges in the same case that Maduro was charged in.
And
Carvajal -- who flipped allegiance and backed Maduro's opponent in 2019 -- has
already expressed interest in cooperating with the feds as he faces the
potential of life in prison at his sentencing, set for next month.
Former
Venezuelan military spy chief, retired Maj. Gen. Hugo Carvajal, walks out of
prison in Estremera on the outskirts of Madrid, on
Sept. 15, 2019.
Hugo
Carvajal, Venezuela's longtime spy chief who flipped allegiance and backed
Maduro's opponent in 2019, has already expressed interest in cooperating with
the feds.
In
this courtroom sketch, retired Maj. Gen. Hugo Carvajal, center, a former
Venezuelan spymaster close to the country's late leader Hugo Chavez, is flanked
by defense attorney Tess Cohen, left, and defense attorney Zachary Margulis-Ohnuma in federal court, Thursday, July 20, 2023, in New
York. Carvajal was extradited to New York from Spain on Wednesday to face
decade-old drug trafficking charges
Carvajal,
center, flanked by defense attorneys in federal court in July 2023 in New York,
is seen in a court sketch after he was extradited from Spain to face decade-old
drug trafficking charges in the same case as Maduro.
"This
is exactly the type of person that would be a witness in the case," former
federal prosecutor Neama Rahmani
told The Post.
If
he takes the witness stand and testifies truthfully, he would get a
"significant reduction in his sentence," Rahmani
said.
"The
sentencing [in drug-trafficking] cases are so high, so you have to
cooperate," the lawyer added.
"This
is exactly the type of person that would be a witness in the case," former
federal prosecutor Neama Rahmani
told The Post.
Dick
Gregorie -- a prosecutor who handled a US case
against another foreign leader, Manuel Noriega, in 1988 -- agreed there is a
"good possibility" that Carvajal will be a prosecution witness.
"I
would assume if he had a deal that he made six months ago, that they have
probably been preparing him for weeks, or months, maybe," Gregorie added.
Prosecutors
will also have "a number of internal people from Venezuela and drug
dealers who were involved in moving the drugs" as witnesses, he said.
6
hours ago
Maduro
declares himself 'prisoner of war' and 'man of God' during spat with one of his
political foes while leaving court
By
Ben Kochman
Twisted
dictator Nicolas Maduro claimed he is a “prisoner of war’’ and “man of God’’
when confronted Monday by a Venezuelan countryman who said he had been an
imprisoned victim of the fallen despot’s regime.
A
man who identified himself as Pedro Rojas stood up in a Manhattan federal
courtroom after the accused narco-trafficker’s arraignment and shouted at
Maduro that he had been the South American nation’s illegitimate president and
would now face “real justice.’’
Maduro
turned to him and said, “I am a man of God” -- and called himself a POW —
during an exchange in Spanish with Rojas as he was led out of the courtroom.
Rojas,
33, later told reporters that he was a political prisoner in Venezuela in 2019
for four months.
6
hours ago
Maduro
and his wife depart Manhattan court in an armored vehicle following not guilty
pleas: photos
By
Joseph Barberio
Ex-Venezuelan
President Nicolás Maduro was taken away from the Daniel Patrick Moynihan United
States Courthouse in Manhattan in an armored vehicle following his arraignment
Monday.
The
former strongman and his wife, Cilia Flores, both pleaded not guilty to federal
narco-terrorism charges.
The
convoy will likely take the couple back to the notorious Metropolitan Detention
Center in Brooklyn, where they were being held in separate cells.
A
convoy believed to be carrying ousted Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro
departs the Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse after Maduro
attended his arraignment hearing on January 5, 2026 in New York.
Maduro
and his wife both pleaded not guilty to federal narco-terrorism charges.
6
hours ago
Maine-based
company says it's being inundated with calls after shackled Maduro pictured
wearing its blue hoodie
By
Emily Crane
A
Maine-based apparel company's phones have been ringing off the hook after a
shackled Nicolás Maduro was snapped wearing one of its hoodies when he was
hauled to the Big Apple, the company says.
The
ousted Venezuelan dictator could be seen sporting the bright blue Origin attire
in a now-infamous photo of him flashing two thumbs up while surrounded by
scores of DEA agents after touching down in New York.
A
Maine-based apparel company's phones have been ringing off the hook after a
shackled Nicolás Maduro was snapped wearing one of its hoodies.
"Probably
a DEA agent slipped this hoodie on him and said, 'You're gonna
feel the fabric of freedom on American soil.' That's my assumption. I'm taking
the liberty to assume," Origin founder Peter Roberts said in a video
statement.
"He
definitely gave two thumbs up, so I think he liked the fabric."
It
wasn't clear exactly how the dictator ended up in the hoodie.
"What
I believe happened is they landed in New York," Roberts speculated.
"It was cold outside and they put a hoodie on him."
The
CEO said his phone immediately "blew up" when people started noticing
the company's logo.
6
hours ago
Maduro's
wife, Cilia Flores, suffered possible rib fracture, bruising during arrest:
lawyer
By
Emily Crane
Venezuela's
ousted first lady Cilia Flores suffered "significant injuries" --
including a possible rib fracture and bruising -- when she was captured by US
forces, her Texas-based lawyer told a judge Monday.
The
private lawyer, Mark Donnelly, asked for his client to undergo a full X-ray to
ensure her health while in federal custody.
He
added that her injuries were visible in court.
DEA
agents are seen early Monday morning, January 5, 2026, at the Wall Street
Heliport as former Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and his wife are
transferred under federal custody en route to the Daniel
Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse in Manhattan.
Maduro's
wife Cilia Flores claims to have suffered broken ribs from the arrest.
Luiz
C. Ribeiro for New York Post
6
hours ago
Maduro's
lawyer says client won't seek immediate release, may request bail later
By
Kyle Schnitzer
One
of Nicolás Maduro's lawyers told Judge Alvin Hellerstein that his client is not
seeking to be immediately released from custody but reserves his right to
"put in a bail application at a further day.''
Maduro,
who was scribbling on a white piece of paper during the proceedings, added at
one point, "I would like to ask that my notes be respected and that I am
entitled to keep them."
7
hours ago
Maduro's
wife pleads not guilty: 'Completely innocent'
By
Emily Crane
Venezuelan
dictator Nicolás Maduro's wife, Cilia Flores, has pleaded not guilty.
"Not
guilty. Completely innocent," Flores, 69, told a Manhattan federal judge
when asked to enter her plea Monday.
Both
Maduro and his alleged co-conspirator wife have been relying on an interpreter
as the proceedings continue.
7
hours ago
Maduro
proclaims his innocence to courtroom during first appearance: 'I am a decent
man'
By
Kyle Schnitzer
Nicolás
Maduro vehemently proclaimed he was innocent of the charges leveled against him
at his arraignment in Manhattan federal court Monday afternoon.
"I
am innocent. I am not guilty. I am a decent man. I am still president of my
country," Maduro insisted after Judge Alvin Hellerstein asked him if he
understood he had the right to legal counsel.
"I
did not know of these rights. Your honor is informing me of them now,"
Maduro said.
He
then claimed he was seeing the indictment against him for the first time, and
said he was pleading innocent.
"I
am innocent. I am not guilty of anything that is mentioned here," he said.
7
hours ago
Venezuelan
dictator Maduro claims he was 'kidnapped' in Manhattan federal court outburst
By
Chris Nesi
Ousted
Venezuelan dictator Nicolás Maduro denounced his capture as a kidnapping in an
outburst in Manhattan federal court that was swiftly cut off by District Judge
Alvin Hellerstein as proceedings got under way Monday.
"I'm
the president of the republic of Venezuela. ... I am here kidnapped. ... I was
captured at my home in Caracas, Venezuela," he said before Hellerstein
stopped him.
Nicolas
Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, are seen in handcuffs after landing at a
Manhattan helipad, escorted by heavily armed Federal agents as they make their
way into an armored car en route to a Federal
courthouse in Manhattan on January 5, 2026 in New York City
"I'm
the president of the republic of Venezuela. ... I am here kidnapped. ... I was
captured at my home in Caracas, Venezuela," Maduro said in Manhattan
federal court.
"Let
me interfere,'' the judge said. "There will be a time and a place to go
into all of this. Your counsel will be able to make motions. ... At this time,
I just want to know one thing: Are you Nicolás Maduro Moros?"
"I
am Nicholas Maduro Moros," the fallen dictator replied.
7
hours ago
Judge
Hellerstein lays out charges against Maduro, including providing financial
support for terrorism, terrorist activity
By
Kyle Schnitzer and Chris Nesi
Manhattan
federal Judge Alvin Hellerstein exchanged brief pleasantries with the toppled
Venezuelan dictator, saying, "Good morning, Mr. Maduro'' -- before reading
out more than a quarter-century's worth of charges contained in the indictment
against him.
"Mr.
Maduro ... is charged in one count of narco-terrorism conspiracy, specifically
from 1999 to 2025, he knowingly conspired with others ... and intentionally
provided something of pecuniary value to a person or organization engaged in
terrorism and terrorist activity," the 92-year-old jurist said from the
bench.
As
Hellerstein spoke, Maduro furiously scribbled notes on a white piece of paper.
7
hours ago
Maduro
arrives in court shackled at the ankles, greets attorneys
By
Kyle Schnitzer
Deposed
Venezuelan dictator Nicolás Maduro entered Manhattan court Monday shackled at
the ankles -- but not the wrists -- wearing prison-issued orange shoes, beige
pants and an orange shirt with what appears to be a black v-neck
underneath.
7
hours ago
Ex-US
hostage urges Venezuela’s Delcy Rodriguez to free
Americans as proof she's willing to work with Washington
By
Caitlin Doornbos
An
American once held hostage by Venezuela’s brutal regime on Monday called on the
country’s de facto leader, Delcy Rodriguez, to
immediately free the five US citizens still being held in Caracas — saying it
would be the clearest sign yet that she’s willing to work with Washington.
“I’d
like to call on interim President Delcy Rodriguez to
release the five Americans immediately as a show of goodwill,” Marine Corps
veteran Matthew Heath told The Post.
Heath,
who was jailed during Nicolás Maduro’s rule on bogus charges and released in
2022, said Americans detained in Venezuela are routinely used as bargaining
chips in political standoffs with the US.
“They don’t have a real justice system,” he
said. “Judges do exactly what they’re told — or they end up in prison
themselves.”
Maduro’s
government detained more than 40 Americans during his time in power, according
to the former prisoner, who said he was personally framed on fabricated charges
and subjected to electric shocks and other torture inside Venezuela’s political
prison system.
Now
free and back in the US since 2022, the former detainee said seeing Maduro face
prosecution in an American courtroom on Monday is deeply satisfying.
“He’s
going to get a fair trial,” he said. “Something none of us were ever given.”
With
Maduro gone, he said, Rodriguez has a rare opportunity to signal a break from
the past — but warned that authoritarian regimes rarely give up hostages
without extracting concessions.
“Hope
springs eternal,” he said. “But history shows these regimes don’t release
detainees unless they get something in return.”
Still,
he said, freeing the Americans now could open the door to improved relations
and help stabilize the country after years of repression and international
isolation.
“If
she wants to show she’s serious about moving Venezuela forward,” he said, “this
is the moment.”
8
hours ago
Private
lawyer who famously negotiated release of WikiLeaks' Julian Assange joins
Maduro team
By
Ben Kochman
Dictator
Nicolas Maduro also will be repped by a top lawyer who once famously negotiated
the prison release of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange.
Barry
Pollack is a prominent private lawyer who is now part of the team defending the
ousted Venezuelan president.
He
brokered a bombshell June 2024 deal with the US government that allowed
Assange, who was charged with breaching the Espionage Act by divulging state
secrets, to return to his native Australia after pleading guilty to a single
misdemeanor count.
Maduro’s
wife, Cilia Flores, will be represented at Monday’s hearing by Mark Donnelly, a
private lawyer from Texas who served as a federal prosecutor.
It’s
unclear whether or how the private lawyers will be paid for the appearance.
Maduro
also is being repped by court-appointed lawyer David Wikstrom
— meaning taxpayers will foot at least that part of the bill.
8
hours ago
Chevron,
energy stocks soar after US capture of Nicolás Maduro – but oil prices barely
move
By
Taylor Herzlich
Chevron
and other energy stocks soared Monday morning, though oil prices barely budged,
after the US captured Venezuelan dictator Nicolás Maduro and President Trump
said American companies would tap into the nation’s rich oil reserves.
