the DON JONES INDEX… 

 

GAINS POSTED in GREEN

LOSSES POSTED in RED

 

   1/23/26…   16,034.90

      1/8/26…   16,030.37

    6/27/13...    15,000.00

 

 

(THE DOW JONES INDEX: 1/23/26... 48,442.44; 1/8/26... 48,996.08; 6/27/13… 15,000.00)

 

LESSON for JANUARY 16th, 2026 – “PIRATES of the POTOMAC!

 

Our last issue’s breaking news was headline nobody else was paying attention to… the White House has declared that piracy is no longer a crime.

Yo ho!  Ho!...

America’s War on Piracy came to a shuddering stop a week ago pursuant to White House Executive Order 14199 in which President Trump pulled the United States out of sixty six international organizations.  Many were involved in issues like fighting climate change or promoting humanitarian issues, but pullout number thirty was from the Regional Cooperation Agreement on Combatting Piracy and Armed Robbery (RECAPP) against Ships in Asia.  (ATTACHMENT ONE “A”)

...and a bottle of, uh, diet Coke.

Wikipedia (ATTACHMENT ONE “B”) defines RECAPP as “multilateral agreement between 16 countries in Asia, concluded in November 2004 and includes the RECAAP Information Sharing Centre (ISC), an initiative for facilitating the dissemination of piracy-related information.”

First proposed in 1999 and ratified in 2006 ReCAAP was established as a decentralized security network, which included the formation of an Information Security Center (ISC) as part of the UN Trade & Development, which produces an annual report on the state of the maritime industry and advocates for developing nations in global trade talks.

The maritime journal Trade Winds (ATTACHMENT ONE “C”) cited an “Asian security group” which said that Americans “paid only a nominal sum every year”, but Germany’s Hansa Shipping and Markets journal claimed that... while withdrawal from the squandrous sixty six was about saving costs, “it was primarily about “which organizations, agreements and treaties run counter to the interests of the United States.”  (ATTACHMENT ONE “D”)

Recaap cooperation is primarily about sharing information on piracy cases, threats, strategic plans. In contrast to East Africa, where some of the states are very weak in terms of naval and coastal protection and Somalia was considered a “failed state”, better developed, sovereign states are involved here.

Strictly speaking, many cases in the region are “armed robbery” and not “piracy” because the vast majority of attacks take place in the territorial waters of the states. This circumstance has important consequences because it is the coastal states that have the right to pursue and intervene there first, and not the naval units of other countries that are on patrol duty and could intervene more quickly if necessary.

Even though pirates off East and West Africa have received much more attention in recent years and the military has recently sounded the alarm again, shipping in Southeast Asia is still struggling with attacks, thefts and boardings. Despite – or perhaps because of – its “low profile” cooperation, Recaap is considered a model for success, even if two important countries in the region, Malaysia and Indonesia, cannot bring themselves to join for fear of losing sovereignty.”

SecState Rubio described the organizations in question as “redundant, mismanaged, unnecessary, wasteful and poorly run”. They would be “captured by the interests of actors pursuing their own agendas contrary to our interests, or pose a threat to our nation’s sovereignty, freedoms and overall prosperity”.

The withdrawal from the global climate treaty is "a new low" from the administration, said Rachel Cleetus, policy director and lead economist for the Union of Concerned Scientists climate and energy program. It's another "sign that this authoritarian, anti-science administration is determined to sacrifice people’s well-being and destabilize global cooperation."

But oh... the treasure to be gained from pirates’ plunder!

This development went almost unnoticed in the press, owing to the press of other events and White House Executive Orders with what little coverage noted primarily concerned with climate change and manifestations of the detestable “green hoax” promulgated by President Trump and his cabinet of curiosities; howsoever it gave credence to not only the active brigands of the Pacific but to contentions by Venezuela’s deposed dictator Nicolas Maduro, (currently locked up for dastardly dictatorial deeds in the doing of Venezuelan gumment bizness) that Djonald UnJollied’s seagoing attacks on and confiscations of oil tankers flying various or no flags but all full of black gold, or goop, which had begun during Christmas Week, had joined the ostensibly original drugrunners, gunrunners and pirates of the Caribbean, impacting customers like Cuba, Iran, Russia, China and more than a few ostensible American allies.

Oil, its extraction from the Venezuelan deposits in primarily located in the vast Orinoco Belt (Faja Petrolífera del Orinoco) in central Venezuela, holding the world's largest proven reserves, mostly as extra-heavy crude. Significant conventional oil resources are also found in the Maracaibo Basin (around Lake Maracaibo) and the Eastern Venezuelan Basin - processing and transport, appearing to have stolen the thunder from the brief and increasingly limited war on that country – replacing regime change (achieved, as to Maduro and his wife) although his own Veep, Delcy Rodriguez has been sworn in as dictator (or President, to supporters) shadow dictator Diosdado Cabello, the interior minister/cum/thuglord in his “Doubt is Treason” continues to rule his armies of colectivo thugs that continue to oppress and arrest and, when orders or whims dictate, kill persons even suspected of being pro-Yanqui.  Trump, SecState Marco Rubio, DefSec Hegseth and the usual MAGA diplomatic foibles like Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner are now focused on cutting deals with the Maduro cronies and, perhaps, commandeering at least a portion of the nation’s wealth... tho’ not the foreign bank accounts of Chavistas (followers of Chavez, the country’s predecessor dictator).  (USA Today, Dec. 2, 2025/Updated Jan. 3, 2026, 6:47 AM ET – ATTACHMENT TWO)

Two days before Christmas, 2025, Venezuela's ruling-party controlled National Assembly unanimously approved a law that allows prison sentences of up to 20 years “for anyone who promotes or finances what it describes as piracy or blockades.”

National Assembly President Jorge Rodriguez, a former psychiatrist and brother of now-President Delcy, accused the supporters of opposition party leader and Nobel prizewinner Machado of promoting sanctions and said they "stole, plundered, bowed down to U.S. imperialism," adding that "they are happy with the aggressive actions currently taking place in the Caribbean Sea."  (Reuters, December 23, 2025 1:30 PM EST –Updated December 23, 2025 – ATTACHMENT THREE)

 

NASTY NIKKI

Asking and answering (sort of) the question of Maduro’s identity and accomplishments... including the awful ones... USA Today reported that, during the 1980s, Maduro worked as a bodyguard and a bus driver, and belonged to the Caracas Metro system transit union.  Jailed for anti-government activities including a reported coup to oust then-President Carlos Andres Perez, he was released with the aid of Hugo Chavez and returned the favor by supporting his predecessor in the 1998 presidential campaign "that promised to give poor Venezuelans a larger share of the economic pie dominated by the country's wealthy ruling elite," 

Earning a place in Chávez’s inner circle, Maduro went on to serve as the country's foreign minister and vice president before being elected President for three terms – the last in July 2024, the country's government-controlled electoral commission declared he’d won the election, keeping his seat in office despite disputed results showing Machado had won from 70 to 80 percent of the vote. 

Maduro and his top generals were indicted in 2020 for their alleged involvement in a drug trafficking conspiracy as the alleged head of the Cartel de los Soles, a group the U.S. State Department has labeled a foreign terrorist organization. 

The Venezuelan president denied having any links to the illegal drug trade.  (ATTACHMENT FOUR – Jan. 3, 2026, 6:47 a.m. ET)  But, in fact, regime change, in its turn, had largely... if briefly... replaced the demonic drugs (largely cocaine and marijuana with fentanyl being a specialty of the Chinese) and invading aliens fleeing Venezuela for economic or political reasons (or, in many cases, to go on living after having offended the regime, one way or another.

Therefore, the prelude to invasion, arrest and extraction of Mr. and Mrs. Maduro which had been presaged by those “piratical” attacks, seizures and sinkings... first upon small boats believed to be transporting the wicked weed and various powders (later, authorities would state that Europe, not America, had been their likely destination) and then seizures of oil-bearing tankers... first a couple under Venezuelan flags, then a “shadow ship” flying the banner of Russia – which protested but, notably, did not declare what fearful Fannies warned might be World War Three.

Rumblings of revolution began under a Wolf supermoon in appropriate Hour of the Wolf - the dead of night Saturday morning, when the New York Times (ATTACHMENT FIVE, Jan. 3, 2026, 2:24 a.m. ET) reported “explosions” in Caracas.  It was not immediately clear what caused the blasts,” said the Times, but the United States “has been building pressure on Nicolás Maduro, Venezuela’s authoritarian president, for months.”

President Trump, having said he would wait until time and the weather co-operated, pulled the plug under that glowering Wolf Supermoon and, amidst the barrage upon what even skeptics agreed were largely military targets (several dozen Cuban mercenaries were reportedly killed in their sleep).

The troops reportedly arrived at Maduro’s compound at 1:01 a.m. ET.  Inside his home on a military base, the Maduros bolted for a safe room as U.S. troops swooped into the compound and explosions lit up the nighttime sky over Caracas.

“Maduro made it as far as the door but couldn’t get it to shut,” reported USA Today’s Michael Collins (ATTACHMENT SIX Jan. 3, 2026/Updated Jan. 4, 2026, 11:12 a.m. ET)

“Members of the Army’s secretive Delta Force grabbed the Venezuelan leader and his wife, Cilia Flores, whisked them out of the compound and took them to the USS Iwo Jima, an amphibious assault ship waiting off the South American coast.” 

No U.S. forces were killed, and no American aircraft were lost during the strike, said President Donald Trump, who announced the military operation had been “one of the most stunning, effective and powerful displays of American military might and competence in American history,” while USA Today concurred that it was “one of the most significant incursions into a foreign country since the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.”

“This mission was meticulously planned, drawing lessons from decades of missions over the last many years,” said Gen. Dan Caine, an Air Force general who serves as Trump’s chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, during a news conference at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida.

Intelligence teams monitored Maduro to understand how he moved, where he lived, where he traveled, what he ate, what he wore – and even what kind of pets he had, Caine said.

Republicans still clung to the “War on Drugs” explanation for the raid and apprehemsion.  Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Tom Cotton, R-Arkansas, said in a post on X that Maduro “wasn’t just an illegitimate dictator; he also ran a vast drug-trafficking operation. That’s why he was indicted in U.S. court nearly six years ago for drug trafficking and narco-terrorism.”

House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-Louisiana, described the military action as “a decisive and justified operation that will protect American lives.”

“Nicolas Maduro is responsible for the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Americans after years of trafficking illegal drugs and violent cartel members into our country – crimes for which he’s been properly indicted in U.S. courts and an arrest warrant duly issued – and today he learned what accountability looks like,” Johnson said in a statement.

Democrats expressed a range of reactions from concern to outright disapproval as the dictator was being hauled back to America. “It’s embarrassing that we went from the world cop to the world bully in less than one year,” said Sen. Ruben Gallego, D-Arizona, an Iraq war veteran.

And Sen. Tim Kaine, D-Virginia, objected to the exclusion of Congressional concurrence, or even input, before military action.

“Where will this go next?” Kaine asked. “Will the president deploy our troops to protect Iranian protesters? To enforce the fragile ceasefire in Gaza? To battle terrorists in Nigeria? To seize Greenland or the Panama Canal? To suppress Americans peacefully assembling to protest his policies? Trump has threatened to do all this and more and sees no need to seek legal authorization from people’s elected legislature before putting servicemembers at risk.”

The Trump administration insisted it did not need congressional authorization for its military operations in and around Venezuela.

Time had said that the half-hour incursion had drawn on “weeks of rehearsals and a vast armada of aircraft and intelligence assets that tracked Maduro’s behavioral habits.”

 

WHY TRUMP AUTHORIZED THE OPERATION

Trump framed the raid as both a law enforcement action and an act of war against drug trafficking networks he says are protected by the Venezuelan state.

“We had to do it because it’s a war,” he said, citing what he described as an armed conflict with cartels moving drugs toward the United States.

Other Administration officials agreed - saying that the strikes were intended to take down transnational drug cartels, arguing that Venezuelan territory had become central to trafficking routes into the United States.  But the first replacement of the campaign... a pivot from drug war to regime change... was also voiced with Time’s Nik Popli contending (Jan. 3, 2:17 PM, ATTACHMENT SEVEN) that it served a broader strategic purpose: “degrading Venezuela’s ability to detect or respond to American military movements, while signaling to Maduro that Trump was prepared to act directly on Venezuelan soil.”

The second pivot... from regime change to oil... was now beginning to manifest and would gain supremacy within a few days (below).

The operation, Time reported, “was carried out by an elite U.S. Army special operations unit known as Delta Force, which specializes in covert and dangerous missions at the direction of the president.”

Trump said the U.S. intended to carry out the operation four days earlier to usher in 2026, but weather nearly delayed the mission. 

“Over the weeks through Christmas and New Year’s, the men and women of the United States military sat ready,” said General Caine.

According to “Raisin’” Caine, the final order to strike Venezuela came late Friday night. “At 10:46 p.m. ET, the President ordered the United States military to move forward with this mission,” he said. “He said to us, ‘Good luck and Godspeed.’”

Over the next several hours, more than 150 aircraft—including bombers, fighter jets, surveillance planes, helicopters and drones—launched from 20 bases on land and at sea across the Western Hemisphere while U.S. Cyber Command, Space Command and other agencies “layered effects overhead” to protect the aircraft and preserve surprise, General Caine said.

A FIREFIGHT DURING THE RAID

He also said that as the apprehension force descended and moved to isolate the area, helicopters came under fire, prompting American forces to respond “with overwhelming force and self defense.”

One U.S. aircraft was hit but remained flyable, and all aircraft returned safely, he added.

Time reported that Trump had said that the United States planned to oversee Venezuela until a transition of power could be arranged. “We’re going to run the country until such time as we can do a safe, proper and judicious transition,” he said.

The British liberals at Guardian U.K., however, cited Alan McPherson, a history professor at Temple University and author of “A Short History of US Interventions in Latin America and the Caribbean” who opined that while “One”... even when kicking the colonials, the English are always polite... “might have thought that this era of naked imperialism – of the US getting the political outcomes it wants in Latin America through sheer military force – would be over in the 21st century, but clearly it is not,” he added.

Looking backwards to the capture of Panama’s dictator Manuel Noriega in 1989, covert actions which helped topple democratically elected governments and usher in military dictatorships in countries such as Brazil, Chile and Argentina and... as Maurício Santoro, a professor of international relations at the State University of Rio de Janeiro, described the new national security strategy published by the Trump administration a few weeks ago... a “Trump corollary” to the Monroe doctrine – the “America for Americans” foreign policy “set out in 1823 by President James Monroe and later used to justify US-backed military coups in South and Central America.”  (G.U.K. – Jan. 3, 2300 EST, ATTACHMENT EIGHT)

Said corollary has, since the dawn of 2026 and the dusk of the dictator, been dubbed the “Donroe Doctrine” by the Man Himself (Jan. 4. 11:42 AM: ATTACHMENT NINE)... one of what Margaret Hartmann in New York Magazine called “...(t)he wildest things Trump said about the Venezuela attack.”

Other whoppers included the statement, during his Saturday press conference, that: “We’re going to run the country until such time as we can do a safe proper and judicious transition... (w)e don’t want to be involved with having somebody else get in and we have the same situation that we had for the last long period of years,” or the contention that, responding to an inquiry from Fox about China’s reaction to the attack: “There’s not going to be a problem... (t)hey’re going to get oil. We’re going to allow people to have oil.”

How civilized!

The New Yorker’s compilation also quoted the Djonald UnCivilized uncivilized threats against Mexico – including the warning: “We can do it again, too.  Nobody can stop us,” and adding that, while Mexican president Claudia Sheinbaum is a “good woman”, (the cartels) are running Mexico, “she’s not running Mexico,” so “something is going to have to be done with Mexico.”

Looking back even further than the Mexican War of 1846 (when the United States nearly doubled its territory by removing Hollywood, Salt Lake and... after a brief interstice of independence, Texas... from Mexico) to a time a quarter of a century earlier, Trump laughed off Democrats’ nagging that the Veninvasion wasn’t constitutional by boasting: “The Monroe Doctrine … They now call it the Donroe Document.”

Trump reversed his timeline back to the future (or, rather, near past... Cuba, Brazil, Panama – where the deposition and apprehension of Manuael Noriega in 1989 was called comparable to the Maduro overthrow) concluded his remarks on Air Force One by claiming that attacking Venezuela, then threatening various other countries, isn’t about oil but peace.

“It’s about peace on earth.”

A noble (if not Nobel) sentiment... but Gothanite troller Margaret Hartmann plucked a few Trumptastic chestnuts from the fires of the (brief) war... (New York Magazine, Jan. 4, ATTACHMENT NINE) and, amidst his Air Force One discourse, related nuggets like...

“Nobody can stop us...”

“We’re going to run the country until such time as we can do a safe proper and judicious transition,” he said. “We don’t want to be involved with having somebody else get in and we have the same situation that we had for the last long period of years.”

China’s reaction to the attacks...

“There’s not going to be a problem.  “They’re going to get oil. We’re going to allow people to have oil.”

“Something is going to have to be done with Mexico.”

“(W)e’re very friendly with” Mexican president Claudia Sheinbaum, who’s a “good woman.”  But … maybe yes? “The cartels are running Mexico, she’s not running Mexico,” so “something is going to have to be done with Mexico.”

“We’re going to be very strongly involved” in Venezuela’s oil industry.

“At least we don’t have to waste a lot of time wondering what this is really about,” Hartmann divulged, citing Trump’s “openly describing how U.S. companies are going to take over Venezuela’s oil business.”

As everyone knows, said the President, “the oil business in Venezuela has been a bust, a total bust. For a long period of time they were pumping almost nothing in comparison to what they could have been pumping and what could have taken place. We’re going to have our very large United States oil companies, the biggest anywhere in the world go in, spend billions of dollars, fix the badly broken infrastructure. The oil infrastructure. And start making money for the country.”

Anticipating questions about constitutionality, Hartman asked: “So how are we supposed to respond to all this? Definitely not by questioning Trump’s power!”

Unfortunately for future history students, she added, “Trump has already coined an incredibly stupid term for this era of American foreign policy.”

“The Monroe Doctrine … They now call it the Donroe Document.”

Venezuela “took our oil away from us.”

Trump then complained that Venezuela took America’s oil … by which he meant Venezuelan oil that he thinks the U.S. is entitled to.  “Remember, they stole our property,” he said. “It was the greatest theft in the history of America. Nobody has ever stolen our property like they have. They took our oil away from us. They took the infrastructure away. And all that infrastructure is rotten and decayed. And the oil companies are going to go in and rebuild it. We’re not going to spend very much money at all. They oil companies are going to go in, we’re going to take our oil back.”

Kidnapping is “not a bad term.”

Trump suggested that he had talked to Delcy Rodríguez, and shrugged off her calling Maduro’s capture a “kidnapping.”

“It’s about peace on earth.”

Or, perhaps, piracy?

While some AI jokers issued deepfakes of Trump as President of Venezuela (prompting the latenite comedians to snark that he’d become the first American in history to lead two failing states) it was Delcy, not Donnie actually “sworn in as Venezuela’s president after Maduro abduction,” according to those boppers at Al Jazeera (Jan. 5, ATTACHMENT TEN).

While the President of only America, so far, actually allowed Rodriguez to take her oath of office... with cautious intimations that it was contingent on deals uncounted (deals on debt, deals on oil, deals on deals with bad actors) - but, apparantly, no deals on democracy’s continuing decline with Trump himself warning that her tenure as president could be cut short, “should she fail to abide by US demands.

“If she doesn’t do what’s right, she is going to pay a very big price, probably bigger than Maduro,”

Parsing the career of Rodriguez – a former labour lawyer and stalwart “chavista” (adhering to the left-wing political movement founded by Maduro’s mentor, the late Chavez) who has held “various ministerial roles under Maduro, including leading the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.”

The jazzies also noted that even Republicans were having doubts about Rodriguez.

“We don’t recognise Delcy Rodriguez as the legitimate ruler of Venezuela. We didn’t recognise Nicolas Maduro as a legitimate ruler,” Republican Senator Tom Cotton told CNN on Sunday.

“It is a fact that she and other indicted and sanctioned officials are in Venezuela. They have control over the military and security services. We have to deal with that fact. That does not make them a legitimate leader.”

 

Then the US military seized two more Venezuela-linked oil tankers, this time including a Russian-flagged ship called the Bella 1 that it had pursued for more than two weeks.  “On Dec. 24, the ship received approval from the Kremlin to reflag under Russia and has since changed its name to the Marinera. It was accompanied by Russian naval vessels and a submarine but was seized between the British Isles and Iceland with support from the UK military.”  (1440 – ATTACHMENT ELEVEN)

Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Kristi Noem shared a video of the operations to the social platform X Wednesday morning at 9:22 a.m. EST.

“In two predawn operations today, the Coast Guard conducted back-to-back meticulously coordinated boarding of two ‘ghost fleet’ tanker ships— one in the North Atlantic Sea and one in international waters near the Caribbean,” she wrote.  (The Hill: Jan. 7, 9:14 AM, ATTACHMENT TWELVE)

Hillsiders Max Rego and Ellen Mitchell said that evidence set forth by officeholders and influencers within the United States accused Delcy Rodriguez and her replacement regime of ordering police to "immediately begin the national search and capture of everyone involved in the promotion or support for the armed attack by the United States," according to the text of the decree, as reported by Reuters and set forth by Fox (Jan. 5, ATTACHMENT THIRTEEN)

Despite denouncing the U.S. military operation, Rodriguez said in a Sunday social media post that the country aspires towards balanced and respectful international relations between Caracas and Washington although, as post-Maduro colectivo thugs hunt down, arrest, torture and kill those who speak out against the continuation of the regime (now, apparently, with the support of the White House), ordinary Venezuelans are dodging police as they journey to retailers to stockpile necessities (like food, medicines and... shades of the plague... toilet paper).

GUK, Jan. 4 (ATTACHMENT FOURTEEN) interviewed residents of Caracas standing in long lines “to stock up on supplies in case the coming days brought yet more drama.”

There was scant sign of citizens celebrating Maduro’s downfall, something locals attributed to fear that his regime – which remains in power despite his arrest – might crack down and a deep-rooted sense that little had actually changed as a result of the US intervention.

“We all get what we deserve. Maduro is a man who never put his hand on his heart to see the hardships of his country, to see his people going hungry,” said Griselda Guzmán, recalling the satisfying moment she had seen images of the dethroned dictator languishing in US custody. “When I saw him like that – handcuffed – I saw him for what he was: the biggest fool on Earth.”

Guzmán said she believed Maduro had had “the opportunity of a lifetime” to leave power voluntarily after the 2024 vote, which independently verified voting data showed he had lost to the political movement led by the Nobel laureate María Corina Machado. “He could have handed over the presidency because he knew he hadn’t won,” she said.

“But instead Maduro chose to cling to power – and now,” he was behind bars in New York facing decades in a US jail.

 

US News (Jan. 5, 4:00 PM, ATTACHMENT FIFTEEN) – having socked the Maduros away in a decrepit Brooklyn jail asked the Administration whether there would be elections in Venezuela... but when?... and would opposition leader and Nobel Peace Prize winner María Corina Machado be allowed to run (or even to return) after Trump said she lacked the “support” and “respect” internally to lead the country.

So what’s next for Venezuela and America’s role there? Olivier Knox asked and, sometimes, offered answers to “some of the big questions,” like...

WHO’S IN CHARGE IN CARACAS?

On Saturday, President Donald Trump sketched out a concept of a plan that, he said, would put the U.S. in charge of Venezuela for an indefinite period of time.

"We're going to run the country until such time as we can do a safe, proper and judicious transition," he said. Who will do the running? "It's largely going to be, for a period of time, the people that are standing right behind me," said Trump, referring to his secretaries of state, Marco Rubio, and defense, Pete Hegseth.

But the deal artist also said he could “work with” a compliant Rodriguez so U.S.N.W.R.’s Olivier Knox termed the American actions “...more a leadership change than a regime change. Coerce and co-opt Caracas, not “run” (it).”

WILL THERE BE ELECTIONS?

“Short answer: Not soon.”  Trump has doubled down on his opinion of Machado’s “lack of support” (only 70%) rejecting her dedication of the Nobel to him and, after the U.S.N. article, her statement that she would hand over the prize itself if Djonald UnBribed would allow control of Venezuela to return to Venezuelans (with the unspoken caveat that Trump, Rubio, Hegseth and such would at least rein in the colectivos if not returning to round up their leaders and install them in prisons next to Maduro).  This, also, was rejected.

Say what you will about Donnie’s love of gold, it tarnishes when compared to his need for control.

So, WILL THERE BE MORE U.S. MILITARY ACTION IN VENEZUELA?

That, according to USN and others, depends on whether Rodriguez can kiss Trump’s backside on issues of import (like oil) while spewing anti-American and patriotic rhetoric that will prevent colectivo commanders like DefSec Bad Vlad Padrino López and interior minister Cabello (above), and also profiled in the Romero/Kurmanev takeaway in the New York Times’ Jan. 3rd anthology – (below, Attachment “A”) from slicing her up like a pineapple.

More American forces in Venezuela if she either fails him or falls victim to a coup? “We’re not afraid of boots on the ground,” Trump said, telling The Atlantic that if Delcy didn’t do “what’s right”, she would “pay a very big price, probably bigger than Maduro” who, at least, is alive – for the time being.

CAN VENEZUELA’S NEW LEADER KEEP THINGS TOGETHER?

This depends on whether Rodríguez “can somehow steer a middle course of satisfying American demands while preventing a rebellion from loyal Chavistas” like López, Cabello and the colectivos in the country’s politics, military and street gangs.

DOES THE U.S. HAVE A PLAN IF SHE DOESN’T?

It’ll take some pretty pivoting for Rodriguez to survive but, if Venezuela collapses, USN’s Knox predicted “large emigrant flows to neighboring countries, with potentially destabilizing effects for the region. And what replaces the regime – chaos or a Maduro diehard – could be worse for American interests.”

WILL AMERICAN OIL COMPANIES RUSH TO VENEZUELA?

On Saturday, Trump repeatedly cited a desire to get American oil companies back in the business of exploiting Venezuelan reserves but the oilies, most already burned, some twice, are going to take their sweet crude time... and at least wait until the country stabilizes (or, at least prices at the pump “rise to the point where it’s profitable to drill for Venezuelan oil) despite the risks.”

 

 

WORLD REACTION

Time (Jan 3, 10:54 AM, ATTACHMENT @X55) took note of world leaders’ reaction to the removal of Maduro “with a mixture of outrage, concern, and caution” two weeks ago Saturday.  

Many countries expressed outrage over the capture of Maduro on Saturday, while even some U.S. allies issued statements calling for the rule of law to be respected.  South American leaders in particular expressed anger at the attack.

THE RESPONSES (Time, unless initialed)

Below is a round-up of global reactions to the operation from Time and from others with fingers in foreign pies as follows...

Excerpts from these last four, plus takeaways from the New York Times anthology have been folded into some of the Time flies from foreign nations with identifying initials inserted... G, U, R, I and N as listed as well as DJI for our own input – based on sources near or far or even wholly imaginary.

         

UNITED KINGDOM 

British Prime Minister Keir Starmer said he wanted to speak to President Trump before making any firm statements either way about Maduro’s capture.  

"I always say and believe we should uphold international law, but I think at this stage [in a] fast moving situation, let's establish the facts and take it from there,” he said in a statement to British broadcasters. 

As news emerged of the U.S. intervention, Starmer said: “I will want to talk to the president” and to allies to “establish the facts.” After Mr. Trump’s announcement, he wrote on X that the U.K. shed “no tears” about the end of Mr. Maduro’s regime and would “discuss the evolving situation with US counterparts” in hopes of a peaceful transition.  (NYT in Attachment “A” – Erlanger)

RUSSIA

Russia's Foreign Ministry said it is "extremely alarmed" and called for "immediate clarification", according to a statement posted on Saturday on the ministry's Telegram channel.

It added later in a post on X: “The US committed an act of armed aggression against Venezuela, which gives rise to deep concern & warrants condemnation.”

The UKRAINIAN Review (Jan. 4th, ATTACHMENT @X69) took a cautiously optimistic stance on the Operation because Moscow has for years supplied weapons and political backing to Nicolás Maduro’s regime and because, following the dictator’s deposition and capture, “the divide between Russia and the United States has become even more pronounced.”

RUSSIA itself denounced the “US aggression” with Deputy Chairman of the Russian Security Council Dmitry Medvedev declaring that “Washington no longer has the formal right to criticize Moscow for any actions” in the Jan. 4th edition of the state news agency TASS.  (ATTACHMENT @70)

Allies of Mr. Maduro, including Cuba and Russia, predictably condemned the American intervention, despite Russia’s own invasion of sovereign Ukraine nearly four years ago.  (NYT – Erlanger 1:00 PM)

The reaction of Russia, another ally of Mr. Maduro, was strongly worded and apparently without irony. Russia, which launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine four years ago and is still at war there, condemned the U.S. military action as “an act of armed aggression against Venezuela.” The Russian foreign ministry, in a statement, called the American attack “deeply concerning and condemnable,” adding: “Ideological hostility has triumphed over businesslike pragmatism.”  (NYT – Erlanger 1:00 PM)

Representative Don Bacon, Republican of Nebraska, said the mission to capture Maduro was “great for the future of Venezuelans and the region,” but he warned that it could hand authoritarian powers a justification for aggression elsewhere. “My main concern is now Russia will use this to justify their illegal and barbaric military actions against Ukraine, or China to justify an invasion of Taiwan,” he wrote in a social media post.  (NYT – Jimison 10:07 AM)

Russian Minister of Foreign Affairs Sergei Lavrov said he had spoken to Venezuelan Vice President Delcy Rodriguez by telephone. Lavrov “expressed firm solidarity with the people of Venezuela in the face of armed aggression” and said Moscow would “continue to support” the government, according to a summary of the conversation published by the ministry.  (NYT – Hopkins 9:57 AM)

“The tanker (Bella 1) recently claimed Russian protection. On Wednesday, the Russian government formally asked the United States to stop chasing the ship, which the Coast Guard tried to intercept last month as it traversed the Caribbean Sea on its way to pick up oil in Venezuela. The Bella 1 recently appeared in Russia’s official register of ships under a new name, the Marinera, with a home port of Sochi, on the Black Sea.

“Ships like the Bella 1, part of a so-called shadow fleet that transports oil for Russia, Iran and Venezuela in violation of sanctions imposed by the United States and other countries...”  (NYT – Triebert and Nehamas, Jan. 2 1:05 PM

 

EUROPEAN UNION

EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas wrote on X that she had spoken to US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and the EU ambassador in Caracas.

"The EU has repeatedly stated that Mr Maduro lacks legitimacy and has defended a peaceful transition," she wrote. "Under all circumstances, the principles of international law and the UN Charter must be respected. We call for restraint."

The president of the European Council, António Costa, said on Saturday that the European Union wants de-escalation in Venezuela. Mr. Costa wrote on X that the E.U. “would continue ​to support a ​peaceful, democratic, and inclusive solution in Venezuela.”  (NYT – Erlanger 1:00 PM)

 

EU and NATO MEMBERS

GERMANY hesitated to condemn the US attack, seeming to have three things on its mind in regard to US capture of of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro in a DW timeline beginning Jan. 3rd  (ATTACHMENT @): be cautious, wait-and-see and don't upset Donald Trump.

Chancellor Friedrich Merz of Germany wrote on social media that “Maduro has led his country into ruin” and that the U.S. intervention was “complex” and required “careful consideration,” without going into further detail. “The objective” now, he added, “is an orderly transition to an elected government.”  (NYT – Erlanger 1:00 PM)

 

FRANCE  NYT

President Emmanuel Macron of France wrote on X that the Venezuelan people could “only rejoice” at the end of Mr. Maduro’s dictatorship, and did not address the U.S. approach - however, French foreign minister, Jean-Noël Barrot, wrote on social media that the military operation “violates the principle of non-resort to force that underpins international law.”

Perhaps the most interesting criticism of Mr. Trump came from Jordan Bardella, the likely presidential candidate of France’s far right National Rally party... “No one will miss” the Maduro regime, Mr. Bardella said on social media. “That said, respect for international law and the sovereignty of states cannot be applied selectively,” he added.

 

DENMARK

Denmark issued a muted response to the operation, saying America needed to get “back on track toward de-escalation and dialogue. International law must be respected," Foreign Minister Lars Løkke Rasmussen wrote on X.

Although unrelated to the Venezuelan operation, Denmark faces invasion of its colony, Greenland,  by Americans, should Djonald UnChained decide the huge island (with its military applications and mineral worth) justify the destruction of NATO and a potential war with former allies like France, Germany, Slovenia etc.  - DJI

 

SPAIN

Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez called for "de-escalation and responsibility” posting that “International Law and the principles of the United Nations Charter must be respected."

 

THE AMERICAS

CANADA

Canada stopped short of condemning the U.S. actions in Venezuela.

“Canada has long supported a peaceful, negotiated, and Venezuelan-led transition process that respects the democratic will of the Venezuelan people,” Prime Minister Mark Carney of Canada said in a statement, adding, “In keeping with our longstanding commitment to upholding the rule of law, sovereignty, and human rights, Canada calls on all parties to respect international law.”  (NYT – Erlanger 1:00 PM)

MEXICO

Mexico's President, Claudia Sheinbaum, cited a United Nations Charter dictate to Members to “refrain from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any State, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Purposes of the United Nations.”

The Mexican government “condemned energetically” Washington’s unilateral military action in Venezuela, warned of regional instability and urged dialogue, according to a statement from the country’s foreign ministry.  (NYT – Erlanger 1:00 PM)

President Trump has included Mexico among Cuba, Iran, Colombia... maybe Nicaragua... as potential targets for invasion.  DJI

 

COLOMBIA

 “The Government of Colombia rejects the aggression against the sovereignty of Venezuela and of Latin America,” wrote Colombia’s President Gustavo Petro

“Internal conflicts between peoples are resolved by those same peoples in peace. That is the principle of the self-determination of peoples, which forms the foundation of the United Nations system.”

President Gustavo Petro of Colombia wrote on X that he rejected “the aggression against the sovereignty of Venezuela and of Latin America.” He added that he was deploying forces to Colombia’s border with Venezuela, with additional support “in the event of a massive influx of refugees.”  (NYT – Erlanger 1:00 PM)

Colombia, like Mexico, has been singled out as a potential target for invasion and Americanization.  DJI

 

ARGENTINA

Mr. Trump had supporters in the region, too. President Javier Milei of Argentina celebrated the capture of Mr. Maduro. “Liberty advances,” he wrote on X.  (NYT – Erlanger 1:00 PM

 

BRAZIL

 “Attacking countries, in flagrant violation of international law, is the first step toward a world of violence, chaos, and instability, where the law of the strongest prevails over multilateralism,” Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva wrote on X.

Lula da Silva of Brazil was particularly scathing. He condemned the U.S. action and said it recalled “the worst moments of interference in the politics” of the region.

  “The bombings on Venezuelan territory and the capture of its president cross an unacceptable line,” Mr. Lula wrote on social media.  (NYT – Erlanger 1:00 PM)

 

Brazil has not been recommended as a target for invasion, as yet... perhaps because it is big, and its jungles are full of snakes.  But President Trump has protested the trial of his best buddy Bolsonaro by imposing punitive tariffs on coffee (thereby punishing Americans who have to get up and go to work in the mornings).  DJI

 

CHILE

President Gabriel Boric of Chile, a leftist whose term is coming to an end, also condemned the intervention. “We express our concern and condemnation of the military actions by the United States taking place in Venezuela, and we call for seeking a peaceful solution to the serious crisis affecting the country,” he said on social media.  (NYT – Erlanger 1:00 PM)

 

CUBA

President Miguel Díaz-Canel of Cuba, a Maduro ally, denounced “a criminal attack” by the United States and called for “urgent reaction” from the world.  (NYT – Erlanger 1:00 PM)

 

PANAMA

The Venezuela intervention in the name of countering drug smuggling recalled to many the invasion of Panama in 1989. Back then, American forces captured Manuel Antonio Noriega, the ruler of Panama, and brought him to the United States to face charges of drug trafficking. He was convicted and sentenced to 40 years in prison, ultimately serving 17 years after a reduction in his sentence for good behavior. He died in Panamanian custody in 2017.  (NYT – Erlanger 1:00 PM)

 

THE MIDEAST

IRAN And from another American enemy, the Jan. 4th Tehran Times (ATTACHMENT @ X71) accepted the gratitude of Venezuelan Foreign Minister Yvan Gil Pinto for Iranian voicing of solidarity with his country.

 

AFRICA

Gen. Dan Caine, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said the mission drew on decades of experience fighting terrorists in the Middle East, Southwest Asia and Africa.  (NYT – Eric Schmitt, Jan. 3 12:07 PM)

 

CHINA

China's Foreign Ministry said in a statement that it was "deeply shocked" by what it described as a "blatant use of force against a sovereign state and action against its president."

"Such hegemonic acts of the U.S. seriously violate international law and Venezuela's sovereignty and threaten peace and security in Latin America and the Caribbean region," it said.  We call on the U.S. to abide by international law and the purposes and principles of the UN Charter, and stop violating other countries’ sovereignty and security," the statement continued.

 

THE UNITED NATIONS

The U.N. itself said it was "deeply alarmed" by the U.S. strikes and capture of Maduro, suggesting it could have violated international law.

"These developments constitute a dangerous precedent," Stéphane Dujarric, spokesman for the U.N. secretary-general, said in a statement.

 

 

 

PARKED in PRISON

A@ FROM THE NEW YORK POST  X67 Maduros in court

Venezuelan dictator Nicolas Maduro and first lady Cilia Flores made their first appearance before 92 year old Judge Alvin Hellerstein in a US federal court Monday, Jan. 5th.

Charges included “narco-terrorism conspiracy, cocaine importation conspiracy, possession of machine guns and destructive devices, and conspiracy to possess machine guns and destructive devices against the United States.”  They pleaded not guilty to the charges. 

The New York Post timeline (ATTACHMENT @X67) tracked proceedings in the New York Southern District Court, and also in Venezuela where “pro-Maduro thugs were called to the streets to hunt down Venezuelans who supported the US attack.”

Gov. Kathy Hochul said she ripped President Trump for acting without Congressional approval in Venezuela after he called her on Monday.

“The Democratic governor also bizarrely claimed credit for sparking the nationwide "No Kings" protest movement against the Trump administration.”

This Post, not that one, also reported “a bizarre courtroom moment” when, after the dictator claimed innocence, a Venezuelan detractor yelled from the gallery, “Jamas!’’

The Spanish word translates to “never’’ — but it is pronounced like “Hamas’’ in English, also the name of the Palestinian terror organization.

Authorities claimed the prosecution would be bolstered by testimony from old Nick’s crony-turned-rat Gen. Hugo Carvajal (aka "El Pollo" or "The Chicken") who agreed to testify so as to obtain a reduced sentence on her own drug-trafficking charges.

The Trumpy Post called Maduro “twisted”, while protestors chanted outside and the Communist dictator proclaimed his innocence to courtroom during first appearance - saying: 'I am a decent man'.

The unjailed Commies at Jacobin reported that capitalists... specifically oily capitalists... were seeking money from lawsuits, not petrolrum  (ATTACHMENT X64).

“Companies with pending claims could be among the first in line to receive a windfall from a new Trump-installed Venezuelan government that is willing to funnel the South American country’s cash to corporate plaintiffs.”

Alleging many of the recipients were Trump cronies, these would be among the first in line to receive “a massive windfall from a new Trump-installed Venezuelan government that is willing to funnel the South American country’s cash to corporate plaintiffs” that include the likes of Halliburton, Koch and ConocoPhillips.

Non-oily beneficiaries may “include the food giant Kellogg’s, the cement and construction firm Holcim Group, packaging conglomerate Smurfit, and Gold Reserve, a mining conglomerate whose largest investors include a trio of US investment firms.”

Time’s Philip Elliott, not a Communist but... now and again... he opens the can of whoop-ass on the occupants of 1600 Pennsylvania.  On Jan. 3, he warned the President that he was “risking his MAGA base” on the invasion, in that many of his most fervent supporters are isolationist who had potshotted Joe Biden and previous enemy agents for involving the United States in fruitless foreign wars.  (ATTACHMENT @)

Trump adopted a colonial posture to replace that stagnation—and take the spoils of war, as the United States did not do in Iraq, much to Trump’s dismay. It was, in a way, the first steps at unfurling a new American empire...” Elliott wrote, and, said Trump, “we are ready to stage a second and much larger attack if we need to do so.”

“This is what many in MAGA thought they voted to end,” said Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, a one-time Trump loyalist who is set to resign this week from her seat representing Georgia. “Boy were we wrong.”

Trump still has his defenders.  Cal Thomas in the Washington Times cited the many liberals who had to grit their teeth and admit that Operation Absolute Resolve was an absolute success.  “Even the Washington Post, which is no fan of Trump or most of his policies, spoke well of the operation that captured Mr. Maduro”, calling the action “a major victory for American interests.”

Thomas also hailed Nobel Peace Prize winner and opposition leader Maria Corina Machado, who posted on X: “The time for freedom has come! [Maduro] will face international justice for atrocious crimes against Venezuelans and against citizens of many other nations.”

Additional justification for military action came from an article by Elliott Abrams, published in National Review days before the raid and republished by the Council on Foreign Relations: with Abrams reporting that “Last year the democratic forces there won a landslide victory in the presidential election — despite the fact that the regime tried desperately to fix the outcome.

Go ahead, Democrats, and try to make the case that Mr. Maduro should have remained in power,” Thomas taunted (Jan. 5th, ATTACHMENT x) and continued to kill Americans and his own people. That won’t benefit your electoral prospects in the next election.”

The liberal Huffington Post, not surprisingly, differed – accusing President Donald Trump of “dialing up the saber-rattling in the wake of the United States’ attack on Venezuela last weekend,” (Jan. 5th, ATTACHMENT @X66).

Among what Huffer Li Zhou called “incendiary” threats on the flight aboard Air Force One on Sunday, Trump targeted Colombia, arguing that it was “very sick, too,” and “run by a sick man, who likes making cocaine and selling it to the United States.”  He said that Mexicans had to “get their act together” but denied looking for another Bay of Pigs in Cuba... which would be “going down” without U.S. military intervention.

But his insisance that “we need Greenland” disturbed NATO and the EU allies and Time (also on Monday last) as Greeny Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen urged: “No more pressure. No more hints. No more fantasies about annexation.” 

Annexation by whom?  That is the question asked and answered by POTUS, who continued to insist that “...(we) need Greenland from a national security situation. It’s so strategic,” the President told reporters aboard Air Force One. “Right now Greenland is covered with Russian and Chinese ships all over the place. We need Greenland from the standpoint of national security. And Denmark is not going to be able to do it.”

 

“PIRATES” of “WHEN? VANCE...”

Before dancing back to Venezuela, let’s view Veep Vance one last time, lobbying the troops at America’s over seventy year old Pituffik Space Base to prepare them for war.  “Our message to Denmark is very simple: You have not done a good job by the people of Greenland,” said Vance as he addressed the U.S. personnel.

And Katie Miller, the wife of Trump’s deputy chief of staff for policy Stephen Miller, alluded to the U.S. one day controlling Greenland in a social media post over the weekend. Miller wrote “soon” alongside an image of a map of Greenland with the U.S. flag across the island.

As our own seven (or eight) day countdown began... another “damned if you do, damned if you don’t”  guest editor Robert Guest opined upon economic issues in, of course, “The Economist” which, having scrutinized the Venezuelan economy before Maduro’s removal, determined that it was not very good.

Not only was Nicolás Maduro’s dictatorship one of the most thuggish in the world, “... *(it) was also one of the most economically incompetent.”  The economy shrank by 69% under Mr Maduro—a swifter decline than would normally occur during an all-out civil war.

“Small wonder Venezuelans in Miami danced in the streets” when Donald Trump deposed the dictator and “whisked him to a courtroom in New York. But they were not dancing in Caracas, for fear of being arrested and tortured. For though the despot is gone, the rest of the regime is still in place.”

So the regime change that is looking more and more like a simple name change was, Guest exclaimed, simply the most dramatic expression yet of the “Donroe doctrine”—Mr Trump’s belief that he can do whatever he likes in the western hemisphere, “from commandeering Venezuela’s oil to grabbing Greenland concluding that “this is a formula for making America weaker in the long run.”

Olivier Knox of U.S. News disagreed with the premise that Venezuela was not Iraq 2.0, inasmuch as “there has been no talk of bringing democracy to Venezuela, a stated goal of President George W. Bush’s Iraq invasion.”  Rodriguez?  OK.  Bad Vlad (Lopez) and creepy Cabello?  Well, uppity people need a strong, authoritarian hand to do right by the regime.  Knox said the regime change that left all the regime below Maduro’s neck in place was “a case of history “rhyming more than repeating.”  (ATTACHMENT @X05)

Nor did most of the talkers on Talkshow Sunday find any particular resonance... US News and World Report pointing out that most of the fentanyl MAGA was so afraid of comes from China, not the Americas – where the drug boats and seized tankers  were primarily transporting marijuana and cocaine.

Drawing... or perhaps scrawling... parallels between George W. Bush and his contention that that toppling Saddam Hussein would promote democracy across the Middle East  (ATTACHMENT @X07), “Morning”Joe Scarborough related a recent conversation with Trump in which the president declared: “The difference between Iraq and this is that (Bush) didn’t keep the oil. We’re going to keep the oil.” 

Crowdsurfing advisers to “the younger Bush”, on the other foot, were so sensitive to allegations of corruption that they hurriedly changed the name of that war from Operation Iraqi Liberation to Operation Iraqi Freedom due to concerns that the sheeple might draw wrongful conclusions about the acronym.

To give the President his due, he may have considered the scenario as unfolded after W’s “disbanding of the Iraqi army and the purge of Saddam Hussein loyalists from every level of government and the military, a process known as de-Baathification after Saddam’s “Ba’ath” Party.”

Those policies “left thousands upon thousands of angry Iraqi men – many of them with guns – unemployed and under military occupation. It’s widely blamed for fueling the deadly insurgency against American forces and for former Iraqi military officials aiding the rise of ISIS.

“What we see in Venezuela today is the Maduro regime chugging along, without Maduro but run by his allies, albeit under threat from the United States.”

Time’s Philip Elliott admitted to the national confusion over what to call Venezuela after Operation Absolute Resolve... “a colony? an occupation?”... around Washington, “even those who have gotten briefed by the Trump Administration’s most-senior hands overseeing the operation cannot convincingly describe it. The D.C. set lacks a vocabulary to detail what has happened, what is happening, and what they expect to happen next.”

One of the victims of verbosity was Speaker Mike – declaiming: “The way this is being described, this is not a regime change,” Johnson said. “This is a demand for change of behavior by a regime.”

“Got that?” Elliott asked. “Yeah, neither does most of Washington.”

Time also added that scholars of U.S. ambitions are also searching for the right language. “It does not seem that Trump is imagining regime change. He would be doing different things if that were the goal,” says Daniel Immerwahr, a historian at Northwestern University whose 2019 book, How to Hide an Empire: A History of the Greater United States, seems prescient these days. “You could call it an informal empire if you wanted to, like, We will turn you into a protectorate. But that is different from We're going to micromanage your internal politics. That is different from We're going to try to make you part of us, or like us in some way, or make you over in our image.”  (Jan. 8th - ATTACHMENT @X08)

In the most simple terms: there is not really a word that fits what just happened.  “It’s not like, to borrow an Immerwahr analogy, the munchkins are ready to greet Dorothy as a liberator for dropping a house on the Wicked Witch of the East.”

Two days later, Elliott could not  help but pile on the paradoxii in dissenting from most of his comrade scriveners in that the President’s objective was ideological, not just oilygarchial.  (Time, Jan. 10th, ATTACHMENT @X01)

Trump, Elliott conjectured, “is fairly uninterested in democracy” after interviewing military historian Dominic Tierney, whose expertise on losing wars has been detailed in several books and told him that: “The use of force, whether it reaches the threshold of war or not, is very difficult to control and very difficult to predict,” leading to the U.S. “despite being incredibly powerful, has a poor military record since World War II.”

To Elliott’s question harkening back to nomenclature – was “regime change the right term to be using here?” – Tierney opted to call the President’s preference for “a law enforcement operation” a false flag, due to the reality that... except for Old Nick and his wife... the “regime” and its policies remain in place.

“The leader, a dictator, has been taken by force,” Tierney said.  “Dozens of people were killed. Certainly if another country tried to do that to the United States, we would consider that a pretty aggressive move and an attempt to regime change,” if not an actual act of war.

And, qualifying the dominant view that the capture and coup was due to oil, Tierney advanced the premise that Trump “is personally quite attracted to this idea of controlling stuff. Maybe it's his real estate background...” and, harking back to the Monroe (and, now, Donroe) Docrine, Tierney expressed the alternative that, since America already has so much oil that prices are falling, there were other motives – “like hemispheric dominance and Venezuela being seen as a kind of leftist state,” a comparison which American leftists refute.

What determines Trump’s willingness to invade, conquer, kill and replace regimes, Tierney believes, is less about democracy than “whether foreign governments are left wing or right wing. Are they seen as liberal or are they seen as more traditional conservative governments? You've seen a big effort by the Trump administration to just explicitly favor European countries or political parties that are right wing or conservative. It's not so much an interest in democracy versus non-democracy but an interest in populist conservative right-wing governments versus liberal left-wing governments. Under Biden, the focus was on Are you a democracy or non-democracy? And under Trump it is Do you like MAGA?”

The problem with Venezuela, as it might be tomorrow in Colombia, Cuba, Nicaragua... even Greenland... anywhere today (or in Iraq, Afghanistan or Syria a quarter of a century ago)... has been the the Americans’ “very moralistic, very crusading view of war, a very black-and-white view that there were good guys and bad guys, and America would wield the swift sword of justice,” which is Tierney calls extremely dangerous “because it exaggerates American power and is too morally self-righteous. You need to be more pragmatic.”

After the December capture of the Russian flagged Bella One (subsequently “Marinera”), the US seized two other tankers—the Centuries and the Skipper (1440, ATTACHMENT @X10)... believed to be part of the “ghost fleet” pursuant to a warrant issued by a U.S. federal court resulting in its tracking by the U.S. Coast Guard Munro, a sixth Legend-class cutter homeported in Alameda, Ca.”  (The Hill, ATTACHMENT @X11)

The U.S. was joined by the U.K. whose DefSec John Healey said that British armed forces supported the operation as part of “global efforts to crack down on sanctions busting.”

“This ship, with a nefarious history, is part of a Russian-Iranian axis of sanctions evasion which is fueling terrorism, conflict, and misery from the Middle East to Ukraine,” Healey said.

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said on X that the “blockade of sanctioned and illicit Venezuelan oil remains in full effect — anywhere in the world.”

 

THE OILIES

Despite the seizures and spookiness, President Trump continued lobbying major American oil companies to invest “at least 100 billion dollars” into Venezuela towards “rebuilding, in a much bigger, better and more modern form, their oil and gas infrastructure.”

He also claimed Washington and Caracas have been “working well together” on rebuilding the Venezuelan oil industry in the days since Venezuelan president Darcy Rodriguez was installed following the snatching-up of Maduro.  (Independent U. K. ATTACHMENT @X03)

“They don't need government money, but they need government protection and need government security that when they spend all this money, it's going to be there,” Trump said. “So they get their money back and make a very nice return.”

According to the White House, executives from 17 companies were in attendance, including Chevron, the only company that has some current involvement in Venezuela, plus ExxonMobil and ConocoPhillips. The two latter companies lost control of prior projects in the country when then-president Hugo Chavez nationalized them nearly two decades ago.

American companies have been loath to invest in Venezuela since a wave of nationalization laws that were enacted in the country starting in 1976, dispossessing American companies including ExxonMobile and ConocoPhillips.

Although the companies were compensated for some of their losses by the Venezuelan government, Trump characterized the nationalization process that occurred decades ago as theft of American-owned assets.

He also suggested his administration’s purported takeover of the Venezuelan oil industry was justified by those long-ago developments.

 

The President promised the oil giants “total safety, total security” in Venezuela in an effort to persuade them to invest $100bn in the country’s infrastructure after US forces toppled Nicolás Maduro from power.  (GUK, Jan. 9, ATTACHMENT @04)

“We’re not going to look at what people lost in the past, because that was their fault. That was a different president. We’re going to make a lot of money, but we’re not going to go back,” he said.

Though Maduro is being tried in US federal court on “narco-terrorism” charges, Trump has been very enthusiastic about Venezuela opening back up to the American oil industry. On Wednesday, the White House said that it planned to control Venezuela’s oil “indefinitely” and that it would sell billions of dollars’ worth of recently seized crude oil.

“History from the last two decades has shown that foreign intervention can have an impact on a country’s oil output, but with mixed and unstable results.

At present the results would be negative – at least for producers.  “Oil is experiencing a global surplus,” GUK reported; average US gas prices “are now about 25 cents lower than last year.”

 

LOCAL and INTERNATIONAL POLITICS and LAW

The Senate fired a warning shot at President Donald Trump, voting Thursday to advance a bipartisan resolution to block him from using military force “within or against Venezuela” unless he gets prior approval from Congress.

“The vote of 52-47 on the war powers measure came after an unsuccessful plea by Republican leaders to sink it and preserve Trump’s authority, as he threatens a “second wave” of attacks on Venezuela.  (NBC, Jan. 8, ATTACHMENT 33)  Trump had declared that the U.S. would “run” the country temporarily after he ordered a military operation last week to capture and extradite leader Nicolás Maduro.

Five Republicans joined all 47 Democrats in voting yes on the motion to advance the resolution to the Senate floor.

“The procedural motion Thursday sets up a full Senate vote on the measure next week; that will also require a simple majority and is expected to pass. It is subject to House approval and a presidential signature, making it unlikely to become law. But it sends a significant message to Trump that could impact his foreign policy moves going forward — in Venezuela and other countries.”

“Instead of responding to Americans’ concerns about the affordability crisis, President Trump started a war with Venezuela that is profoundly disrespectful to U.S. troops, deeply unpopular, suspiciously secretive and likely corrupt.” How is that ‘America First?’ said Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Va).

“Republicans should be ashamed of the Senators that just voted with Democrats in attempting to take away our Powers to fight and defend the United States of America,” Trump replied... presumably threatening primary challenges, if not worse.

One of the dissidents, Josh Hawley (R-Mo.), denied that his vote was not a rebuke of the president: “This is all about going forward. If the president should determine, you know what, I need to put troops on the ground in Venezuela, I think that wouldn't require Congress.” (Independent U.K. Jan, 8th, ATTACHMENT @02)

Not mollified, Trump retorted his revenge and retaliation threats, writing on Truth Social that: “Republicans should be ashamed of the Senators that just voted with Democrats...Susan Collins, Lisa Murkowski, Rand Paul, Josh Hawley, and Todd Young should never be elected to office again.”

Young (R-In) reminded voters and potential primarians that President Trump campaigned against forever wars, “and I strongly support(ed) him in that position. A drawn-out campaign in Venezuela involving the American military, even if unintended, would be the opposite of President Trump’s goal of ending foreign entanglements.”

 

WALKING the PLANK

Pirates walk among us!

The United States Pirate Party[3] (USPP) is an American political party founded in 2006 by Brent Allison and Alex English.[4] The party's platform is aligned with the global Pirate movement, and supports reform of copyright laws to reflect open source and free culture values, government transparency, protection of privacy and civil liberties. The United States Pirate Party also advocates for evidence-based policyegalitarianismmeritocracy and the hacker ethic as well as the rolling back of corporate personhood and corporate welfare. The USPP has also made a priority to advocate for changes in the copyright laws and removal of patents. It is the belief of the party that these restrictions greatly hinder the sharing and expansion of knowledge and resources.  (WIKI, ATTACHMENT THIRTY FOUR)

The party's national organization has existed in multiple incarnations since its 2006 founding. Its most recent is the Pirate National Committee (PNC), formed in 2012 as a coalition of state parties. The PNC officially recognizes Pirate parties from 10 states,[3] and tracks and assists in the growth of more state parties throughout the United States. The board of the USPP is the board of the PNC. The chair of the Pirate National Committee is known as the "Captain". The current Captain is Jolly Mitch.[6]

A decade ago, former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich made an unusual move and decided to publicly describe both himself and Donald Trump as “pirates,” perhaps as a reference to their at-times rogue decisions in the political sphere.  (ABC 7/14/16 ATTACHMENT THIRTY FIVE)

“I told him quite directly that I thought that he had a choice between having two pirates on the ticket, or having a pirate and a relatively stable, more normal person,” Gingrich said today during a Facebook live session while talking about Trump’s decision to choose a running mate -- with sources saying the choice was likely between Gingrich and Indiana Gov. Mike Pence who was chosen and summarily dragged to the gallows. 

Piratinain’t easy

 

And Trump’s invasion of Venezuela was the easy part, Rachel Marsden concluded in the Herald-Standard of Uniontown, Pa (1/14/2026, ATTACHMENT THIRTY SIX)  asking that if Maduro wins his show trial in New York and Trump has to put him back on the shelf, will he get a private ride home or have to fly economy back to Caracas? Earlier accusations that he led the Cartel de Los Solos were quietly dropped. The Justice Department now admits it doesn’t even exist.

“No fentanyl charges either. But he did have weapons. Maybe even an entire army, since he was president. Now they’ll hope that a judge buys the gymnastics of kidnapping a leader and dragging him to trial abroad without an extradition treaty, all while ignoring Trump’s 90-minute televised diatribe insisting that it’s really about the oil.  “Not a single Trump voter asked for any of this, but one of the early beneficiaries appears to be pro-Israel philanthropist and billionaire hedge-funder Paul Singer, who donated $5 million to Trump and now stands to turn his recent bargain-basement purchase of Venezuela’s U.S.-based refineries, designed for the country’s heavy crude, into a potential billionaire payday.

“America First, indeed. If you’re in the donor class.”

As disasters of the paster... Vietnam, Korea, Iran, Iraq, Guatemala, Chile, Afghanistan, Somalia, the Philippines, Libya... reconfigure and recur —Venezuela, Greenland for “national security” — will America have to go to war since Greenland is part of the EU: a Danish territory ever since the U.S. got the Danish West Indies in the 1919 deal (renamed the U.S. Virgin Islands) and infamed by the infamous Jeffrey E.

“But who cares about boring history when you can re-enact the age of swashbuckling high seas hijinks? Does Amazon sell black eye patches?”

 

IN the NEWS: JANUARY 8th, 2026 to JANUARY 15th, 2026

 

Thursday, January 8, 2026

Dow:  49,266.11

Retired ICE Agent says that just escaping does not justify shooting, saying: “You have to tune out the noise.”  DHS Kristi Noem says that driver Renee Nicole Good tried to run over and kill agent Jonathan Ross (on Wednesday the 14th, he reported suffering internal bleeding) – it was “an act of domestic terrorism” and Veep Vance says her death was her own fault.  Protesters in Minneapolis throw snowballs saying “they’re coming after Americans now” and ICE responds with tear gas and pepper spray.  Schools are closed “out of an abundance of caution”.

   Trump tells reporters that America will run Venezuela and take its oil “for years.”  He calls for a 50% increase in the defense budget and the conquest of Greenland.  Rep. Don Bacon (R-Nb)  warns that this will destroy NATO while even Speaker Mike (R-La) admits America already has a base on Greenland.

   RFK Junior says the food pyramid is all wrong... to be healthy, we have to eat more meat and butter, while eating bread will KILL us.

   And it’s the beginning of Awards Season with the Golden Globes, Critics; Choice, various particulate contests leading up to the Oscars on Feb. 1st and Grammys on March 15th.

 

Friday, January 9, 2026

Dow:  49.504.07

ICE shoots two more in Portland, OR... these mostly confirmed as illegal aliens, perhaps affiliated with the feared Venezuelan Tren de Aragua narcogangsters.  Doubling down on bad Good shooting, Veep Vance says she was a “deranged leftist”,

   It’s a split decision day for President Trump.  The House votes to reinstate Obamacare (it’s still unlikely to pass the Senate, yet alone a POTUS veto) but refuses to limit future raids on Venezuela, so Trump says the only thing that can limit his further adventuring “is my own mind.”  The Mind fails, however, to convince American oilies to move back to Venezuela because they are still gun shy after two nationalizing confiscations.

   He also justifies invasion of Greenland, saying Denmark has no claim to it; they just landed a boat (a century after the Mayflower!)

   But hee also praises the insurrectionists in Iran and warns the mullahs that continuing to shoot civilians (42 dead so far) may result in American military interventions including sanctions, bombings and droning (but not boots on the ground, not yet).  Iran cuts off internet service to isolate protesters. whom Supreme Leader Khameini says are Americcan and/or Israeli spies – a clandestine journalist interviews Iranians who say “we have nothing left to lose” as the economy crumbles; some even want to bring back the son of murderous Shah Pahlevi, deposed in 1979..

 

Saturday, January 10, 2026

Dow:  Closed

While protesters dance and shout in the streets, partisan politicians and attorneys debate legality of Good shooting,  Influencers say that, since there is no chance of Federal prosecution of ICEman Jonathan Ross, any Minnesota state prosecution would spark a Constitutional crisis.  Ross’ defenders say he was previously dragged by a protester’s car and had only two seconds to decide whether it might happen again.  On the other hand, Good’s “wife” defends her character and a judge blocks Trump’s blocking of childcare funding in five blue states.

   Rejected by the oilies, Trump rejects a second land invasion of Venezuela, leaving Maduro’s thugs and cronies in place... where they begin searching for and killing pro-American traitors.  Instead, he plots invasions of Colombia, Mexico, Cuba and Greenland and initiates Operation Hawkeye to punish ISIS in Syria.  Advisers float the possibility that he might consider a deal to let elected leader Maria Machado back into Venezuela... if she gives him her Nobel.

   Unionists in Telluride settle their ski patrol strike but, the deadline for a WNBA deal  passes and, in New York City, thousands of nurses prepare to walk off the job.  Sick people facing elective surgeries advised to do without.as flu season rages.

   Aging hippies mourn and remember Bob Weir of the Grateful Dead who joins Jerry Garcia – truckin’down the road a ways,

 

Sunday, January 11, 2026

Dow:  Closed

It’s National Milk Day and, also Talkshow Sunday... Sen. Tina Smith (D-Mn) says that ICE agents are grabbing Americans and, now, shooting them while the Administration lies and covers up their depravities, shaping the narrative to their ends.  Police chief Jason Armstrong says the shooting of Good was good because her turning of the wheel to escape meant Ross faced an immediate threat wherein “the totality of the circumstances”  overrode his belief in “the sanctity of life.”  But former Obama ICE Chief John Sandweg decries a shift in ICE tactics from border pursuits to “at large” street apprehensions that officers have not been trained for.

   Abroad, Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky) breaks with MAGA and calls bombing of Iran a Constitutional issue whieh will also drive the people back to support of the regime.  He also says Venezuela is an example of the Executive v. Legislative struggle comparable to the European monarchial wars of past centuries and, as to the Old World, ”rattling the saber” on Greenland negates any chance of buying it.  What unites all is the War Powers Act.

   The Round Table, former RNC Chair Reince Priebus says Minneapolis Mayor Frey is a “clown” who used the F-bomb in calling Ross a murderer.  DNC’s Donna Brazile says that the murder of a mother of three children is part of Trump’s rewriting the One Six Insurrection.  Sara Isgur cites past atrocities like Ruby Ridge and says everybody saw the same video.  The New Yorker’s Sara Glasser says there is political opportunism in calling Good a terrorist and the temperature of America is being inflamed for personal gain.

   Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Mn)  tells Margaret Brennan of “Face the Nation” that ICE agents should know not to get in front of moving venicles.   Energy Sec. Chris Wright says returning control of Veenezuela to Venezuelans “might take years” but denies allegations of corruption between Trump cronies and the oily men.  Sen. Chris Martin (D-Ct)  says Venezuela-vasion about oil, and says an invasion of Greenland would mean the end of NATO.  Mayor Frey said “I dropped an F-Bomb, they killed somebody.”

 

Monday, January 12, 2026

Dow:  49,590.20

Street riots in Iran and Minnesota draw differing responses from the partisans.  As Tehran burns, Supreme Leader Khameini vows death to America and Israel and brings death to Iranians.  At home, Democrats and liberals condemn killing of Renee Good while ICE and DHS Sec. Kristi Noem bolster the 2,000 agents already in place with another thousand.

  As the investigation of Fed Chairman Powell moves on towards prosecution for lavish reconstruction of the headquarters, critics draw a comparison to Trump’s construction of his Golden Ballroom in what he now says is his White House.  Powell says it’s intimidation to force him to lower interest rates.  Even Republicans like Sen. Thom Tillis are leery, others say the President should “grow up.”  Stocks fall as investigators fear a politicized Fed.  The normally Red Wall Street Journal calls the prosecution “dumb”.

   In a wild weekend of awards and NFL thrillers, “One Battle After Another” takes home the most Golden Globes while Avatar Three trails.  Underdog “Hamnet” wins best picture.  (See all awards here)

 

Tuesday, January 13, 2026

Dow:  49,191.99

In the wake of Maduro capture, Trump imposes extra tariffs on countries trading with Iran and China believes it is being targeted.  Pessimists fear this may lead to a new trade war.  Death count in Iranian riots tops 600.  “There are people being killed who should be killed,” says Trump before posting: “Have no fear, people of Minneapolis,” before turning dark and warning that the day of retribution is coming.

   Rotten Tomatoes reviews awards, calling best picture “Hamnet” upset over “Sinners” and proving that link with Polymarket gambling site confirms the merger of awards sites with sports.  “Sinners” does capture top honors at the NAACP  Image awards, beating out Spike Lee’s “Highest 2 Lowest”.

  In legal news, a father in Mississipi turns in his son who burns down a synagogue, calling it the synagogue of Satan.  The building had survived an attack by the Ku Klux Klan back in the fifties.  States are suing DHS over deployments and Sen. Mark Kelly (D-Az) sues Hegseth for reducing his rank and pension for signing on to a video telling military not to break the law.  SCOTUS smacks down transgender athletes.  The Rotten Mango website reports Karen Read is fighting civil suit from her husband’s family after the criminal case ends in acquittal. 

 

Wednesday, January 14, 2026

Dow:  49,149.63

President Trump tells Iranian protesters “help is on the way” and warns Supreme Leader Khameini not to begin his proposed publis hangings.  American protesters in, for example, Minnesota – not so lucky.  (But the gumment is not saying t hey will execute anybody for expressing their political views – except former astronaut and Arizona Senator Kelly.

   Apropos Minnesota: several DoJ officials resigning in protest over the Bondi/Noem inestigations of victim Renee Good and her family, not the shooter, Joseph Ross.  People are being dragged from cars, houses and businesses, cuffed and beaten and hauled off without even knowing if they are legal.  Mayor Fray tells the press that over fifty ICE agents swarm a house to apprehend one alien.

   And where is Congress?  The House is rushing to idict Bill and Hillary Clinton over their association with dead ped Epstein after Rep. James Comer (R-Ky) says they are in contempt.  The Clintons reply that the Adminsitration has still not released all of the Epstein files.  In the Senate, Senators Graham (SC) and Cassidy (La) are busy working on legislation to ban abortion medications like mifeprestone from being sold over the Internet.

   Actors in court: Timothy Busfield (“The West Wing”) for child sexploitation, Kiefer Sutherland for assaulting a Uber driver and Matthew McConaghy declares war on AI by trademarking himself so that deep fakes of his “Awright, awright” voice and image can’t be used by advertisers.

 

Thursday, January 15, 2026

Dow:  49,442.44

It’s Dolly Day.  She’s 80 and some friends joining for a remake of her old hits.

   President Trup puts on his MAGA cowboy hat (no such thing, but should be) and goes war crazy.  He threatens ICE protesters with the Insurrection Act and, until he decides, the military is also being pivoted from Venezuela to Iran (and, maybe, Greenland),  Dolly Pam Bondi opens proves of Minneapolis Mayor Frey and Gov. Walz... ICE agents shoot more protesters, gas 6 children (nearly killing three) and poke out the eye of a presumed liberal.

   To appease the beast, Venezuela’s Machado hands over her Nobel medallion to Djonald UnRewarded but after he takes it he says he’ll still support Delia Rodriguez (a Communist) over Machado (whom CNN calls a capitalist and gumment cutter – Attachment “C”).  Cancelled lateniter Colbert calls her the “Joker’s Mom” and his guest, Johnathan Meachem says “we are the generation at risk of  losing our ethos” while Trump reportedly posts the sad news that he is sitting alone in the dark with a dying laptop.

   The only thing to cheer him up is to hold a Great Gatsby party at Mar-a-Lago with champagne and crabs – presumably not the crustacians spilled onto an Irish road in a truck crash... many excaping into the void.

 

We add the extra day of the year.  Dow bounces around a bit but keeps closing higher while the Don still breathing the nitrous oxide of last week’s Venezuela, maybe Iran and... as in next week’s lesson, Greenland... cools down to normal.

 

 

 

 

THE DON JONES INDEX

 

CHART of CATEGORIES w/VALUE ADDED to EQUAL BASELINE of 15,000

(REFLECTING… approximately… DOW JONES INDEX of June 27, 2013)

 

Gains in indices as improved are noted in GREEN.  Negative/harmful indices in RED as are their designation.  (Note – some of the indices where the total went up created a realm where their value went down... and vice versa.) See a further explanation of categories HERE

 

ECONOMIC INDICES 

 

(60%)

 

CATEGORY

VALUE

BASE

RESULTS by PERCENTAGE

SCORE

OUR SOURCES and COMMENTS

 

INCOME

(24%)

6/17/13 revised 1/1/22

LAST

CHANGE

NEXT

LAST WEEK

THIS WEEK

THE WEEK’S CLOSING STATS...

 

Wages (hrly. Per cap)

9%

1350 points

 12/11/25

  +5.97%

   1/26

1,963.90

1,963.90

https://tradingeconomics.com/united-states/average-hourly-earnings 38.86 nc 

Average hourly earnings for all employees on US private nonfarm payrolls edged up by 5 cents, or 0.1%, over a month to $36.86 in November 2025, following a 0.4% rise in October and below market forecasts of 0.3%. This was the smalleth increase in wages since August 2023.  This category will be reformatted next week

 

Median Inc. (yearly)

4%

600

 1/8/26

  +0.07%

 1/23/26

1,134.83

1,135.65

http://www.usdebtclock.org/   52,420 444 1,511 548

 

Unempl. (BLS – in mi)

4%

600

 1/8/26

  +4.55%

   1/26*

530.25

530.25

http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS14000000   4.6 nc 4.4

 

Official (DC – in mi)

2%

300

 1/8/26

  +0.23%

 1/23/26

198.19

197.74

http://www.usdebtclock.org/    7,756 767 896 914

 

Unofficl. (DC – in mi)

2%

300

  1/8/26

  +0.33%

 1/23/26

234.89

234.12

http://www.usdebtclock.org/    14,152 170 592 640

 

Workforce Participation

   Number

   Percent

2%

300

  1/8/26

 

   -0.100%

  +0.097%

 1/23/26

298.22

298.51

http://www.usdebtclock.org/    In 164,048 077 3,876 4.040

Out 103,547 587 257 303 Total: 267,595 664 334 343

61.3046 61.2996 61.3001 .359

 

WP %  (ycharts)*

1%

150

  1/8/26

   +0.16%

    1/26*

150.95

150.95

https://ycharts.com/indicators/labor_force_participation_rate  62.50 .40

 

OUTGO

(15%)

 

Total Inflation

7%

1050

 1/8/26

 +0.4%

   10/25*

927.45

927.45

http://www.bls.gov/news.release/cpi.nr0.htm     +0.3 NC NC *

 

Food

2%

300

 1/8/26

 +0.5%

   10/25*

262.59

262.59

http://www.bls.gov/news.release/cpi.nr0.htm     +0.2

 

Gasoline

2%

300

 1/8/26

 +1.9%

   10/25*

255.11

255.11

http://www.bls.gov/news.release/cpi.nr0.htm     +4.1

 

Medical Costs

2%

300

 1/8/26

  -0.1%

   10/25*

274.20

274.20

http://www.bls.gov/news.release/cpi.nr0.htm     +0.3

 

Shelter

2%

300

 1/8/26

 +0.4%

   10/25*

250.63

250.63

http://www.bls.gov/news.release/cpi.nr0.htm     +0.2

 

WEALTH

U.S. flag   An official website of the United States government

census.gov
Notification: Due to the lapse of federal funding, portions of this website are not being updated. Any inquiries submitted via www.census.gov will not be answered until appropriations are enacted.

* Partial results were recorded forDec. 2025, including gas at the pump, but most remained uncompiled

 

Dow Jones Index

2%

300

  1/8/26

  +0.91%

 1/23/26

377.97

381.41

https://www.wsj.com/market-data/quotes/index/   47,885.97 48,442.41 48,063.29 48,996.08 49442.44

 

Home (Sales)

(Valuation)

1%

1%

150

150

  1/8/26

+1.073%

 -1.445%

 1/23/26

126.69

268.76

127.62

264.86

https://www.nar.realtor/research-and-statistics

Sales (M):  4.10 4.13 Valuations (K):  415.2 409.2 

 

Millionaires  (New Category)

1%

150

  1/8/26

 +0.067%

 1/23/26

134.96

135.05

http://www.usdebtclock.org/    23,905 914 958* 974

 

Paupers (New Category)

1%

150

  1/8/26

 +0.036%

 1/23/26

135.49

135.44

http://www.usdebtclock.org/    37,214 208 6,657* 670

 

*Due to the lapse of federal funding, portions of this website were not being updated for two months.  New levels represented, consequently, show the effects of several months’ holdovers.  Data will return to Debt Clock weekly findings – unless the government shuts down again.

