the DON JONES
INDEX…
|
||
|
|
GAINS
POSTED in GREEN LOSSES
POSTED in RED 2/27/26…
15,627.56 2/20/26… 15,631.89 6/27/13... 15,000.00 |
|
|
(THE
DOW JONES INDEX: 3/4/26... 49,499.20; 2/27/26... 49,499.20; 6/27/13… 15,000.00) |
||
LESSON for FRIDAY, MARCH 6th, 2026
– “IRAN ALL the
WAY HOME!”
And again, America is at war.
Last Saturday, at two in the morning (but half past ten, Tehran
time). a barrage dealing death from above struck Iran all the way home; its
people, it’s terrorists and the home of the master of all depraved and deviant
– Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali
Khamenei – during a strategy session.
Also killed were perhaps forty of Khamenei’s most important underthings
in what was the first of many strikes all through the week.
Nobody
said they were sorry to see Khamenei blasted off to the Islamist Paradise...
whatever they call it... not even perhaps a majority of the people (those who’d
protested in the streets and survived the shootings by the Revolutionary Guards
(I@).
Not
President Trump nor his minions, not Republicans (a handful of diehard
isolationists who condemned that attack, but without sympathy for its clericatalytic convertees), not
Democrats (who opposed or, at least, questioned what Trump called “Operation
Epic Fury” on Constitutional grounds, not out of any affection for Khamenei nor
his regime; not the American public – nor foreigners of the NATO persuasion,
nor the Saudis (nor more than a dozen other Islamic states of the Sunni, as
opposed to Shiite-y persuasion – many of whom are now enduring revenge bombing
at the direction of the remnants of the regime). Even anti-Semites... who might have loathed
the Jews and Israel, Semites therein worried about Prime Minister Bibi
Netanyahu’s imperial ambitions out of justrified
fears of retaliation, not love for the Ayatollah; even hardcore American enemies like Russia
or calculating Communist conspirators like China succored Tehran with anything
stronger than strong words.
None of these
said they were sorry as the mullahs burned once America and Israel took the war
all the way home to the Western world’s ancient enemies in Persepolis.
(A
note on our title: sing along to the Impalas with Djonald
UnChained, the Democrats UnEased,
the Sunnis, Israelis and Dean Martin – background and lyrics as ATTACHMENT ONE
– while the good guys continue to blast Iranians into particles of men and
women and children... schools and hospitals and their occupants oblitered: oops!... but not sorry: this is now war and in
war, said the President while tearing up the Constitution, @quote.”
Trump,
DefSec (or WarSec) Hegseck and Congressional tagalongs like Sen. Lindsey
Graham (R-SC) are enjoying their wargasm, and as the TV ads for @ maintain;
nobody is going to get in the way of their fun.
At
least not for awhile.
Few tears are being wept for Khamenei, but polls, of late, say a
majority of Americans still oppose the war – not out of sympathy for the
jihadists, but because it’s raising the price of gas at the pump, heating oil
and propane all the way home and, shortly (as the supply chains begin snapping)
the stuff that they want or need to buy, most of which... domestic or
imported... requires petrol in the productive processes.
Barron’s
(not the President’s youngest but the financial journal) tracked the rise in
oil prices which began even before
(February 27th. ATTACHMENT TWO) the strike after the collapse of nuclear talks between
Iran and an actual Trump son in law, Jared (plus sad old Steve Witkoff)... said crumpilation as
has been blamed, or credited, with the precipitation of Epic Fury.
As
the omnibus website Tangle (purveyors, like the DJI of perspectives of varying
partisanship) looked back in the aftermath of the strike, the warhawks of all enthusiasm... Islamic, Israeli, American
(left, right or other)... looking back to December 2025, when protests broke out across
Iran “in response to declining economic conditions in the country, leading to a
violent crackdown by the Iranian regime.”
(ATTACHMENT THREE) Despite the
horrors of mass massacres at the Christmas season (well, most Christian
Americans, at least, recoiled at the horrors of government agents shooting down
mostly-unarmed protesters), the President... then embroiled in obverse, but
similar shootouts in Minnesota... flung more words (but no actual military or
financial support) at Khameini which, of course, drew
howls of hypocrisy from almost all Democrats, many Independents (or the
‘disgusted with everybody’ legions) and even some Republicans.
The Yankees did, however, build up a
significant military presence in the Middle East in what Tangle called, after
the fact, “anticipation of an attack.”
For weeks, declared Tangle’s Executive Editor
Isaac Saul, “the Trump administration (had) been sending significant military
resources to the Middle East. Speculation about the president’s plans ran
rampant, but as with Trump’s build-up outside Venezuela, this outcome should
have been obvious.”
“Of course, I’m happy to see Ayatollah Ali
Khamenei go,” Saul joine the chorus of hell-wishers
calling Iran’s regime “despotic and oppressive”— but denunciations leave out a
lot of detail. “The U.S.-Israel military alliance will, at some point,
overwhelm and overpower Iran,” Saul predicted, “and I’m once again shocked and morbidly
impressed by the capabilities of the U.S. and Israeli militaries. We will
“win.” Obviously. But this is all the easy stuff to say — it’s
dunking on a toddler, it’s close to meaningless.
“The
harder and more important question is what happens now?”
Globally, the example of Venezuela
should elicit caution – as also the question of who will succeed Khamenei. (There are two top choices... one bad, the
other worse... see below.) Locally,
Americans are going to feel pain at the pump, especially after Iran closed the
Straits of Hormuz to the tanker fleet that supplies perhaps twenty to twenty
five percent of black gold to American refineries.
On Friday, ten hours before EFDay, Reuters (4:19 PM EST, ATTACHMENT FOUR) reported that
SecState Marco Rubio was designating Iran as an
official state sponsor of... uh... wrongful detention?
"The Iranian regime must stop
taking hostages and release all Americans unjustly detained in Iran, steps that
could end this designation and associated actions," Rubio said in a
statement.
Trump added on Friday night that he was disappointed with these
negotiations – and, more significantly, the nuke talks: warning, somewhat
ominously – "sometimes you have to use force."
The “sometimes” became “now” on Saturday morning around 2AM EST
(10:30 Tehran time) when United States and Israel launched
a wave of military strikes against Iran in what President Donald Trump called a
“massive and ongoing” campaign aimed at bringing about what Time Magazine (9:34
AM, ATTACHMENT FIVE) called “a change in the country's
leadership” – effectively acknowledging the intent of regime
change, howsoever denied by so many for so long.
“Our
objective is to defend the American people by eliminating imminent threats from
the Iranian regime, a vicious group of very hard, terrible people,” Trump said
in an eight-minute video posted to Truth Social at 2.30 am Eastern on Saturday.
“Its menacing activities directly endanger the United
States, our troops, our bases overseas, and our allies throughout the world,”
he continued and then advised the Iranian people to: “Stay sheltered. Don’t leave your
home. It’s very dangerous outside. Bombs will be dropping everywhere. When we
are finished, take over your government. It will be yours to take,” he said.
“This will be, probably, your only
chance for generations. For many years, you have asked for America’s help, but
you never got it. No president was willing to do what I am willing to do
tonight. Now you have a president who is giving you what you want. So let’s see how you respond,” he added.
Of
course, it was also dangerous inside
homes... not to mention places of business, markets and, as events would
expose, schools and hospitals.
Time, in fact, monitored Iranian media and would announce that
“at least 40 people were reported killed at a girls'
school in southern Iran, according to Iran's state-run IRNA news agency,
although TIME could not independently verify that claim.”
When
they, and others, did, it was to jump up the toll to @.
“Iran
responded by launching a wave of missiles at Israel and other U.S. allies
across the region. Explosions were heard in the United Arab Emirates capital,
Abu Dhabi. Bahrain, which hosts the U.S. Fifth Fleet, was also targeted,” Time
reported.
Speaking
to NBC News from Tehran on Saturday morning, Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas
Araghchi said “the situation on the ground is—I cannot say normal—life is going
on. Everything is under
control.”
He insisted the Americans and Israelis
had “failed to hit their targets” and that all high-ranking Iranian officials
were still alive.
Back
in June, Trump had authorized the U.S. to join Israel in major strikes on three
key nuclear sites in June including Fodrow (which
became emblematic of the strike). Trump
claimed the country’s nuclear enrichment facilities had been “completely and
totally obliterated,” but questions remained about the survival of key
components of the program although, Timeservers Brian
Bennett and Richard Hall contended that Iran’s leadership had been
“severely weakened following the attack, both regionally and
domestically.
“In
the aftermath of the bombing campaign, Iranian authorities arrested thousands
of people they suspected of being spies—including activists, journalists, and
ordinary citizens. United Nations experts estimated that more than 1,000 people were executed between June and
September alone.”
After
the U.N. reimposed nuclear-related sanctions on the country, “Iran was facing
an economic downturn, rampant inflation and a collapse in its currency.” Protests broke out and Trump ratcheted up his
threats against Iran’s leadership in January, as the death toll from the crackdown on protests in the
country rose dramatically. An internet blackout across the country prevented
effective communication with the outside world, but some estimates have the
death toll reaching into the tens of
thousands.
On
Jan. 13, Trump appeared to indicate the U.S. would intervene militarily in the country” to support
protesters. "Iranian Patriots, KEEP PROTESTING - TAKE OVER YOUR
INSTITUTIONS!!!" Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social. "Save the
names of the killers and abusers. They will pay a big price. I have cancelled
all meetings with Iranian Officials until the senseless killing of protesters
STOPS. HELP IS ON ITS WAY."
During
his State of the Union address Tuesday night, Trump accused Iran of restarting
“sinister ambitions” related to nuclear weaponry and appeared to indicate that
the U.S. would consider taking military action if Tehran did not abandon
said ambitions. He claimed Iran was working to “build missiles that will soon
reach the United States of America.”
Khamenei also threatened on Feb. 17 in a social media post that
Iran may attack U.S. ships. “More dangerous than that warship is the weapon
that can send that warship to the bottom of the sea,” he wrote.
The threat was his last.
Explosions in Tehran were reported
early in the morning Eastern Time on Feb. 28, which is mid-morning in
Iran. (USA Today, 10:49 AM, EST – ATTACHMENT SIX)
Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei
and Iran's President Masoud Pezeshkian were both
directly targeted in the U.S. and Israeli airstrikes, according to a Middle
Eastern official familiar with the matter, who also said, without providing
additional information, that several senior Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps
were killed in the strikes. At that
time, the official “did not discuss the outcome of the strikes on Khamenei or Pezeshkian. Iranian state media has said Pezeshkian is accounted for and safe. Iran has not
commented on Khamenei.”
Nine minutes later, Reuters
(ATTACHMENT SEVEN, February 28, 2026
10:58 AM EST) reported a U.S. Central Intelligence Agency assessment that, even if
Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei was killed in the operation, “he
would likely be replaced by hardline figures from the Islamic Revolutionary
Guard Corps (IRGC).”
Iran analysts have expressed
concern that the attack could spill over into a wider regional war.
"Let’s be clear: This could have catastrophic consequences,"
said Trita Parsi, the co-founder and executive
director of the Quincy Institute, a Washington, DC-based think tank.
Laura
Sanicola and Reshma Kapadia, Barron’s financial reporters, speculated that the U.S. and Israeli attack on Iran—and Tehran’s retaliation—was
“likely to cause oil and other energy prices to spike and stock markets to
react sharply when trading starts on Sunday evening.” (September 28, 12:17 PM, ATTACHMENT EIGHT) Nine minutes
later, comrade Nicole Goodkind quoted Patrick De Haan,
head of petroleum analysis at GasBuddy, who said that the national average
gasoline price, currently around $3 per gallon, was “likely to rise to roughly
$3.10 to $3.15 per gallon over the next couple of weeks if crude prices remain
elevated.
“The biggest concern for oil markets isn’t
just Iran’s own exports,” Ms. Goodkind added. (ATTACHMENT NINE) “It’s the Strait of Hormuz,
the narrow shipping lane between Iran and Oman that handles about 20% of global
oil and liquefied natural gas flows. Even partial disruptions or rerouting of
tankers can push prices higher,” although she noted that OPEC+ countries are scheduled to hold
their monthly meeting Sunday, and that “producers could choose to increase
output to calm markets.”
A Fox timeline (ATTACHMENT TEN, 1:10 PM EST)
reported concerns that another potential impact would be the direction of
retaliatory terror attacks against the homeland – whether instigated by
so-called “sleeper cells” hiding in major cities or near critical infrastructure
facilities, or “lone wolves”, who might not even be Iranian.
American police and politicians ranging from
New York Mayor Zohran Mamdani to California Governor
Gavin Newsome criticized the both the Iranian regime and the American/Israeli
attack, but attempted to assure the public that they were safe.
Democrats (and a few Republicans)
in Congress argued that they, not Trump, should have made the decision whether
or not to attack. “The framers of the
United States Constitution gave Congress the sole power to declare war as the
branch of government closest to the American people," said House Minority
Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) and Reps. Ro Khanna (D-@) and Thomas Massie (R-@)
introduced a bipartisan “War Powers Resolution” to terminate the attack.
"Just this week, Iran and the
United States were negotiating key measures that could have staved off war,”
declared self-described Socialist Rep. Alexandra Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY). The
President walked away from these discussions and chose war instead. President
Trump flippantly acknowledged the possibility of American casualties, stating
'that often happens in war'," she continued.
Fellow “Squadstress”
Rashida Tlaib (D-Mi) also said that Trump did not
care about Americans, nor Iranians. “He
is corrupted. Don't fall for the lies."
Speaking for the war, Sen. Shelley
Moore Capito, R-W.V., and chair of the Senate Republican Policy Committee, said
in a statement that Trump had given “the Iranian regime countless opportunities
to stand down, stop killing their people, and abandon their nuclear
ambitions. Instead of choosing a
peaceful path, they have doubled down on weapons designed to threaten the
American people,” Moore Capito said.
"I do not make this statement
lightly; the Iranian regime seeks to kill," Trump said. "The lives of
courageous American heroes may be lost, and we may have casualties — that often
happens in war. But we're doing this not for now. We're doing it for the
future, and it is a noble mission."
United Nations (U.N.)
Secretary-General António Guterres condemned the military actions in the Middle
East, including the strikes by the U.S. and Israel in Operation Epic Fury, as
well as Iran's retaliation. The U.K. –
set to convene the United Nations Security Council at 4:00 PM EST – prepared to
hear arguments for, by Israeli Ambassador Danny Danon
while war supporter Graham expressed hope that Saudi Arabia would recognize
Israel, in light of “the mothership of terrorism” being “about to go down.”
“I hope the Ayatollah is captured
or killed. He’s a miserable human being,” Graham added, calling the Ayatollah a
“religious Nazi” and “Hitler in a robe.”
By 3:20 PM, the liberal Guardian
U.K. could confirm that Khamenei had been killed, and that Iranian state media
had confirmed statements by Trump and Netanyahu that the dictator was dead. (ATTACHMENT ELEVEN)
This followed the Israeli
termination of Hezbollah Sec. Gen Hassan Nasrallah
in Beirut, their air offensive in June and the American “obliteration” of the Fodrow and other nuclear facilities that Trump and his
supporters, said, the Iranians were attempting to rebuild.
The
GUK bio of Khameini,
who succeeded his mentor, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini
in 1989, cited an assassination attempt that cost him an arm, his battles with
reformist Mohammad Khatami and his investments in
the so-called axis of
resistance – Hamas in Gaza, Hezbollah in Lebanon, the Houthi movement in Yemen
and a motley assortment of Islamic militant militias in Syria and Iraq –
which adventure ended with
the fall of his Syrian ally, Bashar al-Assad’s regime in December.
Infirm, ailing and failing in his
aims, Iranians were already plotting and speculating on Khameini’s
successor while Israelis were warning office-seekers that they would also be
assassinated.
Iranian
President Masoud Pezeshkian said in a prerecorded
message that a new leadership council had begun its work. The country’s foreign
minister, Abbas Araghchi, said a new Supreme Leader would be chosen in “one or
two days.”
Alternately bloodthirsty and
jovial by Sunday... once the Khamenei kill had been confirmed and the dance of
death among successors was proceeding, President Trump expressed hope for
“dialogue” but continued to prosecute the war.
In an essay cowritten by Jon Gambrell, Melanie Lidman, Josh
Boak and Eric Tucker plus a series of fifteen short
takeaways, (ATTACHMENT TWELVE) plus, also, charts, graphs, videos and photo
captions in the Associated Press (see these here),
the story of Operation Epic Fury was told amidst the day’s developments...
including “unrelenting” attacks on Iran, retaliatory strikes on Israel and the
deaths of three service members — “the first known American casualties”.
In
a video he posted on social media, Trump called the three service members “true
American patriots who have made the ultimate sacrifice for our nation, even as
we continue the righteous mission for which they gave their lives.”
He added: “Sadly, there will likely be
more, before it ends. That’s the way it is. Likely be more.”
(And
there were, later - see below)
The
strikes, “the second time in eight months that the U.S. and Israel had combined
against Iran, represented a
startling show of military might” for an American president who swept into
office on an “America First” platform and vowed to keep out of “forever
wars.”
Britain, France and Germany said Sunday
they were ready to join with the U.S. to help stop Iran’s attacks.
Trump
said on social media that nine
Iranian warships had been sunk and that the Iranian navy’s headquarters had
been “largely destroyed.”
The
targets were not all military. Whether
accidentally or to demonstrate “shock and awe”, Iran’s
state-run IRNA news agency reported that parts of the building of the
Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting (IRIB) were struck Sunday and the toll
rose to at least 165 people killed on Saturday when the girls’ school was
struck, with dozens more were wounded, IRNA reported. (The U.S. and Israeli military both denied
culpability but said they would “look into” the reports.)
The AP’s PEANUT GALLERY was
trending negative on Sunday with a conspiracy theorist alleging the attack was
made to provoke regaliation on US soil as would then
“finalize what is growing apparent as a coup
against this Nations form of Government?”, that he and his team “have no love
for Country, just money and self-perceived power,” and, as another posted: the
President’s “callous remarks” that more may be killed, “well that shows how
much empathy he has for anyone other than himself.”
It was not only the Peanuts standing aside
from the President’s football – Time’s Jeffrey Sonnenfeld and Steven Tian alleged that “Donald Trump Shouts Loudly and Fumbles a Big
Stick!” (Sunday, ATTACHMENT THIRTEEN)
Despite the dispatch of Khamenei, the Timeservers
rolled back the clockhands and condemned the
perversion of Teddy Roosevelt’s “bully pulpit” to his bullying of smaller
people and countries like... well... Iran... citing the “unexpected
common link between Trump’s recent setbacks, from the surrender of his demands
to own Greenland, to his shifting explanations for his seizure of Venezuelan
strongman Nicolás Maduro, to the spreading outrage over the indiscriminate
brutal cruelty of ICE raids around the nation,” and merching
their book: Trump’s Ten Commandments, wherin
they identified ten of Trump’s favorite go-to leadership tools.
“Several
of these tools have been failing Trump amidst recent setbacks.”
In no particular
order, Trump’s “go-to tools” were...
(1) NEGOTIATE
THROUGH AGGRESSION
(2) DIVIDE AND CONQUER
(3) REPEAT FALSE INFORMATION
The Timers concluded that, like
the mythical Icarus,
with ambitious omnipotent presumptions, who flew too close to the Sun, leading
his wax wings to melt; Trump’s
wax wings have been melting fast and now he risks crashing to earth.
Or not.
No question that some Iranian
civilians have been crashing to earth, and another Time piece (ATTACHMENT
FOURTEEN) profiled some of these.
“I had just stepped out of the shower,
getting prepared to go out, when the sound of low-flying aircraft startled me,”
said Salman, a 45-year-old contractor living in Tehran. “Seconds later, when
the sound of two explosions reached us, I realized it had started.”
“I was in a car,” said Marziyeh, a 40-year-old
graphic artist. “The music was loud, but suddenly I noticed the drivers around
me hit the brakes and started looking around and up at the sky. I was just
thinking to myself, ‘Is there going to be war?’ When suddenly I heard an explosion,
and I said to myself, Stupid! War has already started.”
BATTLE
FOR THE STREETS
Iranians interviewed by TIME say
they knew the next phase of battle would be for the streets. Since 2009, when
the regime refused to seat a reformist candidate who had clearly won the
presidency, public protests have been the only channel left open to the
majority of Iranians who oppose their authoritarian government. On the night of
January 8, throngs across the nation of 93 million filled public spaces to
chant “death to the dictator.”
“The regime—which had come to
power in 1979 behind similar protests—responded by unleashing a level of force
it deemed commensurate to the threat it faced. Its security forces killed
some 30,000 Iranians that night and the next, senior
officials in Iran’s health ministry later told TIME.
Many cheered Khameini’s death “but few, if any, expect the regime Khamenei led to disappear with him.
Its loyalists number in the millions, and have the
weapons. But for a few hours at least, Iranians found themselves undisturbed.”
On Monday, the Daily Beast opined that Trump had made a “totally
impossible” claim to Fox News host Bret Baier that Iran would quickly replicate
Venezuela—“even though the deposed leader of Venezuela is still
alive.” (ATTACHMENT FIFTEEN)
“He said there is a plan. He points to
Venezuela as a template, which means to me that going in, they had some sense
on the ground of what was coming next,” Baier said of his call with the
president.
At the Pentagon, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth
defended the operation, calling Epic Fury not an “endless war” but a “clear,
devastating, decisive mission” while critics called it an Epic Fairytale.
“Where does this all go?”
Jim Himes, the ranking Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, told NPR.
“We can bomb Iran along with the Israelis for, you know, a lengthy period of
time, but in the service of what?
“Is the intention regime change? Because there aren’t many
examples either of regime change affected through bombing, or, quite frankly,
of American military forces actually doing regime change in a way that is
satisfactory.”
Peanuts from the Gallery included
contentions that “the mullahs will choose a new supreme
leader not 47,”
and that the master plan is to “use force to seize their oil.”
|
IN the NEWS: FEBRUARY 27th,
2026 to MARCH 3rd, 2026 |
|
|
|
Friday, February 27, 2026 Dow: 48,977.92 |
Paramount/Oracle under Larry Ellison (“the most evil human in America” – DJI) outbids Netflix for
Warner Brothers... 120B to 80B. The WB cache-box
includes CNN, which will now be Trumpified by
Ellison and his son (daughter Megan remains a serious, presumably ethical
movie producer) and e-con-mystics believe the $50B debt undertaken will send
numerous workers to the undertakers. After Hillary,
Slick Willie Clinton testifies six hours before Congress; does his Sgt.
Schultz impersonation: “I saw nozzing!” and says he
didn’t know the girl in the hot tub with himself and Jeffy. Still seeking a pardon, GMax
says she, not not Epstein, “liaisoned”
with Bill while Hillary calls Congress a “clown show” and Democrat continut begging for Djonald UnCalledfor (and, now, Melania) to testify. Trump,
himself, is busy drafting an EO to seize midterm ballot boxes and declare
Himself sole arbiter of November’s elections, then lunches on a Baconator after fires on an Ohio farm kill 60,000 pigs
and orders a gumment ban on Claude/Anthropic AI
after they refuse to support mass surveillance of Americans and greenlight
autonomous robots – bringing us all closer to the Terminator. There’s
also more jibber jabber between Witkoff, Jared and
the Iranians – who refuse to give up either nuclear weapons or their
plutonium enrichment programs for “peaceful” power as the pollen season
arrives early, bringing yellow dust and sneezing to increasingly contemptuous
voters and the media, until... |
|
|
Saturday, February 28, 2026 Dow:
Closed |
The United States and Israel break off talks and
break out the bombs at 2 AM (EST, c. 10:30 AM Tehran time) – striking the
compound where Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khameini is
meeting with top officials. With
Morning in America, the media report Khameini has
been killed as drones and missiles continue to blast away on at least nine
Iranian cities. NBC’s morning
correspondent Julie Tsuirkin says Trump “had a
negative view” of the negotiations despite his son-in-law’s best efforts and,
calling the Iranians “hard, terrible people” rebuilding their nuclear bomb
program after Fodrow, chose to join Israel in going
back to what PM Bibi called “a Golden Age” – meaning an Iran of half a
century past under Shah Reza Pahlevi. As
“Operation Epic Fury” continues somebody in Tehran orders retaliatory strikes
on Israel and numerous Sunni Islamic states; American reaction being mostly
partisan except that the isolationist wing of MAGA is conflicted, sometimes
critical. Sen. Lindsey Graham supports
the (still undeclared) war while “peacenik” traitors like two Kentucks (GOP Reps Thomas Massie and SenRand
Paul) as well as MTG (Ga) are joined by Tucker Carlson, who calls Trump “evil”. By sundown.
Djonald UnNobelous can
declare Khameini terminated and, because most of
the regime died with him, “regime change” pending, in a thing (war still undeclared, despite the Constitution) that may
take days, weeks or longer – in which case Trump concedes that there will be
military casualties because “this often happens in war.” At home, local, State and Federal policiers heighten security to prepare for terror –
either from sleeper cells or lone wolves while the DHS shutdown continues,
Alabama enacts a tax-free holiday for guns and ammo, other states cutting Medicaid and food stamps to
support the military and, in the dark of night, Trump also proposes a
“friendly takeover” of Cuba. |
|
|
Sunday, March 1, 2026 Dow:
Closed |
It’s the end of Black History Month, the beginning
of meteorological spring (with warm temperatures South and East (except for
-20° in Maine) and hot SW, like the record 92° in Phoenix,
and, also, Talkshow Sunday. With war on the breakfast table and
partisanship rising among Americans and Iranians (mourners versus celebrants
in the streets, Sunni v. Shiite conflicts spreading to Iraq, Lebanon,
Pakistan and Afghanistan), TV Col. Ganyard (ABC) says that American air superiority means
there probably won’t be boots on the ground.
Gen. Doug Lute disagrees, saying the mullahs’ “deep state” will seize
power while Revolutionary Guards round up and kill pro-democracy activists,
saying the infidels bombed a school to kill 148 children, just because they
could. The ABC roundtablers agree that Khameini’s
death was a blessing, but what comes after varies. Perennial liberal Donna Brazile
feared a Venezuelan do-over where the dictatorship and brutality survive the
leader while Sara Isgur (SCOTUS blot) says that what
happened down there didn’t matter, but Iran matters. Sanderista Faiz Shakur supported the killing because Khameini was antigay while Harvard Republican Doug Heye says that, although the interventionist wing of MAGA
is “on a sugar high”, Democrats will gain converts (even Carlson?) and the
length of the war and duration of gas and oil price hikes will determine who
wins in the midterms. On ”Face the Nation” Margaret Brennan announced that
Iranian President Mashoud Pezeshkian
was also targeted, but escaped, and obscure successor Alireza Arafi becomes interim “Supreme” leader (earning him an
Israeli surprise) while others conspire and claim, including Reza Pahlevi Junior – of whom more, next issue. |
|
|
Monday, March 2, 2026 Dow:
48,904.78 |
Quackery breaks out as partisans
debate whether Israel’s determination to attack dragged Trump into the war or
the reverse, as Djonald UnChained
says neither Bibi nor anybody tells Him what to do. Globalists say Netanyahu wants to wrap up
regime change before Trump’s attention wanders off in other directions...
like invading Cuba. Oil prices surge
11% as Iran attacks Saudi oilfields and bottles up tankers in the Straits of
Hormuz, but the Dow isn’t much bothered – yet. Polls show
support for the war dropping to 27% as Congress will attempt to declare war
or go home on Thursday – for now, they are consumed with investigating those
same old EpFiles and picking at the scabs of Bill
and Hillary after nine hours of their testimony are released for the devoted
to dine upon. Foreigners remain
cautious, Russia and China express opposition, but with words, only, and libDem Schumer says “this is Trump’s War (which is) a war
of chaos with no endgame.” The first
domestic terror arrives at an Austin, Tx bar when a man in a shirt reading
“Property of Allah” kills three, Authorities, however, say the cowboy
jihadist “had mental issues.” |
|
|
Tuesday, March 3, 2026 Dow:
48,223.82 |
Now the war and oil complications disturb the Dow,
which plummets deep into the 47-hundreds before being lifted up by bargain
hunters. E-con-mystics predict the
higher prices at the pump will cause disruptions in the supply chain,
affecting food, clothing, stuff and, especially, utility prices... more trouble
for Trump if the war drags on into Midtermery (with
three primaries today, including critical Texas). He calls the isolationists in MAGA
traitors, declaring the war “a detour that we hve
to take” and then invades Lebanon, proclaiming that “we will have higher
prices for a little while, but then they will go down even lower.” A high
military commander, asked about attacks on schools and hospitals, smiles and
says that God has ordained this wars – it’s part of
the End Times. Accordingly, Tennessee
state legislators promote the reclassification of abortion as homicide so as
to sentence women to death. DefSec/WarSec HegSeck maintains “his was not a regime change war, but
the regime changed.” More speculators
speculating (and gambling on) who will eventually replace Khameini. As gamblers
are betting on war twists and turns, conspiracy theorists say the whole
crisis is being made up by insider traders, looking for quick profits (as
opposed to a distraction from the EpFiles). Alarmists say America is running out of
missiles, bombs and drones – begging the question, can we buy some from
China? In a
lead-up to the March 15th Oscars, “Sinners” sweep the SAG awards. |
|
|
Wednesday, March 4, 2026 Dow: 48,739.41 |
Americans stranded in the MidEast
as Iran continues bombing its neighbors... and, especially, their airports
and tourist hotels, are being alternately told to shelter in place or to get
out any way they can. |
|
|
Thursday, March 5, 2026 Dow: 49,@ |
|
|
|
The Index is late again,
this week, and only partially complete due to the massiave
influx of information that cannot be processed. We appal to Mr.
Trump not to embark upon any more wars or adventures, at least for a few
weeks to allow us, and our readers time for spring cleaning and maybe a
little outdoor recreation as the weather moderats,
but chances of that seem nil. Incentive or not, there will be less
driving here and there due to |
|
|
|
THE DON JONES INDEX CHART of CATEGORIES w/VALUE ADDED to EQUAL BASELINE of 15,000 (REFLECTING… approximately… DOW JONES INDEX of June 27, 2013) Gains in indices as
improved are noted in GREEN. Negative/harmful indices in RED as are their designation. (Note – some of the indices where the total
went up created a realm where their value went down... and vice versa.) See a
further explanation of categories HERE |
|
ECONOMIC INDICES |
(60%) |
|||||||
|
CATEGORY |
VALUE |
BASE |
RESULTS by PERCENTAGE |
SCORE |
OUR SOURCES
and COMMENTS |
|||
|
INCOME |
(24%) |
6/17/13 revised 1/1/22 |
LAST |
CHANGE |
NEXT |
LAST WEEK |
THIS WEEK |
THE WEEK’S CLOSING
STATS... |
|
Wages (hrly.
Per cap) |
9% |
1350 points |
12/11/25 |
-5.42% |
2/26 |
1,878.49 |
1,878.49 |
https://tradingeconomics.com/united-states/average-hourly-earnings 37.17 37.32 |
|
Median Inc. (yearly) |
4% |
600 |
2/13/26 |
+0.05% |
2/27/26 |
1,117.75 |
1,118.31 |
http://www.usdebtclock.org/ 51,720 746 774 |
|
Unempl.
(BLS – in mi) |
4% |
600 |
2/13/26 |
+2.33% |
2/26* |
542.60 |
542.60 |
|
|
Official (DC –
in mi) |
2% |
300 |
2/13/26 |
+0.12% |
2/27/26 |
206.20 |
205.95 |
http://www.usdebtclock.org/ 7,589
7598 610 |
|
Unofficl.
(DC – in mi) |
2% |
300 |
2/13/26 |
+0.19% |
2/27/26 |
239.76 |
239.31 |
http://www.usdebtclock.org/ 14,296
323 354 |
|
Workforce Participation Number Percent |
2% |
300 |
2/13/26 |
+0.025% -0.000165% |
2/27/26 |
298.55 |
298.55 |
http://www.usdebtclock.org/ In 164,345 386 432 Out
103,642 689 721 Total: 267,987 8,075 61.326 321 |
|
WP % (ycharts)* |
1% |
150 |
2/13/26 |
+0.16% |
2/26* |
151.19 |
151.19 |
https://ycharts.com/indicators/labor_force_participation_rate 62.50 |
|
OUTGO |
(15%) |
|||||||
|
Total Inflation |
7% |
1050 |
2/13/26 |
+0.3% |
2/26* |
922.82 |
922.82 |
http://www.bls.gov/news.release/cpi.nr0.htm +0.2 |
|
Food |
2% |
300 |
2/13/26 |
+0.7% |
2/26* |
260.23 |
260.23 |
http://www.bls.gov/news.release/cpi.nr0.htm +0.2 |
|
Gasoline |
2% |
300 |
2/13/26 |
-0.5% |
2/26* |
264.59
|
264.59 |
http://www.bls.gov/news.release/cpi.nr0.htm -3.2 |
|
Medical Costs |
2% |
300 |
2/13/26 |
+0.4% |
2/26* |
272.55 |
272.55 |
http://www.bls.gov/news.release/cpi.nr0.htm
+0.2 |
|
Shelter |
2% |
300 |
2/13/26 |
+0.4% |
2/26* |
239.67 |
239.67 |
http://www.bls.gov/news.release/cpi.nr0.htm
+0.3 |
|
WEALTH |
|
|||||||
|
Dow Jones
Index |
2% |
300 |
2/13/26 |
+0.21% |
2/27/26 |
380.64 |
381.44 |
https://www.wsj.com/market-data/quotes/index/ 49,395.16 9,499.20 |
|
Home (Sales) (Valuation) |
1% 1% |
150 150 |
2/13/26 |
+5.33% -1.17% |
2/27/26 |
141.58 264.86 |
141.58 264.86 |
Sales (M): 4.35 Valuations (K): 404.4 |
|
Millionaires
(New Category) |
1% |
150 |
2/13/26 |
+0.05% |
2/27/26 |
136.51 |
136.58 |
http://www.usdebtclock.org/ 24,056 069 082 |
|
Paupers (New
Category) |
1% |
150 |
2/13/26 |
+0.027% |
2/27/26 |
135.42 |
135.38 |
http://www.usdebtclock.org/ 36,739 749 761 |
|
GOVERNMENT |
(10%) |
|||||||
|
Revenue (trilns.) |
2% |
300 |
2/13/26 |
+0.11% |
2/27/26 |
469.61 |
470.13 |
http://www.usdebtclock.org/ 5,378 384 391 |
|
Expenditures
(tr.) |
2% |
300 |
2/13/26 |
+0.06% |
2/27/26 |
292.94 |
292.77 |
http://www.usdebtclock.org/
7,083 087 090 |
|
National Debt
tr.) |
3% |
450 |
2/13/26 |
+0.07% |
2/27/26 |
349.41 |
349.18 |
http://www.usdebtclock.org/ 38,715
741 850 |
|
Aggregate Debt
(tr.) |
3% |
450 |
2/13/26 |
+0.08% |
2/27/26 |
372.72 |
372.42 |
http://www.usdebtclock.org/ 106,719 805 903 |
|
TRADE |
(5%) |
|||||||
|
Foreign Debt
(tr.) |
2% |
300 |
2/13/26 |
+0.12% |
2/27/26 |
255.36 |
255.06 |
http://www.usdebtclock.org/
9,501 512 524 |
|
Exports (in billions) |
1% |
150 |
2/13/26 |
-1.64% |
2/26* |
178.80 |
178.80 |
https://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/current/index.html 287.3 |
|
Imports (in
billions)) |
1% |
150 |
2/13/26 |
+2.43% |
2/26* |
144.27 |
144.27 |
https://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/current/index.html 357.6 |
|
Trade Surplus/Deficit (blns.) |
1% |
150 |
2/13/26 |
-19.20% |
2/26* |
201.72 |
201.72 |
https://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/current/index.html 70.3 |
|
ACTS of MAN |
(12%) |
|
||||||
|
World Affairs |
3% |
450 |
2/13/26 |
-0.1% |
2/27/26 |
470.55 |
470.08 |
|
|
War and
terrorism |
2% |
300 |
2/13/26 |
-0.1% |
2/27/26 |
284.58 |
284.30 |
Iran/Israel/US
war begins Saturday and quickly spreads across the MidEast
to @ |
|
Politics |
3% |
450 |
2/13/26 |
-0.3% |
2/27/26 |
457.92 |
456.55 |
|
|
Economics |
3% |
450 |
2/13/26 |
-0.3% |
2/27/26 |
430.93 |
429.64 |
Borrowers
celebrate as mortgate rates drop from 6.01% to
5.98%. Block cuts jobs that AI does
“better than people.” |
|
Crime |
1% |
150 |
2/13/26 |
-0.1% |
2/27/26 |
206.02 |
205.81 |
@ Random shooter fires 50 rounds at
Tacoma house, kills woman. |
|
ACTS of GOD |
(6%) |
|
||||||
|
Environment/Weather |
3% |
450 |
2/13/26 |
-0.1% |
2/27/26 |
280.26 |
279.98 |
@ Heavy snow in
Western mountains finally enables snowboarders and skiers to get out and
about, but... |
|
Disasters |
3% |
450 |
2/13/26 |
+0.2% |
2/27/26 |
463.09 |
464.02 |
...causes avalanche
in @ that buries an adventurer, rescued by Cold Samaritans. Military misfires include Kuwaitis shooting
down three US fighter jets and our own DoD shooting down a surveillance drone
over El Paso. Ohio farm fire kills
60,000 pigs, |
|
LIFESTYLE/JUSTICE
INDEX |
(15%) |
|
||||||
|
Science, Tech,
Education |
4% |
600 |
2/13/26 |
+0.1% |
2/27/26 |
613.68 |
614.29 |
Techsters introduce
“Sprout”, a humanoid robot called “soft and friendly” (but he still wants
your job). |
|
Equality
(econ/social) |
4% |
600 |
2/13/26 |
-0.4% |
2/27/26 |
671.70 |
669.01 |
|
|
Health |
4% |
600 |
2/13/26 |
-0.2% |
2/27/26 |
416.71 |
415.88 |
Early spring
brings early pollen season with yellow dust and “Aaah
Choo!” Weber recalls grill brushes
because stupid people eat them. |
|
Freedom and
Justice |
3% |
450 |
2/13/26 |
-0.2% |
2/27/26 |
482.07 |
481.11 |
|
|
CULTURAL and MISCELLANEOUS
INCIDENTS |
(6%) |
|
||||||
|
Cultural
incidents |
3% |
450 |
2/13/26 |
+0.3% |
2/27/26 |
582.55 |
584.30 |
@ Bruno Mars
drops new album: “The Romanticist@”“Sinners”
sweeps SAGs, including its black music score composed by... a Swede! RIP: Actors Bobbie J. Brown (“The Wire”,
in fire), Singer Neil Sedaka, Olympian and Running
influencer Jeff Galloway, |
|
Miscellaneous
incidents |
4% |
450 |
2/13/26 |
+0.1% |
2/27/26 |
548.45 |
549.00 |
|
|
Dow Jones initially dropped 1,200
points on first day of stock market since Iran conflict Dow drops 500 as stocks sell off around the world and oil prices leap
even higher on war worries US Stocks Erase Sharp Losses, While Oil Prices Leap on Worries About
Iran Wa |
||||||||
ARTIE ZWIRN AND HARRY GIOSASI, SECOND HAND SONGS AND WIKIPEDIA
"SORRY (I RAN ALL THE WAY HOME)"
"Sorry (I Ran All
the Way Home)" is a song written by Artie Zwirn and Harry Giosasi
and produced and arranged by LeRoy Holmes.
The (bestest-selling) single was performed by New York-based doo-wop
group The Impalas. It reached #2 on the U.S. pop chart,
behind both The Happy Organ by Dave "Baby" Cortez and Kansas City by Wilbert Harrison.[2] It
also went to #14 on the U.S. R&B chart. Overseas, "Sorry
(I Ran All the Way Home)" went to #28 on the UK Singles Chart in
1959.[3] The
song was featured on The Impalas' 1959 album, Sorry (I Ran All the Way
Home).[4]
The song ranked #24 on Billboard's Year-End
top 100 singles of 1959.[5]
Earlier
versions
|
Buddy Greco with The Heathertones and Instrumental
Accompaniment |
First recording on August 24, 1951 |
|
September 1951 |
|
|
October 12, 1951 |
|
|
October 1951 |
Later
versions
·
Guy Darrell and
The Midniters, as a single in 1964,
but it did not chart.[6]
·
Heinz, on his 1964 album, Tribute to Eddie.[7]
·
The Royal
Showband Waterford, as the B-side to
their 1964 single "Huckle Buck".[8]
·
Phil Orsi and The Little Kings, as a single in 1966, but it did not chart.[9]
THE IMPALAS (lyrics)
[Intro]
Sorry, sorry
Oh so sorry
Uh-oh!