Shares
in Chevron, which is the only major US oil company currently operating in
Venezuela, jumped 4.8%.
Chevron
and other energy stocks soared Monday morning after the US captured Maduro.
ConocoPhillips
and Exxon Mobil – both of which left Venezuela nearly 20 years ago when
Maduro’s socialist predecessor, Hugo Chávez, nationalized their assets – also
rose 5.3% and 2.4%, respectively.
9
hours ago
Lefty
protesters supporting Maduro ripped as 'a--holes' by Cuban, Venezuelan
immigrants
By
Emily Crane
Roughly
a dozen protesters who showed up outside the Manhattan courthouse to denounce
Nicolas Maduro's arrest were blasted as "a--holes" by those hailing
the capture of the Venezuelan dictator.
Dario
Blanzo, who was born in Cuba, came to the federal
court to celebrate Maduro's detainment when he encountered a handful of
protesters holding signs reading “Free President Maduro” and “No War for
Venezuela Oil!”
“You’re an a--hole! You don’t even know where
Venezuela is!” Blanzo shouted at one protester.
“In
Venezuela and Cuba, nobody can do that. Nobody can do that. You go to jail if
you do that."
Maria
Su, who immigrated to the US from Caracas, decried
them as "paid protesters."
“They are not Venezuelans. They are paid
protesters. They don’t speak Spanish!” she raged as she waved a Venezuelan
flag. “They don’t know anything because they are not Venezuelan."
9
hours ago
Maduro
assigned court-appointed attorney -- meaning US will foot bill for dictator's
Monday appearance
By
Emily Crane
Venezuelan
dictator Nicolas Maduro is expected to be repped by a court-appointed attorney
for his initial hearing at Manhattan federal court later today -- meaning the
US will at least initially be footing the bill for his defense.
Maduro
will be represented by longtime Big Apple criminal defense attorney David Wikstrom, The Post confirmed.
It
wasn't immediately clear if the court-appointed attorney would continue to rep
the ousted leader at future court hearings.
10
hours ago
Clinton-nominated
Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein
to oversee Maduro’s court appearance
By
Emily Crane
Manhattan
federal Judge Alvin Hellerstein has been assigned to oversee ousted Venezuelan
President Nicolas Maduro's initial court appearance later Monday.
The
92-year-old veteran judge was nominated and confirmed by President Bill Clinton
in 1998.
The
born-and-bred New Yorker has presided over a slew of cases tied to the 9/11
terror attacks and others related to national security.
In
more recent years, Hellerstein quashed President Trump’s bid to have Manhattan
District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s “hush money” case against him heard in federal
court.
Kyle
Mazza-CNP/Shutterstock
11
hours ago
Nicolas
Maduro could face death penalty if fallen Venezuelan dictator is convicted
By
Jorge Fitz-Gibbon
Fallen
Venezuelan dictator Nicolas Maduro could face the death penalty if convicted on
federal drug-trafficking and other charges.
The
strongman was nabbed at his Caracas palace in a daring US raid and is being
held at the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn pending his arraignment
Monday on a four-count indictment.
If
found guilty, Maduro is likely to spend the rest of his life behind bars — or
worse.
11
hours ago
Maduro
arrives at Manhattan federal courthouse
By
Emily Crane
The
ousted Venezuelan president and his wife have arrived at the Manhattan federal
court where they'll go before a judge later today on narco-terrorism charges.
The
armored car carrying Nicolas Maduro and Cilia Flores reversed into a secured
area at the courthouse just before 7:45 a.m.
Scores
of heavily armed DEA officers and NYPD cops swarmed the streets as the transfer
took place.
11
hours ago
Maduro
touches down in Manhattan
By
Emily Crane and Desheania Andrews
The
chopper carrying fallen Venezuelan leader Nicolas Maduro arrived in downtown
Manhattan at roughly 7:30 a.m.
He
was quickly escorted from the helicopter by about eight heavily armed guards
and put in an armored truck at the helipad.
The
motorcade immediately set off for the courthouse.
12
hours ago
Shackled
Maduro, wife escorted to helicopter
By
Emily Crane
Venezuelan
leader Nicolas Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, have been escorted in cuffs
to a waiting helicopter.
The
fallen leader, 66, and his 69-year-old wife were both in prison garb after leaving
Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn.
12
hours ago
First
look at Maduro ahead of court appearance
By
Samuel Chamberlain
The
motorcade has arrived at a helipad where Maduro will make the short flight
across the East River to Manhattan for his court appearance.
Captured
Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro arrives at the Downtown Manhattan Heliport
on January 5, 2026.
DEA
agents are seen early Monday morning, January 5, 2026, at the Wall Street
Heliport as former Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and his wife are
transferred under federal custody en route to the
Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse in Manhattan.
Luiz
C. Ribeiro for New York Post
News
choppers hovering overhead got a brief glimpse of the fallen left-wing
authoritarian as he was transferred from the armored Bearcat to a police SUV.
Maduro
is clad in what appears to be khakhi prison garb and
red footwear, with his hands shackled in front of him.
12
hours ago
Maduro
leaves Brooklyn jail, bound for Manhattan
By
Samuel Chamberlain
An
armored car believed to be carrying arrested Venezuelan leader Nicolas Maduro
has left the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn.
The
63-year-old is being escorted by unmarked white vans and a fleet of NYPD cop
cars.
Maduro's
first appearance is set for 12 p.m., after which he will be returned behind
bars in Brooklyn.
20
hours ago
Welcome
to ‘hell on Earth,’ Nicolas! Inside the notorious NYC lock-up where Maduro and
his wife are being held
By
Jorge Fitz-Gibbon
Venezuelan
dictator Nicolas Maduro, who dined on steak and lived in a palace as his
country starved, is now in “hell on Earth’’ in a Brooklyn jail — and
machine-gun-toting authorities are making sure he stays there.
Maduro,
63, and his 69-year-old fellow-inmate wife Cilia were thrown into separate
cells in solitary confinement away from the general population at the infamous
federal Metropolitan Detention Center since their extraordinary capture by
elite US forces in Caracas early Saturday.
“This
is the least they deserve,” said Gabriel Bonilla, a Venezuelan comedian who
fled to Argentina in 2017, to The Post on Sunday. “The worst prison in the
United States is a mansion compared to the prisons and holes where people have
been tortured for years in Venezuela.”
20
hours ago
Ousted
Venezuelan dictator Nicolás Maduro arrives in NYC by helicopter hours after
capture by US
By
Marie Pohl
Ousted
Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, touched down in
New York City Saturday night after being captured by US forces — and were
greeted by jeers of “Down with the dictator.”
The
pair — who landed at Stewart Air National Guard Base in Upstate Newburgh around
5 p.m. — arrived via helicopter at a Manhattan heliport just before 7 p.m. and
were hauled away in a heavily armed tactical vehicle called a “Bearcat”
surrounded by a small motorcade.
Maduro,
63, and Flores, 69, will first be transported to the Drug Enforcement
Administration Headquarters in Chelsea, where he was processed before returning
to the West 30th Street Heliport and choppered to
Brooklyn, sources told The Post.
He
took off after 8 p.m., and was seen on video being flown down the West Side of
Manhattan and past the Statue of Liberty before heading to Brooklyn.
20
hours ago
Inside
Operation Absolute Resolve: How US forces captured Venezuela’s Maduro — after
months of secret planning
By
Caitlin Doornbos and Samantha Olander
The
U.S. operation to capture Venezuelan strongman Nicolás Maduro was a
months-in-the-making mission rehearsed using replicas of Maduro’s fortified
compound, showcasing military might, ingenuity — and good timing.
The
Venezuelan dictator was stopped just steps from the steel doors of his
fortified lair as elite Army Delta Force commandos closed in, President Trump
said.
Captured
Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro arrive(d) at the Downtown Manhattan
Heliport, as he heads towards the Daniel Patrick Manhattan United States
Courthouse for an initial appearance to face U.S. federal charges including
narco-terrorism, conspiracy, drug trafficking, money laundering and others in
New York City, U.S., January 5, 2026.
The
Venezuelan dictator was stopped just steps from the steel doors of his
fortified lair as elite Army Delta Force commandos closed in, President Trump
said.
“He was trying to get into a safe place … the
safe place’s all steel, and he wasn’t able to make it to the door because our
guys were so fast,” Trump said.
The
commandos closed in “in a matter of seconds,” Trump said on Fox News.
20
hours ago
Trump
says Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro, wife ‘captured’ after large-scale
strikes
By
Katherine Donlevy
The
U.S. captured Venezuelan dictator Nicolás Maduro early Saturday in an
extraordinary military operation to end the repressive regime of the “fugitive”
leader, and usher in a “new dawn” of freedom to the embattled nation.
Some
150 aircraft took part in Operation Absolute Resolve, which came after months
of mounting pressure by the Trump administration and lasted just under two and
a half hours.
Captured
Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro arrives at the Downtown Manhattan Heliport,
as he heads towards the Daniel Patrick Manhattan United States Courthouse for
an initial appearance to face U.S. federal charges including narco-terrorism,
conspiracy, drug trafficking, money laundering and others in New York City,
U.S., January 5, 2026.
Maduro,
63, and his wife Cilia Flores, 69, were seized just steps from the steel doors
of his high-security Ft Tiuna military compound,
which President Trump said US troops were able to
blast through “a matter of seconds.”
ATTACHMENT “C” – FROM CNN (takeaways)ve
Updates
Venezuela tense while White House says it’s
discussing ‘options’ for acquiring Greenland
Updated 5:31 PM EST, Tue January
6, 2026
Where things stand
• On the ground: Venezuela
remains on edge following the capture of ousted leader Nicolás Maduro. Security forces were seen patrolling
the streets, and gunfire and anti-aircraft fire were reported overnight over the
capital of Caracas. Sigue
nuestra cobertura en español.
• What’s next for
Venezuela?: Opposition leader María Corina Machado has vowed to return home “as
soon as possible,” while President Donald Trump said he considers himself in charge of Venezuela.
Meanwhile, Venezuelans are trying to regain some semblance of normalcy amid
price gouging and rising hunger in the wake of the military operation.
• Focus on
Greenland: Meanwhile, the White House said it is “discussing a range of options”
to acquire Greenland, noting that using the US military is
not off the table. President Donald Trump had said the US needs the Danish
territory, which spurred a statement of support for Denmark from European
leaders.
47
Posts
2 min ago
The US has taken a "prisoner of war," Venezuela's interior
minister says
From CNN's Anabella Gonzalez
Venezuelan Interior Minister
Diosdado Cabello has called ousted president Nicolás Maduro a “prisoner of
war.”
He said the United States “is
violating all international laws” with its attack in Venezuela and arrest of
Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores.
“The imperialists have a prisoner
of war,” he said at a women’s march organized by the government on Tuesday.
“The imperialists know they have committed a terrible crime. That they have
killed civilians – civilians who were sleeping and had nothing to do with the
matter – and a bomb exploded on them,” Cabello said.
Venezuelan Attorney General Tarek
William Saab said three officials have been appointed to investigate the
“dozens” of deaths resulting from the US attack on the country, but the
Venezuelan government has not specified the number of people killed or injured.
On Sunday, the Cuban government,
in a post on
Facebook, said 32 of its citizens were killed during the operation “in combat actions, performing
missions on behalf of the Revolutionary Armed Forces and
the Ministry of the Interior, at the request of counterparts of the South
American country.”
10 min ago
What some Democratic lawmakers are saying today about Venezuela and
Greenland
From CNN’s Ellis Kim and Arlette
Saenz
Lawmakers are trying to learn more
about the United States’ action in Venezuela over the weekend and President
Donald Trump’s view of Greenland.
Here’s what some of the Democrats
have been saying:
Sen. Mark Warner: The top
Democrat on the Senate intelligence committee rejected the capture of Nicolás
Maduro as legal action, and said it was military action, adding that it could
set a dangerous precedent. The Virginia lawmaker also told reporters that while
Trump’s long interest in Greenland was initially viewed as a joke, his rhetoric
about the semiautonomous Danish territory is “very dangerous.”