 

GOVERNMENT

(10%)

 

Revenue (trilns.)

2%

300

  1/8/26

  +0.15%

 1/23/26

465.33

466.03

http://www.usdebtclock.org/    5,274 277 329 337

 

Expenditures (tr.)

2%

300

  1/8/26

  +0.06%

 1/23/26

294.04

293.86

http://www.usdebtclock.org/    7,040 042 058 062

 

National Debt tr.)

3%

450

  1/8/26

  +0.09%

 1/23/26

350.86

350.54

http://www.usdebtclock.org/    38,492 516 554 558 591

 

Aggregate Debt (tr.)

3%

450

  1/8/26

  +0.07%

 1/23/26

375.03

374.77

http://www.usdebtclock.org/    105,818 898 6,019 057 136

 

 

TRADE

(5%)

 

Foreign Debt (tr.)

2%

300

  1/8/26

   +0.13%

 1/23/26

259.53

259.20

http://www.usdebtclock.org/    9,435 442 339 351

 

Exports (in billions)

1%

150

 1/8/26

   +4.39%

   1/26*

187.95

187.95

*https://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/current/index.html  289.3 302.0

 

Imports (in billions))

1%

150

 1/8/26

   +3.23%

   1/26*

155.68

155.68

*https://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/current/index.html  342.1 331.4

 

Trade Surplus/Deficit (blns.)

1%

150

 1/8/26

  -79.59%

   1/26*

482.34

482.34

*https://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/current/index.html    52.8 29.4

 

 

 

SOCIAL INDICES 

 

(40%)

 

 

ACTS of MAN

(12%)

 

 

 

World Affairs

3%

450

 1/8/26

        +0.1%

 1/23/26

470.08

470.55

Malaysia and Indonesia block Elon’s GROK pedo porn sites.  Wildfires in Australia kill one, destroy 300 homes. 

 

War and terrorism

2%

300

 1/8/26

         -0.2%

 1/23/26

286.02

285.44

Iranian riot death toll is this way or that way of 12,000 as hangings are prepared.  Three killed and 13 injured in Georgia prison riot. 

 

Politics

3%

450

 1/8/26

              nc

 1/23/26

459.30

459.30

Having “fixed” the East Wing, Trump now wants a symmetrical ballroom over the West.  It’ll help in hosting oily men still leery of going back to Venezuela.  States starting to require American birth for all political candidates, not just the President.

 

Economics

3%

450

 1/8/26

        +0.3%

 1/23/26

430.50

431.79

Trump and Dems agree on better laws to stop corporate speculators from buying homes.  Report says US new jobs down (bad) but layoffs down (good) and unemployment rate down.  Worse: Trump orders student loan debtors wages should be garnished.  Good Trump proposes cap on credit card interest rates.

 

Crime

1%

150

 1/8/26

         -0.2%

 1/23/26

207.88

207.46

Over a hundred skeletons found at Pennsylvania man’s home..  Actor Tim Barfield accused of child sex abuse.  Gunman shoots eight, kills two at Salt Lake funeral.  15 year old shoots 12 year old brother in Ohio.  Police shoot apolitical front loader thief ramming them.  Instagram hacker steals up to 17M accounts.Synagogue arsonist arrested and killer shoots 5 including a seven year old girl in Mississippi....

 

ACTS of GOD

(6%)

 

 

 

Environment/Weather

3%

450

 1/8/26

        +0.1%

 1/23/26

281.67

281.95

More bad news for Mississippi – three tornadoes in Laurel.  Otherwise, weather is easing but it’s cold in the East while gusts and dust blanket the West 

 

Disasters

3%

450

 1/8/26

        +0.1%

 1/23/26

462.18

462.64

A year after the LA fires, Mayor Karin Bass says that “Palisadians” are rebuilding.  American tourist killed by shark in Virgin Is.  Stories of snow survival spike with the season

 

LIFESTYLE/JUSTICE INDEX

(15%)

 

 

 

Science, Tech, Education

4%

600

 1/8/26

       +0.2%

 1/23/26

613.68

614.91

NASA brings home ISS astronauts for “medical emergency”.  Next up, a trip around (but not to) the moon.  WalMart expands drone deliveries but a robot deliverything is crushed after being stuck on train tracks..

 

Equality (econ/social)

     4%

600

 1/8/26

        -0.1%

 1/23/26

675.08

674.39

Red and blue feminists consider Delcy and Machado.  National Opera departs Kennedy Center after it’s renamed after Trump.  SCOTUS rules against transgender athletes. 

 

Health

4%

600

 1/8/26

        +0.3%

 1/23/26

416.72

417.97

TV docs say that 70% now survive cancer for five years, citing earlier detections, less smoking.  Trump joins RFK in promoting whole milk, so long as there’s a”w” before the “h” while Rep. Carlos Gimenez tells bad foreign actors “we can touch you any time we want to.” .  Incompetent plastic surgeon has his license revoked.  FDA recalls BMW vehicles with faulty airbags.  Australian shrinks promote “Goldilocks” strategy on kids’ social media exposure – too much is bad but banning is also bad.  2 hours OK.

 

Freedom and Justice

3%

450

 1/8/26

        -0.1%

 1/23/26

482.57

482.08

Gumment sues Roblox for abetting pedophiles after a man ways the Bible told him to rape children. Killer of dentist and wife arrested; the wife’s former husband.  In court: Mangione trial proceeding, Uvalde jurors see videos in trial of police scapegoat Adrian Gonzales.   Protests over Ohio prison serving disgusting “Wardenburgers” to inmates.

 

CULTURAL and MISCELLANEOUS INCIDENTS

(6%)

 

 

 

Cultural incidents

3%

450

 1/8/26

       +0.2%

 1/23/26

576.87

578.02

After Chiefs fail to make playoffs, Travis Kelce ponders retirement.  Weekend NFL divisions pit Bills/Broncs, Seahawks/49ers, Rams/Bears, Texans/Patriots. NCAA finale will pit unbeaten Indiana against underdog Miami.  Inspirational skater Maxim Naumov makes Olympic team a year after parents killed in DC air crash

Golden Globes winners are “One Battle After Another” and Avatar with “Hamnet” winning best picture.  Bruno Mars releases first album in ten years.

RIP: Grateful Dead Bob Weir, Scott Adams (“Dilbert”),

 

Miscellaneous incidents

4%

450

 1/8/26

        +0.1%

 1/23/26

546.16

546.71

Disney marathoners, many costumed, won by American.  Superman comic sells for record $15M.  Monkeys on the oloose reported by Colbert show as “intelligent” but “aggressive”.

 

 

 

The Don Jones Index for the week of January 9th  through January 16th, 2025 was UP 4.53 points

The Don Jones Index is sponsored by the Coalition for a New Consensus: retired Congressman and Independent Presidential candidate Jack “Catfish” Parnell, Chairman; Brian Doohan, Administrator.  The CNC denies, emphatically, allegations that the organization, as well as any of its officers (including former Congressman Parnell, environmentalist/America-Firster Austin Tillerman and cosmetics CEO Rayna Finch) and references to Parnell’s works, “Entropy and Renaissance” and “The Coming Kill-Off” are fictitious or, at best, mere pawns in the web-serial “Black Helicopters” – and promise swift, effective legal action againth parties promulgating this and/or other such slanders.

Comments, complaints, donations (especially SUPERPAC donations) always welcome at feedme@generisis.com or: speak@donjonesindex.com.

 

ATTACHMENT ZERO from splash 247

Trump quits anti-piracy and trade bodies in broad UN retreat

By Sam Chambers January 8, 2026

 

The Trump administration yesterday announced it is withdrawing from 66 organisations, a mixture of NGOs and United Nations’ bodies. 

Of note for the shipping industry is the US decision to pull out of the Regional Cooperation Agreement on Combatting Piracy and Armed Robbery against Ships in Asia (RECAAP), as well as the UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), and UN Oceans, an inter-agency coordination mechanism on ocean and coastal issues within the United Nations system.. 

Secretary of state Marco Rubio, who led the review, commented on the 66 organisations: “The Trump administration has found these institutions to be redundant in their scope, mismanaged, unnecessary, wasteful, poorly run, captured by the interests of actors advancing their own agendas contrary to our own, or a threat to our nation’s sovereignty, freedoms, and general prosperity.”

Trump warned that his review of further findings of the secretary of state remains ongoing, suggesting other bodies could face similar treatment. 

The Trump administration has had a strained relationship with another UN body, the International Maritime Organization (IMO), over the past 12 months, walking out of climate talks last April and then helping down the IMO’s Net-zero Framework agreement in October. Nevertheless, the US sought and won for reelection in late November to Category (a) at the IMO Council, the UN body’s executive organ responsible, under the assembly, for supervising the work of the organisation

 

2 Comments:

 

FROM Martyn Benson

January 8, 2026 at 6:32 pm

The incoming Democratic administration is going to have a lot of remedial work to do in 2029 – the draft Executive Orders are already piling up.
In the meantime, the US will have to defend its own ships around the world and may find all sorts of obstacles for non-compliance if they are not willing or able to participate in international frameworks.

FROM Capt. Ed Enoss

January 8, 2026 at 10:55 pm

“The US will have to defend its own ships … “

At the very least we can actually do that, yes? The vast majority of international players that want to impose their agenda upon the rest of the world are incapable of enforcing anything they want without the help of the UN, their Big Brother. We can all see how well that has worked nearly everywhere, throughout history, eh?

But I know … “orange man bad” is all part of your TDS. We all get that.

 

 

ATTACHMENT ONE “A”to “D”– FROM USA TODAY

TRUMP WITHDRAWS US FROM 66 INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS AND TREATIES

By Dinah Voyles Pulver   Jan. 7, 2026 Updated Jan. 8, 2026, 11:40 a.m. ET

The United States will withdraw from more than five dozen international collaborations, including treaties and organizations with the United Nations on climate change and the oceans, President Donald Trump announced in a memo.

Among the organizations the United States will withdraw from are the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. The list also includes agreements and groups on renewable energy, oceans, piracy, counterterrorism and empowerment of women.

The 66 groups, treaties and conventions, including 31 associated with the United Nations, are "contrary to the interests of the United States," the memo's title stated Jan. 7. The withdrawals follow up on a review by Secretary of State Marco Rubio at Trump's request of all international organizations, conventions and treaties to which the United States belongs or is a party to.

The White House stated the withdrawals "will end American taxpayer funding and involvement in entities that advance globalist agendas over U.S. priorities, or that address important issues inefficiently or ineffectively such that U.S. taxpayer dollars are best allocated in other ways to support the relevant missions," Reuters reported.

The Framework Convention on Climate Change was ratified by the U.S. Senate and signed by President George H. W. Bush in October 1992. The United States was the first industrialized nation to sign the convention.

At the time, Bush called it the "first step in crucial long-term international efforts to address climate change." The convention committed countries to inventories of all sources and sinks of greenhouse gases, such as carbon dioxide, and to establish national climate change programs.

Now the United States will be the only nation in the world that is no longer a party to the framework, according to the Union of Concerned Scientists. Though the country had already submitted a letter of intent to leave the Paris climate agreement for the second time, the United States has never withdrawn from the convention before, according to the scientists.

The action to withdraw from the framework and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, or IPCC, follows actions taken by the Trump administration in 2025 to downplay climate change, such as an edict that federal employees were not to be involved with the IPCC's next report. The IPCC is considered the leading global group studying climate change.

'STRATEGIC BLUNDER THAT GIVES AWAY AMERICAN ADVANTAGE'

As reports on 2025's global temperatures are released in the days ahead, major organizations and climate scientists expect it to be either the second- or third-warmest year on record globally. Several organizations quickly criticized the withdrawals from the international collaborations on climate change and the oceans, saying it will harm U.S. residents and American companies.

Pulling out of the framework convention on climate is "a strategic blunder that gives away American advantage for nothing in return," said David Widawsky, director of WRI US, the World Resources Institute in the United States. "Walking away doesn’t just put America on the sidelines − it takes the U.S. out of the arena entirely."

Widawsky said the action will cost American communities and businesses economic ground as other countries take advantage of the "booming clean-energy economy."

The withdrawal from the global climate treaty is "a new low" from the administration, said Rachel Cleetus, policy director and lead economist for the Union of Concerned Scientists climate and energy program. It's another "sign that this authoritarian, anti-science administration is determined to sacrifice people’s well-being and destabilize global cooperation."

According to Cleetus, the withdrawal will serve to further "isolate the United States and diminish its standing in the world following a spate of deplorable actions that have already sent our nation’s credibility plummeting," jeopardize ties with historical allies, and make the world more unsafe.

Since Trump's inauguration nearly a year ago, he has worked to slash funding for the United Nations and cease collaborations with its Human Rights Council and its cultural agency, UNESCO. The administration has also announced plans to leave the World Health Organization.

 

 

A1A  FROM THE WHITE HOUSE

EXECUTIVE ORDER 14199

(Partial only, read the complete list of defunded organizations on White House website here.)

(c)  Consistent with Executive Order 14199 and pursuant to the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, I hereby direct all executive departments and agencies (agencies) to take immediate steps to effectuate the withdrawal of the United States from the organizations listed in section 2 of this memorandum as soon as possible.  For United Nations entities, withdrawal means ceasing participation in or funding to those entities to the extent permitted by law.

(d)  My review of further findings of the Secretary of State remains ongoing.

 

Sec. 2.  Organizations from Which the United States Shall Withdraw.  (a)  Non-United Nations Organizations:

          A total of sixty six are listed.  The relevant removal is...

(xxx)     Regional Cooperation Agreement on Combatting Piracy and Armed Robbery (REagainst Ships in Asia;

 

A1B  FROM WIKIPEDIA

RECAAP DEFINED

Regional Cooperation Agreement on Combating Piracy and Armed Robbery against Ships in Asia

 

Regional Cooperation Agreement on Combating Piracy and Armed Robbery against Ships in Asia - Information Sharing Centre

RECAAP  (see logo HERE)

Abbreviation

ReCAAP ISC

Formation

29 November 2006 (19 years ago)

Type

International organization

Purpose

Anti Piracy

Headquarters

Singapore

Coordinates

1.2923863°N 103.792483°E

Area served

Asia

Membership

21 Contracting Parties

Executive Director

Krishnaswamy Natarajan

Website

www.recaap.org

 

 

List of Countries In ReCAAP   (See map here)

 

The Regional Cooperation Agreement on Combating Piracy and Armed Robbery against Ships in Asia, abbreviated as ReCAAP or RECAAP, is a multilateral agreement between 16 countries in Asia, concluded in November 2004 and includes the RECAAP Information Sharing Centre (ISC), an initiative for facilitating the dissemination of piracy-related information.[1]

To date, twenty one countries in various parts of the world have ratified the ReCAAP agreement.[2]

RECAAP HISTORY

The Regional Cooperation Agreement on Combating Piracy and Armed Robbery against Ships in Asia (ReCAAP) is the first regional government-to-government agreement to promote and enhance cooperation against piracy and armed robbery against ships in Asia. ReCAAP ISC was proposed in 1999 as a result of shared concern specifically related to cases of piracy and armed robbery, and it came into force in November 2006 after further ratification by member states.[3] To date, 21 States (14 Asian countries, 5 European countries, Australia, the USA) have become Contracting Parties to ReCAAP.

On January 2026, the USA withdrew from the Agreement.[4]

The 20 Contracting Parties of ReCAAP:[5] (As of January 2025) 

  Australia

  Bangladesh

  Brunei

  Cambodia

  China

  Denmark

  India

  Japan

  South Korea

  Laos

  Myanmar

  Netherlands

  Norway

  Philippines

  Singapore

  Sri Lanka

  Thailand

  United Kingdom

  Vietnam

 

  Germany (new)

  United States (withdrawn)

 

 

The Structure of ReCAAP

ReCAAP was established as a decentralized security network, which included the formation of an Information Security Center (ISC) and a Governing Council. The ISC also serves as a platform for information exchange with the ReCAAP Focal Points via the Information Network System (IFN). The Governing Council consists of one representative from each contracting member and is tasked with overseeing a focal point and managing the ISC's procedures.[6]

 

A1C  FROM FROM TRADE WINDS

TRUMP DUMPS ANTI-PIRACY BODY ON EVE OF MAJOR REPORT

Administration is withdrawing from 66 organisations that are ‘contrary to US interests’

Published 8 January 2026, 10:17

 

The Trump administration is pulling out of an anti-piracy organisation on the eve of it reporting the highest level of incidents at a notorious hotspot for nearly two decades.

The US said it will withdraw from 66 organisations, including the Regional Cooperation Agreement on Combating Piracy and Armed Robbery against Ships in Asia (ReCAAP).

The list includes 31 United Nations bodies, among them UN Trade & Development, which produces an annual report on the state of the maritime industry and advocates for developing nations in global trade talks.

PAYWALL:  You need a subscription to read the rest of this story

Article includes...

Anti-piracy experts shrug off Trump team pullout

Asia security group says the US paid only a nominal sum every year

 

 

A1D  FROM HANSA SHIPPING and MARKETS (German: see HERE for Description and Logo)

TRUMP WITHDRAWS USA FROM COOPERATION AGAINST PIRACY

January 9, 2026

 

The US government’s drastic withdrawal from international cooperation now also has consequences for the fight against piracy: Donald Trump has ordered the US to quit from a total of 66 organizations, including the “Recaap”.

Around a year ago, Trump instructed US Secretary of State Marco Rubio to review all memberships in international organizations. Although this was also about saving costs, it was primarily about “which organizations, agreements and treaties run counter to the interests of the United States”.

Rubio has now submitted his report. And Trump is making good on his threat. “I have reviewed the Secretary of State’s report and, after consultation with my Cabinet, have determined that it is contrary to the interests of the United States to remain, participate in, or otherwise support some organizations,” reads a statement from the White House.

In it, Trump instructs his followers to withdraw from a total of 66 organizations and cooperations “as soon as possible”.

After the US government exerted massive pressure on the deliberations at the International Maritime Organization (IMO) last autumn, ultimately torpedoing efforts to achieve the widely anticipated “Net Zero Framework”, the shipping industry is now also feeling the consequences of the latest initiative. The IMO is not on the list to be deleted. However, the fight against piracy in Asia is affected.

GERMANY IS ALSO A MEMBER

Among other things, Trump is calling to withdraw from the “Regional Cooperation Agreement to Combat Piracy and Armed Robbery against Ships in Asia”, or Recaap for short. This is an intergovernmental cooperation between 21 countries that was founded in 2004. The members are not only Asian states. The USA, some European countries and, since 2021, Germany have also joined.

Recaap cooperation is primarily about sharing information on piracy cases, threats, strategic plans. In contrast to East Africa, where some of the states are very weak in terms of naval and coastal protection and Somalia was considered a “failed state”, better developed, sovereign states are involved here.

Strictly speaking, many cases in the region are “armed robbery” and not “piracy” because the vast majority of attacks take place in the territorial waters of the states. This circumstance has important consequences because it is the coastal states that have the right to pursue and intervene there first, and not the naval units of other countries that are on patrol duty and could intervene more quickly if necessary.

Even though pirates off East and West Africa have received much more attention in recent years and the military has recently sounded the alarm again, shipping in Southeast Asia is still struggling with attacks, thefts and boardings. Despite – or perhaps because of – its “low profile” cooperation, Recaap is considered a model for success, even if two important countries in the region, Malaysia and Indonesia, cannot bring themselves to join for fear of losing sovereignty.

“BLOOD, SWEAT AND MONEY”

Incidentally, the latest instructions do not necessarily mark the end of the list of deletions. “My review of further findings by the Secretary of State is not yet complete,” Trump continued.

Rubio himself also commented on the deletion list, describing the organizations in question as “redundant, mismanaged, unnecessary, wasteful and poorly run”. They would be “captured by the interests of actors pursuing their own agendas contrary to our interests, or pose a threat to our nation’s sovereignty, freedoms and overall prosperity”. Trump himself is quoted in the statement as saying that it is no longer acceptable to devote “the blood, sweat and money of the American people to these institutions without getting any meaningful results in return. The days of billions of taxpayer dollars flowing to foreign interests at the expense of our people are over.” These organizations are actively trying to limit American sovereignty, he said. “We reject inertia and ideology and instead embrace prudence and purpose. We seek cooperation where it serves our people and remain steadfast where it does not,” it says.

 

ATTACHMENT TWO – FROM USA TODAY

Who is Nicolás Maduro? Trump says Venezuelan president 'captured'

Maduro was seized by U.S. forces early on Jan 3. in what Presdient Trump called "a large scale strike against Venezuela."

By Natalie Neysa Alund   Dec. 2, 2025   Updated Jan. 3, 2026, 6:47 a.m. ET

 

Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro was in U.S. custody overnight on Jan. 3, President Donald Trump said, after U.S. airstrikes a Delta Force raid on the South American country.

The U.S. "successfully carried out a large scale strike against Venezuela and its leader, President Nicolás Maduro, who has been, along with his wife, captured and flown out of the Country," Trump said in a post on Truth Social. "This operation was done in conjunction with U.S. Law Enforcement."

Since September, the U.S. military has carried out fatal strikes on nearly two dozen alleged drug boats in international waters, and has seized oil tankers departing Venezuela.

 WHO IS NICOLÁS MADURO?

Nicolás Maduro, 63, is the president of Venezuela and has served as the oil-rich country's leader since 2013. He was born in the country's capital of Caracas.

In 2013, he married Cilia Flores, who is often captured in photos with him during political events.

Maduro represents the United Socialist Party of Venezuela.

 

Despite Maduro remaining in power, people from across the globe as well as Venezuelan opposition leaders have claimed Maduro lost the country's 2024 election.

 NICOLÁS MADURO'S RISE TO POWER

During the 1980s, Maduro worked as a bodyguard and a bus driver, according to previous USA TODAY reporting. He also belonged to the Caracas Metro system transit union.

He is the hand-picked successor to socialist leader, Hugo Chávez, who died from cancer in 2013.

 

Maduro's relationship with Chávez began in the 1990s when the now president became involved in winning the release of Chávez, who had been jailed for anti-government activities including a reported coup to oust then-President Carlos Andres Perez.

Maduro later supported Chávez's 1998 presidential campaign "that promised to give poor Venezuelans a larger share of the economic pie dominated by the country's wealthy ruling elite," earning him a place in Chávez’s inner circle.

Before becoming the country's top leader, he went on to serve as the country's foreign minister and vice president.

 WHEN WAS NICOLÁS MADARO RE-ELECTED?

Maduro has been president for three terms.

In July 2024, the country's government-controlled electoral commission declared Maduro won the election, keeping his seat in office.

The government's opposition claimed their candidate, Edmundo Gonzalez, won the race, but Venezuela’s Supreme Court backed Maduro on Aug. 22.

 WHAT IS MADURO ACCUSED OF?

Trump himself has said Maduro is allegedly behind supplying illegal drugs trafficked into the U.S. as the alleged head of the Cartel de los Soles, a group the U.S. State Department has labeled a foreign terrorist organization.

Trump has signaled forthcoming land attacks in the country, after telling U.S. troops on Thanksgiving to expect strikes on Venezuelan territory.

Maduro and his top generals were indicted in 2020 for their alleged involvement in a drug trafficking conspiracy. The Venezuelan president has denied having any links to the illegal drug trade.

Delcy Rodriguez, Venezuela's vice president, said on Jan. 3 the Venezuelan government did not know the whereabouts of Maduro or his wife, Cilia Flores, after President Trump announced that the U.S. had captured Maduro and flown them out of the country.

"We demand immediate proof of life of President Nicolás Maduro and the first lady Cilia Flores," Rodriguez said on Venezuelan state TV.

Nicolás Maduro, wife in New York to face charges after US strikes on Venezuela

Who is Nicolás Maduro? Trump says Venezuelan president 'captured'

Explosions rock Caracas as US seizes Maduro in overnight raid

US conducted strike on Venezuela, captured Maduro, Trump says

US bombs targets in Venezuela and captures Nicolás Maduro

The U.S. had positioned an aircraft carrier, guided missile destroyers and a special operations ship near Venezuela. Around 12,000 troops are stationed in the area.

Contributing: Eduardo Cueva and Phillip M. Bailey, USA TODAY

Natalie Neysa Alund is a senior reporter for USA TODAY. Reach her at nalund@usatoday.com and follow her on X @nataliealund

 

 

ATTACHMENT THREE - FROM REUTERS

VENEZUELA PASSES LAW AGAINST PIRACY, BLOCKADES AMID US OIL SHIP SEIZURES

December 23, 2025 1:30 PM EST Updated December 23, 2025

 

Dec 23 (Reuters) - Venezuela's ruling-party controlled National Assembly unanimously approved a law on Tuesday that allows prison sentences of up to 20 years for anyone who promotes or finances what it describes as piracy or blockades.

The law, which includes "other international crimes", comes after recent U.S. actions against Venezuelan oil shipments.

The U.S. Coast Guard seized a sanctioned supertanker carrying Venezuelan crude earlier this month and attempted to intercept two other vessels linked to Venezuela over the weekend, U.S. officials said.

 

The interceptions mark Washington's toughest blow to state oil company PDVSA since its Treasury Department sanctioned the oil company's former trading partners, two subsidiaries of Russia's Rosneft, in 2020, forcing it to cut production and exports. PDVSA was already under sanctions since 2019.

The draft "Law to Guarantee Freedom of Navigation and Commerce Against Piracy, Blockades, and Other International Illicit Acts" was introduced on Monday by pro-government lawmaker Giuseppe Alessandrello.

National Assembly President Jorge Rodriguez said at the end of the session the bill will be sent to the executive for approval and will take effect once published in the Official Gazette.

 

Washington has increased pressure on the government of President Nicolas Maduro in recent months, including stepping up a military build-up in the Caribbean and killing dozens of people in strikes on boats it says, without providing evidence, are trafficking drugs off its coasts.

U.S. authorities say the operations are part of efforts to combat sanctions evasion and drug trafficking.

Maduro says the United States is seeking to undermine Venezuela's economy and remove him from power.

Rodriguez also blasted Venezuela's political opposition, whose leader has been in hiding for months but traveled to Oslo earlier December to collect her Nobel Peace Prize.

He accused the opposition of promoting sanctions and said they "stole, plundered, bowed down to U.S. imperialism," adding that "they are happy with the aggressive actions currently taking place in the Caribbean Sea."

 

A4 X58  FROM NY TIMES

Jan. 3, 2026, 2:24 a.m. ET

 

Explosions Are Reported in Venezuela’s Capital

It was not immediately clear what caused the blasts. The United States has been building pressure on Nicolás Maduro, Venezuela’s authoritarian president, for months.

 

5X53  FROM USA TODAY

Maduro bolted for the door as US forces raided. Trump's attack stuns the world.

By Michael Collins  Jan. 3, 2026/Updated Jan. 4, 2026, 11:12 a.m. ET

Inside his home on a military base, Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro bolted for a safe room as U.S. troops swooped into the compound and explosions lit up the nighttime sky over Caracas.

Maduro made it as far as the door but couldn’t get it to shut.

Members of the Army’s secretive Delta Force grabbed the Venezuelan leader and his wife, Cilia Flores, whisked them out of the compound and took them to the USS Iwo Jima, an amphibious assault ship waiting off the South American coast. Officials said both would travel to the United States, where they are under indictment on drug-trafficking charges. Maduro and Flores landed in New York on Saturday evening.

The attack in Venezuela’s capital during the early morning hours of Jan. 3 was a swift and stunning show of military force. Images and video showed explosions, burning vehicles, plumes of smoke rising over the capital city of Caracas, and a swarm of low-flying helicopters.

President Donald Trump, who announced the military operation, called it “one of the most stunning, effective and powerful displays of American military might and competence in American history.”

The military operation on Jan. 3 was one of the most significant incursions into a foreign country since the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, raising questions about the U.S. role in the Caribbean nation of more than 28 million people.

With Maduro no longer in charge, Trump said the United States would run Venezuela until there can be “a safe, proper and judicious transition.” He signaled Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth would be in charge alongside Venezuelan Vice President Delcy Rodriguez.

Maduro, 63, a former bus driver and union leader, has ruled the county for more than a decade. The hand-picked successor of the country's former leader, he was narrowly elected president following Hugo Chávez’s death in 2013. Maduro was sworn in for a third term last January following an election that was widely condemned by international observers, the Biden administration and the opposition as fraudulent.

Maduro’s reign has severely strained relations with several U.S. presidents, who have accused him of allowing the flow of illegal drugs into the United States. Trump has had his sights set on toppling Maduro since his first term in the White House. He has described Maduro as running Venezuela like a "narco-terrorist" drug cartel that is directly responsible for American deaths.

The federal grand jury in New York that indicted Maduro on charges of narco-terrorism conspiracy, cocaine importation conspiracy and two illegal weapons counts said he “sits atop a corrupt, illegitimate government that, for decades, has leveraged government power to protect and promote illegal activity, including drug trafficking.”

The U.S. attack and capture of Maduro had been in the works for months.

“This mission was meticulously planned, drawing lessons from decades of missions over the last many years,” Gen. Dan Caine, an Air Force general who serves as Trump’s chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said during a news conference at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida.

Intelligence teams monitored Maduro to understand how he moved, where he lived, where he traveled, what he ate, what he wore – and even what kind of pets he had, Caine said.

Meanwhile, starting in early September, U.S. troops mounted a series of attacks on drug-trafficking vessels in the Caribbean and Pacific. The campaign escalated to include the seizure of oil tankers coming and going from Venezuelan ports in late December.

By December, U.S. forces were ready for the attack but waited until the right day to minimize the potential for civilian harm and to maximize the element of surprise, Caine said. Through Christmas and New Year's, troops waited for Trump to issue the order.

Trump gave that order on Jan. 2 at 10:46 p.m. ET, Caine said.

US will 'run' Venezuela after capturing Maduro, Trump says: Live updates

Within hours, aircraft began launching from 20 different bases on land and sea. More than 150 teams –including aircraft, bombers, fighters, intelligence, reconnaissance and law-enforcement – were involved. Helicopters began their flight into Venezuela at 100 feet above the water. As they approached Caracas, Caine said, troops began to disable Venezuela’s air defense systems to make sure the helicopters could safely reach their target.

Helicopters came under fire as they approached the target. One was hit but was still able to fly.

The troops arrived at Maduro’s compound at 1:01 a.m. ET. Maduro and his wife, both inside, gave up and were taken into custody by the U.S. Department of Justice, with assistance from the military.

No U.S. forces were killed, and no American aircraft were lost during the strike, Trump said.

Trump later posted a photo on social media showing Maduro aboard the USS Iwo Jima, dressed in a gray sweatsuit and holding a water bottle. On his head were what appeared to be noise-suppressing earmuffs. A dark blindfold covered his eyes.

What we know about the US strike on Venezuela, Maduro's capture

Republicans, Democrats divided over attack

In Washington, reaction to the military operation divided predictably along party lines, with Republicans supporting it and Democrats accusing the Trump administration of conducting an illegal war.

Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Tom Cotton, R-Arkansas, said in a post on X that Maduro “wasn’t just an illegitimate dictator; he also ran a vast drug-trafficking operation. That’s why he was indicted in U.S. court nearly six years ago for drug trafficking and narco-terrorism.”

House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-Louisiana, described the military action as “a decisive and justified operation that will protect American lives.”

“Nicolas Maduro is responsible for the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Americans after years of trafficking illegal drugs and violent cartel members into our country – crimes for which he’s been properly indicted in U.S. courts and an arrest warrant duly issued – and today he learned what accountability looks like,” Johnson said in a statement.

But Sen. Ruben Gallego, D-Arizona, an Iraq war veteran, called the strike the “second unjustified war in my lifetime” in a social media post.

“This war is illegal,” Gallego said. “It’s embarrassing that we went from the world cop to the world bully in less than one year.”

America First? What Trump's startling arrest of Maduro tells us.

Sen. Tim Kaine, D-Virginia, who has pushed for consultation between the White House and Congress before military action, raised concerns about the administration’s actions.

“Where will this go next?” Kaine asked. “Will the president deploy our troops to protect Iranian protesters? To enforce the fragile ceasefire in Gaza? To battle terrorists in Nigeria? To seize Greenland or the Panama Canal? To suppress Americans peacefully assembling to protest his policies? Trump has threatened to do all this and more and sees no need to seek legal authorization from people’s elected legislature before putting servicemembers at risk.”

The Trump administration has insisted it does not need congressional authorization for its military operations in and around Venezuela.

Other countries were also critical of the operation.

Russia's foreign ministry said the strikes were "deeply concerning and condemnable."

"The pretexts used to justify such actions are unfounded," the ministry said in a statement. "Ideological animosity has prevailed over business pragmatism and the willingness to build relationships based on trust and predictability."

In one of many condemnations from Latin leaders, Brazil's President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva said the "bombings on Venezuelan territory and the capture of its president cross an unacceptable line.”

Trump releases first picture of Nicolás Maduro in US custody

For many, Maduro’s capture evoked memories of a similar raid against Panamanian Gen. Manuel Noriega that took place on the same date more than three decades earlier.

On Jan. 3, 1990, U.S. forces captured Noriega and took him to the United States, where he was convicted of drug-trafficking, racketeering and money-laundering charges and sentenced to 40 years in prison.

Back in Venezuela, the streets of Caracas were mostly silent hours after the attack. Security forces patrolled the city and, later in the day, supporters of Maduro’s government gathered to protest his capture.

Most residents, however, stayed inside their homes as the country – and the world – wondered what came next.

 

6X54  FROM TIME

A President Captured: How the Elite Delta Force Raid in Caracas Unfolded

By Nik Popli   Jan 3, 2026 2:17 PM ET

 

By early Saturday morning, the United States had taken a step not seen in more than three decades: capturing a sitting foreign leader and flying him out of the country to face criminal charges in New York.

How the World Is Reacting to the U.S. Capture of Nicolas Maduro

President Nicolás Maduro of Venezuela and his wife, Cilia Flores, were seized in a pre-dawn raid in Caracas by American special operations forces, the culmination of months of covert intelligence work and steadily escalating military pressure ordered by President Donald Trump to oust the authoritarian leader. The operation, officials said, unfolded in less than half an hour overnight but drew on weeks of rehearsals and a vast armada of aircraft and intelligence assets that tracked Maduro’s behavioral habits.

Speaking from Mar-a-Lago on Saturday, Trump praised what he called a “spectacular assault” on several military facilities in the oil-rich nation, adding that no American service members were killed and no U.S. military equipment was lost. “No nation in the world could achieve what America achieved yesterday,” he said.

Trump Signals Long-Term Involvement in Venezuela After Capturing President

Below is how the operation unfolded—and what comes next.

Months of pressure

The raid on Maduro’s compound was the endpoint of a strategy Trump began accelerating last fall, after authorizing the C.I.A. to take a more aggressive posture toward Venezuela. The New York Times reported that C.I.A. officers working clandestinely inside the country since August built a detailed picture of Maduro’s “pattern of life”—where he lived, how he moved, and when he was most vulnerable.

The covert campaign ran in parallel with an increasingly overt show of force. Since September, the Trump Administration has ordered dozens of strikes on boats accused of carrying drugs in the Caribbean and eastern Pacific, killing at least 115 people. In late December, the C.I.A. carried out a drone strike on a Venezuelan dock believed to be used by drug traffickers.

Administration officials said the strikes were intended to take down transnational drug cartels, arguing that Venezuelan territory had become central to trafficking routes into the United States But the campaign also served a broader strategic purpose: degrading Venezuela’s ability to detect or respond to American military movements, while signaling to Maduro that Trump was prepared to act directly on Venezuelan soil.

The raid on Maduro’s compound

Trump described Maduro as heavily protected inside a presidential compound in Caracas he likened to a fortress. “It had steel doors, it had what they call a safety space where it’s solid steel all around,” Trump said to reporters on Saturday.

He added that U.S. forces were prepared to cut through those steel walls with blow torches if Maduro locked himself in the safe room, but the Venezuelan leader was unable to close the door in time.

“He was trying to get into it, but he got bum-rushed right so fast that he didn’t get into that. We were prepared,” Trump continued.

 

The military had rehearsed the operation using a replica of Maduro’s safe house, Trump added, allowing the special forces to break through steel doors in a matter of seconds. “They actually built a house which was identical to the one they went into, with all the same steel all over the place,” Trump said.

“I watched it literally like you are watching a television show,” he added. “It was an amazing thing.”

The operation was carried out by an elite U.S. Army special operations unit known as Delta Force, which specializes in covert and dangerous missions at the direction of the president.

‘Good luck and Godspeed’

Trump said the U.S. intended to carry out the operation “four days ago,” but that the weather nearly delayed the mission. 

“Over the weeks through Christmas and New Year’s, the men and women of the United States military sat ready,” said General Caine, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, waiting for conditions that would minimize civilian harm and maximize surprise.

 

According to General Caine, the final order to strike Venezuela came late Friday night. “At 10:46 p.m. ET, the President ordered the United States military to move forward with this mission,” he said. “He said to us, ‘Good luck and Godspeed.’”

Over the next several hours, more than 150 aircraft—including bombers, fighter jets, surveillance planes, helicopters and drones—launched from 20 bases on land and at sea across the Western Hemisphere. Thousands of flight hours were airborne at once, General Caine said, in an operation he called “audacious” and “unprecedented” in its complexity.

The helicopters carrying the apprehension force, which included U.S. law enforcement officers, skimmed toward Venezuela at roughly 100 feet above the water to avoid detection. As they approached the coast, U.S. Cyber Command, Space Command and other agencies layered effects overhead to protect the aircraft and preserve surprise, General Caine said.

 

Trump said American forces shut down much of Caracas’s power during the operation. “It was dark,” he said. “The lights of Caracas were largely turned off due to a certain expertise that we have.”

As helicopters neared the city, U.S. aircraft disabled Venezuelan air defense systems to clear a path. By 1:01 a.m. Eastern time—2:01 a.m. in Caracas—the helicopters arrived at Maduro’s compound.

A firefight during the raid

General Caine said that as the apprehension force descended and moved to isolate the area, helicopters came under fire, prompting American forces to respond “with overwhelming force and self defense.”

One U.S. aircraft was hit but remained flyable, and all aircraft returned safely, he added.

On the ground, intelligence teams provided real-time updates, allowing the force to navigate the compound and avoid unnecessary risk. Maduro and Flores, both indicted in the United States on narco-terrorism conspiracy charges, surrendered and were taken into custody without any American loss of life.

 

“A couple of guys were hit,” Trump said, referring to U.S. service members who were injured. “But they came back and they’re supposed to be in pretty good shape.”

The entire assault lasted less than 30 minutes, though explosions and low-flying aircraft sent shock waves through Caracas. It is currently unclear how many members of the Venezuelan military were killed.

After securing the couple, U.S. forces called in helicopters to extract the team while fighter jets and drones provided overhead cover. By 3:29 a.m. Eastern time, General Caine said, the helicopters were back over open water with Maduro and Flores on board. They were later transferred to the U.S.S. Iwo Jima, where Trump said they were held en-route to New York.

On Saturday morning, Trump posted on his Truth Social account a photo of Maduro blindfolded and in a sweatsuit aboard the ship.

 

Why Trump authorized the operation

Trump framed the raid as both a law enforcement action and an act of war against drug trafficking networks he says are protected by the Venezuelan state.

“We had to do it because it’s a war,” he said, citing what he described as an armed conflict with cartels moving drugs toward the United States.

The Justice Department unsealed a new indictment on Saturday accusing Maduro and Flores of participating in a narco-terrorism conspiracy. Attorney General Pam Bondi said the couple would soon face justice “on American soil in American courts.”

Still, the legal authority for the strike remains contested. Congressional leaders said the administration had not notified the Armed Services Committees in advance, and some lawmakers questioned whether the President could authorize such an operation without explicit approval from Congress.

Trump said the United States planned to oversee Venezuela until a transition of power could be arranged. “We’re going to run the country until such time as we can do a safe, proper and judicious transition,” he said.

 

7X59 FROM GUK

‘Naked imperialism’: how Trump intervention in Venezuela is a return to form for the US

Most of the Americas have suffered from interference from their powerful northern neighbour – and are usually the worse off for it

 

Maduro detained in New York – live updates

 

By Tiago Rogero South America correspondent

Sat 3 Jan 2026 23.00 EST

Share

The US bombardment of Venezuela and the capture of its president, Nicolás Maduro, follow a long history of interventions in South and Central America and the Caribbean over the past two centuries. But they also mark an unprecedented moment as the first direct US military attack on a South American country.

 

At a press conference after Maduro’s capture, Donald Trump said that “American dominance in the western hemisphere will never be questioned again”.

But since the mid-19th century, the US has intervened in its continental neighbours not only through economic pressure but also militarily, with a long list of invasions, occupations and, in the case most closely resembling the current situation, the capture of Panama’s dictator Manuel Noriega in 1989.

US agents place chains around the waist of Panama’s then president Manuel Noriega onboard a C-130 transport plane on 4 January 1990. Photograph: AP

Covert actions helped topple democratically elected governments and usher in military dictatorships in countries such as Brazil, Chile and Argentina, but overt US military operations have historically been confined to closer neighbours in Central America and the Caribbean.

The first direct US military attack on a South American country “signals a major shift in foreign and defence policy – one that is made explicit in the new national security strategy published by the Trump administration a few weeks ago”, said Maurício Santoro, a professor of international relations at the State University of Rio de Janeiro.

That strategy called for an “expansion” of the US military presence in the region in what it describes as a “Trump corollary” to the Monroe doctrine – the “America for Americans” foreign policy set out in 1823 by President James Monroe and later used to justify US-backed military coups in South and Central America.

The Guardian view on the new Monroe doctrine: Trump’s forceful approach to the western hemisphere comes at a cost

 

While Saturday’s action was “in line” with many past operations, it is “shocking because nothing like this has happened since 1989”, said Alan McPherson, a history professor at Temple University and author of A Short History of US Interventions in Latin America and the Caribbean.

“One might have thought that this era of naked imperialism – of the US getting the political outcomes it wants in Latin America through sheer military force – would be over in the 21st century, but clearly it is not,” he added.

Almost every country in the region has experienced some form of US intervention, overt or covert, in the past decades. Below are a few examples.

Mexico

A hand-coloured woodcut depicts Gen Winfield Scott leading US forces into Mexico City to end the Mexican-US war in 1847. Illustration: North Wind Picture Archives/Alamy

The annexation of Texas, a former Mexican territory, sparked border disputes that led to a US invasion of Mexico, with American troops occupying the capital, Mexico City, in 1847. The war ended only with the signing of a treaty in 1848 that forced Mexico to cede 55% of its territory – an area encompassing what are now the states of California, Nevada and Utah, as well as parts of Arizona, New Mexico, Colorado and Wyoming.

Cuba

In 1898, the US helped Cuba in its war of independence against Spain. After the victory, the US received control of Puerto Rico and occupied Cuba until 1902, when an agreement granted the US navy perpetual control of Guantánamo Bay. US troops later occupied the island in from 1906 to 1909 and again from 1917 to 1922. After Fidel Castro’s 1959 revolution, the CIA backed the failed Bay of Pigs invasion in 1961 in an attempt to trigger an uprising.

Haiti

US marines board the USS Connecticut at Philadelphia’s League Island navy yard en route for Port-au-Prince, Haiti in 1915. Photograph: Bettmann Archive

Under the pretext of “stabilising” the country and protecting US business interests after domestic unrest that led to the repeated overthrow of Haitian leaders, the US invaded Haiti in 1915, taking control of customs, the treasury and the national bank until 1934. When an attempted rebellion threatened the dictator François “Papa Doc” Duvalier in 1959, the CIA worked behind the scenes to secure his survival, viewing him as an ally in containing the influence of Fidel Castro’s Cuban revolution.

Brazil

Although it ultimately never intervened, a US naval taskforce was positioned off Brazil’s coast to intervene in case there was resistance to the military coup that overthrew the democratically elected leftwing president João Goulart in 1964. In the 1970s, the CIA and the FBI directly advised the repressive apparatus of dictatorships in countries such as Brazil, Chile and Argentina in the persecution and assassination of dissidents under what became known as Operation Condor.

Panama

The US militarily backed the separatist movement that led to Panama’s break from Colombia in 1903 and, after independence, Washington retained significant influence over the Central American country. In 1989, President George HW Bush ordered Panama’s invasion by about 27,000 US troops to capture the dictator Noriega – a former CIA ally who had been indicted on drug-trafficking charges in US courts.

Hours after the strikes, in which an estimated 200-500 civilians were killed, along with about 300 Panamanian soldiers, the US installed the declared winner of the election, Guillermo Endara, as president.

It remains unclear whether a similar outcome will follow in Venezuela, which Trump has said would be “run” by the US until a “proper transition can take place”.

McPherson said it is “very rare” for US interventions in the region to be followed by “peace, tranquillity, stability and democracy”.

“US interventions almost always create long-term problems of succession,” he added.

 

A8X62  X62 from New York Magazine

The Wildest Things Trump Said About the Venezuela Attack

By Margaret HartmannUpdated Jan. 4 11:42 A.M.

 

President George W. Bush did not even utter the words “mission accomplished,” and more than 20 years later, we’re still talking about it. So imagine the reaction if hours into the invasion of Iraq, Bush had said U.S. companies were taking over that nation’s natural resources, adding, “Nobody can stop us.”

Donald Trump said just that about Venezuela on Saturday, shortly after the U.S. conducted air strikes in Caracas and captured its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores. Between a call to Fox & Friends and a late-morning press conference on Saturday, then remarks to reporters on Air Force One on Sunday, Trump made so many absolutely mind-boggling remarks that’s it’s hard to keep track. Here’s a roundup of the wildest remarks Trump made after attacking Venezuela.

“Thank you for your attention to this matter!”

Trump announced the attack on Venezuela in a 4:21 a.m. Truth Social post:

Just a tad less poetic than “a date which will live in infamy.”

“I watched it literally like I was watching a television show.”

Just another reality show.

“We can’t take a chance on letting somebody else run” Venezuela.

So who’s going to be in charge of Venezuela now? On Fox, Trump casually suggested that the U.S. is going to engage in some good old-fashioned imperialism … though it doesn’t sound like he gave it a lot of thought before attacking.

“We can’t take a chance on letting somebody else run it, just take over where [Maduro] left off. So we’re making that decision now.”

“We’re going to run the country.”

Later in his press conference, Trump asserted that the United States has taken over Venezuela — for now, at least.

“We’re going to run the country until such time as we can do a safe proper and judicious transition,” he said. “We don’t want to be involved with having somebody else get in and we have the same situation that we had for the last long period of years.”

He emphasized, “It has to be judicious, because that’s what we’re all about.” Yes, that is obvious.

“Nobody can stop us.”

During his Fox interview, Trump was asked if he’s concerned about China’s reaction to the attacks.

“There’s not going to be a problem,” he said. “They’re going to get oil. We’re going to allow people to have oil.”

He continued, “We can’t take a chance on after having done this incredible thing last night of letting somebody else take over, where we have to do it again. We can do it again, too. Nobody can stop us. There’s nobody that has the capability that we have. You know, when I watch that war in Russia going on and on and on and everybody dying. It’s primitive. It’s horrible. It’s horrible, it’s really horrible.”

“Something is going to have to be done with Mexico.”

So is this attack meant to threaten Mexico?

Trump answered, “Well, it wasn’t meant to be, and we’re very friendly with” Mexican president Claudia Sheinbaum, who’s a “good woman.”

But … maybe yes? “The cartels are running Mexico, she’s not running Mexico,” so “something is going to have to be done with Mexico.”

“We’re going to be very strongly involved” in Venezuela’s oil industry.

At least we don’t have to waste a lot of time wondering what this is really about.

U.S. oil companies will “start making money” for Venezuela.

At the press conference, Trump openly described how U.S. companies are going to take over Venezuela’s oil business.

“As everyone knows, the oil business in Venezuela has been a bust, a total bust. For a long period of time they were pumping almost nothing in comparison to what they could have been pumping and what could have taken place,” Trump said. “We’re going to have our very large United States oil companies, the biggest anywhere in the world go in, spend billions of dollars, fix the badly broken infrastructure. The oil infrastructure. And start making money for the country.”

Democrats shouldn’t say, “Oh gee, maybe it’s not constitutional.”

So how are we supposed to respond to all this? Definitely not by questioning Trump’s power!

“The Monroe Doctrine … They now call it the Donroe Document.”

Unfortunately for future history students, Trump has already coined an incredibly stupid term for this era of American foreign policy.

“We’re in charge.”

While speaking to reporters on Air Force One on Sunday evening, Trump said he hasn’t even spoken to Delcy Rodríguez, Venezuela’s acting president. He briefly tried to play coy about who’s running the country, then claimed it’s the U.S.

Kidnapping is “not a bad term.”

Later Trump suggested that he had talked to Rodríguez, and shrugged off her calling Maduro’s capture a “kidnapping.”

Venezuela “took our oil away from us.”

Trump then complained that Venezuela took America’s oil … by which he meant Venezuelan oil that he thinks the U.S. is entitled to.

“Remember, they stole our property,” he said. “It was the greatest theft in the history of America. Nobody has ever stolen our property like they have. They took our oil away from us. They took the infrastructure away. And all that infrstructure is rotten and decayed. And the oil companies are goign to go in and rebuild it. We’re not going to spend very much money at all. They oil companies are goign to go in, we’re going to take our oil back.”

“It’s about peace on earth.”

Trump concluded his remarks on Air Force One by claiming that attacking Venezuela, then threatening various other countries, isn’t about oil but peace.

This piece has been updated.

More on Venezuela

·         Is Trump Annexing Greenland or Just High on Imperialism?

·         Trump’s ‘Mission Accomplished’ Moment

·         Trump Says ‘We’re Going to Run’ Venezuela and ‘Take’ Its Oil: Now What?

 

 

A9 x63  from al Jazeera

Delcy Rodriguez sworn in as Venezuela’s president after Maduro abduction

Trump has signalled that Rodriguez could face dire consequences should she buck US priorities for Venezuela.

ByAl Jazeera Staff and News Agencies

Published On 5 Jan 2026 5 Jan 2026

 

Delcy Rodriguez, formerly Venezuela’s vice president, has been formally sworn in to lead the South American country following the abduction of Nicolas Maduro in a United States military operation.

On Monday, Rodriguez appeared before Venezuela’s National Assembly to take her oath of office.

Recommended Stories

Trump poses with ‘Make Iran Great Again’ hat after Maduro abduction

‘ I am still president of my country,’ Nicolas Maduro tells US court

After the shock of Maduro’s capture, what’s next for Venezuela?

 

Speaking before the legislative body, composed largely of government loyalists, Rodriguez reaffirmed her opposition to the military attack that led to the capture and removal of Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores.

“I come with pain over the kidnapping of two heroes who are being held hostage: President Nicolás Maduro and First Lady Cilia Flores,” Rodriguez, 56, told the assembly.

“I swear to work tirelessly to guarantee the peace, spiritual, economic and social tranquillity of our people.”

A former labour lawyer, Rodriguez has been serving as acting president since the early-morning attack that resulted in the abduction. Explosions were reported before dawn on Saturday in the capital, Caracas, as well as at nearby Venezuelan military bases and some civilian areas.

Monday’s swearing-in ceremony was overseen by Rodriguez’s brother – the president of the National Assembly, Jorge Rodriguez – and Maduro’s son, Nicolás Maduro Guerra, who held a copy of the Venezuelan Constitution.

 

Other members of Maduro’s inner circle, including Interior Minister Diosdado Cabello and Defence Minister Vladimir Padrino, were also in attendance.

The ceremony took place as Maduro, her predecessor and former boss, faced an arraignment proceeding in a New York City courthouse.

 

Federal prosecutors in the US have charged Maduro with four counts related to allegations he leveraged government powers to export thousands of tonnes of cocaine to North America.

The charges include narco-terrorism conspiracy, cocaine importation conspiracy, the illegal possession of machine guns and other destructive devices, and conspiracy to possess such guns and devices.

Maduro and his wife have pleaded not guilty to the charges, and their allies, including Rodriguez, have denounced the pair’s abduction as a violation of international law, as well as Venezuelan sovereignty.

In court on Monday, Maduro maintained he remained the rightful leader of Venezuela, saying, “I am still president.”

The administration of US President Donald Trump, however, has signalled that it plans to work with Rodriguez for the time being, though Trump himself warned that her tenure as president could be cut short, should she fail to abide by US demands.

“If she doesn’t do what’s right, she is going to pay a very big price, probably bigger than Maduro,” Trump told The Atlantic magazine in a Sunday morning interview.

A day earlier, in a televised address announcing the attack, Trump had said his administration plans “to run the country until such time as we can do a safe, proper, and judicious transition”.

On Air Force One on Sunday, as he flew back to Washington, DC, Trump doubled down on that statement.

“Don’t ask me who’s in charge, because I’ll give you an answer that will be very controversial. We’re in charge,” he told reporters.

He added that Rodriguez is “cooperating” and that, while he personally has not spoken to her, “we’re dealing with the people who just got sworn in”.

The Trump administration’s seeming willingness to allow Rodriguez, a former labour lawyer, to remain in charge has raised eyebrows.

Rodriguez, who served as vice president since 2018, is known to be a stalwart “chavista”: an adherent of the left-wing political movement founded by Maduro’s mentor, the late Hugo Chavez. She has held various ministerial roles under Maduro, including leading the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

But Trump’s allies in the Republican Party have argued that keeping Rodriguez in place is simply a practical reality.

“We don’t recognise Delcy Rodriguez as the legitimate ruler of Venezuela. We didn’t recognise Nicolas Maduro as a legitimate ruler,” Republican Senator Tom Cotton told CNN on Sunday.

“It is a fact that she and other indicted and sanctioned officials are in Venezuela. They have control over the military and security services. We have to deal with that fact. That does not make them a legitimate leader.”

 

While on Air Force One, Trump largely avoided committing to new elections in Venezuela, indicating he would instead focus on “fixing” the country and allowing US oil companies access to its vast petroleum reserves.

One reporter on the aeroplane asked, “How soon can an election take place?”

“Well, I think we’re looking more at getting it fixed, getting it ready first, because it’s a mess. The country is a mess,” Trump replied. “It’s been horribly run. The oil is just flowing at a very low level.”

He later added, “We’re going to run everything. We’re going to run it, fix it. We’ll have elections at the right time. But the main thing you have to fix: It’s a broken country. There’s no money.”

Recent presidential elections in Venezuela have been widely denounced as fraudulent, with Maduro claiming victory in each one.

The contested 2018 election, for example, led to the US briefly recognising opposition leader Juan Guaido as president, instead of Maduro.

Later, Maduro also claimed victory for a third term in office during the 2024 presidential race, despite election regularities.

The official vote tally was not released, and the opposition published documents that appeared to show that Maduro’s rival, Edmundo Gonzalez, had won. Protests erupted on Venezuela’s streets, and the nonprofit Human Rights Watch reported that more than 2,000 protesters were unlawfully detained, with at least 25 dead in apparent extrajudicial killings.

The opposition has largely boycotted legislative elections in Venezuela, denouncing them as rigged in favour of “chavistas”.

Monday’s swearing-in ceremony included the 283 members of the National Assembly elected last May. Few opposition candidates were among them.

 

A10X10  from 1440

Two Tankers Taken

 

The US military said it had seized two Venezuela-linked oil tankers yesterday, including a Russian-flagged ship it pursued for more than two weeks. 

The ship, formerly called the Bella 1, was working to evade the US Coast Guard in the northern Atlantic Ocean weeks after allegedly seeking to dock in Venezuela. On Dec. 24, the ship received approval from the Kremlin to reflag under Russia and has since changed its name to the Marinera. It was accompanied by Russian naval vessels and a submarine but was seized between the British Isles and Iceland with support from the UK military. A second tanker, the Cameroonian-flagged Sophia, was seized after allegedly leaving a Venezuelan port. The US seized two other tankers—the Centuries and the Skipper—last month. 

The latest incidents come after President Donald Trump said the US will take possession of 30 million to 50 million barrels of sanctioned oil from Venezuela—up to 15% of the country’s annual oil production.

 

A11X11 from the Hill

US seizes 2 Venezuela-linked oil tankers, 1 flying Russian flag

by Max Rego and Ellen Mitchell - 01/07/26 9:14 AM ET

 

The U.S. seized two oil tankers linked to Venezuela early Wednesday morning, one that was flying a Russian flag, drawing pushback from Moscow.

Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Kristi Noem shared a video of the operations to the social platform X at 9:22 a.m. EST.

“In two predawn operations today, the Coast Guard conducted back-to-back meticulously coordinated boarding of two ‘ghost fleet’ tanker ships— one in the North Atlantic Sea and one in international waters near the Caribbean,” she wrote.

The vessels, the Motor Tanker Bella-1 and the Motor Tanker Sophia, were located in the North Atlantic and in international waters near the Caribbean, respectively.

The Bella-1 had reportedly changed its name to the Marinera and was reflagged from a Guyanese to a Russian vessel. Moscow, a staunch supporter of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro’s regime, had reportedly deployed a submarine to help escort it across the ocean.

Russia’s transportation ministry released a statement saying U.S. Navy forces boarded the ship around 3 p.m. Moscow time, or 7 a.m. EST, at which point “contact with it was lost.” It also confirmed the ship received permission to fly Russia’s flag on Dec. 24.

“No state has the right to use force against vessels duly registered in the jurisdictions of other states,” the ministry added.

The U.S. European Command said Wednesday on X that the Defense Department, in conjunction with DHS and the Department of Justice, seized the Bella-1 “for violations of U.S. sanctions.”

Noem and U.S. European Command added that the Bella-1 tanker was seized pursuant to a warrant issued by a U.S. federal court and was tracked by the U.S. Coast Guard Munro, a sixth Legend-class cutter homeported in Alameda, Ca.

U.K. Defense Secretary John Healey said Wednesday that British armed forces supported the operation as part of “global efforts to crack down on sanctions busting.”

“This ship, with a nefarious history, is part of a Russian-Iranian axis of sanctions evasion which is fueling terrorism, conflict, and misery from the Middle East to Ukraine,” Healey said of the Bella-1.

The Bella-1 was initially chased by the U.S. Coast Guard off the coast of Venezuela last month. Its capture marks a hot spot between Washington and Moscow, which has accused the U.S. of a “disproportionate” focus on the tanker.

U.S. Southern Command, which oversees Washington’s military campaign in the Caribbean, said on X the Sophia was operating in international waters and “conducting illicit activities” at the time of its capture. The U.S. Coast Guard is now escorting the vessel to the U.S. “for final disposition,” according to the command.

The operations mark the third and fourth such seizures the U.S. has carried out in the past month. It also comes days after the capture of Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores.

The U.S. first seized an oil tanker known as “Skipper” off the coast of Venezuela on Dec. 10, claiming it was being used to transport “sanctioned oil” from Venezuela and Iran. A week later, President Trump said his administration would designate Maduro’s regime a foreign terrorist organization and ordered a blockade of all sanctioned oil tankers going into and out of the country.

Ten days later, Washington took control of a second tanker the Coast Guard identified as “Centuries,” suspected of carrying oil subject to U.S. sanctions.

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said on X that the “blockade of sanctioned and illicit Venezuelan oil remains in FULL EFFECT — anywhere in the world.”

The first two seizures were part of a months-long pressure campaign against Maduro, which culminated in Saturday’s raid to capture the Venezuelan leader. Maduro and Flores pleaded not guilty Monday to U.S. charges of narcoterrorism conspiracy, cocaine importation conspiracy, possessions of machine guns and destructive devices and conspiracy to possess machine guns and destructive devices.

The 25-page indictment from the Justice Department alleges Maduro abused his power to flood the U.S. with cocaine, enriching himself, his family and regime officials in the process.

With Maduro gone, Trump has said the U.S. is now going to “run” Venezuela “until such time as we can do a safe, proper and judicious transition,” and that the country’s petroleum infrastructure would come under the control of American oil companies.

The president also said Tuesday that the Venezuelan government, now led by acting President Delcy Rodríguez, agreed to turn over between 30 million and 50 million barrels of sanctioned oil to the U.S. The oil, Trump noted, will be “taken by storage ships, and brought directly to unloading docks in the United States.”

Venezuela has the largest crude oil reserves in the world, with more than 303 billion barrels as of 2024, according to OPEC.

 

 

A12X61 from FOX

Venezuela orders nationwide manhunt for supporters after Maduro's arrest by US forces

An emergency decree targets anyone who supported military operation that led to drug trafficking charges against former president

 By Louis Casiano  Published January 5, 2026 1:10pm EST

 

Venezuelan authorities have been ordered to find and arrest anyone involved in supporting the military operation that led to the arrest of Nicolás Maduro.

A state of emergency decree issued Saturday, but published Monday, orders police to "immediately begin the national search and capture of everyone involved in the promotion or support for the armed attack by the United States," according to the text of the decree, Reuters reported. 

It was not clear what charges could be levied against those taken into custody. 

Maduro made his first court appearance Monday in New York, days after he and his wife were arrested by U.S. forces over the weekend. 

Fetterman defends Trump's Venezuela military operation against criticism from fellow Democrats

Both have been charged by the Justice Department with narco-terrorism and other offenses. 

"I am innocent. I am not guilty of anything that is written here," Maduro said in court as the charges against him were read. 

DEMOCRATS LABEL TRUMP'S VENEZUELA OPERATION AN 'IMPEACHABLE OFFENSE'

Despite denouncing the U.S. military operation, Rodriguez said in a Sunday social media post that the country aspires towards balanced and respectful international relations between Caracas and Washington. 

 

  A14X60 stockpiling food X60 FROM GUK

Few in Caracas are celebrating as they face an uncertain post-Maduro future

Stockpiling not partying is the priority for Venezuelans who say they fear crackdowns by the regime the US left in place

Patricia Torres in Caracas, Tom Phillips in Bogotá and Camille Rodríguez Montilla   Sun 4 Jan 2026 17.03 EST

there was a whirlwind of emotions on the streets of Caracas on Sunday, 24 hours after the first-ever large-scale US attack on South American soil and the extraordinary snaring of Venezuela’s president, Nicolás Maduro.

“Uncertainty,” said Griselda Guzmán, a 68-year-old pensioner, fighting back tears as she lined up outside a grocery store with her husband to stock up on supplies in case the coming days brought yet more drama.

“Anger,” said Sauriany, a 23-year-old administrative worker from Venezuela’s state-owned electricity company as she queued outside a supermarket on the other side of town with her 24-year-old partner, Leandro.

Leandro voiced shock as the couple waited in a 100-person queue to buy flour, milk and butter alongside a quartet of nuns. “Who could have imagined that his would happen? That right at the start of the year they’d bomb our country while everyone was asleep?” he asked.

 “If I thought it would improve the country I’d welcome it,” Leandro added, as shoppers were allowed into the overcrowded supermarket in small groups. “But I don’t believe this will happen. If they wanted peace, this isn’t the way to achieve it.”

Similarly confused sentiments could be heard all over Caracas on Sunday as its 3 million citizens came to terms with the traumatic nocturnal blitz on their city – a move the governments of Spain, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Mexico and Uruguay warned set “an extremely dangerous precedent for peace and regional security”.

“It’s all so distressing,” said Gabriel Vásquez, a 29-year-old video-maker, recalling how he had been woken by the sound of a “gigantic” explosion at about 2am on Saturday and how his community in central Caracas was plunged into darkness as aircraft circled overhead.

“I thought that any time my house could get bombed too,” said Vásquez, whose neighbourhood was still in the dark on Sunday. “We have no water, no electricity, no phone reception – nothing,” he complained.

Julio Pimentel, a 33-year-old designer, said his electricity and water supplies had also been cut but admitted he had been surprised by the number of people out on the streets “considering the situation we’re in”. “Supermarkets and pharmacies are very, very crowded,” Pimentel said.

There was scant sign of citizens celebrating Maduro’s downfall, something locals attributed to fear that his regime – which remains in power despite his arrest – might crack down and a deep-rooted sense that little had actually changed as a result of the US intervention.

 

Delcy Rodríguez strikes defiant tone but must walk tightrope as Venezuela’s interim leader

 

On Sunday, the head of the armed forces, Vladimir Padrino López, announced that military chiefs had recognised the vice-president, Delcy Rodríguez, as Venezuela’s acting president after the “cowardly kidnapping” of Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores. Trump has also indicated he is prepared to deal with Rodríguez. “She’s essentially willing to do what we think is necessary to make Venezuela great again,” he said after Saturday’s assault.

“They’ve taken Maduro but the [Bolivarian] revolution isn’t over,” said Griselda Guzmán’s 71-year-old husband, Antonio, who like his wife, asked not to be identified with their real names. “We’re still in the same situation – they’ve just removed a pawn from the game of chess.”

But many locals were quietly rejoicing at the demise of a politician who many loathe for leading their oil-rich country into years of ruin and repression since he took power in 2013 and is widely believed to have stolen the 2024 presidential election.

 “We all get what we deserve. Maduro is a man who never put his hand on his heart to see the hardships of his country, to see his people going hungry,” said Griselda Guzmán, recalling the satisfying moment she had seen images of the dethroned dictator languishing in US custody. “When I saw him like that – handcuffed – I saw him for what he was: the biggest fool on Earth.”

Guzmán said she believed Maduro had had “the opportunity of a lifetime” to leave power voluntarily after the 2024 vote, which independently verified voting data showed he had lost to the political movement led by the Nobel laureate María Corina Machado. “He could have handed over the presidency because he knew he hadn’t won,” she said.

But instead Maduro chose to cling to power – and now he was behind bars in New York facing decades in a US jail.

Her husband attributed the lack of public commemorations within Venezuela to a widespread belief that Saturday’s bombardment was merely the beginning of the latest rollercoaster chapter in Venezuela’s turbulent recent history. “Nothing has happened yet … this only started yesterday,” he predicted.

Others were outraged by their president’s abduction and Trump’s decision to invade, a move many experts believe represents a flagrant violation of international law.

“OK, there are problems – but they are Venezuelan problems and Venezuelans need to solve them,” said Sauriany. “They [the US] aren’t Venezuela’s owners. He [Trump] can’t just come along and say … he’s going to rule Venezuela because he’s removed Maduro.”

Sauriany believed Rodríguez should be allowed to “carry on Maduro’s legacy” for the remainder of his six-year term, a prospect that appalls Venezuela’s opposition but seemed to become more likely after Trump’s comments on Saturday.

In the weeks before Trump’s invasion, diplomats and experts warned that such an attack could plunge Venezuela and the surrounding region into chaos or conflict. But on Sunday there was no immediate sign of violence erupting in the wake of Maduro’s toppling, or of a dangerous split in the military, but regional governments are on edge.

Colombia’s president, Gustavo Petro, ordered 30,000 troops to its border with Venezuela to guard against possible turmoil. Armoured personnel carriers took up position at the border crossing between the two countries in the city of Cúcuta.

The Colombo-Venezuelan rebel army, the National Liberation Army, condemned what it called Trump’s “imperial” onslaught, vowing to “confront” the attack on Venezuelan sovereignty.

As he waited to stockpile food on Sunday, Antonio Guzmán said there was little caraqueños could now do but wait: “We still don’t know what is really going on.”

 

 

 

A13  X55 world by country X55  FROM TIME

How the World Is Reacting to the U.S. Capture of Nicolas Maduro 

By Richard Hall  Jan 3, 2026 10:54 AM ET

 

World leaders reacted to the capture of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro by the United States with a mixture of outrage, concern, and caution on Saturday.

President Donald Trump announced the capture of Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, and a “large-scale” strike against Venezuela hours after explosions were reported in the country’s capital, Caracas. 

The extraordinary attack follows months of pressure from the Trump Administration on Maduro to cede power in the South American country over long-standing accusations of drug trafficking and election rigging.

Venezuela Isn’t Panama—No Matter How Much Trump Wishes It Were

It represents the largest U.S. military operation in Latin America since the 1989 invasion of Panama, when, as today, the U.S. captured the country's leader, Manuel Antonio Noriega. 

Many countries expressed outrage over the capture of Maduro on Saturday, while even some U.S. allies issued statements calling for the rule of law to be respected. 

South American leaders in particular expressed anger at the attack.

Here is a round-up of global reaction to the operation. 

UNITED KINGDOM 

British Prime Minister Keir Starmer said he wanted to speak to President Trump before making any firm statements either way about Maduro’s capture.  

"I always say and believe we should uphold international law, but I think at this stage [in a] fast moving situation, let's establish the facts and take it from there,” he said in a statement to British broadcasters. 

"I want to establish the facts first. I want to speak to President Trump,” he said. "I want to speak to allies. As I say I can be absolutely clear we were not involved in that."

RUSSIA

Russia's Foreign Ministry said it is "extremely alarmed" and called for "immediate clarification", according to a statement posted on Saturday on the ministry's Telegram channel.

It added later in a post on X: “The US committed an act of armed aggression against Venezuela, which gives rise to deep concern & warrants condemnation.”

“The pretexts used to justify these actions are untenable. Russia reaffirms its solidarity with the Venezuelan people,’ it continued in the post.  

CHINA

China's Foreign Ministry said in a statement that it was "deeply shocked" by what it described as a "blatant use of force against a sovereign state and action against its president."

"Such hegemonic acts of the U.S. seriously violate international law and Venezuela's sovereignty and threaten peace and security in Latin America and the Caribbean region," it said.

 

"China firmly opposes it. We call on the U.S. to abide by international law and the purposes and principles of the UN Charter, and stop violating other countries’ sovereignty and security," the statement continued.

UNITED Nations

The United Nations said it was "deeply alarmed" by the U.S. strikes and capture of Maduro, suggesting it could have violated international law.

"These developments constitute a dangerous precedent," Stéphane Dujarric, spokesman for the U.N. secretary-general, said in a statement.

"The Secretary-General is deeply alarmed by the recent escalation in Venezuela, culminating with today’s United States military action in the country, which has potential worrying implications for the region," she added.

"The Secretary-General continues to emphasize the importance of full respect—by all—of international law, including the U.N. Charter. He’s deeply concerned that the rules of international law have not been respected," the statement continued

 

EUROPEAN UNION

EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas wrote on X that she had spoken to US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and the EU ambassador in Caracas.

"The EU has repeatedly stated that Mr Maduro lacks legitimacy and has defended a peaceful transition," she wrote. "Under all circumstances, the principles of international law and the UN Charter must be respected. We call for restraint."

MEXICO

In a statement on X, Mexico's President, Claudia Sheinbaum, shared an excerpt from the United Nations Charter.

“The Members of the Organization, in their international relations, shall refrain from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any State, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Purposes of the United Nations.”

BRAZIL

Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva condemned the capture of Maduro as crossing “an unacceptable line”.

“Attacking countries, in flagrant violation of international law, is the first step toward a world of violence, chaos, and instability, where the law of the strongest prevails over multilateralism,” Lula wrote on X.

 

“The international community, through the United Nations, needs to respond vigorously to this episode,” he added.

COLOMBIA

Colombia’s President Gustavo Petro condemned the U.S. operation in several posts on X. 

“The Government of Colombia rejects the aggression against the sovereignty of Venezuela and of Latin America,” he wrote

“Internal conflicts between peoples are resolved by those same peoples in peace. That is the principle of the self-determination of peoples, which forms the foundation of the United Nations system,” Petro continued. 

DENMARK

Denmark, which has been on the receiving end of threats from the Trump Administration to take control of Greenland, issued a muted response to the operation.

"Dramatic development in Venezuela, which we are following closely. We need to get back on track toward de-escalation and dialogue. International law must be respected," Foreign Minister Lars Løkke Rasmussen wrote on X.

 

SPAIN

Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez called for "de-escalation and responsibility.”

“International Law and the principles of the United Nations Charter must be respected," Mr Sanchez wrote on X.

 

A14X51

@FROM GUK

Mexico

A hand-coloured woodcut depicts Gen Winfield Scott leading US forces into Mexico City to end the Mexican-US war in 1847. Illustration: North Wind Picture Archives/Alamy

The annexation of Texas, a former Mexican territory, sparked border disputes that led to a US invasion of Mexico, with American troops occupying the capital, Mexico City, in 1847. The war ended only with the signing of a treaty in 1848 that forced Mexico to cede 55% of its territory – an area encompassing what are now the states of California, Nevada and Utah, as well as parts of Arizona, New Mexico, Colorado and Wyoming.

Cuba

Col Theodore Roosevelt and the Rough Riders after capturing Kettle Hill in Cuba in July 1898. Photograph: Alamy

In 1898, the US helped Cuba in its war of independence against Spain. After the victory, the US received control of Puerto Rico and occupied Cuba until 1902, when an agreement granted the US navy perpetual control of Guantánamo Bay. US troops later occupied the island in from 1906 to 1909 and again from 1917 to 1922. After Fidel Castro’s 1959 revolution, the CIA backed the failed Bay of Pigs invasion in 1961 in an attempt to trigger an uprising.

Haiti

US marines board the USS Connecticut at Philadelphia’s League Island navy yard en route for Port-au-Prince, Haiti in 1915. Photograph: Bettmann Archive

Under the pretext of “stabilising” the country and protecting US business interests after domestic unrest that led to the repeated overthrow of Haitian leaders, the US invaded Haiti in 1915, taking control of customs, the treasury and the national bank until 1934. When an attempted rebellion threatened the dictator François “Papa Doc” Duvalier in 1959, the CIA worked behind the scenes to secure his survival, viewing him as an ally in containing the influence of Fidel Castro’s Cuban revolution.