[Chorus]
I ran all the way home (Ooh-wah-wah, ooh-wah-wah da da da da)
Just to say I'm sorry (Sorry, sorry da da da da)
What can I say? (Ooh-wah-wah, ooh-wah-wah ah)
I ran all the way (Goo-ma goo-ma goo-ma)
Yay-yay-yay (Goo-ma goo-ma goo-ma)
I ran all the way home (Ooh-wah-wah, ooh-wah-wah da da da da)
Just to say I'm sorry (Sorry, sorry da da da da)
Please let me stay (Ooh-wah-wah, ooh-wah-wah ah)
I ran all the way (Goo-ma goo-ma goo-ma)
Yay-yay-yay (Goo-ma goo-ma goo-ma)
[Bridge]
And now I'm sorry, sorry, sorry (Sorry sorry sorry sorry sorry)
I didn't mean to make you cry
Let's make amends (Ooh-wah-wah, ooh-wah-wah)
After all, we're more than friends
(Goo-ma goo-ma goo-ma)
Yay-yay-yay (Goo-ma goo-ma goo-ma)
[Chorus]
I ran all the way home (Ooh-wah-wah, ooh-wah-wah da da da da)
Just to say I'm sorry (Sorry, sorry da da da da)
What can I say? (Ooh-wah-wah, ooh-wah-wah ah)
I ran all the way (Goo-ma goo-ma goo-ma)
Yay-yay-yay (Goo-ma goo-ma goo-ma)
[Instrumental Break]
[Bridge]
And now I'm sorry, sorry, sorry (Sorry sorry sorry sorry sorry)
I didn't mean to make you cry
Let's make amends (Ooh-wah-wah, ooh-wah-wah)
After all, we're more than friends
(Goo-ma goo-ma goo-ma)
Yay-yay-yay (Goo-ma goo-ma goo-ma)
[Chorus]
I ran all the way home (Ooh-wah-wah, ooh-wah-wah da da da da)
Just to say I'm sorry (Sorry, sorry da da da da)
Please let me stay (Ooh-wah-wah, ooh-wah-wah ah)
I ran all the way (Goo-ma goo-ma goo-ma)
Yay-yay-yay (Goo-ma goo-ma goo-ma)
[Outro]
Whoa-uh-oh (Goo-ma goo-ma goo-ma)
Yay-yay-uh-oh (Goo-ma goo-ma goo-ma)
Yay-yay-yeah (Goo-ma goo-ma goo-ma)
Ah (Goo-ma goo-ma goo-ma)
(Goo-ma goo-ma goo-ma)
(Goo-ma goo-ma goo-ma)
X08A Oil Price Tops $70 Amid Trump, Iran Fears. Where It Goes From Here.
X08A Oil Price Tops $70 Amid Trump, Iran Fears. Where It
Goes From Here.
By Alex Kozul-Wright
Updated Feb 27, 2026, 10:37 am EST / Original Feb 27, 2026, 8:19 am EST
International oil
benchmarks rose early Friday, after the latest round of nuclear talks between the
U.S. and Iran failed to end in a deal.
Iran Vows Forceful Response After U.S.-Israel
Strike. International Leaders Urge Restraint as Washington Appears Split.
By Nicole Goodkind and Rupert Steiner
X31 X31 FROM TANGLE
TODAY’S
TOPIC: THE ATTACK ON
IRAN.
On Saturday morning, the United
States and Israel carried out airstrikes
against Iran, killing Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and other
leaders. President Donald Trump said the ongoing mission, called Operation Epic
Fury, will target Iran’s nuclear facilities, military capabilities and regime
leaders, adding that Iranian citizens should prepare to take over the
government. The attack marks the Trump administration’s second operation against
Iran, following airstrikes targeting
the country’s nuclear facilities in June 2025.
Back
up: Tensions between the United States and Iran have been rising in recent
months. In December 2025, protests broke out across
Iran in response to declining economic conditions in the country, leading to a
violent crackdown by the Iranian regime. President Trump vowed to aid
protesters but held off on military action. In the weeks since, U.S. and
Iranian negotiators have met for several discussions regarding Iran’s nuclear
program but failed to reach any agreements. During that time, the U.S. built up a
significant military presence in the Middle East in anticipation of an
attack.
In a statement on
Saturday, President Trump said, “For 47 years, the Iranian regime has chanted ‘Death
to America’ and waged an unending campaign of bloodshed and mass murder,
targeting the United States, our troops and the innocent people in many, many
countries… The United States military is undertaking a massive and ongoing
operation to prevent this very wicked, radical dictatorship from threatening
America and our core national security interests.”
The Israeli military said it struck
approximately 500 targets in Iran as of Saturday evening, with many targeting
missile launchers and aerial defense systems. In a national address, Israeli
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said, “Together with the
United States, we will strike hard at the terror regime and create conditions
that will allow the brave Iranian people to cast off the yoke of this murderous
regime.”
On Sunday, the U.S. military said three service
members were killed and five seriously wounded in an Iranian attack at a base
in Kuwait, the first deaths of U.S. troops in the conflict. On Monday, U.S.
Central Command said one of the
wounded service members had passed away, bringing the death total to four.
Separately, Iranian strikes have killed at least nine people in Israel. Iran
also carried out strikes
in the United Arab Emirates, Kuwait, Qatar, Bahrain and Oman, killing at least
four people and injuring over 100 more. The strikes targeted U.S. military
bases in the Persian Gulf countries, though civilian structures were also hit.
The foreign ministers of those countries met virtually on
Sunday to coordinate a response to the strikes. Meanwhile, Iranian state
television said that over 200
people had been killed and approximately 750 injured in U.S. and Israeli
assaults.
Ayatollah Khamenei’s death prompted
celebrations and public mourning in Iranian cities. Khamenei had served as
supreme leader since 1989 and positioned the country as an adversary to the
United States and Israel while trying to establish Iran as a nuclear power. On
Sunday, the regime named Ayatollah
Alireza Arafi to its interim leadership council,
which will lead the country until a permanent leader is chosen. The council
also includes Iran’s president and head of the judiciary.
In the U.S., many Republican lawmakers praised
President Trump’s decision to launch strikes, while a smaller number of
Republicans and most Democrats suggested that the president should not have
attacked without Congressional authorization. House Minority Leader Hakeem
Jeffries (D-NY) said Democrats will
attempt to force a vote on a war powers resolution, authored by Reps. Thomas
Massie (R-KY) and Ro Khanna (D-CA), to limit Trump’s ability to carry out
further military action.
Today, we’ll
views from the right, left, and writers in the Middle East on the
strikes. Then, Executive Editor Isaac Saul gives his take.
What
the right is saying.
·
The right is mixed on the strikes, but many support Trump’s decision to
attack.
·
Some question the rationale for launching a war.
The Wall Street
Journal editorial board wrote “Trump enforces his red line on
Iran.”
“The U.S.-Israeli attack on Iran that began
Saturday morning is a necessary act of deterrence against a regime that is the
world’s foremost promoter of terrorism. It carries risks as all wars do, but it
also has the potential to reshape the Middle East for the better and lead to a
safer world,” the board said. “Mr. Trump is enforcing the red lines he drew
when the regime slaughtered its people as they protested in January. He said
he’d come to their aid, and now he has. He also gave Iran’s Supreme Leader,
Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, ample chance to strike a deal on nuclear weapons and
its missile force, but the ayatollah refused and he was killed in the attack.
“Mr. Trump has unduly criticized his
predecessors for ‘forever wars’ in the Middle East, but he understands
deterrence. In Yemen, Iran in June, Venezuela and now in Iran again, he has
taken action against manifest threats in his second term that Barack Obama and
Joe Biden refused to take,” the board wrote. “The larger gamble is regime change,
and no one knows if this will happen. Air campaigns alone rarely topple a
dictatorship. But if the U.S. and Israel take long enough to kill enough regime
leaders, basij militia and Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps,
the chance for an internal coup or popular revolt might open up.”
In The Federalist,
John Daniel Davidson said “the administration’s
justifications for action against Iran keep shifting.”
“If we ‘totally obliterated’ Iran’s nuclear
capabilities just eight months ago, then why are we about to go to war with
Iran? After all, the justification for U.S. strikes on Iran has always been
that we cannot allow the regime in Tehran to obtain a nuclear weapon… But we
were assured, over and over for months, that Iran’s nuclear program had been
totally destroyed,” Davidson wrote. “During his State of the Union speech on
Tuesday, President Trump accused Iran of restarting its nuclear program and working
to build missiles that would ‘soon’ be able to reach the United States. Really?
How is that possible if we utterly destroyed their nuclear program in June of
last year?”
“What we’re getting from Trump is
inconsistent. Last month when Iran was killing protesters, Trump threatened
military action against Tehran, suggesting that targeting protesters was a red
line. But today the issue seems to be Iran’s supposedly obliterated nuclear
program, which is inexplicably once again a major threat to American interests,”
Davidson said. “At a certain point, it begins to look like the Trump
administration is fishing for a reason to strike Iran.”
What
the left is saying.
·
Many on the left say Trump’s rationale for war is lacking.
·
Others criticize the decision as short-sighted and baseless.
In The Wall Street
Journal, Sen. Tim Kaine (D-VA) criticized the strikes as “unwise and unconstitutional.”
“There was no imminent threat from Iran to
America sufficient to warrant committing our sons and daughters to another war
in the Middle East — especially without the congressional debate and vote that
the Constitution requires. The American people don’t want to be dragged into
another forever war under false pretenses,” Kaine said. “The U.S. and Iran have
both constructed narratives whereby the other is the aggressor in this
longstanding conflict. More war isn’t the answer. If it were, the past 70 years
would have produced a better outcome than what we see today.”
“Mr. Trump suggests the war is to aid Iranian
protesters. This claim is hard to accept from a president who, at the same
time, is deporting refugees back to Iran, where they are likely to suffer the
persecution he pretends to care about. Mr. Trump suggests the war is about
regime change. But he promised to avoid wars for that reason given the history
of U.S. disasters in attempting regime change in Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan and
Libya,” Kaine wrote. “Finally, he suggests that Iran faces war because it
interfered in the 2020 presidential election, which he still can’t admit that
he lost. Is this a reason to force our sons and daughters into war?”
In Jacobin, Branko
Marcetic called Trump the “warmonger-in-chief.”
“Of all the dumb, pointless wars the United
States has waged in the Middle East, the one it launched today against Iran may
go down as the dumbest and most pointless. This is a war that didn’t need to
happen; even the man waging it doesn’t seem to know why he launched it,”
Marcetic wrote. “Mere hours before Trump launched it, the foreign minister of
Oman… revealed the enormous concessions the Iranians had made in negotiations:
not just agreeing to not stockpile uranium, making it impossible to build a
bomb, but diluting the uranium it currently holds and agreeing to full
verification by International Atomic Energy Agency inspectors.”
“Didn’t matter. Trump spent the week lying
that the Iranians were refusing to make that promise, and in one of his last
public statements before launching the war, lamented how they had supposedly
failed to move far enough in negotiations. Trump had a deal if he wanted it,
and one he could have spent the rest of his life bragging was better than
Obama’s. But he didn’t want it,” Marcetic said. “So whose interest does this
serve? The obvious answer is a war-hungry Israeli leadership increasingly under
the sway of a deranged, neo-Biblical fantasy of using the United States to burn
the Middle East to the ground and annex whatever’s left.”
What
writers in the Middle East are saying.
·
Some Middle Eastern writers suggest Khamenei’s killing could galvanize an
anti-Western movement within Iran.
·
Others criticize Iran’s decision to strike within Gulf countries.
In Al Jazeera,
Mohammad Reza Farzanegan wrote about “Iran after Ayatollah Ali
Khamenei.”
“The regime in Iran is different in many ways
from the ones that collapsed in Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya. The assassination
of leader Ayatollah Khamenei may have a profound impact that does not result in
state collapse,” Farzanegan said. “Within the symbolic universe of Shia Islam,
to which the majority of Iranians belong, Khamenei’s death can be interpreted
as the fulfillment of a martyrological script. Death at the hands of perceived
enemies of Islam can be framed as redemptive passage rather than defeat; it is
not a bitter collapse, as is the case with other Middle Eastern rulers who were
ousted or killed. It is instead an idealised closure: the sacralisation of
political life through sacrificial death.
“This martyrological framing has the potential
to rally a significant portion of the population, including those who were
previously critical of the leadership, around a narrative of national defence,”
Farzanegan wrote. “By transforming a fallen leader into a martyr of ‘foreign
aggression’, the state can trigger a surge of nationalist cohesion and
deep-seated resentment towards external intervention, potentially unifying the
security forces and traditionalist sectors of society in a way that proponents
of regime change did not anticipate.”
In Arab News, Faisal
J. Abbas explored “how Tehran lost the Gulf.”
“Iran has unfortunately lost any sympathy or
solidarity it could have garnered through its indiscriminate response to the
weekend’s attacks carried out by Israel and the US,” Abbas said. “Even Tehran’s
closest regional friends, the Omanis, who until a few days ago were negotiating
on its behalf and trying to spare it a fatal blow, were attacked by Iran —
needless to say, Oman also does not have a US military base. This is a serious
escalation that undermines the role of mediators worldwide.”
“It is a shame that it had to come to this,
after we all believed that the Kingdom and Iran could have worked together to
stabilize the region,” Abbas wrote. “This indiscriminate Iranian aggression
against Gulf countries is a major own goal, resulting only in the increased
isolation of Tehran at a critical moment. Tehran’s escalation does nothing but
confirm the fears of those that see Iran as the main source of danger to the
region and its missile program as a permanent symbol of instability.”
My
take.
Reminder: “My take”
is a section where we give ourselves space to
a personal opinion. If you have feedback, criticism or compliments,
don't unsubscribe. Write in by replying to this email, or leave a comment.
·
Debating war becomes a lot trickier when it isn’t hypothetical.
·
Overthrowing Iran’s regime is a worthy goal, but people across the
political spectrum are leery of military involvement.
·
Trump needs to have a good plan, but I’m not optimistic that he does.
Executive Editor
Isaac Saul: Talking about war is easy when it’s hypothetical. It’s a lot
harder when the real thing arrives.
For weeks, the Trump administration has been
sending significant military resources to the Middle East. Speculation about
the president’s plans ran rampant, but as with Trump’s build-up outside
Venezuela, this outcome should have been obvious.
In an eight-minute address to the nation,
President Trump justified the decision to dive headfirst into this conflict by
declaring that Iran could not be allowed to build a nuclear weapon. This raised
the eyebrows of anyone paying attention over the last eight months. In June,
the president said the U.S. “utterly destroyed their [Iran’s] nuclear
capability.” The White House website still has a page declaring that
“Iran’s nuclear facilities have been obliterated — and suggestions otherwise
are fake news.” Trump has repeated this claim a half dozen
times in recent months. Why are we going to war to stop Iran
from getting a nuclear bomb they supposedly can’t build?
Trump also warned Americans in his address
that troops may die. Tragically, that prediction didn’t take long to come to
fruition. So far, four American troops are confirmed dead, and Trump is warning that more
strikes are coming and that more troops may die. The U.S. is not
the only place suffering casualties. In Israel, at least nine people have been
confirmed killed. Four more people were killed across the UAE, Kuwait, Bahrain,
and Oman. And in Iran, hundreds have been confirmed dead, including at least 153 who
died in a strike near a Naval base that hit an elementary school, according to
Iranian state media.
The cost of war is already adding up in other
ways, too: Shipping in and out of the Persian Gulf has shut down, and Red Sea
routes are being disrupted. In Dubai, the business capital of the Middle
East, buildings have been struck by
the Iranian response, and airports are overcrowded as people try to evacuate.
U.S. bases in Bahrain and Iraq have both been hit, and a U.S. consulate in
Pakistan was stormed by protesters (at least 22 people were
killed). Hezbollah announced it was joining the fight for Iran and began firing
missiles into Haifa, Israel, from Lebanon (and then said 31 people were killed
by Israeli strikes south of Beirut). Rockets are breaking through air defense
systems in Tel Aviv and landing perilously close to
the Old City in Jerusalem. A friendly fire incident in Kuwait brought down
three U.S. F-15 fighter jets (though the airmen survived).
In short: The out-of-control regional war many
of us feared last summer when Trump struck Iran’s nuclear facilities appears to
have arrived in earnest.
For how long will the president tolerate all
this? Major military actions during this administration have conspicuously
fallen on days when the markets were closed; these strikes began on a Saturday,
the capture of Maduro happened on a Saturday, the June strikes in Iran happened
on a Saturday, and the strikes in Nigeria happened on Christmas. Trump is
notoriously reactive to market movements, and the price of crude oil rose 7% on
Sunday; will market pressure, combined with the deaths of American troops (and
the potential for more), move him to deescalate? What if the markets tumble, or
if U.S. forces are hit by a particularly deadly attack?
Among conservatives, a philosophical war
bubbled to the surface again this weekend. The divide touches all corners of
the conservative movement. On one side are those cheering Trump on. Stalwart
right-wing publications like National Review and The Wall Street Journal are
cautiously making the case that the death of Ayatollah Ali Khamenei is a major
victory for the West, and celebrating Trump’s gumption to do the brave and
difficult thing. Other, less reasonable people like Mark Levin are urging “no
off-ramps” and calling for Trump to “destroy” the “subhuman barbarians” in
Iran.
On the other is an anti-war isolationist wing
who feels betrayed. It consists of mainstream conservatives, from center-right
moderates like Saager Enjeti,
who called this the
most “profound campaign betrayal in modern US history,” to more MAGA right-wing
voices like Tucker Carlson, who have been warning about this conflict for
months. Less credible, but still influential figures like Nick Fuentes, are
now urging people to
vote for Democrats in the midterms.
Democrats, obviously, are criticizing Trump.
But their reasons for doing so seem to differ. Some
attack him for not seeking Congressional authority but avoid criticizing the
effort to take out Iran’s regime; others view the whole thing as a major mishap,
both the “what” and the “how.”
Since protests broke out in December, there
has been a robust debate (that we participated in)
about whether or not the U.S. should, or would, strike Iran. But that debate is
now in the past. We did it. So… now what? Of course, I’m happy to see Ayatollah
Ali Khamenei go. Iran’s regime is despotic and oppressive, and I
support efforts to “free” the Iranian people — but that thought leaves out a
lot of detail. The U.S.-Israel military alliance will, at some point, overwhelm
and overpower Iran, and I’m once again shocked and morbidly impressed by the
capabilities of the U.S. and Israeli militaries. We will “win.” Obviously.
But this is all the easy stuff to say — it’s dunking on a toddler, it’s close
to meaningless.
The harder and more important question
is what happens now? What will the war cost, and what will
rise in the vacuum? A debate about Congressional war powers feels archaic, if
not borderline parody at this point. Congress has surrendered those powers to
the executive branch over and over for years on end, showing no interest in
reclaiming them. The Middle East has already been thrown into turmoil, from
Iraq, Kuwait and Bahrain to Israel, the UAE, and even Oman. Hundreds of
thousands of armed personnel operate in Iran and soon may be untethered from
any central command structure. Pro-democracy and pro-Islamist camps, each
divided among themselves in their own rights, will be fighting it out in the
streets. In the West, we imagine every single living Iranian hating this
regime, but that’s a delusion; many celebrated the
death of the ayatollah, yes, but thousands poured into the streets to
mourn Khamenei’s death. All this is ripe for long-term sectarian violence in
Iran and long-term destabilization in the region.
Like Sen. Tim Kaine (D-VA) (under “What the
left is saying”), I have a hard time stepping back and looking at the history
of Iran-U.S. relations and imagining that this action will
somehow bring peace. For decades, we’ve been attacking each other in sporadic
proxy wars, each framing the other as the aggressor, each setting off a new round
of violence. The Trump administration says it wants to bring about a new
regime, but who? When? How?
They don’t seem to know. Trump seems to be
stress-testing arguments, giving different explanations to different
news organizations about what will happen next. He told The
Washington Post we were aiming for “freedom for the people” of Iran. Axios was
told the war could end in “two or three days.” The New York Times was told
“four to five weeks” with “three very good choices” who may take control. That
was on Sunday; this morning, I started my day reading a stunning interview with
ABC’s Jonathan Karl, where Trump conceded that all three of the people he
thought might succeed Khamenei had actually been killed in the initial
strike.
Meanwhile, U.S. air defense stockpiles are
being stressed to defend against the barrage of cheap drones Iran is firing
across the region, just as Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Dan Caine warned the White
House last week. Iran seems to have miscalculated by
attacking other Arab nations in the region, hoping that would inflict a cost
that would stop the U.S.–Israeli barrage but is instead turning their neighbors
against them. After cutting funding for Voice of America, the U.S. is now
having a harder time reaching the Iranian people with the messages they want to
disseminate. And everyone who warned that killing the Iran nuclear deal would
inevitably lead to war is feeling vindicated right now.
In April of last year, I said I was getting nervous about
a war with Iran. In June, I said I was not
optimistic, but hopeful, for peace in the region after the joint U.S.–Israel
strikes. In January, I expressed outright concern and predicted Trump
would attack Iran, and in February, Senior Editor Will Kaback
began sharing that concern.
It’s surreal to actually be here now, with all-out fighting, dead U.S.
soldiers, and a region in turmoil. One would hope we have a plan — an off-ramp,
a future for Iran, a way out — but the honest truth is that it’s not clear at
all to me that we do. Now we wait, and pray for the best.
Numbers.
·
36. The
number of years Ayatollah Ali Khamenei served as Iran’s supreme leader before
his death on Saturday.
·
48. The
number of senior members of the Islamic Republic’s regime killed in U.S. and
Israeli airstrikes, according to President Trump.
·
20%. The
approximate percentage of Iranians who supported the Islamic Republic remaining
in power in a June 2024 Group for Analyzing and Measuring Attitudes in Iran
poll.
·
40%. The
percentage of Iranians who said regime change was a precondition for reform in
the country.
·
27% and
43%. The percentage of U.S. adults who approve and disapprove,
respectively, of U.S. military strikes against Iran, according to a
Reuters/Ipsos poll conducted on February 28 and March 1.
·
7%, 55%,
and 19%. The percentage of Democrats, Republicans and
independents, respectively, who approve of U.S. strikes against Iran.
@ FRIDAY 27
A4X01 X01 FROM REUTERS (reprinted from DJI.260227)
Iran
designated as a state sponsor of wrongful detention, Rubio says
By Reuters
February
27, 2026 4:19 PM EST Updated 1 hour ago
Feb 27 (Reuters) - U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said on
Friday he has designated Iran as a state sponsor of wrongful detention.
"The Iranian regime
must stop taking hostages and release all Americans unjustly detained in Iran,
steps that could end this designation and associated actions," Rubio said
in a statement.
The move comes as tensions mount between the U.S. and Iran, even
as the two countries conducted talks over Iran's nuclear program on Thursday.
U.S. President Donald Trump said on Friday he was disappointed
with the negotiations, warning, "sometimes you have to use force."
A5X08B
@ SATURDAY MORNING 28
A5X02 0934 X02 FROM TIME
U.S and Israel Launch Strikes on Iran, as Trump Promises ‘Massive and
Ongoing’ Campaign
by Brian Bennett and Richard Hall Updated: Feb 28, 2026 9:34 AM ET
The United States and Israel
launched a wave of military strikes against Iran on Saturday in what President
Donald Trump said would be a “massive and ongoing” campaign aimed at bringing
about a change in the country's leadership.
The strikes once again bring the
U.S. into direct confrontation with Iran, and plunge the Middle East into a new
regional conflict several months after a wave of U.S. and Israeli bombs hit Iranian nuclear
facilities in June.
“Our objective is to defend the
American people by eliminating imminent threats from the Iranian regime, a
vicious group of very hard, terrible people,” Trump said in an eight-minute
video posted to Truth Social at 2.30 am Eastern on Saturday.
“Its menacing activities
directly endanger the United States, our troops, our bases overseas, and our
allies throughout the world,” he continued.
: Does Trump Have the Legal Authority to Strike Iran? An Expert
Explains
Trump also addressed the Iranian
people in the conclusion of his speech, telling them that “the hour of your
freedom is at hand.”
“Stay sheltered. Don’t leave your home. It’s very dangerous outside.
Bombs will be dropping everywhere. When we are finished, take over your
government. It will be yours to take,” he said.
“This will be, probably, your only chance for generations. For many
years, you have asked for America’s help, but you never got it. No president
was willing to do what I am willing to do tonight. Now you have a president who
is giving you what you want. So let’s see how you respond,” he added.
The latest campaign, dubbed
Operation Epic Fury by the Pentagon, follows efforts by U.S. and Iranian
officials to try to craft a deal on Iran's nuclear program, as well as
Iran's deadly suppression of mass protests inside the country, in which
thousands were killed. In January, Trump posted a message assuring protestors
"help" was on the way and urging them to "take over" Iran's
institutions.
THE FIRST WAVE
The first strikes of the attack
were heard in Tehran on Saturday, near the residence of Iran's Supreme Leader
Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. He had not made a public appearance for days before the
attack, and his whereabouts are not currently known.
Soon after, Iranian media
reported strikes across the country. At least 40 people were reported killed at
a girls' school in southern Iran, according to Iran's state-run IRNA news
agency, although TIME could not independently verify that claim.
Iran responded by launching a
wave of missiles at Israel and other U.S. allies across the region. Explosions
were heard in the United Arab Emirates capital, Abu Dhabi. Bahrain, which hosts
the U.S. Fifth Fleet, was also targeted.
Speaking to NBC News from Tehran
on Saturday morning, Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said “the situation
on the ground is—I cannot say normal—life is going on. Everything is under control.”
He insisted the Americans and Israelis had “failed to hit their
targets” and that all high-ranking Iranian officials were still alive.
“In less than 2 hours we were
able to start retaliation by hitting U.S. bases with our missiles,” he said,
describing Iranian strikes as “an act of self defense.”
He also questioned Washington’s
approach to diplomacy. “I don’t know why the U.S. Administration insists to
start a negotiation and then in the middle of the negotiation starts attacking
that party,” he said, adding that talks in Geneva on Thursday had made progress
on “serious questions related to Iran’s nuclear program.”
U.S. BUILDUP SET
STAGE FOR IRAN STRIKES
The U.S. military had been
signaling Trump's intention to attack for weeks. Trump had ordered what he
called an "armada" of U.S. military firepower to be deployed in the
waters near Iran. He moved the Abraham Lincoln Carrier Strike Group closer to
the Persian Gulf and redirected the Gerald R. Ford Carrier Strike Group from
the Atlantic Ocean toward the Middle East. The USS Mitscher and USS Michael
Murphy, both guided-missile destroyers, had also been deployed in the Persian
Gulf near the Strait of Hormuz, a key oil shipping passage, according to a
tracker of the American fleet kept by the U.S. Naval Institute.
U.S. and Iranian officials have
been conducting several rounds of negotiations over Iran's nuclear programs but
have failed to come to an agreement. The two sides had one of their “most
intense” rounds of negotiations in Geneva on Thursday, but again failed to
reach a deal.
The next day, Trump said “additional
talks” would take place, but signaled time was running out.
“I’m not happy with the fact
that they are not willing to give us what we have to have,” he told reporters
as he left the White House for Texas. “I’m not thrilled with that. We’ll see
what happens.”
During his State of the Union
address Tuesday night, Trump accused Iran of restarting “sinister ambitions”
related to nuclear weaponry and appeared to indicate that the U.S. would
consider taking military action if Tehran did not abandon
said ambitions. He claimed Iran was working to “build missiles that will soon
reach the United States of America.”
Trump ratcheted up his threats
against Iran’s leadership in January, as the death toll from the crackdown on protests in the
country rose dramatically. An internet blackout across the country prevented effective
communication with the outside world, but some estimates have the death toll
reaching into the tens of thousands.
On Jan. 13, Trump appeared to
indicate the U.S. would intervene militarily in the country to support
protesters. "Iranian Patriots, KEEP PROTESTING - TAKE OVER YOUR
INSTITUTIONS!!!" Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social. "Save the
names of the killers and abusers. They will pay a big price. I have cancelled
all meetings with Iranian Officials until the senseless killing of protesters
STOPS. HELP IS ON ITS WAY."
In response to Trump's repeated
threats, Iran’s parliament speaker, Mohammad Bagher Qalibaf, warned that both
Israel and “all American military centers, bases and ships in the region will
be our legitimate targets” in the event of an attack.
Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah
Ali Khamenei also threatened on Feb. 17 in a social media post that Iran may
attack U.S. ships. “More dangerous than that warship is the weapon that can
send that warship to the bottom of the sea,” he wrote.
YEARS OF PRESSURE
The strikes follow years of
pressure on Iran’s leadership by Trump, dating back to his first term as
president. In 2018, Trump pulled out of a nuclear deal negotiated by his
predecessor, Barack Obama, that had dramatically
reduced Iran’s stockpile of enriched uranium, an essential material for
building a nuclear weapon.
Trump then ordered the assassination
of top Iranian general Qasem Soleimani in January 2020, further inflaming
tensions between the two nations.
Upon returning to office last
year, Trump again ramped up the pressure on the Iranian government over its
nuclear program. Since Trump had left the nuclear agreement—which was negotiated with Iran and other world powers—Tehran had
increased uranium enrichment, built up its stockpile once more, and removed
monitoring equipment from nuclear facilities.
After years of threatening to
take military action to weaken Iran’s nuclear program, Trump authorized the
U.S. to join Israel in major strikes on three key nuclear sites in June. Trump
claimed the country’s nuclear enrichment facilities had been “completely and
totally obliterated,” but questions remained about the survival of key
components of the program.
The 12-day barrage came on the
back of a series of setbacks for Iran’s leaders, including the crippling of its
regional allies Hamas in Gaza and Hezbollah in Lebanon. Iran’s leadership was
left severely weakened following the attack, both regionally and
domestically.
Following the attack, Trump
threatened further action if Iran didn’t return to the negotiating table. “Iran,
the bully of the Middle East, must now make peace,” he said. “If they do not,
future attacks will be far greater and a lot easier.”
In the aftermath of the bombing
campaign, Iranian authorities arrested thousands of people they suspected of
being spies—including activists, journalists, and ordinary citizens. United
Nations experts estimated that more than 1,000 people were executed between June and
September alone.
ECONOMIC CRISIS
As Iran picked up the pieces
from the strikes, it faced another crisis. In September, the U.N. reimposed
nuclear-related sanctions on the country. By late December, Iran was facing an
economic downturn, rampant inflation and a collapse in its currency.
Protests broke out first in
Tehran’s bazaars, as merchants and shopkeepers took to the streets in anger.
Those protests quickly grew into much broader demonstrations against the
Iranian regime that has held power since the Islamic Revolution in 1979, and
into calls for the fall of Supreme Leader Ali Hosseini Khamenei.
Whereas previous protest
movements had been put down swiftly with violence, these came at a time when
the government was already weakened by the Israeli and U.S. attack in June. The
Iranian regime responded with increasing violence. In January, two senior
officials with Iran's Ministry of Health told TIME the death toll
nationwide could be as high as 30,000.
Must-Reads from TIME
·
Iran Accuses U.S. of Spreading
‘Big Lies’ After Trump’s State of the Union Address
·
Iran’s Supreme Leader
Threatens to Attack More U.S. Military Bases: “We Slapped America in the Face”
·
Trump Issues Grave
Warning to Iran After Israeli Strikes: ‘No More Death, No More Destruction’
·
Trump Says ‘Massive
Armada’ Heading to Iran, Warns ‘Time Is Running Out’
to Make a Deal
·
U.S. Joins Israel in
Strikes on Iranian Nuclear Sites, Risking Wider War
1. Energy
A8 FROM BARRON’s
What The Attacks on Iran Mean for Oil and
Stocks
By Laura Sanicola and Reshma Kapadia
Updated Feb 28, 2026, 12:17 pm EST / Original Feb
28, 2026, 3:00 am EST
The U.S. and Israeli attack on Iran—and Tehran’s retaliation—is
likely to cause oil and other energy prices to spike and stock markets to react
sharply when trading starts on Sunday evening
A6 X04 1049 X04 FROM USA TODAY
US, Israel launch strikes on Iran.
What we know so far
The White House has been ramping
up the pressure on Iran for months. Some analysts fear the attack could spill
over into a wider regional war.
Updated Feb. 28, 2026, 10:49 a.m.
ET
What is the name of the U.S.
military campaign against Iran?
President Donald Trump said the
United States and Israel launched "major combat operations" against
Iran on Feb. 28 after the largest build-up of American power in the Middle East
since the 2003 U.S.-led invasion of Iraq. Trump also called for Iranians to
overthrow their government.
Explosions were observed in Tehran
and at least five cities across the country, and Iran's military started
retaliating against Israel, according to the Israel Defense Forces. There were
also explosions and siren-alerts reported in several Middle East nations where
the U.S. has military bases.
Here's what we know about this
developing story.
US AND ISRAEL BOMB IRAN: HOW IT
STARTED
The Pentagon has named the
operation against Iran "Epic Fury." Israel's military codenamed it
"Roaring Lion." Israel initially launched the operation and then was
joined by the U.S. The explosions in Tehran were reported early in the morning
Eastern Time on Feb. 28, which is mid-morning in Iran.
Within hours, Iran started sending
missiles toward Israel and there were reports of attempted strikes against U.S.
military facilities in Bahrain, the United Arab Emirates and Qatar. Some
nations said missiles were intercepted.
The number of casualties from the
attacks and reprisals was not immediately known. The United Arab Emirates'
defense ministry reported one civilian there was killed by falling debris.
Iranian state media reported that dozens of children were killed when a missile
struck a school in Minab, in southern Iran. USA TODAY could not immediately
verify that report.
WHAT DOES TRUMP WANT TO ACHIEVE IN
IRAN?
The White House has been ramping
up the pressure on Iran for months. Trump has at times said he was displeased
with the way Iran's authorities violently cracked down on protesters in
December last year. He also said he wants Iran to agree to a new deal on its nuclear
program. Trump said on Feb. 27 that he was "not happy" with the way
attempts to solve the issue diplomatically were progressing.
Still, some national security
experts have questioned Trump's strategic logic for attacking Iran. Israel's
case may be more clear-cut: The country has long viewed Iran as an existential
threat because of its repeated threats to annihilate Israel. Trump also claimed
that as a result of an earlier attack on Iran, the U.S. had destroyed Iran's
nuclear facilities.
"Trump seems interested, in
no particular order, in demonstrating the prowess of the U.S. military,
strengthening his negotiating position, showing he was serious when he vowed in
a January Truth Social post to protect Iranian protesters, and differentiating
his approach from President Barack Obama's," Nate Swanson, a former White
House adviser on Iran, wrote in a Feb. 24 article for Foreign Affairs magazine,
referring to a 2015 nuclear deal between Iran and other world powers. That
agreement was negotiated by the Obama administration.
"This mishmash of objectives
... will make him less prepared if a strike does not yield the expected, swift
capitulation," wrote Swanson.
MAPS AND GRAPHICS: US, ISRAEL
LAUNCH FIRST OF 'MAJOR COMBAT OPERATIONS' AGAINST IRAN
Iran's supreme leader: Where is
he?
Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah
Ali Khamenei and Iran's President Masoud Pezeshkian were both directly targeted
in the U.S. and Israeli airstrikes, according to a Middle Eastern official
familiar with the matter. The official spoke on the condition of anonymity.
Reuters was the first to report the news.
The official also said, without
providing additional information, that several senior Islamic Revolutionary
Guard Corps were killed in the strikes. The official did not discuss the
outcome of the strikes on Khamenei or Pezeshkian. Iranian state media has said
Pezeshkian is accounted for and safe. Iran has not commented on Khamenei. Some
of the areas in Tehran targeted by the U.S. and Israel were places linked to
Khamenei and Pezeshkian. Iranian state media said Iran's foreign minister was
also safe.
'MIDNIGHT HAMMER': AN EARLIER
ATTACK ON IRAN?
In June 2025, Trump authorized
military strikes against Iran's nuclear program as part of a war Israel, a
close U.S. ally, fought with Iran over its support for the militant group Hamas
in Gaza. It lasted for 12 days. The White House said at the time that the
strikes completely eliminated Iran's nuclear program.
The operation was codenamed
"Midnight Hammer."
It involved 125 American military
aircraft and targeted three nuclear facilities at Fordo, Natanz and Isfahan.
"Obliteration is an accurate term," Trump said of the bombings. No
U.S. personnel were injured in the operation, which struck Iran well after
midnight on June 22, 2025, local time. Iran launched drone and missile attacks
against Israel a few days later, then chose to de-escalate.
IRAN ATTACK: WHAT HAPPENS NOW?
The aircraft carrier USS Abraham
Lincoln sails in the Arabian Sea on Feb. 6, 2026. The Abraham Lincoln Carrier
Strike Group was deployed to the U.S. 5th Fleet area of operations amid U.S.
threats of an attack on Iran.
Iran analysts have expressed
concern that the attack could spill over into a wider regional war.
"Let’s be clear: This could have catastrophic consequences,"
said Trita Parsi, the co-founder and executive director of the Quincy
Institute, a Washington, DC-based think tank.
Parsi said that this would
"not only put countless U.S. troops in the Middle East in the line of
fire, but risk a massive multi-front expansion of the war and other
uncontrollable chaos, from state failure and civil war to ethnic conflict that
spreads through the region."
Whether that happens remains to be
seen. The U.S. has said the operation could last several days.
Other Iran specialists have cautioned
that if Trump is able to force Iran into a new deal over its nuclear program,
it may not improve on the one negotiated by the Obama administration. That
agreement limited Iran's uranium enrichment capabilities and was widely
regarded to be working when Trump pulled the U.S. out of it during his first
term. However, the JCPOA, as that deal was called, did not address Iran's
ballistic missile program or its support for regional militant groups.
Trump said the U.S. would
"destroy" Iran's missiles, "annihilate" its navy and ensure
proxy groups such as Hezbollah and Hamas are no longer able to destabilize the
region. "And we will ensure that Iran does not obtain a nuclear
weapon," he said.
A7X10 1058
X10 FROM REUTERS
Exclusive:
Prior to Iran attacks, CIA assessed Khamenei would be replaced by hardline IRGC
elements if killed, sources say
By Erin Banco
February 28, 2026 10:58 AM EST Updated 1 hour ago
WASHINGTON, Feb 28 (Reuters) - In the run-up to the U.S. and
Israeli attacks on Saturday, the
U.S. Central Intelligence Agency assessed that even if Iran's Supreme Leader
Ayatollah Ali Khamenei was killed in the operation, he would likely be replaced
by hardline figures from the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), two
sources briefed on the intelligence said.
The assessments, which were produced over the past two weeks,
looked broadly at what could occur in Iran following a U.S. intervention and
the extent to which a military operation could trigger regime change in the
Islamic Republic -- now a pronounced objective for Washington.
The IRGC is an elite military force whose purpose is to protect
Shi'ite Muslim clerical rule in Iran.
The intelligence agency reports did not conclude any scenario
with certainty, said the sources, who spoke on condition of anonymity to
discuss intelligence matters.
The Central Intelligence Agency declined to comment.
President Donald Trump has for weeks signaled the U.S. was
interested in seeing regime change in Iran, but has not given in any detail
Washington’s thinking on who could lead the country.
In an early morning video address on Saturday, Trump described
Tehran as a "terrorist regime" and encouraged the Iranian people to
take over the government, saying the U.S. military strikes would set the stage
for an uprising.
The U.S. and Israeli assault comes after weeks of deliberation
inside the U.S. government about whether to strike Iran following the deadly
protests that broke out there in December.
U.S. officials in recent weeks have tried to strike a nuclear
deal with Tehran in an attempt to stave off intervention.
In a briefing last week, Secretary of State Marco Rubio told top
congressional lawmakers known as the Gang of Eight that a U.S. operation would
likely move forward, but that Trump could change his mind, particularly if
nuclear negotiations were successful. Those talks in Geneva did not result in
an agreement.
Rubio notified the Gang of Eight on Friday night that the
operation to attack Iran was likely to commence in the following hours but said
Trump could still change his mind, two sources familiar with the matter said.
Reporting by Erin Banco; Editing by Humeyra Pamuk and Daniel
Wallis
@ SATURDAY AFTERNOON/EVE.
A9 X08C 1246 X08 FROM BARRON’S
Why Gas Prices Could Be Headed Higher After
U.S. Attack on Iran
By Nicole Goodkind Feb 28, 2026, 12:46 pm EST
Key Points
·
U.S.
and Israeli strikes on Iranian targets have introduced uncertainty, with
analysts expecting crude oil prices to jump from $72.87 a barrel.
·
The
national average gasoline price, currently about $3 per gallon, will likely
rise to about $3.10-$3.15 per gallon in coming weeks, Patrick De Haan, head of
petroleum analysis at GasBuddy, said.
·
Reports
indicate Iran’s Revolutionary Guards may be attempting to close the Strait of
Hormuz, which handles 20% of global oil flows.
Gas prices could move higher in the coming weeks after
U.S. and Israeli strikes on Iranian targets on Saturday injected new
uncertainty into global oil markets.
Crude oil is the
single biggest component of the price that drivers pay at the pump, accounting
for over half the retail cost of gasoline. When oil rises, gasoline usually
follows—though not instantly.
Oil settled at $72.87 a barrel on Friday before the
attacks. When trading resumes Sunday evening, analysts expect prices to jump as traders factor
in geopolitical risk and the possibility of supply disruptions.
Patrick De Haan, head of petroleum analysis at GasBuddy,
said the national average gasoline price, currently around $3 per gallon, is
likely to rise to roughly $3.10 to $3.15 per gallon over the next couple of
weeks if crude prices remain elevated.
The biggest concern
for oil markets isn’t just Iran’s own exports. It’s the Strait of Hormuz, the
narrow shipping lane between Iran and Oman that handles about 20% of global oil
and liquefied natural gas flows. Even partial disruptions or rerouting of
tankers can push prices higher.
New reports from Reuters say that the
vessels have been receiving transmissions from Iran’s Revolutionary Guards
saying “no ship is allowed to pass the Strait of Hormuz,” which could indicate
the straight has been closed.
So far, oil
facilities have not been directly targeted. If the conflict remains limited to
military installations and shipping lanes stay open, the impact on pump prices
could be modest.