Sen. Ed Markey: After Trump
said he had talked to oil companies “before and after” the US military removed
Maduro, the Democratic senator from Massachusetts has asked executives at
Chevron, ConocoPhillips and ExxonMobil if they communicated with Trump or his
administration before the strike and whether they had “advance notice of
‘regime change’ operations in Venezuela.” Markey also asked them whether they
made proposals to invest in oil production in Venezuela, and how the recent
military actions have impacted their businesses. CNN has reached out to the
three oil companies for comment.
44 min ago
What is the "Donroe Doctrine?"
CNN’s Jake Tapper explains the “Donroe Doctrine,” a term coined to describe President
Donald Trump’s application of the Monroe Doctrine for the enforcement of US
interests in the Western Hemisphere.
"No external agent" is running Venezuela, acting president
says
From CNN's Ivonne Valdes Garay and Hira Humayun
Venezuela’s acting president Delcy Rodriguez said
today that “no external agent” is running the country.
“There is no external agent who
governs Venezuela. It is Venezuela. It is it’s
constitutional government, the consolidated popular power,” she said in a
televised address a day after being sworn in.
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio
has previously said the administration views Rodriguez as more pragmatic than
ousted president Nicolás Maduro, and as someone the US can work with.
Rodriguez has condemned the US
operation that led to the seizure of Maduro and his wife but has also struck a
softer tone when she called for “cooperation” with
the United States on Sunday.
In her address today, she said
Venezuela is on a “painful path” because of “the aggression it suffered,
unprecedented in our history.” She said women are marching on the streets in
the country, calling for peace and for the release of Maduro and his wife.
1 hr 21
min ago
White House “discussing a range of options” for acquiring Greenland, military
not off the table
From CNN's Kit Maher
The White House said Tuesday that
it is “discussing a range of options” to acquire Greenland, noting that using
the US military is not off the table.
“President Trump has made it well
known that acquiring Greenland is a national security priority of the United
States, and it’s vital to deter our adversaries in the Arctic region. The
President and his team are discussing a range of options to pursue this
important foreign policy goal, and of course, utilizing the U.S. Military is
always an option at the Commander in Chief’s disposal,” White House press
secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a statement to CNN.
On Monday, senior White House aide
Stephen Miller told CNN’s Jake Tapper that nobody would fight the US militarily
“over the future of Greenland.”
1 hr 28
min ago
Dow closes above 49,000 points for first time ever as Wall Street looks
past geopolitical tension
From CNN's John Towfighi
Despite geopolitical uncertainty,
US stocks closed at record highs Tuesday.
The Dow gained 485 points, or
0.99%, to close at a record high of 49,462.08. It’s the first time the
blue-chip index has closed above 49,000 points.
The broader S&P 500 rose 0.62%
and also hit a record high, its first since December 24. The tech-heavy Nasdaq
Composite gained 0.65%.
Wall Street has shrugged off
uncertainty about the US capture of Nicholás Maduro, instead
focusing on fundamentals for markets, such as expectations for strong corporate
earnings and optimism about Federal Reserve interest rate cuts later this year.
The Dow just posted back-to-back
days of record highs. The Dow needs a gain of roughly 1.09% to close above
50,000 points — a milestone that highlights the strength of the recent stock
market rally.
“The new all-time high for the Dow
reflects a constructive broadening in US equity performance,” said Rob Haworth,
senior investment strategy director at US Bank Asset Management.
Market sentiment on Tuesday was
“neutral,” according to CNN’s Fear and Greed Index.
“Despite the solid performance of
the last three years, we think this bull market has more to go,” David
Lefkowitz, head of US equities at UBS Global Wealth Management, said in a note.
Markets across the globe are
kicking off 2026 on a strong note: Benchmark stock indexes in South Korea,
Taiwan, Japan and the United Kingdom all closed at record highs on Tuesday.
1 hr 31
min ago
Schumer calls briefing on Venezuela "troubling," stops short
of saying he regrets vote to confirm Rubio
From CNN's Aileen Graef and Manu Raju
Senate Minority Leader Chuck
Schumer criticized the “troubling” briefing he and a select group of members
received on the US action Venezuela, saying they received few answers and said,
“they don’t know where they’re headed.”
“Mark and I and other members sat
through more than a two and a half hour classified briefing with the
administration, and after all that time, we got no real answers. They don’t
know where they’re headed,” Schumer said at a press conference with Senate
Intelligence Vice Chair Mark Warner.
Schumer said they did not receive
definite answers on how many US troops would be sent to Venezuela, how long the
US “will be running Venezuela,” how much the involvement would cost or “what
country is next.”
Schumer said he was “unsatisfied”
and the briefing was “really troubling.”
Schumer also said he was
disappointed in his former colleague and now Secretary of State Marco Rubio,
who has been instrumental in the operation.
“I am deeply, deeply disappointed
in Marco Rubio, even before Venezuela, and even more so now,” he said when
asked by CNN if he regretted his vote to confirm him as Secretary of State.
Warner said he was worried about
the implications of crossing the “boundaries” of international order, warning
it could lead to “chaos.”
“If any large country can say to a
smaller country next door, ‘we don’t like your leader and he or she broke our
law,’ and then go in and extract them. Where does that lead? Leads to chaos –
which has been the main drive of this Trump administration,” said Warner.
2 hr 4
min ago
Looking back on CNN's 2016 interview with Venezuela's Delcy Rodríguez
By CNN's Zane Heinlein and Rafael
Romo
Delcy Rodríguez, Venezuela’s acting president, has
always been happy to speak on government TV — but she has never been fond of
the free press.
CNN’s Rafael Romo recalls trying
to speak with her on the streets of New York in 2016, when she was still the
foreign minister. He tried to ask her questions about CNN’s year-long
investigation involving the alleged illegal sale of Venezuelan passports out of
the country’s embassy in Iraq.
You can read more about CNN’s
investigation here: Venezuela may have given passports to
people with ties to terrorism.
2 hr 18
min ago
Spain's PM to speak with Venezuela's acting president in bid to
encourage elections
From CNN's Mauricio Torres, Pau
Mosquera and Hira Humayun
Spain’s Prime Minister Pedro
Sanchez said he will speak with Venezuela’s acting President Delcy Rodriguez and opposition leader Edmundo Gonzalez to
help facilitate a move towards elections.
Speaking at a press conference in
Paris as European leaders gathered for Ukraine peace talks, Sanchez did not say
when he would speak to Rodriguez, but said he expects the call to pave the way
for a transition that “ends in clean, free elections.”
“I believe that Spain can play a
role of mediation, of contributing to the realization of a transition that ends
in clean, free elections, where the Venezuelan people can vote freely and
decide freely about their future,” Sanchez told reporters.
The prime minister also said he
would speak to exiled Venezuelan opposition leader Edmundo Gonzalez,
who most Western governments regard as the legitimate winner of the contested 2024 presidential election in
Venezuela.
“A process of dialogue about the
future of Venezuela must be opened among Venezuelans,” Sanchez said, “that is
why we are open to talking with the different parties.”
A timeline for elections in
Venezuela has not been set. On Sunday, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio called
discussions about elections “premature,” and US President Donald Trump has said
an election in Venezuela over the next month is not possible. “We
have to fix the country first. You can’t have an election. There’s no way the
people could even vote,” Trump told NBC News on Monday.
1 hr 24
min ago
Venezuelans try to regain a sense of normalcy amid price gouging and
rising hunger
From CNN staff
In the streets of Caracas today,
there are more people milling around and more vehicles on the street. Fewer
soldiers are patrolling the Venezuelan capital, even if there is a heavy police
presence.
Venezuelans are trying to regain
some semblance of normalcy following the arrests Monday of journalists and the incident involving gunfire and
drones in Miraflores, which brought further tension to the country.
Public offices are operating, some
full-time and others partly.
The economy is, however, flashing
warning signs. The Bolívar has suffered a sharp devaluation. Yesterday, there
were areas in the Venezuelan city of Maracaibo where stores and shops only
accepted cash, and the exchange rate was 900 to 1000 Bolívares
to the US dollar.
Amid reports of price gouging,
some shelves are starting to empty.
In areas further from the Caracas,
hunger is relentless. Towards the east of the country, in smaller cities,
businesses have removed prices.
These are Venezuelans two biggest
concerns right now: what they’re going to eat and how they’re going to get by
(they need to work) and not be stopped in the street.
Correction: An earlier version of
this post gave the wrong day for the journalists’ arrest, which was Monday.
2 hr 4
min ago
Why oil companies may be hesitant to embrace Trump's vision for
Venezuela
From CNN's Elise Hammond
When President Donald Trump talks
to oil companies, he may find that his vision for Venezuela is not realistic,
said Bob McNally, the president of Rapidan Energy Group, a consultancy group
which advices major oil and energy firms.
“I think when the president and
his advisers talks to US oil companies, executives and
analysts, I think there’s going to be a mismatch between how quickly the
president wants the money to flow and the oil production to grow, and how
quickly it will really happen,” he told CNN today.
Trump said yesterday he thinks it
will take less than 18 months for oil companies to rebuild Venezuela’s energy
infrastructure and get it “up and running.”
McNally said that timeline is only
realistic for “low-hanging fruit,” that is obvious repairs and maintenance that
could free up “a few hundred thousand barrels a day compared to the less than a
million they’re producing now.”
It will take decades of investment
to see the kind of production that is worth tens of billions of dollars, he
said.
In addition, while oil companies
are used to operating in dangerous places, they may be hesitant to fully jump
into Venezuela right now, according to McNally. With so much uncertainty around
the political transition, companies are going to be “very risk adverse,” he said.
Industry sources have told CNN that oil executives are expressing this
hesitancy.
“The oil industry is looking at
buying a house they’re going to live in forever, not planning a quick
vacation,” McNally said. “So they want certainty.”
3 hr 36
min ago
Looking ahead: What to expect this week from the Trump administration
and US lawmakers on Venezuela
From CNN’s Maureen Chowdhury
The Trump administration is facing
scrutiny at home and abroad after launching a military operation in Venezuela
that lead to the ousting of leader Nicolás Maduro.
US lawmakers are starting to
be briefed on the operation,
while the administration tries to persuade oil executives to
drill in Venezuela.
As the situation develops in
Venezuela, here’s a look at what’s happening this week:
·
Both the
House and Senate are expected to receive closed-door briefings on
the operation tomorrow. The Senate will hold a members-only classified briefing
at 10 a.m. ET in the Senate’s SCIF, according to a source and a notice sent to
Senate offices. The House is expected to have a similar briefing.
·
The
Senate is set to vote midweek — likely Thursday — on a measure to limit
President Donald Trump’s war powers in Venezuela.
·
US
Energy Secretary Chris Wright will meet with oil executives this
week to discuss US companies once again standing up drilling for oil in
Venezuela, according to an Energy Department spokesperson.
CNN’s Ella Nilsen, Adam Cancryn, René Marsh, Sarah Ferris and Manu Raju
3 hr 52
min ago
Venezuela announces investigation into "dozens" of casualties
from US attack
By CNN's Anabella González
Venezuelan Attorney General Tarek
William Saab announced Tuesday the appointment of three officials to
investigate the “dozens” of deaths resulting from the US attack on the country,
which led to the capture of President Nicolás Maduro and his wife.
“We, as the Public Prosecutor’s
Office, have appointed three prosecutors to investigate the dozens of innocent
civilian and military casualties that occurred during this war crime, this
unprecedented aggression against the Venezuelan homeland,” Saab said at an
event notifying the Attorney General’s Office, the Comptroller General’s
Office, and the Public Prosecutor’s Office of the start of a new five-year term
for Parliament.
To date, the Venezuelan government
has not specified the number of dead or wounded during the attacks.
3 hr 55
min ago
Top Democrat on Senate Judiciary has "mixed feelings" on
Rubio after Venezuela briefing with Bondi
From CNN's Morgan Rimmer
Senate Judiciary Ranking Member
Dick Durbin, who is also a senior member of Senate Democratic leadership, said
he has “mixed feelings” about Secretary of State Marco Rubio after he was
briefed on the Venezuela operation Tuesday morning.
Durbin and the top Republican on
the Senate Judiciary Committee, Chairman Chuck Grassley, were briefed over the
phone by Attorney General Pam Bondi after they released a statement on Monday
expressing their frustration that they were not included in last night’s
briefing for a select group of top lawmakers.