Brazil

Brazil’s then president João Goulart (right) receives full military honours as he arrives for talks with President Kennedy. Lt Col Charles P Murray Jr is in the centre. Photograph: Bettmann/Bettmann Archive

Although it ultimately never intervened, a US naval taskforce was positioned off Brazil’s coast to intervene in case there was resistance to the military coup that overthrew the democratically elected leftwing president João Goulart in 1964. In the 1970s, the CIA and the FBI directly advised the repressive apparatus of dictatorships in countries such as Brazil, Chile and Argentina in the persecution and assassination of dissidents under what became known as Operation Condor.

Panama

Children cheer US marines during ‘Operation Just Cause’, when the US invaded Panama to remove Manuel Noriega in December 1989. Photograph: New York Daily News/Getty Images

The US militarily backed the separatist movement that led to Panama’s break from Colombia in 1903 and, after independence, Washington retained significant influence over the Central American country. In 1989, President George HW Bush ordered Panama’s invasion by about 27,000 US troops to capture the dictator Noriega – a former CIA ally who had been indicted on drug-trafficking charges in US courts.

Hours after the strikes, in which an estimated 200-500 civilians were killed, along with about 300 Panamanian soldiers, the US installed the declared winner of the election, Guillermo Endara, as president.

It remains unclear whether a similar outcome will follow in Venezuela, which Trump has said would be “run” by the US until a “proper transition can take place”.

McPherson said it is “very rare” for US interventions in the region to be followed by “peace, tranquillity, stability and democracy”.

“US interventions almost always create long-term problems of succession,” he added.

 

 

A15  X68 Germany  X68 FROM DW

Venezuela: Germany hesitates to condemn US attack

Jens Thurau

8 hours ago

The German government seems to have three things on its mind in regard to US capture of of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro: be cautious, wait-and-see and don't upset Donald Trump.

https://p.dw.com/p/56MlE

January 3, 2026, Berlin, Berlin, Germany: Protesters at Branderburger Tor in a portest sit-in agaist the imperialistic military USA invasion of Venzuela

A few protesters took to the streets of Berlin following the US attack on Venezuela, but leading politicians have responded with cautionImage: Zaira Biagini/ZUMA/picture alliance

Government spokespeople responded cautiously to journalists' questions on Monday: For almost 40 minutes, Foreign Office spokeswoman Kathrin Deschauer and government spokesman Sebastian Hille took questions on the subject of Venezuela at the Federal Press Conference in Berlin.

Why did Chancellor Friedrich Merz and Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul of the conservative Christian Democratic Union (CDU) not describe last Saturday's action by the US military as what many experts believe it was, namely a violation of international law, reporters wanted to know. On Saturday, US soldiers captured Venezuelan leader Nicolas Maduro in a spectacular operation in the capital Caracas and flew him to the US.

Hille read out a statement harshly criticizing Maduro: "Maduro has led his country into dangerous waters in recent years." The statement also said that his term as president was the result of rigged elections, which is one of the reasons why Germany has never officially recognized Maduro.

The government spokesperson then stated, "The Chancellor has emphasized that everyone, including the US, must respect international law. This applies explicitly to state sovereignty and territorial integrity." A choice of words that carefully avoided explicitly accusing the US of violating international law.

 

How Germany responded to US capture of Nicolas Maduro

GERMANY'S MERZ SHIES AWAY FROM ACCUSING US OF VIOLATING INTERNATIONAL LAW

Over the weekend, Germany had also been part of the effort to come up with a European response and assessment of the US government's decision to seize Maduro. The result was a statement released on Sunday and signed by 26 EU countries, but not Hungary. In the statement, EU Foreign Affairs Representative Kaja Kallas called for compliance with international law. Respecting the will of the Venezuelan people remains the only way for Venezuela to restore democracy, she added. The EU has repeatedly stated that Maduro lacks the legitimacy of a democratically elected president.

German Chancellor Friedrich Merz avoided making a clear statement over the weekend. On Saturday, he wrote on X: "The legal situation regarding the US intervention is complex. We are taking our time to consider it." He added that the principles of international law must apply to relations between states: "There cannot be political instability in Venezuela now. It is important to ensure an orderly transition to a government legitimized by elections."

On Monday morning, Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul felt compelled to once again come to the chancellor's defense. Speaking on Deutschlandfunk public radio before a trip to Lithuania, Wadephul said: "Maduro led an unjust regime; eight million people have left the country. There are political prisoners."

He added that the United Nations had described the human rights situation in Venezuela as very critical and that proceedings were underway against Venezuela at the International Criminal Court. Wadephul said Maduro is not the legitimately elected president of the country and that the geopolitical interests of the US also played a role in the attack.

 

DELCY RODRIGUEZ STEPS IN AS VENEZUELA'S INTERIM PRESIDENT

GERMANY'S LEFT-LEANING POLITICIANS ARE CRITICAL

This statement was criticized as too weak by several German opposition politicians, who described the military action that ultimately brought Maduro to New York as a clear violation of international law. Katharina Dröge, parliamentary leader of the Green Party , said over the weekend: "The US intervention is a violation of international law. What is stopping the Chancellor from stating this clearly."

She added: "In this situation, keeping a low profile is a disastrous strategy, Mr. Merz."

Vice Chancellor and Finance Minister Lars Klingbeil, who also co-chairs the center-left Social Democratic Party (SPD), stated at the weekend: "The events in Venezuela are very worrying. The Venezuelan ruler Maduro has led an authoritarian regime that has clung to power through violence and oppression."

"However, this cannot be a justification for disregarding international law," Klingbeil added.

The far-right Alternative for Germany party (AfD) has hailed US action in Venezuela as part of a necessary "realignment of global politics."

 

EUROPE NEEDS THE US IN THE UKRAINE CONFLICT

Why Merz and Wadephul are not saying this so clearly is currently the subject of speculation in political circles in Berlin. On Tuesday, Merz will meet with French President Emmanuel Macron and other EU leaders in Paris. Representatives from Ukraine and the US will also be present. As so often in the past, the focus will be on the prospects for peace in Ukraine, for which American security guarantees would be very important.

Is that why Germany does not want to clash with Trump over Venezuela? Armin Laschet (CDU), chairman of the Bundestag's Foreign Affairs Committee, put it this way: "Foreign policy is complicated. You have to take the realities of the world into account."

 

He added that if Europeans indicted Trump over the incident, the result would likely be losing leverage in Ukraine policy.

In other words, the German government appears to believe that it is not the time to fan the flames with the US over Venezuela, but rather to focus on achieving the best possible outcome in Ukraine.

 

This article was originally written in German.

 

 

 A16 X69 Russia  X69  FROM UKRAINIAN REVIEW

Apple of Discord: Russian Reaction to the U.S. Operation in Venezuela

04.01.2026

It was long evident that Venezuela had become one of the very illustrative points of confrontation between Russia and the United States. Moscow has for years supplied weapons and political backing to Nicolás Maduro’s regime, while the U.S. President Donald Trump has consistently viewed the Venezuelan dictator as an adversary. Following the successful U.S. operation to capture Maduro, the divide between Russia and the United States has become even more pronounced.

On the official level, Russia condemned the intervention, yet at the same time elements of admiration for the professionalism of the operation surfaced —  in unofficial and semi-official discourse.

OFFICIAL REACTION

The Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs described the U.S. strikes on Venezuela as “an act of armed aggression” and “unacceptable interference in the sovereignty of an independent state.” Leaders of the State Duma framed the operation as an attempted foreign coup carried out under the guise of “legal action.”

Dmitry Medvedev, deputy chairman of the Russian Security Council, reacted with overt irony, calling the U.S. operation a “wonderful example of peacemaking” and hinting that a similar operation could be directed at Ukraine.

Coming from Russian officials who coordinate and justify a brutal full-scale invasion of Ukraine, such statements sound particularly absurd.

Bloggers’ opinions and comparisons with Ukraine

In pro-Kremlin Telegram channels and Z-blogging communities, reactions were mixed, but generally marked by emotional intensity and rhetoric of fear. Comparisons with Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, originally conceived by the Kremlin as a blitzkrieg, were inevitable.

Some Z-bloggers displayed near-hysterical reactions to the unexpectedly effective U.S. operation. This triggered a mix of envy toward American military success and humiliation over Russia’s own military shortcomings.

They carried out the operation competently. This is probably what our Special Operations Forces had in mind—fast, effective, and efficient. It’s unlikely that Gerasimov planned to wage a war for four years, one popular propagandist channel admitted.

Ukrainian former MP Oleh Tsariov, currently in hiding, expressed concern that the United States would now gain control over Venezuela’s oil reserves, potentially driving global prices down, which would benefit Ukraine.

The Russian reaction to the U.S. operation once again highlights a fundamental reality: Russia and the United States have long been ideological rivals. Moscow views its manipulations around Ukraine largely as a tool to counter the U.S., waiting for revenge while tacitly acknowledging that, despite all efforts, Washington remains a step ahead.

What is also evident is jealousy — particularly when Russian commentators compare a precise U.S. operation targeting a dictator with Russia’s terror against civilians in Ukraine.

Finally, Venezuela stands as yet an example of how Russian weapons supplies and political support fail to guarantee the survival of allied authoritarian regimes.

 

 

A17 X70   X70 FROM TASS

US strikes on Venezuela4 Jan, 14:47

Medvedev comments on US aggression on Venezuela, double standards in use by Europe to TASS

According to the senior Russian security official, Washington no longer has the formal right to criticize Moscow for any actions

Deputy Chairman of Russian Security Council Dmitry Medvedev Yekaterina Shtukina/POOL/TASS

Deputy Chairman of Russian Security Council Dmitry Medvedev

© Yekaterina Shtukina/POOL/TASS

MOSCOW, January 4. /TASS/. Deputy Chairman of the Russian Security Council Dmitry Medvedev described the United States’ actions against Venezuela, including the seizure of leader Nicolas Maduro, as aggression and a breach of international law.

According to the senior Russian security official, Washington no longer has the formal right to criticize Moscow for any actions.

TASS has compiled key takeaways from Medvedev’s comments on the US operation in Venezuela in response to its questions.

 

TRUE US PURPOSE

Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro "has repeatedly said that the current US administration’s true purpose is to grab their oil and other fossils," Medvedev recalled. "And [US President Donald] Trump makes no secret of that," he noted.

Medvedev denounced the US actions against Venezuela as aggression and called them unlawful.

However, he said, the US leader has been somewhat consistent in his actions. "He and his team have been rigidly defending his country’s national interests, both political (with Latin America being the backyard of the United States) and economic (give us your oil and other natural resources)," the Russian politician noted.

 

EUROPE’S REACTION

Medvedev described European countries’ reaction to the events in Venezuela as a classic case of using double standards.

Doubts of Maduro’s legitimacy, voiced by Europe, "do not hold water," he argued.

He advised Ukraine’s Vladimir Zelensky not to relax as he argued that Zelensky, whose presidential powers expired long ago, could be removed from office "very soon."

 

UN MECHANISMS

As regards the United Nations, the global organization does not have effective mechanisms to tackle situations as the US aggression on Venezuela, according to Medvedev.

Meanwhile, he continued, the world needs real and effective mechanisms as part of international law that could guarantee a calm, safe and decent life to billions of people on Earth. Fundamental UN documents "have basically remained good intentions the road to hell is paved with," Medvedev lamented.

 

IMPLICATIONS OF US AGGRESSION

The events in Venezuela showed that not a single country disliked by the United States can feel safe, "especially Denmark and Danish-owned Greenland," Medvedev opined.

The seizure of Maduro will also add to the hatred that Latin America harbors toward the United States, Medvedev said.

Besides, Washington might as well repeat the Venezuela scenario in Ukraine, he concluded.

 

POLAND 10 Jul 2022, 16:53

Poland’s ex-President Walesa calls on West not to be limited by liberating Ukraine

According to Lech Walesa, it is necessary to push for changes in Russia’s political system

 

2 hours ago

Venezuela achieved victory at UN Security Council’s meeting — foreign minister

The international community officially recognized that the attack made on January 3 was the act contradicting the international law, Yvan Gil Pinto emphasized

 

3 hours ago

Air defenses down 55 Ukrainian drones over Russian regions during three hours

31 of them were destroyed over the Bryansk Region

 

Today, 01:53

Japan’s prime minister avoids criticizing US actions in Venezuela, Maduro’s capture

Sanae Takaichi emphasized the importance of the "swift restoration of democracy and stabilization of the situation" in Venezuela

 

17 Jul 2017, 06:24

Kremlin stresses Chechen leader’s harsh statements taken out of context

Kadyrov’s words are taken out of context, the Kremlin spokesman stressed

 

30 Dec 2025, 05:00

Press review: Russia may revise Ukraine talks post attack and China launches Taiwan drills

Top stories from the Russian press on Tuesday, December 30th

 

25 Apr 2022, 06:08

Russian defense firm working on improved Kalibr cruise missile — CEO

The Kalibr is a Russian cruise missile developed and produced by the Yekaterinburg-based Novator design bureau

 

Two days ago, 10:04

Russian says warning systems failed during US strikes on Caracas

According to Ivan Pavlov, there is still silence on television

 

1 hour ago

Delcy Rodriguez swore in as acting president of Venezuela

She promised to abide by the constitution and laws of the country, defend its territory and work for prosperity of the nation

 

Today, 07:46

Colombian president says he could take up arms after Trump’s threats

Gustavo Petro also expressed confidence the Colombian people would stand up for him

 

Learn more

2 Jan, 18:46

The Hague's policy of supporting Kiev leads to its deep involvement in conflict — diplomat

Vladimir Tarabrin, Russia’s Ambassador to the Netherlands, added that The Hague prefers to ignore the obvious consequences of this policy, including the prolongation of hostilities and the ever-increasing loss of life

 

1 Jan, 17:23

Dmitriev calls Europeans 'poor' after von der Leyen’s promise

"President of the European Commission promises to work even harder on Western civilization’s suicide in 2026," Russian Direct Investment Fund Kirill Dmitriev said

 

12 Dec 2025, 08:06

Japan, Turkey, Canada, South Korea keen to join EU’s scheme to fund defense investment

EC Spokesperson Thomas Regnier said the commission will "now look into this request"

 

Today, 09:22

No Russians among 116 people injured in Swiss ski resort fire

The list of those injured includes 68 Swiss citizens, 21 Frenchmen, 10 Italians, two Polish citizens, four Serbians, a Belgian, an Australian, a Bosnian, a resident of the Republic of the Congo, a Luxembourgian, a Portuguese and a Czech national as well as four dual residents

 

Today, 05:29

France says US operation to capture Venezuela’s Maduro violates international law

The government’s spokeswoman, Maud Bregeon, said that Venezuela should now be given the opportunity to "build a future after Maduro"

 

Two days ago, 23:15

North Korea launches two ballistic missiles toward Sea of Japan

Earlier, the South Korea’s Joint Chiefs of Staff reported the launch of a missile by North Korea

 

13 Mar 2022, 08:09

Half of Russia’s foreign exchange reserves frozen due to sanctions — Finance Minister

Anton Siluanov reiterated that the debts of countries that were unfriendly to Russia would be paid in rubles

 

Yesterday, 21:38

Trump says US now effectively runs Venezuela

Donald Trump explained that he had not personally been in contact with Venezuelan Vice President Delcy Rodriguez, who is acting as head of state, but noted that "she is cooperating" with the US

 

Today, 09:17

European Commission struggles to assess US actions in Venezuela

The European Commission also declined to comment on whether it condemns civilian deaths following US actions

 

Today, 09:18

Switzerland freezes assets of Venezuela’s Maduro and his inner circle

The measure is said to ensure that "any illicitly acquired assets cannot be transferred out of Switzerland in the current situation", the Swiss government said

 

29 Dec 2025, 05:15

LazerBuzz laser system hits FPV drone at 1 km range

According to LazerBuzz representatives, during testing, the system completely damaged the battery and other components of an FPV drone

 

1 Aug 2025, 07:32

Exhumation of Soviet soldiers in Lvov 'degradation bordering on savagery' — Lavrov

The Russian foreign minister emphasized that despite the OSCE's declared commitment to defending and protecting human rights as one of the organization's fundamental aims, Western countries maintained a deathly silence while watching the actions of the Kiev regime

 

Two days ago, 23:27

Russian forces wipe out Ukrainian infantry near Kupyansk in Kharkov Region

According to the ministry, Russian reconnaissance drones monitor the enemy movements and then direct fire at them

 

Today, 09:45

Spartak Moscow FC announces appointment of Spain’s Carcedo as head coach

Juan Carcedo will assume the position of head coach on January 8 under a contract valid until the summer of 2028

 

Two days ago, 06:02

Russian troops liberate Bondarnoye community in Donetsk region over past day — top brass

The Ukrainian army lost roughly 1,300 troops in battles with Russian forces in all the frontline areas over the past 24 hours, according to the latest data on the special military operation in Ukraine released by Russia’s Defense Ministry

 

Yesterday, 22:37

Trump praises Maduro's decision to surrender

US special forces acted "very violently", Donald Trump said

 

Yesterday, 22:19

Trump says hardly possible that Kiev attacked Russian president's residence

According to the US President, "there is something that happened fairly nearby," but it had nothing to do with the attack on the Russian leader's official residence

 

Yesterday, 14:47

Medvedev comments on US aggression on Venezuela, double standards in use by Europe to TASS

According to the senior Russian security official, Washington no longer has the formal right to criticize Moscow for any actions

 

20 Sep 2019, 11:36

Medvedev bashes US general’s idiotic remarks about Kaliningrad’s air defenses

The Russian PM commented on media reports citing the commander of the US Air Forces in Europe on Pentagon's plans to ‘crack’ the air defenses in the Kaliningrad Region in case of Russia's aggression

 

Yesterday, 16:00

Trump says US needs Greenland 'for defense'

The US President emphasized that the island is "surrounded by Russian and Chinese ships"

 

Yesterday, 23:33

Restoring peak oil production in Venezuela could take decades — US expert

Tom Kloza opined that it might be relatively easy with a friendly administration to get back to two million barrels per day but that would happen later this decade"

 

Yesterday, 23:01

Venezuela's acting president could face something 'worse than Maduro' — Trump

According to Donald Trump, this is possible if Delcy Rodriguez's actions do not satisfy the US

 

3 hours ago 0120

UN trying to get information on the ground about those killed in Venezuela — spokesperson

This was reported by the UN chief’s spokesperson Stephane Dujarric at a news briefing

 

4 hours ago 0020

Russian air defenses down 42 Ukrainian drones during four hours on Monday evening

16 of them were destroyed over the Belgorod Region

 

Today, 04:20

China backs emergency UN Security Council meeting on US operation in Venezuela

Lin Jian added that countries have the full right to choose their own partners for cooperation and external powers should not interfere in their internal affairs under any pretext.

 

ATTACHMENT EIGHTEEN – FROM    X71 FROM TEHRAN TIMES

Venezuela thanks Iran for solidarity as Caracas vows to resist US aggression 

January 4, 2026 - 21:17

TEHRAN – Venezuelan Foreign Minister Yvan Gil Pinto has expressed his gratitude to Iran for voicing solidarity with his country.

In a phone conversation with his Iranian counterpart Abbas Araghchi, the top Venezuelan diplomat underlined the government and people of his country are set to defend their national sovereignty and right to self-determination in the face of the United States’ “bullying and illegal policies”, according to a readout published by Iran’s foreign ministry. 

The Iranian foreign minister, in turn, denounced the United States’ military aggression against Venezuela as “state terrorism and flagrant violation of the Venezuelan people’s national will and sovereignty.”

On Saturday, American warplanes attacked Venezuela, striking positions in the capital, Caracas, and several other regions. U.S. forces also stepped foot in Venezuela in a blatant violation of international law, and abducted President Nicolás Maduro and his wife, who were taken to American soil. The escalation follows nearly four months of U.S. strikes against what it described as drug boats in waters near Venezuela. The attacks have killed over 100 people, whom Washington has not yet been able to identify.

The U.S. aggression has triggered global condemnations. President Donald Trump has accused President Maduro of being involved in drug trafficking, an allegation strongly dismissed by Caracas, and mocked by analysts around the world. Hours after the attacks, Trump declared that Washington will "run" Venezuela and exploit its vast oil reserves, though he provided few details on how the U.S. will achieve this. Trump administration officials somehow believe that the natural resources on Venezuelan territory belong to the United States, accusing Caracas in recent weeks of having "stolen" American oil. Analysts and observers have yet to decode the logic behind that assertion.

The Venezuelan government has promised to stand against Washington’s aggression and exploitation plans. Vice President Delcy Rodriguez slammed the kidnapping of Maduro, saying he is “the only president of Venezuela”. The Latin American country’s Supreme Court has now ordered Rodriguez to serve as Acting President.

The United Nations Security Council is due to meet on Monday on the matter, with Secretary General Antonio Guterres saying the U.S. actions set “a dangerous precedent”.

During the Saturday phone conversation, Araghchi condemned President Maduro’s abduction as a “textbook example of state terrorism”, reaffirming Tehran’s backing for the people and democratically elected government of Venezuela.

A second exchange between Tehran and Caracas came on Sunday. Iran’s Ambassador to Venezuela Ali Chegeni told his colleagues in Iran that all “Iranian expatriates in Venezuela are in full health,” adding Iran’s embassy stands ready to offer any kind of assistance to Iranian nationals residing in the country.

He made the remarks in a phone talk with Iranian Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Esmail Baghaei, who, in turn, appreciated efforts by the ambassador and staff members of the Iranian Embassy in Caracas and was briefed on the latest developments in Venezuela.

Baghaei said Iran condemns the United States’ military aggression against Venezuela and the violation of the South American country’s national sovereignty and territorial integrity.

He recalled the legal and moral responsibility of all governments and international organizations, especially the United Nations and the UN Security Council, to put an immediate end to Washington’s illegal military aggression, saying the necessary measures should be adopted to hold accountable the masterminds and perpetrators behind the crimes committed during the U.S. attacks.

The United States' intervention in Venezuela is already triggering international shockwaves. Following this weekend's strikes, gold prices—which saw their most significant annual surge since 1979 with a nearly 70% increase in 2025—are anticipated to return to the forefront of market attention. Analysts also forecast a sharp rise in silver prices in the near term.

Also, jitters have spread across Latin America, with nations fearing that a successful outcome in Venezuela will embolden Trump to destabilize their countries and expropriate their resources. Dr. Foad Izadi, a professor of American Affairs at Tehran University, believes that if Washington succeeds in imposing its desired order in Venezuela, its focus will likely shift to Cuba next. "Colombia and Nicaragua could be the third and fourth targets," he added.

Further analysis suggests Denmark's Greenland is another objective for the Trump administration should it prevail in Venezuela. Since re-entering office last January, Trump has repeatedly stated his belief that Greenland should belong to the United States. Canada, which Trump has suggested would be better off as an American state, is also considered a potential target.

 

A19X51 what next?  X51 FROM US NEWS

Maduro’s Gone. What’s Next for the U.S. in Venezuela?

Conflicting statements paint a murky picture of what comes next for Venezuela.

By Olivier Knox    Jan. 5, 2026, at 4:00 p.m.

Over the weekend, American forces penetrated Venezuela and seized President Nicolás Maduro – a dictator widely seen in the West as an illegitimate tyrant – and his wife. Both were taken to New York to face criminal charges linked to drug trafficking.

The legally controversial and logistically challenging raid, in the works for months, may have been the easy part. As we have learned over the past quarter-century with wars in Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya, effecting regime change can be immediately successful but messy or even disastrous over the long haul.

The administration has offered shifting rationales for overthrowing Maduro and has yet to lay out a detailed plan for managing the aftermath of his rule.

So what’s next for Venezuela and America’s role there? Here are some of the big questions.

WHO’S IN CHARGE IN CARACAS?

On Saturday, President Donald Trump sketched out a concept of a plan that, he said, would put the U.S. in charge of Venezuela for an indefinite period of time.

"We're going to run the country until such time as we can do a safe, proper and judicious transition," he said. Who will do the running? "It's largely going to be, for a period of time, the people that are standing right behind me," said Trump, referring to his secretaries of state, Marco Rubio, and defense, Pete Hegseth.

 

But the president indicated he could work with Maduro’s vice president Delcy Rodríguez, whom he said had spoken by phone with Rubio. "She's essentially willing to do what we think is necessary," Trump said. And Rubio later walked back the “run the country” stance a bit on Sunday, calling the current situation a “quarantine that allows us to exert tremendous leverage over what happens next.”

In short: For now, the Maduro regime will plug along without Maduro, making this more a leadership change than a regime change. Coerce and co-opt Caracas, not “run.”

WILL THERE BE ELECTIONS?

Short answer: Not soon. Trump’s weekend press conference was short on pro-democracy language. On Sunday, Rubio told NBC’s Meet The Press that talk of elections was “premature at this point.”

On Saturday, the president dismissed talk of supporting opposition leader and Nobel Peace Prize winner María Corina Machado – who has wooed Trump for months, even dedicating her award to him – saying she lacked the “support” and “respect” internally to lead the country.

He did not mention restoring democracy as a U.S. goal in Venezuela. Nor did he talk about Edmundo González Urrutia, the opposition figure widely seen in the West as the winner of Venezuela’s contested 2024 presidential election.

 

WILL THERE BE MORE U.S. MILITARY ACTION IN VENEZUELA?

Trump explicitly threatened remaining regime members on Saturday, saying, "All political and military figures in Venezuela should understand what happened to Maduro could happen to them."

What about American forces in Venezuela? “We’re not afraid of boots on the ground,” he said.

On Sunday, Trump got more specific in an interview with The Atlantic, saying of Rodríguez, “If she doesn’t do what’s right, she is going to pay a very big price, probably bigger than Maduro.”

Speaking on NBC, Rubio said Sunday the United States would continue its restrictions on Venezuelan oil exports, pursue more deadly strikes on boats the administration says carry drugs and seize oil tankers sailing to or from Venezuelan ports.

Trump Bets on Intimidation to Force Venezuelan Leaders Into Line

 

WILL AMERICAN OIL COMPANIES RUSH TO VENEZUELA?

On Saturday, Trump repeatedly cited a desire to get American oil companies back in the business of exploiting Venezuelan reserves, thought to be among the world’s largest.

The administration is reportedly pressuring U.S. oil companies to return and rebuild the country’s crumbling fossil fuel infrastructure.

But those firms are likely to wait until the post-Maduro picture clears up. They’ll want to know about arrangements to keep their staff and equipment safe. And they’ll need oil prices to rise to the point where it’s profitable to drill for Venezuelan oil, which is hard to extract and refine.

 

CAN VENEZUELA’S NEW LEADER KEEP THINGS TOGETHER?

The main question here is whether Rodríguez can somehow steer a middle course of satisfying American demands while preventing a rebellion from loyal Chavistas – Maduro inherited his movement from late President Hugo Chavez – in the country’s politics and military.

In a national address on Saturday, Rodríguez demanded the “immediate liberation” of Maduro and his wife and called the ousted leader “the only president of Venezuela.” By Sunday, her tone had changed: In a post on her Instagram account, she declared, “We invite the US government to collaborate with us on an agenda of cooperation.” She did not call for the ousted leader’s release.

Watch Maduro intimates like Defense Secretary Vladimir Padrino López – who is also the country’s top-ranking military officer – and Diosdado Cabello, the interior minister. They control the security forces. Their support will be crucial to Rodríguez’s survival.

Another potential stressor, albeit one that has not appeared since Maduro’s ouster, is public pressure on the regime.

 

DOES THE U.S. HAVE A PLAN IF SHE DOESN’T?

If Venezuela collapses, you could see large emigrant flows to neighboring countries, with potentially destabilizing effects for the region. And what replaces the regime – chaos or a Maduro diehard – could be worse for American interests.

This is, as one statesman put it last century, merely the end of the beginning.

 

 

 

LEGAL

A20X67 FROM NEW YORK POST - TAKEAWAYS

Nicolas Maduro NYC court appearance live updates: Lawyer hints at dictator’s possible defense

By Ben Kochman, Kyle Schnitzer, Desheania Andrews, Kevin Sheehan, Kathleen Joyce, Joe Marino and Chris Nesi

Updated Jan. 5, 2026, 6:22 p.m. ET  1822

 

Venezuelan dictator Nicolas Maduro and first lady Cilia Flores made their first appearance in a US federal court Monday.

The fallen leader, 66, and his 69-year-old wife were charged with narco-terrorism conspiracy, cocaine importation conspiracy, possession of machine guns and destructive devices, and conspiracy to possess machine guns and destructive devices against the United States in the Southern District of New York on Saturday. They pleaded not guilty to the charges.

The couple was indicted after they were captured at their heavily fortified compound in Caracas by US forces during a daring mission dubbed “Operation Absolute Resolve” after President Trump gave the final directive for the US to attack the South American nation earlier Saturday.

The Trump administration has repeatedly called Maduro’s regime “illegitimate” and said he has remained in power due to rigged elections, including in 2024. Venezuelan Executive Vice President Delcy Rodriguez is next in line for the presidency, according to its constitution.

Pro-Maduro thugs ordered to hunt down US collaborators as tension fills Venezuelan streets

Dems against Trump’s Maduro capture: Letters to the Editor — Jan. 6, 2026

An image collage containing 3 images, Image 1 shows Russia's UN Ambassador Vasily Nebenzya leaving the Security Council meeting, Image 2 shows China's Deputy U.N. Ambassador Sun Lei addressing the Security Council, Image 3 shows Illustration of Nicolás Maduro and his wife Cilia Flores at their arraignment in New York, with defense lawyers and court officers

Russia, China ignore own aggressions to rip US over despot Maduro’s capture during emergency UN Security Council session

Maduro and Flores are in separate, solitary cells inside Brooklyn’s notorious Metropolitan Detention Center — where heavily armed law enforcement members are on patrol outside. The lockup has also housed disgraced music mogul Sean “Diddy” Combs and accused UnitedHealthcare CEO killer Luigi Mangione.

 

5 hours ago  (c. 1300)

Maduro lawyer hints at possible defense

By Kyle Schnitzer

Top Nicolas Maduro lawyer Barry Pollack hinted at a possible defense in court Monday — suggesting the US government violated laws by nabbing the dictator in Caracas and hauling him off for trial.

“There are issues about the legality of his military abduction,” Pollack told the judge.

The Trump administration has claimed it was within its rights to capture Maduro because he is a drug trafficker attacking the US.

Critics have argued that President Trump grossly overstepped his legal bounds under both US and international law.

 

40 minutes ago (c. 1740)

Pro-Maduro thugs ordered to hunt down US collaborators as tension fills Venezuelan streets

By Alex Oliveira

Pro-Maduro thugs were called to the streets to hunt down Venezuelans who supported the US attack to oust the despotic president, according to a state of emergency order issued across the South American Nation over the weekend.

Venezuelan police were ordered to “immediately begin the national search and capture of everyone involved in the promotion or support for the armed attack by the United States,” according to the Saturday decree obtained by Reuters, which was published in full on Monday.

An armed pro-government demonstrator at a protest against the capture of Maduro in Caracas on Jan. 4, 2026.

It remains unclear whether police had begun following that order — or if the Maduro regime’s notorious paramilitary enforcers had been dispatched — but photos began emerging across social media Monday that appeared to show heavily armed and masked civilians patrolling city streets and highways.

 

3 hours ago (c. 1500)

Gov. Hochul says Trump called her - and that she ripped him over Maduro capture

By Vaughn Golden

Gov. Kathy Hochul said she ripped President Trump for acting without Congressional approval in Venezuela after he called her on Monday.

The Democratic governor also bizarrely claimed credit for sparking the nationwide "No Kings" protest movement against the Trump administration, as she celebrated the one-year anniversary of congestion pricing.

Standing with Mayor Zohran Mamdani, MTA CEO Janno Lieber and transit activists, Hochul said she told Trump the scheme to charge drivers in Lower Manhattan was working.

But when Trump brought up his raid on Venezuela that led to the capture of dictator Nicolás Maduro, Hochul said she told him "I disagree."

“You’ve got to go to Congress. You’ve got to get authority. It’s kind of important to do things like that,” Hochul said.

“He’s a bad guy, but you’ve got to get authority,” Hochul said she told Trump about Maduro.

Hochul, trying to appeal to lefty activists who pushed for the phased-in $15 toll for motorists, also claimed that she triggered the "No Kings" protests after she held a pro-congestion pricing press conference in February 2024 where she held up a picture of a fake TIME magazine cover put out by the White House depicting Trump as a king.

“I was pissed. I said, as you heard. I’m still angry when I think about it," Hochul said Monday. "We’re not laboring under a king but it was that image, that day that I believe triggered the ‘No Kings’ rallies all across America."

 

4 hours ago  (c.1400)

Venezuela’s VP Delcy Rodriguez sworn in as interim president after Maduro arrest

By Reuters

Venezuela’s vice president and oil minister Delcy Rodriguez was formally sworn in on Monday as the country’s interim president, as US-deposed President Nicolas Maduro appeared in a New York court on drug charges, after the Trump administration removed him from power in a dramatic weekend military action.

Venezuelan vice president Delcy Rodriguez was sworn in as the country's interim president on Jan. 5, 2025.

Rodriguez, a 56-year-old labor lawyer known for close connections to the private sector and her devotion to the ruling party, was sworn in by her brother Jorge, who is the head of the national assembly legislature.

 

5 hours ago  (c.1300)

Maduro and wife seen in courtroom sketch at NYC arraignment

By Joseph Barberio

Ex-Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, were pictured in a courtroom sketch from their arraignment Monday at Manhattan federal court.

The couple wore matching prison jumpsuits and were flanked by their defense attorneys, Mark Donnelly (second from right, in bowtie) and Andres Sanchez. Flores also appeared to have several bandages on her face.

Venezuela's captured President Nicolas Maduro and his wife Cilia Flores attend their arraignment with defense lawyers Barry Pollack and Mark Donnelly to face U.S. federal charges including narco-terrorism, conspiracy, drug trafficking, money laundering and others, at the Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse in Manhattan, New York City, U.S., January 5, 2026 in this courtroom sketch.

 

5 hours ago  (c.1300)

Bizarre courtroom moment as onlookers hear what they think is shout of, 'Hamas!'

By Kyle Schnitzer

One of the more bizarre moments in the Manhattan courtroom Monday occurred when Nicolas Maduro claimed he was “innocent” — and a Venezuelan detractor yelled from the gallery, “Jamas!’’

The Spanish word translates to “never’’ — but it is pronounced like “Hamas’’ in English, also the name of the Palestinian terror organization.

The sound jarred more than one court-goer, observers said.

 

6 hours ago  (c.1200)

Former Venezuela spy chief could be star witness at trial against Nicolás Maduro: experts

By Priscilla DeGregory

The former spymaster of Venezuela could end up being a star prosecution witness at Nicolás Maduro's drug-trafficking trial, experts told The Post.

Hugo Carvajal -- the country's longtime spy chief, nicknamed "El Pollo" or "The Chicken" -- pleaded guilty in June to narco-terrorism, weapons and drug trafficking charges in the same case that Maduro was charged in.

And Carvajal -- who flipped allegiance and backed Maduro's opponent in 2019 -- has already expressed interest in cooperating with the feds as he faces the potential of life in prison at his sentencing, set for next month.

Former Venezuelan military spy chief, retired Maj. Gen. Hugo Carvajal, walks out of prison in Estremera on the outskirts of Madrid, on Sept. 15, 2019.

Hugo Carvajal, Venezuela's longtime spy chief who flipped allegiance and backed Maduro's opponent in 2019, has already expressed interest in cooperating with the feds.

In A courtroom sketch (see website), retired Maj. Gen. Hugo Carvajal, center, a former Venezuelan spymaster close to the country's late leader Hugo Chavez, is flanked by defense attorney Tess Cohen, left, and defense attorney Zachary Margulis-Ohnuma in federal court, Thursday, July 20, 2023, in New York. Carvajal was extradited to New York from Spain on Wednesday to face decade-old drug trafficking charges

Carvajal, center, flanked by defense attorneys in federal court in July 2023 in New York, is seen in a court sketch after he was extradited from Spain to face decade-old drug trafficking charges in the same case as Maduro.

"This is exactly the type of person that would be a witness in the case," former federal prosecutor Neama Rahmani told The Post.

If he takes the witness stand and testifies truthfully, he would get a "significant reduction in his sentence," Rahmani said.

"The sentencing [in drug-trafficking] cases are so high, so you have to cooperate," the lawyer added.

"This is exactly the type of person that would be a witness in the case," former federal prosecutor Neama Rahmani told The Post.

Dick Gregorie -- a prosecutor who handled a US case against another foreign leader, Manuel Noriega, in 1988 -- agreed there is a "good possibility" that Carvajal will be a prosecution witness.

"I would assume if he had a deal that he made six months ago, that they have probably been preparing him for weeks, or months, maybe," Gregorie added.

Prosecutors will also have "a number of internal people from Venezuela and drug dealers who were involved in moving the drugs" as witnesses, he said.

 

6 hours ago

Maduro declares himself 'prisoner of war' and 'man of God' during spat with one of his political foes while leaving court

By Ben Kochman

Twisted dictator Nicolas Maduro claimed he is a “prisoner of war’’ and “man of God’’ when confronted Monday by a Venezuelan countryman who said he had been an imprisoned victim of the fallen despot’s regime.

A man who identified himself as Pedro Rojas stood up in a Manhattan federal courtroom after the accused narco-trafficker’s arraignment and shouted at Maduro that he had been the South American nation’s illegitimate president and would now face “real justice.’’

Maduro turned to him and said, “I am a man of God” -- and called himself a POW — during an exchange in Spanish with Rojas as he was led out of the courtroom.

Rojas, 33, later told reporters that he was a political prisoner in Venezuela in 2019 for four months.

 

6 hours ago

Maduro and his wife depart Manhattan court in an armored vehicle following not guilty pleas: photos

By Joseph Barberio

Ex-Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro was taken away from the Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse in Manhattan in an armored vehicle following his arraignment Monday.

The former strongman and his wife, Cilia Flores, both pleaded not guilty to federal narco-terrorism charges.

The convoy will likely take the couple back to the notorious Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn, where they were being held in separate cells.

A convoy believed to be carrying ousted Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro departs the Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse after Maduro attended his arraignment hearing on January 5, 2026 in New York.

Maduro and his wife both pleaded not guilty to federal narco-terrorism charges.

 

6 hours ago

Maine-based company says it's being inundated with calls after shackled Maduro pictured wearing its blue hoodie

By Emily Crane

A Maine-based apparel company's phones have been ringing off the hook after a shackled Nicolás Maduro was snapped wearing one of its hoodies when he was hauled to the Big Apple, the company says.

The ousted Venezuelan dictator could be seen sporting the bright blue Origin attire in a now-infamous photo of him flashing two thumbs up while surrounded by scores of DEA agents after touching down in New York.

A Maine-based apparel company's phones have been ringing off the hook after a shackled Nicolás Maduro was snapped wearing one of its hoodies.

"Probably a DEA agent slipped this hoodie on him and said, 'You're gonna feel the fabric of freedom on American soil.' That's my assumption. I'm taking the liberty to assume," Origin founder Peter Roberts said in a video statement.

"He definitely gave two thumbs up, so I think he liked the fabric."

It wasn't clear exactly how the dictator ended up in the hoodie.

"What I believe happened is they landed in New York," Roberts speculated. "It was cold outside and they put a hoodie on him."

The CEO said his phone immediately "blew up" when people started noticing the company's logo.

 

6 hours ago

Maduro's wife, Cilia Flores, suffered possible rib fracture, bruising during arrest: lawyer

By Emily Crane

Venezuela's ousted first lady Cilia Flores suffered "significant injuries" -- including a possible rib fracture and bruising -- when she was captured by US forces, her Texas-based lawyer told a judge Monday.

The private lawyer, Mark Donnelly, asked for his client to undergo a full X-ray to ensure her health while in federal custody.

He added that her injuries were visible in court.

DEA agents are seen early Monday morning, January 5, 2026, at the Wall Street Heliport as former Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and his wife are transferred under federal custody en route to the Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse in Manhattan.

Maduro's wife Cilia Flores claims to have suffered broken ribs from the arrest.

Luiz C. Ribeiro for New York Post

 

6 hours ago

Maduro's lawyer says client won't seek immediate release, may request bail later

By Kyle Schnitzer

One of Nicolás Maduro's lawyers told Judge Alvin Hellerstein that his client is not seeking to be immediately released from custody but reserves his right to "put in a bail application at a further day.''

Maduro, who was scribbling on a white piece of paper during the proceedings, added at one point, "I would like to ask that my notes be respected and that I am entitled to keep them."

 

7 hours ago

Maduro's wife pleads not guilty: 'Completely innocent'

By Emily Crane

Venezuelan dictator Nicolás Maduro's wife, Cilia Flores, has pleaded not guilty.

"Not guilty. Completely innocent," Flores, 69, told a Manhattan federal judge when asked to enter her plea Monday.

Both Maduro and his alleged co-conspirator wife have been relying on an interpreter as the proceedings continue.

 

7 hours ago

Maduro proclaims his innocence to courtroom during first appearance: 'I am a decent man'

By Kyle Schnitzer

Nicolás Maduro vehemently proclaimed he was innocent of the charges leveled against him at his arraignment in Manhattan federal court Monday afternoon.

"I am innocent. I am not guilty. I am a decent man. I am still president of my country," Maduro insisted after Judge Alvin Hellerstein asked him if he understood he had the right to legal counsel.

"I did not know of these rights. Your honor is informing me of them now," Maduro said.

He then claimed he was seeing the indictment against him for the first time, and said he was pleading innocent.

"I am innocent. I am not guilty of anything that is mentioned here," he said.

 

7 hours ago

Venezuelan dictator Maduro claims he was 'kidnapped' in Manhattan federal court outburst

By Chris Nesi

Ousted Venezuelan dictator Nicolás Maduro denounced his capture as a kidnapping in an outburst in Manhattan federal court that was swiftly cut off by District Judge Alvin Hellerstein as proceedings got under way Monday.

"I'm the president of the republic of Venezuela. ... I am here kidnapped. ... I was captured at my home in Caracas, Venezuela," he said before Hellerstein stopped him.

Nicolas Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, are seen in handcuffs after landing at a Manhattan helipad, escorted by heavily armed Federal agents as they make their way into an armored car en route to a Federal courthouse in Manhattan on January 5, 2026 in New York City

"I'm the president of the republic of Venezuela. ... I am here kidnapped. ... I was captured at my home in Caracas, Venezuela," Maduro said in Manhattan federal court.

"Let me interfere,'' the judge said. "There will be a time and a place to go into all of this. Your counsel will be able to make motions. ... At this time, I just want to know one thing: Are you Nicolás Maduro Moros?"

"I am Nicholas Maduro Moros," the fallen dictator replied.

 

7 hours ago

Judge Hellerstein lays out charges against Maduro, including providing financial support for terrorism, terrorist activity

By Kyle Schnitzer and Chris Nesi

Manhattan federal Judge Alvin Hellerstein exchanged brief pleasantries with the toppled Venezuelan dictator, saying, "Good morning, Mr. Maduro'' -- before reading out more than a quarter-century's worth of charges contained in the indictment against him.

"Mr. Maduro ... is charged in one count of narco-terrorism conspiracy, specifically from 1999 to 2025, he knowingly conspired with others ... and intentionally provided something of pecuniary value to a person or organization engaged in terrorism and terrorist activity," the 92-year-old jurist said from the bench.

As Hellerstein spoke, Maduro furiously scribbled notes on a white piece of paper.

 

7 hours ago

Maduro arrives in court shackled at the ankles, greets attorneys

By Kyle Schnitzer

Deposed Venezuelan dictator Nicolás Maduro entered Manhattan court Monday shackled at the ankles -- but not the wrists -- wearing prison-issued orange shoes, beige pants and an orange shirt with what appears to be a black v-neck underneath.

 

7 hours ago

Ex-US hostage urges Venezuela’s Delcy Rodriguez to free Americans as proof she's willing to work with Washington

By Caitlin Doornbos

An American once held hostage by Venezuela’s brutal regime on Monday called on the country’s de facto leader, Delcy Rodriguez, to immediately free the five US citizens still being held in Caracas — saying it would be the clearest sign yet that she’s willing to work with Washington.

“I’d like to call on interim President Delcy Rodriguez to release the five Americans immediately as a show of goodwill,” Marine Corps veteran Matthew Heath told The Post.

Heath, who was jailed during Nicolás Maduro’s rule on bogus charges and released in 2022, said Americans detained in Venezuela are routinely used as bargaining chips in political standoffs with the US.

 “They don’t have a real justice system,” he said. “Judges do exactly what they’re told — or they end up in prison themselves.”

Maduro’s government detained more than 40 Americans during his time in power, according to the former prisoner, who said he was personally framed on fabricated charges and subjected to electric shocks and other torture inside Venezuela’s political prison system.

Now free and back in the US since 2022, the former detainee said seeing Maduro face prosecution in an American courtroom on Monday is deeply satisfying.

“He’s going to get a fair trial,” he said. “Something none of us were ever given.”

With Maduro gone, he said, Rodriguez has a rare opportunity to signal a break from the past — but warned that authoritarian regimes rarely give up hostages without extracting concessions.

“Hope springs eternal,” he said. “But history shows these regimes don’t release detainees unless they get something in return.”

Still, he said, freeing the Americans now could open the door to improved relations and help stabilize the country after years of repression and international isolation.

“If she wants to show she’s serious about moving Venezuela forward,” he said, “this is the moment.”

 

8 hours ago

Private lawyer who famously negotiated release of WikiLeaks' Julian Assange joins Maduro team

By Ben Kochman

Dictator Nicolas Maduro also will be repped by a top lawyer who once famously negotiated the prison release of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange.

Barry Pollack is a prominent private lawyer who is now part of the team defending the ousted Venezuelan president.

He brokered a bombshell June 2024 deal with the US government that allowed Assange, who was charged with breaching the Espionage Act by divulging state secrets, to return to his native Australia after pleading guilty to a single misdemeanor count.

Maduro’s wife, Cilia Flores, will be represented at Monday’s hearing by Mark Donnelly, a private lawyer from Texas who served as a federal prosecutor.

It’s unclear whether or how the private lawyers will be paid for the appearance.

Maduro also is being repped by court-appointed lawyer David Wikstrom — meaning taxpayers will foot at least that part of the bill.

 

8 hours ago

Chevron, energy stocks soar after US capture of Nicolás Maduro – but oil prices barely move

By Taylor Herzlich

Chevron and other energy stocks soared Monday morning, though oil prices barely budged, after the US captured Venezuelan dictator Nicolás Maduro and President Trump said American companies would tap into the nation’s rich oil reserves.

Shares in Chevron, which is the only major US oil company currently operating in Venezuela, jumped 4.8%.

Chevron and other energy stocks soared Monday morning after the US captured Maduro.

ConocoPhillips and Exxon Mobil – both of which left Venezuela nearly 20 years ago when Maduro’s socialist predecessor, Hugo Chávez, nationalized their assets – also rose 5.3% and 2.4%, respectively.

 

9 hours ago

Lefty protesters supporting Maduro ripped as 'a--holes' by Cuban, Venezuelan immigrants

By Emily Crane

Roughly a dozen protesters who showed up outside the Manhattan courthouse to denounce Nicolas Maduro's arrest were blasted as "a--holes" by those hailing the capture of the Venezuelan dictator.

Dario Blanzo, who was born in Cuba, came to the federal court to celebrate Maduro's detainment when he encountered a handful of protesters holding signs reading “Free President Maduro” and “No War for Venezuela Oil!” 

 “You’re an a--hole! You don’t even know where Venezuela is!” Blanzo shouted at one protester.

“In Venezuela and Cuba, nobody can do that. Nobody can do that. You go to jail if you do that."

Maria Su, who immigrated to the US from Caracas, decried them as "paid protesters."

 “They are not Venezuelans. They are paid protesters. They don’t speak Spanish!” she raged as she waved a Venezuelan flag. “They don’t know anything because they are not Venezuelan."

 

9 hours ago

Maduro assigned court-appointed attorney -- meaning US will foot bill for dictator's Monday appearance

By Emily Crane

Venezuelan dictator Nicolas Maduro is expected to be repped by a court-appointed attorney for his initial hearing at Manhattan federal court later today -- meaning the US will at least initially be footing the bill for his defense.

Maduro will be represented by longtime Big Apple criminal defense attorney David Wikstrom, The Post confirmed.

It wasn't immediately clear if the court-appointed attorney would continue to rep the ousted leader at future court hearings.

 

10 hours ago

Clinton-nominated Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein  to oversee Maduro’s court appearance

By Emily Crane

Manhattan federal Judge Alvin Hellerstein has been assigned to oversee ousted Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro's initial court appearance later Monday.

The 92-year-old veteran judge was nominated and confirmed by President Bill Clinton in 1998.

The born-and-bred New Yorker has presided over a slew of cases tied to the 9/11 terror attacks and others related to national security.

In more recent years, Hellerstein quashed President Trump’s bid to have Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s “hush money” case against him heard in federal court.

 

Kyle Mazza-CNP/Shutterstock

11 hours ago  (c.0700)

Nicolas Maduro could face death penalty if fallen Venezuelan dictator is convicted

By Jorge Fitz-Gibbon

Fallen Venezuelan dictator Nicolas Maduro could face the death penalty if convicted on federal drug-trafficking and other charges.

The strongman was nabbed at his Caracas palace in a daring US raid and is being held at the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn pending his arraignment Monday on a four-count indictment.

If found guilty, Maduro is likely to spend the rest of his life behind bars — or worse.

 

11 hours ago

Maduro arrives at Manhattan federal courthouse

By Emily Crane

The ousted Venezuelan president and his wife have arrived at the Manhattan federal court where they'll go before a judge later today on narco-terrorism charges.

The armored car carrying Nicolas Maduro and Cilia Flores reversed into a secured area at the courthouse just before 7:45 a.m.

Scores of heavily armed DEA officers and NYPD cops swarmed the streets as the transfer took place.

 

11 hours ago

Maduro touches down in Manhattan

By Emily Crane and Desheania Andrews

The chopper carrying fallen Venezuelan leader Nicolas Maduro arrived in downtown Manhattan at roughly 7:30 a.m.

He was quickly escorted from the helicopter by about eight heavily armed guards and put in an armored truck at the helipad.

The motorcade immediately set off for the courthouse.

 

12 hours ago  (c.0600)

Shackled Maduro, wife escorted to helicopter

By Emily Crane

Venezuelan leader Nicolas Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, have been escorted in cuffs to a waiting helicopter.

The fallen leader, 66, and his 69-year-old wife were both in prison garb after leaving Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn.

 

12 hours ago

First look at Maduro ahead of court appearance

By Samuel Chamberlain

The motorcade has arrived at a helipad where Maduro will make the short flight across the East River to Manhattan for his court appearance.

Captured Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro arrives at the Downtown Manhattan Heliport on January 5, 2026.

DEA agents are seen early Monday morning, January 5, 2026, at the Wall Street Heliport as former Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and his wife are transferred under federal custody en route to the Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse in Manhattan.

Luiz C. Ribeiro for New York Post

News choppers hovering overhead got a brief glimpse of the fallen left-wing authoritarian as he was transferred from the armored Bearcat to a police SUV.

Maduro is clad in what appears to be khakhi prison garb and red footwear, with his hands shackled in front of him.

 

12 hours ago

Maduro leaves Brooklyn jail, bound for Manhattan

By Samuel Chamberlain

An armored car believed to be carrying arrested Venezuelan leader Nicolas Maduro has left the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn.

The 63-year-old is being escorted by unmarked white vans and a fleet of NYPD cop cars.

Maduro's first appearance is set for 12 p.m., after which he will be returned behind bars in Brooklyn.

 

20 hours ago  (c. 2200 10/4)

Welcome to ‘hell on Earth,’ Nicolas! Inside the notorious NYC lock-up where Maduro and his wife are being held

By Jorge Fitz-Gibbon

Venezuelan dictator Nicolas Maduro, who dined on steak and lived in a palace as his country starved, is now in “hell on Earth’’ in a Brooklyn jail — and machine-gun-toting authorities are making sure he stays there.

Maduro, 63, and his 69-year-old fellow-inmate wife Cilia were thrown into separate cells in solitary confinement away from the general population at the infamous federal Metropolitan Detention Center since their extraordinary capture by elite US forces in Caracas early Saturday.

“This is the least they deserve,” said Gabriel Bonilla, a Venezuelan comedian who fled to Argentina in 2017, to The Post on Sunday. “The worst prison in the United States is a mansion compared to the prisons and holes where people have been tortured for years in Venezuela.”

 

20 hours ago

Ousted Venezuelan dictator Nicolás Maduro arrives in NYC by helicopter hours after capture by US

By Marie Pohl

Ousted Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, touched down in New York City Saturday night after being captured by US forces — and were greeted by jeers of “Down with the dictator.”

The pair — who landed at Stewart Air National Guard Base in Upstate Newburgh around 5 p.m. — arrived via helicopter at a Manhattan heliport just before 7 p.m. and were hauled away in a heavily armed tactical vehicle called a “Bearcat” surrounded by a small motorcade.

Maduro, 63, and Flores, 69, will first be transported to the Drug Enforcement Administration Headquarters in Chelsea, where he was processed before returning to the West 30th Street Heliport and choppered to Brooklyn, sources told The Post.

He took off after 8 p.m., and was seen on video being flown down the West Side of Manhattan and past the Statue of Liberty before heading to Brooklyn.

 

20 hours ago

Inside Operation Absolute Resolve: How US forces captured Venezuela’s Maduro — after months of secret planning

By Caitlin Doornbos and Samantha Olander

The U.S. operation to capture Venezuelan strongman Nicolás Maduro was a months-in-the-making mission rehearsed using replicas of Maduro’s fortified compound, showcasing military might, ingenuity — and good timing.

The Venezuelan dictator was stopped just steps from the steel doors of his fortified lair as elite Army Delta Force commandos closed in, President Trump said.

Captured Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro arrive(d) at the Downtown Manhattan Heliport, as he heads towards the Daniel Patrick Manhattan United States Courthouse for an initial appearance to face U.S. federal charges including narco-terrorism, conspiracy, drug trafficking, money laundering and others in New York City, U.S., January 5, 2026.

The Venezuelan dictator was stopped just steps from the steel doors of his fortified lair as elite Army Delta Force commandos closed in, President Trump said.

 “He was trying to get into a safe place … the safe place’s all steel, and he wasn’t able to make it to the door because our guys were so fast,” Trump said.

The commandos closed in “in a matter of seconds,” Trump said on Fox News.

 

20 hours ago

Trump says Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro, wife ‘captured’ after large-scale strikes

By Katherine Donlevy

The U.S. captured Venezuelan dictator Nicolás Maduro early Saturday in an extraordinary military operation to end the repressive regime of the “fugitive” leader, and usher in a “new dawn” of freedom to the embattled nation.

Some 150 aircraft took part in Operation Absolute Resolve, which came after months of mounting pressure by the Trump administration and lasted just under two and a half hours.

Captured Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro arrives at the Downtown Manhattan Heliport, as he heads towards the Daniel Patrick Manhattan United States Courthouse for an initial appearance to face U.S. federal charges including narco-terrorism, conspiracy, drug trafficking, money laundering and others in New York City, U.S., January 5, 2026.

Maduro, 63, and his wife Cilia Flores, 69, were seized just steps from the steel doors of his high-security Ft Tiuna military compound, which President Trump said US troops were able to blast through “a matter of seconds.”

 

 

A21  X64 Oil money and law  X64 from Jacobin

Corporations Are Ready to Cash In on Venezuela

By Luke Goldstein and Lucy Dean Stockton

 

Before Donald Trump’s capture of Nicolás Maduro, corporations filed lawsuits against Venezuela seeking damages tied to state nationalization, international sanctions, and political instability. A Trump-installed government could tilt the courts in their favor.

Companies with pending claims could be among the first in line to receive a windfall from a new Trump-installed Venezuelan government that is willing to funnel the South American country’s cash to corporate plaintiffs. (Luke Sharrett / Bloomberg via Getty Images)

What Zohran Can Learn From the Sewer Socialists

Chris Maisano

When the Leaning Tower Leaned Left

David Broder

No War but Artisanal Doughnut War

Amber A’Lee Frost

America Can’t Build Homes Anymore

Ryan Cooper

Just weeks before the American military operation in Venezuela to capture President Nicolás Maduro, the US energy giant Halliburton filed an unusual lawsuit in international court claiming the Venezuelan government owed them damages for US sanctions against the country.

A separate case against Venezuela is also being pursued by another fossil fuel giant whose board includes an oil magnate whose family has delivered large financial contributions to Republicans and conservative causes. One family member poured tens of thousands of dollars into a political committee focused on reelecting President Donald Trump in 2024.

Such companies with pending claims could now be among the first in line to receive a massive windfall from a new Trump-installed Venezuelan government that is willing to funnel the South American country’s cash to corporate plaintiffs.

Shortly after the US military operation on January 3, Trump declared that the United States would “run” Venezuela, along with making investments in the country’s oil and gas infrastructure and selling state-run oil assets. Venezuela is home to the largest oil reserves in the world, representing about 17 percent of the world’s global supply, though much of the country’s reserves remain untapped.

In all, Venezuela is facing nine pending cases launched by investors and major corporations alleging financial damages related to the country’s nationalization of state industries, international sanctions, and political instability. The country has settled dozens more in recent decades.

These cases are arbitrated within the World Bank’s International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes, a governing body that has been widely criticized for prioritizing investors’ interests over those of sovereign states, and particularly those of developing nations. In 17 percent of such cases, the host country has been forced to settle.

A US-backed Venezuelan government could settle those cases or fail to adequately argue their side in court, using Venezuela’s resources to award companies with hundreds of millions in damages.

Halliburton’s case seeks damages for the roughly $200 million in losses it allegedly incurred between 2016 and 2020 as it began to cease operations in the country to comply with the US sanctions first imposed in 2005 and escalated in 2017 and 2020. But Halliburton is blaming Venezuela’s domestic instability for those losses and demanding the country now pay up.

Such a legal argument is reportedly rare in arbitration courts, and some financial analysts argued the move indicated that Halliburton potentially expected a military operation in Venezuela to install a more friendly government willing to cut a deal to make them whole. GOP allies have directly cited Halliburton as one of the energy companies that could invest in Venezuela to “rebuild their country” after regime change, as Trump’s former US secretary of state Mike Pompeo told Fox News in December.

In a separate case filed in the World Bank’s arbitration courts, natural gas conglomerate the Williams Companies is seeking damages over a disputed contract and Venezuela’s nationalization of fossil fuel infrastructure in the early 2000s.

Williams’s board includes Scott Sheffield, whose family has donated more than $6 million over the last fifteen years, mostly to conservative causes and Republican candidates. That includes $165,200 worth of donations in 2024 from Sheffield’s son Bryan to the Republican National Committee, according to Federal Election Commission data compiled by the watchdog group Public Citizen. Those donations were earmarked for the “Trump 47 Committee,” a joint fundraising committee to support Trump’s 2024 campaign.

Other companies with pending cases against Venezuela for nationalizing their assets and causing other business disruptions include the food giant Kellogg’s, the cement and construction firm Holcim Group, packaging conglomerate Smurfit, and Gold Reserve, a mining conglomerate whose largest investors include a trio of US investment firms.

The Irish company Smurfit, which is publicly traded on the New York Stock Exchange, won a $469 million arbitration case against Venezuela last year over the company’s 2018 seizure of its assets in the country and has since filed for additional damages.

For years, US and other Western firms have sued the Venezuelan government in international arbitration courts for expropriated property and unpaid debts.

In 2019, the US oil and gas giant ConocoPhillips won nearly $9 billion in the World Bank’s arbitration court after Venezuela’s former president, Hugo Chávez, nationalized the company’s oil assets nearly eighteen years earlier. And in 2021, Koch Industries won a $444 million case against the country for the expropriation of its fertilizer business by Chávez in 2010.

Halliburton’s arbitration case, however, involves a different argument. The company’s exit from the market was the direct result of US sanctions imposed on Venezuela in 2017 and 2020, not state nationalization. According to the Global Arbitration Review’s summary of the filing, Halliburton blames both US sanctions and Venezuelan policy failures for the financial losses it incurred but is suing only Venezuela for damages.

“Halliburton also notes that changes in the Venezuelan government’s exchange rate and U.S. sanctions further complicated the viability of its operations in the country,” reads the review of the legal brief. Although Venezuela withdrew from the international treaty that enforces the World Bank’s arbitration rules in 2012, the country has still been forced to participate in these cases and abide by the court’s rulings.

An energy service company, Halliburton operates oil drilling infrastructure around the world, including the Deepwater Horizon offshore drilling rig that led to the fatal and environmentally catastrophic 2010 Gulf of Mexico oil spill. Since the 1940s, the company has been involved in extracting Venezuela’s massive oil reserves.

Halliburton has previously benefited from US regime-change efforts. In 2003, Vice President Dick Cheney, the company’s former CEO, helped launch the Iraq War. After the country’s military-backed regime change, Cheney’s onetime employer secured lucrative contracts with the new US occupying force to administer the country’s energy production.

This article was first published by the Lever, an award-winning independent investigative newsroom.

 

A22X56  FROM TIME

Donald Trump Is Risking His MAGA Base on Venezuela

BY PHILIP ELLIOTT   January 03, 2026

 

Donald Trump ran for President three times pledging to avoid the type of military entanglements that unfolded on Saturday: U.S. forces had captured Venezuela’s leader and his wife in a pre-dawn operation, flown them to New York, and were installing American national security hawks as open-ended stewards of the oil-rich nation.

How the Elite Delta Force Raid in Caracas Unfolded

It was a dramatic break from what many in Trump’s MAGA coalition had imagined when they rallied a decade ago behind an isolationist, America First agenda. Trump’s move in Venezuela cut directly against that creed, leaving even some allies on Capitol Hill uneasy about how little warning Congress received.

The unanswered question is how Trump’s core supporters will respond. They are voters who helped upend a half-century of Republican hawkish instincts and who viewed regime change as a discredited relic of a bygone era. What is clear, however, is that this is a moment of enormous reset for U.S. posture in global intervention, and one whose consequences are difficult to predict.

“We’re going to be running it,” Trump said of Venezuela from his private club in Florida. And, he hinted, Venezuela might just be his opening gambit. 

How the World Is Reacting to the U.S. Capture of Nicolas Maduro

Trump, lured by the promise of an oil-rich nation he might control as a viceroy, saw nothing but upside for the U.S. energy sector. But what he was unsure of—even among his inner circle—was the tolerance for this type of expansionist viewpoint. While Trump’s advisers have described the policy as an extension of the Monroe Doctrine, many of his most ardent supporters have been far less comfortable with the notion that the hemisphere should fall under American political and commercial dominance. In the simplest terms, it was game on.

“As everyone knows, the oil business in Venezuela has been a bust, a total bust, for a long period of time,” Trump said. “They were pumping almost nothing, by comparison to what they could have been pumping, and what could have taken place.”

Instead, Trump adopted a colonial posture to replace that stagnation—and take the spoils of war, as the United States did not do in Iraq, much to Trump’s dismay. It was, in a way, the first steps at unfurling a new American empire.

“We’re going to have our very large United States oil companies, the biggest anywhere in the world, go in, spend billions of dollars, fix the badly broken infrastructure, the oil infrastructure, and start making money for the country, and we are ready to stage a second and much larger attack if we need to do so,” Trump said, hinting that the real reason for toppling the government was well beyond narco-terrorism charges.

Venezuela, a nation of 30 million people and home to the largest proven oil reserves globally, has been on the receiving end of Trump’s ire for months. The U.S. military has carried out repeated strikes against boats accused of drug trafficking much to the dismay of even his hawkish allies in Congress.

But this weekend’s mission, dubbed Operation Absolute Resolve, went far beyond those actions. It took less than three hours to extract the nation’s leader from his bedroom and involved roughly 150 aircraft swarming the skies over South America. It ended with Venezuela’s President, Nicolas Maduro, and his wife blocked from their safe room and flown toward New York to face criminal charges. 

Venezuela Isn’t Panama—No Matter How Much Trump Wishes It Were

Trump’s rise to power was fueled by vows to end “forever wars” and limit U.S. involvement in other nations’ affairs. On the campaign trail, he promised Russia’s invasion of Ukraine would end on “Day One” and he would bring a swift end to the war between Israel and Hamas in Gaza. But his rhetoric has not always aligned with reality, and Trump’s ability to manifest global affairs has often fallen short. If anything, the last few days have felt like a bitter throwback to an earlier era of U.S. intervention—from Panama to the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq—whose outcomes proved far messier than their architects anticipated.

The reaction from Congress was so far muted, although it was hard to ignore its potential rancor. For many conservatives, the Trump rejoinder to nation building and regime change was the main selling point to his candidacy. Trump’s incursion into Venezuela, the capture of its First Family, and its about-face of campaign promises stung something bitter.

“This is what many in MAGA thought they voted to end,” said Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, a one-time Trump loyalist who is set to resign this week from her seat representing Georgia. “Boy were we wrong.”

In an hour-long news conference explaining the strike to the American people, Trump made no concessions that he perhaps betrayed his campaign pledges. Instead, he warned that the aggression may not stop inside Venezuela. Specifically, he called out Colombian President Gustavo Petro, who condemned the operation. “[Petro] has cocaine mills. He has factories where he makes cocaine. … He’s making cocaine. They’re sending it into the United States,” Trump said. “So he does have to watch his ass.”

Trump has similar warnings for the leaders of Cuba and Mexico. Regime change, it seems, has reached its ripe moment in this hemisphere, cycling back to a Cold War-era ethos of American might is right.

That messaging, right there, is why so much of the Washington foreign policy blob is stuck in a holding pattern to see if Trump finds the reaction to this first strike sufficient or if he wants to keep feeding this fire. In an administration dictated almost entirely by the principal’s whim, the next chapter is one almost always written in pencil. It’s why no one in Washington’s wonk circles is leaving their phones on the coffee table right now.

 

 

  A23X65 Cal Thomas  X65 FROM WASHINGTON TIMES

Dictators everywhere, take note: Trump means business

Maduro's criminal regime collapses, and America's resolve sends a global message

By Cal Thomas - Monday, January 5, 2026

OPINION:

Venezuelans are celebrating in the streets of Caracas and around the world after U.S. forces staged a flawless removal of brutal dictator and narco-trafficker Nicolas Maduro and his wife. Not celebrating are most congressional Democrats, a few Republicans and the new mayor of New York City, Zohran Mamdani, whose foreign policy credentials are akin to dining at International House of Pancakes.

Even The Washington Post, which is no fan of President Trump or most of his policies, spoke well of the operation that captured Mr. Maduro. It called the action “a major victory for American interests” and noted that “just hours before, supportive Chinese officials held a chummy meeting with Maduro, who had also been propped up by Russia, Cuba and Iran.”

So, according to Democrats, it’s OK for some of America’s adversaries to play footsie with Mr. Maduro, but it’s not OK to break his legs and topple his evil regime?

Democrats are already on the wrong side of deporting undocumented immigrants and many social issues. Do they also want to go on record defending Mr. Maduro?

It’s helpful to read the first sentence of the federal indictment of Mr. Maduro: “For over 25 years, leaders of Venezuela have abused their positions of public trust and corrupted once-legitimate institutions to import tons of cocaine into the United States.” Mr. Maduro oversaw an attack on America that was as deadly as a military attack in a conventional war. Democrats in Congress want to invoke the War Powers Act to prevent the president from taking additional military action in Venezuela.

Again, The Washington Post editorial got it right when it said: “Maduro’s removal sends an important message to tin-pot dictators in Latin America and the world: Trump follows through. President Joe Biden offered sanctions relief to Venezuela, and Maduro responded to that show of weakness by stealing an election.”

Nobel Peace Prize winner and opposition leader Maria Corina Machado posted on X: “The time for freedom has come! [Maduro] will face international justice for atrocious crimes against Venezuelans and against citizens of many other nations.”

·         Oil, drugs, sphere of influence: How Venezuela became the epicenter of Trump’s foreign policy

Additional justification for military action came from an article by Elliott Abrams, published in National Review days before the raid and republished by the Council on Foreign Relations: “Last year the democratic forces there won a landslide victory in the presidential election — despite the fact that the regime tried desperately to fix the outcome. Edmundo Gonzalez, the opposition candidate and a virtual unknown before his candidacy, won 70-30 and would have won by a greater margin had the election been fair. Had Maria Corina Machado, whom the opposition had chosen as its candidate, been permitted to run, the margin would, again, have been greater. The desire of the Venezuelan people to get rid of the corrupt and brutal Maduro regime is clear.”

Lefties are already in the streets with their “Free Maduro” signs, but their numbers are a pittance compared with those celebrating his removal. Mr. Maduro’s trial in New York will likely be a spectacle, but the big question is, what comes next?

Mr. Trump says the U.S. and oil companies will “run” Venezuela for an unspecified amount of time. That will work only with the support of the military and the Venezuelan people, who Mr. Trump says will become “rich” after Mr. Maduro’s removal and the ability of citizens to acquire what Mr. Maduro has denied them, including, and most important, freedom.

Dictators in Cuba, along with the ayatollahs in Iran and the Mexican government, which has insufficiently battled the dominant drug cartels, take note. Mr. Trump is serious about the promises he makes. He may often embellish and say things that aren’t true or repeat himself, but especially in the case of removing a threat to the United States, he means business.

Go ahead, Democrats, and try to make the case that Mr. Maduro should have remained in power and continued to kill Americans and his own people. That won’t benefit your electoral prospects in the next election.

• Readers may email Cal Thomas at tcaeditors@tribpub.com. Look for Cal Thomas’ latest book, “A Watchman in the Night: What I’ve Seen Over 50 Years Reporting on America” (Humanix Books).

 

A24X66 FROM HUFFPOST

Trump Ramps Up Incendiary Threats After Venezuela Strike

The president signaled openness to military action in Colombia and warned Mexico about getting "their act together."

By Li Zhou  Jan 5, 2026, 12:05 AM EST

President Donald Trump is dialing up the saber-rattling in the wake of the United States’ attack on Venezuela last weekend.

In comments aboard Air Force One on Sunday, Trump targeted Colombia, arguing that it was “very sick, too,” and “run by a sick man, who likes making cocaine and selling it to the United States.”

When asked about a potential military operation in Colombia, he said: “It sounds good to me.”

Additionally, Trump suggested that Mexico had to “get their act together.”

“We’re going to have to do something,” Trump said, then added that he hoped Mexico would take action first.

He noted that Cuba could “fall” without any U.S. military intervention.

“I don’t think we need any action; it looks like it’s going down,” Trump said.

Trump reiterated that “we need Greenland,” despite leaders in the region having vocally pushed back against any American annexation of the semi-autonomous Danish territory.

Trump also hasn’t discounted further military action in Venezuela.

“If they don’t behave, we will do a second strike,” Trump said, adding the decision to deploy troops on the ground “depends” on how the new administration acts.

In comments aboard Air Force One on Sunday, President Donald Trump dialed up the saber-rattling in the wake of the United States’ attack on Venezuela this weekend.

Trump made his incendiary remarks even as his first attack on Venezuela, and the kidnapping of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and his wife Cilia Flores, faces massive backlash from lawmakers over questions of legality.

Early Sunday, Secretary of State Marco Rubio made the rounds on the morning talk shows and tried to downplay comments Trump made about the U.S. running Venezuela. He said that the U.S. would be focused on enforcing an oil quarantine in Venezuela and less involved in other day-to-day governance.

“That’s the sort of control the president is pointing to when he says that,” Rubio said during an appearance on CBS’s “Face the Nation.”

However, on Sunday night, Trump again pushed his claim that the U.S. was running things in Venezuela.

“Don’t ask me who’s in charge because I’ll give you an answer, and it’ll be very controversial,” Trump said during the Air Force One gaggle. “It means we’re in charge.”

 

A25 X09 Economist  X09  FROM THE ECONOMIST  (use A)

 

 

Outside a supermarket in Caracas a few years ago, I saw national guardsmen checking people’s identity before they were allowed in. The logic was that, courtesy of the revolutionary government, the state-owned shop sold essential groceries at below-market prices. So you needed men with truncheons and tear-gas to make sure shoppers only came in on their state-appointed shopping days.

Nicolás Maduro’s dictatorship was one of the most thuggish in the world. It was also one of the most economically incompetent. When I walked into that shop, half the shelves were bare and none of the groceries that were supposed to be on sale for less than they cost to make were, in fact, available. A combination of price controls, socialist dogma and industrial-scale corruption had dramatically impoverished a once-prosperous country. The economy shrank by 69% under Mr Maduro—a swifter decline than would normally occur during an all-out civil war. Small wonder Venezuelans in Miami danced in the streets when 
Donald Trump kidnapped Mr Maduro and whisked him to a courtroom in New York. But they were not dancing in Caracas, for fear of being arrested and tortured. For though the despot is gone, the rest of the regime is still in place.

Our cover package this week looks at the broader meaning of America’s raid on Venezuela. It is the most dramatic expression yet of the “Donroe doctrine”—Mr Trump’s belief that he can do whatever he likes in the western hemisphere, from commandeering Venezuela’s oil to grabbing Greenland. As we argue, this is a formula for making America weaker in the long run.