De Haan said in
a Substack post that gasoline prices are
unlikely to spike overnight. Wholesale price increases typically filter through
gradually, often appearing in increments of a few cents a day. Some U.S. states
are also in the middle of the seasonal shift to summer-blend gasoline, which
can contribute to price volatility.
There could also be
stabilizing forces at play. OPEC+ countries are scheduled to hold their monthly
meeting Sunday, and producers could choose to increase output to calm markets.
A10 1310 X09 FROM FOX
US, Israel launch attack on Iran
as Trump announces 'major combat operations'
The United States and Israel
launched a massive coordinated military offensive targeting Iran known as
"Operation Epic Fury." President Donald Trump had warned of possible
U.S. intervention in response to deadly
anti-regime protests and if Iran did not accept a sweeping nuclear deal.
Covered by: Efrat Lachter, Morgan
Phillips, Benjamin Weinthal, Michael Sinkewicz, Alexandra Koch, Rachel Wolf,
Michael Dorgan, Elizabeth Elkind, Alex Miller, Andrew Mark Miller, Amanda
Macias, Emma Colton and Alex Nitzberg
Last Update February 28, 2026, 1:10 PM EST
President Donald Trump confirmed
Saturday that the U.S. is carrying out "major combat operations in
Iran." In a video posted to Truth Social, Trump said the objective is to
defend Americans by eliminating imminent threats from the Iranian regime,
describing it as "a vicious group of very hard, terrible people."
In his message, Trump urged the
Iranian regime to "lay down" its weapons or "face certain
death." Calling it their "only chance for generations," Trump
urged the people of Iran to "take over your government" after the
operation.
The United States military attack
against the Iran is named "Operation Epic Fury." Israel, which
coordinated the daytime morning blitz with the U.S., announced the Jewish
State's mission as “Operation Roaring Lion."
The joint military operation is
expected to carry on for days. Officials tell Fox News that Israel is targeting
Iranian leadership, while the U.S. is targeting military targets and ballistic
missile sites that pose an "imminent threat."
FBI raises alert nationwide
The FBI's counterterrorism and
counterintelligence teams are on elevated alert nationwide, a bureau official
told Fox News' Peter Doocy Saturday.
The bureau did not immediately
elaborate on how long it will remain in effect.
The move comes as U.S. operations
against Iran continue and tensions escalate across the region.
Homeland Security Secretary Kristi
Noem said she is "in direct coordination with our federal intelligence and
law enforcement partners as we continue to closely monitor and thwart any
potential threats to the homeland."
Posted by Michael Dorgan
1300 12
mins ago
Mamdani rips Trump's
'catastrophic' Iran attack: 'Americans don't want this'
New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani
said the U.S. and Israeli military strikes on Iran mark a "catastrophic
escalation in an illegal war of aggression."
"Bombing cities. Killing
civilians. Opening a new theater of war. Americans do not want this," the Mamdani
continued. "They do not want another war in pursuit of regime change. They
want relief from the affordability crisis. They want peace."
Mamdani said he was "focused
on making sure that every New Yorker is safe" and is in contact with the
New York City Police Department commissioner and emergency management
officials.
"We are taking proactive
steps, including increasing coordination across agencies and enhancing patrols
of sensitive locations out of an abundance of caution," he said.
"Additionally, I want to
speak directly to Iranian New Yorkers: you are part of the fabric of this city
— you are our neighbors, small business owners, students, artists, workers, and
community leaders. You will be safe here," the mayor added.
Posted by Andrew Mark Miller
17 mins ago
Netanyahu sends subtle message
with book on desk during Trump call
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin
Netanyahu's photo of him speaking with President Donald Trump during the
strikes on Iran had a subtle message. In front of the prime minister is a map
and sitting on top of the map is a book entitled "Allies at War: The
Politics of Defeating Hitler."
The book, which has the U.K.
version of the title, according to X, is gives the history of World War II
alliances based on more than 100 archives, including tensions among the the
Allied Powers. The use of the book in the photo could be seen as a nod to
cooperation between the U.S. and Israel, both of which carried out attacks
against Iran on Saturday.
Posted by Rachel Wolf
placeholder
39 mins ago
Iran strikes test Saudi, UAE roles
and Europe’s resolve
The U.S. and Israeli strikes in
Iran will dramatically impact America's allies in the region, particularly
Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates.
"If any casualties take place
on their territory, as has been reported already, that could change the nature
of their involvement potentially beyond participation in air defense efforts
and opening their air space to U.S. and Israeli overflight," said Jacob
Olidort, director of American security at America First Policy Institute.
Another major factor on the future
of operations in Iran will be how European allies respond.
"A decisive inflection point
will be the involvement of European allies, and their measured responses to
date represent the acute threat posed by Iran’s terror network across Europe
and the potential escalation against soft targets and bases, particularly in
light of Iran’s recent threats against European navies and air forces,” Olidort
said.
Posted by Andrew Mark Miller
45 mins ago
Newsom agrees Iran leadership
'must go' but blasts Trump's methods
California Democratic Gov. Gavin
Newsom reacted to President Donald Trump's move to attack Iran in a Saturday
social media post.
"The corrupt and repressive
Iranian regime must never have nuclear weapon," Newsom, widely seen as a
top White House contender in 2028, posted on X. "The leadership of Iran
must go. "
"But that does not justify
the President of the United States engaging in an illegal, dangerous war that
will risk the lives of our American service members and our friends without
justification to the American people."
Newsom went on to accuse Trump of
"putting Americans at risk abroad because he is unpopular at home."
The U.S. and Israel launched the
joint attack just after 9 a.m. local time in what the Pentagon has dubbed
"Operation Epic Fury."
In video remarks posted to Truth
Social, Trump addressed the Iranian people directly and told them to
"seize control of [their] destiny."
"The hour of your freedom is at hand. Stay sheltered. Don't leave
your home. It's very dangerous outside. Bombs will be dropping everywhere. When
we are finished, take over your government. It will be yours to take,"
Trump said. "This will be, probably, your only chance for generations. For
many years, you have asked for America's help, but you never got it. No
President was willing to do what I am willing to do tonight. Now you have a
President who is giving you what you want."
Posted by Andrew Mark Miller
45 mins ago
What is the Tomahawk missile? The
weapon that opened the US strike on Iran
What is the Tomahawk missile? The
weapon that opened the US strike on Iran
The USS Barry launches a Tomahawk
cruise missile on March 29, 2011, from the Mediterranean Sea. (US Navy photo)
The first missile in the U.S.
arsenal used against Iranian targets in Saturday's pre-dawn strike was the
Tomahawk, a long-range cruise missile launched from Navy ships and submarines.
About half the length of a
standard telephone pole, the Tomahawk flies at the speed of a commercial
airliner and can carry a 1,000-pound warhead about the distance from
Washington, D.C., to Miami.
The missile has been a mainstay of
the Navy’s arsenal since the 1980s and was first used in combat during the 1991
Gulf War. In the decades since, it has become a go-to option for presidents
seeking to strike targets from long range without putting U.S. service members
in harm’s way.
“Tomahawks are the longest-range
cruise missile we have and the one presidents reach for first and often,” said
Thomas Karako, director of the Missile Defense Project at the Center for
Strategic and International Studies.
But demand has outpaced supply, he
noted.
“We’ve been using them far more
frequently than we’ve been producing them,” he added.
Overall, the Tomahawk has been
deployed more than 2,350 times.
This is an excerpt, read the full
story here.
Posted by Amanda Macias
placeholder
47 mins ago
Jeffries demands war powers vote
on Iran, claims Trump doing 'exact opposite' of campaign promise
House Minority Leader Hakeem
Jeffries, D-N.Y., asserted that President Donald Trump's administration must
provide Congress and Americans a solid justification for attacking Iran, and
convey a plan to prevent a protracted "military quagmire" in the
region.
"Donald Trump promised to
keep America out of costly and endless foreign wars. He is now doing the exact
opposite in the Middle East. Congress must vote on a War Powers resolution
immediately," Jeffries declared in a post on X.
Jeffries has said that Trump's
decision to launch a U.S. military operation in Iran leaves American troops in
danger of retaliation.
"Overnight, Donald Trump
announced the start of massive and ongoing military operations against Iran.
The framers of the United States Constitution gave Congress the sole power to
declare war as the branch of government closest to the American people,"
Jeffries said in a statement.
"Iran is a bad actor and must
be aggressively confronted for its human rights violations, nuclear ambitions,
support of terrorism and the threat it poses to our allies like Israel and
Jordan in the region. However, absent exigent circumstances, the Trump
administration must seek authorization for the preemptive use of military force
that constitutes an act of war," he continued.
"Donald Trump failed to seek Congressional
authorization prior to striking Iran. Instead, the President’s decision to
abandon diplomacy and launch a massive military attack has left American troops
vulnerable to Iran’s retaliatory actions. We pray for the safety of the men and
women of the U.S. military as they have been put into harm’s way in a dangerous
theater of war," Jeffries said in the statement.
"If Iran’s nuclear program
was 'completely and totally obliterated' by the military strikes in June 2025,
as Donald Trump boldly proclaimed, there should be no need to strike them now.
Equally troublesome, the advancement of security and stability in the Middle
East requires more than military might, as we painfully discovered in several
failed wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. The Trump administration must explain
itself to the American people and Congress immediately, provide an ironclad
justification for this act of war, clearly define the national security
objective and articulate a plan to avoid another costly, prolonged military
quagmire in the Middle East," Jeffries asserted.
"The War Powers Resolution
introduced by Rep. Ro Khanna and Rep. Thomas Massie demands that President
Trump remove U.S. forces from hostilities in Iran absent Congressional
authorization. House Democrats remain committed to compelling a vote on this
resolution upon our return," the congressman declared.
Posted by Alex Nitzberg
49 mins ago
AOC condemns US-Israeli strikes on
Iran, accuses Trump of dragging Americans into war
AOC condemns US-Israeli strikes on
Iran, accuses Trump of dragging Americans into war
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez,
D-N.Y., speaks at TU Berlin. (Annette Riedl/picture alliance via Getty Images)
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez,
D-N.Y., slammed President Donald Trump as the U.S. and Israel strike Iran.
The progressive "Squad"
member accused Trump of dragging Americans into war and not caring about the
long-term consequences.
"The American people are once
again dragged into a war they did not want by a president who does not care
about the long-term consequences of his actions. This war is unlawful. It is
unnecessary. And it will be catastrophic," Ocasio-Cortez asserted in the
statement.
"Just this week, Iran and the
United States were negotiating key measures that could have staved off war. The
President walked away from these discussions and chose war instead. President
Trump flippantly acknowledged the possibility of American casualties, stating
'that often happens in war'." she continued.
"Mr. President: this was not
an inevitability," she said. "This is a deliberate choice of
aggression when diplomacy and security were within reach. Stop lying to the
American people."
“Violence begets violence. We
learned this lesson in Iraq. We learned this lesson in Afghanistan. And we are
about to learn it again in Iran. Bombs have yet to create enduring democracies
in the region and this will be no different," she added. "In moments
of war, our Constitution is unambiguous: Congress authorizes war. The President
does not. I will do my part to uphold our Constitution by voting YES on
Representatives Ro Khanna and Thomas Massie’s War Powers Resolution. Every
member of Congress must join us in rejecting this aimless war."
Fox News' Daniel Scully
contributed to this report
Posted by Alex Nitzberg
1200 1
hour ago
Trump monitored the attacks on
Iran, spoke with Netanyahu, White House says
President Donald Trump was
monitoring the overnight attacks on Iran from Mar-a-Lago while surrounded by
his national security team, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said
on Saturday. Leavitt confirmed that Trump spoke with Israeli Prime Minister
Benjamin Netanyahu as their countries carried out attacks on Iran.
"Prior to the attacks,
Secretary Rubio called all members of the gang of eight to provide congressional
notification, and he was able to reach and brief seven of the eight
members," Leavitt said.
"The President and his
national security team will continue to closely monitor the situation
throughout the day," she added.
Posted by Rachel Wolf
placeholder
1 hour ago
Capito backs strikes in Iran,
hopes for briefings from Trump administration 'soon'
The Senate’s fourth highest
ranking Republican backed President Donald Trump’s strikes on Iran, and hopes
for a briefing “soon” on the action in the Middle East.
Sen. Shelley Moore Capito, R-W.V.,
and chair of the Senate Republican Policy Committee, said in a statement that
Trump had given “the Iranian regime countless opportunities to stand down, stop
killing their people, and abandon their nuclear ambitions.”
“Instead of choosing a peaceful
path, they have doubled down on weapons designed to threaten the American
people,” Moore Capito said. “I am following U.S. operations in Iran very
closely, and I look forward to receiving briefings soon.”
“In the meantime, I will continue
to monitor developments as we work to ensure the safety and security of
Americans at home and abroad,” she continued. “My prayers are with the brave
men and women who serve our country in uniform.”
Moore Capito joined the rest of
Senate Republican leadership in backing Operation Epic Fury, which saw the U.S.
and Israel jointly strike Iran on Saturday.
Trump said that the strikes were
meant to liberate the Iranian people from the current regime, eliminate
imminent threats to the U.S. from Iran, and to snuff out any nuclear ambitions
— “they can never have a nuclear weapon,” Trump said.
"I do not make this statement
lightly; the Iranian regime seeks to kill," Trump said. "The lives of
courageous American heroes may be lost, and we may have casualties — that often
happens in war. But we're doing this not for now. We're doing it for the
future, and it is a noble mission."
Posted by Alex Miller
1 hour ago
Tlaib calls on Congress to 'exert
war powers' to 'stop this deranged president'
Democratic Rep. Rashida Tlaib, a
fierce Trump critic, is calling on Congress to intervene and stop President
Trump's move to strike Iran.
"Congress must stop the
bloodshed by immediately reconvening to exert its war powers and stop this
deranged president," the Michigan Democrat posted on X on Saturday.
"But let’s be clear: warmongering politicians from both parties support
this illegal war, and it will take a mass anti-war movement to stop it."
Tlaib has posted several critiques
of Trump on X since the U.S. launched the strike alongside Israel around 9 a.m.
local time, including a post reacting to a clip of Trump acknowledging the
possibility of U.S. casualties in the attack.
"He doesn't care about our
loved ones in the military," Tlaib said about Trump. "He doesn't care
about the fact that Americans don't want this war. "He doesn't care about
the Iranian people. He is corrupted. Don't fall for the lies."
Posted by Andrew Mark Miller
1 hour ago
Bessent says US tracking 'illegal
funds being moved out of Iran,' reasserts Trump's 'amnesty' pledge
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent
said President Donald Trump’s Operation Epic Fury targets Iran’s ruling regime
and offers amnesty to combatants who stand down.
“@POTUS has unleashed Operation
Epic Fury on the brutal Iranian regime,” Bessent wrote on social media. “He has
called for all combatants to put down their weapons and receive amnesty.”
Bessent said the Treasury
Department will continue enforcing Trump’s maximum pressure campaign, tracking
what he described as illegal funds moved outside Iran and working to recover
them.
“The @USTreasury reaffirms our
commitment to President Trump’s maximum pressure campaign tracking all illegal
funds moved outside of Iran, and to retrieving these monies on behalf of the
Iranian people,” he wrote.
Posted by Michael Dorgan
placeholder
1 hour ago
No confirmed US casualties in
Iranian counterattacks: US official
No U.S. fatalities or injuries
have been confirmed as part of Iran’s counterattacks following American strikes
Saturday, a U.S. official told Fox News Digital.
Damage assessments remain ongoing
as officials evaluate the impact of missile and drone launches targeting U.S.
facilities across the Middle East. Several bases in Bahrain, Qatar, the United
Arab Emirates and Kuwait were placed on heightened alert amid the retaliation.
U.S. embassies in parts of the
region have also issued security notices urging Americans to shelter in place,
while military installations continue operating under elevated force protection
conditions.
Iran’s barrage came after
coordinated U.S.–Israeli strikes on Iranian military and nuclear-linked targets
earlier Saturday. Regional governments reported intercepting many of the
incoming projectiles, though the full extent of any structural damage has not
been publicly detailed.
The situation remains fluid, and
assessments could change as additional information becomes available.
Posted by Morgan Phillips
1 hour ago
UN chief condemns US-Israeli
strikes, Iran's retaliation in one statement
United Nations (U.N.)
Secretary-General António Guterres condemned the military actions in the Middle
East, including the strikes by the U.S. and Israel in Operation Epic Fury, as
well as Iran's retaliation. Guterres claimed that the actions "undermine
international peace & security" and that they violate the U.N.
Charter.
"I condemn today’s military
escalation in the Middle East... I call for an immediate cessation of
hostilities & de-escalation. Failing to do so risks a wider regional
conflict with grave consequences for civilians & regional stability. I
strongly encourage all parties to return immediately to the negotiating
table," Guterres said.
"I reiterate that there is no
viable alternative to the peaceful settlement of international disputes, in
full accordance with international law, including the UN Charter. The Charter
provides the foundation for the maintenance of international peace and
security," he added.
Posted by Rachel Wolf
1 hour ago
Iran state news agencies hit by
cyberattacks
Cyberattacks disrupted Iranian
state media Saturday as the United States and Israel launched a sweeping joint
military operation across Iran, according to Fox News Chief National Security
Correspondent Jennifer Griffin.
“There have been cyberattacks
across Iran, and the internet is not up and working,” Griffin reported on “FOX
& Friends.” “But the cyber attacks have focused on the news agencies like
Irna, which is the state run television.”
The cyber disruptions came as U.S.
and Israeli forces struck military and leadership targets in what Griffin
described as an open-ended campaign expected to last “not hours, but days.”
“It was a joint operation from the
get-go,” she said.
The cyberattacks unfolded
alongside the broader military campaign as strikes targeted sites in Tehran and
elsewhere across the country.
Posted by Michael Dorgan
placeholder
1 hour ago
UK to convene United Nations
security meeting in NYC as US, Israel attack Iran
UK to convene United Nations
security meeting in NYC as US, Israel attack Iran
Eduardo Munoz/Reuters
The U.K. is set to convene the
United Nations Security Council in New York City on Saturday as the U.S. and
Israel carry out Operation Epic Fury against Iran. The meeting is set to take
place at 4:00 p.m. local time.
Israeli Ambassador to the U.N.
Danny Danon will address the meeting, the Israeli U.N. Mission confirmed.
"The State of Israel is
strong, united and determined to defend its citizens against any existential
threat. Israel will never allow an Iranian nuclear state," Danon said in a
statement.
Posted by Rachel Wolf
2 hours ago
Civilian casualty claims mount
after reported Iran school strike, CENTCOM opens review
Civilian casualty claims mount
after reported Iran school strike, CENTCOM opens review
Fatemeh Bahrami/Anadolu via Getty
Images
U.S. Central Command is
investigating reports that a girls school in southern Iran was struck during
recent military operations, with Iranian state media claiming students were
killed.
“We are aware of reports
concerning civilian harm resulting from ongoing military operations,” CENTCOM
spokesman Tim Hawkins said in a Saturday statement to CNN. “We take these
reports seriously and are looking into them. The protection of civilians is of
utmost importance, and we will continue to take all precautions available to
minimize the risk of unintended harm.”
Iran’s state-run media has
reported that at least five students were killed when a girls school in
southern Iran was hit amid the strikes, though those numbers have not been
independently confirmed by U.S. officials.
CENTCOM’s statement indicates the
U.S. military is reviewing the incident as part of its normal assessment process
when credible allegations of civilian harm arise.
Posted by Morgan Phillips
2 hours ago
Israel launches new strikes on
Iranian missile launchers
The Israel Defense Forces (IDF)
announced on Saturday that hit had begun a flyover and was striking missile
launchers in Iran as Operation Epic Fury unfolds.
The Associated Press, citing the
semiofficial news agency Fars news, reported that explosion had been heard near
the city of Shiraz in southern Iran.
Posted by Rachel Wolf
placeholder
2 hours ago
Schumer demands Iran briefing for
Congress, calls on Senate to immediately return to rein in Trump's
Schumer demands Iran briefing for
Congress, calls on Senate to immediately return to rein in Trump's
Senate Minority Leader Chuck
Schumer, D-N.Y.
Senate Minority Leader Chuck
Schumer, D-N.Y., accused the Trump administration of not providing Congress nor
Americans “critical details about the scope and immediacy of the threat” from
Iran.
“The administration must brief
Congress, including an immediate all senators classified briefing and in public
testimony, to answer these vital questions,” Schumer said in a statement. “The
Senate should quickly return to session and reassert its constitutional duty by
passing our resolution to enforce the War Powers Act.”
Schumer, along with other
congressional leaders from the Gang of Eight, was briefed on the situation in
Iran earlier this week by Secretary of State Marco Rubio.
“When I talked to Secretary Rubio,
I implored him to be straight with Congress and the American people about the
objectives of these strikes and what comes next,” Schumer said. “Iran must
never be allowed to attain a nuclear weapon but the American people do not want
another endless and costly war in the Middle East when there are so many problems
at home.”
Schumer, like most congressional
Democrats, has routinely bucked President Donald Trump’s use of military force
across the globe during his second term.
He said that tackling Iran’s
activity in the region, nuclear ambitions and oppression of their own people
demanded “American strength, resolve, regional coordination, and strategic
clarity.”
“Unfortunately, President Trump’s
fitful cycles of lashing out and risking wider conflict are not a viable
strategy,” Schumer said.
Posted by Alex Miller
2 hours ago
Departure flights for US military
families in Bahrain paused after missile attack
Andrew Caballero-Reynolds/Pool via
Reuters
Departure flights for U.S.
military families in Bahrain have been paused following missile attacks
targeting the headquarters of the U.S. Navy’s 5th Fleet, according to Stars and
Stripes. Smoke was seen rising over Manama, Bahrain, Saturday after the naval
base was struck, though officials have not released details on the extent of
damage or any casualties.
The Department of War had
authorized voluntary departures for military dependents earlier Saturday after
the United States and Israel launched strikes on Iran. An emergency alert sent
to families allowed them to book flights on a first-come, first-serve basis,
according to Stripes. However, by 2 p.m. local time, officials announced
departure flights were on hold pending further notice and instructed personnel
to continue sheltering.
Explosions were heard across
Bahrain as residents took cover, but it remains unclear what specific targets
were hit.
U.S. Central Command did not
immediately respond to a request for comment from Fox News Digital. Bahrain
hosts Naval Forces Central Command and is one of the few accompanied duty
stations in the region.
Posted by Morgan Phillips
2 hours ago
Graham says Saudi recognition of
Israel would be historic reset as ‘mothership of terrorism’ falls
Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., said
Saturday that a potential collapse of Iran’s regime could trigger the biggest
geopolitical shift in the Middle East in “a thousand years” and called on Saudi
Arabia to move to recognize Israel if Tehran falls.
“If Saudi Arabia, the most
important voice in Islam, would recognize the one and only Jewish state, that
is a blow to terrorism worse than bombs,” Graham told “Fox & Friends.”
“The mothership of terrorism is
about to go down.”’
Graham described the moment as a
“new dawn” for the region, arguing the current pressure campaign had set in
motion the regime’s demise and would ultimately bring the regime down.
He also unleashed a blistering
attack on Iran’s supreme leader, saying, “I hope the Ayatollah is captured or
killed. He’s a miserable human being. He’s Hitler in a robe.”
Graham accused the regime of
killing “over 30,000 of his own people to maintain power” and called the
Ayatollah a “religious Nazi.”
The South Carolina Republican
predicted that once the regime collapses, Saudi Arabia will return to normalization
talks with Israel that were close before the Oct. 7 terror attacks.
“If Saudi Arabia recognizes
Israel, it will be the biggest change in a thousand years in the history of the
region,” Graham said, arguing such a move would cause Iran-backed terror
networks to collapse.
He also hailed President Donald
Trump as the “most consequential” president on Middle East policy in his
lifetime and said Trump’s strategy had set the region on a path toward
transformation.
Posted by Michael Dorgan
placeholder
2 hours ago
Trump critic Carney expresses
support for US and Israel's strikes on Iran
Canadian Prime Minister Mark
Carney, an outspoken critic of President Donald Trump, has expressed support
for Operation Epic Fury. The prime minister noted that, despite repeated
warnings from the international community, "ran has neither fully
dismantled its nuclear program, halted all enrichment activities, nor ended its
support for regional terrorist proxy groups."
"Canada stands with the
Iranian people in their long and courageous struggle against Iran’s oppressive
regime... Canada reaffirms Israel’s right to defend itself and to ensure the
security of its people," Carney said in a statement posted on X.
"Canada supports the United
States acting to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon and to prevent
its regime from further threatening international peace and security," he
added.
Posted by Rachel Wolf
2 hours ago
Europe’s top powers push diplomacy
after strikes on Iran
Europe’s top powers push diplomacy
after strikes on Iran
German Chancellor Friedrich Merz,
French President Emmanuel Macron and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer stand
together (Thomas Kienzle/ AFP/Getty Images).
The leaders of France, Germany and
the United Kingdom on Saturday called for renewed negotiations with Iran
following military strikes targeting the country, saying they remain committed
to regional stability but did not participate in the operation.
In a statement released from the French
presidential palace, the three European powers said they are in close contact
with international partners, including the U.S., Israel and regional allies.
“We did not participate in these
strikes,” the statement said, while reaffirming their commitment to protecting
civilian lives and maintaining stability in the region.
The leaders reiterated
long-standing concerns about Iran’s nuclear program, ballistic missile
development and what they described as destabilizing activities in the region
and beyond.
They also condemned what they
called “appalling violence and repression” by Iranian authorities against their
own people.
The three countries strongly
condemned Iranian attacks on regional states and urged Tehran to refrain from
what they described as indiscriminate military strikes.
They called for a resumption of
negotiations and pressed Iran’s leadership to pursue a diplomatic solution,
adding that “ultimately, the Iranian people must be allowed to determine their
future."
Posted by Amanda Macias
2 hours ago
Rand Paul bucks Trump on Iran, 'I
must oppose another Presidential war'
Rand Paul bucks Trump on Iran, 'I
must oppose another Presidential war'
Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky.
Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., broke from
President Donald Trump and the vast majority of congressional Republicans on
the president’s strikes against Iran, arguing Congress should have had a say.
Paul, in a lengthy post on X,
quoted former President John Quincy Adams, who argued that “the executive
branch is the branch most prone to war, therefore, the Constitution, with
studied care, delegated the war power to the legislature.”
“As with all war, my first and
purest instinct is wish Americans soldiers safety and success in their
mission,” Paul said. “But my oath of office is to the Constitution, so with
studied care, I must oppose another Presidential war.”
Paul has routinely pushed back
against the administration’s use of force throughout Trump’s second term, and
has often partnered with Sen. Tim Kaine, D-Va., to push votes on war powers
resolutions that would rein in the president’s use of the military without
congressional approval.
Both Paul and Kaine already had a
war powers resolution in place to curb Trump’s military usage in Iran, with a
vote expected in the coming week.
Kaine already demanded that the
Senate return to vote on their war powers resolution.
Posted by Alex Miller
placeholder
2 hours ago
Omar, Squad lash out at Trump in
response to Iran strike: 'Illegal regime change war'
Omar, Squad lash out at Trump in
response to Iran strike: 'Illegal regime change war'
POLITICS
Omar, Squad lash out at Trump in
response to Iran strike: 'Illegal regime change war'
President Trump's decision to
attack Iran was quickly slammed by progressive members of the House including
Reps. Ilhan Omar, Rashida Tlaib, and Greg Casar.
Democratic Rep. Ilhan Omar, one of
President Donald Trump's most vocal critics, spoke out against the U.S. attack
on Iran in a Saturday morning social media post.
"Trump has launched an
illegal regime change war," the Minnesota Democrat posted on X. "As
someone who has survived the horrors of war, I know military strikes will not
make us safer; they will inflame tensions and push the region further into
chaos."
Omar, a Somali refugee, added,
"When we abandon diplomacy, we choose destruction."
Earlier in the day, Omar reposted
a message from Democratic Rep. Rashida Tlaib, who also criticized Trump's
actions.
"He doesn't care about our
loved ones in the military," Tlaib's post said. "He doesn't care
about the fact that Americans don't want this war. He doesn't care about the
Iranian people. He is corrupted. Don't fall for the lies."
Posted by Andrew Mark Miller
2 hours ago
Leader Thune backs Trump's strikes
in Iran despite 'dogged pursuit' by administration to resolve pea
Leader Thune backs Trump's strikes
in Iran despite 'dogged pursuit' by administration to resolve pea
Senate Majority Leader John Thune,
R-S.D.
Senate Majority Leader John Thune,
R-S.D., lauded President Donald Trump’s strikes against Iran as an action taken
after all other diplomatic avenues were exhausted.
“For years, Iran’s relentless
nuclear ambitions, its expanded ballistic missile inventory, and its unwavering
support for terror groups in the region have posed a clear and unacceptable
threat to U.S. servicemembers, citizens in the region, and many of our allies,”
Thune said in a statement.
“Despite the dogged efforts of the
president and his administration, the Iranian regime has refused the diplomatic
off-ramps that would peacefully resolve these national security concerns,” he
continued. “I commend President Trump for taking action to thwart these
threats.”
Thune earlier in the week said
ahead of the strikes that the most important aspect of the then ongoing
negotiations with Iran was “to prevent them from having nuclear capability.”
“In my view, if you're going to do
something there, you better well make it about getting new leadership and
regime change,” Thune said.
He and other congressional leaders
were briefed by Secretary of State Marco Rubio earlier in the week, and a
source familiar told Fox News Digital that Thune had been pinged ahead of the
strikes, just as House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., had.
“I thank Secretary Rubio for
providing updates on these issues throughout the week, and I look forward to
administration officials briefing all senators about these military
operations,” Thune said. “I commend the bravery of the servicemembers carrying
out these operations and pray for the safety of those in harm’s way.”
Posted by Alex Miller
3 hours ago
Israel targets Iran’s supreme
leader in sweeping strikes as US joins ‘Operation Epic Fury’
Israel targets Iran’s supreme
leader in sweeping strikes as US joins ‘Operation Epic Fury’
Office of the Iranian Supreme
Leader via AP
In a sweeping pre-dawn bombing
campaign across Iran, Israeli forces targeted sites linked to Iran’s Supreme
Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, a senior Israeli official confirmed to Fox News.
The official said Iran’s president was also targeted as part of the joint U.S.
operation, dubbed Operation Epic Fury.
Reuters reported that Khamenei was
not in Tehran during the strikes and was instead transferred to a secure
location.
President Donald Trump described
the "massive and ongoing" operation as the opening phase of a
campaign that he said would devastate Iran’s military, dismantle its nuclear
program and ultimately bring about regime change.
"It will be yours to
take," Trump said in a video statement addressing the Iranian public.
Hours later, Tehran signaled it
would not back down, saying it would defend itself against any attack.
"This will be probably your
only chance for generations," he added. Officials in Tehran said the
country would defend itself against any attack.
This is an excerpt from a story
written by Amanda Macias.
Posted by Rachel Wolf
placeholder
3 hours ago
Kaine demands Senate return,
immediately vote to curb Trump's ‘idiotic’ strikes in Iran
Kaine demands Senate return,
immediately vote to curb Trump's ‘idiotic’ strikes in Iran
Sen. Tim Kaine, D-Va.
Sen. Tim Kaine, D-Va., wants the
Senate to immediately return to Washington, D.C., to put a check on President
Donald Trump’s war powers in Iran.
“Has President Trump learned
nothing from decades of U.S. meddling in Iran and forever wars in the Middle
East,” Kaine questioned in a statement Saturday. “Is he too mentally
incapacitated to realize that we had a diplomatic agreement with Iran that was
keeping its nuclear program in check, until he ripped it up during his first
term?”
Kaine, along with Sen. Rand Paul,
R-Ky., have been the main opponents in the upper chamber to Trump’s use of the
military across the globe, be it in the Caribbean or Middle East. Time and
again the duo have sought to rein in his power and reassert Congress’ authority.
The lawmaker earlier this week
announced that another war powers resolution, this time geared toward
preventing military action in Iran without Congress’ say-so, would be hitting
the Senate floor next week.
“These strikes are a colossal
mistake, and I pray they do not cost our sons and daughters in uniform and at
embassies throughout the region their lives,” Kaine said. “The Senate should
immediately return to session and vote on my War Powers Resolution to block the
use of U.S. forces in hostilities against Iran.”
“Every single Senator needs to go
on the record about this dangerous, unnecessary, and idiotic action,” he
continued.
Posted by Alex Miller
3 hours ago
House Democrat defends Trump's
strikes on Iran: 'Stop them from taking more lives'
President Donald Trump’s strikes
in Iran got rare Democratic support on Saturday morning.
Rep. Greg Landsman, D-Ohio,
released a statement pointing out that Tehran has long destabilized the Middle
East and that the U.S. strikes were “targeting military infrastructure – with
warnings to Iranian civilians to take shelter away from these military
targets.”
“The U.S. is destroying Iran’s
missiles and bombs to stop them from taking more lives,” Landsman said. “For
decades, the regime has caused mayhem and bloodshed through Hezbollah in
Lebanon, Hamas in Gaza, the Houthis in Yemen – all while the people of Iran
have suffered. When the Iranian people stood up to protest the regime last
month, the regime murdered tens of thousands of its own people.”
“I want a lasting peace for
everyone in the region – from the Iranian people to the Lebanese, Palestinians,
Syrians, Iraqis, Jordanians, and Israelis. I hope these targeted strikes on the
Iranian regime’s military assets ends the regime’s mayhem and bloodshed and makes
way for this lasting peace in the region.”
While not mentioning Trump
directly, he thanked U.S. service members in the region and said, “May peace
emerge from all of this.”
Posted by Elizabeth Elkind
3 hours ago
Dem compares Trump’s Iran strikes
to same ‘foolish decision’ made by Bush
Dem compares Trump’s Iran strikes
to same ‘foolish decision’ made by Bush
Sen. Andy Kim, D-N.J.
Sen. Andy Kim, D-N.J., warned that
President Donald Trump was making the same mistake as one of his predecessors
with Operation Epic Fury.
“By launching strikes, President
Trump has made the same dangerous and foolish decision President Bush did a
generation ago,” Kim said on X. “He put Americans in harm’s way without clearly
showing there’s an imminent threat to our national security.”
Trump’s remarks in the early
morning hours of Saturday pitched the joint operation with Israel as a means to
empower Iran’s people to “seize control of [their] destiny.”
Last summer, Trump launched Operation
Midnight Hammer to ensure the Iranian government was incapable of creating a
nuclear bomb. Ahead of Saturday's strikes, Trump refused to rule out the
possibility of U.S. strikes if Iran could not agree to a sweeping nuclear deal.
The president had also warned of possible U.S. intervention in response to the
regime's deadly crackdown on protesters.
“They can never have a nuclear
weapon," Trump said.
Whether that reasoning will fly
with lawmakers is a mixed bag.
Kim charged that Trump had “once
again started a cycle of violence that has already escalated and could spiral
out of control,” and demanded that the Senate vote on a war powers resolution
to rein in his military authority in the region.
“This is unacceptable,” Kim said.
Posted by Alex Miller
placeholder
3 hours ago
Levin calls for unity after Iran
strike: 'You are either on Team America or you are not'
Conservative commentator and Fox
News host Mark Levin reacted to the U.S. attack on Iran in a lengthy X post on
Saturday morning, saying, "GOD BLESS AMERICA, OUR PRESIDENT, AND OUR ARMED
FORCES."
In the X post, Levin said it is
"very important" that the American people show President Trump, the
U.S. armed forces, and the world that the country is "united in this
greatest of peace missions."
"And let us be clear that
those politicians and media outlets that resort to their usual efforts at
sabotaging our country for personal political and ideological purposes will not
be tolerated -- we will take note and you will suffer at the ballot box and in
your precious ratings," Levin, one of the most prominent voices supporting
military actions in Iran, wrote in his post.
"You are either on Team
America or you are not," Levin said, adding that he could "not be
prouder" of the president and members of his administration.
Levin praised our allies who were
involved in the strike, both known and unknown, especially Israel, which he
said is "fighting alongside us as brothers and sisters."
Levin called the strikes a
"monumental and historic peace mission" that will put an end to the
"illegitimate Islamist-Nazi regime" in Iran.
Levin then spoke directly to the
Iranian people:
"And to the Persian people,
you have suffered horribly, and long enough.
You are a great people who have always wanted freedom and peace. I truly believe that you will once again be
able to rise up against these mass murderers, but this time can succeed with
our help. Our President is a great man
with deep compassion and incredible courage.
He is a historic figure who seeks peace throughout the world. He is the great liberator. The same is true of Israel's incredible Prime
Minister. These are truly remarkable
men. God bless them and the armed forces
who are bravely fighting for our security and freedom, and liberating tens of
millions of Persian citizens."
Posted by Andrew Mark Miller
3 hours ago
State Dept urges US citizens to
depart Lebanon now 'while commercial options remain available'
The U.S. Embassy in Beirut has
advised U.S. citizens still in Lebanon to leave "while commercial options
remain available" as the U.S. and Israel hit Iran with Operation Epic
Fury. Additionally, the embassy urged U.S. citizens not to travel to Lebanon.
"Americans who choose not to
depart at this time should prepare contingency plans should the situation
deteriorate. These alternative plans should not rely on the U.S. government for
assisted departure or evacuation," the embassy said in a statement.
"We recommend that U.S. citizens who choose not to depart be prepared to
shelter in place should the situation deteriorate further."
Posted by Rachel Wolf
3 hours ago
If Khamenei falls, who takes Iran?
Strikes will expose power vacuum — and the IRGC’s grip
If Khamenei falls, who takes Iran?
Strikes will expose power vacuum — and the IRGC’s grip
Office of the Iranian Supreme
Leader via AP
As U.S. and Israeli forces strike
deep inside Iran — reportedly targeting senior regime officials including
Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and President Masoud Pezeshkian — the
question of who would lead Iran if the Islamic Republic collapses is no longer
theoretical.
Iran has retaliated with missile
barrages against U.S. positions across the Middle East, and while Iranian state
media says top leaders remain alive and have been moved to secure locations,
the direct targeting of political and military leadership marks a dramatic
escalation.
Yet despite the intensity of the
moment, regional analysts say there is no obvious successor poised to take
control of the country.
Experts consistently point to one
determining factor: whether Iran’s coercive institutions — particularly the
Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) — fracture or consolidate.
If the IRGC remains cohesive, the
most likely outcome is not democratic transition but a harder, more openly
security-dominated system. A clerical reshuffle or military-led consolidation
could preserve much of the existing power structure even if key figures are
removed.
One of the most prominent
opposition figures abroad is Reza Pahlavi, son of Iran’s last shah. He has
lived outside Iran since the 1979 revolution and has spent decades advocating
for a secular, democratic system.
Posted by Morgan Phillips
placeholder
3 hours ago
Fetterman praises Operation Epic
Fury: Trump is 'willing to do what's right'
As one of Israel's staunchest
defenders from the left, Sen. John Fetterman, D-Pa., full-throatedly endorsed
President Donald Trump's attacks on Iran as lawmakers on both sides of the
aisle reacted Saturday morning.
"President Trump has been
willing to do what's right and necessary to produce real peace in the
region," Fetterman wrote on X. "God bless the United States, our
great military, and Israel."
Posted by Rachel Wolf
4 hours ago
Trump admin briefed House Speaker
Mike Johnson ahead of Iran strikes
Trump admin briefed House Speaker
Mike Johnson ahead of Iran strikes
Speaker Mike Johnson was briefed
ahead of the strikes on Iran, his spokesperson said. (Credit: Getty Images)
Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., was
notified by the Trump administration before strikes on Iran were carried out, a
spokesperson told Fox News Digital on Saturday morning.
Johnson got a call from Secretary
of State Marco Rubio before the joint operation between the U.S. and Israel
began.
It’s customary for an
administration to brief congressional leadership before any significant
military actions, which it also did when the U.S. engaged in an operation to
capture Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro weeks earlier.
The speaker has not yet made any
comments on the Iran operation but is likely to do so sometime Saturday
morning.
The only member of congressional
leadership to have released a statement so far is House Majority Whip Tom
Emmer, R-Minn., who praised it as a “bold and decisive act of strength.”
Posted by Elizabeth Elkind
4 hours ago
Iran retaliates with missiles
strikes at US facilities in multiple countries
Iran has started retaliating after
the U.S. and Israel launched Operation Epic Fury early Saturday morning.
Fox News' Jennifer Griffin
reported that approximately 40 missiles had landed in Israel. Meanwhile, the
U.S. military in Iraq intercepted at least one missile targeting U.S.
facilities. Additionally, Iran appeared to hit the U.S. Navy's Fifth Fleet, but
no casualties were reported and it appeared as though the regime struck an
empty warehouse.
Iran also launched missiles at
Saudi Arabia and Jordan, where the U.S. has squadrons of advanced fighter jets,
Griffin reported. This led to condemnations from Jordan, the U.A.E. and others.
Omani Foreign Minister Sayyid Badr
bin Hamad Al Busaidi said on X that he was "dismayed" by the attacks
after her recently mediated indirect talks between the U.S. and Iran.
"I am dismayed. Active and
serious negotiations have yet again been undermined. Neither the interests of
the United States nor the cause of global peace are well served by this. And I
pray for the innocents who will suffer. I urge the United States not to get
sucked in further. This is not your war," the foreign minister said.