“I’ve got mixed feelings. Marco is
a personal friend of mine, and we’ve worked together in the Gang of Eight. We
had a number of things we worked on over the years,” said Durbin. “Having said
that, he has been loyal to President Trump, which you might expect. But when I
voted for him, I had no idea the extent that the president would push him when
it came to decision making. I have mixed feelings about his future.”
Rubio was confirmed 99-0 in
January 2025, with the support of every Senate Democrat.
Durbin also was clear that,
despite the administration’s denials, he believes the US is engaging in a
regime change in Venezuela.
“That term is freighted with a lot
of politics, and there’s been a lot of sad chapters in our nation’s history
with the rubric of regime change. So, they’re careful to say what they’re
doing, but their explanations don’t make sense at this point,” he told
reporters. “It’s about narco-terrorism, and it was about oil, then it was about
regime change. Let’s get down to the bottom line here: We’re on the line with a
country now that has 30 million people and no real leadership. That’s not a
good recipe for a stable future.”
4 hr 20
min ago
Havana reveals the identities of the 32 Cuban agents who died in the US
attack on Venezuela
From CNNE's Gonzalo Zegarra
Cuba’s government on Tuesday
released the identities of the 32 Cuban agents who worked in the security
apparatus of the Venezuelan government and died during Saturday’s attack by the
United States in Caracas.
“Thirty-two Cubans, victims of a
new criminal act of aggression and state terrorism, perpetrated against our
sister the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela by the United States, lost their
lives in combat and after fierce resistance,” the Ministry of the Armed Forces
said as it shared the list,
which includes two colonels, a lieutenant colonel, four majors and other
military ranks, aged between 26 and 67.
“Honor and glory to our
combatants, fallen heroically confronting the criminal aggression and state
terrorism of the US government against Venezuela,” said Foreign Minister Bruno
Rodríguez on X.
Cuban President Miguel Díaz-Canel ordered two days of official mourning from Monday,
during which flags are at half mast and the majority
of public acts suspended.
According to the leader, the
Cubans “were fulfilling missions in representation of the Revolutionary Armed
Forces and the Ministry of the Interior, on the request of the corresponding
bodies of that country (Venezuela).” He related that they died “after fierce
resistance, in direct combat against the attackers and as a result of the
bombings of installations” during the capture of President Nicolás Maduro and
his wife.
Cuba and Venezuela, two close
allies, have since 2000 maintained a comprehensive cooperation agreement that
allows thousands of Cuban doctors and professionals in education, sport, and
other sectors to remain in the South American country, but until now neither of
the two has acknowledged the work of intelligence or security agents, which was
an open secret.
Given that the Venezuelan
government has not divulged the total number of casualties in Saturday’s
military intervention, it is not known what percentage of those killed the 32
Cubans represent.
1 hr 43
min ago
Sen. Gallego says he will introduce resolution to block US military
invasion of Greenland
From CNN's Morgan Rimmer
Sen. Ruben Gallego said that he is
introducing a resolution to prevent the US from invading Greenland.
“WAKE UP. Trump is telling us
exactly what he wants to do. We must stop him before he invades another country
on a whim,” Gallego said in a post on X.
“I’m introducing a resolution to
block Trump from invading Greenland. No more forever wars.”
Under the War Powers Act, the
Senate will have to consider this resolution on the floor in the near future.
The Senate is set to vote in a Venezuela War Powers resolution later this week.
Speaking to CNN’s Dana Bash on
“Inside Politics,” Gallego said, “The reason why you have Article I power is
because you don’t want to let idiots like President Donald Trump make foreign
policy decisions without their being a check and balance against that. So we’re going to force votes to make sure that … maybe we
can change the narrative, maybe we can make it more difficult for this
president. For us to just throw up our hands and say, ‘well, he’s just going to
do whatever he wants,’ would be a total abdication of our Constitutional
duties.”
4 hr 27
min ago
Senators respond to Trump administration’s Venezuela military operation
after classified briefing
From CNN’s Maureen Chowdhury,
Morgan Rimmer and Ted Barrett
Senators who attended last night’s
classified briefing on the US military operation in Venezuela are reacting to
the controversial move by the Trump administration.
Some said the briefing raised more
questions, while others now feel more assured about the administration’s
decision.
·
Senate
Majority Leader John Thune said he is more comfortable and confident that
the US has a plan for how to operate in that country and said he understands
that the new acting President Delcy Rodriguez is
“practical” and “pragmatic.”
·
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said
that top administration officials had “no real answers” on the future of
Venezuela and US involvement during last night’s classified briefing. “For two
long hours, we heard yesterday from the administration, and what we heard was
little more than wishful thinking and no real answers,” Schumer said. He said
he was “troubled” by Trump officials’ answer on potential action in other
nations in the Western Hemisphere, and added that senators and members of
Congress were told there is “no cost estimate” for action relating to
Venezuela.
·
Democratic Sen. Jeanne Shaheen of
New Hampshire echoed concerns from fellow lawmakers that the Trump
administration lacks clarity on its plans for Venezuela. “In terms of what
comes next and the actions that are going to secure the goals that the
administration seems to be articulating for Venezuela, there were there were
not a lot of details,” she said.
4 hr 42
min ago
Russia slams "blatant neocolonial threats and armed
aggression" carried out against Venezuela
From CNN's Kosta Gak and Catherine
Nicholls
Russia’s foreign ministry has
slammed the “blatant neocolonial threats and armed aggression” carried out
against Venezuela over the weekend, without directly naming the United States.
In a statement, the ministry
welcomed the swearing in of Delcy Rodríguez as
Venezuela’s acting president, saying that it demonstrates Caracas’
determination to, among other things, “ensure unity,” “curb the risks of a
constitutional crisis,” and “create the necessary conditions for the further
peaceful and stable development of Venezuela.”
“We welcome the efforts of the
official authorities of this country to protect state sovereignty and national
interests. We confirm Russia’s unwavering solidarity with the Venezuelan people
and government,” the statement said.
The foreign ministry also said it
was ready to provide “the necessary support” to its “friend Venezuela.”
“We firmly believe that Venezuela
must be guaranteed the right to determine its own destiny without any
destructive external interference,” it said.
Some context: Russia and
Venezuela are close allies. After
the US’s attack on Venezuela on Saturday, the Russian foreign ministry
condemned what it called an
“act of armed aggression against Venezuela,” calling any “excuses” given to
justify such actions “untenable.”
After Washington tightened trade
sanctions on Caracas in mid-2024, Venezuela has relied more heavily on other
partners, including Moscow. Russian President Vladimir Putin stated in May last
year that trade with Venezuela grew by 64% in 2024.
CNN’s Svitlana
Vlasova and Billy Stockwell
and CNNE’s Mauricio Torres, Gonzalo Zegarra and
Germán Padinger contributed to this reporting.
5 hr 16
min ago
White House says Greenland would be better protected by US, after
European leaders back Denmark
From CNN's Alejandra Jaramillo
The White House reiterated that
Greenland would be better protected by the US after European leaders expressed support for
Denmark and the Danish territory.
“President Trump believes
Greenland is a strategically important location that is critical from the
standpoint of national security, and he is confident Greenlanders would be
better served if protected by the United States from modern threats in the
Arctic region,” White House spokeswoman Anna Kelly told CNN in a statement.
“The President is committed to establishing long-term peace at home and
abroad,” she added.
The European leaders said in their
statement that “Greenland belongs to its people.”
“It is for Denmark and Greenland,
and them only, to decide on matters concerning Denmark and Greenland,” the
leaders of France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Spain, Britain and Denmark wrote.
5 hr 25
min ago
A look back at Venezuela's history as the country faces turmoil
From CNN’s Nic Robertson
Venezuelans are entering a time of
uncertainty following the US military operation that ousted leader Nicolás
Maduro.
While some are relieved to have
Maduro no longer in power, there is also growing anxiety about
what the US’ role will be in the country moving forward.
4 hr 57
min ago
"Complete nonsense": Danish parliament member dismisses US
talk about needing Greenland for security
From CNN's Catherine Nicholls
The United States is “almost
starting a war with an allied country” in its pursuit of Greenland, Danish
parliament member Rasmus Jarlov told CNN’s Becky
Anderson today.
“It is quite shocking that a
person who’s in charge of this completely illegitimate land claim on Greenland
knows so little about the history and the background of why Greenland belongs
to Denmark,” Jarlov said, referencing White House
deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller, who last night said that
nobody would fight the US if it tried to seize the autonomous Danish territory.
Denmark’s ownership of Greenland
“may be one of the most well-established ownerships of territory in the world.
It is not disputed by anyone. It has never been disputed by the United States
themselves, and they really should know these things before almost starting a
war with an allied country,” Jarlov continued.
For context: US President Donald
Trump has renewed his public calls for the autonomous Danish
territory after the capture of Venezuelan President
Nicolas Maduro.
While the US has said it needs
Greenland for security purposes, Jarlov pointed out
that the country already has “exclusive and full military access” to the
island. “So this talk about needing Greenland for
security is complete nonsense,” he added.
“They talk about that the United
States are the only ones that can protect Greenland, but the fact is that
they’re the only ones threatening Greenland. Neither China nor Russia are threatening Greenland,” he said.
Should the US attack Greenland
militarily, Denmark “will defend it, and in that case, we would be at war,” Jarlov said.
“We would be fighting each other,
which is completely absurd,” he continued. “But you cannot disagree that if the
United States attacks a NATO country, there is no alliance.”
CNN’s Francisca Marques
contributed to this reporting.
5 hr 49
min ago
Cuba faces uncertainty in aftermath of US military operation in
Venezuela
From CNN’s Patrick Oppmann
The attack on Venezuela has
already come at a heavy cost for Cuba, with the government reporting in a social media post that
32 of its citizens were killed during the US military operation.
Ousted Venezuelan leader Nicolás
Maduro’s inner circle of bodyguards were Cuban.
Saturday’s operation appears to be the first time in decades that the former
Cold War-era foes have engaged in combat. Now, the Cuban government is
wondering if it could be the next country targeted by the Trump administration.
Watch
to learn more about what could be next for Cuba amid escalating tensions:
5 hr 58
min ago
Mexico's Sheinbaum calls for a “fair trial” for Maduro in the US
The president of Mexico, Claudia
Sheinbaum, called Tuesday for a “fair trial” for the ousted president of
Venezuela, Nicolás Maduro, who was captured on January 3 along with his wife,
Cilia Flores, in Caracas after a US military intervention, and then transferred
to New York, where they face drug trafficking charges.
“In this case, now that President
Maduro has been detained, what one asks for is always a fair trial. That is
what must be requested, so that truly in everything, for everyone and in any
circumstance – and in this particular case – there must be speed and justice,”
the president said during her morning press conference.
Sheinbaum reiterated Mexico’s
position of rejecting US intervention, stating that “regardless” of one’s
opinion of Maduro’s presidency or the Venezuelan government, her government
condemns Washington’s “invasion.”
“We must recover our history, our
constitution, and what each one says about it,” she said.
She recalled that Mexico defends
“non-intervention, the peaceful resolution of disputes,” and noted that even
“if a country is very small internationally, we are all equal.”
“That is why we speak of the legal
equality of states. International cooperation for development, which is what I
mentioned yesterday. The best way to help a country is international
cooperation for development. Respect, protection, and promotion of human
rights,” she asserted.
Since Maduro’s detention on
January 3, Mexico has expressed its rejection of Washington’s military
intervention in Venezuela and has defended the sovereignty of nations.
On Sunday, it issued a joint statement
with Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Spain, and Uruguay rejecting “the military
actions unilaterally carried out on Venezuelan territory” and expressing
“concern about any attempt at governmental control, administration, or external
appropriation of natural or strategic resources.”
6 hr 1
min ago
Venezuela’s attorney general asserts Maduro has diplomatic immunity
From CNN's Uriel Blanco
Venezuela’s Attorney General Tarek
William Saab demanded the release of ousted Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro,
saying that he has “diplomatic immunity.”
The attorney general urged Alvin K. Hellerstein,
the US judge in charge of Maduro’s case, to “respect international law and
proceed to recognize the lack of jurisdiction of the court under his command to
try the leader of a sovereign nation, like the Venezuelan homeland, who is
protected by diplomatic immunity, I repeat, as head of state.”
Saab also urged Hellerstein to
“cease all human rights violations that have been carried out against the
president, his wife, and obviously against the Venezuelan people.”