 

A26  X05 US News – Iraq 2.0?  @USE a

A@ X05 FROM US NEWS

While there are some similarities to the U.S. invasion of Iraq in 2003 – oil-rich country, strongman leader, talk of terrorism and “weapons of mass destruction” (drugs this time) –  Olivier made the case for why Venezuela is not Iraq 2.0. 

 

For one thing, there has been no talk of bringing democracy to Venezuela, a stated goal of President George W. Bush’s Iraq invasion. Though Olivier remembered that incursion was initially called Operation Iraqi Liberation (acronym: OIL), Bush never explicitly cited petroleum in his justifications for action, as Trump did for Venezuela. Nor are there any indications Trump plans to purge the Venezuelan government or send in a massive ground force, as the U.S. did in Iraq. All that could change, but for now, it’s a case of history rhyming more than repeating.

 

  a27X05 US News – Iraq 2.0? 

X05 FROM US NEWS

While there are some similarities to the U.S. invasion of Iraq in 2003 – oil-rich country, strongman leader, talk of terrorism and “weapons of mass destruction” (drugs this time)   Olivier (Knox) made the case for why Venezuela is not Iraq 2.0.

 

For one thing, there has been no talk of bringing democracy to Venezuela, a stated goal of President George W. Bush’s Iraq invasion. Though Olivier remembered that incursion was initially called Operation Iraqi Liberation (acronym: OIL), Bush never explicitly cited petroleum in his justifications for action, as Trump did for Venezuela. Nor are there any indications Trump plans to purge the Venezuelan government or send in a massive ground force, as the U.S. did in Iraq. All that could change, but for now, it’s a case of history rhyming more than repeating.

 

 

 A28 X07 “X07  FROM US NEWS  @use A

There Are Similarities, but Venezuela Is Not Iraq

 

U.S. Marines prepare to pull down a statue of Saddam Hussein in Baghdad in 2003.

(Ramzi Haidar/AFP/Getty Images)

 

After U.S. soldiers seized President Nicolás Maduro of Venezuela, The Daily Show turned its gimlet eye on the arguments for American military intervention there, inviting viewers to conclude that we’re looking at a new version of the case for the disastrous 2003 invasion of Iraq.

The montage opens with Donald Rumsfeld, defense secretary at the time, declaring in a March 2003 television interview, “We’re giving them (Iraqi leaders) full opportunity to do it the easy way. And when it doesn’t work, we’ll do it the hard way.”

The video cuts to President Donald Trump telling reporters aboard Air Force One, “If we can do things the easy way, that’s fine. And if we have to do it the hard way, that’s fine too.”

The piece includes other parallels. President George W. Bush’s warning in late 2002 that there were “al-Qaida terrorists inside Iraq” turns into Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth calling Latin American drug cartels “the al-Qaida of our hemisphere.”

The Bush White House’s warning of supposed Iraqi chemical weapons programs becomes the Trump administration calling fentanyl a chemical weapon. (And don’t forget the president labeled fentanyl, which chiefly comes from Mexico, a “weapon of mass destruction” in December.)

I could note other parallels as well, like the idea that oil wealth in Iraq or Venezuela will effectively pay for the costs of any conflict.

But let’s not rush to oversimplify.

 

THE JUSTIFICATION

First, American presidents have recycled these kinds of arguments for going to war for as long as I’ve been alive – these are not particular to the conflict that began in 2003. A threat to Americans? Alleged terrorism? We’ve heard this before, many times.

You can spot some of these arguments – or something very close to them – when commanders-in-chief have made the case for military action in Afghanistan, the broader war on terrorism, Syria and even the invasion of another Latin American country, Panama, in December 1989.

“Many attempts have been made to resolve this crisis through diplomacy and negotiations,” President George H. W. Bush said in an address to the nation the day that operation began. “All were rejected by the dictator of Panama, General Manuel Noriega, an indicted drug trafficker.”

In other words: We tried the easy way, then had to resort to the hard way.

There are also two very obvious differences in the messaging:

        George W. Bush repeatedly declared that toppling Saddam Hussein would promote democracy across the Middle East. But Trump never mentioned democracy in his initial press conference on Saturday. He has sidelined leaders of the opposition to Maduro and declined to set a timetable for holding elections.

        The younger Bush did not cite Iraqi oil in his case for war. In fact, the White House hastily retreated after describing the operation as “Operation Iraqi Liberation” because of the unfortunate acronym, a distinct memory from my time covering the start of the war from inside the Bush White House. (It became “Operation Iraqi Freedom.”) Trump has made taking over Venezuela oil operations central to his arguments.

 

Morning Joe host Joe Scarborough related a recent conversation with Trump in which the president declared: “The difference between Iraq and this is that (Bush) didn’t keep the oil. We’re going to keep the oil.”

 

TWO BIG DIFFERENCES

OK, so the messaging isn’t unique to Iraq and Venezuela and there are profound rhetorical differences. Let’s not overlook two very important practical differences between the two conflicts.

The first is that it does not look like we’re waging full-scale war with Venezuela (and not just because only Congress gets to declare war and hasn’t). The United States surely committed an act of war by carrying out strikes on sovereign Venezuelan soil and seizing Maduro. But unlike in Iraq, there’s no massive invasion force on the ground.

What we saw over the weekend was a military strike, but whether it turns into sustained conflict is an open question. I will note, however, that Trump and top aides have said more attacks are coming if Caracas bucks Washington’s demands.

The second difference looks to me like a Trump administration decision to avoid two of the biggest mistakes of the 2003 invasion: The disbanding of the Iraqi army and the purge of Saddam Hussein loyalists from every level of government and the military, a process known as de-Baathification after Saddam’s “Ba’ath” Party.

Those policies left thousands upon thousands of angry Iraqi men – many of them with guns – unemployed and under military occupation. It’s widely blamed for fueling the deadly insurgency against American forces and for former Iraqi military officials aiding the rise of ISIS.

What we see in Venezuela today is the Maduro regime chugging along, without Maduro but run by his allies, albeit under threat from the United States.

That doesn’t mean Venezuela won’t topple into the kind of deadly chaos that bedeviled Iraq under U.S. occupation. But the variance in both moves and messaging make it clear you can’t neatly overlay Baghdad and Caracas.

 

 A29 X08 Time Elliott 1.8 US confusion  X08 FROM TIME  (use A)

A COLONY? AN OCCUPATION? NO ONE KNOWS WHAT TO CALL VENEZUELA

BY PHILIP ELLIOTT  January 08, 2026

Confused about what, exactly, the United States has planned for Venezuela? You’re in very good, mighty large company.

Around Washington, even those who have gotten briefed by the Trump Administration’s most-senior hands overseeing the operation cannot convincingly describe it. The D.C. set lacks a vocabulary to detail what has happened, what is happening, and what they expect to happen next. The problem underlying all three is that none match the known definitions describing past bouts of U.S. ambition abroad. What do you call it when the U.S. seizes the leader of an oil-rich South American nation from his bed and hauls him to Manhattan to face drug charges, but leaves the rest of his leadership intact and warns them that they better do what he wants? In a first for Donald Trump, he is lacking a slogan.

Speaker Mike Johnson seemed ready to split hairs on Monday after a closed-door session with Secretary of State Marco Rubio and other Trump officials. “The way this is being described, this is not a regime change,” Johnson said. “This is a demand for change of behavior by a regime.”

Got that? Yeah, neither does most of Washington.

For his part, appearing Monday in federal court in Manhattan, Venezuela’s autocratic leader Nicolás Maduro said he had been “kidnapped.” U.S. officials countered that he was arrested as part of a criminal case against him and his family. Venezuela’s allies said it felt all too familiar: “It reminds us of the worst interference in our area, in our zone of peace,” Columbia’s Ambassador to the U.N. said during a fiery emergency session this week. The French representative sitting through that Security Council meeting said Trump’s action “chips away at the very foundation of international order” while U.N. Secretary General António Guterres, said the moves violated the U.N. charter.

But here’s the problem no one can untangle: what, exactly, do we call it?

The challenge here is how all of the potentially appropriate language carries biases with it. Regime Change is synonymous to a lot of Washington with plenty of troubled records in removing one set of leaders for another. (And, to be clear, leaving Maduro’s Vice President in charge of the still-intact Maduro government falls far short of that.) Decapitation works only if the body below dies, and that does not seem to have happened; Trump says the new leader is complying with his demands. Regents or viceroys hearken back to royalty and empires, and that’s not the look Trump is going for here—at least for now. And anything bordering on colonial or Cold War language—protectorate, satellite state, occupied territory, vassal state, provisional government, client—are pretty much non-starters with the foreign policy establishment that knows these things seldom end well for the bigger power.

Scholars of U.S. ambitions are also searching for the right language. “It does not seem that Trump is imagining regime change. He would be doing different things if that were the goal,” says Daniel Immerwahr, a historian at Northwestern University whose 2019 book, How to Hide an Empire: A History of the Greater United States, seems prescient these days. “You could call it an informal empire if you wanted to, like, We will turn you into a protectorate. But that is different from We're going to micromanage your internal politics. That is different from We're going to try to make you part of us, or like us in some way, or make you over in our image.”

But as Dominic Tierney, a Swarthmore College political scientist whose research focuses on wars and their perceptions, put it to me: “If any other country made any effort to do that to the United States, it would be considered an act of war, unquestionably.” 

Read more: Maduro’s Nike Tracksuit and the New Visual Language of Power

In the most simple terms: there is not really a word that fits what just happened. It’s not like, to borrow an Immerwahr analogy, the munchkins are ready to greet Dorothy as a liberator for dropping a house on the Wicked Witch of the East. Predictions of Iraqis greeting U.S. forces as liberators to this day haunt the Bush team. The grey zone works in Trump’s favor. That’s why it has been so easy for Trump’s team to talk in circles around what they just accomplished.

“American warriors are second to none, the best in the world and the best of our country,” Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said hours after the operation. “What all of us witnessed last night was sheer guts and grit, gallantry, and glory of the American warrior. I'm simply humbled by such men.”

The next day, appearing on NBC’s Meet the Press, Secretary of State and interim National Security Adviser Marco Rubio downplayed the military aspect of the operation. “There's not a war. I mean, we are at war against drug trafficking organizations, not a war against Venezuela. We are enforcing American laws with regards to oil sanctions,” he said.

And the following day, after meeting with both Secretaries, Johnson seemed ready to parrot the language. “We are not at war. We do not have U.S. armed forces in Venezuela, and we are not occupying that country,” the Speaker said.

But, as he is wont to do, Trump had other messaging. 

"We’re at war with people that sell drugs. We’re at war with people that empty their prisons into our country and empty their drug addicts and empty their mental institutions into our country,” Trump told NBC News that same day.

On Wednesday, when he sat down for almost two hours with reporters from The New York Times, Trump then suggested the U.S. could play a role in Venezuela for years.

“We’re going to be using oil, and we’re going to be taking oil. We’re getting oil prices down, and we’re going to be giving money to Venezuela, which they desperately need,” Trump said Wednesday.

Hours later, Energy Secretary Chris Wright told Fox News that a U.S. takeover of Venezuelan oil is not happening. “No, definitely not. This is Trump being Trump,” he said. “This is the threat of military force but not the use of military force to prevent the export of Venezuelan crude that’s been under sanctions.”

The ambiguity might be strategic but not without cost.

Even the Senate struggled with its vocabulary as it issued a rare rebuke of Trump’s actions in the Southern hemisphere. GOP Sens. Rand Paul of Kentucky, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, Susan Collins of Maine, Todd Young of Indiana, and Josh Hawley of Missouri joined with Democrats to advance largely symbolic legislation that would require Trump to seek Congress’ approval before taking any new military action in Venezuela. But notably absent: an actual definition of what was happening beyond calling future actions “hostilities.”

Then there’s the murky rationale behind all of this. Trump and his allies have said this is to head off a narco-terrorism operation that threatens Americans, but cannot seem to stop talking about Venezuela's oil riches. (“You didn't say that part out loud,” Immerwahr jokes about oil having been an unspoken pretense for past wars.) From the White House, it seems like Trump is already rationing barrels of energy to U.S. firms. Some, like Sen. Rick Scott of Florida, are hailing the move as a first step toward restoring democracy in Venezuela, yet Trump has signaled Maduro’s most credible political rival—the one who won last year’s Nobel Peace Prize—should not be waiting for a phone call installing her, even after she offered to give Trump her award for freeing her nation of Maduro.

So what might end up coming out of this is a term that is uniquely about Venezuela for the moment—but one that could be expanded if Trump replicates this nebulous tactic elsewhere. After all, Balkanization did not mean anything until the 20th Century. Language is fluid—and certainly so is Trump’s pursuit of power.

 

Ian Bremmer: Where Venezuela Goes From Here

 

 

  A29X01  ideology, not oil?  X01  FROM TIME

 ‘Trump is Fairly Uninterested in Democracy’: Why Venezuela Is Unlike Other U.S. Interventions

BY PHILIP ELLIOTT  January 10, 2026

 

Dominic Tierney is an expert on losers—in the best possible way.

The professor’s studies of war and its political price are must-read volumes for those looking to understand how force and governance are often at odds. As Washington tries to make sense of President Donald Trump’s unprecedented push into Venezuela, his capture of Venezuelan President Nicholás Maduro, and his constant chatter about the oil resources of that South American country, I checked in with Tierney—whose books include and The Right Way to Lose a War and How We Fight: Crusades, Quagmires, and the American Way of War—to get a sense of how this moment fits into the larger context of U.S. history and the global consequences for what comes after the initial drive.

The conversation has been condensed and edited for clarity.

 

TIME: Listening to President Trump the last few days, it seems like he thinks this is going to be an easy operation. What does history say about this?

Tierney: The use of force, whether it reaches the threshold of war or not, is very difficult to control and very difficult to predict. People talk about the day after, but you've got to talk about the week after, the month after, and so on. This is especially true with regime change, missions where you are essentially removing the government of a foreign state and then unleashing political forces that you may struggle to control. The U.S., for all of its power, has time and again struggled to control those forces in recent decades. And this is one reason why the U.S., despite being incredibly powerful, has a poor military record since World War II.

 

Is regime change the right term to be using here? I'm struggling to figure out what word we should be using here.

The Trump Administration is trying to describe it as a law enforcement operation, which is deliberately designed to seemingly narrow the scope. It's interesting terminology given a lot of questions about the legality. If you swoop into a foreign country and capture their leader and then whisk them away—with various sorts of behind-the-scenes efforts to negotiate with other potential actors—that is a change in the regime, at least in terms of the leadership.

It's not at all clear how deep that regime change is going to go, whether it's literally just Maduro and then others aligned with him staying in power and sort of reaching some modus vivendi with the United States, or whether we end up in a situation where there's a more sweeping change.

The leader, a dictator, has been taken by force. Dozens of people were killed. Certainly if another country tried to do that to the United States, we would consider that a pretty aggressive move and an attempt to regime change.

That would be an act of war by anyone else.

Certainly if any other country made any effort to do that to the United States, it would be considered an act of war, unquestionably.

The wars since 1945 have not actually been so explicitly about resources, yet the President can't seem to stop talking about oil and energy. Iraq was under the auspices of preventing another attack. Has anything changed about Americans' appetite for this sort of adventurism?

Trump is personally quite attracted to this idea of controlling stuff. Maybe it's his real estate background. I remember he said similar things about the mission in Syria in his first term, where you could see he had doubts about it but he was quite drawn to the idea of We're going to control the oil—even though that wasn't really true and there wasn't a lot of oil.

To be honest with you, it is hard for me to imagine that controlling Venezuelan oil is in fact the key, driving force behind this operation. The United States is producing a massive amount of energy, and if it really wanted to access the oil, it probably could make a deal with Maduro. I think there are other motives that are probably more important, like hemispheric dominance and Venezuela being seen as a kind of leftist state.

Within the Western Hemisphere in particular, he's quite willing to threaten or use force. There's sort of some harking back to a kind of 19th Century approach to this. People are talking about the Donroe—rather than the Monroe—Doctrine. That does lend itself to meddling in Central and South America.

Trump has been willing to use force more widely, in Syria, during the war in Iran, briefly. There's no question that Trump is absolutely not an isolationist. But he's also being quite cautious about sort of large-scale military operations, at least thus far.

Now, in terms of wider American society, I don't see any great appetite to get involved in foreign conflicts. Some of the polling on the Venezuela operations suggest that people are very skeptical about it. One of the polls suggested about a third of Americans supported it, about a third were opposed, a third not sure. Those are very weak numbers for the start of a military operation, right? So there's a bit of a disjuncture, to say the least, between what Trump is talking about and where the American people are.

 

What do you make of the lack of talk of democratizing in this conversation?

That is quite striking. Traditionally, spreading democracy is a thread in American foreign policy. It's always been ambiguous because the U.S. has always pursued its interest first and foremost. Sometimes that has led decisionmakers to cut deals with non-democratic actors or during the Cold War outright destabilize perceived leftist democracies.

Now Trump is fairly uninterested in democracy. He never really even talks about that or human rights or democracy.

You've got two different forces in American ideology. One is a preference for democracy over non-democracy. And I think most Americans do prefer democracy over non-democracy. Their willingness to sacrifice is limited, but they tend to see democracies as friends.

The other piece that I think has become much more important in the last couple years is about whether foreign governments are left wing or right wing. Are they seen as liberal or are they seen as more traditional conservative governments? You've seen a big effort by the Trump administration to just explicitly favor European countries or political parties that are right wing or conservative. It's not so much an interest in democracy versus non-democracy but an interest in populist conservative right-wing governments versus liberal left-wing governments. Under Biden, the focus was on Are you a democracy or non-democracy? And under Trump it is Do you like MAGA? Do you like populism? Are you right wing?

The United States doesn't have a really good record at this sort of operation, especially not in our own backyard. Is there anything about President Trump that might break America's bad trajectory on this sort of operation?

The Venezuela operation makes me very nervous. I'm worried about the competence of a lot of the officials involved. I'm worried about the lack of outreach to Democrats, the complete refusal to build any kind of consensus or reach across the aisle, which by contrast, the Bush administration tried to do with Iraq in 2003.

And they got there.

Exactly. I'm also worried about the lack of any kind of allied buy-in, the reveling in American unilateralism, the lack of planning seemingly for the day after. The United States went to war in 2001 and 2003 with a very moralistic, very crusading view of war, a very black-and-white view that there were good guys and bad guys, and America would wield the swift sword of justice. The way the U.S. saw it was that the war would end like World War II ended, unconditional surrender, total victory. That model of war is extremely dangerous because it exaggerates American power and is too morally self-righteous. You need to be more pragmatic.

This mission is extremely dangerous. Either Trump basically just is satisfied with Maduro, in which case there may actually not be a huge change necessarily in Venezuela. Or Trump is serious when he talks about controlling Venezuela and even saying he wouldn't shy away from boots on the ground. And then you have a recipe for disaster because Venezuela's an impoverished and divided society. You could see a lot of resistance to what is seen by Venezuelans and other people in the region as American occupation, the worst kind of American imperialism.

If you're sitting in the Danish Embassy right now, what is the conversation happening there about Greenland?

There's been a lot of shocking developments during this term. But this is surely among the most shocking: that the United States would talk about the military option remaining on the table in its effort to acquire Greenland, which is essentially threatening the use of force against a treaty ally. It puts the European states in a complete bind because they are desperate to keep Trump somewhat onboard with Ukraine.

The Brits and so on are playing a very careful game here. They're hoping that this is just bluster and there's no real chance of the use of force, but what could happen is that the U.S. could present the Greenlander population with some sort of too-good-to-turn-down proposal. It's seen as controversial, but it's not immediately destroying NATO in the way that an invasion of Greenland would do. That would destroy NATO.

 

 

 

 

 

A30X03  FROM IUK

Trump says major oil companies will invest $100B in Venezuela and promises them government security assistance

The U.S. government is attempting to take control of the Venezuelan oil industry

By Andrew Feinberg   Friday 09 January 2026 22:43 GMT

 

President Donald Trump told top oil industry executives the United States government would guarantee security for companies that assist the administration’s effort to revive the Venezuelan petroleum sector after U.S. forces captured the country’s ex-president.

Speaking in the East Room Friday at the top of a televised sit-down with the energy executives, Trump said his administration would be “making the decision” on which companies to “allow” back into Venezuela and promised his administration would “cut a deal” with those companies.

“We're dealing with the country, so we're empowered to make that deal, and you have total safety, total security. One of the reasons you couldn't go in is you had no guarantees, you had no security. But now you have total security. It's a whole different Venezuela, and Venezuela is going to be very successful, and the people of the United States are going to be big beneficiaries,” he said.

Earlier in the day, the president wrote on Truth Social that “BIG OIL” leaders will invest “at least 100 billion dollars” into Venezuela towards “rebuilding, in a much bigger, better and more modern form, their oil and gas infrastructure.”

He also claimed Washington and Caracas have been “working well together” on rebuilding the Venezuelan oil industry in the days since Venezuelan president Darcy Rodriguez was installed following the snatching-up of longtime leader Nicolas Maduro in an audacious nighttime raid by American commandos last week.

“They don't need government money, but they need government protection and need government security that when they spend all this money, it's going to be there,” Trump said. “So they get their money back and make a very nice return.”

According to the White House, executives from 17 companies were in attendance, including Chevron, the only company that has some current involvement in Venezuela, plus ExxonMobil and ConocoPhillips. The two latter companies lost control of prior projects in the country when then-president Hugo Chavez nationalized them nearly two decades ago.

The sit-down with oil industry bigwigs comes as the president has sought to recast his administration’s decapitation of the Venezuelan government — a surprise attack that has drawn condemnation from much of the world and raised concerns in the U.S. about whether it violated U.S. laws  — as part of his efforts to lower the cost of living for Americans who polling has shown to be weary of his focus on international wheeling and dealing amid unflagging inflation and a slowing job market.

In the wake of Maduro’s shock ouster, Trump claimed the U.S. would be taking over sales of Venezuelan crude across the globe and said the government in Caracas was providing Washington with between 30 and 50 million barrels of formerly sanctioned oil to sell.

While critics have cast the move as a Trumpian do-over of the 2003 American invasion of Iraq — overthrowing the government of an oil-rich nation to install a more U.S.-friendly regime and reap financial benefits — Trump has claimed it would benefit Americans by bringing energy prices down with the aid of cheap oil from the formerly sanctioned nation.

Despite his promise of cheap oil to lower prices for Americans, he may have an uphill climb in convincing executives to throw open their coffers in a country that has been particularly inhospitable for western petroleum concerns over the past decades.

American companies have been wary of signaling any interest in getting back into Venezuela without ironclad contracts and guarantees that would prevent Caracas from interfering, though Trump has said that the U.S. government would assist with guaranteeing any investments while touting his relationship with Rodriguez.

U.S.-based shale oil producers have also cried foul over Trump’s newfound love for foreign oil, which they warn would crater the market for U.S.-produced crude at a time when the president has obsessively pursued re-shoring American industrial capabilities.

American companies have been loath to invest in Venezuela since a wave of nationalization laws that were enacted in the country starting in 1976, dispossessing American companies including ExxonMobile and ConocoPhillips.

Although the companies were compensated for some of their losses by the Venezuelan government, Trump characterized the nationalization process that occurred decades ago as theft of American-owned assets.

He also suggested his administration’s purported takeover of the Venezuelan oil industry was justified by those long-ago developments.

“Decades ago, the United States built Venezuela's oil industry at tremendous expense with American skill, technology, know how and dollars, but those assets were stolen from us, and we had presidents who did nothing about it. This President is much different than your other presidents,” he said.

One of the CEOs in attendance, ExxonMobile CEO Darren Woods, said the country was “uninvestable” without changes to “the legal and commercial constructs and frameworks in place today.”

“There has to be durable investment protections, and there has to be change to the hydrocarbon laws in the country,” said Woods, who also expressed confidence that the Venezuelan government would make those changes “hand in hand” with the Trump administration.

But Woods added his company was “ready to put a team on the ground” to assess the current state of the country’s oil infrastructure “with the invitation of the Venezuelan government and with appropriate security guarantees.”

 

YET TO BE EXCERPTED

 

A31X04  FROM GUK

TRUMP PROMISES OIL COMPANIES ‘TOTAL SAFETY’ IN VENEZUELA AS HE URGES THEM TO INVEST BILLIONS

Country is ‘uninvestable’ today, president told, but CEOs signal they are ready to spend with support

By Lauren Aratani in New York  Fri 9 Jan 2026 17.07 EST

 

Donald Trump promised oil giants “total safety, total security” in Venezuela in an effort to persuade them to invest $100bn in the country’s infrastructure after US forces toppled Nicolás Maduro from power.

At a roundtable press conference at the White House on Friday afternoon with more than a dozen oil executives, including leaders from Chevron, ExxonMobil and ConocoPhilips, the US president doubled down on claims that Maduro’s arrest presents American oil companies with an unprecedented opportunity for extraction.

Many of the executives expressed support for the Trump administration’s actions in Venezuela last weekend – and hinted that they stood ready to invest.

Analysts have expressed skepticism that oil firms will invest vast sums as rapidly as Trump has suggested they will. Earlier this week, the president suggested production in Venezuela could be boosted within 18 months.

“We’re going to be extracting numbers in terms of oil like few people have seen,” he said on Friday, emphasizing that the US stands to benefit from lower energy prices. “Venezuela is going to be very successful, and the people of the United States are going to be big beneficiaries.”

Notably, Trump said the investment would be coming from the oil companies, not the federal government. Earlier in the week, he had suggested that the US taxpayer might fund their investments.

“The plan is for them to spend, meaning our giant oil companies will be spending at least $100bn of their money, not the government’s money,” Trump said. “They don’t need government money, but they need government protection and government security.”

Trump warned the assembled executives that, if they aren’t interested in rebuilding efforts: “I got 25 people that aren’t here today that are willing to take your place.”

While he offered them “total safety”, the president also suggested some of the oil firms present did not need the US government’s help. “These are people that drill oil in some pretty rough places,” he said. “I could say a couple of those places make Venezuela look like a picnic.”

In brief remarks, oil executives – for many, the first public statements since Maduro’s capture – expressed willingness to rebuild Venezuela’s oil infrastructure with the US government’s reassurances.

Chevron “has been a part of Venezuela’s past, we are certainly committed to its present, and we very much look forward as a proud American company to help it build a better future”, said Mark Nelson, vice-chair of Chevron, currently the only US major that regularly exports Venezuelan oil.

Nelson said the company currently had 3,000 employees across four different joint ventures in Venezuela and that it had the capacity to “increase our liftings from those joint ventures 100% essentially, effective immediately”.

Darren Woods, Exxon’s chief executive, said the company expected “significant changes” to Venezuela’s legal and commercial landscapes in order for the company to reinvest in the country. “Today it’s uninvestable,” he said.

“We’re confident that with this administration and President Trump, working hand in hand with the Venezuelan government, that those changes can be put in place,” Woods said.

The ConocoPhillips CEO, Ryan Lance, echoed the cautious optimism, saying that “there’s an opportunity to be quick, fast and restore the quality of what’s been lost in Venezuela over the last 25 years”.

Lance also noted that ConocoPhillips is Venezuela’s largest non-sovereign credit holder, with the country holding $12bn in debt to the company. Though Trump assured the company that it will get its money back, “we’re going to start with an even plate”.

“We’re not going to look at what people lost in the past, because that was their fault. That was a different president. We’re going to make a lot of money, but we’re not going to go back,” he said.

Venezuela’s oil reserves are reputedly the world’s largest. While the country’s oil industry experienced a boom in the late 90s and early 2000s, the then Venezuelan president, Hugo Chávez, eventually reasserted state control over the industry in the mid-2000s. In the years since, oil production in the country has fallen drastically as its infrastructure aged and investment dried up.

Though Maduro is being tried in US federal court on “narco-terrorism” charges, Trump has been very enthusiastic about Venezuela opening back up to the American oil industry. On Wednesday, the White House said that it planned to control Venezuela’s oil “indefinitely” and that it would sell billions of dollars’ worth of recently seized crude oil.

History from the last two decades has shown that foreign intervention can have an impact on a country’s oil output, but with mixed and unstable results.

Oil is experiencing a global surplus. Average US gas prices are now about 25 cents lower than last year.

 

          Legal

          X06  Senate defeats Invasion 2

A32X06  FROM NBC

Senate advances measure to restrict Trump's power to use military force in Venezuela

Democratic Sen. Tim Kaine, who led the bipartisan resolution, said that Trump's actions in Venezuela are "clearly illegal" because he did not seek congressional approval.

By Sahil Kapur and Frank Thorp V   Jan. 8, 2026, 11:42 AM EST / Updated Jan. 8, 2026, 1:05 PM EST

 

WASHINGTON — The Senate fired a warning shot at President Donald Trump, voting Thursday to advance a bipartisan resolution to block him from using military force “within or against Venezuela” unless he gets prior approval from Congress.

The vote of 52-47 on the war powers measure came after an unsuccessful plea by Republican leaders to sink it and preserve Trump’s authority, as he threatens a “second wave” of attacks on Venezuela. Trump has declared that the U.S. would “run” the country temporarily after he ordered a military operation last week to capture and extradite leader Nicolás Maduro.

Five Republicans joined all 47 Democrats in voting yes on the motion to advance the resolution to the Senate floor.

White House defends seizure of oil tanker linked to Venezuela

The legislation, led by Sen. Tim Kaine, D-Va., was co-sponsored by Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., Sen. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y.

“Instead of responding to Americans’ concerns about the affordability crisis, President Trump started a war with Venezuela that is profoundly disrespectful to U.S. troops, deeply unpopular, suspiciously secretive and likely corrupt. How is that ‘America First?’” Kaine said. “Trump’s war is also clearly illegal because this military action was ordered without the congressional authorization the Constitution requires.”

The procedural motion Thursday sets up a full Senate vote on the measure next week; that will also require a simple majority and is expected to pass. It is subject to House approval and a presidential signature, making it unlikely to become law. But it sends a significant message to Trump that could impact his foreign policy moves going forward — in Venezuela and other countries.

“To my Senate colleagues: Enough is enough,” Kaine said. “You were sent here to have courage and to stand up for your constituents. That means no war without a debate and vote in Congress.”

Along with Democrats and Paul, the Republicans who voted for the measure were Sens. Susan Collins of Maine, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, Todd Young of Indiana and Josh Hawley of Missouri.

Trump slammed those five Republicans, calling their votes an act of “stupidity.”

“Republicans should be ashamed of the Senators that just voted with Democrats in attempting to take away our Powers to fight and defend the United States of America. Susan Collins, Lisa Murkowski, Rand Paul, Josh Hawley, and Todd Young should never be elected to office again,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. “This Vote greatly hampers American Self Defense and National Security, impeding the President’s Authority as Commander in Chief.”

Paul said some members of Congress want to “shift the burden of initiating war to the president” rather than take responsibility.

“But make no mistake, bombing another nation’s capital and removing their leader is an act of war, plain and simple,” the Kentucky Republican said. “No provision in the Constitution provides such power to the presidency.”

The vote represents an early test of Republicans’ appetite to slap limits on Trump’s power to use military force after his capture of Maduro. Trump has suggested he is open to U.S. boots on the ground there and also threatened Iran, Greenland and Colombia on Sunday, adding that Cuba “is ready to fall.”

“I believe invoking the War Powers Act at this moment is necessary, given the President’s comments about the possibility of ‘boots on the ground’ and a sustained engagement ‘running’ Venezuela, with which I do not agree,” Collins said in a statement.

Murkowski said Congress must “affirm our role under Article 1.”

Ahead of the vote, Senate Majority Whip John Barrasso, R-Wyo., urged senators to reject the war powers measure, calling the U.S. military capture of Maduro a law enforcement operation.

“It does not make America stronger. It makes America weaker and less safe,” Barrasso said in a written statement. “It would weaken the President’s legitimate, constitutional authority. This body, the United States Senate, is being asked whether the President of the United States has the authority to arrest indicted criminals. Of course he does.”

         

 

Political

          X02  T blames 5 traitors for above

A33X02 FROM IUK

Republicans break ranks to halt future Trump attacks on Venezuela

Five GOP senators break ranks to pass War Powers resolution as Democrats fall into line

By John Bowden in Washington, D.C. Thursday 08 January 2026 19:04 GMT

A group of Republican senators delivered Donald Trump a message of opposition to begin the new year as they voted to limit the president’s ability to launch new attacks on Venezuela.

Five members of the president’s party broke ranks to support a War Powers Act resolution sponsored by Sen. Tim Kaine, a Democrat from Virginia, aimed at preventing the White House from using resources to support further military action inside Venezuela following the capture of the country’s leader Nicolas Maduro. The new resolution blocks the president from using the military against Venezuela without authorization from Congress.

One of them, Josh Hawley (R-Mo.), denied that his vote was not a rebuke of the president: “This is all about going forward. If the president should determine, you know what, I need to put troops on the ground in Venezuela, I think that wouldn't require Congress.”

But after Thursday, a vote of 52-47 now stands as one of the largest shows of Republican resistance on Capitol Hill so far during Trump’s second presidency.

And the president clearly didn’t feel the same way. He quickly dropped a bomb on the wayward Republicans, naming them on Truth Social and writing that “Republicans should be ashamed of the Senators that just voted with Democrats...Susan Collins, Lisa Murkowski, Rand Paul, Josh Hawley, and Todd Young should never be elected to office again.”

The resolution passed with a greater showing of Republican support than had manifested for a similar resolution in the fall, which took place before the raid on Venezuela’s capital to capture Maduro. Just one Democrat, John Fetterman, expressed support for the president’s actions in response to the Maduro raid, but even he fell into line and voted with his party Thursday.

Just two Republicans previously voted to restrict the president’s warmaking in the fall, as a campaign of military strikes against small boats the U.S. has accused of being used for drug smuggling escalated in the Caribbean: Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, and Rand Paul of Kentucky.

Three of their colleagues joined them this week. Sens. Susan Collins, Josh Hawley and Todd Young voted in the affirmative, and indicated to reporters that the capture of Maduro changed the calculation.

The legislation will be sent to the House, and can still be vetoed if it reaches the president’s desk.

White House officials including the president have refused to take the use of U.S. forces, including a ground invasion, off the table to stabilize Venezuela in the wake of Maduro’s capture.

Paul spoke to reporters after the vote and was equally averse to describing it as a firm break with the president.

“I think it's part of the healthy debate that we have in a republic,” he contended.

But the senator admitted that lawmakers and Americans alike were spooked by the rhetoric coming out of the White House, both from Trump who indicated that he’ll pursue potential efforts at regime change or efforts to stop drug trafficking elsewhere, and the likes of Stephen Miller and Karoline Leavitt who repeatedly refused this week to rule out a military invasion of Greenland, which is controlled by a fellow Nato member-state.

Trump and his allies have been cagey about details regarding his future plans for the Western Hemisphere. He has reignited calls for the U.S. to acquire Greenland, while pointedly not ruling out military force and drawing condemnations from European leaders, who say such an act would shatter the NATO alliance. Officials have also revealed only the hints of a solid plan for Venezuela’s future amid questions of who the administration views as the country’s rightful leader, when elections will be held and whether the U.S. has plans to take over or seize parts of Venezuela’s oil reserves.

“I think it concerns people the more they hear loose rhetoric like, Columbia, you're next green Greenland, you're next. Watch out. And so the more it becomes that, well, that the President can make these decisions without any kind of authorization from Congress. I think that's starting to worry more people,” said Paul.

Paul did not answer when asked by The Independent whether he would support similar legislation, introduced by Sen. Ruben Gallego, to restrict military force against Greenland. But he and other lawmakers in both chambers have warned against such saber-rattling from the White House.

“[A]ny effort to claim or take the territory by force would degrade both our national security and our international relationships,” wrote Murkowski, one of Thursday’s yes votes, on Wednesday evening.

Todd Young, her colleague, added of his yes vote on Thursday: “Although I remain open to persuasion, any future commitment of U.S. forces in Venezuela must be subject to debate and authorization in Congress.

“President Trump campaigned against forever wars, and I strongly support him in that position. A drawn-out campaign in Venezuela involving the American military, even if unintended, would be the opposite of President Trump’s goal of ending foreign entanglements,” the Indiana Republican wrote in a statement.

The Senate’s vote follows an all-senators briefing on the subject earlier in the week and complaints from Democrats that the administration gave no forewarning, including to lawmakers with intelligence backgrounds, regarding the strike.

Members of the opposition party who exited the briefing on Wednesday said that the president planned to “steal” Venezuela’s oil “at gun point,” while the future of the country remained unclear.

“This is an insane plan. They’re talking about stealing Venezuelan oil at gunpoint for an undefined period of time to micromanage an entire country,” claimed Sen. Chris Murphy, a Democrat from Connecticut, as he spoke with reporters after Wednesday’s briefing. “The scope and insanity of this is absolutely stunning.”

Even some Republicans who voted against the War Powers resolution on Thursday expressed the need for the administration to guarantee stability within Venezuela in the immediate term, and expressed doubts that American energy companies would make long-term investments without that guarantee. Those with concerns included Thom Tillis, who excoriated the White House this week over rhetoric from Miller and others about Greenland.

“I think [success] depends largely on whether or not we can help the President by passing legislation that sustains the effort. Because, frankly, if we don't do that, why on earth would anybody in the energy sector invest in something that may only be a stable it may be stable for three years?” Tillis asked.

 

ATTACHMENTS TO EXCERPT

@trump piracy

A34 From wiki

The United States Pirate Party[3] (USPP) is an American political party founded in 2006 by Brent Allison and Alex English.[4] The party's platform is aligned with the global Pirate movement, and supports reform of copyright laws to reflect open source and free culture values, government transparency, protection of privacy and civil liberties. The United States Pirate Party also advocates for evidence-based policyegalitarianismmeritocracy and the hacker ethic as well as the rolling back of corporate personhood and corporate welfare. The USPP has also made a priority to advocate for changes in the copyright laws and removal of patents. It is the belief of the party that these restrictions greatly hinder the sharing and expansion of knowledge and resources.[5]

The party's national organization has existed in multiple incarnations since its 2006 founding. Its most recent is the Pirate National Committee (PNC), formed in 2012 as a coalition of state parties. The PNC officially recognizes Pirate parties from 10 states,[3] and tracks and assists in the growth of more state parties throughout the United States. The board of the USPP is the board of the PNC. The chair of the Pirate National Committee is known as the "Captain". The current Captain is Jolly Mitch.[6]

 

ATTACHMENT 35 From abc 7/14/16

Former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich made an unusual move and decided to publicly describe both himself and Donald Trump as “pirates,” perhaps as a reference to their at-times rogue decisions in the political sphere.

“I told him quite directly that I thought that he had a choice between having two pirates on the ticket, or having a pirate and a relatively stable, more normal person,” Gingrich said today during a Facebook live session while talking about Trump’s decision to choose a running mate -- with sources saying the choice is likely between Gingrich and Indiana Gov. Mike Pence.

 

A36 HERALD STANDARD  ATTACHMENT @ From the herald-standard, uniontown, pa 1/14/2026

Trump’s invasion of Venezuela was the easy part

Jan 14, 2026 By RACHEL MARSDEN 5 min read

 

Here we go again. Another U.S. President promises to fix things at home but, once in office, gets distracted by the irresistible thrill of overseas regime change. Americans are tired of it, including Trump himself, at least until he realized that playing pirate is way more fun than running a country.

Kidnapping the internationally recognized head of a sovereign nation by having U.S. special forces drag him out of bed in the dead of night, stuff him into a plane and fly him to New York isn’t exactly a “big win.” Just ask anyone who remembers the initial cheering in Vietnam, Korea, Iran, Iraq, Guatemala, Chile, Afghanistan, Somalia, the Philippines or Libya — before everything went sideways.

A victory for democracy, say European leaders desperate for Trump to commit U.S. troops to babysit their own while they do air squats and burpees in a post-ceasefire Ukraine so they won’t have to worry about Russia showing up when things inevitably go belly-up.

Now that Trump has proof of concept in Venezuela, he’s talking about seizing Greenland for “national security” — part of the EU and Danish territory ever since the U.S. got the Danish West Indies in the 1919 deal (renamed the U.S. Virgin Islands). But who cares about boring history when you can re-enact the age of swashbuckling high seas hijinks? Does Amazon sell black eye patches?

Europeans, not wanting to elicit Trump’s wrath, are reduced to pleading for him to respect international law while applauding its violation in Venezuela “for democracy.” Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni even stroked his ego, praising his “very assertive methods.”

When actions and words ignore common sense and European leaders start tiptoeing around phrases like “unilateral overthrow,” you can bet corruption is involved. For decades, European leaders have sold out their citizens to the same globalist neocon agenda of U.S.-led regime change that Trump just revived. The only thing annoying them now is the bull’s eye he’s aiming directly at them.

The America some cheer as being “so back” isn’t the America that Trump promised his voters. Nobody wanted him to “run Venezuela” for oil like a cartel jefe.

Speaking of which, how is that going to work when Maduro’s old team is still running the country? Team Trump says that the Venezuelan leadership must sell its oil to the U.S. and cut ties with Russia and China, with the unspoken threat that they’re next if they resist.

Trump already ousted one Venezuelan leader only to admit that the opposition puppets the neocons backed didn’t actually have the respect of the Venezuelan people. So who else is left to run the place? Secretary of State Marco Rubio in his fifth role in this administration? Might as well slap a Venezuelan presidential sash on him.

Any puppet propped up by Trump will serve Trump, not Venezuelans. So what will the people do? Stand by politely while American multinationals scoop up their natural resource wealth? History screams otherwise.

Chevron is already in-country, but Exxon Mobil and ConocoPhillips sound like they’d rather wrestle an alligator than deal with Trump’s latest nation-building project. “Uninvestable,” says Exxon’s CEO.

Team Trump treats Venezuelan oil like it’s American just because Big Oil once had to suffer through nationalization. How to avoid such a disaster from repeating itself? Maybe don’t invade, to start.

It’s a hard-learned lesson, apparently, but it might be starting to catch on. Chevron has recently endured attacks in the Niger Delta and the blowback from its resulting security crackdown.

And how many U.S. oil companies are left in Afghanistan after nearly two decades of U.S. occupation, now that the Taliban is back in charge? Hint: it’s a whole integer between – one and one.

France’s TotalEnergies learned the hard way in Mozambique with war crimes allegations, and suspended operations after attacks.

NGOs pursued them for violating the rights of locals in Uganda and Tanzania. Perenco had to abandon infrastructure in Guatemala under public pressure.

Trump says that the U.S. government will handle security this time. No doubt the locals will be thrilled to finally have a flag slapped on the faces that they’ll be aiming at — whether contractors or uniformed forces.

And then there’s the issue of Maduro. If he wins this show trial in New York and Trump has to put him back on the shelf, will he get a private ride home or have to fly economy back to Caracas? Earlier accusations that he led the Cartel de Los Solos were quietly dropped. The Justice Department now admits it doesn’t even exist.

No fentanyl charges either. But he did have weapons. Maybe even an entire army, since he was president. Now they’ll hope that a judge buys the gymnastics of kidnapping a leader and dragging him to trial abroad without an extradition treaty, all while ignoring Trump’s 90-minute televised diatribe insisting that it’s really about the oil.

Not a single Trump voter asked for any of this, but one of the early beneficiaries appears to be pro-Israel philanthropist and billionaire hedge-funder Paul Singer, who donated $5 million to Trump and now stands to turn his recent bargain-basement purchase of Venezuela’s U.S.-based refineries, designed for the country’s heavy crude, into a potential billionaire payday.

America First, indeed. If you’re in the donor class.

(Rachel Marsden is a columnist, political strategist and host of independently produced talk shows in French and English. Her website can be found at [http://www.rachelmarsden.com.)]http://www.rachelmarsden.com.)

 

 

 

TIMELINES and TAKEAWAY ATTACHMENTS from the CAPTURE of NICOLAS MADURO

 

ATTACHMENT “A” – FROM the NEW YORK TIMES

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 2:24 a.m. ET

 

Explosions Are Reported in Venezuela’s Capital

It was not immediately clear what caused the blasts. The United States has been building pressure on Nicolás Maduro, Venezuela’s authoritarian president, for months.

 

Maduro Arrives in N.Y.; Trump Says U.S. Will ‘Run’ Venezuela

Nicolás Maduro, the ousted president of Venezuela, arrived in Brooklyn and will be held on drugs and weapons charges. The country’s interim leader demanded his return.

Published Jan. 3, 2026Updated Jan. 5, 2026, 3:56 p.m. ET

Follow the latest updates on the U.S. military action in Venezuela and the capture of President Nicolás Maduro.

 

By Anatoly Kurmanaev and Tyler Pager

Venezuela’s president, Nicolás Maduro, was taken to New York City on Saturday to face federal drug charges, hours after the U.S. military seized him and his wife in a swift and overwhelming strike on Caracas, the culmination of a campaign by President Trump and his aides to oust him from power.

Late Saturday, Mr. Maduro arrived in Brooklyn and will be held at the Metropolitan Detention Center, according to a law enforcement official with knowledge of Maduro’s movements but who was not authorized to speak about the matter.

At least 40 people, including civilians and soldiers, were killed in the attack in Venezuela, according to a senior Venezuelan official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe preliminary reports. More than 150 U.S. aircraft were dispatched to knock out air defenses, so that military helicopters could deliver the Special Operations forces who assaulted Mr. Maduro’s compound at 2 a.m. local time, U.S. officials said. The whole operation took two hours and 20 minutes.

Hours after the raid, Mr. Trump said at a news conference the United States would “run the country” until a “safe, proper and judicious transition” of power could be arranged, raising the prospect of an open-ended military commitment. He did not say whether U.S. forces would occupy the country, although he added he was not afraid of “boots on the ground.”

Mr. Maduro’s aides appeared to still be in power after the attack. There were no obvious signs of a U.S. military presence in Venezuela on Saturday afternoon, and Venezuela’s top officials and state news media projected a message of defiance.

Mr. Maduro, a self-described socialist, had led Venezuela since 2013, when the country’s previous authoritarian leader, Hugo Chávez, died. The Biden administration accused Mr. Maduro of stealing the election that kept him in power last year.

Mr. Maduro’s vice president, Delcy Rodríguez, who was sworn in as interim president at a secret ceremony in Caracas, said in a national address that Washington had invaded her country under false pretenses and that Mr. Maduro was still Venezuela’s head of state.

“There is only one president in this country, and his name is Nicolás Maduro Moros,” said Ms. Rodríguez, appearing with her defense minister and other officials.

The main opposition leader, María Corina Machado, posted a statement urging that her political ally, Edmundo González, be recognized as Venezuela’s president immediately. Though Mr. Maduro claims he defeated Mr. González in the last election, the United States and other international observers say the election was marred by fraud. “Today we are prepared to enforce our mandate and take power,” said Ms. Machado, who was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize last year.

Mr. Trump avoided fully embracing either Ms. Rodriguez or Ms. Machado. He said his secretary of state, Marco Rubio, had spoken to Ms. Rodriguez and “she’s essentially willing to do what we think is necessary to make Venezuela great again.” He also said Ms. Machado didn’t have the support or respect to lead the country.

One thing Mr. Trump made clear was his desire to open up Venezuela’s vast state-controlled oil reserves to American oil companies. He spoke at length at the news conference about American oil companies rebuilding the country’s energy infrastructure and, presumably, regaining rights they once held to Venezuela’s vast oil reserves.

“We are going to run the country right,″ Mr. Trump said. “It’s going to make a lot of money.” Past Venezuelan governments, he said, “stole our oil” — an apparent reference to the country’s nationalization of its oil industry.

Here is what else to know:

·         Anti-American protests: Hours after Mr. Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, were captured by U.S. forces, Venezuela’s state-run television was broadcasting rallies and protests taking place across several cities, including the capital, Caracas. Mr. Maduro’s supporters vowed to defend their country from what they described as an illegal attack and the kidnapping of their “legitimate” leader. ›

·         C.I.A. involvement: American special operations forces captured Mr. Maduro with the help of a C.I.A. source within the Venezuelan government who had monitored his location in recent days, according to people briefed on the operation. Mr. Trump posted an image of Mr. Maduro in custody aboard the U.S.S. Iwo Jima, one of the American warships that have been prowling the Caribbean, and said he and his wife would be taken to New York.

·         Cartel accusations: A new indictment was unsealed by a federal judge in New York City, charging Mr. Maduro, his wife and four others with four counts, including narco-terrorism, conspiracy to import cocaine and possession of machine guns. The indictment was similar to the one unveiled in March 2020.

·         Military buildup: Before the strikes on Saturday, the Pentagon had amassed troops, aircraft and warships in the Caribbean. The U.S. military has attacked many small vessels that U.S. officials maintained were smuggling drugs, killing at least 115 people. And the C.I.A. conducted a drone strike on a port facility in Venezuela last month, according to people briefed on the operation. The United States has also carried out a campaign against tankers carrying Venezuelan crude, throwing the country’s oil industry into disarray and jeopardizing the government’s main source of revenue.

Genevieve Glatsky contributed reporting from Bogotà, Colombia, and Annie Correal from Mexico City.

 

Jan. 4, 2026, 12:14 a.m. ETJan. 4, 2026

Anatoly KurmanaevTyler PagerSimon Romero and Julie Turkewitz

Anatoly Kurmanaev reported from Venezuela, and Tyler Pager from Palm Beach, Fla.

How Trump fixed on a Maduro loyalist as Venezuela’s new leader.

Image

 

Vice President Delcy Rodríguez of Venezuela, now the country’s interim leader, speaking at the United Nations General Assembly in New York in 2019.Credit...Brittainy Newman for The New York Times

It was one dance move too many for Venezuela’s President Nicolás Maduro.

Mr. Maduro in late December rejected an ultimatum from President Trump to leave office and go into a gilded exile in Turkey, according to several Americans and Venezuelans involved in transition talks.

This week he was back onstage, brushing off the latest U.S. escalation — a strike on a dock that the United States said was used for drug trafficking — by bouncing to an electronic beat on state television while his recorded voice repeated in English, “No crazy war.”

Mr. Maduro’s regular public dancing and other displays of nonchalance in recent weeks helped persuade some on the Trump team that the Venezuelan president was mocking them and trying to call what he believed to be a bluff, according to two of the people, who spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to talk about the confidential discussions.

So the White House decided to follow through on its military threats.

On Saturday, an elite U.S. military team swooped into Caracas, the capital, in a pre-dawn raid and whisked Mr. Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, to New York to face drug trafficking charges.

Weeks earlier, U.S. officials had already settled on an acceptable candidate to replace Mr. Maduro, at least for the time being: Vice President Delcy Rodríguez, who had impressed Trump officials with her management of Venezuela’s crucial oil industry.

The people involved in the discussions said intermediaries persuaded the administration that she would protect and champion future American energy investments in the country.

“I’ve been watching her career for a long time, so I have some sense of who she is and what she’s about,” said one senior U.S. official, referring to Ms. Rodríguez.

“I’m not claiming that she’s the permanent solution to the country’s problems, but she’s certainly someone we think we can work at a much more professional level than we were able to do with him,” the official added, referring to Mr. Maduro.

It was an easy choice, the people said. Mr. Trump had never warmed up to the Venezuelan opposition leader María Corina Machado, who had organized a winning presidential campaign in 2024, earning her the Nobel Peace Prize this year. Since Mr. Trump’s re-election, Ms. Machado has gone out of her way to please him, calling him a “champion of freedom,” mimicking his talking points on election fraud in the United States and even dedicating her Peace Prize to him.

It was in vain. On Saturday, Mr. Trump said he would accept Ms. Rodríguez, saying that Ms. Machado lacked the “respect” needed to govern Venezuela.

U.S. officials say that their relationship with Ms. Rodríguez’s interim government will be based on her ability to play by their rules, adding that they reserve the right to take additional military action if she fails to respect America’s interests. Despite Ms. Rodríguez’s public condemnation of the attack, a senior U.S. official said that it was too soon to draw conclusions about what her approach would be and that the administration remained optimistic that they could work with her.

Mr. Trump declared on Saturday that the United States intended to “run” Venezuela for an unspecified period and reclaim U.S. oil interests, an extraordinary assertion of unilateral, expansionist power after more narrow, and also contested, arguments about stopping the flow of drugs.

In Ms. Rodríguez, the Trump administration would be engaging a leader of a government that it had routinely labeled illegitimate, while abandoning Ms. Machado, whose movement won a presidential election last year in a victory widely recognized as stolen by Mr. Maduro.

And it was not immediately clear if Ms. Rodriguez would even play along. In a televised address, she accused the United States of making an illegal invasion and asserted that Mr. Maduro remained Venezuela’s legitimate leader.

To retain leverage, senior U.S. officials said, restrictions on Venezuelan oil exports would remain in place for now.

But others involved in the talks expressed hope that the administration would stop detaining Venezuelan oil tankers and issue more permits for U.S. companies to work in Venezuela in order to revive the economy and give Ms. Rodríguez a shot at political success.

Ms. Rodríguez, 56, arrives at the job of Venezuela’s interim leader with credentials of an economic troubleshooter who orchestrated the country’s shift from corrupt socialism to similarly corrupt laissez-faire capitalism.

She is the daughter of a Marxist guerrilla who won fame for kidnapping an American businessman. She was educated partly in France, where she specialized in labor law.

She held middling government posts in the government of Mr. Maduro’s predecessor, Hugo Chávez, before being promoted to bigger roles with the help of her older brother Jorge Rodríguez, who eventually became Mr. Maduro’s chief political strategist.

Ms. Rodríguez managed to stabilize the Venezuelan economy after years of crisis and slowly but steadily grow the country’s oil production amid tightening U.S. sanctions, a feat that earned her even the grudging respect of some American officials.

As Ms. Rodríguez consolidated control over economic policy and eliminated rivals, she built bridges with Venezuela’s economic elites, foreign investors and diplomats, to whom she presented herself as a soft-spoken technocrat and a contrast to the burly security officials forming most of the rest of Mr. Maduro’s inner circle.

Those alliances have borne fruit in recent months, earning her powerful champions that helped to cement her rise to power. On Saturday, her assumption of power was greeted with cautious optimism by some of Venezuela’s captains of industry, who said in private that she had the skills to create growth, if she could persuade the United States to relax its chokehold on the country’s economy.

For all her technocratic leanings, Ms. Rodríguez has never denounced the brutal repression and corruption sustaining Mr. Maduro’s rule, once calling her decision to join the government an act of “personal revenge” for her father’s death in prison in 1976, after being interrogated by intelligence agents from pro-U.S. governments.

Ms. Rodríguez’s capacity for negotiating across Venezuela’s ideological chasm could prove useful in easing tensions. Juan Francisco García, a former ruling party lawmaker who has since broken with the government, said he had some apprehensions about her ability to govern but gave her the benefit of the doubt.

“History is full of sectors and figures linked to dictators who have, at some point, served as a bridge to stabilize the country and transition to a democratic scenario,” Mr. García said.

The contradictions enveloping Ms. Rodríguez were on display on Saturday when she addressed the nation.

While Mr. Trump said that Ms. Rodríguez had been sworn in as Venezuela’s new president, it was clear that Mr. Maduro’s supporters — including Ms. Rodríguez herself if her remarks are taken at face value — still see him as Venezuela’s leader.

Spotlighting the potential challenges ahead, even the text on Venezuelan state television labeled her as vice president. People close to the government said those displays of loyalty were a necessary public relations strategy to pacify the ruling party loyalists, including in the armed forces and paramilitary groups, who were reeling from the military humiliation inflicted by the United States on their country and the destruction and death caused by the attack. At least 40 Venezuelans died, both civilians and soldiers, according to a senior Venezuelan official.

U.S. forces managed to descend into the capital largely unopposed, destroy at least three military bases and grab the country’s president from a heavily guarded compound, without any loss of American life.

Still, the Trump administration has chosen to give Mr. Maduro’s vice president a chance and to pass over Ms. Machado, who won the Nobel Prize and had

Ms. Machado, a conservative former member of the National Assembly from an affluent Venezuelan family, boasts decades-long ties to Washington.

She has spent the last year courting Mr. Trump’s support and trying to enlist his help in ousting Mr. Maduro. She has openly supported his military campaign in the Caribbean and mostly refrained from commenting on his policies toward Venezuelan migrants.

On Saturday, after Mr. Trump announced that the U.S. military had captured Mr. Maduro, she released a statement saying that she was ready to lead. “Today we are prepared to assert our mandate and seize power,” she wrote in a message she posted on X.

But roughly two hours later, Mr. Trump said they had not spoken. It would be “very tough” for Ms. Machado to take control of her country, Mr. Trump said, adding in his televised speech that she was a “very nice woman” but “doesn’t have the support” in Venezuela to lead.

A spokeswoman for Ms. Machado declined to comment.

“For Trump, democracy is not a concern — it is about money, power, and protecting the homeland from drugs and criminals,” said Michael Shifter, a senior fellow at the Inter-American Dialogue, a research institute in Washington.

In his speech to the nation, Mr. Trump also made no mention of Edmundo González, the retired diplomat who became Ms. Machado’s political surrogate after she was barred from running. Mr. González, who is in self-imposed exile in Spain, is considered the legitimate winner, by a wide margin, of the 2024 election, even though Venezuelan authorities handed the victory to Mr. Maduro.

Eric Schmitt contributed reporting from Washington, and María Victoria Fermín, Mariana Martínez and Isayen Herrera from Caracas, Venezuela.

 

Venezuela

Sources: Verified videos and photos (strike locations); Venezuela’s communications ministry (states where attacks occurred)

By Agnes Chang, Christiaan Triebert and Pablo Robles/The New York Times

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 11:13 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Yan Zhuang

Restrictions on U.S.-controlled airspace over the Caribbean that took effect as the U.S. military intervened in Venezuela will expire at midnight, Secretary of Transportation Sean Duffy said on social media. The restrictions forced airlines to adjust schedules and cancel flights to and from destinations like Puerto Rico, St. Lucia and Barbados.

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 9:35 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Miles G. Cohen

Reporting from Brooklyn

A police officer who provided security outside of Metropolitan Detention Center ahead of Maduro’s arrival told demonstrators over a loudspeaker that the ousted president had been ushered inside the facility. The crowd cheered and began to sing and wave Venezuelan flags.

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 9:23 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Maria Abi-Habib and Frances Robles

Maria Abi-Habib is based in Mexico City, and Frances Robles reported from Florida.

‘What will happen tomorrow?’ Venezuelans fear chaos after U.S. attack.

How Venezuelans Worldwide Reacted to Overthrow of Maduro

2:14

For Venezuelans living abroad, news of the U.S. military intervention and President Nicolás Maduro’s capture triggered a wide spectrum of emotions, ranging from joy to anger and uncertainty.

Like many Venezuelans, José, an entrepreneur based in Mexico City, voted against Nicolás Maduro in Venezuela’s election in 2024. He was dismayed when Mr. Maduro clung to power, amid accusations of widespread fraud and nationwide opposition protests. But when he awoke Saturday to the news that Mr. Maduro had been ousted in a U.S. military operation, he felt only dread.

“It is bittersweet,” said José, 35, who withheld his last name fearing reprisal against his family in Venezuela from the government. He was worried the majority of his family, who has always voted against Mr. Maduro, will experience further political and economic instability, upending his own plans to return to Venezuela.

“The first thing on my mind isn’t, ‘We are free and I’m so happy,’” he said. “It is, ‘What will happen tomorrow?’ Maduro is just one part of a much bigger machine.”

Mr. Maduro was a deeply unpopular leader and was accused of stealing the election in 2024. An independent exit poll and a tally of votes by the opposition appeared to show that he lost decisively, 66 percent to 31 percent.

“Nobody wants an invasion,” said Beatrice Rangel, who was the chief of staff for Venezuela’s former president Carlos Andrés Pérez. “No one wants a foreign power in their country. I have always been against such interventions.”

Ms. Rangel said that in that posting she had tried to convince Panama’s president, Manuel Noriega, to resign. Her government was opposed to the U.S. coup that ultimately overthrew him.

But with Venezuela today, she said, “There was no other way to remove Maduro without the U.S.”

Still, the Trump administration’s incursion into Venezuela recalled the many U.S.-backed coups that have destabilized Latin America in recent decades.

“This has been my fear from Day 1, that Trump thought this was going to be easy, that once Maduro goes there will be pixie dust, rainbows and everyone is happy,” said Brian Naranjo, who served as the deputy chief of mission at the U.S. Embassy in Caracas from 2014 to 2018.

José and many other Venezuelans have wanted Mr. Maduro out, but they worry that the United States has no plan for a peaceful transition of power and that the South American nation could descend into chaos — with a collection of regional guerrilla groups biting off territory and rival government factions fighting for power.

Many Venezuelans who oppose Mr. Maduro are also wary of Delcy Rodríguez, the vice president who Mr. Trump said had been sworn in as interim president on Saturday, but who appeared loyal to Mr. Maduro in her remarks the same day.

And the fact that the U.S. intervention left Maduro’s inner circle in office fueled concern that his government would not go without a fight.

One teacher in the city of Maracaibo, whose brother was killed by pro-government paramilitary forces, said she had cried with joy when she heard Mr. Maduro had been ousted. But her delight was short-lived, ending when she learned that Ms. Rodríguez would remain at the helm.

Indeed, Mr. Trump has barely spoken about democracy since U.S. forces captured Mr. Maduro in an early morning raid on Saturday, nor has he laid out a detailed transition plan. He was, however, adamant that the administration will receive a more lucrative deal on Venezuelan oil.

That added to the fury among supporters of Mr. Maduro’s government on Saturday.

“Anyone who celebrates an invasion of the gringos is a traitor,” said Alberto González, 42, a government worker in Sucre, a state on the northeast coast of Venezuela.

“They’re going to steal everything from us and humiliate us,” he said. “The country is independent, and we cannot accept Donald Trump coming here to tell us what to do and kidnapping the president.”

To many Venezuelans and analysts, Mr. Trump’s focus on oil reserves draws similarities to the U.S. invasion of Iraq in 2003. Then President George W. Bush declared “mission accomplished” just six weeks after the invasion — only for Iraq to descend into a brutal civil war that killed thousands of Iraqis and U.S. troops.

On Saturday while addressing reporters, Mr. Trump said that the United States will “run” Venezuela, but the country is roughly twice as large as California in square miles and filled with mountains and dense forests. Analysts say that the United States does not have sufficient forces in the Caribbean to prop up a Venezuelan government of Washington’s choosing, despite Mr. Trump’s threats to do so.

And compared to the jubilation that greeted U.S. troops on the streets of Baghdad after Saddam Hussein’s fall in 2003, the roads of Caracas were chillingly silent on Saturday, save for a few small demonstrations organized by the government to protest Mr. Maduro’s ouster.

José Villalobos, a security guard who was a strong supporter of Mr. Maduro’s predecessor, Hugo Chávez, who had led the country’s socialist-inspired “Bolivarian revolution,” said that he had cried when he heard of Mr. Maduro’s arrest.

“I’m afraid the revolution will end and that the rich won’t want to help the poor anymore,” he said of the movement spearheaded by Mr. Chávez.

Mr. Villalobos has been receiving financial support from the Venezuelan government and from a community council, he said, and he is worried about rising food prices.

“I know food is expensive and that we’re struggling,” he said, “but I’m a revolutionary, and as Commander Chávez said, nobody here surrenders.”

Many Venezuelans inside the country may be too afraid to publicly cheer Mr. Maduro’s capture given the uncertainty of what happens next. On Saturday, Ms. Rodríguez gave a speech defiant of the Trump administration, saying that Mr. Maduro remained the “only president” of Venezuela.

Regional threats also loom. A prominent Colombian rebel group is active in the border region of Venezuela and could destabilize the country if there is a power vacuum in Caracas, according to former U.S. diplomats and analysts.

“What is the plan? Key regime people are still in place,” Mr. Naranjo said, adding, “this lack of certainty favors the regime that has been opposed to democracy, not the opposition that has embraced democracy.”

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 9:05 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Miles G. Cohen

Reporting from Brooklyn

As the ousted Venezeulan leader arrived in Brooklyn, law enforcement officers sprinted to a parking lot behind the Metropolitan Detention Center where he will be held. Nearby, about 100 demonstrators, many draped in Venezuelan flags, cheered from behind police barricades. Among them was Jaky Coronado, 45, who arrived in the United States more than a year ago. She waited for four hours to catch a glimpse of Maduro. “He must pay for all the crimes against humanity that he has committed against the Venezuelan people,” she said.

Image

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 8:46 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Chelsia Rose Marcius

A helicopter carrying Nicolás Maduro has landed in Brooklyn near the Metropolitan Detention Center, where he will be held, according to a law enforcement official with knowledge of Maduro’s movements but who was not authorized to speak about the matter

 

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 8:43 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Jack Nicas

Reporting from Mexico City

Maduro’s final plea: ‘No war. Yes peace.’

 

Two nights before his capture, Nicolás Maduro was driving around Caracas, making a plea to the American public.

“The American people should know that here they have a friend — a friendly, peaceful nation — and a friendly government, too,” he said, looking into the camera during a New Year’s Eve interview with a Spanish journalist, conducted as Mr. Maduro gave a tour by car of his nation’s capital.

“Our message is very clear: ‘No war. Yes peace,’” he added, offering a slogan in English that he had been repeating for weeks. He then handed the journalist, Ignacio Ramonet, a red hat in the style of the Make America Great Again cap with those same words.

The hourlong drive on New Year’s Eve was Mr. Maduro’s last known interview, broadcast on Venezuelan state television just hours before American forces swooped into Caracas and captured him, and it provided a final glimpse into the mind of the Venezuelan autocrat as the U.S. military was pressing in.

As he steered a silver Toyota S.U.V. with his wife, Cilia Flores, in the back seat, Mr. Maduro boasted about his success running Venezuela and accused President Trump of devising pretexts to invade his nation. Most of all, he made clear that he had no interest in a fight.

“For Venezuela to be great, we don’t have to hurt anyone,” he said. “Just like the United States. They want to be ‘great again.’ Well, let them be great through hard work, effort, and a commitment to peace — not through threats and war. Enough is enough.”

The line echoed Mr. Maduro’s effort to cast himself as a peace-and-love president of sorts in recent months. In rallies across Venezuela, he sang “Imagine” by John Lennon, danced to a techno beat paired with his peace slogan, and mimicked Bobby McFerrin in his famous tune encouraging listeners to relax.

In other words, if Winston Churchill had “Keep Calm and Carry On” in the face of a foreign threat, Mr. Maduro was trying “Don’t Worry, Be Happy.”

Mr. Maduro has also frequently been defiant, however, saying that Venezuela would defend its homeland against what he called imperial forces.

But in his New Year’s Eve interview, even as the U.S. military had him in their sights, Mr. Maduro said he was eager to make a deal.

“The U.S. government knows this because we’ve told many of their officials,” he said. “If they want to have a serious conversation about an antidrug agreement, we’re ready. If they want Venezuelan oil, Venezuela is ready for U.S. investment — like with Chevron — whenever, wherever, and however they want. People in the U.S. should know that if they want comprehensive economic development agreements, Venezuela is right here.”

Secretary of State Marco Rubio questioned whether Mr. Maduro had actually been interested in a deal. “Nicolás Maduro had multiple opportunities to avoid this,” he said in a news conference on Saturday. “He was provided multiple very, very, very generous offers, and chose instead to act like a wild man, chose instead to play around.”

Mr. Trump has repeatedly called Mr. Maduro a cartel leader, and federal prosecutors on Saturday charged the Venezuelan politician and his wife, Ms. Flores, with narco-terrorism and conspiracy to import cocaine.

In his interview with Mr. Ramonet, Mr. Maduro rejected those accusations, instead saying that his government had fought cartels from Colombia — with lethal force, just like Mr. Trump. He said that Venezuelan forces had downed 431 aircraft trafficking drugs over its territory, though it was not clear over what period of time he was referring to.

“Our model is effective, exemplary and highly efficient,” he said. “Everything else you hear is just a narrative that even people in the United States don’t believe.”

He said that the U.S. government had invented the accusation that Mr. Maduro was a cartel leader to justify invading Venezuela. “They can’t accuse me or Venezuela of having weapons of mass destruction, or nuclear missiles, or chemical weapons, so they invented an accusation that the U.S. government knows is just as false as the W.M.D. claims that led them into an eternal war,” he said. “They know it’s a lie. I believe we need to set all that aside and start talking seriously.”

Mr. Trump on Saturday said that he had spoken to Mr. Maduro “a couple of times,” including last week. Mr. Maduro denied reports of a more recent conversation, saying in the Wednesday interview that he spoke with Mr. Trump once, on Nov. 21, in a 10-minute, “very respectful” call.

“It was actually quite a pleasant conversation, though the developments following that call have not been pleasant,” he said. “We shall see. I leave everything in God’s hands.”

While the U.S. government was already planning his capture, Mr. Maduro was pointing out attractions in Caracas to Mr. Ramonet, a Spanish author who wrote authorized biographies of Fidel Castro and Hugo Chávez, the dual leftist icons of Cuba and Venezuela. There was the plaza where Mr. Castro had held a large rally in 1959, the avenue that Mr. Chávez had filled during his campaign in 2012, and the statue holding aloft a Soviet flag.

Mr. Ramonet said this was the 10th consecutive year that he had interviewed Mr. Maduro, and that he had shown the successes of Mr. Maduro’s government that the international media sought to hide.

“For the Western media, direct democracy doesn’t exist” in Venezuela, Mr. Maduro replied. “I challenge them to debate in any neighborhood in Caracas they want, with our people, not with me. Let them debate the people, so they can see how a new democracy is being built.”

Mr. Maduro’s government has for years suppressed and censored journalists in Venezuela and helped control state-media broadcasts.

As Mr. Maduro drove, he also reminisced about his travels in the United States. “New York, Boston, Baltimore, Philadelphia, New Jersey, Queens, Manhattan, Washington,” he said. “I’ve driven there quite a bit. I told the U.S. President that: I know it well.”

On Saturday, Mr. Trump brought Mr. Maduro back to New York. He was expected to be held at the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn.

Mr. Maduro had something very different in mind for 2026. He said in the final hours of 2025 that this year would be about an important struggle.

“For 2026 — the year I’ve called the Year of the Great Challenge — we will overcome the turmoil and difficulties, and continue strengthening Venezuela as a country at peace,” he said.

“I surrender it all to God,” he added. “God knows what he’s doing.”


Jan. 3, 2026, 8:39 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Robert ChiaritoAdam Sella and Raúl Vilchis

Protests and celebrations in U.S. cities follow Maduro’s capture.

Americans took to the streets of Chicago and Washington on Saturday to protest the U.S. military intervention in Venezuela, even as Venezuelan migrants in New York gathered to celebrate the removal of Nicolás Maduro from power.

Holding signs that read “No Blood for Oil,” “No U.S. War on Venezuela” and “Hands Off Latin America,” a crowd of several hundred people gathered in Federal Plaza in Chicago as night fell. They called the operation to remove Nicolás Maduro, the ousted Venezuelan leader, an act of imperialism that Americans did not vote for, carried out without required Congressional approval.

“I’m 37 and grew up with the Iraq wars,” said Katrina Denny. “This morning, I was like, ‘Oh my God, we’re doing it again.’”

She said she thought that protests would grow if the Trump administration continued to use military force in Venezuela. “They filled half the plaza tonight on short notice, but this is only the beginning,” she said. “If this continues, I’m sure there will be many more events and larger ones.”

Many protesters expressed suspicion of the White House’s motives. “If Maduro wasn’t legally elected, that’s not for us to say,” said Adela Cruz, 51. “It just seems like a ploy to get oil.”

Jonny Bishop, 28, said he was worried for the men and women in the military. “As someone who teaches high school, my kids are the ones who may have to go to war,” he said, adding that with all of the other problems facing Americans, “going to war is the last thing we need.”

After the rally in Federal Plaza, the Chicago police allowed protesters to march up Dearborn Street to Wacker Drive, near Trump Tower Chicago.

In Washington, people on both sides of the issue gathered for separate afternoon rallies near the White House.

At one of them, dozens of opponents of the intervention chanted anti-Trump slogans. One of the organizers, Morgan Artyukhina, 38, said their message was “that this is a war that is being waged by the Trump administration, not just in contravention of U.S. law and international law, but also, falsely in the name of the American people.”

A few blocks away, a smaller group celebrated the capture of Mr. Maduro by U.S. troops.

Draped in a Venezuelan flag, Leonardo Angulo, 35, danced near a statue of Simón Bolivar, who helped free Venezuela from Spanish imperial rule. Mr. Angulo, who has lived in the United States for eight years, said he and his family came out “to celebrate, and gather with my people, because we share this feeling, this feeling of joy, of happiness, of hope most of all.”

Still, there was an undercurrent of anxiety, which one person in the crowd attributed to concerns that federal agents would appear and detain the Venezuelans present at the rally.

In New York, Venezuelan migrants described a mix of euphoria, relief and guarded hope after years of exile.

Beatriz Hernández danced in Times Square as a group of 100 gathered in Midtown, waving flags and calling family members back home.

Ms. Hernández, 60, said the moment felt transformative for the Venezuelan diaspora forced to emigrate because of poverty and lack of freedom during Maduro’s administration.

“It’s a great joy, the news we received,” said Ms. Hernández, who is originally from Maracaibo, Venezuela. “We haven’t slept since 3 a.m. It’s almost 6 p.m. and I don’t think we’ll be sleeping anytime soon because of the adrenaline.”