Posted by Rachel Wolf
4 hours ago
Oman's Foreign Ministry expresses
'profound regret' as US, Israel hit Iran
Oman's Foreign Ministry expresses
'profound regret' as US, Israel hit Iran
Majid Asgaripour/WANA (West Asia
News Agency) via Reuters
The Omani Foreign Ministry
condemned Operation Epic Fury, which the U.S. and Israel launched against Iran
on Saturday.
"The Ministry of Foreign
Affairs expresses the Sultanate of Oman's profound regret over the military
operations launched by Israel and the United States of America against the
Islamic Republic of Iran, warning of the danger of the conflict expanding into
consequences that cannot be rectified in the region," the Omani Foreign
Ministry said in a statement, according to X's translation.
"The Sultanate of Oman
considers this action to be in contravention of the rules of international law
and the principle of resolving issues through peaceful means rather than
hostile means, the shedding of blood, and calls on all parties to immediately
suspend military operations, while urging the United Nations Security Council
to convene an urgent meeting to impose a ceasefire and for the international
community to take a clear stance in support of international law," it
added.
Posted by Rachel Wolf
5 hours ago
Israel releases video of
airstrikes in Iran
The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) on
Saturday published a video of its airstrike on missile launchers in western
Iran as Israel and the U.S. take part in a joint effort against Tehran.
"Within the ‘Roaring Lion’
operation, the IDF struck with the direction of IDF intelligence, hundreds of
Iranian military targets, including missile launchers in western Iran,"
the IDF's statement read.
"Alongside the IAF’s strikes
in Iran, the Aerial Defense Array is currently identifying and intercepting
threats fired from Iran toward the State of Israel," the IDF added.
Posted by Rachel Wolf
5 hours ago
Iran speaks out as US, Israel
carry out Operation Epic Fury
Iran speaks out as US, Israel
carry out Operation Epic Fury
Majid Asgaripour/WANA (West Asia
News Agency) via Reuters
Iran's Foreign Ministry blasted
the U.S. and Israel, which began carrying out Operation Epic Fury on Saturday.
"Our sacred and beloved
homeland, proud and civilization-making Iran, has once again been subjected to
criminal military aggression by the #UnitedStates and the #ZionistRegime,"
Iran's Foreign Ministry said in a statement posted on X.
The Iranian Foreign Ministry
called the attacks by the U.S. and Israel "a gross violation of Iran’s
territorial integrity and national sovereignty."
Iran also called on the United
Nations and the Security Council, where the U.S. has veto power, to act as the
attacks unfold. Tehran claimed that the attacks by the U.S. and Israel, which
it calls "the Zionist regime" were carried out in violation of the
U.N. Charter.
"All member states of the
United Nations, especially regional and Islamic countries, members of the
Non-Aligned Movement, and all states that feel responsible for international
peace and security, are expected to firmly condemn this act of aggression and
take urgent and collective action to confront it, which has undoubtedly exposed
the peace and security of the region and the world to an unprecedented threat,"
Iran's Foreign Ministry said.
Posted by Rachel Wolf
placeholder
5 hours ago
Emmer makes first statement from
congressional leadership on Iran strikes
House Majority Whip Tom Emmer,
R-Minn., is praising President Donald Trump after the U.S. and Israel began joint
strikes on Iran overnight.
“This is a bold, decisive act of
strength by President Trump. The Ayatollah is responsible for killing hundreds
of U.S. service members and slaughtering its own people,” Emmer told Fox News
Digital.
“We pray that because of this
leadership, the U.S. and the world will be a safer place. May God bless and
protect the men and women of our military conducting this mission and serving
in the region.”
It’s the first significant
statement on the operation from a member of congressional leadership.
Emmer has been one of Trump’s most
vocal allies on Capitol Hill so far this term.
Posted by Elizabeth Elkind
5 hours ago
Qatar reserves 'full right' to
defend itself against 'Iranian aggression,' calls for dialogue
Qatar reserves 'full right' to
defend itself against 'Iranian aggression,' calls for dialogue
A plume of smoke rises following a
reported explosion in Tehran on Feb. 28, 2026. (ATTA KENARE/AFP via Getty
Images)
Qatar’s Foreign Ministry said it
reserves its “full right” to defend itself after what it described as Iranian
aggression targeting Qatari territory.
Qatar’s Defense Ministry said it
had “successfully thwarted a number of attacks targeting the country’s
territory” after multiple rounds of alerts sounded. Authorities reported no
immediate injuries or damage in residential areas.
In a statement, Qatar’s Foreign
Ministry said the state will respond in accordance with international law and
in a manner proportionate to the nature of the attack, in defense of its
sovereignty and national security.
The ministry said targeting Qatari
territory contradicts the “principles of good neighborliness” and “cannot be
accepted under any pretext or justification.”
Qatar also condemned what it
described as violations of the sovereignty of Kuwait, the United Arab Emirates,
Jordan and Bahrain, expressing full solidarity with those nations.
Despite the escalation, the
ministry reiterated its call for dialogue with Iran and urged an immediate halt
to hostilities and a return to negotiations.
Blasts were reported across
several Gulf states hosting U.S. military assets, including Qatar, according to
Al Jazeera, after the United States and Israel launched military strikes across
Iranian territory.
The outlet cited Iran’s Fars News
Agency as confirming attacks targeting military bases in the region, including
Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar, which serves as the forward headquarters of U.S.
Central Command.
Posted by Michael Dorgan
5 hours ago
Ukraine declares its support for
the Iranian people, ties the regime to Russia in scathing statement
Ukraine ripped the Iranian regime
and its ties to Russia in a statement on Saturday, as it also declared its
support for the people of Iran.
"The Iranian regime, which
has been mocking the Iranian people for decades, has launched a large-scale
policy of violence against its own people and other countries. This includes
massive human rights violations within the country, support for militants who
have brought chaos to other countries in the region, and direct military
support for the aggressor state of Russia in its unprovoked war of aggression
against Ukraine. We remember and will never forget the strikes of thousands of
'Shaheeds' on our peaceful cities and people," Ukraine's Ministry of
Foreign Affairs (MFA) said in a statement.
"Such cooperation between the
regimes in Moscow and Tehran constitutes a gross violation of international law
and undermines global efforts to restore peace and stability."
The Ukrainian MFA also condemned
Iran's human rights abuses as well as the oppression of its own people.
"The reason for the current
events is precisely the violence and arbitrariness of the Iranian regime, in
particular the murders and repressions against peaceful protesters, which have
become particularly large-scale in recent months," the statement read.
Posted by Rachel Wolf
placeholder
5 hours ago
NYPD 'closely monitoring' the
situation in Iran and the Middle East
The New York Police Department
(NYPD) said it is "closely monitoring" the situation unfolding in
Iran as the U.S. and Israel participate in joint attacks. The department also
said that it was coordinating with its federal and international partners.
"As is our protocol and out
of an abundance of caution, we will be enhancing patrols to sensitive locations
throughout the city, including diplomatic, cultural, religious, and other
relevant sites," the NYPD's statement read.
Posted by Rachel Wolf
6 hours ago
Iranian group releases plan to
turn country into a democratic republic amid US, Israel strikes
The provisional government of
National Council of Resistance of Iran's (NCRI), an Iranian dissidents group,
said on Saturday that it was looking to transform the country from a
dictatorship into a democratic republic based on its president-elect's plan.
The 10-point plan was released by
NCRI's president-elect Maryam Rajavi in June 2020 and it outlines the steps
needed in order to bring freedom to Iran.
The first step of the plan calls
for the rejection of clerical rule in favor of a republic built on
"universal suffrage and pluralism." The second step calls for freedom
of speech, political parties, assembly, the press and the internet, as well as
the disbanding of several entities, namely the Islamic Revolutionary Guard
Corps (IRGC), the Quds Force, plainclothes groups, the Basij, the Ministry of
Intelligence, the Council of the Cultural Revolution and all suppressive
patrols and institutions in cities, villages, schools, universities, offices
and factories.
The third step involves a
commitment to individual and social freedom, which Rajavi says will be in
accordance with the Universal Declaration of Humans Rights. This would involve
the disbanding of agencies that oversee "censorship and inquisition"
as well as "seeking justice for massacred political prisoners," as
well as the prohibition of torture and the end of the death penalty. The fourth
step then calls for a separation of church and state, as well as freedom of
religion.
In the fifth step, Rajavi seeks to
establish gender equality in several parts of society and to allow for the
"equal participation of women in political leadership." This step
would also abolish discrimination, end the country's modesty laws, allow for
freedom to marry and divorce and to obtain education and employment. It also
would prohibit the exploitation of women.
The sixth step would establish an
independent jury and legal system in accordance with international standards
that is based on the presumption of innocence, as well as the right to an
attorney, right of appeal and the right to be tried in a public court. With
this step, Rajavi plans to also abolish Sharia law and shut down Islamic
Revolutionary Courts.
The seventh step would see the end
of Iran's "double injustices against Iranian nationalities and
ethnicities," which would follow NCRI's plan for the autonomy of Iranian
Kurdistan.
The eighth step calls for justice
and equal opportunities in employment and entrepreneurship for all Iranians in
a free market economy, restoring rights for blue-collar workers, farmers,
nurses, white-collar workers, teachers and retirees.
In the ninth step, the group seeks
to protect and restore the environment, which it says was "massacred under
the rule of the mullahs."
The tenth and final step calls for
"non-nuclear Iran that is also devoid of weapons of mass destruction"
as well as peace and regional and international cooperation.
Posted by Rachel Wolf
6 hours ago
Iran vows ‘decisive’ retaliation
after US, Israel launch strikes
Iran vows ‘decisive’ retaliation
after US, Israel launch strikes
Smoke rises over Tehran after
Israeli forces launched a second wave of airstrikes on Iran, Feb. 28, 2026.
(Fatemeh Bahrami/Anadolu via Getty Images)
Iran’s Foreign Ministry vowed a
“decisive and definitive” response Saturday after the United States and Israel
launched military strikes across Iranian territory.
The ministry called the attacks a
violation of the U.N. Charter and warned that its armed forces “will not
hesitate” to defend the country, vowing to make "the aggressors regret
their criminal act."
“The armed forces of the Islamic
Republic of Iran will decisively respond to the aggressors with authority,” the
ministry said.
“History bears witness that
Iranians have never bowed their heads in submission to foreign aggression and
domination; this time too, the response of the Iranian nation will be decisive
and definitive,” it added.
The ministry said the strikes hit
targets in several cities and amounted to “overt armed aggression.”
It said responding to the attacks
is Iran’s “legal and legitimate right” under Article 51 of the U.N. Charter and
that its armed forces will use all their capabilities and resources to counter
what it described as "criminal aggression."
Posted by Michael Dorgan
placeholder
6 hours ago
Strikes on Iran will last days,
not hours, US official says
Strikes on Iran will last days,
not hours, US official says
AP Photo
A U.S. official has told Fox News
that the strikes on Iran are expected to last for days, rather than a few
hours.
Additionally, the official and a
source confirmed to Fox News that there were no casualties resulting from Iran
hit's on a U.S. Navy base in Bahrain. The source said the strike hit an empty
warehouse.
Posted by Rachel Wolf
7 hours ago
Saudi Arabia condemns Iran's
strikes on Trump-aligned Arab states
Saudi Arabia on Saturday issued a
statement condemning Iran’s attacks on several Arab nations, including ones
that have aligned themselves with President Donald Trump. The statement comes
as the U.S. and Israel engage in joint attacks on Iran.
“The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
condemns and denounces in the strongest terms the treacherous Iranian
aggression and the blatant violation of the sovereignty of each of the United
Arab Emirates, the Kingdom of Bahrain, the State of Qatar, the State of Kuwait,
and the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan, affirming its full solidarity and standing
by the side of the sister states, and placing all its capabilities at their
disposal to support them in all measures they take, and warning of the grave
consequences of the continued violation of the sovereignty of states and the principles
of international law,” the statement read, according to X's translation.
Posted by Rachel Wolf
7 hours ago
IDF plans to call up roughly
70,000 reservists following US-Israel joint attack on Iran: source
IDF plans to call up roughly
70,000 reservists following US-Israel joint attack on Iran: source
An IDF tactical flag patch seen on
a soldier. (Nataly Hanin/Getty)
A source who took part in a recent
Israeli military meeting told Fox News there are plans to call up roughly
70,000 reservists over the next few days, following a joint US-Israel attack on
Iran.
As incoming fire is expected from
Iran, the reservists will be tasked with manning the Israel Defense Forces
(IDF)'s air defense systems, according to the source.
Dozens of strikes were reportedly
carried out against Iran Saturday morning, with the source noting the military
is operating at the "highest level with American counterparts."
Many Islamic Revolutionary Guard
Corps (IRGC) commanders and officials were targeted in strikes, according to
initial reports.
Fox News' chief foreign
correspondent Trey Yingst contributed to this report.
Posted by Alexandra Koch
7 hours ago
Former shah of Iran calls joint
US-Israel attack 'humanitarian intervention' from POTUS
Reza Pahlavi, the former crown
prince of Iran, described the joint US-Israel attack on the country as promised
"aid," and an act of "humanitarian intervention" by
President Donald Trump.
Following the reported nationwide
strikes, Pahlavi called on Iranian citizens to abandon support for the regime,
and the U.S. to "exercise the utmost caution" to preserve civilian
lives.
"Moments of destiny lie ahead
of us," Pahlavi wrote in a statement on social media. "... Even with
the arrival of this aid, the final victory will still be forged by our hands.
It is we, the people of Iran, who will finish the job in this final battle. The
time to return to the streets is near."
"Now that the Islamic
Republic is collapsing, my message to the country's military, police, and
security forces is clear: You have sworn an oath to protect Iran and the
Iranian people — not the Islamic Republic and its leaders," he continued.
"Your duty is to defend the people, not a regime that has taken our
homeland hostage through repression and crime. Join the people and help bring
about a stable and secure transition. Otherwise, you will go down with
Khamenei's sinking ship and his regime."
Pahlavi warned citizens to remain
in their homes and stay vigilant, so that when he announces an
"appropriate time," Iranians can "return to the streets for the
final action."
"We are very close to final
victory," he wrote. "I want to be by your side as soon as possible so
that together we can take back and rebuild Iran."
Posted by Alexandra Koch
Breaking News7 hours ago
Iran's supreme leader, president
targeted in attack: senior Israeli official
Iran's supreme leader, president
targeted in attack: senior Israeli official
Map of explosions reported on
Tehran street housing key military and presidential offices. (Fox News)
A senior Israeli official
confirmed to Fox News Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and President Masoud
Pezeshkian were targeted in Saturday's joint U.S.-Israel attack on Iran.
The official noted military forces
also focused on taking out "those responsible for commanding the mass
murder of Iranian protesters."
"Battle damage assessments
will come out later," the official said.
Posted by Alexandra Koch
8 hours ago
Israel targeting Iran’s
leadership, US focusing on sites that pose 'imminent threat': US official
Israel targeting Iran’s
leadership, US focusing on sites that pose 'imminent threat': US official
Smoke rises over the city center
after an explosion in Tehran, Iran on February 28, 2026. (Fatemeh
Bahrami/Anadolu via Getty Images)
A U.S. official told Fox News that
Israel is targeting Iranian leadership in its brazen morning attack against the
regime, but the U.S. is setting its sights on military targets and ballistic
missile sites that pose an “imminent threat.”
The U.S. military is not targeting
Iran’s leadership, the official said.
Posted by Alexandra Koch
placeholder
8 hours ago
Israeli Air Force conducting broad
strike on military targets belonging to Iranian regime
Israeli Air Force conducting broad
strike on military targets belonging to Iranian regime
Israeli air defense systems
intercepted and destroyed several missiles over the skies of Jerusalem, after
the Israeli army announced that it had detected a retaliatory missile attack
from Iran on February 28, 2026. (Gazi Samad/Anadolu via Getty Images)
The Israel Defense Forces (IDF)
confirmed the Israeli Air Force is conducting a broad strike on a number of
military targets belonging to the Iranian regime in western Iran.
Israel's "Operation Lion's
Roar" aims to fundamentally strike the Iranian terror regime and remove
existential threats to the State of Israel for the long term, according to a
statement from the IDF.
The strike included attacks on
dozens of military targets and was carried out as part of a broad, coordinated
and joint offensive against the regime.
"The Iranian regime has not
abandoned its plan to destroy Israel," the IDF said. "In recent
months, despite the heavy blow it suffered during Operation 'rising lion,' the
IDF identified that the regime continued its efforts to fortify, protect, and
conceal its nuclear programs, alongside rehabilitating its missile production
process."
Israeli officials also accused the
regime of continuing to fund, train and arm its proxies stationed along
Israel's borders.
"These actions constitute an
existential threat to the State of Israel and threaten the Middle East and the
entire world," the IDF said.
Joint planning between the IDF and
the U.S. Military spanned months prior to Saturday's ambush.
The Chief of the General Staff,
Lt. Gen. (Rav-Aluf) Eyal Zamir, and IDF commanders are conducting a situational
assessment.
Numerous IDF forces are deployed in
forward defense and are prepared for offense across all sectors against any
enemy, according to the IDF.
"The IDF will continue to act
to cut off any emerging threat against the citizens of the State of Israel,
anywhere and at any time," Israeli officials said. "Even at this
moment, the Air Force continues to strike across Iran based on precise
intelligence. The operation will continue for as long as necessary."
Fox News' Yonat Friling
contributed to this report.
Posted by Alexandra Koch
8 hours ago
Iranian foreign minister says
response would target 'all' US military bases in the region
Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas
Araqchi said Iran's response to the joint U.S.-Israel attack on the country
would be to target "all" U.S. military bases in the region.
U.S. military infrastructure
within Iran's missile range include: Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar, forward
headquarters for U.S. Central Command; Naval Support Activity Bahrain, home to
the U.S. 5th Fleet; Camp Arifjan in Kuwait, a major Army logistics and command
hub; Ali Al Salem Air Base in Kuwait, used by U.S. Air Force units; Prince
Sultan Air Base in Saudi Arabia; Al Dhafra Air Base in the United Arab
Emirates; and Muwaffaq Salti Air Base in Jordan, which hosts U.S. aircraft.
The foreign minister's threats
came as the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) issued an urgent warning to all people
staying inside or near military industrial factories and military
infrastructure across Iran.
"You are in proximity to
weapons and facilities that are dangerous," the IDF wrote in a statement.
"For the sake of your safety
and health, we kindly request that you immediately evacuate these areas and
remain outside them until a new announcement is issued," they continued.
"Your presence in these locations puts your life at risk."
Posted by Alexandra Koch
8 hours ago
US embassies issue slew of
shelter-in-place warnings amid Iran attack
US embassies issue slew of
shelter-in-place warnings amid Iran attack
A map of explosions heard across
Iran Saturday morning. (Fox News)
American embassies in Qatar,
Manama, Jordan and Abu Dhabi, along with the U.S. Consulate in Dubai, have
issued shelter-in-place orders for all personnel following the U.S.-Israel
joint attack on Iran Saturday morning.
Officials recommended all
Americans also shelter-in-place "until further notice."
Qatar, which has previously been
attacked by Iran, is home to Al Udeid Air Base, forward headquarters for U.S.
Central Command.
Thousands of American service
members are stationed at the base.
Posted by Alexandra Koch
placeholder
9 hours ago
Initial strike in Iran attack
targeted area near Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei's offices
Initial strike in Iran attack
targeted area near Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei's offices
Smoke was seen rising in Tehran
after the joint Israel-U.S. attack Saturday morning. (AP)
While military strikes have been
reported nationwide, the initial joint attack was reportedly focused in an area
near the offices of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.
The Associated Press reported the
first apparent strike hit near Khamenei's compound and main offices in downtown
Tehran.
It is unclear if the Iranian
leader was in the area at the time of the attack.
Posted by Alexandra Koch
9 hours ago
Department of War dubs attack on
Iran 'Operation Epic Fury'
The Department of War announced
the Saturday morning U.S. military attack against the Islamic Republic of Iran
has been dubbed "Operation Epic Fury."
The announcement came minutes
after Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who coordinated the blitz with
the U.S., announced the Jewish State's mission was called “Operation Roaring
Lion."
Posted by Alexandra Koch
9 hours ago
Iran begins response to Israel-US
attack, IDF responding to missiles
Iran has started launching
missiles toward Israel in response to a joint attack from the Jewish State and
the United States on Saturday morning.
The Israel Defense Forces said the
Israeli Air Force was responding to the missiles launched from Iran.
“At this time, the IAF is
operating to intercept and strike threats where necessary to remove the
threat,” the IDF said, adding that sirens were sounding in several areas across
the country.
Iran’s response “appears to be
limited” at the moment, according to Fox News correspondent Trey Yingst.
Posted by Michael Sinkewicz
placeholder
10 hours ago
Netanyahu names attack on Iran
'Operation Roaring Lion'
Netanyahu names attack on Iran
'Operation Roaring Lion'
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin
Netanyahu named the military operation against Iran “Operation Roaring
Lion."
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin
Netanyahu has named the military operation against the Islamic Republic of Iran
“Operation Roaring Lion,” his office said.
The U.S. and Israel launched a
joint attack against Iran just after 9 a.m. local time.
Posted by Michael Sinkewicz
10 hours ago
Trump confirms US involvement in
Iran attack, says 'not going to put up' with regime's 'mass terror'
President Donald Trump confirmed
Saturday that the U.S. is carrying out "major combat operations in
Iran."
In video remarks posted to Truth
Social, Trump said the objective is to defend Americans by eliminating imminent
threats from the Iranian regime, describing it as "a vicious group of very
hard, terrible people."
"It's been mass terror and we
are not going to put up with it any longer," Trump said.
He added that "it has always
been the policy of the United States, in particular my administration, that
this terrorist regime can never have a nuclear weapon. I'll say it again, they
can never have a nuclear weapon."
Posted by Michael Sinkewicz
10 hours ago
Israel-US attack on Iran had
'element of surprise'
A joint attack on Iran by Israel
and the United States on Saturday morning had an "element of
surprise," according to Fox News Chief National Security Correspondent
Jennifer Griffin.
The attack was carried out just
after 9 a.m. local time in daylight.
Griffin said she believes U.S. and
Israeli officials wanted Iran to see the strikes and what was being targeted.
She said she expects more military
activity over the next few hours.
Posted by Michael Sinkewicz
11 hours ago
US participating in Israel's
attack on Iran: US official
US participating in Israel's
attack on Iran: US official
Smoke rises on the skyline after
an explosion in Tehran, Iran, Saturday, Feb. 28, 2026. (AP Photo)
The United States is participating
in preemptive strikes Israel launched against Iran on Saturday, a U.S. official
confirmed to Fox News.
Israeli Defense Minister Israel
Katz declared a special and immediate state of emergency across the entire
country.
He said the strike was "to
remove threats" against the state of Israel.
A11 X16 X16 FROM GUK
The rise and fall of Iran’s
ruthless and pragmatic Ayatollah Ali Khamenei
The
radical cleric took over as supreme leader in 1989 and is likely to be replaced
by hardline figures
US-Israeli attack on Iran – live updates
What we know so far: US and Israel wage war on Iran
War on Iran: how the US-Israeli bid for regime change
unfolded
By Jason Burke Sat 28 Feb 2026 15.20 EST
When he appeared in
public for the first time in five years in October 2024, Iran’s supreme
leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, had an uncompromising message:
Israel “won’t last long”, he told tens of thousands of supporters at a mosque
in Tehran in a Friday sermon.
“We must stand up
against the enemy while strengthening our unwavering faith,” the
then-84-year-old told the gathering.
Seventeen months
later, Khamenei faced his final climactic confrontation after decades of bitter
struggle against multiple enemies.
Benjamin Netanyahu said on Saturday
that there were many signs indicating Khamenei “is no longer with us”, without
explicitly confirming his death. Hours later, after Donald Trump also claimed
Khamenei had been killed, it was confirmed by Iranian state media.
It is very clear
that the supreme leader was in the crosshairs from the earliest moments of
Saturday’s strikes, with satellite imagery showing that his secure compound was
heavily damaged in the initial barrage.
Certainly, Israel
and the US have made little secret of their keen desire to eliminate Khamenei
and so trigger the downfall of the Islamic Republic of Iran in its present form.
Back in October
2024, Khamenei already appeared to have his back to a wall.
Days before, Israel
had killed Hassan Nasrallah, the veteran secretary general of Hezbollah, with
huge bombs dropped on the militant Islamist movement’s headquarters in Beirut.
The assassination was a personal blow to Khamenei, who had known Nasrallah for
decades.
The Israeli air
offensive against Iran in June last year was another such blow, revealing the
weakness of both Iran’s air defences and the coalition of Islamist militias
that Khamenei had built up to deter Israel. The Iranian barrage of missiles and
drones launched at Israel inflicted some damage but far from enough to stop
Israeli attacks. The war ended after Donald Trump dispatched
US bombers to strike Iranian nuclear sites, a grave setback to a programme that
Iran’s supreme leader had cherished.
That brief conflict
revealed that Khamenei had few good options left – a situation this careful,
pragmatic, conservative and ruthless revolutionary always sought to avoid.
Born the son of a minor cleric of modest means in the
eastern Iranian shrine city of Mashhad, Khamenei took his first steps as a
radical in the febrile atmosphere of the early 1960s. The then-shah Mohammad
Reza Pahlavi, had launched a major reform project largely rejected by the
country’s conservative clergy.
As a young religious student in Qom, a centre of
theology, Khamenei had soaked in the traditions of Shia Islam and the radical
new thinking of the emerging leader of the conservative opposition, Ayatollah
Ruhollah Khomeini. By the late 1960s, Khamenei was running secret missions for
Khomeini,
who had been exiled, and organising networks of Islamist activism.
Iran's supreme leader,
Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, killed in US-Israeli airstrike – video report
Khamenei soaked up
other influences, too. Though an avowed aficionado of western literature,
particularly Leo Tolstoy, Victor Hugo and John Steinbeck, the young activist
was steeped in the anti-colonial ideologies of the time and the anti-western
sentiment that often went with them. He met thinkers who sought to meld Marxism
and Islamism to create new ideologies, liked works describing the
“westoxification” of his country and translated works by Sayyid Qutb, an
Egyptian who would inspire generations of Islamist extremists, into Farsi.
Imprisoned
repeatedly by Iran’s feared security services, Khamenei was nonetheless able to take part in the vast
protests of 1978 that eventually convinced the shah to flee and allowed
Khomeini to return. A protege of the implacable cleric, he swiftly rose
up the hierarchy of the radical regime that seized power, and by 1981, after
surviving an assassination attempt that deprived him of the
use of an arm, he had won election to the largely ceremonial post of president.
When Khomeini died in 1989, Khamenei was selected as his
successor, once the constitution changed to allow someone of lesser clerical
qualifications to take on the role and with much greater powers
than before. Khamenei swiftly deployed these to consolidate his control over
the sprawling and fragmented apparatus of Iran’s post-revolutionary state.
One key power base was the Islamic Revolutionary Guard
Corps (IRGC), the beating activist heart of the new regime and a powerful
military, social and economic force. But Khamenei, as ever, was
careful to find other powerful allies and clients, too.
Through the 1990s,
he further strengthened his grip, eliminating opponents and rewarding those
loyal to him. Even poets Khamenei had once professed to admire were targeted by
security services. Overseas dissidents were hunted down, and the relationship with
Hezbollah, which the IRGC had helped found in the aftermath of the revolution,
was reinforced.
At all times, he
followed his strategy of pragmatically advancing the inflexible principles of
the project bequeathed him by his late mentor.
When in 1997, Mohammad Khatami, a reformist candidate,
won the presidency in a landslide, Khamenei allowed him some freedom of action but worked hard
and often forcefully to protect the core of the regime
and its ideology from any serious challenge.
Khamenei did not,
however, stop Khatami reaching out to Washington in an ultimately abortive
effort to establish better relations in the aftermath of the 9/11 attacks in 2001
and, following Khomenei’s example, forswore weapons of mass destruction.
But he also backed
the IRGC’s efforts to bleed US forces in Iraq after their 2003 invasion and extend Iranian
influence in the neighbouring country. This marked the further extension of his strategy of
relying on proxies to project power across the region and deter and threaten
Israel, named “Little Satan” by the revolutionaries in 1979, with the “Great
Satan” being the US.
Khamenei was
sceptical of the nuclear deal painstakingly negotiated by Iranian officials
with the US and others, but he did not oppose its implementation in 2015.
Analysts argue over whether he has sought to restrain or encourage hardliners
in the IRGC who have pushed for Iran to acquire a bomb.
Successive waves of
unrest and reform efforts were met with surges of vicious repression alongside
continuing harsh treatment of measures targeting women, gay people and
religious minorities. This, along with deteriorating economic circumstances,
disillusioned many erstwhile supporters of the regime and broadened existing
unrest. A pressure cooker of discontent was building.
Overseas, Khamenei
chose to invest heavily in the so-called axis of resistance – Hamas in Gaza, Hezbollah in Lebanon,
the Houthi movement in Yemen and a motley assortment of Islamic militant
militias in Syria and Iraq. This may have seemed a clever tactic but it
collapsed under the weight of Israeli attacks following the outbreak of war in
Gaza, while Iran’s
historic alliance with Damascus was ended with the fall of Bashar al-Assad’s
regime in December.
On Saturday, as US
and Israeli jets and missiles pounded Iran, striking Khamenei’s offices and
killing him, Hezbollah’s new leadership offered rhetorical support to Iran, but
nothing else. There is little Hamas can do to help, and the Houthis seem
frozen.
Thus weakened,
Khamenei has spent the last months facing spiralling crisis.
During his more than
three decades in power, Khamenei sought to navigate the pressures of
conflicting forces within Iran, to avoid outright war and to preserve
Khomeini’s legacy – as well as his own power and that of his immediate
loyalists, of course.
On the international
scene, it is possible to detect evidence of some remaining pragmatism. Faced with the huge
military power of the US and Donald Trump’s demands for massive concessions
that would strip away the last defences of his regime, Iran’s supreme leader
played for time, offering at least some concessions to forestall immediate
attack. Domestically, it was the hardline ideologue, not the master tactician,
who took centre stage as he sent police and paramilitary thugs to bloodily
crush the biggest wave of internal protest and unrest since the 1979 revolution
that set him on his way to power.
In the run-up to the
US and Israeli attacks, the Central
Intelligence Agency (CIA) assessed that even if Iran’s supreme leader were
killed in the operation, he would probably be replaced by hardline figures from
the IRGC, the most powerful military force within the country and the
most ideologically committed to continuing what they consider the values and
project of the 1979 revolution, two sources told Reuters last week.
For a long time,
Khamenei has been ailing, prompting feverish speculation over a successor. The
end of his long career has made his many failings and many challenges manifest.
It looks now that Khamenei’s brutal balancing is over.
This article
was amended on 1 March 2026. An earlier version said the Iranian revolution
happened in 1970; this should have said 1979.
@ SUNDAY 1
X19 3/1 1700\
A12 X19 FROM A.P.
US, Israel pound Iran
as Trump signals hopes for “dialogue” after Khamenei’s death
1 of 15 |
The Israeli military said it was striking targets in central
Tehran after clearing the path to the capital Saturday. Earlier, Iran fired
missiles at targets in Israel and Gulf Arab states after vowing massive
retaliation for the killing of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei by the
United States and Israel. (AP video by Saeed Sarmadi)
2 of 15 |
Khamenei was killed in a major attack on Iran launched by Israel
and the United States, throwing the future of the Islamic Republic into doubt
and raising the risk of regional instability. (AP video: Mohsen Ganji)
3 of 15 |
Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who assembled theocratic power in Iran
over the decades as its supreme leader and sought to turn it into a regional
powerhouse, bringing it into confrontation with Israel and the United States
over its nuclear program while crushing democracy protesters at home, has died,
Iranian state media confirmed early Sunday.
4 of 15 |
Iran had fired missiles at targets in Israel and Gulf Arab states
after vowing massive retaliation for the killing of Khamenei by the United
States and Israel. Constant missile salvos from Iran sent people in Israel in
and out of shelters.
5 of 15 |
Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who assembled theocratic power in Iran
over the decades as its supreme leader and sought to turn it into a regional
powerhouse, bringing it into confrontation with Israel and the United States
over its nuclear program while crushing democracy protesters at home, has died.
He was 86.
6 of 15 |
The U.S. and Israel attacked Iran on Saturday in a massive
operation that killed Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and hit government
and military sites across the country. In counterattacks, Iran fired drones and
missiles at Israel and aimed strikes at U.S. military installations, including
in Bahrain, Kuwait and Qatar, and locations in the UAE.
7 of 15 |
Smoke rises up after a strike in Tehran, Iran, Sunday, March 1,
2026. (AP Photo/Vahid Salemi)
8 of 15 |
A plume of smoke rises after a strike in Tehran, Iran, Sunday,
March 1, 2026. (AP Photo/Vahid Salemi)
9 of 15 |
Government supporters chant slogans as they gather in mourning
after state TV officially announced the death of Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah
Ali Khamenei, in Tehran, Iran, Sunday, March 1, 2026. (AP Photo/Vahid Salemi)
10 of 15 |
Rescue workers and military personnel survey the scene of a direct
hit a day after an Iranian missile struck in Tel Aviv, Israel, Sunday, March 1,
2026. (AP Photo/Oded Balilty)
11 of 15 |
Government supporters gather in mourning after state TV officially
announced the death of Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, in
Tehran, Iran, Sunday, March 1, 2026. (AP Photo/Vahid Salemi)
12 of 15 |
Israeli air defense system fires to intercept missiles during an
Iranian attack over central Israel, Sunday, March 1, 2026. (AP Photo/Ohad
Zwigenberg)
13 of 15 |
Israeli air defense system fires to intercept missiles during an
Iranian attack over central Israel, Sunday, March 1, 2026. (AP Photo/Ohad
Zwigenberg)
14 of 15 |
Iraqis hold a portrait of Iranian supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali
Khamenei during a protest against U.S. and Israeli attacks on multiple cities
across Iran, at a bridge leading to the fortified Green Zone where the U.S.
Embassy is located, in Baghdad, Iraq, Sunday, March 1, 2026. (AP Photo/Hadi
Mizban)
15 of 15 |
Shiite Muslims hold the portraits of Iranian leaders during a
rally to condemn the killing of Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei,
in Quetta, Pakistan, Sunday, March 1, 2026. (AP Photo/Arshad Butt)
By Jon
Gambrell, Melanie Lidman, Josh Boak And Eric Tucker
Updated
5:00 PM EST, March 1, 2026
DUBAI,
United Arab Emirates (AP) — The U.S. and Israel pounded targets across Iran on
Sunday, dropping massive bombs on the country’s ballistic missile sites and
wiping out warships as part of an intensifying military campaign following the
killing of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.
Blasts
rattled windows across the country and sent plumes of smoke high into the sky
above Tehran. More than 200 people have been killed since the start of the
strikes that killed Khamenei and other senior leaders, Iranian leaders have
said.
Iran
vowed revenge, firing missiles at Israel and Gulf Arab states in a counteroffensive
that the U.S. military said resulted in the deaths of three service members —
the first known American casualties from the conflict. Israeli rescue services said strikes had hit
several locations, including Jerusalem and a synagogue in the central town of
Beit Shemesh, where nine people were killed and 28 wounded, bringing the
overall death toll in the country to 11. Eleven people were still
missing after the strike, police said.
But
the attacks on Iran showed no signs of relenting as the U.S. and Israel took
aim at key military, political and intelligence targets in what appeared to be
a widening war that carried the potential for a prolonged conflict that could
envelop the Middle East and destabilize it. The strikes, the second time in
eight months that the U.S. and Israel had combined against Iran, represented a startling show of military
might for an American president who swept into office on an “America First”
platform and vowed to keep out of “forever
wars.”
Related Stories
Iran’s supreme leader killed in major attack by US and
Israel
What to know as Iran and US prepare for nuclear talks in
Oman
What to know about the new US-Israeli attacks on Iran
U.S.
President Donald Trump said the U.S. would “avenge” the deaths of the service
members and that “there will likely be more” killed before the conflict ends.
In
a video he posted on social media, Trump called the three service members “true
American patriots who have made the ultimate sacrifice for our nation, even as
we continue the righteous mission for which they gave their lives.”
He added: “Sadly, there will likely be
more, before it ends. That’s the way it is. Likely be more.”
Israel,
which had pledged “nonstop” strikes, said it was increasing its attacks, with
100 fighter jets simultaneously striking targets in Tehran, Brig. Gen. Effie
Defrin told reporters at a briefing. The targets included buildings belonging
to Iran’s air force, its missile command and its internal security force, which
violently quashed anti-government protests in January.
The
U.S. military, meanwhile, said B-2 stealth bombers struck Iran’s ballistic
missile facilities with 2,000-pound bombs. Trump said on social media that nine Iranian warships had been
sunk and that the Iranian navy’s headquarters had been “largely destroyed.”
Europe
has mostly stayed out of the war and pressed for diplomacy, but in an
indication that the conflict could draw in other nations, Britain, France and Germany said
Sunday they were ready to work with the U.S. to help stop Iran’s attacks.
Prime
Minister Keir Starmer said Britain would allow the United States to use its
bases to strike Iranian missile sites. The U.K. maintains nearby bases on
Cyprus and the Chagos Islands, a British archipelago in the Indian Ocean.
In
the 12-day war last June, Israeli and American strikes greatly weakened Iran’s air defenses, military
leadership and nuclear program. But the killing of Khamenei, who ruled Iran for
more than three decades, creates a leadership vacuum, increasing the risk of
regional instability.
Trump,
who a day earlier had encouraged Iranians to “take over” their government,
signaled Sunday that he was open to dialogue with Iran’s new leadership.
“They
want to talk, and I have agreed to talk, so I will be talking to them,” he told
The Atlantic.
STREETS OF TEHRAN
ARE LARGELY DESERTED
In
Tehran, there was little sign that Iranians had heeded Trump’s call for an
uprising against the government.
The
streets were largely deserted as people sheltered during heavy airstrikes,
witnesses told The Associated Press, speaking anonymously for fear of
retribution. The paramilitary Basij,
which has played a central role in crushing protests, set up checkpoints across
the city, they said.
Two
powerful explosions were heard in Tehran’s Niavaran neighborhood late Sunday.
An
eyewitness in the city told AP that the windows of their apartment shook
violently, and residents came out onto the streets fearing it was too dangerous
to stay inside. The witness spoke on condition of anonymity for fear of
reprisals. Video footage from Tehran showed plumes of smoke filling the
skyline, and the official IRNA news agency reported that parts of the building
of the Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting (IRIB) were struck Sunday.
In
southern Iran, at least 165 people were killed Saturday when a girls’ school
was struck, and dozens more were wounded, IRNA reported. The Israeli military
said it was not aware of strikes in the area. The U.S. military said it was
looking into the reports.
The
U.S. military did not provide details about the three service members who were
killed or about five others who were seriously wounded. It said several others
suffered minor injuries and concussions.
IRAN SAYS NEW
LEADERSHIP IS IN PLACE
As supreme leader, Khamenei had final say on all
major policies since 1989. He led Iran’s clerical establishment and the
Revolutionary Guard, the two main centers of power in the governing theocracy.
The
CIA had been tracking the movements of senior Iranian leaders, including
Khamenei, for months, according to a person familiar with the operation who was
not authorized to comment publicly and spoke on condition of anonymity. The
intelligence was d with Israeli officials, and the timing of the strikes was
adjusted in part because of that information, the person said.
Iranian
President Masoud Pezeshkian said in a prerecorded message that a new leadership
council had begun its work. The country’s foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi,
said a new supreme leader would be chosen in “one or two days.”
A
senior White House official who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss
internal administration deliberations, said Trump was eventually willing to
talk but that the operation would continue unabated for now.
IRAN VOWS REVENGE
FOR KHAMENEI KILLING
As
word spread of Khamenei’s death, some in Tehran could be seen cheering from
rooftops, witnesses said. Others mourned as a black flag was raised over the
Imam Reza shrine in Mashhad.
An
Iranian medical professional in northern Iran said he and colleagues spent the
early hours of Sunday celebrating Khamenei’s death indoors because armed
security forces are still heavily deployed in his city.
There
were forces stopping and interrogating people celebrating in their cars, but
there was no gunfire, said the doctor, who spoke on condition of anonymity for
fear of reprisal.
“It
was one of the best nights, if not the best night of our lives,” the doctor
said in a voice message from the city of Rasht. In fact, “it was actually my
first time ever smoking a cigarette. It was a very, very nice time. We didn’t
sleep at all. And we don’t even feel tired.”
Araghchi,
Iran’s foreign minister, blamed the U.S. and Israel for starting the war. He
said he had spoken to his counterparts in the Gulf countries and urged them to
pressure the U.S. and Israel to end it.
“You have crossed our red line and must
pay the price,” Iran’s parliamentary speaker, Mohammad Bagher Qalibaf, said in
a televised address. “We will deliver such devastating blows that you
yourselves will be driven to beg.”
Trump warned against any retaliation.
“THEY BETTER NOT DO THAT,” he said in a
social media post. “IF THEY DO, WE WILL HIT THEM WITH A FORCE THAT HAS NEVER
BEEN SEEN BEFORE!”
STRIKES WERE PLANNED
FOR MONTHS AND FEARED FOR WEEKS
Tensions
have escalated in recent weeks as the Trump administration built up the largest force of American warships and
aircraft in the Middle East in decades. The president insisted he wanted a deal
to constrain Iran’s nuclear program while the country struggled with growing dissent following nationwide protests.