Maduro and his wife Cilia Flores
pleaded not guilty yesterday in their first court appearance in New York.
Follow our live coverage in Spanish of
the situation in the country.
5 hr 45
min ago
Bolton: Trump administration's talk about Greenland "harms
American security"
From CNN's Catherine Nicholls
The Trump administration’s
recent rhetoric about Greenland in
light of its actions in Venezuela is harming American security, according to
John Bolton, US President Donald Trump’s former national security adviser.
When asked by CNN’s Kate Bolduan about comments made by White House deputy chief of
staff Stephen Miller yesterday that “nobody’s gonna
fight the United States militarily over the future of Greenland,” Bolton said
that Miller was making a “simple-minded statement.”
“Of course, nobody’s going to
fight us over (Greenland), but it doesn’t mean we should take territory from a
treaty ally. And if we do that or if, frankly, this conversation goes on much
longer, I think the NATO alliance is in grave jeopardy,” he said.
“This is a self-inflicted wound by
the Trump administration. It harms American security. It does not enhance it by
this kind of talk about Greenland,” Bolton continued.
On Venezuela: Bolton also
reiterated that the Trump administration was making a “big mistake” by choosing
not to support opposition leader María Corina Machado as
the new leader of Venezuela.
Machado and fellow opposition
leader Edmundo González “are
the people who can help provide stability,” Bolton said, not those who were a
part of the regime ran by ousted President Nicolás Maduro.
5 hr 58
min ago
Trump celebrates mission to capture Maduro in speech to GOP lawmakers
From CNN's Adam Cancryn
President Donald Trump on Tuesday
celebrated the capture of ousted Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro, boasting
that the high-risk operation proved the US has the “most fearsome” military in
the world.
“We had a lot of boots on the
ground, but it was amazing,” he said during a speech at a House GOP retreat in
Washington, DC. “It was brilliant tactically.”
Trump recounted several operational
details to Republican lawmakers, indicating the US cut electricity to major
parts of Venezuela just before entering the country. That gave the military the
element of surprise as it approached Maduro’s compound.
“And think of it, nobody was
killed,” Trump said. “And on the other side, a lot of people were killed.”
Trump went on to criticize
Democrats for airing concerns about the decision to capture Maduro, complaining
that few in the party were congratulating him.
“At some point they should say,
you know, ‘You did a great job,’” he said. “‘Thank you, congratulations.’
Wouldn’t it be good?”
5 hr 40
min ago
Colombia to submit note of protest to US over Trump's threats
From CNNE's Gonzalo Zegarra
Colombian Foreign Minister Yolanda
Villavicencio confirmed Tuesday that she will submit a note of protest to the
United States over threats made by
President Donald Trump against Colombian President Gustavo Petro.
“The meeting we will have today
with the US representative is to present our note of rejection of these
offenses, which are not only directed at President Gustavo Petro,” the foreign
minister said. “We want them to understand that he is our democratically
elected president. An offense against the president is an offense against our
country,” she added.
On Sunday, Trump described Petro as
“a sick man who likes making cocaine and selling it to the United States, and
he’s not going to be doing it very long.”
When pressed by a reporter on
whether those comments meant there could be an “operation” in Colombia in the
future, Trump responded, “Sounds good to me.” Petro subsequently refuted
Trump’s claims and defended his government’s record on combating drug
trafficking in a lengthy post on X.
Villavivencio rejected the US “aggression”
against Venezuela over the weekend and said that, while Bogotá maintains its
non-recognition of the country’s 2024 elections, it respects the Venezuelan
legal system that led to Delcy Rodríguez taking
office as acting president after Maduro’s capture.
The minister said she has been in
contact with the Venezuelan government, without giving details of those
conversations, and said that Colombia has not received asylum requests from
Chavista leaders.
She added that Colombia seeks “a
solution for Venezuela that is through dialogue and the autonomous decision of
Venezuelans, (and) that they find the way to reach a consensus on the best way
for the country to continue with a government that can overcome (the crisis).”
CNN’s Tim Lister and Hira Humayun
contributed to this report.
7 hr 20
min ago
Journalists detained by Venezuelan security forces, says national media
union
From CNN's Jack Guy
Venezuelan security forces
detained 14 journalists in the capital on Monday, including reporters who were
covering the swearing-in of the country’s national assembly, according to the
national press union.
In a post on X, the SNTP reported
that 13 foreign journalists and one Venezuelan journalist were detained on
Monday in Caracas before later being released.
The union said that journalists
had their equipment and messaging apps checked.
6 hr 16
min ago
Tension in Venezuela as Europe pushes back on US aggression toward
Greenland. Here’s the latest
From CNN’s Maureen Chowdhury
Tensions are high on the ground in
Venezuela following the capture of now ousted leader Nicolas Maduro, while some
of the focus diplomatically has shifted to the US’ claims on Greenland, which
have provoked a strong pushback from Europe.
·
Patrols in
Caracas: Rights groups are reporting checkpoints
and media repression as security forces patrol the streets of Venezuela’s
capital city.
·
UN concerns: The United Nations has said it
is “deeply worried” about
what comes next for Venezuela and said that the military operation “undermined
a fundamental principle of international law.”
·
US Congress briefings: The full House and
Senate are expected to receive closed-door briefings on
the US’ Venezuela operation from top Trump administration officials tomorrow.
·
On Greenland: In a joint statement, leaders
from major European powers have expressed support for Denmark and Greenland,
saying the Arctic island belongs to its people,
following renewed interest by US President Donald Trump in taking over the
Danish territory. Yesterday, White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller told CNN
that Greenland “obviously” should be a part of the US.
·
Reaction in Latin America: Colombian
President Gustavo Petro has warned that Trump is
aiming to turn Latin American nations into colonies of the US. Read
more about what Venezuelans are saying in
Caracas. And follow our live coverage in Spanish of
the situation in the country here.
CNN’s Catherine Nicholls, Sarah
Ferris, Manu Raju, Jack Guy contributed to this report.
7 hr 34
min ago
Trump officials to brief Senate and House on Wednesday
From CNN’s Sarah Ferris and Manu
Raju
The full House and Senate are
expected to receive closed-door briefings on the US’ Venezuela operation
tomorrow.
The Senate will hold a members-only
classified briefing at 10 a.m. ET in the Senate SCIF (sensitive compartmented
information facility), according to a source familiar with the meeting and a
notice sent to Senate offices.
The briefing will be led by
Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth,
Attorney General Pam Bondi, CIA Director Ratcliffe and Joint Chiefs Chairman
Dan Caine.
The House is also expected to
receive a similar classified briefing.
The Gang of Eight and top
Republicans and Democrats from key House and Senate committees were briefed
yesterday, but the fuller meeting this week will allow a wider swath of
lawmakers to pose questions about the legality of the operation, future US
involvement in Venezuela, and more amid questions over the propriety of the
Trump administration’s actions.
8 hr 6
min ago
Focus shifts to Greenland after the US' military operation in Venezuela
From CNN's Catherine Nicholls
The US’ attack on Venezuela and
its capture of ousted President Nicolás Maduro over the weekend drew headlines
worldwide and drew international attention - both positive and negative.
Just a few days after the strike,
focus has also shifted to Greenland, a self-governing territory of Denmark. The
Arctic island’s strategic location between Europe and North America makes it a
critical site for the US ballistic missile defense system. Its mineral wealth
also aligns with Washington’s ambition to reduce reliance on Chinese exports.
On Sunday, US President Donald
Trump repeated his claim that his country “need(s) Greenland” from
a security perspective.
“We need Greenland … It’s so
strategic right now. Greenland is covered with Russian and Chinese ships all
over the place,” Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One. “We need Greenland
from the standpoint of national security, and Denmark is not going to be able
to do it.”
White House deputy chief of staff
Stephen Miller said yesterday that the formal position of the Trump
administration is that “Greenland should be part of the United States.”
“Nobody’s gonna
fight the United States militarily over the future of Greenland,” Miller said
on CNN’s “The Lead with Jake Tapper.”
These remarks came following US
military action on foreign soil, and were met with consternation from European
allies.
“The current and repeated rhetoric
coming from the United States is entirely unacceptable. When the President of
the United States speaks of ‘needing Greenland’ and links us to Venezuela and
military intervention, it is not only wrong. It is disrespectful,” Greenland’s
Prime Minister Jens Frederik Nielsen said yesterday.
Denmark’s Prime Minister Mette
Frederiksen warned that there
would be consequences should the US try to seize Greenland, saying in televised
remarks that “if the US chooses to attack another NATO country militarily,
everything stops, including NATO and thus the security that has been provided
since the end of World War II.”
In a joint statement released today, the
leaders of France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Spain, the United Kingdom and
Denmark reiterated that “Greenland belongs to its people. It is for Denmark and
Greenland, and them only, to decide on matters concerning Denmark and
Greenland.”
CNN’s Rhea Mogul, Kit Maher, Tim
Lister and Matthew Chance contributed to this reporting.
5 hr 4
min ago
Mounting tensions in Venezuela as rights groups denounce repression
From CNN's Jack Guy
Tensions appear to be rising in
Venezuela in the aftermath of US military action to capture President Nicolás
Maduro and his wife Cilia Flores, with rights groups reporting checkpoints and
media repression as security forces patrol the streets.
Venezuela’s Interior Minister
Diosdado Cabello posted two videos on Instagram showing security forces in the
capital Caracas.
In one video, a group of armed men
can be heard shouting: “Loyal always, traitors never!”
The SNTP Venezuelan journalists’
union denounced repression against journalists on Monday, and Edmundo González
– who the opposition maintains was the true winner of the 2024 elections –
repeated calls for the release of political prisoners.
In a video message from exile,
González said that the capture of Maduro was “a necessary step, but not
sufficient” to achieve a democratic transition.
On Monday, the Committee for the
Liberation of Political Prisoners in Venezuela reported that political
prisoners have had visiting rights suspended and are being prevented from
communicating with the outside world.
The committee added that
checkpoints have been going up in cities around the country, with people being
searched and detained for possessing “digital material” linked to the US
military action.
The Venezuelan government on
Monday published the
decree of the State of External Commotion, which grants broad powers to the
presidency and orders security forces to capture “any person involved in the
promotion or support” of the US attack against the South American country.
9 hr 18
min ago
Yesterday saw ousted Venezuelan
President Nicolás Maduro make an appearance at a New York court, after he was
captured alongside his wife Cilia Flores in a US operation over the weekend.
As you can see in the images
below, he was escorted to the court by armed police and Drug Enforcement
Administration agents, traveling both by motorcade and helicopter to move from
a Brooklyn detention center to the Manhattan courthouse.
Captured Venezuelan President
Nicolas Maduro en route to the Daniel Patrick Manhattan United States
Courthouse for an initial appearance to face U.S. federal charges including
narco-terrorism, conspiracy, drug trafficking, money laundering and others in
New York City on Monday, January 5.
Eduardo Munoz/Reuters
Meanwhile in Venezuela, the
country’s former vice president was formally sworn in as acting leader yesterday.
The ambassadors of China, Russia and Iran — key allies of Venezuela — were
among the first dignitaries to
congratulate Delcy Rodríguez when she was sworn in.
9 hr 27
min ago
UN says US action in Venezuela undermines
international law
From CNN's Jack Guy
The United Nations has said it is
“deeply worried” about what comes next for Venezuela following the US capture
of President Nicolas Maduro.
“It is clear that the operation
undermined a fundamental principle of international law – that
states must not threaten or use force against the territorial integrity
or political independence of any state,” the UN High Commissioner for Human
Rights said in a statement on Tuesday.
The statement acknowledged the
Maduro government’s “appalling human rights record”, but said
US intervention could have damaging consequences both for Venezuela and the
rest of the world.
“We fear that the current
instability and further militarization in the country resulting from the U.S.
intervention will only make the situation worse.”
“The future of Venezuela must be
determined by the Venezuelan people alone, with full respect for their human
rights, including the right to self-determination, and sovereignty over their
lives and their resources,” it added.
9 hr 47
min ago
What are the politics of Venezuelan opposition leader María Corina
Machado?
From CNN's Catherine Nicholls
Venezuelan opposition leader María
Corina Machado was awarded the 2025 Nobel Peace Prize in
October last year for keeping “the flame of democracy burning amid a growing
darkness.”