Ms. Hernández arrived in New York four years ago after a long journey that she said included crossing the Darién Gap on foot before reaching the U.S. border, where she requested asylum.

“The news is a hope of being able to return safely to our country,” she said. “I think that now I will be able to see my daughters who stayed there, and that in the not-too-distant future I will be able to return to my country and hug my sister.”

Lucia Coronel, 30, who is originally from Maracay, left Venezuela nine years ago and first emigrated to Colombia. She arrived in New York, where she requested asylum, three years ago.

“Now I don’t care about asylum,” Coronel said. “I feel a relief that opens up the possibility of returning to our homes voluntarily and safely. We didn’t emigrate by choice, we emigrated out of necessity.”

Other Venezuelans were more measured.

“We’ve gone through sadness and joy,” said Kimberly Castillo, 32, who is also from Maracay. “Sadness because nobody wants to see their country being bombed by another country. We are sad about the people who were caught in the middle, but are joyous knowing now there is the possibility for better times for my country.”

Robert Chiarito reported from Chicago and Adam Sella from Washington, D.C.

 

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 8:10 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Jazmine Ulloa

Venezuelan asylum seekers worry about what comes next.

Alejandro Marcano Santelli fled his home country in 2009 after receiving death threats. He had worked for a news outlet that opposed the Venezuelan government and its eventual leader, Nicolás Maduro, who was captured by the United States and brought to New York on Saturday to face drug charges.

Mr. Marcano Santelli, 57, who now lives in Miami, said a feeling of immense joy washed over him when he heard the news of Mr. Maduro’s removal from Venezuela.

More than 15 years ago, he and his family obtained asylum in the U.S. within days and, then, eventually, citizenship. With Mr. Maduro in power, however, Mr. Marcano Santelli had not been able to return to Venezuela, as his mother had lost her memory and died. He has not seen his brother in nearly two decades.

Still, he realized that the reaction in the community around him had been much more mixed, as the immigration status of many Venezuelans, a majority of whom have entered the United States in the past decade, has become increasingly tenuous.

“There is pain and happiness, but above all, worry,” Mr. Marcano Santelli said.

Nearly eight million Venezuelans have fled their troubled country, the largest exodus in Latin America’s modern history and one of the largest crises of forced displacement in the world. As of June 2025, about 1.1 million had come to live in United States, including about 600,000 immigrants through a humanitarian program known as Temporary Protected Status.

Many Americans did not begin paying attention to the plight of Venezuelans until migration levels reached record heights under the Biden administration. As local and state officials struggled to shelter and assist migrants in major cities and in overcrowded shelters along the southern border, President Trump campaigned on the promise of carrying out mass deportations of migrants.

Soon after taking office, Trump administration officials moved to end T.P.S. protection for Venezuelans, a decision the Supreme Court has allowed to stand for now as litigation continues. After the shooting of two National Guard members in Washington, D.C., the administration halted all asylum petitions and immigration applications filed for immigrants from 19 countries. The affected countries were those whose citizens it had restricted from travel to the United States earlier in the year, including Venezuela.

Tricia McLaughlin, the Department of Homeland Security’s assistant secretary, made clear in a statement to The New York Times on Sunday, that the administration had no intention of restoring the T.P.S. program, saying it had for decades “been abused, exploited, and politicized as a de facto amnesty program.”

Ms. McLaughlin added that Kristi Noem, the homeland security secretary, “will use every legal option at the Department’s disposal to end this chaos and prioritize the safety of Americans.”

Speaking to Fox News Sunday, Ms. Noem said every Venezuelan T.P.S. holder “has the opportunity to apply for refugee status” and that an evaluation would follow. But the Trump administration last year set the refugee admission cap for fiscal year 2026 to a historic low of no more than 7,500 refugees. The previous ceiling, set by the Biden administration, was 125,000.

Trump administration officials have framed the measures as efforts to combat fraud and abuse in the national immigration system and to enhance national security. Immigration lawyers and Venezuelan American leaders have countered that the moves have been tainted with racial animus and sought to falsely cast a broad swath of the Venezuelan diaspora as criminals and terrorists.

On Saturday, Mr. Trump repeated familiar talking points, conflating immigration with crime and drug trafficking, as he denounced gangs and criminal organizations that he said had inflicted crime and terror in American cities.

“As I’ve said many times, the Maduro regime emptied out their prisons, sent their worst and most violent monsters into the United States to steal American lives,” Mr. Trump said. At the same time, he added, among the most significant beneficiaries of the U.S. operation would be those who “got thrown out of Venezuela that are now in the United States.”

“Some want to stay, and some probably want to go back,” he said.

Adelys Ferro, a founder of the Venezuelan-American Caucus, a grass-roots group representing Venezuelan interests in the United States, said that, as some Venezuelans were taking to the streets to celebrate, some others were staying inside, worried about immigration raids.

Despite entering the country under humanitarian programs once considered safe and legal, their lives have been thrust into uncertainty, Ms. Ferro said.

“We are victims of the Nicolás Maduro regime, but we are also victims of the Trump administration policies,” she said.

In a statement on Saturday, Eileen Higgins, the newly elected mayor of Miami, called on the Trump administration to reinstate the T.P.S. program, describing the decision to end it as “dangerous, reckless and wrong.”

Homeland Security officials did not immediately respond to requests for comment about whether the administration would raise the refugee cap as it evaluates petitions from Venezuelan T.P.S. holders or whether T.P.S. holders will be able to apply for the status from within the United States. Under U.S. law, a person must apply from outside the country to be admitted as a refugee.

Legal challenges to the Trump administration’s efforts to rescind the T.P.S. program have been led by the Center for Immigration Law and Policy at the U.C.L.A. School of Law. Ahilan T. Arulanantham, a lawyer with the center, said the instability in Venezuela underscored why T.P.S. holders should be allowed to remain in the United States.

Declarations entered in the case say that Venezuelan T.P.S. holders pay taxes and contribute to Social Security, and that they tend to hold jobs and to obtain higher education at greater rates than the broader American population.

In Manhattan, José, a cook from Venezuela, said that he had applied for asylum and T.P.S. as soon as he arrived in the United States in 2022. His T.P.S. has expired, and his asylum case has been pending in bogged-down immigration courts.

Since his last hearing in December, he has had to wear an ankle monitor.

On Saturday, he said he was feeling overjoyed that Mr. Maduro had been toppled, but that he was concerned about what would come next in Venezuela. Mr. Maduro’s reign, for Venezuelans inside and outside the country, elicits memories of food shortages, poor public services and economic decline.

“We still don’t know what is going to happen,” said José, who asked that only his first name be used for fear of retaliation from immigration authorities. “I want to wait it out here.”

At a cafe in Queens on Saturday, Rose Ramírez, 28, of Guárico, Venezuela, said she had been experiencing indescribable emotions since videos of the bombing in her native country began circulating overnight.

“If I had to choose one word to describe this moment, I would say it’s one of great joy and hope that we will have a more prosperous country,” said Ms. Ramírez, while caring for her 4-month-old son, who was in a stroller.

But Ms. Ramírez, who arrived in New York a little over a year ago and was still seeking asylum, also said a new period of uncertainty was now beginning.

“I think we will continue to be in limbo,” she said. “I would like to think that there will now be better cooperation and a better understanding of our legal situation here, but the truth is that it will take time for order to be restored.”

Raúl Vilchis contributed reporting.

 

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 7:44 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Rylee Kirk

Speaking to CBS News, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said Americans will benefit from the capture of Nicolás Maduro. “We can ensure that we have access to additional wealth and resources, enabling a country to unleash that, without having to spend American blood,” he said.

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 7:37 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Patricia Mazzei

Reporting from Doral, Fla.

Three Republican members of Congress from South Florida, where many Venezuelans live, held a news conference on Saturday praising the Trump administration’s capture of Nicolás Maduro. Representative Maria Elvira Salazar said the United States was restoring democracy in Venezuela and elsewhere. “We’re not an occupying power — we are a liberating power,” she said. Representative Carlos A. Gimenez said the United States has been ignoring the region for “far too long.” “Protecting American lives,” he said. “Protecting American interests.”

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 7:20 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Chelsia Rose Marcius

Nicolás Maduro, the ousted president of Venezuela, arrived in New York City by helicopter just before 7 p.m. on Saturday, according to a law enforcement official briefed on on Maduro’s movements but not authorized to speak publicly about the matter. The helicopter touched down at a heliport along the Hudson River near 31st Street, on the west side of Manhattan.

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 7:26 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Tim Balk

After the helicopter arrived, a procession of vehicles flashing emergency lights headed downtown on the West Side Highway, which had been closed to southbound traffic.

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 7:17 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Frances Robles

In wake of U.S. strike, Venezuelan paramilitaries barely hit the street.

Groups of armed civilians known as colectivos have long been known to support the leftist Venezuelan government — often with violence — but it was unclear on Saturday what role the paramilitaries would take to support the ousted president.

In the early hours of Saturday, groups of armed men in civilian clothes had begun to appear on the streets in Caracas, but not in large numbers.

Several men in civilian clothes were seen just after daybreak guarding the Gen. Francisco de Miranda air base outside of Caracas when the airstrikes hit. The men did not allow photographers to work in the area.

Later, Venezuelan soldiers, who allowed photographs, guarded the post.

Two pickup trucks filled with men wearing vests and civilian clothes, carrying gas cans as well as long weapons and handguns, were seen unloading outside the Centro Ciudad Comercial Tamanaco, a shopping mall near the air base that had been hit hours earlier. And in Cumaná, Sucre, a state about 250 miles east of Caracas, one resident reported seeing a caravan of colectivo members drive by, which sowed fear in the community.

Experts said it was notable that the thousands of armed men dispersed throughout the country seemed to be keeping a relatively low profile. However, the colectivos are often used to repress protests, and very few Venezuelans left their homes in the wake of the airstrikes Saturday.

Government officials who are still in power are probably eager to show the Trump administration that they can maintain order, and do not want images of chaos in the streets, said Alejandro Velasco, a Latin America historian at New York University, who is Venezuelan. Their only bargaining chip to stay in power is the ability to keep the peace, he said.

“I have to imagine colectivos have been given the order to lay low,” Mr. Velasco said.

Venezuela has long used the armed civilians to fight back against protesters. They have been known to work alongside police or military forces with no consequences for the excessive or even fatal force often used.

Their precise numbers are impossible to ascertain, but there are at least thousands of them throughout the country, Mr. Velasco said. They are funded by the government and often maintain public-sector jobs, although their true missions are as enforcers.

When protesters hit the streets in large numbers last summer after the Maduro administration announced that it had won the elections — contrary to what poll watchers had tallied — colectivos were unleashed throughout the country to repress protesters.

They originated as pro-government community organizations that have long been a part of the landscape of leftist Venezuelan politics. Experts say the civilians are essentially state-sanctioned paramilitaries, often used to fight back against protests, whether by students, labor unions or others.

The groups date back to the early days of President Hugo Chávez, who conceived them as social organizations to advance his vision of a socialist revolution to transform Venezuela’s poor neighborhoods.

About 300 colectivo members gathered Saturday afternoon at a pro-government rally a few blocks from Miraflores, the presidential palace. Several speakers went up on a stage to denounce the attack.

By early afternoon, they had yet to come out in large numbers throughout the city — particularly since no Venezuelans were in the streets to support the U.S. attack.

President Nicolás Maduro of Venezuela has low approval ratings, and it was unlikely that he had enough support outside the colectivos to show force on the streets, as Mr. Chávez did when he was briefly ousted in 2002, according to a leading human rights activist who spoke anonymously to avoid reprisals.

On Saturday, the colectivos appeared to have been deployed only at the organized rallies that government supporters held in several locations, he said.

 

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 7:13 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Genevieve Glatsky and Annie Correal

Reporting from Bogotá, Colombia, and Mexico City

The U.S. has indicted Maduro on charges of cocaine smuggling. Experts say Venezuela’s role in that trade is modest.

The United States unsealed an indictment on Saturday against Venezuela’s president, Nicolás Maduro, that charges him with narco-terrorism and conspiracy to import cocaine.

The four-count indictment also charges Mr. Maduro’s wife, his son, two high-ranking Venezuelan officials and an alleged leader of the Tren de Aragua group, a gang that the Trump administration designated as a terrorist organization last year. President Trump has said that Tren de Aragua operates in conjunction with Mr. Maduro’s government, a conclusion that U.S. intelligence agencies have contradicted.

The indictment states that Mr. Maduro and his allies worked for decades with major drug trafficking groups to move large quantities of cocaine to the United States.

It follows months of a steadily escalating pressure campaign against Mr. Maduro, which culminated in his capture by the U.S. military in Caracas, the Venezuelan capital. He arrived in New York on Saturday afternoon and will be flown in a helicopter to Manhattan for prosecution.

The pressure campaign began in September with lethal attacks by U.S. forces on small vessels that the Trump administration has said were carrying drugs from Venezuela to the United States. The administration has justified the attacks by saying the United States was in an armed conflict with drug cartels and vowed to destroy trafficking networks. Many experts say these strikes are illegal.

President Trump has asserted that the campaign is targeting drugs killing Americans, but most U.S. overdoses involve fentanyl, which doesn’t come from South America, experts say.

Fentanyl, which causes tens of thousands of overdoses per year, is almost entirely produced in Mexico using chemicals from China, according to U.S. authorities, and Venezuela plays no known role in its trade, nor does any other South American country.

The indictment unsealed Saturday focuses almost entirely on Venezuela’s decades-long role in the cocaine trade. It accuses Mr. Maduro and co-conspirators of working closely with some of the region’s largest drug trafficking groups, in Colombia and in Mexico. They include groups such as the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia, known by its Spanish acronym FARC, and the Sinaloa Cartel, which are also designated by the United States as terrorist organizations.

Experts, however, have said Venezuela is not a major drug producer and have described it as a minor cocaine transit country, with most of the cocaine flowing through Venezuela heading to Europe, not the United States.

The majority of the cocaine bound for the United States is believed to move not through the Caribbean but through the Pacific, according to data from Colombia, the United States and the United Nations. Venezuela does not have a Pacific Coast.

While the indictment states that Venezuela was shipping 200 to 250 metric tons of cocaine a year by around 2020, that represents only about 10 percent to 13 percent of the global cocaine trade. Other countries play a much larger role. In 2018, 1,400 metric tons passed through Guatemala, according to U.S. data.

There is evidence that Mr. Maduro has benefited from the drug trade to stay in power. Both the indictment and experts say he also used profits from drug trafficking to secure the loyalty of military officials and leaders in his party.

 

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 7:02 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

The New York Times

A senior Venezuelan official says at least 40 people, including military personnel and civilians, were killed in the U.S. attack.

At least 40 people were killed in the U.S. attack on Venezuela early Saturday, including military personnel and civilians, according to a senior Venezuelan official who spoke on condition of anonymity to describe preliminary reports.

President Trump, speaking on Fox News on Saturday, said that no American troops had been killed. He suggested, however, that some service members had been injured. Gen. Dan Caine, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said later in the day at a news conference at Mar-a-Lago with Mr. Trump that U.S. helicopters moving to extract President Nicolás Maduro and his wife had come under fire. He said that one helicopter had been hit but “remained flyable,” and that all U.S. aircraft “came home.”

About half a dozen soldiers were injured in the overall operation to capture Mr. Maduro, according to two U.S. officials, who spoke on the condition of anonymity.

In the immediate aftermath of the U.S. attack, details began to emerge of the death of a Venezuelan civilian in Catia La Mar, a low-income coastal area just west of the Caracas airport. There, an airstrike hit a three-story civilian apartment complex and knocked out an exterior wall early Saturday as U.S. forces assaulted the city.

The strike killed Rosa González, 80, her family said, and seriously wounded a second person.

In the afternoon, a government investigator was present in the area of the strike, interviewing witnesses and picking up projectiles.

Wilman González, Ms. Gonzalez’s nephew, said he ducked when heard the strike at about 2 a.m. but nearly lost an eye. He had three stitches on the side of his face.

Mr. González, who appeared numb hours later, showed journalists where the U.S. ordnance had hit. Asked where he would go now that he lost his home, he said simply, “I don’t know.” He spoke little as he bent down and searched for whatever valuables he could salvage. He picked up an old umbrella and carried a set of drawers.

The strike left the interior of an apartment exposed to the public. Among the wreckage was a portrait of Venezuelan independence hero Simón Bolívar that looked like it had been riddled with shrapnel.

One neighbor, a 70-year-old man named Jorge who declined to give his last name, said he lost everything in the airstrike.

Several people were gathered outside on Saturday afternoon while others searched what remained of their apartments. Most were barely speaking.

Some of the residents outside were praying. Others were angry.

One man, who gave his name as Javier, blamed greed for the attack on Venezuela, an apparent reference to the Trump administration’s stated desire to let American companies take control of Venezuelan oil fields. The lives of people like him, he said, meant nothing.

The residents said that four men had tried to rescue Ms. González after the airstrike. They carried her onto a motorbike and took her to a hospital, but she was declared dead on arrival.

Another woman was also taken to the hospital; residents were later told that she had survived, but was in critical condition.

Frances Robles and Mariana Martínez contributed reporting.

 

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 6:39 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Sarah Nir

Reporting from Stewart Air National Guard Base in New York

A small group of protesters gathered at the edge of the Stewart Air National Guard Base. One boy had a Venezuelan flag draped around his shoulders as the group watched for any sign of ousted President Nicolás Maduro, who had arrived earlier. Alexander Silva, 36, a warehouse worker from Newburgh, N.Y., who fled Venezuela in 2022, brought his family to witness history. “I wanted them to see that this really had happened,” Silva said in Spanish, “that the dictatorship had been demolished.”

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 6:36 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Jonah E. Bromwich

A pardon and a prosecution in New York show Trump’s personal geopolitics.

Two Latin American strongmen were charged in Manhattan with corrupting their governments, using state power to import hundreds of tons of cocaine into the United States.

One, the former president of Honduras, Juan Orlando Hernández, was abruptly pardoned by President Trump last month.

The other, President Nicolás Maduro of Venezuela, was captured on Saturday in a military raid that Secretary of State Marco Rubio characterized as a law enforcement operation. Mr. Maduro was brought to the United States to face fresh allegations of narco-terrorism.

The divergent fates of the two men accused of similar crimes by the same prosecutor’s office underscore the way President Trump and his aides are using the federal justice system to conduct a highly personalized geopolitics.

Mr. Trump, when asked on Saturday about his December pardon of Mr. Hernández in light of the operation against Mr. Maduro, made no attempt to disguise his feelings about Mr. Hernández: He saw himself in the imprisoned president.

“The man that I pardoned was, if you could equate it to us, he was treated like the Biden administration treated a man named Trump,” Mr. Trump said, adding, “This was a man who was persecuted very unfairly. He was the head of the country.”

The contradiction prompted an outcry from the president’s political opponents. “You cannot credibly argue that drug trafficking charges demand invasion in one case, while issuing a pardon in another,” Senator Mark Warner, Democrat of Virginia, said in a statement on Saturday.

The U.S. attorney’s office for the Southern District of New York has long been the most prominent federal prosecutor’s office in the country and for years was known for its independence from Washington. It took on Wall Street, prosecuted high-ranking political officials from both parties and, in 2022, charged the ex-president of Honduras in what authorities would later characterize as “one of the largest and most violent drug-trafficking conspiracies in the world.”

Two years later, prosecutors asked a judge to ensure that Mr. Hernández died in prison, saying that he had abused his power, had connections to violent traffickers and was responsible for the “unfathomable destruction” cocaine had caused in the United States. Mr. Trump pardoned him nonetheless.

“Trump thinks he can use federal criminal prosecutions for any purpose, which is to say to promote his foreign policy views, to promote his vendettas, to promote his self-interest and to promote his perceived political interests,” said Bruce Green, a former federal prosecutor who teaches legal ethics at Fordham Law School in New York.

Mr. Rubio, asked about the contradiction on ABC News on Sunday, referred questions to the White House, given that he was not involved in the pardon of Mr. Hernández.

“The president outlined yesterday that he felt that in that particular case there was unfairness,” Mr. Rubio said.

Pushed by the anchor, George Stephanopoulos, who emphasized Mr. Hernández’s conviction by a jury, Mr. Rubio appeared to grow frustrated. He said again he was not involved. When Mr. Stephanopoulos asked whether he supported the pardon, Mr. Rubio declined to comment, again citing his lack of familiarity with the specifics of the case.

Both the Hernández and Maduro cases began as Drug Enforcement Administration investigations around 2010, were investigated by the same D.E.A. unit and were handled by the same investigative unit in the Southern District.

Each prosecution was led at various stages by Emil Bove III, who eventually rose to lead the office’s terrorism and international narcotics unit. After leaving the office, Mr. Bove became a criminal defense lawyer for Mr. Trump and then a top Justice Department official. He is now a judge on the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.

The factual similarities in the cases are striking. It is not just that the charges resemble one another; prosecutors also accused both men of overseeing key way stations in the same hemispheric trade.

Taken together, the indictments provide a bird’s-eye view of the supply chain that for years has brought processed cocaine from Colombia and Venezuela to shipment points in Honduras and, ultimately, to the United States.

Mr. Hernández was charged in 2022 with conspiring to import cocaine into the United States and using machine guns as part of that conspiracy. The charges unveiled against Mr. Maduro on Saturday also include a cocaine importation conspiracy and possession of machine guns as part of it. The combination of the trafficking and gun charges makes the potential penalties in such prosecutions more severe.

In 2020, Mr. Maduro was one of six defendants charged with participating in a narco-terrorism conspiracy, with prosecutors accusing him of leading a drug-trafficking organization known as Cártel de los Soles. Venezuelans have used the phrase for years, a reference to a sun insignia that high-ranking Venezuelan military personnel wear on their uniforms.

Mr. Maduro, that indictment said, “coordinated foreign affairs with Honduras and other countries to facilitate large-scale drug-trafficking.” The newly unsealed indictment was even more specific, saying that the shipment points in Honduras — as well as in Guatemala and Mexico — relied on a “culture of corruption,” in which traffickers paid off politicians for protection and help.

One of those politicians, prosecutors persuaded a jury, was Mr. Hernández. Jurors in 2024 convicted him of having received millions from drug-trafficking organizations throughout the region.

When Mr. Hernández was extradited, Tegucigalpa, the Honduran capital, erupted in celebration, and, after his conviction, expatriates rejoiced outside the Manhattan courthouse. But after pardoning Mr. Hernández last month, Mr. Trump defended the decision, saying it was the will of Hondurans.

“The people of Honduras really thought he was set up, and it was a terrible thing,” he said.

Mr. Hernández’s wife has said he would not immediately return to Honduras, where authorities have issued a warrant for his arrest.

David Smilde, a professor at Tulane University in New Orleans who has studied Venezuela for decades and lived in the country part-time until last year, said that the prosecution of Mr. Maduro might be perceived differently by the eight million Venezuelans who live outside the country, compared with the roughly 30 million who are still there.

The diaspora, he said, might thrill to the prosecution, viewing Mr. Maduro as a Saddam Hussein-like figure whose capture could bring an end to the Venezuelan regime.

People who live in the country, Mr. Smilde said, were likely to be less moved, given that several Venezuelans were prosecuted in recent years, only to be returned to their home countries by the Biden administration. They include two nephews of Mr. Maduro’s wife who were convicted on drug charges in 2015 but released in exchange for Americans.

“With the U.S. justice system and its inconsistency in recent years, it’s not as big a deal as it used to be,” Mr. Smilde said.

 

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 6:32 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Carol Rosenberg

National Security reporter

Ousted President Nicolás Maduro and his wife were transferred to the United States on Saturday via the U.S. Navy base at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, where the F.B.I. had a government plane waiting to take them to Stewart Air National Guard Base north of New York City, according to a U.S. official familiar with the operation who was not authorized by the White House to speak publicly.

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 6:23 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Zolan Kanno-Youngs and David E. Sanger

White House reporter

In toppling Maduro, Trump risks blowback from his ‘America First’ base.

For months, a significant segment of President Trump’s political base has been complaining that he has spent far too much time on foreign policy — seeking a Ukraine deal and addressing a long list of other conflicts he claims to have settled — and too little on America’s economic anxieties.

His announcement on Saturday that the United States had captured Venezuela’s leader and would “run” the country for an indefinite period is adding fuel to that fire. As the scope of the operation was becoming clear on Saturday, critics said Mr. Trump risked getting the United States into the kind of open-ended conflict that he had railed against for years.

“This is what many in MAGA thought they voted to end,” Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, a former Trump ally turned critic, posted on social media. “Boy were we wrong.”

Mr. Trump, who has pledged to cease “endless wars” and reduce the number of American troops overseas, left open the prospect of deployment to Venezuela — something that he has spoken of only vaguely in the past. Speaking to reporters, he said the United States was “not afraid of boots on the ground,” adding that the administration planned to have a military presence in the nation “as it pertains to oil.”

“We’re going to rebuild the oil infrastructure,” Mr. Trump said in comments that stunned some Republicans who questioned how the vague plans squared with a commitment to refrain from military intervention and regime change. “We’re going to run it properly and make sure the people of Venezuela are taken care of.”

Mr. Trump in the past has risked alienating his base over military action, particularly in the run-up to his Iran strikes in June. Yet the targets in Iran were three underground nuclear sites, enabling Mr. Trump to launch a high-risk bombing raid from the other side of the world, bury the stockpiles of uranium and return home. The uproar died down.

What happened in Caracas, however, was different.

Mr. Trump decapitated the Venezuelan government and made no secret of the fact that the United States planned to pull the strings.

“We’re going to run the country right,” Mr. Trump said on Saturday. “It’s going to be run very judiciously, very fairly. It’s going to make a lot of money.”

With those words, Mr. Trump adopted a version of what former Secretary of State Colin Powell used to call the “Pottery Barn rule,” which boils down to you-break-it-you-bought-it. That did not necessarily mean a standing U.S. military force in Venezuela, similar to what the United States kept in Iraq and Afghanistan. But it did suggest continuing political intervention, with at least the threat of a military backup.

Mr. Trump said on Saturday that his administration was “prepared to do a second wave” after the first attack in Venezuela, but for now it was not necessary.

Matthew Bartlett, a Republican strategist and former State Department official under Mr. Trump, said the plan to run Venezuela was “just jaw dropping.”

“That is not something that the president has laid out, certainly during the campaign and even during the last few months,” Mr. Bartlett said.

Ultimately, the extent of any backlash may depend on what happens next.

“This is the difficult part,” said Dave Carney, a Republican strategist who ran Preserve America, a pro-Trump super PAC. “Nobody wants a quagmire. Nobody wants, you know, body bags coming back to Dover of American solders who are being sniped at from, you know, a rebellious minority in Venezuela.”

“If it goes on for three years, it will be negative,” Mr. Carney said. But if the presence in Venezuela lasts months, Mr. Trump “will be celebrated.”

In Florida, home to the largest Venezuelan community in the United States, many did in fact respond to the capture of Venezuela’s leader, Nicolás Maduro, by celebrating in the streets. And many Republicans appeared ready to stand by Mr. Trump, including Senator Mike Lee of Utah, who initially seemed critical of the operation.

Mr. Lee later said in a social media post that after speaking to Secretary of State Marco Rubio he believed the military action “we saw tonight was deployed to protect and defend those executing the arrest warrant” of Mr. Maduro.

The operation in Venezuela was also met with support from the foreign policy hawks that have long been a target of the MAGA movement.

“I’m grateful to the U.S. personnel who carried out orders in harm’s way,” said Senator Mitch McConnell, Republican of Kentucky. “A free, democratic and stable Venezuela, led by Venezuelans, is in America’s national security interests.”

Mr. Trump’s aides have said that military action against Venezuela is aligned with his campaign promises by arguing that Mr. Maduro fueled domestic crises in the United States, including gang violence and a surge of drug overdoses caused by fentanyl.

The fentanyl that fueled America’s overdose crisis is, however, manufactured in Mexican labs using chemicals from China. The U.S. intelligence community also earlier this year undercut Mr. Trump’s claim that Mr. Maduro sent members of the Tren de Aragua gang to the United States, saying that the gang was not controlled by the Venezuelan leader.

Laura Loomer, the far-right activist and Trump ally who supported the Iran attack, joined Tucker Carlson and others in opposing the operation in Venezuela, maintaining that Americans will ultimately pay the price.

“Maybe soon we will see an invasion of Venezuela so that” Maria Corina Machado, the Venezuelan opposition leader who won the Nobel Peace Prize in 2025, “can assume power in a country she will never be able to run without U.S. assistance.” The result, Ms. Loomer said, would be to pave the way for China, among others, to gain a deeper foothold.

Such views get to a central argument: Who owns the definition of America First?

Mr. Trump, who first played with the term in a New York Times interview in 2016, has said that he invented it — he didn’t — and therefore he gets to define it. Some of his MAGA faithful clearly believe otherwise.

But at the core of the dispute is the fact that Mr. Trump is no isolationist, even if many of his backers are.

The person who could face future political ramifications of a prolonged military presence in Venezuela is Vice President JD Vance, who is widely thought to be Mr. Trump’s heir to the MAGA movement. He was not present at Mr. Trump’s news conference on Saturday.

Mr. Vance, who monitored the operation in Venezuela by video conference, has in the past pushed for military restraint.

“No more undefined missions; no more open-ended conflicts,” Mr. Vance told a graduating class at the U.S. Naval Academy earlier this year.

On Saturday, Mr. Vance expressed support for the military intervention.

“The president offered multiple off-ramps, but was very clear throughout this process: The drug trafficking must stop, and the stolen oil must be returned to the United States,” Mr. Vance said on social media. “Maduro is the newest person to find out that President Trump means what he says.”

Whether all of Mr. Trump’s supporters agree may be another matter.

 

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 6:05 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

William K. Rashbaum and Benjamin Weiser

Maduro is expected to make his first court appearance in Manhattan.

 

The cases of Nicolás Maduro, the Venezuelan president, and his wife will move on Monday from the secretive realm of military special operations into the mundane world of Federal District Court in Lower Manhattan, where at noon they are to stand before a judge and face charges of drug-trafficking conspiracy and other crimes.

Their appearance will be the first step in what undoubtedly will be a yearslong prosecution, after a stunning change of scene from Mr. Maduro’s presidential palace in Caracas to the grim and grimy reality of pretrial detention in a Brooklyn federal jail.

Because of the extraordinary nature of the case, what happens next will be predictable in some ways, and perhaps far less so in others.

The arraignment on Monday will occur before the presiding judge in the case, Alvin K. Hellerstein, and Mr. Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, are expected to enter pleas of not guilty. The judge will almost certainly order them detained. And it could be well over a year before a jury is seated to weigh the evidence against them.

But the prosecution of a leader of a sovereign nation snatched from his country in a highly choreographed military operation will most likely lead to arguments seldom heard in an American courtroom. Mr. Maduro’s lawyers might challenge, for example, the legality of his arrest and removal to the United States. They also could argue that as Venezuela’s leader, he is immune from prosecution.

What to Expect

Such initial hearings are often brief. Although the proceedings can vary, the judge will advise Mr. Maduro and Ms. Flores of their rights and ask how they plead.

The indictment released on Saturday charges Mr. Maduro with narco-terrorism conspiracy and conspiracy to import cocaine, among other counts. Ms. Flores is charged in the cocaine conspiracy. The charges carry stiff sentences if the defendants are convicted.

At the hearing, a prosecutor typically summarizes the evidence, such as recordings, documents and other materials seized in searches. There may be discussion of what kinds of motions the defense will file to challenge the government’s case.

The judge is likely to address the issue of pretrial detention, and under the circumstances, almost certainly will order that the defendants be held without bond pending trial. The defense can also raise concerns about conditions at the Metropolitan Detention Center, a troubled lockup that has held other high-profile detainees.

And the judge will ask the prosecutors and the defense lawyers how much time they will need to prepare for trial.

The Setting

The case will play out in the Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States Court House, an imposing 27-story tower of granite, marble and oak on the edge of Chinatown. Security is always tight in and around the building, and Mr. Maduro’s presence there will doubtless bring a marked increase.

The court is part of the Southern District of New York, which has been the site of trials of accused terrorists, Mafia figures and corrupt politicians. A former Honduran president, Juan Orlando Hernández, was extradited to New York in 2022 and tried and convicted two years later in the courthouse. (Mr. Hernández was pardoned recently by President Trump.)

The Players

Prosecutors with the U.S. attorney’s office for the Southern District, led by Jay Clayton, will handle the case of Mr. Maduro and Ms. Flores. It is being prosecuted by assistant U.S. attorneys assigned to the office’s National Security and International Narcotics Unit. The charges stemmed from a lengthy and extensive investigation by the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration.

Defense lawyers play a pivotal role in any criminal case. But because the Maduro prosecution is sure to raise difficult and complex issues — from the legality of his arrest to sovereign immunity to disputes over the possible role of classified evidence — his choice of lawyers and the strategy they chart will be crucial.

It is unclear who will represent Mr. Maduro and Ms. Flores. .

Judge Hellerstein, 92, was appointed to the federal bench in 1998 by President Bill Clinton and recently presided over President Trump’s attempts to move his Manhattan criminal conviction into federal court, a matter that is still pending.

The Stakes

For the government, the stakes of the prosecution of Mr. Maduro could hardly be higher. The Trump administration has made it clear that it went to extraordinary lengths to capture him in Caracas and bring him to New York to face trial, unleashing the full might of the U.S. military.

And the case is interwoven with aspects of President Trump’s domestic and foreign policies — which, like the attack Saturday morning, have come under harsh criticism.

His focus on immigration has leaned heavily into a narrative that frequently cites the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua — which Mr. Trump has tied to Mr. Maduro — as one of the reasons to pursue mass deportations. At the same time, the administration has pointed to the gang to justify its campaign of deadly military strikes on small boats in the Caribbean Sea and eastern Pacific Ocean that it says are hauling drugs linked to Venezuela. The administration has designated Tren de Aragua as a foreign terrorist organization.

While Mr. Trump has said that Tren de Aragua operates in conjunction with Mr. Maduro’s government, it is a conclusion that U.S. intelligence agencies have contradicted.

At stake for Mr. Maduro is his freedom. If convicted, he could face between 30 years and life in prison.

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 5:48 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Genevieve Glatsky

Reporting from Bogotá, Colombia

Who is Cilia Flores, the power broker first lady captured alongside Maduro?

When news broke that the United States had captured and indicted Venezuela’s longtime authoritarian president, Nicolás Maduro, another name appeared alongside his that left some observers puzzled: his wife’s, Cilia Flores.

Far more than a first lady, Ms. Flores is one of Venezuela’s most powerful political figures. She built extraordinary influence over decades while largely operating from the shadows. Ms. Flores shaped a judicial system in which nearly every major decision ran through her and embedded state institutions with relatives and loyalists, according to journalists, analysts and former officials. At the same time, they noted, her family amassed vast, unexplained wealth.

A lawyer from a lower middle class background, Ms. Flores began her political rise in the 1990s, becoming close to Hugo Chávez — the former president who was Mr. Maduro’s mentor and predecessor — while he was imprisoned after a failed coup attempt in 1992. She steadily climbed the ranks of Chávez’s socialist movement, known as chavismo, becoming a central figure in Venezuela’s legislature.

Ms. Flores and Mr. Maduro have been partners since at least the late 1990s, when both were lawmakers. They married in 2013, the year he became president. After Mr. Chávez’s death, she was widely seen as critical to consolidating and sustaining Mr. Maduro’s hold on power, bringing a loyal political base and deep institutional influence.

Within chavismo, she commands both respect and fear, said Roberto Deniz, a Venezuelan investigative journalist who has reported extensively on the Flores family.

“She is a fundamental figure in corruption in Venezuela — absolutely fundamental — and especially in the structure of power,” said Zair Mundaray, who worked a senior prosecutor under both Mr. Chávez and Mr. Maduro. “Many people consider her far more astute and shrewd than Maduro himself.”

In an interview published in the Spanish newspaper La Vanguardia in 2013, Ms. Flores called herself a “combatant” and defended hiring relatives.

“My family got in based on their own merits,” she said. “I am proud of them, and I will defend their work as many times as necessary.”

Though she stopped holding formal government posts after 2013, Ms. Flores retained immense behind-the-scenes authority. She is often described as a key architect of Mr. Maduro’s political survival.

“Within chavismo itself, they know the real power that Cilia Flores has, more so than perhaps the general public,” Mr. Deniz said.

Ms. Flores is also widely believed to wield decisive influence over Venezuela’s justice system. Many judges and senior officials are thought to be loyal to her or have been placed through her networks. The judiciary is considered thoroughly politicized, having failed to issue a single ruling against the state in more than two decades.

“It is a completely politicized, flawed, corrupt judicial system, and Cilia Flores bears a great deal of responsibility for what the Venezuelan judicial system has become,” Mr. Deniz said.

Investigative journalists have documented extensive corruption involving the Maduro-Flores family, including misuse of public funds and business links with sanctioned foreign businessmen. One investigation showed the family effectively taking over an entire street of luxury homes in Caracas, the country’s capital.

A federal indictment unsealed on Saturday charged Ms. Flores, along with her husband and son, with collaborating with drug traffickers.

“She has been basically co-governing the country since he came to power, and in many ways is the strategy or power behind the throne,” said Risa Grais-Targow, the Latin America director for Eurasia Group, a political risk consultancy. “She’s been key to his staying power, but also now his downfall as well.”

 

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 5:33 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Mariana Martinez

Reporting from Caracas, Venezuela

At least 40 people were killed in Saturday’s attack on Venezuela, including military personnel and civilians, according to a senior Venezuelan official who spoke on condition of anonymity to describe preliminary reports.

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 5:15 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Kellen Browning

How Democrats are hitting Trump over his ouster of Maduro.

Prominent Democrats both in and outside of Congress were quick to criticize President Trump’s attack on Venezuela on Saturday.

Out of power and lacking a clear leader, some of the most influential Democrats are among those considered a loose group of potential 2028 presidential contenders, a half dozen of whom had weighed in on Mr. Trump’s actions on social media and in television interviews within hours of his move to capture Nicolás Maduro, the Venezuelan president.

Most tied Mr. Trump’s overseas intervention with his domestic woes, suggesting the president was seeking to distract from crises at home.

“It’s not about drugs,” Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York wrote on social media, adding, “It’s about oil and regime change. And they need a trial now to pretend that it isn’t. Especially to distract from Epstein + skyrocketing health care costs.”

Pete Buttigieg, a 2020 presidential candidate and the transportation secretary in the Biden administration, wrote that Mr. Trump was following an “old and obvious pattern. An unpopular president — failing on the economy and losing his grip on power at home — decides to launch a war for regime change abroad.”

Gov. JB Pritzker of Illinois and Senator Chris Murphy of Connecticut centered their criticisms on affordability, a word that Democrats have seized upon to hammer Mr. Trump as the cost of living remains a top issue heading into this year’s midterm elections.

“Donald Trump’s unconstitutional military action in Venezuela is putting our troops in harm’s way with no long-term strategy,” Mr. Pritzker wrote. “The American people deserve a president focused on making their lives more affordable.”

Mr. Murphy wrote that the boost in military spending included in Mr. Trump’s domestic policy bill last summer was “so he could invade and run Venezuela.” The president paid for it, Mr. Murphy charged, “by throwing millions of actual Americans off their health care and taking food assistance from millions of hungry kids” — a reference to the cuts to Medicaid and food stamps included in the bill.

Senators Mark Kelly and Ruben Gallego of Arizona, both military veterans with national profiles, also weighed in. Mr. Kelly, a combat pilot in the Persian Gulf war of 1991, called Mr. Maduro a “brutal, illegitimate dictator,” but warned that “if we learned anything from the Iraq war, it’s that dropping bombs or toppling a leader doesn’t guarantee democracy, stability or make Americans safer.”

Mr. Gallego referenced his time fighting in the Iraq War as a Marine, writing that this was the “second unjustified war in my lifetime.”

“The American people have been very clear: They do not want to be occupiers again and they do not want to be the world police,” he said in an interview on Fox News.

Representative Ro Khanna of California sent a fund-raising message off the news, blasting Mr. Trump in an email calling for “no more dumb wars” and asking recipients to share their contact information in a petition rejecting war with Venezuela.

On social media, he wrote that the “times call for a movement of the American people to stand against bloated defense budgets and warmongering.”

Hours later, Mr. Khanna threw a dagger at prominent Democrats who had not spoken out: “The silence from many media-hyped 2028 contenders today is shocking. If you cannot oppose this regime change war for oil, you don’t have the moral clarity or guts to lead our party or nation.”

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 5:12 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Sarah Nir

Reporting from Stewart Air National Guard Base in New York

A plane slowly taxied down the runway at Stewart Air National Guard Base outside New York City in the fading light Saturday. News crews filmed the arrival from the side of a snow covered airfield. After it stopped, people wearing jackets emblazoned with the F.B.I surrounded a staircase leading to one of the plane’s exits.

 

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 5:03 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Chelsia Rose Marcius

The ousted Venezuelan president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife will be flown in a helicopter to Manhattan, according to a law enforcement source briefed on the security plan to bring Maduro to the United States. From there, Maduro will be driven to the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration’s New York City headquarters in Manhattan. Then he will be taken by helicopter to Brooklyn and driven to the Metropolitan Detention Center. He is expected to be held there.

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 5:00 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

William Rashbaum

The plane carrying the ousted president of Venezuela, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, has landed in the United States, two law enforcement officials said.

Jan. 3, 2026, 4:50 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Sheyla Urdaneta and Frances Robles

With the president gone, Venezuelans flock to supermarkets.

Venezuelans began lining up at supermarkets throughout the country on Saturday to stock up on supplies as they woke to the news that the United States had launched airstrikes on the capital and seized the country’s leader, Nicolás Maduro.

While many stores in Caracas, the capital, were closed, some that opened found dozens of people already waiting outside.

People filled their carts with water, toilet paper and other goods.

Few cars were on the streets, and there were no signs of public transportation. Areas near a military base that had been attacked lacked electricity.

Users of a private internet company, Vnet, reported service outages.

In Caracas’s Plaza Venezuela neighborhood, Alondra, a 32-year-old woman who did not want her last name published because of fears for her safety, said she had just returned to the capital after the December holidays and had no food at home.

“I’m not happy,” she said as she shopped. “I understand how delicate the situation is, and I’m afraid things will get worse in the country.”

Tensions mounted because some people were cutting the line, which was not budging.

“We’ve suffered so much,” she added. “I’m feeling hopeless, thinking that everything could get worse and that we won’t be able to hold out.”

Videos from La Candelaria, in downtown Caracas, showed dozens of people standing in line for food.

At a shop in a public housing complex in the city, about 10 people were lined up to fill water jugs.

In La Guaira, an area near where the strikes took place, residents sent videos showing damage to what appeared to be an apartment building. A local journalist said government supporters had taken control of the block and were prohibiting access.

In Valencia, a city two hours west of Caracas, supermarkets opened early.

Panic buying caused some people to bring two cars to transport all the goods they bought.

“We don’t know what is going on — nobody knows,” said Cecilia Martínez, 47. “But we are five people in my house and my parents are older than 80, so I can’t sit and wait until they say whether there is a curfew or not. That’s why I came here and spent all I had.”

José López, 29, at another store in Valencia, said he had bought two dozen eggs. “There’s a lot of anxiety and uncertainty,” he said.

In Zulia and Táchira, the states on Venezuela’s border with Colombia, 400 miles west of Caracas, people who lined up at supermarkets said their biggest fear was running out of food.

“Thank God we’re far from Caracas, but we’re afraid that bombings might come to Maracaibo, too,” said Martha Rangel, a 63-year-old woman who lives in that city. “I don’t have much money, but I’ll buy some cheese and flour to make arepas and have some at home.”

The governor of the state of Sucre, about 325 miles east of Caracas, appeared at a town square on Saturday morning and called for supporters of the ruling party to gather there later in the day.

“We demand that the entire world speak out against the threat and chaos they have tried to sow in our homeland,” said the governor, Jhoanna Carrillo.

People in Sucre had lined up for gasoline, although many pumps were closed.

Armed civilians who support the government had begun to gather in caravans in Cumaná, the capital city in Sucre, and many people were frightened.

“Everyone knows what that means,” said Alejandro Barreto, 26. “The only thing that matters now is buying food.”

 

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 4:37 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Farnaz Fassihi

United Nations bureau chief

The United Nations Security Council will convene an emergency meeting on Monday morning to discuss U.S. strikes in Venezuela. Russia, China and Colombia asked for the meeting after Venezuela’s mission to the U.N. wrote a letter to the Council president requesting the meeting to condemn and stop American strikes on the country. Secretary General António Guterres is expected to address the Council on Monday. He said in a statement earlier that all sides must uphold international law and the U.N. charter.

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 4:36 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Nicholas Fandos and Maia Coleman

Mamdani called Trump to criticize the Venezuela strikes.

Zohran Mamdani, the new mayor of New York City, called President Trump on Saturday to personally object to strikes the United States had conducted in Venezuela and to the capture of its leader, Nicolás Maduro.

“I called the president and spoke with him directly to register my opposition to this act,” Mr. Mamdani said at an unrelated news conference on Saturday, adding that he told Mr. Trump that he was “opposed to a pursuit of regime change, to the violation of federal and international law.”

The mayor declined to characterize the president’s response when pressed by reporters. His aides said that Mr. Mamdani had initiated the call earlier on Saturday afternoon and that it was “brief.”

“I registered my opposition, I made it clear and we left it at that,” Mr. Mamdani said.

The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the call.

The remarks — and an earlier written statement — were the first time the mayor, a left-leaning Democrat, had clashed with Mr. Trump since taking office on Thursday. But it raised the possibility of more conflict in the days ahead after Mr. Maduro arrives in New York to face federal drug and weapons charges in Manhattan.

Mr. Mamdani has profound differences with the president, and has called him a “fascist.” But after the men had an unexpectedly cordial meeting at the White House in November, Mr. Mamdani had been careful not to directly stoke Mr. Trump’s ire — including in his inaugural address this week.

Mr. Mamdani sought on Saturday to play down how the call might affect that relationship.

“The president and I have always been honest and direct with each other about places of disagreement,” he said. “New Yorkers have elected me to be honest and direct and always to do so with the understanding that my job is to deliver for the people who call this city home.”

Mr. Mamdani will likely have little influence over what happens to Mr. Maduro in federal custody, even if the leader and a potential trial are being held within the city limits of New York. The mayor seemingly acknowledged these limits when speaking with reporters.

“It is my responsibility that whatever actions the federal government takes, that they have a minimal impact on the day-to-day lives of New Yorkers,” he said.

Mr. Mamdani has been an outspoken critic of American support for Israel’s military campaign in Gaza, but before his comments on Saturday, he had not had much to say about Venezuela or U.S. policy in Latin America. Both Mr. Mamdani and Mr. Maduro describe themselves as socialists, though the policies Mr. Maduro presided over in Venezuela differ starkly from those Mr. Mamdani has vowed to pursue.

In a podcast interview last fall, Mr. Mamdani said Mr. Maduro had “done many a horrible thing.”

“Maduro’s government is one of repression, there is no question about it,” he said.

In labeling the American action unlawful, Mr. Mamdani echoed numerous other Democrats. But where other leaders in his party called Mr. Maduro an “illegitimate dictator,” Mr. Mamdani did not comment on his record or standing in Venezuela.

“This blatant pursuit of regime change doesn’t just affect those abroad, it directly impacts New Yorkers, including tens of thousands of Venezuelans who call this city home,” the mayor said in his written statement.

“My focus is their safety and the safety of every New Yorker,” he added, “and my administration will continue to monitor the situation and issue relevant guidance.”

 

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 4:07 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Rylee Kirk

Senator Mitch McConnell, Republican from Kentucky, said in a statement on X that the president “has broad constitutional authority and long historical precedent for the limited use of military force.” McConnell called Nicolás Maduro a thug and said he expected Congress to be briefed soon. “A free, democratic, and stable Venezuela, led by Venezuelans, is in America’s national security interests,” he wrote.

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 3:52 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Simon Romero

Reporting from São Paulo, Brazil

Delcy Rodríguez, Venezuela’s new leader, boasts leftist credentials.

Delcy Rodríguez, Venezuela’s new interim leader, arrives at the job with impeccable leftist credentials.

She is the daughter of a Marxist guerrilla who won fame for kidnapping an American businessman, was educated partly in France, where she specialized in labor law and rose to meteoric heights in the government of Nicolás Maduro, whom she is succeeding.

But Ms. Rodríguez, 56, is also known for building bridges with Venezuela’s economic elites, foreign investors and diplomats, presenting herself as a cosmopolitan technocrat in a militaristic and male-dominated government.

After Venezuela’s economy endured a harrowing crash from 2013 to 2021, she spearheaded a market-friendly overhaul which had provided a semblance of economic stability before the U.S. military campaign targeting Mr. Maduro.

Her privatization of state assets and relatively conservative fiscal policy had left Venezuela somewhat better prepared to resist the Trump administration’s blockade of sanctioned tankers carrying oil, the country’s economic lifeblood.

The contradictions enveloping Ms. Rodríguez were on display on Saturday when she addressed the nation on state television. While President Trump said that Ms. Rodríguez had been sworn in as Venezuela’s new president, it was clear that Mr. Maduro’s supporters — including her — still see him as Venezuela’s legitimate leader.

Ms. Rodríguez repeatedly said that Mr. Maduro was Venezuela’s “only president,” and even the text on Venezuelan state television labeled her as vice president. When she ended, the state broadcaster immediately said that Ms. Rodríguez, as the vice president, had just made clear that Mr. Maduro remained Venezuela’s president.

Ms. Rodríguez rose to prominence after Mr. Maduro became president in 2013, following the death of Hugo Chávez, the founder of Venezuela’s Bolivarian political movement, which blends left-wing and nationalist ideals.

Mr. Maduro appointed her as communications minister, before naming her foreign affairs minister, the first woman to hold that post in Venezuela.

Shuttling between Latin American capitals, she often seemed to revel in feuding with conservative leaders.

In 2018, Ms. Rodríguez was promoted again, this time to the vice presidency, and the head of SEBIN, a Venezuelan intelligence agency. She took on additional duties in 2020 as economy minister and proceeded to extend an olive branch to business elites in Venezuela.

But she has also been targeted by sanctions from the United States, Canada and the European Union for her role in supporting and helping to oversee crackdowns on dissent in Venezuela.

Her entry into Venezuelan politics seemed natural as the daughter of Jorge Antonio Rodríguez, a Marxist leader who led the kidnapping in Venezuela of William Niehous, an American businessman who was held for three years in a jungle hide-out and rescued in 1979.

Her father was arrested and charged for his role in the kidnapping and died in 1976, at the age of 34, after being interrogated by intelligence agents.

Politics and leftist activism run in the family. Ms. Rodríguez’s older brother, Jorge Rodríguez, is another member of Mr. Maduro’s inner circle. He is the president of the National Assembly and was Mr. Maduro’s chief political strategist.

Anatoly Kurmanaev contributed reporting from Venezuela.

 

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 3:50 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Julie Turkewitz and Genevieve Glatsky

Trump administration declines to back Venezuela’s opposition leader.

President Trump said on Saturday that it would be “very tough” for Venezuela’s leading opposition figure, María Corina Machado, to take control of her country, claiming in his televised speech that she was a “very nice woman” but “doesn’t have the support” in Venezuela to lead.

It was a dramatic shift from the Trump administration’s assessment of Ms. Machado’s movement in recent months, in which Washington officials have asserted that her surrogate, Edmundo González, is the country’s rightful president, after his election victory in 2024. Secretary of State Marco Rubio had called Ms. Machado “the personification of resilience, tenacity and patriotism.”

Ms. Machado has spent the last year courting Mr. Trump’s support and trying to enlist his help in ousting Mr. Maduro. She has openly supported his military operation in the Caribbean and refrained from criticizing his policies toward Venezuelan migrants. In October, she dedicated her Nobel Peace Prize to him, in honor of what she called his “decisive support.”

On Saturday, after Mr. Trump announced that the U.S. military had captured Mr. Maduro, she released a statement celebrating the move and asserting that she was ready to lead.

“Today we are prepared to assert our mandate and seize power,” she wrote in a message she posted on X.

But roughly two hours later, when asked by a reporter about Ms. Machado after addressing the nation, Mr. Trump said they had not spoken. He never mentioned Mr. González.

Instead, he said that his government was in conversation with Mr. Maduro’s No. 2, Vice President Delcy Rodríguez.

“Are you going to work with the vice president of Venezuela?” a reporter asked.

“Marco is working on that directly,” Mr. Trump responded, referring to Mr. Rubio. “He just had a conversation with her, and she’s essentially willing to do what we think is necessary to make Venezuela great again.”

A spokeswoman for Ms. Machado and Mr. González said in a text message that the pair was not offering immediate comment on the speech.

Ms. Machado is a conservative former legislator from an affluent Venezuelan family whose ties to Washington go back two decades. She galvanized millions of Venezuelans to vote in favor of Mr. González in 2024.

Mr. Maduro lost the election, according to an independent monitor, but ignored the results and stayed in power. Mr. González eventually fled to Spain, and Ms. Machado went into hiding.

In recent months, speaking via video, Ms. Machado has backed Mr. Trump’s claims that Mr. Maduro is the head of two drug cartels and helped rig U.S. elections.

Ms. Machado resurfaced in public in early December in Oslo for the Nobel Peace Prize ceremony. One of her top aides, Pedro Urruchurtu, wrote on X on Dec. 17 that she was no longer in Oslo and was “attending medical appointments with a specialist as part of her prompt and full recovery.” Ms. Machado said that she had suffered a fractured vertebra during her departure from Venezuela.

Her current whereabouts is unknown.

Mr. González was also in Oslo to celebrate her prize. Two weeks ago he made an appearance at the Geneva Summit for Human Rights and Democracy. Mr. González, who is 76, was briefly hospitalized in May for a sudden drop in blood pressure.

 

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 3:48 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Jonathan Wolfe

Before Nicolás Maduro, there was Manuel Noriega.

The last time the United States deposed a Latin American leader was in 1989, when U.S. forces captured Gen. Manuel Noriega in Panama. That episode holds some striking parallels to the capture of Nicolás Maduro of Venezuela on Saturday, with some major differences.

In December 1989, President George H.W. Bush sent U.S. troops into Panama with the goal of capturing Mr. Noriega, who had been the country’s military dictator for about six years. Mr. Noriega went into hiding in the Vatican’s Embassy in Panama City, where he was eventually captured, taken to the United States, tried and imprisoned.

Mr. Noriega, like Mr. Maduro, had been indicted on federal drug-trafficking charges. He was accused by U.S. officials at the time of taking millions of dollars in bribes from drug traffickers and turning Panama into a capital of international cocaine smuggling.

Months before both leaders were captured, the United States built up its military presence around their countries.

In Panama, President Bush sent nearly 2,000 soldiers and Marines to reinforce the 10,300 service members already there. The troops also began conducting military exercises, which U.S. officials said was part of their rights under previous treaties. But many saw it as an attempt to put pressure on Mr. Noriega.

As part of the pressure campaign on Venezuela, Mr. Trump has been building up forces in the Caribbean for months, and authorizing strikes on boats that the administration has said are run by drug traffickers. Many legal experts say these strikes are illegal and amount to extrajudicial killings of civilians.

The two Latin American leaders, however, had very different responses to the U.S. pressure campaigns.

In Panama, the National Assembly, under the control of Mr. Noriega, declared the country at war with the United States shortly before U.S. troops invaded. As the assault to capture him began, he fled with his mistress in an unmarked Hyundai and went into hiding, briefly emerging at a Dairy Queen before taking refuge at the embassy of the Holy See.

He was captured after a standoff that went on for days with U.S. troops, who surrounded the building and used speakers to blast heavy metal from bands like Black Sabbath and Guns N’ Roses until he surrendered.

Mr. Maduro, however, told a Spanish journalist as late as this week that he was eager to work with the United States to avoid conflict, including on drug policy and oil agreements.

Mr. Trump said during an interview on Fox News that Mr. Maduro wanted to negotiate in the final days before U.S. forces captured him — an offer that Mr. Trump said he rejected.

“I didn’t want to negotiate,” Mr. Trump said. “I said, ‘Nope, we got to do it.’”

Mr. Trump said that the military repeatedly rehearsed the operation using a replica of Mr. Maduro’s safe house. Gen. Dan Caine, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said the operation benefited from detailed information about his whereabouts collected during months of intelligence gathering.

Around 27,000 troops participated in the operation in Panama, and 23 U.S. troops were killed, along with an estimated 314 Panamanian soldiers and 202 civilians.

U.S. officials said the operation in Venezuela involved 150 aircraft. Since November, the United States has had around 15,000 military personnel in the Caribbean.

It’s unclear how many casualties were involved in the operation on Saturday, but Mr. Trump, speaking on Fox News, said no American troops were killed. He suggested, however, that some service members were injured.

Michael Crowley contributed reporting.

 

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 3:36 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Tyler Pager

Reporting from Palm Beach, Fla.

In an interview with The New York Times, Marco Rubio, the secretary of state, said he was reserving judgment on Delcy Rodríguez’s comments, in which she denied she planned to work with the United States.

“We’re going to make decisions based on their actions and their deeds in the days and weeks to come,” he said, referring to officials in the interim Venezuelan government. “We think they’re going to have some unique and historic opportunities to do a great service for the country, and we hope that they’ll accept that opportunity.”

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 3:36 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Mark Walker

Airlines are canceling flights after the U.S. closes Caribbean airspace.

U.S. airlines canceled flights and air travel was disrupted on Saturday after federal aviation authorities shut down American-controlled airspace over the Caribbean in response to a U.S. military operation in Venezuela that resulted in the capture of the country’s president.

The Federal Aviation Administration issued a notice to airmen early on Saturday, known as a NOTAM, banning U.S. civil aircraft from operating, as the United States took action against the South American country, capturing President Nicolás Maduro and his wife.

The F.A.A. cited “safety-of-flight risks associated with ongoing military activity” as the reason for the closure. The agency did not specify the nature of the military operations in its notice but said that the action was taken in response to the developments involving Venezuela.

Those developments became clearer later on Saturday, when President Trump announced the U.S. military operation. Mr. Maduro’s capture followed months of U.S. military pressure, including deadly strikes on vessels, described by U.S. officials as drug-carrying boats; the seizure of a tanker transporting Venezuelan oil; and a growing U.S. military presence in the Caribbean.

Airlines adjusted schedules and canceled flights into and out of Caribbean destinations like Puerto Rico, St. Lucia and Barbados as the order took effect. Passengers were advised to check with carriers for updated travel information.

In a post on social media on Saturday afternoon, U.S. Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy said the F.A.A. had ordered the closures to “ensure the SAFETY of the flying public.”

“When appropriate, these airspace restrictions will be lifted. Please work with your airlines directly if your flight has been impacted,” he wrote.

Jessica Ramos, 24, a second grade teacher from Harrisburg, Pa., took a cruise with her mother this week to celebrate the New Year. Their cruise docked in San Juan, Puerto Rico, on Saturday morning, and they planned to fly to Philadelphia early Sunday morning. Around 10:30 a.m., as they disembarked their cruise ship, Ms. Ramos said she received a notification that their flight had been canceled.

“It was a little bit chaotic,” Ms. Ramos said in a phone interview on Saturday. “Everybody stormed into basically one hotel.”

Ms. Ramos and her mother began frantically searching for a place to stay, refreshing hotel websites all around the island. They ended up at a Holiday Inn with a one-night stay for $900, she said.

The next flight Ms. Ramos could book was on Jan. 10.

The airspace closure is the latest in a series of aviation restrictions imposed by the F.A.A. in response to tensions in the region, with officials saying they are intended to reduce the risk to civilian aircraft near military activity.

Delta, American and Southwest were among the airlines that had canceled flights on Saturday.

“Delta teams continue to monitor the situation closely, as the safety and security of our customers and people comes before all else,” the airline said in a statement.

Delta, United and JetBlue added that they had issued travel waivers for customers heading to and from the affected airports.

As of 3:07 p.m., the website FlightAware was reporting 724 delays and 49 cancellations, most of which were at the Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport in Florida.

On Saturday morning, the main international airport in Puerto Rico said on social media that most commercial flights operated by U.S. airlines were “suspended or may be temporarily canceled” because of the F.A.A. notice, but that foreign airlines were not included in the restrictions. The overwhelming majority of commercial flights to and from the island were canceled on Saturday, according to the website Flightradar24, which also showed two U.S. Navy aircraft flying nearby.

Caribbean Airlines, which serves U.S. cities including New York and Orlando, said on its website that its operations continued as scheduled on Saturday.

Gabe Castro-Root and Claire Fahy contributed reporting.

 

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 3:24 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Maia Coleman

Mayor Zohran Mamdani of New York City said he called President Trump on Saturday and spoke with him directly to register his opposition to the strikes.

Speaking at an unrelated news conference in Brooklyn, Mamdani said he made clear during the call that he was opposed to “the pursuit of regime change” and “the violation of federal and international law.”

“The president and I have always been honest and direct with each other about places of disagreement,” he said. “I was honest and direct in the Oval Office. I will be honest and direct in the phone conversations we have, and New Yorkers have elected me to be honest and direct.”

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 3:21 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Jack Nicas

Mexico City bureau chief

Venezuela’s interim leader defies Trump and calls Maduro the ‘only president.’

resident Trump said Delcy Rodríguez was sworn in as Venezuela’s interim president and would act as a partner in letting the United States run the country.

“She’s essentially willing to do what we think is necessary to make Venezuela great again,” he said.

Less than two hours later, Ms. Rodríguez — who was Nicolás Maduro’s vice president — delivered a televised address to Venezuela that made clear she viewed the United States as an illegal invader that must be rejected.

“We are determined to be free,” she said. “What is being done to Venezuela is a barbarity.”

Her swift defiance of Mr. Trump made clear that his plans to swoop into the South American nation and run it as his own faced many more hurdles than he suggested in his Saturday news conference declaring victory in Venezuela.

“We had already warned that an aggression was underway under false excuses and false pretenses, and that the masks had fallen off, revealing only one objective: regime change in Venezuela,” she said. “This regime change would also allow for the seizure of our energy, mineral and natural resources. This is the true objective, and the world and the international community must know it.”

Significantly, Ms. Rodríguez delivered her address alongside what she called Venezuela’s National Defense Council, which included the nation’s defense minister, attorney general and the heads of the country’s legislature and judiciary. That unified front directly contradicted Mr. Trump’s claim that the United States would run Venezuela, especially given that White House and Pentagon officials had said that U.S. aircraft and extraction forces had returned to the U.S.S. Iwo Jima.

Venezuela’s defense minister and attorney general also both publicly criticized Mr. Trump and the U.S. military action on Saturday.

In his news conference, Mr. Trump said that Venezuelan leaders must comply with the United States or else. “All political and military figures must realize that what happened to Maduro can happen to them,” he said.

Ms. Rodríguez’s speech also made clear that Mr. Maduro’s supporters — including her — still see him as the nation’s legitimate leader.

She repeatedly said that Mr. Maduro was Venezuela’s “only president” and even the text on Venezuelan state television labeled her as vice president. When she ended, the state broadcaster said that Ms. Rodríguez was the vice president who had just stated that Mr. Maduro was Venezuela’s president.

 

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 3:13 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Aric Toler

A video shows three U.S. military helicopters flying over Caracas and headed westward toward Fuerte Tiuna, the largest military site in Venezuela. At the end of the video, at least one of the helicopters turns southward, and descends toward the military site.

The man filming the video gives a time of 1:58 a.m. Saturday. According to General Dan Caine in the news conference held at Mar-a-Lago on Saturday, helicopters touched down to capture President Maduro in Caracas at 2:01 a.m.

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 3:12 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Adam Sella

Protesters are dispersing after a nearly two hour protest outside the White House against the Trump administration’s capture of Venezuela’s leader, Nicolás Maduro.

The protesters, which numbered a couple hundred at its peak, held signs saying “U.S. out of the Caribbean” and “No Blood for oil.”

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 3:07 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Eric Schmitt

Pentagon reporter

The top Democrat on the House Armed Services Committee expressed shock and anger at President Trump’s decision to capture Nicolás Maduro and have the U.S. run Venezuela for the foreseeable future. “Trump clearly has no idea what comes next,” Representative Adam Smith, Democrat of Washington, said in a telephone interview. “How are we going to run Venezuela when we have no presence in the country. Where does this go?”

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 3:00 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Ashley Ahn

Trump shares an image of Maduro blindfolded and handcuffed.

President Trump posted a photograph on social media on Saturday that he said was of the captured Venezuelan president, Nicolás Maduro, on board a U.S. warship hours after the United States seized him in Caracas, the Venezuelan capital.

The picture showed a man in a gray sweatshirt and sweatpants, blindfolded and handcuffed with a bottle of water in his right hand.

“Nicolas Maduro on board the USS Iwo Jima,” Mr. Trump captioned the photo, minutes before he addressed the nation from Mar-a-Lago, his Florida resort, and announced that America was “going to run” Venezuela.

The U.S.S. Iwo Jima is an amphibious assault ship and one of the American warships that have been prowling the Caribbean in recent weeks; it brought aboard survivors of an American boat strike in October.

Mr. Trump made the post on Truth Social on Saturday before a news conference in which he discussed the American strikes that led to Mr. Maduro’s capture.

Mr. Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, were taken from Caracas, the capital, by helicopter to the Iwo Jima, the president said in an interview with “Fox and Friends.”

“A nice flight,” Mr. Trump said. “I’m sure they loved it. But they’ve killed a lot of people.”

Mr. Maduro and his wife were en route Saturday to New York, where they will face indictments charging them with narco-terrorism and conspiracy to import cocaine.

The photo of what appears to be Mr. Maduro blindfolded and handcuffed was striking as it was the first photo of the captured leader made public after the attack. It came hours after Delcy Rodríguez, who had been Mr. Maduro’s vice president, demanded the United States provide proof that Mr. Maduro and his wife were still alive.

Mr. Trump said he and his team had watched the raid on video feeds as it occurred, subsequently posting what appeared to be photos of himself and other senior cabinet members, including Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, watching the attack in real time.

Iconic photos documenting key moments in American military operations have often come from the Situation Room in the White House, where former President Barack Obama and his national security team observed the mission to kill Osama bin Laden, and Mr. Trump and his team monitored the operation that eliminated Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, the former leader of the Islamic State, during his first term. Photos of those targets, who were both killed, were not released to the public.

 

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 2:44 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Aimee OrtizHannah Ziegler and Yan Zhuang

Here’s what we know about the U.S. operation in Venezuela.

Venezuela’s ousted president, Nicolás Maduro, appeared before a judge in New York on Monday to face drug and weapons charges, two days after he was captured in a U.S. military raid on Caracas.

“I’m innocent. I’m not guilty. I am a decent man,” Mr. Maduro said in court through an interpreter. He added, “I am still president of my country.”

The fallout for Venezuela is still far from clear. The acting president, Delcy Rodríguez, raised the prospect of dialogue with the United States on Sunday — an apparent shift from the defiance that top Venezuelan officials had shown in the face of President Trump’s claim that the United States would “run” the country for the foreseeable future and reclaim American oil interests there.

The U.S. raid followed a monthslong campaign by the Trump administration to oust Mr. Maduro, an authoritarian leader.

Here’s what we know:

What happened?

The United States carried out “a large scale strike against Venezuela” in which Mr. Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, were captured, Mr. Trump said.

Gen. Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said at a news conference that Mr. Trump ordered the operation late Friday. The mission involved 150 aircraft that worked to dismantle Venezuelan air defenses so military helicopters could deliver troops to Caracas, the country’s capital, he said.

The mission took about two hours 20 minutes and continued into early Saturday, when Mr. Maduro and Ms. Flores “gave up,” General Caine said.

U.S. forces encountered significant resistance, Mr. Trump said. At least 80 people were killed, including military personnel and civilians, according to a senior Venezuelan official who spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe preliminary reports. Cuban state media reported that 32 Cubans were killed in the U.S. attack. President Miguel Díaz-Canel of Cuba said they were from Cuba’s armed forces or its interior ministry.

No Americans were killed, Mr. Trump said. Two U.S. officials speaking on the condition of anonymity said that about half a dozen soldiers were injured in the operation. Nearly 200 Special Operations forces took part in the raid, according to Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth.

Did Trump have the authority to capture Maduro?

Secretary of State Marco Rubio said at a news conference on Saturday that it would not have been possible to inform U.S. lawmakers in advance of the strike. He and Mr. Trump described the mission as a law enforcement operation rather than a military action, which would have required greater congressional oversight.

On Monday, the United Nations Security Council convened an emergency meeting to discuss the attack. António Guterres, the secretary general of the United Nations, said in a statement that he was “deeply concerned” that the United States had not respected the rule of international law. Trump administration officials also plan to brief leaders in Congress, after Democrats called on the administration to explain its legal justification for the raid and its plan for the region.

Mr. Maduro, a self-described socialist, had led Venezuela since 2013. The Biden administration accused him of stealing the 2024 election that kept him in power.

Who is in charge of Venezuela now?

The country’s new leader is Ms. Rodríguez. She was Mr. Maduro’s vice president, known as an economic troubleshooter.

Mr. Trump said on Saturday that the United States intended to “run the country” until a transition of power could take place. He said Ms. Rodríguez was “essentially willing to do what we think is necessary to make Venezuela great again.”

On Sunday, Mr. Rubio said the U.S. military would maintain a “quarantine” around Venezuela to prevent the entry and exit of oil tankers under American sanctions and to maintain “leverage” over the country.

Ms. Rodríguez, who has vacillated in her criticism of the Trump administration after the raid in Caracas, was formally sworn in on Monday. During the ceremony, she maintained that Mr. Maduro was the president and said she was pained by the “illegitimate military aggression” of Venezuela by the United States. Ms. Rodríguez described Mr. Maduro and his wife as hostages.

Separately, Venezuela’s main opposition leader, María Corina Machado, has asked that her political ally, Edmundo González, be recognized as Venezuela’s president immediately.

In his own video statement on Sunday, Mr. González referred to himself as the president of Venezuela and called for political prisoners to be released.

What will happen to Maduro?

Mr. Maduro and Ms. Flores were brought to the federal courthouse in Lower Manhattan on Monday. An unsealed indictment charged him with narco-terrorism, cocaine importation conspiracies and possession of machine guns — charges that would carry lengthy prison sentences if he were convicted. Ms. Flores is also charged in the cocaine conspiracy.

Mr. Maduro, speaking in Spanish, told the court that he had been “kidnapped,” and pleaded not guilty to all four counts against him. The next hearing is scheduled for March 17, Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein said.

His court appearance drew dozens of demonstrators — both critics and supporters of Mr. Maduro’s capture — who were separated by a metal barrier outside the courthouse.

The indictment appears similar to a 2020 indictment against Mr. Maduro that accused him of overseeing a violent drug organization known as Cartel de los Soles.

Analysts have said that Cartel de los Soles does not exist as a literal organization, and that the term has been used more broadly to describe the alleged involvement of high-ranking Venezuelan military officers in the drug trade. However, no evidence has been publicly disclosed showing Mr. Maduro directing the effort.

When the 2020 indictment was issued, the Trump administration set a $15 million reward for information leading to the arrest of Mr. Maduro. The Biden administration increased the bounty to $25 million in January 2025. The Trump administration then increased the reward in August to $50 million.

Amanda Holpuch, Alexandra E. Petri and Neil Vigdor contributed reporting.

 

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 2:40 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Emiliano Rodríguez Mega

Reporting from Mexico City

Venezuela broadcasts messages of resistance from Maduro loyalists after the U.S. attack.

Hours after President Nicolás Maduro and his wife were captured by U.S. forces, Venezuela’s state-run television was broadcasting rallies and protests taking place across several cities, including the capital, Caracas. Mr. Maduro’s supporters vowed to defend their country from what they described as an illegal attack and the kidnapping of their “legitimate” leader.

In interviews, residents and people close to Mr. Maduro’s government demanded the Trump administration to return him and the country’s first lady, Cilia Flores, safely to Venezuela.

The messages were broadcast entirely on state-run media programs. A free press does not exist in Venezuela because of years of government suppression and censorship.

Some people condemned the U.S. airstrikes that accompanied the capture of Mr. Maduro as a violation of international law and the United Nations Charter. Others were taking more direct action. In neighborhoods across Caracas and other cities, Venezuelans were seen in bulletproof vests activating local defense committees — groups essentially designed to turn every citizen into a soldier and every city block into a fortress.

“Everybody knows what they have to do,” said Pedro Infante, a high-ranking Venezuelan politician, as he was surrounded by supporters in a district of Miranda, one of the states hit overnight. “Prepare ourselves to defend our homeland and our sovereignty.”

Mr. Infante, who has been a central figure in both the legislative and executive branches under the governments of Mr. Maduro and his predecessor, Hugo Chávez, accused the United States of wanting to steal Venezuela’s resources — specifically the country’s oil.

“Their fundamental interest is to gain control over our energy and resources” and “to have all the puppet governments on their knees,” he added.

Mr. Trump has said on several occasions that Venezuela stole oil and land belonging to the United States — referring to the nationalization of oil fields during which U.S. giants like ExxonMobil and ConocoPhillips lost assets.

In a rally near the Miraflores presidential palace in Caracas, Jorge Luis Márquez, a local resident, told a state-run television program that he was startled in the early morning by the explosions, which he called a “criminal bombing” orchestrated by President Trump.

“The people here are outraged and demand that the world speak out against this crime committed by Donald Trump’s dirty, rotten boot, which trampled on sacred ground,” Mr. Márquez said.