An
Israeli military official described Saturday’s mission as the result of months
of “extremely high coordination” with the U.S. The official, speaking on
condition of anonymity to discuss a covert operation, said a variety of factors
created a “golden opportunity” to take out much of Iran’s leadership. Those
factors included weeks of training and monitoring the movements of senior
figures, along with “real time intelligence” that the targets were gathered
together.
The
results, the official said, were near-simultaneous strikes, within 60 seconds
of one another, in three locations 1,000 miles (1,609 kilometers) from Israel
that killed Khamenei and some 40 senior figures, including the head of the
Revolutionary Guard and the country’s defense minister.
___
Lidman
reported from Tel Aviv, Israel; Boak from West Palm Beach, Florida; and Tucker
from Washington. Associated Press writers Joe Federman in Jerusalem, Sarah El
Deeb in Beirut, Amir Radjy in Cairo, Aamer Madhani, Konstantin Toropin, David
Klepper and Matthew Lee in Washington, and AP journalists around the world,
contributed to this report.
Peanut Gallery
All Comments 230
NEWEST
All Comments
1. Comment by erinblogan.
er
erinbloganMAP Staff7 hrs agopinned
Who
stands to gain strategically from this escalation? Who bears the greatest
long-term cost?
reply28 replies 14 2
1. Comment by AmericanUnlikeTrump.
Am
AmericanUnlikeTrump7 min ago
reply
to Erinblogan:
what
is the purpose of the gain/cost question?
You
think this is just some kind of Corporate focus group action.. Let's do this
and see what they will buy?
The
real question is why our Chief Executive took those actions (like he has taken
in Venezuela, like the strikes on all those boats, still unproven to be 'drug
suppliers', like his threats to invade a member nation and ally) with out
adhering to Our Constitution?
Is
it because He, and they (his entire Party) hope it brings direct attacks on US
soil, so they can attempt to finalize what is growing apparent as a coup
against this Nations form of Government?
reply 3 0
report
2. Comment by dmclev.
dm
dmclev9 min ago
Message
Actions
Trump
must not have a clue what it's like to lose a family member in a war that more
than likely didn't need to happen. I don't think any of his family members were
ever in the military, so how would he? He himself was too scared to be in the
military. His callous remarks that more may be killed, well that shows how much
empathy he has for anyone other than himself. I have absolutely no respect for
him--never have, never will--and I know millions agree.
reply2 replies 3 0
report
o Reply by AmericanUnlikeTrump.
Am
AmericanUnlikeTrump5 min ago
Reply
to dmclev
No
He does not begin to understand. Because He and his entire lineage (Gramps
Trump was a military dodger from Germany, hence fleeing to the US) are service
dodgers, and they have no love for Country, just money and self-perceived
power.
reply1 reply 2 0
report
o Reply by dmclev.
dm
dmclev3 min ago
Reply
to AmericanUnlikeTrump
Totally
agree!
reply 0 0
report
3. Comment by spacecowboy.
sp
spacecowboy23 min ago
Now
that Trump has stirred the Middle East hornet's nest, I'm betting some will
enter our country and et revenge by taking out Trump, etc.
reply4 replies 4 0
report
22 older replies
show older replies
o Reply by HarryTuttle.
Ha
HarryTuttle4 min ago
Reply
to spacecowboy -
view message
or
bring along a "special" suitcase. "dirty" bombs don't
require mastery of the bomb.
reply 0 0
report
o Reply by AmericanUnlikeTrump.
Am
AmericanUnlikeTrump3 min ago
Reply
to this message
not
so, and I know a whole lot of American Service men and women who would like to
take personal exception to your remark.
reply 0 0
a13 A13 X03 1546 X03 FROM TIME
Donald Trump Shouts Loudly and Fumbles a Big Stick
by Jeffrey Sonnenfeld and Steven Tian Jan 29,
2026 2:35 PM ET
President Theodore Roosevelt
referred to the presidency as a “bully pulpit,” which could be used to persuade
legislators to embrace his sweeping policy agenda, from environmental
legislation to antitrust protections. To Roosevelt, the word “bully” meant
“superb” or “excellent.” Today, the term has taken another meaning.
President Donald Trump bullies through coercion, threats, and retribution to
serve his interests.
Increasingly, some of Trump’s
tried-and-true tools for coercion are backfiring on him. In stark contrast to
Roosevelt’s advice to “speak softly and carry a big stick,” Trump is barking
loudly but has apparently fumbled his threatened stick.
The unexpected common link between
Trump’s recent setbacks, from the surrender of his demands to own Greenland, to
his shifting explanations for his seizure of Venezuelan strongman Nicolás
Maduro, to the spreading outrage over the indiscriminate brutal cruelty of ICE
raids around the nation, is that they represent the simultaneous failure of
Trump’s typical intimidation tactics. In our book, Trump’s Ten Commandments,
we identify 10 of Trump’s favorite go-to leadership tools. Several of these
tools have been failing Trump amidst recent setbacks.
NEGOTIATE THROUGH
AGGRESSION
Trump’s first go-to leadership
tool is to begin every negotiation by assaulting the other parties. Trump tends
to open any negotiation with audacious demands, insults, and threats. Most
negotiation experts recommend building a foundation of trust as if you were
building a fire: you ignite tinder, branches, kindling, and finally toss on a
bigger log once the blaze is established. But instead of building trust, Trump
likes to begin by shattering it, believing that later terms offered will look
reasonable compared to the suffering initially threatened. Over the past year,
this approach has worked for the President, even if it came at the cost of
shattered trust. A fury of confusing, seemingly self-destructive trade
sanctions helped him achieve a handful of trade deals. And this strategy also
helped Trump in getting fellow NATO members to better share the burden of
defense costs.
@toss another dog on the
fire
But in the case of Greenland,
Trump’s aggressive opening move—his insistence on owning all of Greenland—for
military bases and rare-earth mineral recovery backfired. When Trump threatened
a hostile military seizure, financial markets revolted across both U.S. stock and bond markets;
and eloquent, dignified, principled European leaders such as Keir Starmer,
Emmanuel Macron, and Friedrich Merz joined with Canada’s Mark Carney to denounce such threats to Denmark and Greenland with
unexpected force and unity. Indeed, Trump managed to accomplish what has been
impossible since Charlemagne: somehow, accidentally unite all of Europe against him.
Faced with this daunting
collective opposition, Trump stepped back his claims about Greenland. Instead,
he has been left to celebrate the opportunity to reopen many of the same military bases the U.S. had been granted back
around the WWII era, but subsequently walked away from. Similarly, he touted
the idea of investing heavily in an expensive and difficult
mineral-extraction plan, which is ironically exactly the investment
Denmark and Greenland have been eager to secure.
Similarly, Trump’s aggressive
opening moves, such as his attacks on public officials like Federal Reserve
Chairman Jerome Powell, have failed. Even Powell’s most scathing critics have
come to his defense, voicing their belief that while they had policy
disagreements with Powell, he is no criminal.
DIVIDE AND
CONQUER
Another go-to tool that has
fallen similarly flat recently is Trump’s reliance on “divide and conquer”
techniques to dilute alliances he finds threatening.
For instance, Trump has used
this approach to try to splinter the business community by singling them out
one-by-one. He has attacked iconic companies such as Bank of America, Boeing, Comcast, Merck, NVIDIA, JP Morgan, and many others. But this approach has
started to backfire on Trump—with businesses collectively countering his
one-off intimidation and calls for boycotts.
One example of how Trump’s
divide-and-conquer tactics have fallen flat can be seen with the blowback over
ICE raids in Minnesota. While Trump’s immigration crackdowns have targeted blue
states one by one—perhaps to prevent collective resistance from forming—
business leaders from Minnesota-based companies like Target, Cargill, and 3M
have collectively called for a “de-escalation” of tensions, calls which were
subsequently echoed by groups such as The Chamber of Commerce and The Business
Roundtable. Now, Trump has removed ICE commander Gregory Bovino from Minnesota
and called for an “honest” investigation into the killing of Alex Pretti.
That pattern echoed earlier
unified dissent from the business community over the costs and damages of Liberation
Day’s reckless country-by-country reciprocal tariffs, as called out by the
National Association of Manufacturers and other trade groups, which resulted in
Trump quickly suspending his planned tariffs for 90 days to allow for time to
reach negotiated deals.
These examples are powerful
reminders that in the face of divide-and-conquer, appeasement does not work.
The only way to stand up to divide-and-conquer is to engage through collective
action, focusing on fighting fire with facts without sinking to the level of
personal insults.
REPEAT FALSE
INFORMATION
Trump’s third go-to tool has
also failed him: his reflexive reliance on repeating false information, hoping
that it may eventually gain traction. In academic research, this is referred to
as “the sleeper effect.” But in the case of Minnesota, the public did not fall
for Trump officials telling people to ignore their own eyes. Citizens watched
the brutal killings of Renee Good and Alex Pretti. They saw the detentions of
peaceful protesters and non-criminal immigrants falsely labelled as “terrorists.”
And Americans have not forgotten
that Trump promised to release the Epstein files on the campaign trail. Not
doing so has eroded the potency of Trump’s sleeper effect. It is undeniable
that only a fraction of the Epstein files have been made public.
Similarly, Trump’s fictional
justification for invading Venezuela, a sovereign albeit hostile neighbor, that
it was at the behest of the strategic needs of the US oil industry, was refuted
by the industry leaders themselves. Oil executives directly declared that they
had no advance knowledge of the invasion, and CEOs such as Darren Woods of
Exxon Mobil called Venezuela uninvestible to Trump’s face.
They insisted that not only the antiquated, corroded infrastructure and
volatile, dangerous government were disincentives, but even the Venezuelan
heavy crude oil was of little interest because it cannot be easily refined for
gasoline. Plus, oil markets are suffering a supply glut, leading to plunging
market prices, massive layoffs, and the elimination of oil rigs. Given all of
this evidence, Trump’s “drill baby drill” mantra has fallen on deaf ears.
To be sure, these setbacks may
not be permanent. Trump has a long history of rebounding from failure,
including from bankruptcy, political failure, impeachment, four criminal indictments, and 34 criminal convictions.
But even Trump isn’t immune to the rules of gravity. When he
overreaches, he tends to fall. Trump is being countered effectively by allied leaders and CEOs
standing up in unity, and by financial markets openly revolting against his
tantrums.
Like the mythical Icarus, with ambitious
omnipotent presumptions, who flew too close to the Sun, leading his wax wings
to melt; Trump’s wax wings
have been melting fast and now he risks crashing to earth.
@begin
A14X34 victims X34
FROM TIME
‘It’s As If I’m Dreaming’:
Iranians Recount the First Day of the War, and the Death of
Khamenei \
By Kay Armin Serjoie
Mar 1, 2026 12:16 PM ET
Iranians say the war is
unfolding in phases. The first roared across the skies on Saturday morning.
“I had just stepped out of the
shower, getting prepared to go out, when the sound of low-flying aircraft
startled me,” said Salman, a 45-year-old contractor living in Tehran. “Seconds
later, when the sound of two explosions reached us, I realized it had started.”
“I was in a car,” said Marziyeh, a 40-year-old graphic artist. “The music was
loud, but suddenly I noticed the drivers around me hit the brakes and started
looking around and up at the sky. I was just thinking to myself, ‘Is there
going to be war?’ When suddenly I heard an explosion, and I said to myself,
Stupid! War has already started.”
Out his window, Salman noticed
“two plumes of smoke rising from the vicinity of the Leader’s Beit” —the
central Tehran compound where Ayatollah Ali Khamenei lived, and was, at that
moment, being buried under the rubble from an Israeli airstrike.
The apparatus of the Iranian
regime was already in motion, however. As U.S. and Israeli warplanes pounded
targets across Iran, a flurry of communiques went out from state television and
state-run news agencies assuring citizens that all would be well: no shortage
of basic staples would occur, nor any disruption in services.
But one message stood out.
Issued by the all-powerful
Supreme National Security Council, it advised citizens in Tehran and other
major cities to leave town: “Travel to other cities to stay safe from the
menace of these two evil regimes.” In the capital, many residents heard their
cell phone ping, and turned to find the same message had arrived as an SMS: go
calmly, it advised, but go.
“Last time they were telling us
not to leave the city,” said one Tehran resident. “Why,” she asked, “are they
telling us to leave this time?”
The answer arrived minutes
later, in the form of a dispatch from the Tasnim News Agency. The outlet, which
is linked to the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC), announced that to
ensure security, “Basij neighborhood patrols were activated in all 22 districts
of Tehran.” An arm of the IRGC, the Basij are paramilitary volunteers notorious
among Iranians for taking the lead in viciously attacking protesters in the
streets.
Another Tasnim dispatch made the
warning explicit: Prosecutor General Mohammad Movahedi-Azad had ordered a
“preventive dealing with any illegal gatherings, riots and behaviors that would
cause instability in the society.”
Finally, the news agency posted
footage of dozens of Basiji careening through Tehran streets on motorcycles, waving
regime flags, and chanting “Allahu akbar!”
Battle for the
streets
Iranians interviewed by TIME say
they knew the next phase of battle would be for the streets. Since 2009, when
the regime refused to seat a reformist candidate who had clearly won the
presidency, public protests have been the only channel left open to the
majority of Iranians who oppose their authoritarian government. On the night of
January 8, throngs across the nation of 93 million filled public spaces to
chant “death to the dictator.”
The regime—which had come to
power in 1979 behind similar protests—responded by unleashing a level of force
it deemed commensurate to the threat it faced. Its security forces killed
some 30,000 Iranians that night and the next, senior
officials in Iran’s health ministry later told TIME. President Donald Trump
repeatedly urged protesters into the streets in January, promising, “Help is on its way.” Two months
later, he announced the beginning of the military action that would make good
on that vow.
“The hour of your freedom is at hand,” Trump declared in a video posted on
Truth Social on Saturday. “Stay sheltered. Don't leave your home. It's very
dangerous outside. Bombs will be dropping everywhere. When we are finished,
take over your government. It will be yours to take.”
In the hours that followed, it was impossible to tell what Iranians made of
Trump’s promise. Then, after dark, news that Khamanei had been killed.
“I suddenly heard the whole
neighborhood cheering,” said a 63-year-old man in Tehran. “I only realized why
when I checked the news and saw reports of Khamenei’s death.”
“People are honking on the
streets, people are cheering from windows and rooftops, my hands are shaking
from joy,” said a resident from Tehran. Scenes of jubilant cheering were
reported from other cities as well.
The night passed with no sign of the snipers
who had sown terror from rooftops in January, or the heavy machine guns firing
from the bed of pickup trucks. “People are dancing on the streets, and there
are no Basiji or Sepahi [IRGC] forces anywhere to be seen,” said a 40-year-old
factory owner in Shiraz.
Few, if any, expect the regime
Khamenei led to disappear with him. Its loyalists number in the millions, and
have the weapons. But for a few hours at least, Iranians found themselves
undisturbed.
“I feel a trembling inside me —
a feeling I’ve never experienced in my life,” said Mehdi, an engineer in his
forties in Mashad. “I think this may be the most important moment of my life.
Someone has died who killed all my dreams.”
@MONDAY 2
A15X28 T speaks X28 from DAILY BEAST
Trump Makes Totally Impossible New War Claim to Fox News Host
Fox News host
Bret Baier said the president told him over the phone that his plan in Iran
mirrors that of Venezuela.
By Martha McHardy Published Mar. 2 2026 1:26PM EST
President Donald Trump has told a reporter that his plan for Iran is modeled on
U.S. actions in Venezuela—even though the deposed leader of Venezuela is still
alive.
Fox News host Bret
Baier said the president told him over the phone that his plan in Iran
mirrors that of Venezuela, where U.S. forces captured the country’s leader
Nicolás Maduro in January and transported him to the U.S. to face drug
trafficking charges.
In the aftermath, U.S. officials initially said they would “run
the country until… a safe, proper and judicious transition” could be arranged.
Vice President Delcy
Rodríguez has since been sworn in as interim president and retains
authority.
“He said there is a plan. He points to Venezuela as a template,
which means to me that going in, they had some sense on the ground of what was
coming next,” Baier said of his call with the president.
But Trump’s airstrikes already killed Iran’s Supreme Leader,
Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, prompting retaliatory attacks on several other
countries in the Middle East and leaving a power vacuum in Iran.
Flailing Trump, 79, Can’t Keep Story Straight on His New
War
Trump also revealed that Saturday’s airstrikes killed any
potential replacements for the Ayatollah.
“The attack was so successful it knocked out most of the
candidates,” Trump told ABC’s Jonathan Karl.
“It’s not going to be
anybody that we were thinking of because they are all dead. Second or third
place is dead.”
Trump told Fox News on Sunday that 48 Iranian leaders were
killed in the strikes.
Since the U.S. and Israeli forces launched a major unprovoked
coordinated air campaign against Iran over the weekend, Trump has spent his
time calling journalists to explain why he went to war with Iran.
It comes as he is facing growing demands to define his endgame
in Iran.
Trump Teases ‘Big’ War Moves ‘Coming Soon’
The president, who campaigned on ending “forever wars,” has
instead pledged continuous “heavy and pinpoint bombing” until the U.S. achieves
what he calls “our objective of peace” in the Middle East. In remarks to the
Daily Mail, he also suggested the conflict could last about four weeks
At the Pentagon, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth defended the
operation, calling Epic Fury not an “endless war” but a “clear, devastating,
decisive mission.” “Epic Fairy?”
Meanwhile, Baier said that Trump believes “the success that they
are seeing right now in Venezuela is the success that he believes is possible
in Iran based on what they know.”
Yet the administration has not publicly detailed what victory
would look like—or how the fighting would stop.
Baier cautioned, “this is a much different theater and operation
{to Venezuela},” one that is “much bigger in scope” and involves “a lot of
variables we don’t know.”
Even so, he said, “from the president’s point of view right now
it is going as well or better than they expected going in.”
Lawmakers and foreign
policy experts warn that without a defined strategy, the U.S. could drift into
the kind of drawn-out conflict Trump once vowed to avoid.
“Where does this all go?”
Jim Himes, the ranking Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, told NPR.
“We can bomb Iran along with the Israelis for, you know, a lengthy period of
time, but in the service of what?
“Is the intention regime change? Because there aren’t many
examples either of regime change affected through bombing, or, quite frankly,
of American military forces actually doing regime change in a way that is
satisfactory.”
PEANUT GALLERY
·
threedsax
21 hours ago
If Trump specified an end game,
he would then be judged on whether or not he achieved it. The end game is
whatever conditions exist when he has to pull out for political reasons. One
thing I would bet on: whenever the offensive ends, there will NOT be peace in
the Middle East.
Reply
2
Share
·
Blind Seeker
1 day ago
Iran is not Venezuela. By
killing the top leaders they leave a vacuum that is unlikely to be filled with
someone who will roll over for 47. Just saying. The mullahs will choose a new supreme leader not 47.
Reply
6
Share
·
WWIIDaughter7
1 day ago
Jeffery Epstein: "You guys
need to understand the guy's psychotic". 12-20-18 (don't know the file
number)
Reply
11
Share
·
LMcgin2925
1 day ago
There is NO PLAN.
Reply
6
Share
·
robert2063
20
hours ago
But it is basically the same plan, use force to seize their oil.
Reply
2
Share
@ TUESDAY 3
A16X35 Get out! Americans X35
FROM CBS
Americans urged to leave 14 Middle East
countries amid Iran war "due to serious safety risks"
By Sarah
Lynch Baldwin, Olivia Gazis and Camilla Schick
Updated on: March 4, 2026 / 12:01 PM EST / CBS News
The U.S. State Department has urged Americans
to leave 14 countries across the Middle East amid the
widening Iran war.
Americans were urged late Monday to "depart now" from
Bahrain, Egypt, Iran, Iraq, Israel, the West Bank, Gaza, Jordan, Kuwait,
Lebanon, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Syria, the United Arab Emirates and
Yemen.
More than a million Americans were believed to be in the region,
a source said.
U.S. citizens had initially been urged to leave "using
available commercial transportation, due to serious safety risks." But on
Tuesday, the State Department said it was facilitating charter flights from the United
Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia and Jordan for Americans and that it would
"continue to secure additional capacity as security conditions
allow."
The State Department was
proactively contacting U.S. citizens to offer them seats on charter flights, an
official told CBS News.
More than 120 people were fielding calls at its 24/7 call center.
The
Free Press: From October 7 to Killing Khamenei
The State Department also told all non-emergency U.S. government
personnel and their families to leave Bahrain, Iraq, Jordan, Qatar, Kuwait and
the United Arab Emirates. Non-essential personnel and their families have
additionally been ordered to depart from U.S. diplomatic posts in Cyprus and
Pakistan.
The State Department said
Tuesday it was helping Americans book commercial flights, as such options were
available
in Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Oman and Egypt.
"For those in countries lacking commercial aviation
availability, the Department is facilitating travel to third countries as
conditions allow," it said. "That includes increasing ground
transportation options for American citizens wishing to leave Israel."
Speaking to reporters on Tuesday, Secretary of State Marco Rubio
said "almost
1,600" Americans had requested assistance with departing the
region. The department also said Tuesday it had answered calls from almost 3,000 U.S.
citizens in the region and will "waive any statutory requirement
for American citizens to reimburse the government for travel
expenses."
Americans who need the government's help arranging travel should
call +1-202-501-4444 from abroad or +1-888-407-4747 from the U.S. and
Canada.
Amid efforts to leave the region, four U.S. embassies have closed and suspended consular
services, although a State Department official said U.S. diplomatic
operations continue.
The U.S. embassies in Beirut and Kuwait announced on Tuesday they would be closed
until further notice "due to ongoing regional tensions." The embassy
in Kuwait was closed a day after smoke was seen rising from the mission
following Iranian attacks on the country.
The U.S. embassies in Saudi Arabia and Jerusalem said they would be closed on Tuesday.
The embassy in Riyadh was attacked by two drones, causing a small fire and
limited damage, the Saudi Ministry of Defense said on X
Monday. A U.S. official and a Gulf official confirmed to CBS News a CIA station at the embassy
complex in Riyadh was hit, but there were no American casualties. The
CIA declined to comment.
Rubio on Tuesday addressed a drone attack on a U.S. consulate in Dubai, where
he said a drone struck a parking lot near a chancellery building and started a
fire. All personnel were accounted for, he said.
The U.S. and Israel began attacking Iran on Saturday in what
President Trump described on
Monday as the "last best chance" to address the threat posed by
Iran's ballistic missiles and nuclear program. He articulated the reasons he said he decided to order strikes, bombing
over 1,000 targets in the opening days of what he said could be a weeks-long
conflict. They include destroying Iran's missile capabilities, annihilating
Iran's navy and preventing Iran from developing nuclear weapons.
Six U.S. troops have been killed during the war. The
U.S.-based Human Rights Activists News Agency said Wednesday that over 1,000 civilians in Iran have
been killed since Saturday.
Americans — and travelers who found themselves stranded amid regional
airport and airspace closures — have been trying to figure out how to leave the
region, with some expressing frustration over the government's response.
“We're honestly
trapped," Sasha Hoffman, an American who lives in Chicago and was
vacationing in Dubai when the strikes began, told CBS News on Tuesday.
"It's really frustrating that right now the U.S. is saying 'Americans come
home' when in reality we can't come home. " We've had flights booked
today, tomorrow, all of them are canceled. All of the airspace is closed
through tomorrow night, now, if you're in the UAE."
In Israel, American Tamar Rubinstein, pregnant with twins, said
she was taking a bus to
Egypt then flying through Europe back to her home in Chicago — a journey
she said will take about two and a half days.
"There's such a lack of clarity," she said.
U.S. Ambassador to Israel
Mike Huckabee said early Tuesday, "We are getting a lot of requests
regarding evacuating from Israel from American citizens who are
currently in Israel or who have family here."
In a lengthy post on social media, Huckabee outlined how people can
depart Israel, noting "there are VERY LIMITED options." He said the
U.S. Embassy was not in a position to evacuate or directly help Americans leave
the country.
An estimated 9,000 Americans have safely departed the Middle
East since the start of the conflict, the State Department said.
Jordan Freiman and Brian Dakss contributed to
this report.
@ WEDNESDAY 4
X36 more strikes – interim
replacement
A17X36 FROM TELEGRAPH uk
ISRAEL HITS
IRAN IN ‘BROAD WAVE OF STRIKES’
|
The Azadi
or ‘Freedom’ Tower in flames following an air strike in Tehran |
|
By Tom
Cotterill, Acting Defence Editor, in Tel Aviv March 4th |
Israel has launched a fresh wave of strikes against Iran and
Hezbollah in Lebanon as the conflict in the Middle East enters its fifth day.
The Israel Defense Forces said it had begun a “broad wave of strikes” targeting
Iranian launch sites, air defence systems and other military infrastructure,
including a leadership compound.
As strikes continue to
rain down on Iran, it has been reported that Ayatollah Ali Khamenei’s son is
the leading contender to take over as
his successor.Mojtaba Khamenei, the second son of the former
ayatollah who was killed by an Israeli air strike on Saturday, is being
considered by the regime’s senior clerics to be the next supreme leader,
according to The New York Times.
The 56-year-old hardliner, who managed his father’s office and networks for
years, could be named the new supreme leader as early as today.
Overnight, the US military identified four of the six American soldiers
killed in an Iranian drone strike in Kuwait on Sunday.
US Army Reservists Capt Cody A Khork, 35; Sgt Noah L Tietjens, 42; Sgt
Nicole M Amor, 39, and Sgt Declan J Coady, 20, were named as those who
lost their lives.
A18 X38 FROM TIME
Marjorie Taylor Greene Warns Trump Administration’s War in Iran Could
Cost Republicans the Midterms
By Chantelle Lee Mar 4, 2026 1:57 PM ET
Former Congresswoman
Marjorie Taylor Greene is warning Republicans that President Donald Trump’s war
in Iran could cost the party in the midterms.
“Now that Trump and his admin betrayed their campaign
promises of No More Foreign Wars/No More Regime Change and Republicans in the
majority in the House and Senate are flat out refusing to pass key legislation,
voter outrage was shown in yesterday’s Texas primary,” she said in a post on X on Wednesday. “More Democrats showed up
to vote than Republicans in yesterday’s Texas primary. If that happens in
November’s general election, Texas will be flipping it’s Senate seat blue.”
“Whatever Trump’s
new twisted perversion of MAGA is, is going to LOSE in the midterms,” she
continued.
Greene, who resigned from Congress in January, used to be a
loyal ally to the President until the two had a very public and dramatic falling out in November.
The former Georgia Representative clashed with Trump over his Administration’s
handling of the files related to the late convicted sex offender Jeffrey
Epstein. Last month, she cautioned the MAGA base that some of their
responses to the release of the so-called “Epstein files” could harm
Republicans in the November elections.
“All of you MAGA influencers and the rest mocking the
seriousness of women who were trafficked and raped as teenagers and young women
look like cult fools,” she said in a social media post. “Good luck trying to get women to
vote for Republicans in the midterms you insensitive clowns. The Republican
Party already has a woman voting problem.”
She didn’t specify
who she was referring to in the post.
The results of the
midterm elections in November could have a major impact on the balance of power
in Washington, D.C., as well as on Trump’s ability to continue to enact his
agenda. At the moment, Republicans control the House and the Senate, but
Democrats are seeking to gain seats in both chambers of
Congress.
And there have
been some signs that Democrats are generating
enthusiasm among voters ahead of the midterms. A historically high number of
Texas Democrats flocked to the polls to vote in the state’s primary election on
Tuesday, early data show. The Southern state has open primaries, which means that any voter can vote in
any party’s primary election. On Tuesday, more voters cast their ballot in the Democratic primary than
in the Republican race, though there are still votes left to be tallied.
TRUMP
GRAPPLES WITH REPUBLICAN PUSHBACK ON THE WAR IN IRAN
Greene is not the only Republican who has criticized
Trump’s military action in Iran.
Tucker Carlson, a former Fox News anchor turned
podcaster, met with the President multiple times in recent weeks to try and
talk him out of authorizing the military operation, the New York Times reported.
Another former Fox News host, Megyn Kelly, shared her criticisms
of the attack on her show, saying that “no one should have to die for a foreign
country.”
“I don’t think those four service members died for the
United States,” she said. “I think they died for Iran or for Israel.”
On Monday, officials
said that the number of American service members killed in the war had risen to six.
Trump and his base
have fired back on that pushback. In an interview with the journalist Rachael Bade earlier
this week, Trump said that “MAGA
is Trump—MAGA’s not the other two,” referring to Carlson and Kelly.
“I have to do what’s
right, number one—and you can’t have Iran getting a nuclear weapon,” he said.
Lawmakers have largely sided with their party over the issue,
with most Republican members of Congress supporting Trump’s decision to launch
the attack.
Early polling shows
that many Americans disapprove of the U.S. military action in Iran:
43%, according to a Reuters/Ipsos poll. In comparison, only 27% of poll
respondents expressed support for the attacks.
But polling also reveals a clear partisan split over the issue. While more than 80%
of Democratic respondents in a CNN poll said they were against the military
operation, only 23% of Republicans felt the same. The CNN poll, which was
conducted by SSRS, found that 77% of Republicans approved of the strikes,
compared to less than 20% of Democrats.
Must-Reads
from TIME
·
Here Are the Key
Elections to Watch Out For in 2026
·
Trump’s Push to
‘Nationalize’ Elections, Explained
·
Trump Floats
Cancelling 2026 Elections, Then Insists He Won’t
·
Trump Administration To Monitor Key Elections in Democrat-Led States. Here’s What
To Know
·
Who Is Thomas Massie?
Trump Seeks to Oust Republican Congressman
@ THURSDAY
A19X40 from financial times
By James Politi 3/5/26
|
Good morning
and welcome to White House Watch. In today’s edition, we’ll be looking at: § Growing alarm
over the lack of an Iran endgame § Whether the
Supreme Court ruling will help tariff challenges in the Court of
International Trade? § How JD Vance
is navigating the Iran war The US Senate
yesterday rejected a resolution to compel Donald Trump to stop military
action against Iran without congressional authorisation. But the
victory for the White House on Capitol Hill belied the reality of deepening
concern in Washington that Trump has launched a spiralling war in the Middle
East without any vision for what comes next. “This is
madness and we don’t even know what the administration’s plan is,” Chuck
Schumer, the top Democrat in the upper chamber of Congress, said in a speech
on Wednesday. “We still don’t know how long we’ll be there, we still don’t
know what Donald Trump is trying to accomplish.” Speaking to
the FT for this piece by
Abigail Hauslohner and Lauren Fedor, Mark Warner,
the Virginia Democrat and vice-chair of the Senate intelligence committee,
issued a stark warning about the lack of a “phase two” plan. “I have never
had, from any of the briefings, any description of what phase two would be,”
he said. “One of the concerns that we’ve had is not having a lot of
visibility into the Iranian resistance.” One
Republican senator added: “I don’t know that the administration could have
possibly thought it through.” The worry
about the lack of any post-war vision for Iran comes as the administration is
already facing pressure to explain why it went to war in the first place.
Karoline Leavitt, the White House press secretary, insisted that Trump acted based on a
“feeling” that Tehran was going to strike US interests first, and had to be
pre-empted, an explanation that raised plenty of eyebrows. Meanwhile,
the FT’s Steff Chávez reports that Pete Hegseth, the US defence secretary, refused to put any timeline
on the war. “Iran cannot outlast us . . . you can say four weeks, but it could be six, it
could be eight, it could be three. Ultimately, we set the pace
and the tempo,” Hegseth said in a briefing. Elbridge Colby, the senior
Pentagon official, added during a conference yesterday that Trump was “not
going to be bound by the sort of conventional wisdom parameters” when it came
to implementing any plan to follow the end of hostilities. So far, Trump has been very cagey
about identifying any Iranian leader, whether a regime moderate or an exiled
opposition chief, that he would like to run the country’s government
once the US stops bombing. The US president has also said that some of the
top candidates for the job had been killed in the US and Israeli strikes. The Trump
administration has said US troops on the ground in Iran are not “part of the
plan” for now, but when asked how Trump viewed America’s role in
post-conflict Iran, Leavitt on Wednesday said it was still being debated. “It’s
something the president is actively considering and discussing with his
advisers and his national security team. But, again, right now, the focus,
minute by minute, hour by hour, day by day is on ensuring the quick and
effective success of Operation Epic Fury,” she said. |
A20X42 and, from usa today
Trump's war in
Iran polls badly, but will it hurt Republicans in 2026?
Trump's war in Iran is polling badly and fraying his MAGA coalition. But
at least some of his supporters say public opinion will shift.
Phillip
M. Bailey Updated March
5, 2026, 10:30 a.m. ET
Why does Iran want to 'draw
blood' before negotiating with Trump?
Why is Trump’s Iran war causing
MAGA coalition backlash?
How might Iran war impact 2026
congressional midterms?
What economic effects stem from
Iran war gas price hikes?
Why does Iran want to 'draw blood'
before negotiating with Trump?
Despite voting for
President Donald Trump three times,
Republican Amanda Cline isn't buying his administration's evolving and conflicting rationale for launching a war with Iran.
The retired 47-year-old Navy
veteran thinks it's the wrong move, especially when she learned U.S. soldiers were killed so early in the conflict.
"I don't think it's worth
it," Cline, who hails from Cherry Valley, California, told USA TODAY.
"It's not our cause. It's their fight to fight. It's their regime and
their problem to fix."
Cline recalls being deployed
overseas in the aftermath of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. She said
she watched intently when Pentagon chief Pete Hegseth told reporters at a March 2 press conference that this conflict would not
morph into nation-building effort, but that it reminded her how the Bush
administration's promises never materialized.
It's kind of insulting the
intelligence of the American people to just have generals get up there and
Hegseth get up there and just say, 'go military, go troops and wave your
American flag and just support us no matter what,'" said Cline, who also
has worked at an anti-abortion pregnancy center.
"That was insulting,"
she added. "We want to know when, because we don't want any more
deaths."
Cline isn't the only one who
feels that way. Trump's war with Iran is polling badly, has kicked up gas prices and injected volatility into a stock market that the administration
regularly cites as a bright spot in a wobbly economy.
It is also fraying the Make America Great Again coalition, whose anti-interventionist wing has
expressed a mixture of disappointment, betrayal and anger that experts
warn could turn a gathering Democratic blue wave into a potential tsunami in
the 2026 congressional elections.
Democrats have led in all but one of the dozens of polls conducted this
year asking voters which party should control Congress.
Paul Brace, a political science
professor emeritus at Rice University, said it is rare that foreign affairs
affect an American election outcome. But he noted that elements of Trump's base
are already disillusioned over other broken promises.
"Between the Epstein files
and the anti-war sentiment among many Trump supporters, there's grounds there
to break away from him," Brace said. "It's going to depend on their
particular constituencies in the context of an election year that does not look
good for them in the first place."
MOST AMERICANS OPPOSE WAR WITH IRAN, POLLS SHOW
Almost a week after the first
strikes, early snapshots show a nation wary about once again entering the
Middle East with many memories still fresh from the incursions into Iraq and
Afghanistan.
Just 27% of Americans approved in a Reuters/Ipsos survey
released less than 48 hours after the first missiles were launched, while 43%
disapproved.
A flash poll conducted by the Washington Post on March 1
found 52% oppose Trump'
airstrikes versus 39% who support it with 9% saying they are unsure. Another
one released by CNN on
March 2 found about 59%
of Americans disapprove of the decision to go to war, including 68% of
independent voters.
Joe McGee, a Republican from
Fairfield, Connecticut, said the Iranian government is an "exporter of
terrorism" but questioned Trump's ability to administer this war,
particularly at a time when the U.S. has quarreled with so many longtime allies. He predicted Democrats would
gain at least 20 seats in the House midterms as a result.
"The problem is Trump has switched now from 'we don't want these
foreign wars, these things have been a disaster,' and he's now initiated
probably the largest one the Middle East that we've ever seen," McGee, 80,
a retired business executive, told USA TODAY.
But most Republicans −
including House Republicans running in competitive districts − are
standing by the president, perhaps encouraged by surveys such as a March 3 one from
Fox News showing 61% of Americans think Iran poses "a real national security
threat."
Republican Paul Holtzman, an
independent contractor from Rohrsburg, Pennsylvania, said he supports the
military action against Iran, citing the foreign adversary's human rights
abuses.
"I think that it's a path
towards peace. You know, sometimes you can get peace through negotiation, but
sometimes you have to use force to bring it about," he said.
CONGRESSIONAL GOP MOSTLY STICKING WITH TRUMP
Speaking to Fox News earlier
this week, Rep. Mike Lawler, R-New York, who represents a competitive
district, denounced Democrats for continuing to block Department of
Homeland Security funding during the war over their demands to put restraints
on immigration enforcement agents. He noted the agency was "created in the
aftermath of 9/11."
Holtzman, 51, said he would like
to see Iran, which had an Islamic revolution in 1979 after decades of reign
under an autocratic monarch, enjoy a government that isn't religious based. He
said Trump is being decisive, adding voters will tolerate a certain number of
U.S. casualties for a limited time if they see the president taking the
necessary step towards peace in the region.
"I'm not looking to see
troops go in there and to invade," Holtzman said. "I mean, if it's
necessary for us to help the people get the government where it's supposed to
be, I guess I could be somewhat OK with that."
Trump enjoyed nearly unanimous
support among Senate Republicans when all but Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky rejected a war powers resolution to halt military
hostilities against Iran on March 4.
"Iran has been building not
only its nuclear capability but also its conventional weapons capability to a
point that it would threaten the entire region," Senate Majority Leader
John Thune, R-South Dakota, said in a March 4 post on X. "(The president)
is taking steps to make the world, our country, and our people safer."
The Trump administration's
staunchest supporters remain optimistic, too, telling USA TODAY the Iranian
regime is turning global opinion against it by launching attacks in
neighboring countries.
Heritage Foundation President Kevin Roberts, a key Trump ally, told USA
TODAY he believes the administration will succeed within the four-week
timetable outlined by the president and rally the country.
There will be a need for clearer
communication about what comes next and the threat posed by Iran, Roberts said,
adding that it has killed Americans "for decades" through its backing
of proxy forces in the Middle East such as Hezbollah.
"We have begun to kneecap,
very successfully, perhaps the largest state sponsor of terrorism in our
lifetimes. This is a long time coming," Roberts said.
"We're going to succeed in
Iran. We're not going to be there," Roberts said. "We're not going to
be nation building, because the president's own conservative movement is honest
enough to prevent that from happening."
Roberts also believes Trump will
be "dialed in" on affordability and help his party hold its own in
the midterm elections.
"What was already going to
be more of a jump ball of a midterm election than most prognosticators indicate
is going to be a really competitive midterm," he said. "I happen to
think that conservatives will do well. Will conservatives have to work really
hard at message discipline − yeah."
A21X41 from usa today
Iran wants 'blood' as Trump says US can fight
'forever'. What to expect.
Iran’s leaders believe they must inflict serious pain on their enemies
before negotiations to end the war can start, some foreign policy experts say.
Dan
Morrison March 5, 2026, 12:07 p.m. ET
Why does Iran want to 'draw blood'
before negotiating with Trump?
How has the war impacted Gulf
allies' economies?
What did Trump say about Iran's
regime change?
How many U.S. troops were killed
in Iran attacks?
Iran doesn’t want to talk. It
doesn’t want to parley. And it’s not sitting down with President Donald Trump.
Even as Iran endures
devastating airstrikes, the country's surviving leaders have determined "it has to really
draw blood" before negotiating an end to the ongoing war with the U.S. and Israel, Trita Parsi,
vice president of the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft, said in an
interview.
The stalemate comes as Trump and
top military leaders have predicted more U.S. military deaths, wealthy Persian
Gulf allies are pushing for a quick conclusion to the war and oil prices have
spiked.
Trump's war in Iran polls
badly. Will it hurt Republicans in 2026?
Amid punishing blows from the
United States and Israel that have killed more than
a thousand people – including its longtime, all-powerful
supreme leader Ali Khamenei – Iran’s leaders believe they must
inflict serious pain before negotiations to end the war can
begin, experts say.
'Regardless of the costs'
"They don't have to win the
war,” Parsi, an expert with contacts in Iran’s government and security
services, told USA TODAY. “They
have to ensure Trump's presidency is on the brink of destruction before they
lose. That's when they believe Trump will pull out – due to the costs."
This wasn't the outcome Trump
wanted.
On Sunday, March 1, as the war
entered its second day, Trump told The Atlantic magazine that the Iranians
“want to talk, and I have agreed to talk, so I will be talking to them.”
But Ali Larijani, Iran’s top
security official, shot down the suggestion. “We will not negotiate with the
United States,” he said in a series of social media posts. “Trump plunged the
region into chaos with his ‘delusional fantasies’ and now fears more American
troop casualties.”
Iran war drives up frustration and gas prices across nation
Larijani said Iran would keep
fighting, “regardless of the costs and will make the enemies sorry for their
miscalculation.”
Experts say Iran’s leadership
has determined that – despite a vast imbalance in military power – it must cause serious political
and economic pain to the U.S. and Israel before agreeing to a ceasefire.
MARKED FOR DEATH: HOW OCT. 7 ATTACK SEALED KHAMENEI'S FATE
They believe Washington will
only bargain in good faith, producing a lasting end to hostilities − and
the Islamist regime's survival − if Trump is damaged by the
political toll of U.S. deaths and rising prices, according to this reading of
Iran’s clerical government and security apparatus.
So far, however, that strategic desire reads like
fantasy: As the U.S. destroyed much of Iran's military capability and
sunk most of its navy, American war deaths have held steady at six service
members.