She was awarded the prize “for her
struggle to achieve a just and peaceful transition from dictatorship to
democracy,” the Norwegian Nobel Committee said at the time. In a statement
accepting the award, Machado said the prize belonged to the people of
Venezuela.
She also dedicated the prize to US
President Donald Trump, telling CNN that
“he deserves a Nobel Peace Prize because of (the) incredible events that are
taking place currently in the world.”
In addition to being a staunch proponent of democracy and a vocal
supporter of Trump, Machado is also an avowed capitalist who previously ran on
a campaign to privatize most
Venezuelan public assets, including in the sectors of health, oil and
education.
In an interview with CNN before
Venezuela’s contested 2024 elections, she repeatedly called for the country’s
markets to be opened, saying: “we need to create conditions that are so
competitive, so attractive that international resources will be invested in a
country, despite what happened in the previous regime.”
Yesterday, Machado said that,
following the US’ capture of ousted Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro, her
country “will be the United States’ main ally in matters of security, energy,
democracy and human rights.”
In an interview with Fox News the
same day, Machado said she hadn’t spoken to Trump since
October, after her Nobel Peace Prize win.
She thanked the US leader for “the
historical actions he has taken against the narco-terrorist regime,” saying
that January 3, when Maduro was captured by the US, “will go down in history as
the day justice defeated tyranny.”
CNN’s Christian Edwards, Char
Reck, Billy Stockwell, Stefano Pozzebon,
Rocío Muñoz-Ledo and Lex Harvey contributed to this
reporting.
9 hr 32
min ago
European leaders back Denmark in face of renewed US interest in
Greenland
Leaders from major European powers
have just expressed support for Denmark and Greenland in a joint statement,
saying the Arctic island belongs to its people,
following renewed interest by US President Donald Trump in taking over the
Danish territory.
“Greenland belongs to its people.
It is for Denmark and Greenland, and them only, to decide on matters concerning
Denmark and Greenland,” said the statement by leaders of France, Germany,
Italy, Poland, Spain, Britain and Denmark.
The leaders said that security in
the Arctic must be achieved collectively with NATO allies, including the United
States.
“NATO has made clear that the
Arctic region is a priority and European Allies are stepping up,” the statement
said. “We and many other Allies have increased our presence, activities and
investments, to keep the Arctic safe and to deter adversaries.”
Trump has said repeatedly he wants
to take over Greenland and told The Atlantic magazine on Sunday: “We do need
Greenland, absolutely. We need it for defense.”
A US military operation at the
weekend, which led to the capture of Venezuela’s President Nicolas Maduro has
further rekindled concerns among Washington’s NATO allies that Greenland might
face a similar scenario.
Some context: Greenland is the
world’s largest island with a population of 57,000 people. It is not an
independent member of NATO but is covered by Denmark’s membership of the
Western military alliance.
The island’s strategic location
between Europe and North America makes it a critical site for the US ballistic
missile defense system. Its mineral wealth also aligns with Washington’s
ambition to reduce reliance on Chinese exports.
10 hr 6
min ago
Venezuela's new acting leader Delcy Rodríguez
and her relationship with the US
From CNN's Catherine Nicholls
The former vice president of
Venezuela, Delcy Rodríguez, was formally sworn in as
the country’s acting leader yesterday.
The 56-year-old has spent more
than two decades as one of the leading figures of Chavismo, a
socialist ideology founded by influential leftist leader Hugo Chávez, which
also values Venezuela’s sovereignty as something to be protected from
“imperialist” powers.
Despite her staunch support of the
Chavismo movement and her hard-line
rhetoric about the US following its capture of ousted Venezuelan President
Nicolás Maduro and his wife Cilia Flores on Saturday, she has seemed to soften
her language regarding the country in the days since.
Initially, Rodríguez accused the
US of “kidnapping” her
country’s leader and said that violations of international law were committed,
accusing US forces of having “savagely attacked” Venezuela’s territorial
integrity.
But on Sunday, she extended an
invitation to the United States government to collaborate on an “agenda of cooperation,”
saying that Venezuela will “prioritize” moving toward “balanced and respectful
international relations” with the US and the region.
Yesterday, US President Donald
Trump did not say whether he has yet spoken directly to Rodríguez, but told
reporters that US Secretary of State Marco Rubio has been speaking with her in
fluent Spanish on the phone and that their “relationship has been very strong.”
CNNE’s Mauricio Torres, CNN’s
Helen Regan and Kit Maher contributed to this reporting.
11 hr 37
min ago
What to know about Venezuela’s oil — and the early odds of the US
reaping the benefits Trump is promising
From CNN's Matthew Rehbein and Matt Egan
US Energy Secretary Chris Wright
is expected to meet this week with
American oil executives as President Donald Trump touts Venezuela’s vast oil resources as
a windfall from his decision to remove President Nicolás Maduro from power.
Trump said yesterday US companies
can rebuild Venezuela’s dilapidated oil infrastructure in about 18 months, a
timeframe drastically at odds with many industry analysts’ estimates.
Here’s what we know about the US
plan:
·
Big Oil is
wary: US oil executives likely aren’t champing at the bit to invest in
Venezuela, industry sources tell CNN.
The troubled country’s oil industry is in shambles, and the political situation
in the wake of Maduro’s removal is murky. Then there’s Venezuela’s recent
history of nationalizing US oil companies’ assets: ConocoPhillips is still
trying to recover $12 billion and ExxonMobil nearly $2 billion for assets
seized in 2006, according to Reuters.
·
Trump says 18 months, experts say years: Despite
the president’s optimistic outlook, analysts estimate rebuilding Venezuela’s
oil infrastructure could take more than a decade.
Just maintaining the country’s current output would require $53 million over 15
years, and increasing capacity to 1990s levels would take $183 million through
2040, consulting firm Rystad Energy said Monday.
·
Ongoing blockade: The US military is continuing to
enforce a blockade of sanctioned vessels entering
and leaving Venezuela. Secretary of State Marco Rubio says
the move “allows us to exert tremendous leverage over what happens next” in
Venezuela by targeting how the regime generates revenue. Rubio and the energy
secretary are leading the effort to engage the US oil industry on Venezuela, a
senior White House official told CNN.
·
Tankers seized: The US has seized multiple vessels since
Trump ordered the blockade last month. As for the oil seized, Trump
has said, “We’re going to keep it.” And the US is maintaining its blockade,
including pursuing sanctioned oil tankers that have attempted to evade
capture, according to four sources.
·
How much oil is at stake: Venezuela has the
largest proven oil resources on Earth – about 20% of global reserves as of
2023. But its potential far outweighs its actual
output, as it produces less than 1% of global crude
production.
CNN’s David Goldman, Natasha
Bertrand, Alayna Treene, Kylie Atwood, Zachary Cohen
and Avery Schmitz contributed reporting.
11 hr 30
min ago
How did countries react at the UN Security Council meeting yesterday?
From CNN's Issy Ronald and
Christian Edwards
Top diplomats at a UN Security
Council meeting yesterday were largely critical of the US operation to capture
Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro.
Criticism came from several
quarters – Latin American countries, with the notable exception of Argentina,
traditional US adversaries Russia and China, as well as less powerful countries
like Pakistan and Uganda. Even Washington’s European allies were reluctant to
throw their full support behind their longtime security partner.
What did the US say? Mike
Waltz, the US envoy to the UN, characterized the move as a “law enforcement
operation,” calling Maduro a “narco-terrorist” who was “responsible for attacks
on the people of the United States, for destabilizing the western hemisphere
and illegitimately repressing the people of Venezuela.”
What did Venezuela
say? Caracas’ UN envoy Samuel Moncada said Maduro’s capture was driven by
the US’ desire to access Venezuela’s resources, and threatened both Venezuela’s
sovereignty and “the credibility of international law”.
Who condemned the US
operation? Chile, Brazil, Mexico, Cuba, Colombia all condemned the US’
actions. Brazil’s UN envoy said the operation “crossed an unacceptable line”
and violated international law. Meanwhile, Russia’s envoy to the UN warned that
Washington’s actions could generate “fresh momentum for neocolonialism and for
imperialism.” Pakistan’s envoy cautioned that the operation could set
“dangerous precedents.”
Who backed the US? Argentina,
led by Trump ally Javier Milei, backed the US’
“decisive action” in Venezuela while Washington’s European allies offered a
more tempered approach. James Kariuki, the UK’s ambassador to the UN, said
London saw Maduro’s claim to power as “fraudulent” and would push for a peaceful
transition towards a legitimate government, but also reiterated the importance
of international law. France struck a similar tone, saying that the US
operation “chips away at the international order”.
11 hr 52
min ago
Colombian President Gustavo Petro accuses US of colonialist ambitions
in Latin America
From CNN's Jack Guy
Colombian President Gustavo Petro
has warned that US President Donald Trump is aiming to turn Latin American
nations into colonies of the US.
“If you read the first few
paragraphs of the national security policy you will understand that the Monroe
Doctrine aims to make sovereign Latin American nations colonies again,” wrote
Petro in a post on X.
“That completely goes against
international law. It’s the same doctrine around living space that Hitler used,
and it caused two world wars,” he added.
In a separate post, Petro called
on US voters to “help construct an international democratic order.”
“It doesn’t matter what color,
party or state these people are from, they need to act, world peace and the
future of human existence are in danger,” he added.
12 hr 6
min ago
Analysis: Why the US strike on Venezuela plunges Greenland and NATO
into uncertainty
From CNN's Matthew Chance\
Amid increasing concerns
that Greenland, a vast
Arctic territory ruled by Denmark, is still being coveted by the Trump
administration, the Danish prime minister has delivered a stark warning to the
White House.
In nationally televised remarks,
Mette Frederiksen reminded Danes that she had already “made it very clear where
the Kingdom of Denmark stands, and that Greenland has repeatedly said that it
does not want to be part of the United States.”
But she also warned of the
consequences of US military action to seize Greenland – something US President
Donald Trump has pointedly refused to rule out.
“First of all, I think you have to
take the US president seriously when he says he wants Greenland,” Frederiksen
said, reflecting heightened anxiety about Trump’s intentions in the aftermath
of his extraordinary military action in
Venezuela.
“But I also want to make it clear
that if the US chooses to attack another NATO country militarily, everything
stops, including NATO and thus the security that has been provided since the
end of World War II,” she added.
A Danish lawmaker has described US
President Donald Trump’s latest comment about how the US needs Greenland as
“very frankly stupid.”
It is a serious and widely shared
concern among NATO allies that the Greenland issue has the potential not only
to anger and humiliate a longtime US partner, but also to fracture the Western
military alliance as pressure from Washington escalates.
Late last night White House deputy
chief of staff for policy Stephen Miller reiterated those claims that
“Greenland should be part of the United States,” but he rejected that military
force would be necessary to acquire it.
“Nobody’s gonna
fight the United States militarily over the future of Greenland,” Miller said
on CNN’s “The Lead with Jake Tapper.”
When pressed whether military
intervention is off the table, Miller instead questioned Denmark’s claim over
the Arctic territory.
You can read the full analysis here.
14 hr 18
min ago
Analysis: What Maduro's capture means for China and Taiwan
From CNN's John Liu and Steven
Jiang
China and Venezuela have
maintained close relations for decades, forged by a shared political ideology
and mutual distrust of a world led by the US.
The bulk of Venezuelan oil exports
flow to China, and Chinese companies finance extensive infrastructure projects
and investments across the country, with Beijing lending billions to Caracas in
recent decades.
Trump’s move has appeared to upend
that relationship, at least for now, raising questions over China’s
preferential access to Venezuelan oil and the future of its political and
economic influence in the wider region.
Chinese social media has erupted
with discussion of the implications. If the US can snatch a leader in its
backyard, many ask, why can’t China do the same? By late Monday, topics linked
to Trump’s capture of Maduro had received more than 650 million impressions on
Weibo, with many users suggesting it could offer a template for Beijing’s
potential military takeover of Taiwan.
But Beijing has struck a different
tone in public statements. It has denounced Maduro’s capture, condemning
Washington for behaving like the world’s policeman, and calling for the ousted
leader’s immediate release.
Subscribers can read the full
analysis here.
12 hr 58
min ago
Venezuela’s opposition leader vows to return home
From CNN's Lex Harvey
Venezuelan opposition leader María
Corina Machado vowed to return home “as soon as possible” in an interview with
Fox News yesterday.