By Saturday morning, Venezuelan authorities were claiming that some of the bombs had struck civilian buildings.

In a televised address from La Guaira, the capital city of a coastal state hit overnight by the U.S. airstrikes, Gov. José Alejandro Terán condemned what he called a “terrorist action by the United States government,” adding that civilians had been targeted. He did not mention any deaths but said that several people, including women and children, had been sent to the region’s hospitals and clinics.

Mr. Terán also said that the city’s historic center had been attacked and that “more than 10 missiles” had destroyed several warehouses at the port — arguably Venezuela’s most strategically vital maritime hub — where, he claimed, important medicines for patients with renal failure were stored.

“There is nothing left to prove to the entire world,” Mr. Terán said. “There has been a systematic attack to the civilian population.”

In a live broadcast from Caracas, Erika Farías, a political organizer and a member of Mr. Maduro’s party, warned both the United States and the Venezuelan opposition that she and many others would not give in despite the attack on Saturday.

“To the empire, we say: Venezuela’s oil is ours, and return Nicolás Maduro to us,” Ms. Farías said. “And to the stateless traitors, we say: Prepare yourselves, because the people have just moved from unarmed struggle to armed struggle — and we are going to defend our freedom, our independence and our sovereignty in the streets.”

 

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 2:32 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Maia Coleman

The family of James Luckey-Lange, a 28-year-old from Staten Island, N.Y., who is among the Americans who have been recently imprisoned in Venezuela, said they had not received any information about his whereabouts or been contacted by U.S. officials since the strikes on the country this morning.

“I remain hopeful and confident that the administration will prioritize the safety of the Americans over there,” Abbie Luckey, his aunt, said in a brief phone interview. Of the likelihood that the capture of President Maduro would hasten his return, she said: “I am more hopeful than I was 24 hours ago.”

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 2:32 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Eric Schmitt

Pentagon reporter

The top Democrat on the Senate Armed Services Committee lambasted President Trump’s plan to run Venezuela. “This is ludicrous,” said Senator Jack Reed, Democrat of Rhode Island. “No serious plan has been presented for how such an extraordinary undertaking would work or what it will cost the American people. History offers no shortage of warnings about the costs — human, strategic, and moral — of assuming we can govern another nation by force.”

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 2:28 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Stanley Reed

Reporting from London

Here’s what to know about the Venezuelan oil industry Trump says he will revive.

Venezuela

303 billion barrels

Saudi Arabia

267 billion barrels

Nearly half of the world’s proven oil reserves are in 12 countries in the Middle East.

Canada

159 billion barrels

United States

81 billion barrels

Russia

80 billion barrels

Libya

48 billion barrels

Nigeria

38 billion barrels

Note: Data shows estimates of proven oil reserves for 2025.

Source: Oil & Gas Journal.

Venezuela’s oil industry would “make a lot of money” with the United States behind it, President Trump said Saturday in a news conference to confirm the capture of the country’s president, Nicolás Maduro, who is facing federal drugs and weapons charges.

“We’re going to have our very large United States oil companies, the biggest anywhere in the world, go in, spend billions of dollars, fix the badly broken infrastructure, the oil infrastructure, and start making money for the country,” Mr. Trump said.

He said the Venezuelan oil industry had been “a total bust,” for a long time, adding, “They were pumping almost nothing by comparison to what they could have been pumping.”

Mr. Trump appears to be counting heavily on U.S. intervention in the oil industry to help transform Venezuela, a proposition that could prove to be complicated and expensive.

How much oil does Venezuela produce?

Venezuela claims to have more than 300 billion barrels in the ground, the largest reserves of oil of any country. But it struggles to produce about one million barrels a day, or around 1 percent of global production.

In addition, much of Venezuela’s oil is extra heavy, making it polluting and expensive to process.

Venezuela’s yearly oil production

Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration.

The New York Times

What is the state of the oil industry in Venezuela?

The industry has seen some recovery in recent years, but output is well below the more than two million barrels a day that Venezuela was producing in the early 2010s.

The national oil company, known as PDVSA, lacks the capital and expertise to increase production. The country’s oil fields are run down and suffer from “years of insufficient drilling, dilapidated infrastructure, frequent power cuts and equipment theft,” according to a recent study by Energy Aspects, a research firm. The United States has placed sanctions on Venezuelan oil, which is now exported primarily to China.

Are any Western oil companies involved there?

Chevron is the main Western oil company still operating in the country and produces about a quarter of Venezuela’s oil. Early in this century, when other companies were forced out, Chevron stayed, figuring that conditions might eventually improve.

Roughly half of Chevron’s production is exported to the United States.

On Saturday, Chevron said it was trying to ensure the safety of its employees and its operations in the country after Mr. Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, were arrested and removed in the U.S. military action.

The oil giant, based in Houston, has conducted operations in Venezuela since 1923 and has maintained five onshore and offshore production projects there.

“With more than a century in Venezuela, we support a peaceful, lawful transition that promotes stability and economic recovery,” said Kevin Slagle, a Chevron spokesman. “We’re prepared to work constructively with the U.S. government during this period, leveraging our experience and presence to strengthen U.S. energy security.”

Later on Saturday, Chevron said it had given an incorrect statement and issued a new one that removed mention of the U.S. government, saying: “We continue to operate in full compliance with all relevant laws and regulations.”

What would U.S. control of the country’s oil production mean?

In theory, if U.S. oil companies were given greater access in Venezuela, they could help gradually turn the industry around. “But it’s not going to be a straightforward proposition,” said Richard Bronze, head of geopolitics at Energy Aspects.

Analysts say increasing Venezuelan production will not be cheap. Energy Aspects estimated that adding another half a million barrels a day of production would cost $10 billion and take about two years.

Major increases might require “tens of billions of dollars over multiple years,” the firm said.

The overthrow of the Venezuelan government may offer opportunities for American oil companies, but they could also find themselves dragged into a messy situation, industry analysts say.

Pressure from Mr. Trump could “force them to play a quasi-governmental role on the capacity building and development front,” Helima Croft, head of commodities at the investment bank RBC Capital Markets, wrote on Saturday in an investment note.

She added that reducing military influence over the oil industry and the broader economy “could prove challenging.”

How will this affect oil prices?

Mr. Trump’s intervention in Venezuela is bound to send jitters through the oil markets, but analysts say that a major price jump is unlikely.

Venezuela is a relatively small producer and many analysts calculate that the oil market is currently oversupplied. Brent crude, the international benchmark, traded at $60.80 a barrel on Friday, near its lows for the year.

After Washington conducted its operation to remove Mr. Maduro, Third Bridge, a research firm, said in a note that it “did not see these events immediately impacting the price of crude oil or the cost of gasoline drivers see at the pump.”

Rebecca Elliott, Ivan Penn and Lazaro Gamio contributed reporting.

 

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 2:28 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Jack Nicas

Mexico City bureau chief

Delcy Rodríguez was sworn in as Venezuela’s new president on Saturday, but it was clear that Nicolás Maduro’s supporters — including her — still see him as the nation’s legitimate leader. She repeatedly said that Maduro was Venezuela’s “only president” and even the text on Venezuelan state television labeled her as vice president. When she ended, the state broadcaster immediately said that Rodríguez was the vice president who had just made clear that Maduro was Venezuela’s president.

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 2:24 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Emiliano Rodríguez Mega

“There is only one president in this country, and his name is Nicolás Maduro Moros,” Rodríguez said to thundering applause.

She added that Venezuela was open to having a respectful relationship with the Trump administration, but only within the framework of international and Venezuelan law. “That is the only type of relationship I will accept, after they have attacked and militarily assaulted our beloved nation,” she said.

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 2:17 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Maria Abi-Habib

Venezuela’s interim president, Delcy Rodríguez, put on a display of force and unity in a live address to the nation, sitting with powerful military officials and other key government leaders as she denounced the United States. As she introduced each figure on live television, they nodded toward her in a show of deference as she demanded that Maduro was the rightful president of Venezuela. The display of force and unity undermined President Trump’s earlier comments that Washington would work with Rodríguez to run Venezuela.

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 2:17 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Emiliano Rodríguez Mega

Rodríguez, Venezuela’s interim president, was defiant as she spoke on live television.“If there is one thing that the Venezuelan people and this country are clear about,” she said, “it is that we will never again be slaves, that we will never again be a colony of any empire, whatever its nature.”

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 2:16 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Jack Nicas

Mexico City bureau chief

Venezuela’s interim president, Delcy Rodríguez, speaking in an address to the the nation, said Washington “launched an unprecedented military aggression” that “constitutes a terrible stain on the development of bilateral relations.” She said that with the invasion, “the masks had fallen off, revealing only one objective: regime change in Venezuela. This regime change would also allow for the seizure of our energy, mineral and natural resources. This is the true objective, and the world and the international community must know it.”

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 2:13 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Jack Nicas

Mexico City bureau chief

Delcy Rodríguez, Venezuela’s interim president, is delivering an address to the nation and taking a much more defiant tone than President Trump suggested. Trump said she had agreed to help the United States run Venezuela. She said the United States invaded Venezuela under false pretenses and that President Maduro is Venezuela’s “only president.”

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 2:10 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Ivan Penn

Chevron, one of the leading private oil companies in Venezuela, said it was working to ensure the safety and security of its people and operation in the country after the arrest of President Nicolás Maduro and his wife. The oil company, based in Houston, has conducted operations in Venezuela since 1923 and has maintained five onshore and offshore production projects in the country. “With more than a century in Venezuela, we support a peaceful, lawful transition that promotes stability and economic recovery,” said Kevin Slagle, a Chevron spokesman. “We’re prepared to work constructively with the U.S. government during this period, leveraging our experience and presence to strengthen U.S. energy security.”

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 2:08 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

The New York Times

In Catia la Mar, a city just west of the Caracas airport, the air strikes hit a three-story civilian apartment complex, knocking out an exterior wall and killing at least one older woman, the victim’s family said.

The woman, Rosa González, died in the strike and a second person was seriously wounded, the family said. One woman in the building said she was hit and nearly lost her eye. Another person, a 70-year-old man named Jorge who declined to give his last name, said he “lost everything” when the bomb exploded.

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 1:41 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Zolan Kanno-Youngs

White House reporter

Representative Majorie Taylor Greene, just days before she is expected to resign from Congress, accused President Trump of walking away from his promise to end overseas wars. “Americans’ disgust with our own government’s never ending military aggression and support of foreign wars is justified because we are forced to pay for it, and both parties, Republicans and Democrats, always keep the Washington military machine funded and going,” Greene, a one-time Trump ally, posted on social media. “This is what many in MAGA thought they voted to end. Boy were we wrong.”

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 1:37 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Maia Coleman

In his first public break with President Trump since taking office two days ago, Mayor Zohran Mamdani of New York City condemned the capture of President Nicolás Maduro and his wife, calling it “an act of war” and “violation of federal and international law.”

“This blatant pursuit of regime change doesn’t just affect those abroad, it directly impacts New Yorkers, including tens of thousands of Venezuelans who call this city home,” the mayor said in a statement posted on social media.

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 1:29 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

William Rashbaum

With President Nicolás Maduro and his wife en route to New York, the next step in their case will come in federal court in Manhattan. They are expected to appear before a U.S. District Court judge in New York City on the four-count narco-terrorism and cocaine trafficking indictment unsealed on Saturday morning. In similar cases, the defendants have been flown to Stewart Air National Guard Base, about 72 miles north of the city, and brought to the federal courthouse in Lower Manhattan. While it is unclear when they will arrive, security will undoubtedly be tight. It is also unclear whether the Venezuelan leader and his wife are yet represented by defense lawyers.

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 1:25 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Eric Schmitt

Pentagon reporter

Even though General Caine did not identify the helicopter unit involved in the operation in Caracas, U.S. officials said it was the 160th Special Operations Aviation Regiment, which flies modified MH-60 and MH-47 helicopters. The 160th, nicknamed the Night Stalkers, specializes in high-risk, low-level, and nighttime missions like insertions, extractions and raids. The unit has conducted what the Pentagon calls training missions near the coast of Venezuela in recent months.

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 1:24 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Stephen Hiltner

Several U.S. airlines, including Delta, American and Southwest, began cancelling flights to the Caribbean on Saturday morning, in compliance with airspace closures from the Federal Aviation Administration.

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 1:22 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Glenn Thrush

Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the extraction of President Nicolás Maduro and his wife from Venezuela was a “law enforcement” operation, yet the attorney general, Pam Bondi, who has not shied away from the spotlight, was a notable no-show at the news conference announcing what is, arguably, the most significant prosecution of her tenure.

Bondi spent the night and early morning hours watching live feeds inside a secure facility at U.S. Central Command headquarters in Tampa, not far from her home, according to a senior U.S. official with knowledge of her whereabouts who requested anonymity because of a lack of authorization to discuss the matter publicly. It is not clear if Bondi, who has access to government aircraft, would have had time to fly to New York, which takes around three hours.

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 1:20 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Zolan Kanno-Youngs

White House reporter

Vice President JD Vance briefly met with President Trump at the president’s golf club in West Palm Beach, Fla., during the day on Friday to discuss the impending strikes, but did not go to Mar-a-Lago that night, a spokesman said. The reason was the national security team worried a late-night motorcade movement by the vice president might tip off the Venezuelans.” Instead the vice president joined a secure video conference through the night to monitor the operation. He traveled to Cincinnati after the operation concluded and was not at Trump’s news conference.

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 1:11 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Megan Mineiro

Senator Jeanne Shaheen, the top Democrat on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, said the capture of Maduro was “entirely inconsistent” with what top officials told top lawmakers in closed-door briefings in recent weeks.

“Because the president and his cabinet repeatedly denied any intention of conducting regime change in Venezuela when briefing Congress, we are left with no understanding of how the Administration is preparing to mitigate risks to the U.S. and we have no information regarding a long-term strategy following today’s extraordinary escalation,” she said in statement.

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 1:08 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Jazmine Ulloa

Adelys Ferro, co-founder of the Venezuelan-American Caucus, a grassroots group representing Venezuelans in the United States, said asylum petitions and immigration proceedings for hundreds of thousands of Venezuelans remain suspended. For them, the situation is particularly fraught. They have tried to prove that they have been targets of the Maduro regime in U.S. immigration courts, she said, but at the same time, the Trump administration has cast them as criminals and lawbreakers who should be deported.

“We are victims of the Nicolás Maduro regime, but we are also victims of the Trump administration policies,” she said.

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 1:01 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Anatoly Kurmanaev

Reporting from Venezuela

Delcy Rodríguez has been sworn in as Venezuela’s interim president in a secret ceremony in Caracas on Saturday, according to two people close to the government, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because of fears for their safety. Rodríguez is President Nicolás Maduro’s vice president.

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 1:00 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Steven Erlanger

Steven Erlanger covers diplomacy in Europe and beyond and wrote from Berlin.

Foreign leaders reacted with shock and skepticism to the U.S. capture of Maduro.

Despite the long American military buildup around Venezuela, the American raid on Caracas to capture President Nicolás Maduro and his wife produced initial reactions of shock, outrage and skepticism from international leaders, many of them troubled by an exercise of American gunboat diplomacy.

The reactions were particularly angry from Latin America and from leaders who are more on the left and who have struggled with President Trump and his trade, tariff and other policies in the region. Allies of Mr. Maduro, including Cuba and Russia, predictably condemned the American intervention, despite Russia’s own invasion of sovereign Ukraine nearly four years ago. And some, like a senior Mexican official, said that Mr. Trump was simply after Venezuela’s large oil deposits.

Shortly after President Trump announced that the United States would “run the country," European leaders appeared to largely support the end to Mr. Maduro’s rule and were more cautious to criticize Mr. Trump’s intervention.

Chancellor Friedrich Merz of Germany wrote on social media that “Maduro has led his country into ruin” and that the U.S. intervention was “complex” and required “careful consideration,” without going into further detail. “The objective” now, he added, “is an orderly transition to an elected government.”

President Emmanuel Macron of France wrote on X that the Venezuelan people could “only rejoice” at the end of Mr. Maduro’s dictatorship, and did not address the U.S. approach. Before Mr. Trump’s announcement, however, the French foreign minister, Jean-Noël Barrot, wrote on social media that the military operation “violates the principle of non-resort to force that underpins international law.”

President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva of Brazil was particularly scathing. He condemned the U.S. action and said it recalled “the worst moments of interference in the politics” of the region.

“The bombings on Venezuelan territory and the capture of its president cross an unacceptable line,” Mr. Lula wrote on social media. “These acts represent a grave affront to Venezuela’s sovereignty and yet another extremely dangerous precedent for the entire international community.”

President Gustavo Petro of Colombia wrote on X that he rejected “the aggression against the sovereignty of Venezuela and of Latin America.” He added that he was deploying forces to Colombia’s border with Venezuela, with additional support “in the event of a massive influx of refugees.”

And President Gabriel Boric of Chile, a leftist whose term is coming to an end, also condemned the intervention. “We express our concern and condemnation of the military actions by the United States taking place in Venezuela, and we call for seeking a peaceful solution to the serious crisis affecting the country,” he said on social media. Like many, he called for dialogue to resolve the crisis.

President Miguel Díaz-Canel of Cuba, a Maduro ally, denounced “a criminal attack” by the United States and called for “urgent reaction” from the world.

The reaction of Russia, another ally of Mr. Maduro, was strongly worded and apparently without irony. Russia, which launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine four years ago and is still at war there, condemned the U.S. military action as “an act of armed aggression against Venezuela.” The Russian foreign ministry, in a statement, called the American attack “deeply concerning and condemnable,” adding: “Ideological hostility has triumphed over businesslike pragmatism.”

Russia said that it supported the leadership of Venezuela and called for an urgent meeting of the U.N. Security Council to discuss the American intervention.

Iran, which has also been threatened in the last few days by Mr. Trump, issued a statement on Saturday condemning the U.S. attack and accusing the United States of violating the United Nations Charter.

But Mr. Trump had supporters in the region, too. President Javier Milei of Argentina celebrated the capture of Mr. Maduro. “Liberty advances,” he wrote on X.

And Prime Minister Kamla Susheila Persad-Bissessar of neighboring Trinidad and Tobago, who drew criticism for her support of Mr. Trump’s military buildup against Mr. Maduro in the name of combating drug trafficking, emphasized that her country played no role in the American operation and maintains peaceful relations with Venezuela.

The Venezuela intervention in the name of countering drug smuggling recalled to many the invasion of Panama in 1989. Back then, American forces captured Manuel Antonio Noriega, the ruler of Panama, and brought him to the United States to face charges of drug trafficking. He was convicted and sentenced to 40 years in prison, ultimately serving 17 years after a reduction in his sentence for good behavior. He died in Panamanian custody in 2017.

The Mexican government “condemned energetically” Washington’s unilateral military action in Venezuela, warned of regional instability and urged dialogue, according to a statement from the country’s foreign ministry. “Mexico makes an urgent call to respect international law, as well as the principles and purposes of the U.N. Charter, and to cease any act of aggression against the Venezuelan government and people,” read the statement, which was posted on X by President Claudia Sheinbaum of Mexico.

Gerardo Fernández Noroña, the former president of Mexico’s Senate and an influential leader of the country’s governing Morena party, said the U.S. actions were aimed at taking control of Venezuela’s oil. “President Maduro has not been captured; he was deprived of his liberty through a military intervention by the United States government,” Mr. Fernández Noroña said on social media. “He is a prisoner of war. They seek through this to subdue the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela in order to seize its natural resources.”

Canada, which like Mexico has a tense relationship with the Trump administration and faces a difficult year of trade negotiations ahead, stopped short of condemning the U.S. actions in Venezuela.

“Canada has long supported a peaceful, negotiated, and Venezuelan-led transition process that respects the democratic will of the Venezuelan people,” Prime Minister Mark Carney of Canada said in a statement, adding, “In keeping with our longstanding commitment to upholding the rule of law, sovereignty, and human rights, Canada calls on all parties to respect international law.”

The Europeans were similarly circumspect. Kaja Kallas, the European Union’s foreign policy chief, said she had spoken to Secretary of State Marco Rubio about events in Venezuela. “The EU is closely monitoring the situation in Venezuela,” she wrote in a social media post. “The EU has repeatedly stated that Mr. Maduro lacks legitimacy and has defended a peaceful transition. Under all circumstances, the principles of international law and the UN Charter must be respected. We call for restraint. The safety of EU citizens in the country is our top priority.”

The president of the European Council, António Costa, said on Saturday that the European Union wants de-escalation in Venezuela. Mr. Costa wrote on X that the E.U. “would continue to support a peaceful, democratic, and inclusive solution in Venezuela.”

Spain, with its close ties to Latin America, offered to mediate in the crisis in an attempt to broker a negotiated and peaceful solution. “Spain calls for de-escalation and restraint,” the foreign ministry said in a statement, adding that it was prepared to support a “democratic, negotiated, and peaceful solution.”

As news emerged of the U.S. intervention, Prime Minister Keir Starmer of Britain was also cautious to take an outright position, saying “I will want to talk to the president” and to allies to “establish the facts.” After Mr. Trump’s announcement, he wrote on X that the U.K. shed “no tears” about the end of Mr. Maduro’s regime and would “discuss the evolving situation with US counterparts” in hopes of a peaceful transition.

The Europeans have been mostly consumed with Ukraine and helping President Volodymyr Zelensky refine a peace proposal that would satisfy Mr. Trump and then be presented to Russia, which has already made it clear that it is unacceptable in current form. On Saturday, the national security advisers of the main European countries were in Kyiv on that matter, which is of more strategic importance to the Europeans than the fate of Mr. Maduro.

Ukraine itself largely supported the actions of Mr. Trump. Foreign Minister Andrii Sybiha argued that Ukraine defended the right of nations to live freely, free of dictatorship, oppression and human rights violations.” He accused Mr. Maduro’s government of having “violated all such principles in every respect.”

Perhaps the most interesting criticism of Mr. Trump came from Jordan Bardella, the likely presidential candidate of France’s far right National Rally party, which has received support from Mr. Trump and Vice President JD Vance.

“No one will miss” the Maduro regime, Mr. Bardella said on social media. “That said, respect for international law and the sovereignty of states cannot be applied selectively,” he added. “The forcible overthrow of a government from the outside cannot constitute an acceptable response, only exacerbating the geopolitical instability of our time.”

In the face of such intervention, he added, France must “rearm our nation, to strengthen our industrial and military capabilities,” in order to “make its independent voice heard on the international stage, one that respects sovereignties.”

Reporting was contributed by Ana Ionova, Annie Correal, Simon Romero, Genevieve Glatsky, Emma Bubola, Maria Abi-Habib, Jason Horowitz, Lizzie Dearden, Jeanna SmialekLeily Nikounazar, Matina Stevis-Gridneffand Pranav Baskar.

 

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 12:50 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Zolan Kanno-Youngs

White House reporter

Trump’s news conference raises many questions. Who exactly will be running Venezuela, as he stated the United States would do for a period of time? Trump indicated there will be a U.S. military presence in Venezuela “as it pertains to oil.” What will that look like and how many U.S. troops could be deployed?

Amid all the questions, Trump did make clear one thing: This military operation was not just about ousting a leader accused of drug trafficking, but also about expanding U.S. access to Venezuela’s oil reserves.

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 12:49 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Maggie Haberman

White House reporter

That was one of the most consequential news conferences of Trump’s two presidential terms, but it remains unclear what will follow.

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 12:46 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Tyler Pager

Reporting from Palm Beach, Fla.

Trump’s news conference has concluded. The biggest takeaway, of course, is Trump’s announcement that the United States would “run” Venezuela, and the lack of details about how that will work. But it’s also striking how much the president focused on oil and how central that will be to how the United States runs the country.

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 12:38 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

John Ismay

Pentagon reporter

Asked about the potential presence of U.S. forces in Venezuela, Trump said that there would be a “presence in Venezuela as it pertains to oil.”

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 12:34 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Zolan Kanno-Youngs

White House reporter

Trump has made various comments during this news conference showing that this military operation was at least in part about gaining more access to oil in Venezuela.

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 12:33 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

John Ismay

Pentagon reporter

When asked how running Venezuela follows Trump’s long-stated goal of putting “America First,” the president said, “We want to surround ourselves with good neighbors.”

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 12:32 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

John Ismay

Pentagon reporter

When asked how much running Venezuela, potentially for years, will cost, Trump said: “It won’t cost us anything.”

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 12:31 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Maggie Haberman

White House reporter

Trump says that Rubio has spoken to the newly sworn-in Venezuelan president and she has said she would support what they are doing.

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 12:30 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Jack Nicas

Mexico City bureau chief

Trump’s suggestion that Venezuela’s vice president, Delcy Rodríguez, would help the United States run the country was stunning because it came just as Venezuelan state television was playing a clip of her denouncing the U.S. military operation.

“Faced with this brutal situation and this brutal attack, we do not know the whereabouts of President Nicolás Maduro and first lady Cilia Flores,” Rodríguez said, according to a clip played by Venezuelan state television on Saturday. “We demand immediate proof of life for President Maduro and the first lady from the government of President Donald Trump.”

But Trump just told reporters that Marco Rubio had spoken with her with a different result. “She’s essentially willing to do what we think is necessary to make Venezuela great again,” Trump said.

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 12:29 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Maggie Haberman

White House reporter

Asked why running a country elsewhere in the Americas is “America First,” Trump said, “I think it is,” citing the need for oil and energy. It’s worth recalling his quote to The Atlantic in which he said that America First is whatever he says it is.

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 12:29 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Zolan Kanno-Youngs

White House reporter

Trump says Rubio and Hegseth will be a “team” working with the people of Venezuela to run Venezuela for this uncertain period of time. It’s unclear who those Venezuelans will be.

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 12:28 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Maggie Haberman

White House reporter

Trump has long had an interest in procuring the oil of other countries, including during his first term.

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 12:28 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

David E. Sanger

White House reporter

Asked how long the United States would occupy Venezuela, Trump said, “I’d like to do it quickly, but it takes a period of time.” He said that the United States would be selling Venezuelan oil to China and other nations.

“We’ll be selling large amounts of oil to other countries,” Trump says.

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 12:26 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Tyler Pager

Reporting from Palm Beach, Fla.

Trump is demonstrating how much this effort is about securing access to oil. When asked about the timeline for the U.S. involvement in the country, he immediately turned to rebuilding oil assets.

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 12:26 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Maria Abi-Habib

President Trump indicated that Vice President Delcy Rodríguez had been sworn in as president of Venezuela. But earlier on Saturday, Rodríguez denounced Washington’s military actions and Maduro’s capture.

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 12:25 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

John Ismay

Pentagon reporter

Asked about the mixed results of U.S. intervention and sponsorship of coups in Latin America, Trump said, “Not with me.”

“We have a perfect record of winning,” he added.

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 12:24 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Zolan Kanno-Youngs

White House reporter

Pressed by reporters on who would be running Venezuela, Trump points to his advisers standing behind him and says that for a “period of time” the “people that are standing right behind me, we’re going to be running it.”

Some of the advisers standing behind him include Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Gen. Dan Caine, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs. Trump said the United States would be a part of an unspecified “group” running Venezuela without providing details.

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 12:22 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Maggie Haberman

White House reporter

Rubio said this was not the kind of mission for which you could give Congress notice in advance. He said it was “largely a law-enforcement” operation.

But Trump quickly stepped in. “Congress has a tendency to leak,” Trump said, before adding that “they knew we were coming.”

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 12:19 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Maggie Haberman

White House reporter

“We’re not afraid of boots on the ground if we have to have” them, Trump said. This is the opposite of what his administration has repeatedly said its posture is.

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 12:19 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

David E. Sanger

White House reporter

“We are going to run the country right,″ Trump said as he turned to oil. “It’s going to make a lot of money.” Then he added, about past Venezuelan governments, “they stole our oil.”

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 12:18 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Maggie Haberman

White House reporter

Asked who’s running Venezuela, Trump said “a group” and immediately turned to the oil industry. He said oil companies would be paying to rebuild the infrastructure.

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 12:17 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

John Ismay

Pentagon reporter

Marco Rubio, the secretary of state, said that Nicolás Maduro could have left Venezuela and been living in another country, but “he wanted to play big boy.”

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 12:17 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Zolan Kanno-Youngs

White House reporter

Trump’s statement that “we are going to run the country,” is remarkable for a president who led a political campaign largely opposed to prolonged overseas conflicts and regime changes.

The statement has prompted many operational questions over how exactly the United States will assert control over Venezuela. Who exactly will be running the nation and for how long?

The statement alone also raises political questions over whether this operation undercuts a campaign promise central to his political identity and support.

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 12:14 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Jack Nicas

Mexico City bureau chief

While Trump said the United States would run Venezuela, some of Maduro’s top deputies were still on Venezuelan state television on Saturday slamming the United States.

Venezuela’s defense minister and attorney general, as well as several governors, all gave defiant statements, calling for an international rejection of the U.S. military operation and saying they still ran the country. State TV has also shown numerous small pro-Maduro rallies from around the country.

Trump said Venezuelan leaders must comply with the United States or else. “All political and military figures must realize that what happened to Maduro can happen to them,” he said.

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 12:12 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

David E. Sanger

White House reporter

General Caine said another team of helicopters was called in to extract Maduro and his wife, and took fire along the way. He said the whole operation happened over about two hours and 20 minutes.

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 12:11 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

John Ismay

Pentagon reporter

General Caine said that U.S. warplanes dismantled Venezuelan air defenses so that American military helicopters could go into Caracas. “One of our aircraft was hit but remained flyable,” Caine said.

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 12:09 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

David E. Sanger

White House reporter

General Caine says the youngest crewmember was 20, the oldest 49, and the military force was followed by an “extraction force” to get Maduro.

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 12:07 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Eric Schmitt

Pentagon reporter

Gen. Dan Caine, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said the mission drew on decades of experience fighting terrorists in the Middle East, Southwest Asia and Africa.

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 12:06 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Maggie Haberman

White House reporter

Caine said this operation involved 150 aircraft launching across the hemisphere, in some of the most detailed description the U.S. government has given so far.

Jan. 3, 2026, 12:05 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

John Ismay

Pentagon reporter

Gen. Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said the military mission in Venezuela was launched as part of a request from the Justice Department. He said the operation was named “Absolute Resolve.”

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 12:03 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Jonah Bromwich

The indictment charging Maduro in Manhattan does not reflect the accusations that Trump just lobbed at the Veneuzuelan president about his ties to Tren de Aragua. Though the leader of the gang, Hector Rusthenford Guerrero Flores, is one of the defendants, the indictment does not appear to explicitly tie him to Maduro, instead accusing him more generally of working with members of the Venezuelan government.

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 12:01 p.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

David E. Sanger

White House reporter

In declaring that the U.S. will be “running” Venezuela, the president has raised a host of questions: Will the United States have an occupying military force? Will it install a pliant government for some number of years? Will it run the courts, and determine who pumps the oil? All of this, of course, could enmesh the United States in the kind of “forever wars” Trump’s MAGA base has rejected.

Trump did talk at some length about bringing in American oil companies to remake the energy infrastucture and, presumably, regain rights it once held to exploit the oil reserves.

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 11:58 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Anatoly Kurmanaev

Reporting from Venezuela

There are no signs of U.S. military presence in the country and the United States closed the embassy in Caracas in 2019, so it is unclear how the Trump administration would run Venezuela, as the president claims.

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 11:56 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Zolan Kanno-Youngs

White House reporter

As he justifies the military operation in Venezuela, Trump argued that Maduro sent members of Tren de Aragua to the United States to terrorize American communities. Trump’s own intelligence community earlier this year undercut that claim, finding that the gang was not controlled by the Venezuelan government.

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 11:55 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Maggie Haberman

White House reporter

Trump has offered no details about what the United States running Venezuela looks like. Will there be an American official placed there in a leadership position?

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 11:53 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Maggie Haberman

White House reporter

Trump has segued from talking about the Venezuela operation to talking about crime in Washington, falsely claiming there have been no murders in Washington, D.C., in the last seven months (and the National Guard has only been there since mid-August).

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 11:52 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Maggie Haberman

White House reporter

For all the rationales the Trump administration gave about trying to curtail illegal drug trafficking, this effort to knock Maduro out of power amounted to regime change, a fact that Trump is not masking in this news conference.

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 11:48 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

David E. Sanger

White House reporter

Trump referred to a “partnership” between Venezuela and the United States, which he said would make Venezuelans “rich, independent and safe.” Of course, this was a partnership accomplished by a government overthrow.

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 11:48 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Tyler Pager

Reporting from Palm Beach, Fla.

“We were prepared to do a second wave” after the first attack, Trump said but ultimately it was not necessary because of the success of the first. He added that the United States was ready to do so in the future if needed.

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 11:47 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

David E. Sanger

White House reporter

Trump put no time limit on the American occupation. It would be up to the United States to decide when to return the country to Venezuelan control. And then he turned to oil, saying that American companies would fix the infrastructure, “and start making money for the country.”

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 11:46 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

David E. Sanger

White House reporter

“We are going to run the country until such time that we can do a safe, proper and judicious transition,” Trump said, suggesting an occupation. The United States has done this before, in Germany, in Japan, and of course Iraq. But the history is checkered.

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 11:45 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Maggie Haberman

White House reporter

What comes next in terms of Venezuelan leadership is unclear, Trump said, the United States would be in charge until there is a clear safe transition. He emphasized it three times.

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 11:44 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Tyler Pager

Reporting from Palm Beach, Fla.

“We are going to run the country,” Trump said of Venezuela. He said he did not want the Maduro regime to continue with another leader.

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 11:43 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

David E. Sanger

White House reporter

“They knew we were coming,″ Trump said, arguing the Venezuelan military was quickly overwhelmed. “Not a single American service member was killed,″ he said, though earlier he suggested there were casualties.

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 11:42 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

David E. Sanger

White House reporter

Trump suggested the United States turned off the power in Caracas, Venezuela’s capital. He didn’t say how, but either a direct physical attack on the grid, or a cyberattack, would be the most likely method.

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 11:42 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

David E. Sanger

White House reporter

Trump opens by saying “overwhelming American military power” was used, from “air, land and sea” to seize Maduro, and he also compared it to other operations he ordered, including the attack in June on Iran’s nuclear sites. He contends that “no other nation” could pull off this kind of operation.

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 11:41 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Maggie Haberman

White House reporter

Trump began his Mar-a-Lago news conference saying the Venezuela operation was a force the likes of which hadn’t been seen since World War II. Trump, who has been awake virtually all night, looks and sounds fatigued.

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 11:40 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Tyler Pager

Reporting from Palm Beach, Fla.

Trump is surrounded by a number of his national security officials: Pete Hegseth, Marco Rubio, Dan Caine, John Ratcliffe and Stephen Miller. Steve Witkoff and Kash Patel are also on the room but standing off to the side.

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 11:37 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Eric Schmitt

Pentagon reporter

The chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee praised Maduro’s capture. “This arrest was the culmination of a monthslong effort by the Trump administration to degrade the narco-terrorist organizations that Maduro oversaw,” said Senator Roger Wicker, Republican of MIssissippi. He called on the administration for a briefing as soon as possible to hear from senior military and law enforcement leaders about the operation.

 

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 11:32 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Tyler Pager

Reporting from Palm Beach, Fla.

Trump just posted a photo on Truth Social that he said is of Maduro aboard the U.S.S. Iwo Jima. The picture shows Maduro in a gray sweatshirt and sweatpants. He is blindfolded and handcuffed and has large headphones on.

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 11:27 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Jack Nicas

Mexico City bureau chief

As President Trump prepares to speak about the U.S. military operation in Venezuela, there is quite a split screen with Venezuelan state television. The main government channel is broadcasting a pro-Venezuela rally in Cuba, where speakers are denouncing Trump as a dictator, with an all-caps chyron that says: “The empire kidnapped them. We want them back.”

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 11:18 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Julian E. Barnes, Tyler Pager and Eric Schmitt

Julian E. Barnes and Eric Schmitt reported from Washington. Tyler Pager reported from West Palm Beach, Fla.

President Trump says he watched the capture of Maduro in real time.

In August, a clandestine team of C.I.A. officers slipped into Venezuela with a plan to collect information on Nicolás Maduro, the country’s president, whom the Trump administration had labeled a narco-terrorist.

The C.I.A. team moved about Caracas, remaining undetected for months while it was in the country. The intelligence gathered about the Venezuelan leader’s daily movements — combined with a human source close to Mr. Maduro and a fleet of stealth drones flying secretly above — enabled the agency to map out minute details about his routines.

It was a highly dangerous mission. With the U.S. embassy closed, the C.I.A. officers could not operate under the cloak of diplomatic cover. But it was highly successful. Gen. Dan Caine, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said at a news conference that because of the intelligence gathered by the team, the United States knew where Mr. Maduro moved, what he ate and even what pets he kept.

That information was critical to the ensuing military operation, a pre-dawn raid Saturday by elite Army Delta Force commandos, the riskiest U.S. military operation of its kind since members of the Navy’s SEAL Team 6 killed Osama bin Laden in a safe house in Pakistan in 2011.

The result was a tactically precise and swiftly executed operation that extracted Mr. Maduro from his country with no loss of American life, a result heralded by President Trump amid larger questions about the legality and rationale for the U.S. actions in Venezuela.

Mr. Trump has justified what was named Operation Absolute Resolve as a strike against drug trafficking. But Venezuela is hardly as big a player in the international drug trade as other countries. Officials had previously told congressional leaders that their objective in Venezuela was not regime change. And Mr. Trump has long said he opposes U.S. foreign occupations.

Yet on Saturday, the president proclaimed that American officials were in charge of Venezuela, and that the United States would rebuild the country’s oil infrastructure.

In contrast to messy U.S. interventions of the past — by the military in Panama or the C.I.A. in Cuba — the operation to grab Mr. Maduro was virtually flawless, according to multiple officials familiar with the details, some of whom spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe the plans.

In the run-up, Delta Force commandos rehearsed the extraction inside a full-scale model of Mr. Maduro’s compound that the Joint Special Operations Command had built in Kentucky. They practiced blowing through steel doors at ever-faster paces.

The military had been readying for days to execute the mission, waiting for good weather conditions and a time when the risk of civilian casualties would be minimized.

Amid the heightened tensions, Mr. Maduro had been rotating between six and eight locations, and the United States did not always learn where he intended to stay until late in the evenings. To execute the operation, the U.S. military needed confirmation that Mr. Maduro was at the compound they had trained to attack.

In the days leading up to the raid, the United States deployed increasing numbers of Special Operations aircraft, specialized electronic warfare planes, armed Reaper drones, search-and-rescue helicopters and fighter jets to the region — last-minute reinforcements that analysts said indicated the only question was when military action would happen, not if.

The United States had made other moves intended to ratchet up the pressure on Mr. Maduro and prepare for the raid to capture him. A week earlier, the C.I.A. had carried out a drone strike on a port facility in Venezuela. And for months, the U.S. military has conducted a legally disputed campaign that has destroyed dozens of boats and killed at least 115 people in the Caribbean and eastern Pacific.

In recent days, Mr. Maduro tried to head off an American raid, offering the United States access to Venezuelan oil, Mr. Trump said Saturday. A U.S. official said the deal, offered on Dec. 23, would have had Mr. Maduro leave the country for Turkey. But Mr. Maduro angrily rejected that plan, the official said. It was clear, the official added, that Mr. Maduro was not serious.

The collapse of the talks set the stage for the capture mission, which culminated with Mr. Maduro flown to the United States and jailed in Brooklyn to face federal drug trafficking charges.

There was likely little doubt in the Venezuelan government that the United States was coming. But the military took pains to maintain so-called tactical surprise, like it did with its operation over the summer to destroy Iran’s nuclear facilities.

Mr. Trump had authorized the U.S. military to go ahead as early as Dec. 25, but left the precise timing to Pentagon officials and Special Operations planners to ensure that the attacking force was ready, and that conditions on the ground were optimal.

The U.S. military wanted to conduct the operation during the holiday period because many government officials were on vacation and because significant numbers of Venezuelan military personnel were on leave, according to a U.S. official.

Unseasonably bad weather pushed the operation off by several days. Earlier in the week, however, the weather cleared, and military commanders looked at a “rolling window” of targeting opportunities in the days ahead. Mr. Trump gave the final go order at 10:46 p.m. Friday.

Had the weather not cleared, the mission could have been pushed off until mid-January, one official said.

The operation officially got underway around 4:30 p.m. on Friday, when U.S. officials gave the first set of approvals to launch certain assets into the air. But that did not mean the full mission would be authorized. For the next six hours, officials continued to monitor the conditions on the ground, including the weather and Mr. Maduro’s whereabouts.

Mr. Trump spent the evening on the patio at Mar-a-Lago, his Florida club, where he had dinner with aides and cabinet secretaries. The president’s aides told him that they would be calling him later that evening, around 10:30 p.m., for the final approval. Mr. Trump did so by phone, then joined his senior national security officials in a secure location on the property.

Inside Venezuela, the effort began with a cyberoperation that cut power to large swaths of Caracas, shrouding the city in darkness to allow the planes, drones and helicopters to approach undetected.

More than 150 military aircraft, including drones, fighter planes and bombers, took part in the mission, taking off from 20 different military bases and Navy ships.

As the aircraft advanced on Caracas, military and intelligence agencies determined that they had maintained tactical surprise: Mr. Maduro had not been warned that the operation was coming.

Early Saturday morning, thunderous explosions boomed across Caracas as U.S. warplanes struck at radar and air defense batteries. While some of the explosions posted on social media looked dramatic, a U.S. official said that they were mostly radar installations and radio transmission towers being taken out.

At least 40 people were killed in Saturday’s attack on Venezuela, including military personnel and civilians, according to a senior Venezuelan official who spoke on condition of anonymity to describe preliminary reports.

Later, General Caine told reporters that the fighter planes, bombers and drones came into Venezuela to find and destroy the country’s air defenses, to clear a safe pathway for the helicopters carrying Special Operations forces.

Even though Venezuelan air defenses were suppressed, the U.S. helicopters came under fire as they moved in on Mr. Maduro’s compound at about 2:01 a.m. local time. General Caine said the helicopters responded with “overwhelming force.”

One of the helicopters was hit. Two U.S. officials said that about half a dozen soldiers were injured in the overall operation.

The Delta Force operators assigned to capture Mr. Maduro were whisked to their target — on Venezuela’s most fortified military base — by an elite Army Special Operations aviation unit, the 160th Special Operations Aviation Regiment, which flies modified MH-60 and MH-47 helicopters.

The 160th, nicknamed the Night Stalkers, specializes in high-risk, low-level and nighttime missions like insertions, extractions and raids. The unit conducted what the Pentagon called training missions near the coast of Venezuela in recent months.

Once on the ground, Delta Force moved quickly through the building to find Mr. Maduro. About 1,300 miles away, in a room inside Mar-a-Lago, Mr. Trump and key aides watched the raid play out in real time, courtesy of a camera positioned on an aircraft overhead.

As General Caine narrated the events on the screen, the president peppered him with questions about how the operation was unfolding.

“I watched it literally like I was watching a television show,” Mr. Trump said on Fox News Saturday morning.

As the president monitored the raid from Florida, the Delta Force operators used an explosive to enter the building.

The U.S. official said that the Special Operations forces took three minutes after blowing open the door to move through the building to Mr. Maduro’s location.

Mr. Trump said that once the Special Operations forces made it through the compound to Mr. Maduro’s room, the Venezuelan leader and his wife tried to escape into a steel-reinforced room, but were stopped by the U.S. forces.

“He was trying to get to a safe place,” Mr. Trump said during the news conference with General Caine, adding: “It was a very thick door, a very heavy door. But he was unable to get to that door. He made it to the door, he was unable to close it.”

About five minutes after entering the building, Delta Force reported that they had Mr. Maduro in custody.

The military was accompanied by an F.B.I. hostage negotiator in case Mr. Maduro had locked himself in a safe room or refused to surrender.

Those negotiations, however, proved unnecessary. The Delta operatives swiftly loaded the couple into the helicopters, which had returned to the compound. By 4:29 a.m. Caracas time, Mr. Maduro and his wife were transferred to the U.S.S. Iwo Jima, a U.S. warship in the Caribbean stationed about 100 miles off the coast of Venezuela during the operation.

The couple was transferred from the Iwo Jima to the U.S. Navy base at Guantánamo Bay, where the F.B.I. had a 757 government plane waiting to bring him to a military-controlled airport north of Manhattan.

Mr. Trump watched until the Special Operations forces were out of Venezuela, flying over the ocean, an official said.

Mr. Trump said that the United States was prepared to conduct a second wave of attacks against Venezuela, but that he did not think it would be necessary. He issued a warning to other Venezuelan leaders: He would be willing to come after them, as well.

Reporting was contributed by Anatoly Kurmanaev and Mariana Martínez from Venezuela, Riley Mellen from New York and Carol Rosenberg from Miami.

 

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 11:18 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Ruth Igielnik

Before this operation,  Americans largely did not support the idea of U.S. military activity in Venezuela. Just 25 percent of voters nationally — and about half of Republicans — supported military action in Venezuela, according to a December poll from Quinnipiac University.

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 11:17 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Isabela Espadas Barros Leal and Genevieve Glatsky

A timeline of the rising tension between the U.S. and Venezuela.

President Trump on Saturday announced the capture of the authoritarian leader of Venezuela, Nicolás Maduro, in a U.S. military operation that appeared to be the culmination of a campaign against Mr. Maduro by the president and other top American officials.

Mr. Maduro’s capture came after months of deadly U.S. strikes on supposed drug-carrying boats, the seizure of two tankers carrying Venezuelan oil and a U.S. military buildup off the South American country’s shores.

Here are some of the events that led to the breakdown in relations between the United States and Venezuela, and the effort to force Mr. Maduro from power.

March 2020: During Mr. Trump’s first term, the Justice Department indicted Mr. Maduro in a narco-terrorism and cocaine-trafficking conspiracy in which, prosecutors said, he helped lead a violent drug cartel that lasted for decades. Mr. Maduro condemned the charges, denying any involvement with drug trafficking.

July 2024: After a vote riddled with irregularities, Mr. Maduro was declared the winner of Venezuela’s 2024 presidential election. Independent monitors said the election was marred by fraud and that an opposition leader, Edmundo González, was its legitimate winner.

January 2025: The Biden administration recognized Mr. González, who had fled Venezuela after the election and was living in exile in Spain, as the legitimate leader of Venezuela as part of an effort to further isolate Mr. Maduro.

July: The Trump administration added Cartel de los Soles, which it described as a “Venezuela-based criminal group,” to a list of global terrorist groups and declared that Mr. Maduro was its leader. The Treasury Department said that Cartel de los Soles “provided material support” to Tren de Aragua, another cartel linked to Venezuela that the administration had designated as a foreign terrorist organization.

The administration treats Cartel de los Soles as an organized group, but some experts on Latin American crime characterize it as a network of corruption in Venezuela’s military and government.

Also in July, Mr. Trump signed a secret order directing the American military to use force against Latin American drug cartels that his administration identified as terrorist organizations.

August: The Pentagon began dispatching warships, fighter jets and thousands of troops into the Caribbean near Venezuela, increasing tensions in the region.

Aug. 7: Attorney General Pam Bondi announced that the United States government had increased its reward for information leading to the arrest of Mr. Maduro to $50 million.

Sept. 2: Mr. Trump ordered a deadly strike on a Venezuelan boat that he claimed was carrying “terrorists” who were members of Tren de Aragua over international waters. Mr. Maduro later called the strike, which killed 11 people, a “heinous crime” and said the United States should have captured those onboard if they were believed to have been transporting drugs.

The American military struck two other small vessels in September, killing six more people, including one who was said to be a Colombian citizen. The strikes have been widely criticized as illegal.

Sept. 4: Two Venezuelan F-16 fighter jets flew over American warships in the Caribbean in a show of force after the first deadly boat strike, a move the Pentagon described as “highly provocative.”

Sept. 6: Mr. Maduro sent a letter to Mr. Trump insisting that his country did not export drugs. The White House press secretary, Karoline Leavitt, later said that the White House had seen the letter but that it did not change the administration’s position on Venezuela.

Oct. 2: Mr. Trump instructed Richard Grenell, who is a special presidential envoy and the president of the Kennedy Center, to stop all diplomatic outreach to Venezuela. Mr. Grenell had been trying to negotiate a deal with Mr. Maduro that would have secured U.S. companies’ access to Venezuelan oil.

Oct. 8: Republicans in the Senate rejected a resolution to bar Mr. Trump from using military force against boats in the Caribbean Sea.

Oct. 15: Mr. Trump acknowledged that he had authorized the C.I.A. to conduct covert action in Venezuela, telling reporters that the administration was “certainly looking at land now, because we’ve got the sea very well under control.” The Venezuelan government said it would raise the matter with the United Nations Security Council.

Oct. 16: The U.S. military carried out a strike on a semisubmersible vessel in the Caribbean Sea, killing two men on board. Two other men were rescued by the U.S. military and repatriated within days to Colombia and Ecuador.

Oct. 17: The U.S. military said it killed three men and destroyed another boat it suspected of running drugs in the Caribbean Sea, this one alleged to have been affiliated with a Colombian insurgency group. It was the seventh boat known to have been attacked since early September.

Oct. 21: The United States struck a vessel that American officials suspected of carrying drugs in the Pacific Ocean off the coast of Colombia, expanding the Trump administration’s campaign past the Caribbean Sea. The strike killed two or three people, a U.S. official said. A second Pacific strike announced a day later killed three more people.

Oct. 23: Mr. Trump said at a news conference that he would not seek congressional approval for military strikes against drug cartels. “I don’t think we’re going to necessarily ask for a declaration of war,” Mr. Trump said, adding: “I think we are going to kill people that are bringing drugs into our country, OK?”

Oct. 24: The Pentagon announced that the aircraft carrier Gerald Ford and its accompanying warships and attack planes would be deployed to waters near Latin America. It came one day after two Air Force B-1 bombers flew near Venezuela.

Oct. 27: Another round of strikes on vessels in the Pacific killed 15 people. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth initially said one person had survived, but he was presumed dead after Mexican officials failed to find anyone in the water.

Oct. 31: María Corina Machado, Venezuela’s de facto opposition leader — who was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in October — told Bloomberg News that she had “no doubt that Nicolás Maduro, Jorge Rodríguez and many others are the masterminds of a system that has rigged elections in many countries, including the U.S.” The comments, which have been widely debunked, were criticized by former diplomats as well as critics of Mr. Maduro for seeming to provide justification for a potential invasion by the United States.

Nov. 2: Mr. Trump said in an interview on CBS News’s “60 Minutes” that he doubted the United States would go to war with Venezuela but would not fully rule out the possibility of land strikes. He accused Venezuela of treating the United States “very badly” and, when asked if Mr. Maduro’s days in office were numbered, said, “I would say yeah.”

Nov. 6: The United States struck a boat in the Caribbean, killing three people. That strike came after two others on the first week of November, one in the Caribbean and one in the Pacific, that killed five people.

Nov. 12: The United States carried out its 20th strike against the purported drug cartels. The strike killed four people and brought the total known death toll to 80.

Nov. 28: The New York Times reported that Mr. Trump and Mr. Maduro had spoken late the previous week, in a phone call that also included Mr. Rubio. The leaders discussed a possible meeting in the United States, though no plans were announced.

Nov. 29: Mr. Trump said on social media that the airspace “above and surrounding Venezuela” should be considered “closed in its entirety.” The president has no authority over Venezuelan airspace, but his post was expected to deter airlines from flying to the country.

Dec. 2: Mr. Hegseth addressed mounting concerns about the legality of the first strike on a Caribbean vessel, citing “the fog of war” in response to questions about whether the U.S. military committed a war crime when it killed two survivors of that attack in a second strike. Mr. Hegseth said he did not personally see survivors of the first strike and that Adm. Frank M. Bradley, the commander of the operation, ordered the second strike.

Dec. 4: A strike in the Eastern Pacific killed four people at a moment of heightened scrutiny over the legality of the U.S. military’s campaign, and nearly two weeks since the previous boat attack.

Dec. 10: Mr. Trump announced that the U.S. had seized a sanctioned oil tanker off the coast of Venezuela. U.S. officials said they expected additional seizures in the coming weeks, asserting that they were part of the Trump administration’s efforts to weaken Mr. Maduro’s government by undermining its oil market. One of the officials said that though the ship was carrying Venezuelan oil, it was seized because of its past links to smuggling illicit Iranian oil.

Dec. 11: Ms. Machado appeared in Oslo hours after missing the ceremony that awarded her the Nobel Peace Prize. Her emergence after more than a year in hiding thrust the opposition back onto the global stage at a volatile moment in U.S.-Venezuela relations. That same day the U.S. imposed new sanctions on Venezuela’s oil sector and on relatives of Mr. Maduro while moving to block tens of millions of dollars’ worth of oil aboard the seized oil tanker.

Dec. 15: The U.S. military struck three boats in the Eastern Pacific, killing eight people, in one of the deadliest days of the campaign. The military said the boats were traveling along a known narco-trafficking route.

Dec. 16: Mr. Trump ordered a “complete blockade” of sanctioned oil tankers entering or leaving Venezuela. In a social media post, Mr. Trump said Venezuela was “completely surrounded” by a growing U.S. naval presence, sharply escalating his efforts to disrupt the country’s oil exports. The move prompted Mr. Maduro to dispatch naval escorts for oil shipments sailing toward Asia.

Dec. 17: An attack in the Eastern Pacific killed four people in a strike the military said was carried out at the direction of Mr. Hegseth. The House rejected two resolutions that would have required Mr. Trump to seek congressional approval before attacking Venezuela and continuing the strikes.

Dec. 18: The military carried out two more strikes on boats in the Eastern Pacific, killing five people.

Dec. 19: Mr. Trump nominated Lt. Gen. Francis L. Donovan, a marine with extensive special operations and Middle East experience, to lead the U.S. Southern Command after the abrupt retirement of Adm. Alvin Holsey, who reportedly objected to the administration’s lethal boat strikes.

Dec. 20: The U.S. Coast Guard tried to intercept the Bella 1, a stateless tanker under U.S. sanctions, for past Iranian oil shipments. Personnel on the ship did not allow it to be boarded and the vessel fled northeast into the Atlantic while broadcasting distress signals.

The Coast Guard also stopped and detained the Centuries, a Panamanian-flagged vessel carrying Venezuelan oil for a China-based trader. It was unclear how long the United States intended to detain the Centuries, as American authorities did not have a warrant to take possession of it.

Dec. 22: The U.S. military said a strike in the eastern Pacific targeted a boat that had been transporting drugs along known trafficking routes. One person was killed.

Dec. 23: Over several days, the U.S. military intensified operations in the Caribbean, sending multiple C-17 transport flights from bases across the country and Japan to Puerto Rico.

Late December: In the first known U.S. operation inside Venezuela, the C.I.A. carried out a drone strike on a port facility sometime during the fourth week of December, likely on Dec. 24. The strike hit a dock purportedly used for shipping narcotics and it did not kill anyone, people briefed on the operation said. News of the strike first came to light on Dec. 26, when Mr. Trump said in a radio interview that the U.S. had destroyed “a big facility” as part of its campaign against Venezuela.

Dec. 29: A strike on a boat in the Eastern Pacific killed two people, according to the U.S. Southern Command. The command said on social media that the boat was engaged in “narco-trafficking operations.”

Dec. 30: Three people were killed aboard one boat during strikes on three boats traveling in a chain, according to the U.S. Southern Command, which announced the operation a day later.

Dec. 31: The U.S. military killed five people in a strike on two boats, the Southern Command said. The command did not provide further information about the boats’ location.

As of Dec. 31, at least 115 people had been killed in 35 boat strikes since Sept. 2.

Jan. 2: President Trump announced on social media that the United States had captured Mr. Maduro and was flying him out of Venezuela. Mr. Trump’s announcement came hours after the start of coordinated U.S. strikes on Venezuela’s capital, Caracas, and other parts of the country. The strikes killed at least 80 people, according to a senior Venezuelan official.

Jan. 3: Mr. Maduro arrived in New York, where he and his wife were indicted on federal drug trafficking and weapons charges and held in a Brooklyn jail. Mr. Trump said in a news conference shortly after the announcement of Mr. Maduro’s capture that the United States would “run” Venezuela, though Mr. Maduro’s aides appeared to still be in power after the attack.

Jan. 4: After top Venezuelan officials fiercely condemned the U.S. attack, the country’s interim leader, Delcy Rodríguez, struck a more conciliatory tone, asserting Venezuela’s right to sovereignty but offering to work on a “cooperative agenda” with the United States. Still, Mr. Trump reiterated his claim to have direct control over the country, saying the United States was “in charge” of Venezuela.

Jan. 5: Mr. Maduro and his wife pleaded not guilty to drug trafficking and other federal charges during their arraignment at a federal courthouse in Manhattan. Mr. Maduro told the judge he had been kidnapped. “I’m innocent. I’m not guilty. I am a decent man,” he said through an interpreter. He added, “I am still president of my country.”

Anushka Patil contributed reporting.

 

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 11:10 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

William Rashbaum

The new indictment tracks President Nicolás Maduro’s rise through the ranks of the Venezuelan government, accusing him of committing the crimes charged in the indictment every step of the way. “Since his early days in Venezuelan government, Maduro Moros has tarnished every public office he has held,” the indictment charged, using Maduro’s full Spanish surname. “As a member of Venezuela’s National Assembly, Maduro Moros moved loads of cocaine under the protection of Venezuelan law enforcement.”

The indictment continues: “As Venezuela’s Minister of Foreign Affairs, Maduro Moros provided Venezuelan diplomatic passports to drug traffickers and facilitated diplomatic cover for planes used by money launderers to repatriate drug proceeds from Mexico to Venezuela. As Venezuela’s President and now-de facto ruler, Maduro Moros allows cocaine-fueled corruption to flourish for his own benefit, for the benefit of members of his ruling regime, and for the benefit of his family members.”

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 11:03 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Tyler Pager

Reporting from Palm Beach, Fla.

We are inside the Tea Room at Mar-a-Lago awaiting the president’s news conference.

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 11:01 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Adam Sella

Reporting from Washington

Vice President JD Vance justifies Maduro’s capture as bringing him to justice.

Vice President JD Vance justified the U.S. operation that captured Venezuela’s leader, Nicolás Maduro, as legal and necessary, praising it in a social media post on Saturday.

“PSA for everyone saying this was ‘illegal’: Maduro has multiple indictments in the United States for narcoterrorism. You don’t get to avoid justice for drug trafficking in the United States because you live in a palace in Caracas,” he said, referring to the Venezuelan capital.

Mr. Maduro, Venezuela’s leader since 2013, has denied U.S. accusations that he controls drug trafficking groups.

Mr. Vance added that “the president offered multiple off ramps, but was very clear throughout this process: the drug trafficking must stop, and the stolen oil must be returned to the United States.”

The “stolen oil” referred to a view within the administration that Venezuela illegally took American oil fields through nationalization.

The U.S. operation inside Venezuela to capture the country’s leader is the latest in a series of escalations. The United States has bombed suspected drug boats in the Caribbean Sea and eastern Pacific Ocean, has declared a blockade on some oil tankers coming to and from Venezuelan ports, and has seized or pursued several tankers.

While Mr. Vance has not been as vocal in the administration’s campaign against Venezuela as Secretary of State Marco Rubio or Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, who have played key roles in it. Still, the vice president has regularly proved to be a stalwart defender of the administration.

In early September after the U.S. first struck a boat the administration said was trafficking narcotics, killing 11, Mr. Vance said on social media that “killing cartel members who poison our fellow citizens is the highest and best use of our military.”

 

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 10:54 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Farnaz Fassihi

United Nations bureau chief

Venezuela’s mission to the U.N. has requested an emergency Security Council meeting and has asked the Council to condemn the U.S. military strikes against the country.

Venezuela’s ambassador, Samuel Reinaldo Moncada Acosta, said in a letter to the Council’s president: “The United States of America always uses lies to fabricate wars. It is an international tyranny imposed with the propaganda of death: the recent past confirms this.” Russia and China, allies of Venezuela and permanent members of the Council, have requested the Council convene an emergency meeting this weekend.

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 10:47 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Emiliano Rodríguez Mega

María Corina Machado, the Venezuelan opposition leader, posted a statement on social media, calling for national unity following the capture of Nicolás Maduro.

“Given his refusal to accept a negotiated exit, the government of the United States has fulfilled its promise to enforce the law,” she wrote. “We have struggled for years, we have given it our all, and it has been worth it. What had to happen is happening.”

Machado added that Edmundo González, who the U.S. has recognized as Venezuela’s President-elect, must “immediately” take office and be recognized as the country’s commander of the armed forces.

“Today we are prepared to enforce our mandate and take power,” Machado said. “We are going to restore order, release the political prisoners, build an exceptional country, and bring our children back home.”

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 10:47 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

William Rashbaum

A judge in the Southern District of New York has unsealed the new indictment against President Nicolás Maduro of Venezuela, which opens by saying that for 25 years the leaders of Venezuela have “abused their positions of public trust and corrupted once-legitimate institutions to import tons of cocaine into the United States.” The charges are the same as in the 2020 indictment, though there is more political rhetoric.

There are four counts in both indictments, including narco-terrorism, conspiracy to import cocaine and possession of machine guns, which, when combined with drug trafficking charges, carries a potentially lengthy prison sentence. Both indictments name six defendants, but the new one includes Maduro’s wife and son. It also names the minister of the interior, Diosado Cabello Rondon, who was charged before. It also adds two new defendants, while dropping three others who had been charged in 2020.

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 10:46 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Annie Karni

Reporting from Washington

Trump didn’t seek congressional authorization to capture Maduro, and some lawmakers are concerned.

Republicans in Congress on Saturday cheered the Trump administration’s dramatic military action to capture President Nicolás Maduro of Venezuela, but top Democrats sounded alarms about the legality of the operation and said they would seek a quick vote to halt hostilities without express authorization.

The surprise nighttime operation — and President Trump’s declaration on Saturday that he planned to “run” Venezuela and use the U.S. military to guard its oil resources — all but guaranteed that lawmakers returning to Washington next week would instantly confront an intense debate about the situation.

That promised the latest test of whether the Republican-controlled House and Senate, which have deferred constantly to the president, would try to reassert any of their power in an election year.

Senator Chuck Schumer, Democrat of New York and the minority leader, said he would push for a vote next week on a war powers resolution to limit Mr. Trump’s ability to take further military action without explicit authorization by Congress.

Senator Andy Kim, Democrat of New Jersey, said Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth had “blatantly” lied to Congress in recent briefings when they said the administration’s objective in Venezuela was not regime change.

Mr. Kim, a former national security official in the Obama administration, called the move to oust Mr. Maduro “disastrous,” arguing that it would further isolate the United States on the global stage.

“Trump rejected our Constitutionally required approval process for armed conflict because the Administration knows the American people overwhelmingly reject risks pulling our nation into another war,” he wrote on social media.

At a morning news conference in Palm Beach, Fla., the president indicated that he had purposefully skipped informing members of Congress before taking action in Venezuela because he did not trust lawmakers to keep his plans confidential.

“Congress has a tendency to leak,” Mr. Trump said.

And after Mr. Trump said at the same news conference that the United States would now “run” Venezuela, Mr. Schumer warned that such an idea “should strike fear in the hearts of all Americans.”

He called on the administration to immediately brief Congress on its plan “to prevent a humanitarian and geopolitical disaster that plunges us into another endless war or one that trades one corrupt dictator for another.”

Representative Hakeem Jeffries, Democrat of New York and the minority leader, also called for a briefing, demanding that the Trump administration immediately present to Congress “compelling evidence to explain and justify this unauthorized use of military force.”

The House and the Senate are set to return to Washington next week after a long holiday break.

But Mr. Schumer said on Saturday afternoon that the administration had not responded to any request from congressional leaders for an immediate briefing.

“They have not given us any details and have not gotten back to us,” Mr. Schumer said during a conference call with reporters. “They kept everyone in the total dark.”

Most congressional Republicans rallied around the president’s action, in keeping with the extraordinary deference they have shown to Mr. Trump even as he has trampled over congressional prerogatives and contradicted his promises to extricate the United States from foreign conflicts.

Senator John Thune, Republican of South Dakota and the majority leader, said Mr. Maduro’s capture was “an important first step to bring him to justice for the drug crimes for which he has been indicted in the United States.” He called the operation a “decisive action” by Mr. Trump.

Speaker Mike Johnson called the operation “decisive and justified,” and said in a statement that the Trump administration was “working to schedule briefings for members as Congress returns to Washington.”

But even some Republicans gently pressed for more answers from the Trump administration.

“I look forward to hearing more about the Administration’s plans for a positive transition in the days ahead,” Senator Todd Young, Republican of Indiana, said online, while also praising the military personnel who carried out the capture of Mr. Maduro.

And others said the operation ran counter to Mr. Trump’s “America First” promises.

“This is what many in MAGA thought they voted to end,” Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, the right-wing Republican from Georgia who is set to vacate her position as lawmakers return to Washington, wrote in a lengthy social media post. “Boy were we wrong.”

Many Democrats called Mr. Maduro’s apprehension good news, but said the way in which it was done raised serious questions.

Representative Debbie Wasserman Schultz, a Florida Democrat who represents a district in which Venezuelan immigrants cheered the news, said that Mr. Maduro’s capture was “welcome.” But she added: “I’ll demand answers as to why Congress and the American people were bypassed in this effort. The absence of congressional involvement prior to this action risks the continuation of the illegitimate Venezuelan regime.”

At least one Democratic candidate running for office in this year’s midterm elections was quick to condemn Republicans in Congress for having failed to stand up to Mr. Trump when they could have, helping to set the stage for what they called an unauthorized large-scale strike on Venezuela.

Graham Platner, a veteran and a progressive Democrat running for Senate in Maine, noted that Senator Susan Collins, the Republican he is challenging, voted with most members of her party against a Senate resolution to block the president from invading Venezuela without congressional authorization. “From Iraq to Venezuela, you can count on Susan Collins to enable illegal foreign wars,” he wrote online.

And the top Democrats on the national security, intelligence and armed services committees all condemned the action even as they denounced Mr. Maduro.

“Last night, President Trump waged war on a foreign nation without authorization, without notification, and without any explanation to the American people,” Senator Jack Reed of Rhode Island, the senior Democrat on the Armed Services Committee, said in a statement. “Whatever comes next, President Trump will own the consequences.”

At least one Republican expressed concern early Saturday about the operation, but later said he was satisfied with the explanation that Mr. Rubio had given him in a phone call. In an initial post on Saturday morning, Mr. Lee said he wanted to know “what, if anything, might constitutionally justify this action” in the absence of congressional authorization for military force.

But in a second post hours later, Mr. Lee wrote that Mr. Rubio had told him that Mr. Maduro had been “arrested by U.S. personnel to stand trial on criminal charges in the United States.” He added: “This action likely falls within the president’s inherent authority under Article II of the Constitution to protect U.S. personnel from an actual or imminent attack.”

Mr. Lee also said that Mr. Rubio “anticipates no further action in Venezuela now that Maduro is in U.S. custody.”

That post came hours before Mr. Trump told reporters that the United States would effectively be running Venezuela and that a U.S. military presence would remain there “as it pertains to oil.”

 

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 10:39 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Julian E. Barnes

The C.I.A. had a group of officers on the ground in Venezuela working clandestinely beginning in August, according to a person familiar with the agency’s work. The officers gathered information about Maduro’s “pattern of life” and movements that was important as the U.S. developed intelligence about his whereabouts and movements.

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 10:31 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Anatoly Kurmanaev

Reporting from Venezuela

Venezuela’s Vice President Delcy Rodríguez is in Caracas, according to three people close to her. Rodríguez is next in line to assume power, according to Venezuelan constitution. She remains the ruling party’s choice to succeed Maduro, said a fourth person, a senior Venezuelan official. The United States has called Mr. Maduro’s government illegitimate, and it’s unclear if the White House would accept Rodríguez as president.

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 10:30 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Emiliano Rodríguez Mega

When asked on Fox News if the attack in Venezuela were intended as a warning to President Claudia Sheinbaum of Mexico, Trump seemed to signal they might. “Well, it wasn’t meant to be,” he replied. “We’re very friendly with her, she’s a good woman. But the cartels are running Mexico — she’s not running Mexico.”

Trump said Sheinbaum had repeatedly declined his offers to intervene against the cartels. “I’ve asked her numerous times, ‘Would you like us to take out the cartels?’” he said, adding that “something is going to have to be done with Mexico.”

His comments came even after his own officials have lauded Mexico for an unprecedented surge in cooperation, citing a record number of cartel arrests and successful fentanyl seizures.

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 10:28 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Jack Nicas

Mexico City bureau chief

In an interview with Venezuelan state television, Venezuela’s attorney general, Tarek William Saab, called on Venezuelans to take to the streets against the U.S. military action in the country. “We are going to show the world what we are made of,” he said. State television has been broadcasting footage of small pro-Maduro rallies on Saturday.

Saab also demanded the United States produce proof that Maduro is alive, and he called on international organizations to denounce Maduro’s capture. “Before the world, I ask the United Nations at this moment to speak out. Where are the international human rights organizations?” he said.

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 10:26 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Jonah Bromwich

U.S. attorney general Pam Bondi has posted the unsealed indictment of President Nicolás Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores. At first glance, it appears quite similar to the 2020 indictment of the Venezuelan leader, charging him with narco-terrorism and cocaine importation conspiracies. The charges also include possession of machine guns. When combined with drug trafficking charges, those gun charges carry strong prison sentences upon conviction.

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 10:10 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Christopher Buckley

The Chinese foreign ministry said in response to the U.S. capture of Nicolás Maduro that it is “deeply shocked and strongly condemns the U.S. for recklessly using force against a sovereign state and targeting its president.” The ministry also said that the U.S. actions “seriously violate international law, violate Venezuela’s sovereignty, and threaten the peace and security of Latin America and the Caribbean.” A Chinese delegation visited with Maduro hours before his capture, according to photos posted on social media by the Venezuelan president.

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 10:09 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Simon Romero and Anatoly Kurmanaev

Simon Romero reported from São Paulo, Brazil, and Anatoly Kurmanaev reported from Venezuela.

Maduro’s inner circle appeared to survive the U.S. strikes on Venezuela.

The United States captured Venezuela’s president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores. But Mr. Maduro’s inner circle appeared on Saturday morning to have survived the U.S. strikes on the country, though it was not immediately clear who was in power.

Venezuela’s vice president, Delcy Rodríguez, who is next in the presidential line of succession, figured among the Venezuelan officials issuing pronouncements or making public appearances after U.S. strikes on targets in the country.

While reports circulated that Ms. Rodríguez was in Russia at the time of the attacks, Ms. Rodríguez is in Caracas, according to three people close to her. Russian state media also denied reports that she was in Moscow.

Other top Maduro allies who appeared to survive the attacks included Vladimir Padrino López, the defense minister and Venezuela’s top ranking military officer; and Diosdado Cabello, the interior minister and one of Mr. Maduro’s top enforcers.

The survival of these officials suggests that Venezuela’s government remains functioning, at least shakily, in the hours after Mr. Maduro and the first lady were seized and extracted from the country.

If Mr. Maduro’s inner circle does remain intact and at the helm of Venezuela’s institutions, that also raises questions as to what happens next.

war game run during President Trump’s first term assessed what may follow if Mr. Maduro were ousted, forecasting chaotic power struggles as military units, rival political factions and guerrilla groups vie for control of the country.

It is unclear how the intervention will influence the Venezuelan opposition’s ambitions to exercise power. Edmundo González, a retired diplomat, is considered the legitimate winner, by a wide margin, of a presidential election in 2024.

Unable to take office after the vote, Mr. González fled to Spain, ceding the spotlight to María Corina Machado, the opposition leader who had been barred from running and who won the 2025 Nobel Peace Prize.

Mr. Trump appeared hesitant to throw his support behind Ms. Machado.

“Well, we have to look at it right now,” he said on Fox News on Saturday morning when asked if he would support her. “They have a vice president, as you know. I mean, I don’t know about what kind of an election that was, but, you know, the election of Maduro was a disgrace.”

Mr. Trump also suggested that his administration would continue to target Venezuelan government officials if they side with Mr. Maduro.

“If they stay loyal, the future is really bad, really bad for them,” he said.

Speaking by telephone on state television, Ms. Rodríguez, the vice president, invoked what she described as Mr. Maduro’s “instructions,” and called on the people and the armed forces to defend Venezuela.

Ms. Rodríguez also asked Mr. Trump to provide proof that Mr. Maduro is alive and condemned the U.S. intervention as an act of “military aggression” that violated the country’s sovereignty.

Educated partly in France, Ms. Rodríguez spearheaded a market-friendly overhaul which had provided, before the U.S. military campaign targeting Mr. Maduro, a semblance of stability in Venezuela’s economy after a prolonged collapse.

Her older brother, Jorge Rodríguez, another member of the inner circle who is the president of the National Assembly and Mr. Maduro’s chief political strategist, shared a statement on Telegram from Ms. Rodríguez calling the intervention a plot to seize Venezuela’s oil reserves.

Separately, Mr. Cabello, the interior minister, appeared on state television and urged Venezuelans to support Mr. Maduro’s government. While allied with Mr. Maduro, Mr. Cabello is also viewed as an internal rival in Venezuela’s power structures.

Mr. Cabello, a retired military figure, is at the helm of Venezuela’s repression apparatus. As a hard-liner with a caustic political style, his public profile had been on the rise as the U.S. intensified its campaign against Venezuela in recent weeks.