'DETERRENCE failure'
Iran's reluctance to negotiate
despite large military and civilian losses is based on hard lessons, experts said.
By acting with relative
restraint – avoiding attacks on U.S. and Gulf nation targets during earlier
military flare-ups with Israel – Iran suffered a "deterrence failure,”
said Kelly Greico, a senior fellow at the Stimson Center think-tank.
Iran financed the Oct. 7, 2023,
attack by Hamas on Israel and has seen its influence in the region wither as
Israel killed as many as 20,000 Hamas fighters in a war that took the lives of
70,000 Palestinians, and assassinated the longtime leader of Lebanon's powerful
Hezbollah militia.
WHO BOMBED A GIRLS' SCHOOL IN
IRAN, AND WILL THERE BE ACCOUNTABILITY?
On April 13, 2024, Tehran
launched 170 drones, 120 ballistic missiles and 30 cruise missiles against
Israeli targets after an Israeli airstrike on the Iranian embassy in Damascus,
Syria, killed top officers of its elite Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. A
U.S.-led coalition joined Israel’s defense, blowing nearly all of the
projectiles out of the sky, and Israel suffered only minor damage.
Less than six months later, on
Oct. 1, 2024, Iran attacked again, this time to avenge Israel’s killing of
Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah, a key ally, and the assassination of Hamas
leader Ismail Haniyeh. Iran launched 200 ballistic missiles, again
causing minor damage.
In neither case did Iran turn
its guns on the gleaming towers and valuable oil and gas facilities of
Washington’s wealthy Gulf allies, including Saudi Arabia, Qatar and the United
Arab Emirates.
Even in June 2025, when Israel
launched a surprise attack that killed scores of top Iranian generals and
nuclear scientists, with a reported death toll topping 1,000, Tehran refrained
from widening hostilities.
SENATE FAILS TO BLOCK TRUMP'S IRAN WAR
Iran fired more than 1,000
drones and 550 ballistic missiles at Israel in the 12-day war, killing 32
civilians. A small attack, which experts regarded as token Iranian retaliation,
on a U.S. base in Qatar caused minor damage after U.S. bombers destroyed three
Iranian nuclear facilities.
“If you are sitting in Tehran and
you are looking at this war, the conclusion is that the restraint you showed
was a deterrent failure,” Grieco, a former professor at the U.S. Air Force’s
Air Command and Staff College, told USA TODAY.
Iran’s leaders, she said, will
feel a need “to raise the cost of the conflict.”
Now, Tehran wants Trump and the Israelis to feel pain – to truly need a
ceasefire – before it will rejoin negotiations. That’s the only way for a deal
to stick − and for the brutal Iranian regime to survive, analysts said.
'NO TO WAR': SPAIN WON'T BACK US ATTACKS ON IRAN
“Iran doesn’t want to be exposed
to Israeli air strikes at will” after a new ceasefire, said Mohamad Bazzi,
director of the Center for Near Eastern Studies at New York University. “This
means exacting a very high price from Israel and from Trump in this war.”
Iran’s attacks in the region are
already squeezing U.S. allies, and may soon affect the U.S. economy.
The conflict has closed the Strait of Hormuz, the narrow sea route for 20% of the
world’s oil exports. Qatar, a global supplier, has paused production of
liquified natural gas amid Iranian airstrikes, while oil giant Saudi Aramco’s
550,000 barrel-a-day Ras Tanura refinery was targeted by two Iranian drone
attacks.
Iran has also hit European targets,
striking a British air base on Cyprus in the Mediterranean, and a French base
in the UAE, while the NATO defense alliance said it shot down a missile that
entered Turkish airspace.
WHY IS THE US AT WAR WITH
IRAN? ANSWERING KEY QUESTIONS ABOUT THE CONFLICT
And on March 2, Hezbollah fired
rockets into Israel, inviting retaliatory strikes that killed scores and sent
tens of thousands of residents fleeing southern Lebanon and Beirut’s southern
suburbs.
Oil prices soared on Tuesday,
March 3, to their highest levels since 2024.
The missile and drone attacks
are “causing economic damage,” Bazzi said. “It’s no accident Hezbollah got involved just as the oil
markets and the stock markets were opening” following the war's first
salvos on Feb. 28.
WHAT'S THE ENDGAME?
President Trump now warns
Americans to expect several more weeks of conflict.
Trump has mused on different
endgames. He’s demanded Iran forgo nuclear weapons, which it already had done
− to wide skepticism.
He’s also called on unarmed Iranian citizens to overthrow the brutal,
47-year-old clerical regime and seize power themselves – somehow with the help
of the very security forces that were gunning them down in the
thousands during protests just six weeks ago.
And he’s suggested a resolution similar to the one he
achieved in Venezuela, in which the U.S. would reach an accommodation with
Iran’s leaders without seeking full regime change.
US stock futures slip as investors weigh Middle East war fallout
But “most of the people we had in mind are dead,” Trump said March 3.
“Now we have another group, they may be dead also, based on reports. So you
have a third wave coming. Pretty soon we’re not going to know anybody.”
Trump worried about installing a
new leader “who’s as bad as the previous person.”
So far, Iran’s leaders aren’t
asking for approval from the American president.
“Trump wanted a short, concise
war, while the Iranians are taking it to a new dimension of organized, global
chaos,” Ali Hashem, a veteran journalist and columnist in the Persian Gulf,
told USA TODAY. “The Iranians knew they would have to face their destiny, while
Trump was engaged in wishful thinking.”
DEADLY MISSILE RACE
Now, the question is which side can hold out before
casualties increase and stocks of ammunition decrease.
Iran has launched more than
2,000 drones and 500 ballistic missiles at U.S., Israeli and regional targets,
Gen. Dan Caine, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said March 4.
Pre-war assumptions put the number of Iranian ballistic missiles at 2,500,
Grieco said.
While the gap in military power
between Tehran and Washington “is so wide, it’s hard to describe it,” Bazzi
said, Israel and other
U.S. allies have shrinking supplies of the missile interceptors that so far
have prevented serious bloodshed on their side amid more more than 700
Iranian deaths.
Air defenses have likewise kept
U.S. troop casualties to six war dead.
The Iran
war might be the end of Congress' war powers. What happened?
Iran
wants 'blood' as Trump says US can fight 'forever'.
What to expect.
Trump's
war in Iran polls badly, but will it hurt Republicans in 2026?
Senate
fails to block US involvement in Iran war
Pentagon
IDs 4 US soldiers killed in Iran war: What to know
Parody
website calls for Barron Trump to join Iran war
Which
countries are involved in the Iran-US war? What to know.
Why is
the US at war with Iran? Answering key questions about the conflict
Timeline
of how hostilities led to Trump's decision to attack Iran
“It’s really a race between Iran’s ballistic missiles and drones, and
the Israeli, American and Gulf interceptors,” Grieco said. “It’s clear the
Israelis and the Americans are hunting those
missile facilities.”
Bloomberg News, citing sources
and documents, reported March 2 that Qatar and the United Arab Emirates were
asking their allies to nudge Trump towards a speedy end to the war.
The UAE was asking allies to
help shore up its air defenses, while Qatar had only four days of Patriot
Missile stocks remaining, the Bloomberg report said. On March 5, Italy
announced it was moving air defense weapons to help defend the Gulf emirates.
Trump said on social media the
U.S. has enough weaponry to keep fighting "forever." But he didn't
address the question of air defenses.
Once the interceptors start to
run out, Grieco said, “you have to make hard choices of what to defend…at the
intersection of material and lives.”
@ IMPLICATIONS
A22
X25 X25
FROM US NEWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@
REACTIONS – domestic
X
polls/politics
A23
X37 X37
FROM US NEWS
Will War With Iran Hurt Trump in
the U.S.?
A plume of smoke rises after an
explosion on March 2 in Tehran, Iran.
By Olivier Knox March 4th
President Donald Trump’s Iran war
isn’t just killing leaders and blowing up buildings in Tehran. It’s also
cratering stocks and inflaming oil prices, creating a politically dangerous
home front for Republicans eight months before the midterm elections.
War is unpredictable. There’s a scenario in which
victory over the regime happens in the four to five weeks Trump has predicted
and the crisis passes, gas prices settle down, Wall Street perks up and the
damage is not so visible by the time Americans cast their ballots.
But it’s also very possible the United
States ends up in a protracted conflict against Iranians who are dug in and
determined to exact the highest possible toll from the U.S. and its partners in
the region.
ON OFFENSE IN IRAN, ON DEFENSE AT
HOME
Secretary of State Marco Rubio,
who is also Trump’s national security adviser, told reporters Monday the administration had a plan to
address oil prices.
“There is a plan in place … to
mitigate against the impact that could have,” he said.
Rubio said the United States will
destroy Iran’s navy, and the U.S. moved in that direction today by sinking an
Iranian warship in the Indian Ocean in the first torpedo attack from a U.S.
submarine since World War II. Tehran’s navy is its best tool for strangling the
Strait of Hormuz, through which about 20 million barrels of oil flow daily.
That’s roughly 20% of all global supplies.
Already, traffic through that
waterway has slackened. One problem: Insurance prices have jumped because of
Iranian strikes on tankers. Reuters reported Tuesday that this is one of the
problems Energy Secretary Chris Wright and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent
were expected to try to solve in the plan referenced by Rubio.
“U.S. support for tanker insurance
is not unprecedented,” Reuters noted. “During the Iran-Iraq conflict in the
1980s, Washington reflagged tankers and provided naval escorts when private
insurers withdrew coverage. After the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, the U.S. issued
insurance policies to keep shipping moving amid elevated war-risk premiums.”
Trump announced on social media
that he was directing the Development Finance Corporation to provide shipping
insurance at a “reasonable price” and said the U.S. Navy would escort ships
through the strait “if necessary.”
The president, who regularly
boasts of lower costs at the pump on his watch, has pleaded for patience.
“We have a little high oil prices for a little while,” he told
reporters in the Oval Office on Tuesday. “But as soon as this ends, those
prices are going to drop, I believe, lower than even before.”
His appeal came after gas prices jumped 10 cents per
gallon overnight Monday into Tuesday, according to AAA, and were
expected to keep climbing.
A DEMOCRATIC OPPORTUNITY
Maybe prices will drop. But in the
meantime, the war may have given Democrats an edge in a political season
defined by the public’s frustration with the cost of living, sometimes shorthanded
as “affordability.”
You can already see two messages emerging
from the opposition: 1)
The war is a distraction, at best, from the issues Americans care about,
and 2) This is an argument
Trump himself used to make.
“Americans are demanding help with
the cost-of-living crisis, but President Trump would rather start another war,
potentially driving up energy prices, than listen to them,” said Rep. Rosa
DeLauro, the top Democrat on the House Appropriations Committee.
And independent Sen. Bernie Sanders,
who has contended for the Democratic presidential nomination, dusted off one of
Trump’s 2020 campaign speeches.
“President Trump was right in 2020,” the Vermont lawmaker
said in a social media post featuring a video of a Trump speech.
In the clip, Trump declares: "We’ve spent $8 trillion in
the Middle East and we're not fixing our roads in this country? How stupid. How
stupid is it? And we’re not fixing our highways, our tunnels, our
bridges, our hospitals even, our schools even? It’s crazy."
Confronting a politician with
their past remarks is coin of the realm in politics. Whether it works will
largely depend on perceptions of the war come November.
A24X22
3/3 X22
FROM TIME
How Americans Feel About Trump’s War With Iran, According to the Latest
Polls
by Chantelle Lee and Miranda Jeyaretnam Mar 3, 2026 5:30 AM ET
The majority of
Americans disapprove of the strikes that President Donald Trump ordered against
Iran over the weekend, early polling shows.
Only 27% of
Americans approved of the U.S.-Israeli bombing of Iran, while 43% disapproved,
according to a new poll by Reuters/Ipsos conducted over the weekend,
before news that six U.S. soldiers have been killed in Iranian retaliatory attacks. And it’s not the
only poll.
The U.S. and
Israel’s military operations against Iran come just months before the U.S.
midterm elections and could prove to be a key issue, especially as the
President, who promised peace in his presidential campaign and claims to have ended eight wars, has signaled the
campaign could go on for weeks and may even involve American boots on the ground.
“Trump promised to
end wars,” Democrats on the House Foreign Affairs Committee posted on X on Monday. “He’s now started more wars
than any president in modern American history. Instead of affordable healthcare
and groceries, the American people get to foot the billion-dollar tabs for Trump’s
foreign wars of choice.”
Since entering
office last January, Trump has ordered military strikes against seven countries—more than any other modern-era U.S. President. The U.S.
and Israeli assassination of Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei is also the second recent example
of the Trump Administration orchestrating foreign regime change, following
the U.S. arrest and extradition of Venezuelan
President Nicolas Maduro in January.
Trump appeared to
shrug off the apparent unpopularity of his moves. In an interview with
the New York Post on Monday, he said, “I think
that the polling is very good, but I don’t care about polling. I have to do the
right thing. I have to do the right thing. This should have been done a long
time ago.”
“Look, whether
polling is low or not, I think the polling is probably fine. But it’s not a
question of polling. You cannot let Iran, who’s a nation that has been run by
crazy people, have a nuclear weapon,” Trump continued. “I think people are very
impressed with what is happening, actually. … I think it’s a silent—if you did
a real poll, the silent poll—and it’s like a silent majority.”
PARTISAN
DIVIDE
Around 59% of
Americans don’t approve of Trump’s decision to strike Iran, according to
a CNN poll conducted by SSRS, while roughly 41% of
poll respondents said they approved of the move.
But the CNN poll
also revealed that Americans are sharply split across party lines. More than
80% of Democrats said they disapproved of the strikes, whereas only 23% of
Republicans said they disapproved. The CNN poll surveyed more than 1,000
respondents over text message over the weekend. Less than 20% of Democrats said
they supported the military action,whereas 77% of Republicans expressed their
support for the decision. Of the poll respondents who identified as
independent, 68% disapproved of the strikes, compared to 32% who approved.
That partisan divide
was reflected in other polls, too. Journalists at the Washington Post, who texted more than
1,000 Americans on Sunday to ask them how they felt about the strikes, found
that 81% of Republicans supported the military action, whereas only 9% of
Democrats did. Just 12% of Republicans said they opposed the attack, whereas
87% of Democrats expressed their disapproval of the strikes. Among independents,
28% supported the attack, while 59% opposed it.
The Post found that, overall, 52% of respondents
disapproved of Trump’s decision to launch the attack, compared to 39% who
supported the move and 9% who said they weren’t sure how they felt about it.
Differences are
evident on the streets too. In Atlanta, Baltimore, Boston, Chicago, Cincinnati,
Denver, Las Vegas, Los Angeles, Miami, Minneapolis, New York City, and other cities, Americans have come out to protest the war, even as others
have rallied to celebrate the death of Khamenei.
X
T and admin
A25X23
rubio X23 FROM USA TODAY
Rubio promises punishment for Iran: 'Hardest
hits are yet to come'
By
Francesca Chambers and Zachary Schermele
March 2, 2026
Updated March 3, 2026, 8:40 a.m. ET
What are the biggest updates at
the moment?
What evidence did the Trump
administration cite for Iran's imminent threat?
Is the U.S. at war with Iran
without congressional declaration?
How did Iranian Americans react to
the U.S. attacks on Iran?
What are the biggest updates at
the moment?
WASHINGTON — Secretary of State Marco Rubio sought to
clarify the president's rationale for attacking Iran and argued
ahead of a March 2 classified briefing with lawmakers that the Trump administration
had fulfilled an obligation to notify Congress of its plans,
despite an outpouring of criticism from Democrats over the military operation.
The administration decided to
act quickly because it was "abundantly clear" that if Iran came under attack from Israel, it
was going to retaliate against the United States, Rubio said.
"We knew that there was
going to be an Israeli action. We knew that that would precipitate an attack
against American forces, and we knew that if we didn't preemptively go after
them, before they launched those attacks, we would suffer higher
causalities," Rubio said. "And then we would all be here answering
questions about why we knew that and didn't act."
Rubio said the intelligence
provided the U.S. with enough to invoke action due to an "imminent
threat."
"No matter what, ultimately
this operation needed to happen," he said. "Look at the damage
they're doing now, and this is a weakened Iran, imagine a year from now."
With Americans divided, Congress readies war powers vote
In a Reuters/Ipsos survey
conducted over the weekend, 27% of
Americans said that they approved of the strikes while 29% said they did not
know and 43% said they disapproved.
"The American people have
already made up their mind, which is they do not want United States in a war in
the Middle East," Sen. Andy Kim, a Democrat from New Jersey, told USA
TODAY in a March 1 interview. "And there is nothing that we can hear from
this Trump administration at this point that's going to change the fact that
Americans don't want this, and that the president is doing this against the
will of the American people."
Kim, who was the Obama-era
director for Iraq on White House National Security Council, said he believes
that Congress should vote so that every lawmaker's stance is on record.
Democratic lawmakers in the
House and Senate have pushed for votes this week on resolutions that would
block Trump's ability to conduct additional strikes on Iran unless he has congressional approval. They've
also said the administration needs to lay out its strategy for winning the war
and address contradictory information about Iran's nuclear capabilities and the
status of its ballistic missile program.
Read more: In Congress, GOP leaders support
Trump strikes on Iran but Democrats seek vote
Rubio told reporters before the
Monday briefing with top lawmakers on Capitol Hill that he doesn't understand
"what the confusion" is around why the Trump administration
preemptively struck the adversary it has repeatedly accused of trying to
restart its nuclear program.
He said the U.S. is conducting
an operation "to eliminate the threat of Iran's short-range ballistic
missiles" and the threat posed by its navy.
"That is the clear
objective of its mission," Rubio, a former Florida senator, said.
He argued that the Trump
administration has followed the law when it comes to a requirement to notify
Congress about military action.
Sen. John Kennedy, R-Louisiana,
said he agreed with the secretary of state. The Constitution, he said, is
"purposely vague" about the division of war powers between the
executive and legislative branches in order to allow presidents to make
important decisions about national security.
"Anybody who thinks that
Iran, then and now, was not and is not an immediate, apparent danger to the
American people is either wrong, or they're taking some really strong
drugs," Kennedy told USA TODAY.
Congressional leaders were
informed of the strikes before they took place, Rubio said. And he said the
administration fulfilled its requirement under the War Powers Act of 1973 to provide formal notification to lawmakers
within 48 hours of beginning hostilities.
"We can't notify 535
members of Congress," Rubio said. "Congress can vote on whatever they
want, but there's no law that requires us to do that."
Rubio spoke before he briefed a
bipartisan group of lawmakers with high-level security clearance, known as Gang of Eight, on the conflict
that Trump has said he expects to last for roughly four weeks. He argued, as he
has in the past, that the War Powers Act is not constitutional.
Even so, the Trump
administration complied with the law, he said. He briefed the top congressional
leaders twice — once on the day of the State of the Union and once on the
evening before the strike. And he was about to brief them again.
DEMOCRATS: NO EVIDENCE OF 'IMMINENT THREAT'
Democrats came away from their
conversations with Rubio and other top administration officials woefully
dissatisfied.
“I found the answers completely
and totally insufficient,” said Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, the
chamber's top Democrat. He said Rubio's latest Gang of Eight briefing “raised
many more questions than it answered.”
Sen. Mark Warner, the top
Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee, told USA TODAY after the meeting
that the administration’s communication with Congress about the strikes was
“much better” compared to its other recent military actions. But, he
argued, the White House still flouted the law.
“There was no imminent threat
against the United States,” he said.
TRUMP ARGUES IRAN POSED URGENT THREAT
Trump argued in a video announcing
the strikes, and again in public remarks at the White House, that the United
States faced an urgent threat from Iran.
Laying out his justification for the strikes,
Trump said during an East Room event that Iran's ballistic missile program was
also growing "rapidly and dramatically" and it "posed a very
clear, colossal threat" to the United States and its forces stationed at overseas
bases.
Tehran already had missiles
capable of hitting Europe and "would soon have had missiles capable of
reaching our beautiful America," Trump said in his remarks on March 2.
Trump signaled earlier in the
day that the U.S. was preparing to launch an even bigger wave of attacks on
Iran.
“We haven’t even started hitting
them hard. The big wave hasn’t even happened. The big one is coming soon,"
the president told CNN host Jake Tapper in a phone call.
On Capitol Hill, his secretary
of state echoed those comments. He told reporters the most punishing phase of
the campaign hadn't even begun yet. Without providing details, Rubio said,
"The hardest hits are yet to come from the U.S. military. The next phase
will be ever more punishing on Iran than it is right now."
Six US service members dead in Iran
war; Rubio briefs lawmakers
'Disgusting and evil.' Trump faces
MAGA backlash on Iran.
Timeline of how hostilities led to
Trump's decision to attack Iran
'It's not true': Trump's reasons for
Iran attacks questioned
Do Americans support Iran strikes?
Here's what new poll says
Satellite images show impact from US
and Israel attacks on Iran
"Someone was screaming,
'how long will it take.' I don't know how long it will take, we have
objectives, we will do this as long as it takes to achieve those
objectives," Rubio told reporters. "And we will achieve those
objectives."
The purpose of the
administration's campaign is to destroy Tehran's navy and its ballistic missile
capabilities, he said, which he argued Iran was using as a shield for its
nuclear program.
"And while we would love to
see a new regime, the bottom line is, no matter who governs this country, a
year from now, they're not going to have these ballistic missiles and these
drones to threaten us," Rubio said.
A26X
dems x29
X29 FROM FOX
FETTERMAN BLASTS IRAN STRIKE
CRITICS, AYATOLLAH'S APOLOGISTS: 'LET'S SEE WHO GRIEVES FOR THAT GARBAGE'
Pennsylvania
Democrat breaks with party critics of Trump-Netanyahu joint strikes, calls
operation necessary to counter Tehran's aggression
By Charles Creitz
Published March 2, 2026 3:59pm
EST
As Democrats line up
to denounce President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin
Netanyahu’s joint strikes on Iran’s ruling regime, Sen. John Fetterman, D-Pa.,
is doing the opposite, forcefully defending the operation and rebuking members
of his own party who call it reckless.
The Pennsylvania
Democrat, who has increasingly staked out unapologetic pro-Israel positions,
has openly questioned why critics from both the far-right and far-left are
making hay over the strikes, arguing the operation was necessary to counter
Tehran’s aggression. His stance is widening a visible fracture inside the party
over how far to back Israel amid escalating regional tensions.
On Monday, Fetterman wrote that he’s "not sure why
it’s controversial to anyone to appreciate and celebrate wiping out 49 leaders
of one of the most evil regimes in recorded history," after Trump
announced the potentially four-week mission was ahead of schedule after
discovering several top Iranian officials being targeted were reportedly in the
same area and could be taken out at once.
After the initial strike on Saturday, Fetterman reposted
an image from the "Israel War Room" that showed a Wanted-style poster
of Ayatollah Ali Hosseini Khamenei with the word "Eliminated" burned
across it.
"Let’s see who
grieves for that garbage," Fetterman captioned.
The former
Pennsylvania lieutenant governor later credited Trump, saying in a statement
that he "has been willing to do what’s right and necessary to produce real
peace in the region."
"God bless the
United States, our great military, and Israel."
He also openly
questioned members of his own caucus, who have otherwise agreed that Iran
cannot be permitted to nuclearize.
"Every member
in the U.S. Senate agrees we cannot allow Iran to acquire a nuclear
weapon,"
he wrote on X.
![]()
IRAN
DIDN’T ADAPT TO AMERICA'S PLAYBOOK. RUSSIA AND CHINA ALREADY HAVE
"I’m baffled
why so many are unwilling to support the only action to achieve that. Empty
sloganeering vs. commitment to global security — which is it?"
He said Saturday he
would be a "hard no" if Democrats forced a war powers resolution vote to claw back
Trump’s authority.
Sen. Tim Kaine,
D-Va., told Richmond press on Monday that he intends to press for a vote on a
War Powers Resolution he filed in January focused on Iran.
Kaine wondered aloud
in a separate public statement whether Trump is "too mentally
incapacitated to realize we had a diplomatic agreement with Iran…"
"The Senate
should immediately return to session and vote on my War Powers Resolution to
block the use of U.S. forces in hostilities against Iran. Every single Senator
needs to go on the record about this dangerous, unnecessary, and idiotic
action," Kaine said.
Fetterman was not
the only Democrat to sound off on critics of the Iran strike. Former New York
Mayor Eric Adams, who is also a former NYPD
officer, lambasted what he called the political fringes for ignoring the human
rights abuses, mass murder and attacks on Americans committed by Khamenei, 86,
and his predecessor, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini.
Rep. Gregory
Landsman, D-Ohio, also praised the operation against
Iran and compared the killing of Khamenei to taking out Usama
bin Laden, but stopped short of endorsing Trump’s broader plans.
"There’s a lot
of folks in Congress who don’t trust this president and I’m one of those
people. In the end I trust the generals and I trust our military," he told
the Cincinnati Enquirer.
A27 IUK (x24a)
The Senate can restrain Trump on Iran — but it won’t
(Part Two)
Sending Americans into war is one of the most consequential decisions any
president can take. But don’t expect the Republican-controlled Congress to take
any action to restrain Trump, Eric Garcia writes
Monday 02 March 2026 20:33 GMT
Trump
says an Iran with nuclear weapons would be 'intolerable threat' to US
Welcome to the the most important decision of President Donald
Trump’s second term - and likely his entire time in the White House.
Over the weekend, the
president announced that the United States and Israel had launched
coordinated strikes against Iran and killed the country’s Supreme
Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.
As of Monday, four
U.S. service members have been killed. “Sadly, there will likely be
more... before it ends, that’s the way it is,” Trump
said Sunday.
Sending Americans into war is one of the most consequential
decisions any president can take. It’s why the Constitution solely invests the
power to declare war with Congress, which is more directly accountable to
voters than the executive.
But don’t expect the Republican-controlled Congress to take any
action to restrain Trump.
RECOMMENDED
Trump dismisses Megyn Kelly and Tucker
Carlson over Iran attacks: ‘MAGA loves it’
In the hours after the strikes, Democratic Sen. Tim Kaine of
Virginia lambasted
the military action and questioned whether Trump is too “mentally incapacitated”
to understand the effects of his decision. Kaine has led efforts to force a War
Powers Act resolution through Congress, which allows the legislative branch to
rein in a president’s military power.
Reps. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) and Thomas Massie (R-Ky.), the
political odd couple that forced the passage of legislation to release the
Epstein files, also said they would push a vote on a War Powers Act resolution
in the lower chamber.
Initially passed in 1973 after the Vietnam War saw a succession
of presidents escalate American involvement in Southeast Asia, the War Powers
Act requires the executive branch inform Congress within 48 hours of troops being deployed.
In addition, it requires that troops be withdrawn within 60
days, with a possible 30-day extension, if Congress has not declared war or
authorized the use of military force.
But consistently, Congress has rebuffed these efforts. Earlier
this year, after Trump’s attack on Venezuela, five Republicans voted with Democrats for a War Powers Act resolution
to go through. But Trump raged
against the Republicans who did so and Senators Josh Hawley of
Missouri and Todd Young of Indiana flipped
their votes, defeating the resolution.
There are a number of reasons for this: The obvious one is that
Republicans fear Trump and have provided a rubber stamp to any of his actions
this presidency, facilitated by House Speaker Mike Johnson and Senate Majority
Leader John Thune.
The second is that even before Trump, many Republicans,
including many who do not personally like the president, ardently oppose the
Iranian regime and would like to see it fall.
And there’s also the fact that Trump has largely gotten lucky
with the administration’s previous military operations since he returned to
office.
Last year, when Trump conducted strikes on Iran’s nuclear
facilities, I
wrote that Trump had gambled his entire presidency on the strikes. It
looked like that gamble paid off, initially. After a scuffle between Iran and
Israel, Trump touted a ceasefire, chided
both countries when they seemed to break it by saying “they don’t know
what the f*** they’re doing.” They
ultimately ceased hostilities.
Similarly, when Trump launched a surprise attack on Venezuela,
capturing President Nicolás Maduro and his wife Cilia Flores, the mission
appeared to have been largely a success - even though the country remains
incredibly unstable, to the point that many
oil companies still do not want to invest, and still under authoritarian
control.
Iran represents a more long-term military commitment, whether
Trump knows it or not. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth brushed off questions
as to whether U.S. attacks on Iran would turn the conflict into another Iraq.
RECOMMENDED
Trump has it the wrong way round – we
are ‘very disappointed’ with him
The Iran war could bring a change in
regime – but do they ever work?
“No stupid rules of
engagement, no nation-building quagmire, no democracy-building exercise, no
politically-correct wars,” he said during a press briefing Monday. “We fight to
win.”
But the fact remains, this is still a war. And as Trump has
completely neutered Congress, he will likely keep the conflict as open-ended as
he likes.
A28 X24
X24b FROM IUK
THE SENATE CAN RESTRAIN TRUMP ON IRAN — BUT IT WON’T
|
|
X
12 MTG and isolationist MAGA
A29 X12 FROM HUFFPOST
Marjorie Taylor Greene Blasts Trump Admin As 'Sick
F**king Liars' As Iran Strikes Divide GOP
"We voted for America First
and ZERO wars,” former Georgia Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene said.
By Pocharapon
Neammanee Feb 28, 2026, 12:28 PM EST
TRUMP
ANNOUNCES IRAN STRIKES
The
United States’ early Saturday morning joint military operation with
Israel against Iran divided Republicans, some praising President Donald Trump, but others warning against the
possibility of getting into a foreign war.
“I
am opposed to this War. This is not ‘America First,’” Rep. Thomas
Massie (R-Ky.) said on X, adding that he and Rep. Ro
Khanna (D-Calif.) will force a congressional vote on war. “The
Constitution requires a vote, and your Representative needs to be on record as
opposing or supporting this war.”
The
president announced Saturday that the U.S. has begun “major combat operations
in Iran,” which the defense department is calling “Operation Epic Fury.”
Trump
seemed to urge regime change, encouraging the Iranian public
to “take over” their government, which he claimed has continued to develop its
nuclear program with plans to develop missiles to reach the U.S.
“My
administration is taking every possible step to minimize the risk to U.S.
personnel in the region. Even so, and I do not make this statement lightly, the
Iranian regime seeks to kill,” Trump said. “The lives of courageous American
heroes may be lost, and we may have casualties. That often happens in war. But
we’re doing this not for now. We’re doing this for the future. And it is a
noble mission.”
TRUMP
ANNOUNCES IRAN STRIKES
The
president’s announcement sparked criticism from conservatives who pride
themselves on being “America First.”
Former
Georgia Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene lashed out in
multiple posts on X against the Trump administration, which she noted had “promised to put America FIRST and Make
America Great Again.”
“The
Trump admin actually asked in a poll how many casualties voters were willing to
accept in a war with Iran???,” the MAGA firebrand and former close Trump ally
wrote. “How about ZERO you bunch of sick fucking liars. We voted for America
First and ZERO wars.”
Conservative
podcaster Tucker Carlson also decried the attack,
calling it “absolutely disgusting and evil,” ABC’s Jonathan
Karl reports.
Sen. Rand
Paul (R-Ky.) said that “yet another preemptive war” had “begun
in the Middle East,” stating that “the Constitution conferred the power to
declare or initiate war to Congress for a reason, to make war less likely. “
“As
with all war, my first and purest instinct is wish Americans soldiers safety
and success in their mission,” Paul wrote. “But my oath of office is to
the Constitution, so with studied care, I must oppose another Presidential
war.”
But
others in the GOP remained loyal to Trump, praising the president’s speech and
the attack itself.
Sen. Lindsey Graham said Trump’s speech “will
go down in history as the catalyst for the most historic change in the Middle
East in a thousand years.”
“I
echo President Trump’s call to the Iranian military, IRGC and security forces
to lay down their arms. I echo his call to the Iranian people to take back
their government,” Graham said. “President Trump was right when he said he’s
the first president in 47 years to stand with the people of Iran and give them
the backing they need.”
Sen. Katie
Britt (R-Ala.) offered full support of the operation in a statement on X, calling it “a defining
moment of generational leadership from President Trump to achieve sustainable
peace.”
Rep. Nancy
Mace (R-S.C.) posted, “History will record this night.”
“President
Trump understood what the weak could not bring themselves to say: that peace is
not found in appeasement - it is won,” she continued.
A30 X30 FROM WASHINGTON TIMES
‘MAGA is Trump’: President bashes blowback over Iranian strikes from
Megyn Kelly, Tucker Carlson
By Valerie
Richardson - The Washington
Times -Tuesday, March 3, 2026
As far as President Trump is concerned, he decides
what it means to put America first, not the pundits on the isolationist right.
Mr. Trump pushed back after podcasters Megyn Kelly and Tucker Carlson bemoaned his decision to
launch strikes on Iran, insisting that the mission is in
America’s best interests and that the Trump-founded Make America Great Again movement is
behind him.
“I think that MAGA is Trump — MAGA’s not the other two,”
Mr. Trump said, referring to Ms. Kelly and Ms. Carlson, in a Monday interview on Rachael
Bade’s “Inner Circle” Substack. “MAGA wants to see our country thrive and be
safe. And MAGA loves what I’m doing — every aspect of it.”
He characterized the massive
attack, which wiped out the top Iranian leadership and its warships in the Gulf
of Oman, as “a detour that we have to take in order to keep our country safe
and keep other countries safe, frankly.”
Leading the blowback on the
anti-war right were Mr. Carlson, who called the attack “absolutely
disgusting and evil” in an interview with ABC News reporter Jonathan Karl, and
Ms. Kelly, who accused the president of doing
Israel’s bidding.
“Our government’s job is not to
look out for Iran or for Israel; it’s to look out for
us,” she said on her Monday podcast. “And this feels very much to me like it’s
Israel’s war.”
·
Trump defends strikes against Iran,
‘sick and sinister regime’: ‘You can’t deal with these people’
·
Nancy Mace faces House ethics
committee investigation
·
Immigration court shuts down
‘amnesty’ loophole for hundreds of thousands of migrants
They drew further attention to
the rift on the right between the anti-interventionist wing and the “peace
through strength” side, which includes the vast majority of Republican
lawmakers.
Despite the GOP support, Daily
Wire podcaster Matt Walsh warned that Mr. Trump’s core constituency
isn’t on board.
“I’m referring to MAGA
conservatives, America Firsters, Trump’s base. The people I talk to every single
day,” he wrote in a Monday post on X. “Attacking Iran was
not a policy priority for them. And many were expressly against it. Trying to
rewrite that history now is just grotesque.”
Happy to stoke the division was
Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, who said shortly after the launch of
Operation Epic Fury that Mr. Trump has become “Israel First.”
SEE ALSO: Iran war overshadows
Trump’s meeting with German Chancellor Merz
“Trump has turned ’America
First’ into ’Israel First’ — which always means ’America Last,’” he said in a
Saturday post on X. “Our Powerful Armed Forces are prepared for this day and
will teach the aggressors the lesson they deserve.”
More than 1,000 Iranian
combatants have been killed in the attacks, while the American death toll
stands at six, U.S. Central Command reported Monday.
“Shedding of both American and
Iranian blood is thus on Israel Firsters,” Mr. Araghchi posted. “American
people deserve better and should take back their country.”
In Mr. Trump’s Monday interview, he said he
wasn’t sure whether a significant portion of his base opposes the war, but
emphasized that preventing Iran from
obtaining nuclear weapons and destroying its military might is critical to
American interests.
“I have to do what’s right,
number one — and you can’t have Iran getting
a nuclear weapon. That’s predominant to me,” he said.
He also shrugged off Mr. Carlson’s criticism, saying that “it has
no impact on me.”
Critics accused Mr. Trump of straying from his campaign
promise to avoid “endless” wars, while the White House posted a list of the 74
times he has vowed that Iran cannot
obtain a nuclear weapon dating back to 2011.
Unpersuaded was Ms. Kelly, who said that “no one should have to
die for a foreign country. I don’t think those … servicemembers died for the
United States. I think they died for Iran or
for Israel.”
Mr. Trump dismissed her take, saying that “Megyn was opposed to me for years when I
ran the first time, and nothing stopped me.
“And so, you know, some people
are against — and they always come back. She came all the way back. But now I
guess she maybe doesn’t like the idea of this war, but I do because I have to
keep nuclear weapons out of the hands of the Iranians.”
The Trump administration has
argued that Iran has been waging a one-sided war
against Americans for 47 years, starting with the 66 hostages taken at the U.S.
Embassy in Tehran following the overthrow of the Shah of Iran in
1979.
Since then, Iranian and
Iranian-backed forces have killed more than 800 Americans, including 608 troops
during the Iraq War and 241 military personnel in the October 1983 bombing of
the Marine compound in Beirut.
“For 47 years, the Iranian
regime has actively and intentionally facilitated the killing of Americans
while chanting ’death to America’ and funding other bloodthirsty terrorists
seeking to destroy the United States and all of Western Civilization,” White
House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said Monday on social media.
“Prior American leaders were too
weak and cowardly to do anything about it,” she added. “Now, President Donald J. Trump is correcting decades of
cowardice and holding those responsible for the deaths of Americans
accountable.”
Conservative supporters of
Operation Epic Fury said eliminating threats to U.S. interests is the
definition of America First.
“This is ’America First,’
getting rid of your deadly enemies and their ability to destroy you,” said
conservative commentator Dinesh D’Souza on X.
Fox News host Mark Levin said
Tuesday on his “Liberty’s Voice” podcast that attacking Iran is
“about America First, national security, supporting our troops, protecting the
homeland, and ensuring Iran never
gets nukes.”
He blasted “these phony
podcasters and video podcasters who pretend that they speak for you and me,”
insisting that the “vast majority of the American people support what he’s
doing.
“The only people who are not
backing the president and what we are doing, our military, are the Democrats,
the Marxists, the Islamists, and Tucker Qatarlson and his cabal in the woke
right.”
Christian conservative radio
host Erick Erickson said Tuesday that “I’m really tired of the professional
contrarianism on the right,” referring to those condemning the attack on
Tehran.
“I’m tired of Megyn Kelly just a few years ago saying
we should take out Iran, to now blame the Jews,” he said on his
Substack page. “I’m tired of Tucker Carlson building an entire career on
regime change to suddenly change his mind.”
He said that support for ousting
the Iranian ayatollahs has been conservative boilerplate for decades.
“If you want to
change your mind, that’s fine,” Mr. Erickson said. “But don’t pretend that the
majority of the right hasn’t for the last forty-nine years been calling for
regime change in Iran when you yourself have been fine
with it.”
PEANUT GALLERY
Trump has gone full MINO (MAGA In Name Only) and Republicans will
lose the midterms as a result. It's a sad day in the USA.
RK1959
VIP
“I think that MAGA is Trump —MAGA’s not the other two,” - POTUS
and MAGA - America's racist & bigots.
MAGA thugs - white nationalists, tea party, fascist, kkk, fake
militia's, Heritage Foundation, SCOTUS, GOP.
Jan. 6, 2021 - The American People will never forget. The ex-POTUS
& his MAGA thugs failed race/civil war, riot & insurrection at the U.S.
Capitol. Democracy defeated autocracy evil (hatred, fear & bigotry) on the Capitol
Hill battlefield. No race/civil war. No martial law. No autocracy. No dictator.
The Truth.
jpnaleid
Recruit
Unfortunately, the president is just chosen Israel first, and he
has lost a lot of his base. The midterms are not going to be very kind to him.
Reply
2 hours ago
A31
X20 gambling X20 FROM US News
|
|
|
THE
UNSETTLING NEW WAY TO CASH IN ON WAR
A
prediction on when the U.S. will strike Iran is shown on the Polymarket app on
Feb. 25.
The
Israeli airstrike that killed Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and
dramatically reshaped the Middle East also dropped a fortune in the lap of a
prediction market bettor – an unsettling development that highlights the
growing pull of gambling on public policy.
“Magamyman”
scored a $553,000 payload on Polymarket by placing bets Khamenei would be
toppled shortly before the bombing that claimed the ayatollah’s life, according
to NPR. We may never learn the anonymous gambler’s identity.
But what
we know is that betting on policy outcomes has become pretty darn popular. Just
search for “Iran” on Polymarket to get a sense of the dizzying array of
options, including yes/no questions and predictions around certain dates. Out:
Cowboys beat the spread. In: When will Iran have a new supreme leader?
Is this
kind of wager more morally or materially questionable than a traditional sports
bet? Sports leagues have implemented restrictions on gambling amid longstanding
concerns that a player or coach seduced by the potential payoff might
deliberately tank a game.
It might
be. Such concerns have wildly higher stakes if we’re talking about insider –
even classified – info from government officials.
The
Commodity Futures Trading Commission notionally oversees prediction markets.
But Polymarket’s offshore operations make things tougher on U.S. regulators.
While prediction markets theoretically ban insider trading, they’re anonymous
and designed in a way that rewards non-public information.
WINNING
IRAN BET JUST ONE OF MANY
Wagering
on public policy raises copious questions not just about trading off insider
knowledge but also the possibility that an official in a position to shape a
decision might shape it according to their financial stake. Pure corruption.
It’s not
academic.
In
December, a new account on Polymarket bet $68,000 that Kevin Hassett would be
nominated to be the next Federal Reserve Chair. An official social media
account tied to Polymarket strongly suggested the company thought it was based
on insider knowledge.
“Either
@novice99 can read Trump’s mind, or they’re serving coffee at Hassett’s
breakfast meetings,” it said.