Machado, who is under a
decade-long travel ban, had been in hiding for more than a year but traveled to
Oslo, Norway in December to accept the Nobel Peace Prize. She left Oslo last month.
In the wake of the capture of
ousted leader Nicolas Maduro, Trump said Machado “doesn’t have the support
within or the respect” to lead Venezuela and has repeatedly said that the US is
in charge of the country.
Machado said she last spoke with
Trump on October 10, when her Nobel Peace Prize win was announced.
Senior White House aide Stephen
Miller has also dismissed calls for the US to install
Machado as president.
“It would be absurd and
preposterous for us to suddenly fly her into the country and to put her in
charge,” he said Monday, arguing that Venezuela’s military would not view her
as legitimate.
The US has instead been working
with Maduro-ally and acting President Delcy
Rodríguez, who has vowed to cooperate.
00:44
12 hr 4
min ago
What’s next for Venezuela and its ousted leader Nicolás Maduro?
From CNN's Lex Harvey
Venezuela remains in turmoil days
after leader Nicolás Maduro and his wife Cilia Flores were captured by US
forces from their military fortress in Caracas.
In New York yesterday, Maduro and
Flores pleaded not guilty to
drug and weapons charges in their first court appearance, in which Maduro
declared: “I am still president of my country.”
Their next hearing is scheduled
for March 17. Neither Maduro nor Flores are immediately seeking bail or
release.
Back in Venezuela, Maduro-ally Delcy Rodriguez was sworn in as acting president yesterday,
though President Donald Trump has repeatedly said he is in charge, and has not
ruled out broader military intervention in the South American country if the
regime does not cooperate.
Here’s what may come next:
·
Miller
outlines US position: White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller
characterized US involvement in Venezuela as an “ongoing military operation,”
even as the administration has contended that capturing Maduro was a law
enforcement action. He told CNN the US is using its control of the
Venezuelan economy as leverage to ensure its new
leadership does what Trump wants. He also said the White House has not ruled
out future indictments for Venezuelan officials.
·
What’s the US plan? Senate Majority
Leader John Thune said
questions on the timeline for US control over Venezuela could be answered in
the “next few days,” while other lawmakers have expressed doubt that
Trump has a clear plan for
Venezuela.
·
Machado vows return to Venezuela: Opposition
leader María Corina Machado said she plans to return to Venezuela
ASAP. She said she hadn’t spoken to Trump since October.
Trump and other US officials have dismissed calls to install Machado as
president, claiming she lacks legitimacy, drawing criticism.
·
The oil angle: US Energy Secretary Chris
Wright will meet with oil executives this
week to discuss Venezuela. Trump has projected it
will take less than 18 months for oil companies to rebuild Venezuela’s energy
infrastructure. The US is also making plans to intercept a Venezuela-linked oil tanker that
Russia has claimed jurisdiction over, sources told CNN, aiming to enforce its
blockade off Venezuela’s coast.
·
Broader threats: Trump has issued threats and
warnings to other countries that he deems uncooperative. He said he could take military action in
Colombia, told Mexico to get its “act together” on drugs, and
said the US “needs Greenland.”
13 hr 9
min ago
Here's what happened overnight in Caracas
From CNN's Helen Regan
Gunfire was heard overnight near the Miraflores presidential
palace in the Venezuelan capital Caracas — a city on
edge with security services on heightened alert following the US attack and
capture of President Nicolás Maduro.
Video verified by CNN shows
anti-aircraft fire over Caracas amid reports of confusion between security
units in the capital.
A Venezuelan ministry later said
police had fired at drones that were “flying without permission” and that “no
confrontation occurred.”
Here’s what we know:
·
Reports of
gunfire: One resident, who spoke to CNN on condition of anonymity, said
they heard gunfire close to Urdaneta Ave near the Miraflores presidential
palace.
·
Videos: Video verified by CNN shows
anti-aircraft fire over the Caracas. In separate video verified by CNN audible
gunfire could also be heard.
·
What authorities said: Venezuela’s Ministry
of Communication and Information said police fired at drones that were “flying
without permission.” The ministry added that “no confrontation occurred.”
·
A “misunderstanding”: Discussions between
Maduro-linked paramilitary groups and heard by CNN indicate the gunfire was
related to confusion between different security groups operating near the
Miraflores presidential palace. A member of one of these groups can be heard
calling for backup and that “several shots were heard.” Later, the speaker said
that a drone flying in the area was fired upon by members of the Miraflores
Police and palace security.
·
What is the situation now? The Ministry
of Communication and Information said “the entire country is completely calm,”
though it did not say who might have been flying the drones. The paramilitary
groups also indicated the situation was under control.
·
What has the US said? A White House official
told CNN they were closely tracking the reports of gunfire out of Venezuela,
but noted that “the US is not involved.”
15 hr 53
min ago
Here's what comes next for Maduro and his wife
From CNN's Lauren del Valle and
Holmes Lybrand
During the first hearing in New
York in the case against ousted Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and his
wife, Cilia Flores, the defendants professed their innocence and accused the US
government of abducting the two from their home.
Both pleaded not guilty to
the drug and weapons charges against them and chose, for the time being, not to
fight their detention.
The historic court appearance
marks the start of what could be a lengthy litigation process as they will
likely fight the legitimacy of their military capture.
Maduro’s attorney Barry Pollack
said he plans to file several motions challenging the indictment and Maduro’s
controversial arrest by US operatives, calling it a “military abduction.”
Pollack also said Maduro has
privileges and immunity tied to his office as the head of a sovereign state.
Maduro and Flores also asked for a
“visit” with the Venezuelan consulate. Under US law, foreign nationals detained
in the US are entitled to consular notification and access to consular
resources. It’s unclear what exactly that would look like.
Attorneys for Maduro and his wife
did not make a pitch for their release in court Monday but said they will make
a formal bail application down the line.
The next hearing in the case is
scheduled for March 17.
02:16
11 hr 59
min ago
What Trump and his administration officials are saying about Venezuela
From CNN's Elise Hammond
President Donald Trump and several
other key members of his administration spoke last night as the United States
determines its next move on Venezuela.
After ousted President Nicolás
Maduro and his wife appeared in a Manhattan courtroom yesterday, the US
president said he is in charge of the South American country.
Here’s what the administration is
saying:
·
Trump told NBC News he
considers himself in charge of Venezuela. He suggested the US could launch a
second military operation if Delcy Rodríguez, who is
now the acting Venezuelan president, stops cooperating but said he doesn’t
think it will be necessary. He also projected it
will take less than 18 months for oil companies to rebuild Venezuela’s energy
infrastructure.”
·
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said
the US operation included nearly 200 US personnel on
the ground in Caracas. He also said Maduro didn’t know the troops were coming
“until about three minutes before they arrived.”
·
US Department of Energy Secretary Chris Wright will
meet with oil executives later this week to discuss US companies once again
standing up drilling for oil in Venezuela, the department said.
·
Senior White House aide Stephen
Miller characterized the US involvement as an “ongoing military operation,” even
as the administration has contended that capturing Maduro was a law enforcement
action. He said the US is effectively using its control over the Venezuelan
economy as leverage to ensure that its new leadership does what the Trump
administration demands.
ATTACHMENT “D” – FROM VARIOUS SOURCES
TRUMP WITHDRAWS US FROM 66
INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS AND TREATIES
Dinah
Voyles Pulver
USA
TODAY
Jan.
7, 2026 Updated Jan. 8, 2026, 11:40 a.m. ET
The
United States will withdraw from more than five dozen international
collaborations, including treaties and organizations with the United Nations on
climate change and the oceans, President Donald Trump announced
in a memo.
Among
the organizations the United States will withdraw from are the United Nations
Framework Convention on Climate Change and
the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. The list also includes
agreements and groups on renewable energy, oceans, piracy, counterterrorism and
empowerment of women.
(c)
Consistent with Executive Order 14199 and pursuant to the authority vested in
me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of
America, I hereby direct all executive departments and agencies (agencies) to
take immediate steps to effectuate the withdrawal of the United States from the
organizations listed in section 2 of this memorandum as soon as possible.
For United Nations entities, withdrawal means ceasing participation in or
funding to those entities to the extent permitted by law.
(d)
My review of further findings of the Secretary of State remains ongoing.
Sec. 2.
Organizations from Which the United States Shall Withdraw. (a)
Non-United Nations Organizations:
(xxx) Regional Cooperation Agreement on
Combatting Piracy and Armed Robbery against Ships in Asia;
Regional Cooperation Agreement on Combating Piracy and Armed Robbery
against Ships in Asia
From
Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
Regional Cooperation Agreement on Combating Piracy and Armed Robbery
against Ships in Asia - Information Sharing Centre |
|
|
See Wiki for Logo of the Regional Cooperation Agreement on Combating
Piracy and Armed Robbery against Ships in Asia - Information Sharing Centre |
|
|
Abbreviation |
ReCAAP ISC |
|
Formation |
29 November 2006 (19 years ago) |
|
Type |
|
|
Purpose |
|
|
Headquarters |
|
|
Coordinates |
|
|
Area served |
|
|
Membership |
21 Contracting Parties |
|
Executive Director |
Krishnaswamy Natarajan |
|
Website |
|
List of Countries In ReCAAP See map here
The Regional Cooperation Agreement on Combating
Piracy and Armed Robbery against Ships in Asia, abbreviated as ReCAAP or RECAAP, is a multilateral agreement between 16 countries in Asia, concluded in November 2004 and includes the
RECAAP Information Sharing Centre (ISC), an initiative for facilitating the
dissemination of piracy-related
information.[1]
To date, twenty one countries in various parts of the
world have ratified the ReCAAP agreement.[2]
ReCAAP History
The Regional Cooperation Agreement on Combating Piracy
and Armed Robbery against Ships in Asia (ReCAAP) is
the first regional government-to-government agreement to promote and enhance
cooperation against piracy and armed robbery against ships in Asia. ReCAAP ISC was proposed in 1999 as a result of shared
concern specifically related to cases of piracy and armed robbery, and it came
into force in November 2006 after further ratification by member states.[3] To
date, 21 States (14 Asian countries, 5 European countries, Australia, the USA)
have become Contracting Parties to ReCAAP.
On January 2026, the USA withdrew from the Agreement.[4]
The 20 Contracting Parties of ReCAAP:[5] (As
of January 2025)
The Structure of ReCAAP
ReCAAP was established as a decentralized security network,
which included the formation of an Information Security Center (ISC) and a
Governing Council. The ISC also serves as a platform for information exchange
with the ReCAAP Focal Points via the Information
Network System (IFN). The Governing Council consists of one representative from
each contracting member and is tasked with overseeing a focal point and
managing the ISC's procedures.[6]
FROM
TRADE WINDS
Trump
dumps anti-piracy body on eve of major report
Administration
is withdrawing from 66 organisations that are
‘contrary to US interests’
Regulation
ReCAAP
executive director Vijay D Chafekar
ReCAAP
executive director Vijay D Chafekar
Photo:
Karen Ng
Paul
Peachey
TradeWinds
correspondent
London
Published
8 January 2026, 10:17
The
Trump administration is pulling out of an anti-piracy organisation
on the eve of it reporting the highest level of incidents at a notorious
hotspot for nearly two decades.
The
US said it will withdraw from 66 organisations,
including the Regional Cooperation Agreement on Combating Piracy and Armed
Robbery against Ships in Asia (ReCAAP).
The
list includes 31 United Nations bodies, among them UN Trade & Development,
which produces an annual report on the state of the maritime industry and advocates
for developing nations in global trade talks.
You
need a subscription to read this story
Anti-piracy
experts shrug off Trump team pullout
Asia
security group says the US paid only a nominal sum every year
Published
9 January 2026, 07:49
The
head of an anti-piracy group says its work will continue unaffected despite the
administration of US President Donald Trump pulling its support.
The
Regional Cooperation Agreement on Combating Piracy and Armed Robbery against
Ships in Asia (ReCAAP) was one of 66 bodies
identified by the White House this week as “contrary to the interests” of the
US.