The defense minister, Mr. Padrino López, also appeared on state television after the U.S. attacks, calling them an act of “criminal military aggression.” He is known as a survivor of political upheaval in Venezuela, holding his role for the last 11 years.

Genevieve Glatsky contributed from Bogotá, Colombia, and Jack Nicas from Mexico City.

 

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 10:07 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Genevieve Glatsky

Reporting from Bogotá, Colombia

Ecuador’s president, Daniel Noboa, appeared to endorse the capture of Nicolás Maduro, writing on X that “all the narco chavista criminals, your time is coming,” and voicing support for Venezuelan opposition leaders María Corina Machado and Edmundo González Urrutia.

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 10:07 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Robert Jimison

Reporting on Congress

Representative Don Bacon, Republican of Nebraska, said the mission to capture Maduro was “great for the future of Venezuelans and the region,” but he warned that it could hand authoritarian powers a justification for aggression elsewhere. “My main concern is now Russia will use this to justify their illegal and barbaric military actions against Ukraine, or China to justify an invasion of Taiwan,” he wrote in a social media post.

 

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 10:03 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Megan Mineiro

Senator John Thune, the Republican majority leader, said the U.S. capture of the Venezuelan president, Nicolás Maduro, was “an important first step to bring him to justice for the drug crimes for which he has been indicted in the United States.” He called the operation a “decisive action” by President Trump.

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 9:57 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Valerie Hopkins

Russian Minister of Foreign Affairs Sergei Lavrov said he had spoken to Venezuelan Vice President Delcy Rodriguez by telephone. Lavrov “expressed firm solidarity with the people of Venezuela in the face of armed aggression” and said Moscow would “continue to support” the government, according to a summary of the conversation published by the ministry.

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 9:56 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Farnaz Fassihi

United Nations bureau chief

United Nations secretary general António Guterres said in a statement that he was alarmed by the events in Venezuela on Saturday and warned that the U.S. military action there would have wider implications for the region. “Independently of the situation in Venezuela, these developments constitute a dangerous precedent,” he said, calling for international law to be respected.

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 9:40 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Jack Nicas

Mexico City bureau chief

Trump suggested on Fox News that his administration would continue to target Venezuelan government officials if they side with Maduro. “If they stay loyal, the future is really bad, really bad for them,” he said. “I’d say most of them have converted.” Several top Venezuelan officials criticized the U.S. action on Venezuelan state television on Saturday.

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 9:39 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Julian E. Barnes

President Trump said to an interviewer on Fox News that he and his team had watched the raid on video feeds as it went down. He said he saw the U.S. military team break through steel doors in “a matter of seconds.” “I’ve never seen anything like it actually,” he said. He added no American troops were killed but then suggested some were injured when their helicopter was hit.

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 9:34 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Julian E. Barnes

Trump said on Fox News that Maduro and his wife had been taken to the U.S.S. Iwo Jima, one of the American warships that have been prowling the Caribbean. Survivors of one of the boat strikes were also taken to the Iwo Jima.

Jan. 3, 2026, 9:32 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Tyler Pager

Reporting from Palm Beach, Fla.

Speaking to Fox News, President Trump declined to throw his support behind Maria Corina Machado, the Venezuelan opposition leader who recently won the Nobel Peace Prize.

“Well, we have to look at it right now,” he said on Fox News when asked if he will support her. “They have a vice president, as you know. I mean, I don’t know about what kind of an election that was, but, you know, the election of Maduro was a disgrace.”

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 9:30 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Tyler Pager

Reporting from Palm Beach, Fla.

Trump brushed off concerns about the legality of the U.S. operation in Venezuela. When asked about criticism from Representative Jim Himes of Connecticut, the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, the president said Democrats were “weak, stupid people.”

“They should say great job,” he said in an interview on Fox News. “They shouldn’t say ‘Oh, gee, maybe it’s not constitutional.’ You know the same old stuff that we’ve been hearing for years and years and years.”

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 9:29 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Patricia Mazzei

Reporting from Doral, Fla.

In South Florida, Venezuelans were partying to celebrate Maduro’s capture.

The party broke out before sunrise in the heavily Venezuelan city of Doral, Fla., west of Miami. Venezuelans and Venezuelan Americans blared music, honked car horns and danced to celebrate the capture of Nicolás Maduro, the Venezuelan leader.

“Viva Venezuela libre!” one man waving a Venezuelan flag yelled as he drove by El Arepazo, a Venezuelan arepa shop in a gas station where Venezuelans often gather for political or sporting events.

South Florida is home to the largest Venezuelan community in the United States — about 40 percent of Doral’s residents are of Venezuelan origin — and a vast majority of them are opposed to Mr. Maduro. Millions of people have left Venezuela in recent years because of economic chaos and political repression in the country.

Some of Doral’s Venezuelan residents immigrated more than two decades ago. Others are more recent arrivals. Many of them watched anxiously over the last few months as President Trump escalated his threats and boat strikes against Venezuela, and they wondered how it would all turn out.

“I can’t believe it,” said Mariannys Milano, 45, as she wiped away tears outside El Arepazo early on Saturday morning. She had hardly slept, she said, after calling and texting relatives in eastern Venezuela all night. “I have so many emotions. I feel like throwing up. I feel joy.”

Several people said they were anxious about what would follow with Mr. Maduro out of power, though they all said they were optimistic. No one wanted any member of Mr. Maduro’s government to remain in office, though his vice president, Delcy Rodríguez, was sworn in as interim president on Saturday.

“The good thing is that they took out Maduro,” said Abner Márquez, 27, of Lake Worth. “Now we have to see who in the government is going to take power, and what they are going to do.”

Many in Doral said they preferred that the U.S. lead a transition that would result in turning the government over to Edmundo González, the diplomat who outpolled Mr. Maduro in a presidential election in 2024 by a margin of more than 2 to 1, according to the Venezuelan opposition’s vote count, but was not allowed to take power.

“I don’t know what’s going to happen,” said Tibisay Mejía, 51, who immigrated to the United States in 2015. “But this is the beginning.”

Jesús Naranjo, 57, said that although he does not like Mr. Trump generally, he enthusiastically approved of his administration’s removal of Mr. Maduro.

“I support his actions toward Venezuela,” said Mr. Naranjo, who left Venezuela in 1998, the same year that Mr. Maduro’s predecessor, Hugo Chávez, was elected president. Mr. Trump, he said, “had the courage to do what had to be done.”

“If the United States lends a hand,” Mr. Naranjo added, “things should work democratically.”

Revelers in Doral said they had deep faith in María Corina Machado, the opposition leader who was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in October. They said they expected her to work closely with the Trump administration to lead a transition.

“She’s not just winging it,” said Yajaira Molina, 52. “I believe in Maria Corina Machado as much as I do in the American government’s strategy.”

In nearby Key Biscayne, a wealthy community with many longtime Venezuelan immigrants, people gathered at the Golden Hog, an upscale deli and market, to celebrate.

“We’re better off than we were yesterday,” María Carolina Jaso said at a church market a few blocks away. “It was either in the hands of criminals or in the hands of unpredictable Trump.”

Some 1,200 miles north in the New York City borough of Queens, people gathered at the Budare Café in Jackson Heights. Among them was Sebastián Sánchez, 26, who had a Venezuelan flag tied around his neck like a cape as he ate a pabellón arepa and sipped black coffee.

“Today this food is for celebrating,” he said. “It’s typical Venezuelan food and it’s a very special day. Living here in the United States, I am very privileged, but my family came here looking for that freedom that we didn’t have in our country, so seeing that there is a new future in Venezuela makes me very happy.”

The celebratory mood in Doral persisted for most of the day. At one point, a couple of hundred people stood in the middle of the gas station, which was closed for business and guarded by police officers, to sing traditional Venezuelan songs and the Venezuelan and American national anthems. Some people ducked into a neighboring convenience store to pick up coffee or the occasional celebratory beer. So many people crowded outside later that the arepa shop and the store had to lock their doors and admit people only one at a time.

“We’ve been waiting for this for so many years,” said Alejandra Arrieta, 55, of Doral.

People held video calls with Venezuelan relatives and live-streamed the celebration, wishing one another a happy new year with a feeling that sounded different from what it might have been on Jan. 1.

Councilman Rafael Pineyro of Doral, a Venezuelan American who immigrated to Miami when he was 15, said he was visiting relatives in Orlando when he heard the Maduro news at about 1:30 a.m. Saturday. He scrambled back to Doral, where the city had spent several weeks, Mr. Pineyro said, preparing for the possibility of residents’ spilling into the streets if the United States took military action in Venezuela.

Mr. Pineyro, a Republican, said that Venezuela “needs help from the U.S. government, 100 percent,” to move on after Mr. Maduro’s removal.

What a transition in power might look like, or how it would take place, remains in question, he said, but he added that the remaining members of Mr. Maduro’s government would be wise to “come to the right side of history.”

José Anka, 57, said that Ms. Rodríguez, the interim president, “is going to have to do what the U.S. wants.”

As the day went on, more people arrived at the gas station, often with their entire families and dogs in tow. Several brought Trump signs or wore “Make America Great Again” hats.

Florida Republicans began seriously courting Venezuelan American voters after Mr. Trump’s first presidential election in 2016. Miami’s influential Cuban American politicians, in particular, embraced Venezuelan Americans, seeing them as ideologically aligned because both groups had fled from left-wing regimes. Republicans had already won over many Venezuelan Americans with hard-line rhetoric and actions against Mr. Maduro, even before his capture on Saturday.

Some people in Doral waved Cuban flags and said that they hoped Cuba’s communist regime would be the next to fall, now that Mr. Maduro was gone and his government could no longer help prop up Cuba’s flailing economy.

“I feel this as if it were my own country,” Yasier Hernández, 40, who is from Cuba, said as he wept at the sight of Venezuelans celebrating. “Tomorrow, it will be our turn.”

When Mr. Trump began speaking at a news conference in Mar-a-Lago, his resort in Palm Beach, some 75 miles to the north, a hush fell over the crowd in Doral. Small groups gathered in twos and threes and strained to listen on their phones. A few people knelt around a loudspeaker. Some people listened to a Spanish translation of Mr. Trump’s remarks.

Some in the crowd tuned him out before he was done. But the street party kept going, a parade of honking cars filling Doral well into the afternoon.

David C. Adams contributed reporting from Key Biscayne, Fla., and Raúl Vilchis from New York.

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 9:28 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

William Rashbaum

An earlier indictment in 2020 had charged that President Nicolás Maduro and several Venezuelan officials “participated in a corrupt and violent narco-terrorism conspiracy between the Cartel de Los Soles and the Fuerzas Armadas Revolucionarias de Colombia,” the armed Columbian group known as FARC.

At the time, the U.S. attorney general, William Barr, said that the Venezuelan regime was “plagued by criminality and corruption” and that “Maduro and a number of high-ranking colleagues” had conspired with the FARC to smuggle tons of cocaine into the United States. Others charged in the 2020 indictment included Venezuela’s Minister of Defense, its chief Supreme Court justice and two FARC leaders.

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 9:20 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

The New York Times

At La Carlota Air Base in Caracas, burned husks of military vehicles could be seen hours after the United States struck the military installation along with other targets across the country.

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 9:17 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Tyler Pager

Reporting from Palm Beach, Fla.

In an interview on Fox News, Trump said that Maduro wanted to negotiate in the final days before U.S. forces captured him but the American president said he rejected that offer. “I didn’t want to negotiate,” he said. “I said, ‘Nope, we got to do it.’”

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 9:14 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Robert Jimison

Reporting on Congress

A number of Republican lawmakers who represent districts in Southern Florida with large Venezuelan-American constituencies were celebrating the capture of Presdient Nicolás Maduro of Venezuela. “Today’s decisive action is this hemisphere’s equivalent to the Fall of the Berlin Wall,” Representative Carlos Gimenez said in a social media post. Representative Mario Diaz-Balart praised President Trump’s “decisive leadership,” and Representative Maria Salazar said it was time for “the rightful leaders of Venezuela to restore freedom and rebuild the nation.”

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 9:09 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Julian E. Barnes and Eric Schmitt

The C.I.A. had a source inside Maduro’s government to help track him.

A C.I.A. source within the Venezuelan government monitored the location of Nicolás Maduro in both the days and moments before his capture by American special operation forces, according to people briefed on the operation.

The American spy agency, the people said, produced the intelligence that led to the capture of Mr. Maduro, monitoring his position and movements with a fleet of stealth drones that provided near constant monitoring over Venezuela, in addition to the information provided by its Venezuelan sources.

The C.I.A. had a group of officers on the ground in Venezuela working clandestinely beginning in August, according to a person familiar with the agency’s work. The officers gathered information about Mr. Maduro’s “pattern of life” and movements.

It is not clear how the C.I.A. recruited the Venezuelan source who informed the Americans of Mr. Maduro’s location. But former officials said the agency was clearly aided by the $50 million reward the U.S. government offered for information leading to Mr. Maduro’s capture.

In his confirmation hearing last year, John Ratcliffe, the C.I.A. director, promised he would lead a more aggressive agency, one willing to conduct covert operations to both collect information and advance American policy. President Trump authorized the C.I.A. to take more aggressive action last fall, and then in November approved planning and preparation for a series of operations in Venezuela.

In late December, the C.I.A. used an armed drone to conduct a strike on a dock that U.S. officials believed was being used by a Venezuelan gang to load drugs on to boats.

One of the people briefed on Mr. Maduro’s capture said it was the product of a deep partnership between the agency and the military and involved “months of meticulous planning.” A senior U.S. official said that the C.I.A. and special operations analysts had Mr. Maduro “wired” — meaning precisely located — from early on in the planning of the operation.

While the C.I.A. played a critical role in planning and carrying it out, the mission was a law enforcement operation by the U.S. military’s special operation forces, rather than operation carried out under the agency’s authority.

 

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 9:03 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

The New York Times

The governor of Sucre, about 325 miles east of Caracas, called for party militants to gather in the town square later in the day. The governor, Jhoanna Carrillo, appeared at the rally along with mayor Pedro Figueroa to show their loyalty to the president. “We demand that the entire world speak out against the threat and chaos they have tried to sow in our homeland,” Carrillo said.

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 9:01 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Jonah E. BromwichWilliam K. Rashbaum and Benjamin Weiser

Bondi says Maduro and his wife to face a fresh indictment in Manhattan.

Nicolás Maduro, the president of Venezuela captured in a military raid on Caracas, faces charges in the Southern District of New York, where prosecutors have targeted him for years.

The U.S. attorney general, Pam Bondi, posted the new indictment on social media on Saturday. It charges Mr. Maduro with narco-terrorism and conspiracy to import cocaine, among other charges. His wife, Cilia Flores, is also charged in the cocaine conspiracy.

Mr. Maduro, the indictment said, “allows cocaine-fueled corruption to flourish for his own benefit, for the benefit of members of his ruling regime and for the benefit of his family members.”

“The defendant now sits atop a corrupt, illegitimate government that, for decades, has leveraged government power to protect and promote illegal activity, including drug trafficking,” it continued. “That drug trafficking has enriched and entrenched Venezuela’s political and military elite.”

In an earlier post, Ms. Bondi said that Mr. Maduro and his wife would “soon face the full wrath of American justice on American soil in American courts.” President Trump said that the couple was being brought to New York.

 

INDICTMENT

Thumbnail of page 1

Read the Indictment Against Nicolás Maduro

 

The Venezuelan president was accused of narco-terrorism and conspiracy to import cocaine, among other charges. His wife, Cilia Flores, was also charged.

Read Document 25 pages

Though the charges against Ms. Flores are new, Mr. Maduro was previously indicted in Manhattan in 2020 on similar allegations. With those charges pending, Secretary of State Marco Rubio referred to Mr. Maduro last year as a “fugitive of American justice.”

The 2020 indictment said that Mr. Maduro had come to lead a drug trafficking organization, the Cartel de los Soles, or Cartel of the Suns, as he gained power in Venezuela. Cartel de los Soles has been an ironic nickname for the Maduro administration’s military officers, who wear suns on their epaulets.

The earlier indictment named six defendants. The one unsealed on Saturday also names six, but they are almost entirely different, including only two men from the earlier charges. They are Mr. Maduro and Diosdado Cabello Rondón, who is the minister of interior, justice and peace, a member of the armed forces and vice president of the ruling party.

The others charged include Mr. Maduro’s son, Nicolas Maduro, known as Nicolasito; a former minister of the interior and justice, Ramón Rodriguez Chacín; and Héctor Guerrero Flores, who prosecutors said was the leader of Tren de Aragua, a gang that the Trump administration designated last year as a foreign terrorist organization.

The inclusion of Mr. Guerrero Flores, who was indicted in a separate case last month, would appear to reflect the White House’s repeated assertion that Mr. Maduro worked with narco-terrorists, including Tren de Aragua. American intelligence agencies have disputed that conclusion.

The charges against Mr. Guerrero Flores do not tie him directly to Mr. Maduro, but rather to “members of the Venezuelan regime” and “an individual he understood to be working with” it.

Southern District prosecutors had long targeted Mr. Maduro, and the investigation that led to his 2020 indictment was overseen by Emil Bove III, a prosecutor who years later became one of Mr. Trump’s criminal defense lawyers and whom the president this year appointed to the federal bench. One of the other prosecutors was Amanda Houle, who now leads the office’s criminal division.

The indictment says Mr. Maduro’s wife, Ms. Flores, along with her husband and other defendants, “partnered with narcotics traffickers and narco-terrorist groups” that were sending cocaine from Venezuela to the United States through countries like Honduras, Guatemala and Mexico.

It also says Ms. Flores attended a meeting in 2007 where she “accepted hundreds of thousands of dollars in bribes to broker a meeting between a large-scale drug trafficker and the director of Venezuela’s national antidrug office, Néstor Reverol Torres.”

The trafficker later arranged to pay monthly bribes to the antidrug official, in addition to about $100,000 to ensure safe passage for each flight transporting cocaine — a portion was then paid to Ms. Flores, the indictment says.

Though the circumstances of Mr. Maduro’s capture in a military raid were extraordinary, the American legal system has experience in arresting South American leaders and putting them on trial. Manhattan prosecutors have a saying — “you can’t suppress the body” — meaning that once a person is in custody, a case tends to move forward regardless of the circumstances of the arrest.

In 1989, the United States invaded Panama and compelled the surrender of Gen. Manuel Antonio Noriega, Panama’s military leader, who was taken to Florida and arrested by agents with the Drug Enforcement Administration. Three years after his surrender, Mr. Noriega was tried, convicted and sentenced to 40 years in prison.

In 2022, the former president of Honduras, Juan Orlando Hernández, was arrested by law enforcement officials from his own country in connection with a U.S. extradition request. He, too, was brought to the United States, where he was tried, convicted and sentenced.

Late last year, Mr. Trump abruptly pardoned Mr. Hernández, saying that the case against him — which had also been overseen by Mr. Bove and had been built over several presidential administrations — “was a Biden administration setup.”

The case against Mr. Hernández and the 2020 charges against Mr. Maduro bear a significant resemblance. Both leaders were accused of using their governments as vehicles for the exporting of cocaine into the United States. And both were charged with conspiring to possess machine guns, which, combined with drug trafficking charges, carries potentially lengthy prison sentences.

Mr. Maduro’s 2020 indictment has been pending in the Manhattan federal court before Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein, a veteran of nearly three decades on the Southern District bench.

Appointed by President Bill Clinton in 1998, the judge is best known for overseeing the many lawsuits filed after the Sept. 11 terror attacks, by families of the dead and workers at ground zero.

More recently, Judge Hellerstein, 92, has presided over Mr. Trump’s attempts to move his Manhattan criminal conviction into federal court, a matter that is pending.

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 8:59 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Tyler Pager

Reporting from Palm Beach, Fla.

In his first comments since Maduro was captured, Vice President JD Vance applauded the success of the mission and defended its legality.

“Maduro has multiple indictments in the United States for narcoterrorism,” he wrote on social media. “You don’t get to avoid justice for drug trafficking in the United States because you live in a palace in Caracas.”

Vance added that Trump had offered “multiple off ramps” to Maduro. Trump had been adamant that “the drug trafficking must stop” and that “the stolen oil” had to be returned to the United States, Vance said.

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 8:58 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Julian E. Barnes

The top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee said Saturday that while Maduro was an “illegitimate ruler” there was no evidence he posed a threat that justified military intervention. “Secretary Rubio repeatedly denied to Congress that the Administration intended to force regime change in Venezuela,” Representative Jim Himes of Connecticut said. “The Administration must immediately brief Congress on its plan to ensure stability in the region and its legal justification for this decision.”

Jan. 3, 2026, 8:56 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Frances Robles

Groups of armed apparent civilians have begun to hit the streets in Caracas, according to a journalist who saw them.

Several men in civilian clothes were seen just after daybreak guarding the Gen. Francisco de Miranda airbase outside of Caracas when the airstrikes hit.

Two pickup trucks filled with men wearing vests and civilian clothes carrying gas cans as well as both long weapons and handguns were seen unloading outside the Centro Comercial Ciudad Tamanaco, a shopping mall near the airbase.

Venezuela’s government has long used armed civilians, known as colectivos, to fight back against protesters.

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 8:55 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Rebecca F. Elliott

Chevron, the largest private oil producer in Venezuela, declined to comment Saturday morning on the status of its operations in the country. “Chevron remains focused on the safety and wellbeing of our employees, as well as the integrity of our assets,” a spokesman said.

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 8:54 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Ben Weiser

It is not uncommon for federal prosecutors to return what is known as a superseding indictment to add additional defendants or charges to an existing indictment. In this case, Attorney General Pam Bondi’s post on X suggests that a new indictment would add Maduro’s wife as a new defendant. The original indictment against Maduro made public in 2020 named him and other current and former Venezuelan officials as defendants.

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 8:54 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Jonathan Wolfe

How tensions between the U.S. and Venezuela escalated.

The raid in Venezuela Saturday morning in which President Trump said the United States had captured Nicolás Maduro, the country’s leader, capped off months of threats and accusations.

The Trump administration accused Mr. Maduro of drug smuggling, and the State Department has labeled him the head of a “narco-terrorist” state.

U.S. officials have said Mr. Maduro, a self-described socialist who has led Venezuela since 2013, is an illegitimate leader and have accused him of controlling criminal groups tied to drug trafficking — charges he denies.

The pressure campaign against Mr. Maduro has been building for years, through a series of indictments, sanctions and, recently, military actions.

In 2020, during the first Trump administration, Mr. Maduro was indicted in the United States on corruption, drug trafficking and other charges. Last year, the United States raised the reward for information leading to Mr. Maduro’s capture to $50 million.

In recent months, top aides to Mr. Trump intensified a push to remove Mr. Maduro from power, as the Trump administration tried to recast the domestic war on drugs as an international terrorist threat.

Since late August, the Pentagon has amassed a dozen ships in the Caribbean Sea. With more than 15,000 military personnel in the region, the U.S. buildup is the largest in the region since the Cuban Missile Crisis in 1962.

The commando raid on Saturday, the riskiest known U.S. military operation of its kind since members of the Navy’s SEAL Team 6 killed Osama bin Laden in a safe house in Pakistan in 2011, comes amid a legally dubious military campaign in the waters around Latin America in an effort to raise pressure on Mr. Maduro.

That campaign has been marked by 35 known U.S. strikes that have killed at least 115 people on boats in the Caribbean and the eastern Pacific. Many legal experts say the strikes are illegal and that the military is killing civilians.

While some, possibly most, of the suspected drug runners are believed to be Venezuelan citizens, the targeted boats also carried some people from Colombia, Ecuador and Trinidad.

Unlike traditional counternarcotics operations that have targeted senior cartel leaders, the boat strikes were aimed at low-level operatives in illicit drug trafficking. In seizing Mr. Maduro, the administration will probably contend that it has captured the mastermind behind the alleged drug trafficking.

In reality, Venezuela is not a major source of drugs in the United States. The country does not produce fentanyl ,and the cocaine that passes through Venezuela is grown and produced in Colombia, and then moves on to Europe.

 

Mr. Trump has also repeatedly threatened to carry out land strikes in Venezuela. Last week, the C.I.A. conducted a drone strike on a port facility in Venezuela which the United States believed was housing narcotics from a Venezuelan gang, according to people briefed on the operation.

The raid to capture Mr. Maduro also constituted Mr. Trump’s latest unilateral exercise of power. He had no explicit authorization from Congress, where a bipartisan group in the Senate has been promoting legislation to try to rein in his authority to engage in hostilities inside Venezuela.

On Saturday, Senator Mike Lee of Utah said on social media that Secretary of State Marco Rubio told him in a phone call that Mr. Maduro was “arrested by U.S. personnel to stand trial on criminal charges in the United States.”

In a social media post after Mr. Trump announced the capture, Mr. Rubio reposted a message he wrote last July, in what appeared to be an attempt to push back against concerns, including from Republican lawmakers, about the legality of the strikes and capture.

“Maduro is NOT the President of Venezuela and his regime is NOT the legitimate government,” Mr. Rubio wrote.

Mr. Lee said Mr. Rubio did not anticipate further action in Venezuela now that Mr. Maduro was in custody.

The Trump administration’s approach to Venezuela has been driven by three separate policy goals: crippling Mr. Maduro, using military force against drug cartels and securing access to the country’s vast oil reserves for U.S. companies.

The goal to oust Mr. Maduro as the leader of Venezuela was an initiative that Mr. Rubio has championed.

On July 25, Mr. Trump signed a secret order for military action against the cartels, calling for maritime strikes. Administration officials referred to the boat attacks as “Phase One,” with SEAL Team 6 taking the lead.

Policymakers at the time also discussed a vague “Phase Two,” with Army Delta Force units possibly carrying out land operations.

In October, Mr. Trump called off efforts to reach a diplomatic agreement with Mr. Maduro, after the Venezuelan leader refused to accede to U.S. demands to give up power voluntarily and as officials continued to insist that they had no part in drug trafficking.

As the strikes against boats continued throughout the fall, Mr. Trump, Mr. Rubio and Stephen Miller, a top White House aide overseeing immigration policy, moved on to the next stage of the campaign against Mr. Maduro: seizing oil tankers to deprive Venezuela of revenue.

They insisted that Mr. Maduro must return oil and other assets “stolen” from the United States before they lift what Mr. Trump has referred to as a blockade.

In its first weeks, the tactic shook Venezuela’s economy by paralyzing its oil industry. Critics called it gunboat diplomacy or, as Mr. Maduro put it, “a warmongering and colonialist pretense.”

Eric Schmitt, Tyler Pager and Carol Rosenberg contributed reporting.

 

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 8:53 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Ben Weiser

The 2020 indictment against Maduro said he had helped to manage and to eventually lead a drug trafficking organization as he gained power in Venezuela. Under his leadership, the indictment charged, the organization sought not only to enrich its members and enhance their power, but also to “flood” the U.S. with cocaine and use it as “a weapon against America.”

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 8:51 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Steven Erlanger

Spain, with its close ties to Latin America, offered to mediate and called for “de-escalation and restraint” in a statement from the foreign ministry. It said it was “ready to help in the search for a democratic, negotiated, and peaceful solution for the country.”

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 8:48 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Ben Weiser

With the original 2020 charges pending in the Southern District against Maduro, the U.S. secretary of state, Marco Rubio, had referred to Maduro as a “fugitive from American justice,” which appeared to bolster the U.S. government’s efforts to oust Maduro and seize him as it would any criminal on the run from the law.

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 8:47 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Jonah Bromwich

Prosecutors in the Southern District had targeted Nicolás Maduro for years. The investigation into him was overseen by a former criminal defense lawyer to President Trump, Emil Bove III. One of the prosecutors on the 2020 case was Amanda Houle, who now leads the office’s criminal division.

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 8:45 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Jack Nicas

Mexico City bureau chief

Two nights before his capture, Nicolás Maduro made a plea for peace in an interview with a Spanish journalist, Ignacio Ramonet, “The American people should know they have a friendly, peaceful people here, and a friendly government as well,” he said, looking at the camera. “They should know that our message is very clear: ‘Not War. Yes Peace,’” he added, saying his peace slogan in English. He then handed the journalist a red hat in the style of the Make America Great Again cap with the words: “No War. Yes Peace.”

In the same interview, Maduro said he was eager to work with the United States to avoid conflict. “If they want to have a serious conversation about an anti-drug agreement, we’re ready,” he said “If they want Venezuelan oil, Venezuela is ready for U.S. investment — like with Chevron — whenever, wherever, and however they want. People in the U.S. should know that if they want comprehensive economic development agreements, Venezuela is right here.”

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 8:37 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Anatoly Kurmanaev

Reporting from Venezuela

Attention is now turning to the Venezuelan military’s response to the U.S. attacks. U.S. forces did not appear to have encountered significant resistance from Venezuelan air defenses or land forces, despite claiming to have an arsenal capable of confronting, if not repelling, such an incursion.

Jan. 3, 2026, 8:26 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

William Rashbaum

It appears, based on Attorney General Pam Bondi’s social media post, that Nicolás Maduro has been charged in a new indictment. The existing charges filed in March 2020 do not include his wife, Cilia Flores. The earlier indictment, filed under seal, contained four counts, charging Maduro and five others with narco-terrorism, conspiracy to import cocaine, possession of machine guns and conspiracy to possess machine guns.

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 7:57 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Ben Weiser

Attorney General Pam Bondi said on social media on Saturday that both Nicolás Maduro and his wife Cilia Flores had been indicted in the Southern District of New York. There has been no public indictment of her.

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 7:55 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Edward Wong

Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau confirmed in a social media post that Nicolás Maduro has been removed from power and will be put on trial or punished.

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 7:48 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Carol Rosenberg

National Security reporter

Attorney General Pam Bondi said that the Venezuelan president, Nicolás Maduro, would face “American justice on American soil in American courts.” She referenced his indictment in the Southern District of New York.

Jan. 3, 2026, 6:53 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Genevieve Glatsky

Reporting from Bogotá, Colombia

Venezuela’s attorney general, Tarek William Saab, made televised remarks condemning the U.S. attacks. “Innocent victims have been mortally wounded and others killed by this criminal terrorist attack,” he said and called for people to take to the streets “with calm and vigilance.” Saab also repeated demands that other officials have made for proof that Nicolás Maduro and his wife Cilia Flores were alive.

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 6:34 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Jason Horowitz

Pedro Sánchez, the left-wing prime minister of Spain who has spoken out against the Trump administration’s previous military actions in Venezuela, struck a new wary note on Saturday. “We urge everyone to de-escalate the situation and act responsibly. International law and the principles of the U.N. Charter must be respected,” he wrote on social media.

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 6:26 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Tyler Pager

Reporting from Palm Beach, Fla.

In one of his first social media posts since Trump announced Maduro’s capture, Secretary of State Marco Rubio reposted what he wrote in July of last year. It appears to be an attempt to push back against concerns, including from Republican lawmakers, about the legality of the strikes and capture. “Maduro is NOT the President of Venezuela and his regime is NOT the legitimate government,” Rubio wrote in July 2025.

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 6:03 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Genevieve Glatsky

Reporting from Bogotá, Colombia

Interior Minister Diosdado Cabello of Venezuela, considered one of Nicolás Maduro’s top enforcers, called for calm in televised remarks and urged Venezuelans to trust the leadership. “Let no one fall into despair. Let no one make things easier for the invading enemy,” he said. Cabello also said, without providing evidence, that bombs had struck civilian buildings.

Jan. 3, 2026, 5:57 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Carol Rosenberg

National Security reporter

Nicolás Maduro was indicted in the United States on corruption, drug trafficking and other charges in 2020, and the State Department had announced a $50 million reward for information leading to his arrest or conviction. In announcing the capture of Maduro, President Trump said it was done in conjunction with U.S. law enforcement. The indictment was sworn out in the Southern District of New York.

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 5:48 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Carol Rosenberg

National Security reporter

Senator Mike Lee of Utah said on social media that Secretary of State Marco Rubio told him in a phone call that Nicolás Maduro was “arrested by U.S. personnel to stand trial on criminal charges in the United States.” Lee said Rubio does not anticipate further action in Venezuela now that Maduro was in custody.

Jan. 3, 2026, 5:36 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Genevieve Glatsky

Reporting from Bogotá, Colombia

Prime Minister Kamla Persad-Bissessar of Trinidad and Tobago, who has expressed strong support for U.S. strikes on suspected drug-smuggling boats near Venezuela, said on social media that her country was not involved in the U.S. military operations and maintains peaceful relations with Venezuela.

Tyler Pager

Jan. 3, 2026, 5:32 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Tyler Pager

Reporting from Palm Beach, Fla.

In a phone interview, Trump celebrated the capture of Maduro.

President Trump sounded tired.

It was just after 4:30 a.m. Saturday morning and 10 minutes after he announced on social media that the United States had captured Nicolás Maduro, the leader of Venezuela. I had called the president to try to better understand what happened and what comes next. He picked up after three rings and answered a few questions.

Mr. Trump first celebrated the mission’s success.

“A lot of good planning and lot of great, great troops and great people,” he told me. “It was a brilliant operation, actually.”

I then asked if he had sought congressional authority before the U.S. military, along with law enforcement personnel, engaged in a “large scale strike,” as he described it on social media.

“We’ll discuss that,” he said. “We’re going to have a news conference.”

In his social media announcement, Mr. Trump said he would speak at 11 a.m. from Mar-a-Lago, his private club and residence where he has spent the past two weeks.

I tried to ask what he envisions next for Venezuela and why the high-risk mission was worth it.

“You’re going to hear all about it 11 o’clock,” he said before hanging up.

The call had lasted 50 seconds.

 

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 5:20 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Anatoly Kurmanaev

Reporting from Venezuela

The U.S. attack has left an unspecified number of Venezuelans dead and injured, Venezuelan officials said in statements. The number of casualties is still being assessed, they said.

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 5:17 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Jiawei Wang

Video obtained by the Reuters news agency and verified by The Times shows smoke billowing near La Carlota Airport in Caracas, Venezuela, as explosions ring out.

Video

CreditCredit...Social media via Reuters

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 5:14 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Emma Bubola

President Javier Milei of Argentina celebrated the capture of Nicolás Maduro. “Liberty advances,” Milei wrote on social media.

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 5:12 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Genevieve Glatsky

Reporting from Bogotá, Colombia

Colombia’s President Gustavo Petro said on social media that his country’s forces were being deployed to the border with Venezuela, and that there would be additional support “in the event of a massive influx of refugees.”

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 5:09 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Annie Correal

Venezuela’s Vice President Delcy Rodríguez, speaking on a state-run television station, says the whereabouts of Nicolás Maduro and his wife are unknown, and asks President Trump for proof of life.

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 4:54 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Eric Schmitt

Pentagon reporter

A U.S. official said there were no American casualties in the operation but would not comment on Venezuelan casualties.

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 4:42 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Anatoly Kurmanaev

Reporting from Venezuela

If President Trump’s claim is true, the Venezuelan constitution states that power would pass to Nicolás Maduro’s vice president, Delcy Rodríguez, who runs economic policy. But we are in uncharted territory and it is unclear who would end up in charge. The United States has not recognized Maduro as a legitimate president, and Venezuela’s opposition says the rightful president is the exiled politician Edmundo Gonzalez.

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 4:39 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Tyler Pager

Reporting from Palm Beach, Fla.

In a brief phone interview with The Times, President Trump celebrated the success of the mission to capture Maduro. “A lot of good planning and lot of great, great troops and great people,” Trump said. “It was a brilliant operation, actually.”

When asked if he had sought congressional authority for the operation or what is next for Venezuela, Trump said he would address those matters during his news conference at Mar-a-Lago in the morning.

Jan. 3, 2026, 4:25 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Tyler Pager

Reporting from Palm Beach, Fla.

President Trump says the United States carried out “a large scale strike against Venezuela.” He said in his social media post that he will host a news conference in Mar-a-Lago at 11 a.m.

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 4:24 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Tyler Pager

Reporting from Palm Beach, Fla.

President Trump announces on social media that the United States has captured Nicolás Maduro, the Venezuelan leader, and his wife and that they are being flown out of the country.

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 4:23 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Anatoly Kurmanaev

Reporting from Venezuela

Venezuela’s defense minister, Gen. Vladimir Padrino Lopez, in a national address, denounces what he called a U.S. attack. “This invasion represents the most blatant outrage suffered by the country,” he says. This is the first public appearance by a senior Venezuelan official since the start of the explosions. General Padrino Lopez is Venezuela’s top ranking officer and is seen as a crucial member of Maduro’s coalition.

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 4:17 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

The New York Times

The U.S. has been building up forces off Venezuela for months.

Before President Trump announced on Saturday that the United States had captured President Nicolás Maduro of Venezuela, the U.S. military had launched one of the largest deployments of its forces to the Caribbean region in decades.

The United States Southern Command said that about 15,000 troops were in the region by December. President Trump described them as a “massive armada.” In August, he had secretly signed a directive to the Pentagon to begin using military force against Latin American drug cartels that his administration had deemed terrorist organizations.

Since the signing, the United States had carried out 35 lethal strikes on boats that the administration said were carrying narcotics. The attacks have killed more than 100 people. Legal and military experts questioned the legality of the strikes. Congress has not authorized them, nor has it declared war on Venezuela.

Some Trump officials have said that the main goal of the increase in troops was to drive Mr. Maduro, Venezuela’s authoritarian leader, from power. Hours before Mr. Trump announced the capture of Mr. Maduro and his wife, the Venezuelan government accused the U.S. military of carrying out attacks in the capital, Caracas, and other parts of the country.

In recent months, the U.S. military buildup has included transport and cargo planes. Flight-tracking data reviewed by The New York Times showed C-17 heavy-lift cargo planes — largely used for transporting military troops and equipment — conducted at least 16 flights to Puerto Rico from American military bases in one recent week. The C-17s flew to Puerto Rico from bases in New Mexico, Illinois, Vermont, Florida, ArizonaUtahWashington State and Japan.

The United States has also recently moved special-operations aircraft to the Caribbean.

Since October, the U.S. forces have included a Navy expeditionary strike group consisting of amphibious warships carrying thousands of Marines, along with warplanes, attack helicopters and other aircraft.

The buildup also brought the arrival in November of a full aircraft carrier strike group, with the U.S.S. Gerald R. Ford and several destroyers loitering roughly 100 nautical miles off the shores of Venezuela.

The Ford and its air wing, however, have not been used to attack vessels suspected of smuggling drugs. Those attacks have been launched by drones and AC-130 gunships controlled by the U.S. Joint Special Operations Command.

The U.S. Coast Guard has also begun chasing, boarding and even seizing oil tankers that the White House says are violating sanctions on Caracas.

Christiaan Triebert, John Ismay and Helene Cooper contributed reporting.

 

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 4:03 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Anatoly Kurmanaev

Reporting from Venezuela

No senior Venezuelan government official or military officer has made a public appearance since the start of the explosions. The government broadcast an address on all television and radio frequencies, in which a state television journalist read out a statement condemning the attack.

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 4:00 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Annie Correal

President Miguel Díaz-Canel of Cuba, in a social media post, denounced what he called a “criminal attack” by the United States against Venezuela, and demanded “urgent reaction” from the international community.

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 3:54 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Kieran Corcoran

The U.S. embassy in Bogotá, Colombia, issued an alert to Americans in Venezuela, telling them to shelter in place, citing “reports of explosions in and around” the city. It did not give details. The United States suspended operations at its embassy in Caracas in 2019.

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 3:37 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Anatoly Kurmanaev

Reporting from Venezuela

Eyewitnesses say the explosions in Caracas have eased up but there is still frequent noise from military planes over the city.

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 3:17 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Anatoly Kurmanaev

Reporting from Venezuela

We are unsure where Maduro is at the moment. But at least some people in his inner circle appeared safe, according to two people who have spoken to them.

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 3:33 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Anatoly Kurmanaev

Reporting from Venezuela

Last month, we reported that Maduro had tightened his personal security amid escalating threats by the Trump administration. People close to the Venezuelan government said he was frequently changing sleeping locations and cellphones, and one said he had expanded the role of Cuban bodyguards in his personal security detail, to try to protect himself from a potential U.S. strike. Read the article here.

Jan. 3, 2026, 3:15 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Tyler Pager

Reporting from Palm Beach, Fla.

President Trump is at Mar-a-Lago in Florida. Many of his top national security advisers have spent significant time with him at the club, where the president has hosted foreign leaders in recent days. On Friday evening, Trump received a national security briefing, according to the White House.

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 3:09 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Qasim Nauman

The Federal Aviation Administration has barred American commercial planes from flying at any altitude over Venezuela, citing safety risks “associated with ongoing military activity.” Its notice, effective for 23 hours starting at 2 a.m. Saturday in Venezuela, did not say which military was involved.

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 2:55 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Genevieve Glatsky

Reporting from Bogotá, Colombia

President Nicolás Maduro accused the United States of carrying out military attacks against Venezuela, in a statement released by Venezuela’s communications ministry. Venezuela “rejects, repudiates, and denounces” U.S. military aggression in the capital of Caracas and the states of Miranda, Aragua, and La Guaira, it said.

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 2:35 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Anatoly Kurmanaev

Reporting from Venezuela

Eyewitnesses report particularly heavy and ongoing sounds of explosions in Fuerte Tiuna, a sprawling military base in the center of Caracas that is home to Venezuela’s top brass and many senior government officials.

Jan. 3, 2026, 2:31 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Tyler Pager

Reporting from Palm Beach, Fla.

The White House declined to comment on the reports of explosions in Caracas.

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 2:30 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Eric Schmitt

Pentagon reporter

A Pentagon spokesman referred all questions about the explosions to the White House.

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 2:15 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Genevieve Glatsky

Reporting from Bogotá, Colombia

Colombia’s president, Gustavo Petro, a critic of the Trump administration, wrote on social media: “Right now they are bombing Caracas. Alert to the whole world, they have attacked Venezuela. They are bombing with missiles.” There has been no acknowledgement or evidence so far that these explosions were caused by military action.

 

JaN. 3, 2026, 2:10 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Eric Schmitt

Pentagon reporter

A spokeswoman for the U.S. military in Washington acknowledged the reports of explosions in Caracas but had no comment on any American role.

 

Jan. 3, 2026, 2:05 a.m. ETJan. 3, 2026

Anatoly Kurmanaev

Reporting from Venezuela

Witnesses report smoke coming out of major military installations in Venezuela’s capital, Caracas, including La Carlota military airbase and the Fuerte Tiuna military base. They also describe the sounds of planes and helicopters over Caracas.

 

Jan. 2, 2026, 1:05 p.m. ETJan. 2, 2026

Christiaan Triebert and Nicholas Nehamas

An oil tanker initially bound for Venezuela is fleeing U.S. forces.

The oil tanker evading U.S. forces is broadcasting its location after more than two weeks of sailing dark, revealing that it is heading northeast in the North Atlantic Ocean.

The ship that had been known as Bella 1, which is still being tracked by the U.S. Coast Guard, is on a course that could take it between Iceland and Britain, according to data published by Pole Star Global, a ship-tracking company. From there, it is possible that the vessel could head around Scandinavia to Murmansk, Russia’s ice-free Arctic port.

The tanker recently claimed Russian protection. On Wednesday, the Russian government formally asked the United States to stop chasing the ship, which the Coast Guard tried to intercept last month as it traversed the Caribbean Sea on its way to pick up oil in Venezuela. The Bella 1 recently appeared in Russia’s official register of ships under a new name, the Marinera, with a home port of Sochi, on the Black Sea.

Ships like the Bella 1, part of a so-called shadow fleet that transports oil for Russia, Iran and Venezuela in violation of sanctions imposed by the United States and other countries, often turn off their transponders to hide their locations.

The pursuit of the tanker comes as President Trump intensifies his pressure campaign on the government of Nicolás Maduro of Venezuela. Mr. Trump has instituted a quasi-blockade on some tankers transporting oil from the country, a longtime ally of Russia, and the United States has already boarded and taken possession of two other tankers in the Caribbean. American officials have said they plan to seize more ships.

The Bella 1 last broadcast its location on Dec. 17, showing it was in the Atlantic heading toward the Caribbean.

The Coast Guard stopped the ship on Dec. 20, saying it was not flying a valid national flag and that the United States had a seizure warrant. But the Bella 1 refused to be boarded and sailed back into the Atlantic.

The next day, the tanker began sending radio distress signals that showed it traveling northeast, more than 300 miles from Antigua and Barbuda.

As the slow-speed chase continued, the vessel claimed Russian protection, a diplomatic chess move that could complicate U.S. efforts to seize it. Boarding a moving vessel with a potentially hostile crew on the high seas is a dangerous mission that would require a specialized team of Coast Guard or Navy operators.

Last week, in a call between the foreign ministers of Russia and Venezuela, Moscow “reaffirmed its all-out support and solidarity with the leaders and people of Venezuela,” according to a summary of the call from Russia’s foreign ministry.

Tyler Pager and Edward Wong contributed reporting.

 

 

More on the U.S. Operation in Venezuela

On January 3, the U.S. military seized Venezuela’s president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife in a strike on Caracas, the culmination of a campaign to oust Maduro from power.


·   The View From Venezuelans’ Cellphones: Videos, filmed on cellphones by people mainly in Caracas and La Guaira, showed the exact moments in which the U.S. air and ground incursion played out in real time.

·   Venezuelans in Colombia Rejoice: Even if the road to returning home remained uncertain after the removal of Nicolás Maduro, many Venezuelans in exile wept from both hope and painwith a hope for change rising among some immigrants.

·   What Latin America Thinks: President Trump has launched a new era of U.S. intervention in Latin America. Some regional leaders are celebrating, while many others are deeply concerned.

·   Worries About Political Stability: Maduro was unpopular. But his abrupt removal has created deep uncertainty for Venezuelans, alarming even those who opposed him. People began lining up at supermarkets throughout the country as they anxiously waited for word on what would happen next.

·   Can the U.S. Legally ‘Run’ Venezuela?: The operation revives disputes over the legality of the 1989 Panama intervention, enhanced by Trump’s vow to take over the country and also by Maduro’s formal status as Venezuela’s president. Secretary of State Marco Rubio appeared to pivot away from Trump’s assertion that the United States would “run” Venezuela.

·   Venezuela’s Oil: The White House had pointed to drug trafficking and migration as reasons to crack down on Maduro. But oil emerged as a central these. It will take years and billions in investment to revitalize Venezuela’s oil industry, and energy producers will likely be cautious before stepping in. Here’s what to know about the Venezuelan oil industry.

 

 

 

ATTACHMENT “B”   FROM NEW YORK POST

NICOLAS MADURO NYC COURT APPEARANCE LIVE UPDATES: LAWYER HINTS AT DICTATOR’S POSSIBLE DEFENSE

By Ben Kochman, Kyle Schnitzer, Desheania Andrews, Kevin Sheehan, Kathleen Joyce, Joe Marino and Chris Nesi

Updated Jan. 5, 2026, 6:22 p.m. ET

Venezuelan dictator Nicolas Maduro and first lady Cilia Flores made their first appearance in a US federal court Monday.

The fallen leader, 66, and his 69-year-old wife were charged with narco-terrorism conspiracy, cocaine importation conspiracy, possession of machine guns and destructive devices, and conspiracy to possess machine guns and destructive devices against the United States in the Southern District of New York on Saturday. They pleaded not guilty to the charges.

The couple was indicted after they were captured at their heavily fortified compound in Caracas by US forces during a daring mission dubbed “Operation Absolute Resolve” after President Trump gave the final directive for the US to attack the South American nation earlier Saturday.

The Trump administration has repeatedly called Maduro’s regime “illegitimate” and said he has remained in power due to rigged elections, including in 2024. Venezuelan Executive Vice President Delcy Rodriguez is next in line for the presidency, according to its constitution.

Pro-Maduro thugs ordered to hunt down US collaborators as tension fills Venezuelan streets

Dems against Trump’s Maduro capture: Letters to the Editor — Jan. 6, 2026

An image collage containing 3 images, Image 1 shows Russia's UN Ambassador Vasily Nebenzya leaving the Security Council meeting, Image 2 shows China's Deputy U.N. Ambassador Sun Lei addressing the Security Council, Image 3 shows Illustration of Nicolás Maduro and his wife Cilia Flores at their arraignment in New York, with defense lawyers and court officers

Russia, China ignore own aggressions to rip US over despot Maduro’s capture during emergency UN Security Council session

Maduro and Flores are in separate, solitary cells inside Brooklyn’s notorious Metropolitan Detention Center — where heavily armed law enforcement members are on patrol outside. The lockup has also housed disgraced music mogul Sean “Diddy” Combs and accused UnitedHealthcare CEO killer Luigi Mangione.

 

5 hours ago

Maduro lawyer hints at possible defense

By Kyle Schnitzer

Top Nicolas Maduro lawyer Barry Pollack hinted at a possible defense in court Monday — suggesting the US government violated laws by nabbing the dictator in Caracas and hauling him off for trial.

“There are issues about the legality of his military abduction,” Pollack told the judge.

The Trump administration has claimed it was within its rights to capture Maduro because he is a drug trafficker attacking the US.

Critics have argued that President Trump grossly overstepped his legal bounds under both US and international law.

 

40 minutes ago

Pro-Maduro thugs ordered to hunt down US collaborators as tension fills Venezuelan streets

By Alex Oliveira

Pro-Maduro thugs were called to the streets to hunt down Venezuelans who supported the US attack to oust the despotic president, according to a state of emergency order issued across the South American Nation over the weekend.

Venezuelan police were ordered to “immediately begin the national search and capture of everyone involved in the promotion or support for the armed attack by the United States,” according to the Saturday decree obtained by Reuters, which was published in full on Monday.

An armed pro-government demonstrator at a protest against the capture of Maduro in Caracas on Jan. 4, 2026.

It remains unclear whether police had begun following that order — or if the Maduro regime’s notorious paramilitary enforcers had been dispatched — but photos began emerging across social media Monday that appeared to show heavily armed and masked civilians patrolling city streets and highways.

 

3 hours ago

Gov. Hochul says Trump called her - and that she ripped him over Maduro capture

By Vaughn Golden

Gov. Kathy Hochul said she ripped President Trump for acting without Congressional approval in Venezuela after he called her on Monday.

The Democratic governor also bizarrely claimed credit for sparking the nationwide "No Kings" protest movement against the Trump administration, as she celebrated the one-year anniversary of congestion pricing.

Standing with Mayor Zohran Mamdani, MTA CEO Janno Lieber and transit activists, Hochul said she told Trump the scheme to charge drivers in Lower Manhattan was working.

But when Trump brought up his raid on Venezuela that led to the capture of dictator Nicolás Maduro, Hochul said she told him "I disagree."

“You’ve got to go to Congress. You’ve got to get authority. It’s kind of important to do things like that,” Hochul said.

“He’s a bad guy, but you’ve got to get authority,” Hochul said she told Trump about Maduro.

Hochul, trying to appeal to lefty activists who pushed for the phased-in $15 toll for motorists, also claimed that she triggered the "No Kings" protests after she held a pro-congestion pricing press conference in February 2024 where she held up a picture of a fake TIME magazine cover put out by the White House depicting Trump as a king.

“I was pissed. I said, as you heard. I’m still angry when I think about it," Hochul said Monday. "We’re not laboring under a king but it was that image, that day that I believe triggered the ‘No Kings’ rallies all across America."

 

4 hours ago

Venezuela’s VP Delcy Rodriguez sworn in as interim president after Maduro arrest

By Reuters

Venezuela’s vice president and oil minister Delcy Rodriguez was formally sworn in on Monday as the country’s interim president, as US-deposed President Nicolas Maduro appeared in a New York court on drug charges, after the Trump administration removed him from power in a dramatic weekend military action.

Venezuelan vice president Delcy Rodriguez was sworn in as the country's interim president on Jan. 5, 2025.

Rodriguez, a 56-year-old labor lawyer known for close connections to the private sector and her devotion to the ruling party, was sworn in by her brother Jorge, who is the head of the national assembly legislature.

 

5 hours ago

Maduro and wife seen in courtroom sketch at NYC arraignment

By Joseph Barberio

Ex-Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, were pictured in a courtroom sketch from their arraignment Monday at Manhattan federal court.

The couple wore matching prison jumpsuits and were flanked by their defense attorneys, Mark Donnelly (second from right, in bowtie) and Andres Sanchez. Flores also appeared to have several bandages on her face.

Venezuela's captured President Nicolas Maduro and his wife Cilia Flores attend their arraignment with defense lawyers Barry Pollack and Mark Donnelly to face U.S. federal charges including narco-terrorism, conspiracy, drug trafficking, money laundering and others, at the Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse in Manhattan, New York City, U.S., January 5, 2026 in this courtroom sketch.

 

5 hours ago

Bizarre courtroom moment as onlookers hear what they think is shout of, 'Hamas!'

By Kyle Schnitzer

One of the more bizarre moments in the Manhattan courtroom Monday occurred when Nicolas Maduro claimed he was “innocent” — and a Venezuelan detractor yelled from the gallery, “Jamas!’’

The Spanish word translates to “never’’ — but it is pronounced like “Hamas’’ in English, also the name of the Palestinian terror organization.

The sound jarred more than one court-goer, observers said.

 

6 hours ago

Former Venezuela spy chief could be star witness at trial against Nicolás Maduro: experts

By Priscilla DeGregory

The former spymaster of Venezuela could end up being a star prosecution witness at Nicolás Maduro's drug-trafficking trial, experts told The Post.

Hugo Carvajal -- the country's longtime spy chief, nicknamed "El Pollo" or "The Chicken" -- pleaded guilty in June to narco-terrorism, weapons and drug trafficking charges in the same case that Maduro was charged in.

And Carvajal -- who flipped allegiance and backed Maduro's opponent in 2019 -- has already expressed interest in cooperating with the feds as he faces the potential of life in prison at his sentencing, set for next month.

Former Venezuelan military spy chief, retired Maj. Gen. Hugo Carvajal, walks out of prison in Estremera on the outskirts of Madrid, on Sept. 15, 2019.

Hugo Carvajal, Venezuela's longtime spy chief who flipped allegiance and backed Maduro's opponent in 2019, has already expressed interest in cooperating with the feds.

In this courtroom sketch, retired Maj. Gen. Hugo Carvajal, center, a former Venezuelan spymaster close to the country's late leader Hugo Chavez, is flanked by defense attorney Tess Cohen, left, and defense attorney Zachary Margulis-Ohnuma in federal court, Thursday, July 20, 2023, in New York. Carvajal was extradited to New York from Spain on Wednesday to face decade-old drug trafficking charges

Carvajal, center, flanked by defense attorneys in federal court in July 2023 in New York, is seen in a court sketch after he was extradited from Spain to face decade-old drug trafficking charges in the same case as Maduro.

"This is exactly the type of person that would be a witness in the case," former federal prosecutor Neama Rahmani told The Post.

If he takes the witness stand and testifies truthfully, he would get a "significant reduction in his sentence," Rahmani said.

"The sentencing [in drug-trafficking] cases are so high, so you have to cooperate," the lawyer added.

"This is exactly the type of person that would be a witness in the case," former federal prosecutor Neama Rahmani told The Post.

Dick Gregorie -- a prosecutor who handled a US case against another foreign leader, Manuel Noriega, in 1988 -- agreed there is a "good possibility" that Carvajal will be a prosecution witness.

"I would assume if he had a deal that he made six months ago, that they have probably been preparing him for weeks, or months, maybe," Gregorie added.

Prosecutors will also have "a number of internal people from Venezuela and drug dealers who were involved in moving the drugs" as witnesses, he said.

 

6 hours ago

Maduro declares himself 'prisoner of war' and 'man of God' during spat with one of his political foes while leaving court

By Ben Kochman

Twisted dictator Nicolas Maduro claimed he is a “prisoner of war’’ and “man of God’’ when confronted Monday by a Venezuelan countryman who said he had been an imprisoned victim of the fallen despot’s regime.

A man who identified himself as Pedro Rojas stood up in a Manhattan federal courtroom after the accused narco-trafficker’s arraignment and shouted at Maduro that he had been the South American nation’s illegitimate president and would now face “real justice.’’

Maduro turned to him and said, “I am a man of God” -- and called himself a POW — during an exchange in Spanish with Rojas as he was led out of the courtroom.

Rojas, 33, later told reporters that he was a political prisoner in Venezuela in 2019 for four months.

 

6 hours ago

Maduro and his wife depart Manhattan court in an armored vehicle following not guilty pleas: photos

By Joseph Barberio

Ex-Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro was taken away from the Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse in Manhattan in an armored vehicle following his arraignment Monday.

The former strongman and his wife, Cilia Flores, both pleaded not guilty to federal narco-terrorism charges.

The convoy will likely take the couple back to the notorious Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn, where they were being held in separate cells.

A convoy believed to be carrying ousted Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro departs the Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse after Maduro attended his arraignment hearing on January 5, 2026 in New York.

Maduro and his wife both pleaded not guilty to federal narco-terrorism charges.

 

6 hours ago

Maine-based company says it's being inundated with calls after shackled Maduro pictured wearing its blue hoodie

By Emily Crane

A Maine-based apparel company's phones have been ringing off the hook after a shackled Nicolás Maduro was snapped wearing one of its hoodies when he was hauled to the Big Apple, the company says.

The ousted Venezuelan dictator could be seen sporting the bright blue Origin attire in a now-infamous photo of him flashing two thumbs up while surrounded by scores of DEA agents after touching down in New York.

A Maine-based apparel company's phones have been ringing off the hook after a shackled Nicolás Maduro was snapped wearing one of its hoodies.

"Probably a DEA agent slipped this hoodie on him and said, 'You're gonna feel the fabric of freedom on American soil.' That's my assumption. I'm taking the liberty to assume," Origin founder Peter Roberts said in a video statement.

"He definitely gave two thumbs up, so I think he liked the fabric."

It wasn't clear exactly how the dictator ended up in the hoodie.

"What I believe happened is they landed in New York," Roberts speculated. "It was cold outside and they put a hoodie on him."

The CEO said his phone immediately "blew up" when people started noticing the company's logo.

 

6 hours ago

Maduro's wife, Cilia Flores, suffered possible rib fracture, bruising during arrest: lawyer

By Emily Crane

Venezuela's ousted first lady Cilia Flores suffered "significant injuries" -- including a possible rib fracture and bruising -- when she was captured by US forces, her Texas-based lawyer told a judge Monday.

The private lawyer, Mark Donnelly, asked for his client to undergo a full X-ray to ensure her health while in federal custody.

He added that her injuries were visible in court.

DEA agents are seen early Monday morning, January 5, 2026, at the Wall Street Heliport as former Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and his wife are transferred under federal custody en route to the Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse in Manhattan.

Maduro's wife Cilia Flores claims to have suffered broken ribs from the arrest.

Luiz C. Ribeiro for New York Post

 

6 hours ago

Maduro's lawyer says client won't seek immediate release, may request bail later

By Kyle Schnitzer

One of Nicolás Maduro's lawyers told Judge Alvin Hellerstein that his client is not seeking to be immediately released from custody but reserves his right to "put in a bail application at a further day.''

Maduro, who was scribbling on a white piece of paper during the proceedings, added at one point, "I would like to ask that my notes be respected and that I am entitled to keep them."

 

7 hours ago

Maduro's wife pleads not guilty: 'Completely innocent'

By Emily Crane

Venezuelan dictator Nicolás Maduro's wife, Cilia Flores, has pleaded not guilty.

"Not guilty. Completely innocent," Flores, 69, told a Manhattan federal judge when asked to enter her plea Monday.

Both Maduro and his alleged co-conspirator wife have been relying on an interpreter as the proceedings continue.

 

7 hours ago

Maduro proclaims his innocence to courtroom during first appearance: 'I am a decent man'

By Kyle Schnitzer

Nicolás Maduro vehemently proclaimed he was innocent of the charges leveled against him at his arraignment in Manhattan federal court Monday afternoon.

"I am innocent. I am not guilty. I am a decent man. I am still president of my country," Maduro insisted after Judge Alvin Hellerstein asked him if he understood he had the right to legal counsel.

"I did not know of these rights. Your honor is informing me of them now," Maduro said.

He then claimed he was seeing the indictment against him for the first time, and said he was pleading innocent.

"I am innocent. I am not guilty of anything that is mentioned here," he said.

 

7 hours ago

Venezuelan dictator Maduro claims he was 'kidnapped' in Manhattan federal court outburst

By Chris Nesi

Ousted Venezuelan dictator Nicolás Maduro denounced his capture as a kidnapping in an outburst in Manhattan federal court that was swiftly cut off by District Judge Alvin Hellerstein as proceedings got under way Monday.

"I'm the president of the republic of Venezuela. ... I am here kidnapped. ... I was captured at my home in Caracas, Venezuela," he said before Hellerstein stopped him.

Nicolas Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, are seen in handcuffs after landing at a Manhattan helipad, escorted by heavily armed Federal agents as they make their way into an armored car en route to a Federal courthouse in Manhattan on January 5, 2026 in New York City

"I'm the president of the republic of Venezuela. ... I am here kidnapped. ... I was captured at my home in Caracas, Venezuela," Maduro said in Manhattan federal court.

"Let me interfere,'' the judge said. "There will be a time and a place to go into all of this. Your counsel will be able to make motions. ... At this time, I just want to know one thing: Are you Nicolás Maduro Moros?"

"I am Nicholas Maduro Moros," the fallen dictator replied.

 

7 hours ago

Judge Hellerstein lays out charges against Maduro, including providing financial support for terrorism, terrorist activity

By Kyle Schnitzer and Chris Nesi

Manhattan federal Judge Alvin Hellerstein exchanged brief pleasantries with the toppled Venezuelan dictator, saying, "Good morning, Mr. Maduro'' -- before reading out more than a quarter-century's worth of charges contained in the indictment against him.

"Mr. Maduro ... is charged in one count of narco-terrorism conspiracy, specifically from 1999 to 2025, he knowingly conspired with others ... and intentionally provided something of pecuniary value to a person or organization engaged in terrorism and terrorist activity," the 92-year-old jurist said from the bench.

As Hellerstein spoke, Maduro furiously scribbled notes on a white piece of paper.

 

7 hours ago

Maduro arrives in court shackled at the ankles, greets attorneys

By Kyle Schnitzer

Deposed Venezuelan dictator Nicolás Maduro entered Manhattan court Monday shackled at the ankles -- but not the wrists -- wearing prison-issued orange shoes, beige pants and an orange shirt with what appears to be a black v-neck underneath.

 

7 hours ago

Ex-US hostage urges Venezuela’s Delcy Rodriguez to free Americans as proof she's willing to work with Washington

By Caitlin Doornbos

An American once held hostage by Venezuela’s brutal regime on Monday called on the country’s de facto leader, Delcy Rodriguez, to immediately free the five US citizens still being held in Caracas — saying it would be the clearest sign yet that she’s willing to work with Washington.

“I’d like to call on interim President Delcy Rodriguez to release the five Americans immediately as a show of goodwill,” Marine Corps veteran Matthew Heath told The Post.

Heath, who was jailed during Nicolás Maduro’s rule on bogus charges and released in 2022, said Americans detained in Venezuela are routinely used as bargaining chips in political standoffs with the US.

 “They don’t have a real justice system,” he said. “Judges do exactly what they’re told — or they end up in prison themselves.”

Maduro’s government detained more than 40 Americans during his time in power, according to the former prisoner, who said he was personally framed on fabricated charges and subjected to electric shocks and other torture inside Venezuela’s political prison system.

Now free and back in the US since 2022, the former detainee said seeing Maduro face prosecution in an American courtroom on Monday is deeply satisfying.

“He’s going to get a fair trial,” he said. “Something none of us were ever given.”

With Maduro gone, he said, Rodriguez has a rare opportunity to signal a break from the past — but warned that authoritarian regimes rarely give up hostages without extracting concessions.

“Hope springs eternal,” he said. “But history shows these regimes don’t release detainees unless they get something in return.”

Still, he said, freeing the Americans now could open the door to improved relations and help stabilize the country after years of repression and international isolation.

“If she wants to show she’s serious about moving Venezuela forward,” he said, “this is the moment.”

 

 

8 hours ago

Private lawyer who famously negotiated release of WikiLeaks' Julian Assange joins Maduro team

By Ben Kochman

Dictator Nicolas Maduro also will be repped by a top lawyer who once famously negotiated the prison release of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange.

Barry Pollack is a prominent private lawyer who is now part of the team defending the ousted Venezuelan president.

He brokered a bombshell June 2024 deal with the US government that allowed Assange, who was charged with breaching the Espionage Act by divulging state secrets, to return to his native Australia after pleading guilty to a single misdemeanor count.

Maduro’s wife, Cilia Flores, will be represented at Monday’s hearing by Mark Donnelly, a private lawyer from Texas who served as a federal prosecutor.

It’s unclear whether or how the private lawyers will be paid for the appearance.

Maduro also is being repped by court-appointed lawyer David Wikstrom — meaning taxpayers will foot at least that part of the bill.

 

8 hours ago

Chevron, energy stocks soar after US capture of Nicolás Maduro – but oil prices barely move

By Taylor Herzlich

Chevron and other energy stocks soared Monday morning, though oil prices barely budged, after the US captured Venezuelan dictator Nicolás Maduro and President Trump said American companies would tap into the nation’s rich oil reserves.

Shares in Chevron, which is the only major US oil company currently operating in Venezuela, jumped 4.8%.

Chevron and other energy stocks soared Monday morning after the US captured Maduro.

ConocoPhillips and Exxon Mobil – both of which left Venezuela nearly 20 years ago when Maduro’s socialist predecessor, Hugo Chávez, nationalized their assets – also rose 5.3% and 2.4%, respectively.

 

9 hours ago

Lefty protesters supporting Maduro ripped as 'a--holes' by Cuban, Venezuelan immigrants

By Emily Crane

Roughly a dozen protesters who showed up outside the Manhattan courthouse to denounce Nicolas Maduro's arrest were blasted as "a--holes" by those hailing the capture of the Venezuelan dictator.

Dario Blanzo, who was born in Cuba, came to the federal court to celebrate Maduro's detainment when he encountered a handful of protesters holding signs reading “Free President Maduro” and “No War for Venezuela Oil!” 

 “You’re an a--hole! You don’t even know where Venezuela is!” Blanzo shouted at one protester.

“In Venezuela and Cuba, nobody can do that. Nobody can do that. You go to jail if you do that."

Maria Su, who immigrated to the US from Caracas, decried them as "paid protesters."

 “They are not Venezuelans. They are paid protesters. They don’t speak Spanish!” she raged as she waved a Venezuelan flag. “They don’t know anything because they are not Venezuelan."

 

 

9 hours ago

Maduro assigned court-appointed attorney -- meaning US will foot bill for dictator's Monday appearance

By Emily Crane

Venezuelan dictator Nicolas Maduro is expected to be repped by a court-appointed attorney for his initial hearing at Manhattan federal court later today -- meaning the US will at least initially be footing the bill for his defense.

Maduro will be represented by longtime Big Apple criminal defense attorney David Wikstrom, The Post confirmed.

It wasn't immediately clear if the court-appointed attorney would continue to rep the ousted leader at future court hearings.

 

 

10 hours ago

Clinton-nominated Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein  to oversee Maduro’s court appearance

By Emily Crane

Manhattan federal Judge Alvin Hellerstein has been assigned to oversee ousted Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro's initial court appearance later Monday.

The 92-year-old veteran judge was nominated and confirmed by President Bill Clinton in 1998.

The born-and-bred New Yorker has presided over a slew of cases tied to the 9/11 terror attacks and others related to national security.

In more recent years, Hellerstein quashed President Trump’s bid to have Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s “hush money” case against him heard in federal court.

 

 

Kyle Mazza-CNP/Shutterstock

11 hours ago

Nicolas Maduro could face death penalty if fallen Venezuelan dictator is convicted

By Jorge Fitz-Gibbon

Fallen Venezuelan dictator Nicolas Maduro could face the death penalty if convicted on federal drug-trafficking and other charges.

The strongman was nabbed at his Caracas palace in a daring US raid and is being held at the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn pending his arraignment Monday on a four-count indictment.

If found guilty, Maduro is likely to spend the rest of his life behind bars — or worse.

 

 

11 hours ago

Maduro arrives at Manhattan federal courthouse

By Emily Crane

The ousted Venezuelan president and his wife have arrived at the Manhattan federal court where they'll go before a judge later today on narco-terrorism charges.

The armored car carrying Nicolas Maduro and Cilia Flores reversed into a secured area at the courthouse just before 7:45 a.m.

Scores of heavily armed DEA officers and NYPD cops swarmed the streets as the transfer took place.

 

11 hours ago

Maduro touches down in Manhattan

By Emily Crane and Desheania Andrews

The chopper carrying fallen Venezuelan leader Nicolas Maduro arrived in downtown Manhattan at roughly 7:30 a.m.

He was quickly escorted from the helicopter by about eight heavily armed guards and put in an armored truck at the helipad.

The motorcade immediately set off for the courthouse.

 

12 hours ago

Shackled Maduro, wife escorted to helicopter

By Emily Crane

Venezuelan leader Nicolas Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, have been escorted in cuffs to a waiting helicopter.

The fallen leader, 66, and his 69-year-old wife were both in prison garb after leaving Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn.

 

 

12 hours ago

First look at Maduro ahead of court appearance

By Samuel Chamberlain

The motorcade has arrived at a helipad where Maduro will make the short flight across the East River to Manhattan for his court appearance.

Captured Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro arrives at the Downtown Manhattan Heliport on January 5, 2026.

DEA agents are seen early Monday morning, January 5, 2026, at the Wall Street Heliport as former Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and his wife are transferred under federal custody en route to the Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse in Manhattan.

Luiz C. Ribeiro for New York Post

News choppers hovering overhead got a brief glimpse of the fallen left-wing authoritarian as he was transferred from the armored Bearcat to a police SUV.

Maduro is clad in what appears to be khakhi prison garb and red footwear, with his hands shackled in front of him.

 

12 hours ago

Maduro leaves Brooklyn jail, bound for Manhattan

By Samuel Chamberlain

An armored car believed to be carrying arrested Venezuelan leader Nicolas Maduro has left the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn.

The 63-year-old is being escorted by unmarked white vans and a fleet of NYPD cop cars.

Maduro's first appearance is set for 12 p.m., after which he will be returned behind bars in Brooklyn.

 

20 hours ago

Welcome to ‘hell on Earth,’ Nicolas! Inside the notorious NYC lock-up where Maduro and his wife are being held

By Jorge Fitz-Gibbon

Venezuelan dictator Nicolas Maduro, who dined on steak and lived in a palace as his country starved, is now in “hell on Earth’’ in a Brooklyn jail — and machine-gun-toting authorities are making sure he stays there.

Maduro, 63, and his 69-year-old fellow-inmate wife Cilia were thrown into separate cells in solitary confinement away from the general population at the infamous federal Metropolitan Detention Center since their extraordinary capture by elite US forces in Caracas early Saturday.

“This is the least they deserve,” said Gabriel Bonilla, a Venezuelan comedian who fled to Argentina in 2017, to The Post on Sunday. “The worst prison in the United States is a mansion compared to the prisons and holes where people have been tortured for years in Venezuela.”

 

 

20 hours ago

Ousted Venezuelan dictator Nicolás Maduro arrives in NYC by helicopter hours after capture by US

By Marie Pohl

Ousted Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, touched down in New York City Saturday night after being captured by US forces — and were greeted by jeers of “Down with the dictator.”

The pair — who landed at Stewart Air National Guard Base in Upstate Newburgh around 5 p.m. — arrived via helicopter at a Manhattan heliport just before 7 p.m. and were hauled away in a heavily armed tactical vehicle called a “Bearcat” surrounded by a small motorcade.

Maduro, 63, and Flores, 69, will first be transported to the Drug Enforcement Administration Headquarters in Chelsea, where he was processed before returning to the West 30th Street Heliport and choppered to Brooklyn, sources told The Post.

He took off after 8 p.m., and was seen on video being flown down the West Side of Manhattan and past the Statue of Liberty before heading to Brooklyn.

 

 

20 hours ago

Inside Operation Absolute Resolve: How US forces captured Venezuela’s Maduro — after months of secret planning

By Caitlin Doornbos and Samantha Olander

The U.S. operation to capture Venezuelan strongman Nicolás Maduro was a months-in-the-making mission rehearsed using replicas of Maduro’s fortified compound, showcasing military might, ingenuity — and good timing.

The Venezuelan dictator was stopped just steps from the steel doors of his fortified lair as elite Army Delta Force commandos closed in, President Trump said.

Captured Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro arrive(d) at the Downtown Manhattan Heliport, as he heads towards the Daniel Patrick Manhattan United States Courthouse for an initial appearance to face U.S. federal charges including narco-terrorism, conspiracy, drug trafficking, money laundering and others in New York City, U.S., January 5, 2026.

The Venezuelan dictator was stopped just steps from the steel doors of his fortified lair as elite Army Delta Force commandos closed in, President Trump said.

 “He was trying to get into a safe place … the safe place’s all steel, and he wasn’t able to make it to the door because our guys were so fast,” Trump said.

The commandos closed in “in a matter of seconds,” Trump said on Fox News.

 

20 hours ago

Trump says Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro, wife ‘captured’ after large-scale strikes

By Katherine Donlevy

The U.S. captured Venezuelan dictator Nicolás Maduro early Saturday in an extraordinary military operation to end the repressive regime of the “fugitive” leader, and usher in a “new dawn” of freedom to the embattled nation.