Or
consider the American operation in January to capture Venezuelan strongman
Nicolás Maduro. On Friday, Jan. 30, an anonymous Polymarket account “appeared
to invest $30,000 … on the market: 'Maduro out by 31 January 2026,’” The
Guardian reported. “After Maduro’s capture was announced on Saturday morning,
the trader seemed to have made profits of $436,759.61.”
IN
SEARCH OF ACCOUNTABILITY
In
mid-February, two Israelis were charged in connection with allegedly using
classified military information to bet on future military operations.
The U.S.
has taken no such action, but some lawmakers have prediction markets in their
sights. Democratic Sen. Chris Murphy of Connecticut has repeatedly criticized
them. In February, he posted a screenshot on social media of bets on how long
the State of the Union speech would be.
“Just
insane that we don't regulate rigged markets like this out of existence,” he
said. “This is not the outcome of a game. This is a question with an answer
that already exists. Trump's inside circle KNOW THE ANSWER and can make a mint.
So corrupt.”
On
Saturday, Murphy highlighted a report about bets on the timing of the Iran
strikes and declared: “It’s insane this is legal. People around Trump are profiting
off war and death. I’m introducing legislation ASAP to ban this.”
It seems
such legislation may already exist, though it’s unclear whether it’s being
applied. U.S. law forbids any wager that “involves, relates to, or references
terrorism, assassination, war, gaming, or an activity that is unlawful under
any State or Federal law.”
Last
week, six Democratic Senators, led by Adam Schiff of California, wrote to the
CFTC chairman, Michael Selig, to urge him to be more aggressive about enforcing
the rules.
“We are
writing to express strong concern with prediction contracts that incentivize
physical injury or death, and the grave and perverse moral and geopolitical
implications of these contracts,” they said. “These contracts present dangerous
national security risks, including creating incentives to incite violence,
foment geopolitical conflicts, and disclose classified information.”
How
quickly will Polymarket offer a wager on, “Will Congress pass legislation
targeting prediction markets?”
@
REACTIONS – foreign
A32 X14 FROM USA TODAY (TIMELINE/TAKEAWAYS)
Iran live updates: Trump vows to avenge 3 troops
killed in action
By Kim Hjelmgaard, N'dea Yancey-Bragg,
Kathryn Palmer, Fernando Cervantes Jr., Eve Chen, Terry Collins, and Francesca
Chambers
USA TODAY
Updated March 1, 2026, 5:00 p.m. ET
Three American service members were killed in action amid
the ongoing conflict with Iran, U.S. military
officials confirmed, one day after the United States and Israel launched
airstrikes and Tehran quickly hit back.
Five others were seriously wounded, according to U.S. Central
Command, which didn't provide further details. The service members were not
immediately identified.
The announcement of the first U.S. casualties in the conflict
came as a new poll shows that one in four Americans approve
of President Donald Trump's
two-day-old air war, which killed Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei,
and dozens of top officials.
“They want to talk, and I have agreed to talk, so I will be
talking to them," Trump told The Atlantic magazine in
a Sunday morning interview. "They should have done it sooner.”
Do Americans support Iran strikes? Here's what new poll says
Meanwhile, Israel and Iran continued to trade attacks. Explosions were heard in Tehran into
the afternoon.
The death toll in the conflict included at least 200 killed more
than 700 injured in Iran, nine deaths in Israel, and three dead in the United
Arab Emirates. President Trump said U.S. forces had struck more than 1,000
targets inside Iran.
"Combat operations continue at this time in full force, and
they will continue until all of our objectives are achieved," Trump said
later in the day in a video posted to social media. "We have very strong
objectives." He warned of more American casualties.
'Secret words': What does US want from Iran?
This is a breaking story. Follow
along with USA TODAY's live coverage.
·
President
Trump told The Atlantic magazine he had agreed to talks with members of Iran's
surviving leadership. In a separate interview with CNBC, he said the US
operation was "ahead of schedule."
·
A
Reuters/Ipsos poll of 1,282 US adults taken on Saturday and Sunday showed that
only 1 in 4 respondents approved of the US-Israeli attack on Iran.
'SADLY
THERE WILL LIKELY BE MORE,' TRUMP SAYS OF U.S. TROOP DEATHS
Zac Anderson
President Trump lamented the deaths of three U.S. troops killed in
the conflict with Iran and said more service members "likely" will
die. He said the Iran operation will continue "until all of our objectives
are achieved.”
"As one nation we grieve for the true American patriots who
have made the ultimate sacrifice for our nation," Trump said in a video posted March 1 on social
media, adding: "Sadly, there will likely be more before it ends, that's
the way it is."
Trump said the three troops, who have not been publicly identified,
died for a "righteous mission" and that the U.S. will "avenge
their deaths."
US
MILITARY HAS STRUCK 1K IRANIAN TARGETS
Terry Collins
The US military has carried out strikes against more than 1,000 Iranian targets since
beginning its joint Operation Epic Fury campaign with Israel on
Feb. 28, according to the US Central Command (CENTCOM).
In a March 1 fact sheet CENTCOM provided on social media, it lists
the "types of targets" it has
struck, including Iranian Navy ships and submarines, anti-missile sites,
commands and control centers, and the headquarters of the Islamic Revolutionary
Guard Corps (IRGC) and its Aerospace Forces.
Earlier, Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) spokesman Effie Defrin said during a
press briefing that Israeli planes had
also targeted dozens of headquarters belonging to the IRGC.
\
WHAT'S
THE IRAN DEATH TOLL?
Julia Gomez
On the morning of Sunday, March 1, President Trump told Fox News
that 48 of Iran's leaders, including Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, had been killed
in punishing U.S. and Israeli strikes. Trump said U.S. forces bombed more than
1,000 targets in Iran since airstrikes began early Saturday morning.
More than 200 people were reported killed in Iran, according to
the Iranian Red Crescent Society. Scores of children were reported killed in an
airstrike on a school in southern Iran.
Casualties have been reported across the region due to Iranian reprisal
attacks.
Since airstrikes began on Saturday, Feb. 28, Iran launched attacks
on 27 U.S. bases and other targets across eight countries, reported Al Jazeera. The
countries where attacks occurred were Bahrain, Iraq, Jordan, Kuwait, Oman,
Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates.
The following casualties were reported in the Middle East,
according to Al Jazeera:
·
Iran- 201 killed, 747 injured
·
Israel- 9 killed, 121 injured
·
The United Arab Emirates- 3 killed, 58 injured
·
Bahrain- 4 injured, no deaths reported
·
Iraq- 2 killed, 5 injured
·
Kuwait- 1 killed, 32 injured
·
Qatar-16 injured, no deaths reported
·
Oman- 5 injured, no deaths reported
·
Saudi Arabia- No deaths or injuries reported
Three U.S. troops were reported dead, and five are wounded.
IRAN UN
AMBASSADOR SAYS OVER 100 KILLED AT SCHOOL
Kathryn Palmer
Dozens of people, many likely children, are reported dead by
Iranian media and officials following an attack on an Iranian all-girls primary school in
the southern part of the country.
Amir Saeid Iravani, Iran’s ambassador to the United Nations, said
in an emergency session on Saturday, Feb. 28, that airstrikes by the United
States and Israel killed more than 100 children at a school in Minab.
On the same day as Iravani's statement to the United Nations
Security Council, a spokesman for Iran’s health ministry said
in a social media post that 60 children were killed and 80 were injured at the
school. Death tolls have also ranged on Sunday, Mar. 1, with state-run media
agency Tasnim putting the number over 100, citing a county prosecutor of Minab.
Official estimates of fatalities and injuries in Iran, including
at any schools, have not been confirmed by American or international
authorities. USA TODAY has also not been able to independently verify the death
toll claims.
More: Iranian state media: 85 killed after
missile blew up all-girls school
The Iranian Red Crescent Society said in a social media post on Sunday, Mar. 1, it
has deployed 200 response teams to the school in Minab for relief operations,
including search and rescue.
Tim Hawkins, a spokesperson for U.S. Central Command, told
multiple media outlets the military is aware of reports about civilians harmed
by the strikes.
"We take these reports seriously and are looking into
them," Hawkins told NPR on Feb.
28. "The protection of civilians is of utmost importance, and we will
continue to take all precautions available to minimize the risk of unintended
harm. Unlike Iran, we have never − and will never − target
civilians."
WHAT'S
HAPPENING WITH THE PRICE OF OIL?
Andrea Riquier
Oil markets are likely to be choppy in the coming days amid
military strikes between the U.S., Israel, and Iran, but may settle relatively
soon after that.
Analysts expect crude oil, which ended trading on Friday at about
$67 a barrel, to open the week at $90 or higher as
traders process the news that Iranian forces had restricted traffic through the
crucial Strait of Hormuz.
Read the full story: Oil prices likely to top $90
EXCLUSIVE:
IRAN WAKES TO FEAR − AND QUIET JOY
Kim Hjelmgaard
TEHRAN − Iranians woke up to a world on March 1 that for the
best part of four decades they dared not hope for: one without the Islamic
Republic's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.
The atmosphere in Tehran was
a strange combination of
quiet, terror, hidden joy and official mourning, said Ali, 42, a
shopkeeper. He said that − unusual for car-clogged Tehran − there
was very little traffic on the roads.
Khamenei, the highest authority in Iran's regime and a guardian of
its rigid theocratic and social doctrine for 36 years, was killed in U.S. and
Israel air strikes. His death, and the attacks, have launched Iran into a new
era of uncertainty. The process to choose his successor has started. It's not
clear how, or when, the conflict ends.
"When Trump said help was on the way, all of us felt joy and
hope. But as time dragged on, we grew worried that perhaps the Islamic Republic
was striking a deal," said Somayeh, a 25-year-old architecture student, in
the interview.
Read the full story: After Khamenei killed in strikes,
Iran wakes to fear — and quiet joy
Watch: Iranians tear down statue of Ayatollah Khomeini
NETANYAHU:
'STRONGER, PAINFUL DAYS' AHEAD
Terry Collins
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said there will be
both stronger and more painful days ahead during the joint Israel-U.S. conflict with Iran.
"Our forces are now striking at the heart of Tehran with
intensifying force, and this will only grow even stronger in the coming
days," Netanyahu said in a translated video statement on X. "That said, these
are painful days."
The Israeli leader also reflected on at least eight people who died during an Iranian
military strike in Beit Shemesh, an Israeli city located west of Jerusalem. The
deaths are among the highest casualties in the two days of combat with Iran.
"Yesterday, here in Tel Aviv, and now in Beit Shemesh, we
lost dear people," Netanyahu said. "My heart goes out to the
families, and on behalf of all of you, citizens of Israel, I send wishes for
recovery to the wounded."
Who was Ali Khamenei? Supreme Leader ruled Iran with iron
fist.
US
DESTROYED IRAN'S NAVAL HEADQUARTERS AND NINE SHIPS, TRUMP SAYS
Francesca Chambers
President Trump in a post on Truth Social said
the United States sank nine Iranian ships so far and will be going after the
rest of its fleet. He said the U.S. military also destroyed Iran's naval
headquarters.
"I have just been informed that we have destroyed and sunk 9
Iranian Naval Ships, some of them relatively large and important. We are going
after the rest — They will soon be floating at the bottom of the sea, also! In
a different attack, we largely destroyed their Naval Headquarters. Other than
that, their Navy is doing very well!" Trump said.
The president did not comment on the deaths of three American
service members in the post, which followed several phone interviews with
reporters. He has not made remarks on camera about the Iranian military
operation since his overnight video announcing the strikes on Saturday.
TOP DEM
CALLS IRAN STRIKES 'A WAR OF CHOICE'
Terry Collins
The top Democrat on the Senate's intelligence committee
called President Donald Trump’s
decision to strike Iran "a war of choice."
Sen. Mark Warner of Virginia told CNN on Sunday that he
saw no intelligence that Iran was on the verge of launching any kind of
preemptive strike against the United States.
"And when the president commits American forces to a war of
choice, he needs to come before Congress and the American people and ask for a
declaration of war," Warner told CNN's Dana Bash. "He does not
have the right to do this on his own."
"I don't believe that the vast majority of American people,
whether they are MAGA supporters or not, want us engaged in another potentially
endless war in the Middle East," said Warner, who is part of the so-called
Gang of Eight, a bipartisan group of leaders in the Senate and House.
NEW
POLL: MOST AMERICANS DISAPPROVE OR UNSURE OF STRIKES
Kathryn Palmer
Only one in four Americans approve of the U.S. strikes on Iran,
according to a new poll released by Reuters/Ipsos.
Some 27% of respondents said they approved of the strikes, while a
majority said they were either unsure about them (29%) or said they disapproved
of the military action (43%).
The two-day poll, which
ended on Sunday, Mar. 1, also found about half of respondents − 56%
− believe President Trump is too willing to use military force to advance
U.S. interests. Trump has also ordered strikes in Venezuela, Syria and Nigeria
in recent months. The vast majority of Democrats, 87%, held this view, as did
23% of Republicans and 60% of people who don't identify with either political
party.
The poll surveyed 1,282 U.S. adults nationwide and has a margin of
error of ± three percentage points.
EXPECT
EXTENDED AIR AND NAVAL CAMPAIGN: SENATE INTEL CHAIR
Francesca Chambers
President Trump does not
plan to put a large contingent of troops on the ground in Iran, says Senate
Intelligence Committee Chairman Tom Cotton.
Cotton said Sunday on CBS News’ “Face the Nation" that
Americans should expect an extended air and naval campaign designed to
“continue to set back Iran's nuclear ambitions,” and destroy its missile
arsenal and manufacturing capabilities.
“But barring that kind of unusual circumstance,” Cotton said, “the
president has no plan for any kind of large-scale ground force inside of Iran.”
Cotton is the third-ranking Republican in Senate leadership and a
member of the Gang of Eight – the bipartisan group of lawmakers who were
briefed by the Trump administration before the strikes.
As for what comes next for Tehran, where top leaders including
Ayatollah Ali Khamenei were killed, Cotton said “there's probably a lot of
jockeying inside of Iran right now” as the government decides who should
replace the supreme leader.
“There's a reason why he
didn't want to have a clear succession plan in place. It's hard to do that when
the United States is pummeling their leadership every moment of the day,”
Cotton said.
VIDEO
SHOWS IRANIANS TOPPLE KHOMEINI MONUMENT
Terry Collins
An eyewitness video is circulating showing crowds taking down a
monument to Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, the founding father of the Islamic
Republic.
The video, verified by NBC News, Sky News, and
Reuters, captures dozens of people toppling the monument dedicated to the
Islamic Republic founder in the southern Iranian town of Galleh Dar on Feb. 28.
The video also shows flames rising from a roundabout with onlookers recording
the moment on their phones and cheering.
The incident occurred hours after Khomeini's successor, Ali
Khamenei, was killed in a joint strike effort by the United States and Israel
against Iran.
DEM
SENATOR HITS OUT AT TRUMP: 'HE'S JUST MAKING THIS UP AS HE GOES ALONG'
Francesca Chambers
What comes next in the conflict with Iran is something that “no
one knows,” not even the president, Sen. Andy Kim, a New Jersey Democrat, said
in an interview on Sunday morning.
“We have a president that just looks like he's just making this up
as he goes along. And that is terrifying,” Kim told USA TODAY.
More: Iranian Americans divided in
reactions to US attacks\
Before he became a senator, Kim had roles at the Pentagon and
State Department and on the White House National Security Council, where he was
Iraq director in the Obama administration.
“If you are a service member that's asked to put your life at risk
for the country, what you deserve is to have your leaders with a strategy that
they can unite behind and make sure that is resourced and that keeps you safe.
We don’t have that, we don’t know how long this is going to go for,” Kim said.
“There are steps that we can take to reduce risk to our forces
right now that are not being done,” said Kim, who spoke with USA TODAY just
before the U.S. announced the deaths of three American servicemembers.
The senator said there also needs to be a “deep diplomatic effort
to try to be able to ensure that we're not entering this next phase completely
isolated.”
TRUMP
SAYS 48 IRANIAN LEADERS KILLED
Kathryn Palmer
President Trump said the joint U.S. and Israeli strikes killed at
least 48 Iranian leaders, according to Fox News.
Anchor Jacqui Heinrich said she spoke to the president on Sunday,
and he told her the nearly 50 Iranian leaders were "wiped out."
Trump
says US is ‘ahead of schedule’ in Iran
N'dea Yancey-Bragg
President Trump expressed optimism about the progress of
the U.S. military operation in Iran in a phone interview with CNBC on
Sunday.
Trump told the outlet the path to an end to the conflict would
depend on many factors, but said “everything is ahead of schedule.”
“Things are evolving in a very positive way right now, a very
positive way,” Trump said.
More: 'It's not true': Trump's reasons
for Iran attacks questioned
EUROPEAN
UNION LEADER: 'RISK OF FURTHER ESCALATION IS REAL'
Terry Collins
European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen believes there
is a real "risk of further escalation" as Iran and Israel continued to trade airstrikes after Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali
Khamenei was killed in the joint strikes with the United
States.
"The risk of further escalation is real. This is why a
credible transition in Iran is urgently needed. One that restores stability and
paves the way for a lasting solution," von der Leyen said in a series
of posts on Xon March 1.
The EU leader said she spoke with Qatari Emir Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani, Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman of
Saudi Arabia, and King Abdullah II of Jordan.
"We discussed the aftermath of Iran’s reckless and
indiscriminate strikes on the country," von der Leyen said of her call
with Qatar’s Emir. "With the region in deep upheaval, Qatar can count on
strong European solidarity."
WHAT IS
THE STRAIT OF HORMUZ?
Kathryn Palmer
The Strait of Hormuz is an energy transportation route critical to
global trade, accounting for about 25% of seaborne oil shipments and about 20%
of liquified natural gas flows.
The narrow channel, whittling down to just 21 miles across at one
point, connects the Persian Gulf to the
Gulf of Oman and the wider Arabian Sea. The waterway's choke
point is sandwiched by the Iranian coastline to one side and a small Omani
peninsula on the other. It is a vital route for exporting oil from major
producers like Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Iran, Qatar and the UAE.
The U.S. and Israeli strikes on Iran have already led to
disruptions. Tehran has warned ships against moving through the waterway.
On Sunday, at least 150 tankers, including oil and natural gas
vessels, dropped anchor in open Gulf waters beyond the Strait
of Hormuz and dozens more were stationary on the other side, Reuters
reported.
US SAYS
AIRCRAFT CARRIER WAS NOT STRUCK BY IRAN
N'dea Yancey-Bragg
U.S. military officials dismissed the claim that the aircraft
carrier USS Abraham Lincoln was hit by
missiles on Sunday.
Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corp said in a statement
reported by state media that the aircraft carrier was targeted with four
ballistic missiles.
“The Lincoln was not hit,” U.S. Central Command said in a response on X.“The missiles launched didn’t even come close.”
The USS Lincoln is one of two aircraft carriers deployed
to the region in recent weeks and the only one relatively close to Iranian
shores.
GULF
COUNTRIES REPORT CASUALTIES
Fernando Cervantes Jr.
As Israel and Iran continue to trade military strikes in the
Middle East, countries across the Gulf region have been caught in the crossfire
and reported casualties and injuries.
According to the Qatari News Agency, three people died due to
Iranian missile strikes in the country, while 58 other people suffered “minor
injuries.” According to Al Jazeera, 16 Qataris were injured from
falling shrapnel and debris.
Nearby, the Kuwaiti Ministry of Health reported one death and 32
injuries in connection with Iranian attacks.
Five injuries were reported in Oman. And two deaths and five
injuries were reported in Iraq in connection with airstrikes from the United
States and Israel, Al Jazeera reported. In Bahrain, Iran
targeted the headquarters of the U.S. Navy’s 5th Fleet as well as several
residential buildings in the capital Manama, leaving four injured, the Bahrain Ministry of Interior confirmed to
the outlet.
WORLDWIDE
CAUTION FOR AMERICANS ABROAD
Eve Chen
The State Department has issued a worldwide caution for Americans,
not just in the Middle East.
“Following the launch of U.S. combat operations in Iran, Americans
worldwide and especially in the Middle East should follow the guidance in the
latest security alerts issued by the nearest U.S. embassy or consulate,”
the State Department announced Saturday.
"The Department of State advises Americans worldwide to exercise
increased caution."
U.S. citizens traveling or living abroad are urged to enroll in
the State Department’s free Smart Traveler Enrollment Program for
important updates and easier reach in the event of an emergency.
“Also follow our WhatsApp channel 'U.S. Department of State –
Security Updates for U.S. Citizens' and @TravelGov social
media,” State Department Assistant Secretary for Consular Affairs Mora Namdar posted on X.
“Americans in the Middle East region who need consular assistance can call 24/7
at +1-202-501-4444 from overseas or +1-888-407-4747 from the U.S. and Canada."
A number of U.S. embassies and consulates across the Middle East
advised U.S. citizens to shelter in place on
Saturday.
POPE LEO
WARNS OF 'IMMENSE TRAGEDY' IF 'SPIRAL OF VIOLENCE' CONTINUES
Fernando Cervantes Jr.
At the Vatican on Sunday, March 1, Pope Leo XIV warned of an
immense tragedy if violence between the United States, Israel and Iran
continues.
During his weekly address at St. Peter’s
Square on Sunday, the pope condemned the ongoing fighting in the Middle East, saying that
a "spiral of violence" could escalate out of control in the region.
“Stability and peace are
not built with mutual threats, nor with weapons, which sow destruction, pain,
and death, but only through a reasonable, authentic, and responsible dialogue,”
he said. “I address to the
parties involved a heartfelt appeal to assume the moral responsibility to stop
the spiral of violence before it becomes an irreparable abyss!”
Pope Leo’s comments are just the latest in a string of
high-profile disagreements from the pontiff with the Trump administration since
becoming pope last May. Back in November, the pope backed a U.S. Roman Catholic
bishops' statementthat criticized the Trump administration's immigration
and mass deportation policies.
"We have to look for ways of treating people humanely,
treating people with the dignity that they have,” he said.
3 US
SERVICE MEMBERS KILLED IN IRAN OPERATION
Marina Pitofsky
Three U.S. service members were killed amid the ongoing conflict
in Iran and five were seriously wounded, according to American military
officials.
"Several others sustained minor shrapnel injuries and
concussions — and are in the process of being returned to duty. Major combat
operations continue and our response effort is ongoing," U.S. Central
Command said in a post on X.
TRAVELERS
IN THE MIDDLE EAST ROCKED BY STRIKES
Eve Chen
Air travel has come to a standstill across the Middle East amid
the ongoing conflict and resulting airspace closures.
In the United Arab Emirates, one person was killed and seven
people were hurt by falling debris after a drone targeting Zayed International Airport was
intercepted, according to Abu Dhabi Airports. The airport and UAE airspace
are currently closed.
Four workers were hurt when a concourse sustained minor damage at
Dubai International Airport, one the world’s busiest,
according to Dubai Airports. Most
terminals had already been evacuated at the time. The airport and Dubai World
Central – Al Maktoum International have both suspended flights until further
notice.
Several workers suffered minor injuries in a drone attack on
Kuwait International Airport, a spokesperson for the country’s civil aviation
authority told state-owned Kuwait News Agency KUNA.
The airport's website listed no arrivals and limited departures for March 1 and
none for March 2.
Bahrain International Airport and Hamad
International Airport in Qatar have suspended flight operations
due to airspace closures over their respective countries. Israel has also
closed its airspace and evacuated passengers at Ben Gurion International
Airport and Haifa Airport, according to its Airports Authority. Some
of Israel’s land border crossings are also closed.
The vast majority of El Al, Emirates, FlyDubai, Gulf Air and Qatar
Airways flights for March 1 are canceled, according to flight tracking website FlightAware. More than
half of Etihad Airways’ flights are canceled as well. Travelers should
reach out to their airlines for rebooking or refund options.
EIGHT
PEOPLE KILLED AFTER MISSILE STRIKE ON ISRAELI TOWN
Reuters
Eight people were killed after an attack on the Israeli town
of Beit Shemesh, the Israeli ambulance service said on Sunday.
More than 20 people were hospitalized with injuries from the
strike, according to multiple reports. Beit Shemesh is located west of
Jerusalem.
'CYNICAL
MURDER': PUTIN WEIGHS IN ON IRAN
Kim Hjelmgaard
Russian President Vladimir Putin for the
first time weighed in on the U.S and Israel attacks on Iran, describing
Khamenei's killing as a "cynical murder," according to Russian state
news agency TASS.
"Khamenei's
assassination is a violation of all standards of human morality and
international law," Putin said. He also offered his condolences
to Iran's President Masoud Pezeshkian.
Ties between Russia and Iran have strengthened in recent years amid
Russia's war in Ukraine. Iran has supplied Russia with its deadly
"Shahed" drones. Russia in turn has been purchasing Iran's
heavily-sanctioned oil exports.
KHAMENEI'S
DEATH SPARKS PRO-GOVERNMENT RALLIES, ALSO CELEBRATIONS
Kim Hjelmgaard
Iran's authorities declared a mourning period of 40 days following
the death of supreme leader Ayatollah Khamenei.
On the second day of the war, state media published videos and
photos showing some pro-government rallies and events in Tehran and other
cities. Still, Iranian authorities have imposed a near-total internet blackout,
according NetBlocks, a
connectivity monitoring group.
That makes communications with the outside world difficult.
However, some video and testimonies have emerged from Iran on social media and
were sent directly to Western news outlets, including USA TODAY, that appear to
show scenes of celebration and joy over Khamenei's killing.
President Trump has called for Iranians to rise up against Iran's
clerical regime. It's not yet clear if they will do so. Iran's domestic
security apparatus is enormous and violent, as January crackdowns on protesters demonstrated.
AT LEAST
10 PROTESTERS KILLED AFTER GROUP BREACHES US CONSULATE
Reuters
At least ten protesters were shot and killed when crowds breached
the outer wall of the U.S. consulate in the Pakistani city of Karachi following
news of U.S. and Israeli strikes on Iran that killed Ayatollah Khamenei.
"Death to Israel, death to America," the protesters
shouted.
Meanwhile in Iraq, police fired tear gas and stun grenades to
scatter hundreds of pro-Iranian protesters who had gathered outside the Green
Zone in the capital of Baghdad, where the U.S. embassy is located. Pakistan and
Iraq have the largest Shi'ite Muslim populations after Iran.
In Karachi, protesters were pushed back from the consulate after
they breached the outer security layer, said Sukhdev Assardas Hemnani, a local
government spokesman. They also set a vehicle ablaze outside the main gate and
clashed with police, he said. U.S. consulate security officials opened fire at
the protesters, Hemnani said.
"We are in constant touch with consulate officials. They are
all safe," he added.
IRAN
VOWS TO SEEK REVENGE FOR KHAMENEI, STARTS LEADERSHIP TRANSITION PROCESS
Kim Hjelmgaard
A top aide to Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who was killed
Saturday in U.S.-Israel airstrikes, insisted that Khamenei's death would be
avenged.
Ali Larijani, who is Iran’s security chief, also said that a
leadership transition process in Iran has started, according to Iranian state
media.
Under Iran's constitution the country's president, the head of its
justice ministry and a senior cleric from the powerful Guardian Council take
charge of Iran an interim basis. Then, an inner circle of senior officials who
are part of a body known as the Assembly of Experts choose his successor.
Iran's supreme leader controls and sets the overall direction of
Iran's domestic and foreign policy. The president is responsible for the
day-to-day running of the government. Masoud Pezeshkian,
known as a cautious reformer, is Iran's current president. Pezeshkian was
elected in 2024.
IRAN
SUPREME LEADER KHAMENEI KILLED IN US-ISRAEL STRIKE
Rebecca Morin
Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Khamenei was killed in joint strikes on Iran, according
to President Trump and Iran's state media.
“Khamenei, one of the most evil people in
History, is dead," Trump wrote on Truth Social. "This is not
only Justice for the people of Iran, but for all Great Americans, and those
people from many Countries throughout the World, that have been killed or
mutilated by Khamenei and his gang of bloodthirsty THUGS."
Khamenei, 86, led Iran since 1989 and is credited with creating
and giving increasing power to Iran's Revolutionary Guard Corp.
Khamenei previously served as the president from 1981 to
1989. He was a close ally of Iran's first supreme leader, Ayatollah
Ruhollah Khomeini, who led the country's 1979 revolution that overthrew the government
and founded Iran's Islamic Republic.
NEW WAVE
OF ISRAEL ATTACKS ON IRAN
Kim Hjelmgaard
Israel on Sunday launched another wave of attacks on Iran,
and Iranian state media reported explosions across Tehran, including near
residential buildings and a complex that houses Iranian broadcasters.
Israel has said they are all targets linked to Iran's regime. Israel's Defense
Forces said in a statement that the country’s air force has killed at least 30
senior Iranian officials in the ongoing operation.
President Trump has warned Iran not to
strike back. "IF THEY DO WE WILL HIT THEM WITH A FORCE THAT HAS NEVER BEEN
SEEN BEFORE," he said in a post on Truth Social. Iran, meanwhile, is
continuing to insist that it will go on attacking U.S. military bases and
Israel, which it started doing on Saturday.
SECRETARY
OF STATE MARCO RUBIO CANCELS TRIP TO ISRAEL
Swapna Venugopal Ramaswamy
The U.S. State Department announced that Secretary of State Marco
Rubio will not be travelling to Israel on Monday, March 2, in the wake of Iran
strikes.
Rubio was scheduled to travel to Israel from March 2-3 to discuss
a range of regional priorities including Iran, Lebanon, and ongoing efforts to
implement President Trump’s 20-Point Peace Plan for Gaza, the state department
had previously announced.
WILL
IRAN CONFLICT DRIVE UP GAS PRICES?
Jessica Guynn
Crude oil prices rose on fears of war in the Persian Gulf. Now the
U.S. and Israeli military strikes on Iran could disrupt oil
exports and put pressure on prices at the pump.
Energy analysts at Barclays predicted crude oil prices would hit
$100 a barrel “as the market grapples with the threat of a potential supply
disruption amid a spiraling security situation in the Middle East.”
U.S. gas prices averaged $2.98 per gallon last week, according to
AAA. Petroleum analyst Patrick De Haan said the national average will likely
roll over $3 a gallon for the first time this year on Monday. Over the next few
weeks, he expects prices to hit at least $3.10 to $3.15 a gallon.
Whether Americans feel a greater pinch at the pump in coming weeks
depends on the extent of the disruption to oil exports and how long the
conflict lasts, analysts said.
The key questions are “how much oil could we lose and for how
long,” Clayton Seigle at the Center for Strategic & International Studies,
told USA TODAY.
The US attacked Iran. Here's what that means for you at
the gas pump.
A33X11 FROM AL JAZEERA
Why are the US and Israel attacking Iran? What we know so far
By Al
Jazeera Staff, Reuters and The Associated Press Published On 28 Feb 2026
Updated: 3 hours ago
The United States and Israel have struck multiple
locations across Iran, including the capital, Tehran, in what US
President Donald Trump described as “major combat operations”.
The attacks come amid negotiations between the US and Iran over
the latter’s nuclear and ballistic missiles programmes, after weeks of mounting
threats from Trump – and eight months after the US and Israel waged a 12-day
war against Iran.
Recommended
Stories
How Trump’s 2026
Iran ‘war’ script echoes and twists the 2003 Iraq playbook
US, Israel
launch attack on Iran, explosions in Israel, Arab states
Trump, Iran and
geopolitical mind games
Iran has struck back with missiles aimed at northern Israel and at
US military bases in the Middle East. Details of casualties and damage in Iran
and Israel are sparse at the moment.
Here’s what we know so far:
WHAT
HAPPENED IN IRAN?
At about 9:27am (06:27 GMT), Iran’s Fars news agency reported a
series of explosions in the capital, Tehran.
Al Jazeera’s correspondent in western Tehran said he heard two
explosions, while videos d on social media showed smoke rising from several
parts of the city.
Israel first announced that it had launched missile strikes on
targets inside Iran.
A US official told Al Jazeera that the strikes were carried out as
part of a joint military operation with Israel. In recent weeks, Washington has
assembled a large fleet of fighter jets and warships in the region, its most
significant military buildup there
since the Iraq War.
Trump described the operation as “massive and ongoing”.
The US Department of Defense later said the mission was named
“Operation Epic Fury”, in the first public statement from the US military since
the start of the joint US-Israeli attack.
WHERE IN
IRAN HAVE THE US AND ISRAEL ATTACKED?
Several missiles struck University Street and the Jomhouri area in
Tehran, and close to Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps headquarters,
Fars reported.
The Associated Press news agency reported that a strike in Iran’s
capital happened near the offices of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.
Iran’s semiofficial Tasnim news agency reported that explosions
also occurred in Tehran’s northern Seyyed Khandan area.
Explosions have also been reported in the cities of Kermanshah,
Qom, Tabriz, Isfahan, Ilam and Karaj, as well as in Lorestan province,
according to local media.
WHAT DID
TRUMP SAY?
While announcing “major combat operations”, Trump said the aim of
the US campaign was to “destroy their missiles and raze their missile industry
to the ground”.
“We are going to annihilate their navy,” Trump added.
Here are the key points of his message:
·
The
US has begun major combat operations in Iran, describing them as “massive and
ongoing”.
·
The
stated aim is to eliminate what Washington calls imminent threats from the
Iranian government.
Trump said the campaign’s military objectives include:
·
Destroying
Iran’s missile capabilities.
·
Target
Iran’s navy.
·
Disrupting
Iran-backed armed groups in the region.
·
Making
sure that Iran does not obtain a nuclear weapon.
He also laid out a warning-cum-offer to Iran’s military personnel.
If they laid down their weapons, Trump said, he would ensure they had amnesty.
But if they did not, he warned, they would face “certain death”. He
acknowledged US forces could face casualties.
Reuters quoted a US official as saying that the Trump
administration was planning a “multiday operation”.
The US president’s comments suggest that Trump was setting “the
table for a revolution in Iran” — 73 years after the CIA orchestrated a coup
against democratically elected Iranian Prime Minister Mohammad Mosaddegh, Al
Jazeera’s Alan Fisher reported from Washington.
“They’ve done it before. This time, they’re doing it with weapons
and bombs rather than covertly through the CIA,” Fisher said. “It’s clear that
this is going to be a continuous military operation, with Donald Trump
accepting the fact that there may be casualties.”
How are
the US and Israel justifying their attack on Iran?
US and Israeli attacks on Iran follow years of confrontation over
Tehran’s nuclear programme and regional influence.
The two allies have long claimed that Iran’s advancing enrichment
activities and missile capabilities pose a threat to them, and they have
repeatedly warned that they could use force against Tehran. Iran has publicly
committed — repeatedly — that it has no intention of building a nuclear bomb.
Israel is the only Middle Eastern nation to have nuclear weapons.
In June last year, Israel and the US attacked Iranian nuclear and
military sites, assassinating several senior commanders.
The current escalation began after Omani mediators announced
progress in Geneva negotiations, where Iran had reportedly agreed to zero
uranium stockpiling and full verification by the International Atomic Energy
Agency (IAEA).
Both the US and Israel have also argued that this is an
opportunity for Iranians to “take over” the government.
“When we are finished, take over your government. It will be yours
to take. This will be, probably, your only chance for generations,” Trump said.
WHAT IS IRAN’S RESPONSE?
Iran retaliated by first launching missiles towards Israel,
according to the Israeli military. Air-raid sirens sounded in several parts of
the country, and explosions were reported in northern Israel.
“The public is requested to follow the instructions of the Home
Front Command,” Israel’s military said in a statement. “At this time, the
Israeli Air Force is operating to intercept and strike threats where necessary
to remove the threat.”
But soon after, Iranian
forces launched missiles at several locations linked to US military operations
across the region, including:
·
Al Udeid airbase in Qatar.
·
Al-Salem airbase in Kuwait.
·
Al-Dhafra airbase in the United Arab
Emirates.
·
The US Fifth Fleet headquarters in
Bahrain.
·
Explosions were also heard in Riyadh,
Saudi Arabia
·
US bases were also reportedly attacked
in Jordan
Earlier, Ebrahim Azizi, head of the Iranian parliament’s national
security commission, threatened a “crushing” response. “We warned you!” Azizi
wrote on social media. “Now you have started down a path whose end is no longer
in your control.”
WHAT DID
ISRAEL’S NETANYAHU SAY?
In a statement, Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said
that the military operation “will continue as long as necessary.” He said the
Israeli operation was called “Lion’s Roar”.
WHERE
ARE IRAN’S LEADERS?
It is not immediately clear
where the 86-year-old Khamenei is.
He hasn’t been seen publicly in days as tensions with the United States have
grown.
Roads to Khamenei’s compound in downtown Tehran were shut down by
authorities as blasts rang out across the capital.
Meanwhile, Iran’s state-run IRNA news agency quoted a source in
the presidential office as saying that President Masoud Pezeshkian was
unharmed.
HOW HAS THE WORLD REACTED?
·
Oman: Foreign Minister Badr Albusaidi said that
active and serious negotiations mediated by his country between Iran and the US
were “yet again undermined” amid the ongoing escalation, and urged the US “not
to get sucked in further”.
·
Qatar condemned the Iranian attack, describing
it as “a flagrant violation of its national sovereignty,” while adding that the
country reserves the right of response in according with international law.
·
The United Arab Emirates condemned the Iranian
missile attacks that reportedly killed a Pakistani national earlier, warning of
“grave consequences” if such violations continue.
·
European Union foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas
described the situation as “perilous” and called for civilians to be protected
and international law to be upheld.
·
French President Emmanuel Macron warned that
the conflict involving the US, Israel and Iran carries “grave consequences for
international peace and security”, adding, “The current escalation is dangerous
for everyone. It must stop.”
·
In Russia, Security Council Deputy Chairman Dmitry
Medvedev criticised Trump, accusing Washington of using negotiations with Iran
as a “cover operation” and questioning how the confrontation would unfold in
the long term.
·
The UK said that Iran must never be allowed to
develop nuclear weapons and stood ready to defend its interests.
·
Canada’s Prime Minister Mark Carney said the
country supports US efforts to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon and
from further threatening international peace and security.
A34 X32 UK x32
use A
FROM TELEGRAPH UK
Britain backs
war, RAF base hit and conflict spreads
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Last night, Britain backed the war with Iran by
giving the US permission to use RAF air bases to strike Tehran’s
infrastructure. Just hours later, one of these British bases was attacked by
drones. This new war spread overnight as Israel hit Lebanon and, in the past
two hours, there have been reports of explosions in several cities, including
Dubai, Doha, and Bahrain’s capital, Manama. Britons caught in the region now
face a race to escape the chaos. We have all the latest developments below.
SIR KEIR STARMER HAS GIVEN THE UNITED STATES
PERMISSION TO USE BRITISH MILITARY BASES TO STRIKE IRAN.
In an address, the Prime Minister backed the war
with Iran after Tehran continued to strike allies across the Middle East with
missiles and drones.
He said: “They’ve hit airports and hotels where
British citizens are staying. This is clearly a dangerous situation. We have at
least 200,000 British citizens in the region – residents, families on holiday,
and those in transit. Iran is striking British interests nonetheless, and
putting British people at huge risk, along with our allies across the region.
That is the situation we face today.”
Hours after the announcement, RAF Akrotiri in Cyprus
was struck in a suspected drone attack, the Ministry of Defence has confirmed.
Source: Institute for the Study of War
Now, the conflict, which Donald Trump has said could
last up to four weeks, has spread further, with Israel attacking Lebanon after
Hezbollah fired retaliatory strikes at various Israeli locations over the
killing of Iranian supreme leader Ali Khamenei.
SMOKE RISES IN BEIRUT AFTER ISRAELI AIRSTRIKES
Meanwhile, explosions have been reported in several
cities across the Middle East this morning. Blasts were heard in Jerusalem,
Dubai, Doha and Manama, marking the latest retaliation from Iran.
Additionally, Kuwait’s interior ministry said air
defence systems intercepted an unspecified number of drones targeting the
country and at least two drones have reportedly been intercepted in Iraq near
Erbil airport.
As the conflict continues to escalate, plans for the
biggest mass evacuation in a generation are now being drawn up to rescue
thousands of Britons stranded in the region.
Follow the latest updates on the conflict here
Plus, Oil surges over fears Iran could close trade route
Chasing the deadly thump of iranian missiles – in
a Kia Picanto
THE AFTERMATH OF AN IRANIAN MISSILE STRIKE IN TEL
AVIV
By Henry Bodkin
Jerusalem Correspondent, in Tel Aviv
It took a little over 12 hours for Iran to
demonstrate that, however degraded its military was from last June’s war, it
retained the ability to terrify and kill Israeli civilians.
The crater in the middle of the road in central Tel
Aviv must have been at least 10 feet deep, and the shockwave had all but
demolished the adjacent block of flats, killing a woman inside and injuring 27
others. The Telegraph arrived shortly after the blast. It was a scene of
devastation and fear. People are defiant – they believe the cost is worth it –
but they can’t quite believe they’re being bombarded again already.
We spent the night with arguably the bravest of the
brave, the lone paramedics who patrol Tel Aviv city centre at night so they can
race to the scene of a missile strike and start co-ordinating the emergency
response. Chaim Gitler, of the Magen David Adom ambulance service, is only 25,
but he spends his nights dodging missiles in Israel’s largest city, and biggest
target, determined to be on the scene first if a missile gets through.
As we quickly learnt, it’s not for the
faint-hearted.
A35 X27 israel X27 FROM GUK
What is Trump’s endgame with Iran?