You
need a subscription to read this story
FROM HAMSA
https://www.bing.com/ck/a?!&&p=ce2d80b8250f5643c5c5005bd5cc62afa9b8e120a4b186afe8f77d8cbf21231eJmltdHM9MTc2ODAwMzIwMA&ptn=3&ver=2&hsh=4&fclid=22207647-2718-6046-2146-609a266e61fe&psq=TRUMP+WITHDRAW+Regional+Cooperation+PIRACY&u=a1aHR0cHM6Ly9oYW5zYS5uZXdzL3RydW1wLXdpdGhkcmF3cy11c2EtZnJvbS1jb29wZXJhdGlvbi1hZ2FpbnN0LXBpcmFjeS8
Trump
withdraws USA from cooperation against piracy
January
9, 2026
The
US government’s drastic withdrawal from international cooperation now also has
consequences for the fight against piracy: Donald Trump has ordered the US to
quit from a total of 66 organizations, including the “Recaap”.
Around
a year ago, Trump instructed
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio to review all memberships in international
organizations. Although this was also about saving costs, it was primarily
about “which organizations, agreements and treaties run counter to the
interests of the United States”.
Rubio
has now submitted his report. And Trump is making good on his threat. “I have
reviewed the Secretary of State’s report and, after consultation with my
Cabinet, have determined that it is contrary to the interests of the United
States to remain, participate in, or otherwise support some organizations,”
reads a statement from the White House.
In
it, Trump instructs his followers to withdraw from a total of 66 organizations
and cooperations “as soon as possible”.
After
the US government exerted massive pressure on the deliberations at the
International Maritime Organization (IMO) last autumn, ultimately torpedoing
efforts to achieve the widely anticipated “Net Zero Framework”, the shipping
industry is now also feeling the consequences of the latest initiative. The IMO
is not on the list to be deleted. However, the fight against piracy in Asia is
affected.
Germany is also a member
Among
other things, Trump is calling to withdraw from the “Regional Cooperation
Agreement to Combat Piracy and Armed Robbery against Ships in Asia”, or Recaap for short. This is an intergovernmental cooperation
between 21 countries that was founded in 2004. The members are not only Asian
states. The USA, some European countries and, since 2021, Germany have
also joined.
Recaap cooperation
is primarily about sharing information on piracy cases, threats, strategic
plans. In contrast to East Africa, where some of the states are very weak in
terms of naval and coastal protection and Somalia was considered a “failed
state”, better developed, sovereign states are involved here.
Strictly
speaking, many cases in the region are “armed robbery” and not “piracy” because
the vast majority of attacks take place in the territorial waters of the
states. This circumstance has important consequences because it is the coastal
states that have the right to pursue and intervene there first, and not the
naval units of other countries that are on patrol duty and could intervene more
quickly if necessary.
Even
though pirates off East and West Africa have received much more attention in
recent years and the military has recently sounded the
alarm again, shipping in Southeast Asia is still struggling
with attacks, thefts and boardings. Despite – or perhaps because of – its “low
profile” cooperation, Recaap is considered a model
for success, even if two important countries in the region, Malaysia and Indonesia,
cannot bring themselves to join for fear of losing sovereignty.
“BLOOD, SWEAT AND MONEY”
Incidentally,
the latest instructions do not necessarily mark the end of the list of
deletions. “My review of further findings by the Secretary of State is not yet
complete,” Trump continued.
Rubio
himself also commented on the deletion list, describing the organizations in
question as “redundant, mismanaged, unnecessary, wasteful and poorly run”. They
would be “captured by the interests of actors pursuing their own agendas
contrary to our interests, or pose a threat to our nation’s sovereignty,
freedoms and overall prosperity”. Trump himself is quoted in the statement as
saying that it is no longer acceptable to devote “the blood, sweat and money of
the American people to these institutions without getting any meaningful
results in return. The days of billions of taxpayer dollars flowing to foreign
interests at the expense of our people are over.” These organizations are
actively trying to limit American sovereignty, he said. “We reject inertia and
ideology and instead embrace prudence and purpose. We seek cooperation where it
serves our people and remain steadfast where it does not,” it says.
A1A FROM THE WHITE
HOUSE
EXECUTIVE
ORDER 14199
(Partial
only, read the complete list of defunded organizations on White House website here.)
(c) Consistent with
Executive Order 14199 and pursuant to the authority vested in me as President
by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, I hereby
direct all executive departments and agencies (agencies) to take immediate
steps to effectuate the withdrawal of the United States from the organizations
listed in section 2 of this memorandum as soon as possible. For United
Nations entities, withdrawal means ceasing participation in or funding to those
entities to the extent permitted by law.
(d) My review of further findings
of the Secretary of State remains ongoing.
Sec. 2. Organizations from
Which the United States Shall Withdraw. (a) Non-United Nations
Organizations:
(A
total of sixty six are listed. The relevant removal is...
(xxx)
Regional Cooperation Agreement on Combatting Piracy and Armed Robbery (RECAPP)
against Ships in Asia;
A1B FROM WIKIPEDIA
RECAAP
DEFINED
Regional Cooperation Agreement on Combating Piracy and Armed Robbery
against Ships in Asia
Bottom of Form
|
Regional Cooperation Agreement on Combating Piracy
and Armed Robbery against Ships in Asia - Information Sharing Centre |
|
|
RECAAP (see
logo HERE) |
|
|
Abbreviation |
ReCAAP ISC |
|
Formation |
29 November 2006 (19 years ago) |
|
Type |
|
|
Purpose |
|
|
Headquarters |
|
|
Coordinates |
|
|
Area served |
|
|
Membership |
21 Contracting Parties |
|
Executive Director |
Krishnaswamy Natarajan |
|
Website |
|
List
of Countries In ReCAAP (See map here)
The Regional
Cooperation Agreement on Combating Piracy and Armed Robbery against Ships in
Asia, abbreviated as ReCAAP or RECAAP,
is a multilateral agreement between
16 countries in Asia,
concluded in November 2004 and includes the RECAAP Information Sharing Centre
(ISC), an initiative for facilitating the dissemination of piracy-related
information.[1]
To
date, twenty one countries in various parts of the world have ratified the ReCAAP agreement.[2]
RECAAP HISTORY
The
Regional Cooperation Agreement on Combating Piracy and Armed Robbery against
Ships in Asia (ReCAAP) is the first regional
government-to-government agreement to promote and enhance cooperation against
piracy and armed robbery against ships in Asia. ReCAAP
ISC was proposed in 1999 as a result of shared concern specifically related to
cases of piracy and armed robbery, and it came into force in November 2006
after further ratification by member states.[3] To
date, 21 States (14 Asian countries, 5 European countries, Australia, the USA)
have become Contracting Parties to ReCAAP.
On
January 2026, the USA withdrew from the Agreement.[4]
The
20 Contracting Parties of ReCAAP:[5] (As
of January 2025) @use
A
The Structure of ReCAAP
ReCAAP was
established as a decentralized security network, which included the formation
of an Information Security Center (ISC) and a Governing Council. The ISC also
serves as a platform for information exchange with the ReCAAP
Focal Points via the Information Network System (IFN). The Governing Council
consists of one representative from each contracting member and is tasked with
overseeing a focal point and managing the ISC's procedures.[6]
@get more to include usa membership
and quit
A1C FROM FROM TRADE WINDS
TRUMP DUMPS ANTI-PIRACY BODY ON EVE OF MAJOR
REPORT
Administration is withdrawing from 66 organisations that are ‘contrary to US interests’
Published 8 January 2026, 10:17
The Trump administration is pulling out of an
anti-piracy organisation on the eve of it reporting
the highest level of incidents at a notorious hotspot for nearly two decades.
The US said it will withdraw from 66 organisations, including the Regional Cooperation Agreement
on Combating Piracy and Armed Robbery against Ships in Asia (ReCAAP).
The list includes 31 United Nations bodies, among
them UN Trade & Development, which produces an annual report on the state
of the maritime industry and advocates for developing nations in global trade
talks.
PAYWALL:
You need a subscription to read the rest of this story
Article includes...
Anti-piracy experts shrug off Trump team pullout
Asia security group says the US paid only a
nominal sum every year
A1D FROM HANSA SHIPPING and MARKETS (German: see HERE for
Description and Logo)
TRUMP WITHDRAWS USA FROM
COOPERATION AGAINST PIRACY
January 9, 2026
The US government’s drastic withdrawal from
international cooperation now also has consequences for the fight against
piracy: Donald Trump has ordered the US to quit from a total of 66
organizations, including the “Recaap”.
Around
a year ago, Trump instructed
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio to review all memberships in international
organizations. Although this was also about saving costs, it was primarily
about “which organizations, agreements and treaties run counter to the
interests of the United States”.
Rubio
has now submitted his report. And Trump is making good on his threat. “I have
reviewed the Secretary of State’s report and, after consultation with my
Cabinet, have determined that it is contrary to the interests of the United
States to remain, participate in, or otherwise support some organizations,”
reads a statement from the White House.
In
it, Trump instructs his followers to withdraw from a total of 66 organizations
and cooperations “as soon as possible”.
After
the US government exerted massive pressure on the deliberations at the
International Maritime Organization (IMO) last autumn, ultimately torpedoing
efforts to achieve the widely anticipated “Net Zero Framework”, the shipping
industry is now also feeling the consequences of the latest initiative. The IMO
is not on the list to be deleted. However, the fight against piracy in Asia is
affected.
GERMANY IS ALSO A MEMBER
Among
other things, Trump is calling to withdraw from the “Regional Cooperation
Agreement to Combat Piracy and Armed Robbery against Ships in Asia”, or Recaap for short. This is an intergovernmental cooperation
between 21 countries that was founded in 2004. The members are not only Asian
states. The USA, some European countries and, since 2021, Germany have
also joined.
Recaap
cooperation is primarily about sharing information on piracy cases, threats,
strategic plans. In contrast to East Africa, where some of the states are very
weak in terms of naval and coastal protection and Somalia was considered a
“failed state”, better developed, sovereign states are involved here.
Strictly
speaking, many cases in the region are “armed robbery” and not “piracy” because
the vast majority of attacks take place in the territorial waters of the
states. This circumstance has important consequences because it is the coastal
states that have the right to pursue and intervene there first, and not the
naval units of other countries that are on patrol duty and could intervene more
quickly if necessary.
Even though pirates
off East and West Africa have received much more attention in recent years
and the military has recently sounded the alarm again, shipping in Southeast Asia is
still struggling with attacks, thefts and boardings. Despite – or perhaps
because of – its “low profile” cooperation, Recaap is
considered a model for success, even if two important countries in the region,
Malaysia and Indonesia, cannot bring themselves to join for fear of losing
sovereignty.
“BLOOD, SWEAT AND MONEY”
Incidentally,
the latest instructions do not necessarily mark the end of the list of
deletions. “My review of further findings by the Secretary of State is not yet
complete,” Trump continued.
Rubio
himself also commented on the deletion list, describing the organizations in
question as “redundant, mismanaged, unnecessary, wasteful and poorly run”. They
would be “captured by the interests of actors pursuing their own agendas
contrary to our interests, or pose a threat to our nation’s sovereignty,
freedoms and overall prosperity”. Trump himself is quoted in the statement as
saying that it is no longer acceptable to devote “the blood, sweat and money of
the American people to these institutions without getting any meaningful
results in return. The days of billions of taxpayer dollars flowing to foreign
interests at the expense of our people are over.” These organizations are
actively trying to limit American sovereignty, he said. “We reject inertia and
ideology and instead embrace prudence and purpose. We seek cooperation where it
serves our people and remain steadfast where it does not,” it says.
'Strategic blunder that
gives away American advantage'
As
reports on 2025's global temperatures are released in the days ahead, major
organizations and climate scientists expect it to be either the second- or third-warmest year on record globally.
Several organizations quickly criticized the withdrawals from the international
collaborations on climate change and the oceans, saying it will harm U.S.
residents and American companies.
Pulling
out of the framework convention on climate is "a strategic blunder that
gives away American advantage for nothing in return," said David Widawsky, director of WRI US, the World Resources Institute
in the United States. "Walking away doesn’t just put America on the
sidelines − it takes the U.S. out of the arena entirely."
Widawsky said the
action will cost American communities and businesses economic ground as other
countries take advantage of the "booming clean-energy economy."
The
withdrawal from the global climate treaty is "a new low" from the administration,
said Rachel Cleetus, policy director and lead
economist for the Union of Concerned Scientists climate and energy program.
It's another "sign that this authoritarian, anti-science administration is
determined to sacrifice people’s well-being and destabilize global
cooperation."