Some 150 aircraft took part in Operation Absolute Resolve, which came after months of mounting pressure by the Trump administration and lasted just under two and a half hours.

Captured Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro arrives at the Downtown Manhattan Heliport, as he heads towards the Daniel Patrick Manhattan United States Courthouse for an initial appearance to face U.S. federal charges including narco-terrorism, conspiracy, drug trafficking, money laundering and others in New York City, U.S., January 5, 2026.

Maduro, 63, and his wife Cilia Flores, 69, were seized just steps from the steel doors of his high-security Ft Tiuna military compound, which President Trump said US troops were able to blast through “a matter of seconds.”

 

 

ATTACHMENT “C” – FROM CNN (takeaways)ve Updates

Venezuela tense while White House says it’s discussing ‘options’ for acquiring Greenland

Updated 5:31 PM EST, Tue January 6, 2026

 

Where things stand

• On the ground: Venezuela remains on edge following the capture of ousted leader Nicolás Maduro. Security forces were seen patrolling the streets, and gunfire and anti-aircraft fire were reported overnight over the capital of CaracasSigue nuestra cobertura en español.

• What’s next for Venezuela?: Opposition leader María Corina Machado has vowed to return home “as soon as possible,” while President Donald Trump said he considers himself in charge of Venezuela. Meanwhile, Venezuelans are trying to regain some semblance of normalcy amid price gouging and rising hunger in the wake of the military operation.

• Focus on Greenland: Meanwhile, the White House said it is “discussing a range of options” to acquire Greenland, noting that using the US military is not off the table. President Donald Trump had said the US needs the Danish territory, which spurred a statement of support for Denmark from European leaders.

47 Posts

2 min ago

The US has taken a "prisoner of war," Venezuela's interior minister says

From CNN's Anabella Gonzalez

Venezuelan Interior Minister Diosdado Cabello has called ousted president Nicolás Maduro a “prisoner of war.”

He said the United States “is violating all international laws” with its attack in Venezuela and arrest of Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores.

“The imperialists have a prisoner of war,” he said at a women’s march organized by the government on Tuesday.
“The imperialists know they have committed a terrible crime. That they have killed civilians – civilians who were sleeping and had nothing to do with the matter – and a bomb exploded on them,” Cabello said.

Venezuelan Attorney General Tarek William Saab said three officials have been appointed to investigate the “dozens” of deaths resulting from the US attack on the country, but the Venezuelan government has not specified the number of people killed or injured.

On Sunday, the Cuban government, in a post on Facebook, said 32 of its citizens were killed during the operation “in combat actions, performing missions on behalf of the Revolutionary Armed Forces and the Ministry of the Interior, at the request of counterparts of the South American country.”

10 min ago

What some Democratic lawmakers are saying today about Venezuela and Greenland

From CNN’s Ellis Kim and Arlette Saenz

Lawmakers are trying to learn more about the United States’ action in Venezuela over the weekend and President Donald Trump’s view of Greenland.

Here’s what some of the Democrats have been saying:

Sen. Mark Warner: The top Democrat on the Senate intelligence committee rejected the capture of Nicolás Maduro as legal action, and said it was military action, adding that it could set a dangerous precedent. The Virginia lawmaker also told reporters that while Trump’s long interest in Greenland was initially viewed as a joke, his rhetoric about the semiautonomous Danish territory is “very dangerous.”

Sen. Ed Markey: After Trump said he had talked to oil companies “before and after” the US military removed Maduro, the Democratic senator from Massachusetts has asked executives at Chevron, ConocoPhillips and ExxonMobil if they communicated with Trump or his administration before the strike and whether they had “advance notice of ‘regime change’ operations in Venezuela.” Markey also asked them whether they made proposals to invest in oil production in Venezuela, and how the recent military actions have impacted their businesses. CNN has reached out to the three oil companies for comment.

44 min ago

What is the "Donroe Doctrine?"

CNN’s Jake Tapper explains the “Donroe Doctrine,” a term coined to describe President Donald Trump’s application of the Monroe Doctrine for the enforcement of US interests in the Western Hemisphere.

"No external agent" is running Venezuela, acting president says

From CNN's Ivonne Valdes Garay and Hira Humayun

Venezuela’s acting president Delcy Rodriguez said today that “no external agent” is running the country.

“There is no external agent who governs Venezuela. It is Venezuela. It is it’s constitutional government, the consolidated popular power,” she said in a televised address a day after being sworn in.

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio has previously said the administration views Rodriguez as more pragmatic than ousted president Nicolás Maduro, and as someone the US can work with.

Rodriguez has condemned the US operation that led to the seizure of Maduro and his wife but has also struck a softer tone when she called for “cooperation” with the United States on Sunday.

In her address today, she said Venezuela is on a “painful path” because of “the aggression it suffered, unprecedented in our history.” She said women are marching on the streets in the country, calling for peace and for the release of Maduro and his wife.

1 hr 21 min ago

White House “discussing a range of options” for acquiring Greenland, military not off the table

From CNN's Kit Maher

The White House said Tuesday that it is “discussing a range of options” to acquire Greenland, noting that using the US military is not off the table.

“President Trump has made it well known that acquiring Greenland is a national security priority of the United States, and it’s vital to deter our adversaries in the Arctic region. The President and his team are discussing a range of options to pursue this important foreign policy goal, and of course, utilizing the U.S. Military is always an option at the Commander in Chief’s disposal,” White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a statement to CNN.

On Monday, senior White House aide Stephen Miller told CNN’s Jake Tapper that nobody would fight the US militarily “over the future of Greenland.”

1 hr 28 min ago

Dow closes above 49,000 points for first time ever as Wall Street looks past geopolitical tension

From CNN's John Towfighi

Despite geopolitical uncertainty, US stocks closed at record highs Tuesday.

The Dow gained 485 points, or 0.99%, to close at a record high of 49,462.08. It’s the first time the blue-chip index has closed above 49,000 points.

The broader S&P 500 rose 0.62% and also hit a record high, its first since December 24. The tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite gained 0.65%.

Wall Street has shrugged off uncertainty about the US capture of Nicholás Maduro, instead focusing on fundamentals for markets, such as expectations for strong corporate earnings and optimism about Federal Reserve interest rate cuts later this year.

The Dow just posted back-to-back days of record highs. The Dow needs a gain of roughly 1.09% to close above 50,000 points — a milestone that highlights the strength of the recent stock market rally.

“The new all-time high for the Dow reflects a constructive broadening in US equity performance,” said Rob Haworth, senior investment strategy director at US Bank Asset Management.

Market sentiment on Tuesday was “neutral,” according to CNN’s Fear and Greed Index.

“Despite the solid performance of the last three years, we think this bull market has more to go,” David Lefkowitz, head of US equities at UBS Global Wealth Management, said in a note.

Markets across the globe are kicking off 2026 on a strong note: Benchmark stock indexes in South Korea, Taiwan, Japan and the United Kingdom all closed at record highs on Tuesday.

1 hr 31 min ago

Schumer calls briefing on Venezuela "troubling," stops short of saying he regrets vote to confirm Rubio

From CNN's Aileen Graef and Manu Raju

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer criticized the “troubling” briefing he and a select group of members received on the US action Venezuela, saying they received few answers and said, “they don’t know where they’re headed.”

“Mark and I and other members sat through more than a two and a half hour classified briefing with the administration, and after all that time, we got no real answers. They don’t know where they’re headed,” Schumer said at a press conference with Senate Intelligence Vice Chair Mark Warner.

Schumer said they did not receive definite answers on how many US troops would be sent to Venezuela, how long the US “will be running Venezuela,” how much the involvement would cost or “what country is next.”

Schumer said he was “unsatisfied” and the briefing was “really troubling.”

Schumer also said he was disappointed in his former colleague and now Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who has been instrumental in the operation.

“I am deeply, deeply disappointed in Marco Rubio, even before Venezuela, and even more so now,” he said when asked by CNN if he regretted his vote to confirm him as Secretary of State.

Warner said he was worried about the implications of crossing the “boundaries” of international order, warning it could lead to “chaos.”

“If any large country can say to a smaller country next door, ‘we don’t like your leader and he or she broke our law,’ and then go in and extract them. Where does that lead? Leads to chaos – which has been the main drive of this Trump administration,” said Warner.

2 hr 4 min ago

Looking back on CNN's 2016 interview with Venezuela's Delcy Rodríguez

By CNN's Zane Heinlein and Rafael Romo

Delcy Rodríguez, Venezuela’s acting president, has always been happy to speak on government TV — but she has never been fond of the free press.

CNN’s Rafael Romo recalls trying to speak with her on the streets of New York in 2016, when she was still the foreign minister. He tried to ask her questions about CNN’s year-long investigation involving the alleged illegal sale of Venezuelan passports out of the country’s embassy in Iraq.

You can read more about CNN’s investigation here: Venezuela may have given passports to people with ties to terrorism.

2 hr 18 min ago

Spain's PM to speak with Venezuela's acting president in bid to encourage elections

From CNN's Mauricio Torres, Pau Mosquera and Hira Humayun

Spain’s Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez said he will speak with Venezuela’s acting President Delcy Rodriguez and opposition leader Edmundo Gonzalez to help facilitate a move towards elections.

Speaking at a press conference in Paris as European leaders gathered for Ukraine peace talks, Sanchez did not say when he would speak to Rodriguez, but said he expects the call to pave the way for a transition that “ends in clean, free elections.”

“I believe that Spain can play a role of mediation, of contributing to the realization of a transition that ends in clean, free elections, where the Venezuelan people can vote freely and decide freely about their future,” Sanchez told reporters.

The prime minister also said he would speak to exiled Venezuelan opposition leader Edmundo Gonzalez, who most Western governments regard as the legitimate winner of the contested 2024 presidential election in Venezuela.

“A process of dialogue about the future of Venezuela must be opened among Venezuelans,” Sanchez said, “that is why we are open to talking with the different parties.”

A timeline for elections in Venezuela has not been set. On Sunday, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio called discussions about elections “premature,” and US President Donald Trump has said an election in Venezuela over the next month is not possible. “We have to fix the country first. You can’t have an election. There’s no way the people could even vote,” Trump told NBC News on Monday.

1 hr 24 min ago

Venezuelans try to regain a sense of normalcy amid price gouging and rising hunger

From CNN staff

In the streets of Caracas today, there are more people milling around and more vehicles on the street. Fewer soldiers are patrolling the Venezuelan capital, even if there is a heavy police presence.

Venezuelans are trying to regain some semblance of normalcy following the arrests Monday of journalists and the incident involving gunfire and drones in Miraflores, which brought further tension to the country.

Public offices are operating, some full-time and others partly.

The economy is, however, flashing warning signs. The Bolívar has suffered a sharp devaluation. Yesterday, there were areas in the Venezuelan city of Maracaibo where stores and shops only accepted cash, and the exchange rate was 900 to 1000 Bolívares to the US dollar.

Amid reports of price gouging, some shelves are starting to empty.

In areas further from the Caracas, hunger is relentless. Towards the east of the country, in smaller cities, businesses have removed prices.

These are Venezuelans two biggest concerns right now: what they’re going to eat and how they’re going to get by (they need to work) and not be stopped in the street.

Correction: An earlier version of this post gave the wrong day for the journalists’ arrest, which was Monday.

2 hr 4 min ago

Why oil companies may be hesitant to embrace Trump's vision for Venezuela

From CNN's Elise Hammond

When President Donald Trump talks to oil companies, he may find that his vision for Venezuela is not realistic, said Bob McNally, the president of Rapidan Energy Group, a consultancy group which advices major oil and energy firms.

“I think when the president and his advisers talks to US oil companies, executives and analysts, I think there’s going to be a mismatch between how quickly the president wants the money to flow and the oil production to grow, and how quickly it will really happen,” he told CNN today.

Trump said yesterday he thinks it will take less than 18 months for oil companies to rebuild Venezuela’s energy infrastructure and get it “up and running.”

McNally said that timeline is only realistic for “low-hanging fruit,” that is obvious repairs and maintenance that could free up “a few hundred thousand barrels a day compared to the less than a million they’re producing now.”

It will take decades of investment to see the kind of production that is worth tens of billions of dollars, he said.

In addition, while oil companies are used to operating in dangerous places, they may be hesitant to fully jump into Venezuela right now, according to McNally. With so much uncertainty around the political transition, companies are going to be “very risk adverse,” he said. Industry sources have told CNN that oil executives are expressing this hesitancy.

“The oil industry is looking at buying a house they’re going to live in forever, not planning a quick vacation,” McNally said. “So they want certainty.”

3 hr 36 min ago

Looking ahead: What to expect this week from the Trump administration and US lawmakers on Venezuela

From CNN’s Maureen Chowdhury

 

The Trump administration is facing scrutiny at home and abroad after launching a military operation in Venezuela that lead to the ousting of leader Nicolás Maduro.

US lawmakers are starting to be briefed on the operation, while the administration tries to persuade oil executives to drill in Venezuela.

As the situation develops in Venezuela, here’s a look at what’s happening this week:

·         Both the House and Senate are expected to receive closed-door briefings on the operation tomorrow. The Senate will hold a members-only classified briefing at 10 a.m. ET in the Senate’s SCIF, according to a source and a notice sent to Senate offices. The House is expected to have a similar briefing.

·         The Senate is set to vote midweek — likely Thursday — on a measure to limit President Donald Trump’s war powers in Venezuela.

·         US Energy Secretary Chris Wright will meet with oil executives this week to discuss US companies once again standing up drilling for oil in Venezuela, according to an Energy Department spokesperson.

CNN’s Ella Nilsen, Adam Cancryn, René Marsh, Sarah Ferris and Manu Raju

3 hr 52 min ago

Venezuela announces investigation into "dozens" of casualties from US attack

By CNN's Anabella González

Venezuelan Attorney General Tarek William Saab announced Tuesday the appointment of three officials to investigate the “dozens” of deaths resulting from the US attack on the country, which led to the capture of President Nicolás Maduro and his wife.

“We, as the Public Prosecutor’s Office, have appointed three prosecutors to investigate the dozens of innocent civilian and military casualties that occurred during this war crime, this unprecedented aggression against the Venezuelan homeland,” Saab said at an event notifying the Attorney General’s Office, the Comptroller General’s Office, and the Public Prosecutor’s Office of the start of a new five-year term for Parliament.

To date, the Venezuelan government has not specified the number of dead or wounded during the attacks.

3 hr 55 min ago

Top Democrat on Senate Judiciary has "mixed feelings" on Rubio after Venezuela briefing with Bondi

From CNN's Morgan Rimmer

Senate Judiciary Ranking Member Dick Durbin, who is also a senior member of Senate Democratic leadership, said he has “mixed feelings” about Secretary of State Marco Rubio after he was briefed on the Venezuela operation Tuesday morning.

Durbin and the top Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee, Chairman Chuck Grassley, were briefed over the phone by Attorney General Pam Bondi after they released a statement on Monday expressing their frustration that they were not included in last night’s briefing for a select group of top lawmakers.

“I’ve got mixed feelings. Marco is a personal friend of mine, and we’ve worked together in the Gang of Eight. We had a number of things we worked on over the years,” said Durbin. “Having said that, he has been loyal to President Trump, which you might expect. But when I voted for him, I had no idea the extent that the president would push him when it came to decision making. I have mixed feelings about his future.”

Rubio was confirmed 99-0 in January 2025, with the support of every Senate Democrat.

Durbin also was clear that, despite the administration’s denials, he believes the US is engaging in a regime change in Venezuela.

“That term is freighted with a lot of politics, and there’s been a lot of sad chapters in our nation’s history with the rubric of regime change. So, they’re careful to say what they’re doing, but their explanations don’t make sense at this point,” he told reporters. “It’s about narco-terrorism, and it was about oil, then it was about regime change. Let’s get down to the bottom line here: We’re on the line with a country now that has 30 million people and no real leadership. That’s not a good recipe for a stable future.”

4 hr 20 min ago

Havana reveals the identities of the 32 Cuban agents who died in the US attack on Venezuela

From CNNE's Gonzalo Zegarra

Cuba’s government on Tuesday released the identities of the 32 Cuban agents who worked in the security apparatus of the Venezuelan government and died during Saturday’s attack by the United States in Caracas.

“Thirty-two Cubans, victims of a new criminal act of aggression and state terrorism, perpetrated against our sister the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela by the United States, lost their lives in combat and after fierce resistance,” the Ministry of the Armed Forces said as it shared the list, which includes two colonels, a lieutenant colonel, four majors and other military ranks, aged between 26 and 67.

“Honor and glory to our combatants, fallen heroically confronting the criminal aggression and state terrorism of the US government against Venezuela,” said Foreign Minister Bruno Rodríguez on X.

Cuban President Miguel Díaz-Canel ordered two days of official mourning from Monday, during which flags are at half mast and the majority of public acts suspended.

According to the leader, the Cubans “were fulfilling missions in representation of the Revolutionary Armed Forces and the Ministry of the Interior, on the request of the corresponding bodies of that country (Venezuela).” He related that they died “after fierce resistance, in direct combat against the attackers and as a result of the bombings of installations” during the capture of President Nicolás Maduro and his wife.

Cuba and Venezuela, two close allies, have since 2000 maintained a comprehensive cooperation agreement that allows thousands of Cuban doctors and professionals in education, sport, and other sectors to remain in the South American country, but until now neither of the two has acknowledged the work of intelligence or security agents, which was an open secret.

Given that the Venezuelan government has not divulged the total number of casualties in Saturday’s military intervention, it is not known what percentage of those killed the 32 Cubans represent.

1 hr 43 min ago

Sen. Gallego says he will introduce resolution to block US military invasion of Greenland

From CNN's Morgan Rimmer

Sen. Ruben Gallego said that he is introducing a resolution to prevent the US from invading Greenland.

“WAKE UP. Trump is telling us exactly what he wants to do. We must stop him before he invades another country on a whim,” Gallego said in a post on X.

“I’m introducing a resolution to block Trump from invading Greenland. No more forever wars.”

Under the War Powers Act, the Senate will have to consider this resolution on the floor in the near future. The Senate is set to vote in a Venezuela War Powers resolution later this week.

Speaking to CNN’s Dana Bash on “Inside Politics,” Gallego said, “The reason why you have Article I power is because you don’t want to let idiots like President Donald Trump make foreign policy decisions without their being a check and balance against that. So we’re going to force votes to make sure that … maybe we can change the narrative, maybe we can make it more difficult for this president. For us to just throw up our hands and say, ‘well, he’s just going to do whatever he wants,’ would be a total abdication of our Constitutional duties.”

4 hr 27 min ago

Senators respond to Trump administration’s Venezuela military operation after classified briefing

From CNN’s Maureen Chowdhury, Morgan Rimmer and Ted Barrett

Senators who attended last night’s classified briefing on the US military operation in Venezuela are reacting to the controversial move by the Trump administration.

Some said the briefing raised more questions, while others now feel more assured about the administration’s decision.

·         Senate Majority Leader John Thune said he is more comfortable and confident that the US has a plan for how to operate in that country and said he understands that the new acting President Delcy Rodriguez is “practical” and “pragmatic.”

·         Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said that top administration officials had “no real answers” on the future of Venezuela and US involvement during last night’s classified briefing. “For two long hours, we heard yesterday from the administration, and what we heard was little more than wishful thinking and no real answers,” Schumer said. He said he was “troubled” by Trump officials’ answer on potential action in other nations in the Western Hemisphere, and added that senators and members of Congress were told there is “no cost estimate” for action relating to Venezuela.

·         Democratic Sen. Jeanne Shaheen of New Hampshire echoed concerns from fellow lawmakers that the Trump administration lacks clarity on its plans for Venezuela. “In terms of what comes next and the actions that are going to secure the goals that the administration seems to be articulating for Venezuela, there were there were not a lot of details,” she said.

4 hr 42 min ago

Russia slams "blatant neocolonial threats and armed aggression" carried out against Venezuela

From CNN's Kosta Gak and Catherine Nicholls

Russia’s foreign ministry has slammed the “blatant neocolonial threats and armed aggression” carried out against Venezuela over the weekend, without directly naming the United States.

In a statement, the ministry welcomed the swearing in of Delcy Rodríguez as Venezuela’s acting president, saying that it demonstrates Caracas’ determination to, among other things, “ensure unity,” “curb the risks of a constitutional crisis,” and “create the necessary conditions for the further peaceful and stable development of Venezuela.”

“We welcome the efforts of the official authorities of this country to protect state sovereignty and national interests. We confirm Russia’s unwavering solidarity with the Venezuelan people and government,” the statement said.

The foreign ministry also said it was ready to provide “the necessary support” to its “friend Venezuela.”

“We firmly believe that Venezuela must be guaranteed the right to determine its own destiny without any destructive external interference,” it said.

Some context: Russia and Venezuela are close allies. After the US’s attack on Venezuela on Saturday, the Russian foreign ministry condemned what it called an “act of armed aggression against Venezuela,” calling any “excuses” given to justify such actions “untenable.”

After Washington tightened trade sanctions on Caracas in mid-2024, Venezuela has relied more heavily on other partners, including Moscow. Russian President Vladimir Putin stated in May last year that trade with Venezuela grew by 64% in 2024.

CNN’s Svitlana Vlasova and Billy Stockwell and CNNE’s Mauricio Torres, Gonzalo Zegarra and Germán Padinger contributed to this reporting.

5 hr 16 min ago

White House says Greenland would be better protected by US, after European leaders back Denmark

From CNN's Alejandra Jaramillo

The White House reiterated that Greenland would be better protected by the US after European leaders expressed support for Denmark and the Danish territory.

“President Trump believes Greenland is a strategically important location that is critical from the standpoint of national security, and he is confident Greenlanders would be better served if protected by the United States from modern threats in the Arctic region,” White House spokeswoman Anna Kelly told CNN in a statement. “The President is committed to establishing long-term peace at home and abroad,” she added.

The European leaders said in their statement that “Greenland belongs to its people.”

“It is for Denmark and Greenland, and them only, to decide on matters concerning Denmark and Greenland,” the leaders of France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Spain, Britain and Denmark wrote.

5 hr 25 min ago

A look back at Venezuela's history as the country faces turmoil

From CNN’s Nic Robertson

Venezuelans are entering a time of uncertainty following the US military operation that ousted leader Nicolás Maduro.

While some are relieved to have Maduro no longer in power, there is also growing anxiety about what the US’ role will be in the country moving forward.

4 hr 57 min ago

"Complete nonsense": Danish parliament member dismisses US talk about needing Greenland for security

From CNN's Catherine Nicholls

The United States is “almost starting a war with an allied country” in its pursuit of Greenland, Danish parliament member Rasmus Jarlov told CNN’s Becky Anderson today.

“It is quite shocking that a person who’s in charge of this completely illegitimate land claim on Greenland knows so little about the history and the background of why Greenland belongs to Denmark,” Jarlov said, referencing White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller, who last night said that nobody would fight the US if it tried to seize the autonomous Danish territory.

Denmark’s ownership of Greenland “may be one of the most well-established ownerships of territory in the world. It is not disputed by anyone. It has never been disputed by the United States themselves, and they really should know these things before almost starting a war with an allied country,” Jarlov continued.

For context: US President Donald Trump has renewed his public calls for the autonomous Danish territory after the capture of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro.

While the US has said it needs Greenland for security purposes, Jarlov pointed out that the country already has “exclusive and full military access” to the island. “So this talk about needing Greenland for security is complete nonsense,” he added.

“They talk about that the United States are the only ones that can protect Greenland, but the fact is that they’re the only ones threatening Greenland. Neither China nor Russia are threatening Greenland,” he said.

Should the US attack Greenland militarily, Denmark “will defend it, and in that case, we would be at war,” Jarlov said.

“We would be fighting each other, which is completely absurd,” he continued. “But you cannot disagree that if the United States attacks a NATO country, there is no alliance.”

CNN’s Francisca Marques contributed to this reporting.

5 hr 49 min ago

Cuba faces uncertainty in aftermath of US military operation in Venezuela

From CNN’s Patrick Oppmann

The attack on Venezuela has already come at a heavy cost for Cuba, with the government reporting in a social media post that 32 of its citizens were killed during the US military operation.

Ousted Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro’s inner circle of bodyguards were Cuban. Saturday’s operation appears to be the first time in decades that the former Cold War-era foes have engaged in combat. Now, the Cuban government is wondering if it could be the next country targeted by the Trump administration.

Watch to learn more about what could be next for Cuba amid escalating tensions:

5 hr 58 min ago

Mexico's Sheinbaum calls for a “fair trial” for Maduro in the US

The president of Mexico, Claudia Sheinbaum, called Tuesday for a “fair trial” for the ousted president of Venezuela, Nicolás Maduro, who was captured on January 3 along with his wife, Cilia Flores, in Caracas after a US military intervention, and then transferred to New York, where they face drug trafficking charges.

“In this case, now that President Maduro has been detained, what one asks for is always a fair trial. That is what must be requested, so that truly in everything, for everyone and in any circumstance – and in this particular case – there must be speed and justice,” the president said during her morning press conference.

Sheinbaum reiterated Mexico’s position of rejecting US intervention, stating that “regardless” of one’s opinion of Maduro’s presidency or the Venezuelan government, her government condemns Washington’s “invasion.”

“We must recover our history, our constitution, and what each one says about it,” she said.

She recalled that Mexico defends “non-intervention, the peaceful resolution of disputes,” and noted that even “if a country is very small internationally, we are all equal.”

“That is why we speak of the legal equality of states. International cooperation for development, which is what I mentioned yesterday. The best way to help a country is international cooperation for development. Respect, protection, and promotion of human rights,” she asserted.

Since Maduro’s detention on January 3, Mexico has expressed its rejection of Washington’s military intervention in Venezuela and has defended the sovereignty of nations.

On Sunday, it issued a joint statement with Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Spain, and Uruguay rejecting “the military actions unilaterally carried out on Venezuelan territory” and expressing “concern about any attempt at governmental control, administration, or external appropriation of natural or strategic resources.”

6 hr 1 min ago

Venezuela’s attorney general asserts Maduro has diplomatic immunity

From CNN's Uriel Blanco

Venezuela’s Attorney General Tarek William Saab demanded the release of ousted Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro, saying that he has “diplomatic immunity.”

The attorney general urged Alvin K. Hellerstein, the US judge in charge of Maduro’s case, to “respect international law and proceed to recognize the lack of jurisdiction of the court under his command to try the leader of a sovereign nation, like the Venezuelan homeland, who is protected by diplomatic immunity, I repeat, as head of state.”

Saab also urged Hellerstein to “cease all human rights violations that have been carried out against the president, his wife, and obviously against the Venezuelan people.”

Maduro and his wife Cilia Flores pleaded not guilty yesterday in their first court appearance in New York.

Follow our live coverage in Spanish of the situation in the country.

5 hr 45 min ago

Bolton: Trump administration's talk about Greenland "harms American security"

From CNN's Catherine Nicholls

The Trump administration’s recent rhetoric about Greenland in light of its actions in Venezuela is harming American security, according to John Bolton, US President Donald Trump’s former national security adviser.

When asked by CNN’s Kate Bolduan about comments made by White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller yesterday that “nobody’s gonna fight the United States militarily over the future of Greenland,” Bolton said that Miller was making a “simple-minded statement.”

“Of course, nobody’s going to fight us over (Greenland), but it doesn’t mean we should take territory from a treaty ally. And if we do that or if, frankly, this conversation goes on much longer, I think the NATO alliance is in grave jeopardy,” he said.

“This is a self-inflicted wound by the Trump administration. It harms American security. It does not enhance it by this kind of talk about Greenland,” Bolton continued.

On Venezuela: Bolton also reiterated that the Trump administration was making a “big mistake” by choosing not to support opposition leader María Corina Machado as the new leader of Venezuela.

Machado and fellow opposition leader Edmundo González “are the people who can help provide stability,” Bolton said, not those who were a part of the regime ran by ousted President Nicolás Maduro.

5 hr 58 min ago

Trump celebrates mission to capture Maduro in speech to GOP lawmakers

From CNN's Adam Cancryn

President Donald Trump on Tuesday celebrated the capture of ousted Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro, boasting that the high-risk operation proved the US has the “most fearsome” military in the world.

“We had a lot of boots on the ground, but it was amazing,” he said during a speech at a House GOP retreat in Washington, DC. “It was brilliant tactically.”

Trump recounted several operational details to Republican lawmakers, indicating the US cut electricity to major parts of Venezuela just before entering the country. That gave the military the element of surprise as it approached Maduro’s compound.

“And think of it, nobody was killed,” Trump said. “And on the other side, a lot of people were killed.”

Trump went on to criticize Democrats for airing concerns about the decision to capture Maduro, complaining that few in the party were congratulating him.

“At some point they should say, you know, ‘You did a great job,’” he said. “‘Thank you, congratulations.’ Wouldn’t it be good?”

5 hr 40 min ago

Colombia to submit note of protest to US over Trump's threats

From CNNE's Gonzalo Zegarra

Colombian Foreign Minister Yolanda Villavicencio confirmed Tuesday that she will submit a note of protest to the United States over threats made by President Donald Trump against Colombian President Gustavo Petro.

“The meeting we will have today with the US representative is to present our note of rejection of these offenses, which are not only directed at President Gustavo Petro,” the foreign minister said. “We want them to understand that he is our democratically elected president. An offense against the president is an offense against our country,” she added.

On Sunday, Trump described Petro as “a sick man who likes making cocaine and selling it to the United States, and he’s not going to be doing it very long.”

When pressed by a reporter on whether those comments meant there could be an “operation” in Colombia in the future, Trump responded, “Sounds good to me.” Petro subsequently refuted Trump’s claims and defended his government’s record on combating drug trafficking in a lengthy post on X.

Villavivencio rejected the US “aggression” against Venezuela over the weekend and said that, while Bogotá maintains its non-recognition of the country’s 2024 elections, it respects the Venezuelan legal system that led to Delcy Rodríguez taking office as acting president after Maduro’s capture.

The minister said she has been in contact with the Venezuelan government, without giving details of those conversations, and said that Colombia has not received asylum requests from Chavista leaders.

She added that Colombia seeks “a solution for Venezuela that is through dialogue and the autonomous decision of Venezuelans, (and) that they find the way to reach a consensus on the best way for the country to continue with a government that can overcome (the crisis).”

CNN’s Tim Lister and Hira Humayun contributed to this report.

7 hr 20 min ago

Journalists detained by Venezuelan security forces, says national media union

From CNN's Jack Guy

Venezuelan security forces detained 14 journalists in the capital on Monday, including reporters who were covering the swearing-in of the country’s national assembly, according to the national press union.

In a post on X, the SNTP reported that 13 foreign journalists and one Venezuelan journalist were detained on Monday in Caracas before later being released.

The union said that journalists had their equipment and messaging apps checked.

6 hr 16 min ago

Tension in Venezuela as Europe pushes back on US aggression toward Greenland. Here’s the latest

From CNN’s Maureen Chowdhury

Tensions are high on the ground in Venezuela following the capture of now ousted leader Nicolas Maduro, while some of the focus diplomatically has shifted to the US’ claims on Greenland, which have provoked a strong pushback from Europe.

·         Patrols in Caracas: Rights groups are reporting checkpoints and media repression as security forces patrol the streets of Venezuela’s capital city.

·         UN concerns: The United Nations has said it is “deeply worried” about what comes next for Venezuela and said that the military operation “undermined a fundamental principle of international law.”

·         US Congress briefings: The full House and Senate are expected to receive closed-door briefings on the US’ Venezuela operation from top Trump administration officials tomorrow.

·         On Greenland: In a joint statement, leaders from major European powers have expressed support for Denmark and Greenland, saying the Arctic island belongs to its people, following renewed interest by US President Donald Trump in taking over the Danish territory. Yesterday, White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller told CNN that Greenland “obviously” should be a part of the US.

·         Reaction in Latin America: Colombian President Gustavo Petro has warned that Trump is aiming to turn Latin American nations into colonies of the US. Read more about what Venezuelans are saying in Caracas. And follow our live coverage in Spanish of the situation in the country here.

CNN’s Catherine Nicholls, Sarah Ferris, Manu Raju, Jack Guy contributed to this report.

7 hr 34 min ago

Trump officials to brief Senate and House on Wednesday

From CNN’s Sarah Ferris and Manu Raju

The full House and Senate are expected to receive closed-door briefings on the US’ Venezuela operation tomorrow.

The Senate will hold a members-only classified briefing at 10 a.m. ET in the Senate SCIF (sensitive compartmented information facility), according to a source familiar with the meeting and a notice sent to Senate offices.

The briefing will be led by Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, Attorney General Pam Bondi, CIA Director Ratcliffe and Joint Chiefs Chairman Dan Caine.

The House is also expected to receive a similar classified briefing.

The Gang of Eight and top Republicans and Democrats from key House and Senate committees were briefed yesterday, but the fuller meeting this week will allow a wider swath of lawmakers to pose questions about the legality of the operation, future US involvement in Venezuela, and more amid questions over the propriety of the Trump administration’s actions.

8 hr 6 min ago

Focus shifts to Greenland after the US' military operation in Venezuela

From CNN's Catherine Nicholls

The US’ attack on Venezuela and its capture of ousted President Nicolás Maduro over the weekend drew headlines worldwide and drew international attention - both positive and negative.

Just a few days after the strike, focus has also shifted to Greenland, a self-governing territory of Denmark. The Arctic island’s strategic location between Europe and North America makes it a critical site for the US ballistic missile defense system. Its mineral wealth also aligns with Washington’s ambition to reduce reliance on Chinese exports.

On Sunday, US President Donald Trump repeated his claim that his country “need(s) Greenland” from a security perspective.

“We need Greenland … It’s so strategic right now. Greenland is covered with Russian and Chinese ships all over the place,” Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One. “We need Greenland from the standpoint of national security, and Denmark is not going to be able to do it.”

White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller said yesterday that the formal position of the Trump administration is that “Greenland should be part of the United States.”

“Nobody’s gonna fight the United States militarily over the future of Greenland,” Miller said on CNN’s “The Lead with Jake Tapper.”

These remarks came following US military action on foreign soil, and were met with consternation from European allies.

“The current and repeated rhetoric coming from the United States is entirely unacceptable. When the President of the United States speaks of ‘needing Greenland’ and links us to Venezuela and military intervention, it is not only wrong. It is disrespectful,” Greenland’s Prime Minister Jens Frederik Nielsen said yesterday.

Denmark’s Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen warned that there would be consequences should the US try to seize Greenland, saying in televised remarks that “if the US chooses to attack another NATO country militarily, everything stops, including NATO and thus the security that has been provided since the end of World War II.”

In a joint statement released today, the leaders of France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Spain, the United Kingdom and Denmark reiterated that “Greenland belongs to its people. It is for Denmark and Greenland, and them only, to decide on matters concerning Denmark and Greenland.”

CNN’s Rhea Mogul, Kit Maher, Tim Lister and Matthew Chance contributed to this reporting.

5 hr 4 min ago

Mounting tensions in Venezuela as rights groups denounce repression

From CNN's Jack Guy

Tensions appear to be rising in Venezuela in the aftermath of US military action to capture President Nicolás Maduro and his wife Cilia Flores, with rights groups reporting checkpoints and media repression as security forces patrol the streets.

Venezuela’s Interior Minister Diosdado Cabello posted two videos on Instagram showing security forces in the capital Caracas.

In one video, a group of armed men can be heard shouting: “Loyal always, traitors never!”

The SNTP Venezuelan journalists’ union denounced repression against journalists on Monday, and Edmundo González – who the opposition maintains was the true winner of the 2024 elections – repeated calls for the release of political prisoners.

In a video message from exile, González said that the capture of Maduro was “a necessary step, but not sufficient” to achieve a democratic transition.

On Monday, the Committee for the Liberation of Political Prisoners in Venezuela reported that political prisoners have had visiting rights suspended and are being prevented from communicating with the outside world.

The committee added that checkpoints have been going up in cities around the country, with people being searched and detained for possessing “digital material” linked to the US military action.

The Venezuelan government on Monday published the decree of the State of External Commotion, which grants broad powers to the presidency and orders security forces to capture “any person involved in the promotion or support” of the US attack against the South American country.

9 hr 18 min ago

Yesterday saw ousted Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro make an appearance at a New York court, after he was captured alongside his wife Cilia Flores in a US operation over the weekend.

As you can see in the images below, he was escorted to the court by armed police and Drug Enforcement Administration agents, traveling both by motorcade and helicopter to move from a Brooklyn detention center to the Manhattan courthouse.

Captured Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro en route to the Daniel Patrick Manhattan United States Courthouse for an initial appearance to face U.S. federal charges including narco-terrorism, conspiracy, drug trafficking, money laundering and others in New York City on Monday, January 5. 

Eduardo Munoz/Reuters

Meanwhile in Venezuela, the country’s former vice president was formally sworn in as acting leader yesterday. The ambassadors of China, Russia and Iran — key allies of Venezuela — were among the first dignitaries to congratulate Delcy Rodríguez when she was sworn in.

9 hr 27 min ago

UN says US action in Venezuela undermines international law

From CNN's Jack Guy

The United Nations has said it is “deeply worried” about what comes next for Venezuela following the US capture of President Nicolas Maduro.

“It is clear that the operation undermined a fundamental principle of international law – that states must not threaten or use force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state,” the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights said in a statement on Tuesday.

The statement acknowledged the Maduro government’s “appalling human rights record”, but said US intervention could have damaging consequences both for Venezuela and the rest of the world.

“We fear that the current instability and further militarization in the country resulting from the U.S. intervention will only make the situation worse.”

“The future of Venezuela must be determined by the Venezuelan people alone, with full respect for their human rights, including the right to self-determination, and sovereignty over their lives and their resources,” it added.

9 hr 47 min ago

What are the politics of Venezuelan opposition leader María Corina Machado?

From CNN's Catherine Nicholls

Venezuelan opposition leader María Corina Machado was awarded the 2025 Nobel Peace Prize in October last year for keeping “the flame of democracy burning amid a growing darkness.”

She was awarded the prize “for her struggle to achieve a just and peaceful transition from dictatorship to democracy,” the Norwegian Nobel Committee said at the time. In a statement accepting the award, Machado said the prize belonged to the people of Venezuela.

She also dedicated the prize to US President Donald Trump, telling CNN that “he deserves a Nobel Peace Prize because of (the) incredible events that are taking place currently in the world.”

In addition to being a staunch proponent of democracy and a vocal supporter of Trump, Machado is also an avowed capitalist who previously ran on a campaign to privatize most Venezuelan public assets, including in the sectors of health, oil and education.

In an interview with CNN before Venezuela’s contested 2024 elections, she repeatedly called for the country’s markets to be opened, saying: “we need to create conditions that are so competitive, so attractive that international resources will be invested in a country, despite what happened in the previous regime.”

Yesterday, Machado said that, following the US’ capture of ousted Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro, her country “will be the United States’ main ally in matters of security, energy, democracy and human rights.”

In an interview with Fox News the same day, Machado said she hadn’t spoken to Trump since October, after her Nobel Peace Prize win.

She thanked the US leader for “the historical actions he has taken against the narco-terrorist regime,” saying that January 3, when Maduro was captured by the US, “will go down in history as the day justice defeated tyranny.”

CNN’s Christian Edwards, Char Reck, Billy Stockwell, Stefano Pozzebon, Rocío Muñoz-Ledo and Lex Harvey contributed to this reporting.

9 hr 32 min ago

European leaders back Denmark in face of renewed US interest in Greenland

Leaders from major European powers have just expressed support for Denmark and Greenland in a joint statement, saying the Arctic island belongs to its people, following renewed interest by US President Donald Trump in taking over the Danish territory.

“Greenland belongs to its people. It is for Denmark and Greenland, and them only, to decide on matters concerning Denmark and Greenland,” said the statement by leaders of France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Spain, Britain and Denmark.

The leaders said that security in the Arctic must be achieved collectively with NATO allies, including the United States.

“NATO has made clear that the Arctic region is a priority and European Allies are stepping up,” the statement said. “We and many other Allies have increased our presence, activities and investments, to keep the Arctic safe and to deter adversaries.”

Trump has said repeatedly he wants to take over Greenland and told The Atlantic magazine on Sunday: “We do need Greenland, absolutely. We need it for defense.”

A US military operation at the weekend, which led to the capture of Venezuela’s President Nicolas Maduro has further rekindled concerns among Washington’s NATO allies that Greenland might face a similar scenario.

Some context: Greenland is the world’s largest island with a population of 57,000 people. It is not an independent member of NATO but is covered by Denmark’s membership of the Western military alliance.

The island’s strategic location between Europe and North America makes it a critical site for the US ballistic missile defense system. Its mineral wealth also aligns with Washington’s ambition to reduce reliance on Chinese exports.

10 hr 6 min ago

Venezuela's new acting leader Delcy Rodríguez and her relationship with the US

From CNN's Catherine Nicholls

The former vice president of Venezuela, Delcy Rodríguez, was formally sworn in as the country’s acting leader yesterday.

The 56-year-old has spent more than two decades as one of the leading figures of Chavismo, a socialist ideology founded by influential leftist leader Hugo Chávez, which also values Venezuela’s sovereignty as something to be protected from “imperialist” powers.

Despite her staunch support of the Chavismo movement and her hard-line rhetoric about the US following its capture of ousted Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and his wife Cilia Flores on Saturday, she has seemed to soften her language regarding the country in the days since.

Initially, Rodríguez accused the US of “kidnapping” her country’s leader and said that violations of international law were committed, accusing US forces of having “savagely attacked” Venezuela’s territorial integrity.

But on Sunday, she extended an invitation to the United States government to collaborate on an “agenda of cooperation,” saying that Venezuela will “prioritize” moving toward “balanced and respectful international relations” with the US and the region.

Yesterday, US President Donald Trump did not say whether he has yet spoken directly to Rodríguez, but told reporters that US Secretary of State Marco Rubio has been speaking with her in fluent Spanish on the phone and that their “relationship has been very strong.”

CNNE’s Mauricio Torres, CNN’s Helen Regan and Kit Maher contributed to this reporting.

11 hr 37 min ago

What to know about Venezuela’s oil — and the early odds of the US reaping the benefits Trump is promising

From CNN's Matthew Rehbein and Matt Egan

US Energy Secretary Chris Wright is expected to meet this week with American oil executives as President Donald Trump touts Venezuela’s vast oil resources as a windfall from his decision to remove President Nicolás Maduro from power.

Trump said yesterday US companies can rebuild Venezuela’s dilapidated oil infrastructure in about 18 months, a timeframe drastically at odds with many industry analysts’ estimates.

Here’s what we know about the US plan:

·         Big Oil is wary: US oil executives likely aren’t champing at the bit to invest in Venezuela, industry sources tell CNN. The troubled country’s oil industry is in shambles, and the political situation in the wake of Maduro’s removal is murky. Then there’s Venezuela’s recent history of nationalizing US oil companies’ assets: ConocoPhillips is still trying to recover $12 billion and ExxonMobil nearly $2 billion for assets seized in 2006, according to Reuters.

·         Trump says 18 months, experts say years: Despite the president’s optimistic outlook, analysts estimate rebuilding Venezuela’s oil infrastructure could take more than a decade. Just maintaining the country’s current output would require $53 million over 15 years, and increasing capacity to 1990s levels would take $183 million through 2040, consulting firm Rystad Energy said Monday.

·         Ongoing blockade: The US military is continuing to enforce a blockade of sanctioned vessels entering and leaving Venezuela. Secretary of State Marco Rubio says the move “allows us to exert tremendous leverage over what happens next” in Venezuela by targeting how the regime generates revenue. Rubio and the energy secretary are leading the effort to engage the US oil industry on Venezuela, a senior White House official told CNN.

·         Tankers seized: The US has seized multiple vessels since Trump ordered the blockade last month. As for the oil seized, Trump has said, “We’re going to keep it.” And the US is maintaining its blockade, including pursuing sanctioned oil tankers that have attempted to evade capture, according to four sources.

·         How much oil is at stake: Venezuela has the largest proven oil resources on Earth – about 20% of global reserves as of 2023. But its potential far outweighs its actual output, as it produces less than 1% of global crude production.

CNN’s David Goldman, Natasha Bertrand, Alayna Treene, Kylie Atwood, Zachary Cohen and Avery Schmitz contributed reporting.

11 hr 30 min ago

How did countries react at the UN Security Council meeting yesterday?

From CNN's Issy Ronald and Christian Edwards

Top diplomats at a UN Security Council meeting yesterday were largely critical of the US operation to capture Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro.

Criticism came from several quarters – Latin American countries, with the notable exception of Argentina, traditional US adversaries Russia and China, as well as less powerful countries like Pakistan and Uganda. Even Washington’s European allies were reluctant to throw their full support behind their longtime security partner.

What did the US say? Mike Waltz, the US envoy to the UN, characterized the move as a “law enforcement operation,” calling Maduro a “narco-terrorist” who was “responsible for attacks on the people of the United States, for destabilizing the western hemisphere and illegitimately repressing the people of Venezuela.”

What did Venezuela say? Caracas’ UN envoy Samuel Moncada said Maduro’s capture was driven by the US’ desire to access Venezuela’s resources, and threatened both Venezuela’s sovereignty and “the credibility of international law”.

Who condemned the US operation? Chile, Brazil, Mexico, Cuba, Colombia all condemned the US’ actions. Brazil’s UN envoy said the operation “crossed an unacceptable line” and violated international law. Meanwhile, Russia’s envoy to the UN warned that Washington’s actions could generate “fresh momentum for neocolonialism and for imperialism.” Pakistan’s envoy cautioned that the operation could set “dangerous precedents.”

Who backed the US? Argentina, led by Trump ally Javier Milei, backed the US’ “decisive action” in Venezuela while Washington’s European allies offered a more tempered approach. James Kariuki, the UK’s ambassador to the UN, said London saw Maduro’s claim to power as “fraudulent” and would push for a peaceful transition towards a legitimate government, but also reiterated the importance of international law. France struck a similar tone, saying that the US operation “chips away at the international order”.

11 hr 52 min ago

Colombian President Gustavo Petro accuses US of colonialist ambitions in Latin America

From CNN's Jack Guy

Colombian President Gustavo Petro has warned that US President Donald Trump is aiming to turn Latin American nations into colonies of the US.

“If you read the first few paragraphs of the national security policy you will understand that the Monroe Doctrine aims to make sovereign Latin American nations colonies again,” wrote Petro in a post on X.

“That completely goes against international law. It’s the same doctrine around living space that Hitler used, and it caused two world wars,” he added.

In a separate post, Petro called on US voters to “help construct an international democratic order.”

“It doesn’t matter what color, party or state these people are from, they need to act, world peace and the future of human existence are in danger,” he added.

12 hr 6 min ago

Analysis: Why the US strike on Venezuela plunges Greenland and NATO into uncertainty

From CNN's Matthew Chance\

Amid increasing concerns that Greenland, a vast Arctic territory ruled by Denmark, is still being coveted by the Trump administration, the Danish prime minister has delivered a stark warning to the White House.

In nationally televised remarks, Mette Frederiksen reminded Danes that she had already “made it very clear where the Kingdom of Denmark stands, and that Greenland has repeatedly said that it does not want to be part of the United States.”

But she also warned of the consequences of US military action to seize Greenland – something US President Donald Trump has pointedly refused to rule out.

“First of all, I think you have to take the US president seriously when he says he wants Greenland,” Frederiksen said, reflecting heightened anxiety about Trump’s intentions in the aftermath of his extraordinary military action in Venezuela.

“But I also want to make it clear that if the US chooses to attack another NATO country militarily, everything stops, including NATO and thus the security that has been provided since the end of World War II,” she added.

A Danish lawmaker has described US President Donald Trump’s latest comment about how the US needs Greenland as “very frankly stupid.”

It is a serious and widely shared concern among NATO allies that the Greenland issue has the potential not only to anger and humiliate a longtime US partner, but also to fracture the Western military alliance as pressure from Washington escalates.

Late last night White House deputy chief of staff for policy Stephen Miller reiterated those claims that “Greenland should be part of the United States,” but he rejected that military force would be necessary to acquire it.

“Nobody’s gonna fight the United States militarily over the future of Greenland,” Miller said on CNN’s “The Lead with Jake Tapper.”

When pressed whether military intervention is off the table, Miller instead questioned Denmark’s claim over the Arctic territory.

You can read the full analysis here.

14 hr 18 min ago

Analysis: What Maduro's capture means for China and Taiwan

From CNN's John Liu and Steven Jiang

China and Venezuela have maintained close relations for decades, forged by a shared political ideology and mutual distrust of a world led by the US.

The bulk of Venezuelan oil exports flow to China, and Chinese companies finance extensive infrastructure projects and investments across the country, with Beijing lending billions to Caracas in recent decades.

Trump’s move has appeared to upend that relationship, at least for now, raising questions over China’s preferential access to Venezuelan oil and the future of its political and economic influence in the wider region.

Chinese social media has erupted with discussion of the implications. If the US can snatch a leader in its backyard, many ask, why can’t China do the same? By late Monday, topics linked to Trump’s capture of Maduro had received more than 650 million impressions on Weibo, with many users suggesting it could offer a template for Beijing’s potential military takeover of Taiwan.

But Beijing has struck a different tone in public statements. It has denounced Maduro’s capture, condemning Washington for behaving like the world’s policeman, and calling for the ousted leader’s immediate release.

Subscribers can read the full analysis here.

12 hr 58 min ago

Venezuela’s opposition leader vows to return home

From CNN's Lex Harvey

Venezuelan opposition leader María Corina Machado vowed to return home “as soon as possible” in an interview with Fox News yesterday.

Machado, who is under a decade-long travel ban, had been in hiding for more than a year but traveled to Oslo, Norway in December to accept the Nobel Peace Prize. She left Oslo last month.

In the wake of the capture of ousted leader Nicolas Maduro, Trump said Machado “doesn’t have the support within or the respect” to lead Venezuela and has repeatedly said that the US is in charge of the country.

Machado said she last spoke with Trump on October 10, when her Nobel Peace Prize win was announced.

Senior White House aide Stephen Miller has also dismissed calls for the US to install Machado as president.

“It would be absurd and preposterous for us to suddenly fly her into the country and to put her in charge,” he said Monday, arguing that Venezuela’s military would not view her as legitimate.

The US has instead been working with Maduro-ally and acting President Delcy Rodríguez, who has vowed to cooperate.

00:44

12 hr 4 min ago

What’s next for Venezuela and its ousted leader Nicolás Maduro?

From CNN's Lex Harvey

Venezuela remains in turmoil days after leader Nicolás Maduro and his wife Cilia Flores were captured by US forces from their military fortress in Caracas.

In New York yesterday, Maduro and Flores pleaded not guilty to drug and weapons charges in their first court appearance, in which Maduro declared: “I am still president of my country.”

Their next hearing is scheduled for March 17. Neither Maduro nor Flores are immediately seeking bail or release.

Back in Venezuela, Maduro-ally Delcy Rodriguez was sworn in as acting president yesterday, though President Donald Trump has repeatedly said he is in charge, and has not ruled out broader military intervention in the South American country if the regime does not cooperate.

Here’s what may come next:

·         Miller outlines US position: White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller characterized US involvement in Venezuela as an “ongoing military operation,” even as the administration has contended that capturing Maduro was a law enforcement action. He told CNN the US is using its control of the Venezuelan economy as leverage to ensure its new leadership does what Trump wants. He also said the White House has not ruled out future indictments for Venezuelan officials.

·         What’s the US plan? Senate Majority Leader John Thune said questions on the timeline for US control over Venezuela could be answered in the “next few days,” while other lawmakers have expressed doubt that Trump has a clear plan for Venezuela.

·         Machado vows return to Venezuela: Opposition leader María Corina Machado said she plans to return to Venezuela ASAP. She said she hadn’t spoken to Trump since October. Trump and other US officials have dismissed calls to install Machado as president, claiming she lacks legitimacy, drawing criticism.

·         The oil angle: US Energy Secretary Chris Wright will meet with oil executives this week to discuss Venezuela. Trump has projected it will take less than 18 months for oil companies to rebuild Venezuela’s energy infrastructure. The US is also making plans to intercept a Venezuela-linked oil tanker that Russia has claimed jurisdiction over, sources told CNN, aiming to enforce its blockade off Venezuela’s coast.

·         Broader threats: Trump has issued threats and warnings to other countries that he deems uncooperative. He said he could take military action in Colombia, told Mexico to get its “act together” on drugs, and said the US “needs Greenland.”

13 hr 9 min ago

Here's what happened overnight in Caracas

From CNN's Helen Regan

Gunfire was heard overnight near the Miraflores presidential palace in the Venezuelan capital Caracas — a city on edge with security services on heightened alert following the US attack and capture of President Nicolás Maduro.

Video verified by CNN shows anti-aircraft fire over Caracas amid reports of confusion between security units in the capital.

A Venezuelan ministry later said police had fired at drones that were “flying without permission” and that “no confrontation occurred.”

Here’s what we know:

·         Reports of gunfire: One resident, who spoke to CNN on condition of anonymity, said they heard gunfire close to Urdaneta Ave near the Miraflores presidential palace.

·         Videos: Video verified by CNN shows anti-aircraft fire over the Caracas. In separate video verified by CNN audible gunfire could also be heard.

·         What authorities said: Venezuela’s Ministry of Communication and Information said police fired at drones that were “flying without permission.” The ministry added that “no confrontation occurred.”

·         A “misunderstanding”: Discussions between Maduro-linked paramilitary groups and heard by CNN indicate the gunfire was related to confusion between different security groups operating near the Miraflores presidential palace. A member of one of these groups can be heard calling for backup and that “several shots were heard.” Later, the speaker said that a drone flying in the area was fired upon by members of the Miraflores Police and palace security.

·         What is the situation now? The Ministry of Communication and Information said “the entire country is completely calm,” though it did not say who might have been flying the drones. The paramilitary groups also indicated the situation was under control.

·         What has the US said? A White House official told CNN they were closely tracking the reports of gunfire out of Venezuela, but noted that “the US is not involved.”

15 hr 53 min ago

Here's what comes next for Maduro and his wife

From CNN's Lauren del Valle and Holmes Lybrand

During the first hearing in New York in the case against ousted Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, the defendants professed their innocence and accused the US government of abducting the two from their home.

Both pleaded not guilty to the drug and weapons charges against them and chose, for the time being, not to fight their detention.

The historic court appearance marks the start of what could be a lengthy litigation process as they will likely fight the legitimacy of their military capture.

Maduro’s attorney Barry Pollack said he plans to file several motions challenging the indictment and Maduro’s controversial arrest by US operatives, calling it a “military abduction.”

Pollack also said Maduro has privileges and immunity tied to his office as the head of a sovereign state.

Maduro and Flores also asked for a “visit” with the Venezuelan consulate. Under US law, foreign nationals detained in the US are entitled to consular notification and access to consular resources. It’s unclear what exactly that would look like.

Attorneys for Maduro and his wife did not make a pitch for their release in court Monday but said they will make a formal bail application down the line.

The next hearing in the case is scheduled for March 17.

02:16

11 hr 59 min ago

What Trump and his administration officials are saying about Venezuela

From CNN's Elise Hammond

President Donald Trump and several other key members of his administration spoke last night as the United States determines its next move on Venezuela.

After ousted President Nicolás Maduro and his wife appeared in a Manhattan courtroom yesterday, the US president said he is in charge of the South American country.

Here’s what the administration is saying:

·         Trump told NBC News he considers himself in charge of Venezuela. He suggested the US could launch a second military operation if Delcy Rodríguez, who is now the acting Venezuelan president, stops cooperating but said he doesn’t think it will be necessary. He also projected it will take less than 18 months for oil companies to rebuild Venezuela’s energy infrastructure.”

·         Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said the US operation included nearly 200 US personnel on the ground in Caracas. He also said Maduro didn’t know the troops were coming “until about three minutes before they arrived.”

·         US Department of Energy Secretary Chris Wright will meet with oil executives later this week to discuss US companies once again standing up drilling for oil in Venezuela, the department said.

·         Senior White House aide Stephen Miller characterized the US involvement as an “ongoing military operation,” even as the administration has contended that capturing Maduro was a law enforcement action. He said the US is effectively using its control over the Venezuelan economy as leverage to ensure that its new leadership does what the Trump administration demands.

 

 

ATTACHMENT “D” – FROM VARIOUS SOURCES

TRUMP WITHDRAWS US FROM 66 INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS AND TREATIES

Dinah Voyles Pulver

USA TODAY

Jan. 7, 2026 Updated Jan. 8, 2026, 11:40 a.m. ET

The United States will withdraw from more than five dozen international collaborations, including treaties and organizations with the United Nations on climate change and the oceans, President Donald Trump announced in a memo.

Among the organizations the United States will withdraw from are the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. The list also includes agreements and groups on renewable energy, oceans, piracy, counterterrorism and empowerment of women.

 

(c)  Consistent with Executive Order 14199 and pursuant to the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, I hereby direct all executive departments and agencies (agencies) to take immediate steps to effectuate the withdrawal of the United States from the organizations listed in section 2 of this memorandum as soon as possible.  For United Nations entities, withdrawal means ceasing participation in or funding to those entities to the extent permitted by law.

(d)  My review of further findings of the Secretary of State remains ongoing.

Sec. 2.  Organizations from Which the United States Shall Withdraw.  (a)  Non-United Nations Organizations:

 

(xxx)     Regional Cooperation Agreement on Combatting Piracy and Armed Robbery against Ships in Asia;

 

Regional Cooperation Agreement on Combating Piracy and Armed Robbery against Ships in Asia

 

 

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Regional Cooperation Agreement on Combating Piracy and Armed Robbery against Ships in Asia - Information Sharing Centre

See Wiki for Logo of the Regional Cooperation Agreement on Combating Piracy and Armed Robbery against Ships in Asia - Information Sharing Centre

Abbreviation

ReCAAP ISC

Formation

29 November 2006 (19 years ago)

Type

International organization

Purpose

Anti Piracy

Headquarters

Singapore

Coordinates

1.2923863°N 103.792483°E

Area served

Asia

Membership

21 Contracting Parties

Executive Director

Krishnaswamy Natarajan

Website

www.recaap.org

 

 

List of Countries In ReCAAP  See map here

The Regional Cooperation Agreement on Combating Piracy and Armed Robbery against Ships in Asia, abbreviated as ReCAAP or RECAAP, is a multilateral agreement between 16 countries in Asia, concluded in November 2004 and includes the RECAAP Information Sharing Centre (ISC), an initiative for facilitating the dissemination of piracy-related information.[1]

To date, twenty one countries in various parts of the world have ratified the ReCAAP agreement.[2]

ReCAAP History

The Regional Cooperation Agreement on Combating Piracy and Armed Robbery against Ships in Asia (ReCAAP) is the first regional government-to-government agreement to promote and enhance cooperation against piracy and armed robbery against ships in Asia. ReCAAP ISC was proposed in 1999 as a result of shared concern specifically related to cases of piracy and armed robbery, and it came into force in November 2006 after further ratification by member states.[3] To date, 21 States (14 Asian countries, 5 European countries, Australia, the USA) have become Contracting Parties to ReCAAP.

On January 2026, the USA withdrew from the Agreement.[4]

The 20 Contracting Parties of ReCAAP:[5] (As of January 2025)

 Australia

 Bangladesh

 Brunei

 Cambodia

 China

 Denmark

 India

 Japan

 South Korea

 Laos

 Myanmar

 Netherlands

 Norway

 Philippines

 Singapore

 Sri Lanka

 Thailand

 United Kingdom

 Vietnam

 Germany

The Structure of ReCAAP

ReCAAP was established as a decentralized security network, which included the formation of an Information Security Center (ISC) and a Governing Council. The ISC also serves as a platform for information exchange with the ReCAAP Focal Points via the Information Network System (IFN). The Governing Council consists of one representative from each contracting member and is tasked with overseeing a focal point and managing the ISC's procedures.[6]

 

FROM TRADE WINDS

Trump dumps anti-piracy body on eve of major report

Administration is withdrawing from 66 organisations that are ‘contrary to US interests’

 

Regulation

ReCAAP executive director Vijay D Chafekar

ReCAAP executive director Vijay D Chafekar

Photo: Karen Ng

Paul Peachey

TradeWinds correspondent

London

 

Published 8 January 2026, 10:17

The Trump administration is pulling out of an anti-piracy organisation on the eve of it reporting the highest level of incidents at a notorious hotspot for nearly two decades.

 

The US said it will withdraw from 66 organisations, including the Regional Cooperation Agreement on Combating Piracy and Armed Robbery against Ships in Asia (ReCAAP).

 

The list includes 31 United Nations bodies, among them UN Trade & Development, which produces an annual report on the state of the maritime industry and advocates for developing nations in global trade talks.

 

You need a subscription to read this story

 

Anti-piracy experts shrug off Trump team pullout

Asia security group says the US paid only a nominal sum every year

 

Published 9 January 2026, 07:49

The head of an anti-piracy group says its work will continue unaffected despite the administration of US President Donald Trump pulling its support.

 

The Regional Cooperation Agreement on Combating Piracy and Armed Robbery against Ships in Asia (ReCAAP) was one of 66 bodies identified by the White House this week as “contrary to the interests” of the US.

 

You need a subscription to read this story

 

FROM HAMSA

 

·         Shipping & Markets

 

https://www.bing.com/ck/a?!&&p=ce2d80b8250f5643c5c5005bd5cc62afa9b8e120a4b186afe8f77d8cbf21231eJmltdHM9MTc2ODAwMzIwMA&ptn=3&ver=2&hsh=4&fclid=22207647-2718-6046-2146-609a266e61fe&psq=TRUMP+WITHDRAW+Regional+Cooperation+PIRACY&u=a1aHR0cHM6Ly9oYW5zYS5uZXdzL3RydW1wLXdpdGhkcmF3cy11c2EtZnJvbS1jb29wZXJhdGlvbi1hZ2FpbnN0LXBpcmFjeS8

Trump withdraws USA from cooperation against piracy

January 9, 2026

The US government’s drastic withdrawal from international cooperation now also has consequences for the fight against piracy: Donald Trump has ordered the US to quit from a total of 66 organizations, including the “Recaap”.

Around a year ago, Trump instructed US Secretary of State Marco Rubio to review all memberships in international organizations. Although this was also about saving costs, it was primarily about “which organizations, agreements and treaties run counter to the interests of the United States”.

Rubio has now submitted his report. And Trump is making good on his threat. “I have reviewed the Secretary of State’s report and, after consultation with my Cabinet, have determined that it is contrary to the interests of the United States to remain, participate in, or otherwise support some organizations,” reads a statement from the White House.

In it, Trump instructs his followers to withdraw from a total of 66 organizations and cooperations “as soon as possible”.

After the US government exerted massive pressure on the deliberations at the International Maritime Organization (IMO) last autumn, ultimately torpedoing efforts to achieve the widely anticipated “Net Zero Framework”, the shipping industry is now also feeling the consequences of the latest initiative. The IMO is not on the list to be deleted. However, the fight against piracy in Asia is affected.

Germany is also a member

Among other things, Trump is calling to withdraw from the “Regional Cooperation Agreement to Combat Piracy and Armed Robbery against Ships in Asia”, or Recaap for short. This is an intergovernmental cooperation between 21 countries that was founded in 2004. The members are not only Asian states. The USA, some European countries and, since 2021, Germany have also joined.

Recaap cooperation is primarily about sharing information on piracy cases, threats, strategic plans. In contrast to East Africa, where some of the states are very weak in terms of naval and coastal protection and Somalia was considered a “failed state”, better developed, sovereign states are involved here.

Strictly speaking, many cases in the region are “armed robbery” and not “piracy” because the vast majority of attacks take place in the territorial waters of the states. This circumstance has important consequences because it is the coastal states that have the right to pursue and intervene there first, and not the naval units of other countries that are on patrol duty and could intervene more quickly if necessary.

Even though pirates off East and West Africa have received much more attention in recent years and the military has recently sounded the alarm again, shipping in Southeast Asia is still struggling with attacks, thefts and boardings. Despite – or perhaps because of – its “low profile” cooperation, Recaap is considered a model for success, even if two important countries in the region, Malaysia and Indonesia, cannot bring themselves to join for fear of losing sovereignty.

“BLOOD, SWEAT AND MONEY”

Incidentally, the latest instructions do not necessarily mark the end of the list of deletions. “My review of further findings by the Secretary of State is not yet complete,” Trump continued.

Rubio himself also commented on the deletion list, describing the organizations in question as “redundant, mismanaged, unnecessary, wasteful and poorly run”. They would be “captured by the interests of actors pursuing their own agendas contrary to our interests, or pose a threat to our nation’s sovereignty, freedoms and overall prosperity”. Trump himself is quoted in the statement as saying that it is no longer acceptable to devote “the blood, sweat and money of the American people to these institutions without getting any meaningful results in return. The days of billions of taxpayer dollars flowing to foreign interests at the expense of our people are over.” These organizations are actively trying to limit American sovereignty, he said. “We reject inertia and ideology and instead embrace prudence and purpose. We seek cooperation where it serves our people and remain steadfast where it does not,” it says.

 

A1A  FROM THE WHITE HOUSE

EXECUTIVE ORDER 14199

(Partial only, read the complete list of defunded organizations on White House website here.)

(c)  Consistent with Executive Order 14199 and pursuant to the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, I hereby direct all executive departments and agencies (agencies) to take immediate steps to effectuate the withdrawal of the United States from the organizations listed in section 2 of this memorandum as soon as possible.  For United Nations entities, withdrawal means ceasing participation in or funding to those entities to the extent permitted by law.

(d)  My review of further findings of the Secretary of State remains ongoing.

 

Sec. 2.  Organizations from Which the United States Shall Withdraw.  (a)  Non-United Nations Organizations:

(A total of sixty six are listed.  The relevant removal is...

(xxx)     Regional Cooperation Agreement on Combatting Piracy and Armed Robbery (RECAPP) against Ships in Asia;

 

A1B  FROM WIKIPEDIA

RECAAP DEFINED

Regional Cooperation Agreement on Combating Piracy and Armed Robbery against Ships in Asia

 

Bottom of Form

Regional Cooperation Agreement on Combating Piracy and Armed Robbery against Ships in Asia - Information Sharing Centre

RECAAP  (see logo HERE)

Abbreviation

ReCAAP ISC

Formation

29 November 2006 (19 years ago)

Type

International organization

Purpose

Anti Piracy

Headquarters

Singapore

Coordinates

1.2923863°N 103.792483°E

Area served

Asia

Membership

21 Contracting Parties

Executive Director

Krishnaswamy Natarajan

Website

www.recaap.org

 

 

List of Countries In ReCAAP   (See map here)

 

The Regional Cooperation Agreement on Combating Piracy and Armed Robbery against Ships in Asia, abbreviated as ReCAAP or RECAAP, is a multilateral agreement between 16 countries in Asia, concluded in November 2004 and includes the RECAAP Information Sharing Centre (ISC), an initiative for facilitating the dissemination of piracy-related information.[1]

To date, twenty one countries in various parts of the world have ratified the ReCAAP agreement.[2]

RECAAP HISTORY

The Regional Cooperation Agreement on Combating Piracy and Armed Robbery against Ships in Asia (ReCAAP) is the first regional government-to-government agreement to promote and enhance cooperation against piracy and armed robbery against ships in Asia. ReCAAP ISC was proposed in 1999 as a result of shared concern specifically related to cases of piracy and armed robbery, and it came into force in November 2006 after further ratification by member states.[3] To date, 21 States (14 Asian countries, 5 European countries, Australia, the USA) have become Contracting Parties to ReCAAP.

On January 2026, the USA withdrew from the Agreement.[4]

The 20 Contracting Parties of ReCAAP:[5] (As of January 2025)  @use A

 Australia

 Bangladesh

 Brunei

 Cambodia

 China

 Denmark

 India

 Japan

 South Korea

 Laos

 Myanmar

 Netherlands

 Norway

 Philippines

 Singapore

 Sri Lanka

 Thailand

 United Kingdom

 Vietnam

 Germany

 

The Structure of ReCAAP

ReCAAP was established as a decentralized security network, which included the formation of an Information Security Center (ISC) and a Governing Council. The ISC also serves as a platform for information exchange with the ReCAAP Focal Points via the Information Network System (IFN). The Governing Council consists of one representative from each contracting member and is tasked with overseeing a focal point and managing the ISC's procedures.[6]

@get more to include usa membership and quit

 

 

A1C  FROM FROM TRADE WINDS

TRUMP DUMPS ANTI-PIRACY BODY ON EVE OF MAJOR REPORT

Administration is withdrawing from 66 organisations that are ‘contrary to US interests’

Published 8 January 2026, 10:17

 

The Trump administration is pulling out of an anti-piracy organisation on the eve of it reporting the highest level of incidents at a notorious hotspot for nearly two decades.

The US said it will withdraw from 66 organisations, including the Regional Cooperation Agreement on Combating Piracy and Armed Robbery against Ships in Asia (ReCAAP).

The list includes 31 United Nations bodies, among them UN Trade & Development, which produces an annual report on the state of the maritime industry and advocates for developing nations in global trade talks.

PAYWALL:  You need a subscription to read the rest of this story

Article includes...

Anti-piracy experts shrug off Trump team pullout

Asia security group says the US paid only a nominal sum every year

 

 

A1D  FROM HANSA SHIPPING and MARKETS (German: see HERE for Description and Logo)

TRUMP WITHDRAWS USA FROM COOPERATION AGAINST PIRACY

January 9, 2026

 

The US government’s drastic withdrawal from international cooperation now also has consequences for the fight against piracy: Donald Trump has ordered the US to quit from a total of 66 organizations, including the “Recaap”.

Around a year ago, Trump instructed US Secretary of State Marco Rubio to review all memberships in international organizations. Although this was also about saving costs, it was primarily about “which organizations, agreements and treaties run counter to the interests of the United States”.

Rubio has now submitted his report. And Trump is making good on his threat. “I have reviewed the Secretary of State’s report and, after consultation with my Cabinet, have determined that it is contrary to the interests of the United States to remain, participate in, or otherwise support some organizations,” reads a statement from the White House.

In it, Trump instructs his followers to withdraw from a total of 66 organizations and cooperations “as soon as possible”.

After the US government exerted massive pressure on the deliberations at the International Maritime Organization (IMO) last autumn, ultimately torpedoing efforts to achieve the widely anticipated “Net Zero Framework”, the shipping industry is now also feeling the consequences of the latest initiative. The IMO is not on the list to be deleted. However, the fight against piracy in Asia is affected.

GERMANY IS ALSO A MEMBER

Among other things, Trump is calling to withdraw from the “Regional Cooperation Agreement to Combat Piracy and Armed Robbery against Ships in Asia”, or Recaap for short. This is an intergovernmental cooperation between 21 countries that was founded in 2004. The members are not only Asian states. The USA, some European countries and, since 2021, Germany have also joined.

Recaap cooperation is primarily about sharing information on piracy cases, threats, strategic plans. In contrast to East Africa, where some of the states are very weak in terms of naval and coastal protection and Somalia was considered a “failed state”, better developed, sovereign states are involved here.

Strictly speaking, many cases in the region are “armed robbery” and not “piracy” because the vast majority of attacks take place in the territorial waters of the states. This circumstance has important consequences because it is the coastal states that have the right to pursue and intervene there first, and not the naval units of other countries that are on patrol duty and could intervene more quickly if necessary.

Even though pirates off East and West Africa have received much more attention in recent years and the military has recently sounded the alarm again, shipping in Southeast Asia is still struggling with attacks, thefts and boardings. Despite – or perhaps because of – its “low profile” cooperation, Recaap is considered a model for success, even if two important countries in the region, Malaysia and Indonesia, cannot bring themselves to join for fear of losing sovereignty.

“BLOOD, SWEAT AND MONEY”

Incidentally, the latest instructions do not necessarily mark the end of the list of deletions. “My review of further findings by the Secretary of State is not yet complete,” Trump continued.

Rubio himself also commented on the deletion list, describing the organizations in question as “redundant, mismanaged, unnecessary, wasteful and poorly run”. They would be “captured by the interests of actors pursuing their own agendas contrary to our interests, or pose a threat to our nation’s sovereignty, freedoms and overall prosperity”. Trump himself is quoted in the statement as saying that it is no longer acceptable to devote “the blood, sweat and money of the American people to these institutions without getting any meaningful results in return. The days of billions of taxpayer dollars flowing to foreign interests at the expense of our people are over.” These organizations are actively trying to limit American sovereignty, he said. “We reject inertia and ideology and instead embrace prudence and purpose. We seek cooperation where it serves our people and remain steadfast where it does not,” it says.

'Strategic blunder that gives away American advantage'

As reports on 2025's global temperatures are released in the days ahead, major organizations and climate scientists expect it to be either the second- or third-warmest year on record globally. Several organizations quickly criticized the withdrawals from the international collaborations on climate change and the oceans, saying it will harm U.S. residents and American companies.

Pulling out of the framework convention on climate is "a strategic blunder that gives away American advantage for nothing in return," said David Widawsky, director of WRI US, the World Resources Institute in the United States. "Walking away doesn’t just put America on the sidelines − it takes the U.S. out of the arena entirely."

Widawsky said the action will cost American communities and businesses economic ground as other countries take advantage of the "booming clean-energy economy."

The withdrawal from the global climate treaty is "a new low" from the administration, said Rachel Cleetus, policy director and lead economist for the Union of Concerned Scientists climate and energy program. It's another "sign that this authoritarian, anti-science administration is determined to sacrifice people’s well-being and destabilize global cooperation."