By
Robert Reich Tue 3 Mar 2026 06.00 EST
This is a war without
a plan, without a strategy, and without any clear understanding of where it
leads or how it ends
I’ve spent the last
several days checking with foreign policy experts, analysts and specialists in
the Middle East for their understanding of Donald Trump’s real goal in Iran,
and how anyone (including him) will know he’s achieved it.
Several told me that
Trump is seeking the kind of “war” that the US executed in Venezuela – an
abduction of a leader by special forces or, as in June, surgical airstrikes on
locations where Iran appeared to be building
nuclear bombs.
With the killing
of Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, they said, Trump can now claim that
his goal of “regime change” has been achieved.
Hence, as soon as
possible – before US casualties mount and before higher oil prices show up at
the pump – he’ll declare the attack on Iran a success and say the action now
moves back to the bargaining table.
They assume he’ll
now expect Iran to cave to his demands for an end to the production of weapons grade
plutonium and to its nuclear program, a destruction of all its ballistic
missiles, and agreements to disarm its proxies: Hezbollah in Lebanon, Hamas,
various militias in Iraq (PMF, Kata’ib Hizballah), the Houthis in Yemen, and
forces in Syria.
Other experts I
spoke with told me Benjamin Netanyahu, the Israeli prime
minister, is a much bigger player in this conflict than the American press is
reporting, and Netanyahu is committed to destroying all of Iran’s ballistic
missile capabilities, which will require far more extensive bombardment,
perhaps continuing for months.
Trump doesn’t want
to be upstaged by Netanyahu and doesn’t want Netanyahu telling the world that
more needs to be done to eliminate the Iranian threat. Hence, they believe,
Trump will keep attacking Iran until Netanyahu agrees to end the bombing.
A few of the people I spoke with told me that Trump still
clings to the goal that he believes he achieved in Venezuela: gaining a
subservient regime.
He wants to be remembered as the American president who ended the threat of
Iran once and for all, and he believes he can pull off a total victory.
So far, no American
troops have set foot on Iranian soil. But if Trump seeks permanent “regime
change”, it will almost surely require ground troops. Iran has nearly a million
men under arms.
The experts and
specialists fear that Trump and his advisers have minimized the size and
determination of Iran’s military and Revolutionary Guard. Trump and the people around him
also believe they can engineer a coup in Iran, for which US troops will be
needed only as advisers and counselors. This is delusional (does anyone
remember Vietnam?).
Trump and Netanyahu’s attack on Iran is an illegal act of
aggression
There is also the
very real possibility of civil war in Iran.
Most of the people I spoke with think Trump has no
strategy. They say Pete Hegseth and Marco Rubio are way over their heads and
that the Pentagon and state department and national security staff are in
chaos. No one is in charge.
Trump believes he
can somehow pull this off because he thinks he’s smarter than everyone else,
but he’s getting conflicting advice about ongoing strategy and maneuvers and
making conflicting and inconsistent decisions.
By this view, the
only people with any sense of what’s happening are the generals and top
Pentagon brass who are getting real-time reports from Iran, but they don’t have
an exit strategy because they don’t think it’s their responsibility to decide
when the US has been successful or what “success” even means. The generals are
worried, however, that the conflict could deplete resources necessary to deal
with other potential conflicts around the world.
I was told
repeatedly that this is a war without a plan, without a strategy, and without
any clear understanding of where it leads or how it ends.
·
Robert
Reich, a former US secretary of labor, is a professor of public policy emeritus
at the University of California, Berkeley. He is a Guardian US columnist and
his newsletter is at robertreich.substack.com. His new book, Coming Up
Short: A Memoir of My America, is out now in the US and on 15 March in the UK
MATCH to anti-Reich article
x@
Russia
a36 X26 china X26 FROM GUK
Trump’s show of force in the Middle East creates a
weakness China can exploit
By
Amy Hawkins
Beijing can again leverage its critical minerals
dominance over an increasingly busy US military, as Taiwan slides further down
the White House list of priorities
US-Israel war on Iran – live updates
Mon 2 Mar 2026 23.36 EST
As the US and Israel
opened a new chapter of chaos in the Middle East, China stands
to benefit from a Washington establishment that does not have the political or
physical resources to focus on Asia.
Officially, China
has condemned the attacks. Wang Yi, the foreign minister, called them
“unacceptable” and called for a ceasefire, rhetoric that is typical of Beijing
in response to Donald Trump’s increasingly erratic foreign policy moves.
Wang made similar comments after the US capture of the
Venezuelan president, Nicolás Maduro, in January. The Chinese government wastes no opportunity to present
itself as the defender of international laws and stability, although it
provides little material support to smaller partners in the crosshairs of the
US president’s latest furies.
But, aside from the
chance to score diplomatic points, Trump’s decision to embark on a war against
Iran that is already widening into a regional conflict creates a space for
China to once more leverage its critical mineral dominance, particularly in the
area of defence, and places the issue of Taiwan on
an increasingly long list of concerns for the US.
However, the strikes
on Iran do pose some risk to China,
especially when it comes to oil.
China is thought to
buy about 80% of Iran’s shipped oil. That accounts for about 13% of China’s
seaborne imports, although grasping the true scale of China’s Iranian oil
imports is difficult because much of it is labelled as originating from
Indonesia or Malaysia to avoid US sanctions.
Losing cheap oil
from Iran would be a blow to China, although a manageable one. But it is barely
two months since the US in effect took control of Venezuela’s oil industry,
another, albeit much smaller, source of cheap supply for China.
According to an analysis by Erica Downs, a senior research scholar
at the Center on Global Energy Policy at Columbia University, more than a fifth
of China’s oil imports in 2025 came from sources, including Venezuela, Iran and
Russia, that had been placed under sanctions. Two of those supply chains are
now imperilled. And on Saturday, Kirill Dmitriev, the head of
Russia’s sovereign wealth fund, tweeted that prices could be “$100+ oil per
barrel soon”. Prices of the benchmark Brent crude hit $82 per barrel on Monday, a 14-month high.
“This is not coming
at a good time for China,” says Alicia García-Herrero, the chief economist
for Asia Pacific at the investment bank Natixis, who
notes that China was facing surging energy demands because of the rapid rollout
of datacentres needed to train artificial intelligence, a key pillar of China’s
economic plans for the next five years. “The trend is less and less oil at
below market prices.”
On Sunday, Hualue
American Studies Center, a Shanghai-based thinktank with government links,
noted that a 2021 China-Iran strategic partnership agreement, worth $400bn,
could also be at risk if the leadership in Tehran was replaced with a
pro-western regime.
But China has been
strengthening its strategic buffers. Only a tiny fraction of the $400bn
promised in 2021 has actually been delivered. And perhaps mindful of
geopolitical shocks on the horizon, China spent last year building up
stockpiles of oil, demand for which is likely to peak soon as China’s green
transition accelerates. China’s crude oil imports increased by 4.4% last year,
with more than 80% of that increase being stockpiled, according to calculations
based on data from Rystad Energy.
That means it will
be able to weather any shocks to its supply – both from the loss of Iranian oil
and from disruptions in the strait of Hormuz – for at least a few months.
Some analysts say
that the biggest harm done by a shock in oil prices will be to Trump, who wants
to keep a lid on inflation in the US in the run-up the midterms in November.
A CRITICAL MOMENT
And there may be
some aspects in which China could benefit from the unrest unleashed by
Washington’s military salvoes.
Launching a new
offensive in Iran will deplete stockpiles of American weapons for both the US
and Israel. Last year, the Pentagon halted weapons shipments to Ukraine because of
concerns about dwindling stockpiles. The Guardian reported that the Pentagon has only 25% of the
Patriot missile systems needed for its military plans.
And yet, the US has
deployed much of its most powerful weaponry for Operation Epic Fury in the
Middle East, including Patriot and Thaad missile defence systems, as well as
F-35 fighter jets and other advanced kit.
These weapons are
all reliant on semiconductors and radars made with gallium, a critical mineral
whose supply chain China controls. During last year’s US-China trade war,
Beijing cut off the export of gallium and other rare earths, nearly crippling global industrial supply
chains and forcing Washington’s hand in trade negotiations.
Some analysts
believe that Trump’s decision to open a new military front at a time when the
US is still dependent on China for a crucial defence industry commodity will
strengthen China’s hand for the upcoming Trump-Xi meeting in Beijing.
Joseph Webster, a
senior fellow at the Atlantic Council thinktank, says: “Beijing will be
delighted to see the US expending scarce munitions and interceptors in a
secondary theatre. Drawing down existing weapons stockpiles will not only lower
resources available for a Taiwan contingency, but China’s critical minerals
dominance could give it leverage over the production of new weapons.”
Matthew P Funaiole,
a senior fellow at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, notes
that gallium is primarily used in the sensors rather than the expendable
components of most munitions. “The more sustained vulnerability is not in
firing them, but in the ability to manufacture, upgrade and repair the broader
ecosystem of gallium-enabled systems.”
US attempts to build
up non-China supply chains of critical minerals like gallium are still in their
early stages and “are unlikely to meaningfully change supply dynamics in the
immediate term”, Funaiole says.
There are
nonetheless risks for China on the horizon. Some analysts believe that the
elimination of a second leader of a Chinese strategic partner in as many months
will dent China’s appeal to global south countries. In the past three years
Iran joined the Shanghai Co-operation Organisation and Brics, two China-led
multilateral organisations. China also brokered a detente between Iran and
Saudi Arabia, which looks somewhat meaningless now that there are questions
about the extent to which Saudi Arabia may have supported the US strikes.
Still, a US foreign policy establishment that is preoccupied
with yet another sprawling, unpredictable conflict, far from China’s
neighbourhood, is likely to bring more gains than losses for Beijing.
@
GAS/oil
X
A37 X21 hormuz X21 FROM TIME
As Oil Tankers Come Under Attack, Experts Fear for Global Trade Through
Strait of Hormuz
By Callum Sutherland Mar 3, 2026 9:22 AM ET
Global oil and gas
prices have surged as the Iran war has brought the crucial Strait of Hormuz,
a narrow passage between the Persian Gulf and the Gulf of Oman through which
around a fifth of global oil production flows, to a halt.
As of Tuesday, Brent
crude oil prices have risen by around 7%, reaching as high as $83
per barrel. When markets closed on Friday, ahead of the Iran war but amid
rising tensions, the barrel cost was just over $73.
European natural
futures jumped by around 30% following the strikes in Qatar, a major
exporter of the commodity. The price of natural gas in the U.S. was up by 5%.
Daily freight rates
for LNG (liquefied natural gas) tankers jumped more
than 40% on Monday after Qatar halted operations.
Serving as a global
lifeline for the supply of oil and LNG, the Strait of Hormuz has long been
positioned by Iran as a geopolitical bargaining point during times of conflict.
With Iran controlling the Northern side of the passage, the country has the means
to block vessels from journeying through and can disrupt trade by attacking
shipping containers and tankers.
Read
More: What Is the Strait of Hormuz?
An Iranian
Revolutionary Guards senior official reportedly issued a warning over the
crossing on Monday, referring to it as “closed.”
“If anyone tries to pass, the heroes of
the Revolutionary Guards and the regular navy will set those ships
ablaze," said Ebrahim Jabari, a senior adviser to the Guards
commander-in-chief, according to state media.
Iran appears to have
targeted several oil tankers in a series of ongoing retaliatory strikes against
Gulf countries in response to the U.S.-Israeli military operation that launched
over the weekend and killed Iran’s Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei.
Iran's Islamic
Revolutionary Guards Corps on Sunday claimed three tankers from the U.K. and
U.S. had been “struck by missiles” and were “burning.”
Elsewhere, a tanker
called MKD VYOM, flying the Marshall Islands flag, was struck by the Gulf of
Oman, near the entrance of the Strait, Oman’s Maritime Security Center reported. A
Palau-flagged vessel called Skylight was also struck in a separate incident,
Oman confirmed.
THE U.K. MARITIME
TRADE Operations confirmed that another vessel in the port of
Bahrain had been struck by “two unknown projectiles causing a fire.”
Oil storage
infrastructures and energy facilities are also at risk.
The Fujairah Oil Terminal in the United Arab Emirates
encountered a fire after the successful interception of a drone Tuesday. The
production at Ras Tanura refinery in Saudi Arabia and QatarEnergy’s LNG facility in
Qatar have also been disrupted by strikes.
While Iran has not
followed through on its threats to officially “close” the Strait, amid the
widespread disruption, dozens of tankers are now waiting in nearby ports and along the coast of
the UAE and Oman.
Many global shippers
have responded by suspending operations in the area.
Large-scale Danish
shipping company Maersk has paused all vessel crossings in the Strait until
further notice, instead seeking alternative routes. As is often the case in
such circumstances, they are now charging an “emergency freight increase to cover
these constraints and increased operating costs.” Increased shipping prices are
another significant sign of the impact on global trade.
“What we are seeing
right now in the Strait of Hormuz is severe disruption,” says Noam Raydan, a
senior fellow at The Washington Institute for Near East Policy, remarking upon
the heightened “risk” of making the crossing.
Amid grave concerns
about the functioning of the Strait of Hormuz given Iran’s position and the
widening of the conflict, TIME spoke to experts about what the unrest means for
global supply chains and consumer prices.
THE SURGE OF OIL PRICES AND IMPACT ON CONSUMERS
The supply of oil
from a number of Gulf countries is at a relative standstill and markets have
reacted with concern.
While drops in stock
prices aren’t too sharp for now, Raydan says this will likely change if the
disturbance to the flow of shipping vessels continues.
There is particular
concern about the supply of Iraqi oil, she notes. Iraq
produces the second highest volume of crude oil in the
Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) behind Saudi Arabia.
While Iraq can
export some of its oil to the north via a pipeline through Turkey, most crude
oil moves through its southern port in Basra. “Iraq relies on Hormuz. If there’s
complete disruption, they have no other outlet to export Basra’s crude oil,”
says Raydan.
She notes that other
producers such as Saudi Arabia and the UAE also have alternative routes to
export oil, but their capacity cannot match that of tankers. “Can these
pipelines be an alternative for the volume of oil that they export through
Hormuz? Absolutely not,” she argues.
THE INCREASE OF OIL
PRICES IS INEVITABLY GOING TO BE PASSED ON TO THE CONSUMER, TOO.
Jim Krane, a fellow
for energy studies at Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy, says
“when shippers' costs go up, this is folded into the price at the pump that
consumers pay in a market.”
According to Krane,
only consumers in countries where the government regulates the price of
oil—such as Saudi Arabia and Qatar—will feel less of an impact.
However, stockpiled
reserves of oil could supply a reprieve for some.
“Big oil exporters
in the Gulf have been moving oil at a furious pace out of the Gulf and away
from the Strait of Hormuz for the past few weeks,” says Krane, noting that
Saudi Arabia has filled up a number of its reserves in the Red Sea, the
Netherlands, and South Africa. “There is a lot of Saudi oil right now that's
nowhere in danger of an Iranian attack.”
China has amassed
reserves of roughly one billion barrels of oil, around half of its storage
capacity, according to Krane. (Other analysts cite 900 million barrels.) China sources
its oil from a number of supplies, which could ease the impact of any closure
in the Gulf, but 14% of total imports still come from Saudi Arabia, and an
additional 7% from the UAE as of 2025.
THE PARTICULAR IMPACT ON LIQUID NATURAL GAS SUPPLIES
Equally concerning
for experts is the impact of LNG supplies, with roughly 20% of global LNG passing through the
choke point in the Middle East, nearly all of which is from Qatar.
Qatar’s state-owned
energy firm confirmed that it would be stopping production of LNG at its two
main facilities on Monday after attacks.
“Due to military
attacks on QatarEnergy’s operating facilities in Ras Laffan Industrial City and
Mesaieed Industrial City in the State of Qatar, QatarEnergy has ceased
production of liquefied natural gas (LNG) and associated products,” the company said.
“Ras Laffan is
critical to the economic security of the Qatari state. It's impossible to
overstate its importance to Qatar and its economy and political system,” says
Krane.“This will definitely put a lot of upward pressure on gas prices,
especially at a time when you have countries that urgently need that gas.”
The Dutch TTF index,
which measures the price of LNG, jumped by over four points on Monday following the hit on
Qatari infrastructure.
HOW INSURERS ARE REACTING AND THE IMPACT ON BUSINESS
AMID UNCERTAINTY OF WAR
Insurance providers
for oil companies and tankers are showing signs of apprehension and dropping
war risk protections.
“Insurance companies
are rightly worried about this, so they are retracting coverage, or doubling or
tripling the cost of it,” says Krane. “A lot of the shipping vessels that are
not going through the Strait are either balking at the costs or waiting for
headquarters to approve it.”
Raydan also marks
the cancellation of contracts and price increases as a major reason for the
halt in traffic.
“For a lot of ships,
if they want to transit via Hormuz, they're going to be transiting without
coverage, meaning if anything happens—a hit, an oil spill—it's on them,” she
says, noting that companies simply won’t—nor should they—take that risk.
The uncertainty
surrounding Iran’s next move is prompting companies to keep tankers docked,
too.
“Iran seems to be
ready to escalate further, if they want to... it seems that they are willing to
go after energy infrastructure,” says Raydan.
And even if
mediators were to sit down immediately and negotiate an end to the conflict, the
ripple effect on market prices would still be felt, she argues.
“We are going to
feel this for at least [a few] weeks. We need to take what happened, especially
to the Gulf states, as something that will definitely change the region. The
region right now is not the region that it was before the war,” says Raydan.
@ to come
@
succession x3
A39 X33 X33 FROM TIME
After Khamenei, Who Could Lead Iran Next?
by Miranda Jeyaretnam
and Chad de Guzman
Mar 2, 2026 6:00 AM ET
Who could come next after the
killing of Ayatollah Ali Khamenei during U.S. and Israeli attacks
on Iran is a question on many minds but with no clear answer.
Even U.S. President Donald Trump
admitted that his Administration had ideas about potential successors to the
Iranian leader—but they were also killed in the attacks.
“The attack was so successful it
knocked out most of the candidates,” Trump told ABC
News Sunday. "It’s not going to be anybody that we were
thinking of because they are all dead. Second or third place is dead.”
: ‘It’s As If I’m Dreaming’: Iranians Recount the First Day of the
War, and the Death of Khamenei
Trump added to ABC News that
someone from the Iranian government has since reached out to him, although
Iran’s top security official Ali Larijani refuted that suggestion with a post on Monday, declaring: “We will not negotiate
with the United States.”
Khamenei reportedly began making preparations for a
successor while sheltering during the 12-day war between Iran and Israel last June. According to the New York Times, Khamenei’s top picks to succeed him
were his chief of staff Ali Asghar Hejazi, whom Israel told the Times on Saturday that it killed, although Tehran
has not yet confirmed his death; Supreme Court Chief Justice Gholam-Hossein
Mohseni-Eje’i; and Hassan Khomeini, the grandson of former Supreme Leader
Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini. Trump told Fox News reporter Jacqui Heinrich on Sunday
that 48 senior Iranian leaders were killed in the U.S.-Israeli bombings.
According to Iran’s
constitution, the Supreme Leader must be a Shia Islamic jurist chosen by the
Assembly of Experts, an 88-member elected committee of clerics. In the
meantime, a temporary council led by President Masoud Pezeshkian,
Mohseni-Eje’i, and Ayatollah Alireza Arafi, a jurist appointed from the
Guardian Council, will oversee the country per its constitution, according to
Iranian news outlets.
But the question of transition
comes at a pivotal moment for Iran as the country reels from widespread domestic unrest and faces sustained U.S. and Israeli military attacks aimed
at collapsing the revolutionary order that has been
in place since 1979.
: Trump Calls Khamenei’s Death ‘Justice for the People of Iran’
While anything may still happen,
especially as the war escalates following Iran’s retaliatory attacks across the Gulf and on U.S. military bases, here’s what to know about some
known contenders for Iran’s next Supreme Leader.
Gholam-Hossein
Mohseni-Eje’i
Gholam-Hossein Mohseni-Eje’i has
served as the head of Iran’s judiciary since Khamenei appointed him in July
2021. The 69-year-old, who is also a senior jurist, has held a number of other
official positions, including serving as intelligence minister from 2005 to
2009, prosecutor-general from 2009 to 2014, and first deputy chief justice from
2014 to 2021.
Mohseni-Eje’i is widely seen as
a hardline conservative. The U.S. State Department and the European Union
sanctioned him in 2011 for his role in crushing protests in support of the
political opposition after the 2009 presidential election. According to
the sanction decision by the E.U., intelligence agents
under Mohseni-Eje’i’s command detained, tortured, and coerced false confessions
from hundreds of activists, journalists, dissidents and reformist political
figures.
As millions of people took to
the streets of Iran after the rial plunged, Mohseni-Eje’i vowed to show “no leniency” to protestors and
called for expedited trials and executions. He also accused the U.S. and Israel of having “openly and
explicitly supported the unrest” in Iran.
Hassan Khomeini
Hassan Khomeini is the grandson
of Iran’s late Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, the founder of the
Islamic Republic who oversaw the 1979 revolution. While Khomeini, a cleric, has
not held public office, he is considered a potential successor given his reformist
views and his lineage.
After the June strikes on Iranian nuclear sites, Reuters reported that Khomeini had already emerged as a
frontrunner to succeed Khamenei. Amid conflict with the U.S. then, five
insiders told Reuters that Khomeini, who reportedly commands respect among the
IRGC and Iran’s senior clerics, could represent a more moderate Iran compared
to Khamenei’s son, Mojtaba. Iran International reported that
in May last year, Khomeini, at the mausoleum of his late grandfather, said:
“Sometimes dignity is born through war, and sometimes through holding firm in
the field of negotiation.”
Khomeini’s close links to
reformists, who have for decades tried—but failed—to open Iran up, resulted in
Khomeini being barred from running for a seat at Iran’s top
clerical body, the Assembly of Experts, back in 2016. The body manages the
Supreme Leader and ensures that he continues to qualify as one, lest they
remove him.
Mojtaba Khamenei
Mojtaba Khamenei, 56, is
Ayatollah Ali Khamenei’s second-eldest son. Bloomberg reported in January that Motjaba
Khamenei oversees an investment empire, with unnamed sources saying he has
access to Swiss bank accounts and British luxury property worth more than $100
million, despite U.S. sanctions imposed on him back in 2019.
Khamenei’s son, who has largely
avoided the public eye and has not held government office, is also believed to
wield massive influence, including on Iran's administrators and one of the country's
most powerful organizations, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), as
well as the Basij volunteer paramilitary force.
But the fact that Mojtaba
Khamenei is the Supreme Leader’s son may work against him: a father-to-son
succession in the Shiite Muslim clerical establishment may spark outrage.
Khamenei had already indicated opposition to his son’s candidacy, an Iranian
source close to his office told Reuters in 2024, adding that the leader did not
want to witness a return to hereditary rule, as many Iranians view it as undermining the 1979 revolution, which
ousted the U.S.-backed authoritarian monarchy of Shah Mohammad Reza
Pahlavi.
Alireza Arafi
After Ayatollah Ali Khamenei’s
death, Iran named senior cleric Alireza Arafi to its interim leadership
council, which also includes President Pezeshkian and Chief Justice
Mohseni-Eje’i.
Arafi has been a member of the
Guardian Council—the country’s powerful Islamic legal authority, comprised of
clerics and lawyers—since 2019. The council is mandated to oversee elections,
to vet candidates for elections, and to veto legislation passed by the parliament
to ensure conformity with Islamic standards. Arafi
also heads the Iranian seminary.
According to Alex Vatanka of the
D.C.-based think tank Middle East Institute, Arafi’s rise to power could be
traced to how the latter has appointed him to senior posts. Vatanka described
Arafi as one of Khamenei’s “loyalists that will advance his agenda and in
return they enjoy his patronage.”
Mohammad Mehdi
Mirbagheri
Mohammad Mehdi Mirbagheri, an
Assembly of Experts member since 2015, is known as a staunch conservative in the
clerical establishment.
The current leader of the
Islamic Sciences Academy in the northern city of Qom, Mirbagheri gained public
attention in 2024, after the sudden death of President Ebrahim Raisi, when he
expressed support for the hardline candidate Saeed Jalili through his speeches.
According to activist outlet Iran Wire, "super-revolutionary" factions in
the establishment view Mirbagheri as a potential future leader.
Mirbagheri has made headlines
for his extreme rhetoric, including thwarting “infidels”
and branding the 2022 Woman, Life, Freedom protests after Mahsa Amini’s killing as
“Western-inspired sedition.” Mirbagheri has also previously quoted the late
Supreme Leader Khomeini, saying that establishing a “new culture based on Islam
in the world” would entail “hardship, martyrdom, and hunger” and that the
Iranian people had “voluntarily chosen” to take that path.
Ali Larijani
Ali Larijani, a veteran politician,
took the reins of Iran’s crisis management and national security at the start
of this year, Iranian officials told the Times. He was appointed by Pezeshkian and Khamenei
to head Iran’s Supreme National Security Council in August last year—a post he
held from 2005 to 2007—and in that role led nuclear negotiations with the Trump
Administration before the U.S. and Israel launched attacks over the weekend. He
was also in charge of the deadly crackdown on anti-government protests earlier
this year, for which he was sanctioned by the U.S. government.
The 67-year-old has a storied
career behind him that has positioned him well to act as a power broker after Khamenei’s
assassination. He was a former commander in the Revolutionary Guards Corps, the
head of Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting from 1994 to 2004, and has held
several other governmental roles over four decades. He unsuccessfully ran for
President in 2005, and filed for candidacy in the 2021 and 2024 presidential
elections but was disqualified in both.
He is known for being a loyalist
to Khamenei and a pragmatist in managing relations between rival factions
within the country. He also brought a pragmatic approach to nuclear talks with
the U.S., reportedly telling Oman state television last
month that “if the Americans’ concern is that Iran should not move toward
acquiring a nuclear weapon, that can be addressed.”
After the U.S.-Israeli attacks,
however, Larijani has urged powerful retaliation. “We will make the Zionist
criminals and the shameless Americans regret their actions,” he posted on Saturday, noting in another post that Iran did not initiate the
hostilities. “The brave soldiers and the great nation of Iran will deliver an
unforgettable lesson to the hellish international oppressors.”
A40 X39 FROM time
The U.S. and Israeli War With Iran, Explained
by Miranda Jeyaretnam and Chad de Guzman Mar 5, 2026 3:45 AM ET
The Middle East has
been plunged into a new era of volatility after joint U.S.-Israeli strikes on Iran since Feb. 28 have reportedly killed more than 1,000 people, including more than 150 schoolchildren, and triggered a wave of
Iranian retaliatory attacks across the region.
Iran’s Supreme
Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and dozens of senior Iranian officials have been
killed in the strikes, leaving a power vacuum in Tehran. The fate of Iran’s
theocratic government is uncertain, and the Trump Administration has openly
called for regime change. The strikes also collapsed nascent U.S. talks with
Iran over the future of their nuclear program, which were earlier derailed by
the 12-day war between Iran and Israel last June.
“We’re doing this,
not for now, we’re doing this for the future, and it is a noble mission,”
President Donald Trump said in a video statement after launching the attack,
dubbed “Operation Epic Fury.” He warned of potential American casualties—“that
often happens in war,” he said—and several U.S. servicemembers have already been
killed in the days since.
The spiraling
conflict has also endangered millions of lives across the Middle East and left
tens of thousands of foreign citizens stranded and at risk of being caught in
the violence in the region. Its effects are also felt globally on the economy,
having disrupted one of the world’s most important energy corridors as well as
a key hub of the aviation and tourism sectors.
Here’s what to know
about how the U.S. and Israeli war with Iran got to this point and what could
come next.
WHY
DID THE U.S. AND ISRAEL STRIKE IRAN?
American and Israeli
officials have offered conflicting explanations for why they
attacked Iran, even as Trump has insisted that strikes were necessary and that
operations would continue until U.S. objectives are met. Immediately after the
launch of “Operation Epic Fury” on Feb. 28, Trump characterized the attack as defensive and
suggested that it was intended to eliminate “imminent threats” from Iran.
Israel described it as a “preemptive strike” aimed at
neutralizing an anticipated missile attack from Iran. Trump had a “good
feeling” that Iran was planning to attack the U.S., White House Press Secretary
Karoline Leavitt told reporters on March 4. Neither the U.S. nor
Israel provided evidence that Iran was planning to attack them. In private
briefings to Congress, Trump Administration officials acknowledged that U.S. intelligence did not show
Iran was preparing to strike before the U.S.-Israeli attacks; instead, they
said Iran’s missiles and proxy forces posed a threat to U.S. personnel and
allies in the region, although officials presented differing views over whether
that threat was more general or imminent.
The rationale behind
the strikes continued evolving days after the strikes. U.S. officials
have described the offensive as aimed at crippling
Iran’s ballistic missile infrastructure and preventing Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon after what the Trump
Administration has since said were failed
nuclear negotiations. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has repeatedly
described the Iranian regime as an “existential threat” to Israel. Iran has maintained that
it is not looking to develop a nuclear weapon, although
the United Nations’ nuclear watchdog said Tehran had enriched uranium beyond
civilian energy needs. Even so, the watchdog said that Iran did not have a
structured program towards developing a nuclear weapon. After bombing three
Iranian nuclear facilities last June, Trump also claimed that the U.S. had “obliterated” Iran’s
nuclear program.
U.S. Secretary of
State Marco Rubio initially suggested that the U.S. launched strikes in part
due to pressure from Israel which was preparing its own attack. Rubio, as well
as Trump, later walked back those comments, insisting that the strike
was a decision made by Trump and that Israel did not force U.S. action.
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said that the operation is “not a so-called regime
change war,”
but broader American and Israeli messaging have indicated a goal of toppling
Iran’s leadership. Immediately after the strikes, Trump called on the Iranian people to “take over” their
government. The strikes also came weeks after Trump had promised to “rescue” Iranian protesters in
January. After Khamenei’s killing, Israel warned that whoever became the next Supreme
Leader under the current regime would also be a potential target.
WHAT
IS THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE U.S. AND IRAN?
The U.S. and Iran
have long been political adversaries, ending formal diplomatic ties after the
1979 Iranian Revolution which established the Islamic Republic of Iran. During
Trump’s second term in office, the Trump Administration has ramped up pressure on Iran to abandon its nuclear
program after Trump in his first term withdrew the U.S. from a nuclear deal the Barack
Obama Administration agreed with Iran. In January, Trump also threatened the
Iranian regime over its violent crackdown on anti-government protesters.
Even so, Washington
and Tehran had been engaged in ongoing nuclear negotiations when the U.S. and
Israel carried out its strikes. Those talks had resumed in early February after
being stalled since June, when Israel attacked Iran and the U.S. joined Israel in strikes on Iranian nuclear sites.
There were reports of limited
but notable progress between U.S. and Iranian negotiators, who met
in Oman on Feb. 6 and Geneva on Feb. 26 and 27, just a day before the
U.S.-Israeli strikes. The ongoing attacks, however, have once again hardened
Iran’s stance towards the U.S. and may have shattered hopes for a diplomatic agreement around Iran’s nuclear program.
How has Iran responded?
Iran responded with
a swathe of retaliatory attacks on U.S. military installations across the
region, hitting Israel, United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Bahrain, Kuwait, and Saudi
Arabia in initial attacks over the weekend. Suspected Iranian strikes have
also hit civilian sites, including Saudi Arabia’s oil refinery, a hotel in Dubai, and near airports in the U.A.E. and
Kuwait. In the following days, Iran expanded its attacks, launching missiles
and drones at Jordan which were intercepted and targeting a British Royal Air Force base in Cyprus.
Suspected Iranian strikes have also been reported over Iraq and Oman’s airspace.
Iran also began targeting American political centers in the
region, including striking U.S. embassies in Riyadh and Kuwait City. More than a dozen people have been killed by
suspected Iranian strikes across the region.
Six U.S. service members were killed in an Iranian
retaliatory strike on a U.S. operations center in Kuwait, marking the first reported American combat deaths in this war.
More than a dozen other soldiers were reportedly wounded in Iranian attacks.
Iran’s conventional
military capabilities are far smaller and less technologically advanced than
those of the U.S. and Israel. Iran has more than 600,000 active military personnel, with another 350,000
reserves, compared to Israel’s roughly 170,000 active-duty personnel and
more than 450,000 reservists. But at around $10 billion, Iran’s defense budget is dwarfed by Israel’s $35 billion budget, not to mention the U.S.’s
nearly $1 trillion defense budget—the largest in the world.
Israel also has highly advanced missile defense systems and is believed to
possess a clandestine nuclear weapon, while the U.S. has one of the biggest
nuclear arsenals in the world, superior technology, and extensive military
reach across the world. Experts told Al Jazeera that Iran has shifted its strategy
since last June toward a more aggressive use of regional missiles and drone
attacks, although it is still constrained by its degraded capabilities and fear
of escalating war with the U.S.
The conflict has
also broadened after Iranian-backed paramilitary Hezbollah fired rockets and
drones at an Israeli military site on March 2 in retaliation for Khamenei’s
killing. Israel responded with ongoing strikes on Beirut and southern Lebanon
which have killed more than 50 people as it continues to
trade attacks with Hezbollah. Lebanon has condemned both Israel and Hezbollah’s
attacks and urged them not to use Lebanon as a “platform for proxy wars.”
How has the rest of the world reacted?
Immediately after
the first wave of American and Israeli strikes in Iran, world leaders
urged restraint, and multilateral institutions like the United Nations and the European Union have called for
de-escalation.
The Gulf States have historically avoided direct
confrontation with Iran and repeatedly rejected being dragged into a regional
conflict. In
the weeks leading up to the U.S. attack, Oman had been mediating indirect talks
between Washington and Tehran. But as neighboring states found themselves in
Iran’s crosshairs after Tehran targeted U.S. bases and civilian sites across the region, the Gulf Cooperation Council,
which includes the UAE, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia, Oman, Qatar, and Kuwait, convened an emergency meeting to condemn Iran’s
actions and “reserve[d] their legal right to respond.”
The North Atlantic
Treaty Organization, of which the U.S. is a member, supports the military
campaign against Iran, according to its secretary-general Mark Rutte,
although the alliance said
it will not get involved. Some of the U.S.’s NATO allies
have shown hesitation over being dragged into the war. The U.K. initially
opposed the
U.S. military using a joint base in the British-governed Chagos Islands to send
defensive missiles to Iran, but Prime Minister Keir Starmer
eventually relented following public rebuke by Trump. Starmer also allowed the U.S. to use its military base RAF
Akrotiri in Cyprus for “defensive” strikes against Iran; the base was hit in
a suspected Hezbollah drone strike soon after the
announcement. Spain was more resolute: when Trump threatened to cut off
bilateral trade after the European nation rejected the American military’s use
of its bases, its Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez responded, “No to war.”
Outside the Middle
East, the conflict has prompted warnings of a greater global fallout. India has raised concerns about knock-on effects,
including to trade and energy supply chains, while Russia, Iran’s ally that has pinned blame on the U.S.
and Israel and remains at war with Ukraine, condemned the new violence
as pushing the region “toward a humanitarian, economic, and potentially even
radiological disaster.”
WHAT
ARE THE GLOBAL IMPLICATIONS OF THE WAR?
The war has caused
widespread travel disruption. While Americans have been advised to leave the Middle East immediately, doing so
is not easy: several Gulf nations closed their airspaces, and some
international airports in the Gulf, many of which serve as key transit points
for global travel, also sustained damage from Iran’s counteroffensives, leaving
thousands of travelers stranded. Some Gulf airlines have since resumed flights,
though mainly for repatriation efforts.
The war also threatens to disrupt global oil and natural gas supplies.
There is already a bottleneck in the Strait of Hormuz, a narrow maritime passage between the
Persian Gulf and the Gulf of Oman through which around a fifth of the world’s
oil production passes. Iran, which controls the northern side of the strait and
can block any traversing ships, has previously used the waterway as a political
bargaining chip amid tensions. Following the attack over the weekend, Iranian
forces threatened that any ship passing through would be “set ablaze.” Several
LNG facilities across the region were also attacked. Analysts told TIME that the threat of prolonged conflict
has prompted shippers to either dock to avoid risks or to jack up costs,
leading to price surges.
After Khamenei: What Iran, and the World, Face Next
WHO
WAS AYATOLLAH ALI KHAMENEI?
Ayatollah Ali
Khamenei had served as Iran’s Supreme Leader for more than 36 years, the
longest of any leader in the Middle East at the time of his death. Like
Ruhollah Khomeini, the grand ayatollah who founded the Islamic Republic of Iran
after the 1979 revolution, Khamenei
strongly rejected what the theocratic regime saw as “Western imperialism,”
positioning Iran as a counterweight to American, Israeli, and Saudi influence
in the region. Under Khamenei’s rule, Iran funded militant groups,
including Hezbollah, to function as regional proxies.
As Supreme Leader,
Khamenei virtually dictated all aspects of governance in the Islamic Republic,
appointing the heads of the judiciary and controlling Iran’s military and the
Revolutionary Guard Corps—the defenders of Iran’s Islamic system. Khamenei
often used the broad range of powers at his disposal to quell dissent.
Khamenei’s
detractors rejoiced upon hearing his death, citing decades of
repression and crackdowns on expression and protests under his rule. In 2022, protests broke out after the death of Mahsa Amini
in the custody of so-called “morality police” for allegedly flouting Hijab
laws, only for the Khamenei regime to respond with even more stringent punishments to deter
women from breaching strict dress code rules. People also took to the
streets late last year and early this year to vent their
frustration at Iran’s struggling economy amid a plunging currency and soaring
inflation, issues that stem in part from international sanctions imposed on
Iran over the years.
WHO
WILL LIKELY SUCCEED KHAMENEI AS LEADER?
With Khamenei’s
antagonistic views towards the U.S. and the West, his death has sparked hope
for a more moderate or reformist Supreme Leader to take his place. But
the pool of replacement candidates has also become
significantly smaller in recent years, especially as the U.S. has killed some
of Khamenei’s preferred successors. Trump has said Iran needs “more moderate”
leadership, but he conceded that in the worst case, Khamanei’s replacement
could be someone “who’s as bad as the previous person.” The attacks have tested
Tehran’s willingness to negotiate with Washington.
Iran’s constitution
states that the Supreme Leader must be a Shia Islamic jurist chosen by the
Assembly of Experts, an 88-member elected committee of clerics. Among the possible candidates to
replace Khamenei are his son Mojtaba Khamenei; Supreme Court Chief
Justice Gholam-Hossein Mohseni-Eje’i; and Hassan Khomeini, the grandson of former Supreme Leader
Khomeini.
WHAT’S
THE LEGAL STATUS OF THE WAR?
Lawmakers and
international observers have raised concerns about the legal basis for the
U.S.-Israeli strikes. While the U.S. President is also the country’s Commander
in Chief, his authority to order military action is limited to repelling
attacks or deterring a clearly imminent attack, an expert told TIME, and
so far there has been little evidence that is the
case. For the President to launch an attack on a sovereign state, he is
required to get authorization from Congress, which has the exclusive power to declare
war. Military action without congressional approval is restricted by the 1973
War Powers Resolution, which limits the operation to 60 days.
Although Congress
does not need to take action to declare the strikes illegal, lawmakers have
again found their ability to constrain Trump limited, especially after
military action has already been taken. Democrats in the Senate attempted to
block further military action against Iran without congressional authorization,
but the resolution failed. Another war powers resolution is
expected to be voted on in the House on March 5. Trump has largely been able to
carry out military action without congressional approval or significant
recourse, including the military raid on Venezuela, strikes on alleged drug boats in the Caribbean and
Pacific, and strikes on several countries, including
Iran.
Did Trump Have the Legal Authority to Strike Iran? An Expert
Explains
HOW
LONG COULD THE WAR LAST?
Trump has offered conflicting timelines on how long the Iran
conflict will take to resolve. Early on Feb. 28, after the initial strikes, he
told Axios that he had the choice to “go long”
or “end it in two to three days.” The day after the first salvo, Trump
told the Daily Mail that the campaign in Iran would
take about four weeks.
In a March 2
Pentagon press briefing, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs Gen. Dan Caine said the
campaign was “not a single overnight operation,” and Defense Secretary Pete
Hegseth said that the Administration would “never hang a time frame” on the war
and that the progress could “move up” or “move back.”
WHAT
DO AMERICANS THINK OF THE WAR?
Several polls
carried out in the immediate days after the U.S.-Israeli attack suggest that most Americans disapprove of the
war, although sentiment towards the war has been divided along party lines.
According to most polls, most Republicans support the military action, while
most Democrats and Independents do not.
Across the board, 69% of Americans, according to a CBS News poll, said Trump needs to get authorization from
Congress to continue military operations against Iran. A majority of those
surveyed also felt the Trump Administration had not provided a clear
explanation for the U.S.’s objectives in Iran.
Read
More: How Americans Feel About Trump’s War With
Iran, According to the Latest Polls
Across American
cities, people have also taken to the streets to protest the war, including in
New York City, Los Angeles, Miami, Chicago, and D.C. At the same time,
thousands of others have rallied to celebrate the death of Khamenei and
call for the end of the Iranian regime.
Must-Reads
from TIME
·
Trump Calls Khamenei’s Death ‘Justice for the People of
Iran’
·
After Khamenei, Who Could Lead Iran Next?
·
U.S and Israel Launch Major Military Campaign Against Iran
·
Iran Accuses U.S. of Spreading ‘Big Lies’ After Trump’s
State of the Union Address
·
Israeli Hospital Damaged by Iranian Airstrike as Missile
Exchange Continues